Transmission of hepatitis B virus by HBV-negative blood transfusion

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients in Japan

Hepatitis B surface antigen is widely used in hepatitis B virus surveillance; patients who test negative for the antigen are judged to be uninfected. However, occult hepatitis B virus infection has been confirmed with hepatitis B virus DNA at low levels in the liver and peripheral blood in patients positive for hepatitis B core antibody or hepatitis B surface antibody, even if they test negative for hepatitis B surface antigen. To investigate the prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus in hemodialysis patients, we performed cross-sectional analysis of 161 hemodialysis patients in two related institutions for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, and hepatitis B surface antibody. Hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, or hepatitis B surface antibody was present in 45 patients (28.0%). Hepatitis B virus DNA was present in six patients (3.7%), all of whom also tested positive for hepatitis B core antibody. Hepatitis B surface antibody positivity was unrelated in only one of the six patients. Four of the six patients were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen; however, two (1.3%) of these with occult hepatitis B virus infection were found to be hepatitis B surface antigen negative. Occult hepatitis B virus infection may be missed in hepatitis B virus surveillance using hepatitis B surface antigen alone; therefore, routine hepatitis B core antibody screening is necessary. Patients who test positive for hepatitis B core antibody should undergo further hepatitis B virus DNA testing to enable accurate hepatitis B virus screening.

Reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus transfusion-transmitted infection

Before 1970, approximately 6% of multi-transfused recipients acquired a transfusion-transmitted Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The safety improvements since then have been tremendous. From a level of a few infections per 1000 donations, the risk today, depending on the screening algorithm and additional measurements performed, has decreased to around 1:500,000 to 1:1,000,000, an improvement greater than 1000-fold compared to 50 years ago. This enormous gain in safety has been achieved through many factors, including development of increasingly more sensitive Hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg) assays; the adoption in some countries of hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) screening; an improved donor selection procedure; HBV vaccination programs; and finally the introduction of HBV nucleic acid testing (NAT). Because there is a tendency in transfusion medicine to add one safety measure on top of another to approach the ultimate goal of zero risks, costs become increasingly a matter of debate. It is obvious that any new measure in addition to existing methods or measures will have very poor cost effectiveness. Therefore each country needs to perform its own calculation based on the country’s own epidemiology, resources, political and public awareness of the risks, in order to choose the correct and most cost-efficient measures. Ideally, each country would make decisions regarding implementation of additional blood safety measures in the context of both the perceived benefit and the allocation of overall health care resources.

Hepatitis B virus vaccination of blood donors--what costs may be expected?

Although the risk of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis B virus (TT-HBV) infection is very low, it still exists. Therefore, introduction of further precautions to reduce this risk is discussed at present. However, so far no data are available about the HBV vaccination status among blood donors (BDs). We compared HBV vaccination status of apheresis donors (ADs) of a university based and whole BDs (WBDs) of a Red Cross blood donation service using a standardized questionnaire. On the basis of these data, the estimated costs over 10 years for HBV vaccination were calculated for two different strategies and compared with the costs for HBV nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) testing. 22.3% of the WBDs and 41.2% of the ADs indicated having received at least one HBV vaccine dose. This difference was related to the different demographic structures of the two BD populations (BDPs). With regard to the primary costs for the blood donation service, HBV vaccination of BDs could be an alternative to HBV NAT testing, especially for BDPs with an already high HBV vaccination rate and a high donation frequency.

Frequent occult hepatitis B virus infection in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1

The presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) serological markers was investigated in 170 patients (137 male, 33 female) infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1. Antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc antibodies) were detected in 115 (68%) patients. Of these 115, 14 (12%) were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive, 60 (52%) presented anti-HBs antibodies, and 41 (35%) were anti-HBc positive only. All 115 of the anti-HBc positive samples were tested for HBV DNA by using two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays that amplify the core and pre-S regions of the HBV genome, respectively. HBV DNA was detected in 23 samples: 7 of 14 (50%) HBsAg-positive samples, 12 of 60 (20%) anti-HBs-positive samples, and 4 of 41 (10%) samples positive for anti-HBc only. Six samples (all HBsAg positive) were positive in both PCR assays and 17 samples were HBV DNA positive in only one assay. The mean viral load in HBsAg-positive patients was higher than that observed in HBsAg-negative patients. A number of patients were receiving treatment with lamivudine, a drug that interferes with both HBV and HIV replication. However, neither the rate of HBV DNA positivity nor HBV load was significantly different between patients treated with lamivudine and those not treated with this drug.

High-throughput HBV DNA and HCV RNA detection system using a nucleic acid purification robot and real-time detection PCR: its application to analysis of posttransfusion hepatitis

BACKGROUND

A high-throughput detection system was developed for HBV DNA and HCV RNA.

METHODS

A combination of real-time detection PCR using an automated system (PRISM 7700, PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and automatic viral nucleic acid extraction (BioRobot 9604, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used as the high-throughput detection system. An internal control for HBV DNA detection was also developed.

RESULTS

Testing of 96 samples for HBV and HCV was completed within 5 hours. The sensitivity of this system almost equals that of the manual method using nested PCR. The addition of an internal control for HBV detection did not affect the sensitivity of the method and confirmed the accuracy of results. It was possible to quantify HBV in HBV+ samples that contain more than 500 genome equivalents per mL. We started using this system from June 1999 for testing stored donor and patient samples to analyze cases of posttransfusion hepatitis and identified three HBV+ donations that were implicated in posttransfusion hepatitis B.

CONCLUSION

The high-throughput detection system is a useful tool for HBV DNA and HCV RNA detection because it enables rapid and reliable testing of a large number of samples.

Determination of hepatitis B virus subtypes by an enzyme immunoassay method using monoclonal antibodies to type-specific epitopes of HBsAg

We described a Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) subtyping method based on a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detection of HBsAg in which the procedure was modified to include the use of monoclonal antibodies with restricted anti-HBs specificities. This method, which was able to classify HBsAg as: ayw1, ayw2, ayw3, ayw3* (intermediate between ayw3 and ayw4), ayw4, ayr, adw2, adw4 and adr, was compared to counter electrophoresis procedure (CEP) by testing HBsAg positive sera from blood donors included in a prospective national epidemiological survey. Among the 256 HBsAg positive samples tested with both techniques, 111 (43.3%) could not be subtyped with CEP vs 10 (3.9%) with our modified EIA. This difference was related to the serum HBsAg concentration which must be greater than 3000 ng/mL and 100 ng/mL for CEP and EIA, respectively. The results obtained from 145 sera with both methods were concordant. Seventeen out of 18 samples partially classified as ay with CEP were completely determined with EIA. This reliable procedure, derived from commercially available reagents, can be easily used in several applications such as large epidemiologic studies and as a substitute for nucleotide sequencing genotyping which is not adapted for large-scale screening and not applicable on samples from nonviremic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers.

Analysis of HBV infection after blood transfusion in Japan through investigation of a comprehensive donor specimen repository

BACKGROUND

To understand the risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infection, it is important to precisely assess cases of infection that follow transfusion.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

HBV infections noted after transfusion in 1997, 1998, and 1999 were analyzed. Transfusion in all these cases was performed before NAT was adopted for donor screening. To detect viral infection, PCR and serologic tests for HBV were performed retrospectively on all blood samples from implicated donors that had been stored in a frozen state after each donation. The concentration of HBV genome was measured in HBV-positive blood samples.

RESULTS

One hundred three cases of HBV infection were analyzed; of these, only 16, including at least 10 infections due to window-period (HBsAg-positive by reverse particle hemagglutination assay) donations, were confirmed by further testing to be related to transfusion. The concentrations of HBV genome were very low in four blood samples (<50, 400, 500, and 800 genome equivalents/mL of plasma).

CONCLUSIONS

The remaining risk of transfusion transmission of HBV infection before the adoption of NAT was mainly due to window-period donations, including one that was made before the HBV genome was detectable by PCR. However, it was determined that transfusion was not responsible in many cases for HBV infection after transfusion.

Over a decade of experience with a yeast recombinant hepatitis B vaccine

Experience with the yeast recombinant hepatitis B vaccine Engerix-B now exceeds 10 years. We reviewed published studies on this vaccine. These show the vaccine to be safe, causing mostly only minor local symptoms and to be highly immunogenic both in monitored clinical trials and under field conditions. Engerix-B consistently elicits high geometric mean antibody titres and a high protective efficacy has been established in three groups at high-risk of hepatitis B infection, homosexual men, institutionalised mentally handicapped subjects and neonates of chronic carrier mothers. The profile of the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in certain high-risk groups and immuno compromised people is discussed. Finally we present updated post marketing surveillance data based on 496 million distributed doses of vaccine.

Transfusion-transmitted diseases: risks, prevention and perspectives

During the past decades major improvements in blood safety have been achieved, both in developed and developing countries. The introduction of donor counseling and screening for different pathogens has made blood a very safe product, especially in developed countries. However, even in these countries, there is still a residual risk for the transmission of several pathogens. For viruses such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and the hepatitis viruses B and C, this is due mainly to window-period donations. Furthermore, the threat of newly emerging pathogens which can affect blood safety is always present. For example, the implications of the agent causing new variant Creutzfeld-Jakob disease for transfusion practice are not yet clear. Finally, there are several pathogens, e.g. CMV and parvo B19, which are common in the general donor population, and might pose a serious threat in selected groups of immunosuppressed patients. In the future, further improvements in blood safety are expected from the introduction of polymerase chain reaction for testing and from the implementation of photochemical decontamination for cellular blood products. The situation in transfusion medicine in the developing world is much less favorable, due mainly to a higher incidence and prevalence of infectious diseases.

Reactivation of hepatitis B in a long-term anti-HBs-positive patient with AIDS following lamivudine withdrawal

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In HIV-infected patients, who have recovered completely from an acute hepatitis B infection and become anti-HBs positive, hepatitis B infection may be reactivated after progression to AIDS.

CASE REPORT

We present the case of a homosexual male patient with AIDS who developed clinical and serological reactivation of hepatitis B with detectable HBV-DNA 18 years after complete recovery from acute hepatitis B infection. Prior to reactivation, antiretroviral triple therapy including lamivudine was changed to therapy without lamivudine. After reintroduction of lamivudine in the triple therapy, HBV-DNA became undetectable and the patient lost HBsAg and again developed anti-HBs antibodies.

CONCLUSION

The hepatitis B in this patient can be explained best by reactivation of persistent HBV infection, possibly because of transient decline in antibodies against HBs-antigen due to a reduction in CD4+ lymphocyte numbers and B cell dysfunction. This observation points to the clinical relevance of HBV persistence in serum and blood cells of anti-HBs-positive subjects for many years after recovery from acute hepatitis B infection. The possible role of lamivudine withdrawal which immediately preceded HBV breakthrough in our patient is noteworthy. Regular monitoring of markers of HBV infection, including HBV-DNA, in patients with AIDS appears justified after discontinuation of lamivudine.

[Practical repercussions of 3 years of experience of national hemovigilance on the subject of viral complications]

The residual risk of transmitting viral infections by transfusion of screened blood is mainly linked to donations occurring in the window period. Using a mathematical model, a French study, including a 3 year period of blood donations (1994-1996), was performed by the Hepatitis Virus and Retrovirus working groups of the French Society of Blood Transfusion. The residual risk in France was estimated as follows: for HIV, 1 in 1 million (IC 95% = 1/10 million to 1/295,000), for HTLV 1 in 5 million (IC 95% = 0 to 1/625,000), for VHC 1 in 200,000 (IC 95% = 1/530,000 to 1/97,000), for VHB 1 in 180,000 (IC 95% = 1/560,000 to 1/66,000). Based on these estimations, the number of recipients possibly contaminated should have been seven for HIV, one or two for HTLV, 35 for VHC, 40 for VHB for a 3 year period. These 83 to 84 theoretically contaminated recipients are not in accordance with the six recipients contaminated by a blood product (two with HIV, one with VHC, three with VHB) that were reported to the National Haemovigilance Unit of the Agence Française du Sang. This observed difference may be explained by an overestimated calculated risk (the whole window period is not infectious), or by an underestimation of real post-transfusion contamination due to a lack of exhaustive notifications. However, a national database of post-tranfusion contamination is useful to approach the real residual risk. Therefore, efforts to continue the recipient follow-up have to be encouraged.

Application of nested PCR and mass spectrometry for DNA-based virus detection: HBV-DNA detected in the majority of isolated anti-HBc positive sera

DNA preparations from three different groups of serum samples were examined for HBV-DNA via a nested polymerase chain reaction assay (lower detection limit: 10 viral genomes in 100 microliters serum): Group I consisted of 11 uninfected control sera, group II consisted of sera obtained from 11 HBV infected patients and group III consisted of 21 isolated anti-HBc positive samples. The 21 samples from group III were HBV-DNA negative according to a conventional non-nested PCR assay and hybridization with a 32P-labelled probe. Using nested PCR and mass spectrometry, HBV-DNA was detected in none of group I and in all of group II samples. In 11 out of 21 (52%) of the isolated anti-HBc positive sera from group III, HBV-DNA was detected. No correlation was observed between HBV-DNA positivity and anti-HBc titers. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry provided a fast, sensitive and non-radioactive assay for the detection of PCR products without the need for gel electrophoresis or hybridization with labelled probes.

Variation in the sensitivity of HBsAg screening kits

Fifteen HBsAg kits from 14 manufacturers were assessed. Their sensitivity was evaluated by testing 150 HBsAg-positive sera, sera from four donors who were low-level HBsAg carriers, and sequential specimens from 22 seroconverting individuals together with dilutions of six of these specimens. The British HBsAg Working Standard (0.5 IU mL-1) and the NIBSC/UKBTS HBsAg Monitor Sample (0.125 IU mL-1) were also tested. Five assays failed to detect one of the 150 routine HBsAg-positive sera. Four assays (Auszyme Monoclonal; Monolisa Ag HBs 2nd generation; Murex HBsAg; Ortho HBsAg Test Systems 3) were able to detect HBsAg in all but one of the six sera from low-level carriers, whereas one assay (MicroTrak II HBsAg) detected only one of the six. The most sensitive kit (Monolisa Ag HBs 2nd generation) detected HBsAg in 79 specimens from the seroconversion panels; four other kits detected HBsAg in at least 70 specimens, seven in 60-69, two in 50-59 and the least sensitive in 31. Further analysis of the findings on seroconverters indicated a median reduction in the duration of HBsAg detection of 5 days or more for four assays when compared with the most sensitive assay. One kit (Auszyme Monoclonal) detected HBsAg in 15 of the 18 dilutions prepared from the seroconversion specimens, whereas three kits detected HBsAg in fewer than 10 dilutions. Two kits gave negative reactions with the British HBsAg Working Standard on all of five occasions and six were consistently unreactive with the NIBSC/UKBTS HBsAg Monitor Sample; only three kits (Bioelisa, Enzygnost, Murex) were always reactive. There is therefore substantial variation in sensitivity among the HBsAg kits currently available.