Micronized progesterone: clinical indications and comparison with current treatments

Luteal phase support of intramuscular progesterone associated with lower hypertensive disorders of pregnancy as compared to vaginal progesterone: A cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) risk between vaginal and intramuscular (IM) progesterone in programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital, and only women who achieved ongoing pregnancy after programmed FET between January 2018 and June 2022 were included. Women with chronic hypertension before pregnancy or with history of gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia in previous pregnancies were excluded. All women were divided into IM progesterone or vaginal progesterone groups according to the route of progesterone supplementation. Follow-up information on obstetric complications and neonatal outcomes were obtained by telephonic interviews. The primary outcome was HDP. Association between routes of progesterone supplementation and HDP was assessed by subgroup analysis and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 5891 programmed FET cycles (3196 IM progesterone cycles and 2695 vaginal progesterone cycles) were included in the analysis. The prevalence of HDP in the IM progesterone group was significantly lower than that of the vaginal progesterone group (6.54% vs 9.17%, P < 0.001). Therein, the prevalence of gestational hypertension (3.57% vs 4.94%, P = 0.009) and pre-eclampsia (2.97% vs 4.23%, P = 0.009) in the IM progesterone group were all significantly lower as compared to the vaginal progesterone group. According to subgroup analysis, IM progesterone was associated with lower HDP risk in all subgroups. The logistic regression analysis showed that the IM progesterone cycles were associated with lower risk of HDP compared to vaginal progesterone cycles (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54-0.80, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among women undergoing programmed FET cycles, progesterone supplementation with IM progesterone was associated with reduced HDP risk compared to vaginal progesterone.

Spray Dried Progesterone Formulations for Carrier Free Dry Powder Inhalation

Low oral absorption and extensive first pass metabolism of progesterone is reported for many oral formulations which warrants investigation into other routes of administration. It is the aim of this study to investigate the generation of inhaled formulations of progesterone though a spray drying approach with a focus on how spray drying impacts the physicochemical properties of progesterone. Formulations of progesterone with L-leucine and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS) are reported to this aim. X-ray diffraction, spectroscopy and thermal analysis were used to characterise these formulations and confirmed that progesterone crystallises as the Form II polymorph during spray drying regardless of the solvent used. The resultant formulations showed higher aqueous solubility than progesterone Form I starting material and the addition of HPMCAS was shown to temporarily enable a supersaturated state. Thermal analysis was used to show that the Form II polymorph was sensitive to transformation to Form I during heating. The addition of L-leucine to the formulations reduced the temperature for the polymorphic transformation by ∼10 °C. However, when HPMCAS was added to the formulation, the Form II polymorph was prevented from transforming to the Form I polymorph. Cascade impaction was used to determine the aerosol performance of the spray dried powders and showed promising lung deposition profiles (mass median aerodynamic diameter 5 µm) with significant variation depending on the organic solvent used and the ratio of organic to aqueous phase in the feedstock. However, further optimisation of formulations was required to direct more progesterone into the alveolar regions. The addition of HPMCAS was seen to increase the alveolar deposition and therefore formed a formulation with a lower fine particle fraction and mass median aerodynamic diameter. The most suitable formulation for inhalation was formed from a 50:50 acetone:water destockck and showed an ED, FPF and FPD of 81.7%, 44.5% and 7.3 mg respectively. Therefore, HPMCAS is suggested as a suitable excipient to increase solubility, prevent polymorphic transformation and improve inhalation properties of spray dried progesterone formulations. This study highlights the use of spray drying to form inhalable progesterone powders with higher solubility which may broaden the application of this medicine.

Micronized Curcumin Causes Hyperlocomotion in Zebrafish Larvae

Zebrafish larvae have been widely used in neuroscience and drug research and development. In the larval stage, zebrafish present a broad behavioral repertoire and physiological responses similar to adults. Curcumin (CUR), a major component of Curcuma longa L. (Zingiberaceae), has demonstrated the ability to modulate several neurobiological processes relevant to mental disorders in animal models. However, the low bioavailability of this compound can compromise its in vivo biological potential. Interestingly, it has been shown that micronization can increase the biological effects of several compounds. Thus, in this study, we compared the effects of acute exposure for 30 min to the following solutions: water (control), 0.1% DMSO (vehicle), 1 μM CUR, or 1 μM micronized curcumin (MC) in zebrafish larvae 7 days post-fertilization (dpf). We analyzed locomotor activity (open tank test), anxiety (light/dark test), and avoidance behavior (aversive stimulus test). Moreover, we evaluated parameters of oxidative status (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances and non-protein thiols levels). MC increased the total distance traveled and absolute turn angle in the open tank test. There were no significant differences in the other behavioral or neurochemical outcomes. The increase in locomotion induced by MC may be associated with a stimulant effect on the central nervous system, which was evidenced by the micronization process.

A review of conventional and sustained-release formulations of oral natural micronized progesterone in obstetric indications

Background

Exogenous progesterone is a treatment option for obstetric indications associated with reduced progesterone activity. Oral natural micronized progesterone (NMP) is effective, although it requires multiple daily doses and may cause adverse events due to its active metabolites. A sustained-release formulation of NMP (NMP-SR) has been developed to overcome the limitations of conventional oral NMP.

Methods

This narrative review examines the available evidence for oral NMP and NMP-SR in several obstetric indications of interest.

Results

Literature searches identified 17 studies of oral NMP (luteal phase support during assisted reproduction, prevention of threatened miscarriage, prevention of preterm delivery), and clinical studies supporting use of NMP-SR (luteal phase support during intrauterine insemination, maintenance of high-risk pregnancy). Oral NMP was effective for luteal phase support during in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination, prevention of threatened miscarriage, and prevention of preterm delivery. NMP-SR was comparable to dydrogesterone for luteal phase support during intrauterine insemination and effectively maintained high-risk pregnancies. Oral NMP-SR was well tolerated.

Conclusions

By releasing progesterone gradually and circumventing first-pass metabolism, NMP-SR elicits the desired therapeutic effect with benefits over conventional oral NMP in terms of bioavailability, once-daily dosing and improved tolerability. Oral NMP-SR appears to be a valuable option for treating obstetric conditions associated with insufficient progesterone exposure.

Comparison of the effects of Duphaston and Cetrotide on oocyte and embryo quality in women undergoing ICSI: A cross-sectional study

Background

Premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge is one of the causes for assisted reproductive technology cycle cancellation, and it is needed to find novel approaches with improved efficacy and safety profile.

Objective

To compare the effects of Duphaston and Cetrotide on the prevention of premature LH surge and characteristics of retrieved follicles and embryos in women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 200 patients who were administrated recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone from the third day of menstruation cycle were included. When the follicular diameter reached above 13-14 mm, Cetrotide was prescribed in the control group, while in the case group, Duphaston was taken orally from the third day of cycle. The retrieved oocytes were fertilized in vitro by intracytoplasmic sperm. The level of hormones on the third day of menstruation and the characteristic of follicles, oocytes, and embryos were compared between the two groups.

Results

Duphaston successfully inhibits premature LH surge. There was no significant difference in the level of follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol, and LH between the case and control groups (p > 0.05). However, results also showed that Duphaston causes more oocyte retrieval in comparison with Cetrotide (p = 0.04). Although, the number of follicles above 14 mm, mature oocyte, and the total number of viable embryos in the case group was slightly higher, it did not reach a significant difference compared with the control group (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Duphaston could be used as an appropriate medication instead of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Duphaston prescription not only prevents premature LH surge but also improves the number of retrieved oocytes.

Progesterone: History, facts, and artifacts

Progesterone and its related molecules are a crucial tool in modern clinical practice, particularly in the fields of reproductive medicine. Its history is old, but still under development. Presently, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of progesterone is well-known and knowledge on natural progesterone (P4) and other molecules with progestational activity, namely progestogens or gestagens, are improved and their interest is still alive. Topics of great and current interest are progesterone and its role in assisted reproductive protocols, threatened and recurrent pregnancy loss, threatened preterm birth with favorable results on pregnancy, and perinatal outcomes. Moreover, progesterone provides several other positive effects on women's health. This paper describes the main chronological steps that characterized the history of progesterone, where scientific research and clinical practice are arrived and WHICH are the future perspectives on this hormone with a "never-ending history."

Efficacy of Different Progestins in Women With Advanced Endometriosis Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for in vitro Fertilization-A Single-Center Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Object: Is it possible to use different progestins cotreatment with human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG) in women with advanced endometriosis but normal ovulation during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in vitro fertilization (IVF)? Whether different progestins treatments can be an alternative choice for women with severe endometriosis in considering IVF/ICSI treatment remains unknown? Design: Non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. Setting: Tertiary-care academic medical center. Population: Four hundred and fifty infertile patients with severe endometriosis undergoing IVF/ICSI between May 2016 and March 2017. Methods: Four hundred and fifty infertile patients with severe endometriosis undergoing IVF/ICSI were randomized to: medroxyprogesterone acetate +hMG; dydrogesterone +hMG; and progesterone +hMG. Ovulation was induced with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Viable embryos were cryopreserved for later transfer. Main Outcome Measures: The primary endpoint outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved. Secondary indicators included the incidence of a premature surge in luteinizing hormone (LH), the number of viable embryos, and clinical pregnancy outcomes. Results: The number of oocytes retrieved was higher in the medroxyprogesterone acetate +hMG group than the two other groups (9.3 ± 5.7 vs. 8.0 ± 4.5 vs. 7.8 ± 5.2, P = 0.021). LH levels were suppressed after a 6-day progestin treatment in the medroxyprogesterone acetate +hMG and dydrogesterone +hMG groups, but there was a rebound of LH values in the progesterone +hMG group. No premature LH surge and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred. No significant differences among the three groups were observed in fertilization and pregnancy outcomes. Conclusion: It is mandatory to point out that our conclusions are valid for patients with ovarian advanced endometriosis but normal ovarian functions. These results suggest three different progestins protocols are equivalent in terms of pregnancy outcomes for women with advanced endometriosis. PPOS protocol can be an alternative choice for women with severe endometriosis and normal ovarian reserve in IVF/ICSI treatment. These methods could be tested with other populations of women with endometriosis. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier:ChiCTR-OIN-16008529. Trial registration date: 2014-05-25. Date of first patient enrollment: May 2016.

Effect of Polymorphisms in CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 on the Disposition, Safety and Metabolism of Progesterone Administrated Orally or Vaginally

INTRODUCTION

Exogenous progesterone is prescribed for a variety of conditions with endogenous progesterone deficiency, e.g. menstrual alterations, primary or secondary infertility or premenopause. To the best of our knowledge, no pharmacogenetic studies have been published in relation to exogenous progesterone pharmacokinetic safety or progesterone metabolites so far.

METHODS

Candidate-gene study where we evaluated whether five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (CYP2C9*2, *3, CYP2C19*2, *3 and *17) were related to the pharmacokinetics, safety and metabolism of progesterone in 24 healthy volunteers who received a 200-mg progesterone formulation either orally or vaginally.

RESULTS

The vaginal formulation had an average AUCt value approximately 18 times greater than the oral formulation. CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers (IM) consistently showed higher adjusted AUCt and adjusted C_max than extensive metabolizers (EM) (P < 0.05); CYP2C9 EM incongruently exhibited higher adjusted C_max and longer half-life than IM (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that reports variability in progesterone disposition according to the CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 phenotype. We suggest that CYP2C19 may condition progesterone disposition and that it may be more relevant than CYP2C9. This study lays the foundations for further in-depth research to evaluate the pharmacogenetics of progesterone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT numbers are 2012-005105-43 and 2012-005011-10.

The role of progesterone therapy in early pregnancy: from physiological role to therapeutic utility

Progesterone is a steroid hormone of essential role in reproduction. In early pregnancy, it is responsible for preparation of endometrium for implantation process and maintenance of gestational sac in uterus, also by modulation of maternal immune system. Even though, several indices has been proposed as markers of endogenous progesterone synthesis (progesterone or luteinizing hormone measurements, endometrial biopsy), none has been proved to be reliable in detecting luteal phase defect. Currently, several pharmaceutical formulations are available, but in clinical setting the non-oral formulations seems to be effective in therapy. Progesterone is effective in the treatment of patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology procedure, as a luteal phase support. Some studies showed also its efficacy in the treatment of threatening or recurrent miscarriage, but newer trials neglected this beneficial effect. Due to controversies regarding utility of progesterone supplementation in these conditions, further studies are needed to address this issue.

Progesterone in normal and pathological pregnancy

Progesterone is an essential hormone in the process of reproduction. It is involved in the menstrual cycle, implantation and is essential for pregnancy maintenance. It has been proposed and extensively used in the treatment of different gynecological pathologies as well as in assisted reproductive technologies and in the maintenance of pregnancy. Called "the pregnancy hormone", natural progesterone is essential before pregnancy and has a crucial role in its maintenance based on different mechanisms such as: modulation of maternal immune response and suppression of inflammatory response (the presence of progesterone and its interaction with progesterone receptors at the decidua level appears to play a major role in the maternal defense strategy), reduction of uterine contractility (adequate progesterone concentrations in myometrium are able to counteract prostaglandin stimulatory activity as well as oxytocin), improvement of utero-placental circulation and luteal phase support (it has been demonstrated that progesterone may promote the invasion of extravillous trophoblasts to the decidua by inhibiting apoptosis of extravillous trophoblasts). Once the therapeutic need of progesterone is established, the key factor is the decision of the best route to administer the hormone and the optimal dosage determination. Progesterone can be administered by many different routes, but the most utilized are oral, the vaginal and intramuscular administration. The main uses of progesterone are represented by: threatened miscarriage, recurrent miscarriage and preterm birth (in the prevention strategy, as a tocolytic agent and also in the maintenance of uterine quiescence).

Utrogestan as an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization

A major cause of cycle cancellation during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) is the occurrence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges. Steroidal preparations can modulate the secretion of gonadotropins (Gn); however, few studies using progesterone to inhibit the premature LH surges in COH have been published. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the oral delivery of progesterone soft capsules (Utrogestan) to prevent LH surges from the follicular phase and to compare cycle characteristics as well as to evaluate pregnancy outcomes in subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. A total of 374 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study, among which 187 patients were simultaneously administered Utrogestan and human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG) from cycle day 3 until the trigger day. A short protocol including 187 controls with comparable age, body mass index (BMI), infertility duration, and antral follicle count was also used. GnRH agonist (0.1 mg) or hCG (3000 IU) was used for a trigger when the dominant follicles matured. Viable embryos were cryopreserved for later transfer in both groups. The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcomes included the number of mature oocytes, incidence of premature LH surge, and clinical pregnancy outcomes from FET cycles. Consistent LH suppression was achieved during COH, with a range of 0.07 to 8.9 IU/L, and no premature LH surge was detected. The number of oocytes retrieved in the Utrogestan and hMG protocol was comparable with that in the short protocol (10.92 ± 5.74 vs 10.6 ± 6.22, P > 0.05), and the dose of hMG was higher than that used in the short protocol (1884.22 ± 439.47 IU vs 1446.26 ± 550.48 IU, P < 0.05). No significant between-group difference was observed in the mature oocyte rate (88.88% vs 90.12%), cleavage rate (96.58% vs 96.58%), clinical pregnancy rate (54.27% vs 51.65%), or implantation rate (33.59% vs 34.02%). The study shows that Utrogestan is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature LH surges in women undergoing COH, which will help to establish a convenient user regimen in combination with FET.

Prescribing menopausal hormone therapy: an evidence-based approach

The constantly changing landscape regarding menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has been challenging for providers caring for menopausal women. After a decade of fear and uncertainty regarding MHT, reanalysis of the Women’s Health Initiative data and the results of recent studies have provided some clarity regarding the balance of risks and benefits of systemic MHT. Age and years since menopause are now known to be important variables affecting the benefit-risk profile. For symptomatic menopausal women who are under 60 years of age or within 10 years of menopause, the benefits of MHT generally outweigh the risks. Systemic MHT initiated early in menopause appears to slow the progression of atherosclerotic disease, thereby reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. During this window of opportunity, MHT might also provide protection against cognitive decline. In older women and women more than 10 years past menopause, the risk-benefit balance of MHT is less favorable, particularly with regard to cardiovascular risk and cognitive impairment. For women entering menopause prematurely (<40 years), MHT ameliorates the risk of cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and cognitive decline. Nonoral administration of estrogen offers advantages due to the lack of first-pass hepatic metabolism, which in turn avoids the increased hepatic synthesis of clotting proteins, C-reactive protein, triglycerides, and sex hormone-binding globulin. The duration of combined MHT use is ideally limited to less than 5 years because of the known increase in breast cancer risk after 3–5 years of use. Limitations to use of estrogen only MHT are less clear, since breast cancer risk does not appear to increase with use of estrogen alone. For women under the age of 60 years, or within 10 years of onset of natural menopause, MHT for the treatment of bothersome menopausal symptoms poses low risk and is an acceptable option, particularly when nonhormonal management approaches fail.

Revisiting the roles of progesterone and allopregnanolone in the nervous system: resurgence of the progesterone receptors

Progesterone is commonly considered as a female reproductive hormone and is well-known for its role in pregnancy. It is less well appreciated that progesterone and its metabolite allopregnanolone are also male hormones, as they are produced in both sexes by the adrenal glands. In addition, they are synthesized within the nervous system. Progesterone and allopregnanolone are associated with adaptation to stress, and increased production of progesterone within the brain may be part of the response of neural cells to injury. Progesterone receptors (PR) are widely distributed throughout the brain, but their study has been mainly limited to the hypothalamus and reproductive functions, and the extra-hypothalamic receptors have been neglected. This lack of information about brain functions of PR is unexpected, as the protective and trophic effects of progesterone are much investigated, and as the therapeutic potential of progesterone as a neuroprotective and promyelinating agent is currently being assessed in clinical trials. The little attention devoted to the brain functions of PR may relate to the widely accepted assumption that non-reproductive actions of progesterone may be mainly mediated by allopregnanolone, which does not bind to PR, but acts as a potent positive modulator of γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A) receptors. The aim of this review is to critically discuss effects of progesterone on the nervous system via PR, and of allopregnanolone via its modulation of GABA(A) receptors, with main focus on the brain.

The role of progesterone in maternal and fetal medicine

Progesterone is an essential hormone in the process of reproduction. It has been extensively studied in the treatment of different gynecological pathologies, as a contraceptive and in assisted reproductive technologies. However, the use of progesterone in the pathophysiology of pregnancy remains controversial. Progesterone, and its synthetic form 17 α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17 OHP-C), offer an effective intervention when the continuation of pregnancy is at risk from immunological factors, luteinic and neuroendocrine deficiencies, and myometrial hypercontractility. Progesterone has been successfully used as prophylaxis in the prevention of spontaneous miscarriage, with treatment beginning from the first trimester of pregnancy. There is substantial evidence, too, to indicate that women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage may benefit from the immunomodulatory properties of progesterone in early pregnancy. The use of progesterone and 17 OHP-C has been extensively studied in the prevention of preterm birth in a variety of settings. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in singleton pregnancies between 19 and 24 weeks' gestation has been deemed the best way to identify women (approximately 2% of the pregnant population) who would benefit from prophylactic progesterone treatment for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth. This paper reviews the evidence for the safety and efficacy of the use of progesterone in each of these indications.

Counseling postmenopausal women about bioidentical hormones: ten discussion points for practicing physicians

Bioidentical hormones are compounds that have exactly the same chemical and molecular structure as endogenous human hormones. In contrast, nonbioidentical, or synthetic, hormones are structurally dissimilar from endogenous hormones. Although available for years, bioidentical compounded hormone therapy (BCHT) has gained popularity in the United States only recently. This popularity has paralleled women's rising fears of conventional hormone therapy, especially since the publication of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trials. Although BCHT offers advantages, it is not the panacea of hormone therapy. The claims that BCHT lowers the risk of breast cancer, coronary artery disease, stroke, or thromboembolism are not supported by scientific research. The goal of this review is to present an overview of the available research evidence on BCHT, dispel myths about the use of compounded hormones, and provide helpful tips to answer commonly asked questions about BCHT.

Problèmes pratiques de prise en charge des hormonothérapies

On trouve plusieurs types de produits d'hormonothérapie en vente au Canada, qui contiennent différents oestrogènes et progestines. Ils sont proposés en diverses présentations, en différentes doses et en plusieurs voies d'administration. Il existe des différences importantes d'action pharmacologique entre les diverses hormones et de marqueurs substituts selon la voie d'administration. On peut obtenir le même résultat clinique global avec différentes molécules, mais étant donné l'importante variabilité inter- et intrapatient des produits, il faut personnaliser le traitement pour optimiser les résultats et la qualité de vie de la patiente. (Voir page 14.)

A randomized, open-label, crossover study comparing the effects of oral versus transdermal estrogen therapy on serum androgens, thyroid hormones, and adrenal hormones in naturally menopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To compare the changes induced by oral versus transdermal estrogen therapy on the total and free serum concentrations of testosterone (T), thyroxine (T4), and cortisol (C) and the concentrations of their serum binding globulins sex hormone-binding globulin, thyroxine-binding globulin, and cortisol-binding globulin in naturally menopausal women.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, crossover. Interventions included a 6-week withdrawal from previous hormone therapy (baseline), followed in randomized order by 12 weeks of oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) (0.625 mg/d) and 12 weeks of transdermal estradiol (TD E2) (0.05 mg/d), with oral micronized progesterone (100 mg/d) given continuously during both transdermal estrogen therapy regimens.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven women were enrolled in the study, and 25 completed both treatment periods. The mean(SD) percentage changes from baseline of sex hormone-binding globulin, total T, and free T with oral CEE were +132.1% (74.5%), +16.4% (43.8%), and -32.7% (25.9%), respectively, versus +12.0% (25.1%), +1.2% (43.7%), and +1.0% (45.0%) with TD E2. The mean (SD) percentage changes of thyroxine-binding globulin, total T4, and free T4 with oral CEE were +39.9% (20.1%), +28.4% (29.2%), and -10.4% (22.3%), respectively, versus +0.4% (11.1%), -0.7% (16.5%), and +0.2% (26.6%) with TD E2. The mean (SD) percentage changes of cortisol-binding globulin, total C, and free C with oral CEE were +18.0% (19.5%), +29.2% (46.3%), and +50.4% (126.5%), respectively, versus -2.2% (11.3%), -6.7% (30.8%), and +1.8% (77.1%) with TD E2. Concentrations of all hormones and binding globulins were significantly different (P < or = 0.003) during administration of oral versus transdermal estrogen therapy, except for free T4 and free C.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with oral CEE, TD E2 exerts minimal effects on the total and free concentrations of T, T4, and C and their binding proteins.

Effects of estradiol with oral or intravaginal progesterone on risk markers for breast cancer in a postmenopausal monkey model

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of oral estradiol given with either oral or intravaginal micronized progesterone (P4) on risk biomarkers for breast cancer in a postmenopausal monkey model.

DESIGN

This experiment was a two-way crossover study in which 20 ovariectomized adult female cynomolgus macaques were treated (in equivalent doses for women) with oral estradiol (1 mg/d) + oral micronized P4 (200 mg/d) or intravaginal P4 delivered by Silastic rings (6- to 10-mg/d release rate). Hormone treatments lasted 2 months and were separated by a 1-month washout period. The primary outcome measure was breast epithelial proliferation.

RESULTS

Serum P4 concentrations were significantly greater in subjects receiving oral P4 (10.9 ng/mL) compared with intravaginal P4 (3.8 ng/mL) at 2 to 3 hours after oral dosing (P<0.0001) but not at 24 to 28 hours after oral dosing (2.9 ng/mL for oral P4 vs 3.2 ng/mL for intravaginal P4 at 2 months, P=0.19). Serum estradiol concentrations were significantly lower after oral P4 than after intravaginal P4 (P<0.05 for all time points). Oral P4 resulted in significantly decreased body weight (-2.5%) compared with intravaginal P4 (+3.6%) (P=0.0001). Markers of breast proliferation, sex steroid receptor expression, and endometrial area did not differ significantly between oral P4 and intravaginal P4 treatments (P>0.1 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite different pharmacodynamic profiles, oral and intravaginal P4 had similar effects on biomarkers in the postmenopausal breast.

Effects of estradiol with micronized progesterone or medroxyprogesterone acetate on risk markers for breast cancer in postmenopausal monkeys

The addition of the synthetic progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) to postmenopausal estrogen therapy significantly increases breast cancer risk. Whether this adverse effect is specific to MPA or characteristic of all progestogens is not known. The goal of this study was to compare the effects of oral estradiol (E2) given with either MPA or micronized progesterone (P4) on risk biomarkers for breast cancer in a postmenopausal primate model. For this randomized crossover trial, twenty-six ovariectomized adult female cynomolgus macaques were divided into social groups and rotated randomly through the following treatments (expressed as equivalent doses for women): (1) placebo; (2) E2 (1 mg/day); (3) E2 + P4 (200 mg/day); and (4) E2 + MPA (2.5 mg/day). Hormones were administered orally, and all animals were individually dosed. Treatments lasted two months and were separated by a one-month washout period. The main outcome measure was breast epithelial proliferation, as measured by Ki67 expression. Compared to placebo, E2 + MPA resulted in significantly greater breast proliferation in lobular (P < 0.01) and ductal (P < 0.01) epithelium, while E2 + P4 did not. Intramammary gene expression of the proliferation markers Ki67 and cyclin B1 was also higher after treatment with E2 + MPA (P < 0.01) but not E2 + P4. Both progestogens significantly attenuated E2 effects on body weight, endometrium, and the TFF1 marker of estrogen receptor activity in the breast. These findings suggest that oral micronized progesterone has a more favorable effect on risk biomarkers for postmenopausal breast cancer than medroxyprogesterone acetate.

A Five-Day Gradual Reduction Regimen of Chlormadinone Reduces Premenstrual Anxiety and Depression: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Anxiety and depression commonly occur in premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). The PMDD symptomatology disappears once the menstrual cycle reinitiates, resembling a withdrawal syndrome.

METHODS

The present study is a pilot, controlled, double-blind study exploring the effectiveness of a premenstrual 5-day gradual reduction regimen of chlormadinone acetate on PMDD. Volunteers received an initial dose of 10 mg (five 2-mg tablets) on the 24(th) day of the menstrual cycle and one-fifth of the dose less (one tablet) each day until a dose of 2 mg (one 2-mg tablet) was reached on the 28(th) day of the menstrual cycle. The control group received placebo with a similar regimen.

RESULTS

The 5-day gradual reduction regimen of chlormadinone significantly improved (F(3.76) = 3.29, p <0.02) the daily symptoms report (DSR) scores by the third month of treatment. The resulting relative risk was 4.09 (confidence interval: 1.15-14.57, p <0.005, 95% CI). Compared to placebo, chlormadinone clinically and statistically reduced the severity of depression, anxiety, food cravings, mood swings and cramps. A statistical reduction of symptoms such as poor coordination, irritability, feeling out of control, hopelessness, decreased interest and headache was detected but was not clinically relevant. No changes occurred in concentration difficulties, tiredness, insomnia, swelling, breast tenderness and aches. As side effects, 30% of the volunteers showed changes in the length of the menstrual cycle, and 15% experienced dyspepsia.

CONCLUSIONS

A 5-day gradual reduction regimen of chlormadinone improves some of the discomforting ailments associated with PMDD, namely, depression and anxiety.

Effect of female sex hormone supplementation and withdrawal on gastrointestinal and colonic transit in postmenopausal women

Females are disproportionately affected by constipation, which is often aggravated during pregnancy. Bowel function also changes during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. The aim was to compare the effects of acute administration of female sex steroids on gastric emptying, small bowel transit and colonic transit in healthy postmenopausal subjects. A second aim was to determine whether withdrawal of the hormones was associated with a change in transit. Forty-nine postmenopausal females were randomized to receive for 7 days 400 mg day(-1) micronized progesterone, 0.2 mg day(-1) oestradiol, combination of the two, or placebo. Treatment groups were balanced on age. Participants underwent whole gut transit measurement by scintigraphy using a 99m-labeled technetium-egg meal and 111-labeled indium-charcoal via a delayed-release capsule. Transit measurement was repeated after withdrawal of the study medications. The primary endpoints were ascending colon (AC) emptying half-life time (t1/2) and colonic geometric centre (GC) at 24 h. Secondary analysis variables were GC at 4 and 48 h, gastric emptying t1/2 and colonic filling at 6 h. There was a significant overall effect of progesterone on colonic transit with shorter AC emptying t1/2 and significantly greater colonic GC at 48 h. No transit endpoints were altered by oestradiol or combined hormonal treatment relative to placebo. Oestradiol and progesterone resulted in looser stool consistency. Withdrawal of the hormone supplement was not associated with significant alteration in transit. Micronized progesterone does not retard colonic transit in postmenopausal females.

Exogenous progesterone attenuates the subjective effects of smoked cocaine in women, but not in men

In a previous study, we showed that the positive subjective effects of cocaine were higher during the follicular phase compared to the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. The purpose of the present study was to determine if exogenously administered progesterone during the follicular phase in females would attenuate the response to cocaine compared to the normal follicular phase, thus making the response to cocaine similar to the luteal phase. To address the role of sex differences, males were also administered exogenous progesterone during one inpatient stay. In all, 11 female and 10 male non-treatment-seeking cocaine smokers participated. Females had three inpatient stays: one during a normal follicular phase, one during a normal luteal phase, and one during a follicular phase when exogenous progesterone was administered. Males had two inpatient stays: one when exogenous progesterone was administered and the other when placebo was administered. During each inpatient admission, there were four smoked cocaine administration sessions: participants were administered six doses of cocaine (0, 6, 12, or 25 mg cocaine base) at 14 min intervals. Smoked cocaine increased heart rate, blood pressure and several subjective effects such as 'good drug effect' and 'drug quality' cluster scores. Administration of progesterone during the follicular phase in women attenuated the positive subjective effects of cocaine, whereas only minimal changes were observed in men. These results indicate that progesterone modulates the response to cocaine in women and suggests that fluctuations in endogenous progesterone levels account for some of the sex differences observed in humans.

A pilot study to examine a combination botanical for the treatment of menopausal symptoms

OBJECTIVE

Hormone replacement therapy has become a controversial treatment for symptoms of menopause, leading many women and their physicians to search for safer, effective alternatives. Certain botanicals are known to contain phytoestrogenic activity, which may be helpful in alleviating menopausal symptoms. We report the results of a study using a combination botanical supplement to treat menopausal symptoms.

DESIGN

Prospective pilot study.

SETTING/LOCATION

Family practice medical center, Phoenix metropolitan area.

SUBJECTS

Eight (8) women with moderate vasomotor and somatic symptoms of menopause.

INTERVENTION

Combination botanicals daily for 3 months.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Modified Kupperman Index (KI), daily hot flashes severity, and overall quality of life (QoL) using the SF-36 index, which were collected at enrollment, during treatment, and at the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Mean KI total symptoms decreased from 30.3 +/- 7.5 to 22.9 +/- 8.4 (95% CI, 25-34), p = 0.0028. Daily hot flashes decreased from 68.1 +/- 14.3 to 39.6 +/- 9.7 (95% CI, 38-46), p = 0.0003, and the overall QoL also improved at the end of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrates the potential benefit of a combination botanical for improving moderate menopausal symptoms in women. The efficacy and role of combination botanicals for long-term use to reduce menopausal symptoms requires further exploration.

Sleep and menopause

Many midlife women obtain inadequate sleep, and sleep problems are common during the menopause transition. This article reviews the research literature on sleep and sleep disorders during menopause. Few studies have included subjective and objective measures of sleep quality or studied women during different menopause stages. Potential mechanisms associated with the emergence of insomnia and sleep-disordered breathing during menopause are discussed along with effects of estrogen and progesterone on sleep. It is argued that sleep quality is an important determinant of health status and quality of life for women during and beyond menopause.

Comparison of physical and emotional side effects of progesterone or medroxyprogesterone in early postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To compare the mood and somatic effects during the initial 2 months of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) or progesterone combined with conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) in early postmenopausal women.

DESIGN

Twenty-three nondepressed, early postmenopausal women (average age, 52.5 years) completed a 91-day, single-blind pilot study with the following sequence of treatments: 1 week of no substance; 2 weeks of placebo; 2 weeks of progestogen only; 1 week of placebo; and 2 months of "standard hormone replacement therapy cycles," which consisted of (in order) 2 weeks of 0.625 mg CEE, 2 weeks of CEE plus progestogen, 2 weeks of CEE, and 2 weeks of CEE plus progestogen. Ten women who completed the study received MPA (5 mg/day) as their progestogen, and 13 who completed the study received micronized, oil-suspended progesterone (200 mg/day) as their progestogen. All participants made daily assessments of mood using the Profile of Mood States and daily recordings of somatic symptoms. All subjects had plasma follicle-stimulating hormone of greater than 35 IU/L and had not had spontaneous vaginal bleeding for more than 1 year.

RESULTS

None of the hormone treatments had a detectable effect on mood. MPA users reported more vaginal bleeding and breast tenderness than progesterone users.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast with the widely held belief among psychiatrists that progesterone depresses mood, neither of the progestogens we used in normal, nondepressed and nonanxious women showed this effect. Absence of an effect on mood was also found when the results of the two progestogens were combined. The lesser side effects of the micronized progesterone-containing regimen suggest that some women may prefer it to an MPA-containing regimen.

Concurrent administration of sustained-release bezafibrate may counteract the increased thrombotic risk associated with oral estrogen therapy

Although hormone replacement therapy (HRT) can have many favorable effects on serum lipids and on vascular endothelium that presumably mediate the decreased risk for heart attack and stroke associated with HRT in observational epidemiology, oral estrogen also has various pro-coagulant effects: increases in serum triglycerides and factor VII activity, decreases in serum antithrombin III and protein S. This may explain the increased risk for venous thromboembolism observed with HRT and oral contraceptives, as well as the temporary increase in coronary risk noted when women with preexisting coronary disease initiate HRT. The well-tolerated hypolipidemic agent bezafibrate has anticoagulant actions that are diametrically opposed to the procoagulant effects of oral estrogen: namely, reductions in serum triglycerides and factor VII activity, and an increase in antithrombin III. However, bezafibrate could be expected to complement the protective effects of oral estrogen on serum lipids and on serum IGF-I activity. Thus, there is reason to believe that concurrent bezafibrate administration would minimize any thrombotic risk associated with HRT or oral contraception, while amplifying the health benefits of oral estrogen, and would make it more feasible to administer these therapies in women at increased vascular risk. These predictions require confirmation in controlled clinical studies. Certain natural hypolipidemic agents may also have potential as adjuvants to oral estrogen, but their effects on hemostasis require further investigation.

Androgenic progestins amplify the breast cancer risk associated with hormone replacement therapy by boosting IGF-I activity

Recent epidemiology indicates that unopposed oral estrogen replacement therapy has a surprisingly small impact on breast cancer risk--little if any in overweight women--whereas combined regimens featuring synthetic progestins are attended by a much larger increase in this risk. These findings may reflect the fact that oral estrogen acts on the liver to down-regulate systemic IGF-I activity, whereas concurrent administration of androgens--including the androgenic progestins often used in replacement therapy--abrogates this effect. Increased systemic IGF-I activity has been linked to increased breast cancer risk, and may be largely responsible for the greater incidence of breast cancer in overweight postmenopausal women--who thus should have the most to gain from suppression of IGF-I activity by oral estrogen. Down-regulation of IGF-I may likewise account for the marked reduction in colon cancer risk associated with current estrogen replacement therapy. Fortunately, natural progesterone--now available in micronized oral preparations--does not oppose the hepatic effects of oral estrogen, and moreover may be preferable to androgenic progestins with respect to vascular function. Oral replacement therapy featuring micronized progesterone, if administered throughout postmenopausal life, can be expected to have a highly positive impact on vascular health, bone density, and risks for Alzheimer's disease and colon cancer--benefits which, in most women, may vastly outweigh the associated increase in risk for breast and endometrial cancers.