Surveillance for factor VIII inhibitor development in the Canadian Hemophilia A population following the widespread introduction of recombinant factor VIII replacement therapy

Emerging therapies for hemophilia: controversies and unanswered questions

Several new therapies for hemophilia have emerged in recent years. These strategies range from extended half-life factor replacement products and non-factor options with improved pharmacokinetic profiles to gene therapy aiming for phenotypic cure. While these products have the potential to change hemophilia care dramatically, several challenges and questions remain regarding broader applicability, long-term safety, and which option to pursue for each patient. Here, we review these emerging therapies with a focus on controversies and unanswered questions in each category.

Prospective surveillance study of haemophilia A patients switching from moroctocog alfa or other factor VIII products to moroctocog alfa albumin-free cell culture (AF-CC) in usual care settings

This prospective, open-label, postauthorisation safety surveillance study assessed clinically significant inhibitor development in patients with severe haemophilia A transitioning from moroctocog alfa or other factor VIII (FVIII) replacement products to reformulated moroctocog alfa (AF-CC). Males aged12 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C) < 1 IU/dl), > 150 exposure days (EDs) to recombinant or plasma-derived FVIII products, and no detectable inhibitor at screening were enrolled. Primary end point was the incidence of clinically significant FVIII inhibitor development. Secondary end points included annualised bleeding rate (ABR), less-than-expected therapeutic effect (LETE), and FVIII recovery. Patients were assigned to one of two cohorts based on whether they were transitioning to moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) from moroctocog alfa (cohort 1; n=146) or from another recombinant or plasma-derived FVIII product (cohort 2; n=62). Mean number of EDs on study was 94 (range, 1–139). Six positive FVIII inhibitor results, as determined by local laboratories, were reported in four patients; none were confirmed by a central laboratory, no inhibitor-related clinical manifestations were reported, and all anti-FVIII antibody assays were negative. Median ABRs were 23.4 and 3.4 in patients categorised at baseline as following on-demand and prophylactic regimens, respectively; 86.5 % of bleeding episodes resolved after one infusion. LETE incidence was 0.06 % and 0.19 % in the on-demand and prophylaxis settings, respectively. FVIII recovery remained constant throughout the study. No new safety concerns were identified. This study found no increased risk of clinically significant FVIII inhibitor development in patients transitioning from moroctocog alfa or other FVIII replacement products to moroctocog alfa (AF-CC).

Joint WFH-ISTH session: issues in clinical trial design

Haemophilia therapy is experiencing an unprecedented expansion in the number and novelty of clotting factor concentrates. Every product must be licensed by regulatory authorities, primarily on the basis of its safety and efficacy profiles. The low prevalence of haemophilia, and other inherited bleeding disorders, presents a significant challenge to patient recruitment for preauthorization clinical trials, especially given the low frequency of inhibitory antibodies, the major adverse event related to clotting factor exposure. Other challenges include a lack of harmonization between the major regulatory authorities in certain key areas, the selection of laboratory monitoring methodologies and the difficulty in obtaining high-quality phase IV safety data following authorization. These aspects will be reviewed in this session, which will also highlight the roles played by the World Federation of Hemophilia and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis in the promotion of these discussions.

Recombinant factor IX (BAX326) in previously treated paediatric patients with haemophilia B: a prospective clinical trial

A newly developed recombinant factor IX (BAX326(1) ) was investigated for prophylactic use in paediatric patients aged <12 years with severe (FIX level <1%) or moderately severe (FIX level 1-2%) haemophilia B. The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to assess the safety, haemostatic efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile of BAX326 in previously treated paediatric patients. BAX326 was administered as prophylaxis twice a week for a period of 6 months, and on demand for treatment of bleeds. Safety was assessed by the occurrence of related AEs, thrombotic events and immunologic assessments. Efficacy was evaluated by annualized bleeding rate (ABR), and by treatment response rating (excellent, good, fair, none). PK was assessed over 72 h. None of the 23 treated paediatric subjects had treatment-related SAEs or AEs. There were no thrombotic events, inhibitory or specific binding antibodies against FIX, rFurin or CHO protein. Twenty-six bleeds (19 non-joint vs. 7 joint bleeds) occurred (mean ABR 2.7 ± 3.14, median 2.0), of which 23 were injury-related. Twenty subjects (87%) did not experience any bleeds of spontaneous aetiology. Haemostatic efficacy of BAX326 was excellent or good for >96% of bleeds (100% of minor, 88.9% of moderate and 100% of major bleeds); the majority (88.5%) resolved after 1-2 infusions. Longer T1/2 and lower IR were observed in younger children (<6 years) compared to those aged 6 to 12 years. BAX326 administered as prophylactic treatment as well as for controlling bleeds is efficacious and safe in paediatric patients aged <12 years with haemophilia B.

Switching clotting factor concentrates: considerations in estimating the risk of immunogenicity

The development of neutralizing antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) is the most serious complication of therapy for haemophilia A. There is now excellent documentation that a large number of both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the risk of FVIII inhibitor incidence. One of the environmental factors that has been proposed as an influence on this complication is the occurrence of FVIII product switching. There are only a small number of clinical studies that have addressed this question, and thus, the amount of objective information available to assess this association is limited. In this review, in addition to summarizing past evidence pertinent to this subject, we present the results of a complementary strategy, a Delphi analysis, to add to the considerations of product switching and FVIII immunogenicity. With the imminent arrival in the clinic of several new FVIII products, the haemophilia community must be prepared to collect prospectively controlled data to better address this important management issue.

The role of natural VWF/FVIII complex concentrates in contemporary haemophilia care: a guideline for the next decade

Current treatment for haemophilia provides excellent efficacy and safety albeit with a number of unresolved issues. The development of inhibitors following treatment with factor VIII (FVIII) is the most challenging complication of haemophilia and bears the highest economic burden for a chronic disease. Moreover, prophylactic therapy for haemophilia requires repeated infusions of FVIII, frequently as often as two or three times weekly, which can impact greatly on patients' daily lives. As considerable scope remains for further advancements in the management of this condition, the primary focus of this paper relates to issues regarding current treatment and strategies in place to resolve the various issues. For countries approaching access to replacement therapy, it is important to know whether or not plasma-derived and recombinant products are associated with different risks of inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia. The ongoing international SIPPET study is expected to provide an answer to this clinical dilemma. Methods under investigation to prolong the half-life of factor concentrates offer new hope to reduce the burden of prophylaxis for patients with haemophilia, with early results suggesting greater benefits with FIX.

Clotting factor concentrate switching and inhibitor development in hemophilia A

The development of alloantibodies or inhibitors is the most serious complication a patient with severe hemophilia can experience from treatment with clotting factor concentrates. Although common in previously untreated patients, inhibitor development is rare in multiply exposed, well-tolerized patients. There has been a nonevidence-based reluctance to change concentrate because of a perceived greater inhibitor risk after the switch, even though most patients are now likely to be using a concentrate on which they did not begin. Inhibitors in previously treated patients are observed in approximately 2 per 1000 patient/years, which makes it difficult to study and compare rates among different products. Because the baseline inhibitor risk in previously treated patients may vary over time, it is important to compare the risk in patients switching to a new product with that in a parallel control group of nonswitching patients or within a case-controlled study. The study designs imposed by regulators are suboptimal in detecting immunogenicity signals. The issue of immunogenicity of new products is likely to gain more relevance in the near future, with a call for effective postmarketing surveillance studies for all of the new engineered factor VIII concentrates with prolonged half-lives that are likely to enter clinical practice.

How we choose factor VIII to treat hemophilia

In high-income countries, the large availability of coagulation factors for replacement therapy of patients with hemophilia A has raised the life expectancy of these lifelong bleeders to that of males from the general population. The practicing clinician is offered a multitude of choices among several commercial brands of factor VIII extracted from human plasma or engineered from mammalian cell cultures by means of recombinant DNA technology. This article has the goal to offer our opinions on how to choose among the different products, that we consider interchangeable relevant to their clinical efficacy in the control of bleeding and safety from pathogen transmission. Hence, the main determinants of our choices are price and the risk of occurrence of factor VIII inhibitory alloantibodies. With this as background, we present the rationale underlying the choices for different categories of patients with severe hemophilia A: previously untreated patients, multiply treated patients, and patients undergoing immune tolerance induction with large doses of factor VIII to eradicate inhibitors. Mention is also made to the possible strategies that should be implemented to make available coagulation factors for replacement therapy in developing countries.

Can B-domain deletion alter the immunogenicity of recombinant factor VIII? A meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies

BACKGROUND

As a result of the infrequency of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A and the small size of available clinical studies, the immunogenicity of factor (F)VIII products has been difficult to assess.

OBJECTIVES

A meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies was conducted to test the hypothesis that de novo inhibitor incidence differs between PTPs receiving full-length recombinant FVIII (FL-rFVIII) and B-domain deleted recombinant FVIII (BDD-rFVIII).

METHODS

Prospective studies with data on inhibitors in PTPs receiving FL-rFVIII or BDD-rFVIII were sought using systematic methods including bibliographic database searches. Data were secured from published study reports and inquiries to investigators. Between-group differences in inhibitor incidence rates were evaluated using mixed effects Cox regression.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies with 3012 total PTPs were included. Patients were at risk of de novo inhibitor development for a median of 79 exposure days. A total of 35 de novo inhibitors were observed. The cumulative hazard for all de novo inhibitors was 1.25% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.63-1.88%. The corresponding rate for high-titer de novo inhibitors [> 5 Bethesda units (BU)] was 0.29% (CI, 0.01-0.57%). Exposure to BDD-rFVIII was associated with an increased risk of all de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 7.26; CI, 2.12-24.9; P = 0.0016) and of high-titer de novo inhibitors (hazard ratio, 10.8; CI, 2.17-53.7; P = 0.0037), compared with FL-rFVIII.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies suggests that recombinant FVIII products may differ in immunogenicity.

The case for wider use of recombinant factor VIII concentrates

The introduction of clotting factor concentrates led to major advances in hemophilia care. Rather than simply providing an alternative to plasma-derived concentrates, the introduction in the 1990s of recombinant concentrates added value to replacement therapy particularly with respect to prophylaxis and immune-tolerance induction. While the safety of plasma-derived concentrates has improved considerably, these concentrates may still pose an infectious risk through as-yet unknown pathogens and poor impurity constituent characterization. Recombinant concentrates are increasingly used because of their benefits in pathogen safety, convenience and the potential for unfettered supply. Yet worldwide they remain accessible only to a limited number of patients due to fear of the potential for inhibitor development, overestimation of their costs and underestimation of their benefits. This article reviews the characteristics and properties of recombinant FVIII concentrates to help physicians and patient representatives promote the right of access of patients to the safest products.

Incidence of factor VIII inhibitors throughout life in severe hemophilia A in the United Kingdom

The age-adjusted incidence of new factor VIII inhibitors was analyzed in all United Kingdom patients with severe hemophilia A between 1990 and 2009. Three hundred fifteen new inhibitors were reported to the National Hemophilia Database in 2528 patients with severe hemophilia who were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 12 (4-19) years. One hundred sixty (51%) of these arose in patients ≥ 5 years of age after a median (interquartile range) of 6 (4-11) years' follow-up. The incidence of new inhibitors was 64.29 per 1000 treatment-years in patients < 5 years of age and 5.31 per 1000 treatment-years at age 10-49 years, rising significantly (P = .01) to 10.49 per 1000 treatment-years in patients more than 60 years of age. Factor VIII inhibitors arise in patients with hemophilia A throughout life with a bimodal risk, being greatest in early childhood and in old age. HIV was associated with significantly fewer new inhibitors. The inhibitor incidence rate ratio in HIV-seropositive patients was 0.32 times that observed in HIV-seronegative patients (P < .001). Further study is required to explore the natural history of later-onset factor VIII inhibitors and to investigate other potential risk factors for inhibitor development in previously treated patients.

Harmonization of clinical trial guidelines for assessing the risk of inhibitor development in hemophilia A treatment

At the present time, the most significant complication of hemophilia therapy is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) to factor (F) VIII, which adds greatly to the difficulty and expense of preventing and treating bleeding episodes. Both patient-related and therapy-related variables contribute to the development of inhibitors. The multifactorial nature of inhibitor development and the relatively small numbers of patients that participate in clinical trials make it difficult to accurately assess the risk of inhibitor development. Adding to that challenge is the lack of a uniform standard of design for conducting clinical trials to evaluate the safety of FVIII products. This hinders the comparison of products and is an obstacle to the meta-analysis necessary to make statistically valid assessments of inhibitor risk. This article reviews similarities and differences in clinical trial guidelines of European and US regulatory agencies and discusses the need for their harmonization to facilitate the assessment of FVIII products.

Inhibitors in previously treated patients: a review of the literature

Previously treated patients are the first patients to receive novel factor VIII products during clinical investigations under the rationale that a product with increased antigenicity is more likely to be detected in this population because of a low baseline risk of inhibitor formation compared with previously untreated patients. As clinical investigations of factor products are not typically randomized comparisons, the rate of new inhibitor formation in a clinical trial is compared with the expected rates based on prior reports. The published experience of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) informs the number of new inhibitors per cohort that are acceptable in a clinical trial. However, a single acceptable limit of new inhibitors fails to recognize the heterogeneity of inhibitors and their variable impact on clinical care. This review will discuss the published literature on epidemiology and clinical characteristics of inhibitors and possible risk factors for formation in PTPs.

Non-genetic risk factors and the development of inhibitors in haemophilia: a comprehensive review and consensus report

SUMMARY

The development of inhibitors to the infused factor in patients with haemophilia is a serious clinical problem. Recent evidence suggests that alongside the strong genetic contribution to inhibitor formation, there are a number of non-genetic factors--perceived by the immune system as danger signals--which promote formation of inhibitors. This study provides a comprehensive review of clinical studies relating to these factors and also presents a survey of opinion concerning their importance and clinical influence, conducted among the members of the European Haemophilia Treatment Standardisation Board (EHTSB). Taken together, this information highlights the lack of robust data concerning the influence of several non-genetic risk factors on inhibitor development, and an urgent need for prospective, well-conducted studies that adhere to recommendations made by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) for studying inhibitors. Based on current literature, the EHTSB formulated consensus recommendations. It is desirable to minimize intensive treatment wherever possible, given the clinical situation. Prophylaxis should be offered to all children, although we still need to determine optimal dosing with respect to inhibitor development, and age for starting treatment. Vaccinations should be given subcutaneously and concomitant factor concentrate infusions avoided. According to the board, there is no evidence in the literature supporting suggestions that the type of concentrate influences inhibitor risk; but all patients should be monitored during their first exposures. Furthermore, there is no evidence to support an association between pregnancy-related issues, breast feeding and treatment-related factors (e.g. route of administration, or use of blood components) and inhibitor development.

Review of antihemophilic factor injection for the routine prophylaxis of bleeding episodes and risk of joint damage in severe hemophilia A

Individuals with severe factor VIII deficiency experience recurrent hemorrhages and develop progressive joint damage. Large retrospective, nonrandomized studies of patient cohorts followed over decades show that factor prophylaxis initiated at an early age before the onset of recurrent bleeding reduces the incidence of hemophilic arthropathy. Two recent prospective, multicenter, randomized trials conducted in Europe (the ESPRIT study) and the USA (the Joint Outcome Study) confirm the efficacy of prophylaxis in the prevention of hemarthroses and arthropathy. Regular prophylaxis initiated in early childhood enhances the quality of life for patients with severe hemophilia and reduces the risk of inhibitor development. The substantial costs of such preventative therapy may be offset by the reduced expenditures that the care of degenerative joint disease in adult hemophilia patients would otherwise require.

Evolution of recombinant factor VIII safety: KOGENATE and Kogenate FS/Bayer

The use of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in the treatment of hemophilia A has raised important safety issues, historically of pathogen transmission and increasingly of inhibitor development to FVIII treatment. While manufacturing processes of current recombinant FVIII products have been shaped entirely around preventing pathogen transmission, the same modifications that afford a greater margin of safety could affect immunogenicity of the product, consequences of which could only be seen through long-term clinical experience. This review summarizes pathogen safety and inhibitor reports from clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance studies, and study reports on KOGENATE and its successor, Kogenate FS/Bayer. Although KOGENATE and Kogenate FS/Bayer are nearly identical products, subtle manufacturing improvements to address the need for greater margins of safety from a pathogen transmission perspective have also led to a potentially improved immunogenicity profile (15% in previously untreated/minimally treated patients with severe hemophilia A for Kogenate FS/Bayer). Notably, there has been no occurrence of pathogen contamination, and minimal de novo inhibitor formation in previously treated patients throughout the use of both products. Overall, KOGENATE and Kogenate FS/Bayer have a long history of safety in a variety of clinical settings, including treatment of bleeding, surgical management, and prophylaxis therapy.

Current challenges of pharmacovigilance in bleeding disorders: converting the burden to benefit

SUMMARY

Safety surveillance studies have proven essential in research and development of new biological therapies for bleeding disorders as well as other diseases. Although product safety regarding HIV, hepatitis, and other blood-borne infections is currently excellent, potential new infectious agents require continued vigilant monitoring. Inhibitor development is the most common serious side effect of haemophilia replacement therapy. Several aetiological factors associated with inhibitors have been identified, but their true impact is still largely unknown. Moreover, whether plasma-derived and recombinant factor products differ in their immunogenic profiles is an unresolved issue. Coagulation factor products under development and those currently on the market require uniform, long-term surveillance. The European Haemophilia Safety Surveillance (EUHASS) project was recently established to meet these goals. The pharmaceutical industry and clinicians face common challenges complying with these requirements. In rare diseases like haemophilia, obtaining adequate patient numbers poses a challenge. Another challenge is a lack of methods for assessing disease severity, a surprising deficiency in the era of modern medical and laboratory technology. National and international registries can be used to gather required safety surveillance information. Simultaneously, clinicians benefit from well-organized registry data in their daily practice and harmonize the quality of comprehensive haemophilia care by homogeneous follow-up platforms. Experience with such registries comes, for example, from Europe (PEDNET), the USA (CDC/UDC), the UK (UKHCDO), and Sweden (Malmö). It is important to commit to future pharmacovigilance efforts, aiming at high-quality safety surveillance programmes at both the pharmaceutical research community and clinical levels.

Recombinant versus plasma-derived factor VIII products and the development of inhibitors in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A: the CANAL cohort study

It has been suggested that plasma-derived factor VIII products induce fewer inhibitors than recombinant factor VIII products. We investigated the relationship of factor VIII product type and switching between factor VIII products with the risk to develop inhibitors. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 316 patients with severe hemophilia A born between 1990 and 2000. The outcome was clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least 2 positive inhibitor titers with decreased recovery. The risk of inhibitor development was not clearly lower in plasma-derived compared with recombinant factor VIII products (relative risk [RR], 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.3). Among high-titer inhibitors, the possible reduction in risk was even less pronounced (RR, 0.9; CI, 0.5-1.5). Plasma-derived products with considerable quantities of von Willebrand factor (VWF) carried the same risk for inhibitor development as recombinant factor VIII products (RR, 1.0; CI, 0.6-1.6). Switching between factor VIII products did not increase the risk for inhibitors (RR, 1.1; CI, 0.6-1.8). In conclusion, our findings support neither the notion that plasma-derived factor VIII products with considerable concentrations of VWF confer a lower risk to develop inhibitory antibodies than recombinant factor VIII products, nor that switching between factor VIII product brands increases inhibitor risks in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A.

Inhibitor treatment in haemophilias A and B: inhibitor diagnosis

The clinical diagnosis and quantitative measurement of polyclonal IgG inhibiting antibodies are the subjects of this review. Inhibitors in congenital haemophilia are usually diagnosed either as part of a routine surveillance schedule or following a bleeding episode that responds poorly to standard specific replacement therapy. Routine surveillance schedules for paediatric haemophilia A patients during high-risk incidence periods are variable and the subject of ongoing discussion. There have never been any published recommendations for following haemophilia B patients at high risk for inhibitor development. The Factor VIII/IX Subcommittee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis scientifically endorsed the Nijmegen method for inhibitor measurement in 1996. However, there are many unresolved issues surrounding inhibitor diagnosis using these assays. These issues include: (i) questions of accuracy and inter-assay variability inherent to the one-stage clotting assay; (ii) lack of consensus regarding the assay cut-off for negative determination; (iii) lack of assay standardization and (iv) the clinical importance of capturing non-neutralizing antibodies currently not measured in the functional assays. Ongoing efforts to resolve these issues will be discussed.

Epidemiology of inhibitor formation with recombinant factor VIII replacement therapy

This article reviews the epidemiology of inhibitor formation in patients receiving recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) replacement therapy for haemophilia A. Data from pivotal trial programmes, post-marketing surveillance studies, and pharmacovigilance studies for all available rFVIII products were reviewed. To date, no comparative studies have been performed, and in the non-comparative studies, there were differences in the patient population enrolled and study design (including the number of patient exposure days). In the absence of comparative clinical trials, it is not possible to make comparisons between inhibitor data for the various rFVIII products. This review of the epidemiological data shows that across the pivotal trial programmes for rFVIII products, the observed incidence of inhibitors was in the range of 15-32% in previously untreated patients (PUPs) and 0.9-2.9% in previously treated patients (PTPs). High-titre inhibitors (peak >5 BU) were detected in 10-16% of PUPs and 0-2.3% of PTPs. Several initiatives proposed to help standardize collection and interpretation of inhibitor data for patients receiving rFVIII treatment are described. Such standardization would help to clarify the epidemiology of inhibitor formation across FVIII treatments.

Clinical Evaluation of Recombinant Factor VIII Preparation (Kogenate) in Previously Treated Patients with Hemophilia A: Descriptive Meta-Analysis of Post-Marketing Study Data

The safety and efficacy of Kogenate, a recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) preparation for the treatment of bleeding episodes, were studied in a 123-patient meta-analysis population of previously treated patients (PTPs), including 15 enrolled in the registration Phase III trial (PTP-I group), 93 from the post-marketing special investigation (PTP-II group), and 15 from short-term special investigations in surgery or tooth extraction (SI group). These patients (82 severe, 31 moderate, 9 mild, and 1 unknown), aged 11 months to 72 years, were enrolled in 28 centers in Japan. Blood samples taken at the baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after the introduction of Kogenate were evaluated for FVIII inhibitor antibodies, antibodies formed against trace proteins derived from the rFVIII production process, and for general changes in laboratory test results. Mean exposure to Kogenate was 1103 days in PTP-I, 86 days in PTP-II, 27 days in patients in surgery, and 2 days in patients with tooth extraction. Assessment of FVIII inhibitor activity was conducted in 115 of the 123 patients by means of the Bethesda assay. Twelve patients were found to have a low titer of FVIII inhibitor (0.5-3.0 BU/mL) prior to any administration of Kogenate, and 103 were inhibitor-negative at the baseline. Among this latter group, 3 patients (2.9%) tested inhibitor-positive, with titers ranging from 1.2 to 2.1 BU/mL, with 4 patients below 1.0 BU/mL. One patient in the 11 PTPs investigated (PTP-I) developed antibodies against baby hamster kidney protein and mouse immunoglobulin G, but these findings were transient and asymptomatic. Hemostasis was achieved (markedly effective or effective) in 3666 of the 3855 bleeding episodes (95.1%) observed in 108 patients. Only 1 infusion was necessary in 3790 (98.3%) of these episodes. These data indicate that Kogenate is safe and very effective for the treatment of bleeding in PTPs with hemophilia A.

Management of factor VIII inhibitors

The development of inhibitory alloantibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) is a major complication of clotting factor replacement therapy for hemophilia A. Inhibitor development compromises effective hemostasis management in affected individuals and results in higher morbidity and costs of care compared with hemophilic individuals without anti-FVIII antibodies. The therapeutic approach to the management of bleeding in the presence of low- and high-titer inhibitors is founded on the principles of either saturating antibody with excess FVIII or bypassing the FVIII requirement altogether. Although spontaneous antibody disappearance does occur, immune tolerance is often required for antibody eradication. Studies aimed at optimizing this treatment approach and developing newer strategies for inhibitor prevention are ongoing.

Consideration in Hemophilia Therapy Selection

The risk of pathogen transmission via clotting factor therapies has been reduced over the last two decades through the development of effective and progressively more sensitive pathogen screening and inactivation methods and the introduction of recombinant clotting factors for hemophilia, beginning with recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) in 1992. However, new understanding about the potential for transmission of an emerging infectious agent through blood and blood products has renewed concerns about vulnerabilities that remain in plasma-derived and some recombinant clotting therapies that still use plasma components during some stages of the manufacturing process. In the 1980s, patients with hemophilia became "canaries in the coal mine" for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the blood supply. Moving forward, healthcare providers must continue to take a proactive role in educating themselves about new information regarding emerging pathogens and develop approaches to discussing this risk with their patients as part of their therapy selection process.

Management of factor VIII inhibitors

The development of inhibitory alloantibodies to factor VIII is arguably one of the most severe and important complications of clotting factor concentrate exposure in haemophilia A. The development of an inhibitor compromises the ability to effectively manage haemorrhage, resulting in a greater rate of disability, complications and costs of therapy. This chapter briefly reviews the epidemiology, immunobiology, and laboratory evaluation of inhibitors. It discusses the therapeutic approach and management of inhibitors in various clinical settings and also focuses on inhibitor eradication practices (immune tolerance) and newer experimental strategies with potential clinical application for inhibitor prevention.

The physician's role in selecting a factor replacement therapy

Over the past 20 years, transmissions of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus have been virtually eliminated from plasma-derived or recombinant therapy in the USA, a record that can be largely attributed to the use of effective screening and inactivation technologies for known pathogens. The next significant threat will likely come from the emergence of a new, blood-borne infectious disease, perhaps one transmitted by a non-lipid-enveloped virus or prion, for which current inactivation methods are ineffective. Following the HIV crisis of the 1980s, government, patient advocacy groups, medical and scientific communities and the manufacturers of clotting therapies can learn from the past and approach potential threats from emerging pathogens in a proactive and productive manner. For clinicians, this includes actively engaging patients in a dialogue about all the factors that may influence their choice of clotting factor therapies, including emerging pathogens, patient convenience, consistency and reliability of supply, relative cost/benefit ratios, reimbursement issues (where applicable), patient preference and brand loyalty. It is our obligation as healthcare providers to understand potential risks and help make proactive decisions with our patients, decisions that often must be made in an environment of scientific uncertainty. Threats from infectious agents that were once deemed theoretical can, and often do, ultimately become real, with serious implications for morbidity and mortality.

Optimal haemophilia care versus the reality

Haemophilia A and B are inherited bleeding disorders whose diagnosis and management is generally well established and best provided by specialists in a comprehensive care setting. Patients may be put at unnecessary risk if appropriate expertise is not sought for the management of accidents and surgery. The delivery of a high quality comprehensive service to patients with bleeding disorders depends upon defined standards and a network of haemophilia centres in the UK with similar models in other countries. In developing countries, despite a shortage or absence of treatment products, development of local expertise results in an improved outlook and reduction in mortality. Optimal care for severe haemophilia includes accurate diagnosis, early and adequate factor replacement for bleeding episodes and the provision of prophylaxis from an early age to prevent joint bleeding and the consequent arthropathy. Haemophilia treatment is expensive resulting in considerable inequity in provision of care across the world. Despite decades of experience, optimal treatment levels are not robustly defined. Transfusion-transmitted infections continue to have a significant impact on patient management. The development of inhibitory antibodies seriously complicates the management both in morbidity and cost. While gene therapy has not yet produced the hoped-for cure, new technologies will produce improved products.

The promise and challenges of bioengineered recombinant clotting factors

The past 10 years of clinical experience have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of recombinant clotting factors. With the adoption of prophylactic strategies, there has been considerable progress in avoiding the complications of hemophilia. Now, insights from our understanding of clotting factor structure and function, mechanisms of hemophilia and inhibitors, gene therapy advances and a worldwide demand for clotting factor concentrates leave us on the brink of embracing targeted bioengineering strategies to further improve hemophilia therapeutics. The ability to bioengineer recombinant clotting factors with improved function holds promise to overcome some of the limitations in current treatment, the high costs of therapy and increase availability to a broader world hemophilia population. Most research has been directed at overcoming the inherent limitations of rFVIII expression and the inhibitor response. This includes techniques to improve rFVIII biosynthesis and secretion, functional activity, half-life and antigenicity/immunogenicity. Some of these proteins have already reached commercialization and have been utilized in gene therapy strategies, while others are being evaluated in pre-clinical studies. These novel proteins partnered with advances in gene transfer vector design and delivery may ultimately achieve persistent expression of FVIII leading to an effective long-term treatment strategy for hemophilia A. In addition, these novel FVIII proteins could be partnered with new advances in alternative recombinant protein production in transgenic animals yielding an affordable, more abundant supply of rFVIII. Novel rFIX proteins are being considered for gene therapy strategies whereas novel rVIIa proteins are being evaluated to improve the potency and extend their plasma half-life. This review will summarize the status of current recombinant clotting factors and the development and challenges of recombinant clotting factors bioengineered for improved function.

A Bayesian approach to the assessment of inhibitor risk in studies of factor VIII concentrates

The assessment of inhibitor risk is a crucial component in the clinical development of new and modified factor VIII (FVIII) preparations. There has been a recent discussion about the design of studies and the assessment of inhibitors and inhibitor risk in such studies at a recent FDA-sponsored FVIII Inhibitor Workshop, and new requirements for the success of these trials have been proposed to evaluate inhibitor data based on the use of an upper 95% confidence bound. We review the consequences of these requirements and demonstrate that for any product to succeed, it must have an extremely low underlying risk of inhibitor development. Furthermore, several existing commercially available FVIII products with an excellent safety record would not necessarily pass these endpoints. As a result, we propose an alternative set of acceptance criteria based on a Bayesian statistical paradigm. This approach is based on the determination of a probability that the product in question actually has an inhibitor risk below some pre-set limit, a concept that we believe is more intuitive than the traditional confidence interval method. We show that all existing products would pass this approach, but a product (Bisinact) with known inhibitor risk would not.

Inhibitors in congenital coagulation disorders

The development of inhibitory 'allo' antibodies to a deficient coagulation factor is arguably now the most severe and important complication of clotting factor concentrate exposure in haemophilia and other congenital coagulation disorders. Furthermore, development of an inhibitor to the factor VIII or factor IX transgene product remains a significant concern in gene therapy protocols for haemophilia. Although the development of an inhibitor does not usually change the rate, initial severity or pattern of bleeding, it does compromise the ability to manage haemorrhage in affected individuals, resulting in a greater rate of complications, cost and disability. The purpose of this review is to summarize current understanding of the epidemiology, immunobiology, laboratory evaluation and management of inhibitors arising in patients with congenital coagulation disorders. An attempt has been made to focus on recent advances in the immunology of inhibitors, and to speculate on their potential clinical application.