Partial characterization of lipoproteins containing apo[a] in human atherosclerotic lesions

Supporting evidence for lipoprotein(a) measurements in clinical practice

High levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are causal for development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and highly regulated by genetics. Levels are higher in Blacks compared to Whites, and in women compared to men. Lp(a)'s main protein components are apolipoprotein (apo) (a) and apoB100, the latter being the main component of Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) particles. Studies have identified Lp(a) to be associated with inflammatory, coagulation and wound healing pathways. Lack of validated and accepted assays to measure Lp(a), risk cutoff values, guidelines for diagnosis, and targeted therapies have added challenges to the field. Scientific efforts are ongoing to address these, including studies evaluating the cardiovascular benefits of decreasing Lp(a) levels with targeted apo(a) lowering treatments. This review will provide a synopsis of evidence-based effects of high Lp(a) on disease presentation, highlight available guidelines and discuss promising therapies in development. We will conclude with current clinical information and future research needs in the field.

The impact of race and ethnicity on lipoprotein(a) levels and cardiovascular risk

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a plasma circulating apoB100 (apoB) containing lipoprotein. It has a unique glycoprotein bound to the apoB100, apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. The majority of the population expresses two apo(a) isoforms, when bound to apoB100 they create two circulating Lp(a) particles. Lp(a) levels are genetically determined and epidemiological studies have established elevated levels of Lp(a) to be a causal risk factor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lp(a) levels differ across racial groups and Blacks of Sub-Saharan decent have higher levels when compared to white. In comparison to white populations, studies in minorities are less represented in the published literature. Additionally, there is a lack of standardization in the commercial assays used to measured Lp(a) levels, and hence it is difficult to assess risk based on individual Lp(a) levels, but risk seems to occur in the upper percentiles of the population.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent study using data from the UK biobank highlights the racial differences in Lp(a) levels and the increase risk in CVD amongst all races.

SUMMARY

This review will highlight Lp(a) biology and physiology with a focus on available data from racially diverse cohorts. There is a need to perform studies in diverse populations to understand if they are at higher risk than whites are.

Beyond Lipoprotein(a) plasma measurements: Lipoprotein(a) and inflammation

Genome wide association, epidemiological, and clinical studies have established high lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Lp(a) is an apoB100 containing lipoprotein covalently bound to apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], a glycoprotein. Plasma Lp(a) levels are to a large extent determined by genetics. Its link to cardiovascular disease (CVD) may be driven by its pro-inflammatory effects, of which its association with oxidized phospholipids (oxPL) bound to Lp(a) is the most studied. Various inflammatory conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and chronic renal failure are associated with high Lp(a) levels. In cases of RA, high Lp(a) levels are reversed by interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) blockade by tocilizumab, suggesting a potential role for IL-6 in regulating Lp(a) plasma levels. Elevated levels of IL-6 and IL-6R polymorphisms are associated with CVD. Therapies aimed at lowering apo(a) and thereby reducing plasma Lp(a) levels are in clinical trials. Their results will determine if reductions in apo(a) and Lp(a) decrease cardiovascular outcomes. As we enter this new arena of available treatments, there is a need to improve our understanding of mechanisms. This review will focus on the role of Lp(a) in inflammation and CVD.

Lipoprotein (a): Recent Updates on a Unique Lipoprotein

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Genetic, epidemiological, and translational data indicate that Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is likely in the causal pathway for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases as well as calcification of the aortic valves.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lp(a) is structurally similar to low-density lipoprotein, but in addition to apolipoprotein B-100, it has a glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], which is attached to the apolipoprotein B-100. Several distinctive properties of Lp(a) can be attributed to the presence of apo(a). This review discusses the current state of literature on pathophysiological and clinical aspects of Lp(a). After five decades of research, the understanding of Lp(a) structure, biochemistry, and pathophysiology of its cardiovascular manifestations still remains less than fully understood. Universally, Lp(a) elevation may be the most predominant monogenetic lipid disorder with approximate prevalence of Lp(a)>50 mg/dL among estimated >1.4 billion people. This makes a compelling rationale for diagnosing and managing Lp(a)-mediated risk. In addition to discussing various cardiovascular phenotypes of Lp(a) and associated morbidity, we also outline current and emerging therapies aimed at identifying a definitive treatment for elevated Lp(a) levels.

Genome-Wide Association Study Highlights APOH as a Novel Locus for Lipoprotein(a) Levels-Brief Report

OBJECTIVE

Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and plasma levels are primarily determined by variation at the LPA locus. We performed a genome-wide association study in the UK Biobank to determine whether additional loci influence Lp(a) levels. Approach and Results: We included 293 274 White British individuals in the discovery analysis. Approximately 93 095 623 variants were tested for association with natural log-transformed Lp(a) levels using linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, genotype batch, and 20 principal components of genetic ancestry. After quality control, 131 independent variants were associated at genome-wide significance (P≤5×10-8). In addition to validating previous associations at LPA, APOE, and CETP, we identified a novel variant at the APOH locus, encoding β2GPI (beta2-glycoprotein I). The APOH variant rs8178824 was associated with increased Lp(a) levels (β [95% CI] [ln nmol/L], 0.064 [0.047-0.081]; P=2.8×10-13) and demonstrated a stronger effect after adjustment for variation at the LPA locus (β [95% CI] [ln nmol/L], 0.089 [0.076-0.10]; P=3.8×10-42). This association was replicated in a meta-analysis of 5465 European-ancestry individuals from the Framingham Offspring Study and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (β [95% CI] [ln mg/dL], 0.16 [0.044-0.28]; P=0.0071).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large-scale genome-wide association study of Lp(a) levels, we identified APOH as a novel locus for Lp(a) in individuals of European ancestry. Additional studies are needed to determine the precise role of β2GPI in influencing Lp(a) levels as well as its potential as a therapeutic target.

Serum lipoprotein (a) is associated with increased risk of stroke in Chinese adults: A prospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Epidemiological evidence on the association between elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp (a)) with risk of stroke remains inconsistent. We aimed to investigate the association between serum Lp (a) level and the risk of stroke among middle-aged and elderly Chinese.

METHODS

A community-based prospective cohort study of 8500 participants aged 40 years or older was conducted in Jiading district, Shanghai, China, in 2010. The incident strokes were documented at follow-up visit during 2014-2015.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 5.1 years, 444 incident cases of stroke occurred. The incidences of stroke were 4.44%, 5.14% and 6.14% from the lowest to the highest serum Lp (a) tertile, respectively. A significant association between serum Lp (a) tertile and the risk of incident stroke was observed (p for trend<0.05). Compared with individuals in the lowest tertile of serum Lp (a), the multivariable adjusted hazards ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for incident stroke in Lp (a) tertile 3 were 1.34 (1.06-1.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum Lp (a) concentration was associated with increased risk of incident stroke in Chinese adults.

The metabolism of lipoprotein (a): an ever-evolving story

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is characterized by apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] covalently bound to apolipoprotein B 100. It was described in human plasma by Berg et al. in 1963 and the gene encoding apo(a) (LPA) was cloned in 1987 by Lawn and colleagues. Epidemiologic and genetic studies demonstrate that increases in Lp(a) plasma levels increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Novel Lp(a) lowering treatments highlight the need to understand the regulation of plasma levels of this atherogenic lipoprotein. Despite years of research, significant uncertainty remains about the assembly, secretion, and clearance of Lp(a). Specifically, there is ongoing controversy about where apo(a) and apoB-100 bind to form Lp(a); which apoB-100 lipoproteins bind to apo(a) to create Lp(a); whether binding of apo(a) is reversible, allowing apo(a) to bind to more than one apoB-100 lipoprotein during its lifespan in the circulation; and how Lp(a) or apo(a) leave the circulation. In this review, we highlight past and recent data from stable isotope studies of Lp(a) metabolism, highlighting the critical metabolic uncertainties that exist. We present kinetic models to describe results of published studies using stable isotopes and suggest what future studies are required to improve our understanding of Lp(a) metabolism.

Lipoprotein (a) as a cause of cardiovascular disease: insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology

Human epidemiologic and genetic evidence using the Mendelian randomization approach in large-scale studies now strongly supports that elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease, that is, for myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic stenosis, and aortic valve stenosis. The Mendelian randomization approach used to infer causality is generally not affected by confounding and reverse causation, the major problems of observational epidemiology. This approach is particularly valuable to study causality of Lp(a), as single genetic variants exist that explain 27-28% of all variation in plasma Lp(a). The most important genetic variant likely is the kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) copy number variant, as the apo(a) product of this variant influences fibrinolysis and thereby thrombosis, as opposed to the Lp(a) particle per se. We speculate that the physiological role of KIV-2 in Lp(a) could be through wound healing during childbirth, infections, and injury, a role that, in addition, could lead to more blood clots promoting stenosis of arteries and the aortic valve, and myocardial infarction. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of Lp(a) reduction in individuals with very high concentrations to reduce cardiovascular disease are awaited. Recent genetic evidence documents elevated Lp(a) as a cause of myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic stenosis, and aortic valve stenosis.

Lipoprotein(a) metabolism: potential sites for therapeutic targets

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] resembles low-density lipoprotein (LDL), with an LDL lipid core and apolipoprotein B (apoB), but contains a unique apolipoprotein, apo(a). Elevated Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for coronary and peripheral vascular diseases. The size and concentration of plasma Lp(a) are related to the synthetic rate, not the catabolic rate, and are highly variable with small isoforms associated with high concentrations and pathogenic risk. Apo(a) is synthesized in the liver, although assembly of apo(a) and LDL may occur in the hepatocytes or plasma. While the uptake and clearance site of Lp(a) is poorly delineated, the kidney is the site of apo(a) fragment excretion. The structure of apo(a) has high homology to plasminogen, the zymogen for plasmin and the primary clot lysis enzyme. Apo(a) interferes with plasminogen binding to C-terminal lysines of cell surface and extracellular matrix proteins. Lp(a) and apo(a) inhibit fibrinolysis and accumulate in the vascular wall in atherosclerotic lesions. The pathogenic role of Lp(a) is not known. Small isoforms and high concentrations of Lp(a) are found in healthy octogenarians that suggest Lp(a) may also have a physiological role. Studies of Lp(a) function have been limited since it is not found in commonly studied small mammals. An important aspect of Lp(a) metabolism is the modification of circulating Lp(a), which has the potential to alter the functions of Lp(a). There are no therapeutic drugs that selectively target elevated Lp(a), but a number of possible agents are being considered. Recently, new modifiers of apo(a) synthesis have been identified. This review reports the regulation of Lp(a) metabolism and potential sites for therapeutic targets.

Percutaneous coronary intervention results in acute increases in native and oxidized lipoprotein(a) in patients with acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate possible changes of native and oxidized lipoprotein(a) [ox-Lp(a)] levels after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Lp(a), ox-Lp(a), and Lp(a) immune complexes (IC) and autoantibody levels were studied in 111 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and 68 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) before and after PCI.

RESULTS

Compared with pre-PCI, Lp(a), ox-Lp(a), and Lp(a)-IC levels acutely increased, while the autoantibody decreased in both the ACS and stable CAD patients. They all returned toward baseline by 1 to 2 days. The absolute change of ox-Lp(a) was found positively related with both the diameter of stenosis (R=0.273, P=0.004) and the number of vessel disease (R=0.312, P=0.001) in the ACS patients, while not in the stable CAD patients.

CONCLUSION

PCI results in acute plasma increases of ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a). Ox-Lp(a) may be present in ruptured or permeable plaques and be released into the circulation by PCI.

Elevated concentrations of oxidized lipoprotein(a) are associated with the presence and severity of acute coronary syndromes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate possible mechanisms and association of increased oxidized Lp(a) [ox-Lp(a)] levels with presence and extent of acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

METHODS

Ox-Lp(a) levels were studied in 96 patients with ACS, 89 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), and 100 control subjects.

RESULTS

Compared to control, ox-Lp(a) levels increased in stable CAD patients (P<0.001), and especially in ACS (P<0.001) (ACS, 16.29+/-13.80 microg/ml; stable CAD, 10.04+/-10.32 microg/ml; control, 7.10+/-9.16 microg/ml). The ratio of ox-Lp(a) to Lp(a) was higher in the ACS than those in the stable CAD (P<0.05) and control (P<0.001). Ox-Lp(a) levels were found associated with a graded increase in extent of angiographically documented CAD in the ACS (R=0.275, P=0.007), while not in the stable CAD (R=0.090, P=0.402). Multiple linear regression analysis found ox-Lp(a) (beta=0.271, P=0.019), age (beta=0.244, P=0.038) and TG (beta=0.213, P=0.070) accounted for 11.1% of the variation in the extent of angiographically documented CAD in ACS patients; Lp(a) (beta=0.415, P=0.000) and extent of CAD (beta=0.193, P=0.071) accounted for 21.5% of that in ox-Lp(a) levels.

CONCLUSION

Elevated ox-Lp(a) levels are associated with presence and severity of ACS, and may be useful for identification of patients with ACS.

Plasma oxidized lipoprotein(a) and its immune complexes are present in newborns and children

BACKGROUND

Oxidized Lp(a) [ox-Lp(a)] has been reported to play more potent roles than native Lp(a) in atherosclerosis. We investigated the distribution characteristics of plasma ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a) immune complex [Lp(a)-IC] levels in newborns and children.

METHODS

Plasma ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC levels were measured in 747 children and 30 cord blood by ELISAs.

RESULTS

The mean levels of Lp(a), ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC were much lower in newborns than in children (P<0.001), and increased rapidly to that in children after birth. The distributions of Lp(a), ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC were skewed toward low values in children, no difference of their levels was found in each of the 13year groups. The levels of ox-Lp(a) correlated positively with total and LDL cholesterol, Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC; Lp(a)-IC correlated positively with sex, total and LDL cholesterol, Lp(a) and ox-Lp(a), respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis showed Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC accounted for 42% of the variation in ox-Lp(a) levels, and ox-Lp(a) accounted for 30% of that in Lp(a)-IC.

CONCLUSIONS

The fact that ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC are present in newborns and children suggests that oxidized lipoproteins play an initiating role in atherosclerotic process.

Native, oxidized lipoprotein(a) and lipoprotein(a) immune complex in patients with active and inactive rheumatoid arthritis: plasma concentrations and relationship to inflammation

BACKGROUND

Several studies suggest that lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] act as acute phase reactant and be associated with early atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Oxidized Lp(a) [ox-Lp(a)] and Lp(a) immune complex (IC) concentrations both increased in patients with coronary heart disease. We investigated Lp(a), ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC concentrations in RA patients and to explore the relationships with inflammatory disease activity markers.

METHODS

Plasma Lp(a), ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC concentrations, and inflammatory markers were analyzed in 54 patients with RA, including 23 active and 21 inactive RA, and 60 control subjects.

RESULTS

Lp(a) and ox-Lp(a) concentrations in active RA were higher than those in both inactive RA and control; Lp(a)-IC concentrations in active RA were also higher than inactive RA, while no difference was found in Lp(a), ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC concentrations between inactive RA and control. Lp(a) concentrations were found positively correlated with ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC concentrations, respectively; ox-Lp(a) concentrations were also related with Lp(a)-IC. Lp(a), ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC were all found positively related with C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Native, oxidized Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC concentrations increased in active RA patients. Inflammation may induce the changes of Lp(a), resulting in increased ox-Lp(a) and Lp(a)-IC, and may play an important role in atherosclerosis.

Development of new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for oxidized lipoprotein(a) by using purified human oxidized lipoprotein(a) autoantibodies as capture antibody

BACKGROUND

Oxidized Lp(a) [ox-Lp(a)] has been reported to play more potent role than native Lp(a) in atherosclerosis. Ox-Lp(a), autoantibodies, and Lp(a) immune complexes have all been detected in vivo. Thus, the isolation of its autoantibodies and the investigation of ox-Lp(a) may provide a new means to explore the exact pathogenic role of ox-Lp(a). We isolated and identified human autoantibodies against ox-Lp(a) and developed a new ELISA for ox-Lp(a) by using autoantibodies as capture antibody.

METHODS

Ox-Lp(a) autoantibodies were isolated and identified from healthy subjects by affinity chromatography. 2 "sandwich" ELISAs were developed for measuring ox-Lp(a) level, using autoantibodies against ox-Lp(a) or rabbit antiserum against ox-LDL as the capture antibody and quantitating with monoclonal anti-apo(a) enzyme conjugate, respectively. Ox-Lp(a) levels were studied by both the ELISAs in 100 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and 100 control subjects.

RESULTS

The isolated ox-Lp(a) autoantibodies reacted with both apo(a) and apoB epitopes of Ox-Lp(a). Compared to control, plasma ox-Lp(a) levels in patients with CHD were significantly increased (ELISA using human autoantibodies: 24.3+/-33.4 vs. 8.4+/-9.3 microg/ml, P<0.0001; ELISA using antibodies against ox-LDL: 13.0+/-13.8 vs. 7.3+/-9.7 microg/ml, P<0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, a significantly positive relationship between ox-Lp(a) levels detected by 2 ELISAs was also found (R=0.78, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We isolated human autoantibodies against ox-Lp(a), which can recognize both apo(a) and apoB epitopes of ox-Lp(a). The developed ELISA for ox-Lp(a) by using human auoantibodies may more accurately reflect the state of Lp(a) oxidation in vivo. Ox-Lp(a) levels increase in patients with CHD.

Oxidizability of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins and serum paraoxonase/arylesterase activities in preeclampsia

OBJECTIVES

Lipoprotein oxidation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia and paraoxonase, an antioxidant enzyme shown to protect lipoproteins from being oxidized. The aim of the present study was to evaluate oxidizability of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins and serum paraoxonase/arylesterase activities in preeclampsia.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-one women with mild preeclampsia, 21 women with severe preeclampsia, and 20 women with normal uncomplicated pregnancy were included in this study. Serum malondialdehyde (MDA) level, an indicator of lipid peroxidation, was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The oxidizability of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins was evaluated by copper-induced in vitro peroxidation of the isolated fraction of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins coupled with the thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances assay and expressed as the difference between copper-treated MDA and basal MDA (DeltaMDA). The serum paraoxonase and arylesterase activities were determined spectrophotometrically.

RESULTS

Serum MDA and DeltaMDA levels of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins were significantly higher in both mild and severe preeclampsia groups than in the normal pregnant group. Serum paraoxonase and arylesterase activities were not significantly different among the study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhancement in oxidizability of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins accompanying with dyslipidemia and increased serum MDA levels suggests that those lipoproteins play a role in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Further studies are needed to investigate serum paraoxonase activity in women with normal pregnancies and preeclampsia.

Lipoprotein (a) and its immune complexes in dyslipidemic subjects

OBJECTIVES

To investigate plasma levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-circulating immune complexes (IC) in subjects with various dyslipidemias.

METHODS

Plasma Lp(a), Lp(a)-IC, and LDL-IC levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) in 198 subjects with various dyslipidemias and 34 control subjects.

RESULTS

Hypertriglyceridemic subjects exhibited the lowest plasma Lp(a) levels, while hypercholesterolemic subjects exhibited the highest levels. Subjects with mixed hyperlipidemia had intermediate plasma Lp(a) concentrations, which were significantly lower than those of subjects with normal lipid levels. Interestingly, we also found that hypertriglyceridemic subjects had the lowest plasma Lp(a)-IC and LDL-IC levels, while hypercholesterolemic subjects exhibited the highest levels. Triglyceride (TG) levels were negatively correlated with Lp(a) (r = -0.15, P < 0.05), Lp(a)-IC (r = -0.20, P < 0.01), and LDL-IC (r = -0.214, P < 0.01) concentrations. Furthermore, significantly positive relationships were found between Lp(a)-IC and Lp(a) levels (r = 0.65, P < 0.001) and between LDL-IC and LDL-C levels (r = 0.43, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results argue for a regulatory role of TG on plasma Lp(a) and its circulating immune complexes in subjects with various dyslipidemias. The circulating levels of these immune complexes levels are likely to change with different concentrations of Lp(a) and LDL.

The effect of estrogens and phytoestrogenic lignans on macrophage uptake of atherogenic lipoproteins

The present study examined the effect of estrogens and compounds with estrogenic activity on the uptake of atherogenic lipoproteins into macrophages, thought to be the initiating step in the development of atherosclerotic lesions. Isolated low density lipoprotein (LDL) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) were radiolabelled with (3)H-cholesterol linoleate, and incubated with J774 macrophages for 24 hours in the presence of pharmacological doses of estrogens and phytoestrogens. At a concentration of 0.1 microM, the estrogen 17beta-estradiol significantly reduced LDL uptake by macrophages by 14% (p < 0.05), but estrone did not have any effect. At 10 microM, both estrogens significantly reduced macrophage LDL uptake, but the phytoestrogenic-lignans enterodiol and enterolactone had no effect on LDL uptake. Lp(a) uptake into cells was significantly reduced by both estrone and estradiol, and by enterolactone and enterodiol at concentrations of 10 microM (p < 0.01), with enterodiol being most effective. The results of this study suggest that the uptake of these structurally similar lipoproteins is regulated differently. Macrophage Lp(a) uptake appears more phytoestrogen sensitive than does LDL uptake.

Lipoprotein(a): an emerging cardiovascular risk factor

Lipoprotein(a) is a cholesterol-enriched lipoprotein, consisting of a covalent linkage joining the unique and highly polymorphic apolipoprotein(a) to apolipoprotein B100, the main protein moiety of low-density lipoproteins. Although the concentration of lipoprotein(a) in humans is mostly genetically determined, acquired disorders might influence synthesis and catabolism of the particle. Raised concentration of lipoprotein(a) has been acknowledged as a leading inherited risk factor for both premature and advanced atherosclerosis at different vascular sites. The strong structural homologies with plasminogen and low-density lipoproteins suggest that lipoprotein(a) might represent the ideal bridge between the fields of atherosclerosis and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of vascular occlusive disorders. Unfortunately, the exact mechanisms by which lipoprotein(a) promotes, accelerates, and complicates atherosclerosis are only partially understood. In some clinical settings, such as in patients at exceptionally low risk for cardiovascular disease, the potential regenerative and antineoplastic properties of lipoprotein(a) might paradoxically counterbalance its athero-thrombogenicity, as attested by the compatibility between raised plasma lipoprotein(a) levels and longevity.

Detection of IgG-bound lipoprotein(a) immune complexes in patients with coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

LDL-immune complexes (IC) have a powerful pathogenic role for inducing foam cell formation in vitro more efficiently than any other known mechanism. Studies have also shown that plasma LDL-IC concentration is a powerful marker for the development of atherosclerosis. The structure, fatty acid composition and antioxidant concentrations of Lp(a) and LDL are quite similar. The same oxidation pattern has also been described for both lipoproteins. Modified forms of Lp(a), some resembling oxidized Lp(a), have been identified in human atheromatous lesions. The existence of autoantibodies against MDA-Lp(a) in vivo is also presented. Therefore, we suppose that Lp(a) might trigger an immune response leading to the production of autoantibodies and subsequently to the formation of immune complexes. This study examined the existence of IgG-bound Lp(a)-IC and investigated its value as a risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis.

METHODS

We developed two "sandwich" ELISAs for measuring plasma Lp(a)-IC and LDL-IC concentrations, using anti-human IgG(Fab) as the capture antibody, and quantitating with monoclonal anti-apo(a) or anti-apoB enzyme conjugate. Their concentrations were studied in 160 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and 290 control subjects.

RESULTS

Plasma TC, LDL-C, TG and apoB concentrations in CHD patients were all significantly increased, whereas HDL-C and apoAI concentrations were decreased. The Lp(a) concentrations in the patients with CHD were also significantly different from those of control (262.4+/-220.0 vs. 211.3+/-199.4 mg/l, P<0.005). Plasma Lp(a)-IC (2.24+/-1.71 vs. 1.62+/-1.50 AU, P<0.0001) and LDL-IC (2.77+/-1.29 vs. 1.40+/-0.92 AU, P<0.0001) concentrations in patients with CHD were both significantly higher than those of control. The relationships between Lp(a)-IC, LDL-IC concentrations and other lipid traits in all the studied subjects (n=450) were carried out. LDL-IC concentrations were positively correlated with LDL-C, apoB, TC, TG and Lp(a) concentrations, while negatively correlated with HDL-C and apoAI concentrations, respectively. Similarly, Lp(a)-IC concentrations were positively correlated with Lp(a), LDL-C, apoB and TC concentrations, while negatively correlated with HDL-C and apoAI concentrations, respectively. Furthermore, a significantly positive relation between LDL-IC and Lp(a)-IC concentrations was also found (r=0.313, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We report the existence of Lp(a)-IC in both the plasma of patients with CHD and control subjects. Lp(a)-IC concentration increases in the CHD patients.

Influence of lipoprotein(a) on restenosis after femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in Type 2 diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

The influence of vascular morphology and metabolic parameters including lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) on restenosis after peripheral angioplasty has been compared in Type 2 diabetes (DM) vs. non-diabetic patients (ND).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The clinical course and risk profile of 132 (54 DM vs. 78 ND) patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAD) were observed prospectively following femoropopliteal angioplasty (PTA). Clinical examination, oscillometry, ankle brachial blood pressure index (ABI) and the toe systolic blood pressure index (TSPI) were used during follow-up. Duplex sonography and reangiography were also used to verify suspected restenosis or reocclusion.

RESULTS

At the time of intervention patients with DM had a lower median Lp(a) of 9 vs. 15 mg/dl (P < 0.01) in patients without diabetes. Recurrence within 1 year after PTA occurred in 25 diabetic (= 46%, Lp(a) 12 mg/dl) and 30 non-diabetic (= 38%, Lp(a) 48 mg/dl) patients. DM patients with 1 year's patency had a median Lp(a) of 7 vs. 11 mg/dl in non-diabetic patients (P < 0.05). However, 12 months after angioplasty Lp(a) correlated negatively with the ABI (r = -0.44, P < 0.01) in diabetic and in non-diabetic patients (r = -0.20, P < 0.05). The probability of recurrence after PTA continuously increased with higher levels of Lp(a) in each subgroup of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that Lp(a) is generally lower in those with peripheral arterial occlusive disease and Type 2 diabetes than in non-diabetic individuals. The increased risk for restenosis with rising levels of Lp(a) is set at a lower Lp(a) in diabetes and may be more harmful for diabetic patients.

Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthesis by oxidized lipoprotein(a) in a murine macrophage cell line

Increased plasma levels of human lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are highly correlated with the development of atherosclerotic lesions. During our study, we investigated the effects of native and hypochlorite oxidized lipoprotein(a) (ox-Lp(a)) on nitric oxide production by the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in lipopolysaccharide/interferon stimulated mouse macrophages (J774A.1). Ox-Lp(a) (0-2 microg/ml) induces a dose dependent inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthesis. iNOS protein expression showed a dose dependent reduction as revealed by immunoblotting when cells were incubated with increasing amounts of ox-Lp(a). Ox-Lp(a) decreases iNOS mRNA synthesis as shown by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Ox-Lp(a) induced iNOS inhibition might contribute to the development of atherosclerotic lesions by reducing the anti-atherogenic effects of nitric oxide.

Lipoprotein(a) oxidation and autoantibodies: a new path in atherothrombosis

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is considered a vascular pathogen of outstanding importance. High plasma levels of this lipoprotein are associated with premature arterial disease; however, the mechanisms involved have not been clarified. The atherosclerotic process is increasingly regarded as a chronic inflammatory reaction in the arterial wall where oxidation-mediated endothelial injury involving modified forms of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) seems to be a key event. Autoimmune pathways are involved in the progression of atherosclerosis and humoral response to oxidatively modified LDL can be considered among these pathways. A number of factors can be encountered in the pathogenesis of the accelerated arterial disease seen in patients with antiphospholipid (Hughes) syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Among these, high levels of Lp(a) have been described in both and increasing evidence indicates that patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are under oxidative stress. Recent studies suggest that the so-called 'oxidation theory of atherosclerosis' may also be applied to Lp(a). This fact makes this lipoprotein potentially suitable as a target of the immune system and antibodies reacting against oxidatively-modified Lp(a) by malondialdehyde have been recently described in APS and SLE. It is therefore likely that an immune response to the oxidized moiety of Lp(a) might be influential in the pathogenicity of this lipoprotein and, subsequently, of atherosclerosis.

Dominant role of the C-terminal domain in the binding of apolipoprotein(a) to the protein core of proteoglycans and other members of the vascular matrix

The C-terminal domain of apolipoprotein(a) binds in vitro to the protein core of proteoglycans as well as fibrinogen and fibronectin, suggesting that this domain plays a role in anchoring lipoprotein(a) or free apolipoprotein(a) to the vascular subendothelial matrix.

Correlates of lipoprotein(a) levels in a biracial cohort of young girls: the NHLBI Growth and Health Study

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). However, racial differences in both Lp(a) levels and their associated CHD risk are observed, with African Americans having, on average, higher Lp(a) levels than US whites but not the expected increase in CHD risk. We determined Lp(a) levels and their correlates in a large cohort (n = 2379) of black and white girls, ages 9 to 10 years, at the baseline visit of a longitudinal study of obesity development, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. Lp(a) levels were available for 1269 girls. The median Lp(a) level in black girls was over 3-fold higher than that in white girls. Associations were examined between Lp(a) levels and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, adiposity, pubertal maturation stage, body fat patterning (triceps/truncal skinfold ratio), and dietary fat (Keys' score). In black girls multiple regression analysis identified LDL-C (P <.001) and adiposity (P =. 08) as predictors of Lp(a) levels. In white girls only LDL-C (P =. 02) was associated with Lp(a). In conclusion, the level of Lp(a) was significantly higher in black girls. Our study also revealed a racial difference in correlates of Lp(a), such as LDL-C and adiposity. Whether this racial difference is due to an underlying biologic difference or is merely a reflection of a greater statistical power to detect a relationship with the level, which was 2.5-fold higher in black girls than in white girls, needs further investigation.

Atherogenecity of lipoprotein(a) and oxidized low density lipoprotein: insight from in vivo studies of arterial wall influx, degradation and efflux

The accumulation of atherogenic lipoproteins in the arterial intima is pathognomonic of atherosclerosis. Modification of LDL by covalent linkage of apo(a) (resulting in the formation of Lp(a)) or oxidation probably enhances its atherogenecity. Although the metabolism of LDL in arterial intima has been rather extensively characterized, little has been known about the interaction of Lp(a) and oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) with the arterial wall. The present paper reviews a series of recent in vivo studies of the interaction of Lp(a) and ox-LDL with the arterial wall. The results have identified several factors that affect the accumulation of Lp(a) and ox-LDL in the arterial intima and have provided fresh insight into unique metabolic characteristics of Lp(a) and ox-LDL that may explain the large atherogenic potential of these modified LDL species.

Lipoprotein(a) as a risk factor for coronary artery disease

Since its identification by Kåre Berg in 1963, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has become a focus of research interest owing to the results of case-control and prospective studies linking elevated plasma levels of this lipoprotein with the development of coronary artery disease. Lp(a) contains a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like moiety, in which the apolipoprotein B-100 component is covalently linked to the unique glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. Apo(a) is composed of repeated loop-shaped units called kringles, the sequences of which are highly similar to a kringle motif present in the fibrinolytic proenzyme plasminogen. Variability in the number of repeated kringle units in the apo(a) molecule gives rise to different-sized Lp(a) isoforms in the population. Based on the similarity of Lp(a) to both LDL and plasminogen, it has been hypothesized that the function of this unique lipoprotein may represent a link between the fields of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. However, determination of the function of Lp(a) in vivo remains elusive. Although Lp(a) has been shown to accumulate in atherosclerotic lesions, its contribution to the development of atheromas is unclear. This uncertainty is related in part to the structural complexity of the apo(a) component of Lp(a) (particularly apo(a) isoform size heterogeneity), which also poses a challenge for standardization of the measurement of Lp(a) in plasma. The fact that plasma Lp(a) levels are largely genetically determined and vary widely among different ethnic groups adds scientific interest to the ongoing study of this enigmatic particle. Most recently, the identification of proteolytic fragments of apo(a) in both plasma and urine has fueled speculation about the origin of these fragments and their possible function in the atherosclerotic process.

Apolipoprotein(a) binds via its C-terminal domain to the protein core of the proteoglycan decorin. Implications for the retention of lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic lesions

Although it is known that lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) binds to proteoglycans, the mechanism for this binding has not been fully elucidated. In order to shed light on this subject, we examined the interactions of decorin, a proteoglycan with a well defined protein core and a single glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chain, with Lp(a) and derivatives, namely Lp(a) deprived of apo(a), or Lp(a-), free apo(a), and the two main proteolytic fragments, F1 and F2. By circular dichroism criteria, the decorin preparations used had the same secondary structure as that previously reported for native decorin. Authentic low density lipoprotein from the same human donor was used as a control. In a solid phase system, Lp(a-)and low density lipoprotein bound to decorin in a comparable manner. This binding required Ca2+/Mg2+ ions, was lysine-mediated, and was markedly decreased in the presence of GAG-depleted decorin, suggesting the ionic nature of the interaction likely involving apoB100 and the GAG component of decorin. Free apo(a) also bound to decorin; however, the binding was neither cation-dependent nor lysine-mediated, unaffected by sialic acid depletion of apo(a), and markedly decreased when either reduced and alkylated apo(a) or reduced and alkylated decorin was used in the assay. Of note, the binding of apo(a) was unaffected when it was incubated with a spectrally native decorin that had been renatured from either 4 M guanidine hydrochloride by extensive dialysis or cooled from 65 to 25 degrees C. On the other hand, the binding significantly increased when decorin was depleted of GAGs, which by themselves had no affinity for apo(a). The binding of apo(a) to the decorin protein core was also elicited by the C-terminal domain of apo(a), and it was favored by high NaCl concentrations, 1 to 2 M. No binding was exhibited by the N-terminal domain accounting for the lack of effect of apo(a) size polymorphism on the binding. In the case of whole Lp(a), the binding to immobilized decorin was mostly GAG-dependent and ionic in nature. A minor contribution by apo(a) was detected when GAG-depleted decorin was used in the assay. Our results indicate that the binding of Lp(a) to decorin involves interactions both electrostatic (apoB100-GAG) and hydrophobic (apo(a)-decorin protein core), and that the binding of apo(a) requires decorin protein core to be in its native state.

Influence of lipoprotein(a) plasma concentration on neointimal growth in a monkey model of vascular injury

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been proposed as a risk factor for both restenosis and coronary heart disease. Recently, we identified Lp(a) in the arterial wall during the initial rapid neointimal growth phase that occurs after balloon injury in cynomolgus monkeys. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between circulating Lp(a) levels and the extent of early neointimal formation. Initially, 348 cynomolgus monkeys were screened to identify 15 monkeys that had either high or low circulating Lp(a) levels. In the 15 monkeys, circulating Lp(a) levels were confirmed by two separate measurements over 6 weeks using an immunoturbidimetric assay. Cohorts were identified with plasma Lp(a) levels that differed by four fold. Lp(a) levels expressed as total mass averaged 32 +/- 4 (N = 8) and 136 +/- 12 (N = 7) mg/dl in the low and high groups, respectively. Between the two assays absolute Lp(a) levels differed by less than 6%. Iliac arteries were harvested 14 days after injury induced by expansion of the internal vessel diameter 1.4 times its initial size with an angioplasty balloon. The neointimal area in the high Lp(a) monkeys was 16% greater (0.49 +/- 0.12 mm2, N = 8 versus 0.57 +/- 0.10 mm2, N = 7) than in the low animals; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.63). Medial areas averaged 1.27 +/- 0.11 and 1.44 +/- 0.20 mm2 (P = 0.48) in these groups, respectively. Tissue Lp(a) quantification, using a mouse monoclonal anti-Lp(a) antibody, indicated that the percent total area staining positive for Lp(a) was 1.7-fold higher in the high versus the low Lp(a) group (2.7 +/- 0.4% versus 1.6 +/- 0.4%, N = 6-8); this difference was not statistical significant (P = 0.28). In summary, a four-fold increase in circulating plasma Lp(a) levels did not result in a statistically significant enhanced neointimal formation at 14 days after balloon injury. This finding suggests that studies of longer duration may be needed to amplify the trend toward increased neointimal growth observed in this study.

Enhanced macrophage uptake of lipoprotein(a) after Ca2+-induced aggregate-formation

We tested the hypothesis that aggregated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is avidly taken up by macrophages. Lp(a) was isolated by sequential centrifugations and gel chromatography from a patient with high plasma levels of Lp(a) who was being treated with low density lipoprotein (LDL)-apheresis. Aggregated Lp(a) was prepared by mixing native Lp(a) with 2.5 mmol/L CaCl2, and 54% of the 125I-Lp(a) aggregated after interacting with CaCl2. The binding and degradation of aggregated Lp(a) in macrophages were 4.6- and 4.7-fold higher than those of native Lp(a), respectively. An excess amount of LDL did not inhibit either increase. Cholesterol esterification in macrophages was markedly stimulated by aggregated Lp(a), and macrophages were transformed into foam cells. Cytochalasin B, a phagocytosis inhibitor, strongly inhibited the degradation and cholesterol esterification (78 and 83%, respectively). These findings suggested that aggregation may be partially involved in Lp(a) accumulation, thereby contributing to the acceleration of atherosclerosis.

Metabolism of Lp(a): assembly and excretion

Lp(a) is one of the most atherogenic lipoproteins, and we know much more about the pathophysiology of Lp(a) than about its physiological function and metabolism. From our previous investigations and the new results reported here, we propose the following model of Lp(a) metabolism: apo(a) is biosynthesized in liver cells and the size of the isoform determines its rate of synthesis and excretion. Specific kringle-4 domains in apo(a), mainly T-6 and T-7, bind in a first step to circulating LDL, followed by the stabilization of the newly formed Lp(a) complex by a disulfide bridge. Circulating Lp(a) interacts specifically with kidney cells, or possibly other tissues, causing cleavage of 2/3-3/4 of the N-terminal part of apo(a) by a collagenase-type protease. Part of the apo(a) fragments is found in the urine, but there are indications that they in fact represent the biologically active form of apo(a). The core portion of Lp(a) in turn is cleared by the LDL-receptor or another specific binding system of the liver. Strategies for reducing plasma Lp(a) levels with medication should aim at interfering with the assembly of Lp(a) on one hand and the stimulation of apo(a) fragmentation on the other hand.

Lipoprotein(a) levels in patients receiving renal replacement therapy: methodologic issues and clinical implications

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for vascular disease and a potential link between coagulation, lipoproteins, and the development of atherosclerosis. Its role in the vascular complications of patients with chronic renal disease is unclear. We review methodologic issues involved in measuring Lp(a), particularly as they relate to studies of patients with chronic renal disease. The accurate measurement of Lp(a) is difficult because all the commercially available assays are sensitive to apolipoprotein(a) isoform size, Lp(a) behaves like an acute phase reactant, and levels vary markedly among ethnic groups. The results of 12 studies that included data on median Lp(a) levels in controls and patients receiving renal replacement therapy were analyzed. Although there was variation among studies, most found elevated levels of Lp(a) in patients receiving hemodialysis (range of medians, 9.0 to 38.4 mg/dL) compared with controls (range of medians, 4.7 to 19.7 mg/dL). With the exception of one study, Lp(a) levels also were elevated in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis compared with controls and patients receiving hemodialysis. In one study, an elevated Lp(a) level in patients receiving hemodialysis correlated with subsequent development of vascular events. A separate study associated the occurrence of vascular access occlusion with Lp(a) level. Following renal transplantation, Lp(a) levels decreased in all four studies, which included data before and after transplantation. Although variability in results were seen, Lp(a) levels appear to be elevated in patients receiving renal replacement therapy. Renal transplantation at least partially reverses this effect. The variability in results is probably related to methodologic difficulties in measuring Lp(a) and failure to segregate ethnic groups in study design and analysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Extraction of lipoprotein(a), apo B, and apo E from fresh human arterial wall and atherosclerotic plaques

Several studies have analysed apo(a) quantitatively in arterial wall tissue derived from post mortem samples. The purpose of this study was a qualitative analysis of Lp(a) in fresh human arterial wall tissue. It was evaluated whether Lp(a) exists as an intact lipoprotein or whether it is degraded. Additionally it was analysed whether there are differences in the apolipoprotein composition between lesion-free and diseased human arterial wall tissue. Serum and intimal tissue samples taken from the abdominal aorta and the inferior caval vein of 18 organ donors were analysed for lipids, Lp(a), and apolipoproteins apo B and apo E. Serum and tissue parameters were correlated. In the aortic tissue, higher Lp(a) and apolipoprotein levels were observed in the diseased samples. The total amount of Lp(a) recovered during three different extraction procedures was 5 micrograms/g wet weight in tissue free of plaque and 11.8 micrograms/g wet weight in atherosclerotic tissue. The corresponding values for apo B and apo E were 4.3 and 6.1 micrograms/g wet weight vs. 5.0 and 9.1 micrograms/g wet weight. After density gradient centrifugation of the aortic tissue extracts, it was shown that the major parts of apo(a) and apo B detected in the lesion-free vessel wall were present as Lp(a)-like particles. In the diseased tissue Lp(a) was partly dissociated into LDL-like particles and free apo(a). With this study we confirm that Lp(a) accumulates in the arterial wall, preferentially in diseased tissue, and that Lp(a) particles, deposited in atherosclerotic plaques, are partly degraded to LDL-like particles and free apo(a) in atherosclerotic plaques.

A rapid and simple method for measuring the susceptibility of low-density-lipoprotein and very-low-density-lipoprotein to copper-catalyzed oxidation

Much evidence has accumulated to suggest a role for the oxidation of low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) and very low-density-lipoprotein (VLDL) in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The susceptibility of lipoprotein to copper-catalyzed oxidation is often used to evaluate its oxidizability. A method was developed which isolates the non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) fraction and removes EDTA by a dextran-magnesium precipitation method. The oxidizability of this fraction is evaluated by monitoring the fluorescence and measuring thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) at different intervals of incubation. Those parameters reflect apolipoprotein B (apo B) modification and lipid degradation during LDL and VLDL oxidation. Our assay is sensitive enough to study factors which can influence the oxidizability of LDL and VLDL. The method is simple, rapid and can be easily conducted in a routine laboratory.

Immunochemically detectable lipid-free apo(a) in plasma and in human atherosclerotic lesions

Although Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in humans, the precise pathogenetic mechanisms are still unknown. We have shown that Lp(a) accumulates in human atherosclerotic lesions, and some particles undergo oxidation. Since, following agarose electrophoresis of both plaque extracts and plasma, a region close to the origin immunostained intensely for apo(a) but was lipid-free, we sought to identify whether such samples contained lipid-free apo(a), as previously reported to occur in plaque extracts. Immunochemically identifiable apo(a) was found following density-gradient ultracentrifugation both in the 1.05 < d < 1.09 and the d > 1.21 density fraction from both plasma and plaque extracts. However, because in a competitive binding RIA, displacement curves of apo(a) in plasma and the d > 1.21 were not parallel, it is premature to ascribe a relative amount of total apo(a) to this fraction. Whereas apo(a) immunoblots of SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions of the d > 1.21 fraction of a plaque extract with high apo(a) content showed high molecular weight bands consistent with apo(a) isoforms, the corresponding d > 1.21 fraction showed multiple low molecular weight bands characteristic of fragmentation. Since the d > 1.21 of arterial extracts contained all the material immunostaining for apo(a) migrating towards the cathode, characteristic of immunoglobulins (IgG), we asked whether fragments of apo(a) might have associated with human IgG both in plasma and tissue extracts, or whether our anti-apo(a) reacted with epitopes on human IgG. Immunoblotting with our anti-apo(a) of samples of plasma and plaque extracts run on agarose electrophoresis or SDS-PAGE further demonstrated intense staining of multiple bands in the molecular weight range of human IgG. Furthermore, a fraction of plasma and tissue extracts that bound to a protein G affinity column demonstrated immunostaining for apo(a) and was in the size range of IgG. Although one polyclonal anti-apo(a) provided by another laboratory showed the same findings as our antibody, two other polyclonal anti-apo(a) failed to demonstrate immunostaining of human IgG, either on agarose electrophoresis or SDS-PAGE. We speculate that the Lp(a) immunogen used to prepare our anti-apo(a) may have undergone modest oxidation, thus exposing epitopes not normally expressed on apo(a) in native Lp(a). Either antibodies to these epitopes could be recognizing apo(a) fragments, possibly released during oxidation, which are then covalently bound to IgG, or oxidation of apo(a) creates epitopes on apo(a) that are homologous with IgG, thereby leading to cross-reactivity with IgG.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)