Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose in rats: more concentrated polycose is not always more reinforcing

Evidence that carbohydrate-to-fat ratio and taste, but not energy density or NOVA level of processing, are determinants of food liking and food reward

This virtual (online) study tested the common but largely untested assumptions that food energy density, level of processing (NOVA categories), and carbohydrate-to-fat (CF) ratio are key determinants of food reward. Individual participants (224 women and men, mean age 35 y, 53% with healthy weight, 43% with overweight or obesity) were randomised to one of three, within-subjects, study arms: energy density (32 foods), or level of processing (24 foods), or CF ratio (24 foods). They rated the foods for taste pleasantness (liking), desire to eat (food reward), and sweetness, saltiness, and flavour intensity (for analysis averaged as taste intensity). Against our hypotheses, there was not a positive relationship between liking or food reward and either energy density or level of processing. As hypothesised, foods combining more equal energy amounts of carbohydrate and fat (combo foods), and foods tasting more intense, scored higher on both liking and food reward. Further results were that CF ratio, taste intensity, and food fibre content (negatively), independent of energy density, accounted for 56% and 43% of the variance in liking and food reward, respectively. We interpret the results for CF ratio and fibre in terms of food energy-to-satiety ratio (ESR), where ESR for combo foods is high, and ESR for high-fibre foods is low. We suggest that the metric of ESR should be considered when designing future studies of effects of food composition on food reward, preference, and intake.

Rats learn to prefer the late-consumed flavor over the early-consumed flavor in a multi-flavored meal paired with oral glucose and corn oil

Conditioned flavor preference (CFP) is established by association: where a neutral flavor (conditioned stimulus, CS) is paired with orosensory and post-ingestive components of nutrients, including sugar and fat (unconditioned stimulus, US). A previous study reported that rats can learn to prefer flavors that they consumed earlier and later in a multi-flavored solution paired with an intragastric infusion of glucose, but they expressed only a preference for a late-consumed flavor when they were tested after feeding (Myers and Whitney, 2011). This paradigm can be a suitable rodent model to explain how humans acquire a selective preference for routinely late-served "dessert" foods and why these foods remain attractive even in the absence of hunger. Here, we examined whether oral glucose (Experiment 1) or fat (Experiment 2) acts as a US for flavor preference learning processes in this paradigm. In Experiment 1, adult female rats under food restriction were trained in 16 daily sessions with two distinct flavor CSs in succession per session; eight CS(+) sessions in which two distinct flavor CSs (early(+), late(+)) were sequentially presented for 8 min each with oral glucose (12%) as a US, and eight CS(-) sessions in which different CSs (early(-), late(-)) were unpaired with the US. In the 30-minute two-bottle choice test, rats preferred late(+) over late(-) only when tested 90 min after consumption of normal chow (fed test) but not after overnight deprivation (hungry test). Early(+) was not preferred over early(-) in both tests. Moreover, a significant preference for late(+) over early(+) was observed only in the fed test, which is a unique feature of oral glucose-CFP. These results indicate that taste sensations of oral glucose promote a rewarding effect of late-onset glucose nutrients. In Experiment 2, separate rats were trained with the same conditioning paradigm, but used a caloric matched fat solution (5.3% corn oil) for a US. The results showed that they expressed stronger preferences for early(+) and late(+) relative to their respective CS(-) flavors in both tests. Similar to Experiment 1, it was observed in the fed test that there was a preference for late(+) over early(+) in oral fat-CFP. Taken together, the present results suggest that routine timing arrangements can cause qualitative differences in conditioned preferences between multiple flavors within a sugar or fat-containing meal in rats, and that rats prefer the late-consumed flavor over the early-consumed flavor in the absence of hunger.

The Role of Post-Ingestive Feedback in the Development of an Enhanced Appetite for the Orosensory Properties of Glucose over Fructose in Rats

The simple sugars glucose and fructose share a common “sweet” taste quality mediated by the T1R2+T1R3 taste receptor. However, when given the opportunity to consume each sugar, rats learn to affectively discriminate between glucose and fructose on the basis of cephalic chemosensory cues. It has been proposed that glucose has a unique sensory property that becomes more hedonically positive through learning about the relatively more rewarding post-ingestive effects that are associated with glucose as compared to fructose. We tested this theory using intragastric (IG) infusions to manipulate the post-ingestive consequences of glucose and fructose consumption. Food-deprived rats with IG catheters repeatedly consumed multiple concentrations of glucose and fructose in separate sessions. For rats in the “Matched” group, each sugar was accompanied by IG infusion of the same sugar. For the “Mismatched” group, glucose consumption was accompanied by IG fructose, and vice versa. This condition gave rats orosensory experience with each sugar but precluded the differential post-ingestive consequences. Following training, avidity for each sugar was assessed in brief access and licking microstructure tests. The Matched group displayed more positive evaluation of glucose relative to fructose than the Mismatched group. A second experiment used a different concentration range and compared responses of the Matched and Mismatched groups to a control group kept naïve to the orosensory properties of sugar. Consistent with results from the first experiment, the Matched group, but not the Mismatched or Control group, displayed elevated licking responses to glucose. These experiments yield additional evidence that glucose and fructose have discriminable sensory properties and directly demonstrate that their different post-ingestive effects are responsible for the experience-dependent changes in the motivation for glucose versus fructose.

Licking microstructure and hedonic changes after flavour preference learning in rats

Pairing a neutral flavour conditioned stimulus (CS) with a nutrient reward will create a learned preference for that CS. Prior studies suggest that this is accompanied by an increase in the hedonic value of the CS, although the reliability of this effect is yet to be fully established. Here, flavour CS+s were mixed with either 16% sucrose or maltodextrin (with control CS-s mixed with 2% solutions of the same carbohydrate). While a reliable preference for the CS+ was seen in every case, and there was a learned increase in lick cluster size when all conditions were considered together, this difference was significant in only one experimental condition considered alone. A meta-analysis of these results and similar published licking microstructure analysis studies found that the Cohen's d_av effect size for changes in licking microstructure after flavour preference learning was 0.16. This is far smaller than the effect sizes reported when assessing learned hedonic changes in flavour preference based on other test or training methods. Although this confirms that flavour preference learning produces hedonic changes in the cue flavours, the analysis of licking microstructure with training based on voluntary consumption of CS and unconditioned stimulus (US) compounds may be an insensitive means of assessing such effects.

Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog

Mice adapted to drink a flavored saccharin solution (CS-) paired with intragastric (IG) self-infusions of water rapidly increase their intake of a new flavored solution (CS+) that is paired with IG glucose self-infusions. The present study extends this method to examine post-oral glucose appetition in rats. Food-restricted rats were trained to consume a CS- flavor (e.g., grape saccharin) paired with IG water in 5 daily 1-h tests. In the next 3 tests, they drank a CS+ (e.g., cherry saccharin) paired with IG glucose. Rats infused with 8% glucose increased intake significantly on CS+ Test 1, but those infused with 16% glucose showed only a small increase in intake, which may reflect a counteracting satiating effect. Both groups further increased CS+ intakes in Tests 2 and 3, and preferred (81%) the CS+ to the CS- in a two-bottle test without infusions. A second experiment investigated rats' responses to IG alpha-methyl-d-glucopyranoside (MDG), a non-metabolizable sugar analog which stimulates CS+ intake and preference in mice. The rats reduced their intake of the MDG-paired CS+ flavor over sessions, and preferred the CS- to the CS+ in the choice test. The glucose data show that rats, like mice, rapidly detect the sugar's positive post-oral effects that can stimulate intake within the first hour of exposure. The MDG avoidance may indicate a greater sensitivity to its post-oral inhibitory effects in rats than in mice, or perhaps slower clearance of MDG in rats. The test protocol described here can be used to investigate the peripheral and central processes involved in stimulation of intake by post-oral nutrients in rats.

An attempt to condition flavour preference induced by oral and/or postoral administration of 16% sucrose in pigs

The present study investigated the acquisition of conditioned flavour preferences in pigs using the caloric value and/or sweet taste of sucrose. Nine water-deprived juvenile pigs were given four three-day conditioning sessions during which they received flavoured solutions as conditioned stimuli (CS). The CS solutions were paired with three treatments that generated a gustatory and/or a caloric reinforcement (US). The CS++ solution was added with 16% sucrose and paired with an intraduodenal (ID) infusion of water, the CS+ solution was paired with an ID infusion of 16% sucrose and the CS- solution was paired with an ID infusion of water. One and two weeks after conditioning, the water-deprived pigs were subjected to two-choice preference tests with the unreinforced CS solutions. Solutions intake, behavioural activity and some drinking parameters were measured. Despite no difference in CS intake during conditioning, the animals spent less time inactive and more time standing during CS++ than CS+ conditioning. When receiving CS++, the pigs explored the drinking trough more than when receiving CS-. Compared to the CS- condition, the numbers of drinking episodes and intra-drinking episode (IDE) pauses were also 36% and 49% lesser in the CS++ condition, but these differences were not significant. During the two-choice tests, the pigs did not show significant preferences. Nevertheless, during the first session, the pigs seemed to show a slight preference for the CS++ (57% of total intake) compared to CS+. The duration of CS++ drinking episodes represented 64% of the total duration compared to CS+ and CS- . The total time spent drinking the CS++ also represented 57% of the total time in the CS++ vs. CS- test. To conclude, although no clear-cut preferences were found during two-choice tests, the oral perception of 16% sucrose during conditioning induced changes in behavioural activities, motivational responses and microstructure of CS intake, suggesting the importance of oral food perception for food selection processes in pigs. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of water deprivation on the expression of flavour preferences in pigs.

An evolutionary perspective on food and human taste

The sense of taste is stimulated when nutrients or other chemical compounds activate specialized receptor cells within the oral cavity. Taste helps us decide what to eat and influences how efficiently we digest these foods. Human taste abilities have been shaped, in large part, by the ecological niches our evolutionary ancestors occupied and by the nutrients they sought. Early hominoids sought nutrition within a closed tropical forest environment, probably eating mostly fruit and leaves, and early hominids left this environment for the savannah and greatly expanded their dietary repertoire. They would have used their sense of taste to identify nutritious food items. The risks of making poor food selections when foraging not only entail wasted energy and metabolic harm from eating foods of low nutrient and energy content, but also the harmful and potentially lethal ingestion of toxins. The learned consequences of ingested foods may subsequently guide our future food choices. The evolved taste abilities of humans are still useful for the one billion humans living with very low food security by helping them identify nutrients. But for those who have easy access to tasty, energy-dense foods our sensitivities for sugary, salty and fatty foods have also helped cause over nutrition-related diseases, such as obesity and diabetes.

Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study

In a recent study, intragastric (IG) self-infusion of 16% glucose stimulated 1-h intake and conditioned a preference for a flavored saccharin solution in C57BL/6J mice (Zukerman et al., 2011). Experiment 1 of the present study presents a concentration-response analysis of IG glucose-induced intake stimulation monitored by recording licking response every min of the 1h/day sessions. Separate groups of food-restricted mice consumed a flavored saccharin solution (the CS-) paired with IG self-infusions of water (Test 0) followed by a different flavored solution (the CS+) paired with IG self-infusions of 2, 4, 8, 16, or 32% glucose (Tests 1-3). Following additional CS- and CS+ training sessions, a two-bottle CS+ vs. CS- choice test was conducted without infusions. Self-infusions of 8%, 16% or 32% glucose stimulated CS+ licking within 12 min of the first test session and even earlier in subsequent test sessions, and also conditioned significant CS+ preferences in the two-bottle test. The stimulation of early licking and CS+ preference increased as a function of glucose concentration. The amount of glucose solute self-infused increased with sugar concentration as did post-infusion blood glucose levels. The 2% glucose infusion did not stimulate CS+ intake and the 2% and 4% infusions failed to produce a CS+ preference in the 1-h test. Experiment 2 revealed that intraperitoneal self-infusions of 8% glucose, unlike IG glucose self-infusions, failed to stimulate CS+ licking or preference despite producing maximal increases in blood glucose levels. Taken together, these and other findings suggest that glucose rapidly produces concentration-dependent intestinal signals that stimulate intake and condition flavor preferences while post-oral satiation signals limit total amounts consumed.

WITHDRAWN: Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: A concentration-response study

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.

Gut-brain nutrient signaling. Appetition vs. satiation

Multiple hormonal and neural signals are generated by ingested nutrients that limit meal size and suppress postmeal eating. However, the availability of sugar-rich and fat-rich foods can override these satiation/satiety signals and lead to overeating and obesity. The palatable flavor of these foods is one factor that promotes overeating, but sugar and fat also have postoral actions that can stimulate eating and increase food preferences. This is revealed in conditioning studies in which rodents consume flavored solutions paired with intragastric sugar or fat infusions. The significant flavor preferences and increased intake produced by the nutrient infusions appear to involve stimulatory gut-brain signals, referred to here as appetition signals, that are distinct from the satiation signals that suppress feeding. Newly developed rapid conditioning protocols may facilitate the study of postoral appetition processes.

The CS-US delay gradient in flavor preference conditioning with intragastric carbohydrate infusions

Rats are able to associate a flavor with the delayed presentation of food, but the obtained flavor preferences are often weak. The present studies evaluated the effect of delay between a flavor CS and a post-oral nutrient US on the expression of conditioned flavor preferences. In Experiment 1, rats were trained with two CS flavors: one was followed after a delay by intragastric infusion of 8% glucose, and the other was followed after the same delay by intragastric water. Rats trained with 2.5, 10, and 30-min delays expressed significant (84-68%) preferences for the glucose-paired flavor whereas rats trained with 60-min delays were indifferent (51%). Experiment 2 examined flavor conditioning over a 60-min delay using 8 or 16% Polycose based on findings that orally consumed Polycose conditions preferences at this delay interval. The 8 and 16% Polycose infusions produced significant preferences which peaked at 62% and 73%, respectively. The ability to bridge these delays may allow animals to learn about slowly digested foods.

Flavor preferences conditioned by post-oral infusion of monosodium glutamate in rats

Monosodium glutamate (MSG), the prototypical umami source, can enhance preference for associated flavors in humans and rodents. Although MSG flavor preference has been attributed to its taste, vagally-mediated post-oral detection has also been demonstrated. Recent studies showed that water-restricted rats acquired a preference for a flavor paired with intragastric (IG) infusion of 60 mM MSG in rats. The present study extends this work by comparing MSG-based flavor conditioning in water- and food-restricted rats and testing the persistence of flavor preferences. Rats with IG catheters drank flavored solutions paired with volume-matched infusions of 60 mM MSG or water in daily 30-min sessions. Two training/test cycles were conducted, each with eight one-bottle training sessions followed by two two-bottle preference tests without infusions. Food- and water-restricted groups displayed similar preferences for the MSG-paired flavor. When non-reinforced testing was continued after the second cycle, the food-restricted group sustained its preference across three 2-day tests, but water-restricted rats lost their preference. Other food-restricted rats learned to prefer a flavor paired with intraduodenal infusion, indicating that gastric stimulation by MSG is not required. A third experiment showed that adding 2 mM of the nucleotide inosine monophosphate to the IG infusion of MSG did not significantly enhance flavor conditioning. Because MSG-based flavor preferences can be obtained with infusions that bypass the stomach, the site for detecting MSG reinforcement may be intestinal.

Post-oral infusion sites that support glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats

Rats learn to prefer a flavored solution (CS+) paired with a gastrointestinal glucose infusion over an alternate flavor (CS-) paired with a non-caloric infusion. Prior work implicates a post-gastric site of glucose action, which is the focus of this study. In Exp. 1, male rats (8-10/group) were infused in the duodenum (ID), mid-jejunum (IJ), or distal ileum (II) with 8% glucose or water as they drank saccharin-sweetened CS+ and CS- solutions, respectively, in one-bottle 30-min sessions. Two-bottle tests (no infusions) were followed by a second train-test cycle. By the second test, the ID and IJ groups preferred the CS+ (69%, 67%) to the CS- but the II group did not (48%). Satiation tests showed that ID and IJ infusions of glucose reduced intake of a palatable solution similarly, while II infusions were ineffective. In Exp. 2, rats (10/group) drank CS solutions in one-bottle, 30-min sessions and were given 2-h ID or hepatic portal vein (HP) infusions. The CS+ and CS- were paired with 10 ml infusions of 10% glucose and 0.9% saline, respectively. Following 8 training sessions, the ID group preferred the CS+ (67%) to the CS- but the HP group did not (47%) in a two-bottle test. The similar CS+ preferences displayed by ID and IJ, but not II groups implicate the jejunum as a critical site for glucose-conditioned preferences. A pre-absorptive glucose action is indicated by the CS+ preference displayed by ID but not HP rats in Exp. 2. Our data were obtained with non-nutritive CS solutions. HP glucose infusions are reported to condition preferences for a flavored food that itself has pre- and post-absorptive actions. Thus, there may be multiple sites for glucose conditioning with the upper or mid-intestines being the first site of action.

Flavor-nutrient learning is less rapid with fat than with carbohydrate in rats

Flavor-nutrient learning occurs when the post-ingestive consequences of a food are associated with its flavor. As a signal of the food's energy density, flavor-nutrient associations have the potential to contribute to the regulation of meal size. While all calorie sources (fat, carbohydrate, protein, ethanol) can support flavor-nutrient learning, prior research has found that flavor-nutrient associations based on fat may require higher nutrient concentrations and more rigorous experimental protocols than are required to train carbohydrate (cho)-based associations. To further explore potential macronutrient-specific differences in flavor-nutrient learning, the present study compared the time course of acquisition of cho- and fat-based associations. Rats were trained to associate distinctive flavors with high-density (3.2 kcal/mL) and low-density (0.2 kcal/mL) orally-consumed solutions, either fat (corn oil emulsion) or carbohydrate (sucrose). For each nutrient, both within- and between-group designs were used to assess (via two-bottle preference testing) whether flavor-nutrient learning had occurred after 2, 4, or 6 training trial pairs. Rats trained with carbohydrate demonstrated preferential intake of the low-density paired flavor after only 2 training pairs; in contrast, rats trained with fat required 6 training pairs. These findings demonstrate differential rapidity of acquisition flavor-nutrient associations. The longer time course of acquisition of fat-based flavor-nutrient associations may be yet another mechanism by which high-fat foods promote overeating.

Potentiation of taste and extract stimuli in conditioned flavor preference learning

In these experiments, we investigated the nature of potentiation in the conditioned flavor preference paradigm. Almond and banana extracts, which have strong odor components, were combined with salt and saccharin (liked tastes; Experiment 1) or quinine and citric acid (disliked tastes; Experiment 2) in a flavor preference procedure that mixed these solutions with a caloric reinforcer (polycose). The results showed that liked tastes potentiated preference conditioning to extracts (Experiment 1), whereas extracts potentiated preference conditioning to disliked tastes (Experiment 2). In both experiments, the presumably less liked stimulus (i.e., the extract in Experiment 1 and the disliked taste in Experiment 2) was the potentiated cue.

Learned flavor preferences. The variable potency of post-oral nutrient reinforcers

The notion that preferences for flavors paired with various nutrients can be attributed simply to their energy content ("flavor-calorie learning") is belied by variation in nutrient reinforcing potency. Fructose, fat and ethanol, all regarded as powerful contributors to food and fluid preferences, are less potent than glucose when their orosensory effects are bypassed. Conditioning studies in animals infused with nutrients as they consume target flavor solutions have shown that the weaker reinforcing effects of these nutrients can be enhanced by various methods that improve the opportunity for associating a flavor with post-oral effects. Until the nature of the reinforcing stimuli is understood, "flavor-nutrient learning" is a better label for these phenomena.

Sucrose taste but not Polycose taste conditions flavor preferences in rats

Rats have an inborn preference for sweet taste and learn to prefer flavors associated with sweetness. They are also strongly attracted to the taste of glucose polymers (e.g., Polycose). This "poly" taste differs in quality from the sweet taste of sugar. To determine if poly taste, like sweet taste, conditions flavor preferences rats were trained with a distinctive flavor (CS+) added to 2% Polycose solution and a different flavor (CS-) added to plain water. In a subsequent two-bottle test the rats did not prefer the CS+ to CS- when both flavors were presented in water. In contrast, other rats significantly preferred a CS+ flavor that had been paired with 2% sucrose. Adding saccharin to a flavored Polycose solution did not improve CS+ flavor learning; rather, Polycose appeared to overshadow saccharin-induced conditioning. Flavor conditioning by a 16% Polycose solution was assessed using a sham-feeding procedure to prevent post-oral reinforcement. Although the rats sham-fed substantial amounts of the CS+ flavored Polycose solution, they failed to prefer the CS+ to the CS- flavor. This contrasts with the preference other rats displayed for a CS+ paired with sham-fed sucrose. Why attractive sweet and poly tastes differ in their ability to condition flavor preferences is not certain, although some findings suggest that they differentially activate dopamine and/or serotonin circuits involved in flavor learning.

Conditioned preference for sweet stimuli in OLETF rat: effects of food deprivation

The Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rat, an outbred strain of Long- Evans Tokushima Otsuka rat (LETO) that lacks CCK-1 receptor expression, is hyperphagic and develops obesity and type-2 diabetes. The present study sought to assess how OLETF rats alter intake, preference, and conditioned preference of palatable solutions after acute food deprivation. Our results show that after 24 h chow restriction, LETO rats increase both sucrose intake and two-bottle sucrose preference relative to their free-fed baseline, whereas OLETF rats do not increase sucrose intake (0.3 M or 1.0 M sucrose) or preference (1.0 M vs. 0.3 M sucrose) when they are food deprived. In contrast, OLETF rats exhibit a higher conditioned flavor preference when sucrose is used as unconditioned stimulus (US) relative to LETO rats, whether overnight food restricted (81% vs. 71% for OLETF and LETO rats, respectively) or free fed (82% vs. 54% for OLETF and LETO rats, respectively) during the test. When a noncaloric saccharin solution is used as US, OLETF rats show a higher preference for the saccharin-associated flavor relative to LETO rats when nondeprived (76% vs. 58% for OLETF and LETO rats, respectively); however, neither strain shows differential conditioned flavor preference for saccharin in the deprivation state during the test. These findings suggest that OLETF rats fail to integrate postabsorptive and orosensory effects of sucrose in a conditioning setting to influence intake. Thus, it appears that OLETF rats form preferences for sucrose based largely on orosensory and hedonic properties of the solution, rather than caloric value.

Energy density and macronutrient composition determine flavor preference conditioned by intragastric infusions of mixed diets

In prior studies rats preferred a flavor (CS+HF) paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of a high-fat diet to a flavor (CS+HC) paired with a high-carbohydrate diet, yet just the opposite preference was observed with pure-nutrient infusions. The present study tested the hypothesis that variations in nutrient density as well as composition influence flavor learning. Animals were trained (22 h/day) with IG infusion of milk-based high-fat and high-carbohydrate liquid diets paired with intakes of flavored, noncaloric CS+ solutions. A third flavor, the CS-, was paired with water infusion. Standard chow was available ad libitum. The rats preferred both CS+ flavors to the CS-, whether the infused diets were dense (HF and HC, 2.1 kcal/ml) or dilute (hf and hc, 0.5 kcal/ml), indicating that all diet infusions were reinforcing. They consumed the CS+hc and CS+hf equally in training, and preferred the CS+hc, showing that at low-energy density carbohydrate was more reinforcing than fat. In contrast, CS+HF intake exceeded that of CS+HC in training, and the rats preferred the CS+HF to the CS+HC. In further tests the rats preferred the CS+HF to the CS+hc, the CS+HF to the CS+hf, and the CS+HC to the CS+hc; i.e., when the diets differed in energy density the flavors associated with the more concentrated infusions were preferred. In the absence of influence by flavor cues from the nutrients themselves, rats' preferences for flavors associated with diets high in fat or carbohydrate are dependent on energy density. The differential satiating effects of fat and carbohydrate may contribute to these density-dependent preferences.

Food deprivation enhances the expression but not acquisition of flavor acceptance conditioning in rats

The postingestive actions of nutrients condition strong flavor preferences in rats and may also enhance flavor acceptance (increase total intake) in some situations. This study determined the impact of food deprivation on flavor preference and acceptance conditioned by intragastric (i.g.) infusions of glucose. Rats fitted with gastric catheters were trained (20 h/day) to associate a CS+ solution (bitter or sour) with i.g. 16% glucose and a CS- solution with water infusions. One group (FR) was food-restricted during the training sessions, while a second group (AL) was given food ad libitum. All rats were given 2-h access to food prior to the daily sessions. During one-bottle training, the FR rats consumed substantially more CS+ than CS- whereas AL rats drank only slightly more CS+ than CS-. In additional one-bottle acceptance tests, the FR and AL rats consumed substantially more CS+ than CS- when both groups were food-restricted, but only slightly more CS+ than CS- when both groups had food ad libitum. Throughout the experiment, the FR and AL rats displayed equally strong CS+ preferences in two-bottle choice tests irrespective of their deprivation state during the test. The findings indicate that food restriction stimulates the intake of a CS+ flavor that is (or was previously) paired with i.g. glucose infusions but does not fundamentally alter the learned association between the CS+ flavor and the post-oral nutrient stimulus.

Persistence of preference for a flavor presented in simultaneous compound with sucrose

Rats exposed to a simultaneous compound of a flavor and sucrose subsequently exhibited a preference for the flavor over water. This preference persisted across repeated testing even though the flavor was presented in the absence of sucrose. The preference did, however, extinguish if the rats were hungry when trained or tested, or if they had been reexposed to sucrose between training and test. Though failing to extinguish the preference, presentation of the flavor outside the compound protected it from the effects of sucrose devaluation, indicating that these presentations extinguished the within-compound association between the flavor and sucrose. The authors conclude that the hedonic reaction elicited by sucrose imbues the flavor with the same hedonic properties, and these properties maintain the preference independently of the flavor-sucrose association.

The relationship between food reward and satiation revisited

The postingestive satiating action of food is often viewed as producing a positive affective state that rewards eating. However, in an early test of this idea, Van Vort and Smith [Physiol. Behav. 30 (1983) 279] reported that rats did not learn to prefer a food that was "real-fed" and satiating over a food that was "sham-fed" and not satiating. Subsequent investigators obtained similar findings with concentrated nutrient sources. With dilute nutrient sources, however, rats learned to prefer the real-fed to the sham-fed food. These and other findings demonstrate that nutrients have rewarding postingestive effects that enhance food preferences via a conditioning process. These reward effects appear separate from the satiating actions of nutrients, which may actually reduce food reward. Food intake and preference are controlled by a complex interaction of positive and negative signals generated by nutrients in the mouth and at postingestive sites.

Fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration

Previous studies indicate that fructose postingestive reward for flavor preference learning is weaker than that of glucose. The present experiments explored the effects of several variables that modulate the response to fructose. In Experiment 1, ad libitum fed male rats were trained in 22 h sessions with one flavor (the CS+) paired with intragastric infusions of 7.18% fructose and another flavor (the CS-) paired with intragastric water infusion. Subsequent preference for the CS+ relative to the CS- was 90% with saccharin-sweetened flavors and only 67% with nonsweet flavors. Experiments 2 (males) and 3 (females) examined the effects of taste quality on conditioning with 16% fructose infusions. Males and females both preferred the sweet CS+ flavor (71-72%). In contrast, males avoided the nonsweet CS+ flavor (31%) and females were indifferent (47%). The different preference patterns were accompanied by differences in sweet and nonsweet training intakes and bout patterns, suggesting stimulation of intake with sweet flavor and 7.18% fructose, and satiating effects of 16% fructose. The sex difference in response to nonsweet flavors may reflect a greater sensitivity of male rats to fructose's postingestive satiating or aversive effects. Possible mechanisms for the sweet-taste enhancement of conditioning include increasing CS intakes in training, facilitating fructose metabolism and increasing flavor salience.

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric ethanol with limited access training

In a prior study, ad libitum fed rats learned a strong preference (90%) for a flavored saccharin solution (conditioned stimulus, CS+) paired with concurrent intragastric (IG) infusions of 5% ethanol over another flavor (CS-) paired with water infusions in unlimited access sessions (22 h/day). The present study expanded the investigation of ethanol-conditioned preferences to limited access sessions (30 min/day). Experiment 1 revealed that ad lib or food-restricted rats failed to develop a CS+ preference using the same CS solutions (0.05% Kool-Aid+0.2% saccharin) and IG infusions that were effective with long-term training. Experiments 2 and 3 mimicked the parameters from a report of successful ethanol conditioning in deprived rats: ethanol (0.5 g/kg) or water was infused intragastrically 5 min before access to sweetened CS solutions flavored with HCl or NaCl. Rats learned to prefer the ethanol-paired CS+ when the flavors were mixed with 5% sucrose but not when mixed with 0.2% saccharin. Experiment 4 revealed that 5% sucrose solutions flavored with 0.25% Kool Aid also supported flavor preference conditioning by IG ethanol (0.5 g/kg). CS+ preferences were obtained in rats trained with ethanol infused 5 min before or concurrent with CS+ intake, but not in rats trained with ethanol infused 30 min before CS+ intake. These data confirm that flavor preferences can be conditioned by IG ethanol using a limited access procedure. However, in contrast to 22 h/day training, 30 min/day training requires more intense CS flavors and a nutritive sweetener. The preference reinforcing actions of ethanol may develop slowly and are thus most effective with long training sessions or when intense CS flavors are used in short training sessions.

Selective effects of vagal deafferentation and celiac-superior mesenteric ganglionectomy on the reinforcing and satiating action of intestinal nutrients

The role of vagal afferents and splanchnic fibers in nutrient-induced flavor conditioning and feeding suppression was determined. Male rats were fitted with intraduodenal (ID) catheters and given subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation (SDA), celiac-superior mesenteric ganglionectomy (CGX), combined (COM) treatments, or sham surgery. In separate conditioning trials, they were trained to drink (30 min/day) flavored saccharin solutions paired with concurrent ID infusions of 8% maltodextrin or water and 3.55% corn oil or water. Experiment 1 revealed that SDA and sham rats showed equal preferences for the nutrient-paired flavors over the water-paired flavors. In contrast, SDA rats, unlike sham rats, failed to suppress their intake of a palatable fluid when infused intraduodenally with maltodextrin or corn oil. Experiment 2 revealed that CGX, COM and sham rats all developed preferences for the maltodextrin-paired flavor, although CGX alone or COM attenuated the conditioned preference. CGX and COM treatments also attenuated or blocked the feeding inhibitory actions of ID nutrient infusions. These findings along with prior data indicate that gut vagal afferents and splanchnic nerves are not essential for flavor-nutrient preference conditioning, whereas both vagal afferents and splanchnic nerves are implicated in carbohydrate- and fat-induced satiation.

Flavor quality and ethanol concentration affect ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences

A previous report showed that outbred rats acquired preferences for a sweetened conditioned stimulus (CS) flavor paired with intragastric ethanol. To evaluate the role of sweet taste in ethanol conditioning, this study compared training with sweetened and unsweetened flavors. In Experiment 1, nondeprived rats were trained to drink one flavored solution (CS+, e.g., grape) paired with intragastric infusion of 5% ethanol and another (CS-, e.g., cherry) paired with intragastric water on alternate days. The volume of ethanol solution infused was matched to the volume of flavored solution the rats consumed. The sweet group's flavors initially contained 0.2% saccharin, reduced to 0.1%, 0.05%, and 0% over days; the plain group's flavors were unsweetened. The sweet group drank more and self-infused more ethanol during training and its preference for the CS+ over the CS- (without saccharin) exceeded that of the plain group (75% versus 62%). Experiment 2 equated total ethanol intake in rats trained with two combinations of flavor quality and ethanol concentration. The Sweet5 group drank flavors with 0.2% saccharin throughout training and tests and received 5% ethanol when they drank CS+, while the Plain10 group drank unsweetened flavors and the CS+ was paired with 10% ethanol. Despite equal daily ethanol doses, the Sweet5 group strongly preferred the CS+ (89%) while the Plain10 group avoided it (31%). The two groups continued to show opposite CS+ preference profiles even when both were tested with sweet CS flavors and 10% ethanol infusions. Thus, sweet taste contributes to the development of ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences, and this effect is not explained by a simple enhancement of ethanol intake.

Flavor avoidance induced by LiCl and dexfenfluramine in rats and mice using nondeprivation protocols

Using dexfenfluramine as unconditional stimulus (US), the authors confirmed that sham-operated and area postrema (AP)-lesioned rats form comparable conditioned flavor avoidances. When lithium chloride (LiCI) was used as the US, AP-lesioned rats did not learn to avoid a drug-paired flavor conditional stimulus (CS+). Sham-operated, but not AP-lesioned, rats had low intakes of the placebo-paired flavor (CS-), which suggests that the lesions disrupted generalization of avoidance. Generalized avoidance in intact rats was similar when either sweetened milk or Polycose was used as the caloric vehicle for the CSs. When flavored gels of Polycose were used as CSs, C57BL/6J mice developed flavor avoidance with either LiCl or dexfenfluramine as US. Compared with rats, mice required higher doses of these agents, avoidance was not complete after many pairings, and there was no generalization to the CS-.

Flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose depend upon training and testing methods: two-bottle tests revisited

In confirmation of prior work, rats given one-bottle training with flavored 5% and 30% sucrose solutions (CS5 and CS30) strongly preferred the CS5 when both flavors were presented in intermediate 17.5% sucrose solutions. The CS5 preference has been attributed to a conditioned satiety response to the CS30 flavor, but equal intakes of CS5 and CS30 in one-bottle tests did not support this view. To determine if sweetness differences between training and test solutions contributed to the CS5 preference, new rats were trained and tested with flavored 10% sucrose solutions. One flavor (CS5) was paired with matched intragastric (ig) water infusions (=net 5% solution) and another flavor (CS30) was paired with matched infusions of 50% sucrose (=net 30% solution) during one-bottle training. In two-bottle tests with both flavors paired with an intermediate infusion (25%=net 17.5%), the rats initially showed no overall preference for the CS5 or CS30. Following additional training, the rats significantly preferred the CS30 to the CS5. The intragastric data suggested that a change in sweet taste context between training and testing might have accounted for the strong CS5 preference obtained in the first experiment. This was confirmed in a third experiment in which rats were trained with flavored 5% and 30% sucrose solutions and then given two-bottle tests with both flavors presented either in 5% sucrose or 30% sucrose. Rats tested with 30% sucrose strongly preferred the CS5 flavor, whereas rats tested with 5% sucrose significantly preferred the CS30 flavor. Thus, the outcome of two-bottle flavor preference tests and presumably other tests of conditioned flavor reward may be greatly influenced by the solutions used in the tests. The impact of this variable may be greatest when the training solutions do not substantially differ in their net postingestive reinforcing actions. This appears to be the case with 5% and 30% sucrose solutions because the satiating effect of the concentrated solution tends to counteract its nutrient reinforcing action.

Parabrachial nucleus lesions block taste and attenuate flavor preference and aversion conditioning in rats

Rats with ibotenic acid lesions of the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) failed to learn a taste aversion induced by lithium chloride (LiCl) toxicosis. The same rats also did not learn to prefer a taste that was paired with intragastric (IG) carbohydrate infusions during 22 hr/day trials. The PBN-lesioned rats did learn to prefer a flavor (odor + taste) paired with the IG carbohydrate infusions over a different flavor paired with IG water. The PBN-lesioned rats also learned to avoid a flavor paired with IG LiCl infusions during 22 hr/day trials. The flavor preference and aversion, however, were less pronounced than those displayed by control rats. These data indicate that the PBN is essential for forming orosensory-viscerosensory associations when taste is the primary cue but is less critical when more complex flavor cues are available.

Post-ingestive positive controls of ingestive behavior

Post-ingestive negative controls of ingestive behavior are well characterized. Nutrients act in the gut to inhibit meal size by direct actions on feeding and by conditioning a satiation response to orosensory (flavor) stimuli. Accumulating evidence indicates that there are also post-ingestive positive controls of ingestion that operate by conditioning flavor preference and increased acceptance. In several experiments rats trained to consume a flavored solution paired with intragastric carbohydrate infusions significantly increased their solution intake. Drinking bout size and number, and lick rates and burst size were also increased by carbohydrate infusions. Whether intake is stimulated or inhibited by post-ingestive nutrient actions depends upon several factors, including most notably nutrient concentration. Post-ingestive positive controls need to be incorporated into theoretical models of ingestive behavior.

Naltrexone fails to block the acquisition or expression of a flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions

The effects of naltrexone on the expression and acquisition of flavor preferences conditioned by the postingestive actions of carbohydrates were investigated. Food-restricted rats (Experiment 1) were given one-bottle training with one flavored saccharin solution (CS+) paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of 16% sucrose, and another flavored saccharin solution (CS-) paired with water infusions. In two-bottle tests CS+ was preferred to CS-, and naltrexone (1.0-5.0 mg/kg) reduced total intake but not CS+ preference. In Experiment 2 food-restricted rats that received naltrexone (0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg; NTX group) throughout one-bottle training consumed less CS+ and CS- than did saline-treated control rats. Yet, the NTX and control groups displayed similar CS+ preferences during two-bottle tests when treated with saline or naltrexone (0.1-5.0 mg/kg). In Experiment 3, rats were trained to accept more CS+ than CS- in one-bottle tests. Naltrexone (0.1-2.5 mg/kg) reduced the one-bottle intakes of both solutions, and the rats continued to consume more CS+ than CS-. We conclude that the opioid system modulates the consumption of flavored solutions, but is not critically involved in the acquisition or expression of flavor preferences conditioned by IG carbohydrate.

Food-conditioned odour rejection in the late stages of the meal, mediating learnt control of meal volume by aftereffects of food consumption

In a two-bottle choice test, rats drank more of the fluid having a novel odour than that having an odour which had previously been presented in the later part of meals on concentrated maltodextrin solution. Rats are normally more averse to a novel odour than to a familiar odour; therefore, the conditioned reaction to the odour acquired in these circumstances is likely to be an ingestive aversion, rather than merely a lack of preference. Furthermore, this learnt odour rejection was seen only in the second half of the meal, indicating that it is dependent on an ingestion-induced state of repletion. Together then, these observations are evidence that the volume of meals rich in carbohydrate can be controlled by learnt rejection of particular food flavours in the presence of visceral cues specific to repletion (previously dubbed "conditioned satiety"), the only known mechanism by which aftereffects of ingested energy could reduce meal volume.

Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference, and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose, and fructose in rats

The postingestive reinforcing and satiating effects of intragastric (i.g.) infusions of 16% galactose, glucose, and fructose were compared in adult female rats. In Experiment 1, food-restricted rats were trained to drink (30 min/day) flavored solutions (the CS+Gal and CS+Glu) paired with intragastric (i.g.) infusions of galactose and glucose; other flavors (the CS-) were paired with IG water infusions. In subsequent choice tests, the rats strongly preferred (91%) the CS+Glu to the CS-, but avoided the CS+Gal (21%) in favor of the CS-. In Experiment 2, the rats were trained with a CS+Fru paired with i.g. fructose infusions and a CS- paired with i.g. water. In the choice test they consumed similar amounts of CS+Fru and CS- (CS+Fru preference = 51%). In other choice tests they preferred the CS+Glu (>80%) to CS+Fru and CS+Gal, and the CS+Fru (81%) to CS+Gal. Satiation tests were performed in Experiment 3 by adapting the rats to drink a 3% sugar + 0.2% saccharin solution paired with i.g. water infusions (30 min/day). On different test days 16% sugar instead of water was infused. IG galactose, glucose, and fructose produced comparable reductions in sugar+saccharin intake in the first test session. These findings demonstrate that, while the three sugars had similar satiating effects, they differed substantially in their postingestive flavor conditioning effects. The glucose and fructose results confirm prior data indicating that only glucose generates potent postingestive reinforcing stimuli. The galactose-induced flavor avoidance indicates that this sugar has a negative postingestive consequence. This may be due to the slow and incomplete hepatic metabolism of this sugar in adult rats. Conceivably, galactose intolerance may contribute to the lactose avoidance in adult animals.

Flavor preferences conditioned by high-fat versus high-carbohydrate diets vary as a function of session length

Intragastric (i.g.) infusions of fat and carbohydrate condition flavor preferences in rats, but different results have been obtained in studies using pure and mixed nutrient infusions. This experiment compared the preference conditioning effects of mixed high-carbohydrate (HC) and high-fat (HF) diet infusions during short-term and long-term sessions. In Experiment 1 food-deprived rats were given one flavored saccharin solution (CS+HC) paired with i.g. infusions of an HC liquid diet, a second flavor (CS+HF) paired with HF diet infusions, and a third flavor (CS-) paired with i.g. water infusions during 30-min one-bottle training sessions. In subsequent two-bottle tests (30 min/day), the rats preferred both CS+s to the CS- and preferred the CS+HC to the CS+HF. In Experiment 2, the same rats were trained and tested with the CSs and paired infusions during 22 h/day sessions with chow available ad lib. Both CS+s were again preferred to the CS-, but now the CS+HF was preferred to the CS+HC. When given additional 30-min choice sessions in Experiment 3 the rats showed no reliable preference for the CS+HC versus CS+HF under food-deprived or ad lib conditions. In Experiment 4, the rats were given 22-h CS+HC versus CS+HF choice sessions every other day. They showed no reliable CS preference during the first 30 min of each session, but reliably preferred the CS+HF during the remaining 21.5 h. These findings indicate that previously reported differences in preferences conditioned by pure versus mixed nutrient infusions are due to training procedures (session length, deprivation state) rather than to the type of nutrient infusions per se. The rats displayed different CS+HF versus CS+HC preferences as a function of test duration even after being given both short- and long-term training. Thus, short-term choice tests do not always predict the long-term intakes and preferences for high-fat and high-carbohydrate foods.

Differential reinforcing and satiating effects of intragastric fat and carbohydrate infusions in rats

Food intake and preferences are modulated by the postingestive satiating and reinforcing actions of nutrients. This experiment compared the feeding effects of isocaloric intragastric (i.g.) carbohydrate (maltodextrin) and fat (corn oil) infusions in food-restricted rats fed low-fat (12% fat kcal) or high-fat (48% fat kcal) diets. In Experiment 1, the rats were given one flavored saccharin solution (CS+C) paired with i.g. carbohydrate infusions, a second flavor (CS+F) paired with i.g. fat infusions, and a third flavor (CS-) paired with i.g. water infusions during 30-min one-bottle training sessions. In subsequent two-bottle tests, the rats preferred both CS+s to the CS- (68-83%) and the CS+C to the CS+F (68-70%). In Experiment 2, the feeding inhibitory effects of the nutrient infusions on an ongoing meal (satiation test) or a subsequent meal (satiety test) were compared. The intake of a palatable Polycose+saccharin solution was suppressed by a concurrent carbohydrate infusion but not by a fat infusion. Also, i.g. carbohydrate preloads suppressed the intake of a subsequent (30-180 min) mixed carbohydrate+fat test meal more than did i.g. fat preloads. The satiety effects of the fat preloads were more pronounced in rats fed the low-fat diet than in rats fed the high-fat maintenance diet. Diet composition did not reliably influence the preference conditioning and satiation effects of the nutrient infusions. These results confirm prior reports that fat is less satiating than carbohydrate, and further demonstrate that i.g. carbohydrate infusions condition a stronger flavor preference than fat infusions.

High-fat diet preference and overeating mediated by postingestive factors in rats

The role of postingestive factors in the preference for and overconsumption of high-fat (HF) foods, relative to high-carbohydrate (HC) foods, was investigated using a self-regulated intragastric feeding procedure. On one-bottle training days, rats drank one flavored saccharin solution [conditioned stimulus (CS) + HF] paired with intragastric infusions of an HF liquid diet, a second flavored solution (CS+HC) paired with an HC liquid diet, and a third flavored solution (CS-) paired with intragastric water. The diets had the same energy and protein content; the CS solutions and infusions along with chow were available ad libitum. The rats drank more CS and self-infused more diet on HF than HC training days. In two-bottle choice tests, the rats preferred the CS+HF to the CS+HC and both CS+HF and CS+HC to the CS-. The rats consumed more CS+HF than CS+HC by taking more bouts per day; bout sizes did not reliably differ. In a subsequent experiment, rats preferred the CS+HF even though diet intakes in training were matched. In a final experiment, the CS+HC and CS+HF intakes were equated in training by diluting the HC diet. Now the rats did not reliably prefer the CS+HF to the CS+HC, yet caloric intakes were much higher on CS+HF than CS+HC training days. Thus, relative to an isocaloric HC diet, the postingestive effects of HF diets stimulate overeating and condition a stronger flavor preference. Reduced satiety rather than increased reinforcement may be the direct promoter of overeating. However, postingestive reinforcement may enhance the selection of HF foods when a choice of HF and HC foods is available.

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric sugar infusions in rats: maltose is more reinforcing than sucrose

Prior research indicates that glucose conditions much stronger flavor preferences in rats than does fructose. This could occur because intestinal absorption of fructose is much slower than that of glucose and because fructose malabsorption may have aversive consequences. Fructose absorption is facilitated when glucose is also present in the gut. The present study therefore compared the flavor conditioning effects of maltose (a glucose + glucose disaccharide) to those of sucrose (a glucose + fructose disaccharide). In Experiment 1, rats had different flavors paired with intragastric infusions of 32% maltose (CS+M), 32% sucrose (CS+S), and water (CS-) 23 h/day. In subsequent two-bottle tests, both CS+ solutions were strongly preferred to the CS-, but the CS+M was also preferred (78%) to the CS+S. Experiment 2A revealed that the rats also learned to prefer a CS+M to a CS+S when 16% sugar infusions were used. In Experiment 2B, the same rats preferred a flavor paired with 16% maltose to a flavor paired with 8% maltose. They did not reliably prefer a flavor paired with 16% sucrose to a flavor paired with 8% maltose. These results demonstrate that the postingestive actions of maltose are more reinforcing than those of sucrose. This indicates that fructose is less reinforcing than glucose even when malabsorption is not a factor. In contrast to their preference for the CS+M over the CS+S, the rats preferred sucrose to maltose when drinking the sugars by mouth. Therefore, sugar preferences mediated by oral taste receptors differ from those conditioned by postoral nutrient detectors.

Increased flavor acceptance and preference conditioned by the postingestive actions of glucose

In Experiment 1, rats were given daily 2-h access to chow and water and 20-h access to flavored solutions (cherry or grape). On alternate days, one flavor (CS+) was paired with intragastric infusions of 16% glucose and another flavor (CS-) with IG water. In subsequent choice tests, the rats strongly preferred (95%) the CS+ to the CS-. CS+ intake also greatly exceeded CS- intake during one-bottle training sessions (71 vs. 18 g/20 h). This increased acceptance was due to both increased bout size and number. When CS+ was paired with IG water (extinction test), CS+ bout size declined to CS- levels, while CS+ bout number and total intake remained elevated. In Experiment 2, rats trained with sucrose octa acetate and citric acid solutions also showed increased CS+ acceptance and preference in one- and two-bottle tests, respectively. The rats also consumed more CS+ than CS- during short-term (30 min/day) one-bottle tests and intraoral intake tests under both deprived and ad lib. feeding conditions. These results demonstrate that the postingestive actions of glucose can condition substantial increases in flavor acceptance as well as flavor preference.

Evidence that oral and nutrient reinforcers differentially condition appetitive and consummatory responses to flavors

Rats tend to increase their intake of a flavor that has previously been paired with either sweet taste or with caloric repletion. However, it is unclear whether such a change in intake is caused by changes in appetitive behaviors such as orienting and approach, or changes in consummatory behaviors and oral responsiveness. Also, it is unclear whether oral reinforcers (sweetness) and postingestive reinforcers (nutrients) lead to the same kinds of behavioral change. In the current experiments, weanling rats with oral and gastric cannulas repeatedly experienced a flavor paired with either sweetness, high caloric density, or neither. Rats were then tested for differences in appetitive olfactory orienting and consummatory oral responsiveness elicited by the flavor. Results suggest that oral reinforcement (sweetness) produces conditioning of appetitive responding to the flavor, while postingestive reinforcement produces conditioning of consummatory responding. A second experiment indicates that these behavioral changes are specific increases in responsiveness conditioned by flavor + unconditioned stimulus (US) pairing, and are unlikely to be nonspecific effects of daily unconditioned stimulus exposure.