The decision to terminate resuscitative efforts: results of a questionnaire

Non-medical factors in prehospital resuscitation decision-making: a mixed-methods systematic review

Aim

This systematic review explored how non-medical factors influence the prehospital resuscitation providers’ decisions whether or not to resuscitate adult patients with cardiac arrest.

Methods

We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis and searched for original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies on non-medical factors influencing resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Mixed-method reviews combine qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies to answer complex multidisciplinary questions. Our inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed empirical-based studies concerning decision-making in prehospital resuscitation of adults > 18 years combined with non-medical factors. We excluded commentaries, case reports, editorials, and systematic reviews. After screening and full-text review, we undertook a sequential exploratory synthesis of the included studies, where qualitative data were synthesised first followed by a synthesis of the quantitative findings.

Results

We screened 15,693 studies, reviewed 163 full-text studies, and included 27 papers (12 qualitative, two mixed-method, and 13 quantitative papers). We identified five main themes and 13 subthemes related to decision-making in prehospital resuscitation. Especially the patient’s characteristics and the ethical aspects were included in decisions concerning resuscitation. The wishes and emotions of bystanders further influenced the decision-making. The prehospital resuscitation providers’ characteristics, experiences, emotions, values, and team interactions affected decision-making, as did external factors such as the emergency medical service system and the work environment, the legislation, and the cardiac arrest setting. Lastly, prehospital resuscitation providers’ had to navigate conflicts between jurisdiction and guidelines, and conflicting values and interests.

Conclusions

Our findings underline the complexity in prehospital resuscitation decision-making and highlight the need for further research on non-medical factors in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01004-6.

Documentation of ethically relevant information in out-of-hospital resuscitation is rare: a Danish nationwide observational study of 16,495 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests

Background

Decision-making in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest should ideally include clinical and ethical factors. Little is known about the extent of ethical considerations and their influence on prehospital resuscitation. We aimed to determine the transparency in medical records regarding decision-making in prehospital resuscitation with a specific focus on ethically relevant information and consideration in resuscitation providers’ documentation.

Methods

This was a Danish nationwide retrospective observational study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests from 2016 through 2018. After an initial screening using broadly defined inclusion criteria, two experienced philosophers performed a qualitative content analysis of the included medical records according to a preliminary codebook. We identified ethically relevant content in free-text fields and categorised the information according to Beauchamp and Childress’ four basic bioethical principles: autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice.

Results

Of 16,495 medical records, we identified 759 (4.6%) with potentially relevant information; 710 records (4.3%) contained ethically relevant information, whereas 49 did not. In general, the documentation was vague and unclear. We identified four kinds of ethically relevant information: patients’ wishes and perspectives on life; relatives’ wishes and perspectives on patients’ life; healthcare professionals’ opinions and perspectives on resuscitation; and do-not-resuscitate orders. We identified some “best practice” examples that included all perspectives of decision-making.

Conclusions

There is sparse and unclear evidence on ethically relevant information in the medical records documenting resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. However, the “best practice” examples show that providing sufficient documentation of decision-making is, in fact, feasible. To ensure transparency surrounding prehospital decisions in cardiac arrests, we believe that it is necessary to ensure more systematic documentation of decision-making in prehospital resuscitation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00654-y.

How long should we run the code? Survival analysis based on location and duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after in-hospital cardiac arrest

Background: The duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly affects long-term survival in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA). In this study, we questioned the long-term clinical benefits of extending CPR beyond twenty minutes for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. Additionally, we aimed to compare the outcomes of CPR at different locations of a large tertiary care community hospital.

Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of 169 patients with IHCA recorded between 1 January 2016, and 31 December 2018, at a large volume tertiary care community hospital.

Results: Of the 169 patients suffering from cardiac arrest during hospitalization, 44.4% arrested in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 55.6% in a non-critical care setting. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved in 60% of ICU and 70.2% of non-ICU patients. While only 20% of ICU patients survived the cardiac arrest, the overall survival for non-ICU patients was 31.9%. Despite the significant difference in percentage survival, survival difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.082) due to the small sample size. Overall survival was 26.6%. An initial shockable rhythm was associated with improved survival compared to a non-shockable rhythm (41% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.022).

In patients who had cardiac arrest for less than 20 minutes, 60.9% of patients achieved ROSC, compared to 37.9% who arrested for more than 20 minutes. Survival to hospital discharge was significantly lower for patients who had cardiac arrest for more than 20 minutes, compared to patients who were arrested for less than 20 minutes (3.1% vs. 41.3%, p = <0.0001). For patients who had a cardiac arrest for more than 30 minutes, ROSC was achieved in only 14.8% of patients. None of these patients survived to be discharged from the hospital (p = <0.0001).

The mean age for the patients in this study was 70 years. 52.6% of subjects were male, and 47.4% were females. Older age was not related to shorter duration of CPR (Pearson correlation: 0.030, P = 0.69).

Conclusion: Survival was significantly lower when CPR was unsuccessful for twenty minutes, and there is no survival benefit of extending CRP for more than 30 minutes. Lowest survival after a cardiac arrest on the general medical floor, compared to telemetry and ICU, may be related to delay in recognizing cardiac arrest and barriers in implementing standardized advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) protocol.

Factors associated with physician decision making on withholding cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prehospital medicine

This study seeks to identify factors that are associated with decisions of prehospital physicians to start (continue, if ongoing) or withhold (terminate, if ongoing) CPR in patients with OHCA. We conducted a retrospective study using anonymised data from a prehospital physician response system. Data on patients attended for cardiac arrest between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2018 except babies at birth were included. Logistic regression analysis with start of CPR by physicians as the dependent variable and possible associated factors as independent variables adjusted for anonymised physician identifiers was conducted. 1525 patient data sets were analysed. Obvious signs of death were present in 278 cases; in the remaining 1247, resuscitation was attempted in 920 (74%) and were withheld in 327 (26%). Factors significantly associated with higher likelihood of CPR by physicians (OR 95% CI) were resuscitation efforts by EMS before physician arrival (60.45, 19.89-184.29), first monitored heart rhythm (3.07, 1.21-7.79 for PEA; 29.25, 1.93-442. 51 for VF / pVT compared to asystole); advanced patient age (modelled using cubic splines), physician response time (0.92, 0.87-0.97 per minute) and malignancy (0.22, 0.05-0.92) were significantly associated with lower odds of CPR. We thus conclude that prehospital physicians make decisions to start or withhold resuscitation routinely and base those mostly on situational information and immediately available patient information known to impact outcomes.

Factors influencing termination of resuscitation in children: a qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Pediatric Advanced Life Support provides guidelines for resuscitating children in cardiopulmonary arrest. However, the role physicians' attitudes and beliefs play in decision-making when terminating resuscitation has not been fully investigated. This study aims to identify and explore the vital "non-medical" considerations surrounding the decision to terminate efforts by U.S.-based Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) physicians.

METHODS

A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted using PEM physician experiences in terminating resuscitation within a large freestanding children's hospital. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 physicians, sampled purposively for their relevant content experience, and continued until the point of content saturation. Resulting data were coded using conventional content analysis by 2 coders; intercoder reliability was calculated as κ of 0.91. Coding disagreements were resolved through consultation with other authors.

RESULTS

Coding yielded 5 broad categories of "non-medical" factors that influenced physicians' decision to terminate resuscitation: legal and financial, parent-related, patient-related, physician-related, and resuscitation. When relevant, each factor was assigned a directionality tag indicating whether the factor influenced physicians to terminate a resuscitation, prolong a resuscitation, or not consider resuscitation. Seventy-eight unique factors were identified, 49 of which were defined by the research team as notable due to the frequency of their mention or novelty of concept.

CONCLUSION

Physicians consider numerous "non-medical" factors when terminating pediatric resuscitative efforts. Factors are tied largely to individual beliefs, attitudes, and values, and likely contribute to variability in practice. An increased understanding of the uncertainty that exists around termination of resuscitation may help physicians in objective clinical decision-making in similar situations.

Decision-making in cardiac arrest: physicians' and nurses' knowledge and views on terminating resuscitation

Introduction

Many cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempts are unsuccessful and must be terminated. On the contrary, premature termination results in a self-fulfilling prophecy. This study aimed to investigate 1) physicians’ self-assessed competence in terminating CPR, 2) physicians’ and nurses’ knowledge of the European Resuscitation Council guidelines on termination, and 3) single factors leading to termination.

Methods

Questionnaires were distributed at advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) courses at a university hospital in Denmark. Participants included ACLS health care providers, ie, physicians and nurses from cardiac arrest teams, intensive care and anesthetic units or medical wards with a duty to provide ACLS. Physicians were divided into junior physicians (house officers) and experienced physicians (specialist registrars and consultants).

Results

Overall, 308 participants responded (104 physicians and 204 nurses, response rate: 98%). Among physicians, 37 (36%) did not feel competent to decide when to terminate CPR (junior physicians: n=16, 64%, compared with experienced physicians: n=21, 28%, P=0.002). Two (2%) physicians and one (0.5%) nurse were able to state the contents of termination guidelines. Several factors were reported to impact termination, including absence of a pupillary light reflex (physicians: 17%, nurses: 22%) and cardiac standstill on echocardiography (physicians: 18%, nurses: 20%). Moreover, nine (9%) physicians and 35 (17%) nurses would terminate prolonged CPR despite a shockable rhythm present.

Conclusion

One-third of all physicians did not feel competent to decide when to terminate CPR. Physicians’ and nurses’ knowledge of termination guidelines was poor, and both professions reported unvalidated or controversial factors as a single reason for terminating CPR.

Assessment of ventricular wall motion with focused echocardiography during cardiac arrest to predict survival

OBJECTIVES

Our primary goal is to investigate the hypothesis that in patients with a detectable ventricular wall motion (VWM) in cardiac ultrasonography (US) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), survival rate is significantly more than in patients without VWM in US.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In our prospective, single center study, 129 adult cardiac arrest (CA) patients were enrolled. Cardiac US according to Focus Assessed Transthoracic Echo (FATE) protocol was performed before CPR. Presence of VWM was recorded on forms along with demographic data, initial rhythm, CA location, presence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and time until ROSC was obtained.

RESULTS

129 patients were included. ROSC was obtained in 56/77 (72.7%) patients with VWM and 3/52 (5.8%) patients without VWM which is statistically significant (p > 0.001). Presence of VWM is 95% (95% CI: 0.95-0.99) sensitive and 70% (95% CI: 0.58-0.80) specific for ROSC. 43/77 (55.8%) patients with VWM and 1 (1.9%) of 52 patients without VWM survived to hospital admission which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Presence of VWM was 100% (95% CI: 0.87-1.00) sensitive and 54% (95% CI: 0.43-0.64) specific for survival to hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

No patient without VWM in US survived to hospital discharge. Only 3 had ROSC in emergency department and only 1 survived to hospital admission. This data suggests no patient without VWM before the onset of CPR survived to hospital discharge and this may be an indication to end resuscitative efforts early in these patients.

For how long can two emergency medical technicians perform high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the duration and obstacles to prolonged on-scene cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and establish how long a pair of emergency medical technicians (EMTs) can provide high-quality CPR.

METHOD

Intermediate-level EMTs in Gyeonggi-do Province, Republic of Korea completed a survey regarding on-scene CPR. EMTs undergoing routine training took part in a simulation using mannequins. Parameters including compression depth, total number and rate of compressions; occurrence of incorrect hand position and incomplete chest recoil were collected over 16 2-min cycles of CPR (32 min total), with EMTs working in pairs.

RESULT

The simulation study included 43 EMTs. The median duration of on-scene CPR was 3.7 min. Fear of decrease in performance was the main obstacle to continued CPR (n = 188/254 [74.0%]). Standards for high-quality CPR were met at each of the 16 steps of the simulation. Compression rate increased significantly with time. There were no significant changes in any other parameter.

CONCLUSION

Pairs of EMTs maintained high-quality CPR for 16 cycles (32 min) with no decrease in performance. Our findings could provide evidence to recommend guidelines for duration of on-scene CPR for cardiac arrest, particularly in countries where the level and number of ambulance crews are limited.

The scene time interval and basic life support termination of resuscitation rule in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

We validated the basic life support termination of resuscitation (BLS TOR) rule retrospectively using Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) data of metropolitan emergency medical service (EMS) in Korea. We also tested it by investigating the scene time interval for supplementing the BLS TOR rule. OHCA database of Seoul (January 2011 to December 2012) was used, which is composed of ambulance data and hospital medical record review. EMS-treated OHCA and 19 yr or older victims were enrolled, after excluding cases occurred in the ambulance and with incomplete information. The primary and secondary outcomes were hospital mortality and poor neurologic outcome. After calculating the sensitivity (SS), specificity (SP), and the positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), tested the rule according to the scene time interval group for sensitivity analysis. Of total 4,835 analyzed patients, 3,361 (69.5%) cases met all 3 criteria of the BLS TOR rule. Of these, 3,224 (95.9%) were dead at discharge (SS,73.5%; SP,69.6%; PPV,95.9%; NPV, 21.3%) and 3,342 (99.4%) showed poor neurologic outcome at discharge (SS, 75.2%; SP, 89.9%; PPV, 99.4%; NPV, 11.5%). The cut-off scene time intervals for 100% SS and PPV were more than 20 min for survival to discharge and more than 14 min for good neurological recovery. The BLS TOR rule showed relatively lower SS and PPV in OHCA data in Seoul, Korea.

Resuscitation duration inequality by patient characteristics in emergency department out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study

Objective

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients unresponsive to basic life support are frequently transferred to emergency departments (EDs) for further resuscitation. Although some survive with good neurologic outcomes, additional resuscitation in EDs is often futile. Without a dedicated termination of resuscitation (TOR) rule for ED resuscitation, the decision when to stop the resuscitation is up to emergency physicians. In this study, we assessed the association between patient characteristics and duration of resuscitation in EDs to understand how emergency physicians decide when to terminate cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the OHCA registry of a single ED was conducted. Adult (18 years or older) patients without any return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after unsuccessful ED advanced cardiac life support were included. The primary endpoint was duration of resuscitation attempts. Prehospital and demographic factors were assessed as independent variables. The relationship between these factors and duration of resuscitative attempts was analyzed with multivariable quantile regression.

Results

From January 2008 to August 2012, ED resuscitation was terminated without ROSC in 266 patients (53.5%). The duration of resuscitative attempts was significantly shorter if any of the currently recognized poor prognostic factors was present. Interestingly, controversial factors such as female sex and older age were significantly associated with shorter resuscitation duration, while factors definitively indicating poor prognosis, such as severe trauma and poor baseline neurological status, showed no significant association.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that physicians adjust the resuscitation duration according to their subjective prediction of futility despite the absence of evidence-based TOR guidelines.

Reliability testing and update of the Resuscitation Predictor Scoring (RPS) Scale

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to test the reliability of the Resuscitation Predictor Scoring (RPS) Scale1 (Appendix A), a survival prediction nomogram designed to aid resuscitation termination decisions during a resuscitation attempt.

METHOD

Bivariate comparisons of predictors of survival and survival rates between the primary RPS Scale data set (1993-2000) and a secondary data set (2000-2003). A total of 2121 patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

Comparisons of the two sets of data showed an increase in resuscitation attempts for patients > or =80 years (p<0.001); an increase in pulseless electrical activity (PEA) (p=0.01) and an increase in the duration of arrests (p=0.012). However, in relation to the RPS Scale there were no statistical differences in survival between any of the sub groups demonstrating the reliability of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The final updated RPS Scale demonstrates predicted survival rates 15 min into a resuscitation attempt. These can be poor and suggest that it is an acceptable point at which to first consider termination (where there has been no ROSC). The RPS Scale has demonstrated reliability and validity, but can only be a guide for the cessation of resuscitation.

Out-of-hospital resuscitation: have we gone too far?

Americans are living longer and are more likely to be chronically or terminally ill at the time of death. Although surveys indicate that most people prefer to die at home, the majority of people in the United States die in acute care hospitals. Each year, approximately 400,000 persons suffer sudden cardiac arrest in the US, the majority occurring in the out-of-hospital setting. Mortality rates are high and reach almost 100% when prehospital care has failed to restore spontaneous circulation. Nonetheless, patients who receive little benefit or may wish to forgo life-sustaining treatment often are resuscitated. Risk versus harm of resuscitation efforts can be differentiated by various factors, including cardiac rhythm. Emergency medical services policy regarding resuscitation should consider its utility in various clinical scenarios. Patients, family members, emergency medical providers, and physicians all are important stakeholders to consider in decisions about out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ideally, future policy will place greater emphasis on patient preferences and quality of life by including all of these viewpoints.

The perspective of paramedics about on-scene termination of resuscitation efforts for pediatric patients

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the attitude of paramedics to on-scene termination of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) efforts in children prior to developing a pediatric T-CPR policy.

METHODS

A 26-item anonymous survey was conducted of all of the active paramedics in a large urban EMS system where T-CPR had been practiced routinely for adults. Questions addressed paramedic demographics, training level, experience with adult and pediatric advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), experience with T-CPR in adults, T-CPR case scenarios, and T-CPR in children.

RESULTS

All 201 paramedics in the system (mean age=34.2 years; mean years as paramedic = 8.5 ) completed all relevant items of the survey (100% compliance). Two-thirds had provided ACLS for cardiac arrest to >50 adults (93% >10 adults) and more than one-third had performed ACLS on >20 children (72% >5 children). In addition, 90% had participated in T-CPR for adults. The majority of paramedics reported at least occasional (pre-defined) difficulty with adult T-CPR including family confrontation, 43%; personal discomfort, 13%; disagreement with physician decision to continue efforts, 11%; and fear of liability, 10%. Paramedic self ratings of comfort with terminating CPR on a scale from 1 to 10 (1: very comfortable; 10: uncomfortable) for adults and children were 1 and 9, respectively (P<0.001). In addition, the clear majority (72%) responded that children deserve more aggressive resuscitative efforts than adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Paramedics feel relatively uncomfortable with the concept of terminating resuscitation efforts in children in the pre-hospital setting.

Prehospital resuscitation practices: a survey of prehospital providers

Numerous factors affect decision making in the prehospital provision of resuscitative care. This study was undertaken to determine current practices involved in the initiation, continuation and termination of resuscitative efforts, and the impact of advance directives, in the prehospital resuscitation setting. This cross-sectional mailed questionnaire surveyed 3807 members of the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians. The study instrument included questions regarding the termination and withholding of resuscitative efforts in the prehospital setting, as well as survival rates, local protocols and compliance with advance directives. Of 1546 respondents (41% response rate), with a mean 9.0 years of experience, most (89%) indicated that they would withhold resuscitative efforts in the presence of an official state-approved advance directive. However, very few providers would withhold resuscitative efforts if only an unofficial document (4%) or verbal report of an advance directive (10%) were available. Providers with more than 10 years experience were more likely to withhold resuscitation attempts in the presence of only a verbal report of an advance directive (p = 0.02, Chi-square), and were more likely to withhold resuscitation attempts in situations they considered futile (p = 0.001, Chi-square). Most (77%) respondents have local EMS guidelines for termination of resuscitation in the prehospital setting, but 23% of those consider existing guidelines to be inadequate. The majority of prehospital providers stated that they honor official state-approved advance directives, but do not follow directives from unofficial documents or verbal reports of advance directives. More experienced providers stated that they withhold resuscitative efforts more often in futile situations, or in the presence of unofficial advance directives. Advance directives should be utilized more uniformly among patients who wish to forgo resuscitative efforts in the event of cardiac arrest. Because many local protocols are judged to be inadequate, we support the institution of improved clinical guidelines regarding the prehospital termination of resuscitative efforts.

Termination of resuscitation: the art of clinical decision making

Despite all of the progress in reanimating patients in cardiac arrest over the last half century, resuscitation attempts usually fail to restore spontaneous circulation. Thus, the most common of all resuscitation decisions after initiation remains the decision to stop. An entire library of research and guidelines for terminating resuscitative efforts has been developed in the past decade. However, this most central decision is often left open to chance, provider preference, family wishes, futility judgments, and resource concerns-a host of subjective considerations at the bedside and beyond. This article sheds light on these considerations, acknowledging the pivotal role that resuscitation science and guidelines can play in the multifactorial decision to discontinue resuscitative efforts.

Resuscitation decision index: a new approach to decision-making in prehospital CPR

Retrospective and prospective studies have been undertaken to assess physicians' practice-patterns by studying cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) case summaries. Most summaries reveal similar influences by the physician, patient and situation-related variables on the patterns of resuscitation. The initiation of resuscitation efforts is addressed frequently, but, very few studies discuss the topic of termination of resuscitation. Prehospital emergencies are addressed very rarely. The objective of this study was to introduce a new methodological approach towards initiation and termination of resuscitation efforts in prehospital situations. The subject studied were the physicians' decisions concerning initiation/withholding, termination/withdrawal and the resulting early survival rates. The result is termed the "Resuscitation decision index" (RDI). The "RDI" could be a tool allowing comparisons on a quantitative level, between different EMS systems or disciplines and giving an insight into the decision process. The "RDI" can enhance audit of resuscitation. The process of decision-making can be used to help future theoretical decision-making strategies.

Decisions to terminate resuscitation. Resuscitation Committee

To gain more insight into decision making around the termination of resuscitation (CPR), we studied factors which influenced the time before discontinuing resuscitation, and the criteria on which those decisions were based. These criteria were compared with those of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the American Heart Association (AHA). For this study, we reviewed the audiotapes of resuscitation attempts in a hospital. A total of 36 attempts were studied, involving 27 men and nine women, mean (S.D.) age 64 (18) years. A total of 19 patients received resuscitation on general wards, and 17 in the emergency room after an out-of-hospital circulatory arrest. The median interval time (range) from start to termination was 33 min (8-81 min). Results from multiple linear regression showed that a delay greater than 5 min in first advanced life support measures, drawing a sample for biochemical analysis, and the patient's response shown by return of spontaneous circulation were independently associated with the time of terminating resuscitation. The team used a number of criteria which can be found in the guidelines of the ERC and the AHA, but also used additional criteria. The ERC and the AHA criteria were not sufficient to cover all termination decisions. We conclude that the point in time to terminate resuscitation is not always rationally chosen. Updating of the current guidelines for terminating resuscitation and training resuscitation teams to use these guidelines is recommended.