Administration of live varicella vaccine to children wtih leukaemia

Alphaherpesvirus Vaccines

Prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines for the alphaherpesviruses including varicella zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 have been the focus of enormous preclinical and clinical research. A live viral vaccine for prevention of chickenpox and a subunit therapeutic vaccine to prevent zoster are highly successful. In contrast, progress towards the development of effective prophylactic or therapeutic vaccines against HSV-1 and HSV-2 has met with limited success. This review provides an overview of the successes and failures, the different types of immune responses elicited by various vaccine modalities, and the need to reconsider the preclinical models and immune correlates of protection against HSV.

Transmission of Vaccine-Strain Varicella-Zoster Virus: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Live vaccines usually provide robust immunity but can transmit the vaccine virus.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the characteristics of secondary transmission of the vaccine-strain varicella-zoster virus (Oka strain; vOka) on the basis of the published experience with use of live varicella and zoster vaccines.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic review of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus databases for articles published through 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles that reported original data on vOka transmission from persons who received vaccines containing the live attenuated varicella-zoster virus.

DATA EXTRACTION

We abstracted data to describe vOka transmission by index patient's immune status, type (varicella or herpes zoster) and severity of illness, and whether transmission was laboratory confirmed.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included. We identified 13 patients with vOka varicella after transmission from 11 immunocompetent varicella vaccine recipients. In all instances, the vaccine recipient had a rash: 6 varicella-like and 5 herpes zoster. Transmission occurred mostly to household contacts. One additional case was not considered direct transmission from a vaccine recipient, but the mechanism was uncertain. Transmission from vaccinated immunocompromised children also occurred only if the vaccine recipient developed a rash postvaccination. Secondary cases of varicella caused by vOka were mild.

LIMITATIONS

It is likely that other vOka transmission cases remain unpublished.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthy, vaccinated persons have minimal risk for transmitting vOka to contacts and only if a rash is present. Our findings support the existing recommendations for routine varicella vaccination and the guidance that persons with vaccine-related rash avoid contact with susceptible persons at high risk for severe varicella complications.

Varicella Vaccination of Children With Leukemia Without Interruption of Maintenance Therapy: A Danish Experience

BACKGROUND

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) can be fatal or cause severe complications in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This analysis set out to investigate the morbidity and mortality of VZV vaccination without interruption of maintenance therapy in children with ALL.

METHODS

Files of 73 seronegative children with ALL were examined for data regarding VZV vaccination and infection, and long-term seroconversion was measured. Criteria before VZV vaccination were (1) seronegative, (2) in complete remission, (3) age ≥ 1.0 year, (4) lymphocyte count ≥ 0.6 × 10/L at time of vaccination and (5) receiving maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

Forty-five children were vaccinated. No child died or experienced serious adverse events due to VZV vaccination. Nine children developed late chickenpox despite vaccination. Long-term protection was found in 86% of children not receiving acyclovir and 78% of the entire population. Long-term seroconversion was found in 52% of the children. There were no severe cases of varicella infection. Acyclovir prophylaxis postvaccination was associated with an increased risk of late chickenpox [hazard ratio = 5.40 (1.43, 20.41), P = 0.01]. In contrast, a vaccine-induced rash reduced the risk of late chickenpox [hazard ratio = 0.08 (0.01, 0.66), P = 0.02]. No child had interruption of maintenance therapy at the time of vaccination, but 33% experienced discontinuation of therapy due to vaccine-induced rash. Dexamethasone was associated with an increased risk of vaccine-induced rash [hazard ratio = 2.9 (1.21, 6.90), P = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis indicates that VZV vaccination is feasible and justified in seronegative children with ALL, in countries where VZV vaccination is not part of the national vaccination program.

Vaccines for post-exposure prophylaxis against varicella (chickenpox) in children and adults

BACKGROUND

The prevention of varicella (chickenpox) using live attenuated varicella vaccines has been demonstrated both in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and in population-based immunisation programmes in countries such as the United States and Australia. Many countries do not routinely immunise children against varicella and exposures continue to occur. Although the disease is often mild, complications such as secondary bacterial infection, pneumonitis and encephalitis occur in about 1% of cases, usually leading to hospitalisation. The use of varicella vaccine in persons who have recently been exposed to the varicella zoster virus has been studied as a form of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of vaccines for use as PEP for the prevention of varicella in children and adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2014, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to March week 1, 2014), EMBASE (January 1990 to March 2014) and LILACS (1982 to March 2014). We searched for unpublished trials registered on the clinicaltrials.gov and WHO ICTRP websites.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and quasi-RCTs of varicella vaccine for PEP compared with placebo or no intervention. The outcome measures were efficacy in prevention of clinical cases and/or laboratory-confirmed clinical cases and adverse events following vaccination.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted and analysed data using Review Manager software.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three trials involving 110 healthy children who were siblings of household contacts. The included trials varied in study quality, vaccine used, length of follow-up and outcomes measured and, as such, were not suitable for meta-analysis. We identified high or unclear risk of bias in two of the three included studies. Overall, 13 out of 56 vaccine recipients (23%) developed varicella compared with 42 out of 54 placebo (or no vaccine) recipients (78%). Of the vaccine recipients who developed varicella, the majority only had mild disease (with fewer than 50 skin lesions). In the three trials, most participants received PEP within three days following exposure; too few participants were vaccinated four to five days post-exposure to ascertain the efficacy of vaccine given more than three days after exposure. No included trial reported on adverse events following immunisation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

These small trials suggest varicella vaccine administered within three days to children following household contact with a varicella case reduces infection rates and severity of cases. We identified no RCTs for adolescents or adults. Safety was not adequately addressed.

Live vaccine use and safety in DiGeorge syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Live vaccines are generally contraindicated in patients with DiGeorge syndrome (DGS), a congenital disorder characterized by cellular immune deficiency. Vaccine utilization and safety in this population are not well described. This study examined vaccination patterns and adverse events following live immunization (AEFLI) in these individuals.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted in subjects with DGS confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization assay (chromosome 22q11.2 microdeletion). Live vaccine-preventable illnesses, vaccination coverage and timeliness, and AEFLIs in the 56-day window after live vaccination were examined. Bivariate and multivariable analyses assessed the impact of demographics medical history, timing of diagnostic confirmation, and preceding immune function on vaccination patterns and AEFLIs.

RESULTS

Of 194 subjects, 77% and 75% received measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and varicella vaccines, respectively; 58% completed recommended vaccinations by age 19 to 35 months. Adverse events occurred after 14% and 20% of MMR and varicella vaccine doses, respectively. Most events were minor, few were serious, and no deaths were reported in post-live vaccination windows. Although early diagnostic confirmation negatively affected live vaccination coverage and timeliness (P < .001), baseline CD4% did not differ between subjects who did or did not receive live vaccines by 12 to 18 months. Among varicella vaccine recipients, those with a subsequent adverse event had a lower preceding CD4% (24.8% ± 7.3%) than those without (35.5% ± 11.7%) (P < .05); no CD4% differences were observed with MMR vaccination. Fourteen unvaccinated subjects experienced live vaccine-preventable illnesses.

CONCLUSIONS

Live vaccines were frequently given and generally well-tolerated among patients with DGS with mild-to-moderate immunosuppression.

The host immune response to varicella zoster virus

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is a highly successful human pathogen, which is never completely eliminated from the host. VZV causes two clinically distinct diseases, varicella (chickenpox) during primary infection and herpes zoster (shingles) following virus reactivation from latency. Throughout its lifecycle the virus encounters the innate and adaptive immune response, and in order to prevent eradication it has developed many mechanisms to evade and overcome these responses. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of the host immune response to VZV infection, during the multiple stages of the virus lifecycle and at key sites of VZV infection. We will also briefly describe some of the strategies employed by the virus to overcome the host immune response and the ongoing challenges in further elucidating the interplay between VZV and the host immune response in an attempt to lead to better therapies and a ‘second generation’ vaccine for VZV disease.

Aciclovir and varicella-zoster-immunoglobulin in solid-organ transplant recipients

Clear recommendations for the management of acute varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infections for cases of significant exposure and the use of prophylactic drugs after solid-organ transplantation are missing due to the lack of evidence by prospective studies. Heterogeneity in patient groups, patient numbers, age groups, immunosuppressive regimens, timing, and dosage of aciclovir and/or varicella-zoster immunoglobulin (VZIG), pre-transplant vaccination or VZV wild-type infection and inconsistency of data make comparability of different studies impossible. Although the benefit of aciclovir and/or VZIG is uncertain in immunosuppressed children, prospective controlled double-blind studies are not feasible for ethical considerations as fatal cases with disseminating varicella disease are well known in these patient groups despite the use of aciclovir and/or VZIG, whereas severe side-effects of these drugs are rare. However, a reporting bias is likely as mainly severe or fatal cases might have been predominantly published or cases of successfully used aciclovir and/or VZIG in mild cases or in cases of breakthrough infections after vaccination. As neither VZIG prophylaxis nor treatment with intravenous aciclovir offers complete protection against severe VZV infection to immunosuppressed pediatric solid-organ transplant recipients, high priority should be given to vaccination against VZV prior to transplantation, and, most importantly, in their close contact persons. Clinical observations suggest that only assessment of humoral immunity together with cellular immunity may allow predication about protection in exposed patients.

Vaccines for prophylaxis of viral infections in patients with hematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

Viral infections cause significant morbidity and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. It remains uncertain whether viral vaccinations in these patients are supported by good evidence.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of viral vaccines in patients with hematological malignancies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL (June 2010), reference lists of relevant papers, abstracts from scientific meetings and contacted vaccine manufacturers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating viral vaccines in patients with hematological malignancies were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Relative risk (RR) was used for binary data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data. Primary outcome was incidence of infection. Secondary outcomes were mortality, incidence of complications and severe viral infection, hospitalization, immune response and adverse effects. Fixed-effect model was used in meta-analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight RCTs were included, with 305 patients in the intervention groups and 288 in the control groups. They evaluated heat-inactivated varicella zoster virus (VZV) vaccine (two trials), influenza vaccines (five trials) and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) (one trial). Seven trials had high and one trial had moderate risk of bias.VZV vaccine might reduce herpes zoster compared to no vaccine (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.0, P=0.05), but not statistically significant. Vaccination also demonstrated efficacy in immune response but frequently caused local adverse effects. One trial reported severity score of zoster, which favored vaccination (MD 2.6, 95% CI 0.94 to 4.26, P=0.002).Two RCTs compared inactivated influenza vaccine with no vaccine and reported lower risk of lower respiratory infections (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.78, P=0.008) and hospitalization (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.31, P<0.00001) in vaccine recipients. However, vaccine recipients more frequently experienced irritability and local adverse effects. There was no significant difference in seroconversion between one and two doses of influenza vaccine (one trial), or between recombinant and standard influenza vaccine (one trial), or influenza vaccine given with or without re-induction chemotherapy (one trial).The IPV trial comparing vaccination starting at 6 versus 18 months after stem cell transplant (SCT) found no significant difference in seroconversion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Inactivated VZV vaccine might reduce zoster severity in adult SCT recipients. Inactivated influenza vaccine might reduce respiratory infections and hospitalization in adults with multiple myeloma or children with leukemia or lymphoma. However, the quality of evidence is low. Local adverse effects occur frequently. Further high-quality RCTs are needed.

Vaccines for post-exposure prophylaxis against varicella (chickenpox) in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Live attenuated varicella vaccines for the prevention of varicella (chickenpox) has been demonstrated both in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and in population-based immunisation programmes in countries such as the United States. However, many countries do not routinely immunise children against varicella, and exposures continue to occur. Although the disease is often mild, complications such as secondary bacterial infection, pneumonitis and encephalitis occur in about 1% of cases, usually leading to hospitalisation. The use of varicella vaccine in persons who have recently been exposed to the varicella zoster virus has been studied as a form of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of vaccines for use as PEP for the prevention of varicella in children and adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2008, Issue 1); MEDLINE (1966 to February 2008); and EMBASE (January 1990 to February 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs and quasi-RCTs of varicella vaccine for PEP compared with placebo or no intervention. The outcome measures were efficacy in prevention of clinical cases and/or laboratory-confirmed clinical cases and adverse effects following vaccination.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted and analysed data using Review Manager software.

MAIN RESULTS

Three studies involving 110 healthy children who were siblings of household contacts were identified as suitable for inclusion. The studies varied in quality, study design, vaccine used, and outcomes measured and, as such, were not suitable for meta-analysis. Overall, 13 out of 56 vaccine recipients (18%) developed varicella compared with 42 out of 54 placebo (or no vaccine) recipients (78%). Of the vaccine recipients who developed varicella, the majority only had mild disease (with less than 50 skin lesions). In the three studies, most subjects received PEP within three days following exposure; too few subjects were vaccinated four to five days post exposure to ascertain the efficacy of vaccine given more than three days after exposure. No included studies reported on adverse events following immunisation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

These small trials suggest varicella vaccine administered within three days to children following household contact with a varicella case reduces infection rates and severity of cases. No RCTs for adolescents or adults were identified. However safety was not adequately addressed.

Safety and immunogenicity of varicella-zoster virus vaccine in pediatric liver and intestine transplant recipients

Primary varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infections following organ transplantation may cause significant morbidity. We examined the safety and immunogenicity of Varivax after transplantation as a potential prophylactic tool. Pediatric liver and intestine transplant recipients without history of chickenpox received one dose of Varivax. VZV humoral and cellular immunity were assessed before and > or =12 weeks after vaccination. Adverse events (AE) and management of exposure to wild type VZV were monitored. Sixteen VZV-naïve subjects, 13-76 months of age, at 257-2045 days after transplantation were immunized. Five children developed mild local AE of short duration. Four subjects developed fever and four developed non-injection site rashes, three of whom received acyclovir. Liver enzymes did not increase during the month after vaccination. Eighty-seven percent and 86% of children developed humoral and cellular immunity, respectively. There were five reported exposures to varicella in four children, none of which resulted in chickenpox. One subject received VZV-immunoglobulin and another subject with liver enzyme elevations after exposure received acyclovir; all remained asymptomatic. Varivax was safe and immunogenic in pediatric liver and intestine transplant recipients. Larger studies are needed to establish the efficacy and role of varicella vaccination after transplantation.

A review of the varicella vaccine in immunocompromised individuals

BACKGROUND

Individuals with underlying cell-mediated immunodeficiency disorders are at high risk of developing severe, life-threatening illness associated with varicella-zoster virus infection. A live-attenuated varicella vaccine is recommended for routine childhood immunisation in some countries. In healthy children, the vaccine is efficacious and safe but because immunocompromised individuals may be unable to limit replication of live-attenuated vaccine viruses, the varicella vaccine is not recommended for them and there are few exceptions.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this paper is to review the published studies addressing the use of the varicella vaccine in people with cell-mediated immunodeficiency disorders.

METHODS

A computerised search on the PubMed database was used to collect the relevant papers published up to March 2003.

RESULTS

The varicella vaccine has been extensively studied in susceptible children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in remission, but studies involving individuals with other immunodeficiency disorders are scarce. Some of the current recommendations are based on very few and small studies with short follow-up. Immunocompromised individuals should be given the varicella vaccine only with complete knowledge of their clinical and immunological conditions and after considering the risks of natural infection and vaccination.

Live-attenuated varicella vaccine

This article reviews the history and development of live attenuated varicella vaccine from its early days in Japan to its widespread use throughout the world. The vaccine has proven extremely safe after immunization of as many as 10 million healthy children and adults in the United States alone. The vaccine is also highly immunogenic and offers close to 100% protection from severe chickenpox and 90% protection from illness. It is expected to have a major impact on the epidemiology of varicella and zoster in countries with high vaccine uptake.

Live attenuated varicella vaccine

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is a ubiquitous human pathogen that causes varicella, commonly called chicken pox; establishes latency; and reactivates as herpes zoster, referred to as shingles. A live attenuated varicella vaccine, derived from the Oka strain of VZV has clinical efficacy for the prevention of varicella. The vaccine induces persistent immunity to VZV in healthy children and adults. Immunization against VZV also has the potential to lower the risk of reactivation of latent virus. The varicella vaccine may eventually reduce or eliminate herpes zoster, which is a serious problem for elderly and immunocompromised individuals.

The varicella vaccine. Clinical trials in immunocompromised individuals

A review of the use of live attenuated varicella vaccine in immunocompromised children, particularly those with underlying leukemia in remission, is presented. Data concerning safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of this vaccine in high-risk children are reviewed. The unique contributions toward our understanding of varicella vaccine, including spread of vaccine-type virus, incidence of zoster, and immune correlates provided by studies of immunocompromised patients are discussed. The importance of protecting high-risk children against severe varicella by the use of varicella vaccine is apparent.

Immune responses to varicella-zoster virus

The host response to VZV is critical to the outcome of primary VZV infection. The maintenance of immune memory to the virus is required to prevent symptomatic re-infection on exogenous re-exposure to VZV and to prevent symptomatic reactivation of endogenous virus. Immunization with live varicella (Oka) vaccine elicits primary and memory immunity to VZV. Humoral and cell-mediated host responses induced by the wild-type virus and by the vaccine strain are comparable, which is consistent with the clinical observation that varicella vaccine protects against or significantly reduces the clinical symptoms caused by primary VZV infection. Widespread use of the varicella vaccine in healthy children will yield further knowledge about host-virus interactions, such as the role of exogenous re-exposure in maintaining persistent immunity, which will be relevant to vaccine strategies to prevent other human herpesvirus infections.

Use of a reformulated Oka strain varicella vaccine (SmithKline Beecham Biologicals/Oka) in healthy children

The first live-attenuated Oka strain varicella vaccines needed to be stored at -20 degrees C. Reformulation of this vaccine by SmithKline Beecham Biologicals has provided a vaccine shelf life of up to 2 years when stored at +4 degrees C to +8 degrees C. In this study the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two different production lots of this reformulated vaccine at two different titres each, which corresponded to the release and expected expiry titres, were evaluated. A double-blind randomised clinical trial was conducted in healthy children aged from 9 to 24 months. Immunogenicity was assessed by the measurement of varicella specific antibodies in paired serum samples taken before and from 35 to 63 days post vaccination. Reactogenicity was assessed by the evaluation of any untoward reactions occurring up to 42 days post vaccination. In order to assess protective efficacy, parents of these subjects were contacted approximately 6 months after completion of the trial. One hundred and ninety-one subjects were recruited into the study. Of the 181 initially seronegative subjects who completed the trial according to the protocol, 179 showed seroconversion (98.9%). Reactions to the vaccine were minor and observed in 46/191 (24%) of subjects. Rashes were present in 19, fever in 22, and both fever and rash in 5. Rashes were mainly maculo-papular in nature but were vesicular in 6. Febrile reactions were shortlived. After a 6-month follow up period, attenuated varicella with minor clinical symptoms was diagnosed in 6/52 vaccinees who had close contact with natural varicella (attack rate = 11.5%).

CONCLUSION

This reformulated vaccine was well tolerated, highly immunogenic and provided protection against varicella. In increased stability allowing refrigerator storage makes it a good candidate for mass vaccination programmes.

Varicella zoster infections in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

During the period July 1986 through December 1991, 67 children were treated for non-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia at The Juliane Marie Centre, GGK, The University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen. Twenty-five children were susceptible to varicella zoster (VZ) virus at diagnosis. For these patients the cumulated risk of VZ exposure was 90% after 32 months. Five patients developed varicella (two of whom had pneumonitis) during the period of antileukemic treatment. Two of these had received prophylactic treatment with acyclovir. The 2 year cumulated risk of having chickenpox or herpes zoster in children with previous VZ infection was 24% and 34%, respectively. VZ vaccination ought to be considered for this group of children in order to diminish transmission and morbidity.

T cell function in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Modern intensive chemotherapy has dramatically improved the prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in children. However, once remission has been established, quality of life and even survival may be threatened by exacerbation of viral infections in the prolonged period of continuation therapy necessary to prevent relapse. Often the viruses involved in the most severe infections are from the herpesvirus and paramyxovirus groups, suggesting that patients suffer from a defect in the cellular immunity thought essential to control such cell-associated infections. This may result from a T cell defect and, in this study, T cell responsiveness of patients under therapy for leukaemia has been investigated. In vitro proliferative responses of peripheral blood leucocytes (PBL) to the T cell mitogen phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) were impaired in children with ALL before treatment and in the induction of remission. Impairment was attributable to reduced T cell numbers, the presence of inhibitors in the patient's serum and direct damage to lymphocytes. On achieving remission, proliferative responses to PHA of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets quickly returned to normal levels with the switch to continuation chemotherapy. Proliferative responses to Herpes simplex virus antigens were also apparently normal in the majority of patients tested in remission. Further investigations, however, have suggested a persisting defect in CD8+ lymphocyte function. Gamma interferon secretion by PHA-stimulated PBLs was severely reduced for children with ALL in remission when compared with control children of similar age. Further, cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to allogeneic cells could only be induced in PBL isolated from two of 13 children in remission from ALL whilst all control children of similar age and adults produced anti-allogeneic responses.

Active immunization of children with leukemia and other malignancies

Active immunization against measles, Haemophilus influenza B, tetanus, diphtheria, hepatitis B, influenza, poliomyelitis, and, when indicated varicella and pneumococcus induces long-lasting immunologic protection in most healthy pediatric vaccine recipients. Among children receiving immunosuppressive therapy for cancer, possible early loss of specific immunity acquired from prior vaccination or disease, and likely diminished responsiveness to initial or booster vaccination must be considered. In addition, the safety of vaccine administration requires separate study in this population. Published evidence demonstrates preservation of vaccine-induced antibody titers against tetanus, diphtheria, poliomyelitis and (in children treated for lymphoma) pneumococcus. In contrast, prior immunity to varicella, influenza, and hepatitis B (when naturally acquired), and measles (acquired by vaccination) is compromised during and/or after antineoplastic therapy. Studies of immunologic protection acquired by prior vaccination against hepatitis B, varicella, and H influenza have not been published. The safety of administering toxoids and inactivated vaccines in this population is well documented. In contrast, morbidity must be expected if live attenuated vaccines (oral polio vaccine, attenuated measles vaccine or attenuated varicella vaccine) are administered to children receiving anti-cancer therapy. The risks of using live vaccines should be measured against demonstrable benefits in any vaccine program. The response to initial or booster immunizations against tetanus and diphtheria are similar to those in healthy children. For all other immunizations reviewed, responsiveness is diminished during periods of chemotherapy, more strikingly in children treated for leukemia than for solid tumors. Antibody responses to these vaccines range from slightly blunted (in the case of H influenza B) to marginal (influenza) or completely useless (pneumococcus and hepatitis B in children treated for leukemia).

Current status and prospects of live varicella vaccine

Since its development in 1974 the Oka strain live attenuated varicella vaccine has been tested in healthy and immunocompromised adults and children. Its safety and efficacy have been established and it is now licensed for general use in Japan and Korea, and for immunocompromised patients in several other countries. Possibilities for the future include its use to prevent zoster in the elderly, its incorporation in a multivalent vaccine and its use as a vehicle to express foreign genes in recombinant vaccines.

Varicella vaccine in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma

To determine the safety and efficacy of varicella vaccine, 17 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 2 children with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving chemotherapy in remission were immunized with live attenuated varicella vaccine (Oka strain). Rash occurred in 7 children 7-53 days (median 24 days) after vaccination. There were 10-80 (median 20) erythematous vesicles and low-grade fever. All children required no specific treatment. There was no spread of varicella to their susceptible siblings. The control group comprised 92 ALL and 25 NHL patients receiving chemotherapy in remission who were nonvaccinated and susceptible to varicella. Over a risk duration of 80 person-years, one child of the vaccinated group developed varicella of mild degree, whereas in a risk duration of 120 person-years, 14 of the control group developed varicella. One patient died, though prompt antiviral therapy, especially acyclovir, was given to all of them. Herpes zoster of mild degree was observed in one child of the vaccinated group 65 days after vaccination. Two children of the control group developed disseminated herpes zoster. With acyclovir therapy, there was no mortality. The incidence of varicella in the vaccinated group was less than that of the control group. The difference is statistically significant (p = .0222), and the side effects of the vaccine were acceptable. Thus we conclude that the vaccine can be safely used in children with ALL or NHL under chemotherapy and can effectively protect such children from varicella.

The incidence of zoster after immunization with live attenuated varicella vaccine. A study in children with leukemia. Varicella Vaccine Collaborative Study Group

BACKGROUND

The Oka strain of live attenuated varicella vaccine is immunogenic and highly protective, but there has been concern about the risk of zoster after immunization.

METHODS

We examined the incidence of zoster, risk factors for it, and measures of immune response in children with leukemia who received the vaccine and in appropriate controls.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 4.1 years, zoster was documented in 13 of the 548 vaccinated children with leukemia (2.4 percent). In a subgroup of 96 vaccinated children matched prospectively with 96 children with leukemia who had had natural varicella infections, there were 4 cases of zoster among the vaccinated children and 15 among the controls, for crude incidence rates of 0.80 and 2.46 cases per 100 person-years, respectively (P = 0.01). Of the total of 13 vaccinated children who had zoster, 11 had a skin rash due to varicella-zoster virus, either from the vaccine itself or from breakthrough varicella after household exposure in the period between immunization and the documentation of zoster. In the 268 children who had any type of rash caused by varicella-zoster virus after vaccination, as compared with those who did not have a rash, the relative risk of subsequent zoster was 5.75. For the 21 vaccinated children who received bone marrow transplants, as compared with those who did not, the relative risk of zoster was 7.5. Cell-mediated immunity as assessed by lymphocyte stimulation was lower in 4 children in whom zoster later developed than in 29 controls who had been vaccinated but who did not have zoster (mean stimulation index, 5.1 vs. 23.8; P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In children with leukemia who receive the live attenuated varicella vaccine, the subsequent incidence of zoster is lower than in children who have natural varicella infections.

A rapid and simplified micromethod for subtyping varicella-zoster virus

A simplified and rapid micromethod based on restriction endonuclease analysis of radiolabelled varicella-zoster virus (VZV) DNA is described and applied to strains for comparison. This procedure is cheaper and less time consuming than that requiring viral nucleocapsid purification (macromethod). The micromethod is suitable for routine DNA analysis of VZV isolates, allows differentiation of vaccine strain from wild strains, and provides evidence for variability of wild strains.

Placebo-controlled trial of varicella vaccine given with or after measles-mumps-rubella vaccine

A placebo-controlled study of varicella vaccine given either with or 6 weeks after measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine was undertaken in healthy children (mean age 16 months). A total of 101 varicella-zoster virus antibody-negative children completed the study. Serologic response to MMR vaccine was excellent (nearly 100%) and not significantly affected by the administration of varicella vaccine. Seroconversion in response to varicella vaccine was excellent and was not affected by MMR vaccine. No significant differences in fever or skin rashes between those receiving MMR vaccine with varicella vaccine or MMR vaccine with placebo were noted, but fever and skin rashes were more frequent after the first immunization (MMR with varicella vaccine or MMR vaccine with placebo) compared with the second (varicella vaccine or placebo injection). Symptoms of fatigue, irritability, and upper respiratory tract infections were more common after MMR vaccine was given regardless of whether it was given simultaneously with varicella vaccine or placebo injection.

Natural and artificial immunity to varicella zoster virus

The live varicella vaccine has been recommended for use in immunocompromised subjects and in adults who are susceptible to chickenpox. However, we do not know how humoral and cell-mediated immune responses induced after vaccination differed from those obtained after natural infection. To answer this, 45 previously infected subjects (23 chickenpox, 22 vaccinated) were tested for their varicella zoster virus (VZV)-specific antibody levels and for their lymphocyte stimulation responses to VZV antigen. Antibody was measured by both an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and an immunofluorescence assay (IF), while lymphocyte stimulation was detected by tritiated thymidine incorporation. Antibody was tested in ten postchickenpox and nine vaccinated subjects. About 6 to 8 weeks after first exposure, the magnitude of the responses determined by both ELISA and IFT were much higher in the naturally infected than in the vaccinated group (P less than 0.001) with both test methods). There was no significant difference in the lymphocyte transformation responses in both groups of subjects. Thirteen postchickenpox and 13 vaccinated subjects who had been infected at least 12 months previously were also tested. Total antibody levels were again significantly higher in the naturally infected than in the vaccinated group (P less than 0.001). One vaccinated subject had VZV-specific IgA and IgM in the serum. The magnitude of the lymphocyte transformation reaction was higher in the naturally infected than in the vaccinated group (P less than 0.01). Thus, antibody responses to VZV were better in naturally infected than in vaccinated subjects. The IFT appears to be a more sensitive technique for antibody detection in the vaccinated subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The risk of zoster after varicella vaccination in children with leukemia

We examined the incidence of zoster in 346 children with underlying acute lymphoblastic leukemia who were immunized with live attenuated varicella vaccine while in remission. We also compared a subset of 84 of these children with a matched group of 84 children with leukemia who had had natural infection with varicella. Of the 346 vaccinated children, 5 (1.45 percent) became infected with zoster after 10,878 months of observation, for an incidence of 0.552 case per 100 person-years. Among the matched pairs of subjects, zoster occurred in 3 (3.6 percent) of the 84 vaccinated subjects during 2936 months of observation--an incidence of 1.23 cases per 100 person-years--and in 11 (13.1 percent) of the subjects with natural infection during 4245 months--an incidence of 3.11 cases of zoster per 100 person-years. Although the incidence of zoster was more than twice as high in the control children as in the vaccinated children (3.11 vs. 1.23 cases per 100 person-years), a Kaplan-Meier product-limit analysis revealed no significant differences in incidence between the two groups. Children from both groups in whom leukemia recurred were more likely to contract zoster than those who did not have a recurrence (7 of 35 vs. 7 of 133, P less than 0.025). Zoster was not a marker for impending relapse. No case of zoster was severe or disseminated. We conclude that the incidence of zoster following immunization with live attenuated varicella vaccine is no greater than that following natural varicella infection.

Efficacy of varicella vaccine in patients with solid tumours

Thirty nine children with malignant disease and without antibodies to varicella zoster virus were immunised with a live Oka strain varicella vaccine. Seroconversion was shown in 24 of those who were vaccinated but five of 18 who responded to the vaccine who were followed up for over six months subsequently lost their antibodies. Of 10 children who were revaccinated, nine responded to the second dose but three lost their antibodies within six months to two years. Four children developed reactions related to the vaccine, one local and three generalised, but all these were transitory and of no clinical concern. Nine of those who were vaccinated, including four who did not respond to the vaccine, have subsequently had close exposure to varicella but none has developed the disease.

Immunological competence of patients in remission from acute leukaemia: apparently normal T cell function but defective pokeweed mitogen-driven immunoglobulin synthesis

Immunological function of 62 patients in remission from acute leukaemia has been evaluated using peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro assays. T cell function, as indicated by proliferation in response to polyclonal activation (by phytohaemagglutinin) and antigen-specific stimulation (allogeneic cells), was normal in these patients. In contrast, pokeweed mitogen-driven Ig synthesis was significantly decreased for all immunoglobulin classes measured (IgM, IgG and IgA) in the case of adult and childhood acute lymphocytic leukaemia patients, and for IgA in the case of adult acute non-lymphocytic leukaemia patients. The defects in humoral immunological responses may contribute to the increased susceptibility to infection of these patients.

Inoculation of guinea pigs with varicella-zoster virus via the respiratory route

Guinea pigs were inoculated by the respiratory route with wild-type (Cyr) or vaccine (Oka) strain varicella zoster virus (VZV). Wild-type cell-free virus obtained by sonication produced neutralizing antibody responses in steroid-treated animals when given via the intratracheal route, and induced neutralizing antibody as well as a pneumonitis in normal animals when given via the intrabronchial (i.b.) route. A humoral response also followed i.b. instillation of cell-associated wild-type or vaccine strain VZV. Prior i.b. administration of thioglycollate or exposure to hyperoxia altered the number and function of pulmonary macrophages, respectively, but viral susceptibility of the guinea pigs was not enhanced. Both strains of VZV could be isolated from bronchial washings up to 48 hours after i.b. instillation of cell-associated virus, but neither strain was isolated thereafter from cultures of bronchial washings or explanted lung tissues.

Use of a bacterial expression vector to map the varicella-zoster virus major glycoprotein gene, gC

The genome of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) encodes at least three major glycoprotein genes. Among viral gene products, the gC gene products are the most abundant glycoproteins and induce a substantial humoral immune response (Keller et al., J. Virol. 52:293-297, 1984). We utilized two independent approaches to map the gC gene. Small fragments of randomly digested VZV DNA were inserted into a bacterial expression vector. Bacterial colonies transformed by this vector library were screened serologically for antigen expression with monoclonal antibodies to gC. Hybridization of the plasmid DNA from a gC antigen-positive clone revealed homology to the 3' end of the VZV Us segment. In addition, mRNA from VZV-infected cells was hybrid selected by a set of VZV DNA recombinant plasmids and translated in vitro, and polypeptide products were immunoprecipitated by convalescent zoster serum or by monoclonal antibodies to gC. This analysis revealed that the mRNA encoding a 70,000-dalton polypeptide precipitable by anti-gC antibodies mapped to the HindIII C fragment, which circumscribes the entire Us region. We conclude that the VZV gC glycoprotein gene maps to the 3' end of the Us region and is expressed as a 70,000-dalton primary translational product. These results are consistent with the recently reported DNA sequence of Us (A.J. Davison, EMBO J. 2:2203-2209, 1983). Furthermore, glycosylation appears not to be required for a predominant portion of the antigenicity of gC glycoproteins. We also report the tentative map assignments for eight other VZV primary translational products.

Three major glycoprotein genes of varicella-zoster virus whose products have neutralization epitopes

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) codes for approximately eight glycosylated polypeptides in infected cell cultures and in virions. To determine the number of serologically distinct glycoprotein gene products encoded by VZV, we have developed murine monoclonal antibodies to purified virions. Of 10 monoclonal antibodies which can immunoprecipitate intracellular VZV antigens and virion glycoproteins, 1 (termed gA) reacted with gp105, 1 (termed gB) reacted with gp115 (intracellular only), gp62, and gp57, and 8 (termed gC) reacted with gp92, gp83, gp52, and gp45. The anti-gA monoclonal antibody neutralized VZV infectivity in the absence of complement. All eight anti-gC monoclonal antibodies neutralized only in the presence of complement. An anti-gB monoclonal antibody obtained from another laboratory also neutralizes in the absence of complement. Since the above reactivities account for all major detectable VZV glycoprotein species, the data strongly suggest that VZV has three major glycoprotein genes which encode glycosylated polypeptides with neutralization epitopes.

Live attenuated varicella virus vaccine. Efficacy trial in healthy children

We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of the live attenuated Oka/Merck varicella vaccine among 956 children between the ages of 1 and 14 years, with a negative clinical history of varicella. Of the 914 children who were serologically confirmed to be susceptible to varicella, 468 received vaccine and 446 received placebo. The vaccine produced few clinical reactions and was well tolerated. There was no clinical evidence of viral spread from vaccinated children to sibling controls. Approximately eight weeks after vaccination, 94 per cent of the initially seronegative children who received vaccine had detectable antibody to varicella. During the nine-month surveillance period, 39 clinically diagnosed cases of varicella, 38 of which were confirmed by laboratory tests, occurred among study participants. All 39 cases occurred in placebo recipients; no child who received vaccine contracted varicella. The vaccine was 100 per cent efficacious in preventing varicella in this population of healthy children (P less than 10(-9).

Symposium on infectious complications of neoplastic disease (Part II). Immunoprophylaxis of varicella-zoster infections

Because it is possible to identify groups of persons with a high risk of varicella development and also because it is possible to anticipate when an attack may occur, immunoprophylaxis for varicella has met with great success. In contrast, the nature of zoster--its unpredictability and low attack rate--makes immunoprophylaxis much more difficult to implement. Varicella may be modified by administration of varicella-zoster immune globulin within three days of a known exposure to the virus. Although interferon has not yet been used in an attempt to prevent or modify varicella in humans, it has been used successfully to abort an outbreak of simian varicella in a monkey colony. Thus it might be clinically useful, particularly for those who cannot be given varicella-zoster immune globulin within three days of exposure. Transfer factor has also been shown to induce at least partial immunity to varicella in children with leukemia. The duration of this protection is unknown, and further study of the efficacy of transfer factor against both varicella and possibly even against zoster seems warranted. Live attenuated varicella vaccine, although still experimental, seems now to be the most practical way to prevent severe varicella in high-risk persons. The vaccine is safe and immunogenic, even in children with underlying leukemia who are still receiving chemotherapy. Studies in Japan, Europe, and the United States have shown that most vaccinated leukemic children who are exposed are protected against severe disease, although mild breakthrough cases have been reported. Varicella vaccine's potential to cause zoster remains under study.

Susceptibility of vaccine strains of varicella-zoster virus to antiviral compounds

Using a plaque reduction assay, we determined the 50% effective doses of six antiviral compounds against low- and high-passage viruses of the KMcC and Oka strains of varicella-zoster virus vaccine. The potency, as indicated by the ranges of 50% effective doses (micrograms per milliliter) of the antiviral compounds, in decreasing order was as follows: (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-2'-deoxyuridine, 0.0007 to 0.0035; 1-(2'-flouro-2-deoxy-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodocytosine, 0.0063 to 0.0091; aphidicolin, 0.092 to 0.180; acyclovir, 0.79 to 1.81; vidarabine, 0.62 to 2.10; and phosphonoformic acid, 8.18 to 16.4. Susceptibility to the various antiviral compounds was independent of passage level or strain. These data, along with the available in vivo data, indicate that varicella-zoster virus vaccine infections requiring antiviral therapy most probably would be treated as effectively as would natural varicella infections.

Varicella and herpes zoster. Changing concepts of the natural history, control, and importance of a not-so-benign virus

New knowledge of the relationship between the varicella-zoster virus and its host suggests a heretofore unappreciated dynamic pattern. Molecular finger-printing has demonstrated a degree of heterogeneity between different strains of virus. It is probable that exogenous reinfection with different strains and endogenous reactivation are commonplace events, although usually asymptomatic. The lability of the endogenous interaction inversely parallels the responsiveness of the cell-mediated immune system--a major factor in viral containment by the human host. Thus, the therapeutic use of immunosuppressive or cytotoxic substances increases the morbidity and mortality associated with varicella-zoster. Promising new approaches to the prevention and treatment of the virus should alter the balance in favor of the host.

DNA mapping of paired varicella-zoster virus isolates from patients with shingles

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) was isolated from two separate sites in each of three patients with shingles (herpes zoster). The DNAs of the six VZV isolates were compared by high-resolution restriction endonuclease analysis with HindIII, KpnI, and HpaI. DNA cleavage patterns for each pair of VZV isolates were indistinguishable. These studies suggest that clinical shingles is the manifestation of a single VZV strain that becomes reactivated and causes both a viraemia and a dermatomal exanthem.