Post-trial monitoring of a randomised controlled trial of intensive glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes extended from 10 years to 24 years (UKPDS 91)

High-Dose Semaglutide (Up to 16 mg) in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Overweight or Obesity: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial

OBJECTIVE

Studies have demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists for glycemic control and body weight. The aim of this trial was to characterize the dose-dependent effects of semaglutide (up to 16 mg/week) in people with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this parallel-group, participant- and investigator-blinded, phase 2 trial, 245 individuals with type 2 diabetes and BMI ≥27 kg/m2 on metformin were randomized to weekly semaglutide (2, 8, or 16 mg s.c.) or placebo for 40 weeks. Doses were escalated every 4 weeks, followed by a maintenance period. Dose modifications were not allowed. Primary and secondary efficacy end points included change from baseline to week 40 in HbA1c and body weight, respectively.

RESULTS

Estimated treatment difference between 16 and 2 mg was -0.3 percentage points (%-points) (95% CI -0.7 to 0.2; P = 0.245) for HbA1c change and -3.4 kg (-6.0 to -0.8; P = 0.011) for weight change for the treatment policy estimand and -0.5%-points (-1.0 to -0.1; P = 0.015) and -4.5 kg (-7.6 to -1.4; P = 0.004), respectively, for the hypothetical estimand. Dose-response modeling confirmed these findings. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuations due to AEs, primarily gastrointestinal, were more frequent in the semaglutide 8 and 16 mg groups than in the 2 mg group. No severe hypoglycemic episodes were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher semaglutide doses for type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity provide modest additional glucose-lowering effect, with additional weight loss, at the expense of more AEs and treatment discontinuations. A study for evaluating high-dose semaglutide in obesity is currently underway.

Time-divided hypoglycemia management derived by continuous glucose monitoring may reduce microvascular diseases in type 2 diabetes patients

PURPOSE

To assess the association between hypoglycemia exposure and the risk of developing microvascular diseases (MVDs) in type 2 diabetes patients via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), aiming to identify optimal hypoglycemia thresholds for improved glucose management.

METHODS

A total of 174 type 2 diabetes patients underwent 2 weeks of CGM. Binary multivariate logistic regression assessed the association between hypoglycemia exposure and MVDs prevalence at thresholds of 3.0-3.9 mmol/L.

RESULTS

After 14 days of monitoring, 79.9% of patients experienced hypoglycemia. The MVDs group had a significantly greater percentage of participants with hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.4 mmol/L: 57.6 vs. 39.8%, P = 0.023) and nocturnal hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.9 mmol/L: 62.1 vs. 46.3%, P = 0.043), with no significant difference in daytime hypoglycemia. After adjustment for confounders, only nocturnal hypoglycemia was independently associated with the risk of developing MVDs, and the prevalence of MVDs was positively associated with hypoglycemia severity. When the hypoglycemia threshold was reduced from 3.4-3.0 mmol/L, the odds ratio increased from 1.342 (1.026, 1.798) to 1.855 (1.141, 3.457). Further subgroup analysis revealed that nocturnal hypoglycemia below 3.4 mmol/L was a risk factor for the development of retinopathy and neuropathy (P < 0.05) but not for nephropathy.

CONCLUSION

Nighttime glucose levels below 3.4 mmol/L are strongly associated with a greater risk of developing retinopathy and neuropathy in type 2 diabetes patients. Thus, blood glucose management should be time-specific, with daytime levels maintained above 3.9 mmol/L and nighttime levels maintained above 3.4 mmol/L.

iGlarLixi provides improved early glycaemic control after 12 weeks of treatment compared with basal insulin in Asian people with type 2 diabetes: A post hoc analysis of the LixiLan-O-AP and LixiLan-L-CN studies

AIMS

To evaluate early glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] < 7.0% [<53.0 mmol/mol], fasting plasma glucose [FPG] ≤ 7.0 mmol/L or postprandial glucose [PPG] ≤ 10.0 mmol/L) with iGlarLixi versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in Asian people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in LixiLan-O-AP or basal insulin (BI) ± OADs in LixiLan-L-CN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This post hoc analysis evaluated changes from baseline to Week 12 in HbA1c, FPG and PPG, hypoglycaemia incidence and the rates of target HbA1c achievement at Weeks 8 and 12. Median time to glycaemic control (i.e., time to 50% achieving target HbA1c, FPG or PPG) was also assessed.

RESULTS

At Week 12, mean HbA1c reductions were greater with iGlarLixi versus Gla-100 in LixiLan-O-AP (-1.6% vs. -1.1% [-17.0 vs. -12.0 mmol/mol]) and LixiLan-L-CN (-1.3% vs. -0.5% [-13.9 vs. -5.4 mmol/mol]). PPG reductions were greater with iGlarLixi, while FPG reductions and hypoglycaemia incidence were similar. At Weeks 8 and 12, more participants had achieved target HbA1c or PPG with iGlarLixi versus Gla-100 in both studies. Median time to achieve HbA1c and PPG targets was shorter with iGlarLixi versus Gla-100 in LixiLan-O-AP (85 vs. 126 days and 84 vs. 167 days) and LixiLan-L-CN (85 vs. 239 days and 85 days vs. not estimable); median time to achieve FPG target was similar in LixiLan-O-AP (57 vs. 57 days) and LixiLan-L-CN (29 vs. 30 days).

CONCLUSIONS

In Asian people with T2D suboptimally controlled on OADs or BI, iGlarLixi provided comprehensive earlier glycaemic control than Gla-100.

Comparison of Dose Escalation Versus Switching to Tirzepatide Among People With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Lower Doses of Dulaglutide : A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Tirzepatide, a once-weekly glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity, showed clinically meaningful reductions in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body weight in the SURPASS phase 3 clinical trial program.

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy and safety of escalation of dulaglutide dose versus switching to tirzepatide in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 4 trial (SURPASS-SWITCH [A Phase 4, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Weekly Dulaglutide to Weekly Tirzepatide in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes], ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05564039).

SETTING

38 sites across 5 countries.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with HbA1c 7.0% or greater to 9.5% or less, stable body weight, body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or greater, receiving a stable dose of dulaglutide (0.75 or 1.5 mg) for at least 6 months and 0 to 3 oral antihyperglycemic medications for at least 3 months.

INTERVENTION

Escalation of dulaglutide to 4.5 mg or maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or switching to tirzepatide.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary end point was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 40. The key secondary end point was change from baseline in weight at week 40.

RESULTS

A total of 282 adults were randomly assigned to tirzepatide (n = 139) or dulaglutide (n = 143). Change from baseline in HbA1c at week 40 was -1.44% (SE, 0.07) with tirzepatide, 15 mg or MTD, and -0.67% (SE, 0.08) with dulaglutide, 4.5 mg or MTD (estimated treatment difference, -0.77% [95% CI, -0.98% to -0.56%; P < 0.001]). Change from baseline in weight at week 40 was -10.5 kg (SE, 0.5) with tirzepatide and -3.6 kg (SE, 0.5) with dulaglutide (estimated treatment difference, -6.9 kg [CI, -8.3 to -5.5 kg; P < 0.001]). Serious adverse events were reported by 10 (7.2%) tirzepatide and 10 (7.0%) dulaglutide participants. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea and diarrhea.

LIMITATION

Open-label design.

CONCLUSION

In SURPASS-SWITCH, switching treatment to tirzepatide provided additional HbA1c reduction and weight loss compared with escalating treatment with dulaglutide.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Eli Lilly and Company.

Development and Validation of the Patient-Level Chinese Diabetes Outcome Model on Long-term Complications in Type 2 Diabetes: An Application of the Hong Kong Diabetes Register

OBJECTIVE

Patient-level simulation models, mainly developed in Western populations, capture complex interactions between risk factors and complications to predict the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of novel treatments and identify high-risk subgroups for personalized care. However, incidence of outcomes varies significantly by ethnicity and region. We used high-quality, patient-level register data to develop the Chinese Diabetes Outcomes Model (CDOM) for predicting incident and recurrent events in type 2 diabetes (T2D).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The CDOM was developed using the prospective Hong Kong Diabetes Register (HKDR) cohort (n = 21,453; median follow-up duration, 7.9 years; 166,433 patient-years). It was externally validated with a retrospective territory-wide cohort of Chinese patients with T2D attending Hong Kong publicly funded diabetes centers and community clinics (n = 176,120; follow-up duration, 7.2 years; 953,523 patient-years).

RESULTS

The CDOM predicted first and recurrent events with satisfactory performance during internal (C-statistic = 0.740-0.941) and external (C-statistic = 0.758-0.932) validation after calibration. The respective C-statistic values for cancer were 0.664 and 0.661. Subgroup analysis showed consistent performance during internal (C-statistic = 0.632-0.953) and external (C-statistic = 0.598-0.953) validation after calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

The CDOM, developed using comprehensive register data with long-term follow-up, is a robust tool for predicting long-term outcomes in Chinese patients with T2D. The model enables the identification of patient subgroups to augment study design and develop tailored novel treatment strategies, inform policy, and guide practice to improve cost-effectiveness of diabetes care.

Identifying and visualising temporal trajectories of hospitalisations for traditional and non-traditional complications in people with type 2 diabetes: a population-based study

Background

People with type 2 diabetes are increasingly susceptible to complications that are not specific to diabetes. We aimed to examine the temporal trajectories of hospitalisations for traditional and non-traditional complications in people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

We included 758,254 people with incident type 2 diabetes between 2002 and 2018 in Hong Kong, followed up until 2019. We included hospitalisations for 72 selected diseases and all-cause deaths. We derived the temporal trajectories of hospitalisations based on pairs of disease associations and identified trajectory clusters using Markov Cluster Algorithm.

Findings

During a median follow-up of 7.8 (IQR: 4-12) years, 57.6% of people experienced a hospitalisation for any of the 72 selected diseases and 22.6% of people died. Among the 5184 directional disease pairs, 95 were identified as having a significant and directional association. The three most common disease pairs were hospitalisations for urinary tract infection followed by pneumonia, ischemic heart disease followed by heart failure, and ischemic stroke followed by pneumonia. Cardiovascular and kidney diseases were predominant in the hospitalisation trajectories. However, these traditional complications had complex associations both among themselves and with various non-traditional complications across multiple systems. Three distinct trajectory clusters were identified, with heart failure/chronic kidney disease, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection as central diseases.

Interpretation

Cardiovascular and kidney diseases interacted with a broad set of non-traditional complications to influence the overall patterns of hospitalisation progression in people with diabetes, highlighting the need to broaden diabetes care to consider complications beyond the traditional focus.

Funding

Direct Grant for Research from The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Long-term benefits of atorvastatin on the incidence of cardiovascular events: the ASCOT-Legacy 20-year follow-up

AIMS

Cardiovascular (CV) deaths were reduced by atorvastatin during a 16-year follow-up of participants in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-lipid-lowering arm. We now extend these observations over 20 years and report both non-fatal and fatal CV outcomes.

METHODS

A cohort of 4605 UK hypertensive participants with total cholesterol <6.5 mmol/L (2317 atorvastatin vs 2288 placebo) was followed for up to 21 years (IQR 9.1-19.3). Cox proportional hazard models assessed HRs for non-fatal and fatal CV events. At the end of the original trial (3.3 years), all participants were offered atorvastatin. Lipid profiles were obtained from all subjects 2 years later and from subgroups approximately 9 years post-trial.

RESULTS

Patients allocated to atorvastatin had a significant reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) events (HR (95% CI) 0.81 (0.69 to 0.94, p=0.006)), total coronary events (0.88 (0.80 to 0.98, p=0.017)) and CV deaths (0.86 (0.74 to 0.99, p=0.048)). No significant reduction in heart failure (HF), strokes, total CV events and all-cause mortality was observed.In participants assigned atorvastatin in the trial, 3-year mean low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was strongly associated with long-term CV outcomes. The HRs per 1 mmol/L decrease were for non-fatal MI and fatal CHD (0.69 (0.57 to 0.85, p<0.001)), total coronary events (0.70 (0.61 to 0.79, p<0.001)), non-fatal and fatal HF (0.68 (0.57 to 0.81, p<0.001)), non-fatal and fatal stroke (0.74 (0.59 to 0.92, p=0.006)), total CV events and procedures (0.74 (0.66 to 0.81, p<0.001)), CV mortality (0.66 (0.55 to 0.81, p<0.001)) and all-cause mortality (0.81 (0.71 to 0.90, p<0.001)).Two years after the trial, approximately two-thirds of subjects in each arm were taking atorvastatin. At this time point and approximately 9 years post-trial, lipid profiles were similar between those formerly assigned atorvastatin or placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations provide further evidence for the long-term legacy effects of statins and have implications for the early introduction of statins to prevent CV events and mortality.

Correlation between key indicators of continuous glucose monitoring and the risk of diabetic foot

BACKGROUND

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics, such as time in range (TIR) and glycemic risk index (GRI), have been linked to various diabetes-related complications, including diabetic foot (DF).

AIM

To investigate the association between CGM-derived indicators and the risk of DF in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

A total of 591 individuals with T2DM (297 with DF and 294 without DF) were enrolled. Relevant clinical data, complications, comorbidities, hematological parameters, and 72-hour CGM data were collected. Logistic regression analysis was employed to examine the relationship between these measurements and the risk of DF.

RESULTS

Individuals with DF exhibited higher mean blood glucose (MBG) levels and increased proportions of time above range (TAR), TAR level 1, and TAR level 2, but lower TIR (all P < 0.001). Patients with DF had significantly lower rates of achieving target ranges for TIR, TAR, and TAR level 2 than those without DF (all P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that GRI, MBG, and TAR level 1 were positively associated with DF risk, while TIR was inversely correlated (all P < 0.05). Achieving TIR and TAR was inversely correlated with white blood cell count and glycated hemoglobin A1c levels (P < 0.05). Additionally, achieving TAR was influenced by fasting plasma glucose, body mass index, diabetes duration, and antidiabetic medication use.

CONCLUSION

CGM metrics, particularly TIR and GRI, are significantly associated with the risk of DF in T2DM, emphasizing the importance of improved glucose control.

Clinical Profile and Management of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Hospital Setting

Background

New-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common clinical scenario in the hospital settings. However, data on the baseline characteristics of these patients at diagnosis in Spain remain limited.

Objectives

This study aims to describe the characteristics of 165 patients admitted to a Spanish tertiary hospital with new-onset T2DM. We analysed the use of different treatment regimens at discharge and metabolic control during follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective, single-centre cohort study was conducted at General University Gregorio Marañón Hospital, between January 2018 and April 2021.

Results

A total of 165 patients participated, with a mean age of 56.4 years, 62.4% of whom were men. Diabetes-related complications were observed in 24.8% of patients at diagnosis. Combined antidiabetic treatment was required in 87% of cases. The mean baseline HbA1c was 10.8%, which decreased by 4.9% after 8 months of follow-up.

Conclusion

The clinical heterogeneity and severity of hyperglycaemia in this cohort presented management challenges, in contrast to outpatient settings. Monotherapy was rarely used, with higher adoption of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists compared to other studies. Additional research is needed to refine treatment strategies and optimize care for patients with newly diagnosed T2DM.

Removing barriers to management of adults with type 2 diabetes on insulin using continuous glucose monitoring in UK primary care practice: An expert consensus

AIMS

This expert consensus reviews the reality of primary care clinical management of people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on non-intensive insulin therapy, with an emphasis on the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology for effective care in this participant group. Here, we identify key unmet needs for skills and systems development within this frontline healthcare setting, along with major challenges and opportunities associated with managing these changes effectively.

METHODS

The authors participated in two primary care consensus panels held on 28 November 2023 and on 21 May 2024. The focus for these expert panels was to understand the unmet needs within primary care to manage adults with T2D treated with non-intensive insulin therapy and incorporating the use of CGM systems. A Delphi Survey was undertaken among a wider group of Primary Care Diabetes Technology Network members in the United Kingdom, to understand prevalent attitudes to management of adults with T2D on insulin and using CGM in primary care. Based on these activities, a series of consensus statements were tested in a second Delphi Survey.

RESULTS

The activities described, involving primary care healthcare professionals (HCPs) with expertise in diabetes management, identified a series of training and educational needs within UK general practice that are central to skills development for the care of adults with T2D on insulin therapy and the application of CGM technology. Potential barriers to effective primary care management of people with T2D using CGM devices were identified. Areas of concern included confidence in national and local guidelines for the management of T2D using CGM systems, lack of experience on the part both of HCPs and people with T2D, clinical workflows and systems, as well as inbuilt resistance to change among primary care teams. However, the expert group were clear that the goal of providing care for people with T2D on non-intensive insulin therapy using CGM technology as standard of care could be met (94.3%, n = 33). This will deliver clinical benefits for people with T2D, and improvements to clinical workflows in primary care. Cost-savings to the health service were also identified as an outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The need to adapt to the management of people with T2D on insulin therapy puts significant pressure on current workflows and skills for primary care teams. Steps in overcoming these immediate pressures, to ensure effective clinical management of people with T2D, are discussed, along with a series of consensus statements that identify the key areas of change to manage. Ultimately, the great majority of expert primary care HCPs were confident or very confident that using CGM technology will become the standard of care for people with T2D treated with insulin in primary care.

A five-drug class model using routinely available clinical features to optimise prescribing in type 2 diabetes: a prediction model development and validation study

BACKGROUND

Data to support individualised choice of optimal glucose-lowering therapy are scarce for people with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to establish whether routinely available clinical features can be used to predict the relative glycaemic effectiveness of five glucose-lowering drug classes.

METHODS

We developed and validated a five-drug class model to predict the relative glycaemic effectiveness, in terms of absolute 12-month glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), for initiating dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones. The model used nine routinely available clinical features of people with type 2 diabetes at drug initiation as predictive factors (age, duration of diabetes, sex, and baseline HbA1c, BMI, estimated glomerular filtration rate, HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and alanine aminotransferase). The model was developed and validated with observational data from England (Clinical Practice Research Datalink [CPRD] Aurum), in people with type 2 diabetes aged 18-79 years initiating one of the five drug classes between Jan 1, 2004, and Oct 14, 2020, with holdback validation according to geographical region and calendar period. The model was further validated in individual-level data from three published randomised drug trials in type 2 diabetes (TriMaster three-drug crossover trial and two parallel-arm trials [NCT00622284 and NCT01167881]). For validation in CPRD, we assessed differences in observed glycaemic effectiveness between matched (1:1) concordant and discordant groups receiving therapy that was either concordant or discordant with model-predicted optimal therapy, with optimal therapy defined as the drug class with the highest predicted glycaemic effectiveness (ie, lowest predicted 12-month HbA1c). Further validation involved pairwise drug class comparisons in all datasets. We also evaluated associations with long-term outcomes in model-concordant and model-discordant groups in CPRD, assessing 5-year risks of glycaemic failure (confirmed HbA1c ≥69 mmol/mol), all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events or heart failure (MACE-HF) outcomes, renal progression, and microvascular complications using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical covariates.

FINDINGS

The five-drug class model was developed from 100 107 drug initiations in CPRD. In the overall CPRD cohort (combined development and validation cohorts), 32 305 (15·2%) of 212 166 drug initiations were of the model-predicted optimal therapy. In model-concordant groups, mean observed 12-month HbA1c benefit was 5·3 mmol/mol (95% CI 4·9-5·7) in the CPRD geographical validation cohort (n=24 746 drug initiations, n=12 373 matched pairs) and 5·0 mmol/mol (4·3-5·6) in the CPRD temporal validation cohort (n=9682 drug initiations, n=4841 matched pairs) compared with matched model-discordant groups. Predicted HbA1c differences were well calibrated with observed HbA1c differences in the three clinical trials in pairwise drug class comparisons, and in pairwise comparisons of the five drug classes in CPRD. 5-year risk of glycaemic failure was lower in model-concordant versus model-discordant groups in CPRD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0·62 [95% CI 0·59-0·64]). For long-term non-glycaemic outcomes, model-concordant versus model-discordant groups had a similar 5-year risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 0·95 [0·83-1·09]) and lower risks of MACE-HF outcomes (aHR 0·85 [0·76-0·95]), renal progression (aHR 0·71 [0·64-0·79]), and microvascular complications (aHR 0·86 [0·78-0·96]).

INTERPRETATION

We have developed a five-drug class model that uses routine clinical data to identify optimal glucose-lowering therapies for people with type 2 diabetes. Individuals on model-predicted optimal therapy had lower 12-month HbA1c, were less likely to need additional glucose-lowering therapy, and had a lower risk of diabetes complications than individuals on non-optimal therapy. With setting-specific optimisation, the use of routinely collected parameters means that the model is easy to introduce to clinical care in most countries worldwide.

FUNDING

UK Medical Research Council.

Improving Therapeutic Adherence and Reducing Therapeutic Inertia in the Management of People with Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Call-to-Action from the Middle East

Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes are highly prevalent and poorly controlled cardiometabolic diseases in the Middle East. Therapeutic non-adherence and therapeutic inertia are major contributors to this suboptimal disease control. Regardless of the cardiometabolic disease, evidence-based solutions may be used to improve therapeutic non-adherence and overcome inertia, and thereby help to alleviate the heavy burden of cardiovascular disease in the Middle East. Such solutions include the routine and early use of single-pill combinations, educational initiatives for patients, and multidisciplinary team-based care. This article highlights these and other potential solutions for therapeutic non-adherence and inertia, as discussed at the 2024 Evidence in the Cardiometabolic Environment (EVIDENT) Summit. There is now a 'call-to-action' from healthcare providers and other stakeholder groups to ensure that the solutions discussed at this meeting are implemented within health systems in the Middle East to significantly improve cardiovascular outcomes.Infographic available for this article.

Role of the liver in the sustained normalisation of A1c over 2 years following short-term insulin therapy in early type 2 diabetes

AIMS

When administered in early type 2 diabetes (T2DM), the strategy of 'induction' with short-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) followed by 'maintenance' with metformin thereafter can yield outstanding glycaemic control, with some patients achieving A1c in the normal range of its assay. We thus sought to identify determinants of sustained normalisation of A1c in response to this treatment strategy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, adults with T2DM of mean duration 1.7 ± 1.4 years received induction IIT (glargine, lispro) for 3 weeks, followed by metformin maintenance either with or without periodic 2-week courses of IIT every 3 months for 2 years. Sustained glycaemic normalisation was defined by A1c <6.0% at 2 years.

RESULTS

Of 101 participants, 26 achieved A1c <6.0% at 2 years. At baseline, these individuals had lower A1c and fasting glucose than the other participants, along with better beta-cell function. During maintenance therapy from 3 weeks to 2 years, they had greater reduction of adiposity (body mass index: p = 0.02; waist circumference: p = 0.02), hepatic insulin resistance (HOMA-IR: p = 0.02) and ALT (p = 0.005), coupled with relative stabilisation of beta-cell function and glycaemia. On logistic regression analyses, significant independent predictors of normalisation of A1c at 2 years were baseline A1c (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.01 [95% CI 0.001-0.16], p = 0.001) and the changes in waist circumference (aOR = 0.77 [0.63-0.94], p = 0.012) and ALT (aOR = 0.90 [0.82-0.98], p = 0.019) during maintenance therapy from 3 weeks to 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

While lower baseline A1c and greater reduction in central adiposity predicted A1c <6.0% at 2 years as anticipated, the emergence of greater reduction in ALT as a concomitant determinant highlights the role of the liver in the achievement of sustained glycaemic normalisation.

Glycemic Targets and Prevention of Complications

CONTEXT

Complications of diabetes mellitus have significant impacts on morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and health costs for individuals. Setting and achieving glycemic targets to prevent these complications is a top priority when managing diabetes. However, patients often already have complications when diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. Therefore, methods to prevent disease progression become a crucial component of diabetes management. The purpose of this article is to review glycemic targets and methods of screening and managing diabetes-related complications.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A PubMed review of the literature pertaining to diabetes mellitus, glycemic targets, microvascular complications, and macrovascular complications was conducted. We reviewed articles published between 1993 and 2024. Guidelines published by nationally recognized organizations in the fields of diabetes, nephrology, and cardiology were referenced. Public health statistics obtained by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Kidney Foundation were used.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Achieving glycemic targets and screening for diabetes-related complications at appropriate intervals remains the key factor for early detection and intervention. An algorithmic approach to glycemic management based on individual risk factors is beneficial in choosing pharmacotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The consequences of diabetes-related complications can be detrimental. However, achieving and maintaining glycemic targets combined with diligent screening, reduction of risk factors, and prompt treatment can halt disease progression.

The Anti-Aging Mechanism of Metformin: From Molecular Insights to Clinical Applications

Aging represents a complex biological phenomenon marked by the progressive deterioration of physiological functions over time, reduced resilience, and increased vulnerability to age-related diseases, ultimately culminating in mortality. Recent research has uncovered diverse molecular mechanisms through which metformin extends its benefits beyond glycemic control, presenting it as a promising intervention against aging. This review delves into the anti-aging properties of metformin, highlighting its role in mitochondrial energy modulation, activation of the AMPK-mTOR signaling pathway, stimulation of autophagy, and mitigation of inflammation linked to cellular aging. Furthermore, we discuss its influence on epigenetic modifications that underpin genomic stability and cellular homeostasis. Metformin's potential in addressing age-associated disorders including metabolic, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative diseases is also explored. The Targeting Aging with Metformin (TAME) trial aims to provide key evidence on its efficacy in delaying aging in humans. Despite these promising insights, significant challenges persist in gaining a more comprehensive understanding into its underlying mechanisms, determining optimal dosing strategies, and evaluating long-term safety in non-diabetic populations. Addressing these challenges is crucial to fully realizing metformin's potential as an anti-aging therapeutic.

Association between sex, age, temporal trends, and glycemic control of 221,769 adults with type 2 diabetes in a multi-ethnic middle-income Asian country

AIMS

We examined the association between sex, age, temporal trends, and glycemic control among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a multi-ethnic middle-income Asian country.

METHODS

Using the National Diabetes Registry (2011-2020), we analyzed data for 221,769 adult Malaysians with T2D.We used quantile regressions to estimate the association of sex, age, and their interaction on HbA1clevels at the 5th, 50th, and 95thpercentile and logistic regression to estimate the odds of good control (HbA1c < 7 %).

RESULTS

The participants were Malays (61.8 %), females (59.3 %), and aged 50-69 years (63.5 %). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) HbA1c was 7.2 % (6.4 %, 8.9 %) for males and 7.3 % (6.4 %, 9.0 %) for females. The prevalence of good control was 42.8 % for males and 41.8 % for females. Glycemic control improved from 2011 to 2020 for both females and males above 40. Control significantly improved with age among both sexes. However, females had increasingly better control than men with increasing age (PHeterogeneity < 0.001). The adjusted odds (95 % CI) of good control comparing females to males at 30, 50, and 70 years was 0.90 (0.81, 0.99), 0.93 (0.90, 0.97), and 1.12 (1.08, 1.16) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A more aggressive approach to type 2 diabetes management is needed for both sexes, targeting especially the younger age groups, to improve glycemic control and reduce diabetes burden.

Revisiting the concepts of de novo lipogenesis to understand the conversion of carbohydrates into fats: Stop overvaluing and extrapolating the renowned phrase "fat burns in the flame of carbohydrate"

Carbohydrates can be converted into fatty acids via de novo lipogenesis (DNL). Although DNL is considered inefficient, these endogenous fatty acids contribute substantially to the esterification pathway in adipose tissue, together with fatty acids of feeding. This article revisited the concepts of DNL and aimed to discuss the clinical magnitude of carbohydrate overfeeding and fat mass accumulation. Although fat storage resulting from fat intake is more favorable for fat mass accrual than carbohydrates due to molecule structure and metabolism (e.g., oxidation and thermic effect), carbohydrates can substantially participate in lipogenesis and esterification under excess carbohydrate intake over time. Regarding only monosaccharide overfeeding, glucose and fructose favor the subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue, respectively. While fructose and sucrose are considered villains in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, energy surplus from carbohydrates, regardless of sources, can be considered an underlying cause of obesity. Interestingly, some degree of DNL in adipocytes may be favorable to mitigate a high deposition of fatty acids in the liver, conferring a physiological role. Although "fat burns in the flame of carbohydrate" is a praiseworthy phrase that has helped describe basic concepts in biochemistry for many decades, it appears to be overvalued and extrapolated even nowadays. DNL cannot be neglected. It is time to consider DNL an efficient biochemical process in health and disease.

Therapeutic effects of composite probiotics derived from fermented camel milk on metabolic dysregulation and intestinal barrier integrity in type 2 diabetes rats

Background

In the Kazakh community of Xinjiang, China, fermented camel milk has been traditionally used to manage diabetes. This study evaluates the effects of composite probiotics derived from fermented camel milk (CPCM) on metabolic disturbances in a rat model of Type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Methods

T2DM was induced in Wistar rats using streptozotocin. Experimental groups included a diabetic control, Metformin, and low- and high-dose CPCM. Measurements over 6 weeks included body weight (BW), fasting blood glucose (FBG), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), C-peptide (CP), lipid profiles, inflammatory markers, fecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and tight junction protein expression in colonic tissues.

Results

High-dose CPCM significantly increased BW by 22.2% (p < 0.05) and reduced FBG by 6.5 mmol/L (p < 0.001). The OGTT AUC decreased by 40.1% (p < 0.001), and HbA1c levels fell by 22.9% (p < 0.01). CP levels rose by 21.8% (p < 0.05). Lipid profiles improved: TC decreased by 40.0%, TG by 17.1%, and LDL-C by 30.4% (all p < 0.001). Fecal SCFAs, including acetate (75.4%, p < 0.001), methyl acetate (18.9%, p < 0.05), and butyrate (289.9%, p < 0.001), increased, with total SCFAs rising by 89.7% (p < 0.001). Inflammatory markers IL-1β (12.7%, p < 0.01), TNF-α (16.7%, p < 0.05), and IL-6 (17.3%, p < 0.01) were significantly reduced. Tight junction protein expression (ZO-1, occludin, claudin-1) and mucin (MUC2) in colonic tissues increased (p < 0.05). CPCM treatment also reduced serum total bile acids by 24.9%, while hepatic and fecal bile acids increased by 114.0% and 37.8% (all p < 0.001). CPCM lowered serum DAO, D-lactate, and LPS levels (all p < 0.001). mRNA levels of TGR5 and CYP7A1 in the liver, and TGR5 and FXR in the colon, were markedly elevated (all p < 0.001). Histological examinations revealed reduced pancreatic inflammation and hepatic steatosis, with restored colonic structure.

Conclusion

CPCM treatment significantly improved metabolic dysregulation in the T2DM rat model, reducing blood glucose and lipid levels, enhancing intestinal barrier function, and increasing insulin secretion. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of CPCM in T2DM management and probiotics' role in metabolic health.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed NA, McCoy RG, Aleppo G, Bajaj M, Balapattabi K, Beverly EA, Briggs Early K, Bruemmer D, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Ekhlaspour L, Gaglia JL, Garg R, Girotra M, Khunti K, Lal R, Lingvay I, Matfin G, Neumiller JJ, Pandya N, Pekas EJ, Pilla SJ, Polsky S, Segal AR, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Bannuru RR. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

When Does Metabolic Memory Start? Insights From the Association of Medical Diabetologists Annals Initiative on Stringent HbA1c Targets

Early, intensive glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with long-term benefits in cardiovascular disease (CVD) development. Evidence on benefits of achieving HbA1c targets close to normal values is scant. Individuals with newly diagnosed T2D, without CVD at baseline, were identified in an Italian clinical registry (n = 251,339). We adopted three definitions of early exposure periods (0-1, 0-2, and 0-3 years). Mean HbA1c was categorized into HbA1c <5.7%, 5.7-6.4%, 6.5-7.0%, 7.1-8.0%, and >8.0%. The outcome was the incidence of major cardiovascular events. After a mean follow-up of 4.6 ± 2.9 years, at multivariate Cox regression analysis, compared with mean HbA1c <5.7% during the first year after diagnosis, the increase in the risk of CVD was 24%, 42%, 49%, and 56% for patients with HbA1c of 5.7-6.4%, 6.5-7.0%, 7.1-8.0%, and >8.0%, respectively. The same trend was documented in all exposure periods. In conclusion, our data support that an early achievement of stringent targets of HbA1c <5.7% is worthy for CVD prevention.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Glycaemic control is still central in the hierarchy of priorities in type 2 diabetes management

A panel of primary care and diabetes specialists conducted focused literature searches on the current role of glycaemic control in the management of type 2 diabetes and revisited the evolution of evidence supporting the importance of early and intensive blood glucose control as a central strategy to reduce the risk of adverse long-term outcomes. The optimal approach to type 2 diabetes management has evolved over time as the evidence base has expanded from data from trials that established the role of optimising glycaemic control to recent data from cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) demonstrating organ-protective effects of newer glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs). The results from these CVOTs were derived mainly from people with type 2 diabetes and prior cardiovascular and kidney disease or multiple risk factors. In more recent years, earlier diagnosis in high-risk individuals has contributed to the large proportion of people with type 2 diabetes who do not have complications. In these individuals, a legacy effect of early and optimal control of blood glucose and cardiometabolic risk factors has been proven to reduce cardiovascular and kidney disease events and all-cause mortality. As there is a lack of RCTs investigating the potential synergistic effects of intensive glucose control and organ-protective effects of newer GLDs, this article re-evaluates the evolution of the scientific evidence and highlights the importance of integrating glycaemic control as a pivotal early therapeutic goal in most people with type 2 diabetes, while targeting existing cardiovascular and kidney disease. We also emphasise the importance of implementing multifactorial management using a multidisciplinary approach to facilitate regular review, patient empowerment and the possibility of tailoring interventions to account for the heterogeneity of type 2 diabetes.

Traditional versus intensive blood glucose control: long-term target range duration and cardiovascular disease risk and all-cause mortality - a real-world cohort study

Objective

For a long time, the dispute about whether improved glycemic control can bring significant benefits has remained unresolved. We aimed to investigate the association of time spent in different fasting glucose target ranges with cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality in a population with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Method

A total of 3460 T2DM patients in the Kailuan cohort were included in this study. The Time in Target Range (TITRE) was calculated as the proportion of time that fasting blood glucose (FBG) was within the usual glycemic control range and the intensive glycemic control range between 2006 and 2016. The Cox proportional hazards regression model analyzed the relationship between TITRE, defined by different glucose ranges, and cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality.

Results

During a median follow-up of 4.23 years, a total of 360 CVDs and 238 deaths were recorded. After correcting for traditional risk factors, we observed that in the conventional blood glucose control group, each increase of 1 standard deviation in TITRE was associated with a 23% (HR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.68-0.87) reduction in CVD risk and a 20% reduction in all-cause mortality (HR, 0.80; 95%CI, 0.69-0.92). Similar results were also observed in the intensified blood glucose control group. In the conventional blood glucose control group, participants with TITRE of 50% or more had an absolute incidence rate of CVD of 16.77%, whereas in the intensified blood glucose control group, participants with TITRE of 50% or more had an absolute incidence rate of CVD of 11.82%.

Conclusions

In patients with type 2 diabetes, achieving near-normal blood glucose levels appears to significantly reduce the risk of diabetes-related cardiovascular outcomes.

Assessment of cardiovascular risk with sulfonylurea use in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cohort study

AIMS

The utilization of sulfonylurea (SU) for the management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) has witnessed a decline, attributed to the rising popularity of alternative medications and uncertainties surrounding the cardiovascular risk profile of SUs. This study aimed to investigate the potential association between SU intake and the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study, based on a general practice (GP) registry, was designed, encompassing patients diagnosed with T2DM between 2005 and 2014.Follow-up persisted until the occurrence of a cardiovascular event, loss to follow-up, or until December 31, 2022. Comparative analyses were conducted between patients, receiving SU treatment and those without RESULTS: Data from a cohort comprising 5589 patients revealed that 13 % and 13.1 % of individuals in the comparator group and the SU group, respectively, experienced a cardiovascular event. However, no statistically significant elevation in the risk of cardiovascular events was observed after SU usage. Furthermore, the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were significantly higher in the SU group (7.0 % vs. 6.4 %, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this study indicate that the use of sulfonylureas SUs is not associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of cardiovascular events among patients with type T2DM. These results contribute to the ongoing discourse on the safety and efficacy of SU therapy in diabetes management.

Worldwide trends in diabetes prevalence and treatment from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 1108 population-representative studies with 141 million participants

BACKGROUND

Diabetes can be detected at the primary health-care level, and effective treatments lower the risk of complications. There are insufficient data on the coverage of treatment for diabetes and how it has changed. We estimated trends from 1990 to 2022 in diabetes prevalence and treatment for 200 countries and territories.

METHODS

We used data from 1108 population-representative studies with 141 million participants aged 18 years and older with measurements of fasting glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and information on diabetes treatment. We defined diabetes as having a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of 7·0 mmol/L or higher, having an HbA1c of 6·5% or higher, or taking medication for diabetes. We defined diabetes treatment as the proportion of people with diabetes who were taking medication for diabetes. We analysed the data in a Bayesian hierarchical meta-regression model to estimate diabetes prevalence and treatment.

FINDINGS

In 2022, an estimated 828 million (95% credible interval [CrI] 757-908) adults (those aged 18 years and older) had diabetes, an increase of 630 million (554-713) from 1990. From 1990 to 2022, the age-standardised prevalence of diabetes increased in 131 countries for women and in 155 countries for men with a posterior probability of more than 0·80. The largest increases were in low-income and middle-income countries in southeast Asia (eg, Malaysia), south Asia (eg, Pakistan), the Middle East and north Africa (eg, Egypt), and Latin America and the Caribbean (eg, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and Costa Rica). Age-standardised prevalence neither increased nor decreased with a posterior probability of more than 0·80 in some countries in western and central Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, east Asia and the Pacific, Canada, and some Pacific island nations where prevalence was already high in 1990; it decreased with a posterior probability of more than 0·80 in women in Japan, Spain, and France, and in men in Nauru. The lowest prevalence in the world in 2022 was in western Europe and east Africa for both sexes, and in Japan and Canada for women, and the highest prevalence in the world in 2022 was in countries in Polynesia and Micronesia, some countries in the Caribbean and the Middle East and north Africa, as well as Pakistan and Malaysia. In 2022, 445 million (95% CrI 401-496) adults aged 30 years or older with diabetes did not receive treatment (59% of adults aged 30 years or older with diabetes), 3·5 times the number in 1990. From 1990 to 2022, diabetes treatment coverage increased in 118 countries for women and 98 countries for men with a posterior probability of more than 0·80. The largest improvement in treatment coverage was in some countries from central and western Europe and Latin America (Mexico, Colombia, Chile, and Costa Rica), Canada, South Korea, Russia, Seychelles, and Jordan. There was no increase in treatment coverage in most countries in sub-Saharan Africa; the Caribbean; Pacific island nations; and south, southeast, and central Asia. In 2022, age-standardised treatment coverage was lowest in countries in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia, and treatment coverage was less than 10% in some African countries. Treatment coverage was 55% or higher in South Korea, many high-income western countries, and some countries in central and eastern Europe (eg, Poland, Czechia, and Russia), Latin America (eg, Costa Rica, Chile, and Mexico), and the Middle East and north Africa (eg, Jordan, Qatar, and Kuwait).

INTERPRETATION

In most countries, especially in low-income and middle-income countries, diabetes treatment has not increased at all or has not increased sufficiently in comparison with the rise in prevalence. The burden of diabetes and untreated diabetes is increasingly borne by low-income and middle-income countries. The expansion of health insurance and primary health care should be accompanied with diabetes programmes that realign and resource health services to enhance the early detection and effective treatment of diabetes.

FUNDING

UK Medical Research Council, UK Research and Innovation (Research England), and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[Cardiovascular preventive recommendations. PAPPS 2024 thematic updates]

The recommendations of the semFYC's Program for Preventive Activities and Health Promotion (PAPPS) for the prevention of vascular diseases (VD) are presented. New in this edition are new sections such as obesity, chronic kidney disease and metabolic hepatic steatosis, as well as a 'Don't Do' section in the different pathologies treated. The sections have been updated: epidemiological review, where the current morbidity and mortality of CVD in Spain and its evolution as well as the main risk factors are described; vascular risk (VR) and recommendations for the calculation of CV risk; main risk factors such as arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus, describing the method for their diagnosis, therapeutic objectives and recommendations for lifestyle measures and pharmacological treatment; indications for antiplatelet therapy, and recommendations for screening of atrial fibrillation, and recommendations for management of chronic conditions. The quality of testing and the strength of the recommendation are included in the main recommendations.

Intense simplified strategy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in patients with severe hyperglycaemia: multicentre, open label, randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the intense simplified strategy, which comprises short term intensive insulin therapy (SIIT) followed by subsequent oral antihyperglycaemic regimens, could improve long term glycaemic outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe hyperglycaemia.

DESIGN

Multicentre, open label, randomised trial.

SETTING

15 hospitals in China between December 2017 and December 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

412 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and significant hyperglycaemia (HbA1c ≥8.5%).

INTERVENTIONS

All randomised participants initially received SIIT for 2-3 weeks, followed by linagliptin 5 mg/day, metformin 1000 mg/day, combination linagliptin plus metformin, or lifestyle modification alone (control) for 48 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% at week 48 after SIIT. Secondary outcomes included glycaemic control, β cell function, and variations in insulin sensitivity.

RESULTS

412 participants were randomised. At baseline, the mean age was 46.8 (standard deviation 11.2) years, mean body mass index was 25.8 (2.9), and mean HbA1c was 11.0% (1.9%). At week 48, 80% (78/97), 72% (63/88), and 73% (69/95) of patients in the linagliptin plus metformin, linagliptin, and metformin groups, respectively, achieved HbA1c <7.0%, compared with 60% (56/93) in the control group (P=0.02 overall; P=0.003 for linagliptin plus metformin versus control; P=0.12 for linagliptin versus control; P=0.09 for metformin versus control). Additionally, 70% (68/97), 68% (60/88), and 68% (65/95) of patients in the linagliptin plus metformin, linagliptin, and metformin group, respectively, achieved HbA1c <6.5% compared with 48% (45/93) in the control group (P=0.005 overall; P=0.005 for linagliptin plus metformin versus control; P=0.01 for linagliptin versus control; P=0.008 for metformin versus control; all were significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons). Thus, compared with the control group, participants in the linagliptin plus metformin group were more likely to achieve HbA1c <7.0% at week 48 (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 5.65; P=0.005). Moreover, the linagliptin plus metformin group showed the most significant improvement in fasting plasma glucose and β cell function indices. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The intense simplified strategy using subsequent oral therapies post-SIIT, especially the linagliptin plus metformin combination, sustainably improved glycaemic control and β cell function in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe hyperglycaemia. This approach offers a promising direction for decision making in the clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03194945.

Current type 2 diabetes guidelines: Individualized treatment and how to make the most of metformin

Evidence-based guidelines provide the premise for the delivery of quality care to preserve health and prevent disabilities and premature death. The systematic gathering of observational, mechanistic and experimental data contributes to the hierarchy of evidence used to guide clinical practice. In the field of diabetes, metformin was discovered more than 100 years ago, and with 60 years of clinical use, it has stood the test of time regarding its value in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes. Although some guidelines have challenged the role of metformin as the first-line glucose-lowering drug, it is important to point out that the cardiovascular-renal protective effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists were gathered from patients with type 2 diabetes, the majority of whom were treated with metformin. Most national, regional and international guidelines recommend metformin as a foundation therapy with emphasis on avoidance of therapeutic inertia and early attainment of multiple treatment goals. Moreover, real-world evidence has confirmed the glucose-lowering and cardiovascular-renal benefits of metformin accompanied by an extremely low risk of lactic acidosis. In patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate 15-30 mL/min/1.73m2), metformin discontinuation was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular-renal events compared with metformin persistence. Meanwhile, it is understood that microbiota, nutrients and metformin can interact through the gut-brain-kidney axis to modulate homeostasis of bioactive molecules, systemic inflammation and energy metabolism. While these biological changes contribute to the multisystem effects of metformin, they may also explain the gastrointestinal side effects and vitamin B12 deficiency associated with metformin intolerance. By understanding the interactions between metformin, foods and microbiota, healthcare professionals are in a better position to optimize the use of metformin and mitigate potential side effects. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study and the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Program commenced 40 years ago provided the first evidence that type 2 diabetes is preventable and treatable. To drive real-world impact from this evidence, payors, practitioners and planners need to co-design and implement an integrated, data-driven, metformin-based programme to detect people with undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes (intermediate hyperglycaemia), notably impaired glucose tolerance, for early intervention. The systematic data collection will create real-world evidence to bring out the best of metformin and make healthcare sustainable, affordable and accessible.

Knowledge and Practice of Foot Care among Patients with Diabetes Attending Diabetes Center, Saudi Arabia

Background: Diabetic foot is a serious and often debilitating diabetes complication that poses a significant risk of morbidity and even mortality. However, ensuring good knowledge and good practice of appropriate foot care for patients with diabetes has been frequently neglected in diabetes management. Objectives: This study aimed to assess foot care knowledge and practice in patients with diabetes. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 400 patients with diabetes at Madinah Diabetes Center, Madinah City, Saudi Arabia, in 2023. Sociodemographic, knowledge score, practice of foot care, and diabetes-related data were collected using a valid interview structured questionnaire. The prevalence of good knowledge and practice level was calculated and compared using the studied patients' characteristics using appropriate statistical tests. Results: The prevalence of good knowledge of foot care and its practice was 35% and 27%, respectively. The knowledge level showed statistically significant differences among patients based on their age and diabetes type and duration. Patients who were >50 years (70.1%), had type 2 diabetes (89.5%), and with diabetes duration >10 years (65%) showed significantly better knowledge. Female patients (65.7%) had a higher good practice level compared with male patients (34.3%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights the insufficient knowledge and inadequate foot care practice among patients with diabetes in the studied population. Educational interventions and targeted strategies are necessary to improve knowledge about the importance of foot care and promote better foot care practices among patients with diabetes.