Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts

Concurrent Coprimary KIT Exon 17 and BRAF Mutations in a Small Intestinal GI Stromal Tumor-A Case Report

PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare neoplasms driven by mutations in KIT, PDGFRA, or BRAF. Concomitant KIT/BRAF mutations are exceptionally rare and have historically been regarded as mutually exclusive. We report the first documented instance of a GIST with concurrent KIT exon 17 (D816H) and BRAF exon 15 (V600E) mutations, exploring the implications of these mutations for treatment and prognosis. KIT exon 17 mutations are rare and associated with imatinib resistance, and the literature on concurrent KIT/PDGFRA and BRAF mutations is limited, highlighting the potential of this case to provide valuable insights into the management of similar tumors.

METHODS

A 70-year-old woman presented with abdominal pain and a 20-year history of intermittent melena. Imaging and histopathological examination confirmed a duodenal GIST. The patient underwent en bloc tumor resection, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) identified co-occurring KIT exon 17 (D816H) and BRAF exon 15 (V600E) mutations. Postoperatively, the patient received adjuvant imatinib therapy for a planned duration of 3 years.

RESULTS

The patient tolerated adjuvant imatinib therapy well, experiencing only mild nausea and diarrhea. After 2 years of follow-up, no recurrence of the tumor was detected, and the patient remained in radiological remission with no signs of metastasis or tumor progression.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates a favorable outcome in a patient with localized GIST with concomitant KIT exon 17 and BRAF mutations following surgical resection with no evidence of recurrence. These findings underscore the significance of early comprehensive genotyping in GISTs to guide therapy and predict imatinib resistance.

Endoscopic versus laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors at the esophagogastric junction using propensity score matching analysis

The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) has a complex anatomy and critical physiological functions, making postoperative quality of life an important consideration in the surgical resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors at this location (EGJ-GISTs). We conducted a propensity score-matched (1:1) analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection (ER) and laparoscopic resection (LR) for patients with EGJ-GIST treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China, from December 2013 to November 2023. We reviewed 176 patients (ER 82; LR 94) with EGJ-GIST, of whom 85 patients with a tumor size of 2-5 cm met the matching criteria (ER 42; LR 43), yielding 20 pairs of patients. ER showed advantages over LR, with a shorter postoperative nil per os time (4.0 days (IQRs, 3.0-5.0) vs. 5.5 days (IQRs, 4.3-7.8), p = 0.005) and postoperative hospitalization time (6.0 days (IQRs, 5.0-6.8) vs. 8.5 days (IQRs, 6.0-11.8, p = 0.002). Long-term adverse events were significantly lower in the ER group (15% vs. 55%, p = 0.005). No recurrence or metastasis was observed in either group during a mean follow-up of 42.3 months. These findings suggest that for 2-5 cm EGJ-GISTs, ER is a safe and effective alternative, offering minimal invasiveness, faster recovery, fewer complications, and improved long-term quality of life.

Minimally invasive treatment strategies for submucosal tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract: Advances in innovative endoscopy-based therapies

The increasing detection of submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI) is due to the increased clinical use of endoscopy and imaging technology. Some of these SMTs have malignant potential and may cause clinical symptoms. Thus, it is recommended in clinical guidelines to consider resection of these SMTs. Endoscopic techniques have become widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of SMT in the UGI as compared with traditional surgery due to their advantages of minimally invasive, quick recovery, and economical cost. Recently, new endoscopic techniques and instruments have been continuously implemented, leading to revolutionary innovation in endoscopic treatments. However, the safety and efficacy of these innovative techniques remain unclear. Therefore, we have comprehensively summarized the various techniques used in the treatment of UGI tumors in recent years, evaluated the indications and effects of each technique, and compared their benefits and disadvantages. We hope that this review will provide a more comprehensive reference for clinical and endoscopic practitioners, and help them develop more individualized treatment plans for different patients. This will ultimately expand the patient population that can benefit from these innovative technologies.

Potential biomarkers for the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

In this editorial we comment on the article published in the recent issue of World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. This study aims to explore the relationship between preoperative inflammation markers and the recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after surgery. It is well known that the best-documented prognostic parameters for GIST are mitotic activity, tumor size and anatomical site. Besides, mutation status represents a prognostic as well as predictive factor. This study provides a new tool for postoperative recurrence risk assessment of GIST patients by establishing a line chart prediction model, which is certificated by previous research that high platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio correlated with increased tumour sizes, more advanced tumour stages and mitotic index. However, as a retrospective study, inevitable bias exists in the results; furthermore, the sample size of this study is relatively small, influencing the universality of the results. Moreover, when assessing risk rating and prognosis of GIST, some novel inflammatory makers could be taken into consideration, such as proenkephalin and SLITRK3. Overall, this study can offer an additional model for GIST prognosis and recurrence risk assessment, independent of the traditional prognostic factors of GIST.

Next questions on gastrointestinal stromal tumors: unresolved challenges and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite remarkable progress in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), critical challenges persist. Key aspects such as risk stratification, the optimal duration of adjuvant therapy, and strategies to enhance the efficacy of first-line treatment remain subjects of ongoing debate. This review explores emerging concepts and innovative approaches aimed at refining patient selection and optimizing therapeutic decision-making to further improve clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular and genomic parameters have the potential to enhance traditional risk models, enabling more precise stratification of high-risk patients. Innovations in artificial intelligence and liquid biopsy are emerging as powerful tools for refining predictions of recurrence and treatment response. Meanwhile, the definition and prognostic significance of tumor rupture remain pivotal challenges that influence both risk assessment and adjuvant therapy decisions. Furthermore, transcriptomic and multiomic analyses have unveiled distinct GIST subtypes with significant prognostic and therapeutic implications, paving the way for more tailored treatment strategies.

SUMMARY

Integrating molecular features into clinical decision making may refine risk assessment and personalize the treatment in patients with GIST. Future research should focus on validating these tools and redefine clinical trial designs to accelerate drug development for this rare disease.

A Large Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor under the Disguise of a Gastric Diverticulum: Report of a Case and Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a relatively rare clinical entity. They usually appear as solid masses in numerous locations throughout the gastrointestinal tract, varying in size and typically exhibiting extraluminal expansion along with a range of nonspecific symptoms. The exophytic growth pattern of these tumors may occasionally complicate the differential diagnosis from other medical conditions with similar clinical and imaging findings.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a case of a 46-year-old male patient who presented to the emergency department with symptoms of upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage. Initial endoscopic findings suggested a large gastric diverticulum. Surprisingly, further investigation with computed tomography and a second endoscopy with biopsy sampling revealed that the stomach wall outpouching was actually a disguised, oversized gastric GIST. The patient underwent a posterior wall sleeve gastrectomy en bloc with the mass, the spleen, and the tail of the pancreas and recovered uneventfully. Daily administration of imatinib as adjuvant therapy was included in the treatment plan. No recurrence was observed even up to the 4-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

GISTs are uncommon tumors with the ability to masquerade as gastrointestinal tract diverticula, causing diagnostic confusion. Nevertheless, high clinical suspicion combined with a thorough clinical and imaging evaluation can ultimately lead to the correct diagnosis and an appropriate treatment plan.

Surgical management of rare tumors (Part 1)

With an annual cumulative occurrence of approximately 15,000 in North America, all childhood cancers are rare. Very rare cancers as defined by both the European Cooperative Study Group for Rare Pediatric Cancers and the Children's Oncology Group fall into two principal categories: those so uncommon (fewer than 2 cases/million) that their study is challenging even through cooperative group efforts (e.g., pleuropulmonary blastoma and desmoplastic small round cell tumor) and those that are far more common in adults and therefore rarely studied in children (e.g., thyroid, melanoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor). Treatment strategies for these latter tumors are typically based on adult guidelines, although the pediatric variants of these tumors may harbor different genetic signatures and demonstrate different behavior. If melanoma and differentiated thyroid cancer are excluded, other rare cancer types account for only 2% of the cancers in children aged 0 to 14. This article highlights several of the most common rare tumor types.

Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Background

Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST) is a rare subtype of gastrointestinal stromal tumor, with limited information on its clinical characteristics and prognostic factors. This study aims to identify the risk factors affecting survival in EGIST patients and to develop a prognostic nomogram for predicting EGIST-specific survival (TSS).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with EGIST, aged 18 to 80, were enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Research Plus database, covering the years 2000 to 2019. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for developing a nomogram. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was evaluated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and the concordance index. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess the nomogram's clinical utility and net benefit for application in clinical practice. Additionally, the nomogram's performance was compared with the tumor SEER stage.

Results

A total of 389 patients were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified age, household income, surgery, tumor grade, tumor size, and tumor SEER stage as significant predictors of TSS (all P<0.05). These factors were incorporated into the prognostic nomogram. The nomogram demonstrated superior prognostic value compared to the tumor SEER stage alone, as evidenced by the area under the curve and concordance index. The calibration plot indicated a high level of accuracy in forecasting survival probabilities. Furthermore, DCA highlighted the nomogram's clinical applicability and positive net benefit. The nomogram also proved more effective than the tumor SEER stage alone in identifying patients with poorer prognoses.

Conclusions

Age, household income, surgery, tumor grade, tumor size, and tumor SEER stage were identified as risk factors for TSS in patients with EGIST. We have developed and validated a prognostic nomogram to predict TSS in EGIST patients, which may improve patient management and guide personalized medical treatment for EGIST.

Endoscopic treatment outcome of oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours

BACKGROUND

There are few clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical results for oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Thus, the objective of this study was to identify the clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical results of oesophageal GISTs.

AIM

To investigate endoscopic treatment effective of oesophageal GISTs.

METHODS

It was retrospective research that collected 32 patients with oesophageal GISTs treated by endoscopic resection (ER) between January 2012 and January 2023 in two Hospital. Clinicopathologic, endoscopic records, and follow-up data were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients underwent en bloc resection and 24 (75.0%) lesions underwent R0 resection. The size of GISTs was 2.12 ± 1.88 cm. The overall complication rate was 25.0%, including hydrothorax and post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome. The mean mitotic index was 3.34 ± 5.04 (median, 1.50; range, 1.00-4.00). Eighteen (56.3%), 6 (18.8%), 2 (6.3%), and 6 (18.8%) patients were identified as very low, low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively. Three patients developed recurrence after a median follow-up of 64.69 ± 33.13 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 100%, and the disease-free survival rate was 90.6%.

CONCLUSION

ER is safe and effective for patients with low-risk oesophageal GISTs. Early detection of oesophageal GISTs is essential to achieve a favourable prognosis.

Survival trends of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in real-world settings: a population-based retrospective study

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate whether survival outcomes for GIST patients have improved over the past decades and to identify the specific patient subgroups that have benefited from advances in treatment.

Patients and methods

A total of 4,127 GIST patients diagnosed between January 1980, and December 2019, were included in this study using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-9 Registries. Survival differences among GIST patients were analyzed across five time periods (1980-1999, 2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019) and within demographic, neoplastic, temporal, economic, and geographic categories using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression models were employed to identify risk factors associated with GIST-specific survival. Associations between time periods and GIST-specific mortality (TSM) were examined using a multivariable Cox regression model.

Results

Survival outcomes for GIST patients significantly improved in the 2000-2009 period but showed no substantial improvement in the 2010-2019 period. After adjusting for age, gender, tumor location, ethnicity, tumor stage, median household income, and geographic area, the multivariable Cox regression models revealed that older age (≥65 years) (HR = 1.977, 95% CI = 1.470-2.657), tumors located outside the gastrointestinal tract (HR = 1.505, 95% CI = 1.267-1.786), regional lesions (HR = 2.225, 95% CI = 1.828-2.708), and distant lesions (HR = 5.177, 95% CI = 4.417-6.069) were independent risk factors for TSM (p < 0.05). After adjusting for time periods and age, gender, tumor location, tumor stage, median household income, patients in 2000-2004 (HR = 0.662, 95% CI = 0.523-0.839), 2005-2009 (HR = 0.431, 95% CI = 0.339-0.549), 2010-2014 (HR = 0.437, 95% CI = 0.341-0.561), and 2015-2019 (HR = 0.365, 95% CI = 0.273-0.489) had a significantly lower risk of TSM than patients in 1980-1999 (p < 0.05). Similarly, patients in 2005-2009 (HR = 0.661, 95% CI = 0.555-0.788), 2010-2014 (HR = 0.696, 95% CI = 0.578-0.838), and 2015-2019 (HR = 0.607, 95% CI = 0.476-0.773) also had a significantly lower risk of TSM than patients in 2000-2004 (p < 0.05). However, patients in 2010-2014 (HR = 1.042, 5% CI = 0.863-1.258) and 2015-2019 (HR = 0.945, 95% CI = 0.734-1.216) did not have a significantly lower risk of TSM compared to patients in 2005-2009 (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

GIST survival has significantly improved during the period 2000-2009 but showed no substantial improvement in 2010-2019, with the turning point for lower risk of TSM being 2005. Innovative strategies are needed to further improve survival outcomes for GIST patients, particularly for older patients and those with tumors originating outside the gastrointestinal tract.

Management of subepithelial esophageal tumors

Subepithelial esophageal tumors (SET) are normally benign intramural esophageal lesions of mesenchymal origin. Although rare, the incidence of SET has increased in recent decades due to the more widespread use of endoscopy and diagnostic imaging. The current review aims to provide an overview of the histopathologic spectrum and the most frequent entities including leiomyoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), diagnostic workup, and multidisciplinary treatment options. Staging for SET should include endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and tissue sampling. Current consensus guidelines recommend that SET suggestive of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) larger than 20 mm or lesions with high-risk stigmata should undergo tissue sampling. Most SET have an excellent long-term outcome, but malignancy may be present in certain subtypes. Asymptomatic SET without high-risk stigmata discovered incidentally usually do not require specific treatment. However, depending on the size and location of the lesion symptoms may occur. Therapeutic interventions range from endoscopic interventional resections to major surgical procedures. Enucleation via minimally invasive or robotic-assisted access remains the standard of care for most SET sub-entities.

Transcriptome-proteome integration analysis identifies elevated expression of LARP7 promoting the tumorigenesis and development of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the digestive tract, with c-kit and PDGFRA mutations being the primary causes. However, GIST pathogenesis is not still fully understood. Differential expression analysis, Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to screen for up-regulated and prognostically relevant genes. The expression distribution was compared across various demographics and clinical groups. The relationship between gene expression and cytokine pathway activation was assessed via CytoSig. Immune cell infiltration was analyzed using TIMER2.0. Four paired GIST and adjacent normal tissues were collected to validate the expression trend. CCK8 assays and scratch wound healing assays were conducted in GIST-T1 and GIST-882 cells. Results indicated that LARP7 was up-regulated in GISTs at both mRNA and protein levels. This elevated expression was associated with poor prognosis, particularly in GISTs located in the small intestine and those with larger tumor sizes. LARP7 was implicated in the expression of IFN-induced genes and the negative regulation of viral processes. Predictions of cytokine pathways supported these findings, and immune cell infiltration analysis revealed a higher presence of CD8+ T cells in GISTs with high LARP7 expression. The lncRNA (H19 or LINC00665)-miRNA(hsa-miR-138-5p) axis targeted LARP7. Furthermore, LARP7 was elevated in imatinib-resistant GISTs, with some other drugs predicted to aid in therapy. LARP7 knockdown resulted in reduced proliferation and migration of GIST-T1 and GIST-882 cells. Overall, high expression of LARP7 correlates with poor prognosis in GISTs, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to outline the current understanding of the molecular drivers and treatment paradigms of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, with a focus on recent developments in treatment in the advanced disease setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been recent advancements in our understanding of the molecular biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, including the identification of new genetic drivers and complex resistance mechanisms. We review the most recent findings in these areas, focusing on how new research insights are reshaping treatment strategies. Recent advancements in our understanding of the biology and treatment of GIST are paving the way for more personalized and effective therapeutic options. As knowledge of rare molecular subtypes, resistance mechanisms, and novel genomic techniques grows, new approaches are emerging in an effort to improve patient outcomes.

Clinical description and development of a prognostic score for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated GISTs: a retrospective study from the NETSARC

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) occur in ∼7% of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients. Data about their natural history remain scarce and neither risk classifications, prognosis model nor adjuvant treatment have been validated in this population.

METHODS

This national retrospective study included consecutive operated NF1-GIST cases from 31 reference centers in France, mostly from the NETSARC+ network. Factors associated with relapse were used to build a new prognostic score (RECKGIST). To address potential bias between adjuvant group and follow-up group, a propensity score was used.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients were included between 2008 and 2023, of whom 61% were women. Median age was 53 years (range 20-78 years). The main primary location was the small bowel (86%) and the stomach (11%). Median size and mitotic count (mit) were 45 mm [95% confidence interval (CI) 45-58 mm] and 2 mit/5 mm2 (95% CI 3-9 mit/5 mm2), respectively. The vast majority were KIT/PDGFRA wild type (mutation KIT 2%, PDGFRA 3%). The median follow-up was 6 years. For GISTs <30 mm (n = 35), none relapsed. For GISTS >30 mm (n = 84), 18 developed metastases (21%). There was no difference in relapse according to tumor location (P = 0.45) or tumor rupture (P = 0.11), whereas KIT/PDGFRA-mutated GISTs were at higher risk of relapse [recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 10 years of 30% versus 82.5% for wild type, P = 0.03]. Miettinen and Joensuu classification did not predict relapse accurately. For the RECKGIST score A (size ≤30 mm, n = 34) group, 10-year RFS was 100%; it was 78.5% in the RECKGIST B group (size >30 mm and 0 < mit ≤ 5, n = 60), and 45.5% in the RECKGIST C group (size >30 mm and mit >5, n = 20) (P < 0.0001). After matching, 10-year RFS was similar between adjuvant and surveillance groups (P = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

For NF1-GISTs <30 mm, prognosis without relapse is excellent. RECKGIST score accurately predicts recurrence and needs to be validated in an external cohort, but it may help treatment decision making. No efficacy of adjuvant treatment was observed.

The value of a nomogram model based on CT imaging features in differentiating duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors from pancreatic head neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVE

To construct a nomogram model based on multi-slice spiral CT imaging features to predict and differentiate between duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and pancreatic head neuroendocrine tumors (NENs), providing imaging evidence for clinical treatment decisions.

METHODS

A retrospective collection of clinical information, pathological results, and imaging data was conducted on 115 cases of duodenal GISTs and 76 cases of pancreatic head NENs confirmed by surgical pathology at Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University from November 2013 to November 2022. Comparative analysis was performed on the tumor's maximum diameter, shortest diameter, long diameter/short diameter ratio, tumor morphology, tumor border, central position of the lesion, lesion long-axis direction, the relationship between tumor and common bile duct (CBD), duodenal side ulceration of the lesion, calcification, cystic and solid proportion within the tumor, thickened feeding arteries, tumor neovascularization, distant metastasis, and CT values during plain and enhanced scans in arterial and venous phases. Statistical analysis was conducted using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and χ2 tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors for differentiating duodenal GISTs from pancreatic head NENs. Based on these independent predictors, a nomogram model was constructed, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the model. The nomogram was validated using a calibration curve, and decision curve analysis was applied to assess the clinical application value of the nomogram.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the duodenal GISTs group and the pancreatic head NENs group in terms of longest diameter (P < 0.001), shortest diameter (P < 0.001), plain CT value (P < 0.001), arterial phase CT value (P < 0.001), venous phase CT value (P = 0.002), lesion long-axis direction (P < 0.001), central position of the lesion (P < 0.001), the relationship between tumor and CBD(< 0.001), border (P = 0.004), calcification (P = 0.017), and distant metastasis (P = 0.018). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified uncertain location (OR 0.040, 95% CI 0.003-0.549), near the duodenum (OR 0, 95% CI 0-0.009), with the lesion long-axis direction along the pancreas as a reference, along the duodenum (OR 0.106, 95% CI 0.010-1.156) or no significant difference (OR 4.946, 95% CI 0.453-54.017), and the relationship between tumor and CBD (OR 0.013, 95% CI 0.001-0.180), shortest diameter (OR 0.705, 95% CI 0.546-0.909), and calcification (OR 18.638, 95% CI 1.316-263.878) as independent risk factors for differentiating between duodenal GISTs and pancreatic head NENs (all P values < 0.05). The combined diagnostic model's AUC values based on central position of the lesion, calcification, lesion long axis orientation, the relationship between tumor and CBD, shortest diameter, and the joint diagnostic model were 0.937 (0.902-0.972), 0.700(0.624-0.776), 0.717(0.631-0.802), 0.559 (0.473-0.644), 0.680 (0.603-0.758), and 0.991(0.982-0.999), respectively, with a sensitivity of 97.3% and a specificity of 93.0% for the joint diagnostic model. The nomogram model's AUC value was 0.985(0.973-0.996), with a sensitivity and specificity of 94.7% and 93.9%, respectively. The calibration curve indicated good agreement between predicted and actual risks. Decision curve analysis verified the clinical application value of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram model based on CT imaging features effectively differentiates between duodenal GISTs and pancreatic head NENs, aiding in more precise clinical treatment decisions.

Huaier inhibits the proliferation and migration of gastrointestinal stromal tumors by regulating the JAK2 / STAT3 signaling pathway

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the digestive tract, often accompanied by a high risk of recurrence and drug resistance. Huaier (Trametes robiniophila Murr), a traditional Chinese medicinal fungus, has demonstrated potent anticancer properties and is widely used as an adjuvant treatment for liver, breast, gastric, colon, and non-small cell lung cancers. However, its effects and molecular mechanisms in GIST remain unclear.

AIM

This study aims to explore the inhibitory effects and underlying mechanisms of Huaier on GIST through network pharmacology and experimental validation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Initially, we utilized a publicly accessible database to identify the core targets and principal pathways associated with Huaier's therapeutic effects on gastrointestinal stromal tumors. To further evaluate its biological impact, cell viability, proliferation, migration, and invasion were assessed through CCK-8 and EdU assays, wound healing tests, and Transwell experiments. Apoptotic cell death was quantified using flow cytometry analysis. Additionally, the influence of Huaier extract on the expression levels of JAK2 and STAT3 proteins was examined via Western blotting. Finally, a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model was employed to investigate the anti-tumor efficacy of Huaier in vivo.

RESULTS

In this study, GAPDH, TNF, STAT3, ESR1, EGFR, IL6, CCND1, PTGS2, BCL2L1, and MAPK3 were identified as shared molecular targets, with the JAK/STAT signaling pathway recognized as the pivotal regulatory mechanism. Experimental findings demonstrated that Huaier exerted inhibitory effects on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of GIST-T1 and GIST-882 cells, exhibiting both dose- and time-dependent responses. Furthermore, Huaier was found to promote apoptosis in these cells. Western blot analysis revealed that treatment with Huaier extract significantly decreased the phosphorylation levels of JAK2 and STAT3, thereby suppressing the activation of the JAK2/STAT3 signaling cascade. In vivo experiments further substantiated these findings, showing that Huaier treatment markedly reduced tumor size and inhibited tumor progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that Huaier may inhibit the growth of GIST cells by inhibiting the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway, reduce cell proliferation, induce apoptosis, reduce cell migration and invasion, and show anti-tumor effects in vivo and in vitro.

Inflammatory biomarker correlations and prognosis in high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients: a multicenter retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The accurate prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has garnered substantial attention, yet a gap persists in understanding the influence of inflammatory markers on the prognosis of high-risk GIST patients. This study investigated the relationship between various factors and the prognosis of high-risk GIST patients, with a specific focus on first recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) as crucial prognostic indicators.

METHODS

A comprehensive collection of clinical data was conducted on 145 high-risk GIST patients meeting specific inclusion and exclusion criteria at 17 medical centers in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China, covering the period from January 2013 to December 2019. Single-factor analysis and survival curves were used to analyze the variables, while the Cox regression model evaluated independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Within the cohort, a balanced male-to-female ratio of 1:1.1 was observed. Univariate analysis revealed compelling associations between RFS and age, preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), preoperative systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI), mitotic index, and whether or not imatinib (IM) was taken regularly in high-risk GIST patients (P < 0.05). Except age, these other variables were also significantly correlated with OS (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that age, preoperative PNI, mitotic index and postoperative IM adjuvant therapy independently affected RFS (P < 0.05). In addition, preoperative PNI and postoperative IM adjuvant therapy were also independent factors of OS, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Age was negatively correlated with RFS, and early routine IM treatment after operation significantly reduced the risk of recurrence and death. Higher mitotic index is closely related to poor RFS, and higher preoperative PNI indicates a better prognosis.

CONCLUSION

A close correlation between young age, low preoperative PNI, high mitotic index, and lack of IM treatment had an unfavorable prognosis in high-risk GIST patients. Notably, the PNI was identified as a potential additional prognostic factor, enhancing the accuracy of predicting treatment efficacy and patient outcomes in high-risk patients with GISTs. Therefore, we advocate for the serious consideration of the PNI as a valuable addition to standard clinical practice for managing high-risk GIST patients.

Impact of Mutation Profile on Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy in GIST

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant imatinib therapy plays a crucial role in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but its impact across various mutational profiles remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to describe the clinicopathological features and to assess the response and surgical outcomes of neoadjuvant imatinib in GIST patients exhibiting diverse mutational profiles.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study, extracting data from the Dutch GIST Registry, including patients treated with neoadjuvant imatinib. Response rate was the primary outcome, and secondary outcomes were the time on neoadjuvant treatment and resection margins (R0 vs. R1/R2), respectively.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2021, 326 patients were treated with neoadjuvant imatinib, of which 264 (80.9%) underwent resection. A total of 197 (74.6%) of them had a KIT-exon 11 mutation, 19 (7.3%) had other KIT mutations, 10 (3.8%) had PDGFRA D842 mutations, 21 (6.8%) had other PDGFRA mutations, 2 (0.7%) had NTRK mutation, 1 (0.4%) had an SDH mutation, and 17 (6.4%) had WT GISTs. Patients with KIT-exon 11 mutations demonstrated a higher rate of partial response to imatinib (60.5% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.00). A positive resection margin (R1 or R2) was observed in 14 (21.2%) patients with a non-KIT exon 11 mutations and in 11 (5.5%) patients with a KIT-exon 11 mutation (p = 0.00). Moreover, non-KIT exon 11 mutation patients had a shorter median duration of neoadjuvant therapy (5.3 months, range 0.5-21.0) compared to patients with a KIT exon 11 mutation (8.8 months, range 0.2-31.3; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the variability in treatment response associated with different GIST mutational profiles. Patients with a KIT-exon-11 mutation tended to respond more favorably to neoadjuvant imatinib in terms of partial response and surgical outcomes.

Spontaneous Hemoperitoneum Caused by Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Case Report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are less prevalent mesenchymal tumors, accounting for 1% of gastrointestinal malignancies. Spontaneous hemoperitoneum (SH) following gastric GIST rupture is a rare occurrence. The present study described a case of a 67-year-old female who presented with acute onset abdominal pain. Vital signs at the time of presentation were unstable. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen revealed a mixed-density mass lesion with multiple hyperdense areas within. A hemogram indicated a low hemoglobin level. An emergency laparotomy revealed a ruptured pedunculated, friable mass with active bleeding arising from the lesser curvature of the stomach. A wedge resection was carried out to achieve a gross negative margin of the mass. Final pathology confirmed GIST epitheloid type with positive margins (pT3N0M0-pathologically tumor size within 10 cm with no nodal or distant metastasis) and positive for CD117, DOG1. Given the tumor rupture and positive margins, the patient was started on imatinib mesylate therapy. As demonstrated in this case, GIST rarely ruptures, resulting in hemoperitoneum. The primary treatment approach is surgical exploration and resection.

Patient-derived xenograft models of gastrointestinal stromal tumors provide a ready-to-use platform for translational research

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. Most GISTs harbor mutations in oncogenes, such as KIT, and are treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as imatinib. Most tumors develop secondary mutations, inducing drug resistance against the available TKIs, requiring novel therapies. We established a GIST patient-derived xenograft (PDX) platform of GIST that can be used for preclinical drug testing. Tumor tissue from consenting GIST patients was transplanted subcutaneously to NMRI nu/nu mice. Once tumor growth was observed, the tumor was re-transplanted to a next generation of mice. Tumors were characterized histopathologically and molecularly at every re-transplantation and compared with the original patient tumor. We transplanted 112 tumor samples from 99 GIST patients, resulting in 12 established and well-characterized GIST models with different mutations and TKI sensitivity. Three models harbor secondary KIT mutations. One model is characterized by a primary, imatinib-resistant PDGFRA exon 18 p.D842V mutation. Our established platform of well-characterized GIST PDX models, covering the most relevant driver mutations, serves as an excellent tool for preclinical drug testing and tumor biology studies.

Surgical Management of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are sarcomas that arise from the muscular layer of the gastrointestinal tract. The stomach is the most common location, followed by the small intestine. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment; extensive margins and lymphadenectomy are not routinely required. Commonly utilized resection techniques include wedge gastrectomy, excision and closure of the gastrotomy, and anterior gastrotomy access with internal wedge resection. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors can be utilized in the neoadjuvant setting for cases where a reduction in tumor size would optimize resection, and in the adjuvant setting for high-risk tumors. In select cases, metastasectomy may improve prognosis.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): British Sarcoma Group clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

British Sarcoma Group guidelines for the management of GIST were initially informed by those published by the European Society of Clinical Oncology. This update was written by a group of experts to includes a discussion of the highlight improvements in our knowledge of the disease and recent treatment developments. The guidelines include sections on Incidence, Aetiology, Diagnosis, including risk assessment, Treatment and Follow-up.

METHODS

A careful review of the literature was performed to ensure that wherever possible recommendations are supported by the results of clinical trials or substantive retrospective reports. Areas of uncertainty are indicated appropriately.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines represent a consensus view of current best clinical practice. Where appropriate, key recommendations are given and the levels of evidence and strength of recommendation gradings are those used by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO).

A randomized study of 6 versus 3 years of adjuvant imatinib in patients with localized GIST at high risk of relapse

BACKGROUND

The administration of adjuvant imatinib during 3 years is indicated after resection of primary localized GIST at high risk of recurrence, but many patients relapse afterwards.

METHODS

IMADGIST (NCT02260505) was a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III study evaluating the maintenance of imatinib for 3 more years (6-year arm) compared with interruption (3-year arm) from the day of randomization, conducted in the French Sarcoma Group. The primary endpoint was intent-to-treat disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, time to imatinib resistance, response after imatinib reintroduction at relapse, and safety.

RESULTS

From 24 December 2014 to 4 April 2023, 136 patients aged ≥18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, with a localized gastrointestinal stromal tumor with an R0 or R1 surgery, and a risk of tumor recurrence ≥35% according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk classification were randomized in 14 centers. Sixty-five patients were randomized to the 3-year arm versus 71 to the 6-year arm. There were 68 males and females. Primary sites were gastric and small bowel in 60 (44%) and 64 (47%) patients, respectively. Respectively, 52 (38%) and 71 (52%) patients had a risk of relapse of 35%-70% and >70%. With a median follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range 46-59 months) after randomization, disease-free survival was significantly superior in the 6-year arm [hazard ratio: 0.40 (0.20-0.69), P = 0.0008]. Time to imatinib resistance, survival, adverse events, and quality of life were not different in the two arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Three additional years of adjuvant imatinib reduces the risk of relapse in patients who have received 3 years of adjuvant imatinib with an acceptable tolerance.

Pathologic diagnosis and molecular features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a mini-review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal, predominantly affecting the stomach and small intestine, with rare occurrences in the duodenum, rectum, and extraintestinal sites. Histologically, GISTs can present as spindle cells, epithelioid cells, or mixed morphologies, with immunohistochemical staining revealing expression of KIT (CD117) and discovered on GIST 1 (DOG1). Approximately 80% of GISTs harbor activating mutations in KIT or platelet derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA), which influence their clinical behavior and treatment response. SDH-deficient GISTs, associated with syndromes such as Carney triad and Carney-Stratakis syndrome, represent a distinct subgroup with unique characteristics and management challenges. The standard treatment includes surgery and imatinib for metastatic cases; however, resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors remains a significant hurdle, especially in pediatric and wildtype GISTs. This highlights the need for advanced therapeutic strategies and emphasizes the importance of molecular profiling in guiding treatment decisions and improving outcomes for GIST patients.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Quiz: Test your knowledge

Having a strong understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is crucial for clinicians who may encounter this cancer. The quiz below is designed for medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing physicians to test their knowledge and review key concepts for understanding GIST.

Clinical importance of tumor rupture in gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Risk factors of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) include tumor size, location, mitosis, and tumor rupture. Although the first three are commonly recognized as independent prognostic factors, tumor rupture is not a consistent finding. Indeed, tumor rupture may be subjectively diagnosed and is rarely observed. Moreover, the criteria used for diagnosis differ among oncologists, which may result in inconsistent outcomes. Based on these conditions, a universal definition of tumor rupture was proposed in 2019 and consists of six scenarios: tumor fracture, blood-stained ascites, gastrointestinal perforation at the tumor site, histologically proven invasion, piecemeal resection, and open incisional biopsy. Although the definition is considered appropriate for selection of GISTs with worse prognostic outcomes, each scenario lacks a high level of evidence and there is yet no consensus for some, including histological invasion and incisional biopsy. It may be, however, important to have common criteria for clinical decision-making, which may facilitate reliability, external validity, and comparability of clinical studies in rare GISTs. After the definition, several retrospective reports indicated that even with adjuvant therapy, tumor rupture was associated with high recurrence rates and poor prognostic outcomes. The prognosis of patients with ruptured GISTs is improved by 5-year adjuvant therapy compared with 3-year therapy. Nevertheless, the universal definition requires further evidence, and prospective clinical studies based on the definition are warranted.

Safety, effectiveness and the optimal duration of preoperative imatinib in locally advanced gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of preoperative imatinib (IM) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, therapeutic effectiveness, and optimal duration of preoperative IM in patients with locally advanced gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

METHODS

The clinicopathologic data of 41 patients with locally advanced gastric GIST who received preoperative IM and underwent surgical resection from January 2014 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

After a median of 7.0 (IQR: 4.5-10) months of preoperative IM treatment, 30 patients experienced adverse events (AEs), 80% of which were grade 1/2 AEs. The mean tumor size decreased from 12.71 ± 5.34 cm to 8.26 ± 4.00 cm, with a reduction rate of 35%. Setting 8 months as the cut-off value according to the results of ROC analysis. The proportion of laparoscopic surgery was higher in patients with short-term (≤8 months) versus long-term (>8 months) preoperative IM. Compared with the subtotal/total gastrectomy group, patients in the local gastrectomy group exhibited less intraoperative blood loss, shorter length of postoperative hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications. The 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 82.9% and 97.6%, and the expected 5-year RFS and OS rates were 75.6% and 90.2% respectively. RFS was better in the short-term than in the long-term preoperative IM treatment group, and it was also better in pre- plus postoperative IM treatment group than that in the preoperative IM alone group. Both univariate and multivariate COX analysis showed that a higher mitotic index and long-term preoperative IM treatment were associated with worse RFS, while postoperative IM treatment could significantly improve RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that in patients with locally advanced gastric GIST, preoperative short-term (≤8 months) use of IM is associated with higher RFS than long-term use.

Common Symptoms and a Rare Diagnosis: A Case of Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Presenting as Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (D-GISTs) are a rare subtype of GISTs, accounting for only 4% to 5% of all GIST cases. This case report details the presentation, diagnosis, and management of a 48-year-old female who presented with melena and anemia and was eventually diagnosed with a D-GIST. The tumor was identified through imaging studies, and histopathology performed after surgical resection revealed a submucosal neoplasm composed of spindle cells with extensive hemorrhage and necrosis. Given the tumor's rarity and its challenging presentation, which can mimic other conditions such as pancreatic masses, the case underscores the importance of considering D-GIST in differential diagnoses of duodenal or pancreatic lesions. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment, with adjuvant therapy considered in high-risk cases to prevent recurrence.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: incidence, recurrence and mortality. A decade of patients from a New Zealand tertiary surgical centre

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. The New Zealand (NZ) population incidence has not previously been documented nor has the potential effect of ethnicity been reviewed. We furthermore wanted to assess the difference between those undergoing a wedge resection versus a more extensive operation which we hypothesised would correlate with recurrence and mortality.

METHODS

All patients (n = 103) with a GIST diagnosed and treated at Te Whatu Ora Waitematā (Auckland, New Zealand) between 2012 and 2021 are presented. Patient demographics, method of GIST detection, management approach, index surgery, histological features, use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant imatinib, follow-up, recurrence and mortality rates were analysed.

RESULTS

This paper reports the largest NZ GIST cohort to date and estimates an incidence of 17 cases per million per year. Eighty-four patients underwent surgical resection, 58 received a wedge resection and 17 received a more extensive operation. Five-year disease-free survival rates were 100% in the low/very low risk, 90% in the intermediate and 59% in the high risk groups as determined by the modified NIH criteria. Our overall 5-year GIST-specific survival rate was 83%; it was 91% in those who underwent a wedge resection and 60% in the extensive operation group. There is evidence that Māori have higher rates of GIST recurrence compared to non-Māori and are more likely to require an extensive surgical resection.

Utilization of neoadjuvant therapy for localized gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors and the association with survival

BACKGROUND

For gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), neoadjuvant imatinib is most often reserved for tumors near the gastroesophageal junction, multivisceral involvement, or limited metastatic disease. Whether localized gastric GISTs benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains unknown. We sought to examine factors associated with NAT utilization for localized gastric GISTs and evaluate implications on survival.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database identified patients with localized gastric GISTs treated with NAT (2010-2020), excluding tumors extending beyond the gastric wall, located in the cardia, or with metastatic disease. Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics of NAT use. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 7203 patients, 762 (10.6%) received NAT followed by resection. On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor size was associated with NAT use (<2.0 cm vs 2.0-5.0 cm [odds ratio {OR}, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.19-3.47; P = .010] vs >5 cm [OR, 16.87; 95% CI, 10.02-28.40; P < .001]). After propensity score matching, 1506 patients remained. Median OS for NAT was 46.0 months vs 43.0 months for resection (P = .059), which was independently predictive of improved survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; P = .041). Subgroup analysis by tumor size showed no survival differences for tumors <2.0 cm or from 2.0 to 5.0 cm. Median OS was higher for tumors > 5.0 cm treated with NAT (NAT, 45.4 months [IQR, 29.5-65.9] vs upfront resection, 42.3 months [IQR 26.9-62.8]) and associated with improved survival on multivariable analysis (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99; P = .040).

CONCLUSION

Although patients who received NAT had improved survival, this was primarily due to tumors >5.0 cm. Expanding NAT selection criteria to include localized gastric GISTs >5.0 cm may improve outcomes and warrants investigation through clinical trials.

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation and Risk Stratification for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Transabdominal Ultrasound Imaging

PURPOSE

To develop a deep neural network system for the automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS

A total of 980 ultrasound (US) images from 245 GIST patients were retrospectively collected. These images were randomly divided (6:2:2) into a training set, a validation set, and an internal test set. Additionally, 188 US images from 47 prospective GIST patients were collected to evaluate the segmentation and diagnostic performance of the model. Five deep learning-based segmentation networks, namely, UNet, FCN, DeepLabV3+, Swin Transformer, and SegNeXt, were employed, along with the ResNet 18 classification network, to select the most suitable network combination. The performance of the segmentation models was evaluated using metrics such as the intersection over union (IoU), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall, and precision. The classification performance was assessed based on accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

Among the compared models, SegNeXt-ResNet18 exhibited the best segmentation and classification performance. On the internal test set, the proposed model achieved IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 82.1, 90.2, 91.7, and 88.8%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 87.4 and 92.0%, respectively. On the external test set, the segmentation models exhibited IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 81.0, 89.5, 92.8, and 86.4%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 86.7 and 92.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This two-stage SegNeXt-ResNet18 model achieves automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction for GISTs and demonstrates excellent segmentation and classification performance.

Improvement of perioperative outcomes of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) resections and the influence of minimal invasive surgery

BACKGROUND

Safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) is still under debate since it might increase the risk of tumour rupture, especially in larger tumours. The aim of this study was to investigate trends in treatment and perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing resections of gastric GISTs over time.

METHODS

This was a multicentre retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent wedge resection or partial gastrectomy for localized gastric GIST at five GIST reference centres between January 2009 and January 2022. To evaluate changes in treatment and perioperative outcomes over time, patients were divided into four equal periods. Perioperative outcomes were analysed separately and as a novel composite measure textbook outcome (TO).

RESULTS

In total 385 patients were included. Patient and tumour characteristics did not change over time, except for median age (62-65-68-68 years, p = 0.002). The proportion of MIS increased (4.0%-9.8%-37.4%-53.0 %, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo ≥2; 22%-15%-11%-10 %, p = 0.146), duration of admission (6-6-5-4 days, p < 0.001) and operating time (92-94-77-73 min, p = 0.007) decreased over time while TO increased (54.0%- 52.7%-65.9%-76.0 %, p < 0.001). No change was seen in perioperative ruptures (6.0%- 3.6%-1.6%-3.0 %, p = 0.499). MIS was correlated with less CD ≥ 2 complications (p = 0.006), shorter duration of admission (p < 0.001) and more TO (p < 0.001). Similar results were observed in tumours ≤5 cm and >5 cm.

CONCLUSION

A larger percentage of gastric GIST were treated with MIS over time. MIS was correlated with less complications, shorter duration of admission and more TO. Tumour rupture rates remained low over time.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) in Pediatric Patients: A Case Report and Literature Review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms that primarily affect adults, with pediatric cases constituting only 0.5-2.7% of the total. Pediatric GISTs present unique clinical, genetic, and pathological features that distinguish them from adult cases. This literature review aims to elucidate these differences, emphasizing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. We discuss the resistance of pediatric GISTs to conventional chemotherapy and highlight the importance of surgical intervention, especially in emergency situations involving intra-abdominal bleeding. The review also explores the molecular characteristics of pediatric GISTs, including rare mutations such as quadruple-negative wild-type GIST with an FGF3 gene gain mutation. To illustrate these points, we conclude with a case from our clinic involving a 15-year-old female with multiple CD117-positive gastric GISTs and a quadruple-negative wild-type genetic profile who required urgent surgical intervention following a failed tumor embolization. This case underscores the critical need for early diagnosis and individualized therapeutic strategies combining oncologic and surgical care to improve outcomes in pediatric GIST patients.

Interpretable artificial intelligence to optimise use of imatinib after resection in patients with localised gastrointestinal stromal tumours: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend use of adjuvant imatinib therapy for many patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs); however, its optimal treatment duration is unknown and some patient groups do not benefit from the therapy. We aimed to apply state-of-the-art, interpretable artificial intelligence (ie, predictions or prescription logic that can be easily understood) methods on real-world data to establish which groups of patients with GISTs should receive adjuvant imatinib, its optimal treatment duration, and the benefits conferred by this therapy.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, we considered for inclusion all patients who underwent resection of primary, non-metastatic GISTs at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC; New York, NY, USA) between Oct 1, 1982, and Dec 31, 2017, and who were classified as intermediate or high risk according to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Miettinen criteria and had complete follow-up data with no missing entries. A counterfactual random forest model, which used predictors of recurrence (mitotic count, tumour size, and tumour site) and imatinib duration to infer the probability of recurrence at 7 years for a given patient under each duration of imatinib treatment, was trained in the MSKCC cohort. Optimal policy trees (OPTs), a state-of-the-art interpretable AI-based method, were used to read the counterfactual random forest model by training a decision tree with the counterfactual predictions. The OPT recommendations were externally validated in two cohorts of patients from Poland (the Polish Clinical GIST Registry), who underwent GIST resection between Dec 1, 1981, and Dec 31, 2011, and from Spain (the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas), who underwent resection between Oct 1, 1987, and Jan 30, 2011.

FINDINGS

Among 1007 patients who underwent GIST surgery in MSKCC, 117 were included in the internal cohort; for the external cohorts, the Polish cohort comprised 363 patients and the Spanish cohort comprised 239 patients. The OPT did not recommend imatinib for patients with GISTs of gastric origin measuring less than 15·9 cm with a mitotic count of less than 11·5 mitoses per 5 mm2 or for those with small GISTs (<5·4 cm) of any site with a count of less than 11·5 mitoses per 5 mm2. In this cohort, the OPT cutoffs had a sensitivity of 92·7% (95% CI 82·4-98·0) and a specificity of 33·9% (22·3-47·0). The application of these cutoffs in the two external cohorts would have spared 38 (29%) of 131 patients in the Spanish cohort and 44 (35%) of 126 patients in the Polish cohort from unnecessary treatment with imatinib. Meanwhile, the risk of undertreating patients in these cohorts was minimal (sensitivity 95·4% [95% CI 89·5-98·5] in the Spanish cohort and 92·4% [88·3-95·4] in the Polish cohort). The OPT tested 33 different durations of imatinib treatment (<5 years) and found that 5 years of treatment conferred the most benefit.

INTERPRETATION

If the identified patient subgroups were applied in clinical practice, as many as a third of the current cohort of candidates who do not benefit from adjuvant imatinib would be encouraged to not receive imatinib, subsequently avoiding unnecessary toxicity on patients and financial strain on health-care systems. Our finding that 5 years is the optimal duration of imatinib treatment could be the best source of evidence to inform clinical practice until 2028, when a randomised controlled trial with the same aims is expected to report its findings.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute.

Is laparoscopic approach as treatment of large gastric GIST acceptable?

AIM

Laparoscopic surgery is widely used for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (≤ 5 cm) but remains a controversial approach for larger gastric GISTs (> 5 cm). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection in comparison with open resection for gastric GISTs measuring over 5 cm.

METHOD

All patients receiving surgery for gastric GIST > 5 cm between 2000 and 2021 in a single tertiary hospital were included. Data were collected from prospectively maintained records. Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used to compare survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 108 included patients, 59 patients had minimally invasive (MI) surgery (54.6%) whereas 49 patients had open surgery (46.4%). The rate of overall postoperative morbidity was 14.8% and the median length was significantly shorter in the MI group [4 (range 2-30) vs. 7 (range 4-33) days; P = 0.007]. The overall R0 resection rate was 98.2% and the rate of tumor rupture was 13%, not different between the two groups. Recurrence occurred in 24% of the whole population without any difference between groups (20.3% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.31). Minimally invasive surgery was not found as a negative prognostic disease-free survival factor.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery could be a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery in large gastric GIST, bringing the benefits of minimally invasive surgery without compromising oncologic results.

Different efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors by KIT and PGFRA mutations identified in circulating tumor DNA for the treatment of refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

While advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are primarily treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), acquired resistance from specific mutations in KIT or PDGFRA frequently occurs. We aimed to assess the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a modality of therapeutic decision-making in advanced GIST.

METHODS

We conducted a pooled analysis of SCRUM-Japan studies for advanced GIST patients. We compared patient characteristics analyzed with tissue and blood samples, assessed gene alteration profiles, and evaluated prognostic implications from ctDNA status.

RESULTS

In 133 patients, tissue and blood samples were analyzed for 89 and 44 patients, respectively. ctDNA was detected in 72.7% of cases; no prior treatment or progressive disease was significantly associated with ctDNA-positivity. ctDNA-positive patients had significantly shorter progression-free survival compared with ctDNA-negative patients (hazard ratio = 3.92; P = 0.007). ctDNA genotyping revealed a complex landscape of gene alterations, characterized by multi-exonic mutations in KIT, compared with tissue-based analysis. Patients who received TKIs matched to the identified KIT mutation in ctDNA demonstrated significantly longer PFS than those with unmatched treatment (median, 8.23 vs. 2.43 months; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA-based analysis facilitates assessment of disease status and genomic profiles, thus potentially assisting in identifying optimal therapeutic strategies for advanced GIST patients.

Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Imatinib in a Recurrent Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Although surgery is the treatment of choice in resectable disease, neoadjuvant therapy is indicated in advanced, metastatic, and recurrent tumors. Decreasing tumor burden may facilitate resection and reduce surgical morbidity. We describe a case of a 66-year-old male with a recurrent duodenal GIST, after surgery and adjuvant imatinib five years before. Following neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib for 12 months, the patient underwent a cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy, without complications. The final histopathology showed a pathological complete response (pCR) with no residual neoplasm. A pathological complete response to imatinib in a recurrent disease is extremely rare. Molecular testing should be performed before neoadjuvant therapy to identify response-predictive mutations. In recurrent/metastatic disease, systemic therapy is the standard treatment for all patients. Surgery should be considered in a tailored approach in patients with good responses to systemic therapy before developing therapeutic resistance.

Adjuvant imatinib in high-risk resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Merely delaying the inevitable?

INTRODUCTION

Patients with high-risk resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) receiving adjuvant imatinib have improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), however whether a complete cytocidal effect exists is unknown. We investigated this using a normalized recurrence timeline measured from end of oncologic treatment (EOOT), defined as the later of resection or end of adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with resected high-risk GIST at our cancer center from 2003 to 2018. RFS (measured from resection and EOOT), overall survival (OS), and time to imatinib resistance (TTIR) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. The performance of the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) GIST nomogram was assessed.

RESULTS

We identified 86 patients with high-risk GIST with a median 106 months of postsurgical follow-up. One-third (n = 29; 34%) did not receive adjuvant imatinib, while 57 (66%) did for a median of 3 years. The MSK nomogram-predicted 5-year RFS for patients receiving adjuvant imatinib was similar to those who did not (29% vs. 31%, p = 0.64). When RFS was measured from EOOT, the MSK-predicted RFS was independently associated with EOOT RFS (hazard ratio 0.22, p = 0.02), while adjuvant imatinib receipt and duration were not. Neither receipt nor duration of adjuvant imatinib were associated with TTIR or OS (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with adjuvant imatinib delays, but does not clearly impact ultimate recurrence, TTIR, or OS, suggesting many patients with high-risk GIST may receive adjuvant imatinib unnecessarily. Additional studies are needed to establish the benefit of adjuvant therapy versus initiating therapy at first radiographic recurrence.

Survival of patients with ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumour treated with adjuvant imatinib in a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) have poor prognosis. Little information is available about how adjuvant imatinib influences survival.

METHODS

We explored recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with ruptured GIST who participated in a randomised trial (SSG XVIII/AIO), where 400 patients with high-risk GIST were allocated to adjuvant imatinib for either 1 year or 3 years after surgery. Of the 358 patients with confirmed localised GIST, 73 (20%) had rupture reported. The ruptures were classified retrospectively using the Oslo criteria.

RESULTS

Most ruptures were major, four reported ruptures were reclassified unruptured. The 69 patients with rupture had inferior RFS and OS compared with 289 patients with unruptured GIST (10-year RFS 21% vs. 55%, OS 59% vs. 78%, respectively). Three-year adjuvant imatinib did not significantly improve RFS or OS of the patients with rupture compared with 1-year treatment, but in the largest mutational subset with KIT exon 11 deletion/indel mutation OS was higher in the 3-year group than in the 1-year group (10-year OS 94% vs. 54%).

CONCLUSIONS

About one-fifth of ruptured GISTs treated with adjuvant imatinib did not recur during the first decade of follow-up. Relatively high OS rates were achieved despite rupture.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00116935.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach: Is There Any Advantage of Robotic Resections? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The role of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resection remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in patients requiring surgery for gastric GISTs. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 4, 2023. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of the literature to select all types of analytic studies comparing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for GISTs and reporting intraoperative, postoperative, and/or pathological outcomes. Results: Overall, 4 retrospective studies were selected, including a total of 264 patients, specifically 111 (42%) in the robotic and 153 (58%) in the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery was associated with longer operating time (+42.46 min; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.34, 75.58; P=0.01; I2: 85%) and reduced use of mechanical staplers (odds ratio [OR]: 0.05; 95%CI: 0.02, 0.11; P<0.00001; I2: 92%;) compared with laparoscopy. Although nonsignificant, conversion to open surgery was less frequently reported for robotic surgery (2.7%) than laparoscopy (5.2%) (OR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.17, 2.03; P=0.4; I2: 0%). No difference was found for postoperative and oncological outcomes. Conclusions: Robotic surgery for gastric GISTs provides similar intraoperative, postoperative, and pathological outcomes to laparoscopy, despite longer operative time.

English version of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) issued by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) have been published in accordance with the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2014 and 2017. A specialized team independent of the working group for the revision performed a systematic review. Since GIST is a rare type of tumor, clinical evidence is not sufficient to answer several clinical and background questions. Thus, in these guidelines, we considered that consensus among the experts who manage GIST, the balance between benefits and harms, patients' wishes, medical economic perspective, etc. are important considerations in addition to the evidence. Although guidelines for the treatment of GIST have also been published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), there are some differences between the treatments proposed in those guidelines and the treatments in the present guidelines because of the differences in health insurance systems among countries.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Originating from the Muscularis Propria

BACKGROUND

The role of endoscopic resection (ER) in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has not been fully elucidated.

AIMS

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of ER in patients with GISTs originating from the muscularis propria (MP).

METHODS

A total of 233 consecutive patients with gastric GISTs originating from the MP layer, who underwent ER between February 2012 and May 2023, were included in this study. Clinical characteristics, tumor features, and outcomes were recorded and compared between patients who underwent en bloc resection and piecemeal resection.

RESULTS

Among the 233 patients, the median size of GISTs was 12 mm (range 5-60 mm). Risk assessment categorized 190 patients as very low risk, 26 as low risk, 10 as moderate risk, and 7 as high risk. The procedures performed included endoscopic submucosal excavation (127 cases), endoscopic full-thickness resection (103 cases), and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (3 cases). The complete and R0 resection rate was 93.1%. Complications occurred in 4.7% of cases (perioperative perforations 1.7%, perioperative bleeding 1.3%, both 0.9%), resulting in conversion to surgery in 1.3% of cases. Risk factors associated with piecemeal resection were tumor size [odds ratio (OR) 0.402, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.207-0.783; P = 0.007] and shape (OR 0.045, 95% CI 0.009-0.235; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ER is proven to be an effective and reasonably safe approach for gastric GISTs originating from the MP. Notably, larger tumor size and irregular shape are identified as risk factors for piecemeal resection during ER procedures.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for the treatment of intermediate- or high-risk gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many studies of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (g-GISTs) following endoscopic resection (ER) have typically focused on tumor size, with most tumors at low risk of aggressiveness after risk stratification. There have been few systematic studies on the oncologic outcomes of intermediate- or high-risk g-GISTs after ER.

METHODS

From January 2014 to January 2020, we retrospectively collected patients considered at intermediate- or high-risk of g-GISTs according to the modified NIH consensus classification system. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Six hundred and seventy nine (679) consecutive patients were diagnosed with g-GISTs and treated by ER between January 2014 and January 2020 in three hospitals in Shanghai, China. 43 patients (20 males and 23 females) were confirmed at intermediate-or high-risk. The mean size of tumors was 2.23 ± 1.01 cm. The median follow-up period was 62.02 ± 15.34 months, with a range of 28 to 105 months. There were no recurrences or metastases, even among patients having R1 resections. The 5-year OS rate was 97.4% (42/43).

CONCLUSION

ER for intermediate- or high-risk gastric small GISTs is a feasible and safe method, which allows for a wait-and-see approach before determining the necessity for imatinib adjuvant or surgical treatment. This approach to g-GISTs does require that patients undergo close follow-up.

[Gastrointestinal stromal tumors : Where do we stand?]

For more than 20 years gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) have been a paradigm for a targeted treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. A fundamental prerequisite for a neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of localized GIST or an additive treatment of metastatic GIST is the molecular typing of tumors, ideally at the initial diagnosis. In addition, the possibility of a hereditary or syndromic predisposition must be considered because this results in consequences for the treatment and a different follow-up strategy.

Hemodialysis and imatinib: Plasma levels, efficacy and tolerability in a patient with metastatic GIST - Case report

Purpose

To study plasma levels, efficacy and tolerability of imatinib in a patient affected by metastatic GIST treated with oral Imatinib and undergoing hemodialysis.

Patients and methods

The patient suffered from metastatic GIST to the liver having a mutation of exon 9 of KIT. He was on hemodialysis and received first-line treatment with imatinib 400 mg/day.

Results

The overall mean plasma level of imatinib was 1875,4 ng/ml pre-dialysis, 1553,0 ng/ml post-dialysis and 1998,1 ng/ml post-24h. In red blood cells the overall mean level of imatinib was 619,5 ng/ml pre-dialysis, 484,9 ng/ml post-dialysis and 663,1 ng/ml post-24h. The plasma level of nor-imatinib/imatinib was 16,2% pre-dialysis, 15,6% post-dialysis and 16,4% post-24h. Comparing our findings regarding levels of imatinib in plasma and RBC, we found a statistically significant difference between pre-dialysis and post-dialysis (respectively p < 0,001 and p = 0,002), post-dialysis and post-24h (both p < 0,001), pre-dialysis and post-24h (respectively p = 0.035 and p = 0,042). Ultimately, regarding nor-imatinib/imatinib in plasma, we did not find any statistically significant difference between pre-dialysis and post-dialysis (p = 0,091), post-dialysis and post-24h (p = 0,091), pre-dialysis and post-24h (p = 0.903). Currently the patient is receiving oral imatinib 400 mg/day with radiological evidence of response.

Conclusion

In this case, hemodialysis did not affect significantly imatinib plasma levels. The statistically significant difference between pre- and post-dialysis can be explained by the fact that dialysis may likely contribute to a small portion of the normal metabolism of imatinib. The evaluation of imatinib levels in RBC and of its main metabolite in plasma also suggests that hemodialysis did not affect other aspects of the elimination of the drug.

Primary EGIST of the greater omentum - a rare presentation

Extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms, which develop in the retroperitoneum, mesentery, and omentum, lacking continuity to the stomach or intestines. Authors hereby present a female patient with a large heterogeneous abdominal mass as a case of an omental EGIST. A 46-year-old woman was referred to our hospital due to an insidious enlargement and colicky pain in the right iliac fossa. Abdominal palpation revealed a voluminous, freely mobile, and non-pulsatile mesoabdominal bulge expanding to the hypogastrium. On exploratory midline laparotomy, the tumor was densely fused to the greater omentum, not connected to the stomach, without gross involvement of adjacent structures. The large mass was completely excised after adequate mobilization. Immunohistochemical techniques showed strong and diffuse expression of WT1, actin and DOG-1, as well as multifocal c-KIT marking. Mutational study concluded a double mutation of KIT exon 9 and a mutation of PDGFRA exon 18. The patient was submitted to adjuvant treatment with imatinib mesylate 800 mg/day. Despite an extremely diverse presentation, omental EGISTs often remain clinically silent for a long time having enough space to grow before becoming symptomatic. These tumors have a consistent pattern of metastasis that typically spares lymph nodes unlike epithelial gut neoplasms. Surgery remains the preferred treatment for non-metastatic EGISTs of the greater omentum. It is possible that DOG-1 will supplant KIT as the leading marker in the future. The scarcity of knowledge on omental EGISTs implies a close monitoring of these patients to detect local relapse or distant metastasis.

Development and validation of a preoperative risk nomogram prediction model for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) carry a potential risk of malignancy, and the treatment of GIST varies for different risk levels. However, there is no systematic preoperative assessment protocol to predict the malignant potential of GIST. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and clinically applicable preoperative nomogram prediction model to predict the malignant potential of gastric GIST.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a pathological diagnosis of gastric GIST from January 2015 to December 2021 were screened retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for gastric GIST with high malignancy potential. Based on these independent risk factors, a nomogram model predicting the malignant potential of gastric GIST was developed and the model was validated in the validation group.

RESULTS

A total of 494 gastric GIST patients were included in this study and allocated to a development group (n = 345) and a validation group (n = 149). In the development group, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that tumor size, tumor ulceration, CT growth pattern and monocyte-to- lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were independent risk factors for gastric GIST with high malignancy potential. The AUC of the model were 0.932 (95% CI 0.890-0.974) and 0.922 (95% CI 0.868-0.977) in the development and validation groups, respectively. The best cutoff value for the development group was 0.184, and the sensitivity and specificity at this value were 0.895 and 0.875, respectively. The calibration curves indicated good agreement between predicted and actual observed outcomes, while the DCA indicated that the nomogram model had clinical application.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size, tumor ulceration, CT growth pattern and MLR are independent risk factors for high malignancy potential gastric GIST, and a nomogram model developed based on these factors has a high ability to predict the malignant potential of gastric GIST.

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting with life-threatening upper GI bleeding in a young patient: A case report and literature review

Key Clinical Message

Duodenal GISTs are rare and challenging tumors. Acute life-threatening upper GI bleeding is a possible presentation of duodenal GISTs. Surgery is the standard treatment for localized duodenal GISTs. Imatinib is an effective adjuvant therapy for duodenal GISTs.

Abstract

GIST is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, accounting for 1%-2% of gastrointestinal tumors. They originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal and are rare in patients younger than 30 years. The stomach is the most common site, followed by the small intestine and colon. GISTs are caused by a gain-of-function mutation in the proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase, with activating mutations in KIT being the most common. Most GISTs are asymptomatic. Even if gastrointestinal bleeding is the most common complication life-threatening hemorrhage is extremely uncommon. We present a case of a 31-year-old male patient presented with massive active hematemesis and melena with hemorrhagic shock. The patient presented with massive hematemesis and melena of 1 h duration. Endoscopy showed pulsating active bleeding from the third part of the duodenum which was difficult to manage via endoscopy. Histopathologic evaluation showed spindle cell type GIST. Intraoperatively, there was a nodular mass with active bleeding on the third part of the duodenum. Duodenectomy with end-to-end anastomosis was done. Discharged with no postoperative complication and was put on imatinib. There are considerable challenges that arise in the diagnosis and treatment of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) when they present with life-threatening upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. In order to achieve the best possible outcomes for patients, it is crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of the clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, and treatment approaches.

Case report: detection of multiple sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumors by dual-time 18 F-FDG PET/CT

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Typically, GISTs are solitary; however, in rare cases, they may be multiple and appear in one or more organs. Multiple GISTs can appear in familial GISTs, children, or certain tumor syndromes such as neurofibromatosis type 1, Carney syndrome, and Carney-Stratakis syndrome. However, the diagnosis of primary multiple sporadic GISTs is often more difficult than that of these diseases. Herein, we report a case of multiple primary sporadic GISTs in a 64-year-old man, affecting the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneum, as identified through dual-time point positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). Notably, the dual-time-point PET/CT revealed the migration of masses near the lower abdomen into the abdominal cavity. Furthermore, a significant increase in radioactive uptake of the mass 3 h after 18F-FDG injection compared with that 1 h after injection may be an important cue for its diagnosis.

The development of a prediction model based on deep learning for prognosis prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a SEER-based study

Accurately predicting the prognosis of Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients is an important task. The goal of this study was to create and assess models for GIST patients' survival patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database based on the three different deep learning models. Four thousand five hundred thirty-eight patients were enrolled in this study and divided into training and test cohorts with a 7:3 ratio; the training cohort was used to develop three different models, including Cox regression, RSF, and DeepSurv model. Test cohort was used to evaluate model performance using c-index, Brier scores, calibration, and the area under the curve (AUC). The net benefits at risk score stratification of GIST patients based on the optimal model was compared with the traditional AJCC staging system using decision curve analysis (DCA). The clinical usefulness of risk score stratification compared to AJCC tumor staging was further assessed using the Net Reclassification Index (NRI) and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI). The DeepSurv model predicted cancer-specific survival (CSS) in GIST patients showed a higher c-index (0.825), lower Brier scores (0.142), and greater AUC of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (1-year ROC:0.898; 3-year:0.853, and 5-year ROC: 0.856). The calibration plots demonstrated good agreement between the DeepSurv model's forecast and actual results. The NRI values ( training cohort: 0.425 for 1-year, 0.329 for 3-year and 0.264 for 5-year CSS prediction; test cohort:0.552 for 1-year,0.309 for 3-year and 0.255 for 5-year CSS prediction) and IDI (training cohort: 0.130 for 1-year,0.141 for 5-year and 0.155 for 10-year CSS prediction; test cohort: 0.154 for 1-year,0.159 for 3-year and 0.159 for 5-year CSS prediction) indicated that the risk score stratification performed significantly better than the AJCC staging alone (P < 0.001). DCA demonstrated the risk score stratification as more clinically beneficial and discriminatory than AJCC staging. Finally, an interactive native web-based prediction tool was constructed for the survival prediction of GIST patients. This study established a high-performance prediction model for projecting GIST patients based on deep learning, which has advantages in predicting each person's prognosis and risk stratification.