Jewish religion and risk of breast cancer

Cancer risk and gammopathies in 2123 adults with Gaucher disease type 1 in the International Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry

There are numerous reports of cancers in Gaucher disease (GD) from mostly small single-center studies; however, precise risk estimates and cancer types involved have not been delineated. We conducted a study involving 2123 patients with GD type 1 (GD1) to assess the incidence of hematological malignancies, gammopathies, and solid tumors in an international observational study, the International Cooperative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00358943). Risk for cancer overall and for each type of malignancy was compared to the United States (US) population using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Natural history of gammopathy was determined through assessing the progression from a diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) to multiple myeloma (MM). Risk for hematological malignancies was more than four times higher than expected compared to the general population: non-Hodgkin lymphoma was approximately three times higher; MM was approximately nine times higher. Age-specific incidence rates of MGUS were unexpectedly high among younger patients. The 10-year cumulative incidence of MM after diagnosis of MGUS was 7.9%, comparable to the general population. Compared to the general US population, GD1 patients were at higher risk for solid malignancies of liver (2.9 times), kidney (2.8 times), melanoma (2.5 times), and breast (1.4 times). Colorectal, prostate, and lung cancer risks were lower than expected. These findings help advance care of patients with GD1 by supporting recommendations for individualized monitoring for malignancies and antecedents such as MGUS for MM and provoke important questions of the role of glucosylceramide and related sphingolipids in cancer biology.

Variance in disease risk: rural populations and genetic diversity

Over 19% of the US population resides in rural areas, where studies of disease risk and disease outcomes are difficult to assess due to smaller populations and lower incidence. While some studies suggest rural disparities for different chronic diseases, the data are inconsistent across geography and definitions of rurality. We reviewed the literature to examine if local variations in population genomic diversity may plausibly explain inconsistencies in estimating disease risk. Many rural communities were founded over 150 years ago by small groups of ethnically and ancestrally similar families. These have since endured relative geographical isolation, similar to groups in other industrialized nations, perhaps resulting in founder effects impacting local disease susceptibility. Studies in Europe and Asia have found that observably different phenotypes may appear in isolated communities within 100 years, and that genomic variation can significantly vary over small geographical scales. Epidemiological studies utilizing common “rural” definitions may miss significant disease differences due to assumptions of risk homogeneity and misinterpretation of administrative definitions of rurality. Local genomic heterogeneity should be an important aspect of chronic disease epidemiology in rural areas, and it is important to consider for designing studies and interpreting results, enabling a better understanding of the heritable components of complex diseases.

Recent Enhancements to the Genetic Risk Prediction Model BRCAPRO

BRCAPRO is a widely used model for genetic risk prediction of breast cancer. It is a function within the R package BayesMendel and is used to calculate the probabilities of being a carrier of a deleterious mutation in one or both of the BRCA genes, as well as the probability of being affected with breast and ovarian cancer within a defined time window. Both predictions are based on information contained in the counselee’s family history of cancer. During the last decade, BRCAPRO has undergone several rounds of successive refinements: the current version is part of release 2.1 of BayesMendel. In this review, we showcase some of the most notable features of the software resulting from these recent changes. We provide examples highlighting each feature, using artificial pedigrees motivated by complex clinical examples. We illustrate how BRCAPRO is a comprehensive software for genetic risk prediction with many useful features that allow users the flexibility to incorporate varying amounts of available information.

Breast cancer in adolescent and young adult women

Breast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among adolescent and young adult (AYA) women, accounting for approximately 14% of all AYA cancer diagnoses and 7% of all breast cancer. Breast cancer in AYA women is believed to represent a more biologically aggressive disease, but aside from commonly known hereditary predispositions, little is still known about the underlying molecular genetic causes. This review examines the current trends of breast cancer in AYA women as they relate to clinical, social, genetic, and molecular pathologic characteristics. We highlight existing trends, treatment and imaging approaches, and health burdens as they relate to breast cancer in AYA women and provide a discussion on ways to help improve the overall management of this breast cancer cohort.

Does perceived risk predict breast cancer screening use? Findings from a prospective cohort study of female relatives from the Ontario site of the breast cancer family registry

While the relationship between perceived risk and breast cancer screening use has been studied extensively, most studies are cross-sectional. We prospectively examined this relationship among 913 women, aged 25-72 with varying levels of familial breast cancer risk from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry. Associations between perceived lifetime breast cancer risk and subsequent use of mammography, clinical breast examination (CBE) and genetic testing were assessed using logistic regression. Overall, perceived risk did not predict subsequent use of mammography, CBE or genetic testing. Among women at moderate/high familial risk, those reporting a perceived risk greater than 50% were significantly less likely to have a CBE (odds ratio (OR) = 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0.91, p = 0.04), and non-significantly less likely to have a mammogram (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.40-1.20, p = 0.70) or genetic test (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.34-1.10, p = 0.09) compared to women reporting a perceived risk of 50%. In contrast, among women at low familial risk, those reporting a perceived risk greater than 50% were non-significantly more likely to have a mammogram (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.59-2.16, p = 0.78), CBE (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.63-1.95, p = 0.74) or genetic test (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.50-3.33, p = 0.35) compared to women reporting a perceived risk of 50%. Perceived risk did not significantly predict screening use overall, however this relationship may be moderated by level of familial risk. Results may inform risk education and management strategies for women with varying levels of familial breast cancer risk.

Family history and BRCA1/BRCA2 status among Japanese ovarian cancer patients and occult cancer in a BRCA1 mutant case

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine family history among Japanese ovarian cancer patients and to investigate the TP53 status of fallopian tube epithelial and ovarian cancer cells in a Japanese BRCA1 mutant case that may be associated with the transformed state in hereditary ovarian cancer.

METHODS

One hundred and two primary ovarian cancer patients were retrospectively evaluated in this cross-sectional study. The family history of cancer was determined in probands. In a BRCA1 mutant case, p53 immunostaining and direct sequencing, followed by laser-capture microdissection, were performed for the fallopian tube, considered the origin of ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

Nine of 102 (8.8%) families were regarded as having hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome, two families (2.0%) were diagnosed with Lynch syndrome and six patients harbored BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. One case underwent risk-reductive salpingo-oophorectomy as a BRCA1 mutant carrier was retrospectively diagnosed as occult cancer. Common TP53 mutations were detected in cancer and fallopian tube epithelial cells in the case.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we integrate family cancer history and histology in ovarian cancer cases as well as TP53 status in a BRCA1 mutant case into a discussion regarding carcinogenesis in a Japanese population. The TP53 status for the BRCA1 mutant case examined here supports the recently proposed theory that ovarian cancer develops because of BRCA1 or BRCA2 inactivation and/or TP53 mutations.

Breast cancer risk scores in a standard screening population

SUMMARY Aim: Information regarding the characteristics and breast cancer risk factors of British women in the standard population attending breast cancer screening is limited. Such information could be useful in personalizing screening and care, and informing and educating women about their risk. Materials & methods: Information about various breast cancer risk factors was obtained from 355 women aged between 46 and 74 years at a UK inner-city breast cancer screening clinic using questionnaires. The risk of breast cancer was calculated using the modified Gail model and analyzed using descriptive and regression statistics. Results: There were 26 women recalled for further assessment and two cases confirmed as invasive breast cancer. Forty-seven women reported first-degree relatives with breast cancer. A total of 58% of our sample was overweight or obese, although 84% reported meeting the recommended target of ≥150 min of exercise per week. A total of 44% were smokers and 23% reported consuming alcohol on a regular basis. The mean lifetime risk score was 9.0% and the mean 5-year risk score was 1.5%. Various non-Gail model risk factors were found to be correlated with risk scores, but the only factor that was significantly different between women recalled for further assessment and those who were not was age of menarche. Conclusion: The results suggest that determining risk factor data in a standard screening population could be useful both to the women, who may have modifiable lifestyle factors that can be changed to improve their risk, and to the clinics, which can identify women at a higher risk who may be unaware and not present themselves as candidates for risk assessment.

Impact of familial risk and mammography screening on prognostic indicators of breast disease among women from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry

Although several studies have found screen-detected cancers in women with familial breast cancer risk have favorable prognostic features compared with symptomatic cancers, the impact of level of familial risk is unknown. A cohort of 899 first-degree female relatives of cases of breast cancer from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry was followed for 2 years. Logistic regression analyses compared diagnoses of breast cancer or benign breast disease (BBD) between women at high (n = 258, 28.7 %) versus low/moderate (n = 641, 71.3 %) familial risk. Similar analyses compared prognostic features of invasive cancers and BBD by level of familial risk and mammography screening status. Among 899 women, 44 (4.9 %) were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and/or ductal carcinoma in situ, and 56 (6.2 %) with BBD. Women with high familial risk were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 2.84, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.50-5.38] than low/moderate risk women, particularly if diagnosed at age ≥50 (OR = 2.99, 95 % CI 1.37-6.56) or screened with mammography (OR = 3.33, 95 % CI 1.54-7.18). High risk women were more likely to be diagnosed with BBD (OR = 1.94, 95 % CI 1.03-3.66). Level of familial risk was not associated with prognostic features. Cancers among unscreened women were larger (OR = 9.72, 95 % CI 1.01-93.61) and diagnosed at stage II or above (OR = 7.80, 95 % CI 1.18-51.50) compared with screen-detected cancers. Screening mammography may be effective for women with a first-degree family history of breast cancer, irrespective of level of familial risk.

Jewish ethnicity and pancreatic cancer mortality in a large U.S. cohort

BACKGROUND

An association between Jewish ethnicity and pancreatic cancer risk was suggested by analyses comparing pancreatic cancer mortality rates between Jews and non-Jews in New York in the 1950s. These analyses lacked information on potential confounding factors and the association between Jewish ethnicity and pancreatic cancer has not been examined in any contemporary U.S. population or in any cohort study.

METHODS

We examined the association between Jewish ethnicity and pancreatic cancer mortality among approximately 1 million participants in the Cancer Prevention Study II cohort. Participants completed a questionnaire at enrollment in 1982 which included information on religion, smoking, obesity, and diabetes. During follow-up through 2006, there were 6,727 pancreatic cancer deaths, including 480 among Jewish participants. Proportional hazards modeling was used to calculate multivariable rate ratios (RR).

RESULTS

After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, body mass index, and diabetes, pancreatic cancer mortality was higher among Jewish participants than among non-Jewish whites (RR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.30-1.57). In analyses by birthplace, RRs were 1.59 (95% CI, 1.31-1.93) for North American-born Jews with North American-born parents, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.27-1.61) for North American-born Jews with 1 or more parents born outside North America, and 1.03 (0.73, 1.44) for Jews born outside North America (P(heterogeneity) = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

These results support a higher risk of developing pancreatic cancer among U.S. Jews that is not explained by established risk factors.

IMPACT

Future studies may clarify the role of specific environmental or genetic factors responsible for higher risk among U.S. Jews.

A population-based audit of ethnicity and breast cancer risk in one general practice catchment area in North London, UK: implications for practice

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a pilot population-based study within a general practice catchment area to determine whether the incidence of breast cancer was increased in the Ashkenazi population.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING

A single general practice catchment area in North London.

PARTICIPANTS

1947 women over the age of 16 who responded to a questionnaire about ethnicity and breast cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of breast cancer, ethnicity.

RESULTS

This study showed a 1.5-fold (95% CI 0.93-2.39) increase in breast cancer risk in the Ashkenazim compared with the non-Ashkenazi white population. The increased incidence was for both premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer (expected incidence pre:post is 1:4 whereas in the Ashkenazim it was 1:1; 51 and 52% of cases respectively). This increase was not shown in the Sephardim. Asians had a reduction in incidence (OR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.10-1.89). Results were adjusted for other risk factors for breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

This study showed a 1.5-fold increase in breast cancer rates in Ashkenazim compared with the non-Jewish white population when adjusted for age (i.e. corrections were made to allow comparison of age groups) and this is not observed in the Sephardic population. The proportion of premenopausal breast cancer was just over double that of the general population. This is the first general practice population-based study in the UK to address this issue and has implications for general practitioners who care for patients from the Ashkenazi community.

Estimating risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: a meta-analytic approach

Estimates of penetrance (or risk) of breast cancer among BRCA mutation carriers in published studies are heterogeneous, prohibiting direct combined estimates. Estimates of prevalence of BRCA mutations are more homogeneous and could allow combined estimates of prevalence. We propose a combined estimator of penetrance from combined estimates of the prevalence of BRCA mutations in women with and without breast cancer and from the probability of breast cancer by using Bayes' Theorem. The relative risk of having breast cancer with positive family history and the prevalence of positive family history contribute to the combined estimate of penetrance if family history is present. The combined estimate incorporates variation in estimates from different resources. The method is illustrated by using data from Ashkenazi Jewish women unselected for family history and for those with family history. Risks of breast cancer conferred by BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are estimated to be 8.39 per cent (6.56, 10.68 per cent) and 2.66 per cent (1.85, 3.82 per cent) by 40 years old, and 47.45 per cent (37.39, 57.72 per cent) and 31.85 per cent (23.72, 41.26 per cent) by 75 years old, respectively. For those with family history, risks of breast cancer conferred by BRCA mutations appear to be higher.

Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics

BACKGROUND

The collection of ethnicity information as part of cancer datasets is important for planning services and ensuring equal access, and for epidemiological studies. However, ethnicity has generally not been well recorded in cancer registries in the UK. The aim of this study was to determine the completeness of ethnicity coding in the Thames Cancer Registry (TCR) database and within the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data as held by the London Health Observatory, and to investigate factors associated with ethnicity being recorded.

METHODS

Records for 111821 hospital admissions of London residents with a malignant cancer as a primary diagnosis between April 2002 and March 2003 and records for 25581 London residents diagnosed with cancer in 2002 were examined. Data on sex, age, cancer network of residence, deprivation, proportion of non-whites in the local authority population, and site of cancer were available. The proportion of patients in each group with a valid ethnicity code was calculated. In the TCR data proportions were also calculated adjusted for all other variables.

RESULTS

Ethnicity was recorded for 90661 (81.1%) of the hospital admissions in the HES data and 5796 (22.7%) patients on the TCR database. Patients resident in areas with a higher proportion of non-white residents and the most deprived populations were more likely to have an ethnic code on the TCR database, though this pattern was not seen in the HES data. Adjustment did not materially affect the association between deprivation and ethnicity being recorded in the TCR data.

CONCLUSION

There was a large difference in completeness of ethnicity between the data sources. In order to improve the level of recording in TCR data there needs to be better recording of ethnicity in sources TCR data collection staff have access to, or use of information from other sources e.g. electronic data feeds from hospitals or pathology laboratories, or HES data itself supplied directly to TCR. Efforts to collect ethnicity data should be encouraged in all healthcare settings. Future research should explore where the difficulties collecting ethnicity information lie, whether with patients, healthcare professionals or the recording procedure, and how such problems can be overcome.

A Local Community Health Survey: Findings From A Population-Based Survey Of The Largest Jewish Community In Chicago

Accurate estimates of health risk factors and outcomes are difficult to obtain for certain ethnic populations. The health of Jewish individuals is particularly hard to determine because of the small group size and because health data rarely include information on religious affiliation. Furthermore, local level health information (for any population subgroup) is limited. To assess health risk factors and outcomes, as well as issues related to access to care, within a Jewish community in Chicago, a group of community agencies and researchers initiated a unique, population-based health survey. Specifically, a three-stage sampling design was used to select a representative sample of 201 adults and 58 children in the most concentrated Jewish neighborhood in the city. Nearly 500 questions were asked, covering a wide variety of demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related topics. The findings revealed that these Jewish individuals were generally as healthy (or healthier) than the average residents of Chicago and the U.S.; however, many serious health concerns still existed. In particular, health problems such as obesity, depression, disability, and domestic violence were common and, in some cases, more prevalent than in the general population. This local level information provides the first accurate estimates of key health variables for the estimated 23,000 Jewish individuals living in this community. This type of data is essential because it enables the efforts and priorities of health and social service providers to be focused on the most pressing health problems. Moreover, this project provides an example for other population subgroups (based on residence, ethnicity, religious affiliation, country of origin, or other characteristics) who would benefit from local level health information.

An evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations penetrance estimates for breast cancer among Ashkenazi Jewish women

PURPOSE

Three founder mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes increase breast cancer risk among Ashkenazi Jewish women. Reported estimates of the magnitude of this risk vary widely. We describe an integrated approach for assessing the plausibility of these estimates.

METHODS

Our approach integrates four epidemiologic parameters: (1) the proportion of all breast cancer cases with a founder mutation, (2) the proportion of women that carry one of these mutations, (3) the proportion of women with a mutation that develops cancer, and (4) the number of women who will develop cancer, regardless of mutation status. We then assess the published estimates of the proportion of Ashkenazi Jewish women with a mutation that develops cancer in the context of the other three parameters.

RESULTS

Penetrance for the founder mutations by ages 40, 50, and 70 are approximately 7%, 20%, and 40%, respectively. In two of the four published studies that evaluated at least two of the four parameters, penetrance estimates were internally consistent with the other three parameters and were also consistent with our consensus estimate. The third study had incomplete data. In the fourth study, the penetrance estimate was not internally consistent with the other three parameters, nor was it consistent with the consensus estimate.

CONCLUSIONS

The four epidemiologic parameters are interdependent and can be used to test the plausibility of any one parameter. Based on the range of breast cancer penetrance estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations derived by our approach, recently reported penetrance estimates appear to be overestimated.

Hereditary breast cancer in Jews

A family history of breast cancer poses higher risks for Jewish versus non-Jewish women, particularly for early-onset breast cancer. This appears to be due in large part to the high prevalence (2.5%) of three BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations in Ashkenazi Jews. About 4 to 8% of non-Jewish male breast cancer cases versus 19% of Jewish male breast cancer cases carry germline BRCA mutations. Jewish women are disproportionately impacted by BRCA mutations throughout life, with a 10% carrier rate for breast cancer diagnosed at any age and a 21 to 30% carrier rate for breast cancer diagnosed by age 40. Comparable rates in non-Jewish populations are 6.1% for breast cancer diagnosed before age 50. Lifetime penetrance estimates based on genotyping of probands have ranged widely in Jewish and non-Jewish populations. However, a study of 1008 Jewish women with breast cancer which extended genotyping to relatives found high penetrance rates with considerably smaller standard errors. This study and studies of early-onset incident breast cancer in non-Jews have found that at least half of high-risk cases would be missed by family history screening alone. While the carrier rate in non-Jewish populations is too low to consider genetic screening, the carrier rate in Ashkenazi Jews is high and genetic screening poses fewer technical barriers. The high genetic attributable cancer risks of Ashkenazi BRCA founder mutations, the sobering lethality of ovarian and early onset breast cancers, and the increasing clarity about effectiveness of medical interventions make imperative further dialogue and research to keep guidelines for genetic screening up to date.

Racial meanings and scientific methods: changing policies for NIH-sponsored publications reporting human variation

Conventional wisdom holds that race is socially constructed and not based on genetic differences. Cutting-edge genetic research threatens this view and hence also endangers the pursuit of racial equality and useful public health research. The most recent incarnation of racial genetics is not due to scientific discoveries about population differences per se, but follows from how the United States and other governments have organized racial categories. This article explains tensions in U.S. government guidelines and publications on the study of human genetic diversity, points out the absence of any compelling public health benefits that might justify this research, introduces conceptual tools for addressing the complicated heuristic and policy problems posed by medical population genetics, and offers two policy proposals to remedy the current problems.

Prevalence of family history of breast and ovarian cancer in a single primary care practice using a self-administered questionnaire

Women at high risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer require specific management strategies for cancer prevention and early detection. The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of familial breast and ovarian cancer among patients in a primary care practice. Questionnaires were mailed to the 608 women less than 81 years of age in a single primary care practice. Additional mailings and phone calls were used for nonresponders. Data were analyzed by bloodline, the degree of relative, age of diagnosis and cancer type. Women were grouped into three categories of breast/ovarian family history: "no family history,""insignificant family history," and "significant potentially high-risk family history" (women with two or more relatives in a single bloodline with breast and/or ovarian cancer, a single individual with bilateral breast cancer or breast and ovarian cancer, or breast and/or ovarian cancer at less than 40 years of age). A pedigree analysis of women categorized as "significant potentially high-risk family history" further classified these women as to the likelihood of being at risk for hereditary cancer. Data were obtained from 567 women (93%); 27 patients with a personal diagnosis of breast and/or ovarian cancer were excluded. Of the 540 remaining respondents, 351 (65%) had no family history of cancer, 138 (25.6%) had an insignificant family history, and 51 (9.4%) had a significant family history. Based on pedigree analysis of these 51 patients, 19 were unlikely to be at high risk for hereditary cancer, and 32 (6%) were likely to be at significant risk and warrant intensive evaluation. The large proportion of women identified with a significant family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer has major implications regarding the magnitude of a population-based process to identify and manage high-risk individuals.

Familial risk factors for breast cancer among Arab women in Israel

The incidence of breast cancer in Arab women is low compared with western populations in other countries. Very few studies on risk factors for breast cancer in Arab women have been reported. The aim of the present study was to evaluate familial risk factors for breast cancer among Arab women in Israel. A case-control study was carried out on 72 Arab women diagnosed with breast cancer and 140 healthy controls. Cases were identified through oncology wards and controls were sampled from community and hospital out-patient clinics. All participants were interviewed and information obtained on family history of breast cancer and other cancers, and other potential risk factors. Eight women with breast cancer and five women without breast cancer had a first-degree relative with breast cancer. The odds ratio for breast cancer for a woman with a first-degree relative with breast cancer was 3.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-10.7, P = 0.04). The odds ratio for Muslim women with a first-degree relative with breast cancer was higher than that for Christian women (6.07 and 1.53, respectively). Family history of breast cancer was a risk factor for breast cancer in Arab women. The estimated relative risk associated with an affected first-degree relative was generally higher than that reported from other populations.

Heritable breast cancer in twins

Known major mutations such as BRCA1/2 and TP53 only cause a small proportion of heritable breast cancers. Co-dominant genes of lower penetrance that regulate hormones have been thought responsible for most others. Incident breast cancer cases in the identical (monozygotic) twins of representative cases reflect the entire range of pertinent alleles, whether acting singly or in combination. Having reported the rate in twins and other relatives of cases to be high and nearly constant over age, we now examine the descriptive and histological characteristics of the concordant and discordant breast cancers occurring in 2310 affected pairs of monozygotic and fraternal (dizygotic) twins in relation to conventional expectations and hypotheses. Like other first-degree relatives, dizygotic co-twins of breast cancer cases are at higher than usual risk (standardised incidence ratio (SIR)=1.7, CI=1.1-2.6), but the additional cases among monozygotic co-twins of cases are much more numerous, both before and after menopause (SIR=4.4, CI=3.6-5.6), than the 100% genetic identity would predict. Monozygotic co-twin diagnoses following early proband cancers also occur more rapidly than expected (within 5 years, SIR=20.0, CI=7.5-53.3). Cases in concordant pairs represent heritable disease and are significantly more likely to be oestrogen receptor-positive than those of comparable age from discordant pairs. The increase in risk to the monozygotic co-twins of cases cannot be attributed to the common environment, to factors that cumulate with age, or to any aggregate of single autosomal dominant mutations. The genotype more plausibly consists of multiple co-existing susceptibility alleles acting through heightened susceptibility to hormones and/or defective tumour suppression. The resultant class of disease accounts for a larger proportion of all breast cancers than previously thought, with a rather high overall penetrance. Some of the biological characteristics differ from those of breast cancer generally.

Religion and medicine III: developing a theoretical model

In this third of a four-article series on religion and medicine, I describe a theoretical model to illustrate the complex pathways by which religion may influence physical health. Genetic factors, childhood training, psychological and social influences, health behaviors, and healthcare practices are discussed as part of this model. Considerable space is given to recent advances in psychoneuroimmunology and to stress-induced cardiovascular changes that demonstrate physiological pathways by which cognitive, emotional, and behavioral processes may influence susceptibility to disease and disease course. I also discuss research illustrating the important role that social support plays in moderating the physiological effects of stress and improving health outcomes. If religious beliefs and practices improve coping, reduce stress, prevent or facilitate the resolution of depression, improve social support, promote healthy behaviors, and prevent alcohol and drug abuse, then a plausible mechanism exists by which physical health may be affected.

Breast cancer: hormones and other risk factors

In North America and Northern Europe, breast cancer incidence rates begin increasing in the early reproductive years and continue climbing into the late seventies, whereas rates plateau after menopause in japan and less developed countries. Female gender, age and country of birth are the strongest determinants of disease risk. Family history and mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are important correlates of lifetime risk. Genetic polymorphisms associated with estrogen synthesis and metabolism are currently under study. Atypical hyperplasia and molecular alterations in benign breast lesions appear to be involved in the pathogenesis of invasive carcinoma. In postmenopausal women, increased breast density on mammograms increases risk. Bone density and breast cancer are associated, presumably through the mechanism of endogenous estrogen levels. Serum estrogen levels are higher in breast cancer cases than controls. Many established risk factors for breast cancer may function through and endocrine mechanism. Current use of oral contraceptives and prolonged, current or recent use of hormone replacement therapy moderately increase risk. Tamoxifen and possibly other selective estrogen receptor modulators reduce breast cancer risk in high risk women. Relationships between various dietary micro and macronutrients and breast cancer have been suggested but require evaluation in clinical trials. Whereas alcohol consumption is associated with increased risk, most environmental factors, including polychlorinated compounds and electromagnetic fields, are not.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer etiology is becoming clearer through the study of molecular alterations in germline and somatic cell genes, and the interaction of these genes with steroid hormones and relevant growth factors. This knowledge should be useful for breast cancer prevention.

Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving treatment in women with breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations

PURPOSE

Recent laboratory data suggest a role for BRCA1/2 in the cellular response to DNA damage. There is a paucity of clinical data, however, examining the effect of radiotherapy (RT), which causes double-strand breaks, on breast tissue from BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Thus the goals of this study were to compare rates of radiation-associated complications, in-breast tumor recurrence, and distant relapse in women with BRCA1/2 mutations treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) using RT with rates observed in sporadic disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one women with a BRCA1/2 mutation and stage I or II breast cancer treated with BCT were matched 1:3 with 213 women with sporadic breast cancer. Conditional logistic regression models were used to compare matched cohorts for rates of complications and recurrence.

RESULTS

Tumors from women in the genetic cohort were associated with high histologic (P =.0004) and nuclear (P =.009) grade and negative estrogen (P=.0001) and progesterone (P=.002) receptors compared with tumors from the sporadic cohort. Using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity scoring, there were no significant differences in acute or chronic morbidity in skin, subcutaneous tissue, lung, or bone. The 5-year actuarial overall survival, relapse-free survival, and rates of tumor control in the treated breast for the patients in the genetic cohort were 86%, 78%, and 98%, respectively, compared with 91%, 80%, and 96%, respectively, for the sporadic cohort (P = not significant).

CONCLUSION

There was no evidence of increased radiation sensitivity or sequelae in breast tissue heterozygous for a BRCA1/2 germline mutation compared with controls, and rates of tumor control in the breast and survival were comparable between BRCA1/2 carriers and controls at 5 years. Although additional follow-up is needed, these data may help in discussing treatment options in the management of early-stage hereditary breast cancer and should provide reassurance regarding the safety of administering RT to carriers of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation.

Increased risk for familial ovarian cancer among Jewish women: a population-based case-control study

Jewish women have been reported to have a higher risk for familial breast cancer than non-Jewish women and to be more likely to carry mutations in breast cancer genes such as BRCA1. Because BRCA1 mutations also increase women's risk for ovarian cancer, we asked whether Jewish women are at higher risk for familial ovarian cancer than non-Jewish women. To determine the effects of 1) Jewish religion and 2) ovarian cancer in a first-degree relative on women's risk for epithelial ovarian cancer, we used data from a population-based, case-control study conducted in 8 geographic regions in the United States from 1980 through 1982. The study group included 471 cases and 4,025 controls. Jewish women were more likely to have familial ovarian cancer than non-Jewish women [odds ratio (OR) = 8.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.6-28]. The risk of having ovarian cancer appeared to be greater in Jewish women having a first-degree relative with ovarian cancer (OR = 8.81, 95% CI = 2.02-38.23) than in non-Jewish women having a first-degree relative with ovarian cancer (OR = 3.01, 95% CI = 1.61-5.64), but differences between Jewish and non-Jewish women were not statistically significant. Jewish women with no first-degree relative with ovarian cancer had no increased risk for ovarian cancer (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.74-2.91) compared to non-Jewish women. These results suggest that Jewish women may have a higher rate of familial ovarian cancer than non-Jewish women, but because the results are based on a small number of Jewish women with familial ovarian cancer, the results need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Evaluation and treatment of BRCA-positive patients

The recent discovery of the breast cancer-associated genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 has now made it possible to identify individuals who are at a very high risk for the future development of breast cancer. To some extent, however, society has fallen victim to its molecular genetic technology. The significance of these discoveries to the detection, treatment, and prevention of breast cancer cannot be overstated. Nevertheless, the appropriate administration and interpretation of BRCA genetic testing and the treatment of BRCA-positive patients remain controversial issues. Complexities of BRCA testing require that such genetic screening be restricted to selected high-risk patients and that test results be interpreted by a knowledgeable molecular geneticist. Although no medical prophylaxis has been demonstrated to be of benefit in BRCA-positive patients, recent evidence suggests that a prophylactic mastectomy, with or without reconstruction, is a reasonable treatment option that substantially reduces cancer risk.

Understanding probabilistic risk in predisposition genetic testing for Alzheimer disease

The utility of genetic testing in preventing the onset of conditions such as Alzheimer disease (AD) depends upon categorizing individuals based on their "risk" of illness. Although no strategies to prevent the occurrence of AD have been proven effective, the promise of the new molecular medicine is based on the assumption that those "at risk" can be identified, counseled about their likelihood of developing a disease, and prescribed specific preventive interventions. We suggest that this paradigm of disease prevention through risk stratification has limitations that have not been fully explored. Within the fields of cognitive and health psychology, research has addressed how individuals understand the numeric presentation of uncertain future events; this research often focuses on the "perceptual pathology" of lay people. The uncertainty inherent in the risk estimates themselves is rarely considered, nor has research addressed how those risk estimates are created. There has been limited work to date focused on genetic risk assessment, and little is known about how individual might understand the meaning or consequences of being at genetic risk for AD. An emerging social science critique of concepts of risk in genetic medicine offers a broader perspective, examining the process of producing scientific risk estimates as well as the response of individual patients, such as the experience of embodied risk that is central to genetic testing. Making fully informed choices about genetic testing for AD may prove more difficult than our current model of ethical practice suggests.

Screening for cancer in the patient with rheumatic disease

This article begins with a discussion of the types of cancer that are most often the target of cancer screening in general medical practice. Colorectal, prostate, cervical, and breast cancer screening guidelines are reviewed and some of the evidence (and controversy) behind these recommendations is discussed. A discussion of some of the special risks for cancer in patients with rheumatologic disease follows, and some modifications of standard screening guidelines are suggested for these high-risk patients.

Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in unselected Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Approximately 2.0%-2.5% of Ashkenazi Jewish women carry one of three founding mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, and each mutation is associated with a high lifetime risk of invasive breast cancer. We investigated the extent to which these three mutations contribute to breast cancer incidence in the Ashkenazi Jewish population.

METHODS

We ascertained 457 Jewish women with prevalent cases of breast cancer who were unselected for age or family history of the disease; 412 of these women were tested for the three founder mutations (case patients). Control subjects consisted of 360 non-Jewish women with breast cancer (control patients) and 380 healthy Jewish women with no history of cancer (control subjects).

RESULTS

Mutations were found in 48 (11.7%) of 412 Jewish case patients. Forty-six of 48 mutations occurred in women with early-onset breast cancer (<50 years) or a history of ovarian or early-onset breast cancer in a first-, second-, or third-degree relative. The estimated penetrance to age 70 years for breast cancer was 59.9% for the BRCA1 gene mutations and 28.3% for the BRCA2 gene mutation. Compared with Jewish control subjects, the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer for first-degree relatives of mutation carriers was 5.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.14-8. 48), but risk was also increased for relatives of noncarriers (RR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.18-2.33). The RR of prostate cancer for first-degree relatives of Jewish case patients was 3.36 (95% CI = 1. 49-7.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 12% of breast cancers in the Ashkenazi Jewish population are attributable to mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. Genetic testing may be useful when Jewish women with breast cancer are diagnosed before age 50 years or have a close relative with ovarian or early-onset breast cancer. An association between breast and prostate cancers was observed in our study population.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer

Breast cancer, one of the most common serious malignancies affecting women, occurs in hereditary and sporadic forms. Hereditary breast cancer accounts for 5-10% of all cases and has some distinctive clinical features compared with sporadic breast cancer. The recently identified genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 appear to account for the majority of hereditary breast cancer in US and European populations. Both of these genes have already been localized and isolated; however, the exact functions of their proteins are not clear yet. The detection of LOH in the 17q21 and 13q12-q13 regions, where the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are located, indicates that BRCA1 and BRCA2 act as tumor suppressor genes. The list of identified germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 is still growing, and mutation carriers have a substantial lifetime risk of both breast and ovarian cancer. However, it is still undetermined whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 play similar important roles in sporadic breast cancer. This paper reviews the current advances in BRCA1/BRCA2 research: the structure of their genes and proteins, their mutation frequencies, their possible roles in both hereditary and sporadic breast cancers, and their functions in transcriptional regulation and DNA repair.

Frequency and carrier risk associated with common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer patients

Based on breast cancer families with multiple and/or early-onset cases, estimates of the lifetime risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations may be as high as 85%. The risk for individuals not selected for family history or other risk factors is uncertain. We determined the frequency of the common BRCA1 (185delAG and 5382insC) and BRCA2 (6174delT) mutations in a series of 268 anonymous Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer, regardless of family history or age at onset. DNA was analyzed for the three mutations by allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization. Eight patients (3.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5%-5.8%) were heterozygous for the 185delAG mutation, two (0.75%, 95% CI 0.20-2.7) for the 5382insC mutation, and eight (3.0%, 95% CI 1.5-5.8) for the 6174delT mutation. The lifetime risk for breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish carriers of the BRCA1 185delAG or BRCA2 6174delT mutations was calculated to be 36%, approximately three times the overall risk for the general population (relative risk 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.8). For the 5382insC mutation, because of the low number of carriers found, further studies are necessary. The results differ markedly from previous estimates based on high-risk breast cancer families and are consistent with lower estimates derived from a recent population-based study in the Baltimore area. Thus, presymptomatic screening and counseling for these common mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish women not selected for family history of breast cancer should be reconsidered until the risk associated with these mutations is firmly established, especially since early diagnostic and preventive-treatment modalities are limited.

Noncutaneous malignant tumors in the PUVA follow-up study: 1975-1996

There is concern about possible association between PUVA treatment and an increased risk of noncutaneous cancer. An alteration in the risk of cancer among persons with psoriasis has also been postulated. To test this hypothesis, for nearly two decades we have prospectively followed 1380 patients who first began PUVA treatment for psoriasis in 1975-1976. We compare the risk of noncutaneous cancer in our cohort with that expected based on general population incidence rates. The overall risk of noncutaneous cancer was nearly identical to that expected in general population. For three separate sites, we noted significant increases: thyroid cancer (RR = 3.57, 95% CI = 1.16-8.34), breast cancer (RR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.19-2.64), and central nervous system neoplasms (RR = 2.80, 95% CI = 1.13-5.57). Since 1987, however, the risk of central nervous system neoplasms has not been elevated (RR = 0.00, 95% CI = 0.00-3.35) and the relative risk of breast cancer was lower than in the prior decade and not statistically significant. There was no association between higher levels of exposure to PUVA and the risk of any of these cancers. We did not detect any significant increase in the risk of lymphoma or leukemia. Our study does not support the hypothesis that long-term PUVA treatment increases the risk of noncutaneous cancer.

The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews

BACKGROUND

Carriers of germ-line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 from families at high risk for cancer have been estimated to have an 85 percent risk of breast cancer. Since the combined frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations exceeds 2 percent among Ashkenazi Jews, we were able to estimate the risk of cancer in a large group of Jewish men and women from the Washington, D.C., area.

METHODS

We collected blood samples from 5318 Jewish subjects who had filled out epidemiologic questionnaires. Carriers of the 185delAG and 5382insC mutations in BRCA1 and the 6174delT mutation in BRCA2 were identified with assays based on the polymerase chain reaction. We estimated the risks of breast and other cancers by comparing the cancer histories of relatives of carriers of the mutations and noncarriers.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were identified. By the age of 70, the estimated risk of breast cancer among carriers was 56 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 40 to 73 percent); of ovarian cancer, 16 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 6 to 28 percent); and of prostate cancer, 16 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 4 to 30 percent). There were no significant differences in the risk of breast cancer between carriers of BRCA1 mutations and carriers of BRCA2 mutations, and the incidence of colon cancer among the relatives of carriers was not elevated.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 2 percent of Ashkenazi Jews carry mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 that confer increased risks of breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer. The risks of breast cancer may be overestimated, but they fall well below previous estimates based on subjects from high-risk families.

Genetics of breast cancer

Familial breast cancer is characterized by young age at diagnosis, an increased risk of bilateral breast cancer, an increasing risk in conjunction with increasing numbers of affected family members, and a strong association with ovarian cancer. At least eight candidate breast cancer susceptibility genes have been identified. Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, p53, and the Cowden disease gene are relatively uncommon, are highly penetrant, and produce striking familial clusters of breast cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most important of these, accounting for an estimated 80% of hereditary breast cancer and 5 to 6% of all breast cancers. Specific BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are of particular importance in population subgroups, such as those identified among Jewish women of central European (Ashkenazi) origin. Mutations in the ataxia-telangiectasia gene and the rare HRAS1 variable number of tandem repeats polymorphisms are much more common but also much less penetrant. They do not produce dramatic familial aggregations of breast cancer but may prove to be responsible for a substantial proportion of all breast cancers if their epidemiologic association with breast cancer is confirmed. Predictive genetic testing for breast cancer risk is under way. Oncologists and primary-care physicians must become familiar with these genetic disorders and the issues surrounding predictive testing in order to make appropriate management decisions about women thought to have a high genetic risk of breast cancer.

Recent advances in understanding of genetic susceptibility to breast cancer

The breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1, was isolated in 1994. Recent investigations into the genetic epidemiology of BRCA1 have revealed an unexpectedly high prevalence of mutations amongst Ashkenazi Jews. Analyses of BRCA1 function have indicated that it may act as an inhibitor of cell proliferation and is necessary for normal development in the mouse. The presence of a motif in BRCA1 characteristic of a family of proteins known as granins, has led to the suggestion that the protein is secreted into the extracellular space. The BRCA2 gene has recently been identified. BRCA2 encodes a large protein of 3418 amino acids without strong homology to any other protein in the database. However, BRCA2 also contains a putative granin motif and a different eight times repeated motif of unknown function. In addition to breast and ovarian cancer, germline BRCA2 mutations probably confer a small risk of a wide range of cancers. Somatic mutations of BRCA2 in sporadic breast and ovarian cancer are very rare. The gene for Cowden syndrome has recently been located and it will now be possible to assess whether it is responsible for the set of families not accounted for by BRCA1 and BRCA2.