Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with multiple brain metastases

Total brain dose estimation in single-isocenter-multiple-targets (SIMT) radiosurgery via a novel deep neural network with spherical convolutions

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Accurate prediction of normal brain dosimetric parameters is crucial for the quality control of single-isocenter multi-target (SIMT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment planning. Reliable dose estimation of normal brain tissue is one of the great indicators to evaluate plan quality and is used as a reference in clinics to improve potentially SIMT SRS treatment planning quality consistency. This study aimed to develop a spherical coordinate-defined deep learning model to predict the dose to a normal brain for SIMT SRS treatment planning.

METHODS

By encapsulating the human brain within a sphere, 3D volumetric data of planning target volume (PTVs) can be projected onto this geometry as a 2D spherical representation (in azimuthal and polar angles). A novel deep learning model spherical convolutional neural network (SCNN) was developed based on spherical convolution to predict brain dosimetric evaluators from spherical representation. Utilizing 106 SIMT cases, the model was trained to predict brain V50%, V60%, and V66.7%, corresponding to V10Gy and V12Gy, as key dosimetric indicators. The model prediction performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).

RESULTS

The SCNN accurately predicted normal brain dosimetric values from the modeled spherical PTV representation, with R2 scores of 0.92 ± 0.05/0.94 ± 0.10/0.93 ± 0.09 for V50%/V60%/V66.7%, respectively. MAEs values were 1.94 ± 1.61 cc/1.23 ± 0.98 cc/1.13 ± 0.99 cc, and MAPEs were 19.79 ± 20.36%/20.79 ± 21.07%/21.15 ± 22.24%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The deep learning model provides treatment planners with accurate prediction of dose to normal brain, enabling improved consistency in treatment planning quality. This method can be extended to other brain-related analyses as an efficient data dimension reduction method.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases: current principles, expanding indications and opportunities for multidisciplinary care

The management of brain metastases is challenging and should ideally be coordinated through a multidisciplinary approach. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been the cornerstone of management for most patients with oligometastatic central nervous system involvement (one to four brain metastases), and several technological and therapeutic advances over the past decade have broadened the indications for SRS to include polymetastatic central nervous system involvement (>4 brain metastases), preoperative application and fractionated SRS, as well as combinatorial approaches with targeted therapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. For example, improved imaging and frameless head-immobilization technologies have facilitated fractionated SRS for large brain metastases or postsurgical cavities, or lesions in proximity to organs at risk. However, these opportunities come with new challenges and questions, including the implications of tumour histology as well as the role and sequencing of concurrent systemic treatments. In this Review, we discuss these advances and associated challenges in the context of ongoing clinical trials, with insights from a global group of experts, including recommendations for current clinical practice and future investigations. The updates provided herein are meaningful for all practitioners in clinical oncology.

Utilizing Vision Transformers for Predicting Early Response of Brain Metastasis to Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Stage Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Treatment

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study explores the application of vision transformers to predict early responses to stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases using minimally pre-processed magnetic resonance imaging scans. The objective is to assess the potential of vision transformers as a predictive tool for clinical decision-making, particularly in the context of imbalanced datasets.

METHODS

We analyzed magnetic resonance imaging scans from 19 brain metastases patients, focusing on axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and high-resolution contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences. Patients were categorized into responders (complete or partial response) and non-responders (stable or progressive disease).

RESULTS

Despite the imbalanced nature of the dataset, our results demonstrate that vision transformers can predict early treatment responses with an overall accuracy of 99%. The model exhibited high precision (99% for progression and 100% for regression) and recall (99% for progression and 100% for regression). The use of the attention mechanism in the vision transformers allowed the model to focus on relevant features in the magnetic resonance imaging images, ensuring an unbiased performance even with the imbalanced data. Confusion matrix analysis further confirmed the model's reliability, with minimal misclassifications. Additionally, the model achieved a perfect area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC = 1.00), effectively distinguishing between responders and non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the potential of vision transformers, aided by the attention mechanism, as a non-invasive, predictive tool for early response assessment in clinical oncology. The vision transformer (ViT) model employed in this study processes MRIs as sequences of patches, enabling the capture of localized tumor features critical for early response prediction. By leveraging patch-based feature learning, this approach enhances robustness, interpretability, and clinical applicability, addressing key challenges in tumor progression prediction following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The model's robust performance, despite the dataset imbalance, underscores its ability to provide unbiased predictions. This approach could significantly enhance clinical decision-making and support personalized treatment strategies for brain metastases. Future research should validate these findings in larger, more diverse cohorts and explore the integration of additional data types to further optimize the model's clinical utility.

Stereotactic aspiration alone or Ommaya placement and aspiration followed by stereotactic radiosurgery for cystic brain metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Cystic brain metastases (BMs) are often more challenging to treat than solid BMs. Stereotactic cyst aspiration for volume reduction followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an alternative treatment modality that may benefit patients with large cystic BMs not favorable for SRS alone nor microsurgical resection.

Research question

Here, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of stereotactic aspiration alone or reservoir (Ommaya) placement plus aspiration followed by SRS for cystic BMs.

Material and methods

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we reviewed articles published between 1968 and December 31-th, 2022. We retained 10 studies reporting 280 patients.

Results

Overall rate of tumor control for combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus aspiration plus SRS was 81.2% (62.5-99.9%, p < 0.001) and for stereotactic aspiration plus SRS was 64.7% (46.1-83.3%, p < 0.001). Overall rate of further intervention for combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus aspiration plus SRS was 15.8% (p = 0.08) and for stereotactic aspiration plus SRS was 14.8% (5.3-24.4%, p = 0.002). Overall complication rate for combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus aspiration plus SRS was 12.8% (2.3-23.3%, p = 0.01) and for stereotactic aspiration plus SRS was 1.5% (p = 0.12).

Discussion and conclusion

Combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus cyst aspiration plus SRS in cystic BMs yields better local control as compared to stereotactic aspiration plus SRS, with similar rate of further intervention between procedures. Aspiration of the cyst plus SRS should be considered for patients with cystic metastases not able to undergo open surgery or upfront SRS.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of combined therapies incorporating whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is a standard and effective approach for brain metastases, but it is linked to neurocognitive complications, specifically issues related to the hippocampus. Innovative strategies are being explored to enhance outcomes. However, a consensus is yet to be reached in this field. Our aim is to investigate the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), memantine, and hippocampal avoidance (HA) techniques in treatment of brain metastases.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we comprehensively searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane for studies reporting the efficacy and toxicity of WBRT-based combination therapies from inception to September 19, 2023. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) for dichotomous outcomes, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Among 2175 articles, 29 studies involving 3460 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to WBRT alone, combination therapies significantly mitigated neurocognitive function decline (RD = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.18-0.01]; P = 0.03) and intracranial control failure (RR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.52-1.44]; P = 0.02), without increasing the risk of hippocampal recurrence or high-grade toxicities. Notably, HA-WBRT + SIB/memantine demonstrated improved neurocognitive outcomes and survival benefits.

CONCLUSION

WBRT-based combination therapies demonstrate improved efficacy and comparable safety to WBRT alone, with specific emphasis on the effectiveness of HA-WBRT + Memantine and HA-WBRT + SIB in optimizing therapeutic outcomes for brain metastases.

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The role of local ablative radiotherapy (stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)/stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)) in the management of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of SBRT/SRS in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Totally 80 mBC patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) and 80 with oligoprogressive disease (OPD) to ≤5 metastatic lesions were retrospectively analyzed. The endpoint was overall survival and progression-free survival, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Totally 160 mBC cases (80 OMD and 80 OPD cases) were analyzed, with a total of 291 treated metastases. In the study of OMD, we analyzed 30 cases with oligo-recurrence and 50 cases with sync-oligometastases. The median follow-up time was 46 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates for all patients were 89.8%, 77.6%, and 67.3%, respectively, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 71.4%, 44.9%, and 34.7% respectively. In multivariate analysis (MVA), treatment for oligometastases and non-triple-negative status predicted favorable OS. In patients with oligometastases, median OS was 58 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 100%, 91.7%, and 83.3%, respectively; median OS in patients with oligoprogression was 35 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 80%, 64%, and 52%, respectively. In mBC cases with limited brain metastases administered SRS, poor OS was detected in patient age under 45 years (P = 0.041), triple-negative cases (P = 0.025), and those with OPD (P = 0.022). In OMD, a significant improvement in PFS was observed in the oligo-recurrence group compared to the sync-oligometastases group (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Patients administered local ablative radiotherapy (SBRT/SRS) for oligometastases have better overall survival than those treated for oligoprogression. SBRT/SRS may be beneficial for young and non-triple-negative mBC cases. The presence of oligo-recurrence can predict a favorable prognosis of oligometastases in patients with mBC treated with SBRT/SRS.

Utilization of Palliative Radiation in Pediatric Oncology Patients During the End-of-Life (EOL)

BACKGROUND

Suffering at the end-of-life (EOL) can impact the perception of a "good death" and ultimately affect bereavement for families of children with cancer. Palliative radiation (pXRT) is a tool that can address pain, mitigate suffering and improve quality of life.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review of pediatric oncology patients who died over an 11-year period was completed. Descriptive analysis and nonparametric tests to compare groups were used.

RESULTS

2202 total deaths occurred during the study period; 167 patients met study criteria, reflecting a 7.6% incidence of pXRT use at the EOL. Most patients were white (68%) and male (59%), with a median age of 9 years. Solid tumors were most common (52%), followed by CNS tumors (38%), and leukemia (10%). pXRT was primarily used to treat pain (37%) and focused on sites including brain/spine (37%), head/neck (24%), and pelvis (12%). Mean radiation dose delivered was 23.8Gy (range: 1.8-55.8 Gy) in a median of 7 fractions (range: 1-31). Side effects were rare and 58% of patients had a decrease in reported pain scores. Additionally, 87% received a pediatric palliative care (PPC) consultation which increased the likelihood for hospice referral, documented DNR preferences and decrease episodes of CPR on the day of death.

CONCLUSIONS

There is underutilization and significant variability in the use of pXRT during EOL in pediatric oncology. Barriers to this tool may include physician perceptions, family/patient preferences, and logistical hardships. Guidelines to standardize pXRT, alongside earlier PPC integration, may guide clinician decision making and increase pXRT utilization.

Progress of intracranial metastases during the interval before stereotactic radiosurgery, a retrospective cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of intracranial metastatic disease is increasing worldwide. As a valuable treatment modality, stereotactic radiosurgery requires detailed imaging, and this study evaluated the differences between imaging obtained on the day of treatment compared to historical or referral imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed, evaluating all the patients presenting with eligible referral imaging in a 13-month period and comparing this imaging to the imaging taken on the day of treatment. Numbers of additional metastases, volumes and volume differences among the images were compared.

RESULTS

There was a median interval of 19 days between the acquisition of the diagnostic or referral scan and the day of treatment imaging. Even the group that had the shortest interval (up to 2 weeks) showed at least one additional deposit in 50 % of the patients. Volume was increased in 75 % of this group. Longer intervals were associated with higher increases in volume.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate the increase in the disease burden in patients with intracranial metastatic disease, in relation to number and volume, in the interval between the referral and treatment imaging. This has significant implications for planning pathways, to ensure that metastatic deposits are not missed or undertreated.

Advances in the Management of Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Lung cancer, both non-small cell and small cell, harbors a high propensity for spreading to the central nervous system. Radiation therapy remains the backbone of the management of brain metastases. Recent advances in stereotactic radiosurgery have expanded its indications and ongoing studies seek to elucidate optimal fractionation and coordination with systemic therapies, especially targeted inhibitors with intracranial efficacy. Efforts in whole-brain radiotherapy aim to preserve neurocognition and to investigate the need for prophylactic cranial irradiation. As novel combinatorial strategies are tested and prognostic/predictive biomarkers are identified and tested, the management of brain metastases in lung cancer will become increasingly personalized to optimally balance intracranial efficacy with preserving neurocognitive function and patient values.

Brain metastases reirradiation

The advances in cancer screening and therapies have allowed the improvement of metastatic patients' survival, including those with brain metastases. This led to a substantial shift in brain metastases patients' management for whom whole-brain radiation therapy, formerly widely used, has given way to a more focused management in which single- or multifractionated stereotactic radiation therapy now plays a predominant role. Although stereotactic radiation therapy offers excellent local control rates (70 to 90%), it does not prevent brain recurrence outside the radiation field, which is all the more frequent the higher the number of initial metastases and the longer the patient's survival. In the case of brain recurrence after irradiation, therapeutic options will depend both on the previous treatment and on the features of the recurrence. This article aims to review the available data on the efficacy and tolerability of various reirradiation schemes in different clinical situations.

A Randomised Phase II Trial of Hippocampal Sparing Versus Conventional Whole Brain Radiotherapy After Surgical Resection or Radiosurgery in Favourable Prognosis Patients With 1-10 Brain Metastases

AIMS

To assess in patients with 1-10 brain metastases, each of which has been treated by neurosurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery, whether hippocampal sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) better spares neurocognitive function (NCF) than standard WBRT. Further, to assess whether a phase III randomised trial of HS-WBRT would be feasible in the UK.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicentre, randomised, open label phase II trial was undertaken, randomising patients to 30Gy in 10 fractions of WBRT or HS-WBRT. The primary endpoint was decline in Total recall using Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R) at 4 months post treatment. To assess this, we aimed to recruit 84 patients over 3 years. Secondary endpoints included further measures of NCF, quality of life, duration of functional independence, local control of treated metastases, development of new metastases, disease control within the hippocampal regions, overall survival, steroid and antiepileptic medication requirements, and toxicity.

RESULTS

The trial closed prematurely due to slower than anticipated recruitment. From April 2016 to January 2018, 23 patients were randomised. Follow up was a median of 25 months. Fifteen patients (6 WBRT, 9 HS-WBRT) were assessed for the primary endpoint; of these, 1 in each arm experienced significant decline in the 4-month HVLT-R Total recall score (p = 0.8). Patients in the HS-WBRT arm experienced less insomnia (p < 0.01) and drowsiness (p < 0.01). There were no differences in other secondary endpoints.

CONCLUSION

A phase III randomised trial of HS-WBRT was shown not to be feasible at this time in the UK. As most randomised trials of HS-WBRT reported to date share common endpoints, including NCF, an individual patient data meta-analysis should be undertaken.

Multifraction stereotactic radiotherapy utilizing inhomogeneous dose distribution for brainstem metastases: a single-center retrospective analysis

Brainstem metastases are challenging to manage owing to the critical neurological structures involved. Although stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) offers targeted high doses while minimizing damage to adjacent normal tissues, the optimal dose fractionation remains undefined. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of multifraction SRT with an inhomogeneous dose distribution. This retrospective study included 31 patients who underwent 33 treatments for 35 brainstem lesions using linear accelerator-based multifraction SRT (30 Gy in five fractions, 35 Gy in five fractions or 42 Gy in 10 fractions) with an inhomogeneous dose distribution (median isodose, 51.9%). The outcomes of interest were local failure, toxicity and symptomatic failure. The median follow-up time after brainstem SRT for a lesion was 18.6 months (interquartile range, 10.0-24.3 months; range, 1.8-39.0 months). Grade 2 toxicities were observed in two lesions, and local failure occurred in three lesions. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed. The 1-year local and symptomatic failure rates were 8.8 and 16.7%, respectively. Toxicity was observed in two of seven treatments with a gross tumor volume (GTV) greater than 1 cc, whereas no toxicity was observed in treatments with a GTV less than 1 cc. No clear association was observed between the biologically effective dose of the maximum brainstem dose and the occurrence of toxicity. Our findings indicate that multifraction SRT with an inhomogeneous dose distribution offers a favorable balance between local control and toxicity in brainstem metastases. Larger multicenter studies are needed to validate these results and determine the optimal dose fractionation.

Laser interstitial thermal therapy followed by consolidation stereotactic radiosurgery (LITT-cSRS) in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and safety of laser interstitial thermal therapy followed by consolidation radiosurgery (LITT-cSRS) was previously studied in brain metastasis that recurs locally after initial radiosurgery (BMRS). Here, we characterize the clinical outcome of LITT-cSRS in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2023, ten consecutive cancer patients with newly diagnosed brain mass of unclear etiology who underwent stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB) and LITT in the same setting followed by consolidation SRS (cSRS) with > 6 months follow-up were identified retrospectively. Clinical and imaging outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

The histology of the BM were: breast cancer (n = 3), melanoma (n = 3), non-cell cell lung cancer (n = 3), colon (n = 1). There were no wound or procedural complications. All patients were discharged home, with a median one-day hospital stay (range: 1-2 days). All patients were off corticosteroid therapy by the one-month follow-up. cSRS were carried out 12-27 days (median of 19 days) after SNB + LITT. There were no subsequent emergency room presentation, 30-day or 90-day re-admission. The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) remains stable or improved at the 3 months-follow-up. With a median follow-up of 416 days (13.8 mo; range: 199-1,096 days), there was one local recurrence at 384 days (12.8 mo) post-LITT-cSRS. With exception of this patient with local recurrence, all patients showed decreased FLAIR volume surrounding the LITT-cSRS treated BMRS by the six-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

To our awareness, this case series represent the first to describe LITT-cSRS in the setting of newly diagnosed BM. The results presented here provide pilot data to support the safety and efficacy of LITT-cSRS and lay the foundation for future studies.

Predicting Tumor Dynamics Post-Staged GKRS: Machine Learning Models in Brain Metastases Prognosis

This study assesses the predictive performance of six machine learning models and a 1D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) in forecasting tumor dynamics within three months following Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in 77 brain metastasis (BM) patients. The analysis meticulously evaluates each model before and after hyperparameter tuning, utilizing accuracy, AUC, and other metrics derived from confusion matrices. The CNN model showcased notable performance with an accuracy of 98% and an AUC of 0.97, effectively complementing the broader model analysis. Initial findings highlighted that XGBoost significantly outperformed other models with an accuracy of 0.95 and an AUC of 0.95 before tuning. Post-tuning, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) demonstrated the most substantial improvement, achieving an accuracy of 0.98 and an AUC of 0.98. Conversely, XGBoost showed a decline in performance after tuning, indicating potential overfitting. The study also explores feature importance across models, noting that features like "control at one year", "age of the patient", and "beam-on time for volume V1 treated" were consistently influential across various models, albeit their impacts were interpreted differently depending on the model's underlying mechanics. This comprehensive evaluation not only underscores the importance of model selection and hyperparameter tuning but also highlights the practical implications in medical diagnostic scenarios, where the accuracy of positive predictions can be crucial. Our research explores the effects of staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) on larger tumors, revealing no significant outcome differences across protocols. It uniquely considers the impact of beam-on time and fraction intervals on treatment efficacy. However, the investigation is limited by a small patient cohort and data from a single institution, suggesting the need for future multicenter research.

Headache in Brain Tumors

The prevalence of brain tumors in patients with headache is very low; however, 48% to 71% of patients with brain tumors experience headache. The clinical presentation of headache in brain tumors varies according to age; intracranial pressure; tumor location, type, and progression; headache history; and treatment. Brain tumor-associated headaches can be caused by local and distant traction on pain-sensitive cranial structures, mass effect caused by the enlarging tumor and cerebral edema, infarction, hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, and tumor secretion. This article reviews the current findings related to epidemiologic details, clinical manifestations, mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and management of headache in association with brain tumors.

Predictors of local control after robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: 10-years-experience after Cyberknife installation

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the factors influencing brain metastases (BM) local control (LC) after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2020, a cohort of 145 patients (246 BM) treated consecutively with robotic radiosurgery was analysed.

RESULTS

Median age was 61 years (range, 29-90 years). Median radiological follow-up of the lesions was 21.7 months (range, 3-115 months). The mean overall survival and LC were 33.0 and 82.7 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, sex, primary cancer site, histological type, use of systemic steroids, maximum diameter, volume, early MRI response, isodose line, number of fractions, BED10 value, and BED10 value proportional to volume and maximum diameter were significant factors for LC. On multivariate analysis, female sex (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.10 P: 0.035), adenocarcinoma histology (HR: 6.54 P: 0.001), no steroid use (HR: 3.60 P: 0.001), maximum diameter (≤1 cm) (HR: 2.64 P: 0.018), complete response of lesion at first follow-up MRI compared to stable or progressive disease (HR: 4.20, P = 0.024; HR: 19.15, P < 0.001), isodose line (≥90%) (HR: 2.00 P: 0.036), and tumour volume (PTV ≤2 cc) (HR: 5.19 P: 0.001) were independent factors improving LC.

CONCLUSIONS

SRT is an effective treatment for patients with a limited number of BM with a high LC rate. There are many factors related to the patient, tumour, and radiotherapy plan that have an impact on LC after SRT in brain metastases. These results warrant further investigation in a prospective setting.

Challenges in radiological evaluation of brain metastases, beyond progression

MRI is the cornerstone in the evaluation of brain metastases. The clinical challenges lie in discriminating metastases from mimickers such as infections or primary tumors and in evaluating the response to treatment. The latter sometimes leads to growth, which must be framed as pseudo-progression or radionecrosis, both inflammatory phenomena attributable to treatment, or be considered as recurrence. To meet these needs, imaging techniques are the subject of constant research. However, an exponential growth after radiotherapy must be interpreted with caution, even in the presence of results suspicious of tumor progression by advanced techniques, because it may be due to inflammatory changes. The aim of this paper is to familiarize the reader with inflammatory phenomena of brain metastases treated with radiotherapy and to describe two related radiological signs: "the inflammatory cloud" and "incomplete ring enhancement", in order to adopt a conservative management with close follow-up.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Machine Performance Checks as an Alternative to Winston-Lutz Quality Assurance Testing in the TrueBeam Linear Accelerator with HyperArc

HyperArc is a preferred technique for treating brain metastases, employing a single isocenter for multiple lesions. Geometrical isocentricity in the TrueBeam linear accelerator with HyperArc is crucial. We evaluated machine performance checks (MPCs) as an alternative to the Winston-Lutz (WL) test to verify the treatment isocenter. Between January and July 2023, we assessed 53 data points using MPC and Winston-Lutz tests. The isocenter size obtained from the MPC and its sum, including the rotation-induced couch shift, were compared with the maximum total delta value from the Winston-Lutz test. The maximum total delta was 0.68 ± 0.10 mm, while the isocenter size was 0.28 ± 0.02 mm. The sum of the isocenter size and rotation-induced couch shift measured by MPC was 0.61 ± 0.03 mm. During the Winston-Lutz test (without couch rotation), the maximum total delta value was 0.56 ± 0.13 mm. A t-test analysis revealed a significant difference in the isocenter size averages between the Winston-Lutz and MPC outcomes, whereas the Pearson's correlation coefficient yielded no correlation. Our study highlights the necessity for separate MPC and Winston-Lutz tests for isocenter verification. Therefore, the Winston-Lutz test should precede stereotactic radiosurgery for isocenter verification.

Can we predict overall survival using machine learning algorithms at 3-months for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer after gamma knife radiosurgery?

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GRKS) is widely used for patients with brain metastases; however, predictions of overall survival (OS) within 3-months post-GKRS remain imprecise. Specifically, more than 10% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients died within 8 weeks of post-GKRS, indicating potential overtreatment. This study aims to predict OS within 3-months post-GKRS using machine learning algorithms, and to identify prognostic features in NSCLC patients. We selected 120 NSCLC patients who underwent GKRS at Chungbuk National University Hospital. They were randomly assigned to training group (n = 80) and testing group (n = 40) with 14 features considered. We used 3 machine learning (ML) algorithms (Decision tree, Random forest, and Boosted tree classifier) to predict OS within 3-months for NSCLC patients. And we extracted important features and permutation features. Data validation was verified by physician and medical physicist. The accuracy of the ML algorithms for predicting OS within 3-months was 77.5% for the decision tree, 72.5% for the random forest, and 70% for the boosted tree classifier. The important features commonly showed age, receiving chemotherapy, and pretreatment each algorithm. Additionally, the permutation features commonly showed tumor volume (>10 cc) and age as critical factors each algorithm. The decision tree algorithm exhibited the highest accuracy. Analysis of the decision tree visualized data revealed that patients aged (>71 years) with tumor volume (>10 cc) were increased risk of mortality within 3-months. The findings suggest that ML algorithms can effectively predict OS within 3-months and identify crucial features in NSCLC patients. For NSCLC patients with poor prognoses, old age, and large tumor volumes, GKRS may not be a desirable treatment.

Is Gamma Knife surgery, omitting adjunct whole brain radiation treatment, feasible for patients with 20 or more brain metastases?

Background

The importance of the number of brain metastases (BM) when deciding between whole brain radiation treatment (WBRT) and radiosurgery is controversial. We hypothesized that the number of BM is of limited importance when deciding radiation strategy, and offered Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) also for selected patients with 20 or more BM.

Methods

The outcome following single session GKS for 75 consecutive patients harboring 20 or more (20+) BM was analyzed. Data was collected both retro- and prospectively.

Results

The median survival time was 9 months. Two grade 3 complications occurred, 1 resolved and 1 did not. Sex and clinical condition at the time of GKS (ECOG value) were the only parameters significantly related to survival time. Eighteen patients developed leptomeningeal dissemination with or without distant recurrences (DR), and another 32 patients developed DR a total of 73 times. DR was managed with GKS 24 times, with WBRT 3 times and with systemic treatment or best supportive care 46 times. The median time to developing DR was unrelated to the number of BM, but significantly longer for patients older than 65 years, as well as for patients with NSCLC.

Conclusions

GKS is a reasonable treatment option for selected patients with 20 or more BM. It is better to decide the optimal management of post-GKS intracranial disease progression once it occurs rather than trying to prevent it by using adjunct WBRT.

The Safety and Efficacy of Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Stereotactic Radiosurgery Therapy with Practitioner and Researcher Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown growing promise in the treatment of brain metastases, especially combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The combination of ICIs with SRS has been studied for efficacy as well as increasing radiation necrosis risks. In this review, we compare clinical outcomes of radiation necrosis, intracranial control, and overall survival between patients with brain metastases treated with either SRS alone or SRS-ICI combination therapy.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane was performed in May 2023 for articles comparing the safety and efficacy of SRS/ICI versus SRS-alone for treating brain metastases.

RESULTS

The search criteria identified 1961 articles, of which 48 met inclusion criteria. Combination therapy with SRS and ICI does not lead to significant increases in incidence of radiation necrosis either radiographically or symptomatically. Overall, no difference was found in intracranial control between SRS-alone and SRS-ICI combination therapy. Combination therapy is associated with increased median overall survival. Notably, some comparative studies observed decreased neurologic deaths, challenging presumptions that improved survival is due to greater systemic control. The literature supports SRS-ICI administration within 4 weeks of another for survival but remains inconclusive, requiring further study for other outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination SRS-ICI therapy is associated with significant overall survival benefit for patients with brain metastases without significantly increasing radiation necrosis risks compared to SRS alone. Although intracranial control rates appear to be similar between the 2 groups, timing of treatment delivery may improve control rates and demands further study attention.

Overall survival following stereotactic radiosurgery for ten or more brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumours. Variation exists in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with 10 or more brain metastases. Concerns include an increasing number of brain metastases being associated with poor survival, the lack of prospective, randomised data and an increased risk of toxicity.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess overall survival of patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery as primary therapy. The search strings were applied to MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Log hazard ratios and standard errors were estimated from each included study. A random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian and Laird method was applied using the derived log hazard ratios and standard errors on studies which included a control group.

RESULTS

15 studies were included for systematic review. 12 studies were used for pooled analysis for overall survival at set time points, with a predicted 12 month survival of 20-40%. The random-effects meta-analysis in five studies of overall survival comparing ten or greater metastases against control showed statistically worse overall survival in the 10 + metastases group (1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.18, p-value = < 0.01, I2 = 6%). A funnel plot showed no evidence of bias. There was insufficient information for a meta-analysis of toxicity.

DISCUSSION

Overall survival outcomes of patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with SRS is acceptable and should not be a deterrent for its use. There is a lack of prospective data and insufficient real-world data to draw conclusions on toxicity.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42021246115.

Selecting the Appropriate Radiation Therapy Technique for Extensive Brain Metastases from Tens to Hundreds: Should the Latest Technique Always Be the Best Option?

Brain metastases (BMs) are one of the most common metastatic lesions in adult cancer patients and the most common intracranial neoplasms in adult patients. Especially for multiple BMs, historically, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been performed as the mainstay of therapy, which improves neurological symptoms and median survival. However, WBRT could negatively impact the patient's quality of life due to late complications. Owing to these complications, attempts have been made to use the latest radiotherapy (LRT) such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat BMs. However, for the extensive BMs (ranging from tens to hundreds), there are currently no prospective studies comparing WBRT with LRT such as IMRT or SRS. For extensive brain metastases, LRT cannot be the best option. Instead, upfront WBRT should be considered given its advantages and disadvantages, rather than LRT. We hope that faster and more reliable LRT for extensive BMs will be applicable for clinical practice without any clinical concerns in the near future.

Repeated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Local Brain Metastases Failure or Distant Brain Recurrent: A Retrospective Study of 184 Patients

BACKGROUND

The main advantages of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) are to delay whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and to deliver ablative doses. Despite this efficacy, the risk of distant brain metastases (BM) one year after SRT ranges from 26% to 77% and 20 to 40% of patients required salvage treatment. The role and consequences of reirradiation remain unclear, particularly in terms of survival. The objective was to study overall survival (OS) and neurological death-free survival (NDFS) and to specify the prognostic factors of long-term survival.

METHODS

we retrospectively reviewed the data of patients treated between 2010 and 2020 with at least two courses of SRT without previous WBRT.

RESULTS

In total, 184 patients were treated for 915 BMs with two-to-six SRT sessions. Additional SRT sessions were provided for local (5.6%) or distant (94.4%) BM recurrence. The median number of BMs treated per SRT was one with a median of four BMs in total. The mean time between the two SRT sessions was 8.9 months (95%CI 7.7-10.1) and there was no significant difference in the delay between the two sessions. The 6-, 12- and 24-month NDFS rates were 97%, 82% and 52%, respectively. The 6-, 12- and 24-month OS rates were 91%, 70% and 38%, respectively. OS was statistically related to the number of SRT sessions (HR = 0.48; p < 0.01), recursive partitioning analysis (HR = 1.84; p = 0.01), salvage WBRT (HR = 0.48; p = 0.01) and brain metastasis velocity (high: HR = 13.83; p < 0.01; intermediate: HR = 4.93; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer and melanoma were associated with a lower NDFS compared to breast cancer. A low KPS, a low number of SRT sessions, synchronous extracerebral metastases, synchronous BMs, extracerebral progression at SRT1, a high BMV grade, no WBRT and local recurrence were also associated with a lower NDFS. A high KPS at SRT1 and low BMV grade are prognostic factors for better OS, regardless of the number of BM recurrence events.

Single-Isocenter Linac-Based Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases with Coplanar Arcs: A Dosimetric and Clinical Analysis

The efficacy of linac-based SRS/fSRS treatments using the single-isocenter coplanar FFF-VMAT technique for both single and multiple BM was investigated. Seventy patients (129 BM) treated with 15-21 Gy in 1 (n = 59) or 27 Gy in 3 (n = 11) fractions were analyzed. For each fraction, plans involving the intra-fractional errors measured by post-treatment CBCT were recalculated. The relationships of BM size, distance-to-isocenter, and barycenter shift with the difference in target coverage were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. The median delivery time was 3.78 min (range, 1.83-9.25). The median post-treatment 3D error was 0.5 mm (range, 0.1-2.7) and the maximum rotational error was 0.3° (range, 0.0-1.3). In single BM patients, the GTV D95% was never reduced by >5%, whereas PTV D95% reductions >1% occurred in only 11 cases (29%). In multiple BM patients, dose deficits >5% and >1% occurred in 2 GTV (2%) and 34 PTV (37%), respectively. The differences in target coverage showed a moderate-to-strong correlation only with barycenter shift. Local failure of at least one treated BM occurred in 13 (21%) patients and the 1-year and 2-year local control rates for all lesions were 94% and 90%, respectively. The implemented workflow ensured that the degradation of target and brain dose metrics in delivered treatments was negligible. Along with encouraging clinical outcomes, these findings warrant a reduction in the PTV margins at our institution.

Untoward global effects of current guideline formulation of stereotactic radiotherapy for symptomatic brain metastases by international medical societies

The quality of evidence leading to new oncological treatments suffers shortcomings, as has recently been addressed for drug approvals. In this 'Personal view', we evaluate the unintended effects of adopting stereotactic radiosurgery as the standard of care for patients with limited number of symptomatic brain metastases and favourable prognostic factors in international guidelines in view of the limitations in the evidence of efficacy and effectiveness, with special focus on countries with relatively limited resources.

Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases

Postsurgical radiotherapy (RT) has been early proven to prevent local tumor recurrence, initially performed with whole brain RT (WBRT). Subsequent to disadvantageous cognitive sequalae for the patient and the broad distribution of modern linear accelerators, focal irradiation of the tumor has omitted WBRT in most cases. In many studies, the effectiveness of local RT of the resection cavity, either as single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT (hFSRT), has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. However, whereas prospective high-level incidence is still lacking on which dose and fractionation scheme is the best choice for the patient, further ablative techniques have come into play. Neoadjuvant SRS (N-SRS) prior to resection combines straightforward target delineation with an accelerated post-surgical phase, allowing an earlier start of systemic treatment or rehabilitation as indicated. In addition, low-energy intraoperative RT (IORT) on the surgical bed has been introduced as another alternative to external beam RT, offering sterilization of the cavity surface with steep dose gradients towards the healthy brain. This consensus paper summarizes current local treatment strategies for resectable brain metastases regarding available data and patient-centered decision-making.

Geometric accuracy in patient positioning for stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial tumors

Background/Purpose

This study determines and compares the geometric setup errors between stereoscopic x-ray and kilo-voltage cone beam CT (CBCT) in phantom tests on a linear accelerator (linac) for image-guided (IG) stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial tumors. Additionally, dose-volume metrics in the target volumes of the setup errors of CBCT were evaluated.

Materials/Methods

A Winston-Lutz- and an anthropomorphic phantom were used. The mean deviation and root mean square error (RMSE) of CBCT and stereoscopic x-ray were compared. Dose-volume metrics of the planning target volume (PTV) and gross target volume (GTV) for CBCT were calculated.

Results

The RMSEs in the tests with the Winston-Lutz-Phantom were 0.3 mm, 1.1 mm and 0.3 mm for CBCT and 0.1 mm, 0,1 mm and <0.1 mm for stereoscopic x-ray in the translational dimensions (right-left, anterior-posterior and superior-inferior). The RMSEs in the tests with the anthropomorphic phantom were 0.3 mm, 0.2 mm and 0.1 mm for CBCT and 0.1 mm, 0,1 mm and <0.1 mm for stereoscopic x-ray. The effects on dose-volume metrics of the setup errors of CBCT on the GTV were within 1 % for all considered dose values. The effects on the PTV were within 5 % for all considered dose values.

Conclusion

Both IG systems provide high accuracy patient positioning within a submillimeter range. The phantom tests exposed a slightly higher accuracy of stereoscopic x-ray than CBCT. The comparison with other studies with a similar purpose emphasizes the importance of individual IG installation quality assurance.

A novel weight optimized dynamic conformal arcs with TrueBeam™ Linac for very small tumors (≤1 cc) with single isocenter of multiple brain metastases (2≤, ≥4) in stereotactic radiosurgery: A comparison with volumetric modulated arc therapy

Introduction

We evaluated whether improved increase delivery efficiency of weight optimized dynamic conformal arc (WO-DCA) therapy in comparison to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with single isocenter for SRS treatment of very small volume and multiple brain metastases (BMs).

Materials and Methods

20 patients having a less than 1 cc volume and 2≤, ≥4 of multiple BMs, redesigned for 20 Gy in 1 fraction using WO-DCA and VMAT techniques with double full coplanar and three partial noncoplanar arcs. Plan qualities were compared using tumor coverage, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), V4Gy, V10Gy, and V12Gy volumes of brain, monitor units (MUs), and percent of quality assurance pass rate (QA%).

Results

Both techniques satisfied clinical requirements in coverage and CI. VMAT had a significantly higher MU and mean GI than WO-DCA (for MUs; 2330 vs. 1991; P < 0.001, and for GI; 4.72 vs. 3.39; P < 0.001). WO-DCA was found significantly lower V4Gy (171.11 vs. 232.80 cm3, P < 0.001), V10Gy (25.82 vs. 29.71 cm3, P < 0.05), and V12Gy (14.35 vs. 17.28 cm3, P < 0.05) volumes than VMAT. WO-DCA was associated with markedly increase QA pass rates for all plans (97.65% vs. 92.64%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

WO-DCA may be the first choice compared to the VMAT in reducing the dose in the brain and minimizing small-field dosimetric errors for very small SRS treatment of brain metastases in the range of ≤ 1 cc and 2≤, ≥4.

Management of patients with brain metastases from NSCLC without a genetic driver alteration: upfront radiotherapy or immunotherapy?

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the most common cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Brain metastases (BM) are detected in 21% of patients with lung cancer at the time of diagnosis and are the sole metastatic site in 35% of patients with stage IV disease. The best upfront therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer depends on both tumor programmed death 1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and the presence or absence of a targetable genetic alteration in genes such as epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase. In the absence of a targetable genetic alteration, options include chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and ICI combined with chemotherapy. Upfront local therapy followed by systemic therapy is the current standard of care for the management of BM, and may include whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or craniotomy for surgical resection followed by consolidative SRS. This paradigm is effective in achieving local control, but it remains unclear if this approach is necessary for every patient. Prospective and retrospective data suggest that ICIs with or without chemotherapy can have activity against BM; however, appropriately selecting patients who are able to safely forgo local therapy and start an ICI-based treatment remains a challenge. To be considered for upfront ICI-based therapy, a patient should be free of neurologic symptoms, lesions should be small and not located in a critical region of the central nervous system, if corticosteroids are indicated the requirement should be low (prednisone 10 mg/d or less), and PD-L1 expression should be high. The decision to proceed with upfront ICI without local therapy to BM should be made in a multidisciplinary fashion and patients should undergo frequent surveillance imaging so that salvage local therapy can be administered when necessary. Prospective clinical trials are needed to validate this approach before it can be widely adopted.

Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, carries a low incidence of acute toxicities: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Data on acute toxicities after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and nature of toxicities immediately after SRT using a linear accelerator.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 315 patients with brain metastases treated with SRT at our institution between May 2019 and February 2022. In total, 439 SRT sessions were performed for 2161 brain metastases. The outcome of interest was immediate side effects (ISEs), defined as new or worsening symptoms occurring during SRT or within 14 days after the end of SRT.

RESULTS

Grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 ISEs occurred in 16 (3.6%) and 7 (1.6%) cases, respectively. Among 63 treatments for 10 or more lesions (range: 10-40), 1 (1.6%) ISE occurred. Among 22 treatments for lesions with a maximum tumor volume of > 10 cc, 2 (9.1%) ISEs occurred. Grade ≥ 3 ISEs included 1, 4, 1, and 1 cases of grade 3 nausea, grade 3 new-onset partial and generalized seizures, grade 3 obstructive hydrocephalus, and grade 5 intracranial hemorrhage, respectively. ISEs were more common in patients with a larger maximum tumor volume, primary sites other than lung and breast cancer, and pre-treatment neurological symptoms.

CONCLUSION

SRT using a linear accelerator for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, is safe, with a low incidence of ISEs. Serious complications immediately after SRT are rare but possible; therefore, careful follow-up is necessary after treatment initiation.

Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery as Single or Combined Therapy for Brain Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To determine the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in treating patients with brain metastases (BMs), a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a direct comparison of cohort studies were performed. Relevant literature regarding the effectiveness of SRS alone and in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and surgery was retrieved using systematic database searches up to April 2019. The patterns of overall survival (OS), one-year OS, progression-free survival (PFS), one-year local brain control (LBC), one-year distant brain control (DBC), neurological death (ND), and complication rate were analyzed. A total of 18 RCTs and 37 cohorts were included in the meta-analysis. Our data revealed that SRS carried a better OS than SRS+WBRT (p= 0.048) and WBRT (p= 0.041). Also, SRS+WBRT demonstrated a significantly improved PFS, LBC, and DBC compared to WBRT alone and SRS alone. Finally, SRS achieved the same LBC as high as surgery, but intracranial relapse occurred considerably more frequently in the absence of WBRT. However, there were not any significant differences in ND and toxicities between SRS and other groups. Therefore, SRS alone may be a better alternative since increased patient survival may outweigh the increased risk of brain tumor recurrence associated with it.

Advances in Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases

Radiotherapy remains a cornerstone treatment of brain metastases. With new treatment advances, patients with brain metastases are living longer, and finding solutions for mitigating treatment-related neurotoxicity and improving quality of life is important. Historically, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was widely used but treatment options such as hippocampal sparing WBRT and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have emerged as promising alternatives. Herein, we discuss the recent advances in radiotherapy for brain metastases including the sparing of critical structures that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcomes (eg, hippocampus, fornix) that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcome, evidence supporting preoperative and fractionated-SRS, and treatment strategies for managing radiation necrosis.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for the Treatment of Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive treatment option for intracranial tumors that are challenging to treat via traditional methods; however, its safety and efficacy are not yet well validated in the literature. The objectives of the study were to assess the available evidence of the indications and adverse events (AEs) of LITT and 1-year progression-free survival and 1-year overall survival in the treatment of primary and secondary brain tumors.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted through the databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until October 2021. Comparative and descriptive studies, except for case reports, were included in the meta-analysis. Separate analyses by tumor type (high-grade gliomas, including World Health Organization grade 4 astrocytomas [which include glioblastomas] as a specific subgroup; low-grade gliomas; and brain metastases) were conducted. Pooled effect sizes and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated via random-effects models.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding 826 patients for meta-analysis. There were 829 lesions in total, of which 361 were classified as high-grade gliomas, 116 as low-grade gliomas, 337 as metastatic brain tumors, and 15 as nonglial tumors. Indications for offering LITT included deep/inaccessible tumor (12 studies), salvage therapy after failed radiosurgery (9), failures of ≥2 treatment options (3), in pediatric patients (4), patient preference (1); indications were nonspecific in 12 studies. Pooled incidence of all (minor or major) procedure-related AEs was 30% (95% CI, 27%-40%) for all tumors. Pooled incidence of neurologic deficits (minor or major) was 16% (12%-22%); postprocedural edema 14% (8%-22%); seizure 6% (4%-9%); hematoma 20% (14%-29%); deep vein thrombosis 19% (11%-30%); hydrocephalus 8% (5%-12%); and wound infection 5% (3%-7%). One-year progression-free survival was 18.6% (11.3%-29.0%) in high-grade gliomas, 16.9% (11.6%-24.0%) among the grade 4 astrocytomas; and 51.2% (36.7%-65.5%) in brain metastases. One-year overall survival was 43.0% (36.0%-50.0%) in high-grade glioma, 45.9% (95% CI, 37.9%-54%) in grade 4 astrocytomas; 93.0% (42.3%-100%) in low-grade gliomas, and 56.3% (47.0%-65.3%) in brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

New neurologic deficits and postprocedural edema were the most reported AEs after LITT, albeit mostly transient. This meta-analysis provides the best statistical estimates of progression and survival outcomes based on the available information. LITT is generally a safe procedure for selected patients, and future well-designed comparative studies on its outcomes versus the current standard of care should be performed.

A simplified and effective off-axis Winston-Lutz for single-isocenter multi-target SRS

PURPOSE

To safely perform single-iso multi-target (SIMT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), clinics must demonstrate SRS delivery accuracy for off-axis targets. The traditional Winston-Lutz (W-L) was widely adopted because it provides a simple and accurate solution for testing radiation-isocenter coincidence that uses a static target, enables testing arbitrary treatment angles, and does not require expensive commercial phantoms. The current noncommercial tests are cumbersome and insufficiently accurate. For an off-axis Winston-Lutz (OAWL) test, one must design MLC fields centered on off-axis targets. Unfortunately, because MLC leaf-interfaces are often misaligned with the target center, accomplishing this presents a nontrivial geometry problem that has not been previously solved in the literature. We present a solution for evaluating SIMT SRS accuracy that provides a straightforward method for creating OAWL test fields and offers all the benefits of the standard W-L test.

METHODS

We have developed a method to use any gantry, table, and initial collimator angles to create OAWL fields. This method calculates a series of nested coordinate transformations that produce a small collimator angle adjustment to align the MLC and create a symmetric field around an off-axis target.

RESULTS

For an 8 cm off-axis target, the described method yields OAWL results within 0.07 mm of standard isocentric W-L results. Our six most recent isocentric W-L tests show max and mean errors of 0.59 and 0.37 mm, respectively. For six runs of our proposed OAWL test, the average max and mean errors are 0.66 and 0.40 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This method accurately evaluates SRS delivery accuracy for off-axis distances that span the majority of a typical human brain for a centered SIMT arc. We have made this method publicly available, so that physicists can employ it within their clinics, foregoing the need for expensive phantoms and improving access to the state-of-the-art SIMT SRS technique.

Stereotactic radiosurgery and resection for treatment of multiple brain metastases: a systematic review and analysis

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to resection for treating multiple brain metastases. Given the lack of consensus regarding the application of SRS versus resection for multiple brain metastases, the authors aimed to conduct a systematic literature review of all published work on the topic.

METHODS

The PubMed, OVID, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were used to identify studies that examined clinical outcomes after resection or SRS was performed in patients with multiple brain metastases. Radiological studies, case series with fewer than 3 patients, pediatric studies, or national database studies were excluded. Data extracted included patient demographics and mean overall survival (OS). Weighted t-tests and ANOVA were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1300 abstracts were screened, 450 articles underwent full-text review, and 129 studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 20,177 patients (18,852 treated with SRS and 1325 who underwent resection). The OS for the SRS group was 10.2 ± 6 months, and for the resection group it was 6.5 ± 3.8 months. A weighted ANOVA test comparing OS with covariates of age, sex, and publication year revealed that the treatment group (p = 0.045), age (p = 0.034), and publication year (0.0078) were all independently associated with OS (with SRS, younger age, and later publication year being associated with longer survival), whereas sex (p = 0.95) was not.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with multiple brain metastases, SRS and resection are effective treatments to prolong OS, with published data suggesting that SRS may have a trend toward lengthened survival outcomes. The authors encourage additional work examining outcomes of treatments for multiple brain metastases.

Volume prediction for large brain metastases after hypofractionated gamma knife radiosurgery through artificial neural network

The effectiveness of single-session gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for small metastatic brain tumors has been proven, but hypofractionated GKRS (hfGKRS) for large brain metastases (BM) from the linear quadratic (LQ) model is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to investigate volume changes large BM after hfGKRS from the LQ model and predict volume changes using artificial neural network (ANN). We retrospectively investigated the clinical findings of 28 patients who underwent hfGKRS with large BM (diameter >3 cm or volume >10 cc). A total of 44 tumors were extracted from 28 patients with features. We randomly divided 30 large brain tumors as training set and 14 large brain tumors as test set. To predict the volume changes after hfGKRS, we used ANN models (single-layer perceptron (SLP) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP)). The volume reduction was 96% after hfGKRS for large BM from the LQ model. ANN model predicted volume changes with 70% and 80% accuracy for SLP and MLP, respectively. Even in large BM, hfGKRS from the LQ model could be a good treatment option. Additionally, the MLP model could predict volume changes with 80% accuracy after hfGKRS for large BM.

The Clinical Frailty Scale as useful tool in patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) evaluates patients' level of frailty on a scale from 1 to 9 and is commonly used in geriatric medicine, intensive care and orthopedics. The aim of our study was to reveal whether the CFS allows a reliable prediction of overall survival (OS) in patients after surgical treatment of brain metastases (BM) compared to the Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS).

METHODS

Patients operated for BM were included. CFS and KPS were retrospectively assessed pre- and postoperatively and at follow-up 3-6 months after resection.

RESULTS

205 patients with a follow-up of 22.8 months (95% CI 18.4-27.1) were evaluated. CFS showed a median of 3 ("managing well"; IqR 2-4) at all 3 assessment-points. Median KPS was 80 preoperatively (IqR 80-90) and 90 postoperatively (IqR 80-100) as well as at follow-up after 3-6 months. CFS correlated with KPS both preoperatively (r = - 0.92; p < 0.001), postoperatively (r = - 0.85; p < 0.001) and at follow-up (r = - 0.93; p < 0.001). The CFS predicted the expected reduction of OS more reliably than the KPS at all 3 assessments. A one-point increase (worsening) of the preoperative CFS translated into a 30% additional hazard to decease (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15-1.46; p < 0.001). A one-point increase in postoperative and at follow-up CFS represents a 39% (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.25-1.54; p < 0.001) and of 42% risk (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.27-1.59; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The CFS is a feasible, simple and reliable scoring system in patients undergoing resection of brain metastasis. The CFS 3-6 months after surgery specifies the expected OS more accurately than the KPS.

Intracranial Metastatic Disease: Present Challenges, Future Opportunities

Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) is a prevalent complication of cancer that significantly limits patient survival and quality of life. Over the past half-century, our understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of IMD has improved and enabled the development of surveillance and treatment algorithms based on prognostic factors and tumor biomolecular characteristics. In addition to advances in surgical resection and radiation therapy, the treatment of IMD has evolved to include monoclonal antibodies and small molecule antagonists of tumor-promoting proteins or endogenous immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging as well as the development of new serological assays to detect brain metastases promise to revolutionize IMD diagnosis. In this review, we will explore current treatment principles in patients with IMD, including the emerging role of targeted and immunotherapy in select primary cancers, and discuss potential areas for further investigation.

Recent Advances and Applications of Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Radiation therapy (RT) is a mainstay of treatment for brain metastases from solid tumors. Treatment of these patients is complex and should focus on minimizing symptoms, preserving functional status, and prolonging survival.

RECENT FINDINGS

Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) can lead to toxicity, and while it does reduce recurrence in the CNS, this has not been shown to provide a survival benefit. Recent advances focus on reducing the toxicity of WBRT or using more targeted radiation therapy. New paradigms including the use of proton RT for leptomeningeal metastases (LM) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) before craniotomy hold promise in improving treatment efficacy and reducing toxicity. Omission or replacement of WBRT is often safe and the use of SRS is expanding to include patients with more lesions and preoperative RT. Proton RT holds promise for LM. Progress is being made in improving patient-centered outcomes and reducing toxicity for patients with brain metastases.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin to Suppress Progression in a Patient With Advanced Breast Cancer

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is used to treat various diseases and has anticancer effects that suppress metastases in animal models of sarcoma and melanoma. However, these effects have been observed in a limited number of clinical cases. We report the case of a patient with metastatic breast cancer in which long-term IVIG treatment stopped disease progression in the absence of salvage chemotherapy. The patient was treated with IVIG for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia. Surprisingly, the lung and brain metastases were stabilized, and the patient achieved a progression-free interval of 29 months. More cases are needed to investigate and confirm the efficacy of IVIG in solid tumors in the future.

Radiosurgery for brain oligometastases in lung cancer

INTRODUCTION Brain metastases are a common problem in oncology patients, especially in lung cancer. The usual treatment for cerebral oligometastases is whole brain radiation therapy. Given the persistent poor prognosis of this disease, other therapeutic alternatives such as stereotactic radiosurgery have been considered. However, there is no clarity regarding the effectiveness of its addition. METHODS We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS We identified 17 systematic reviews including seven studies overall, of which four were randomized trials. All trials assessed patients with brain oligometastases, but none of them included exclusively lung cancer population. We concluded that it is not possible to clearly establish whether radiosurgery decreases neurological functionality, cognitive impairment, mortality or serious adverse effects, as the certainty of the existing evidence has been assessed as very low.

Dose-Response Effect and Dose-Toxicity in Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: A Review

Simple Summary

Brain metastases are one of the most frequent complications for cancer patients. Stereotactic radiosurgery is considered a cornerstone treatment for patients with limited brain metastases and the ideal dose and fractionation schedule still remain unknown. The aim of this literature review is to discuss the dose-effect relation in brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiosurgery, accounting for fractionation and technical considerations.

Abstract

For more than two decades, stereotactic radiosurgery has been considered a cornerstone treatment for patients with limited brain metastases. Historically, radiosurgery in a single fraction has been the standard of care but recent technical advances have also enabled the delivery of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for dedicated situations. Only few studies have investigated the efficacy and toxicity profile of different hypofractionated schedules but, to date, the ideal dose and fractionation schedule still remains unknown. Moreover, the linear-quadratic model is being debated regarding high dose per fraction. Recent studies shown the radiation schedule is a critical factor in the immunomodulatory responses. The aim of this literature review was to discuss the dose–effect relation in brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiosurgery accounting for fractionation and technical considerations. Efficacy and toxicity data were analyzed in the light of recent published data. Only retrospective and heterogeneous data were available. We attempted to present the relevant data with caution. A BED10 of 40 to 50 Gy seems associated with a 12-month local control rate >70%. A BED10 of 50 to 60 Gy seems to achieve a 12-month local control rate at least of 80% at 12 months. In the brain metastases radiosurgery series, for single-fraction schedule, a V12 Gy < 5 to 10 cc was associated to 7.1–22.5% radionecrosis rate. For three-fractions schedule, V18 Gy < 26–30 cc, V21 Gy < 21 cc and V23 Gy < 5–7 cc were associated with about 0–14% radionecrosis rate. For five-fractions schedule, V30 Gy < 10–30 cc, V 28.8 Gy < 3–7 cc and V25 Gy < 16 cc were associated with about 2–14% symptomatic radionecrosis rate. There are still no prospective trials comparing radiosurgery to fractionated stereotactic irradiation.

Improving efficiency in the radiation management of multiple brain metastases using a knowledge-based planning solution for single-isocentre volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to develop a single-isocentre volumetric modulated arc therapy (si-VMAT) technique for multiple brain metastases using knowledge-based planning software, comparing it with a multiple-isocentre stereotactic radiosurgery (mi-SRS) planning approach.

METHODS

Twenty-six si-VMAT plans were created and uploaded into RapidPlanTM (RP) to create a si-VMAT model. Ten patients, with 2 to 6 metastases (mets), were planned with a si-VMAT technique utilising RP, and a mi-SRS technique on Brainlab iPlan. Paddick Conformity Index (PCI) was used to compare conformity. The volumes of the brain receiving 15Gy, 12Gy, 10Gy, 7.5Gy and 3Gy were also compared. Retrospective treatment times from the last eight patients treated were averaged for pre-imaging and beam on time to calculate treatment times for both techniques.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the PCI scores for the mi-SRS plans (M = 0.667, SD = 0.114) and si-VMAT plans (M = 0.728, SD = 0.088), with PCI values suggesting better prescription dose conformity with the si-VMAT technique (P = 0.014). Percentage of total brain volume receiving low-dose wash at four of the five different dose levels was significantly less (P < 0.05) with mi-SRS. Average time to treat a single met with current mi-SRS technique is 25.7 min, with each additional met requiring this same amount of time. The average time to treat 2-3 mets using si-VMAT would be 25.3 min and 4+ metastases 33.5 min.

CONCLUSION

A knowledge-based si-VMAT approach was efficient in planning and treating multi metastases while achieving clinically acceptable dosimetry with respect to dose conformity and low-dose fall off.

Advances in radiotherapy for brain metastases

As novel systemic therapies yield improved survival in metastatic cancer patients, the frequency of brain metastases continues to increase. Over the years, management strategies have continued to evolve. Historically, stereotactic radiosurgery has been used as a boost to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) but is increasingly being used as a replacement for WBRT. Given its capacity to treat both macro- and micro-metastases in the brain, WBRT has been an important management strategy for years, and recent research has identified technologic and pharmacologic approaches to delivering WBRT more safely. In this review, we outline the current landscape of radiotherapeutic treatment options and discuss approaches to integrating radiotherapy advances in the contemporary management of brain metastases.

Predicting local failure of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery with radiomics on planning MR images and dose maps

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an important modality in the treatment of brain metastases. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential of radiomic features from planning magnetic resonance (MR) images and dose maps to predict local failure after SRS for brain metastases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Twenty-eight patients who received Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery for brain metastases were retrospectively reviewed in this IRB-approved study. 179 irradiated tumors included 42 that locally failed within one-year follow-up. Using SRS tumor volumes, radiomic features were calculated on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images acquired for treatment planning and planned dose maps. 125 radiomic features regarding tumor shape, dose distribution, MR intensities and textures were extracted for each tumor. Logistic regression with automatic feature selection was built to predict tumor progression from local control after SRS. Feature selection and model evaluation using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed in a nested cross validation (CV) scheme. The associations between selected radiomic features and treatment outcomes were statistically assessed by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

The logistic model with feature selection achieved ROC AUC of 0.82 ± 0.09 on 5-fold CV, providing 83% sensitivity and 70% specificity for predicting local failure. A total of 10 radiomic features including 1 shape feature, 6 MR images and 3 dose distribution features were selected. These features were significantly associated with treatment outcomes (p < 0.05). The model was validated on independent holdout data with an AUC of 0.78.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomic features from planning MR images and dose maps provided prognostic information in SRS for brain metastases. A model built on the radiomic features shows promise for early prediction of tumor local failure after treatment, potentially aiding in personalized care for brain metastases.

Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

This evidence report synthesizes the available evidence on radiation therapy for brain metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The literature search included PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov, and published guidelines in July 2020; independently submitted data, expert consultation, and contacting authors. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and large observational studies (for safety assessments), evaluating whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone or in combination, as initial or postoperative treatment, with or without systemic therapy for adults with brain metastases due to lung cancer, breast cancer, or melanoma.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven studies reported in 189 publications were identified, but the number of analyses was limited owing to different intervention and comparator combinations as well as insufficient reporting of outcome data. Risk of bias varied, and 25 trials were terminated early, predominantly owing to poor accrual. The combination of SRS plus WBRT compared with SRS alone or WBRT alone showed no statistically significant difference in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69%-1.73%; 4 RCTs) or death owing to brain metastases (relative risk [RR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.48%-1.81%; 3 RCTs). Radiation therapy after surgery did not improve overall survival compared with surgery alone (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.76%-1.26%; 5 RCTs). Data for quality of life, functional status, and cognitive effects were insufficient to determine effects of WBRT, SRS, or postsurgery interventions. We did not find systematic differences across interventions in serious adverse events, number of adverse events, radiation necrosis, fatigue, or seizures. WBRT plus systemic therapy (RR 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03%-2.00%; 14 studies) was associated with increased risks for vomiting compared with WBRT alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the substantial research literature on radiation therapy, comparative effectiveness information is limited. There is a need for more data on patient-relevant outcomes such as quality of life, functional status, and cognitive effects.

Local ablative therapy of brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer: benefits and limitations

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumors and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are responsible for BM more than any other solid tumor. Its frequency is increasing due to of the availability of new imaging techniques, earlier diagnosis and improvement in treatment techniques and survival rates. NSCLC patients with BM represent heterogeneous prognostic group. The possibility of better prognostic stratification associated with more systemic therapy options and imaging and radiation technology advances have led to an increment of evaluation and indication of local ablative radiotherapy. The definite increment in quality of life and the potential overall survival (OS) benefit of its indication must be balanced with eventual higher risk of brain disseminated disease when whole brain irradiation is postponed. Therefore, a multidisciplinary evaluation is recommended to refine and personalize the therapeutic approach. The development of clinical nomograms or evaluation of circulating tumor cells/tumoral DNA that predict the survival free of new lesions may be the tools that will warranty further optimization of the treatment of NSCLC patients with BM. In this review, we report the main aspects of diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic options and dilemmas evolving local ablative radiotherapy essentially based on seminal, updated prospective studies and ongoing trials.

WBRT for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: for whom and when?-Contemporary point of view

The incidence of brain metastases (BM) is estimated between 20% and 40% of patients with solid cancer. The most common cause of this failure is lung cancer, and in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BM represent a common site of relapse in 30-55% cases. The basic criteria of therapeutic decision-making are based on the significant prognostic factors which are components of prognostic scores. The standard approach to treatment of BM from NSCLC include whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) which is used as adjuvant modality after local therapy (surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery) or as primary treatment and it remains the primary modality of treatment for patients with multiple metastases. WBRT is also used in combination with systemic therapy. The aim of presented review of literature is trying to answer which patients with BM from NSCLC should receive WBRT and when it could be omitted. There were presented the aspects of application of WBRT in relation to (I) choice between WBRT or the best supportive care and (II) employment of WBRT in combination with local treatment modalities [surgical resection or stereotactic radio-surgery (SRS)] and/or with systemic therapy. According to data from literature we concluded that the most important factor that needs to be considered when assessing the suitability of a patient for WBRT is the patient's prognosis based on the Lung-molGPA score. WBRT should be applied in treatment of multiple BM from lung cancer in patients with favourable prognosis and in in patients with presence of EML4-ALK translocation before therapy with crizotinib. Whereas WBRT could be omitted in patients with poor prognosis and after primary SRS.