2-36[K4,RYYSA(19-23)]PP a novel Y5-receptor preferring ligand with strong stimulatory effect on food intake

Illuminating the neuropeptide Y4 receptor and its ligand pancreatic polypeptide from a structural, functional, and therapeutic perspective

The neuropeptide Y4 receptor (Y4R), a rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and the hormone pancreatic polypeptide (PP) are members of the neuropeptide Y family consisting of four receptors (Y1R, Y2R, Y4R, Y5R) and three highly homologous peptide ligands (neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, PP). In this family, the Y4R is of particular interest as it is the only subtype with high affinity to PP over NPY. The Y4R, as a mediator of PP signaling, has a pivotal role in appetite regulation and energy homeostasis, offering potential avenues for the treatment of metabolic disorders such as obesity. PP as anorexigenic peptide is released postprandial from the pancreas in response to food intake, induces satiety signals and contributes to hamper excessive food intake. Moreover, this system was also described to be associated with different types of cancer: overexpression of Y4R have been found in human adenocarcinoma cells, while elevated levels of PP are related to the development of pancreatic endocrine tumors. The pharmacological relevance of the Y4R advanced the search for potent and selective ligands for this receptor subtype, which will be significantly progressed through the elucidation of the active state PP-Y4R cryo-EM structure. This review summarizes the development of novel PP-derived ligands, like Obinepitide as dual Y2R/Y4R agonist in clinical trials or UR-AK86c as small hexapeptide agonist with picomolar affinity, as well as the first allosteric modulators that selectively target the Y4R, e.g. VU0506013 as potent Y4R positive allosteric modulator or (S)-VU0637120 as allosteric antagonist. Here, we provide valuable insights into the complex physiological functions of the Y4R and PP and the pharmacological relevance of the system in appetite regulation to open up new avenues for the development of tool compounds for targeted therapies with potential applications in metabolic disorders.

Crystal structures of human neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY)

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) form the evolutionarily conserved pancreatic polypeptide family. While the fold is widely utilized in nature, crystal structures remain elusive, particularly for the human forms, with only the structure of a distant avian form of PP reported. Here we utilize a crystallization chaperone (antibody Fab fragment), specifically recognizing the amidated peptide termini, to solve the structures of human NPY and human PYY. Intriguingly, and despite limited sequence identity (~50%), the structure of human PYY closely resembles that of avian PP, highlighting the broad structural conservation of the fold throughout evolution. Specifically, the PYY structure is characterized by a C-terminal amidated α-helix, preceded by a backfolded poly-proline N-terminus, with the termini in close proximity to each other. In contrast, in the structure of human NPY the N-terminal component is disordered, while the helical component of the peptide is observed in a four-helix bundle type arrangement, consistent with a propensity for multimerization suggested by NMR studies.

Binding of Natural Peptide Ligands to the Neuropeptide Y5 Receptor

The binding mode of natural peptide ligands to the Y5 G protein-coupled receptor (Y5 R), an attractive therapeutic target for the treatment of obesity, is largely unknown. Here, we apply complementary biochemical and computational approaches, including scanning of the receptor surface with a genetically encoded crosslinker, Ala-scanning of the ligand and double-cycle mutagenesis, to map interactions in the ligand-receptor interface and build a structural model of the NPY-Y5 R complex guided by the experimental data. In the model, the carboxyl (C)-terminus of bound NPY is placed close to the extracellular loop (ECL) 3, whereas the characteristic α-helical segment of the ligand drapes over ECL1 and is tethered towards ECL2 by a hydrophobic cluster. We further show that the other two natural ligands of Y5 R, peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) dock to the receptor in a similar pose.

Hypothalamic circuits regulating appetite and energy homeostasis: pathways to obesity

The ‘obesity epidemic’ represents a major global socioeconomic burden that urgently calls for a better understanding of the underlying causes of increased weight gain and its associated metabolic comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. Improving our understanding of the cellular basis of obesity could set the stage for the development of new therapeutic strategies. The CNS plays a pivotal role in the regulation of energy and glucose homeostasis. Distinct neuronal cell populations, particularly within the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, sense the nutrient status of the organism and integrate signals from peripheral hormones including pancreas-derived insulin and adipocyte-derived leptin to regulate calorie intake, glucose metabolism and energy expenditure. The arcuate neurons are tightly connected to other specialized neuronal subpopulations within the hypothalamus, but also to various extrahypothalamic brain regions, allowing a coordinated behavioral response. This At a Glance article gives an overview of the recent knowledge, mainly derived from rodent models, regarding the CNS-dependent regulation of energy and glucose homeostasis, and illustrates how dysregulation of the neuronal networks involved can lead to overnutrition and obesity. The potential impact of recent research findings in the field on therapeutic treatment strategies for human obesity is also discussed.

Summary: This at a glance article gives an overview of the recent knowledge mainly derived from rodent models regarding the CNS-dependent regulation of energy and glucose homeostasis, and depicts how dysregulation of the involved neuronal networks promotes overnutrition and obesity.

Neuropeptide Y inhibits the trigeminovascular pathway through NPY Y1 receptor: implications for migraine

In vivo electrophysiology in migraine animal model shows that neuropeptide Y dose dependently inhibits dural-evoked trigeminal activity, through NPY Y1 receptor activation. Implications for pain and premonitory symptomatology.

Migraine is a painful neurologic disorder with premonitory symptomatology that can include disturbed appetite. Migraine pathophysiology involves abnormal activation of trigeminocervical complex (TCC) neurons. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is synthesized in the brain and is involved in pain modulation. NPY receptors are present in trigeminal ganglia and trigeminal nucleus caudalis suggesting a role in migraine pathophysiology. The present study aimed to determine the effect of systemic administration of NPY on TCC neuronal activity in response to dural nociceptive trigeminovascular activation. We performed in vivo electrophysiology in anesthetized rats, administered NPY (10, 30, and 100 µg·kg⁻¹), and investigated the receptors involved by studying NPY Y₁ (30 µg·kg⁻¹), Y₂ (30 µg·kg⁻¹), and Y₅ receptor agonists (100·µg·kg⁻¹), and NPY Y₁ receptor antagonist (30 µg·kg⁻¹). NPY (30 and 100 µg·kg⁻¹) significantly reduced TCC neuronal firing in response to dural-evoked trigeminovascular activation, but only NPY (30 µg·kg⁻¹) significantly reduced spontaneous trigeminal firing. NPY Y₁ receptor agonist also significantly reduced dural-evoked and spontaneous TCC neuronal firing. NPY (10 µg·kg⁻¹), NPY Y₂, and Y₅ receptor agonists, and the NPY Y₁ receptor antagonist had no significant effects on nociceptive dural-evoked neuronal firing in the TCC or spontaneous trigeminal firing. This study demonstrates that NPY dose dependently inhibits dural-evoked trigeminal activity, through NPY Y₁ receptor activation, indicating antinociceptive actions of NPY in a migraine animal model. Based on the role of NPY in appetite regulation, it is possible that disruption of the NPY system might explain changes of appetite in migraineurs.

Regulation of energy homeostasis by the NPY system

Obesity develops when energy intake exceeds energy expenditure over time. Numerous neurotransmitters, hormones, and factors have been implicated to coordinately control energy homeostasis, centrally and peripherally. However, the neuropeptide Y (NPY) system has emerged as the one with the most critical functions in this process. While NPY centrally promotes feeding and reduces energy expenditure, peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP), the other family members, mediate satiety. Importantly, recent research has uncovered additional functions for these peptides that go beyond the simple feeding/satiety circuits and indicate a more extensive function in controlling energy homeostasis. In this review, we will discuss the actions of the NPY system in the regulation of energy balance, with a particular focus on energy expenditure.

The role of neuropeptide Y in energy homeostasis

When administered into the brain, NPY acts at Y1 and Y5 receptors to increase food intake. The response occurs with a short latency and is quite robust, such that exogenous NPY is generally considered to be the most potent of a growing list of orexigenic compounds that act in the brain. The role of endogenous NPY is not so straightforward, however. Evidence from diverse types of experiments suggests that rather than initiating behavioral eating per se, endogenous NPY elicits autonomic responses that prepare the individual to better cope with consuming a calorically large meal.

The role of NPY in hypothalamic mediated food intake

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a highly conserved neuropeptide with orexigenic actions in discrete hypothalamic nuclei that plays a role in regulating energy homeostasis. NPY signals via a family of high affinity receptors that mediate the widespread actions of NPY in all hypothalamic nuclei. These actions are also subject to tight, intricate regulation by numerous peripheral and central energy balance signals. The NPY system is embedded within a densely-redundant network designed to ensure stable energy homeostasis. This redundancy may underlie compensation for the loss of NPY or its receptors in germline knockouts, explaining why conventional knockouts of NPY or its receptors rarely yield a marked phenotypic change. We discuss insights into the hypothalamic role of NPY from studies of its physiological actions, responses to genetic manipulations and interactions with other energy balance signals. We conclude that numerous approaches must be employed to effectively study different aspects of NPY action.

Peptide hormone isoforms: N-terminally branched PYY3-36 isoforms give improved lipid and fat-cell metabolism in diet-induced obese mice

The prevalence of obesity is increasing with an alarming rate worldwide and there is a need for efficacious satiety drugs. PYY3-36 has been shown to play a role in hypothalamic appetite regulation and novel analogs targeting the Y2 receptor have potential as drugs for the treatment of obesity. We have designed a series of novel PYY3-36 isoforms, by first adding the dipeptide Ile-Lys N-terminal to the N(α) of Ser-13 in PYY13-36 and then anchoring the N-terminal segment, e.g. PYY3-12, to the new Lys N(ε)-amine. We hypothesized that such modifications would alter the folding of PYY, due to changes in the turn motif, which could change the binding mode to the Y receptor sub-types and possibly also alter metabolic stability. In structure-affinity/activity relationship experiments, one series of PYY isoforms displayed equipotency towards the Y receptors. However, an increased Y2 receptor potency for the second series of PYY isoforms resulted in enhanced Y receptor selectivity compared to PYY3-36. Additionally, acute as well as chronic mice studies showed body-weight-lowering effects for one of the PYY isoforms, which was also reflected in a reduction of circulating leptin levels. Interestingly, while the stability and pharmacokinetic profile of PYY3-36 and the N-terminally modified PYY3-36 analogue were identical, only mice treated with the branched analogue showed marked increases in adiponectin levels as well as reductions in non-esterified free fatty acids and triglycerides.

Responsiveness of obese Zucker rats to [D-Trp34]-NPY supports the targeting of Y5 receptor for obesity treatment

The increased synthesis and release of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the hypothalamus participate in the development of overeating and obesity in the Zucker fa/fa rat. The orexigenic effects of NPY are mediated through the Y1 and Y5 receptors. The substitution of [D-Trp34] in the NPY amino-acid sequence increases selectivity without lowering potency at the Y5 receptor. In the present study, to address the role of the NPY Y5 receptor in obesity, we investigated the acute effect of [D-Trp 34]-NPY in lean and obese Zucker rats. Obese rats were markedly hyperphagic (27.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 18.7 +/- 0.4 (lean) g/day; p < 0.01). Injection of [D-Trp34]-NPY in the lateral brain ventricle at a dose of 16 microg stimulated food intake to the same extent in both lean (p < 0.01) and obese (p < 0.01) rats 1 h after injection. This effect was still observed after 6 h (p < 0.01). These results indicate, therefore, that the obese rats are responsive to [D-Trp34]-NPY. They support the role of the neuropeptide Y5 receptor in the regulation of food intake and suggest that NPY Y5 antagonism might be useful for treating obesity.

Neuropeptide y receptor selective ligands in the treatment of obesity

Obesity is a serious public health problem throughout the world, affecting both developed societies and developing countries. The central nervous system has developed a meticulously interconnected circuitry in order to keep us fed and in an adequate nutritional state. One of these consequences is that an energy-dense environment favors the development of obesity. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most abundant and widely distributed peptides in the central nervous system of both rodents and humans and has been implicated in a variety of physiological actions. Within the hypothalamus, NPY plays an essential role in the control of food intake and body weight. Centrally administered NPY causes robust increases in food intake and body weight and, with chronic administration, can eventually produce obesity. NPY activates a population of at least six G protein-coupled Y receptors. NPY analogs exhibit varying degrees of affinity and specificity for these Y receptors. There has been renewed speculation that ligands for Y receptors may be of benefit for the treatment of obesity. This review highlights the therapeutic potential of Y(1), Y(2), Y(4), and Y(5) receptor agonists and antagonists as additional intervention to treat human obesity.

Brain regulation of food intake and appetite: molecules and networks

In the clinic, obesity and anorexia constitute prevalent problems whose manifestations are encountered in virtually every field of medicine. However, as the command centre for regulating food intake and energy metabolism is located in the brain, the basic neuroscientist sees in the same disorders malfunctions of a model network for how integration of diverse sensory inputs leads to a coordinated behavioural, endocrine and autonomic response. The two approaches are not mutually exclusive; rather, much can be gained by combining both perspectives to understand the pathophysiology of over- and underweight. The present review summarizes recent advances in this field including the characterization of peripheral metabolic signals to the brain such as leptin, insulin, peptide YY, ghrelin and lipid mediators as well as the vagus nerve; signalling of the metabolic sensors in the brainstem and hypothalamus via, e.g. neuropeptide Y and melanocortin peptides; integration and coordination of brain-mediated responses to nutritional challenges; the organization of food intake in simple model organisms; the mechanisms underlying food reward and processing of the sensory and metabolic properties of food in the cerebral cortex; and the development of the central metabolic system, as well as its pathological regulation in cancer and infections. Finally, recent findings on the genetics of human obesity are summarized, as well as the potential for novel treatments of body weight disorders.

Are Hormones from the Neuropeptide Y Family Recognized by Their Receptors from the Membrane-Bound State?

Hormones and many other neurotransmitters, growth factors, odorant molecules, and light all present stimuli for a class of membrane-anchored receptors called G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The GPCRs are the largest family of cell-surface receptors involved in signal transduction. About 1% of all known genes of Drosophila and more than 5% of the genes of Caenorhabditis elegans encode GPCRs. In addition, more than 50% of current therapeutic agents on the market target these receptors. When the enormous biological and pharmaceutical importance of these receptors is considered, it is surprising how little is known about the mechanism with which these receptors recognize their natural ligands. In this review we present a structural approach, utilizing techniques of high-resolution NMR spectroscopy, to address the question of whether peptides from the neuropeptide Y family of neurohormones are recognized directly from solution or from the membrane-bound state. In our studies we discovered that the structures of the membrane-bound species are better correlated to the pharmacological properties of these peptides than the solution structures are. These findings are supported by the observation that many biophysical properties of these peptides seem to be optimized for membrane binding. We finally present a scenario of possible events during receptor recognition.

Strongly Altered Receptor Binding Properties in PP and NPY Chimeras Are Accompanied by Changes in Structure and Membrane Binding,

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and the pancreatic polypeptide (PP) are members of the neuropeptide Y family of hormones. They bind to the Y receptors with very different affinities: Whereas PP is highly selective for the Y(4) receptor, NPY displays highest affinites for Y(1), Y(2), and Y(5) receptor subtypes. Introducing the NPY segment 19-23 into PP leads to an increase in affinity at the Y(1) and Y(2) receptor subtypes whereas the exchange of this segment from PP into NPY leads to a large decrease in affinity at all receptor subtypes. PP displays a very stable structure in solution, with the N terminus being back-folded onto the C-terminal alpha-helix (the so-called PP-fold). The helix of NPY is less stable and the N terminus is freely diffusing in solution. The exchange of this segment, however, does not alter the PP-fold propensities of the chimeric peptides in solution. The structures of the phospholipid micelle-bound peptides serving to mimic the membrane-bound species display segregation into a more flexible N-terminal region and a well-defined alpha-helical region. The introduction of the [19-23]-pNPY segment into hPP leads to an N-terminal extension of the alpha-helix, now starting at Pro(14) instead of Met(17). In contrast, a truncated helix is observed in [(19)(-)(23)hPP]-pNPY, starting at Leu(17) instead of Ala(14). All peptides display moderate binding affinities to neutral membranes (K(assoc) in the range of 1.7 to 6.8 x 10(4) mol(-)(1) as determined by surface plasmon resonance) with the differences in binding being most probably related to the exchange of Arg-19 (pNPY) by Glu-23 (hPP). Differences in receptor binding properties between the chimeras and their parental peptides are therefore most likely due to changes in the conformation of the micelle-bound peptides.

Synthesis of new benzoxazinone derivatives as neuropeptide Y5 antagonists for the treatment of obesity

Screening of our internal chemical collection against the neuropeptide Y5 (NPY Y5) receptor allowed the identification of a benzoxazine derivative 5f as a hit that showed moderate affinity (IC(50) = 300 nM). With the aim of improving the in vitro potency, a series of 2-benzoxazinone derivatives have been synthesized and tested for NPY Y5 activity. Most of the compounds were found to be potent and selective NPY Y5 antagonists having nanomolar binding affinities for the NPY Y5 receptor and showing functional antagonism in the forskolin-induced cyclic AMP test. Prelimminary studies in order to understand the structure-activity relationship were undertaken. Selected compounds were further evaluated for in vivo efficacy, affording the lead compound 2-[4-(8-methyl-2-oxo-4H-benzo[d][1,3]oxazin-1-yl)piperidin-1-yl]-N-(9-oxo-9H-fluoren-3-yl)acetamide 5p, which displayed in vivo activity reducing food intake in rodents.

Localization of neuropeptide Y receptor Y5 mRNA in the guinea pig brain by in situ hybridization

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has prominent stimulatory effects on food intake in virtually all animals that have been studied. In mammals, the effect is primarily mediated by receptors Y1 and Y5, which seem to contribute to different aspects of feeding behavior in guinea pigs and rats/mice. Interestingly, differences in receptor distribution among mammalian species have been reported. To get a broader perspective on the role of Y5, we describe here studies of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus), a species which due to its phylogenetic position in the mammalian radiation is an interesting complement to previous studies in rat and mouse. Guinea pig brain sections were hybridized with two 35S-labeled oligonucleotides complementary to Y5 mRNA. The highest expression levels of Y5 mRNA were observed in the hippocampus and several hypothalamic and brain stem nuclei implicated in the regulation of feeding, such as the paraventricular, arcuate and ventromedial hypothalamic nuclei. This contrasts with autoradiography studies that detected low Y5-like binding in these areas, a discrepancy observed also in rat and human. Y5 mRNA expression was also seen in the striatum, in great contrast to mouse and rat. Taken together, these data show that Y5 mRNA distribution displays some interesting species differences, but that its expression in feeding centers seems to be essentially conserved among mammals, adding further support for an important role in food intake.

Structural Similarities of Micelle-bound Peptide YY (PYY) and Neuropeptide Y (NPY) are Related to their Affinity Profiles at the Y Receptors

Here, we investigate the structure of porcine peptide YY (pPYY) both when unligated in solution at pH 4.2 and when bound to dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles at pH 5.5. pPYY in solution displays the PP-fold, with the N-terminal segment being back-folded onto the C-terminal alpha-helix, which extends from residue 17 to 31. In contrast to the solution structure of Keire et al. published in the year 2000 the C-terminal helix does not display a kink around residue 23-25. The root mean square deviation (RMSD) for backbone atoms of the NMR ensemble of conformers to the mean structure is 0.99(+/-0.35) Angstrom for residues 14-31. The back-fold is supported by values of 0.60+/-0.1 for the (15)N(1)H-NOE and by generalized order parameters S(2) of 0.74+/-0.1 for residues 5-31 which indicate that the peptide is folded in that segment. We have additionally used DPC micelles as a membrane model and determined the structure of pPYY when bound to it. Therein, an alpha-helix occurs in the segment comprising residues 17-31 and the N terminus freely diffuses in solution. The hydrophobic side of the amphipathic helix forms the micelle-binding interface and hydrophobic side-chains extend into the micelle interior. A significant stabilization of helical conformation occurs in the C-terminal pentapeptide, which is important for receptor binding. The latter is supported by positive values of the heteronuclear NOE in that segment (0.52+/-0.1 compared to 0.08+/-0.4 for the unligated form) and by values of S(2) of 0.6+/-0.2 (versus 0.38+/-0.2 for the unligated form). The structures of micelle-bound pPYY and pNPY are much more similar than those of pPYY and bPP with pairwise RMSDs of 1.23(+/-0.21)A or 3.21(+/-0.39) Angstrom, respectively. In contrast to the conformational similarities in the DPC-bound state their structures in solution are very different. In fact pPYY is more similar to bPP, which with its strong preference for the Y(4) receptor displays a completely different binding profile. Considering the high degree of sequence homology of pNPY and pPYY (>80%) and the fact, that their binding affinities at all receptor subtypes are high and, more importantly, rather similar, it is much more likely that PYY and NPY are recognized by the Y receptors from the membrane-bound state. As a consequence of the latter the PP-fold is not important for recognition of PYY or NPY at the Y receptors. To our knowledge this work provides for the first time strong arguments derived from structural data that support a membrane-bound receptor recognition pathway.

A potent and selective NPY Y5 antagonist reduces food intake but not through blockade of the NPY Y5 receptor

AIM

These studies were performed to test the hypothesis that endogenous neuropeptide Y (NPY) acting on the NPY Y(5) receptor subtype contributes to the control of food intake. The hypothesis was tested using S 25585-a newly synthesized NPY Y(5) receptor antagonist.

METHODS AND RESULTS

S 25585 was shown to be a high-affinity antagonist of the NPY Y(5) receptor subtype (IC(50) 5 nM) with no significant affinity toward other NPY receptor subtypes and over 40 other receptors, channels or uptake systems. S 25585 (7.5 mg/kg, i.p.) did not induce a conditioned taste aversion, significantly alter need-induced sodium appetite or induce pica, suggesting that at this dose the compound did not induce illness or malaise. In satiated rats, S 25585 (5.0 and 7.5 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly decreased the overfeeding induced by i.c.v. injection of NPY (1 microg) and the highly selective NPY Y(5) receptor agonist [hPP(1-17), Ala(31), Aib(32)]NPY (0.7 microg). In rats fasted for 4 h immediately before the dark phase, analysis of the microstructure of feeding behavior revealed that S 25585 significantly increased latency to eat and significantly decreased the duration and size of the meals without altering the meal number or eating rate. Analysis of the behavioral satiety sequence at this time revealed that the animals passed through the normal pattern of feeding, grooming and resting. Although S 25585 appeared to be influencing a physiological system controlling appetite, this does not involve the NPY Y(5) receptor since the antagonist also markedly reduced food intake in the NPY Y(5) knockout mouse.

CONCLUSIONS

The results presented do not support a role for the NPY Y(5) receptor in the control of food intake. The results further illustrate that it is imperative that the activity of any new NPY Y(5) antagonist be assessed in the NPY Y(5) knockout mouse before assuming that its effect on food intake is due to blockade of this receptor.

Agonists for neuropeptide Y receptors Y1 and Y5 stimulate different phases of feeding in guinea pigs

1. The stimulatory effect of neuropeptide Y (NPY) on food intake is well established but the roles of the receptor subtypes Y(1) and Y(5) have been difficult to define. We have studied the effects of two novel Y(1)-preferring and two Y(5)-preferring agonists on feeding in guinea pigs. 2. The Y(1)-preferring receptor agonists [Arg(6),Pro(34)]pNPY and [Phe(7),Pro(34)]pNPY had high affinity for the Y(1) receptor (K(i) values 0.07 and 0.04 nM, respectively) and nanomolar affinity for the Y(5) receptor. Administration of either compound into the third brain ventricle increased food intake equally to NPY. 3. The Y(5) agonist [Ala(31),Aib(32)]pNPY displayed a moderate affinity for the Y(5) receptor (K(i) 7.42 nM) and a low affinity for Y(1) (K(i) 1.7 micro M). This compound had only a modest effect on feeding. 4. The other Y(5)-preferring peptide [cPP(1-7),NPY(19-23),Ala(31),Aib(32),Gln(34)]hPP had a higher affinity at the Y(5) receptor (K(i) 1.32 nM) and also at the Y(1) receptor (K(i) 85 nM). It potently stimulated feeding: the food consumption after administration of this peptide was two-fold compared to NPY. 5. Our results support the view that both the receptor subtypes Y(1) and Y(5) are involved in the stimulation of feeding. As the action profiles of the Y(1) and Y(5) agonists on feeding parameters were different, it seems that they influence different phases of eating.

Structure-activity relationships in a series of NPY Y5 antagonists: 3-amido-9-ethylcarbazoles, core-modified analogues and amide isosteres

Beginning with carbazole 1a, the amide and alkyl substituents were optimized to maintain potency while adding solubilizing groups. Efforts to replace the 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole core, a known carcinogen, used the SAR generated in the carbazole series for guidance and led to the synthesis of a number of core-modified analogues. In addition, an isosteric series, in which the amide was replaced with an imidazole, was prepared. Two potent new series lacking the putative toxicophore were identified from these endeavors.

Recent developments in our understanding of the physiological role of PP-fold peptide receptor subtypes

The three peptides pancreatic polypeptide (PP), peptide YY (PYY), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) share a similar structure known as the PP-fold. There are four known human G-protein coupled receptors for the PP-fold peptides, namely Y1, Y2, Y4, and Y5, each of them being able to bind at least two of the three endogenous ligands. All three peptides are found in the circulation acting as hormones. Although NPY is only released from neurons, PYY and PP are primarily found in endocrine cells in the gut, where they exert such effects as inhibition of gall bladder secretion, gut motility, and pancreatic secretion. However, when PYY is administered in an experimental setting to animals, cloned receptors, or tissue preparations, it can mimic the effects of NPY in essentially all studies, making it difficult to study the effects of PP-fold peptides and to delineate what receptor and peptide accounts for a particular effect. Initial studies with transgenic animals confirmed the well-established action of NPY on metabolism, food-intake, vascular systems, memory, mood, neuronal excitability, and reproduction. More recently, using transgenic techniques and novel antagonists for the Y1, Y2, and Y5 receptors, NPY has been found to be a key player in the regulation of ethanol consumption and neuronal development.

Bovine pancreatic polypeptide (bPP) undergoes significant changes in conformation and dynamics upon binding to DPC micelles

The pancreatic polypeptide (PP), a 36-residue, C-terminally amidated polypeptide hormone is a member of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) family. Here, we have studied the structure and dynamics of bovine pancreatic polypeptide (bPP) when bound to DPC-micelles as a membrane-mimicking model as well as the dynamics of bPP in solution. The comparison of structure and dynamics of bPP in both states reveals remarkable differences. The overall correlation time of 5.08ns derived from the 15N relaxation data proves unambiguously that bPP in solution exists as a dimer. Therein, intermolecular as well as intramolecular hydrophobic interactions from residues of both the amphiphilic helix and of the back-folded N terminus contribute to the stability of the PP fold. The overall rigidity is well-reflected in positive values for the heteronuclear NOE for residues 4-34. The membrane-bound species displays a partitioning into a more flexible N-terminal region and a well-defined alpha-helical region comprising residues 17-31. The average RMSD value for residues 17-31 is 0.22(+/-0.09)A. The flexibility of the N terminus is compatible with negative values of the heteronuclear NOE observed for the N-terminal residues 4-12 and low values of the generalized order parameter S(2). The membrane-peptide interface was investigated by micelle-integrating spin-labels and H,2H exchange measurements. It is formed by those residues which make contacts between the C-terminal alpha-helix and the polyproline helix. In contrast to pNPY, also residues from the N terminus display spatial proximity to the membrane interface. Furthermore, the orientation of the C terminus, that presumably contains residues involved in receptor binding, is different in the two environments. We speculate that this pre-positioning of residues could be an important requirement for receptor activation. Moreover, we doubt that the PP fold is of functional relevance for binding at the Y(4) receptor.

Selective antagonism of the NPY Y5 receptor does not have a major effect on feeding in rats

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is thought to play a key role in stimulating feeding, thus making NPY receptors attractive appetite suppressant drug targets for treating obesity. Because the orexigenic effects of NPY have been ascribed to actions at the NPY Y5 receptor, we have determined the role of this receptor in feeding in rats, using a small molecule antagonist of this receptor. NPY5RA-972 is a selective and potent (<10 nmol/l) NPY Y5 receptor antagonist. This compound is central nervous system (CNS) penetrant, and an oral dose of 10 mg/kg NPY5RA-972 to rats produced concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid that greatly exceeded the in vitro IC(50) (inhibitory concentration 50%). Indeed, at doses to rats as low as 1 mg/kg, NPY5RA-972 inhibited feeding induced by intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of a selective NPY Y5 agonist ([cPP(1-7),NPY(19-23),Ala(31),Aib(32),Gln(34)]-hPP). However, in the dose range 1-10 mg/kg, NPY5RA-972 had no significant effect on food intake in Wistar rats induced to feed by either ICV NPY or 24 h fasting or in free-feeding Wistar or obese Zucker rats. Chronic administration of NPY5RA-972 (10 mg/kg twice daily) had no effect on food intake or body weight in either free-feeding Wistar rats or dietary obese rats. These data indicate that NPY5RA-972 is a potent, selective, orally active, and CNS-penetrant antagonist of the NPY Y5 receptor that prevents feeding driven by activation of this receptor. The data obtained with this antagonist indicate that the NPY Y5 receptor is not a major regulator of feeding in the rat.

Key motif to gain selectivity at the neuropeptide Y5-receptor: structure and dynamics of micelle-bound [Ala31, Pro32]-NPY

The structure of [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY, a neuropeptide Y mutant with selectivity for the NPY Y(5)-receptor (Cabrele, C., Wieland, H. A., Stidsen, C., Beck-Sickinger, A. G., (2002) Biochemistry XX, XXXX-XXXX (companion paper)), has been characterized in the presence of the membrane mimetic dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles using high-resolution NMR techniques. The overall topology closely resembles the fold of the previously described Y(5)-receptor-selective agonist [Ala(31), Aib(32)]-NPY (Cabrele, C., Langer, M., Bader, R., Wieland, H. A., Doods, H. N., Zerbe, O., and Beck-Sickinger, A. G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem 275, 36043-36048). Similar to wild-type neuropeptide Y (NPY) and [Ala(31), Aib(32)]-NPY, the N-terminal residues Tyr(1)-Asp(16) are disordered in solution. Starting from residue Leu(17), an alpha helix extends toward the C-terminus. The decreased density of medium-range NOEs for the C-terminal residues resulting in larger RMSD values for the backbone atoms of Ala(31)-Tyr(36) indicates that the alpha helix has become interrupted through the [Ala(31), Pro(32)] mutation. This finding is further supported by (15)N-relaxation data through which we can demonstrate that the well-defined alpha helix is restricted to residues 17-31, with the C-terminal tetrapeptide displaying increased flexibility as compared to NPY. Surprisingly, increased generalized order parameter as well as decreased (3)J(HN)(alpha) scalar coupling constants reveal that the central helix is stabilized in comparison to wild-type NPY. Micelle-integrating spin labels were used to probe the mode of association of the helix with the membrane mimetic. The Y(5)-receptor-selective mutant and NPY share a similar orientation, which is parallel to the lipid surface. However, signal reductions due to efficient electron, nuclear spin relaxation were much less pronounced for the surface-averted residues in [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY when compared to wild-type DPC-bound NPY. Only the signals of residues Asn(29) and Leu(30) were significantly more reduced in the mutant. The postulation of a different membrane binding mode of [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY is further supported by the faster H/D exchange at the C-terminal amide protons. We conclude that arginine residues 33 and 35, which are believed to be directly involved in forming contacts to acidic receptor residues at the membrane-water interface, are no longer fixed in a well-defined conformation close to the membrane surface in [Ala(31), Pro(32)]-NPY.

Appetite suppression based on selective inhibition of NPY receptors

AIM

The aim of this review is to critically assess available evidence that blockade of the actions of NPY at one of the five NPY receptor subtypes represents an attractive new drug discovery target for the development of an appetite suppressant drug.

RESULTS

Blockade of the central actions of NPY using anti-NPY antibodies, antisense oligodeoxynucleotides against NPY and NPY receptor antagonists results in a decrease in food intake in energy-deprived animals. These results appear to show that endogenous NPY plays a role in the control of appetite. The fact that NPY receptors exist as at least five different subtypes raises the possibility that the actions of endogenous NPY on food intake can be adequately dissociated from other effects of the peptide. Current drug discovery has produced a number of highly selective NPY receptor antagonists which have been used to establish the NPY Y(1) receptor subtype as the most critical in regulating short-term food intake. However, additional studies are now needed to more clearly define the relative contribution of NPY acting through the NPY Y2 and NPY Y5 receptors in the complex sequence of physiological and behavioral events that underlie the long-term control of appetite.

CONCLUSIONS

Blockade of the NPY receptor may produce appetite-suppressing drugs. However, it is too early to state with certainty whether a single subtype selective drug used alone or a combination of NPY receptor selective antagonists used in combination will be necessary to adequately influence appetite regulation.

Structure and receptor binding of PYY analogs

Differences in the structure of PYY and two important analogs, PYY [3-36] and [Pro34]PYY, are evaluated. Y-receptor subtype ligand binding data are used in conjunction with structural data to develop a model for receptor subtype selective agonists. For PYY it is proposed that potent binding to Y1, Y4 and Y5 receptors requires the juxtaposition of the two termini while Y2 binding only requires the C-terminal helix. Further experiments that delineate between primary and tertiary structure contributions for receptor binding and activation are required to support the hypothesis that tertiary structure is stable enough to influence the expression of PYY's bioactivity.

Novel analogues of neuropeptide Y with a preference for the Y1-receptor

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most abundant neuropeptides in the mammalian brain and acts in humans via at least three receptor subtypes: Y1, Y2, and Y5. Whereas selective agonists and antagonists are known for the Y2- and Y5-receptors, the Y1-receptor still lacks a highly selective agonist. This work presents the first NPY-based analogues with Y1-receptor preference and agonistic properties. Furthermore, the importance of specific amino acids of NPY for binding to the Y-receptor subtypes is presented. Amongst the analogues tested, [Phe7,Pro34]pNPY (where pNPY is porcine neuropeptide Y) showed the most significant Y1-receptor preference (> 1 : 3000-fold), with subnanomolar affinity to the Y1-receptor, and Ki values of approximately 30 nM for the Y2- and Y5-subtype, respectively. Variations of position 6, especially [Arg6,Pro34]pNPY and variations within positions 20-23 of NPY were found to result in further analogues with significant Y1-receptor preference (1 : 400-1 : 2000). In contrast, cyclo S-S [Cys20,Cys24]pNPY was found to be a highly selective ligand at the Y2-receptor, binding only threefold less efficiently than NPY. Analogues containing variations of positions 31 and 32 showed highly reduced affinity to the Y1-receptor, while binding to the Y5-receptor was affected less. Inhibition of cAMP-accumulation of selected peptides with replacements within position 20-23 of NPY showed preserved agonistic properties. The NPY analogues tested give insights into ligand-receptor interaction of NPY at the Y1-, Y2- and Y5-receptor and contribute to our understanding of subtype selectivity. Furthermore, the Y1-receptor-preferring peptides are novel tools that will provide insight into the physiological role of the Y1-receptor.

Blockade of pancreatic polypeptide-sensitive neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors by agonist peptides is prevented by modulators of sodium transport. Implications for receptor signaling and regulation

Ligand binding to rodent pancreatic polypeptide-responding neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors (here termed PP/NPY receptors), or to cloned Y4 or Y5 receptors, is selectively inhibited by amiloride, peptide or alkylating modulators of sodium transport. The PP/NPY and Y4 receptors are also selectively blocked by human or rat pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and the blocking peptides are not dissociated by high concentrations of alkali chlorides (which restore most of the binding of subtype-selective agonists to Y1 and Y2 sites). The PP/NPY receptors could also be blocked by NPY and related full-length peptides, including Y1-selective agonists (IC50 300-400 pM). The cloned Y(4) receptors from three species are much less sensitive to NPY or PYY. The sensitivity of both the PP/NPY sites and the Y(4) sites to Y2-selective peptides is quite low. The ligand attachment to PP/NPY sites is also very sensitive to peptidic Y1 antagonist ((Cys31,NVal34NPY27-36))2, which however blocks these sites at much higher molarities. Blockade of PP/NPY and Y4 sites by agonist peptides can be largely prevented by N5-substituted amiloride modulators of Na+ transport, and by RFamide NRNFLRF.NH2, but not by Ca2+ channel blockers, or by inhibitors of K+ transport. Protection of both PP/NPY and Y4 sites against blockade by human or rat pancreatic polypeptide is also afforded by short N-terminally truncated NPY-related peptides. The above results are consistent with a stringent and selective activity regulation for rabbit PP/NPY receptor(s) that may serve to differentiate agonists and constrain signaling, and could involve transporter-like interactants.

Y-receptor affinity modulation by the design of pancreatic polypeptide/neuropeptide Y chimera led to Y(5)-receptor ligands with picomolar affinity

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) bind to the Y-receptors with very different affinities: NPY has high affinity for the receptors Y(1), Y(2) and Y(5), while PP binds only to Y(4)-receptor with picomolar affinity. By exchanging of specific amino acid positions between the two peptides, we developed 38 full-length PP/NPY chimeras with binding properties that are completely different from those of the two native ligands. Pig NPY (pNPY) analogs containing the segment 19-23 from human PP (hPP) bound to the Y-receptors with much lower affinity than NPY itself. The affinity of the hPP analog containing the pNPY segments 1-7 and 19-23 was comparable to that of pNPY at the Y(1)- and Y(5)-receptor subtypes, and to that of hPP at the Y(4)-receptor. Furthermore, the presence of the segments 1-7 from chicken PP (cPP) and 19-23 from pNPY within the hPP sequence led to a ligand with IC(50) of 40 pM at the Y(5)-receptor. This is the most potent Y(5)-receptor ligand known so far, with 15-fold higher affinity than NPY.

Structure and dynamics of micelle-bound neuropeptide Y: comparison with unligated NPY and implications for receptor selection

The biological importance of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) has steered a number of investigations about its solution structure over the last 20 years. Here, we focus on the comparison of the structure and dynamics of NPY free in solution to when bound to a membrane mimetic, dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles, as studied by 2D (1)H NMR spectroscopy. Both, free in solution and in the micelle-bound form, the N-terminal segment (Tyr1-Glu15) is shown to extend like a flexible tail in solution. This is not compatible with the PP-fold model for NPY that postulates backfolding of the flexible N terminus onto the C-terminal helix. The correlation time (tau(c)) of NPY in aqueous solution, 5.5 (+/-1.0) ns at 32 degrees C, is only consistent with its existence in a dimeric form. Exchange contributions especially enhancing transverse relaxation rates (R(2)) of residues located on one side of the C-terminal helix of the molecule are supposed to originate from dimerization of the NPY molecule. The dimerization interface was directly probed by looking at (15)N-labeled NPY/spin-labeled [TOAC34]-[(14)N]-NPY heterodimers and revealed both parallel and anti-parallel alignment of the helices. The NMR-derived three-dimensional structure of micelle-bound NPY at 37 degrees C and pH 6.0 is similar but not identical to that free in solution. The final set of 17 lowest-energy DYANA structures is particularly well defined in the region of residues 21-31, with a mean pairwise RMSD of 0.23 A for the backbone heavy atoms and 0.85 A for all heavy atoms. The combination of NMR relaxation data and CD measurements clearly demonstrates that the alpha-helical region Ala18-Thr32 is more stable, and the C-terminal tetrapeptide becomes structured only in the presence of the phosphocholine micelles. The position of NPY relative to the DPC micelle surface was probed by adding micelle integrating spin labels. Together with information from (1)H,(2)H exchange rates, we conclude that the interaction of NPY with the micelle is promoted by the amphiphilic alpha-helical segment of residues Tyr21-Thr32. NPY is located at the lipid-water interface with its C-terminal helix parallel to the membrane surface and penetrates the hydrophobic interior only via insertions of a few long aliphatic or aromatic side-chains. From these data we can demonstrate that the dimer interface of neuropeptide Y is similar to the interface of the monomer binding to DPC-micelles. We speculate that binding of the NPY monomer to the membrane is an essential key step preceeding receptor binding, thereby pre-orientating the C-terminal tetrapeptide and possibly inducing the bio-active conformation.

Reduced food intake in response to CGP 71683A may be due to mechanisms other than NPY Y5 receptor blockade

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to test the continuing validity of the hypothesis that neuropeptide Y (NPY) produced in the brain controls food intake through an interaction with the NPY Y(5) receptor subtype.

METHODS

The hypothesis was tested using CGP 71683A a potent and highly selective non-peptide antagonist of the NPY Y(5) receptor which was administered into the right lateral ventricle of obese Zucker fa/fa rats.

RESULTS

Intraventricular injection of 3.4 nmol/kg NPY increased food intake during a 2 h test period. Doses of CGP 71683A in excess of 15 nmol/kg (i.cv.) resulted in blockade of the increase in food intake produced by NPY. Repeated daily injection of CGP 71683A (30--300 nmol/kg, i.cv.) immediately before the dark phase produced a dose-dependent and slowly developing decrease in food intake. CGP 71683A has a low affinity for NPY Y(1), Y(2) and Y(4) receptors but a very high affinity for the NPY Y(5) receptor (Ki, 1.4 nM). Surprisingly, CGP 71683A had similarly high affinity for muscarinic receptors (Ki, 2.7 nM) and for the serotonin uptake recognition site (Ki, 6.2 nM) in rat brain. Anatomic analysis of the brain after treatment with CGP 71683A demonstrated an inflammatory response associated with the fall in food intake.

CONCLUSIONS

While the fall in food intake in response to CGP 71683A may have a Y(5) component, interactions with other receptors or inflammatory mediators may also play a role. It is concluded that CGP 71683A is an imprecise tool for investigating the role of the NPY Y(5) receptor in the control of physiological processes including food intake. International Journal of Obesity (2001) 25, 84-94

Binding properties of three neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes from zebrafish: comparison with mammalian Y1 receptors

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) are two related 36-amino-acid peptides found in all vertebrates and are involved in many physiological processes. Five receptor subtypes have been cloned in mammals (Y1, Y2, Y4, Y5, and y6). We have recently cloned three NPY/PYY receptor subtypes in zebrafish, called Ya, Yb, and Yc. Here we report on a direct comparison of the pharmacological properties of these three receptors in vitro using porcine NPY with alanine substitutions in positions 33-36 as ligands and three analogues with internal deletions: [Ahx(8-20)]NPY, [Ahx(8-20), Pro(34)]NPY, and [Ahx(5-24)]NPY. In all cases, the zYc receptor was the most sensitive to the modifications of the NPY molecule and zYa was the least sensitive (except for the Arg --> Ala replacement at position 33). Our data identified zYa as a receptor that can bind ligands specific for Y1, Y2, and Y4 receptors, while zYb and zYc were more Y1-like. All peptides with internal deletions bound to the zYa receptor with affinities similar to that of intact pNPY. Neither the Y1-selective antagonists BIBP3226 and SR120819A nor the Y2-selective BIIE0246 bound to any of the zebrafish receptors, although the amino acids identified as important for BIBP3226 binding were almost completely conserved. These results may prove helpful in molecular modeling of the three-dimensional receptor structure.

The role of NPY in metabolic homeostasis: implications for obesity therapy

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36 amino acid amidated peptide which has now emerged as an important regulator of feeding behaviour. Upon intracerebroventricular (icv.) administration, NPY produces a pronounced feeding response in a variety of species. The actions of NPY are believed to be mediated by a family of receptor subtypes named Y1 - y6. Recent studies suggest that the Y1 and Y5 receptor subtypes are intimately involved in NPY induced feeding. This review presents preclinical data obtained with receptor subtype selective agonists and antagonists as well as findings from knockout mice. These new data suggest that NPY receptor antagonists may become an additional option for treating human obesity.