1
|
Caronna E, Gallardo VJ, Egeo G, Vázquez MM, Castellanos CN, Membrilla JA, Vaghi G, Rodríguez-Montolio J, Fabregat Fabra N, Sánchez-Caballero F, Jaimes Sánchez A, Muñoz-Vendrell A, Oliveira R, Gárate G, González-Osorio Y, Guisado-Alonso D, Ornello R, Thunstedt C, Fernández-Lázaro I, Torres-Ferrús M, Alpuente A, Torelli P, Aurilia C, Pére RL, Castrillo MJR, Icco RD, Sances G, Broadhurst S, Ong HC, García AG, Campoy S, Sanahuja J, Cabral G, Beltrán Blasco I, Waliszewska-Prosół M, Pereira L, Layos-Romero A, Luzeiro I, Dorado L, Álvarez Escudero MR, May A, López-Bravo A, Martins IP, Sundal C, Irimia P, Lozano Ros A, Gago-Veiga AB, Juanes FV, Ruscheweyh R, Sacco S, Cuadrado-Godia E, García-Azorín D, Pascual J, Gil-Gouveia R, Huerta-Villanueva M, Rodriguez-Vico J, Viguera Romero J, Obach V, Santos-Lasaosa S, Ghadiri-Sani M, Tassorelli C, Díaz-de-Terán J, Díaz Insa S, Oria CG, Barbanti P, Pozo-Rosich P. Redefining migraine prevention: early treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies enhances response in the real world. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2024; 95:927-937. [PMID: 38777579 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-333295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP MAbs) are approved and available treatments for migraine prevention. Patients do not respond alike and many countries have reimbursement policies, which hinder treatments to those who might respond. This study aimed to investigate clinical factors associated with good and excellent response to anti-CGRP MAbs at 6 months. METHODS European multicentre, prospective, real-world study, including high-frequency episodic or chronic migraine (CM) patients treated since March 2018 with anti-CGRP MAbs. We defined good and excellent responses as ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in monthly headache days (MHD) at 6 months, respectively. Generalised mixed-effect regression models (GLMMs) were used to identify variables independently associated with treatment response. RESULTS Of the 5818 included patients, 82.3% were females and the median age was 48.0 (40.0-55.0) years. At baseline, the median of MHD was 20.0 (14.0-28.0) days/months and 72.2% had a diagnosis of CM. At 6 months (n=4963), 56.5% (2804/4963) were good responders and 26.7% (1324/4963) were excellent responders. In the GLMM model, older age (1.08 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.15), p=0.016), the presence of unilateral pain (1.39 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.60), p<0.001), the absence of depression (0.840 (95% CI 0.731 to 0.966), p=0.014), less monthly migraine days (0.923 (95% CI 0.862 to 0.989), p=0.023) and lower Migraine Disability Assessment at baseline (0.874 (95% CI 0.819 to 0.932), p<0.001) were predictors of good response (AUC of 0.648 (95% CI 0.616 to 0.680)). These variables were also significant predictors of excellent response (AUC of 0.691 (95% CI 0.651 to 0.731)). Sex was not significant in the GLMM models. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest real-world study of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. It provides evidence that higher migraine frequency and greater disability at baseline reduce the likelihood of responding to anti-CGRP MAbs, informing physicians and policy-makers on the need for an earlier treatment in order to offer the best chance of treatment success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor José Gallardo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gabriella Egeo
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Roma, Italy, Italian Migraine Registry (IGRAINE) study group
| | | | | | - Javier A Membrilla
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gloria Vaghi
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Joana Rodríguez-Montolio
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
- Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - Alex Jaimes Sánchez
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Albert Muñoz-Vendrell
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Renato Oliveira
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Gabriel Gárate
- Neurology Department, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Yésica González-Osorio
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Cem Thunstedt
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Iris Fernández-Lázaro
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Torres-Ferrús
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Alpuente
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paola Torelli
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Headache Center, University of Parma, Parma, Italy, Italian Migraine Registry (IGRAINE) study group
| | - Cinzia Aurilia
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Roma, Italy, Italian Migraine Registry (IGRAINE) study group
| | - Raquel Lamas Pére
- Unidad de Cefaleas, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Roberto De Icco
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Grazia Sances
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Hui Ching Ong
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrea Gómez García
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio Campoy
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Viladecans-IDIBELL, Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Sanahuja
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova-IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Gonçalo Cabral
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Isabel Beltrán Blasco
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Departament, Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Liliana Pereira
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
| | - Almudena Layos-Romero
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain
| | - Isabel Luzeiro
- Headache Outpatient Unit, Hospitalar and University Centre of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Coimbra Health School/ESTeSC, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Laura Dorado
- Department of Neuroscience, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Arne May
- University Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alba López-Bravo
- Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Reina Sofía, Tudela, Spain
| | - Isabel Pavão Martins
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Sta Maria, Faculty of Medicine University of Lisbon & Campus Neurologico, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Christina Sundal
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- NorHEAD, Norwegian Headache Research Centre, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Neurology, NeuroClinic, Norway, Lillestrøm, Norway
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Pablo Irimia
- Department of Neurology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alberto Lozano Ros
- Headache Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Velasco Juanes
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Ruth Ruscheweyh
- Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Elisa Cuadrado-Godia
- Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Neuroscience Research Program, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David García-Azorín
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Neurology Department, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Mariano Huerta-Villanueva
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Viladecans-IDIBELL, Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaime Rodriguez-Vico
- Headache Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Victor Obach
- Neurology Department Headache Unit, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sonia Santos-Lasaosa
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
- Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Javier Díaz-de-Terán
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Samuel Díaz Insa
- Headache Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele, Roma, Italy, Italian Migraine Registry (IGRAINE) study group
- University San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Clinic, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fernández-Bravo-Rodrigo J, Cavero-Redondo I, Lucerón-Lucas-Torres M, Martínez-García I, Flor-García A, Barreda-Hernández D, Pascual-Morena C. Real-world effectiveness and safety of erenumab for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pharmacol 2024; 976:176702. [PMID: 38823758 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a common and disabling primary headache disorder. Several drugs targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), such as erenumab (an anti-CGRP receptor mAb), have been developed recently. However, the real-world effects of erenumab are not well understood. OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of erenumab for reducing migraine intensity and frequency in the real world. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to December 2023. Studies estimating the real-world effect of erenumab on monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), headache impact test (HIT-6), number of days in medication (NDM), acute monthly intake (AMI), pain intensity (PI) and safety outcomes were included. Meta-analyses of proportions or mean differences were performed. RESULTS Fifty-three studies were included. At 3-months, the effect was -7.18 days for MMD, -6.89 days for MHD, -6.97 for HIT-6, -6.22 days for NDM, -15.75 for AMI, and -1.71 for PI. Generally, the effect at 6- and 12-months increased slightly and gradually. The MMD/MHD response rates revealed that approximately one-third of patients exhibited a response greater than 30%, while one-sixth demonstrated a response exceeding 50%. Additionally, 3-4% of patients achieved a response rate of 100%. Adverse event rates were 0.34 and 0.43 at 6- and 12-months, respectively. CONCLUSION This study provides strong evidence of the effectiveness and safety of erenumab in the real world; to our knowledge, this is the first real-world meta-analysis specific to erenumab. Erenumab represents a solid therapeutic option for physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Fernández-Bravo-Rodrigo
- Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, 16071, Spain; Pharmacy Service, Hospital Virgen de la Luz, 16002, Cuenca, Spain; Pharmacy Service. Hospital Virgen del Castillo, 30510, Yecla, Murcia, Spain.
| | - Iván Cavero-Redondo
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, 3460000, Chile.
| | | | - Irene Martínez-García
- Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, 16071, Spain.
| | | | | | - Carlos Pascual-Morena
- Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, 16071, Spain; Facultad de Enfermería de Albacete, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, 02006, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al-Hashel JY, Alroughani R, Alshaf F, Ashkanani HK, Akl A, AlMutairi O, Alwazzan S, Ahmed SF. Real-world experiences of migraine patients on Erenumab: a Kuwait single center cohort. Neurol Res 2024; 46:772-780. [PMID: 38909320 DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2024.2354618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a prevalent headache disorder with a significant impact on the quality of life. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of erenumab, mAb targeting the CGRP receptor, in treating chronic (CM) and episodic (EM) migraine in clinical practice Kuwait, providing region-specific insights to treatment options. METHOD This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients diagnosed with EM or CM treated with erenumab. The primary outcome of the study was to assess the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction in monthly mean migraine days, and several changes including the mean number of monthly migraine days, the frequency of analgesic use, attack severity, AEs, and QoL. RESULTS The study included 151 patients with a mean age of 44.0±11.4 years, and 81.9% female. The primary outcome was achieved in 74.2% of patients, with a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in headache frequency, pain severity, analgesic use, and improvement in QoL. Age and duration of migraine were significant predictors of achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in headache frequency after therapy (OR = 0.955; p = 0.009) and (OR = 0.965; p = 0.025), respectively. Treatment compliance was observed in 76.2% of patients, and 24.5% discontinued treatment. Constipation was the most commonly reported AEs (6.0%), and conservative management was the most common approach to managing AEs. CONCLUSION Erenumab was effective in reducing the frequency and severity of migraine attacks and improving QoL, and safe with manageable AEs in a real-world setting in Kuwait. Further research is needed to better understand erenumab's effectiveness and safety in different populations and settings, as well as to compare it with other migraine prophylactic treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasem Youssef Al-Hashel
- Neurology Department, Ibn Sina Hospital, Safat, Kuwait City, Kuwait
- Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Raed Alroughani
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Amiri Hospital, Sharq, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Fatemah Alshaf
- Neurology Department, Ibn Sina Hospital, Safat, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | | | - Amr Akl
- Medicine Department, Farwaniya Hospital, Farwaniya, Kuwait
| | | | - Sawsan Alwazzan
- Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Samar Farouk Ahmed
- Neurology Department, Ibn Sina Hospital, Safat, Kuwait City, Kuwait
- Neuropsychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Minia University, Minia City, Minia, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Almarzooqi A, Zidan M. Impact of Erenumab on Migraine Disability: A Three-Month MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment Scale) Score Analysis at Dubai Health Facilities. Cureus 2024; 16:e67113. [PMID: 39156992 PMCID: PMC11330575 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder causing recurrent headaches that significantly impact daily life. Erenumab, a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, has emerged as a promising treatment for migraine. CGRP is thought to play a role in migraine pathophysiology, and erenumab works by blocking CGRP binding to its receptors. Erenumab has been found to be effective in reducing migraine frequency, with potential benefits for improving patient outcomes. This study investigated the impact of erenumab on migraine disability in patients treated at Dubai Health facilities. We specifically assessed changes in Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores before and after a three-month treatment period. METHODS This retrospective analysis examined data from 26 patients diagnosed with migraine according to the established criteria. All patients received erenumab treatment for three months. MIDAS, a validated tool, was used to quantify migraine-related disability at baseline and after treatment completion. Due to potential skewness in the data distribution, the statistical analysis focused on the median change in MIDAS scores across groups based on gender and erenumab dosage. Non-parametric tests were employed to assess group differences. RESULTS Erenumab treatment resulted in a median decrease of 13 points in MIDAS scores, suggesting a potential improvement in migraine disability at three months. Statistical analysis revealed no statistically significant group differences regarding MIDAS score changes between genders or erenumab dosage groups. However, trends toward improvement were observed in all subgroups. CONCLUSION While not statistically significant due to the limited sample size and the absence of a control group, these findings suggest a potential benefit of erenumab in reducing migraine disability. Future research with more extensive, controlled trials is warranted to definitively assess erenumab's effectiveness and explore potential treatment regimen variations for optimal patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Heintz S, Storch P, Burow P, Maier P, Obermann M, Stoessel G, Kraya T, Naegel S. Erenumab escalation in migraine - double dose without additional benefit - a retrospective experience. Acta Neurol Belg 2024:10.1007/s13760-024-02603-z. [PMID: 39066884 DOI: 10.1007/s13760-024-02603-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody specifically targeting the CGRP-receptor. Several studies showed efficacy and safety in patients with migraine. Less is known regarding dosage increase, especially in a difficult to treat patients. The aim of the study is to evaluate the increased dosage under real world conditions with particular focus on 70 mg non-responders. METHODS In a retrospective analysis, patients treated in tertiary headache centers (Halle or Jena, Germany) receiving 70 mg erenumab for at least 3 months with a dosage increase to 140 mg were analyzed. Data were evaluated regarding headache days, intake of acute medication, previous prophylaxis, and medication overuse. Baseline and all treatment intervals were determined as three-month periods. RESULTS Datasets of 52 migraine patients (90.4% women) aged between 22 and 78 years (mean 50.4 years, SD 12.1 years) were analyzed. At baseline (mean headache-days 15.67 ± 6.37) 51.9% met criteria for chronic migraine and 56% were currently overusing acute medication. While therapy with 70 mg showed significant improvement in headache days and 50% response, further improvement was not achieved for therapy escalation to 140 mg. The same applies to the secondary endpoints and covers the entire study population as well as the subgroups of chronic and episodic migraine. The 50% response of the 70 mg non-responders for escalation was only 5.14%. CONCLUSIONS In this difficult-to-treat patient cohort we reconfirmed the effectiveness of erenumab, but could not detect any additional benefit for a dosage escalation from 70 mg to 140 mg erenumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Heintz
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle- Wittenberg, Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Peter Storch
- Headache Center Jena, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Philipp Burow
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle- Wittenberg, Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Patricia Maier
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle- Wittenberg, Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Mark Obermann
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Weser-Egge, Höxter, Germany
| | - Grit Stoessel
- Headache Center Jena, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Torsten Kraya
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle- Wittenberg, Wittenberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Steffen Naegel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle- Wittenberg, Wittenberg, Germany.
- Department of Neurology, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus Essen, Alfried-Krupp-Straße 21, 45131, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Triller P, Raffaelli B. [Anti-CGRP-based Migraine Medications: A Comprehensive Overview]. FORTSCHRITTE DER NEUROLOGIE-PSYCHIATRIE 2024; 92:277-282. [PMID: 38547904 DOI: 10.1055/a-2276-2239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
In the early 1990s, the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was identified as a key messenger in the pathophysiology of migraine and emerged as a treatment target, fundamentally transforming our approach to migraine therapy. While previous prophylactic drugs were non-specific and often caused intolerable side effects, the discovery of CGRP marked the advent of a new era in migraine treatment. The two main classes of CGRP-specific migraine treatments are monoclonal antibodies that bind to CGRP or the CGRP receptor, and CGRP receptor antagonists, the so-called gepants. Extensive clinical trials have conclusively demonstrated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of monoclonal CGRP(-receptor) antibodies in the prophylactic treatment of both episodic and chronic migraine. The same positive results apply to the use of various gepants. They have proven to be not only an effective alternative to triptans in acute migraine therapy but also promising options for continuous use as prophylactic treatments. In this review, we aim to present the current state of research on CGRP-specific migraine therapy and insights in real-world data from the first years after their launch in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Triller
- Klinik für Neurologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Klinik für Neurologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Özge A, Baykan B, Bıçakçı Ş, Ertaş M, Atalar AÇ, Gümrü S, Karlı N. Revolutionizing migraine management: advances and challenges in CGRP-targeted therapies and their clinical implications. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1402569. [PMID: 38938785 PMCID: PMC11210524 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1402569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Migraine, a prevalent neurological disorder, affects approximately 14.1% of the global population and disproportionately impacts females. This debilitating condition significantly compromises quality of life, productivity, and incurs high healthcare costs, presenting a challenge not only to individuals but to societal structures as a whole. Despite advances in our understanding of migraine pathophysiology, treatment options remain limited, necessitating ongoing research into effective therapies. This review delves into the complexity of migraine management, examining the roles of genetic predisposition, environmental influences, personalized treatment approaches, comorbidities, efficacy and safety of existing acute and preventive treatments. It further explores the continuum between migraine and tension-type headaches and discusses the intricacies of treating various migraine subtypes, including those with and without aura. We emphasize the recent paradigm shift toward trigeminovascular activation and the release of vasoactive substances, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which offer novel therapeutic targets. We assess groundbreaking clinical trials, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives, safety, tolerability, and the real-world application of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants. In the face of persisting treatment barriers such as misdiagnosis, medication overuse headaches, and limited access to specialist care, we discuss innovative CGRP-targeted strategies, the high cost and scarcity of long-term efficacy data, and suggest comprehensive solutions tailored to Turkiye and developing countries. The review offers strategic recommendations including the formulation of primary care guidelines, establishment of specialized outpatient clinics, updating physicians on novel treatments, enhancing global accessibility to advanced therapies, and fostering patient education. Emphasizing the importance of lifestyle modifications and holistic approaches, the review underscores the potential of mass media and patient groups in disseminating critical health information and shaping the future of migraine management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Özge
- Department of Neurology, Algology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Türkiye
| | - B. Baykan
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ş. Bıçakçı
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Türkiye
| | - M. Ertaş
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - A. Ç. Atalar
- Department of Neurology, University Health Sciences, Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - S. Gümrü
- Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - N. Karlı
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Al-Khazali HM, Ashina H, Christensen RH, Wiggers A, Rose K, Iljazi A, Amin FM, Ashina M, Snellman J, Maio-Twofoot T, Schytz HW. Hypersensitivity to CGRP as a predictive biomarker of migraine prevention with erenumab. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024241258734. [PMID: 38859744 DOI: 10.1177/03331024241258734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study aimed to investigate the predictive value of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-induced migraine attacks for effectiveness to erenumab treatment in people with migraine. METHODS In total, 139 participants with migraine underwent a single experimental day involving a 20-min infusion with CGRP. Following this, the participants entered a 24-week treatment period with erenumab. The primary endpoints were the predictive value of CGRP-induced migraine attacks on the effectiveness of erenumab, defined as ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days, or ≥ 50% reduction in either monthly migraine or monthly headache days of moderate to severe intensity. RESULTS Among participants with CGRP-induced migraine attacks, 60 of 99 (61%) achieved ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days during weeks 13-24 with erenumab. Conversely, 13 of 25 (52%) where CGRP infusion did not induce a migraine achieved the same endpoint (p = 0.498). There were no significant differences between the ≥50% reduction in either monthly migraine or monthly headache days of moderate to severe intensity between CGRP-sensitive and non-sensitive participants (p = 0.625). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the CGRP-provocation model cannot be used to predict erenumab's effectiveness. It remains uncertain whether this finding extends to other monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP ligand or to gepants.Trial Registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04592952).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haidar M Al-Khazali
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Håkan Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rune Häckert Christensen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Astrid Wiggers
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kathrine Rose
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Afrim Iljazi
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Faisal Mohammad Amin
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Henrik W Schytz
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Youn MS, Kim N, Lee MJ, Kim M. Treatment Outcome After Switching From Galcanezumab to Fremanezumab in Patients With Migraine. J Clin Neurol 2024; 20:300-305. [PMID: 38713076 PMCID: PMC11076194 DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2023.0311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP-R) have been widely administered to patients with migraine who show inadequate responses to preventive medications. Among patients in whom a particular anti-CGRP-R mAb is ineffective, switching between different anti-CGRP-R mAbs can be the next option. Few studies have investigated treatment outcomes for antibody switching, especially between mAbs with the same target of the CGRP ligand. We aimed to determine the treatment outcome after switching between two anti-CGRP mAbs (galcanezumab to fremanezumab). METHODS We identified migraine patients in a prospective headache clinic registry who received galcanezumab for ≥3 months and were switched to fremanezumab for a further ≥3 months at a single university hospital. We defined a treatment response as a ≥50% reduction in the number of days with a moderate or severe headache at the third month of treatment relative to baseline. The treatment response after switching to fremanezumab was compared with the initial treatment response to galcanezumab. RESULTS Among 21 patients identified in the registry, 7 (33.3%) were initial responders to galcanezumab. After switching to fremanezumab, 7 (33.3%) showed a treatment response. The treatment response rate was 28.6% in the initial responders and 71.4% in the nonresponders to galcanezumab (p>0.999). CONCLUSIONS Switching between anti-CGRP mAbs (galcanezumab to fremanezumab) yielded a treatment outcome comparable to that reported previously when switching from an anti-CGRP-R mAb (erenumab) to an anti-CGRP mAb (galcanezumab or fremanezumab). The treatment response to fremanezumab seems to be independent of the prior treatment response to galcanezumab. Our findings suggest that switching to another anti-CGRP mAb can be considered when a particular anti-CGRP mAb is ineffective or intolerable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Sojung Youn
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Namoh Kim
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Manho Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alabbad S, Figueredo N, Yuan H, Silberstein S. Developments in targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:477-485. [PMID: 38557226 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2332754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapy has revolutionized migraine treatment since its first approval in 2018. CGRP-targeted therapy includes monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and gepants, which modulate trigeminal nociceptive and inflammatory responses, alleviating pain sensitization involved in migraine pathogenesis. CGRP-targeted therapy is effective not only for migraine but also for other chronic headache disorders that share the CGRP pathway. AREAS COVERED The authors review the latest developments and evidence for CGRP-targeted therapy for episodic migraine and chronic migraine. In addition, the authors discuss the emerging evidence on response prediction, menstrual migraine, vestibular migraine, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, post-traumatic headache, and the relationship between selected migraine comorbidities and CGRP. EXPERT OPINION Since the launch of CGRP-targeted therapy, many practical issues have been raised. Generally, it's safe to combine CGRP-targeted mAbs and gepants; this is an excellent option for patients with partial response. When considering stopping CGRP-targeted therapy, although a disease-modifying effect is likely, the optimal time for discontinuation remains unknown. Finally, beyond migraine, CGRP-targeted therapy may be used for other chronic pain disorders and psychological comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sawsan Alabbad
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nathalia Figueredo
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hussein M, Hassan A, Nada MAF, Mohammed Z, Abdel Ghaffar NF, Kedah H, Fathy W, Magdy R. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Arabic version of HIT-6 questionnaire in patients with migraine indicated for preventive therapy: A multi-center study. Headache 2024; 64:500-508. [PMID: 38651363 DOI: 10.1111/head.14719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) is an important patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in migraine prevention trials. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to (i) assess the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of HIT-6 in Arabic-speaking patients experiencing migraine, and (ii) evaluate the responsiveness of HIT-6 following migraine preventive therapy. METHODS In this prospective study, patients with migraine (n = 145) were requested to fill out a headache diary, the Arabic version of HIT-6, and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) at two time points (baseline and 3 months after initiation of prophylactic treatment). Some respondents (n = 73) were requested to fill out HIT-6 again 1 week from the baseline for test-retest reliability. The intensity of migraine headache attacks was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). An anchor-based method was used to establish the minimal important change (MIC) value and responsiveness of HIT-6. RESULTS The total scores of HIT-6 were significantly correlated to a fair degree with MIDAS (r = 0.41), as well as VAS (r = 0.53), and monthly migraine days (r = 0.38) at the baseline while at the follow-up (after 3 months), the correlations were of moderate degree with MIDAS scores (r = 0.62) and monthly migraine days (r = 0.60; convergent validity). Reliability estimates of the Arabic HIT-6 were excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.91 at baseline and 0.89 at follow-up). The average measure interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value for the test-retest reliability was 0.96 (95% confidence interval = 0.94-0.98, p < 0.001). The HIT-6 total score is sensitive to change, being significantly reduced after prophylactic treatment compared to before (effect size = 1.5, standardized response mean = 1.3). A reduction from baseline of 4.5 on HIT-6 showed the highest responsiveness to predict improvement with an area under the curve equal to 0.66, sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 45%, and significance at 0.021. Changes in the HIT-6 total score were positively correlated with changes in monthly migraine days (r = 0.40) and VAS scores (r = 0.69) but not with changes in the score of MIDAS (r = 0.07). CONCLUSION The Arabic version of HIT-6 is valid, reliable, and sensitive to detect clinical changes following migraine prophylactic treatment with a MIC of 4.5 points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Hussein
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Amr Hassan
- Department of Neurology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mona A F Nada
- Department of Neurology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Zeinab Mohammed
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Nawal F Abdel Ghaffar
- Department of Neurology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Wael Fathy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Surgical ICU and Pain Management, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Rehab Magdy
- Department of Neurology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Dolezil D, Paemeleire K, Stepien A, Stude P, Snellman J, Arkuszewski M, Stites T, Ritter S, Lopez Lopez C, Maca J, Ferraris M, Gil-Gouveia R. Early Use of Erenumab vs Nonspecific Oral Migraine Preventives: The APPRAISE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2024; 81:461-470. [PMID: 38526461 PMCID: PMC10964163 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Importance Patients with migraine often cycle through multiple nonspecific preventive medications due to poor tolerability and/or inadequate efficacy leading to low adherence and increased disease burden. Objective To compare the efficacy, tolerability, patient adherence, and patient satisfaction between erenumab and nonspecific oral migraine preventive medications (OMPMs) in patients with episodic migraine (EM) who had previously failed 1 or 2 preventive treatments. Design, Setting, and Participants The 12-month prospective, interventional, global, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized clinical trial comparing sustained benefit of 2 treatment paradigms (erenumab qm vs oral prophylactics) in adult episodic migraine patients (APPRAISE) trial was a 12-month open-label, multicenter, active-controlled, phase 4 randomized clinical trial conducted from May 15, 2019, to October 1, 2021. This pragmatic trial was conducted at 84 centers across 17 countries. Overall, participants 18 years or older with a 12-month or longer history of migraine, and 4 or more but fewer than 15 monthly migraine days (MMDs) were included. Interventions Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive erenumab or OMPMs. Dose adjustment was permitted (label dependent). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the proportion of patients completing 1 year of the initially assigned treatment and achieving a reduction of 50% or greater from baseline in MMDs at month 12. Secondary end points included the cumulative mean change from baseline in MMDs during the treatment period and the proportion of responders according to the Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale at month 12 for patients taking the initially assigned treatment. Results A total of 866 patients were screened, of whom 245 failed the screening and 621 completed the screening and baseline period. Of the 621 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 41.3 [11.2] years; 545 female [87.8%]; 413 [66.5%] in the erenumab group; 208 [33.5%] in the OMPM group), 523 (84.2%) completed the treatment phase, and 98 (15.8%) discontinued the study. At month 12, significantly more patients assigned to erenumab vs OMPM achieved the primary end point (232 of 413 [56.2%] vs 35 of 208 [16.8%]; odds ratio [OR], 6.48; 95% CI, 4.28-9.82; P <.001). Compared with OMPMs, treatment with erenumab showed higher responder rate (314 of 413 [76.0%] vs 39 of 208 [18.8%]; OR, 13.75; 95% CI, 9.08-20.83; P <.001) on the PGIC scale (≥5 at month 12). Significant reduction in cumulative average MMDs was reported with erenumab treatment vs OMPM treatment (-4.32 vs -2.65; treatment difference [SE]: -1.67 [0.35] days; P < .001). Substantially fewer patients in the erenumab arm compared with the OMPM arm switched medication (9 of 413 [2.2%] vs 72 of 208 [34.6%]) and discontinued treatment due to adverse events (12 of 408 [2.9%] vs 48 of 206 [23.3%]). No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrated that earlier use of erenumab in patients with EM who failed 1 or 2 previous preventive treatments provided greater and sustained efficacy, safety, and adherence than continuous OMPM. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03927144.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Dolezil
- Headache Center, Dado Medical sro, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adam Stepien
- Department of Neurology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | - Tracy Stites
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | - Shannon Ritter
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | | | - Jeff Maca
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | | | - Raquel Gil-Gouveia
- Hospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Ferrari MD, Da Silva Lima GP, Mondal S, Kalim J, Hasan F, Wen S, Arkuszewski M, Pandhi S, Stites T, Lanteri-Minet M. Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Participants With Episodic Migraine in Whom 2-4 Prior Preventive Treatments Had Failed: LIBERTY 3-Year Study. Neurology 2024; 102:e209349. [PMID: 38669638 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000209349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The LIBERTY study assessed the efficacy and safety of erenumab in participants with episodic migraine (EM) and 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures. The results have been presented after 3 years of erenumab exposure in its open-label extension phase (OLEP). METHODS Participants completing the 12-week double-blind treatment phase (DBTP) of the LIBERTY study could enter the OLEP and receive 140 mg of erenumab once monthly for 3 years. The main outcomes included the proportion of participants achieving ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs), the mean MMD change from baseline, and tolerability and safety. RESULTS Overall, 240/246 (97.6%) participants entered the OLEP and 168/240 (70.0%) completed the study (85/118 continuing erenumab [n = 1 lost during follow-up]; 83/122 switching from placebo [n = 2 lost during follow-up]). In the overall population, 79/151 participants (52.3%) with valid data points achieved ≥50% reduction in MMDs at week 168 (i.e., responders). In the continuous erenumab group, 35/117 participants (29.9%) were ≥50% responders at week 12 of the DBTP and 26/35 (74.3%) remained ≥50% responders in at least half of OLEP visits. Of the 82/117 participants (70.1%) not achieving responder status at week 12 in the continuous erenumab group, 17/82 (20.7%) converted to ≥50% responders in at least half of OLEP visits. Of 103/120 participants (85.8%) not achieving responder status at week 12 in the placebo-erenumab group, 42/103 (40.8%) converted to ≥50% responders in at least half of OLEP visits after switching to erenumab. Overall, the mean (SD) MMD change from baseline showed sustained improvement over 3 years (-4.4 [3.9] days at week 168). The most common treatment-emergent AEs (per 100 person-years) were nasopharyngitis (28.8), influenza (7.5), and back pain (5.8). Overall, 9.6% (3.9 per 100 person-years) and 6.7% (2.7 per 100 person-years) of participants reported events of treatment-emergent hypertension and constipation, respectively. The safety and tolerability profile remained consistent with earlier studies. DISCUSSION Erenumab (140 mg) showed sustained efficacy over 3 years in participants with EM and 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures. No new safety signals were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03096834.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Reuter
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Michel D Ferrari
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Gabriel Paiva Da Silva Lima
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Subhayan Mondal
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jawed Kalim
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Fatima Hasan
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Shihua Wen
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Michal Arkuszewski
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Shaloo Pandhi
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Tracy Stites
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Michel Lanteri-Minet
- From the Department of Neurology (U.R.), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (U.R.), Germany; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Neurology (M.D.F.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Amgen Inc. (G.P.D.S.L.), Thousand Oaks, CA; Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (S.M., J.K., F.H.), Hyderabad, India; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation (S.W., T.S.), East Hanover, NJ; Novartis Pharma AG (M.A., S.P.), Basel, Switzerland; Pain Department and FHU InovPain (M.L.-M.), CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, France; and INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain (M.L.-M.), Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Naghdi S, Underwood M, Brown A, Matharu M, Duncan C, Davies N, Aksentyte A, Mistry H. Adverse and serious adverse events incidence of pharmacological interventions for managing chronic and episodic migraine in adults: a systematic review. BMJ Neurol Open 2024; 6:e000616. [PMID: 38646505 PMCID: PMC11029425 DOI: 10.1136/bmjno-2023-000616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Migraine is the second most common prevalent disorder worldwide and is a top cause of disability with a substantial economic burden. Many preventive migraine medications have notable side effects that affect different body organs. Method We systematically searched for published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using terms for migraine/headache and preventive medications. Using eligibility criteria, two reviewers independently assessed the articles. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was applied to assess the quality of the studies. Data were classified by system organ class (SOC). Results Thirty-two RCTs with 21 780 participants met the eligibility criteria for the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Additionally, 33 RCTs with 22 615 participants were included to synthesise the incidence of serious AEs (SAEs). The percentage of attributed AEs and SAEs to each SOC for 10 preventive drugs with different dosing regimens was calculated. Amitriptyline and topiramate had a higher incidence of nervous system disorders; Topiramate was also associated with a higher incidence of psychiatric disorders. All drugs showed a certain incidence of infections and infestations, with Onabotulinumtoxin A (BTA) having the lowest rate. BTA had a higher incidence of musculoskeletal disorders than the other drugs. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) such as fremanezumab and galcanezumab were linked to more general disorders and administration site conditions than other drugs. Conclusion Notably, the observed harm to SOCs varies among these preventive drugs. We suggest conducting head-to-head RCTs to evaluate the safety profile of oral medications, BTA, and CGRP MAbs in episodic and/or chronic migraine populations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021265993.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyran Naghdi
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| | - Martin Underwood
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, Coventry, UK
| | - Anna Brown
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Manjit Matharu
- Headache Group, UCL Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Callum Duncan
- Department of Neurology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Natasha Davies
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Aiva Aksentyte
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Hema Mistry
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xu X, Dong L, Zhou J. ELEVATEd hope for patients after migraine treatment failure. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:328-330. [PMID: 38364830 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00072-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaonuo Xu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Liang Dong
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jiying Zhou
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lipton RB. Preventive Treatment of Migraine. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2024; 30:364-378. [PMID: 38568488 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article describes strategies for the preventive treatment of migraine including the emerging role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapies and introduces novel paradigms for the preventive treatment of migraine. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Multiple migraine medications targeting CGRP have been introduced since 2018, including injectable monoclonal antibodies (ie, eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) and oral small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (ie, ubrogepant, rimegepant, atogepant, and zavegepant). With the exceptions of ubrogepant and zavegepant, which are approved only as acute treatments, all of these agents have demonstrated efficacy in the preventive treatment of migraine; the monoclonal antibodies and atogepant have evidence of effectiveness in adults with either episodic or chronic migraine. The safety and tolerability profiles of CGRP-targeted therapies in migraine are favorable. ESSENTIAL POINTS The goals of preventive migraine therapy include reducing the frequency, severity, duration, and disability associated with attacks, reducing the need for acute treatment and the risk of medication overuse, enhancing self-efficacy and health-related quality of life, and reducing headache-related distress and interictal burden. Six drugs targeting CGRP (four monoclonal antibodies and two gepants) are now available for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults. The efficacy of CGRP-targeted medications in the acute and preventive treatment of migraine, together with good safety and tolerability, has led to the emergence of new approaches to preventive treatment.
Collapse
|
17
|
Charles AC, Digre KB, Goadsby PJ, Robbins MS, Hershey A. Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeting therapies are a first-line option for the prevention of migraine: An American Headache Society position statement update. Headache 2024; 64:333-341. [PMID: 38466028 DOI: 10.1111/head.14692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a position statement update from The American Headache Society specifically regarding therapies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) for the prevention of migraine. BACKGROUND All migraine preventive therapies previously considered to be first-line treatments were developed for other indications and adopted later for migraine. Adherence to these therapies is often poor due to issues with efficacy and tolerability. Multiple new migraine-specific therapies have been developed based on a broad foundation of pre-clinical and clinical evidence showing that CGRP plays a key role in the pathogenesis of migraine. These CGRP-targeting therapies have had a transformational impact on the management of migraine but are still not widely considered to be first-line approaches. METHODS Evidence regarding migraine preventive therapies including primary and secondary endpoints from randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials, post hoc analyses and open-label extensions of these trials, and prospective and retrospective observational studies were collected from a variety of sources including PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The results and conclusions based upon these results were reviewed and discussed by the Board of Directors of The American Headache Society to confirm consistency with clinical experience and to achieve consensus. RESULTS The evidence for the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of CGRP-targeting migraine preventive therapies (the monoclonal antibodies: erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab, and the gepants: rimegepant and atogepant) is substantial, and vastly exceeds that for any other preventive treatment approach. The evidence remains consistent across different individual CGRP-targeting treatments and is corroborated by extensive "real-world" clinical experience. The data indicates that the efficacy and tolerability of CGRP-targeting therapies are equal to or greater than those of previous first-line therapies and that serious adverse events associated with CGRP-targeting therapies are rare. CONCLUSION The CGRP-targeting therapies should be considered as a first-line approach for migraine prevention along with previous first-line treatments without a requirement for prior failure of other classes of migraine preventive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew C Charles
- Department of Neurology, UCLA Goldberg Migraine Program, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kathleen B Digre
- Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- Department of Neurology, UCLA Goldberg Migraine Program, Los Angeles, California, USA
- King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew S Robbins
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Hershey
- Department of Pediatrics and Neurology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tassorelli C, Nagy K, Pozo-Rosich P, Lanteri-Minet M, Sacco S, Nežádal T, Guo H, De Abreu Ferreira R, Forero G, Trugman JM. Safety and efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults for whom conventional oral preventive treatments have failed (ELEVATE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:382-392. [PMID: 38364831 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00025-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atogepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, has been approved for the preventive treatment of migraine, but its efficacy and safety in people who have been failed by conventional oral preventive migraine treatments has not yet been evaluated in a dedicated clinical trial. The ELEVATE trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in participants for whom two to four classes of conventional oral preventive treatments have failed. METHODS ELEVATE was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3b trial done at 73 sites in Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Adults (18-80 years) with episodic migraine who had previously been failed by two to four classes of conventional oral treatments for migraine prevention were randomly assigned (1:1) using interactive web response technology to oral atogepant 60 mg once a day or placebo, stratified by baseline monthly migraine days, number of treatment classes participants have been failed by, and region. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days across the 12-week treatment period in the off-treatment hypothetical estimand (OTHE) population, which included participants in the safety population (all participants who received ≥1 dose of study intervention) who had evaluable data available for the baseline period and for one or more of the 4-week post-baseline periods (whether on treatment or off treatment). The primary endpoint was analysed using a mixed model for repeated measures and a fixed-sequence procedure was used to control for multiple comparisons. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04740827) and EudraCT (2019-003448-58), and is completed. FINDINGS Between March 5, 2021, and Aug 4, 2022, 540 participants were screened, 315 were randomly assigned, and 313 participants (280 [89%] female, 33 [11%] male, and 300 [96%] White) received at least one dose of study intervention. In the OTHE population, which comprised 309 participants (155 assigned to placebo and 154 to atogepant), least squares mean changes from baseline in monthly migraine days across 12 weeks were -1·9 (SE 0·4) with placebo and -4·2 (0·4) with atogepant (least squares mean difference -2·4, 95% CI -3·2 to -1·5; adjusted p<0·0001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse event with atogepant was constipation in 16 (10%) of 156 participants (vs four [3%] of 157 for placebo). Serious adverse events occurred in four [3%] of 156 participants in the atogepant group vs none in the placebo group, and treatment-emergent adverse events resulting in treatment discontinuation occurred in three [2%] in the atogepant group vs two [1%] in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION Atogepant 60 mg once a day was safe, well tolerated, and showed significant and clinically relevant reductions in mean monthly migraine days compared with placebo across 12 weeks in patients with episodic migraine who had previously been failed by two to four classes of conventional oral preventive treatments. Atogepant might be an effective preventive treatment option for patients in this difficult-to-treat population. FUNDING Allergan (now AbbVie).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Tassorelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Science, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Centre, IRCCS C Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
| | | | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michel Lanteri-Minet
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Nice, France; INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sara Sacco
- Carolinas Headache Clinic, Matthews, NC, USA
| | - Tomáš Nežádal
- Neurology Department, Military University Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rikos D, Vikelis M, Dermitzakis EV, Soldatos P, Rallis D, Rudolf J, Andreou AP, Argyriou AA. Reporting Quality and Risk of Bias Analysis of Published RCTs Assessing Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1964. [PMID: 38610729 PMCID: PMC11012539 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are vulnerable to many types of bias beyond randomization. Insights into the reporting quality of RCTs involving migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide system (anti-CGRP MAbs) are currently lacking. Our aim was to analyze the reporting quality of phase II/III RCTs involving migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. Methods: A systematic search was performed on the PubMed and EMBASE databases, according to PRISMA guidelines, for relevant RCTs in either episodic or chronic migraine prevention. Additionally, an adapted version of the 2010 CONSORT statement checklist was utilized. The ROBvis online tool was used to document the risk of bias. Results: From the initially identified 179 articles, we finally found 31 RCTs that were eligible for evaluation. The average CONSORT compliance was 88.7% (69.7-100%), while 93.5% (N = 29) of the articles had a compliance greater than 75%. Twenty-eight CONSORT items were reported in more than 75% of the articles. The average compliance of the analyzed RCTs was 93.9% for Galcanezumab, 91.3% for Fremanezumab, followed by 85.4% for Erenumab and Eptinezumab studies. Implementation of the ROB2 tool showed some concerning "missing information" arising from the inadequate reporting. Specifically, 50% of the studies (N = 16) were categorized as having inadequate information regarding the randomization process. Conclusions: Adequate reporting quality was disclosed in the evaluated RCTs with anti-CGRP MAbs in migraine prevention. However, some methodological issues need to be highlighted to be addressed in future studies assessing the efficacy of new molecules targeting CGRP or other candidate pathways implicated in migraine pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michail Vikelis
- Headache Clinic, Mediterraneo Hospital, 16675 Athens, Greece;
| | | | | | - Dimitrios Rallis
- Department of Neurology, Tzaneio General Hospital of Piraeus, 18536 Athens, Greece;
| | - Jobst Rudolf
- Department of Neurology, Papageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 54645 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Anna P. Andreou
- Headache Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK;
- Headache Research-Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE1 1LU, UK
| | - Andreas A. Argyriou
- Headache Outpatient Clinic, Department of Neurology, Agios Andreas General Hospital of Patras, 26335 Patras, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pozo-Rosich P, Poveda JL, Crespo C, Martínez M, Rodríguez JM, Irimia P. Is erenumab an efficient alternative for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine in Spain? Results of a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:40. [PMID: 38491460 PMCID: PMC10943917 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01747-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reimbursement of erenumab in Spain and other European countries is currently restricted because of the cost of this novel therapy to patients with migraine who have experienced previous failures to traditional preventive treatments. However, this reimbursement policy should be preferably based on cost-effectiveness studies, among other criteria. This study performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of erenumab versus topiramate for the prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine (EM) and versus placebo for chronic migraine (CM). METHODS A Markov model with a 10-year time horizon, from the perspective of the Spanish National Healthcare System, was constructed based on data from responder and non-responder patients. A responder was defined as having a minimum 50% reduction in the number of monthly migraine days (MMD). A hypothetical cohort of patients with EM with one or more prior preventive treatment failures and patients with CM with more than two treatment failures was considered. The effectiveness score was measured as an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and cost per migraine day (MD) avoided. Data from clinical outcomes and patient characteristics were obtained from erenumab clinical trials (NCT02066415, STRIVE, ARISE, LIBERTY and HER-MES). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the model. RESULTS After a 10-year follow-up, the estimated QALYs were 5.88 and 6.11 for patients with EM treated with topiramate and erenumab, respectively. Erenumab showed an incremental cost per patient of €4,420 vs topiramate. For CM patients, erenumab resulted in 0.756 QALYs gained vs placebo; and an incremental cost of €1,814. Patients treated with erenumab achieved reductions in MD for both EM and CM (172 and 568 MDs, respectively). The incremental cost per QALY gained with erenumab was below the Spanish threshold of €30,000/QALY for both health and societal perspectives (EM €19,122/QALY and CM €2,398/QALY). CONCLUSIONS Erenumab is cost-effective versus topiramate as a preventive treatment for EM and versus placebo for patients with CM from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Valld'Hebron University Hospital, Ps. Vall d'Hebron 119-12, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
- Headache Research Group, Medicine Departament, VHIR, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - José Luis Poveda
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carlos Crespo
- Axentiva Solutions, Barcelona, Spain
- G.M. Statistics Department, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Pablo Irimia
- Department of Neurology, Headache Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gonzalez-Martinez A, Sanz-García A, García-Azorín D, Rodríguez-Vico J, Jaimes A, Gómez García A, Casas-Limón J, Díaz de Terán J, Sastre-Real M, Membrilla J, Latorre G, Calle de Miguel C, Gil Luque S, Trevino-Peinado C, Quintas S, Heredia P, Echavarría-Íñiguez A, Guerrero-Peral Á, Sierra Á, González-García N, Porta-Etessam J, Gago-Veiga AB. Effectiveness, tolerability, and response predictors of preventive anti-CGRP mAbs for migraine in patients over 65 years old: a multicenter real-world case-control study. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2024; 25:194-202. [PMID: 37847661 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical characteristics, effectiveness, and tolerability of preventive anti- calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in the elderly. Anti-CGRP mAbs have demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with migraine although there is limited information regarding the elderly. DESIGN We performed a multicenter case-control study of cases (patients over 65 years old) and controls (sex-matched patients under 55 years old) with migraine receiving anti-CGRP mAbs. METHODS We included the demographic characteristics, effectiveness-reduction in the number of monthly headache days (MHD) and monthly migraine days (MMD), 30%, 50%, and 75% responder rates-and treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The primary endpoint was the 50% response rate regarding MHD at weeks 20-24; exploratory 50% response predictors in the elderly were evaluated. RESULTS In total, 228 patients were included: 114 cases , 114 controls-. Among cases 84.2% (96/114) were women, 79.8% (91/114) CM; mean age of cases 70.1 years old (range: 66-86); mean age of controls was 42.9 years old(range: 38-49). Cases had a higher percentage of vascular risk factors (P < .05),older age of onset (P < .001) and more reported prior preventive treatments (P < .001). Regarding effectiveness in cases, 50% response rate was achieved by 57.5% (42/73) at 20-24 weeks, with lower reduction in the MHD at 8-12 weeks (5 [7.2], 8 [9.1]; P = .001) and a higher reduction in MMD at 20-24 weeks (10.7 [9.1], 9.2 [7.7]; P = .04) compared to the control group. The percentage of TEAEs was similar in the 2 groups. Diagnosis of episodic migraine (EM) (P = .03) and lower number of MHD at baseline (P = .001) were associated with a 50% response in the elderly in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides real world evidence of effectiveness and safety of anti-CGRP mAbs for migraine in patients without upper age-limit and possible predictors of anti-CGRP response in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain
| | - Ancor Sanz-García
- Data Analysis Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - David García-Azorín
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Jaime Rodríguez-Vico
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Alex Jaimes
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Andrea Gómez García
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Javier Casas-Limón
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid 28922, Spain
| | - Javier Díaz de Terán
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | - María Sastre-Real
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | - Javier Membrilla
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | - Germán Latorre
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Madrid 28942, Spain
| | - Carlos Calle de Miguel
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Madrid 28942, Spain
| | - Sendoa Gil Luque
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Castilla y León 09006, Spain
| | - Cristina Trevino-Peinado
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Leganés, Madrid 28914, Spain
| | - Sonia Quintas
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - Patricia Heredia
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - Ana Echavarría-Íñiguez
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Ángel Guerrero-Peral
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Álvaro Sierra
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Castilla y León 47003, Spain
| | - Nuria González-García
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Jesús Porta-Etessam
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Madrid 28006, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wei S, Lv H, Yang D, Zhang L, Li X, Ning Y, Tang Y, Wu X, Han J. Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions in the treatment of migraine: a bibliometric and visual analysis. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1342111. [PMID: 38379705 PMCID: PMC10878131 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1342111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Migraine imposes a substantial global burden, impacting patients and society. Pharmacotherapy, as a primary treatment, entails specific adverse reactions. Emphasizing these reactions is pivotal for improving treatment strategies and enhancing patients' well-being. Thus, we conducted a comprehensive bibliometric and visual analysis of relevant literature. Methodology We conducted a comprehensive search on the Science Citation Index Expanded within the Web of Science, restricting the literature for analysis based on criteria such as document type, publication date, and language. Subsequently, we utilized various analytical tools, including VOSviewer, Scimago Graphica, the R package 'bibliometrix', CiteSpace, and Excel programs, for a meticulous examination and systematic organization of data concerning journals, authors, countries/regions, institutions, keywords, and references. Results By August 31, 2023, the literature was distributed across 379 journals worldwide, authored by 4,235 individuals from 1726 institutions. It featured 2,363 keywords and 38,412 references. 'HEADACHE' led in publication count, with 'SILBERSTEIN S' as the most prolific author. The United States ranked highest in publication volume, with 'UNIV COPENHAGEN' leading among institutions. Conclusion Our research findings indicate that researchers in the field continue to maintain a focus on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) system and explore diverse mechanisms for drug development through the application of novel biotechnological approaches. Furthermore, it is imperative to enhance the assessment of clinical trial outcomes, consistently monitor the efficacy and safety of prominent drugs such as Erenumab and Fremanezumab. There is a need for further evaluation of acute and preventive treatments tailored to different populations and varying types of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shijie Wei
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Hao Lv
- Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Dianhui Yang
- Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Lili Zhang
- Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Xuhao Li
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Yike Ning
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Yu Tang
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Xinyu Wu
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Jing Han
- Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wei S, Lv H, Yang D, Zhang L, Li X, Ning Y, Tang Y, Wu X, Han J. Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions in the treatment of migraine: a bibliometric and visual analysis. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1342111. [PMID: 38379705 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1342111if:] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine imposes a substantial global burden, impacting patients and society. Pharmacotherapy, as a primary treatment, entails specific adverse reactions. Emphasizing these reactions is pivotal for improving treatment strategies and enhancing patients' well-being. Thus, we conducted a comprehensive bibliometric and visual analysis of relevant literature. METHODOLOGY We conducted a comprehensive search on the Science Citation Index Expanded within the Web of Science, restricting the literature for analysis based on criteria such as document type, publication date, and language. Subsequently, we utilized various analytical tools, including VOSviewer, Scimago Graphica, the R package 'bibliometrix', CiteSpace, and Excel programs, for a meticulous examination and systematic organization of data concerning journals, authors, countries/regions, institutions, keywords, and references. RESULTS By August 31, 2023, the literature was distributed across 379 journals worldwide, authored by 4,235 individuals from 1726 institutions. It featured 2,363 keywords and 38,412 references. 'HEADACHE' led in publication count, with 'SILBERSTEIN S' as the most prolific author. The United States ranked highest in publication volume, with 'UNIV COPENHAGEN' leading among institutions. CONCLUSION Our research findings indicate that researchers in the field continue to maintain a focus on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) system and explore diverse mechanisms for drug development through the application of novel biotechnological approaches. Furthermore, it is imperative to enhance the assessment of clinical trial outcomes, consistently monitor the efficacy and safety of prominent drugs such as Erenumab and Fremanezumab. There is a need for further evaluation of acute and preventive treatments tailored to different populations and varying types of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shijie Wei
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Hao Lv
- Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Dianhui Yang
- Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Lili Zhang
- Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Xuhao Li
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Yike Ning
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Yu Tang
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Xinyu Wu
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Jing Han
- Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
de Vries T, Rubio-Beltrán E, van den Bogaerdt A, Dammers R, Danser AHJ, Snellman J, Bussiere J, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Pharmacology of erenumab in human isolated coronary and meningeal arteries: Additional effect of gepants on top of a maximum effect of erenumab. Br J Pharmacol 2024. [PMID: 38320397 DOI: 10.1111/bph.16322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Multiple drugs targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor have been developed for migraine treatment. Here, the effect of the monoclonal antibody erenumab on CGRP-induced vasorelaxation was investigated in human isolated blood vessels, as well as the effect of combining erenumab with the small molecule drugs, namely rimegepant, olcegepant, or sumatriptan. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Concentration-response curves to CGRP, adrenomedullin or pramlintide were constructed in human coronary artery (HCA) and human middle meningeal artery (HMMA) segments, incubated with or without erenumab and/or olcegepant. pA2 or pKb values were calculated to determine the potency of erenumab in both tissues. To study whether acutely acting antimigraine drugs exerted additional CGRP-blocking effects on top of erenumab, HCA segments were incubated with a maximally effective concentration of erenumab (3 μM), precontracted with KCl and exposed to CGRP, followed by rimegepant, olcegepant, or sumatriptan in increasing concentrations. KEY RESULTS Erenumab shifted the concentration-response curve to CGRP in both vascular tissues. However, in HCA, the Schild plot slope was significantly smaller than unity, whereas this was not the case in HMMA, indicating different CGRP receptor mechanisms in these tissues. In HCA, rimegepant, olcegepant and sumatriptan exerted additional effects on CGRP on top of a maximal effect of erenumab. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Gepants have additional effects on top of erenumab for CGRP-induced relaxation and could be effective in treating migraine attacks in patients already using erenumab as prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa de Vries
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eloísa Rubio-Beltrán
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ruben Dammers
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - A H Jan Danser
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ashina M, Hoffmann J, Ashina H, Hay DL, Flores-Montanez Y, Do TP, De Icco R, Dodick DW. Pharmacotherapies for Migraine and Translating Evidence From Bench to Bedside. Mayo Clin Proc 2024; 99:285-299. [PMID: 38180396 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is a ubiquitous neurologic disorder that afflicts more than 1 billion people worldwide. Recommended therapeutic strategies include the use of acute and, if needed, preventive medications. During the past 2 decades, tremendous progress has been made in better understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying migraine pathogenesis, which in turn has resulted in the advent of novel medications targeting signaling molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor. Here, we provide an update on the rational use of pharmacotherapies for migraine to facilitate more informed clinical decision-making. We then discuss the scientific discoveries that led to the advent of new medications targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide signaling. Last, we conclude with recent advances that are being made to identify novel drug targets for migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Knowledge Center on Headache Disorders, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Jan Hoffmann
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience.), King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility/SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Håkan Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Debbie L Hay
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Yadira Flores-Montanez
- BIDMC Comprehensive Headache Center, Department of Neurology and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Thien Phu Do
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Knowledge Center on Headache Disorders, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Roberto De Icco
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shibata M, Fujita K, Hoshino E, Minami K, Koizumi K, Okada S, Sakai F. Real-world experience with calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted antibodies for migraine prevention: a retrospective observational cohort study at two Japanese headache centers. BMC Neurol 2024; 24:32. [PMID: 38238659 PMCID: PMC10795407 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03521-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) are an efficacious and safe therapeutic modality for migraine prevention, their clinical benefits have not been well validated in Japanese patients in the real-world setting. The present study aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and erenumab in Japanese patients with migraine. METHODS This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted at two headache centers in Japan. Patients with migraine who had experienced treatment failure with at least one traditional oral migraine preventive agent were treated with a CGRP mAb de novo. The primary efficacy endpoints were the changes from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMDs) and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score after 3 dosing intervals (V3). We explored whether demographic and clinical characteristics predicted therapeutic outcomes at V3. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients who completed three doses of a CGRP mAb (85.3% female [58/68], mean age: 46.2 ± 13.1 years) were included in the analysis. There were 19 patients with chronic migraine. The baseline MMDs were 13.4 ± 6.0. After 3 doses, the MMDs significantly decreased to 7.4 ± 5.5 (p < 0.0001), and the 50% response rate was 50.0%. HIT-6 score was significantly reduced from 66.7 ± 5.4 to 56.2 ± 8.7 after 3 doses (P = 0.0001). There was a positive correlation between the changes in MMDs and HIT-6 score from baseline after 2 doses (p = 0.0189). Those who achieved a ≥ 50% therapeutic response after the first and second doses were significantly more likely to do so at V3 (crude odds ratio: 3.474 [95% CI: 1.037 to 10.4], p = 0.0467). The most frequent adverse event was constipation (7.4%). None of the adverse events were serious, and there was no need for treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS This real-world study demonstrated that CGRP mAbs conferred Japanese patients with efficacious and safe migraine prevention, and an initial positive therapeutic response was predictive of subsequent favorable outcomes. Concomitant measurement of MMDs and HIT-6 score was useful in evaluating the efficacy of CGRP mAbs in migraine prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamoru Shibata
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, 5-11-13 Sugano, Ichikawa, Chiba, 272-8513, Japan.
| | - Kazuki Fujita
- Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Saitama, Japan
| | - Eri Hoshino
- Saitama International Headache Center, Saitama Neuropsychiatric Institute, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kazushi Minami
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, 5-11-13 Sugano, Ichikawa, Chiba, 272-8513, Japan
| | - Kenzo Koizumi
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, 5-11-13 Sugano, Ichikawa, Chiba, 272-8513, Japan
| | - Satoshi Okada
- Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, 5-11-13 Sugano, Ichikawa, Chiba, 272-8513, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ornello R, Andreou AP, De Matteis E, Jürgens TP, Minen MT, Sacco S. Resistant and refractory migraine: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and management. EBioMedicine 2024; 99:104943. [PMID: 38142636 PMCID: PMC10788408 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide. A minority of individuals with migraine develop resistant or refractory conditions characterised by ≥ 8 monthly days of debilitating headaches and inadequate response, intolerance, or contraindication to ≥3 or all preventive drug classes, respectively. Resistant and refractory migraine are emerging clinical definitions stemming from better knowledge of the pathophysiology of migraine and from the advent of migraine-specific preventive treatments. Resistant migraine mostly results from drug failures, while refractory migraine has complex and still unknown mechanisms that impair the efficacy of preventive treatments. Individuals with resistant migraine can be treated with migraine-specific preventive drugs. The management of refractory migraine is challenging and often unsuccessful, being based on combinations of different drugs and non-pharmacological treatment. Future research should aim to identify individuals at risk of developing treatment failures, prevent the condition, investigate the mechanisms of refractoriness to treatments, and find effective treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Anna P Andreou
- Headache Research-Wolfson CARD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Headache Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Eleonora De Matteis
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Tim P Jürgens
- Headache Center North-East, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany; Department of Neurology, KMG Hospital Güstrow, Güstrow, Germany
| | - Mia T Minen
- Departments of Neurology and Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Raffaelli B, Do TP, Chaudhry BA, Amin FM, Ashina H, Snellman J, Maio-Twofoot T, Ashina M. Activation of ATP-sensitive potassium channels triggers migraine attacks independent of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024231222916. [PMID: 38181724 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231222916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study aimed to investigate whether levcromakalim, a KATP channel opener, induces migraine attacks in people with migraine pre-treated with erenumab, a monoclonal CGRP receptor antibody. METHODS In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way cross-over study, adults with migraine without aura received a subcutaneous injection of 140 mg of erenumab on day 1. Subsequently, they were randomized to receive a 20-minute infusion of 0.05 mg/ml levcromakalim or placebo on two experimental days separated by at least one week (between days 8 and 21). The primary endpoint was the difference in the incidence of migraine attacks between levcromakalim and placebo during the 12-hour post-infusion period. RESULTS In total, 16 participants completed the study. During the 12-hour observation period, 14 (88%) of 16 participants experienced migraine attacks after levcromakalim, compared to two (12%) after placebo (p < 0.001). The area under the curve for median headache intensity was greater after levcromakalim than placebo (p < 0.001). Levcromakalim elicited dilation of the superficial temporal artery during the first hour after infusion, a response absent following placebo (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The induction of migraine attacks via opening of KATP channels appears independent of CGRP receptor activation.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT05889442.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitä Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Thien Phu Do
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Basit Ali Chaudhry
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Faisal Mohammad Amin
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Håkan Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chase BA, Semenov I, Rubin S, Meyers S, Mark A, Makhlouf T, Chirayil TT, Maraganore D, Wei J, Zheng SL, Xu J, Epshteyn A, Pham A, Frigerio R, Markopoulou K. Characteristics associated with response to subcutaneously administered anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody medications in a real-world community cohort of persons living with migraine: A retrospective clinical and genetic study. Headache 2024; 64:68-92. [PMID: 38071464 DOI: 10.1111/head.14655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate response to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) migraine preventives in a real-world community cohort of persons living with migraine and to identify clinical and genetic characteristics associated with efficacious response. BACKGROUND Erenumab-aooeb, fremanezumab-vrfm, and galcanezumab-gnlm target CGRP or its receptor; however, many patients are non-responsive. METHODS In this retrospective clinical and genetic study, we identified 1077 adult patients who satisfied the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for migraine without aura, migraine with aura, or chronic migraine and who were prescribed an anti-CGRP migraine preventive between May 2018 and May 2021. Screening of 558 patients identified 289 with data at baseline and first follow-up visits; data were available for 161 patients at a second follow-up visit. The primary outcome was migraine days per month (MDM). In 198 genotyped patients, we evaluated associations between responders (i.e., patients with ≥50% reduction in MDM at follow-up) and genes involved in CGRP signaling or pharmacological response, and genetic and polygenic risk scores. RESULTS The median time to first follow-up was 4.4 (0.9-22) months after preventive start. At the second follow-up, 5.7 (0.9-13) months later, 145 patients had continued on the same preventive. Preventives had strong, persistent effects in reducing MDM in responders (follow-up 1: η2 = 0.26, follow-up 2: η2 = 0.22). At the first but not second follow-up: galcanezumab had a larger effect than erenumab, while no difference was seen at either follow-up between galcanezumab and fremanezumab or fremanezumab and erenumab. The decrease in MDM at follow-up was generally proportional to baseline MDM, larger in females, and increased with months on medication. At the first follow-up only, patients with prior hospitalization for migraine or who had not responded to more preventive regimens had a smaller decrease in MDM. Reasons for stopping or switching a preventive varied between medications and were often related to cost and insurance coverage. At both follow-ups, patient tolerance (1: 92.2% [262/284]; 2: 95.2% [141/145]) and continued use (1: 77.5% [224/289]; 2: 80.6% [116/145]) were high and similar across preventives. Response consistency (always non-responders: 31.7% [46/145]; always responders: 56.5% [82/145], and one-time only responders: 11.7% [17/145]) was also similar across preventives. Non-responder status had nominally significant associations with rs12615320-G in RAMP1 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 4.7 [1.5, 14.7]), and rs4680-A in COMT (0.6[0.4, 0.9]). Non-responders had a lower mean genetic risk score than responders (1.0 vs. 1.1; t(df) = -1.75(174.84), p = 0.041), and the fraction of responders increased with genetic and polygenic risk score percentile. CONCLUSIONS In this real-world setting, anti-CGRP preventives reduced MDM persistently and had similar and large effect sizes on MDM reduction; however, clinical and genetic factors influenced response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce A Chase
- Health Information Technology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Skokie, Illinois, USA
- Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Irene Semenov
- Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Susan Rubin
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Steven Meyers
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Angela Mark
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Thomas Makhlouf
- Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Tanya T Chirayil
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Jun Wei
- Center for Individualized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Siqun L Zheng
- Center for Individualized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Center for Individualized Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Alexander Epshteyn
- Health Information Technology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Skokie, Illinois, USA
| | - Anna Pham
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Roberta Frigerio
- Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Katerina Markopoulou
- Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pathak P, Yue L, Gupta S, Fang J, Cheadle MA, Tiwari S, Ferraris M, Joshi P, Thompson J, Shah R, Vo P. Real-world treatment satisfaction with erenumab in migraine: analysis of the US National Health and Wellness Survey. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:1585-1591. [PMID: 36919462 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2191479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The treatment landscape for the prevention of migraine has rapidly evolved in recent years with the advent of calcitonin gene-related peptide therapy, including erenumab. The objective of this study was to assess patient-reported treatment satisfaction among erenumab users. METHODS This retrospective, cross-sectional study used data from the 2019 US National Health and Wellness Survey collected during March-July 2019. Respondents self-reporting physician-diagnosed migraine and currently using erenumab were analyzed. Treatment satisfaction was measured on a seven-point Likert scale. Data were further reported by the duration of erenumab treatment. Data on respondents' socio-demographic characteristics and treatment patterns were also collected. RESULTS Overall, 67 respondents using erenumab with or without other migraine preventives for up to 1 year were included in the analysis. The mean (standard deviation) age was 46.7 (12.9) years. Most of the respondents were women (86.6%), White (74.6%), and commercially-insured (67.2%). Notably, 40.3% had ≥1 comorbidity per the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Approximately half of the respondents were college graduates and employed (49.3% each). Among the 67 respondents, 46 received erenumab exclusively. Across both cohorts, the percentage of respondents who were satisfied with erenumab treatment was slightly higher among those with a longer treatment duration (overall erenumab cohort: 63.6%, 69.6%, and 75.8% for 0-<3, 3-<6, and 6-12 months, respectively; erenumab monotherapy cohort: 62.5%, 71.4%, and 87.5% for 0-<3, 3-<6, and 6-12 months, respectively). Treatment patterns before switching to erenumab revealed that most respondents had used ≥1 preventive treatment for migraine (80.6%; 54/67), over two-thirds (33/54) of whom had ≥2 treatment failures owing to nonresponse. CONCLUSION Satisfaction was high among long-term erenumab users, indicating that those using erenumab for a longer duration are more satisfied. Furthermore, this study provided insights on the basic socio-demographics, disease characteristics, and health behaviors of erenumab users as well as their treatment patterns before switching to erenumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Parth Joshi
- Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, India
| | | | | | - Pamela Vo
- Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Alsaadi T, Kayed DM, Al-Madani A, Hassan AM, Terruzzi A, Krieger D, Riachi N, Sarathchandran P, Al-Rukn S. Consensus-Based Recommendations on the Use of CGRP-Based Therapies for Migraine Prevention in the UAE. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1845-1865. [PMID: 37792218 PMCID: PMC10630270 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00550-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is a common debilitating neurological disorder affecting a large proportion of the general population. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37-amino acid neuropeptide, plays a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine, and the development of therapies targeting the anti-CGRP pathway has revolutionized the field of migraine treatment. METHODS An expert task force of neurologists in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) developed and critically assessed recommendations on the use of CGRP-based therapies in migraine treatment and management in the UAE, based on available published literature. A consensus was reached for each statement by means of an open-voting process, based on a predefined agreement level of at least 60%. RESULTS The consensus recommendations advocate the need for guidelines for the appropriate use of CGRP-based therapies by defining patient cohorts and appropriate monitoring of therapeutic response as well as standardizing the initiation, assessment, and cessation of treatment. The consensus recommendations were primarily formulated on the basis of international studies, because of the limited availability of regional and local data. As such, they may also act as guidelines for global healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS These are the first consensus recommendations for the UAE that address the use of CGRP-based therapies in the treatment and management of migraine, integrating both clinical evidence and medical expertise to enhance clinical judgment and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taoufik Alsaadi
- Department of Neurology, American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
| | - Deeb M Kayed
- Neurology Department, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | | | | | | | - Derk Krieger
- Neurology Department, Mediclinic Parkview Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - Naji Riachi
- Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Khalifa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ashina M, Tepper SJ, Gendolla A, Sperling B, Ettrup A, Josiassen MK, Starling AJ. Long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures: extension of a randomized controlled trial. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:155. [PMID: 37985968 PMCID: PMC10662788 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01688-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eptinezumab demonstrated efficacy in adults with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures in the placebo-controlled phase of the DELIVER clinical trial; its long-term effectiveness in this population has not yet been reported. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in a migraine patient population during the 48-week extension phase of DELIVER. METHODS DELIVER was conducted June 1, 2020 to September 15, 2022. 865 adults with migraine, with documented evidence of 2-4 prior preventive migraine treatment failures and with completion of the 24-week placebo-controlled period of DELIVER received eptinezumab (100 or 300 mg) during the dose-blinded extension, either continuing their randomized dose or, if originally receiving placebo, were randomized 1:1 to an eptinezumab dose (100 or 300 mg). A mixed model for repeated measures was used to evaluate changes from baseline in the number of monthly migraine days (MMDs). RESULTS Of 865 patients entering the extension (eptinezumab 100 mg, n = 433; 300 mg, n = 432), 782 (90.4%) completed and 11 (1.3%) discontinued due to an adverse event. Eptinezumab was associated with early and sustained reductions in migraine frequency. Mean MMDs at baseline were approximately 14 days across groups. Mean (standard error) change from baseline in MMDs over the final dosing interval (weeks 61-72) was -6.4 (0.50) with placebo/eptinezumab 100 mg, -7.3 (0.49) with placebo/eptinezumab 300 mg, -7.1 (0.39) with eptinezumab 100 mg, and -7.0 (0.39) with eptinezumab 300 mg. During weeks 61-72, 63-70% of patients demonstrated ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs, and 36-45% demonstrated ≥ 75% reduction. Headache severity and acute medication use reductions, and patient-reported improvements in most bothersome symptom, disease status, quality of life, and work productivity, were observed. Adverse events were generally mild, transient, and similar in frequency/type to previous eptinezumab trials. CONCLUSIONS The long-term effectiveness and safety/tolerability of eptinezumab in patients with migraine and 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures was demonstrated by high completion rates and migraine-preventive benefits sustained for up to 18 months, implying that eptinezumab is a viable long-term treatment option for patients still seeking successful migraine treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04418765; URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ct2/show/NCT04418765 ); EudraCT (Identifier: 2019-004497-25; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2019-004497-25 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Glostrup Valdemar Hansen Vej 5, Glostrup, DK-2600, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Stewart J Tepper
- The New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lanteri-Minet M, Fabre R, Martin C, Pradat K, Alchaar A, Bozzolo E, Duchene ML, Van Obberghen EK, Donnet A, Fontaine D. One-year prospective real-world assessment of effectiveness and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: results of the French FHU INOVPAIN registry study. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:152. [PMID: 37940860 PMCID: PMC10633983 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01680-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy and safety of erenumab. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of erenumab in a real-world setting in French patients with migraine associated with extreme unmet needs. METHODS This is a one year-prospective real-word study with enrolment of all consecutive adult patients included in the FHU InovPain registry who participated in a compassionate erenumab use program. RESULTS Of 144 patients included, 140 patients (82.1% female / mean age of 50.9 ± 11.4) received at least one dose of erenumab and were concerned by effectiveness and safety assessment. All patients had failed 11 oral preventive treatments. Most of them suffered from chronic migraine (88.6%) and presented a medication overuse (90.7%) at baseline. Thirty-eight (27.1%) discontinued treatment during the 12-month follow-up, with 22 (15.7%), 11 (7.9%) and 5 (3.6%) patients before 3, 6 or 9 months of treatment. The proportion of ≥ 50% responders at M3, M6, M9 and M12 was 74/140 (52.9%), 69/118 (58.5%), 61/107 (57.0%) and 60/102 (58.8%) respectively. At M3, the rate of reversion from chronic migraine to episodic migraine was 57.3% and the rate of transition from medication overuse to non-overuse was 46.5%. For monthly migraine days, the median (IQR) was 18.0 (13.0-26.0), 9.0 (5.0-17.0), 7.5 (5.0-14.0), 8.0 (5.0-12.5) and 8.0 (5.0-12.0) at M0, M3, M6, M9 and M12 respectively. For HIT-6 score, the median (IQR) was 68.0 (63.8-73.3), 60.0 (54.0-65.0), 60.0 (50.3-53.0), 59.0 (50.0-63.0) and 58.0 (50.0-62.9) at M0, M3, M6, M9 and M12 respectively. Fifty-three (37.9%) patients reported at least one of the following adverse events: cutaneous erythema and/or pain at the injection site for 42 (30%) patients, constipation for 22 (15.7%) patients, muscle spasm for 2 (1.4%) patients, alopecia for one (0.7%) patient and blood pressure increase in one (0.7%) patient. There was no serious adverse event. One female patient became pregnant after 5 months of exposure to erenumab with a safe evolution after treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION This first French real-world study related to migraine prevention with CGRP-mAbs confirms effectiveness and safety of erenumab in patients with extreme unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lanteri-Minet
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Hôpital Cimiez, 4 Rue Reine Victoria, 06003, Nice, France.
- INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| | - R Fabre
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Hôpital Cimiez, 4 Rue Reine Victoria, 06003, Nice, France
- Public Health Department, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Nice, France
| | - C Martin
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Hôpital Cimiez, 4 Rue Reine Victoria, 06003, Nice, France
| | - K Pradat
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Hôpital Cimiez, 4 Rue Reine Victoria, 06003, Nice, France
| | - A Alchaar
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Hôpital Cimiez, 4 Rue Reine Victoria, 06003, Nice, France
| | - E Bozzolo
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Hôpital Cimiez, 4 Rue Reine Victoria, 06003, Nice, France
| | - M L Duchene
- Cinical Pharmacy Departement, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Nice, France
| | - E K Van Obberghen
- Pain Department and FHU InovPain, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Hôpital Cimiez, 4 Rue Reine Victoria, 06003, Nice, France
| | - A Donnet
- Pain Departement, Timone Hospital, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - D Fontaine
- Neurosurgery Department and FHU InovPain, CHU Nice and Côte Azur University, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chan M, Thaler A. Post-stroke Headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:673-678. [PMID: 37676411 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01169-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Stroke is a major health concern and a leading cause of long-term disability. Persistent post-stroke headache (PPSH) is a common complication of stroke yet little is known about its specific characteristics or optimal management. The purpose of this review is to discuss the epidemiology, presentation, and hypothesized pathophysiology of PPSH. Acute and preventive treatment options, as well as specific concerns regarding triptans and the newer CGRP antagonists, will be discussed in detail as well. RECENT FINDINGS The 2018 International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) was the first headache diagnostic manual to include criteria for PPSH and defines this disorder as an acute headache that develops in close temporal relation to stroke and persists beyond 3 months. Recent literature estimates the prevalence of PPSH to be somewhere between 1 and 23% of patients post-stroke. Presentation is variable, but most often mimics tension-type headache. There are no evidence-based guidelines on the optimal treatment of PPSH. PPSH is a common but poorly understood complication of stroke. Given the significant disability burden that PPSH carries, the epidemiology and pathophysiology of PPSH, as well as the efficacy and safety of potential treatment options, warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Chan
- Division of Headache and Facial Pain, Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
- Department of Neurology, Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, 700 2nd St NE, Washington, DC, 20002, USA.
| | - Alison Thaler
- Division of Headache and Facial Pain, Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA
- , 1468 Madison Avenue Annenberg 2-035, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ashina M, Mitsikostas DD, Ramirez Campos V, Barash S, Ning X, Diener HC. Numbers needed to treat or harm and likelihood of being helped versus harmed for fremanezumab in patients who had prior inadequate response to two to four classes of migraine preventive medications: A post hoc analysis. Headache 2023; 63:1351-1358. [PMID: 37955395 DOI: 10.1111/head.14651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and likelihood of being helped or harmed (LHH) in a post hoc analysis of the phase 3b FOCUS trial. BACKGROUND Fremanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), has demonstrated efficacy, tolerability, and safety in adults with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), with documented previous inadequate response to two to four classes of migraine preventive medications. METHODS In the 12-week double-blind period of the FOCUS study, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to quarterly fremanezumab, monthly fremanezumab, or matched monthly placebo. NNT was based on responder analysis, defined as ≥50% reduction in monthly average number of migraine days at 12 weeks. NNH was based on discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). RESULTS Among patients with CM (n = 509), response rates and discontinuation rates were 27% (45/169) and 0 for quarterly fremanezumab, 29% (50/173) and 2% (3/173) for monthly fremanezumab, and 8% (13/167) and <1% (1/167) for placebo, respectively. These results translated to NNTs of 5.3 and 4.7, NNHs of 1000 and 88, and LHHs of 188 and 19 for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab, respectively. Among patients with EM (n = 328), response rates were 47% (50/107) for quarterly fremanezumab, 43% (47/110) for monthly fremanezumab, and 10% (11/111) for placebo. Discontinuation rates were <1% (n = 1) in all three groups. These results translated to NNTs of 2.7 and 3.0, NNHs of 1000 and 1000, and LHHs of 368 and 328 for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The NNT, NNH, and LHH for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab compare favorably with those for traditional oral preventive medications, including topiramate, valproate, and propranolol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Messoud Ashina
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dimos D Mitsikostas
- First Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Steve Barash
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Xiaoping Ning
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty of the University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
VanderPluym JH, Victorio MCC, Oakley CB, Rastogi RG, Orr SL. Beyond the Guidelines: A Narrative Review of Treatments on the Horizon for Migraine in Children and Adolescents. Neurology 2023; 101:788-797. [PMID: 37604658 PMCID: PMC10634646 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is common in children and adolescents and can cause significant disability. There are relatively limited evidence-based treatment options available, especially when compared with treatment of migraine in adults. The Pediatric Research Equity Act requires the study of a new drug or biologic in pediatric populations. As such it is mandatory that the newest migraine treatment options available for adults be evaluated in children and adolescents. It will take years before results from clinical trials in pediatric patients become available. In the meantime, there is eagerness among clinicians to seek out the existing evidence that may help provide clarity on utilization of the newer migraine therapies in children and adolescents because many of the currently available, guideline-recommended treatments do not provide benefit for all patients. In this narrative review, the literature regarding onabotulinumtoxinA, neuromodulatory devices, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies, 5-hydroxytryptamine (1F) agonists (i.e., ditans), and CGRP small-molecule receptor antagonists (i.e., gepants) for the treatment of migraine in children and adolescents will be summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana H VanderPluym
- From the Department of Neurology (J.H.V.), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Division of Neurology (M.C.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Department of Neurology (C.B.O.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Neurology (R.G.R.), Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, AZ; Department of Child Health and Neurology (R.G.R.), University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix; Departments of Pediatrics (S.L.O.), Community Health Sciences, and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta; and Department of Neurology (S.L.O.), Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Canada.
| | - M Cristina C Victorio
- From the Department of Neurology (J.H.V.), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Division of Neurology (M.C.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Department of Neurology (C.B.O.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Neurology (R.G.R.), Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, AZ; Department of Child Health and Neurology (R.G.R.), University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix; Departments of Pediatrics (S.L.O.), Community Health Sciences, and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta; and Department of Neurology (S.L.O.), Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Canada
| | - Christopher B Oakley
- From the Department of Neurology (J.H.V.), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Division of Neurology (M.C.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Department of Neurology (C.B.O.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Neurology (R.G.R.), Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, AZ; Department of Child Health and Neurology (R.G.R.), University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix; Departments of Pediatrics (S.L.O.), Community Health Sciences, and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta; and Department of Neurology (S.L.O.), Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Canada
| | - Reena G Rastogi
- From the Department of Neurology (J.H.V.), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Division of Neurology (M.C.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Department of Neurology (C.B.O.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Neurology (R.G.R.), Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, AZ; Department of Child Health and Neurology (R.G.R.), University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix; Departments of Pediatrics (S.L.O.), Community Health Sciences, and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta; and Department of Neurology (S.L.O.), Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Canada
| | - Serena L Orr
- From the Department of Neurology (J.H.V.), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; Division of Neurology (M.C.C.V.), NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, OH; Department of Neurology (C.B.O.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Neurology (R.G.R.), Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, AZ; Department of Child Health and Neurology (R.G.R.), University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix; Departments of Pediatrics (S.L.O.), Community Health Sciences, and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta; and Department of Neurology (S.L.O.), Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hong JB, Lange KS, Fitzek M, Overeem LH, Triller P, Siebert A, Reuter U, Raffaelli B. Impact of a reimbursement policy change on treatment with erenumab in migraine - a real-world experience from Germany. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:144. [PMID: 37899428 PMCID: PMC10614330 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01682-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) pathway are safe and effective treatments for migraine prevention. However, the high cost of these novel therapies has led to reimbursement policies requiring patients to try multiple traditional preventives before access. In Germany, a recent change in insurance policy significantly expanded coverage for the CGRP receptor mAb erenumab, enabling migraine patients who failed just one prior prophylactic medication to receive this mAb. Here, we compare the clinical response to treatment with erenumab in migraine patients treated using the old and new coverage policy. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we included CGRP-mAb naïve patients with episodic or chronic migraine, who started erenumab at our headache center according to either the old or the new insurance policy and received at least 3 consecutive injections. Headache diaries and electronic documentation were used to evaluate reductions in monthly headache and migraine days (MHD and MMD) and ≥ 50% and ≥ 30% responder rates at month 3 (weeks 9-12) of treatment. RESULTS We included 146 patients who received erenumab according to the old policy and 63 patients that were treated using the new policy. At weeks 9-12 of treatment, 37.7% of the old policy group had a 50% or greater reduction in MHD, compared to 63.5% of the new policy group (P < 0.001). Mean reduction in MHD was 5.02 days (SD = 5.46) and 6.67 days (SD = 5.32, P = 0.045) in the old and new policy cohort, respectively. After propensity score matching, the marginal effect of the new policy on treatment outcome was 2.29 days (standard error, SE: 0.715, P = 0.001) more reduction in MHD, and 30.1% (SE: 10.6%, P = 0.005) increase in ≥ 50% response rate for MHD. CONCLUSIONS Starting erenumab earlier in the course of migraine progression in a real-world setting may lead to a better response than starting after multiple failed prophylactic attempts. Continually gathering real-world evidence may help policymakers in deciding how readily to cover CGRP-targeted therapies in migraine prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ja Bin Hong
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Mira Fitzek
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Paul Triller
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anke Siebert
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jinesh S. Pharmaceutical aspects of novel CGRP inhibitors used in the prophylaxis and treatment of migraine. Inflammopharmacology 2023; 31:2245-2251. [PMID: 37421480 DOI: 10.1007/s10787-023-01276-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is one of the most prevalent neurological disorders known to have an immense adverse socio-economic impact. Neurogenic inflammation is thought to mediate migraine, and CGRP is known to be released during acute attacks of migraine that causes vasodilation in extracerebral arteries. Hence, CGRP is believed to play a key role in triggering migraine. Although there are several classes of medications used in the prevention and treatment of migraine pain, targeted therapies are fewer. Therefore, CGRP receptor inhibitors which bind to CGRP receptors in the cranial vasculature have been developed as drugs for migraine therapy. In this review article, we describe the basic pathophysiologic mechanism that causes migraine headaches and the pharmacotherapeutic aspects of CGRP inhibitors available for clinical use. For the purpose of this review, a search was performed on the pharmacological, pharmacokinetic, pharmaceutical, and therapeutic aspects of the FDA-approved CGRP inhibitors viz. erenumab, ubrogepant, rimegepant, atogepant, eptinezumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab in UpToDate database and PubMed beginning year 2000. Based on the data collected, a risk-benefit comparison of different classes of novel CGRP inhibitors available for clinical use is provided. This comparative review may help the healthcare providers in choosing the best pharmacotherapeutic agent for their patients based on patient-specific information.
Collapse
|
39
|
Cho S, Kim BK. Update of Gepants in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:561-569. [PMID: 37656319 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01167-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite the unmet therapeutic needs of patients with chronic migraine (CM) and/or medication overuse, available treatment options are limited. Recently, four calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists, known as gepants, have been approved for the treatment of migraine. This review focuses on the preventive treatment of CM with gepants and highlights recent findings. RECENT FINDINGS Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown promising results for rimegepant and atogepant as preventive treatments for CM. In an RCT targeting patients with CM, atogepant demonstrated a significant reduction in the mean monthly migraine days, irrespective of acute medication overuse. Moreover, the patients reported no significant safety concerns and exhibited good tolerance to treatment. These findings highlight the potential of gepants as a new and effective therapeutic option for patients with CM and/or medication overuse. Gepant use will help improve the management and quality of life of individuals with this debilitating condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soohyun Cho
- Department of Neurology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Byung-Kun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Aleksovska K, Hershey AD, Deen M, Icco RD, Lee MJ, Diener HC. Efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP in migraine prevention. GRADE tables elaborated by the ad hoc working group of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231206162. [PMID: 37879637 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231206162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tables were created using a standardized and independent assessment of the efficacy and side effects of treatments with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or the CGRP receptor for the prevention of migraine. We hope to provide support for author groups writing national or regional treatment or management guidelines for migraine prevention. METHODS We formulated patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) questions for the efficacy and safety of mAb against CGRP or the CGRP-receptor for the prevention of migraine attacks. We performed a systematic literature research for randomized studies with eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab and galcanezumab and a pooled analysis was done, using RevMan 5.4 software. For dichotomous outcomes we used risk ratio, and for continuous outcomes we used the mean difference to compare and summarize the evidence between groups. The evidence across studies, for each outcome, except serious adverse events, was assessed using GRADE evidence tables. Additionally, we report the serious adverse effects in the tables of the characteristics of the studies. RESULTS All mAb are superior to placebo for the reduction in monthly migraine days (days in which a headache consistent with migraine occurred) in participants with episodic and chronic migraine. There are no major differences between the mAb. CONCLUSIONS The GRADE evidence summary tables provided will support author groups to write treatment guidelines for the prevention of migraine with mAb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katina Aleksovska
- Department of Neurology, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia
| | - Andrew D Hershey
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA
| | - Marie Deen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Robert de Icco
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Headache Science & Neurorehabilitation Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sun W, Cheng H, Xia B, Liu X, Li Y, Wang X, Liu C. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Five Anti-calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Agents for Migraine Prevention: A Network Meta-analysis. Clin J Pain 2023; 39:560-569. [PMID: 37278480 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) agents are some of the newest preventive medications for migraine. There is limited literature comparing the efficacy of the most recent CGRP antagonist, atogepant, to CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention. In this network meta-analysis, the efficacy and safety of migraine treatments including different doses of atogepant and CGRP monoclonal antibodies were evaluated to provide a reference for future clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS A search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library identified all randomized controlled trials published through May 2022 and including patients diagnosed with episodic or chronic migraine and treated with erenumab, fremanezumab, eptinezumab, galcanezumab, atogepant, or placebo. The primary outcomes were the reduction of monthly migraine days, 50% response rate, and the number of adverse events (AEs). The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS In this study, 24 articles were considered for analysis. Regarding efficacy, all interventions were superior to placebo with a statistically significant difference. The most effective intervention was monthly fremanezumab 225 mg in change from baseline of migraine days (standard mean difference = -0.49, 95% CI: -0.62, -0.37) and 50% response rate (risk ratio = 2.98, 95% CI: 2.16,4.10), while the optimal choice for reducing acute medication days was monthly erenumab 140 mg (standard mean difference = -0.68, 95% CI: -0.79, -0.58). In terms of AEs, all therapies and placebo did not achieve statistical significance except for monthly galcanezumab 240 mg and quarterly fremanezumab 675 mg. There was no significant difference in discontinuation due to AEs between interventions and placebo. DISCUSSION All anti-CGRP agents were more effective than placebo in migraine prevention. Overall, monthly fremanezumab 225 mg, monthly erenumab 140 mg, and daily atogepant 60 mg were effective interventions with fewer side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Xuemei Wang
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing
| | - Chengjiang Liu
- Department of General, Practice, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ornello R, Raffaelli B. Editorial: Spotlight on resistant and refractory migraine. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1291439. [PMID: 37830091 PMCID: PMC10565493 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1291439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Headache Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kim SA, Jang H, Lee MJ. Predictors of galcanezumab response in a real-world study of Korean patients with migraine. Sci Rep 2023; 13:14825. [PMID: 37684346 PMCID: PMC10491682 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42110-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
To assess factors associated with galcanezumab response in a real-world study of Korean patients with migraine. Predictors of the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP(-R) mAb) have been rarely investigated in Asians. We prospectively recruited and followed up patients with migraine who received monthly galcanezumab treatment in a single university hospital from June 2020 to October 2021. We defined the treatment response with ≥ 50% reduction in moderate/severe headache days in the 3rd month of treatment compared to baseline. Responders and non-responders were compared in terms of demographics, disease characteristics and severity, and previous response to migraine prophylactic treatments. Potential predictors of anti-CGRP(-R) mAb response were tested by using the univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Among 104 patients (81.7% female; mean age 42.0 ± 13.02; 76.9% chronic migraine; and 45.5% medication overuse headache) included, 58 (55.7%) were responders. Non-responders had more chronic migraine, medication overuse headache, monthly headache days, days with acute medication, and daily headaches (i.e. chronic migraine persisting everyday without remission). The multivariable logistic analysis showed chronic migraine (OR 0.05 [95% CI 0.00-0.82], p = 0.036) and the number of previously failed preventive medication classes (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.33-0.92], p = 0.024] were independently associated with treatment response. Chronic migraine and multiple failures from preventive medication are associated with poor galcanezumab response. Further studies are needed to investigate if earlier treatment before disease chronification or multiple failures may lead to a greater therapeutic gain from anti-CGRP(-R) mAb treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Ae Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyemin Jang
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Alzheimer's Disease Convergence Research Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mi Ji Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Haneke H, Sulaiman S, Nickel S, Raffaelli B, Jansen JP, Kirchberger V. Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Therapy-Resistant Migraine during Treatment with Erenumab in an Ambulatory Care Setting. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5619. [PMID: 37685685 PMCID: PMC10488376 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine preventive treatment with the CGRP-receptor monoclonal antibody Erenumab can positively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disease-associated disability. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a valuable additional datapoint to real-world evidence covering how treatment affects physical, mental, and social domains of patients' lives. In this real-world, single-center retrospective observational cohort study, we analyzed clinical performance indicators and PROMs for migraine patients who failed at least four other preventive medications and received Erenumab over the course of one year. Endpoints were the average monthly migraine days as well as PROMs including the MIDAS, EQ-5D-VAS and PROMIS-29. Data were collected digitally via the software heartbeat ONE in an ambulatory care setting as part of the clinical routine. A total of 145 patients treated with Erenumab provided data for 12 months. After 12 months, the median number of monthly migraine days decreased from 9 to 7 days. A clinically relevant reduction in migraine days by ≥30% was reported by 40% of the patients. The migraine-specific MIDAS score, the EQ-5D-VAS measuring the overall health status and all PROMIS domains, except sleep disturbance, changed significantly, reflecting a positive disease progression. This study highlights how patients with a treatment-resistant migraine in an outpatient setting benefit from a preventive treatment with Erenumab. A decrease in migraine days and an increase in HRQoL was maintained over one year. It also underscores the significance of collecting real-world evidence, including PROMs, as an integral component of the healthcare cycle, as such data can reveal additional factors relevant to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Schoenen J, Van Dycke A, Versijpt J, Paemeleire K. Ten open questions in migraine prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies blocking the calcitonin-gene related peptide pathway: a narrative review. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:99. [PMID: 37528353 PMCID: PMC10391994 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01637-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) blocking the calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) pathway, collectively called here "anti-CGRP/rec mAbs", have dramatically improved preventive migraine treatment. Although their efficacy and tolerability were proven in a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and, maybe even more convincingly, in real world settings, a number of open questions remain. In this narrative review, we will analyze published data allowing insight in some of the uncertainties related to the use of anti-CGRP/rec mAbs in clinical practice: their differential efficacy in migraine subtypes, outcome predictors, switching between molecules, use in children and adolescents, long-term treatment adherence and persistence, effect persistence after discontinuation, combined treatment with botulinum toxin or gepants, added-value and cost effectiveness, effectiveness in other headache types, and potential contraindications based on known physiological effects of CGRP. While recent studies have already provided hints for some of these questions, many of them will not find reliable and definitive answers before larger studies, registries or dedicated RCTs are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Schoenen
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology‑Citadelle Hospital, University of Liège, Boulevard du 12 ème de Ligne 1, Liège, 4000, Belgium.
| | - Annelies Van Dycke
- Department of Neurology, General Hospital Sint-Jan Bruges, Ruddershove 10, Bruges, 8000, Belgium
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
de Vries Lentsch S, Perenboom MJL, Carpay JA, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Terwindt GM. Visual hypersensitivity in patients treated with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (receptor) monoclonal antibodies. Headache 2023; 63:926-933. [PMID: 37358548 DOI: 10.1111/head.14531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of treatment with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP; receptor) antibodies on visual hypersensitivity in patients with migraine. BACKGROUND Increased visual sensitivity can be present both during and outside migraine attacks. CGRP has been demonstrated to play a key role in light-aversive behavior. METHODS In this prospective follow-up study, patients treated for migraine with erenumab (n = 105) or fremanezumab (n = 100) in the Leiden Headache Center were invited to complete a questionnaire on visual sensitivity (the Leiden Visual Sensitivity Scale [L-VISS]), pertaining to both their ictal and interictal state, before starting treatment (T0) and 3 months after treatment initiation (T1). Using a daily e-diary, treatment effectiveness was assessed in weeks 9-12 compared to a 4-week pre-treatment baseline period. L-VISS scores were compared between T0 and T1. Subsequently, the association between the reduction in L-VISS scores and the reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) was investigated. RESULTS At 3 months, the visual hypersensitivity decreased, with a decrease in mean ± standard deviation (SD) ictal L-VISS (from 20.1 ± 7.7 to 19.2 ± 8.1, p = 0.042) and a decrease in mean ± SD interictal L-VISS (from 11.8 ± 6.6 to 11.1 ± 7.0, p = 0.050). We found a positive association between the reduction in MMD and the decrease in interictal L-VISS (β = 0.2, p = 0.010) and the reduction in ictal L-VISS (β = 0.3, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION A decrease in visual hypersensitivity in patients with migraine after treatment with anti-CGRP (receptor) antibodies is positively associated with clinical response on migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Johannes A Carpay
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum, the Netherlands
| | - Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hong JB, Lange KS, Overeem LH, Triller P, Raffaelli B, Reuter U. A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies: Predicting Response. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:934. [PMID: 37513846 PMCID: PMC10385131 DOI: 10.3390/ph16070934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) are increasingly being used as preventive treatments for migraine. Their effectiveness and safety were established through numerous randomized placebo-controlled trials and real-world studies, yet a significant proportion of patients do not respond to this treatment, and currently, there is a lack of accepted predictors of response to guide expectations, as data from studies so far are lacking and inconsistent. We searched Embase and MEDLINE databases for studies reporting on predictors of response to CGRP and/or CGRP-receptor (CGRP-R) mAbs, defined as a 30% or 50% reduction in monthly headache or migraine days at varying durations of follow-up. Quantitative synthesis was performed where applicable. We found 38 real-world studies that investigated the association between various predictors and response rates. Based on these studies, good response to triptans and unilateral pain with or without unilateral autonomic symptoms are predictors of a good response to CGRP(-R) mAbs. Conversely, obesity, interictal allodynia, the presence of daily headaches, a higher number of non-successful previous prophylactic medications, and psychiatric comorbidities including depression are predictive of a poor response to CGRP(-R) mAbs. Future studies should confirm these results and help to generate more tailored treatment strategies in patients with migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ja Bin Hong
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kristin Sophie Lange
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Lucas Hendrik Overeem
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Doctoral Program, International Graduate Program Medical Neurosciences, Humboldt Graduate School, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Triller
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Bianca Raffaelli
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH), 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Humboldt University and Free University Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vandenbussche N, Pisarek K, Paemeleire K. Methodological considerations on real-world evidence studies of monoclonal antibodies against the CGRP-pathway for migraine: a systematic review. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:75. [PMID: 37344811 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01611-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world data are accumulating on the effectiveness, tolerability and safety of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway monoclonal antibodies for the preventive treatment of migraine. We performed a systematic review of the methodology of prospective, observational, clinic-based real-world evidence studies with these drugs in both episodic and chronic migraine. METHODS The objectives were to evaluate the definitions and reported outcomes used, and to perform a risk of bias assessment for each of the different studies. PubMed and EMBASE were systematically queried for relevant scientific articles. Study quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using the "National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Study Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group". RESULTS Forty-six studies fitted the criteria for the systematic review and were included in the analysis. Ten studies (21.7%) defined a migraine day for the study, while only 5 studies defined a headache day for the study (10.9%). The most common primary endpoint/objective of the studies was change in monthly migraine days (n = 16, 34.8%), followed by responder rate (n = 15, 32.6%) and change in monthly headache days (n = 5, 10.9%). Eight studies (17.4%) did not define the primary endpoint/objective. Thirty-three studies were graded as "good" quality and 13 studies were graded as "fair". CONCLUSION Our analysis shows rather significant heterogeneity and/or lack of predefined primary outcomes/objectives, definitions of outcomes measures and the use of longitudinal monitoring (e.g. headache diaries). Standardization of terminology, definitions and protocol procedures for real-world evidence studies of preventive treatments for migraine are recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered with PROSPERO with ID CRD42022369366.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Vandenbussche
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Karolina Pisarek
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rhyne C, Cohen JM, Seminerio MJ, Carr K, Krasenbaum LJ. Burden of migraine with acute medication overuse or psychiatric comorbidities and treatment with CGRP pathway-targeted monoclonal antibodies: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e33874. [PMID: 37335663 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000033874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a complex and often debilitating neurological disease that affects more than 1 billion people worldwide. It is characterized by moderate-to-intense, throbbing headache attacks that are worsened by activity and is associated with nausea, vomiting, and sensitivity to light and sound. Migraine, ranked the second leading cause of years lived with disability by the World Health Organization, can diminish patients' quality of life and bring significant personal and economic burden. Furthermore, migraine patients with a history of acute medication overuse (AMO) or psychiatric comorbidities, such as depression or anxiety, may experience even greater impairment and burden, and their migraine may be more difficult-to-treat. Appropriate treatment of migraine is essential to reduce this burden and improve patient outcomes, especially for those with AMO or psychiatric comorbidities. There are several available preventive treatment options for migraine, though many of these are not migraine-specific and may have limited efficacy and/or poor tolerability. The calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway plays a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine, and monoclonal antibodies that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway have been developed as specific preventive treatments for migraine. Four of these monoclonal antibodies have been approved for the preventive treatment of migraine after demonstrating favorable safety and efficacy profiles. These treatments offer substantial benefits for migraine patients, including those with AMO or common psychiatric comorbidities, by reducing monthly headache days and migraine days, days of acute medication use, and disability measures, as well as improving quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joshua M Cohen
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., West Chester, PA
| | | | - Karen Carr
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., West Chester, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Alonso-Moreno M, Rodríguez-de Francisco L, Ciudad-Gutiérrez P. Gender bias in clinical trials of biological agents for migraine: A systematic review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286453. [PMID: 37267250 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is considered one of the most disabling diseases. Currently, there are few studies on clinical migraine treatment based on sex-related differences, despite the important role of sex in migraine. Our aim was to evaluate gender bias in published clinical trials on monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab and eptinezumab). We performed a systematic review of controlled clinical trials of erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab and eptinezumab, searching the PubMed/MEDLINE database for articles published before December 2021. The search identified 760 articles, 25 of which met the inclusion criteria. Of all the patients included in these trials, 85.1% were women. Only one study had female lead authors. Two of the 25 studies included a sex-based analysis of the primary endpoint. None of the articles discussed the results separately for men and for women. The proportion of men recruited in trials is scarce and more studies are needed to guarantee the safety and tolerability of monoclonal antibodies used in male migraine. As observed in our study, despite the high number of women recruited, only 2 studies analysed the results separately by sex. Thus, a potential risk of gender bias was found in these clinical trials.
Collapse
|