Axitinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced sarcomas including alveolar soft-part sarcoma: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Resectable Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: A National Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIT) with checkpoint blockade has been increasingly studied for soft tissue sarcomas, however, survival outcomes data are limited, and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) histology remains underrepresented in recent trial cohorts. We assessed the impact of NIT with or without radiation therapy (RT) on overall survival (OS) for resectable DDLPS.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic DDLPS who received NIT and underwent surgical resection between 2016 and 2022. Primary outcome was 5-year OS.

RESULTS

A total of 3414 patients with DDLPS met the inclusion criteria and NIT was administered to 31 (1%) patients. Factors associated with receipt of NIT were receipt of neoadjuvant RT (NRT, odds ratio [OR]: 5.75, p < 0.001) and male sex (OR: 3.33, p = 0.036). NIT was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) for mortality of 0.89 (p = 0.786). No difference was found in 5-year OS in the overall cohort (NIT 72% vs. 61% no NIT, p = 0.320) or in the propensity-matched cohort (68% vs. 65%, p = 0.848). Subanalysis between NIT with NRT versus NRT-only also did not find any significant difference in 5-year OS (88% vs. 59%, p = 0.331).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective NCDB analysis of patients with resectable DDLPS, administration of NIT did not significantly affect OS.

Potential Mechanisms for Immunotherapy Resistance in Adult Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

Soft-tissue sarcomas represent a diverse group of rare malignancies originating from mesenchymal tissue, accounting for less than 1% of adult cancers in the USA. With over 13,000 new cases and around 5350 deaths annually, patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas face limited therapeutic options and an estimated median overall survival of 18 months. While immunotherapy has demonstrated effectiveness in several cancers, its application in soft-tissue sarcomas remains challenging owing to the tumors' largely "cold" immunological environment, characterized by low levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a lack of soft-tissue sarcoma-specific biomarkers. This review examines potential mechanisms underlying immunotherapy resistance in soft-tissue sarcomas, including the complex interplay between innate and adaptive immunity, the tumor microenvironment, and the role of immune-related genes. Despite preliminary findings suggesting correlations between immune profiles and histological subtypes, consistent biomarkers for predicting immunotherapeutic responses across soft-tissue sarcoma types are absent. Emerging strategies focus on converting "cold" tumors to "hot" tumors, enhancing their susceptibility to immunologic activation. While research is ongoing, personalized treatment approaches may offer hope for overcoming the inherent heterogeneity and resistance seen in soft-tissue sarcomas, ultimately aiming to improve outcomes for affected patients.

Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and anthracyclines as a potential first-line regimen for dedifferentiated liposarcoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is a rare and aggressive subtype of soft tissue sarcoma, characterized by limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Despite surgical resection being the only potentially curative treatment for localized DDLPS, the recurrence rate remains high, and systemic chemotherapy, typically anthracycline-based, shows limited efficacy in advanced stages. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise in various sarcoma subtypes, including DDLPS, their role as a first-line treatment remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in treating patients with DDLPS. A total of 25 studies encompassing 245 patients were included. Data on overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and grade III-V treatment-related adverse events were analyzed. We assessed treatment efficacy based on the line of therapy and treatment regimens, including ICI monotherapy, dual ICI therapy, and ICI combinations with other modalities.

RESULTS

The pooled ORR for all ICI-based treatments was 7%. First-line ICI therapy yielded a significantly higher ORR of 22%, compared to 4% in later-line treatment. The combination of ICI with anthracyclines demonstrated the highest ORR of 52%. In contrast, ICI regimens combined with trabectedin or other agents showed limited efficacy. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of results, and publication bias was not detected.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis supports the potential role of ICIs, particularly in combination with anthracyclines, as a first-line therapeutic strategy for DDLPS. These results provide a foundation for future prospective studies aimed at optimizing immunotherapy approaches for this rare and challenging malignancy.

Expression of Cancer-Testis Antigens MAGE-A1, MAGE-A4, NY-ESO-1 and PRAME in Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas: The Experience From a Single Center in China

OBJECTIVE

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies, low disease-control levels and the limited durability of responses have prompted the exploration of various novel immunotherapeutic approaches. To preliminarily explore the feasibility of cancer vaccines based on cancer testis antigen in the immunotherapy of sarcomas, we investigate the expression of Cancer/Testis Antigens (CTA) MAGE-A4, PRAME, MAGE-A1, KK-LC-1, and NY-ESO-1 in bone and soft tissue sarcomas, with the aim of assessing their potential for use in sarcoma immunotherapy and determining their expression levels in different subtypes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We employed immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunostaining microarrays (MI chips) to assess the expression of MAGE-A4, PRAME, MAGE-A1, KK-LC-1, and NY-ESO-1 in 21 cases of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), 26 cases of smooth muscle sarcoma, 28 cases of liposarcoma, 40 cases of osteosarcoma (OS), and 13 cases of chondrosarcoma. MAGE-A1 showed the highest expression in osteosarcoma (32.50%), while it was lower in liposarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (10.71% and 10.00%) and undetectable in chondrosarcoma. MAGE-A4 expression was elevated in osteosarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (40.00% and 33.00%), but lower in liposarcoma and smooth muscle sarcoma (17.00% and 33.00%). NY-ESO-1 expression was relatively low across all sarcoma subtypes. PRAME expression was highest in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (47.62%) and low in chondrosarcoma (7.69%). None of the sarcomas expressed KK-LC-1. Additionally, while there was no statistically significant correlation between CTA expression and patient age or gender, some differences related to age and gender were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

CTA expression in bone and soft tissue sarcomas was correlated with both CTA type and sarcoma subtype, showing relatively high levels of expression in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and osteosarcoma (OS). The poly-expression of MAGE-A4, PRAME, and MAGE-A1 across all subtypes suggests that these antigens may serve as potential targets for sarcoma-specific immunotherapy.

Monocyte-lineage tumor infiltration predicts immunoradiotherapy response in advanced pretreated soft-tissue sarcoma: phase 2 trial results

Immunoradiotherapy holds promise for improving outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumors, including in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). However, the ideal combination of treatment modalities remains to be determined, and reliable biomarkers to predict which patients will benefit are lacking. Here, we report the results of the STS cohort of the SABR-PDL1 phase II trial that evaluated the anti-PDL1 atezolizumab combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered concurrently with the 2nd cycle to at least one tumor site. Eligible patients received atezolizumab until progression or unmanageable toxicity, with SBRT at 45 Gy in 3 fractions). The primary endpoint was one-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate with success defined as 13 patients achieving 1-year PFS. Sixty-one heavily pretreated patients with STS (median 5 prior lines; 52% men; median age 54 years; 28% leiomyosarcoma) were enrolled across two centers (France, Spain). SBRT was delivered to 55 patients (90%), with the lung being the most commonly irradiated site (50%). After a median follow-up of 45 months, the one-year PFS rate was 8.3% [95% CI: 3.6-18.1]. Median PFS and overall survival were 2.5 and 8.6 months, respectively. Best responses included partial responses (5%) and stable disease (60%). Immune profiling revealed increased immunosuppressive tumor-associated macrophages (e.g., IL4I1, HES1) and monocyte-recruiting chemokines in non-responders. Higher monocyte/lymphocyte ratios (MonoLR) in tumor and blood correlated with progression. PD-L1 status, lymphoid infiltration, and tertiary-lymphoid structures were not predictive. Although the primary endpoint was not met, this study highlights MonoLR imbalance as a potential biomarker to identify STS patients likely to benefit from immunoradiotherapy. EudraCT No. 2015-005464-42; Clinicaltrial.gov number: NCT02992912.

Deep multi-omics integration approach reveals new molecular features of uterine leiomyosarcoma

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is a rare and aggressive cancer representing approximately 25 % of all uterine malignancies. The molecular heterogeneity and pathogenesis of uLMS are not well understood, and translational studies aimed at discovering the vulnerabilities of this tumor type are of high priority. We conducted an innovative comprehensive multi-omics integration study from DNA to protein using freshly frozen tumors. Here, we show that two tumors harbor actionable therapeutic targets, IDH1_p.Arg132Cys and KRAS_p.Gly12Cys, and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is the most predominant genomic signature. Additionally, 80 % of the samples presented a chromothripsis signature, reinforcing the aneuploidy phenotype of these tumors. Tumors with a high proliferation score and high Ki67 expression was associated with worse overall survival (OS). We observed a high frequency of balanced fusion events involving EEF1A1 with enrichment of the EGFR pathway. For the first time, uLMS proteomics analysis showed the enrichment of pathways associated with suppression of the innate immune system and ECM organization. Finally, our comprehensive multi-omics integration analysis identified amplification of the CTHRC1 gene from the matrisome, with a negative impact on OS. Interestingly, the expression of Ki67 and CTHRC1 exhibits a strong negative correlation, underscoring two distinct and mutually exclusive biological profiles in uLMS: (i) highly proliferative tumors, characterized by elevated Ki67 expression, and (ii) tumors driven by ECM remodeling, marked by high CTHRC1 levels. Taken together, this deep functional multi-omics approach contributes to the detection of new molecular features of uLMS and suggests that patients could benefit from precision oncology in clinical practice.

Current status and future perspectives of immunotherapy for abdominal liposarcoma: From basic research to clinical practice

Liposarcoma is a highly heterogeneous type of soft tissue sarcoma originating from adipose tissue, characterized by complex biological behavior and invasiveness. Traditional treatments have shown limited efficacy in high-grade and metastatic liposarcoma, with unsatisfactory patient outcomes. In recent years, the breakthroughs of immunotherapy in various solid tumors have sparked interest in its potential application to liposarcoma. This review systematically examines the progress in basic research and clinical practice of immunotherapy for liposarcoma, discussing the tumor immune microenvironment, mechanisms of immune evasion, the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors, combination therapy strategies, the challenges faced, as well as the future direction, with an aim to provide a theoretical basis for personalized treatment of liposarcoma, promote the development of novel immunotherapy strategies, and ultimately improve patient prognosis and quality of life.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with diverse clinical and molecular characteristics, characterized by limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as promising therapies for STS, yet comprehensive evaluations of their efficacy, especially in combination with other treatments, are scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on ICIs in STS treatment, sourced from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to May 31, 2024. The studies included both monotherapy and combination therapies with ICIs. We assessed the methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. Data synthesis involved random-effects meta-analysis to determine pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for objective response rates (ORR), disease control rates (DCR), and high-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

RESULTS

The analysis included 38 studies with 1349 patients covering 24 STS subtypes. The overall ORR was 16% (95% CI 0.12-0.21), DCR was 64% (95% CI 0.57-0.70), and the rate of Grade 3-5 TRAEs was 19% (95% CI 0.13-0.27). Treatments combining ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) showed the highest efficacy (ORR 28%, 95% CI 0.18-0.40), albeit with increased adverse events. ORRs in first-line treatments were substantially higher (28%) compared to second-line treatments or beyond (11%). Subtypes like alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), angiosarcoma (AS), and epithelioid sarcoma (ES) exhibited favorable responses exceeding 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that ICIs, particularly when combined with TKIs, provide substantial therapeutic benefits in treating STS, significantly enhancing response rates in specific subtypes such as ASPS and AS. The results underscore the transformative potential of ICIs in STS treatment strategies. However, the variability across subtypes and treatment lines emphasizes the need for further randomized controlled trials to refine and personalize therapeutic approaches, ensuring optimal outcomes for patients with these diverse malignancies.

Optimal early endpoint for second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated advanced solid cancers: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The administration of second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in previously treated patients with advanced solid cancers has been clinically investigated. However, previous clinical trials lacked an appropriate primary endpoint for efficacy assessment. This systematic review aimed to explore the most optimal early efficacy endpoint for such trials.

METHODS

Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid cancers with disease progression following standard first-line therapy receiving second-line or subsequent ICI administration, with adequate survival outcome data, were included from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before February 2023. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3, 6, and 9 months were investigated as potential early efficacy endpoint candidates for 12-month overall survival (OS), with a strong correlation defined as Pearson's correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.8.

RESULTS

A total of 64 RCTs comprising 22,725 patients and 106 non-randomized prospective trials involving 10,608 participants were eligible for modeling and external validation, respectively. RCTs examined 15 different cancer types, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 28%), melanoma (9, 14%), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (5, 8%). The median sample size of RCTs was 124 patients, and the median follow-up time was 3.2-57.7 months. The ORR (r = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.54) and PFS (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64) exhibited weak trial-level correlations with OS. Within ICI treatment arms, the r values of ORR and 3-, 6-, and 9-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37-0.79), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90), respectively. External validation of 6-month PFS indicated an acceptable discrepancy between actual and predicted 12-month OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-randomized phase 2 trials on second-line or subsequent ICI therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, 6-month PFS could serve as an early efficacy endpoint. However, early efficacy endpoints are not recommended in RCTs to replace OS.

Emerging treatments for sarcoma: from 2024 onward

INTRODUCTION

Sarcomas are a rare and diverse group of mesenchymal-origin solid tumors, constituting only 1% of adult malignancies and classified into soft tissue and bone sarcomas. For localized diseases, surgery and radiotherapy remain the cornerstone treatments. However, systemic options for advanced stages are limited, with an overall survival of approximately 20 months. There is an urgent need to refine clinical trial designs and evaluate novel therapies to improve patient outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes recent advancements in sarcoma clinical trials, highlighting promising therapies that may reshape treatment paradigms. It also examines insights from comprehensive genomic profiling studies, which are paving the way for next-generation therapeutic approaches.

EXPERT OPINION

The heterogeneity and rarity of sarcomas present substantial challenges to the development and regulatory approval of effective therapies. Recent progress in the field has introduced innovative approaches, including novel chemotherapeutic agents, targeted therapies, and immunotherapeutics. However, despite these advancements, significant hurdles persist. While these strategies have demonstrated some success, the overall improvements in survival have often been modest, irrespective of the therapeutic modality. This underscores critical concerns regarding the true cost-benefit balance and the potential for adverse effects, particularly when evaluated over extended follow-up periods.

"From Drowning to Treading Water": Adolescents and Young Adults Living with Incurable and Indolent Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma for More than Two Years

INTRODUCTION

Adolescent/young adult (AYA) patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) typically face a dismal prognosis. However, a subset of patients with incurable disease lives beyond two years. Due to the rarity of diagnoses and inherent heterogeneity within this population, a paucity of data exists regarding the experiences of AYAs with an indolent course (and how to best capture these experiences). With increasing biological insight and clinical experience, including the use of targeted or immune therapies, it is anticipated that more such patients will experience prolonged survival. Our pilot study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and illness experiences of AYAs with incurable yet indolent metastatic STS who were living two years after their diagnoses. Our exploratory aim was to generate a conceptual framework that could subsequently be tested in a multi-center study with a larger cohort of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic incurable STS, aged 15-39 years at diagnosis, and at least two years from diagnosis, were eligible. Patients were recruited over a two-year period at a quaternary children's hospital with a comprehensive AYA oncology program. Participants completed a demographic form and PROMIS short form questionnaires for seven domains and answered an open-ended question. Responses to open-ended questions were coded independently by two authors and utilized to generate themes. Clinical variables were collected from medical records.

RESULTS

Five patients completed questionnaires. Mean age was 29.4 years (18.5-39.8 years) at diagnosis and 34 years (23.2-45.7 years) at study. Three patients were female; two were male; four were White; and one was Black/African American. Diagnoses included ASPSCR1::TFE3 alveolar soft part sarcoma; WWTR1::CAMTA1 epithelioid hemangioendothelioma; INI-1 deficient epithelioid sarcoma; EWSR1::NR4A3 extra-skeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma; and low-grade ARHGAP23::FER spindle cell malignancy, a novel fusion-driven sarcoma. Mean time since diagnosis was 4.5 years (2.6-6 years), and mean treatment duration was 4.2 years (1.5-6 years). On average, patients received 4.8 lines (range 2-8 lines) of antineoplastic therapy. All patients received at least one targeted therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor. Patients reported increased fatigue and anxiety and decreased physical function compared to the standardized US reference population. Themes emerging from qualitative responses included managing physical symptoms, navigating feelings of guilt and inadequacy, self-reflection generating gratitude, and changing illness experiences over time.

CONCLUSIONS

AYA patients living with incurable metastatic soft tissue sarcoma for more than two years were treated with multiple lines of antineoplastic therapy longitudinally. PROMIS data identified fatigue, anxiety, and decreased physical function within this population. Exploratory thematic analysis of qualitative responses generated concepts that could be further tested in an expanded cohort of patients.

Phase Ib Study for the Combination of Doxorubicin, Dacarbazine, and Nivolumab as the Upfront Treatment in Patients With Advanced Leiomyosarcoma: A Study by the Spanish Sarcoma Group (GEIS)

PURPOSE

Doxorubicin, alongside a select group of cytotoxic agents, is capable of inducing an adaptive immune response via a well-established peculiar type of tumor cell death called immunogenic cell death (ICD). We hypothesize that combining doxorubicin and dacarbazine with nivolumab may enhance therapeutic efficacy by exerting synergy in the ICD circuit. We hereby present a phase Ib trial with this combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced leiomyosarcoma and anthracycline-naïve were eligible. The initial dose level consisted of doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 once on day 1, once every three weeks, followed by dacarbazine 400 mg/m2 once on days 1 and 2, once every three weeks, plus nivolumab 360 mg once on day 2, once every 3 weeks, for six courses and then 1 year of nivolumab. A (-1) dose level was the same regimen but with nivolumab 240 mg. A classic 3 + 3 phase-I design was used to determine the recommended phase-II dose (RP2D). Secondary end points included overall response rate, safety profile, survival, and translational research.

RESULTS

From January 2002 to July 2023, 24 patients were enrolled and 23 were evaluable for efficacy, excluding one patient because of noncompliant dose. All patients were treated with the initial dose level, then the RP2D. Toxicity was mild, with the most frequent being grade 4 toxicity neutropenia (16.7%) and thrombocytopenia (8.3%), while no grade 5 toxicity occurred. The centrally reviewed objective response rate was as follows: partial response 56.5%, stable disease 39.1%, and progression 4.4%. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 80% (95% CI, 63 to 98). Dynamic increases of HMGB1 in blood significantly correlated with longer PFS.

CONCLUSION

This scheme of doxorubicin, dacarbazine, and nivolumab is feasible and well tolerated. Clinical activity is encouraging and the prognostic impact of HMGB1 supports the relevance of ICD activation. Further clinical research is already underway with this concept in leiomyosarcoma.

Efficacy and safety of the combination of anlotinib and envafolimab in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma: findings from a single-center retrospective study

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with envafolimab in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study enrolled 15 patients with unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma, who were treated at the Retroperitoneal Tumor Surgery Research Center of Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital between April 2022 and November 2023. The treatment regimen consisted of anlotinib combined with envafolimab. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

Results

A total of 15 patients with unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma were included; among them, seven were male (46.7%) and eight were female (53.3%), with a median age of 55 years. The pathological subtype distribution was as follows: three (20.0%) patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma, 11 (73.3%) patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and one (6.7%) patient with myxoid liposarcoma. At 12 weeks post-diagnosis, none of the patients achieved a complete response. The objective response rate was 6.7%, with one patient (6.7%) achieving a partial response. Disease stability was observed in 10 (66.6%) patients, which corresponded to a disease control rate of 73.3%. Disease progression occurred in four (26.7%) patients. The median follow-up time was 16.9 months and the median progression-free survival time was 14.2 months. Seven patients experienced TRAEs, of whom three (42.2%) had grade 3-4 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were liver function abnormalities, hypertension, and fatigue.

Conclusion

Anlotinib combined with envafolimab demonstrates promising efficacy and manageable safety in treating unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma.

Angiogenesis and Microvascular Permeability

Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood microvessels, is a necessary physiological process for tissue generation and repair. Sufficient blood supply to the tissue is dependent on microvascular density, while the material exchange between the circulating blood and the surrounding tissue is controlled by microvascular permeability. We thus begin this article by reviewing the key signaling factors, particularly vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which regulates both angiogenesis and microvascular permeability. We then review the role of angiogenesis in tissue growth (bone regeneration) and wound healing. Finally, we review angiogenesis as a pathological process in tumorigenesis, intraplaque hemorrhage, cerebral microhemorrhage, pulmonary fibrosis, and hepatic fibrosis. Since the glycocalyx is important for both angiogenesis and microvascular permeability, we highlight the role of the glycocalyx in regulating the interaction between tumor cells and endothelial cells (ECs) and VEGF-containing exosome release and uptake by tumor-associated ECs, all of which contribute to tumorigenesis and metastasis.

SMARCB1/INI-1-Deficient sinonasal carcinoma demonstrates a poor prognosis but favorable clinical outcomes after PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy: A case series

Despite advances in multimodal cancer therapy, such as combining radical surgery with high-intensity chemoradiotherapy, for SMARCB1/INI-1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma (SDSC), the prognosis of patients remains poor. Immunotherapy is gaining increasing popularity as a novel treatment strategy for patients with SMARCB1/INI-1-deficient tumors. Herein, we report on the management of three patients with SDSC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy as a part of multimodal therapy based on surgery and chemoradiotherapy. All three patients survived and demonstrated good clinical remission and disease control. To our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting the use of immunotherapy to improve clinical outcomes in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and late first-line stages of treatment in patients with SDSC. Furthermore, we reviewed the relevant literature and further explored the correlation between SMARCB1/INI-1 deletion and immunotherapy.

Treatment of Retroperitoneal Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma with Combination of Penpulimab and Anlotinib: A Case Report and Literature Review

To observe the efficacy of combination therapy with Penpulimab and Anlotinib in the treatment of retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma. Retrospective analysis of clinical data of a patient with retroperitoneal well-differentiated soft tissue sarcoma admitted to Shaoxing People's Hospital, and review of relevant literature. The patient is a young male who experienced recurrence of retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma after two surgeries. After first-line treatment with Anlotinib combined with Penpulimab, the patient achieved almost complete remission with a progression free survival period of about 16 months. The first-line treatment of retroperitoneal well-differentiated soft tissue sarcoma using Anlotinib combined with Penpulimab resulted in a good prognosis.

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

Novel Therapeutics in Soft Tissue Sarcoma

There has been noteworthy progress in molecular characterisation and therapeutics in soft tissue sarcomas. Novel agents have gained regulatory approval by the FDA. Examples are the tyrosine kinase inhibitors avapritinib and ripretinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), the immune check point inhibitor atezolizumab in alveolar soft part tissue sarcoma, the γ-secretase inhibitor nirogacestat in desmoid tumours, the NTRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib in tumours with NTRK fusions, the mTOR inhibitor nab-sirolimus in PEComa, and the EZH-2 inhibitor tazemetostat in epithelioid sarcoma. The FDA has also recently granted accelerated approval for autologous T-cell therapy with afami-cel in patients with HLA-A*02 and MAGE-A4-expressing synovial sarcoma. There are other promising treatments that are still investigational, such as MDM2 and CDK4/6 inhibitors in well-/dedifferentiated liposarcoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors in the head and neck angiosarcoma and a subset of patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and PARP inhibitors in leiomyosarcoma. The challenges in drug development in soft tissue sarcoma are due to the rarity and the molecular heterogeneity of the disease and the fact that many subtypes are associated with complex karyotypes or non-targetable molecular alterations. We believe that progress maybe possible with a better understanding of the complex biology, the development of novel compounds for difficult targets such as proteolysis targeting chimeras (Protacs), the utilisation of modern clinical trial designs, and enhanced collaboration of academia with industry to develop treatments with a strong biologic rationale.

Recent advances in sarcoma therapy: new agents, strategies and predictive biomarkers

Soft tissue and bone sarcomas are a heterogenous group of uncommon mesenchymal tumors with high unmet needs for novel therapeutic and diagnostic strategies. Despite many challenges that persist, innovative therapeutics are emerging. Here we provide a review of the studies presented at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting that were focused on sarcoma. There were many outstanding studies that were reported at the meeting. We begin by discussing the clinical studies on soft tissue sarcoma (STS) that included multiple histology subtypes, followed by highlighting developments in cellular therapy, before delving into specific STS histologic subtypes followed by a section covering the studies that were focused on predictive biomarkers. We conclude by discussing the studies in bone sarcomas. Some of the studies discussed here are likely to be practice changing. Some of the early-phase clinical trials have shown encouraging results.

Histology-Specific Clinical Trial of Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab in Patients with Sarcoma

PURPOSE

Survival of patients with metastatic sarcoma remains poor, and there is a pressing need for new therapies. Most sarcoma subtypes are not responsive to immune checkpoint inhibition alone. Lenvatinib, a multireceptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting tumor vasculature, has an immunomodulatory activity that contributes to its antitumor effects. Therefore, we hypothesized that a combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab would lead to improved clinical outcomes in patients with sarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an open-label, single-arm study of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in the following cohorts: (A) leiomyosarcoma, (B) undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), (C) vascular sarcomas (angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma), (D) synovial sarcoma or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and (E) bone sarcomas (osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma). The primary endpoint was the best overall response (BOR) rate documented by RECIST v1.1 by 27 weeks in each cohort, with a threshold of ≥2 responses among 10 patients. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, and safety.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint, which was met in the UPS and MPNST/synovial cohorts (BOR rates by 27 weeks of 25% and 30%, respectively). There were seven partial responses overall with additional responses noted in angiosarcoma and osteosarcoma. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 50/51 (98%) and 29/51 (57%) of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed durable responses in MPNST, synovial sarcoma, and osteosarcoma. Patients with UPS and angiosarcoma also responded. Further exploration of this approach is warranted to confirm activity and determine optimal dosing schedules.

Anlotinib plus TQB2450, a PD-L1 Antibody, in Patients with Advanced Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma: A Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is an ultrarare soft-tissue sarcoma with a high rate of metastasis and no established treatment. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and TQB2450 (a PD-L1 inhibitor) in patients with ASPS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy of TQB2450, an anti-PD-L1 agent, combined with anlotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in adults with advanced ASPS. TQB2450 was given intravenously (1,200 mg) on day 1, and anlotinib (12 mg/day) was taken orally from day 1 to 14 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate, with secondary endpoints including duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Lymphocyte infiltration and tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) were also analyzed as potential prognostic biomarkers.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 29 patients, of whom 28 were evaluable (one withdrew because of acute pancreatitis). An objective response was achieved in 82.1% of patients, including 4 complete and 19 partial responses. The median time to response was 2.8 months, and the duration of response was not reached, with an estimated median progression-free survival of 35.2 months. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 44.8% of patients, with no study-related deaths. Responders had a higher proportion of TLS area, TLS density, and CD20-positive immune cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of anlotinib and TQB2450 is effective and tolerable in patients with ASPS. TLS may serve as a prognostic biomarker, meriting further investigation.

Predictive and Dynamic Signature for Antiangiogenics in Combination with a PD1 Inhibitor in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Correlative Studies Linked to the IMMUNOSARC Trial

PURPOSE

The IMMUNOSARC trial combined an antiangiogenic agent (sunitinib) with a PD1 inhibitor (nivolumab) in advanced sarcomas. Here, we present the first correlative studies of the soft-tissue sarcoma cohort enrolled in this trial.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline and week 13. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples were used for transcriptomics and multiplex immunofluorescence, whereas peripheral blood samples were used for multiplexed immunoassays. Flow cytometry and Luminex assays were performed to validate translational findings in tumor-isolated cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from patients.

RESULTS

The density of intratumoral CD8+ T cells, measured by multiplexed immunophenotyping, was significantly increased after treatment. This augment was accompanied by the dynamic significant increase in the gene expressions of CD86, CHI3L1, CXCL10, CXCL9, LAG3, and VCAM1 and the decrease in the expression levels of NR4A1. In peripheral blood, 12 proteins were significantly modulated by treatment at week 13. A score integrating the dynamic expression of the 7 genes and the 12 soluble factors separated 2 groups with distinct progression-free survival (PFS): 4.1 months [95% confidence interval, 3.5-not reached (NR)] versus 17 months (95% confidence interval, 12.0-NR), P = 0.014. This molecular score was predictive of PFS when applied to the normalized data determined in the baseline samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with sunitinib and nivolumab inflamed the sarcoma microenvironment, increasing CD8+ T-cell density and the expression of several genes/proteins with relevance in the response to PD1 inhibitors. A molecular signature identified two groups of patients with distinct PFS for the combination of antiangiogenics plus PD1 inhibitor therapy.

The Role of Adenosine in Overcoming Resistance in Sarcomas

Resistance to systemic therapies in sarcomas poses a significant challenge to improving clinical outcomes. Recent research has concentrated on the tumor microenvironment's role in sarcoma progression and treatment resistance. This microenvironment comprises a variety of cell types and signaling molecules that influence tumor behavior, including proliferation, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Adenosine, abundant in the tumor microenvironment, has been implicated in promoting immunosuppression and chemoresistance. Targeting adenosine receptors and associated pathways offers a novel approach to enhancing immune responses against tumors, potentially improving immunotherapy outcomes in cancers, including sarcomas. Manipulating adenosine signaling also shows promise in overcoming chemotherapy resistance in these tumors. Clinical trials investigating adenosine receptor antagonists in sarcomas have fueled interest in this pathway for sarcoma treatment. Ultimately, a comprehensive understanding of the tumor and vascular microenvironments, as well as the adenosine pathway, may open new avenues for improving treatment outcomes and overcoming resistance in sarcoma. Further studies and clinical trials are crucial to validate these findings and optimize therapeutic strategies, particularly for osteosarcoma. This study provides a literature review exploring the potential role of the adenosine pathway in sarcomas.

Exploratory analysis of immunomodulatory factors identifies L1CAM as a prognostic marker in alveolar soft-part sarcoma

Background

Alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare tumor driven by the ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion protein, with a propensity for metastasis. Prognostic factors remain poorly understood, and traditional chemotherapies are largely ineffective. Recent interest lies in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), yet predictive biomarkers for treatment response are lacking. Previous studies have shown promising results with ICIs in ASPS, indicating a need for further investigation into biomarkers associated with immune response.

Objectives

To identify prognostic biomarkers in ASPS and to explore the role of immune-related markers, particularly L1CAM, in predicting patient outcomes.

Design

A retrospective cohort study of 19 ASPS patients registered in the GEIS database. The study involved the collection of clinical and histopathological data, followed by an analysis of immune markers and gene expression profiles to identify potential prognostic indicators.

Methods

Clinical and histopathological data were retrospectively collected from the GEIS-26 study cohort of 19 ASPS patients. Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate immune markers programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L1), programmed death-1, FAS, FASL, CD8, CD3, and CD4. An HTG ImmunOncology panel was conducted on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples to explore gene expression. Effects of differentially expressed genes on survival were explored by Kaplan-Meier.

Results

PD-L1 positivity was widely observed (63%) in tumors, and CD8+ lymphocytic infiltration was common. High CD8 density correlated with greater overall survival (OS) while not statistically significant. No associations were found for other immune markers. L1CAM was identified as differentially expressed in patients with low CD8 infiltration and correlated negatively with OS.

Conclusion

High L1CAM expression correlated with poorer OS, highlighting its potential as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target in ASPS. Immunomodulatory interventions may hold promise, as evidenced by PD-L1 expression and CD8+ infiltration. Further research, including larger cohorts and international collaborations, is needed to validate these findings and explore therapeutic strategies targeting L1CAM in ASPS.

ASPSCR1::TFE3-mediated upregulation of insulin receptor substrate 2 (IRS-2) activates PI3K/AKT signaling and promotes malignant phenotype

The ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion gene, resulting from chromosomal translocation, is detected in alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and a subset of renal cell carcinomas (RCC). The ASPSCR1::TFE3 oncoprotein, functioning as an aberrant transcription factor, contributes to tumor development and progression by inappropriately upregulating target genes. Here, we identified insulin receptor substrate 2 (IRS-2), a cytoplasmic adaptor protein, as a novel transcriptional target of ASPSCR1::TFE3. Ectopic expression of ASPSCR1::TFE3 led to increased IRS-2 mRNA and protein levels. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and luciferase assays demonstrated that ASPSCR1::TFE3 bound to the IRS-2 promoter region and enhanced its transcription. Moreover, IRS-2 was highly expressed in the ASPSCR1::TFE3-positive RCC cell line FU-UR1, while small interfering RNA-mediated depletion of ASPSCR1::TFE3 markedly decreased IRS-2 mRNA and protein levels. Functionally, IRS-2 knockdown attenuated activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway and reduced proliferation, migration, invasion, adhesion, and clonogenicity in FU-UR1 cells. Pharmacological inhibition of IRS-2 also reduced AKT activation as well as cell viability, clonogenicity, migration, invasion, and adhesion. These findings suggest that IRS-2, regulated by ASPSCR1::TFE3, promotes tumor progression by activating PI3K/AKT signaling and enhancing the malignant phenotype.

Two-step consensus clustering approach to immune cell infiltration: An integrated exploration and validation of prognostic and immune implications in sarcomas

To conduct a comprehensive investigation of the sarcoma immune cell infiltration (ImmCI) patterns and tumoral microenvironment (TME). We utilized transcriptomic, clinical, and mutation data of sarcoma patients (training cohort) obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) server. Cell-type Identification by Estimating Relative Subsets of RNA Transcripts (CIBERSORT) and Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumor tissues using Expression data (ESTIMATE) algorithms were applied to decipher the immune cell infiltration landscape and TME profiles of sarcomas. An unsupervised clustering method was utilized for classifying ImmCI clusters (initial clustering) and ImmCI-based differentially expressed gene-driven clusters (secondary clustering). Mortality rates and immune checkpoint gene levels was analyzed among the identified clusters. We calculated the ImmCI score through principal component analysis. The tumor immune dysfunction evaluation (TIDE) score was also employed to quantify immunotherapy efficacy between two ImmCI score groups. We further validated the biomarkers for ImmCI and gene-driven clusters via experimental verification and the accuracy of the ImmCI score in predicting survival outcomes and immunotherapy efficacy by external validation cohorts (testing cohort). We demonstrated that ImmCI cluster A and gene-driven cluster A, were beneficial prognostic biomarkers and indicators of immune checkpoint blockade response in sarcomas via in-silico and laboratory experiments. Additionally, the ImmCI score exhibited independent prognostic significance and was predictive of immunotherapy response. Our research underscores the clinical significance of ImmCI scores in identifying sarcoma patients likely to respond to immunotherapy.

Comprehensive analysis of prognostic and immunological role of basement membrane-related genes in soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) represents highly multifarious malignant tumors that often occur in adolescents and have a poor prognosis. The basement membrane, as an ancient cellular matrix, was recently proven to play a vital role in developing abundant tumors. The relationship between basement membrane-related genes and STS remains unknown.

METHODS

Consensus clustering was employed to identify subgroups related to differentially expressed basement membrane-related genes. Cox and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analyses were utilized to construct this novel signature. Then, we established a nomogram and calibration curve, including the risk score and available clinical characteristics. Finally, we carried out functional enrichment analysis and immune microenvironment analysis to investigate enriched pathways and the tumor immune microenvironment related to the novel signature.

RESULTS

A prognostic predictive signature consisting of eight basement membrane-related genes was established. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated that the patients in the high-risk group had a poor prognosis. Independent analysis illustrated that this risk model could be an independent prognostic predictor. We validated the accuracy of our signature in the validation data set. In addition, gene set enrichment analysis and immune microenvironment analysis showed that patients with low-risk scores were enriched in some pathways associated with immunity. Finally, in vitro experiments showed significantly differential expression levels of these signature genes in STS cells and PSAT1 could promote the malignant behavior of STS.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel signature is a promising prognostic predictor for STS. The present study may improve the prognosis and enhance individualized treatment for STS in the future.

Microsatellite Instability and Clinical Use in Sarcomas: Systematic Review and Illustrative Case Report

Sarcomas, a diverse group of malignancies, exhibit substantial heterogeneity in both biological behavior and microenvironment, influencing their response to immunotherapy. Although pembrolizumab is approved for deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) tumors regardless of histology, there is a paucity of data to support its effectiveness in dMMR/MSI-H sarcomas. This study presents a case of a metastatic undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the retroperitoneum with dMMR status demonstrating a sustained complete response to pembrolizumab. Our case revealed inconsistencies in identifying dMMR/MSI-H status through next-generation sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and polymerase chain reaction methods. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to analyze various methods for assessing dMMR/MSI-H and to explore whether pembrolizumab's indications rely on this biomarker.

Alveolar soft part sarcomas in young patients: The French national NETSARC+ network experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is an ultra-rare chemo-resistant sarcoma in children, occurring preferentially in young adults. We aimed to describe and compare its clinical presentation and behaviour in children and young adults to determine whether the same therapeutic strategy should be addressed for both populations.

METHODS

National retrospective multicentre study of children (0-18 years) vs. young adults (19-30 years) included in the "ConticaBase" sarcoma database, treated for ASPS between 2010 and 2019 with pathology reviewed via the NETSARC + network.

RESULTS

Overall, 45 patients were identified, 19 children (42%) and 26 young adults (58%). All ASPS diagnoses were confirmed with TFE3 rearrangement by immunohistochemistry or FISH. All clinical characteristics were balanced between both populations with frequent metastases at diagnosis (8/19 vs. 10/26). The therapeutic strategy was based on surgery (17/19 vs. 21/26), radiotherapy (8/19 vs. 12/26) ± systemic treatment (8/19 vs. 9/26). In patients with initially localized disease, metastatic relapse occurred only in adults (8/16), whereas metastatic progression was present in both metastatic groups (5/8 vs. 8/10). After a median follow-up of 5.2 years (range, 0.2-12.2), 5-year EFS was 74% [95%CI, 56-96] vs. 47% [30-74] (p = 0.071) respectively, and 5-year OS was 95% [85-100] vs. 85% [70-100] (p = 0.84). For localized tumours, 5-year MFS was 100% [100-100] vs. 60% [39-91] (p = 0.005). The 5-year OS of all patients with metastasis at diagnosis was 80.2% (62.2%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

ASPS appears to have the overall same clinical characteristics, but a more aggressive behaviour in young adults than in children. However, despite frequent metastases at diagnosis, long-term survival is high in both groups. Overall, the same therapeutic strategies may be considered for both populations.

Real-world efficacy, safety data and predictive clinical parameters for treatment outcomes in advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with combined immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy

BACKGROUND

The combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy has shown potential in the treatment of numerous malignant tumors, but limited evidence was available for soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Therefore, the aim of the present study is to assess the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in conjunction with antiangiogenic therapy in patients diagnosed with advanced STS (aSTS).

METHODS

The study enrolled patients with aSTS from January 2014 to October 2022. Eligible participants had previously received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, presented with an anthracycline-resistant sarcoma subtype, or were ineligible for anthracycline treatment due to medical conditions. Following enrollment, these patients received a combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were included in this cohort study. The median duration of follow-up was 15.8 months. The ORR and DCR were 17.6%, and 76.5%, respectively. The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.8 months (95% CI: 4.8-6.8) for all patients, and the median OS had not been reached as of the date cutoff. Multivariate analysis indicated that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and ≤ second-line treatment were positive predictors for both PFS and OS. Patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma or clear cell sarcoma had longer mPFS (16.2 months, 95% CI: 7.8-25.6) when compared to those with other subtypes of STS (4.4 months, 95% CI: 1.4-7.5, P < 0.001). Among the observed adverse events, hypertension (23.5%), diarrhea (17.6%), and proteinuria (17.6%) were the most common, with no treatment-related deaths reported.

CONCLUSION

The combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents showed promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in patients with aSTS, especially those with alveolar soft part sarcoma or clear cell sarcoma.

Spatial distribution of tumour immune infiltrate predicts outcomes of patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) may modify tumour immune infiltrate. This study characterized immune infiltrate spatial distribution after NAC in primary high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and investigate association with prognosis.

METHODS

The ISG-STS 1001 trial randomized STS patients to anthracycline plus ifosfamide (AI) or a histology-tailored (HT) NAC. Four areas of tumour specimens were sampled: the area showing the highest lymphocyte infiltrate (HI) at H&E; the area with lack of post-treatment changes (highest grade, HG); the area with post-treatment changes (lowest grade, LG); and the tumour edge (TE). CD3, CD8, PD-1, CD20, FOXP3, and CD163 were analyzed at immunohistochemistry and digital pathology. A machine learning method was used to generate sarcoma immune index scores (SIS) that predict patient disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS).

FINDINGS

Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-1+ cells together with CD163+ cells were more represented in STS histologies with complex compared to simple karyotype, while CD20+ B-cells were detected in both these histology groups. PD-1+ cells exerted a negative prognostic value irrespectively of their spatial distribution. Enrichment in CD20+ B-cells at HI and TE areas was associated with better patient outcomes. We generated a prognostic SIS for each tumour area, having the HI-SIS the best performance. Such prognostic value was driven by treatment with AI.

INTERPRETATION

The different spatial distribution of immune populations and their different association with prognosis support NAC as a modifier of tumour immune infiltrate in STS.

FUNDING

Pharmamar; Italian Ministry of Health [RF-2019-12370923; GR-2016-02362609]; 5 × 1000 Funds-2016, Italian Ministry of Health; AIRC Grant [ID#28546].

ASPSCR1::TFE3 Drives Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma by Inducing Targetable Transcriptional Programs

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare mesenchymal malignancy driven by the ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion. A better understanding of the mechanisms by which this oncogenic transcriptional regulator drives cancer growth is needed to help identify potential therapeutic targets. In this study, we characterized the transcriptional and chromatin landscapes of ASPS tumors and preclinical models, identifying the essential role of ASPSCR1::TFE3 in tumor cell viability by regulating core transcriptional programs involved in cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and mitochondrial biology. ASPSCR1::TFE3 directly interacted with key epigenetic regulators at enhancers and promoters to support ASPS-associated transcription. Among the effector programs driven by ASPSCR1::TFE3, cell proliferation was driven by high levels of cyclin D1 expression. Disruption of cyclin D1/CDK4 signaling led to a loss of ASPS proliferative capacity, and combined inhibition of CDK4/6 and angiogenesis halted tumor growth in xenografts. These results define the ASPS oncogenic program, reveal mechanisms by which ASPSCR1::TFE3 controls tumor biology, and identify a strategy for therapeutically targeting tumor cell-intrinsic vulnerabilities. Significance: The ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion propels the growth of alveolar soft part sarcoma  by activating transcriptional programs that regulate proliferation, angiogenesis, mitochondrial biogenesis, and differentiation and can be therapeutically targeted to improve treatment.

Combination treatment with PD1/PDL-1 inhibitors for sarcomas: state of the art, next questions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Only a small fraction of sarcomas exhibit recognized parameters of immune sensitivity, such as tumor mutational burden, PDL-1 expression, or microsatellite instability. Combined strategies aimed to modulate tumor microenvironment to increase the efficacy of PD1/PDL-1 inhibitors in sarcoma. Most explored prospective studies were based on combinations of PD1/PDL-1 inhibitors with antiangiogenics, other immune checkpoints, or chemotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Results on 6-month PFS rate, median PFS, and ORR in trials using PD1/PDL-1 inhibitors plus antiangiogenics ranged respectively as 46.9-55%, 4.7-7.8 months and 21-36.7%. In combination with other immune checkpoint inhibitors, the results of median PFS and ORR ranged from 2.8-4.1 months and 10-16%, respectively. In combination with chemotherapy, the best results were obtained with doxorubicin-based regimens compared to other agents. Duplet-based chemotherapy plus anti-PD1/PDL-1 obtained the highest ORR (56.2%) compared with doxorubicin (19-36.7%). Currently, the most robust predictive biomarker for anti-PD1/PDL-1 efficacy is the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) with mature dendritic cells.

SUMMARY

Even when direct comparisons between PD1/PDL-1 inhibitor-based combinations and single agents have not been performed yet in sarcoma, some combinations appear promising. Studies controlling heterogeneity by biomarker or histotype selection contribute to an increase in efficacy or knowledge crucial for future comparative trials.

An Evaluation of Risk Factors for Intracranial Metastases of Sarcomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Sarcomas, a group of neoplasms comprising both tissue and bone soft tissue tumors, has an increasing prevalence in recent years. Prognosis significantly hinges on early detection, and if not detected early, may consequently metastasize. This review will be the first systematic review and meta-analysis characterizing the presentation and progression of brain metastases from bone and soft tissue cancers.

METHODS

The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried to identify studies reporting the incidence of intracranial brain metastases from primary sarcoma to the present. Abstract and full-text screening of 1822 initial articles returned by preliminary search yielded 28 studies for inclusion and data extraction. Qualitative assessment of the studies was conducted in accordance with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria. Meta-analyses were applied to assess risk factors on outcomes.

RESULTS

The average age within the cohort was 27.9 years with a male and female prevalence of 59.1% and 40.9%, respectively. The odds ratio for living status (dead/alive) was calculated for several risk factors - male/female [OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.62, 2.07], single/multiple metastases [OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.35, 1.28], lung metastases/not [OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.85, 3.13], surgery/no surgery [OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.20, 1.21]. The standardized mean differences for duration from diagnoses to metastases were likewise analyzed - male/female [SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.15, 0.42], single/multiple metastases [SMD 0.11, 95% CI -0.20, 0.42], lung metastases/not [SMD -0.03, 95% CI -0.38, 0.32], surgery/no surgery [SMD 0.45, 95% CI -0.18, 1.09]. The standardized mean differences for duration from metastases to death were analyzed - lung metastases/not [SMD 0.43, 95% CI -0.08, 0.95].

CONCLUSIONS

Our study observed no statistically significant differences in mortality rate among several patient risk factors. Consequentially, there lacks a clear answer as to whether or not an association between mortality rates exists with these patient factors. As such, it is important to continue research in brain-metastasizing sarcomas despite their relative rarity.

Advancements in Diagnosis and Multimodal Treatment Strategies for Retroperitoneal Tumors: A Comprehensive Review

Retroperitoneal tumors (RPTs) encompass both benign and malignant entities, constituting ~0.1% to 0.2% of all malignant tumors, of which 70% to 80% manifest malignancy. Predominantly, retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent the most prevalent subtype among RPT. With over 70 histologic forms identified, liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas emerge as the primary constituents of RPS. Accurate diagnosis of RPTs necessitates preoperative core-needle biopsy and comprehensive imaging assessment. The current staging protocol for RPS relies on the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM classification. Surgical excision remains the established gold standard for treating RPS. Therapeutic approaches vary according to the underlying pathophysiology. Although chemotherapy and radiotherapy exhibit efficacy in managing metastatic and recurrent unresectable RPS, their role in primary RPS remains unresolved, necessitating further clinical trials for validation. Concurrently, ongoing research explores the potential of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of existing research, delineating diagnostic pathways and optimal therapeutic strategies for RPT.

Comprehensive Review of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Targeted Therapy

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is the most common subtype of uterine sarcomas. They have a poor prognosis with high rates of recurrence and metastasis. The five-year survival for uLMS patients is between 25 and 76%, with survival rates approaching 10-15% for patients with metastatic disease at the initial diagnosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that several biological pathways are involved in uLMS pathogenesis. Notably, drugs that block abnormal functions of these pathways remarkably improve survival in uLMS patients. However, due to chemotherapy resistance, there remains a need for novel drugs that can target these pathways effectively. In this review article, we provide an overview of the recent progress in ascertaining the biological functions and regulatory mechanisms in uLMS from the perspective of aberrant biological pathways, including DNA repair, immune checkpoint blockade, protein kinase and intracellular signaling pathways, and the hedgehog pathway. We review the emerging role of epigenetics and epitranscriptome in the pathogenesis of uLMS. In addition, we discuss serum markers, artificial intelligence (AI) combined with machine learning, shear wave elastography, current management and medical treatment options, and ongoing clinical trials for patients with uLMS. Comprehensive, integrated, and deeper insights into the pathobiology and underlying molecular mechanisms of uLMS will help develop novel strategies to treat patients with this aggressive tumor.

Immunotherapy in Sarcoma: Current Data and Promising Strategies

Traditionally sarcomas have been considered immunologically quiet tumours, with low tumour mutational burden (TMB) and an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME), consisting of decreased T-cell infiltration and elevated levels of H1F1α, macrophages and neutrophils.1,2 However, research has shown that a subset of sarcomas are immunologically 'hot' with either high TMB, PDL-1 expression, CD8+ T cells or presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) demonstrating sensitivity to immunotherapy.3,4 Here, we review the current evidence for immunotherapy use in bone sarcomas (BS) and soft tissue sarcomas (STS), with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and adoptive cellular therapies including engineered T-cell therapies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and cancer vaccines and biomarkers of response.

How to develop new systemic treatments in ultra-rare cancers with high unmet needs? The case of alveolar soft-part sarcoma

Developing new drugs or generating evidence for existing drugs in new indications for ultra-rare cancers is complex and carries a high-risk of failure. This gets even harder in ultra-rare tumours, which have an annual incidence of 1 per 1,000,000 population or less. Here, we illustrate the problem of adequate evidence generation in ultra-rare tumours, using Alveolar Soft-Part Sarcomas (ASPS) - an ultra-rare sarcoma newly diagnosed in approximately 60 persons a year in the European Union - as an exemplar case showing challenges in development despite being potentially relevant for classes of agents. We discuss some possible approaches for addressing such challenges, especially focussing on constructive collaboration between academic groups, patients and advocates, drug manufacturers, and regulators to optimise drug development in ultra-rare cancers. This article, written by various European stakeholders, proposes a way forward to ultimately get better options for patients with ultra-rare cancers.

From standard therapies to monoclonal antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors - an update for reconstructive surgeons on common oncological cases

Malignancies represent a persisting worldwide health burden. Tumor treatment is commonly based on surgical and/or non-surgical therapies. In the recent decade, novel non-surgical treatment strategies involving monoclonal antibodies (mAB) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been successfully incorporated into standard treatment algorithms. Such emerging therapy concepts have demonstrated improved complete remission rates and prolonged progression-free survival compared to conventional chemotherapies. However, the in-toto surgical tumor resection followed by reconstructive surgery oftentimes remains the only curative therapy. Breast cancer (BC), skin cancer (SC), head and neck cancer (HNC), and sarcoma amongst other cancer entities commonly require reconstructive surgery to restore form, aesthetics, and functionality. Understanding the basic principles, strengths, and limitations of mAB and ICI as (neo-) adjuvant therapies and treatment alternatives for resectable or unresectable tumors is paramount for optimized surgical therapy planning. Yet, there is a scarcity of studies that condense the current body of literature on mAB and ICI for BC, SC, HNC, and sarcoma. This knowledge gap may result in suboptimal treatment planning, ultimately impairing patient outcomes. Herein, we aim to summarize the current translational endeavors focusing on mAB and ICI. This line of research may serve as an evidence-based fundament to guide targeted therapy and optimize interdisciplinary anti-cancer strategies.

An unusual case of primary splenic soft part alveolar sarcoma: case report and review of the literature with emphasis on the spectrum of TFE3-associated neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Alveolar soft part sarcoma is a rare tumour of soft tissues, mostly localized in muscles or deep soft tissues of the extremities. In rare occasions, this tumour develops in deep tissues of the abdomen or pelvis.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this case report, we described the case of a 46 year old man who developed a primary splenic alveolar soft part sarcoma. The tumour displayed typical morphological alveolar aspect, as well as immunohistochemical profile notably TFE3 nuclear staining. Detection of ASPSCR1 Exon 7::TFE3 Exon 6 fusion transcript in molecular biology and TFE3 rearrangement in FISH confirmed the diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

We described the first case of primary splenic alveolar soft part sarcoma, which questions once again the cell of origin of this rare tumour.

Atezolizumab as the First Systemic Therapy Approved for Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of atezolizumab (Tecentriq) for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 2 years and older with unresectable or metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE databases, published abstracts, and ongoing studies from ClinicalTrials.gov between January 1, 1981, and May 31, 2023. Keywords included atezolizumab, Tecentriq, MPDL3280, immunotherapy, PD-L1, PD-1, pediatrics, sarcoma, and ASPS.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All English-language studies involving atezolizumab for ASPS were included and discussed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Atezolizumab is an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody designed to block the interaction between PD-L1 and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor. Atezolizumab was granted approval by the FDA specifically for ASPS based on a phase II clinical trial in adult and pediatric patients (n = 49), which reported an overall response rate of 24% and a durable response rate at 6 and 12 months of 67% and 42%, respectively. Common grade 3/4 adverse reactions include musculoskeletal pain (8%), followed by hypertension (6%), weight gain (6%), headache (4%), and dizziness (4%).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON WITH EXISTING DRUGS

Advanced ASPS is a high-risk disease with limited treatment options. Atezolizumab appears to be a viable treatment option in ASPS demonstrating clinical efficacy and a manageable toxicity profile.

CONCLUSIONS

With no other treatments that are FDA approved specifically for ASPS, and few demonstrating efficacy in the advanced setting, the approval of atezolizumab, including the first approval for pediatric patients, represents a landmark improvement to the therapeutic arsenal against this rare disease.

Well-differentiated liposarcomas and dedifferentiated liposarcomas: Systemic treatment options for two sibling neoplasms

Well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) account for 60 % of all liposarcomas, reflecting the heterogeneity of this type of sarcoma. Genetically, both types of liposarcomas are characterized by the amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 genes, which indicates an important molecular event with diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. In both localized WDLPS and DDLPS of the retroperitoneum and the extremities, between 25 % and 30 % of patients have local or distant recurrence, even when perioperatively treated, with clear margins present. The systemic treatment of WDLPS and DDLPS remains a challenge, with anthracyclines as the gold standard for first-line treatment. Several regimens have been tested with modest results regarding their efficacy. Herein we discuss the systemic treatment options for WDLPS and DDLPS and review their reported clinical efficacy results.

The more the merrier? Evidence and efficacy of immune checkpoint- and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations in advanced solid cancers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have gained therapeutical significance in cancer therapy over the last years. Due to the high efficacy of each substance group, additive or complementary effects are considered, and combinations are the subject of multiple prospective trials in different tumor entities. The majority of available data results from clinical phase I and II trials. Although regarded as well-tolerated therapies ICI-TKI combinations have higher toxicities compared to monotherapies of one of the substance classes and some combinations were shown to be excessively toxic leading to discontinuation of trials. So far, ICI-TKI combinations with nivolumab + cabozantinib, pembrolizumab + axitinib, avelumab + axitinib, pembrolizumab + lenvatinib have been approved in advanced renal cell (RCC), with pembrolizumab + lenvatinib in endometrial carcinoma and with camrelizumab + rivoceranib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several ICI-TKI combinations are currently investigated in phase I to III trials in various other cancer entities. Further, the optimal sequence of ICI-TKI combinations is an important subject of investigation, as cross-resistances between the substance classes were observed. This review reports on clinical trials with ICI-TKI combinations in different cancer entities, their efficacy and toxicity.

Precision Oncology in Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), including gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), are mesenchymal neoplasms with heterogeneous clinical behavior and represent broad categories comprising multiple distinct biologic entities. Multidisciplinary management of these rare tumors is critical. To date, multiple studies have outlined the importance of biological characterization of mesenchymal tumors and have identified key molecular alterations which drive tumor biology. GIST has represented a flagship for targeted therapy in solid tumors with the advent of imatinib which has revolutionized the way we treat this malignancy. Herein, the authors discuss the importance of biological and molecular diagnostics in managing STS and GIST patients.

Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy Combinations for Sarcoma

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of bone and soft tissue tumors. Survival outcomes for advanced (unresectable or metastatic) disease remain poor, so therapeutic improvements are needed. Radiotherapy plays an integral role in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of localized disease as well as in the treatment of metastatic disease. Combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy to potentiate immunotherapy has been used in a variety of cancers other than sarcoma, and there is opportunity to further investigate combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy to try to improve outcomes in sarcoma. In this review, we describe the diversity of the tumor immune microenvironments for sarcomas and describe the immunomodulatory effects of radiotherapy. We discuss studies on the timing of radiotherapy relative to immunotherapy and studies on the radiotherapy dose and fractionation regimen to be used in combination with immunotherapy. We describe the impact of radiotherapy on the tumor immune microenvironment. We review completed and ongoing clinical trials combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy for sarcoma and propose future directions for studies combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy in the treatment of sarcoma.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in sarcoma: a two-center study

Background

Sarcoma is a highly heterogeneous malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although chemotherapy and targeted therapy have improved the prognosis to some extent, the efficacy remains unsatisfactory in some patients. The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in sarcoma need further evaluation.

Methods

We conducted a two-center study of sarcoma patients receiving PD-1 immunotherapy at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital and Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital. The treatment regimens included PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy based on PD-1 inhibitors. The observed primary endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS). Survival curves were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

A total of 43 patients were included from the two centers. The median follow-up time for all patients was 13 months (range, 1-48 months). In the group of 37 patients with advanced or unresectable sarcoma, the mPFS was 6 months (95%CI: 5-12 months), and the mOS was 16 months (95%CI: 10-28 months). The ORR was 10.8% (4/37), and the DCR was 18.9% (7/37). Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.11) and mOS (p=0.88) between patients with PD-L1 negative/positive expression. There were also no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.13) or mOS (p=0.72) between PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy. Additionally, there were no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.52) or mOS (p=0.49) between osteogenic sarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma. Furthermore, the results showed no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.66) or mOS (p=0.96) between PD-1 inhibitors combined with targeted therapy and PD-1 inhibitors combined with AI chemotherapy. Among the 6 patients receiving adjuvant therapy after surgery, the mPFS was 15 months (95%CI: 6-NA months), and the mOS was not reached. In terms of safety, most adverse events were mild (grade 1-2) and manageable. The most severe grade 4 adverse events were bone marrow suppression, which occurred in 4 patients but resolved after treatment. There was also one case of a grade 4 adverse event related to hypertension.

Conclusion

Immunotherapy is an effective treatment modality for sarcoma with manageable safety. Further inclusion of more patients or prospective clinical trials is needed to validate these findings.

Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic sarcomas after prior chemotherapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sarcoma is a heterogeneous malignancy arising from interstitial tissue. Anthracycline-based therapy is the first-line treatment recommended by guidelines for patients with locally advanced or metastatic unresectable sarcoma. Recently, targeted therapies, in particular tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have made significant progress in the treatment of sarcoma, and their efficacy has been investigated in randomized controlled trials. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of TKIs in patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma who have previously received chemotherapy.

METHODS

We completed a meta-analysis after conducting literature searches in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. The single-drug, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled clinical trials of TKIs in patients with advanced or progressive sarcoma who have previously received chemotherapy are available for inclusion in the study. The observation results were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The subgroup analysis was performed according to histological subtypes of sarcoma.

RESULTS

This study included 6 studies, including 1033 patients. The ORR (OR: 7.99, 95% CI: 3.62-19.61, P < .00001), DCR (OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.27-5.08, P = .009), PFS (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34-0.62, P < .00001), and OS (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67-0.96, P = .02) of patients treated with TKIs were better than those in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced sarcoma, TKIs have been shown to have advantages in terms of ORR, DCR and PFS and OS. Multi-targeted TKIs may be considered as one of the second-line treatment options for sarcoma patients who have received prior chemotherapy.

New clinical trial design in precision medicine: discovery, development and direction

In the era of precision medicine, it has been increasingly recognized that individuals with a certain disease are complex and different from each other. Due to the underestimation of the significant heterogeneity across participants in traditional "one-size-fits-all" trials, patient-centered trials that could provide optimal therapy customization to individuals with specific biomarkers were developed including the basket, umbrella, and platform trial designs under the master protocol framework. In recent years, the successive FDA approval of indications based on biomarker-guided master protocol designs has demonstrated that these new clinical trials are ushering in tremendous opportunities. Despite the rapid increase in the number of basket, umbrella, and platform trials, the current clinical and research understanding of these new trial designs, as compared with traditional trial designs, remains limited. The majority of the research focuses on methodologies, and there is a lack of in-depth insight concerning the underlying biological logic of these new clinical trial designs. Therefore, we provide this comprehensive review of the discovery and development of basket, umbrella, and platform trials and their underlying logic from the perspective of precision medicine. Meanwhile, we discuss future directions on the potential development of these new clinical design in view of the "Precision Pro", "Dynamic Precision", and "Intelligent Precision". This review would assist trial-related researchers to enhance the innovation and feasibility of clinical trial designs by expounding the underlying logic, which be essential to accelerate the progression of precision medicine.

The Future of Targeted Therapy for Leiomyosarcoma

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an aggressive subtype of soft tissue sarcoma that arises from smooth muscle cells, most commonly in the uterus and retroperitoneum. LMS is a heterogeneous disease with diverse clinical and molecular characteristics that have yet to be fully understood. Molecular profiling has uncovered possible targets amenable to treatment, though this has yet to translate into approved targeted therapies in LMS. This review will explore historic and recent findings from molecular profiling, highlight promising avenues of current investigation, and suggest possible future strategies to move toward the goal of molecularly matched treatment of LMS. We focus on targeting the DNA damage response, the macrophage-rich micro-environment, the PI3K/mTOR pathway, epigenetic regulators, and telomere biology.

PTEN pathogenic variants are associated with poor prognosis in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

We aimed to examine whether PTEN pathogenic variants (mutPTEN) were associated with overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with the presence of one or more of the most common genomic alterations including p53, CDKN2A, RB1, and ATRX pathogenic variants.

METHODS

This study included patients from Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Stanford Cancer Center with grade 2 or higher locally advanced and metastatic STS.

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients had leiomyosarcoma (LMS), 136 had undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), 78 had Liposarcoma (LPS), and 214 had other histology subtypes (Others). Among all patients with STS, OS was worse for those with mutPTEN versus wild-type PTEN (wtPTEN, adjusted HR [aHR] = 1.58 [95% CI, 1.11-2.23]), mutCDKN2A vs wtCDKN2A (aHR = 1.33 [95% CI .99-1.80]), and mutRB1 vs wtRB1 (aHR = 1.26 [95% CI 0.93-1.70[), while OS was similar for mutp53 vs wtp53 and mutATRX vs wtATRX. MutPTEN versus wtPTEN was consistently associated with worse OS in histologic subtypes including LMS and UPS and molecular subgroups.

CONCLUSION

MutPTEN vs wtPTEN was associated with worse OS in advanced STS. If confirmed, our findings could be helpful for prognostic stratification in clinical practice and for further understanding the molecular mechanisms of STS.