Structural stigma and LGBTQ+ health: a narrative review of quantitative studies

Associations Between Policy and Health for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth in the United States: A Scoping Review

Strengthening policy research and its translation is essential to improving sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) health. We conducted a scoping review of studies testing the relationship between policy and health for SGMY (aged 13-26) living in the United States to document the scope of research in this area and identify opportunities to advance research in SGMY health policy. Guided by the Population, Concept, and Context framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist, we searched seven databases for English peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2023 that tested the association between individual or composite measures of policy and mental health, substance use, or sexual health for SGMY aged 26 or younger. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were cross-sectional and heavily relied on Youth Risk Behavior Survey data. Eighteen studies observed significant associations between policy and health for SGMY; only two assessed this association specifically for transgender youth. SGMY health and policy scholarship would advance through improved sexual orientation and (in particular) gender identity data collection in national data sources, measurement guidance and design testing, a greater use of longitudinal and quasiexperimental methods, and assessment of proximal mechanisms and implementation strategies through which policies impact health.

Study protocol for the Rainbow Austrian Longitudinal Family (RALF) study: a longitudinal, multi-method, multi-rater investigation of risk and resilience factors in Austrian LGBTQ+ parent families

BACKGROUND

Research on LGBTQ+ parent families is evolving to include a growing range of family systems, identities, methodologies, and topics. However, studies that examine minority-specific risk and resilience factors and their associations with within-family processes remain scarce, particularly outside a US-American context. Addressing these research gaps quantitatively poses challenges for researchers, because traditional modelling techniques based on (generalized) linear models are not ideally suited to capture the complexity and intersectionality of family experiences. Within this study protocol, we introduce the Rainbow Austrian Longitudinal Family (RALF) study. Its main goal is to comprehensively investigate general and minority-specific factors that affect the well-being of LGBTQ+ parent family members in Austria.

METHODS

RALF is a three-wave, longitudinal study over two years that examines risk and resilience factors at the individual, couple, and family level using a multi-method, multi-rater approach. We will assess child adjustment outcomes across three child cohorts, parental mental health, and family processes across three annual data waves through online questionnaires. We aim to recruit N = 150 LGBTQ+ parent families from a variety of family forms and with various identities residing in Austria. A focal sample (target n = 60) will additionally participate in observational, video-based assessments. Our participatory research approach aims to actively engage community members and stakeholders throughout the study. A community advisory board ensures that the study reflects the lived experiences of LGBTQ+ parent families adequately, while community events and accessible dissemination strategies for study results, such as the open access data explorer ExploRALF, support community engagement and facilitate the dissemination and discussion of results. Data will be analyzed using machine learning-based approaches designed to capture complex, non-linear interactions, which are ideally suited to model intersectional experiences of LGBTQ+ parent families.

DISCUSSION

The RALF study is the first prospective study to comprehensively investigate minority-specific risk and resilience factors in Austrian LGBTQ+ parent families. Findings have the potential to fill key research gaps, inform policy, and guide clinical practices that support LGBTQ+ parent families.

Associations between structural stigma and earlier pubertal timing persist for 1 year among Black girls and Latinx youth

Black and Latinx youth experience earlier pubertal timing relative to their non-stigmatized peers. Research on determinants of this increased risk has largely focused on aspects of individuals (e.g., body mass index) or their proximal environment (e.g., socioeconomic status), to the exclusion of broader macro-social factors. Using 2 years of Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study® data, we examined whether structural stigma (e.g., state-level policies, aggregated prejudicial attitudes) was associated with hormonal and physical markers of pubertal development. Baseline results documented earlier pubertal timing among Black girls (hormones) and Latinx girls and boys (youth and/or caregiver report) in states with higher (vs. lower) levels of structural racism and xenophobia, respectively. Observed associations were comparable in effect size to a well-established correlate of pubertal development, body mass index, and remained 1 year later among these stigmatized (vs. non-stigmatized) groups. Findings suggest the need to broaden the study of determinants of pubertal development to include macro-social factors.

Leveraging insights from the psychological science of gender stereotyping to advance scholarship on gender-diverse individuals' pain experiences

There is evidence of gender disparities in pain experience and pain care as well as the role of stereotypes in perpetuating discriminatory care, however most of this work focuses on comparisons between cisgender men and women; little is known about gender-diverse individuals' pain experiences and outcomes. We consider the value of extending existing cisgender-focused frameworks to understand how the application of gender stereotypes in clinical care contribute to pain care disparities and perpetuate bias, stigma, and discrimination experienced by gender-diverse people. First, we review the literature on stereotype content and stereotype application processes that are theorized to contribute to gender discrimination in pain treatment. We then leverage this extant framework to conduct a novel empirical investigation into the culturally endorsed pain-relevant stereotypes (i.e., trustworthiness, competence, mental illness, and emotional dramatization) of transgender men, transgender women, and nonbinary individuals (as well as cisgender men and cisgender women for replication and comparison purposes). We find that a sample of U.S. adult participants (N = 221) consistently endorsed more negative cultural stereotypes relevant to pain for gender-diverse than cisgender individuals illustrating how stereotype application may undermine high quality and equitable pain treatment of gender-diverse individuals. Based on our findings, we illustrate how this stereotype application may manifest in clinical contexts. Finally, we integrate existing social psychological theorizing to identify opportunities to decrease the impact of stereotypes in the clinical pain encounters. PERSPECTIVE: Gender-diverse individuals experience pain care disparities, which are in part attributable to cultural stereotypes. Building upon stereotyping theory and research from social psychology, we show that pain-relevant negative stereotypes are applied to gender-diverse individuals and highlight opportunities to interrupt stereotype application in clinical interactions to improve health equity.

Examining pathways between structural stigma and tobacco use: a comparison among young adults living in the United States by sexual orientation and gender identity

BACKGROUND

Sexual and gender minority young adult (SGM YA) populations use tobacco at higher rates than their non-SGM YA peers. Prior studies have identified significant correlations between interpersonal stigma and tobacco use, yet structural stigma may also influence tobacco use among SGM YA. This study aimed to assess the indirect effects of structural stigma on current tobacco use among SGM YA and non-SGM YA via depletion of economic resources, interpersonal discrimination, and perceived psychological stress.

METHODS

Structural Equation Modeling was used to conduct a secondary data analysis from a cross-sectional parent study. Eligible participants were 18-35 years old and currently residing in the U.S. (N = 2,649). Current use of combustible cigarettes and nicotine vapes was our dependent variable. Our independent variable of interest, structural stigma, was a latent variable comprised of three state-level indicator items: Attitudes toward SGM people, SGM protective policies (absence of), and SGM discriminatory policies (introduced or passed in 2022). We assessed three mediators of interest: Depletion of economic resources was a latent variable, which included two indicator items: food insecurity and financial strain. Interpersonal discrimination and perceptions of psychological stress were also assessed. Covariates included race/ethnicity, age, and educational attainment.

RESULTS

Structural stigma was indirectly associated with current tobacco use via depletion of economic resources for SGM YA, but not non-SGM YA. Structural stigma was not indirectly associated with current tobacco use via interpersonal discrimination or psychological stress for either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Future tobacco intervention research should consider the role of structural stigma when working with SGM YA; specifically, how interventions promoting economic stability may influence tobacco use and cessation in this population.

[Pathologization of LGBTQIA*individuals in psychiatry, psychosomatic medicine, and psychotherapy - historical continuities and implications for medical training and practice]

The ongoing pathologization and criminalization of sexual and gender minorities means that LGBTQIA*individuals, due to minority stress, are significantly more likely to suffer from mental illness. A connection is made between the involvement of psychiatrists and psychotherapists in the systematic pathologization of LGBTQIA*individuals in the past and the associated implications for medical training and practice in the present.Heuristic methods of knowledge acquisition, using literature research, with a focus on the history of the (de-)pathologization of sexual and gender minorities as well as the associated historical continuities.Various examples of historical continuities in the pathologization of LGBTQIA*persons can be found. Although there has been an increased awareness of the importance of teaching aspects of diversity in medical school in recent years, there is still a need for a medical-historical examination of the pathologization of sexual and gender minorities.An "active de-pathologization" can only be achieved by dealing with the medical-psychiatric past in terms of content, including the implementation of such contents in medical education, as part of teaching medical history and the subjects of psychiatry, psychosomatic medicine, and psychotherapy, as well as in the context of courses on history taking.These reflexive processes must continue during psychiatric and psychosomatic training, and residents must be offered specific training on topics in this area.

Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorder Stigma: Mapping Pathways Between Structures and Individuals to Accelerate Research and Intervention

Researchers, interventionists, and clinicians are increasingly recognizing the importance of structural stigma in elevating the risk of mental illnesses (MIs) and substance use disorders (SUDs) and in undermining MI/SUD treatment and recovery. Yet, the pathways through which structural stigma influences MI/SUD-related outcomes remain unclear. In this review, we aim to address this gap by summarizing scholarship on structural MI/SUD stigma and identifying pathways whereby structural stigma affects MI/SUD-related outcomes. We introduce a conceptual framework that describes how structural-level stigma mechanisms influence the MI/SUD treatment cascade via (a) interpersonal- and individual-level stigma mechanisms and (b) mediating processes among people with MI/SUD (i.e., access to resources, psychological responses, behavioral responses, social isolation). We consider intersections between MI/SUD stigma and stigma based on race/ethnicity, gender identity, and sexual orientation. Finally, we discuss the implications of this review for future research, interventions, and clinical practice.

Structural stigma and mental health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults: Policy protection and cultural acceptance

Emerging studies link the mental health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults to structural stigma, focusing on state policies. Limited work considered cultural norms and the time changing nature of culture and policy. In this study, we draw from the structural stigma theory and hypothesize that both policy protection and cultural acceptance will independently promote LGB mental health and explore their interactive roles. Composing a novel state-year longitudinal dataset on policy and culture related to sexual minority people, we link it to a sample of cisgender LGB adults from the large-scale, representative Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2016-2023). Our multilevel regression models predicted depressive diagnosis and frequent mental distress from varied stigma measures, controlling for state-level and individual-level factors. The results revealed that LGB adults especially bisexual women faced elevated mental health challenges. Models generally showed structural stigma measures in the policy and culture domains were not independent, significant predictors of LGB mental health. Moreover, there was generally no significant and sizable interactions between policy and culture. One exception came from lesbian women, where policy protection was negatively associated with worse mental health, reducing frequent mental distress by around 6 percentage points across policy score ranges. We conclude by discussing the varied findings and encouraging future studies to incorporate the time-changing nature of policy and culture when linking structural stigma to LGB mental health.

An intersectional analysis of behavioral financial hardship and healthcare utilization among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, plus cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or another nonheterosexual or cisgender identity (LGBTQ+) cancer survivors experience high financial hardship. However, structural drivers of inequities do not impact all LGBTQ+ individuals equally. Using All of Us data, we conducted an intersectional analysis of behavioral financial hardship among LGBTQ+ cancer survivors.

METHODS

LGBTQ+ inequities in behavioral financial hardship (ie, cost-related foregone care, delayed care, and medication alterations) and non-cost-related delayed care were estimated using All of Us data. Multivariable logit models were used to generate predicted probabilities, average marginal effects, and 95% confidence intervals. Models were then used to estimate inequities when disaggregating LGBTQ+ status and combing LGBTQ+ status with age, race, ethnicity, and treatment status.

RESULTS

This analysis included N = 36 217 cancer survivors (6.6%, n = 2399 LGBTQ+). In multivariable models, LGBTQ+ identity was associated with higher probabilities of and significant average marginal effects for all types of behavioral financial hardship (foregone care 31.1% vs 19.4%; delayed care 22.6% vs 15.6%; medication alterations 19.2% vs 11.9%) and non-cost delayed care (14.3% vs 7.2%). Within the disaggregated analysis, cisgender bisexual and another/multiple orientation women and gender minority survivors had the highest predicted probabilities of all outcomes. In intersectional analyses, survivors who were aged 18-39 and LGBTQ+, Black and LGBTQ+, or Hispanic/Latine and LGBTQ+ had the highest predicted probabilities of all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

LGBTQ+ cancer survivors experience significantly more behavioral financial hardship and non-cost-related delayed care than non-LGBTQ+ cancer survivors. Interventions at the individual, system, and policy level are needed to address LGBTQ+ inequities in financial hardship.

The Mental Health of Sexual Minority Individuals: Five Explanatory Theories and Their Implications for Intervention and Future Research

Research on the disparity in common mental health problems borne by sexual minority individuals has entered a stage of increasing theoretical complexity. Indeed, such a substantial disparity is likely not determined by a singular cause and therefore warrants diverse etiological perspectives tested with increasingly rigorous methodologies. The research landscape is made even more complex by the constant and rapid shift in the ways in which sexual minority people understand and characterize their own identities and experiences. This review introduces readers to this complexity by summarizing the historical legacy of research on the sexual orientation disparity in mental health, describing five contemporary theoretical explanations for this disparity and their supporting evidence, and suggesting theoretically informed interventions for reducing this disparity. Last, we offer an agenda for future research to accurately model the complexity of the pathways and solutions to the disproportionately poorer mental health of sexual minority populations.

Editorial: Towards an Intersectional Understanding of Sexual Identity, Mental Health, Neurodivergence, and Beyond

Around the globe, individuals whose sexual identities are minoritized are known to be more likely to experience mental health challenges compared with heterosexual individuals. This is evident across the lifespan but is particularly significant in young people,1 especially considering the profound impact of identity development on future well-being and mental health. Reasons for the heightened mental health challenges are most often explained by the minority stress model,2 which posits that excess exposure to social stress due to structural stigma3 interacts with psychological factors to produce health impacts in sexual minority populations. Despite the known longitudinal stability of internalized sexual stigma, minority stress, and mental health associations,4 the developmental-mechanistic relationships and intricate variations related to intersectionality remain unclear. In this issue, Bränström and Pachankis provide new population-based evidence5 that moves our field toward more clarity regarding the developmental nuances, especially the timing of the emergence of mental health needs of sexual minority individuals.

Intersectional discrimination and alcohol problems among transfeminine people of color: The moderating role of financial instability

This study examines the conditional indirect effect of discrimination on alcohol problems among transfeminine people of color, moderated by financial instability. An online cross-sectional survey (N = 80) was conducted from October 2021 to May 2022 with transfeminine adults of color with a history of alcohol problems. Using Hayes' PROCESS Macro, results showed that past-year discrimination was associated with higher drinking motives, greater alcohol use, and more alcohol-related problems. Among participants experiencing financial instability, past-year discrimination was associated with greater alcohol use and subsequent alcohol problems. Conversely, among financially stable participants, past-year discrimination was associated with less alcohol use and fewer alcohol problems. Findings highlight that economic deprivation amplifies the impact of discrimination-related stress on alcohol problems. Addressing basic needs is essential to mitigating these effects. This study underscores the importance of transgender inclusive policies while calling for further research on longitudinal outcomes.

The inclusion of LGBTQ + people within UK health policy: a critical discourse analysis

BACKGROUND

Health policymakers can leverage change to improve equity in access to care, patient experiences and clinical outcomes. Despite legal progress to reduce health inequalities, social and systemic injustices persist and lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ+) people have increased risk of some health conditions and poorer health outcomes linked to the discrimination they experience. In 2022, 42 regional integrated care systems were created across England to reduce health inequalities and improve the wellbeing of their local population.

METHODS

This study aimed to examine the inclusion of UK Equality Act (2010) protected characteristics within the 42 publicly available integrated care system strategies, and to consider specifically how LGBTQ + communities and their needs, experiences and outcomes are framed within these strategies. A Critical Discourse Analysis was conducted positioned within a social constructivist paradigm.

RESULTS

Almost all strategies talked about the needs of their populations in terms of age (42/42), disability (42/42), gender (41/42), ethnicity (39/42) and maternity or pregnancy (39/32). 27/42 strategies mentioned religion. There were no references to marital status. 22/42 strategies referred to LGBTQ + people, but only around 25% of those references provided context about the specific needs of LGBTQ + people, the health inequities they face, or services for LGBTQ + people. Regarding gender minorities, there were eight mentions of trans people and no mentions of intersex people, despite some policies using the acronym LGBQTI. While there were two mentions of inequities in care delivery for trans people, the specific health or social care needs of trans people were not described in any strategies, and there were a small number of examples where trans people were presented in a problematizing frame; with no discussion of trans inclusive care, only problems associated with being trans. Across all 42 strategies there were only four references to systemic forces (e.g. homophobia, transphobia, discrimination) affecting LGBTQ + people.

CONCLUSIONS

While the needs of some minoritized groups are well recognized within health policies, LGBTQ + people remain marginalized. Further work is needed to educate and enable policy makers to advocate for LGBTQ + people and communities, and to ensure equitable and respectful inclusion of all minoritised groups.

State of the Science of Structural Stigma and LGBTQ+ Health: Meta-Analytic Evidence, Research Gaps, and Future Directions

While public health practitioners and scholars have long theorized that structural forms of stigma shape the health of disadvantaged groups, they have frequently bemoaned the lack of research on this topic. A unique opportunity to address this lacuna occurred in the past two decades, with the advent of dramatic changes in laws, social attitudes, and other structural manifestations of stigma surrounding LGBTQ+ individuals. In a review of this literature, we conducted a meta-analysis of LGBTQ+ structural stigma and health, finding an effect size comparable to several other well-established macrolevel risk factors for poor health (e.g., income inequality, racial residential segregation, neighborhood socioeconomic status). In addition, we enumerated a range of established methodological strategies that studies have used to strengthen inferences; these strategies include documenting result specificity (i.e., structural stigma is unrelated to the health of cisgender heterosexuals), addressing alternative explanations (e.g., social selection), and triangulating evidence across multiple methods, measures, and health outcomes. We offer suggestions for future research to advance this rapidly expanding field, including identifying sources of unexplained heterogeneity in the structural stigma-health association. Finally, we discuss implications for other marginalized groups and for public health interventions and policies to reduce LGBTQ+ health disparities.

Dimensions of cisheteronormativity that influence healthcare utilization practices in LGBTQ+ populations: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Cisheteronormativity in healthcare settings may further exacerbate existing health disparities between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ populations. The aim of the current review is to identify dimensions of cisheteronormativity that manifest in healthcare settings to influence healthcare utilization by LGBTQ+ individuals.

METHOD

8148 articles were screened, with 53 remaining for inclusion.

RESULTS

Thematic synthesis identified five themes linked to negative healthcare use: 1) Lack of Provider LGBTQ+ Knowledge, 2) Endorsements of Cisheteronormativity, 3) Assumptions of LGBTQ+ experiences and assumptions of non-LGBTQ+ identity, 4) Negation, and 5) Abuse of Power.

CONCLUSION

Findings emphasize the need for provider education regarding LGBTQ+ identities and the dismantling of cisheteronormative structures in healthcare.

Sexual Orientation Disparities in Subjective Cognitive Decline in a Large Cohort of Female Nurses

Purpose: Sexual minority (SM) women have more dementia risk factors than heterosexual women, but it remains unknown whether they experience increased symptoms of subjective cognitive decline (SCD)-a key predictor of dementia. Methods: We investigated sexual orientation-related disparities in SCD in Nurses' Health Study II (N = 70,772). Sexual orientation subgroups included completely heterosexual (n = 62,884); participants identifying as heterosexual with same-sex experience ("heterosexual-SM", n = 5017); and participants identifying as mostly heterosexual (n = 1825), bisexual (n = 287), or lesbian/gay (n = 759). SCD was measured using seven symptoms from the Structured Telephone Interview for Dementia Assessment, controlling for demographics with Poisson regression models. Results: Relative to completely heterosexual participants, SM participants had 29% more SCD symptoms (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26-1.32). Symptoms were elevated in every SM subgroup; the largest disparities were among bisexual and mostly heterosexual subgroups (adjusted risk ratios for 1-unit increment in symptoms [aRR]: 1.60, 95% CI = 1.45-1.77; 1.48, 95% CI = 1.42-1.54, respectively) followed by lesbian/gay (aRR: 1.22, 95% CI = 1.14-1.31) and heterosexual-SM participants (aRR: 1.21, 95% CI = 1.18-1.25). Conclusion: SM women-particularly bisexual and mostly heterosexual women-had more symptoms of SCD than completely heterosexual women. These findings align with known sexual orientation-related disparities in dementia risk factors (e.g., mental health, substance use), and indicate that better understanding and closer monitoring of cognitive health in SM groups remains important for prevention efforts as an increasing proportion of aging Americans identifies as SM.

Sexual Orientation- and Gender Identity-Affirming Activities Provided in Primary Care

Importance

Addressing health disparities in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) communities has been a significant policy focus for more than a decade. Ensuring access to safe, respectful primary health care from knowledgeable clinicians is crucial for reducing health inequalities.

Objective

To assess the engagement of primary care practices in LGBTQ+ affirming care activities and identify practice characteristics associated with increased engagement.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used data from the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems II, which focused on primary care practices in the US and was administered between June 2022 through February 2023. Participants were primary care physicians and practice managers. Percentages were weighted for national representation. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to December 2024.

Exposure

Practice characteristics including practice size, ownership, federally qualified health center (FQHC) designation; percentage of patients enrolled in Medicare; percentage of patients enrolled in Medicaid; having accountable care organization (ACO) contracts for Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial insurance; rurality; census region; and LGBTQ+ Equality Score by state policy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Sexual orientation- and gender identity- (SOGI) affirming activities, a composite variable reflecting activity specific to SOGI patients.

Results

Among 1245 practices in the sample (38.4% response rate), 923 (77.40%) collected data on gender identity, 921 (75.62%) on sexual orientation, and 742 (65.83%) on patients' pronouns. Only 412 practices (34.42%) provided LGBTQ+ training for clinicians and 480 practices (39.20%) provided training for staff. Practices designated as FQHCs had 3.16 (95% CI, 4.60 to 19.73) percentage points higher probability of engaging in all SOGI-affirming activities) compared with non-FQHCs (P = .001). Practices with a Medicaid payer mix at least 50% had 3.28 (95% CI, 1.19 to 5.36) percentage points higher probability than practices with less than 50% Medicaid payer mix (P = .002), and participation in a Medicaid ACO was associated with 4.26 (95% CI, 0.78 to 7.73) percentage points increased probability compared with nonparticipants (P = .02). Each 1-unit increase in the state-level LGBTQ+ Equality Score was associated with 1.07 (95% CI, 0.28 to 1.85) percentage points higher probability of engaging in all SOGI-affirming activities (P = .02). High performance was negatively associated with practice rurality (average marginal effect, -16.00 [95% CI, -29.72 to -2.28]; P = .02), and rural practices were less likely to provide appropriate referrals (average marginal effect, -15.47 [95% CI, -29.22 to -1.72]; P = .03).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest there is a need for federal and state mandates to require LGBTQ+ health care and competency training for health professionals and standardized data collection on SOGI, and these may be particularly important in rural regions. These measures are essential to evaluate practice performance and address health disparities effectively.

Employment Nondiscrimination Protection and Mental Health Among Sexual Minority Adults

Importance

In the 2020 Bostock v Clayton County decision, the US Supreme Court extended employment nondiscrimination protection to sexual minority adults. The health impacts of this ruling and similar policies related to sexual orientation-based discrimination are not currently known.

Objective

To estimate changes in mental health following the Bostock decision among sexual minority adults in states that gained employment nondiscrimination protection (intervention states) compared with those in states with protections already in place (control states).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used 2018-2022 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and a difference-in-differences approach to evaluate changes in mental health after the Bostock decision by comparing sexual minority adults (aged ≥18 years and identifying as lesbian, gay, or bisexual) in 12 intervention states with those residing in 9 control states. Models were estimated for all participants and separately for employed participants. Data were analyzed between February and September 2024.

Exposure

Residing in a state that gained employment nondiscrimination protection after the Bostock decision.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was number of poor mental health days during the past 30 days, and the secondary outcome was severe mental distress (defined as 14 or more past-month poor mental health days).

Results

Of 597 462 participants (306 365 in intervention states [77.7% aged 18-64 years and 22.3% aged ≥65 years; 51.7% female] and 291 097 in control states [77.5% aged 18-64 years and 22.5% aged ≥65 years; 50.6% female]), 5.1% in intervention states and 6.0% in control states self-identified as sexual minority adults. The mean (SE) number of past-month poor mental health days was unchanged after the Bostock decision among sexual minority adults in both intervention (from 8.70 [0.27] to 9.59 [0.24] days; adjusted difference, 0.57 [95% CI, -1.02 to 2.16] days) and control (from 8.53 [0.21] to 10.15 [0.20] days; adjusted difference, 1.17 [95% CI, -0.46 to 2.79] days) states, resulting in no differential change between the 2 groups (difference-in-differences, -0.60 days; 95% CI, -1.25 to 0.06 days). Among the subset of employed sexual minority adults, the mean (SE) number of poor mental health days did not change in intervention states (from 7.99 [0.38] to 8.83 [0.30] days; adjusted difference, 0.87 [95% CI, -0.49 to 2.22] days) but increased in control states (from 7.75 [0.27] to 9.75 [0.26] days; adjusted difference, 1.84 [95% CI, 0.44-3.24] days). These findings corresponded to a significant relative reduction in poor mental health days among employed sexual minority adults in intervention vs control states (difference-in-differences, -0.97 days; 95% CI, -1.74 to -0.21 days). Mean (SE) rates of severe mental distress increased less among employed sexual minority adults in intervention (from 26.35% [1.59%] to 29.92% [1.46%]; adjusted difference, 6.81% [95% CI, 2.20%-11.42%]) vs control (from 26.53% [1.27%] to 34.26% [1.16%]; adjusted difference, 10.30% [95% CI, 5.99%-14.61%) states, also corresponding to a significant relative reduction among employed sexual minority adults (difference-in-differences, -3.49%; 95% CI, -6.71% to -0.27%).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings show significant relative reductions in past-month poor mental health days and severe mental distress among employed sexual minority adults after the implementation of a federal ban on employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. Larger and more consistent mental health benefits observed among sexual minority adults in the workforce underscore the importance of broadening protections to other social domains.

[Barriers and strategies for healthcare accessibility for trans people in Cordoba, Argentina]

The life trajectories of transgender individuals are marked by multiple vulnerabilities. This study aims to explore healthcare accessibility for trans people in the province of Córdoba, Argentina. Using a narrative design and a biographical approach, eight semi-structured interviews were conducted between 2022 and 2023 with trans individuals to examine the barriers to healthcare access and the strategies they employed. The accounts reveal that while discrimination and mistreatment remain the primary barriers, a notable concern is the lack of training and knowledge about trans health among healthcare professionals. Among the strategies highlighted are the involvement and efforts of collective spaces and LGBTTTIQ+ social organizations, which play a key role in facilitating access to healthcare. Social networks for disseminating information emerge as critical strategies, alongside inclusive comprehensive healthcare clinics within health services.

Quantitative approaches to structural intersectionality research: Conceptual and methodologic considerations

There has been a recent influx in the development of novel measures of structural forms of discrimination, including structural racism, xenophobia, sexism, heterosexism, and cisgenderism. These systems of power and oppression are inherently interdependent and mutually constitutive, yet a paucity of research has investigated their joint impacts; this gap is likely reflective of the limited guidance that exists regarding how to effectively combine multiple measures of structural discrimination to examine their joint impacts on population health and health inequities. In this commentary, we seek to redress this by describing conceptual and methodologic considerations for population health researchers interested in conducting quantitative structural intersectionality research - an intersectionality-informed research approach focused on examining how systems of power and oppression intersect to shape population health and health inequities. Developing best practices for measuring and analyzing the joint impacts of structural forms of discrimination is crucial for effectively describing and quantifying their impacts on population health and health inequities, and for informing interventions, laws, and policies to advance health equity and social justice.

Moving Forward With Pride: LGBTQ+ Health and Contemporary Rights Movements in Asia

As Pride marches are celebrated globally in June, stigma and discriminatory laws against LGBTQ+ individuals remain prevalent in over a third of countries, potentially worsening health disparities among this population. Despite these challenges, notable progress has been made in Asia. Several countries have seen court rulings favoring LGBTQ+ rights, while the National Medical Commission of India has committed to ending conversion therapy, a harmful healthcare practice. As Asian nations advance and draw inspiration from their neighbors' successes, health practitioners, researchers, organizations, and institutions in the region can advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, offer targeted health services, and promote inclusive healthcare practices.

Variation Between LGBT Estimates and State Policy Context

State-level social policy and LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) population concentration are key measures that are often used as indicators reflecting geographic social climate. Still, research has yet to investigate how they may be interrelated, including the degree to which the LGBT population are subject to certain policies. Using population-based experimental data from the Household Pulse Survey and policy measures from the Movement Advancement Project, we compared measures of state-level policy and concentration of the LGBT population for 2022. After calculating the correlation between these two constructs, the authors identified state-level variation in these measures for each of the 50 states and Washington, DC. With a correlation of 0.58, the findings revealed variation at the state level and indicated that LGBT population concentration and state-level LGBT policy do not necessarily reflect synonymous social phenomena and constitute distinct but complementary measures for use in constructing indices of structural heterosexism and social climate.

Relationships between structural stigma, societal stigma, and minority stress among gender minority people

Structural stigma towards gender minority (GM; people whose current gender does not align with sex assigned at birth) people is an important contributor to minority stress (i.e., stress experienced due to one's marginalized GM identity), although existing variables are unclear in their inclusion of social norms, or societal stigma, as a key component of the construct. We examined potential variables representing structural stigma, including variables that are inclusive of societal stigma, to identify those that most strongly relate to minority stress outcomes. We tested variables identified in the literature as measures of structural stigma inclusive of societal stigma (LGBT + Business Climate Index, state voting behaviors, and Google Trends search data), the most commonly used structural stigma variable (State Policy Environment Tally), and proxy variables (region, population density) for comparison. The relationships between structural stigma and minority stress model outcomes were tested in a sample of GM participants from The Population Research in Identity and Disparities for Equality (PRIDE) Study (N = 2,094) 2019 Annual Questionnaire using a structural equation model (SEM). Lower structural stigma (i.e., higher LGBT Business Climate Index) was associated with lower experienced stigma (β= -0.260, p < .01) and lower anticipated stigma (β= -0.433, p < .001). Greater conservative voting behavior was associated with less experienced stigma (β= -0.103, p < .01). Living in a more densely populated county was also associated with lower anticipated stigma (β=-0.108, p < .001) and greater identity outness (β = 0.053, p < .05). Two of the identified structural stigma variables that were inclusive of societal stigma (i.e., LGBT + Business Climate Index, conservative voting behaviors) and one proxy variable (population density) were associated with minority stress outcomes. However, the most commonly used variable for structural stigma (State Policy Environment Tally) was not associated with any outcomes. The State LGBT + Business Climate Index showed the most promise for use as a structural stigma variable in future research. The application of this variable should be investigated further to explore its association with health outcomes and to inform efforts to reduce health equity barriers experienced by GM people through addressing structural stigma in a manner inclusive of societal stigma.

Impact of a Virtual Care Navigation Service on Member-Reported Outcomes Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Populations: Case Study

Background

While the significance of care navigation in facilitating access to health care within the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other (LGBTQ+) communities has been acknowledged, there is limited research examining how care navigation influences an individual's ability to understand and access the care they need in real-world settings. By analyzing private sector data, we can bridge the gap between theoretical research findings and practical applications, ultimately informing both business strategies and public policy with evidence grounded in real-world efficacy.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of specialized virtual care navigation services on LGBTQ+ individuals' ability to comprehend and access necessary care within a national cohort of commercially insured members.

Methods

This case study is based on the experience of commercially insured members, aged 18 or older, who used the LGBTQ+ Health Care Navigation (LGBTQ+ Navigation) service by Included Health between January 26 and July 31, 2023. Care coordinators assisted members by connecting them with vetted identity-affirming in-network providers, helping them navigate and understand their LGBTQ+ health benefits, and providing education and advocacy for clinical and nonclinical needs. We examined the impact of navigation on 5 member-reported outcomes. In addition to reporting the proportion who agreed or strongly agreed, we calculated an impact score that averaged assigned numerical values to all 5 question responses (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree) for each respondent. We used ANOVA with Tukey post hoc tests and t tests to explore the relationships between the impact score and member characteristics, including optional self-reported demographics.

Results

Out of 4703 LGBTQ+ Navigation cases, 7.53% (n=354) had member-reported outcomes. A large majority of LGBTQ+ members agreed or strongly agreed that care navigation resulted in less stress (315/354, 89%), less care avoidance (305/354, 86.2%), higher confidence in finding an identity-affirming provider (327/354, 92.4%), improved ability to comprehend health care information (312/354, 88.1%), and improved ability to engage with providers (308/354, 87%). The average impact score was 4.44 (SD 0.69), with statistically significant differences by gender identity (P=.003), race (P=.01), ethnicity (P=.008), and pronouns (P=.02). The scores were highest for members with multiple gender identities (mean 4.56, SD 0.37), and members who did not provide their race, ethnicity, or their pronouns (mean 4.55, SD 0.64). Impact scores were lowest for transgender members (mean 4.11, SD 0.95).

Conclusions

The LGBTQ+ Navigation service, by enhancing members' comprehension and use of necessary care, demonstrates potential public health utility and value. Continuous evaluation of navigation services can serve as a supplementary tool for employers seeking to promote health equity and improve belonging among employees. This is particularly important as discrimination and stigma against LGBTQ+ communities persist in the United States. Therefore, scalable and system-level changes that use navigation services are essential to reach a larger proportion of the LGBTQ+ population.

Mental Health Disparities by Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the All of Us Research Program

Importance

Limited research explores mental health disparities between individuals in sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations and cisgender heterosexual (non-SGM) populations using national-level data.

Objective

To explore mental health disparities between SGM and non-SGM populations across sexual orientation, sex assigned at birth, and gender identity within the All of Us Research Program.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used survey data and linked electronic health records of eligible All of Us Research Program participants from May 31, 2017, to June 30, 2022.

Exposure

Self-identified SGM status.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Prevalence of common mental health conditions identified from linked electronic health records. Logistic regression adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, educational level, income, employment status, and geographic region was used to assess the association between SGM status and mental health conditions.

Results

Among 413 457 participants, 269 947 (65.3%) were included in the analysis (median age, 59 [IQR, 43-70] years), with 22 189 (8.2%) self-identified as SGM. Men with cisgender sexual minority identity had higher odds of bipolar disorder (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.87; 95% CI, 1.70-2.56) compared with cisgender heterosexual men. Women with cisgender sexual minority identity had higher odds of bipolar disorder (AOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.95-2.25) compared with cisgender heterosexual women. Gender diverse people assigned female sex at birth had higher odds of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) compared with both cisgender heterosexual men (AOR, 3.67; 95% CI, 2.99-4.50) and cisgender heterosexual women (AOR, 2.77; 95% CI, 2.26-3.40). Gender diverse individuals assigned male sex at birth had higher odds of bipolar disorder (AOR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.66-3.33) compared with cisgender heterosexual men and higher odds of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.48-3.23) compared with cisgender heterosexual women. Transgender men had higher odds of depression (AOR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.80-2.49) compared with cisgender heterosexual men, while transgender women had higher odds of any personality disorder (AOR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.84-3.99) compared with cisgender heterosexual women.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study of participants in the All of Us Research Program, there were significant mental health disparities between participants in SGM and non-SGM groups. These findings underscore the need for tailored mental health interventions to improve the well-being of SGM populations, while noting that the associations do not imply causality but reflect the stigma and minority stress experienced by these individuals.

"Feeling Like You Matter:" LGBTQ + Young Adult Perspectives on Affirmative Mental Healthcare

The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of LGBTQ + young people in mental healthcare and to understand their perspectives on what affirmative mental healthcare practice should look like. Between June and September of 2023, interviews were conducted with LGBTQ + young people ages 18-26 years in Los Angeles and Seattle. Interviews lasted 30 to 60 min and were transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis (N = 28). Four themes were developed from analysis of the interviews: (1) disconnection from community and self as an impetus for seeking formal mental healthcare; (2) marginalization during mental health service encounters; (3) the therapeutic power of belonging and mattering in the mental healthcare system; and (4) mutual human connection as the foundation for affirming mental healthcare experiences. Affirmative mental healthcare was defined by LGBTQ + young adults as free of judgment with priority placed on the therapeutic power of genuine human connection. The need for trans-specific mental healthcare was also highlighted. Participants also expressed a preference for providers with shared identities and experiences to alleviate feelings of isolation and increase feelings of connectivity. Mental health providers should emphasize connectivity and empathy to offer affirming care with LGBTQ + clients, such asking about client preferences for care, developing knowledge about sexuality and gender identity, and acknowledging provider limitations or knowledge gaps. Improving access to affirmative mental healthcare for LGBTQ + young adults (e.g., workforce development, training requirements) is needed to address the disparities in mental healthcare.

State-level LGBTQ+ policies and health: the role of political determinants in shaping health equity

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ+) individuals in the United States experience higher rates of discrimination and stressors that negatively impact health compared with their straight, cisgender counterparts. Using 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) data, estimating multilevel mixed-effects logistic regressions, we examined the relationship between state LGBTQ+ policies and health among LGBT people. Findings reveal a statistically significant inverse link between protective (high) state policy scores and poor self-rated health, poor mental health days, and poor physical health days. Specifically, with each 1-point increase in policy score, the odds of poor self-rated health are reduced by 0.03%, high mental health burden by 0.02%, and high physical health burden by 0.02%. Inequalities in self-rated health, high mental health burden, and high physical health burden are greater in policy environments with fewer state-level protections, with LGBT individuals reporting better health where there are more protections. These results indicate that discriminatory state policies are linked to poorer health for LGBT individuals and suggest that protective policies could improve health. Further research with comprehensive data is needed to deepen understanding.

Patient voices and student insights into LGBTQ+ healthcare: a call for equitable healthcare through medical education

PURPOSE

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender diverse (LGBTQ+) individuals have health needs specific to their identities. However, they face discrimination and cis-heteronormativity in most patient-provider interactions, which often translate into poor healthcare. Evidence suggests doctors are inadequately trained to care for LGBTQ+ patients. Medical students are well-placed as the future workforce to establish affirming behaviours. This study garners LGBTQ+ patients' healthcare experiences, where limited qualitative evidence exists, and explores whether students have insight into these experiences.

METHOD

Thirty LGBTQ+ patients and twenty students, evenly divided between Singapore and the United Kingdom (UK), two legally and culturally different countries, consented to semi-structured interviews in 2022 to evaluate their LGBTQ+ healthcare perceptions. Thematic analysis was conducted using a collaborative, iterative process involving five investigators, with frequent auditing of data interpretation.

RESULTS

Most patients described implicit biases with a lack of support and professionalism from doctors, hindering health outcomes. Patients experienced misgendering and a lack of recognition of sexual and gender diversity; students appreciated the need to acknowledge patient identity. Although perceptions surrounding certain themes were similar between patients and students in both countries, patients' voices on the complexity and dissatisfaction of gender-diverse care contrasted with students' lack of insight on these themes. Singapore patients were more concerned with sociolegal acceptance affecting health needs, whilst UK patients noted more nuanced barriers to healthcare. Although many students were unsure about specific health needs and perceived a lack of training, they expressed willingness to create an equitable healthcare environment.

CONCLUSIONS

LGBTQ+ patients provided powerful narratives on discrimination surrounding their healthcare needs. To address these, medical students must be encouraged by healthcare educators to develop identity-affirming behaviours as future change-makers and challenge cis-heteronormative views. Alongside vital institutional changes tailored to each country, patients' and students' collective action would create meaningful educational opportunities to reach culture change.

The use and operationalization of "structural stigma" in health-related research: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Research that investigates the negative health effects of stigma beyond the individual and interpersonal levels is increasingly using the concept of "structural stigma." This scoping review investigates how the concept of "structural stigma" has been used and operationalized in health-related literature to date in order to characterize its usage and inform future operationalizations.

METHODS

A systematic search and screening process identified peer-reviewed, English-language research articles that used the term "structural stigma" available prior to January 1, 2024 in five databases (i.e., PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL).

RESULTS

Of the 298 articles identified, over half (53%) were published from 2021 onward. Articles most commonly were set in the United States (n = 163, 55%), investigated stigma toward sexual minority people (n = 163, 55%), and cited the introduction of a special issue of Social Science & Medicine as their source of the concept (n = 84, 28%). Most articles (64%) used at least one additional conceptual framework, most commonly minority stress theory (n = 107, 36%). Quantitative operationalizations (n = 102) engaged most in the conceptual domain of laws and government-level policies, while qualitative operationalizations (n = 68) engaged most with institutional (i.e., non-government-level) policies, practices, and procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

As the use of "structural stigma" is increasing, operationalizations can better leverage the concept's breadth and account for individuals' intersectional lived experiences. This will necessitate bridging across methodologies and bodies of research on related negative social processes.

Incorporating Sex-Diverse and Gender-Inclusive Perspectives in Higher Education Biology Courses

Inclusive teaching is teaching in a way that reaches all students in the classroom; this is beneficial for everyone, particularly for those with minoritized identities. Instructors play a critical role in scaffolding how students are exposed to and learn science content in the classroom. In this manuscript, we discuss how biology instructors can make their classrooms more inclusive with regard to sex and gender diversity content. Many topics in biology are based on androcentric, heteronormative, and oppressive framing, even though those lenses are more reflective of our own history and culture than they are of the diversity we see in nature. Here, we summarize information presented in the SICB 2024 workshop titled "Incorporating sex diversity and gender inclusivity in biology undergraduate classrooms" and provide instructors with (a) rationale for why inclusive teaching matters, (b) guidance on how to challenge unscientific views and make their curricula more sex diverse and gender inclusive, and (c) practical and easy-to-implement strategies for discussing "contentious" topics in the classroom. Incorporation of this material will be beneficial for students, for science and medicine, and for accurately representing the diversity found across the tree of life.

Incorporating pharmacoequity in the formulary review and evaluation process: Opportunities for health-system P&T committees to address health disparities and inequities

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

The Synergistic Health Threats of State Laws Targeting Marginalized Groups in the United States

Discriminatory state laws have deleterious effects on the health of socially marginalized groups. Health care clinicians, institutions, researchers, and research funders have tended to view different discriminatory laws in isolation, focusing on particular issues or groups. In contrast, intersectionality calls attention to the overlapping and synergistic systems of oppression that discriminatory legislation promotes or upholds, warranting an integrated analysis of these laws. In this analytic essay, we assess discriminatory state laws simultaneously and discuss their implications for health care clinicians, institutions, and researchers. We present a multifunctional model of law and population health that describes how discriminatory law affects health outcomes among marginalized groups. We then draw on publicly available legislation trackers to identify 30 states that have enacted legislation since 2020 that targets Black people and other people of color; lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer people; transgender and nonbinary people; and women and other birthing people. Finally, we call for a coordinated, multilateral, and forceful effort by health care professionals, institutions, researchers, and research funders to counter these laws and address their predictable health consequences. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(12):1335-1343. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307830).

The socioecology of sexual minority stigma: Advancing theory on stigma-based mechanisms underlying sexual orientation-based disparities in health

Research in public health and psychology has identified sexual minority stigma-related risk factors that contribute to sexual orientation-based health disparities across settings and societies worldwide. Existing scholarship, however, has predominantly focused on these factors as independent, stand-alone risk factors, neglecting their interconnected nature across different levels. This article theoretically explores how sexual minority stigma may function as a multilevel socioecological system, by building on prevailing theories and emphasizing the interplay between structural, interpersonal, and intrapersonal stigma-related factors. Drawing on the minority stress and socioecological theories, three central tenets are proposed, namely 1) chronosystem with immediate, accumulating, or lasting effects across spatiotemporal contexts, 2) nested multilevel system with cross-level effects, and 3) mechanistic pathways linking stigma exposure to health. By providing a nuanced and comprehensive understanding of how sexual minority stigma may operate as a multilevel socioecological system, this article reflects on the novel implications of this interpretation for future research and aims to guide future conceptualizations and studies, acknowledging the complexity of sexual minority stigma exposure across historical contexts, societies, and the individual life course in shaping physical and mental health of sexual minorities. Limitations of current research and recommendations for future research are being discussed.

Sex differences in COVID-19 vaccine confidence in people living with HIV in Canada

Background

Understanding the roots of vaccine confidence in vulnerable populations, such as persons living with HIV (PLWH), is important to facilitate vaccine uptake, thus mitigating infection and spread of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. In an online survey of PLWH conducted in Canada during winter 2022 (AIDS and Behav 2023), we reported that the overall COVID-19 vaccination uptake rate in PLWH was similar by sex. Here, we examined attitudes and beliefs towards vaccination against COVID-19 based on sex.

Methods

Between February and May 2022, PLWH across Canada were recruited via social media and community-based organizations to complete an online survey consisting of a modified Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS) questionnaire with items from the National Advisory Committee on Immunization Acceptability Matrix. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics and responses to the VHS questionnaire by sex. The effect of biological sex on total VHS score, two subscales ("lack of confidence" and "perceived risk") was assessed separately by linear regression adjusting for other key baseline variables.

Results

Of 259 PLWH, 69 (27 %) were females and 189 (73 %) were males. Sixty-six (26 %) of participants self-identified as a woman, 163(63 %) as a man and 28(11 %) as trans/two-spirited/queer/non-binary/agender/other. The mean age (SD) was 47 ± 14 years. Females were less likely to believe that COVID-19 vaccination was: important for his/her own health (71 % vs. 86 %); a good way to protect themselves from infection (68 % vs. 86 %); that getting the COVID-19 vaccine was important for the health of others in his/her community (78 % vs. 91 %); believed recommendations by their doctor/health care provider about COVID-19 vaccines (78 % vs. 88 %); that information about COVID-19 vaccines from public health officials was reliable and trustworthy (56 % vs. 75 % vs); COVID-19 vaccines are effective in preventing COVID-19 infections (61 % vs. 82 %) and that all COVID-19 vaccines offered by government programs in their communities were important for good health (70 % vs. 87 %). Although more males than females felt that new vaccines generally carry more risks than older vaccines (19 % vs 16 %,), fewer males than females endorsed concern about serious side effects of COVID-19 vaccines (33 % vs 45 %).The linear regression model showed females had a significantly higher VHS total score than males (adjusted mean difference 0.38; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.64; p = 0.004), indicating greater COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among females. It was observed that females had a greater "lack of confidence in vaccines" score than males (adjusted mean difference 0.43; 95 % CI 0.14-0.73; p = 0.004). We did not observe a significant difference in "perceived risk in vaccines" between males and females (adjusted mean difference 0.20; 95 % CI -0.07-0.46; p = 0.1). The inadequate number of participants self-identifying as different from biological sex at birth prevented us from analyzing the VHS score based on gender identity.

Conclusions

Among PLWH, females showed greater COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy than males. Specifically, compared with males, females had a higher level of lack of confidence in vaccines. Fewer females than males believed that COVID-19 vaccines had health benefits at both the personal and societal levels and that recommendations made by their doctor/health care provider and public health officials are reliable and trustworthy. Further investigation into reasons for this difference in opinion still needs to be elucidated. Educational interventions targeted toward females living with HIV are especially needed to increase confidence in vaccination.

Developmental psychopathology turns 50: Applying core principles to longitudinal investigation of ADHD in girls and efforts to reduce stigma and discrimination

The seminal contributions of Dante Cicchetti to the field/paradigm/metaparadigm of developmental psychopathology (DP) - and its continuing ascendance as a guiding force for multidisciplinary investigation of normative and atypical development - are legion. Our aim is to illustrate a number of DP's core principles in the context of (a) prospective longitudinal research on children (particularly girls) with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and (b) theoretical and empirical work dedicated to alleviating the stigma and discrimination toward those experiencing mental health, substance use, and neurodevelopmental challenges. We feature (i) the mutual interplay of perspectives on normative and non-normative development, (ii) reciprocal and transactional processes, and the constructs of equifinaliy and multifinality; (iii) continuities and discontinuities in developmental processes and outcomes, with particular focus on heterotypic continuity; (iv) the inseparability of heritable and environmental risk; (v) multiple levels of analysis, and (vi) the benefits of qualitative perspectives. We highlight that interventions promoting recovery, along with the multi-level facilitation of protective factors/strengths, lie at the heart of both DP and anti-stigma efforts. The ongoing youth mental-health crisis provides a sobering counterpoint to the gains of the DP enterprise over the past half century.

Global unmet psychosocial needs in cancer care: health policy

Preventable psychosocial suffering is an unmet need in patients with cancer around the world, significantly compromising quality of life and impairing cancer health outcomes. This narrative review overviews the global prevalence of emotional distress and cancer-related needs and the access barriers to psychosocial care. The COVID-19 pandemic has served only to amplify the need for psychosocial care, exacerbating the inadequacy of available psychosocial resources, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Proposed solutions include implementing routine screening for emotional distress, addressing stigma related to mental health needs, and increased attention to the psychosocial dimensions of cancer care in oncology training and interprofessional models of care. There is an urgent need to address health policy issues such as resource allocation in cancer control plans and to embrace technological innovation in order to fill the universal gaps to providing more equitable psychosocial cancer care.

Funding

None.

School-Based Health Centers Addressing Health Equity for LGBTQ + Patients (SBHCs HELP): protocol for a stepped-wedge trial to implement innovations promoting structural competency

BACKGROUND

School-based health centers (SBHCs) provide vital behavioral, sexual, and reproductive healthcare services to school-aged youth across the United States. Adolescents who are sexual and gender diverse (SGD) are far more likely to suffer from adverse health outcomes than their cisgender and heterosexual peers. Emerging structural competency frameworks call for cultivating capacities in SBHCs to modify organizational service delivery environments, including provider and staff knowledge and behaviors, to influence SGD adolescent well-being. Nationally recognized guidelines for nurturing structural competency include (1) adopting, disseminating, and adhering to SGD supportive policies and procedures; (2) creating welcoming physical environments; (3) systematically documenting and using sexual orientation and gender identity information in clinical care; (4) training all employees in best practices for interacting with SGD patients; and (5) developing the clinical workforce to deliver high-quality services to SGD patients. This community-engaged study will test the effectiveness of the Dynamic Adaptation Process (DAP) in implementing these guidelines in SBHCs in culturally and geographically diverse areas of New Mexico.

METHODS

We will conduct mixed-method readiness assessments to identify inner- and outer-context determinants affecting the implementation of structurally competent changes in SBHCs; employ a stepped-wedge trial to examine how the DAP-enabled implementation impacts adoption and changes in SBHC, student (patient), and implementation outcomes; and investigate inner- and outer-context determinants, bridging factors, and associated mediators and moderators influencing implementation processes and outcomes related to guideline adoption and SGD student care (e.g., reduced barriers, greater satisfaction and engagement).

DISCUSSION

This study addresses the long-term goal of high-quality care and decreased health disparities for SGD youth. As investments in SBHCs rise nationwide, opportunities to enhance services for SGD youth will also grow. This study will demonstrate the usefulness of a multifaceted implementation strategy, the DAP, in helping SBHCs build structural competency to serve a sizeable population of students affected by stigmatization, discrimination, and other social forces that create inequities in health. Accordingly, we will advance a model featuring a set of implementation strategies to reduce knowledge and practice gaps, create welcoming environments, and improve the quality of care for SGD youth.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN13844475; 20 September 2024.

Brain Health Outcomes in Sexual and Gender Minority Groups: Results From the All of Us Research Program

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) groups have been historically underrepresented in neurologic research, and their brain health disparities are unknown. We aim to evaluate whether SGM persons are at higher risk of adverse brain health outcomes compared with cisgender straight (non-SGM) individuals.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study in the All of Us Research Program, a US population-based study, including all participants with information on gender identity and sexual orientation. We used baseline questionnaires to identify sexual minority (lesbian, gay, bisexual, diverse sexual orientation; nonstraight sexual orientation) and gender minority (gender diverse and transgender; gender identity different from sex assigned at birth) participants. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke, dementia, and late-life depression, assessed using electronic health record data and self-report. Secondarily, we evaluated each disease separately. Furthermore, we evaluated all subgroups of gender and sexual minorities stratified by sex assigned at birth. We used multivariable logistic regression (adjusted for age, sex assigned at birth, race/ethnicity, cardiovascular risk factors, other relevant comorbidities, and neighborhood deprivation index) to assess the relationship between SGM groups and the outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 413,457 US adults enrolled between May 31, 2017, and June 30, 2022, we included 393,041 participants with available information on sexual orientation and gender identity (mean age 51 [SD 17] years), of whom 39,632 (10%) belonged to SGM groups. Of them, 38,528 (97%) belonged to a sexual minority and 4,431 (11%) to a gender minority. Compared with non-SGM, SGM persons had 15% higher odds of the brain health composite outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.22). In secondary analyses, these results persisted across sexual and gender minorities separately (all 95% CIs > 1). Assessing individual diseases, all SGM groups had higher odds of dementia (SGM vs non-SGM: OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.29) and late-life depression (SGM vs non-SGM: OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.17-1.38) and transgender women had higher odds of stroke (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.04-2.70).

DISCUSSION

In a large US population study, SGM persons had higher odds of adverse brain health outcomes. Further research should explore structural causes of inequity to advance inclusive and diverse neurologic care.

A systematic review of the prevalence and associated factors of mental health conditions among lesbian, bisexual, and other sexual minority women in Southeast Asia

The present review explored the prevalence and factors of mental health conditions among lesbian, bisexual, and other sexual minority women (LBSW) in Southeast Asia. It found that the rates of significant depression and depressive symptoms range from 10% to 93.2%, with a median of 27.7%. This wide range can be due to a study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, which found elevated depression, stress, and anxiety rates. Studies also highlight high levels of sadness, hopelessness, sleep and eating problems, fatigue, and suicidal thoughts among LBSW. Suicide rates indicate that LBSW have higher odds of suicidal ideations and attempts than their heterosexual peers in the region. Additionally, bisexual and polysexual women report higher rates of depressive symptoms and suicidal behaviors than lesbian women, necessitating tailored mental health interventions. Substance use among LBSW is also notable, including smoking and heavy drinking, though some rates are below the global average. Factors influencing mental health include openness about sexuality, coping styles, and discrimination. Discrimination is linked to various mental health issues, supporting the minority stress model's applicability in the region. Aging-related factors also affect mental health among LBSW, with older age being possibly protective against depression. Overall, this review highlights the urgent need for more inclusive mental health research and interventions in the region. Recommendations include training healthcare providers, developing tailored mental health programs, adopting suicide prevention initiatives, enacting anti-discrimination laws, and addressing substance use. Future research should focus on underrepresented regions and older LBSW.

The identity group as a source of social influence for individuals with concealable stigmatized identities

Many people who are stigmatized along concealable features (e.g., sexual minorities or people with mental illness) anticipate social rejection due to their features and associated labels, and these beliefs are a prominent predictor of psychological distress. While ecological approaches to stigma research have highlighted the social basis of these two related outcomes, it typically has focused on the impact of non-stigmatized counterparts. Also embedded in the social environment are similarly-stigmatized others who, in concealing, may be less accessible to the individual. Given the centrality of psychological distress and rejection concerns as a relational self-conception in attachment theories, we tested if identity-based rejection sensitivity and distress may emerge from diminished access to similarly-stigmatized others as identity group members. Leveraging the University as a partially-controlled, naturalistic setting, we collected measures of concealment, identity-based rejection sensitivity, and psychological distress from undergraduate students in introductory psychology courses who reported a concealable stigmatized identity (N = 355; k = 15 identity groups). With concealment aggregated to the level of the identity group, multi-level modeling showed that concealment by similarly-stigmatized students was positively associated with both individuals' identity-based rejection sensitivity and their psychological distress. Moreover, rejection sensitivity mediated the association of group-level concealment and distress. Findings suggest that rejection concerns and distress may emerge from identity group inaccessibility in the social environment, with the association of concerns and distress possibly contextualized by underlying group attachment dynamics. Results reveal the identity group as a novel source of social influence in the lives of individuals with concealable stigmatized identities.

Sexual orientation disparities in gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Sexual minority (SM) individuals (e.g., those with same-sex attractions/partners or who identify as lesbian/gay/bisexual) experience a host of physical and mental health disparities. However, little is known about sexual orientation-related disparities in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP; gestational hypertension [gHTN] and preeclampsia).

OBJECTIVE

To estimate disparities in GDM, gHTN and preeclampsia by sexual orientation.

METHODS

We used data from the Nurses' Health Study II-a cohort of nurses across the US enrolled in 1989 at 25-42 years of age-restricted to those with pregnancies ≥20 weeks gestation and non-missing sexual orientation data (63,518 participants; 146,079 pregnancies). Our primary outcomes were GDM, gHTN and preeclampsia, which participants reported for each of their pregnancies. Participants also reported their sexual orientation identity and same-sex attractions/partners. We compared the risk of each outcome in pregnancies among heterosexual participants with no same-sex experience (reference) to those among SM participants overall and within subgroups: (1) heterosexual with same-sex experience, (2) mostly heterosexual, (3) bisexual and (4) lesbian/gay participants. We used modified Poisson models to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), fit via weighted generalised estimating equations, to account for multiple pregnancies per person over time and informative cluster sizes.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of each outcome was ≤5%. Mostly heterosexual participants had a 31% higher risk of gHTN (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03, 1.66), and heterosexual participants with same-sex experience had a 31% higher risk of GDM (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13, 1.50), compared to heterosexual participants with no same-sex experience. The magnitudes of the risk ratios were high among bisexual participants for gHTN and preeclampsia and among lesbian/gay participants for gHTN.

CONCLUSIONS

Some SM groups may be disparately burdened by GDM and HDP. Elucidating modifiable mechanisms (e.g., structural barriers, discrimination) for reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes among SM populations is critical.

State LGBTQ policy environments and the cancer burden in sexual and gender minoritized communities in the United States

PURPOSE

Our objective was to assess the association between state policies related to sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) and cancer prevalence and survivorship indicators in a sexual and gender minoritized (SGM) population in the United States.

METHODS

Data from the 2017-2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were used to measure cancer diagnosis, physical and mental health, and substance use for SGM adult cancer survivors. A state policy Z-score, ranging from most restrictive to most protective state policies related to SOGI, was computed from data available from the Movement Advancement Project. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to test the relationship between state policies and cancer-related outcomes for SGM people.

RESULTS

More protective state policies were associated with lower odds of a cancer diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.97). Among SGM cancer survivors, increasing protective state policies were associated with lower odds of poor physical health (AOR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.74-0.94), lower odds of difficulty walking or climbing stairs (AOR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.80-1.00), and lower odds of difficulty concentrating or remembering (AOR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.98). No significant associations were found between state policies and mental health, depression, substance use, diabetes, or cardiovascular disease among SGM cancer survivors.

CONCLUSION

SGM people diagnosed with cancer are more likely to live in restrictive policy states, and survivors in those states have worse physical health and cognitive disability. Additional research should investigate potential causal relationships between state policies and SGM cancer outcomes.

Disparities in Mortality by Sexual Orientation in a Large, Prospective Cohort of Female Nurses

Importance

Extensive evidence documents health disparities for lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) women, including worse physical, mental, and behavioral health than heterosexual women. These factors have been linked to premature mortality, yet few studies have investigated premature mortality disparities among LGB women and whether they differ by lesbian or bisexual identity.

Objective

To examine differences in mortality by sexual orientation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study examined differences in time to mortality across sexual orientation, adjusting for birth cohort. Participants were female nurses born between 1945 and 1964, initially recruited in the US in 1989 for the Nurses' Health Study II, and followed up through April 2022.

Exposures

Sexual orientation (lesbian, bisexual, or heterosexual) assessed in 1995.

Main Outcome and Measure

Time to all-cause mortality from assessment of exposure analyzed using accelerated failure time models.

Results

Among 116 149 eligible participants, 90 833 (78%) had valid sexual orientation data. Of these 90 833 participants, 89 821 (98.9%) identified as heterosexual, 694 (0.8%) identified as lesbian, and 318 (0.4%) identified as bisexual. Of the 4227 deaths reported, the majority were among heterosexual participants (n = 4146; cumulative mortality of 4.6%), followed by lesbian participants (n = 49; cumulative mortality of 7.0%) and bisexual participants (n = 32; cumulative mortality of 10.1%). Compared with heterosexual participants, LGB participants had earlier mortality (adjusted acceleration factor, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64-0.84]). These differences were greatest among bisexual participants (adjusted acceleration factor, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.51-0.78]) followed by lesbian participants (adjusted acceleration factor, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.68-0.95]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In an otherwise largely homogeneous sample of female nurses, participants identifying as lesbian or bisexual had markedly earlier mortality during the study period compared with heterosexual women. These differences in mortality timing highlight the urgency of addressing modifiable risks and upstream social forces that propagate and perpetuate disparities.