MK-7622: A First-in-Class M1 Positive Allosteric Modulator Development Candidate

Application of Deuterium in an M1 Positive Allosteric Modulator Back-Up Program: The Discovery of VU6045422

Recently, we disclosed VU0467319, an M1 positive allosteric modulator (PAM) clinical candidate that had successfully completed a phase I single ascending dose clinical trial. Pharmacokinetic assessment revealed that, in humans upon increasing dose, a circulating, inactive metabolite constituted a major portion of the total drug-related area under the curve (AUC). One approach the team employed to reduce inactive metabolite formation in the back-up program was the kinetic isotope effect, replacing the metabolically labile C-H bonds with shorter, more stable C-D bonds. The C-D dipole afforded VU6045422, a more potent M1 PAM (human EC50 = 192 nM, 80% ACh Max) than its proteocongener VU0467319 (human EC50 = 492 nM, 71% ACh Max), and retained the desired profile of minimal M1 agonism. Overall, the profile of VU6045422 supported advancement, as did greater in vitro metabolic stability in both microsomes and hepatocytes than did VU0467319. In both rat and dog in vivo, low doses proved to mirror the in vitro profile; however, at higher doses in 14-day exploratory toxicology studies, the amount of the same undesired metabolite derived from VU6045422 was equivalent to that produced from VU0467319. This unexpected IVIVC result, coupled with less than dose-proportional increases in exposure and no improvement in solubility, led to discontinuation of VU0467319/VU6045422 development.

Discovery of VU0467319: an M1 Positive Allosteric Modulator Candidate That Advanced into Clinical Trials

Herein we detail the first disclosure of VU0467319 (VU319), an M1 Positive Allosteric Modulator (PAM) clinical candidate that successfully completed a Phase I Single Ascending Dose (SAD) clinical trial. VU319 (16) is a moderately potent M1 PAM (M1 PAM EC50 = 492 nM ± 2.9 nM, 71.3 ± 9.9% ACh Max), with minimal M1 agonism (EC50 > 30 μM), that displayed high CNS penetration (Kps > 0.67 and Kp,uus > 0.9) and multispecies pharmacokinetics permissive of further development. Based on robust efficacy in multiple preclinical models of cognition, an ancillary pharmacology profile devoid of appreciable off-target activities, and a lack of cholinergic adverse effects (AEs) in rats, dogs and nonhuman primates, VU319 advanced into IND-enabling studies. After completing 4-week rat and dog GLP toxicology without AEs, including absence of cholinergic effects, the first in human Phase I SAD clinical trial of VU319 (NCT03220295) was performed at Vanderbilt, where a similar lack of adverse effects, including absence of cholinergic effects was noted. Moreover, signals of target engagement were seen at the highest dose tested. Thus, VU319 demonstrated the feasibility of achieving selective targeting of central M1 muscarinic receptors without eliciting cholinergic AEs that have plagued other drugs targeting CNS cholinergic neurotransmission.

Synergistic activity of nootropic herbs as potent therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease: A cheminformatics, pharmacokinetics, and system pharmacology approach

Background

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, which subdues over 55 million people and finding a cure, still remains disenchanting. Indian medicinal herbs notably, Withania somnifera, Bacopa monnieri, Curcuma longa, and Clitoria ternatea are traditionally utilized for their memory-enhancing properties.

Objective

We computationally investigated the therapeutic potential of four nootropic herbs by uncovering the molecular mechanisms underlying their treatment for AD.

Methods

Cheminformatics, pharmacokinetics, and system pharmacology studies were carried out to predict the phytocompounds drug-like properties, protein targets, targets functional association and enrichment analysis. A comparative study was performed with phytocompounds and FDA-approved drugs. Investigation on the expression of protein targets in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex of the AD brain was performed. Network was constructed to depict the interaction between phytocompounds, drugs, and molecular targets.

Results

Through comparative analysis, we found that the phytocompounds shared common targets with both FDA drugs and drugs under clinical trials. We identified potential active compounds notably, Withaferin A, Withanolide-D, Withanolide-E, Withanolide-G, and Humulene epoxide II, that can combat AD. Interestingly, the enzyme inhibition scores of the identified drugs were much higher than FDA-approved drugs. In addition, regulatory proteins such as AβPP, acetylcholinesterase, BACE1, and PTPN1 were the targets of 8, 16, 9, and 22 phytocompounds, respectively. Nonetheless, AR and CYP19A, were the primary targets of most phytocompounds.

Conclusions

Herbal medicines can synergistically stimulate multiple protein targets, rendering a holistic and integrative treatment, encouraging a promising avenue to treat AD.

A golden age of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor modulation in neurological diseases

Over the past 40 years, the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor family, particularly the M1-receptor and M4-receptor subtypes, have emerged as validated targets for the symptomatic treatment of neurological diseases such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer disease. However, despite considerable effort and investment, no drugs have yet gained clinical approval. This is largely attributable to cholinergic adverse effects that have halted the majority of programmes and resulted in a waning of interest in these G-protein-coupled receptor targets. Recently, this trend has been reversed. Driven by advances in structure-based drug design and an appreciation of the optimal pharmacological properties necessary to deliver clinical efficacy while minimizing adverse effects, a new generation of M1-receptor and M4-receptor orthosteric agonists and positive allosteric modulators are now entering the clinic. These agents offer the prospect of novel therapeutic solutions for 'hard to treat' neurological diseases, heralding a new era of muscarinic drug discovery.

Discovery of VU6007496: Challenges in the Development of an M1 Positive Allosteric Modulator Backup Candidate

Herein we report progress toward a backup clinical candidate to the M1 positive allosteric modulator (PAM) VU319/ACP-319. Scaffold-hopping from the pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine-based M1 PAM VU6007477 to isomeric pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyridine and thieno[3,2-b]pyridine congeners identified several backup contenders. Ultimately, VU6007496, a pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyridine, advanced into late stage profiling, only to be plagued with unanticipated, species-specific metabolism and active/toxic metabolites which were identified in our phenotypic seizure liability in vivo screen, preventing further development. However, VU6007496 proved to be a highly selective and CNS penetrant M1 PAM, with minimal agonism, that displayed excellent multispecies IV/PO pharmacokinetics (PK), CNS penetration, no induction of long-term depression (or cholinergic toxicity) and robust efficacy in novel object recognition (minimum effective dose = 3 mg/kg p.o.). Thus, VU6007496 can serve as another valuable in vivo tool compound in rats and nonhuman primates, but not mouse, to study selective M1 activation.

Opportunities and challenges for the development of M1 muscarinic receptor positive allosteric modulators in the treatment for neurocognitive deficits

Targeting allosteric sites of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M1 receptors) is a promising strategy to treat neurocognitive disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. Indeed, the last two decades have seen an impressive body of work focussing on the design and development of positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) for the M1 receptor. This has led to the identification of a structurally diverse range of highly selective M1 PAMs. In preclinical models, M1 PAMs have shown rescue of cognitive deficits and improvement of endpoints predictive of symptom domains of schizophrenia. Yet, to date only a few M1 PAMs have reached early-stage clinical trials, with many of them failing to progress further due to on-target mediated cholinergic adverse effects that have plagued the development of this class of ligand. This review covers the recent preclinical and clinical studies in the field of M1 receptor drug discovery for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia, with a specific focus on M1 PAM, highlighting both the undoubted potential but also key challenges for the successful translation of M1 PAMs from bench-side to bedside. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue Therapeutic Targeting of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: hot topics from the Australasian Society of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacologists and Toxicologists 2021 Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v181.14/issuetoc.

Structure, function and drug discovery of GPCR signaling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are versatile and vital proteins involved in a wide array of physiological processes and responses, such as sensory perception (e.g., vision, taste, and smell), immune response, hormone regulation, and neurotransmission. Their diverse and essential roles in the body make them a significant focus for pharmaceutical research and drug development. Currently, approximately 35% of marketed drugs directly target GPCRs, underscoring their prominence as therapeutic targets. Recent advances in structural biology have substantially deepened our understanding of GPCR activation mechanisms and interactions with G-protein and arrestin signaling pathways. This review offers an in-depth exploration of both traditional and recent methods in GPCR structure analysis. It presents structure-based insights into ligand recognition and receptor activation mechanisms and delves deeper into the mechanisms of canonical and noncanonical signaling pathways downstream of GPCRs. Furthermore, it highlights recent advancements in GPCR-related drug discovery and development. Particular emphasis is placed on GPCR selective drugs, allosteric and biased signaling, polyphamarcology, and antibody drugs. Our goal is to provide researchers with a thorough and updated understanding of GPCR structure determination, signaling pathway investigation, and drug development. This foundation aims to propel forward-thinking therapeutic approaches that target GPCRs, drawing upon the latest insights into GPCR ligand selectivity, activation, and biased signaling mechanisms.

Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest family of transmembrane proteins, regulate a wide array of physiological processes in response to extracellular signals. Although these receptors have proven to be the most successful class of drug targets, their complicated signal transduction pathways (including different effector G proteins and β-arrestins) and mediation by orthosteric ligands often cause difficulties for drug development, such as on- or off-target effects. Interestingly, identification of ligands that engage allosteric binding sites, which are different from classic orthosteric sites, can promote pathway-specific effects in cooperation with orthosteric ligands. Such pharmacological properties of allosteric modulators offer new strategies to design safer GPCR-targeted therapeutics for various diseases. Here, we explore recent structural studies of GPCRs bound to allosteric modulators. Our inspection of all GPCR families reveals recognition mechanisms of allosteric regulation. More importantly, this review highlights the diversity of allosteric sites and presents how allosteric modulators control specific GPCR pathways to provide opportunities for the development of new valuable agents.

Multitargeting nature of muscarinic orthosteric agonists and antagonists

Muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) are typical members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and exist in five subtypes from M1 to M5. Muscarinic receptor subtypes do not sufficiently differ in affinity to orthosteric antagonists or agonists; therefore, the analysis of receptor subtypes is complicated, and misinterpretations can occur. Usually, when researchers mainly specialized in CNS and peripheral functions aim to study mAChR involvement in behavior, learning, spinal locomotor networks, biological rhythms, cardiovascular physiology, bronchoconstriction, gastrointestinal tract functions, schizophrenia, and Parkinson's disease, they use orthosteric ligands and they do not use allosteric ligands. Moreover, they usually rely on manufacturers' claims that could be misleading. This review aimed to call the attention of researchers not deeply focused on mAChR pharmacology to this fact. Importantly, limited selective binding is not only a property of mAChRs but is a general attribute of most neurotransmitter receptors. In this review, we want to give an overview of the most common off-targets for established mAChR ligands. In this context, an important point is a mention the tremendous knowledge gap on off-targets for novel compounds compared to very well-established ligands. Therefore, we will summarize reported affinities and give an outline of strategies to investigate the subtype's function, thereby avoiding ambiguous results. Despite that, the multitargeting nature of drugs acting also on mAChR could be an advantage when treating such diseases as schizophrenia. Antipsychotics are a perfect example of a multitargeting advantage in treatment. A promising strategy is the use of allosteric ligands, although some of these ligands have also been shown to exhibit limited selectivity. Another new direction in the development of muscarinic selective ligands is functionally selective and biased agonists. The possible selective ligands, usually allosteric, will also be listed. To overcome the limited selectivity of orthosteric ligands, the recommended process is to carefully examine the presence of respective subtypes in specific tissues via knockout studies, carefully apply "specific" agonists/antagonists at appropriate concentrations and then calculate the probability of a specific subtype involvement in specific functions. This could help interested researchers aiming to study the central nervous system functions mediated by the muscarinic receptor.

Drug Design Targeting the Muscarinic Receptors and the Implications in Central Nervous System Disorders

There is substantial evidence that cholinergic system function impairment plays a significant role in many central nervous system (CNS) disorders. During the past three decades, muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) have been implicated in various pathologies and have been prominent targets of drug-design efforts. However, due to the high sequence homology of the orthosteric binding site, many drug candidates resulted in limited clinical success. Although several advances in treating peripheral pathologies have been achieved, targeting CNS pathologies remains challenging for researchers. Nevertheless, significant progress has been made in recent years to develop functionally selective orthosteric and allosteric ligands targeting the mAChRs with limited side effect profiles. This review highlights past efforts and focuses on recent advances in drug design targeting these receptors for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), schizophrenia (SZ), and depression.

Computational investigation of drug bank compounds against 3C-like protease (3CLpro) of SARS-CoV-2 using deep learning and molecular dynamics simulation

Blocking the main replicating enzyme, 3 Chymotrypsin-like protease (3CL^pro) is the most promising drug development strategy against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, responsible for the current COVID-19 pandemic. In the present work, 9101 drugs obtained from the drug bank database were screened against SARS-CoV-2 3CL^pro prosing deep learning, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation techniques. In the initial stage, 500 drug-screened by deep learning regression model and subjected to molecular docking that resulted in 10 screened compounds with strong binding affinity. Further, five compounds were checked for their binding potential by analyzing molecular dynamics simulation for 100 ns at 300 K. In the final stage, two compounds {4-[(2s,4e)-2-(1,3-Benzothiazol-2-Yl)-2-(1h-1,2,3-Benzotriazol-1-Yl)-5-Phenylpent-4-Enyl]Phenyl}(Difluoro)Methylphosphonic Acid and 1-(3-(2,4-dimethylthiazol-5-yl)-4-oxo-2,4-dihydroindeno[1,2-c]pyrazol-5-yl)-3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)urea were screened as potential hits by analyzing several parameters like RMSD, Rg, RMSF, MMPBSA, and SASA. Thus, our study suggests two potential drugs that can be tested in the experimental conditions to evaluate the efficacy against SARS-CoV-2. Further, such drugs could be modified to develop more potent drugs against COVID-19.

Neuropharmacology of Cevimeline and Muscarinic Drugs-Focus on Cognition and Neurodegeneration

At present, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias cannot be cured. Therefore, scientists all over the world are trying to find a new approach to prolong an active life of patients with initial dementia. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological pathways are investigated to improve the key symptom of the disease, memory loss. In this respect, influencing the neuromodulator acetylcholine via muscarinic receptors, such as cevimeline, might be one of the therapeutic alternatives. The purpose of this study is to explore the potential of cevimeline on the cognitive functions of AD patients. The methodology is based on a systematic literature review of available studies found in Web of Science, PubMed, Springer, and Scopus on the research topic. The findings indicate that cevimeline has shown an improvement in experimentally induced cognitive deficits in animal models. Furthermore, it has demonstrated to positively influence tau pathology and reduce the levels of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide in the cerebral spinal fluid of Alzheimer’s patients. Although this drug has not been approved by the FDA for its use among AD patients and there is a lack of clinical studies confirming and extending this finding, cevimeline might represent a breakthrough in the treatment of AD.

Discovery of a novel class of heteroaryl-pyrrolidinones as positive allosteric modulators of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1

This Letter describes the synthesis and optimization of a series of heteroaryl-pyrrolidinone positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M₁ (mAChR M₁). Through the continued optimization of M₁ PAM tool compound VU0453595, with a focus on replacement of the 6,7-dihydro-5H-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyridin-5-one with a wide variety of alternative 4,5-dihydropyrrolo-fused heteroaromatics, the generation of M₁ PAMs with structurally novel chemotypes is disclosed. Two compounds from these subseries, 8b (VU6005610) and 20a (VU6005852), show robust selectivity for the M₁ mAChR, and no M₁ agonism. Both compounds have favorable preliminary PK profiles in vitro;8b additionally demonstrates high brain exposure in a rodent IV cassette model.

Design, Synthesis, and Structure-Activity Relationships Study of N-Pyrimidyl/Pyridyl-2-thiazolamine Analogues as Novel Positive Allosteric Modulators of M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor

The M₃ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) plays an essential pharmacological role in mediating a broad range of actions of acetylcholine (ACh) released throughout the periphery and central nerve system (CNS). Nevertheless, its agonistic functions remain unclear due to the lack of available subtype-selective agonists or positive allosteric modulators (PAMs). In the course of our extended structure-activity relationships (SARs) study on 2-acylaminothiazole derivative 1, a previously reported PAM of the M₃ mAChR, we successfully identified N-pyrimidyl/pyridyl-2-thiazolamine analogues as new scaffolds. The SARs study was rationalized using conformational analyses based on intramolecular interactions. A comprehensive study of a series of analogues described in this paper suggests that a unique sulfur-nitrogen nonbonding interaction in the N-pyrimidyl/pyridyl-2-thiazolamine moiety enable conformations that are essential for activity. Further, a SARs study around the N-pyrimidyl/pyridyl-2-thiazolamine core culminated in the discovery of compound 3g, which showed potent in vitro PAM activity for the M₃ mAChR with excellent subtype selectivity. Compound 3g also showed a distinct pharmacological effect on isolated smooth muscle tissue from rat bladder and favorable pharmacokinetics profiles, suggesting its potential as a chemical tool for probing the M₃ mAChR in further research.

Fine Tuning Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Signaling Through Allostery and Bias

The M1 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are highly pursued drug targets for neurological diseases, in particular for Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. Due to high sequence homology, selective targeting of any of the M1-M5 mAChRs through the endogenous ligand binding site has been notoriously difficult to achieve. With the discovery of highly subtype selective mAChR positive allosteric modulators in the new millennium, selectivity through targeting an allosteric binding site has opened new avenues for drug discovery programs. However, some hurdles remain to be overcome for these promising new drug candidates to progress into the clinic. One challenge is the potential for on-target side effects, such as for the M1 mAChR where over-activation of the receptor by orthosteric or allosteric ligands can be detrimental. Therefore, in addition to receptor subtype selectivity, a drug candidate may need to exhibit a biased signaling profile to avoid such on-target adverse effects. Indeed, recent studies in mice suggest that allosteric modulators for the M1 mAChR that bias signaling toward specific pathways may be therapeutically important. This review brings together details on the signaling pathways activated by the M1 and M4 mAChRs, evidence of biased agonism at these receptors, and highlights pathways that may be important for developing new subtype selective allosteric ligands to achieve therapeutic benefit.

Computationally designed synthetic peptides for transporter proteins imparts allostericity in Miltefosine resistant L. major

The emergence of drug resistance is a major concern for combating against Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, a neglected tropical disease affecting 98 countries including India. Miltefosine is the only oral drug available for the disease and Miltefosine transporter proteins play a pivotal role in the emergence of drug-resistant Leishmania major. The cause of resistance is less accumulation of drug inside the parasite either by less uptake of the drug due to a decrease in the activity of P4ATPase-CDC50 complex or by increased efflux of the drug by P-glycoprotein (P-gp, an ABC transporter). In this paper, we are trying to allosterically modulate the behavior of resistant parasite (L. major) towards its sensitivity for the existing drug (Miltefosine, a phosphatidylcholine analog). We have used computational approaches to deal with the conservedness of the proteins and apparently its three-dimensional structure prediction through ab initio modeling. Long scale membrane-embedded molecular dynamics simulations were carried out to study the structural interaction and stability. Parasite-specific motifs of these proteins were identified based on the machine learning technique, against which a peptide library was designed. The protein-peptide docking shows good binding energy of peptides Pg5F, Pg8F and PC2 with specific binding to the motifs. These peptides were tested both in vitro and in vivo, where Pg5F in combination with PC2 showed 50-60% inhibition in resistant L. major's promastigote and amastigote forms and 80-90% decrease in parasite load in mice. We posit a model system wherein the data provide sufficient impetus for being novel therapeutics in order to counteract the drug resistance phenotype in Leishmania parasites.

Impact of Allosteric Modulation in Drug Discovery: Innovation in Emerging Chemical Modalities

Recent years have seen an unprecedented level of innovation in allosteric drug discovery and development, with multiple drug candidates advancing into clinical studies. From early examples of allosteric drugs like GABA_A receptor modulators (benzodiazepines) in the 1960s to more recent GPCR negative allosteric modulators of CCR5 (maraviroc) approved in 2007, the opportunities for interrogating allosteric sites in drug discovery have expanded to other target classes such as protein-protein interactions, kinases, and nuclear hormone receptors. In this Innovation Letter, the authors highlight the latest advances of allosteric drug discovery from different target classes and novel emerging chemical modalities beyond small molecules.

Selective Modulation of Dynamic Protein Complexes

Dynamic proteins perform critical roles in cellular machines, including those that control proteostasis, transcription, translation, and signaling. Thus, dynamic proteins are prime candidates for chemical probe and drug discovery but difficult targets because they do not conform to classical rules of design and screening. Selectivity is pivotal for candidate probe molecules due to the extensive interaction network of these dynamic hubs. Recognition that the traditional rules of probe discovery are not necessarily applicable to dynamic proteins and their complexes, as well as technological advances in screening, have produced remarkable results in the last 2-4 years. Particularly notable are the improvements in target selectivity for small-molecule modulators of dynamic proteins, especially with techniques that increase the discovery likelihood of allosteric regulatory mechanisms. We focus on approaches to small-molecule screening that appear to be more suitable for highly dynamic targets and have the potential to streamline identification of selective modulators.

T-495, a novel low cooperative M1 receptor positive allosteric modulator, improves memory deficits associated with cholinergic dysfunction and is characterized by low gastrointestinal side effect risk

M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M₁ R) activation can be a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of cognitive deficits associated with cholinergic hypofunction. However, M₁ R activation causes gastrointestinal (GI) side effects in animals. We previously found that an M₁ R positive allosteric modulator (PAM) with lower cooperativity (α-value) has a limited impact on ileum contraction and can produce a wider margin between cognitive improvement and GI side effects. In fact, TAK-071, a novel M₁ R PAM with low cooperativity (α-value of 199), improved scopolamine-induced cognitive deficits with a wider margin against GI side effects than a high cooperative M₁ R PAM, T-662 (α-value of 1786), in rats. Here, we describe the pharmacological characteristics of a novel low cooperative M₁ R PAM T-495 (α-value of 170), using the clinically tested higher cooperative M₁ R PAM MK-7622 (α-value of 511) as a control. In rats, T-495 caused diarrhea at a 100-fold higher dose than that required for the improvement of scopolamine-induced memory deficits. Contrastingly, MK-7622 showed memory improvement and induction of diarrhea at an equal dose. Combination of T-495, but not of MK-7622, and donepezil at each sub-effective dose improved scopolamine-induced memory deficits. Additionally, in mice with reduced acetylcholine levels in the forebrain via overexpression of A53T α-synuclein (ie, a mouse model of dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson's disease with dementia), T-495, like donepezil, reversed the memory deficits in the contextual fear conditioning test and Y-maze task. Thus, low cooperative M₁ R PAMs are promising agents for the treatment of memory deficits associated with cholinergic dysfunction.

Rapid and efficient synthesis of a novel cholinergic muscarinic M1 receptor positive allosteric modulator using flash chemistry

Continuous flow-flash synthesis of a 2-bromobenzaldehyde derivative 18 as a key intermediate of a novel cholinergic muscarinic M₁ positive allosteric modulator 1 bearing an isoindolin-1-one ring system as a pharmacophore has been achieved using flow microreactors through selective I/Li exchange of 1-bromo-2-iodobenzene derivative 17 with BuLi and subsequent formylation at -40 °C of the highly reactive 2-bromophenyllithium intermediate using DMF, which is difficult to achieve by a conventional batch process due to the conversion of the highly reactive 2-bromophenyllithium intermediate into benzyne even at -78 °C. Late-stage cyclization to give the isoindolin-1-one ring system, through reductive amination of 18 followed by palladium-catalyzed carbonylation with carbon monoxide and intramolecular cyclization, efficiently afforded 1 for its further research and development.

Allosteric Modulators of Potential Targets Related to Alzheimer's Disease: a Review

Among neurodegenerative disorders, Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia, and there is an urgent need to discover new and efficacious forms of treatment for it. Pathological patterns of AD include cholinergic dysfunction, increased β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide concentration, the appearance of neurofibrillary tangles, among others, all of which are strongly associated with specific biological targets. Interactions observed between these targets and potential drug candidates in AD most often occur by competitive mechanisms driven by orthosteric ligands that sometimes result in the production of side effects. In this context, the allosteric mechanism represents a key strategy; this can be regarded as the selective modulation of such targets by allosteric modulators in an advantageous manner, as this may decrease the likelihood of side effects. The purpose of this review is to present an overview of compounds that act as allosteric modulators of the main biological targets related to AD.

Cryptic pocket formation underlies allosteric modulator selectivity at muscarinic GPCRs

Allosteric modulators are highly desirable as drugs, particularly for G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) targets, because allosteric drugs can achieve selectivity between closely related receptors. The mechanisms by which allosteric modulators achieve selectivity remain elusive, however, particularly given recent structures that reveal similar allosteric binding sites across receptors. Here we show that positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) achieve exquisite selectivity by occupying a dynamic pocket absent in existing crystal structures. This cryptic pocket forms far more frequently in molecular dynamics simulations of the M1 mAChR than in those of other mAChRs. These observations reconcile mutagenesis data that previously appeared contradictory. Further mutagenesis experiments validate our prediction that preventing cryptic pocket opening decreases the affinity of M1-selective PAMs. Our findings suggest opportunities for the design of subtype-specific drugs exploiting cryptic pockets that open in certain receptors but not in other receptors with nearly identical static structures.

Discovery of Tricyclic Triazolo- and Imidazopyridine Lactams as M1 Positive Allosteric Modulators

This Letter describes the chemical optimization of a new series of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype 1 (M₁) positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) based on novel tricyclic triazolo- and imidazopyridine lactam cores, devoid of M₁ agonism, e.g., no M₁ ago-PAM activity, in high expressing recombinant cell lines. While all the new tricyclic congeners afforded excellent rat pharmacokinetic (PK) properties (CL_p < 8 mL/min/kg and t_1/2 > 5 h), regioisomeric triazolopyridine analogues were uniformly not CNS penetrant ( K_p < 0.05), despite a lack of hydrogen bond donors. However, removal of a single nitrogen atom to afford imidazopyridine derivatives proved to retain the excellent rat PK and provide high CNS penetration ( K_p > 2), despite inclusion of a basic nitrogen. Moreover, 24c was devoid of M₁ agonism in high expressing recombinant cell lines and did not induce cholinergic seizures in vivo in mice. Interestingly, all of the new M₁ PAMs across the diverse tricyclic heterocyclic cores possessed equivalent CNS MPO scores (>4.5), highlighting the value of both "medicinal chemist's eye" and experimental data, e.g., not sole reliance (or decision bias) on in silico calculated properties, for parameters as complex as CNS penetration.

Striatal, Hippocampal, and Cortical Networks Are Differentially Responsive to the M4- and M1-Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Mediated Effects of Xanomeline

Preclinical and clinical data suggest that muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation may be therapeutically beneficial for the treatment of schizophrenia and Alzheimer's diseases. This is best exemplified by clinical observations with xanomeline, the efficacy of which is thought to be mediated through co-activation of the M1 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). Here we examined the impact of treatment with xanomeline and compared it to the actions of selective M1 and M4 mAChR activators on in vivo intracellular signaling cascades in mice, including 3'-5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation and inositol phosphate-1 (IP1) accumulation in the striatum, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex. We additionally assessed the effects of xanomeline on hippocampal electrophysiological signatures in rats using ex vivo recordings from CA1 (Cornu Ammonis 1) as well as in vivo hippocampal theta. As expected, xanomeline's effects across these readouts were consistent with activation of both M1 and M4 mAChRs; however, differences were observed across different brain regions, suggesting non-uniform activation of these receptor subtypes in the central nervous system. Interestingly, despite having nearly equal in vitro potency at the M1 and the M4 mAChRs, during in vivo assays xanomeline produced M4-like effects at significantly lower brain exposures than those at which M1-like effects were observed. Our results raise the possibility that clinical efficacy observed with xanomeline was driven, in part, through its non-uniform activation of mAChR subtypes in the central nervous system and, at lower doses, through preferential agonism of the M4 mAChR.

Allosteric Modalities for Membrane-Bound Receptors: Insights from Drug Hunting for Brain Diseases

Medicinal chemists are accountable for embedding the appropriate drug target profile into the molecular architecture of a clinical candidate. An accurate characterization of the functional effects following binding of a drug to its biological target is a fundamental step in the discovery of new medicines, informing the translation of preclinical efficacy and safety observations into human trials. Membrane-bound proteins, particularly ion channels and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are biological targets prone to allosteric modulation. Investigations using allosteric drug candidates and chemical tools suggest that their functional effects may be tailored with a high degree of translational alignment, making them molecular tools to correct pathophysiological functional tone and enable personalized medicine when a causative target-to-disease link is known. We present select examples of functional molecular fine-tuning of allosterism and discuss consequences relevant to drug design.

Breakthroughs in Medicinal Chemistry: New Targets and Mechanisms, New Drugs, New Hopes-3

n/a