Inhibition of the specific DNA binding activity of the dioxin receptor by phosphatase treatment

The complex biology of aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation in cancer and beyond

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling pathway is a complex regulatory network that plays a critical role in various biological processes, including cellular metabolism, development, and immune responses. The complexity of AHR signaling arises from multiple factors, including the diverse ligands that activate the receptor, the expression level of AHR itself, and its interaction with the AHR nuclear translocator (ARNT). Additionally, the AHR crosstalks with the AHR repressor (AHRR) or other transcription factors and signaling pathways and it can also mediate non-genomic effects. Finally, posttranslational modifications of the AHR and its interaction partners, epigenetic regulation of AHR and its target genes, as well as AHR-mediated induction of enzymes that degrade AHR-activating ligands may contribute to the context-specificity of AHR activation. Understanding the complexity of AHR signaling is crucial for deciphering its physiological and pathological roles and developing therapeutic strategies targeting this pathway. Ongoing research continues to unravel the intricacies of AHR signaling, shedding light on the regulatory mechanisms controlling its diverse functions.

Aromatic hydrocarbon receptors in mitochondrial biogenesis and function

Mitochondria are ubiquitous membrane-bound organelles that not only play a key role in maintaining cellular energy homeostasis and metabolism but also in signaling and apoptosis. Aryl hydrocarbons receptors (AhRs) are ligand-activated transcription factors that recognize a wide variety of xenobiotics, including polyaromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins, and activate diverse detoxification pathways. These receptors are also activated by natural dietary compounds and endogenous metabolites. In addition, AhRs can modulate the expression of a diverse array of genes related to mitochondrial biogenesis and function. The aim of the present review is to analyze scientific data available on the AhR signaling pathway and its interaction with the intracellular signaling pathways involved in mitochondrial functions, especially those related to cell cycle progression and apoptosis. Various evidence have reported the crosstalk between the AhR signaling pathway and the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), tyrosine kinase receptor signaling and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). The AhR signaling pathway seems to promote cell cycle progression in the absence of exogenous ligands, whereas the presence of exogenous ligands induces cell cycle arrest. However, its effects on apoptosis are controversial since activation or overexpression of AhR has been observed to induce or inhibit apoptosis depending on the cell type. Regarding the mitochondria, although activation by endogenous ligands is related to mitochondrial dysfunction, the effects of endogenous ligands are not well understood but point towards antiapoptotic effects and inducers of mitochondrial biogenesis.

The Ah Receptor: Adaptive Metabolism, Ligand Diversity, and the Xenokine Model

The Ah receptor (AHR) has been studied for almost five decades. Yet, we still have many important questions about its role in normal physiology and development. Moreover, we still do not fully understand how this protein mediates the adverse effects of a variety of environmental pollutants, such as the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), the chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins ("dioxins"), and many polyhalogenated biphenyls. To provide a platform for future research, we provide the historical underpinnings of our current state of knowledge about AHR signal transduction, identify a few areas of needed research, and then develop concepts such as adaptive metabolism, ligand structural diversity, and the importance of proligands in receptor activation. We finish with a discussion of the cognate physiological role of the AHR, our perspective on why this receptor is so highly conserved, and how we might think about its cognate ligands in the future.

Targeting the Kynurenine Pathway for the Treatment of Cisplatin-Resistant Lung Cancer

Cisplatin resistance is a major barrier in the effective treatment of lung cancer. Cisplatin-resistant (CR) lung cancer cells do not primarily use glucose but rather consume amino acids such as glutamine and tryptophan (Trp) for survival. CR cells activate the kynurenine (KYN) pathway (KP) to cope with excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) and maintain homeostasis for growth and proliferation. Consequently, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 (IDO1) becomes an essential enzyme for CR cells' survival because it initiates and regulates the first step in the KP. Increased IDO1 activities and ROS levels are found in CR cells versus cisplatin-sensitive lung cancer. Importantly, significantly greater KYN/Trp ratio (P = 0.005) is detected in serum of patients who fail cisplatin when compared with naïve treatment. Knocking down IDO1 using shRNA or IDO1 inhibitors heightens ROS levels and results in a significant growth inhibitory effect only on CR cells and not on cisplatin-sensitive cells. Exposing CR cells to antioxidant (TIRON) results in suppression of IDO1 activity and confers resistance to IDO1 inhibition, indicating an interrelationship between ROS and IDO1. Because KYN plays a critical role in reprogramming naïve T cells to the immune-suppressive regulatory T-cell (T-reg) phenotype, we observed higher expression of TGFβ, FoxP3, and CD4⁺CD25⁺ in mice bearing CR tumors compared with tumors from cisplatin-sensitive counterparts. IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that the enzyme-inhibitory activity and antitumor efficacy of IDO1 inhibitors rely in part on ROS levels, arguing that IDO1 expression alone may be insufficient to determine the clinical benefits for this class of experimental cancer drugs. Importantly, IDO1 inhibitors may be more suitable to treat patients with lung cancer who failed cisplatin therapy than naïve treatment patients.

The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Immunity: Tools and Potential

The signaling pathway of the evolutionary old transcription factor AhR is inducible by a number of small molecular weight chemicals, including toxicants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, bacterial toxic pigments, and physiological compounds such as tryptophan derivatives or dietary indoles. AhR activation is of immunological importance, but at the same time mediates toxicity of environmental pollutants, such as immunosuppression by dioxins. Measuring AhR activity and identification of ligands is thus of great interest for a variety of research fields. In this chapter, I briefly introduce the AhR signaling pathway, its role in immunology, and the tools and assays needed to analyze AhR signaling. Both are also needed when therapeutic applications are envisioned.

Ah Receptor Pathway Intricacies; Signaling Through Diverse Protein Partners and DNA-Motifs

The Ah receptor is a transcription factor that modulates gene expression via interactions with multiple protein partners; these are reviewed, including the novel NC-XRE pathway involving KLF6.

SUMOylation of AhR modulates its activity and stability through inhibiting its ubiquitination

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a transcription factor that belongs to the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) Per-Arnt-Sim homology domain (PAS) family. AhR can be activated by 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2, 3, 7, 8-TCDD) and once activated, it promotes the abnormal expression of cytochrome P450, leading to several diseases, including cancer. In this study, we showed that AhR is subjected to post-translational modification by SUMOylation and this modification could be reversed by SENP1. Two SUMOylation sites were identified, one in the bHLH domain (K63) and the other in the TAD domain (K510) of AhR. Substitution of either K63 or K510 with arginine resulted in reduced SUMOylation for AhR. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with TCDD led to a reduced level of SUMOylated AhR in a time-dependent manner, and this occurred mainly in the nucleus. SUMOylation of AhR enhanced its stability through inhibiting its ubiquitination. Moreover, SUMOylation also repressed the transactivation activity of AhR and this could be reversed by TCDD. These results suggested that SUMOylation of AhR might play an important role in the regulation of its function, and TCDD may activate the transcriptional activity of AhR through downregulating its SUMOylation.

Identification of aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding targets in mouse hepatic tissue treated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

Genome-wide, promoter-focused ChIP-chip analysis of hepatic aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) binding sites was conducted in 8-week old female C57BL/6 treated with 30 μg/kg/body weight 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) for 2 h and 24 h. These studies identified 1642 and 508 AHR-bound regions at 2h and 24h, respectively. A total of 430 AHR-bound regions were common between the two time points, corresponding to 403 unique genes. Comparison with previous AHR ChIP-chip studies in mouse hepatoma cells revealed that only 62 of the putative target genes overlapped with the 2 h AHR-bound regions in vivo. Transcription factor binding site analysis revealed an over-representation of aryl hydrocarbon response elements (AHREs) in AHR-bound regions with 53% (2 h) and 68% (24 h) of them containing at least one AHRE. In addition to AHREs, E2f-Myc activator motifs previously implicated in AHR function, as well as a number of other motifs, including Sp1, nuclear receptor subfamily 2 factor, and early growth response factor motifs were also identified. Expression microarray studies identified 133 unique genes differentially regulated after 4 h treatment with TCDD. Of which, 39 were identified as AHR-bound genes at 2 h. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis on the 39 AHR-bound TCDD responsive genes identified potential perturbation in biological processes such as lipid metabolism, drug metabolism, and endocrine system development as a result of TCDD-mediated AHR activation. Our findings identify direct AHR target genes in vivo, highlight in vitro and in vivo differences in AHR signaling and show that AHR recruitment does not necessarily result in changes in target gene expression.

Differential ligand-dependent activation and a role for Y322 in aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated regulation of gene expression

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) mediates the toxic effects of halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons (HAHs), such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD), 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,7,8-TCDF). Non-traditional activators, including omeprazole (Omp), are thought to regulate AHR action through phosphorylation rather than binding to the receptor. In this study, we examined the ability of these compounds to induce AHR-dependent regulation of cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) and CYP1B1 in T-47D human breast cancer cells. The role of Y322, a residue implicated in Omp-dependent activation of AHR was also investigated. All four compounds induced CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 mRNA expression, with Omp differing from the HAHs. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed ligand- and gene-selectivity in the recruitment patterns of AHR coactivators. We also found that residue Y322 of human AHR was important for maximum activation of AHR by 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF, but required for 2,3,7,8-TCDF and Omp in an AHR-deficient MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line. In summary, this study provides evidence for context- and ligand-selective differences in coactivator recruitment in AHR-regulated gene expression and reveal an important role of Y322 in AHR activation.

Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor AhR Promotes retinoic acid-induced differentiation of myeloblastic leukemia cells by restricting expression of the stem cell transcription factor Oct4

Retinoic acid (RA) is used to treat leukemia and other cancers through its ability to promote cancer cell differentiation. Strategies to enhance the anticancer effects of RA could deepen and broaden its beneficial therapeutic applications. In this study, we describe a receptor cross-talk system that addresses this issue. RA effects are mediated by RAR/RXR receptors that we show are modified by interactions with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a protein functioning both as a transcription factor and a ligand-dependent adaptor in an ubiquitin ligase complex. RAR/RXR and AhR pathways cross-talk at the levels of ligand-receptor and also receptor-promoter interactions. Here, we assessed the role of AhR during RA-induced differentiation and a hypothesized convergence at Oct4, a transcription factor believed to maintain stem cell characteristics. RA upregulated AhR and downregulated Oct4 during differentiation of HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells. AhR overexpression in stable transfectants downregulated Oct4 and also decreased ALDH1 activity, another stem cell-associated factor, enhancing RA-induced differentiation as indicated by cell differentiation markers associated with early (CD38 and CD11b) and late (neutrophilic respiratory burst) responses. AhR overexpression also increased levels of activated Raf1, which is known to help propel RA-induced differentiation. RNA interference-mediated knockdown of Oct4 enhanced RA-induced differentiation and G(0) cell-cycle arrest relative to parental cells. Consistent with the hypothesized importance of Oct4 downregulation for differentiation, parental cells rendered resistant to RA by biweekly high RA exposure displayed elevated Oct4 levels that failed to be downregulated. Together, our results suggested that therapeutic effects of RA-induced leukemia differentiation depend on AhR and its ability to downregulate the stem cell factor Oct4.

Suppression mechanisms of flavonoids on aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated signal transduction

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that mediates biological and toxicological effects by binding to its agonists such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Previously we demonstrated that flavonoids suppressed the TCDD-induced DNA-binding activity of the AhR in a structure-dependent manner. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms by which flavonoids suppressed the AhR-mediated signal transduction in mouse hepatoma Hepa-1c1c7 cells. Flavones and flavonols suppressed the TCDD-induced nuclear translocation of the AhR and dissociation of its partner proteins, heat shock protein 90 and X-associated protein 2, whereas flavanones and catechins did not. Flavonoids of all these four subclasses suppressed the phosphorylation of both AhR and Arnt and the formation of a heterodimer consisting of these proteins. Since certain flavonoids are known to inhibit mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), we confirmed the contribution of MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK) to the AhR-mediated signal transduction by using U0126, an inhibitor of MEK1/2. U0126 suppressed TCDD-induced phosphorylation of the AhR and Arnt followed by the DNA-binding activity of the AhR. Flavanones and catechins suppressed the TCDD-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2. The inhibition of MEK/ERK phosphorylation is one of the mechanisms by which flavanones and catechins suppress the AhR-mediated signal transduction in Hepa-1c1c7 cells.

Amino acid substitutions in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain reveal YH439 as an atypical AhR activator

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is traditionally defined as a transcription factor activated by exogenous polyaromatic and halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH/HAH) ligands. Active AhR induces genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism, including cytochrome P4501A1, which function to metabolize activating ligands. However, recent studies implicate AhR in biological events that are apparently unrelated to the xenobiotic response, implying that endogenous activation mechanisms exist. Three AhR genes in zebrafish (Danio rerio) encode proteins that demonstrate differential activation in response to PAH/HAHs, with the nonresponsive drAhR1a having some sequence divergence from the PAH/HAH-responsive AhRs in the ligand binding domain (LBD). We used these differences to guide the mutagenesis of mouse AhR (mAhR), aiming to generate variants that functionally discriminate between activation mechanisms. We found substitution of histidine 285 in the LBD with tyrosine gave a receptor that could be activated by isopropyl-2-(1,3-dithietane-2-ylidene)-2-[N-(4-methylthiazol-2-yl)carbamoyl]acetate (YH439), a potential AhR ligand chemically distinct from classic PAH/HAH-type ligands, but prevented activation by both exogenous PAH/HAH ligands and the endogenous activation mimics of suspension culture and application of shear-stressed serum. The differential response of H285Y mAhR to YH439 suggests that this activator has a novel mode of interaction that tolerates tyrosine at position 285 in the LBD and is distinct from the binding mode of the well characterized PAH/HAH ligands. In support of this, the PAH-type antagonist 3',4'-dimethoxyflavone blocked mAhR activation by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin but not YH439. Furthermore, the strict correlation between response to exogenous PAH/HAH ligands and mimics of endogenous activation suggests that a PAH-type ligand may underpin endogenous mechanisms of activation.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor at the crossroads of multiple signaling pathways

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) has long been recognized as a ligand-activated transcription factor responsible for the induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Its role in the combinatorial matrix of cell functions was established long before the first report of an AHR cDNA sequence was published. It is only recently that other functions of this protein have begun to be recognized, and it is now clear that the AHR also functions in pathways outside of its well-characterized role in xenobiotic enzyme induction. Perturbation of these pathways by xenobiotic ligands may ultimately explain much of the toxicity of these compounds. This chapter focuses on the interactions of the AHR in pathways critical to cell cycle regulation, mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades, differentiation and apoptosis. Ultimately, the effect of a particular AHR ligand on the biology of the organism will depend on the milieu of critical pathways and proteins expressed in specific cells and tissues with which the AHR itself interacts.

Sulfonation and phosphorylation of regions of the dioxin receptor susceptible to methionine modifications

Tagged murine dioxin receptor was purified from mammalian cells, digested with trypsin, and analyzed by capillary HPLC-MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS and -MS/MS. Several chromatographically distinct semitryptic peptides matching two regions spanning residues Glu(409)-Arg(424) and Ser(547)-Arg(555) of the dioxin receptor were revealed by de novo sequencing. Methionine residues at 418 and 548 were detected in these peptides as either unmodified or modified by moieties of 16 (oxidation) or 57 amu (S-carboxamidomethylation) or in a form corresponding to degradative removal of 105 amu from the S-carboxamidomethylated methionine. MS/MS spectra revealed that the peptides containing modified methionine residues also existed in forms with a modification of +80 amu on serine residues 411, 415, and 547. The MS/MS spectra of these peptide ions also revealed diagnostic neutral loss fragment ions of 64, 98, and/or 80 amu, and in some instances combinations of these neutral losses were apparent. Taken together, these data indicated that serines 411 and 547 of the dioxin receptor were sulfonated and serine 415 was phosphorylated. Separate digests of the dioxin receptor were prepared in H(2)(16)O and H(2)(18)O, and enzymatic dephosphorylation was subsequently performed on the H(2)(16)O digest only. The digests were mixed in equal proportions and analyzed by capillary HPLC-MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS and -MS/MS. This strategy confirmed assignment of sulfonation as the cause of the +80-amu modifications on serines 411 and 547 and phosphorylation as the predominant cause of the +80-amu modification of serine 415. The relative quantitation of phosphorylation and sulfonation enabled by this differential phosphatase strategy also suggested the presence of sulfonation on a serine other than residue 411 within the sequence spanning Glu(409)-Arg(424). This represents the first description of post-translational sulfonation sites and identification of a new phosphorylation site of the latent dioxin receptor. Furthermore this is only the second report of serine sulfonation of eukaryotic proteins. Mutagenesis studies are underway to assess the functional consequences of these modifications.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor cross-talks with multiple signal transduction pathways

Exposure to toxic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons raises a number of toxic and carcinogenic responses in experimental animals and humans mediated for the most part by the aryl hydrocarbon -- or dioxin -- receptor (AHR). The AHR is a ligand-activated transcription factor whose central role in the induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes has long been recognized. For quite some time now, it has become clear that the AHR also functions in pathways outside of its role in detoxification and that perturbation of these pathways by xenobiotic ligands may be an important part of the toxicity of these compounds. AHR activation by some of its ligands participates among others in pathways critical to cell cycle regulation, mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades, immediate-early gene induction, cross-talk within the RB/E2F axis and mobilization of crucial calcium stores. Ultimately, the effect of a particular AHR ligand may depend as much on the adaptive interactions that it established with pathways and proteins expressed in a specific cell or tissue as on the toxic responses that it raises.

Dietary curcumin modulates transcriptional regulators of phase I and phase II enzymes in benzo[a]pyrene-treated mice: mechanism of its anti-initiating action

Curcumin has been shown to possess anti-initiating and anti-promoting activity in experimental systems. However, the mechanisms of its actions are not fully elucidated in vivo. In the present study, mechanisms of curcumin-mediated anti-initiation were investigated in mice employing benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) as a model carcinogen. Dietary pretreatment of mice with chemopreventive doses of curcumin showed significant inhibition of B[a]P-induced enzyme activity, protein and messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of cytochrome P450 1A1/1A2 in liver and lungs. Although curcumin alone did not alter the basal levels of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), it significantly decreased the B[a]P-induced AhR protein levels, its phosphorylation, nuclear translocation and subsequent binding to DNA, thereby decreasing the transactivation of CYP1A. Dietary curcumin led to increase in NF-E2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) protein levels and enhanced its nuclear translocation in liver and lungs of mice as compared with controls. Additionally, increased binding of Nrf2 to antioxidant response element occurred in nuclear extracts from liver and lungs of mice pretreated with dietary curcumin. Induction of activity, protein and mRNA levels of glutathione S-transferase, its isoforms and NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase-1 by dietary curcumin in mice paralleled the curcumin-mediated activation of Nrf2, leading to increased detoxification of B[a]P. In agreement with the observed curcumin-mediated decrease in B[a]P-induced phase I enzyme and concomitant induction of phase II enzymes, pretreatment with dietary curcumin resulted in significant reduction of B[a]P-induced DNA adduct, oxidative damage and inflammation. To conclude, curcumin exhibits anti-initiating effects via modulating the transcriptional regulators of phase I and phase II enzymes in mice.

Antagonistic and agonistic effects of indigoids on the transformation of an aryl hydrocarbon receptor

Halogenated and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, exogenous ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), cause various toxicological effects through the transformation of the AhR. In this study, we investigated the antagonistic effects of indigoids on the transformation in addition to their agonistic ones. In a cell-free system, indigoids induced the transformation dose-dependently, but suppressed the transformation induced by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and the binding of 3-methylcholanthrene to the AhR. In mouse hepatoma Hepa-1c1c7 cells, indigoids, especially indirubin, suppressed the transformation and expression of CYP1A1 by inhibiting the translocation of AhR into the nucleus. When orally administered to mice at 10mg/kg BW/day for three successive days, indigoids did not induce AhR transformation and expression of the CYP1A subfamily in the liver, while indirubin and indigo upregulated quinone reductase activity. These results indicate that indigoids are able to bind to the AhR as ligands and exhibit antagonistic effects at lower concentrations in mammalian cells.

Curcumin suppresses the transformation of an aryl hydrocarbon receptor through its phosphorylation

Halogenated and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons induce diverse biochemical responses through the transformation of a cytosolic aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). In mouse hepatoma Hepa-1c1c7 cells, curcumin, a yellow pigment of Curcuma longa, did not inhibit the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-induced translocation of the AhR into the nucleus, but rather accelerated it. In the nucleus, curcumin inhibited the TCDD-induced heterodimerization of the AhR with an AhR nuclear translocator (Arnt), an essential partner for the transformation, and also dose-dependently inhibited the TCDD-evoked phosphorylation of both the AhR and Arnt. Moreover, curcumin significantly inhibited the TCDD-induced activation of protein kinase C (PKC), which is involved in the transformation, decreased the TCDD-induced DNA-binding activity of the AhR/Arnt heterodimer, and downregulated CYP1A1 expression. In a cell-free system, curcumin inhibited the binding of 3-methylcholanthrene, an AhR agonist, to the receptor. These results indicate that curcumin is able to bind to the AhR as a ligand, but suppresses its transformation by inhibiting the phosphorylation of AhR and Arnt, probably by PKC.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway and sexual differentiation of neuroendocrine functions

Historically, much of the research on health effects of environmental pollutants focused on ascertaining whether compounds were carcinogenic. More recent findings show that environmental contaminants also exert insidious effects by disrupting hormone action. Of particular concern are findings that developmental exposure to dioxins, chemicals that act through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway, permanently alters sexually differentiated neural functions in animal models. In this review, we focus on mechanisms through which dioxins disrupt neuroendocrine development as exemplified by effects on a brain region critical for ovulation in rodents. We also provide evidence that dysregulation of GABAergic neural development may be a general mechanism underlying a broad spectrum of effects seen after perinatal dioxin exposure.

Allium cepa derived EROD as a potential biomarker for the presence of certain pesticides in water

Allium cepa root length inhibition test is a well recommended bioassay for the evaluation of the toxicity of various polluted waters. The utility of EROD (7-ethoxy resorufin O-deethylase) as a potential biomarker of pesticide pollution was investigated using the Allium cepa system. Onion bulbs exposed to model water samples containing any of the six pesticides viz. 2,4-D, HCB, malathion, carbaryl, DDT and endosulphan were analyzed for EROD activity. The pesticide treatment resulted in the enhanced activity of the enzyme, with carbaryl and HCB causing 63- and 53-fold induction respectively with respect to the control at a dose of 1.2 ppb. The industrial wastewater samples from Ghaziabad city of Northern India resulted in about a 68-fold rise in the EROD activity, whereas the Aligarh samples did not exhibit any change within the statistical limit. These results suggest the presence of the test pesticides in the Ghaziabad sample and their absence in the Aligarh sample. Pesticide analysis in the test water samples by HPLC supported this to a large extent. Presence of cycloheximide in the test system brought down the EROD activity, equal to that of control, suggesting the de novo synthesis of the enzyme following the exposure of Allium cepa to pesticides. These studies suggest that the Allium cepa derived EROD can act as a potential biomarker of certain pesticides since even 1ppb of total/individual pesticides brought about >10-fold induction of EROD. We recommend the assay of EROD in the Allium cepa system as a presumptive test for the detection of these pesticides before using analytical techniques like HPLC.

Probing the Control Elements of the CYP1A1 Switching Module in H4IIE Hepatoma Cells

Previous research from our laboratory has shown a switch-like response to PCB 126 mediated CYP1A1 induction in primary rat hepatocytes and in H4IIE rat hepatoma cells. On a single cell level, cells appear to be either "on" or "off" for CYP1A1 induction at a given dose; some cells never respond to PCB 126. These cells represent a non-responding population. Cells that are switched "on" by PCB 126 display varying levels of induction, much like the dimmer on a light switch. The goal of the present research is to begin to uncover the mechanism for this switch-like response to CYP1A1 induction in H4IIE rat hepatoma cells. The AhR pathway is modulated by multiple co-activators and by phosphorylation. This research focuses on the phosphorylation cascades initiated by PCB 126 and the role they play in CYP1A1 induction. Our research reveals a likely role for protein kinase C (PKC) in this switch response. Inhibition of PKC by H-7 dramatically reduced the percent of cells that express CYP1A1 in response to PCB 126 treatment, as determined by flow cytometry. The effect of H-7 was concentration dependent, decreasing the number of cells expressing CYP1A1 rather than decreasing the level of CYP1A1 in all cells. This finding provides further evidence for the switch-like behavior of CYP1A1 induction and implicates PKC in this response to PCB126. The protein kinase inhibitor, HA-1004, had only a minor effect on CYP1A1 induction. A high-throughput immunoblot screen for 40 proteins revealed the regulation of several proteins/phosphoproteins by PCB 126. Most importantly, two proteins containing phosphoserine/phoshothreonine residues were increased by PCB126 treatment. However, PKC translocation studies and activity studies failed to verify that PCB126 activates PKC. It is possible that constitutive PKC activity is sufficient to maintain phosphorylation of critical components of the AhR pathway. Immunoblotting studies showed that MAP kinases ERK and JNK are not activated by PCB 126 in H4IIE cells and the ERK inhibitor U0126 did not impair CYP1A1 induction. Additional studies are planned to further investigate the role of PKC in the switch-like response to PCB 126.

The Role of Protein Kinase C in Regulation of TCDD-Mediated CYP1A1 Gene Expression

Cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) is induced by halogenated and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons following activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Protein kinase C (PKC) has been implicated in the regulation of this response. In tissue culture, induction of PKC activity with phorbol esters synergizes the actions of TCDD-induced CYP1A1, while PKC inhibitors block induction of CYP1A1 by TCDD. Here, the actions of specific PKC inhibitors on CYP1A1 induction were examined using a HepG2 human cell line (TV101L) that carries a stably integrated firefly luciferase gene under control of the human CYP1A1 promoter (-1612/+293). TV101 cells were treated with TCDD and either the kinase inhibitor staurosporine or one of the PKC inhibitors GF109203X, Gö6983, or Gö6976. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent activation of CYP1A1-luciferase and cellular PKC activity were measured. TCDD treatment induced CYP1A1-luciferase activity in an AhR-dependent manner, as determined by binding of nuclear AhR to xenobiotic response elements (XREs). Dose-dependent inhibition of PKC activity by staurosporine was concordant with inhibition of TCDD-induced CYP1A1-luciferase activity. However, the PKC inhibitors GF109203X, Gö6983, and Gö6976 blocked PKC activity at concentrations independent of those necessary to block TCDD induction of CYP1A1-luciferase activity. For all inhibitors, reduction in CYP1A1-luciferase activity was independent of AhR activation, as determined by electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of TCDD-activated nuclear AhR. The specific PKC inhibitors did not significantly alter cytosolic or nuclear levels of AhR protein, whether alone or in combination with TCDD. These results suggested that PKC was not the sole factor responsible for regulation of CYP1A1.

Molecular mechanism of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation by the fungicide iprodione in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hepatocytes

The dicarboximide fungicide iprodione (Ip) causes oxidative damage as a result of the production of free oxygen radicals, and induces cytochrome P4501A3 (CYP1A3) in cultured rainbow trout hepatocytes. The aim of this study was to characterise some of the molecular mechanisms by means of which Ip activates the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and subsequently induces the CYP1A3 gene in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The study was performed using primary hepatocytes and transfected HepG2 cells with a reporter construct, in which luciferase gene expression is under the transcriptional control of a multimerised xenobiotic response elements (4XREs), or a 2.3 Kb DNA fragment (corresponding to the trout CYP1A3 gene promoter). Ip exposure increased rainbow trout hepatocyte CYP1A3 mRNA over time and increased the expression of reporter gene in HepG2, thus suggesting that Ip induces the CYP1A3 gene by activating the AhR. Genistein, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, efficiently inhibited the Ip-mediated induction of the CYP1A3 gene as demonstrated by mRNA level decrease and the impaired activation of the luciferase reporter gene constructs. Staurosporine, an inhibitor of protein kinase C, also suppressed the induction by Ip. When the AhR antagonist alpha-naphthoflavone was added to the cultures, Ip-mediated CYP1A3 induction was suppressed. These findings are consistent with a mechanism of Ip-mediated CYP1A3 gene induction that involves the activation of the AhR complex via phosphorylation-dephosphorylation reactions.

Regulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signal transduction by protein tyrosine kinases

The involvement of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) in aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-mediated signalling by omeprazole and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) was investigated in hepatoma cells. Both omeprazole- and TCDD-dependent AhR signalling was attenuated by inhibition of c-src kinase, either by using pyrazolopyrimidine 4-amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4 ]pyrimidine (PP1) and 4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (PP2) inhibitors or by expression of dominant-negative c-src. These results indicate that the overall AhR function is modulated by c-src kinase activity. In contrast, a selective inhibition of omeprazole-mediated AhR signalling was revealed by tyrosine kinase inhibitors, tyrphostins AG17 and AG879. Furthermore, omeprazole-dependent AhR activation was abolished by mutation of Tyr320 to Phe, suggesting that this residue is a putative phosphorylation site. TCDD-dependent AhR signalling was neither affected by tyrphostins nor by this mutation. Our results are consistent with activation of the AhR by omeprazole in a ligand-independent manner, via a signal transduction pathway that involves protein tyrosine kinases, and are different from the mechanism exerted by high-affinity ligands.

Phosphorylation analysis of 90 kDa heat shock protein within the cytosolic arylhydrocarbon receptor complex

The arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR) functions as a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates the transcription of genes encoding xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes and also mediates most of the toxic effects caused by dioxins and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The cytosolic AhR complex exists as a transcriptionally cryptic complex, consisting of the 90 kDa heat shock protein (HSP90) and the hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2 (XAP2). The posttranslational modifications, especially phosphorylation, of the cytosolic AhR-HSP90-XAP2 complex are poorly understood, although the phosphorylation of a transcriptionally active heterodimer of AhR and an AhR nuclear translocator is critically involved in AhR function. To reveal the phosphorylation status involved in AhR function, we used mass spectrometry to determine the site-specific phosphorylation of the steady-state cytosolic AhR complex, prepared from Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing mouse AhR. We identified phosphorylations of the HSP90 subunits within the AhR complex at Ser225 and Ser254 of HSP90beta and Ser230 of HSP90alpha. By site-directed mutagenesis, these serine residues were substituted with alanine and glutamic acid to elucidate the role of the HSP90beta serine phosphorylations in the AhR function. Immunoprecipitation assays using COS7 transfectants showed that the replacement of Ser225 and Ser254 by Ala, S225/254A, increased the binding affinity for AhR, as compared with the Glu replacement. In a ligand-induced AhR transcription activity assay using Hepa1 transfectants, the S255/254A mutant exhibited more potent transcription activity than the S225/254E mutant, which had activity similar to that of wild-type HSP90beta. These results suggest that the phosphorylations in the charged linker region of the HSP90 molecule modulate the formation of the functional cytosolic AhR complex.

Inhibition of the MEK-1/p42 MAP kinase reduces aryl hydrocarbon receptor–DNA interactions

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) induces expression of the cytochrome P450 1A1 gene, cyp1a1, by binding to its receptor, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). TCDD-bound AhR translocates to the nucleus and forms a heterodimer with its partner protein, AhR nuclear translocator (Arnt). The AhR/Arnt heterodimer then binds to the dioxin-response elements (DREs) in the cyp1a1 enhancer and stimulates transcription of cyp1a1. We tested whether kinase pathways are involved in this process by treating Hepa1c1c7 cells with kinase inhibitors. The MEK-1 inhibitor PD98059 reduced TCDD-induced transcription of cyp1a1. TCDD treatment results in phosphorylation of p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), a substrate of MEK-1. Overexpression of dominant negative form of p42 MAPK suppressed TCDD-dependent transcription of a reporter gene controlled by dioxin-response elements (DREs), and pretreatment with PD98059 also blocked this transcription. PD98059 pretreatment also inhibited TCDD-induced DRE binding of the AhR/Arnt heterodimer. Together these results indicate that TCDD activates the MEK-1/p44/p42 MAPK pathway, which in turn activates AhR and so facilitates binding of AhR to the cyp1a1 DRE.

Phosphorylation of nuclear localization signal inhibits the ligand-dependent nuclear import of aryl hydrocarbon receptor

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor which plays a role as an intracellular mediator of the xenobiotic signaling pathway. We previously identified the minimum nuclear localization signal (NLS) of AhR(13-39): it is composed of two basic amino acid segments, AhR(13-16:RKRR) and AhR(37-39:KRH). In this study, we showed that the two protein kinase C (PKC) sites of Ser-12 and Ser-36 are located one amino acid upstream from each of the two segments, and that a ligand-dependent nuclear import of AhR is inhibited by substitution of aspartic acid for Ser-12 (S12D) or Ser-36 (S36D), which mimics the negative charge of phosphorylation. This observation was supported by microinjection analysis, an in vitro nuclear transport assay, and a luciferase reporter assay, suggesting a two-step mechanism in the ligand-dependent nuclear translocation of AhR.

Protein kinase C delta is activated in mouse ovarian surface epithelial cancer cells by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)

Interactions between the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathways are governed in cell and tissue-specific manners, albeit the physiological significance of which is unclear. This research sought to define the effects of TCDD on the PKC pathway using a mouse ovarian surface epithelial cancer cell line (ID8). Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) potentiated (1 nM) TCDD-induced 7-ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity after 24h of treatment, and pre-treatment with (1 microM) of either a general PKC inhibitor (BisI) or PKCdelta-specific inhibitor (Rotterlin) abolished the potentiation indicating that activation of PKC enhances TCDD signal transduction. Western blot analysis revealed that unstimulated ID8 cells express PKCalpha, beta, epsilon, tau, lambda and RACK1. PKCgamma, eta, theta and DGKtheta were not detected. TCDD (1 nM) increased PKCdelta protein approximately eight-fold after 24h of treatment and this effect was dose-dependent (0.1-100 nM); other PKC isoforms and related signaling proteins tested were unaffected by TCDD treatment. Immunofluorescent microscopy revealed that TCDD (1 nM) promoted the subcellular redistribution of PKCdelta, from the cytoplasm and the nucleus to the perinuclear area after 2h of treatment, however, after 24h of treatment PKCdelta was observed in nuclear structures that resembled nucleoli. TCDD (1 nM) also increased total PKC and PKCdelta-specific kinase activities in biphasic time-responsive manners. Total PKC and PKCdelta-specific activities increased after 1-2h of treatment. Then TCDD increased the total PKC activity again after 12h of treatment, whereas, PKCdelta-specific activity resurged at 24h and remained elevated at 48 h after treatment. The results indicate that TCDD preferentially induces PKCdelta protein expression and phosphotransferase activity, and its membrane translocation, indicating a potential intracellular role for PKCdelta as an effector molecule for TCDD-mediated biological events in this ovarian cancer cell line.

A dynamic role for the Ah receptor in cell signaling? Insights from a diverse group of Ah receptor interacting proteins

The aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor (AhR) is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix PER-ARNT-SIM (PAS) transcription factor family. Consistent with the notion that PAS proteins are biological sensors, AhR binding to Ah toxicants induces or represses transcription of a wide range of genes and results in a cascade of toxic responses. However, an endogenous role for AhR in development and homeostasis is supported by (1) the discovery of low affinity, endogenous ligands; (2) studies demonstrating a role for the receptor in development of liver and vascular systems, that were established using mice lacking AhR expression; and (3) the presence of functional dioxin-responsive elements in promoter regions of genes involved in cellular growth and differentiation. A large body of recent literature has implicated AhR in multiple signal transduction pathways. AhR is known to interact with signaling pathways that are mediated by estrogen receptor and other hormone receptors, hypoxia, nuclear factor kappaB, and retinoblastoma protein. In addition, AhR complexes may affect cellular signaling through interactions with various other regulatory and signaling proteins, including PAS heterodimerization partners (ARNT), chaperone and immunophilin-like proteins (e.g. HSP90, XAP2/ARA9/AIP, p23), protein kinases and phosphatases (e.g. tyrosine kinases, casein kinase 2, protein kinase C), and coactivators (e.g. SRC-1, RIP 140, CBP/p300). Here we summarize the types of molecular cross talk that have been identified between AhR and cell signaling pathways.

Mutational analysis of the mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor tyrosine residues necessary for recognition of dioxin response elements

Tyrosine phosphorylation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a member of the basic helix-loop-helix/PER-ARNT-SIM transcription factor family, has been shown to regulate its dioxin response elements (DRE) binding ability, although no specific residues have been directly demonstrated to be phosphorylated. Of the 23 tyrosines in the mouse AhR, 19 are conserved across all mammalian species sequenced thus far. The studies presented here were conducted to examine tyrosine residue(s) that are both likely candidates of phosphorylation and necessary for DNA binding and/or transcriptional activity of the AhR. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of phosphatase-treated AhR indicated that the receptor is phosphorylated on serine/threonine and tyrosine residues. Computational analysis predicted several highly conserved tyrosine residues to be phosphorylated. Both the N terminus (amino acids 1-399) and the C terminus (amino acids 399-805) of the mouse receptor synthesized in vitro using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system are tyrosine phosphorylated as detected by antiphosphotyrosine antibodies. Furthermore, the N-terminal AhR bound DRE in a ligand-dependent manner similar to that by the full-length receptor, suggesting that phosphorylated tyrosines involved in DNA binding are likely located in the region between residues 1 and 399. Mouse AhR tyrosine (Y) residues were evaluated by phenylalanine (F) mutational analysis for both DNA binding (electrophoretic mobility shift assays; EMSAs) and ability to induce a DRE-driven reporter gene in transiently transfected AhR-deficient cells. Of the 12 tyrosine residues in the N-terminal AhR, only a tyrosine 9 mutant (AhRY9F) significantly decreased DRE binding as determined by EMSA. Similarly, only the AhRY9F mutant decreased the DRE-driven luciferase expression in AhR-deficient cells. Overall, these data strongly suggest that the putative posttranslational modification at, or mediated by, tyrosine 9, and not any other individual mouse AhR tyrosine residue, is necessary for AhR DRE binding and transcriptional activity.

Characterization of the phosphorylation status of the hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2

The cytosolic Ah receptor (AhR) heterocomplex consists of one molecule of the AhR, a 90-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp90) dimer, and one molecule of the hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2 (XAP2). Serine residues 43,53,131-2, and 329 on XAP2-FLAG were identified as putative phosphorylation sites using site-directed mutagenesis followed by two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping analysis. Protein kinase CK2 (CK2) was identified as the 45-kDa kinase from COS 1 cell or liver extracts that was responsible for phosphorylation of serine 43 in the XAP2 peptide 39-57. Loss of phosphorylation at any or all of the serine residues did not significantly affect the ability of XAP2-FLAG to bind to the murine AhR in rabbit reticulocyte lysate or Hsp90 in COS-1 cells. Furthermore, all of these serine mutants were able to sequester murine AhR-YFP into the cytoplasm as well as wild-type XAP2. YFP-XAP2 S53A was unable to enter the nucleus, indicating a potential role of phosphorylation in nuclear translocation of XAP2.

DNA binding and protein interactions of the AHR/ARNT heterodimer that facilitate gene activation

Gene activation by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and its DNA binding partner, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) requires a number of sequential steps that occur following the binding of ligand and entry of the AHR into the nuclear compartment. This includes heterodimerization of the AHR and ARNT, formation of the appropriate amino acid/nucleotide contacts at the GCGTG recognition site and interactions between either the AHR or ARNT with proteins that facilitate changes in chromatin structure. The majority of these steps are likely modulated by changes in both phosphorylation and oxidation status of the AHR, ARNT and associated proteins. Studies of both the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors and the nuclear hormone receptor family can provide significant insights into how this unique signaling pathway activates its target genes.

Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in cell cycle regulation

Traditionally, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is considered to be a ligand-activated receptor and transcription factor responsible for the induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Its role in the combinatorial matrix of cell functions was neatly established long before the first report of an AHR cDNA sequence was published. Only recently, other functions of this protein have begun to be recognized. This review addresses novel findings relating to AHR functions that have resulted from experimental approaches markedly outside traditional receptor analyses. Here we examine the aspects of AHR biology relevant to its role in cell cycle regulation, from the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases to the cross-talk between AHR and the RAS pathway and the functional significance of the interaction between AHR and the retinoblastoma protein. We have attempted to provide the reader with a balanced interpretation of the evidence, highlighting areas of consensus as well as areas still being contested.

Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) by aromatic hydrocarbons: role in the regulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) function

The aromatic hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor (AHR) is the only known cellular receptor of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and of many other widespread environmental contaminants that cause diverse toxic effects in animals and humans. Most, if not all, the biological effects of TCDD are mediated by the activation of AHR, which is a ligand-activated transcription factor required for ligand-induced expression of several detoxification genes, including those encoding for cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1. Environmental agents also activate several mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, believed to modulate transcription factor function and to regulate gene expression. However, the contribution to TCDD toxicity resulting from cross-talk between AHR and MAPK pathways has yet to be determined. In this study, we show that TCDD and other AHR ligands induced the immediate activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases and the Jun N-terminal kinases, but not the p38 MAPKs. MAPK activation by TCDD did not require the AHR, since it occurred equally well in AHR-negative CV-1 cells and in Ahr (-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts as in AHR-positive cells. Distinct from serum factors and the tumor promoter TPA-induced MAPKs, which resulted in transcriptional activation of ELK or c-JUN, TCDD-stimulated MAPKs were critical for the induction of AHR-dependent gene transcription and CYP1A1 expression. These data indicate that AHR ligands elicit AHR-independent non-genomic events that are essential for AHR activation and function.

Transcriptional induction of CYP1A1 by oltipraz in human Caco-2 cells is aryl hydrocarbon receptor- and calcium-dependent

Oltipraz, a synthetic derivative of the cruciferous vegetable product 1,2-dithiole-3-thione, is considered as one of the most potent chemoprotectants. It modulates both cytochrome P-450 (CYP) and glutathione S-transferase expression and activities in rat tissues. Its effects, however, are variable according to the enzyme, tissue, and species. We show here that, as previously found in rat lung and kidney, CYP1A1 is inducible by oltipraz in both rat intestine and Caco-2 cells, a cell line originated from a human colon adenocarcinoma. In these cells, a 50 microm oltipraz treatment increased CYP1A1 mRNA ( approximately 30-fold), protein and activity. mRNA level was augmented as early as 2 h after the beginning of treatment, suggesting a transcriptional activation, and was maximal between 8 and 12 h. Transient transfection of Caco-2 cells with constructs containing different sizes of the 5'-flanking region of the CYP1A1 gene upstream of the luciferase reporter gene showed an increase in luciferase activity in oltipraz-treated cells, which correlates with the presence of the xenobiotic responsive element (XRE). Furthermore we demonstrated that resveratrol, an antagonist of the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor, inhibited the induction of both CYP1A1 promoter activity and mRNA by oltipraz, supporting the involvement of the Ah receptor in this induction. In an attempt to further characterize the mechanism of CYP1A1 induction, we showed a rapid increase in intracellular calcium concentration upon treatment of Caco-2 cells with oltipraz. Moreover, the effect of this compound on CYP1A1 was strongly abolished in the presence of BAPTA-AM, a well known chelator of intracellular calcium, and 2-aminoethyl diphenylborate, an inhibitor of store-operated calcium channels. These results bring the first demonstration that oltipraz activates transcription of the CYP1A1 gene through the Ah receptor-XRE pathway in Caco-2 cells and that CYP1A1 induction relies upon an increase of intracellular calcium concentration.

Regulation of DNA binding activity of the ligand-activated aryl hydrocarbon receptor by tyrosine phosphorylation

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a member of the bHLH-PAS family, is a ligand-activated transcription factor which plays an important role in normal liver development and in mediating the toxicity of polycyclic and halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon pollutants such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Phosphorylation is known to regulate the transformation process of unliganded AhR into functionally active AhR/ARNT heterodimer that has high affinity for dioxin-responsive elements (DRE) and transactivation activity. Here, we report that DRE binding activity of the AhR is regulated by phosphorylation on the AhR/ARNT complex itself. Studies with specific protein phosphatases indicated that tyrosine phosphorylation is involved in this modulation. In addition, the AhR is phosphorylated at tyrosine residue(s) as determined by anti-phosphotyrosine immunoblot analysis. These results suggest that tyrosine phosphorylation on the AhR is required for its DNA binding activity and may provide mammalian cells with another layer of control mechanism that allows cell type specific and developmental stage specific induction of the AhR target genes.

Induction and regulation of xenobiotic-metabolizing cytochrome P450s in the human A549 lung adenocarcinoma cell line

Several cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are expressed in the human lung, where they participate in metabolic inactivation and activation of numerous exogenous and endogenous compounds. In this study, the expression pattern of all known xenobiotic-metabolizing CYP genes was characterized in the human alveolar type II cell-derived A549 adenocarcinoma cell line using qualitative reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In addition, the mechanisms of induction by chemicals of members in the CYP1 and CYP3A subfamilies were assessed by quantitative RT-PCR. The expression of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) of CYPs 1A1, 1B1, 2B6, 2C, 2E1, 3A5, and 3A7 was detected in the A549 cells. The amounts of mRNAs of CYPs 1A2, 2A6, 2A7, 2A13, 2F1, 3A4, and 4B1 were below the limit of detection. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) induced CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 mRNAs 56-fold and 2.5-fold, respectively. CYP3A5 was induced 8-fold by dexamethasone and 11-fold by phenobarbital. CYP3A4 was not induced by any of the typical CYP3A4 inducers used. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein and the protein kinase C inhibitor staurosporine blocked TCDD-elicited induction of CYP1A1, but they did not affect CYP1B1 induction. Protein phosphatase inhibitors okadaic acid and calyculin A enhanced TCDD-induction of CYP1B1 slightly, but had negligible effects on CYP1A1 induction. These results suggest that CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 are differentially regulated in human pulmonary epithelial cells and give the first indication of the induction of CYP3A5 by glucocorticoids in human lung cells. These results establish that having retained several characteristics of human lung epithelial cell CYP expression, the A549 lung cell line is a valuable model for mechanistic studies on induction of the pulmonary CYP system.

The spineless-aristapedia and tango bHLH-PAS proteins interact to control antennal and tarsal development in Drosophila

The Drosophila spineless (ss) gene encodes a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS transcription factor that is required for proper specification of distal antennal identity, establishment of the tarsal regions of the legs, and normal bristle growth. ss is the closest known homolog of the mammalian aryl hydrocarbon receptor (Ahr), also known as the dioxin receptor. Dioxin and other aryl hydrocarbons bind to the PAS domain of Ahr, causing Ahr to translocate to the nucleus, where it dimerizes with another bHLH-PAS protein, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (Arnt). Ahr:Arnt heterodimers then activate transcription of target genes that encode enzymes involved in metabolizing aryl hydrocarbons. In this report, we present evidence that Ss functions as a heterodimer with the Drosophila ortholog of Arnt, Tango (Tgo). We show that the ss and tgo genes have a close functional relationship: loss-of-function alleles of tgo were recovered as dominant enhancers of a ss mutation, and tgo-mutant somatic clones show antennal, leg, and bristle defects almost identical to those caused by ss(−) mutations. The results of yeast two-hybrid assays indicate that the Ss and Tgo proteins interact directly, presumably by forming heterodimers. Coexpression of Ss and Tgo in Drosophila SL2 cells causes transcriptional activation of reporters containing mammalian Ahr:Arnt response elements, indicating that Ss:Tgo heterodimers are very similar to Ahr:Arnt heterodimers in DNA-binding specificity and transcriptional activation ability. During embryogenesis, Tgo is localized to the nucleus at sites of ss expression. This localization is lost in a ss null mutant, suggesting that Tgo requires heterodimerization for translocation to the nucleus. Ectopic expression of ss causes coincident ectopic nuclear localization of Tgo, independent of cell type or developmental stage. This suggests that the interaction of Ss and Tgo does not require additional signals, unlike the ligand-dependent interaction of Ahr and Arnt. Despite the very different biological roles of Ahr and Arnt in insects and mammals, the molecular mechanisms by which these proteins function appear to be largely conserved.

Signal transduction-mediated CYP1A1 induction by omeprazole in human HepG2 cells

Benzimidazole compounds, such as omeprazole and thiabendazole, are a different type of CYP1A1-inducer from Ah receptor-ligands, such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and 3-methylcholanthrene. In HepG2 cells, the commonly used tyrosine kinase-inhibitors, herbimycin-A and a series of tyrphostins, inhibited the induction of CYP1A1 produced by treatment with TCDD. Genistein, another type of tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibited the induction of CYP 1A1 whether it was produced by omeprazole or TCDD; however, this inhibition was caused by a dual effect of genistein, that is an anti-tyrosine kinase and an anti-topoisomerase I effect. An antagonist of Ah receptor, 3'-methoxy-4'-aminoflavone (1 microM), did not inhibit the induction of CYP1A1 produced in HepG2 cells by omeprazole or alpha-naphthoflavone (50 microM), but this antagonist did inhibit that produced by TCDD. Thus, omeprazole appears to induce CYP1A1 by initiating a protein tyrosine kinase-mediated signal transduction pathway, a different pathway from that initiated by TCDD.

Induction of cytochrome P-450 1A1 by omeprazole in human HepG2 cells is protein tyrosine kinase-dependent and is not inhibited by alpha-naphthoflavone

Benzimidazole compounds, such as omeprazole and thiabendazole, are a different type of CYP1A1 inducer from Ah receptor-ligands, such as TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) and 3-methylcholanthrene. In HepG2 cells, the commonly used tyrosine kinase inhibitors, herbimycin-A and a series of tyrphostins, inhibited the induction of CYP1A1 produced by treatment with TCDD. Genistein, another type of tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibited the induction of CYP1A1 whether it was produced by omeprazole or TCDD; however, this inhibition was caused by a dual effect of genistein, that is an anti-tyrosine kinase and an anti-topoisomerase I effect. An antagonist of Ah receptor, alpha-naphthoflavone (0.1-10 microM), and 3'-methoxy-4'-aminoflavone (1 microM), did not inhibit the induction of CYP1A1 produced in HepG2 cells by omeprazole, but both of them did inhibit that produced by TCDD. In one of a number of human lung tumor cell lines, S6T, the inducibility of CYP1A1 was high by TCDD, whereas the inducibility by omeprazole was low. Thus, omeprazole appears to induce CYP1A1 by initiating a protein tyrosine kinase-mediated signal transduction pathway, a different pathway from that inhibited by TCDD.

Expression of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) in fetal, benign hyperplastic, and malignant prostate

BACKGROUND

Androgen-dependent tissue has been reported to be affected by chemical ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a ligand-activated transcription factor, which heterodimerizes with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein (ARNT).

METHODS

Fetal (n = 3), benign hyperplastic (BPH) (n = 10), and carcinomatous (CaP) (n = 19) prostate tissues were analyzed using immunohistochemistry. Western blot analysis was used to confirm the identity of the recognized proteins.

RESULTS

Immunoblotting of enriched prostatic epithelial cells (EC) and stromal cells revealed constitutive expression of bands at around 110 kDa and 90 kDa, using anti-AhR and anti-ARNT, respectively. Immunohistology of the fetal specimens revealed heterogeneous cytoplasmic and nuclear AhR expression of immature EC and mesenchymal cells. Constitutive expression of AhR (primarily cytoplasmic) and ARNT (nuclear and cytoplasmic) by the majority of adult basal and secretory EC, CaP, and smooth muscle cells was confirmed in situ. The most intense anti-AhR/-ARNT reactivity was found on smooth muscle cells, followed by EC and fibrocytes. Secretory BPH-EC revealed significantly decreased AhR expression when compared to normal tissue segments. By contrast, anti-AhR reactivity was frequently increased in the more dedifferentiated tumor areas.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that an undefined physiologic AhR ligand(s) as well as environmental factors may exert effects on EC and smooth muscle cells in the prostate through binding to these receptors.

Suppression of CYP1A1 transcription by H2O2 is mediated by xenobiotic-response element

We have previously demonstrated that H2O2 downregulates CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 transcription in isolated rat hepatocytes (C. W. Barker, et al., 1994, J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3985-3990). In the present study, induction of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) expression driven by 3.1 kb of rat CYP1A1 upstream regulatory sequences was suppressed by 56% in Hepa-1 cells treated with H2O2. Similarly, H2O2 inhibited CAT expression from vectors containing two copies of either xenobiotic-response element (XRE) 1 or XRE2. H2O2 did not inhibit basal CAT expression in cells that were not treated with the inducer beta-napthoflavone. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that the suppression of XRE-dependent transcription by H2O2 was not due to changes in nuclear aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor DNA binding activity. Several types of experiments indicated that modulation of XRE enhancer strength by various means could modify H2O2-dependent suppression of CAT expression. Conditions that increased the transactivation potential of the Ah receptor (increase in XRE copy number or shortening of the distance between XREs and the minimal CYP1A1 promoter) attenuated the action of H2O2, while conditions that reduced XRE-mediated transactivation potential (decrease in XRE copy number, increase of the distance between the XRE and the promoter, or reduction of the number of bound Ah receptors by lowering the concentration of inducer) potentiated the inhibitory action of H2O2.

Signal transduction-mediated activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in rat hepatoma H4IIE cells

We have investigated mechanisms of omeprazole (OME)-mediated induction of CYP1A1 and CYP3A, using the rat hepatoma H4IIE cell line, in comparison with mechanisms exerted by traditional aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligands such as benso(a)pyrene (B(a)P) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). OME did not bind specifically to AhR, and it could not activate the AhR complex in rat cytosol to a xenobiotic-responsive element (XRE)-binding form in vitro. Genistein, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and daidzein, an inhibitor of casein kinase II, efficiently inhibited OME-mediated but not B(a)P- or TCDD-mediated induction of CYP1A1, as monitored at the transcriptional, mRNA, and protein levels as well as by analysis of activation of XRE-luciferase reporter constructs transfected into H4IIE cells. The protease inhibitor Nalpha-p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone (TLCK) and lavendustin A also had similar OME-specific effects. In addition, insulin pretreatment caused an almost complete inhibition of OME-dependent CYP1A1 induction but only partially affected TCDD and B(a)P-mediated induction of CYP1A1. Staurosporine, an inhibitor of protein kinase C, impaired the induction by both B(a)P and OME. OME caused an approximately 2-fold increase in the level of CYP3A expression, but all inhibitors used were ineffective in preventing this induction. Gel shift analysis with radiolabeled XRE and specific peptide antibodies toward AhR and aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein (Arnt) revealed an OME-mediated translocation of the AhR.Arnt complex into the nuclei. Genistein inhibited the specific nuclear XRE binding caused by OME, but it potentiated the formation of the TCDD-induced XRE.AhR complex. Although daidzein was able to effectively inhibit the OME-stimulated CYP1A1 gene transcription, it did not influence the OME-dependent AhR.XRE complex formation. The data are consistent with a mechanism for OME-mediated induction of CYP1A1 that involves activation of the AhR complex via intracellular signal transduction systems and that is distinct from induction mediated by AhR ligands.

Activation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha: posttranscriptional regulation and conformational change by recruitment of the Arnt transcription factor

In response to hypoxia the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) mediates transcriptional activation of a network of genes encoding erythropoietin, vascular endothelial growth factor, and several glycolytic enzymes. HIF-1 consists of a heterodimer of two basic helix-loop-helix PAS (Per/Arnt/Sim) proteins, HIF-1alpha and Arnt. HIF-1alpha and Arnt mRNAs are constitutively expressed and were not altered upon exposure of HeLa or HepG2 cells to hypoxia, suggesting that the activity of the HIF-1alpha-Arnt complex may be regulated by some as yet unknown posttranscriptional mechanism. In support of this model, we demonstrate here that Arnt protein levels were not increased under conditions that induce an hypoxic response in HeLa and HepG2 cells. However, under identical conditions, HIF-1alpha protein levels were rapidly and dramatically up-regulated, as assessed by immunoblot analysis. In addition, HIF-1alpha acquired a new conformational state upon dimerization with Arnt, rendering HIF-1alpha more resistant to proteolytic digestion in vitro. Dimerization as such was not sufficient to elicit the conformational change in HIF-1alpha, since truncated forms of Arnt that are capable of dimerizing with HIF-1alpha did not induce this effect. Moreover, the high affinity DNA binding form of the HIF-1alpha-Arnt complex was only generated by forms of Arnt capable of eliciting the allosteric change in conformation. In conclusion, the combination of enhanced protein levels and allosteric change by dimerization defines a novel mechanism for modulation of transcription factor activity.

Inhibitors of serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatases stimulate transcription by the Ah receptor/Arnt dimer by affecting a step subsequent to XRE binding

The Ah receptor binds aryl hydrocarbons such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) with high affinity. After binding aryl hydrocarbons, the receptor releases the 90-kDa heat shock protein and forms a dimer with the Arnt protein capable of binding at xenobiotic-responsive elements (XREs) and stimulating the transcription of genes involved in the metabolism of aryl hydrocarbons. The activity of the Ah receptor/ Arnt dimer can be decreased by treatments causing the down-regulation of protein kinase C and decreasing the nuclear accumulation of the receptor. Incubation with acid phosphatase or with alkaline phosphatase has been reported to block XRE binding. Thus the literature suggests that phosphorylation regulates Ah receptor activity by affecting DNA binding and/or nuclear transport. A reporter plasmid containing two XREs was used to investigate the effects of phosphatase inhibitors on TCDD-dependent transcription by the Hepa-1 mouse liver cell line. The inhibitors calyculin A and okadaic acid caused two- to threefold increases in TCDD-dependent transcription at concentrations capable of selectively inhibiting protein phosphatase 1 and protein phosphatase 2A. The inhibitor cyclosporin A doubled TCDD-dependent transcription at a concentration capable of selectively inhibiting protein phosphatase 2B. All three of the phosphatase inhibitors increased TCDD-dependent transcription without affecting transcription in the absence of TCDD. Nuclear extracts were prepared from cells treated with concentrations of okadaic acid or cyclosporin A which substantially stimulated TCDD-dependent transcription. Neither of the inhibitors significantly increased the level of TCDD-dependent XRE binding in the extracts. GAL4-Arnt fusion proteins were used to further investigate whether the phosphatase inhibitors affected a step other than DNA binding. Okadaic acid treatment specifically increased the ability of a GAL4 fusion protein containing the Arnt PAS and transactivation domains to stimulate transcription. These results suggest that serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatases can act at a level subsequent to XRE binding to inhibit the ability of the Ah receptor/Arnt dimer to stimulate transcription.