Budesonide nasal spray as prophylactic treatment after polypectomy (a double blind clinical trial)

Topical corticosteroids for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: GRADE systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is associated with a significant disease burden. The optimal use of and administration route for intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) when managing CRSwNP are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We systematically synthesized the evidence addressing INCS for CRSwNP.

METHODS

We searched studies archived in Medline, Embase, and Central from database inception until September 1, 2021, for randomized controlled trials comparing INCS using any delivery method to placebo or other INCS administration types. Paired reviewers screened records, abstracted data, and rated risk of bias (CLARITY revision of Cochrane Risk of Bias version 1 tool) independently and in duplicate. We synthesized the evidence for each outcome using random effects network meta-analyses. We critically appraised the evidence following the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

RESULTS

We analyzed 61 randomized controlled trials (7176 participants, 8 interventions). Sinusitis-related quality of life might improve with INCS rinse (mean difference [MD] -6.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] -11.94 to -1.71) and exhalation delivery system (EDS) (MD -7.86, 95% CI -14.64 to -1.08) compared to placebo (both low certainty evidence). Nasal obstruction symptoms are likely improved when receiving INCS via stent/dressing (MD -0.31, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.08), spray (MD -0.51, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.41), and EDS (MD -0.35, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.18) (all moderate to high certainty) compared to placebo. We found no important differences in adverse effects among interventions (moderate certainty for INCS spray, very low to low certainty for others).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple delivery forms of INCS are viable therapeutic options for CRSwNP, resulting in improvement of patient-important outcomes. INCS via stent, spray, and EDS appear to be beneficial across the widest range of considered outcomes.

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021

I.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BACKGROUND: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR-RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR-RS-2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence-based findings of the document.

METHODS

ICAR-RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence-based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary.

RESULTS

ICAR-RS-2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence-based management algorithm is provided.

CONCLUSION

This ICAR-RS-2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis-Could Phenotyping or Endotyping Aid Therapy?

OBJECTIVES

We reviewed the phenotyping and endotyping of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and treatment options.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, and the Proquest Central Database of the Kırıkkale University Library.

RESULTS

Phenotypes are observable properties of an organism produced by the environment acting upon the genotype, that is, patients with a particular disorder are subgrouped according to common characteristics. Currently, CRS is usually phenotyped as being with (CRSwNP) or without (CRSsNP) nasal polyps. However, this is not immutable as some individuals progress from nonpolyp to polypoid CRS over time. Phenotypes of CRS are also based on inflammatory patterns, generally CRSwNP is eosinophilic, CRSsNP neutrophilic; but there is a spectrum, rather than a clear-cut division into 2 types. An endotype is a subtype of a condition defined by a distinct functional or pathobiological mechanism. Endotypes of CRS can be (1) nontype Th2, (2) moderate type Th2, and (3) severe type Th2 immune reactions, based on cytokines and mediators such as IL4, 5, 13. CRS endotyping can also include a (1) type 2 cytokine-based approach, (2) eosinophil-mediated approach, (3) immunoglobulin E-based approach, and (4) cysteinyl leukotriene-based approach. Subdivisions of CRSwNP can be made into nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease, allergic fungal sinusitis, and eosinophil pauci-granulomatous arteritis by testing. General treatment for all CRS is nasal douching. The place of surgery needs careful reconsideration. Endotype-directed therapies include glucocorticosteroids, antibiotics, aspirin, antifungals, anticytokines, and immunoglobulin replacement. The recognition of united airways and the co-occurrence of CRSwNPs and severe asthma should lead to common endotyping of both upper and lower airways in order to better direct therapy.

CONCLUSION

Endotyping can allow for the identification of groups of patients with CRS with a high likelihood of successful treatment, such as patients with a moderate type 2 immune reaction or those with acquired immune deficiency.

Particle Deposition of Therapeutic Aerosols in the Nose and Paranasal Sinuses after Transnasal Sinus Surgery: A Cast Model Study

Background

The topical administration of steroids or antibiotics to the nose and the sinuses is one of the important postsurgical therapies of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).

Methods

To investigate the effective deposition of aerosols in the paranasal sinuses after ESS, we restored the human nasosinus model that underwent ESS and studied the particle depositions on the ostiomeatal complex (OMC), maxillary, and ethmoid sinuses quantitatively.

Results

A 45° nozzle insertion angle significantly increased the particle depositions more than the 30° angle (p < 0.05). A computer simulation-assisted analysis shows that the inertial deposition at OMC increased with a nozzle angle of 45° versus 30°. The particles with 5.63 mm in diameter significantly deposit on OMC and maxillary sinus compared with the particles with 16.37 mm (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The topical administration of drugs to the paranasal sinuses postoperatively must be performed in consideration with aerodynamics of aerosols.

Results of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Nasal Polyps

Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for nasal polyps was performed on 105 patients, who had a total of 134 operations, on 263 sides. Most patients (84%) had been previously operated on because of recurrent nasal polyps. The subjective results were good in 86% after one or more operations, with a median follow-up of almost 2 years. The objective results, as assessed by nasal endoscopy, show no recurrence in this group in 61%. Preoperative and postoperative lung function was tested in 30 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). An improvement was noted in 64%, in 23% the lung function was unchanged, and in 13% it had decreased. A relationship was noted between IgE-mediated allergy and the recurrence of nasal polyps. Patients with an IgE-mediated allergy had significantly more recurrences (50%). The complication rate was 4.3% of the 263 operated sides.

Chronic rhinosinusitis: Endotypes, biomarkers, and treatment response

It is increasingly recognized that chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) comprises a spectrum of different diseases with distinct clinical presentations and pathogenic mechanisms. Defining the distinct phenotypes and endotypes of CRS affects prognosis and, most importantly, is necessary as the basis for making therapeutic decisions. The need for individualized definitions of pathogenic mechanisms before initiating therapy extends to virtually all therapeutic considerations. This is clearly crucial with antibiotics, where, barring an influence from their off-target anti-inflammatory pharmacologic effects, an understanding of the role of the individual biome predicts likelihood of therapeutic benefit. However, this need for identifying individual phenotypes and endotypes also extends to the agent that is currently considered the mainstay of treatment of CRS, specifically glucocorticoids. As with asthma, it is recognized that a large minority of patients with CRS have a steroid-resistant phenotype, identification of which will preclude use of these agents with their potential side effects. Identification of endotypes is also becoming increasingly imperative because targeted biotherapeutic agents, such as anti-IgE and anti-cytokine antibodies, are becoming available. These agents are likely to benefit patients in whom the targeted mediator is not only expressed but demonstrably driving a central mechanism in that patient. In summary, the treatment of CRS is at an exciting crossroad. On the positive side, numerous therapeutics are in development that seem likely to have a positive effect in our patients with this condition. The challenge is that these therapies will require targeted individualized treatments based on identifying subjects with the relevant endotype.

Lack of Efficacy of Symptoms and Medical History in Distinguishing the Degree of Eosinophilia in Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing eosinophilic nasal polyps (NP) from noneosinophilic NP will impact prognosis and therapeutic responsiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the ability of clinical history and biomarkers to distinguish these conditions.

METHODS

A total of 74 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for NP were enrolled. Clinical presentations were evaluated using the 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22). Biomarkers included absolute eosinophil count, IgE, and extent of tissue hyperplasia on sinus computed tomography scan. Tissue eosinophilia was quantified in 10 random hpf and data analyzed addressing both peak and average results.

RESULTS

No component of the SNOT-22 was predictive of tissue eosinophilia. Similarly, a medical history of allergic rhinitis, asthma, or aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease was not predictive. An absolute eosinophil count of more than 300 was associated with NP tissue eosinophilia. In contrast, neither IgE nor extent of sinus computed tomography hyperplasia was predictive.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability to individualize therapies for NP is dependent on identifying clinical features or biomarkers of eosinophilia. However, with the exception of circulating eosinophilia, we could not identify a clinical feature or biomarker that robustly predicted the presence of tissue eosinophilia. Even more problematic, even the seeming "criterion standard" determination of tissue pathology was of limited value, as our cohort displayed a continuous spectrum of tissue eosinophil expression, making arbitrary any definitive cutoff distinguishing these conditions.

Intranasal steroids versus placebo or no intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

This review is one of six looking at the primary medical management options for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.Chronic rhinosinusitis is common and is characterised by inflammation of the lining of the nose and paranasal sinuses leading to nasal blockage, rhinorrhoea, facial pressure/pain and loss of sense of smell. The condition can occur with or without nasal polyps. The use of topical (intranasal) corticosteroids has been widely advocated for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis given the belief that inflammation is a major component of this condition.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of intranasal corticosteroids in people with chronic rhinosinusitis.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Trials Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 8); MEDLINE; EMBASE; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 11 August 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a follow-up period of at least three months comparing intranasal corticosteroids (e.g. beclomethasone dipropionate, triamcinolone acetonide, flunisolide, budesonide) against placebo or no treatment in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL), patient-reported disease severity and the commonest adverse event - epistaxis. Secondary outcomes included general HRQL, endoscopic nasal polyp score, computerised tomography (CT) scan score and the adverse events of local irritation or other systemic adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome; this is indicated in italics.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 18 RCTs with a total of 2738 participants. Fourteen studies had participants with nasal polyps and four studies had participants without nasal polyps. Only one study was conducted in children. Intranasal corticosteroids versus placebo or no intervention Only one study (20 adult participants without polyps) measured our primary outcome disease-specific HRQL using the Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measures-31 (RSOM-31). They reported no significant difference (numerical data not available) (very low quality evidence).Our second primary outcome, disease severity , was measured using the Chronic Sinusitis Survey in a second study (134 participants without polyps), which found no important difference (mean difference (MD) 2.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.02 to 10.70; scale 0 to 100). Another study (chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps) reported an increased chance of improvement in the intranasal corticosteroids group (RR 2.78, 95% CI 1.76 to 4.40; 109 participants). The quality of the evidence was low.Six studies provided data on at least two of the individual symptoms used in the EPOS 2012 criteria to define chronic rhinosinusitis (nasal blockage, rhinorrhoea, loss of sense of smell and facial pain/pressure). When all four symptoms in the EPOS criteria were available on a scale of 0 to 3 (higher = more severe symptoms), the average MD in change from baseline was -0.26 (95% CI -0.37 to -0.15; 243 participants; two studies; low quality evidence). Although there were more studies and participants when only nasal blockage and rhinorrhoea were considered (MD -0.31, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.24; 1702 participants; six studies), the MD was almost identical to when loss of sense of smell was also considered (1345 participants, four studies; moderate quality evidence).When considering the results for the individual symptoms, benefit was shown in the intranasal corticosteroids group. The effect size was larger for nasal blockage (MD -0.40, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.29; 1702 participants; six studies) than for rhinorrhoea (MD -0.25, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.17; 1702 participants; six studies) or loss of sense of smell (MD -0.19, 95% CI -0.28 to -0.11; 1345 participants; four studies). There was heterogeneity in the analysis for facial pain/pressure (MD -0.27, 95% CI -0.56 to 0.02; 243 participants; two studies). The quality of the evidence was moderate for nasal blockage, rhinorrhoea and loss of sense of smell, but low for facial pain/pressure.There was an increased risk of epistaxis with intranasal corticosteroids (risk ratio (RR) 2.74, 95% CI 1.88 to 4.00; 2508 participants; 13 studies; high quality evidence).Considering our secondary outcome, general HRQL, one study (134 participants without polyps) measured this using the SF-36 and reported a statistically significant benefit only on the general health subscale. The quality of the evidence was very low.It is unclear whether there is a difference in the risk of local irritation (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.64; 2124 participants; 11 studies) (low quality evidence).None of the studies treated or followed up patients long enough to provide meaningful data on the risk of osteoporosis or stunted growth (children). Other comparisons We identified no other studies that compared intranasal corticosteroids plus co-intervention A versus placebo plus co-intervention A.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Most of the evidence available was from studies in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. There is little information about quality of life (very low quality evidence). For disease severity, there seems to be improvement for all symptoms (low quality evidence), a moderate-sized benefit for nasal blockage and a small benefit for rhinorrhoea (moderate quality evidence). The risk of epistaxis is increased (high quality evidence), but these data included all levels of severity; small streaks of blood may not be a major concern for patients. It is unclear whether there is a difference in the risk of local irritation (low quality evidence).

WITHDRAWN: Topical steroids for nasal polyps

Review withdrawn from Issue 4, 2016. Replaced by new reviews 'Intranasal steroids versus placebo or no intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis' (Chong 2016a) and 'Different types of intranasal steroids for chronic rhinosinusitis' (Chong 2016b).

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Intranasal corticosteroids for nasal polyposis : biological rationale, efficacy, and safety

Nasal polyposis, occurring in about 2% of the general population, is the ultimate form of inflammation of the upper airways. For unknown reasons, polyps develop preferentially in subtypes of inflammatory diseases and are associated with perennial non-allergic rhinitis, asthma, intolerance of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid)/NSAIDs, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, cystic fibrosis, and primary ciliary dyskinesia. In contrast to common beliefs, IgE-mediated allergy does not seem to play an etiological role in nasal polyposis.The polyps originate from the mucosa around the clefts of the lateral nasal wall, especially in the region of the ostiomeatal complex. The factors that determine the localization of the disease to a few square centimeters of the airways are not known.Polyps are edematous bags covered by respiratory epithelium and contain very few nerves, blood vessels, and glands that have undergone cystic degeneration. They contain degranulated mast cells, have a very high concentration of histamine, and are characteristically infiltrated by eosinophils. These cells accumulate due to the release of proinflammatory cytokines (in particular, interleukin-5).Nasal polyposis is preceded by a prolonged history of rhinitis accompanied by severe and persistent nasal blockage; typically, the sense of smell is seriously impaired when polyps develop. The diagnosis is based on anterior rhinoscopy or, preferably, endoscopy.Nasal polyposis is medically treatable. Surgical treatment is carried out when medication fails. Intranasal corticosteroids reduce rhinitis symptoms, improve nasal breathing, reduce the size of polyps, and prevent, in part, their recurrence, but this treatment has little effect on the sense of smell. Intranasal corticosteroids can, as basic long-term therapy, be used alone in mild cases or together with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgery in severe cases. Systemic corticosteroids administered for 2-3 weeks have a beneficial effect on all observed symptoms and pathology, including the sense of smell. When nasal blockage is a problem in spite of medical treatment, surgery is recommended. Simple polypectomy can be performed, but endoscopic surgery is recommended in more severe and persistent cases.

[ASA-intolerance syndrome and persistent rhinosinusitis : Differential diagnosis and treatment]

BACKGROUND

A differential diagnosis of persistent chronic rhinosinusitis is ASA-intolerance syndrome (AIS), also known as Aspirin®‑exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), Samter-Trias (Samter's disease, Morbus Widal). Particularly in cases of frequent recurrency of nasal polyps in combination with bronchial asthma and hypersensitivity reactions to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAR) can often be referred to an underlying AIS. The pathogenesis of this syndrome is attributed to a misallocation of the arachidonic acid metabolism, resulting in an increased leukotriene production.

METHODS

The diagnosis may be difficult in the early stages of the disease with incomplete triad of symptoms.

RESULTS

Therapy may consist of paranasal sinuses surgery, drug therapy and adaptive deactivation as the only causal treatment option for patients with AIS.

CONCLUSION

For adaptive desactivation, positive effects were actually shown even in patients with long-term recurrent or persistent complaints of chronic rhinosinusitis.

The use of postoperative topical corticosteroids in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Topical intranasal corticosteroids (INCSs) are used to control disease symptoms in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). The evidence to recommend INCSs as part of the postoperative care is limited. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of INCSs in the postoperative care of patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) during the 1st year postoperatively.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1995 to May 2012), MEDLINE (January 1948 to May 2012), EMBASE (January 1980 to May 2012), and the reference lists of articles. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies comparing INCSs with placebo or comparing different types of INCSs were included.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (n = 945 patients) were RCTs and one prospective cohort study (n = 32 patients). As measured by the standardized mean difference (SMD) INCSs had a beneficial effect on symptom scores (SMD, -1.35; 95% CI, -2.05 to -0.64; p = 0.0002; 3 trials; 137 patients) and polyp score (SMD, 0.53; 95% CI, -0.91 to -0.14; p = 0.007; 5 trials; 223 patients). Compared with placebo, the use of INCSs decreased the odds of polyp recurrence (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.51; p = 0.002; 2 trials; 74 patients). Two RCTs (n = 105) and one cohort study (n = 32) reported normal adrenocorticotropic hormone levels postintervention.

CONCLUSION

INCS use is a safe therapy in postoperative management of CRSwNP patients. INCS showed significant improvement in polyp score, patients' symptoms and significant decrease in polyp recurrence in the first year postoperatively.

Sinus surgery and delivery method influence the effectiveness of topical corticosteroids for chronic rhinosinusitis: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) use either nasal delivery (nasal drop or nasal spray) or sinus delivery (sinus catheter or sinus irrigation) in patients with or without sinus surgery. This influences topical drug delivery and distribution. The effect of these factors on the published results of RCTs is assessed. This systematic review explores the strength of evidence supporting the influence of sinus surgery and delivery methods on the effectiveness of topical steroids in studies for CRS with meta-analyses.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of RCTs comparing INCS with either placebo or no intervention for treating CRS. Data were extracted for meta-analysis and subgroup analyses by sinus surgery status and topical delivery methods.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies (3961 patients) met the inclusion criteria. INCS improved overall symptoms (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.49; p < 0.00001) and the proportion of responders (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; p < 0.00001) compared with placebo. It decreased nasal polyp size with a greater proportion of responders (RR, 0.48; p < 0.00001) and prevented polyp recurrence (RR, 0.59; p = 0.0004) compared with placebo. Reduction of polyp size was greater in patients with sinus surgery (RR, 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20, 0.48) than those without (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46, 0.81; p = 0.009). Greater symptom improvement occurred when sinus delivery methods (SMD, -1.32; 95% CI, -2.26, -0.38) were compared with nasal delivery methods (SMD, -0.38; 95% CI, -0.55, -0.22; p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

INCS is effective for CRS. Prior sinus surgery and direct sinus delivery enhance the effectiveness of INCS in CRS.

Brazilian Academy of Rhinology position paper on topical intranasal therapy

This documents aims at educating those who treat sinonasal diseases - both general practitioners and specialists - about topical nasal treatments. By means of scientific evidence reviews, the Brazilian Academy of Rhinology provides its practical and updated guidelines on the most utilized topical nasal medication, except for the drugs that have topical antibiotics in their formulas.

Chronic sinusitis pathophysiology: the role of allergy

BACKGROUND

Chronic hyperplastic eosinophilic sinusitis (CHES) is an inflammatory disease characterized by eosinophil infiltration of sinus tissue that can present with and without nasal polyps (NPs). Aeroallergen sensitization in CHES occurs regularly, but the causality between allergen sensitivity, exposure, and disease is unclear.

METHODS

Allergen is unlikely to directly enter healthy sinuses either by diffusion or ciliary flow, and, even this is more problematic given the loss of patency of the ostia of diseased sinuses. Inflammation and tissue eosinophilia can develop secondary to allergen exposure in the nares, with systemic humoral recirculation of allergic cells including eosinophils, Th2 lymphocytes, and eosinophil precursors that are nonspecifically recruited back to the diseased sinuses.

RESULTS

The possibility of an allergic reaction to peptides derived from bacteria (i.e., Staphylococcus or superantigens) or fungi that colonize the diseased sinus also provides a plausible allergic mechanism.

CONCLUSION

Treatments of this disease include agents directed at allergic mediators such as leukotriene modifiers and corticosteroids, although this does not necessarily signify that an IgE-dependent mechanism can be ascribed. However, more recently, omalizumab has shown promise, including in patients without obvious aeroallergen sensitization. Although many aspects of the role of allergy in CHES remain a mystery, the mechanisms that are being elucidated allow for improved understanding of this disease, which ultimately will lead to better treatments for our patients who live daily with this disease.

Chronic rhinosinusitis and emerging treatment options

This review describes the epidemiology and various treatments in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). Evidence for short-term use of systemic corticosteroids has been shown to be favorable in CRSwNP, but still limited in CRSsNP. Topical corticosteroids improve symptom scores in both CRS subgroups. The role of microbes in CRS is still controversial. Culture-directed antibiotics are recommended for CRSsNP with exacerbation. Long-term use of low dosage antibiotics is recommended for CRSsNP for their anti-inflammatory effects. Other emerging treatment options are also discussed.

Topical steroids for nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) represents inflammatory changes throughout the nose and sinuses from a group of disorders which all lead to swelling and overgrowth of the nasal mucosa. Topical corticosteroids have been the most widely used treatment, with each clinician using different regimes, at different doses, in different settings and with or without sinus surgery. CRSwNP requires ongoing medical management to prevent recurrence.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of topical corticosteroids on CRSwNP and to analyse various subgroups, including patients who had sinus surgery immediately prior to the delivery of the corticosteroids, surgery any time prior to the topical corticosteroids or patients who had never had previous surgery. Also to assess the most effective dose and delivery methods for topical corticosteroids.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; BIOSIS Previews; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 10 April 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials studying topical corticosteroids for patients with CRSwNP.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors reviewed the search results and selected trials meeting the eligibility criteria, obtaining full texts and contacting authors. We documented our justification for the exclusion of studies. At least two authors extracted data using a pre-determined, standardised data form.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty studies (3624 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The trials were at low (21 trials), medium (13 trials) and high (six trials) risk of bias. The primary outcomes were sino-nasal symptoms, polyp size and polyp recurrence after surgery. When compared to placebo, topical corticosteroids improved overall symptom scores (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.65 to -0.27, P < 0.00001; seven trials, n = 445) and had a higher proportion of patients whose symptoms improved (responders) (risk ratio (RR) 1.71; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.26, P = 0.0002; four trials, n = 234). Topical corticosteroids also decreased the polyp score (SMD -0.73; 95% CI -1.00 to -0.46, P < 0.00001; three trials, n = 237) and had a greater proportion of patients with a reduction in polyp size (responders) (RR 2.09; 95% CI 1.65 to 2.64, P < 0.00001; eight trials, n = 785) when compared to placebo. Topical corticosteroids also prevented polyp recurrence after surgery (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.79, P = 0.0004; six trials, n = 437). Subgroup analyses by sinus surgery status revealed a greater benefit in reduction of polyp score when topical steroid was administered any time after sinus surgery (SMD -1.19; 95% CI -1.54 to -0.83) compared to patients who had never had surgery (SMD -0.13; 95% CI -0.53 to 0.28, P < 0.00001). There was no difference between groups in terms of adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Topical corticosteroids are a beneficial treatment for CRSwNP and the adverse effects are minor, with benefits outweighing the risks. They improve symptoms, reduce polyp size and prevent polyp recurrence after surgery. Patients having sinus surgery may have a greater response to topical corticosteroids but further research is required.

State of the art treatment of nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Nasal polyposis represents the end point of multiple inflammatory pathways and controversy continues as to the exact roles of medical and surgical approaches in the management of nasal polyposis.

METHODS

A combination of both is often required to manage polyps adequately with surgery and intranasal steroids remaining the mainstay of therapy.

RESULTS

Fortunately, new technological advances are making surgery safer and more efficient. In the postoperative period, debridement is effective in reducing the formation of adhesions, and topical medications may play a beneficial role in preventing polyp reformation.

CONCLUSION

Additional investigations into the optimal perioperative medical management is needed to ensure optimal surgical outcomes.

Examining the safety of prednisolone acetate 1% nasal spray for treatment of nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Topical intranasal corticosteroid sprays are a mainstay of treatment for nasal polyposis. Newer treatment strategies for refractory polypoid disease include "off label" topical steroids such as prednisolone acetate. This study investigates the safety of intranasal prednisolone acetate; evaluating its effect on serum cortisol and adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) levels.

METHODS

This retrospective study included adult patients with refractory nasal polyposis, who had not taken oral steroids for 3 months prior to entry into the study. Patients applied 2 sprays of 1% prednisolone acetate delivered via a 15-mL standardized spray bottle twice daily. Morning serum cortisol and ACTH levels were collected prior to treatment and 6 to 8 weeks posttreatment. Pretreatment and posttreatment values were compared.

RESULTS

Nine patients were included in this study. The average serum cortisol and ACTH levels prior to treatment was 12.09 μg/dL (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.94-17.24) and 12.33 ng/L (95% CI, 8.97-15.70), respectively. After 6 to 8 weeks of treatment, the average serum cortisol and ACTH levels were 11.76 μg/dL (95% CI, 9.51-14.00) and 13.22 ng/L (95% CI, 10.68-15.77), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between pretreatment and posttreatment values for cortisol (p = 0.89) or ACTH (p = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

Intranasal delivery of prednisolone acetate, at the specified dose, does not result in suppression of the adrenal axis. It can be considered as a safe alternative for management of aggressive nasal polyposis refractory to traditional treatment strategies.

Genetics and phenotyping in chronic sinusitis

Chronic sinusitis with nasal polyposis historically has been treated as a single monolithic clinical disorder. Just as asthma is now accepted as numerous heterogeneous diseases, chronic sinusitis should also be viewed as comprising several diseases with varying causes, with each one characterized by distinct histologic and gene and protein expression patterns. This includes recognition of the need to define these diseases based on the presence or absence of an eosinophilic infiltrate but also on additional distinctions based on unique agents that drive their development and perpetuation. As a collection of heterogeneous diseases, proper differential diagnosis is required to delineate appropriate therapeutic intervention. This review will focus on recognized distinct presentations of chronic sinus disease, including distinguishing the clinical presentations, cellular and molecular characteristics, genetic differences, and current treatment options for each.

Actual concepts in rhinosinusitis: a review of clinical presentations, inflammatory pathways, cytokine profiles, remodeling, and management

Rhinosinusitis (RS) is a heterogeneous group of diseases. It is a significant and increasing health problem that affects about 15% of the population in Western countries. It has a substantial impact on patients’ health-related quality of life and daily functioning and represents a huge financial burden to society and the health care system as a result of the direct and indirect costs. In addition, RS is not well-understood, and little is known about the etiology and pathophysiology. In the past decade, many papers have been published that have changed our understanding of RS. RS is commonly classified into acute and chronic RS based on symptom duration. In acute RS, an inflammatory reaction initiated by a viral infection characterizes most uncomplicated, mild to moderate cases. Therefore, the first line of treatment for these cases are intranasal steroids and not antibiotics. In severe and complicated cases, antibiotics combined with topical steroids remain the treatment of choice. On the other hand, chronic RS is actually subdivided into two distinct entities (chronic rhinosinusitis with and without polyps), as growing evidence indicates that these entities have specific inflammatory pathways and cytokine profiles. The authors review recent data regarding the clinical presentations, cytokine profiles, tissue remodeling, and modalities of treatment for each form of RS.

Evidence-based management of nasal polyposis by intranasal corticosteroids: from the cause to the clinic

BACKGROUND

Nasal polyposis is an inflammatory disorder involving the mucosa of the nose and paranasal sinuses and affecting approximately 2-4% of the general population.

METHODS

A literature search of Medline and Embase was conducted to obtain an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and current treatment of nasal polyposis, focusing on evidence-based efficacy of intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) as primary and postoperative therapy. Recent research on INSs in nasal polyp treatment, along with notable historic findings, was reviewed.

RESULTS

Nasal polyps are mostly characterized by eosinophil infiltration, a complex inflammation of nasal mucosa, and possibly production of polyclonal IgE. Current treatment modalities include INSs, oral corticosteroids, and surgery; surgery is generally limited to those with an insufficient response to medical treatment. Because of their effects on eosinophil-dominated inflammation, INSs and oral corticosteroids are the primary medical treatment strategies. The very low (≤1%) systemic bioavailability of newer INSs minimizes the systemic adverse effects seen with oral corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

Based on randomized, controlled trials, guidelines recommend INSs as first-line therapy for nasal polyps and for care after polypectomy. Clinical data suggest INSs are effective in reducing polyp size and relieving nasal symptoms. INS treatment has also reduced nasal polyp recurrence in patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Treatment with these mainstay options has been found to improve quality of life, which, along with symptom improvement, is a key factor in disease treatment.

Topical glucocorticoids downregulate COX-1 positive cells in nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

Influx of inflammatory cells is one of the hallmarks of nasal polyposis. As glucocorticoids (GC) are known to exhibit strong anti-inflammatory effects, these drugs are frequently used in the treatment of the disease. Part of the anti-inflammatory effects of GC is attributed to their interference with prostanoid synthesis. As cyclooxygenases (COX) are key enzymes in the synthesis of both pro- (COX-1, COX-2) and anti-inflammatory prostanoids (COX-2), we investigated the role of topical GC on COX-1, COX-2 and inflammatory markers in nasal polyps (NP).

METHODS

Immunohistochemical analysis of inflammatory markers (CD68, CD117, MBP, elastase, IgE, BB-1, IL-4, IL-5 and IL-6), COX-1 and COX-2 was performed on normal nasal mucosa (NM) (n = 18), non-GC treated NP (n = 27) and topical GC treated NP (n = 12). NP groups were matched for allergy, asthma and ASA intolerance.

RESULTS

Increased numbers of eosinophils, IL-5+ cells and IgE+ cells and decreased numbers of mastcells are striking features of NP inflammation (P < 0.05). In addition, increased numbers of COX-1+ cells are observed in NP epithelium compared to NM (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Topical GC significantly reduce the number of COX-1+ NP cells (P < 0.05), but have no significant effect on COX-2+ NP cells. No significant reduction in the number of eosinophils is observed for GC treated NP. The number of IL-5+ cells is however increased significantly upon GC treatment (P < 0.05).

Chronisch polypöse Rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of chronic polypous rhinosinusitis is high at 1-2%. In the present study, the predisposing factors for this condition, the clinical symptomatology, results of surgical interventions, significance of computed tomography diagnosis, as well as histology and post-operative therapy with steroids were investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 15% stratified sample, made up of 194 post-paranasal sinus surgery patients of 5 surgical years was investigated. Above all, the eosinophil dominated type led to the formation of polyps. In the diagnosis of chronic polypous rhinosinusitis computed tomography is only sufficiently sensitive for the ethmoid bone. The complication rate was, with 4.6%, in the lower range of comparable pre-examinations. In addition, the 18% relapse rate in the patient population, of whom 49% had already been operated on once or several times, corresponds to a good result when compared at an international level.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm that surgical experience and a consistent post-surgical treatment can reduce the relapse frequency of chronic polypous rhinosinusitis. This is indicated by the on average late occurrence of a relapse.

Current concepts in therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis

The exact pathophysiological mechanisms leading to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) still to a large extent remain obscure. However, recently there has been some progress in elucidating the etiology of nasal polyposis, especially regarding tissue eosinophilia as well as the role of aspirin intolerance and eicosanoid mediators. Endonasal sinus surgery has evolved to be the treatment of choice in CRS and nasal polyposis in all cases where conservative treatment has failed or resulted in only a partial or temporary relief. Today, state of the art in surgical technique includes the ability to combine microscopic and endoscopic procedures. Regardless of technical advances like powered instrumentation or computer-aided surgery, in a modern protocol, surgical therapy can offer only one option within a complex and individually tailored therapeutical concept. This review discusses current concepts and new developments in the diagnosis and treatment of CRS and nasal polyposis.

Glucocorticosteroids in allergic inflammation: clinical benefits in allergic rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, and otitis media

Allergic rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, and otitis media are among the most common health problems encountered in general practice. Although frequently trivialized, they affect the quality of life, represent a significant socioeconomic burden, and are associated with some serious complications. In addition, allergic rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, and otitis media are often considered as comorbidities. These disorders involve an inflammatory process of the respiratory mucosa of the nose, paranasal sinuses, or middle ear. Because of their well-known anti-inflammatory effects, the role of glucocorticosteroids in the management of these three disorders has been questioned, evaluated, and, in some cases, established.

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray does not influence the recurrence rate of chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 1 year after functional endoscopic sinus surgery

BACKGROUND

Local corticosteroids are widely used in the treatment of nasal polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis both before and after nasal surgery. Their efficacy after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has not been fully established by placebo-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE

This double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study was performed in order to investigate whether fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) reduces the recurrence rate of nasal polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis during the first year after FESS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The trial looked at 162 patients aged 18 years and older requiring FESS for chronic rhinosinusitis or nasal polyps. After FESS combined with peri-operative systemic corticosteroids, patients were randomized and given FPANS 400 microg b.i.d., FPANS 800 microg b.i.d. or placebo b.i.d. for the duration of 1 year. Patients were withdrawn from the trial (but still included in the study for statistical purposes) if there were recurrent or persistent diseases, defined as progressive regrowth of nasal polyps, recurrent signs and symptoms of chronic sinusitis combined with abnormalities on computed tomography scan and persistent complaints for at least 2 months after FESS.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of symptoms was seen after FESS. After 1 year, 46 patients had been withdrawn from the trial because of recurrent diseases and 32 patients because of persistent symptoms. No differences in the number of patients withdrawn because of recurrent or persistent diseases were found between the patients treated with FPANS and patients treated with placebo. We were also unable to find a positive effect of FPANS compared with placebo in several subgroups such as patients with nasal polyps, high score at FESS or no previous sinus surgery.

CONCLUSION

This placebo-controlled study does not show that treatment with FPANS up to 1 year after FESS had a positive effect compared with placebo.

Diffuse nasal polyposis and endonasal endoscopic surgery: long-term results, a 65-case study

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy of a standardized surgical procedure in patients with nasal polyposis.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study of nonrandomized cases from a single institution.

METHODS

An inception cohort of 65 consecutive patients with nasal polyposis observed from January 1994 to December 1997. Presence of asthma, allergies, or aspirin intolerance, duration of nasal polyposis, previous surgery, and medical treatment were noted. Clinical symptoms were evaluated with a visual analogue scale (VAS), and a preoperative computed tomography scan was performed before the surgical procedure. At the end of the study, an evaluation was performed to collect all information concerning nasal symptoms, asthma conditions, quality of life, and patient's opinion about this type of surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty patients have completed the study. Polyposis was isolated in 29 patients (group A), asthma was present in 21 patients (group B), and aspirin intolerance in 10 patients (group C). Nasal obstruction (n = 53/60, 88.3%) and olfactory disturbances (n = 54/56, 96.4%) were the main preoperative complaints, according to the VAS, with a high degree of severity. No significant difference for nasal symptomatology was found between the three groups. Nasal obstruction and olfactory dysfunction was improved in 37 and 42 patients, respectively, without a statistical significance between the groups. A reduction of the antiasthmatic treatment was observed in 24 of 31 patients. A massive and anteriorly localized recurrence was noted in 3 and 19 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic sphenoethmoidectomy is indicated for nasal polyposis refractory to intensive medical management with a good improvement of patient's quality of life.

[Nasal polyposis: postoperative long term results (5 years) after endoscopic sinus surgery]

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results after endoscopic sinus surgery in cases of nasal polyposis. We include 54 patients with diffuse nasal polyposis suffering from nasal obstruction. An endoscopic sinus surgery under general anesthesia with excision of the polyposis was performed. There were no complications. The patients were followed closely and treated with local and systemic steroids. After 5 years, the 75% of these patients were free of nasal symptoms and in the 67% the mucosa appeared normal. We also review the influence of some factors (ASA triad, anosmia, allergy...) in the recurrence of the disease.

Sensitivity of a new grading system for studying nasal polyps with the potential to detect early changes in polyp size after treatment with a topical corticosteroid (budesonide)

We have previously compared different scoring systems for endoscopic staging of nasal polyps. Of the five methods evaluated, we found that two were better than the others with regard to reproducibility and agreement between physicians. One method was lateral imaging, developed by the authors, and the other was a scoring system developed by Lildholdt et al. The main objective of the present study was to compare the sensitivity of these two methods. Another aim was to study the effect on nasal polyposis of topical nasal corticosteroids over a 2-week period. Patients with bilateral nasal polyposis (n = 100) were randomized to a 2-week treatment with a topical corticosteroid (budesonide aqueous nasal spray: 128 microg b.i.d.) or placebo in a double-blind manner. Nasal symptoms were scored before treatment and after 3, 7 and 14 days of treatment, and the patients underwent nasal endoscopy at clinical visits. Patients treated with active substance had an improvement in their symptoms, an effect already detectable after 3 days of treatment, compared with those who received placebo. In addition, a statistically significant decrease in polyp size could be registered after 14 days using lateral imaging but not with the other scoring system. In conclusion, lateral imaging was more sensitive and could detect effects earlier than the other scoring system and can be recommended for the endoscopic staging of nasal polyps in clinical studies.

Topical corticosteroids in nasal polyposis

Nasal polyps are the common end-point of a number of conditions characterised by inflammation and are rarely 'curable' in its true sense. After consideration of the underlying aetiology and confirmation of the diagnosis, they are normally managed by a combination of medical and surgical interventions. Of these, topical corticosteroids have proved to be the medical treatment of choice. The objectives of the medical management are to eliminate or reduce the size of polyps, re-establish nasal airway and nasal breathing, improve or restore the sense of smell, and prevent recurrence of nasal polyps. The mechanism of action of corticosteroids may be by a multifactorial effect on various aspects of the inflammatory reaction, the effect being initiated by their binding to a specific cytoplasmic glucocorticoid receptor. At a cellular level, there is a reduction in the number of antigen-presenting cells, in the number and activation of T cells, in the number of mast cells, and in the number and activation of eosinophils. When polyps are large (grade 3) topical medication is difficult to instil in a very blocked nose and surgery or short term systemic corticosteroids may be required. Topical corticosteroids are of use in the primary treatment of nasal polyps when they are of a small or medium size (grades 1 and 2) and in the maintenance of any therapeutic improvement. The efficacy of topical corticosteroids such as betamethasone sodium phosphate nose drops, beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone propionate and budesonide nasal sprays in reducing polyp size and rhinitis symptoms has been demonstrated in several randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Beclomethasone dipropionate, flunisolide and budesonide sprays have also been shown to delay the recurrence of polyps after surgery. Placebo-controlled studies of agents that have shown a significant clinical effect in the management of nasal polyposis are reviewed.

Prophylactic budesonide nasal spray after polypectomy

This double blind study compared the effect of budesonide nasal spray with placebo, in the prophylaxis of nasal polyp recurrence after avulsion. 38 cases were given budesonide nasal spray and 25 placebo for 3 months after polypectomy. Follow up of 9 months revealed budesonide treated patients to have significantly lower recurrence rate as compared to the placebo. Interestingly patients with recurrent nasal polyposis benefitted much more from topical budesonide treatment as compared to ones with no previous history of polypectomy.

Inhibition of GM-CSF secretion by topical corticosteroids and nedocromil sodium. A comparison study using nasal polyp epithelial cells

Nasal epithelial cells maintain eosinophil survival by secreting granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Corticosteroids antagonize eosinophil viability induced by GM-CSF. We investigated the effect of topical corticosteroids and nedocromil sodium on the release of GM-CSF from nasal polyp epithelial cells. Epithelial cells were obtained from 19 patients undergoing nasal polypectomy and cultured. After reaching confluence, cultured cells were stimulated with 10% foetal calf serum in the absence and presence of four topical corticosteroids and nedocromil sodium for 48 h. GM-CSF was measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Fluticasone propionate was the most potent inhibitor of GM-CSF release (IC25 = 46 pM) closely followed by budesonide (IC25 = 4 nM), beclomethasone dipropionate (IC25 = 40 nM) and triamcinolone acetonide (IC25 = 75 nM). Nedocromil sodium had no effect on GM-CSF release. We conclude that the effect of topical steroids on reducing eosinophil infiltration in nasal polyps may be due in part to downregulation, among other cytokines, of epithelial GM-CSF production which prolongs eosinophil viability. Quantitatively, fluticasone propionate inhibited GM-CSF production more potently than budesonide, beclomethasone dipropionate and triamcinolone acetonide.

Efficacy of an aqueous and a powder formulation of nasal budesonide compared in patients with nasal polyps

Nasal polyps are commonly treated surgically. Intranasal administration of topical corticosteroids has gained increased acceptance as a treatment alternative. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of treatment of two formulations of budesonide with placebo on nasal polyps. At four Danish clinics 138 patients suffering from moderate or severe nasal polyps were randomized to a twice daily treatment with Rhinocort Aqua 128 micrograms, Rhinocort Turbuhaler 140 micrograms or placebo (Astra Draco, Sweden) for 6 weeks. Polyp size (primary efficacy variable), nasal symptoms, sense of smell, and patients' overall evaluation of treatment of efficacy were assessed by scores. Polyp size was reduced significantly in both budesonide treated groups compared with placebo, but there was no statistical difference between the two actively treated groups. Patients' nasal symptom scores was significantly more reduced in the Aqua compared to the Turbuhaler treated group, and both reduced symptom scores were significantly better compared to placebo. Sense of smell was significantly improved in the actively treated groups compared to placebo. The proportion of patients rating substantial or total control over symptoms after 6 weeks treatment was 60.9% and 48.2% in the Aqua and Turbuhaler-treated groups, respectively, which was significantly better compared with 29.8% in the placebo-treated group. Rhinocort Aqua and Rhinocort Turbuhaler were equally well tolerated.

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in the treatment of nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Topical glucocorticoids are the medical treatment of choice in a majority of patients suffering from nasal polyposis. Fluticasone propionate is a fluorinated steroid reported to be highly effective when used topically in the nose for seasonal and perennial allergic and nonallergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal fluticasone propionate in the treatment of long-standing polyposis.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with long-standing nasal polyposis were treated over a 26-week period with fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid, beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid or placebo, administered intranasally in an aqueous spray in a double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group design at a single center. The primary efficacy endpoint was the physicians' assessment of symptoms and polyp score. Peak nasal inspiratory flow was performed twice daily and on every visit to evaluate the effect of the corticosteroids on nasal air flow.

RESULTS

A significant difference in the primary efficacy endpoint between fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray compared with placebo was seen after 14 weeks of treatment. This was further verified by the peak nasal inspiratory flow results. There was some evidence of earlier onset in the fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray group compared with the beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray group after 4 weeks in terms of the primary efficacy endpoint. From the daily record cards patients receiving fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray had a significantly higher percentage of days on which they required no rescue medication (P < .009) and a higher percentage of days with an overall nasal blockage score on waking of < 2 (P < .013) when compared with placebo-treated patients. No other statistically significant results were found between the two active compounds.

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid and beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid are effective in treating the symptoms of nasal polyps, with some evidence that fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray has a faster onset of action and is tolerated at least as well as beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray at the same dose.

Nasal polyps: medical or surgical management?

Nasal polyposis is considered to be a non-IgE-mediated inflammatory condition of the nose and sinuses, often associated with chronic non-allergic rhinitis, aspirin intolerance and non-allergic asthma. The aetiology of nasal polyposis is unknown. The main symptoms are nasal obstruction and disturbance of the sense of smell. Occlusion of the nasal passage by a few large polyps could be treated by simple polypectomy to help the patient breathe through the nose. Polypectomy per se does not worsen asthma. Other surgical procedures can be performed, depending on the degree of the disease. The aim of surgery is to restore the physiological properties of the nose by making the nose as free from polyps as possible, and to allow drainage of infected sinuses. Complementary medical treatment of polyposis is always necessary, as surgery cannot treat the inflammatory component of the mucosal disease. In this respect, topical corticosteroids have long been the drugs of choice to reduce the size of polyps, to prevent recurrence after surgery, and are often the main treatment for the disease in many patients. Fluticasone propionate has now been shown to be at least as effective as beclomethasone dipropionate as a medical tool in the management of polyposis. Short-term treatment with systemic corticosteroids is an alternative method of inducing remission and controlling nasal polyps. However, in most patients with nasal polyps, treatment consists of both medical and surgical management.

Clinical course of patients with primary nasal polyps

A follow-up study on 180 patients treated for the first time for nasal polyps was performed. The follow-up period was from 1 to 8 years with a median of 57 months. The majority of patients had postoperative topical steroid treatment. 65.6% of patients had one polypectomy, 17.8% had two polypectomies, 10% had 3, 2.8% had 4, and 3.9% of patients had 5-10 polypectomies performed during the follow-up period. Patients without asthma, acute recurrent or chronic sinusitis, acetylsalicylic acid intolerance, or allergy had fewer polypectomies and less topical steroid treatment than patients with these characteristics. The recurrence profile between the first and second polypectomy described with the life-table method showed a slow decline in the number of patients with only one polypectomy. The time span needed before significant clinical symptoms occurred after the first polypectomy indicates that not all primary polyp patients are prone to recurrence. Nasal polyps is probably a manifestation of different clinical and aetio-pathogenetic entities. Further identification of such entities is needed to improve treatment strategy.

The effect of budesonide (Rhinocort) in the treatment of small and medium-sized nasal polyps

The objectives of this study were to determine if the size of nasal polyps could be assessed in a reproducible way and to study the effect of budesonide in patients suffering from eosinophilic nasal polyposis with small and medium sized polyps. Ninety-one patients entered the study. Budesonide 200 micrograms b.i.d. (aerosol or aqua) and placebo (aerosol or aqua) were compared in a 3-month double-blind, multi-centre, randomized study. Efficacy was measured by an assessment of polyp size, nasal peak-flow index and the patient's assessment of nasal symptoms. The conclusions were that the size of polyps could be assessed in a reproducible way, and that budesonide delivered either as a water-based suspension or as an aerosol is effective in the treatment of patients with small and medium sized polyps.

Clinical aspects and distribution of immunologically active cells in the nasal mucosa of patients with nasal polyps after endoscopic sinus surgery and treatment with topical corticosteroids

Clinical parameters of 72 patients who were operated upon for nasal polyps were evaluated as well as biopsy specimens of the mucosa of the middle and inferior turbinates of 41 of these patients. Biopsies were taken at the time of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), after 6 months and after 1 year in 23 patients. During the follow-up period the patients were treated with topical corticosteroids (budesonide). At the time of ESS significantly more CD8+ (suppressor/cytotoxic) cells than CD4+ (helper/inducer) cells were found in the middle and inferior turbinates. At 6 months significantly more CD4+ cells were found than at the time of ESS, whereas at 1 year the number of CD4+ cells had decreased and was lower than at 6 months. These data support the theory that the occurrence of nasal polyps is associated with T-cell-dependent disturbances. Clinical evaluation revealed that most of the patients with chronic airway obstruction had better pulmonary functions postoperatively or required less medication for lung disease. These findings show that ESS combined with topical corticosteroids has a positive effect on upper and lower respiratory tract pathology.