Juxtamembrane region of the amino terminus of the corticotropin releasing factor receptor type 1 is important for ligand interaction

Modulation of PTH1R signaling by an extracellular binding antibody

Parathyroid hormone receptor 1 (PTH1R) is a class B G-protein coupled receptor with key roles in bone development. The receptor signals through both the G_s and G_q G-proteins as well as through β-arrestin in a G-protein independent manner. Current treatments for bone disorders, such as osteoporosis, target the PTH1R but are suboptimal in their efficacy. Monoclonal antibodies represent a major growth area in therapeutics as a result of their superior specificity and long serum half-life. Here, we discovered antibodies against the extracellular domain (ECD) of PTH1R from a phage display library. One of these antibodies, ECD-ScFvhFc, binds PTH1R with high affinity and although it has little or no effect on G-protein dependent receptor signaling, it does reduce PTH1R mediated β-arrestin signaling. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) demonstrated that the ECD-ScFvhFc binding site overlapped partially with that of the cognate ligand, PTH. The results of this study demonstrate the suitability of PTH1R as a target for therapeutic antibody development.

The Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Family: Physiology of the Stress Response

The physiological stress response is responsible for the maintenance of homeostasis in the presence of real or perceived challenges. In this function, the brain activates adaptive responses that involve numerous neural circuits and effector molecules to adapt to the current and future demands. A maladaptive stress response has been linked to the etiology of a variety of disorders, such as anxiety and mood disorders, eating disorders, and the metabolic syndrome. The neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and its relatives, the urocortins 1–3, in concert with their receptors (CRFR1, CRFR2), have emerged as central components of the physiological stress response. This central peptidergic system impinges on a broad spectrum of physiological processes that are the basis for successful adaptation and concomitantly integrate autonomic, neuroendocrine, and behavioral stress responses. This review focuses on the physiology of CRF-related peptides and their cognate receptors with the aim of providing a comprehensive up-to-date overview of the field. We describe the major molecular features covering aspects of gene expression and regulation, structural properties, and molecular interactions, as well as mechanisms of signal transduction and their surveillance. In addition, we discuss the large body of published experimental studies focusing on state-of-the-art genetic approaches with high temporal and spatial precision, which collectively aimed to dissect the contribution of CRF-related ligands and receptors to different levels of the stress response. We discuss the controversies in the field and unravel knowledge gaps that might pave the way for future research directions and open up novel opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

PTH and Vitamin D

PTH and Vitamin D are two major regulators of mineral metabolism. They play critical roles in the maintenance of calcium and phosphate homeostasis as well as the development and maintenance of bone health. PTH and Vitamin D form a tightly controlled feedback cycle, PTH being a major stimulator of vitamin D synthesis in the kidney while vitamin D exerts negative feedback on PTH secretion. The major function of PTH and major physiologic regulator is circulating ionized calcium. The effects of PTH on gut, kidney, and bone serve to maintain serum calcium within a tight range. PTH has a reciprocal effect on phosphate metabolism. In contrast, vitamin D has a stimulatory effect on both calcium and phosphate homeostasis, playing a key role in providing adequate mineral for normal bone formation. Both hormones act in concert with the more recently discovered FGF23 and klotho, hormones involved predominantly in phosphate metabolism, which also participate in this closely knit feedback circuit. Of great interest are recent studies demonstrating effects of both PTH and vitamin D on the cardiovascular system. Hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D deficiency have been implicated in a variety of cardiovascular disorders including hypertension, atherosclerosis, vascular calcification, and kidney failure. Both hormones have direct effects on the endothelium, heart, and other vascular structures. How these effects of PTH and vitamin D interface with the regulation of bone formation are the subject of intense investigation.

Insights into mechanisms of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor signal transduction

During evolution, mammals have developed remarkably similar molecular mechanisms to respond to external challenges and maintain survival. Critical regulators of these mechanisms are the family of 'stress'-peptides that consists of the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and urocortins (Ucns). These neuropeptides 'fine-tune' integration of an intricate series of physiological responses involving the autonomic, endocrine, immune, cardiovascular and reproductive systems, which induce a spectrum of behavioural and homeostatic changes. CRH and Ucns exert their actions by activating two types of CRH receptors (CRH-R), CRH-R1 and CRH-R2, which belong to the class-B1 family of GPCRs. The CRH-Rs exhibit signalling promiscuity facilitated by their ability to couple to multiple G-proteins and regulate diverse intracellular networks that involve intracellular effectors such as cAMP and an array of PKs in an agonist and tissue-specific manner, a property that allows them to exert unique roles in the integration of homeostatic mechanisms. We only now begin to unravel the plethora of CRH-R biological actions and the transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms such as alternative mRNA splicing or phosphorylation-mediated desensitization developed to tightly control CRH-Rs biological activity and regulate their physiological actions. This review summarizes the current understanding of CRH-R signalling complexity and regulatory mechanisms that underpin cellular responses to CRH and Ucns.

Photo-cross-linkers incorporated into G-protein-coupled receptors in mammalian cells: a ligand comparison

Capturing the right ligand at the right spot: a well-balanced system for non-natural amino acid mutagenesis allows the ligand binding sites of a class II G-protein coupled receptor to be mapped and distinct binding domains to be identified for different ligands in the native environment of mammalian cells.

Alanine scanning mutagenesis of the second extracellular loop of type 1 corticotropin-releasing factor receptor revealed residues critical for peptide binding

Upon binding of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) analog sauvagine to the type 1 CRF receptor (CRF(1)), the amino-terminal portion of the peptide has been shown to lie near Lys257 in the receptor's second extracellular loop (EL2). To test the hypothesis that EL2 residues play a role in the binding of sauvagine to CRF(1) we carried out an alanine-scanning mutagenesis study to determine the functional role of EL2 residues (Leu251 to Val266). Only the W259A, F260A, and W259A/F260A mutations reduced the binding affinity and potency of sauvagine. In contrast, these mutations did not seem to significantly alter the overall receptor conformation, in that they left unchanged the affinities of the ligands astressin and antalarmin that have been suggested to bind to different regions of CRF(1). The W259A, F260A, and W259A/F260A mutations also decreased the affinity of the endogenous ligand, CRF, implying that these residues may play a common important role in the binding of different peptides belonging to CRF family. Parallel amino acid deletions of the two peptides produced ligands with various affinities for wild-type CRF(1) compared with the W259A, F260A, and W259A/F260A mutants, supporting the interaction between the amino-terminal residues 8 to 10 of sauvagine and the corresponding region in CRF with EL2 of CRF(1). This is the first time that a specific region of CRF(1) has been implicated in detailed interactions between the receptor and the amino-terminal portion of peptides belonging to the CRF family.

Residue 17 of sauvagine cross-links to the first transmembrane domain of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (CRFR1)

Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (CRFR1) mediates the physiological actions of corticotropin-releasing factor in the anterior pituitary gland and the central nervous system. Using chemical cross-linking we have previously reported that residue 16 of sauvagine (SVG) is in a close proximity to the second extracellular loop of CRFR1. Here we introduced p-benzoylphenylalanine (Bpa) at position 17 of a sauvagine analog, [Tyr0, Gln1, Bpa17]SVG, to covalently label CRFR1 and characterize the cross-linking site. Using a combination of receptor mutagenesis, peptide mapping, and N-terminal sequencing, we identified His117 within the first transmembrane domain (TM1) of CRFR1 as the cross-linking site for Bpa17 of 125I-[Tyr0, Gln1, Bpa17]SVG. These data indicate that, within the SVG-CRFR1 complex, residue 17 of the ligand lies within a 9 angstroms distance from residue 117 of the TM1 of CRFR1. The molecular proximity between residue 17 of the ligand and TM1 of CRFR1 described here and between residue 16 of the ligand and the CRFR1 second extracellular loop described previously provides useful molecular constraints for modeling ligand-receptor interaction in mammalian cells expressing CRFR1.

Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane-bound receptors and also the targets of many drugs. Understanding of the functional significance of the wide structural diversity of GPCRs has been aided considerably in recent years by the sequencing of the human genome and by structural studies, and has important implications for the future therapeutic potential of targeting this receptor family. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the five main human GPCR families--Rhodopsin, Secretin, Adhesion, Glutamate and Frizzled/Taste2--with a focus on gene repertoire, general ligand preference, common and unique structural features, and the potential for future drug discovery.

Photoaffinity labeling and its application in structural biology

This review contains a brief consideration of some theoretical aspects of photoaffinity (photoreactive) labeling (PAL), and the most widely used photoreactive groups, such as arylazide, benzophenone, and 3-(trifluoromethyl)-3-phenyldiazirine, are characterized in comparison. Experimental methodology is described, including modern approaches of mass spectrometry for analysis of cross-linking products between the photoreactive probes and biomolecules. Examples of PAL application in diverse fields of structural biology during the last five-ten years are presented. Potential drug targets, transport processes, stereochemistry of interaction of G-protein-coupled receptors with ligands, as well as structural changes in nicotinic acetylcholine receptor are considered. Applications of photoaffinity ganglioside and phospholipid probes for studying biological membranes and of nucleotide probes in investigations of replicative and transcriptional complexes, as well as photoaffinity glycoconjugates for detecting carbohydrate-binding proteins are covered. In combination with modern techniques of instrumental analysis and computer-aided modeling, PAL remains the most important approach in studies on the organization of biological systems.

Evidence that corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 couples to Gs- and Gi-proteins through different conformations of its J-domain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

According to the two-domain model for the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF(1)), peptide antagonists bind to the N-terminal domain (N-domain), non-peptide antagonists to the transmembrane region (J-domain), whereas peptide agonists attach to both the N- and J-domain of the receptor to express activity. The aim of this study was to search for possible differences in the antagonism of the Gs- and Gi-protein coupling of CRF(1) by a peptide (alpha-helical CRF(9-41)) and non-peptide antagonist (antalarmin), to determine whether the conformational requirements of the activated CRF(1) states for Gs and Gi coupling are similar or different.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We studied the inhibitory effect of alpha-helical CRF(9-41) and antalarmin on the coupling of CRF(1) to Gs- and Gi-protein in human embryonic kidney cells, using the [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding stimulation assay.

KEY RESULTS

The non-peptide antagonized the receptor coupling to Gs competitively but that to Gi noncompetitively, and its antagonistic potency was different for urocortin- and sauvagine-evoked G-protein activation. In contrast, the peptide antagonist exhibited uniformly competitive antagonism.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The results allow us to extend the two-domain model of CRF(1) activation by assuming that CRF(1) agonists activate the receptor by binding to at least two ensembles of J-domain configurations which couple to Gs or Gi, that are in turn antagonized by a non-peptide antagonist competitively and allosterically, respectively. It is further concluded that the allosteric mechanism of non-peptide antagonism is not valid for the Gs-mediated physiological activities of CRF(1).

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptor signaling in the central nervous system: new molecular targets

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and the related urocortin peptides mediate behavioral, cognitive, autonomic, neuroendocrine and immunologic responses to aversive stimuli by activating CRF(1) or CRF(2) receptors in the central nervous system and anterior pituitary. Markers of hyperactive central CRF systems, including CRF hypersecretion and abnormal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning, have been identified in subpopulations of patients with anxiety, stress and depressive disorders. Because CRF receptors are rapidly desensitized in the presence of high agonist concentrations, CRF hypersecretion alone may be insufficient to account for the enhanced CRF neurotransmission observed in these patients. Concomitant dysregulation of mechanisms stringently controlling magnitude and duration of CRF receptor signaling also may contribute to this phenomenon. While it is well established that the CRF(1) receptor mediates many anxiety- and depression-like behaviors as well as HPA axis stress responses, CRF(2) receptor functions are not well understood at present. One hypothesis holds that CRF(1) receptor activation initiates fear and anxiety-like responses, while CRF(2) receptor activation re-establishes homeostasis by counteracting the aversive effects of CRF(1) receptor signaling. An alternative hypothesis posits that CRF(1) and CRF(2) receptors contribute to opposite defensive modes, with CRF(1) receptors mediating active defensive responses triggered by escapable stressors, and CRF(2) receptors mediating anxiety- and depression-like responses induced by inescapable, uncontrollable stressors. CRF(1) receptor antagonists are being developed as novel treatments for affective and stress disorders. If it is confirmed that the CRF(2) receptor contributes importantly to anxiety and depression, the development of small molecule CRF(2) receptor antagonists would be therapeutically useful.

The molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of the biological activity of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptors: implications for physiology and pathophysiology

The CRH receptor (CRH-R) is a member of the secretin family of G protein-coupled receptors. Wide expression of CRH-Rs in the central nervous system and periphery ensures that their cognate agonists, the family of CRH-like peptides, are capable of exerting a wide spectrum of actions that underpin their critical role in integrating the stress response and coordinating the activity of fundamental physiological functions, such as the regulation of the cardiovascular system, energy balance, and homeostasis. Two types of mammal CRH-R exist, CRH-R1 and CRH-R2, each with unique splicing patterns and remarkably distinct pharmacological properties, but similar signaling properties, probably reflecting their distinct and sometimes contrasting biological functions. The regulation of CRH-R expression and activity is not fully elucidated, and we only now begin to fully understand the impact on mammalian pathophysiology. The focus of this review is the current and evolving understanding of the molecular mechanisms controlling CRH-R biological activity and functional flexibility. This shows notable tissue-specific characteristics, highlighted by their ability to couple to distinct G proteins and activate tissue-specific signaling cascades. The type of activating agonist, receptor, and target cell appears to play a major role in determining the overall signaling and biological responses in health and disease.

Binding differences of human and amphibian corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 (CRF(1)) receptors: identification of amino acids mediating high-affinity astressin binding and functional antagonism

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) type 1 receptors (CRF(1)) from human (hCRF(1)) and Xenopus (xCRF(1)) differ from one another by their agonist- and antagonist-binding preference. While the agonist-binding site of the xCRF(1) receptor has been mapped, the amino acids that mediate binding of the potent peptide antagonist astressin are unknown. By constructing receptor chimeras followed by site-directed mutagenesis, the astressin-binding site of the xCRF(1) receptor was located between residues 76 and 83. This region partially overlaps with the agonist-selective domain of the xCRF(1) receptor (residues 76-89). Mutagenesis of the amphibian residues Gln(76), Gly(81) and Val(83) to the human sequence (Arg(76)Asn(81)Gly(83)) generated a receptor mutant that bound astressin with even higher affinity than the native hCRF(1) receptor. An amino acid doublet (Glu(70)Tyr(71)) that is conserved in the xCRF(1) and hCRF(2(a)) receptor after incorporation into the hCRF(1) receptor sequence was found to facilitate antagonist binding up to 15-fold higher. In agreement with the binding data, astressin was a more potent functional antagonist at receptors expressing the Glu(70)Tyr(71) motif. These data show that the agonist- and antagonist-binding sites of the hCRF(1) receptor partially overlap and that two amino acids within the N terminus of the hCRF(1) receptor negatively influence binding and functional antagonism of astressin.

NMR structure and peptide hormone binding site of the first extracellular domain of a type B1 G protein-coupled receptor

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) ligand family has diverse effects on the CNS, including the modulation of the stress response. The ligands' effects are mediated by binding to CRF G protein-coupled receptors. We have determined the 3D NMR structure of the N-terminal extracellular domain (ECD1) of the mouse CRF receptor 2beta, which is the major ligand recognition domain, and identified its ligand binding site by chemical-shift perturbation experiments. The fold is identified as a short consensus repeat (SCR), a common protein interaction module. Mutagenesis reveals the integrity of the hormone-binding site in the full-length receptor. This study proposes that the ECD1 captures the C-terminal segment of the ligand, whose N terminus then penetrates into the transmembrane region of the receptor to initiate signaling. Key residues of SCR in the ECD1 are conserved in the G protein-coupled receptor subfamily, suggesting the SCR fold in all of the ECD1s of this subfamily.

CRF and CRF receptors: role in stress responsivity and other behaviors

Since corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) was first characterized, a growing family of ligands and receptors has evolved. The mammalian family members include CRF, urocortinI (UcnI), UcnII, and UcnIII, along with two receptors, CRFR1 and CRFR2, and a CRF binding protein. These family members differ in their tissue distribution and pharmacology. Studies have provided evidence supporting an important role of this family in regulation of the endocrine and behavioral responses to stress. Although CRF appears to play a stimulatory role in stress responsivity through activation of CRFR1, specific actions of UcnII and UcnIII on CRFR2 may be important for dampening stress sensitivity. As the only ligand with high affinity for both receptors, UcnI's role may be promiscuous. Regulation of the relative contribution of the two CRF receptors to brain CRF pathways may be essential in coordinating physiological responses to stress. The development of disorders related to heightened stress sensitivity and dysregulation of stress-coping mechanisms appears to involve regulatory mechanisms of CRF family members.

A soluble form of the first extracellular domain of mouse type 2beta corticotropin-releasing factor receptor reveals differential ligand specificity

The heptahelical receptors for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), CRFR1 and CRFR2, display different specificities for CRF family ligands: CRF and urocortin I bind to CRFR1 with high affinity, whereas urocortin II and III bind to this receptor with very low affinities. In contrast, all the urocortins bind with high affinities, and CRF binds with lower affinity to CRFR2. The first extracellular domain (ECD1) of CRFR1 is important for ligand recognition. Here, we characterize a bacterially expressed soluble protein, ECD1-CRFR2beta, corresponding to the ECD1 of mouse CRFR2beta. The K(i) values for binding to ECD1-CRFR2beta are: astressin = 10.7 (5.4-21.1) nm, urocortin I = 6.4 (4.7-8.7) nm, urocortin II = 6.9 (5.8-8.3) nm, CRF = 97 (22-430) nm, urocortin III = sauvagine >200 nm. These affinities are similar to those for binding to a chimeric receptor in which the ECD1 of CRFR2beta replaces the ECD of the type 1B activin receptor (ALK4). The ECD1-CRFR2beta possesses a disulfide arrangement identical to that of the ECD1 of CRFR1, namely Cys(45)-Cys(70), Cys(60)-Cys(103), and Cys(84)-Cys(118). As determined by circular dichroism, ECD1-CRFR2beta undergoes conformational changes upon binding astressin. These data reinforce the importance of the ECD1 of CRF receptors for ligand recognition and raise the interesting possibility that different ligands having similar affinity for the full-length receptor may, nevertheless, have different affinities for microdomains of the receptor.

Mechanism of corticotropin-releasing factor type I receptor regulation by nonpeptide antagonists

Mechanisms of nonpeptide ligand action at family B G protein-coupled receptors are largely unexplored. Here, we evaluated corticotropin-releasing factor 1 (CRF(1)) receptor regulation by nonpeptide antagonists. The antagonist mechanism was investigated at the G protein-coupled (RG) and uncoupled (R) states of the receptor in membranes from Ltk(-) cells expressing the cloned human CRF(1) receptor. R was detected with the antagonist (125)I-astressin with 30 microM guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate present, and RG detected using (125)I-sauvagine. At the R state, nonpeptide antagonists antalarmin, NBI 27914, NBI 35965, and DMP-696 only partially inhibited (125)I-astressin binding (22-32% maximal inhibition). NBI 35965 accelerated (125)I-astressin dissociation and only partially increased the IC(50) value of unlabeled sauvagine, CRF, and urocortin for displacing (125)I-astressin binding (by 4.0-7.1-fold). Reciprocal effects at the R state were demonstrated using [(3)H]NBI 35965: agonist peptides only partially inhibited binding (by 13-40%) and accelerated [(3)H]NBI 35965 dissociation. These data are quantitatively consistent with nonpeptide antagonist and peptide ligand binding spatially distinct sites, with mutual, weak negative cooperativity (allosteric inhibition) between their binding. At the RG state the compounds near fully inhibited (125)I-sauvagine binding at low radioligand concentrations (79-94 pM). NBI 35965 did not completely inhibit (125)I-sauvagine binding at high radioligand concentrations (82 +/- 1%, 1.3-2.1 nM) and slowed dissociation of (125)I-sauvagine and (125)I-CRF. The antagonist effect at RG is consistent with either strong allosteric inhibition or competitive inhibition at one of the peptide agonist binding sites. These findings demonstrate a novel effect of R-G interaction on the inhibitory activity of nonpeptide antagonists: Although the compounds are weak inhibitors of peptide binding to the R state, they strongly inhibit peptide agonist binding to RG. Strong inhibition at RG explains the antagonist properties of the compounds.

Sauvagine cross-links to the second extracellular loop of the corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor

Contact sites between the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRFR1), the sauvagine (SVG) radioligands [Tyr(0),Gln(1)]SVG ((125)I-YQS) and [Tyr(0),Gln(1), Leu(17)]SVG ((125)I-YQLS) were examined. (125)I-YQLS or (125)I-YQS was cross-linked to CRFR1 using the chemical cross-linker, disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS), which cross-links the epsilon amino groups of lysine residues that have a molecular distance of 11.4 A. DSS specifically and efficiently cross-linked (125)I-YQLS and (125)I-YQS to CRFR1. CRFR1 contains 5 putative extracellular lysine residues (Lys(110), Lys(111), Lys(113), Lys(257), and Lys(262)) that can cross-link to the 4 lysine residues (Lys(16), Lys(22), Lys(25), and Lys(27)) of the radioligands. Identification of the CNBr-cleaved fragments of CRFR1 cross-linked to (125)I-YQLS or (125)I-YQS established that the second extracellular loop of CRFR1 cross-links to Lys(16) of YQS. Additionally, site-directed mutagenesis (changing Lys to Arg in CRFR1 individually and in combination) revealed that Lys(257) in the second extracellular loop of CRFR1 is an important cross-linking site. In conclusion, it was shown that in SVG-bound CRFR1, Lys(257) of CRFR1 lies in close proximity (11.4 A) to Lys(16) of SVG.

Purification and characterization of a receptor for human parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related peptide

The human parathyroid hormone (PTH) receptor (hPTH1R), containing a 9-amino acid sequence of rhodopsin at its C terminus, was transiently expressed in COS-7 cells and solubilized with 0.25% n-dodecyl maltoside. Approximately 18 microg of hPTH1R were purified to homogeneity per mg of crude membranes by single-step affinity chromatography using 1D4, a monoclonal antibody to a rhodopsin epitope. The N terminus of the hPTH1R is Tyr(23), consistent with removal of the 22-amino acid signal peptide. Comparisons of hPTH1R by quantitative immunoblotting and Scatchard analysis revealed that 75% of the receptors in membrane preparations were functional; there was little, if any, loss of functional receptors during purification. The binding affinity of the purified hPTH1R was slightly lower than membrane-embedded hPTH1R (K(d) = 16.5 +/- 1.3 versus 11.9 +/- 1.9 nm), and the purified receptors bound rat [Nle(8,21),Tyr(34)]PTH-(1-34)-NH(2) (PTH-(1-34)), and rat [Ile(5),Trp(23),Tyr(36)]PTHrP-(5-36)-NH(2) with indistinguishable affinity. Maximal displacement of (125)I-PTH-(1-34) binding by rat [alpha-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib)(1,3),Nle(8),Gln(10),Har(11),Ala(12),Trp(14),Arg(19),Tyr(21)]PTH-(1-21)-NH(2) and rat [Aib(1,3),Gln(10),Har(11),Ala(12),Trp(14)]PTH-(1-14)-NH(2) of 80 and 10%, respectively, indicates that both N-terminal and juxtamembrane ligand binding determinants are functional in the purified hPTH1R. Finally, PTH stimulated [(35)S]GTP gamma S incorporation into G alpha(s) in a time- and dose-dependent manner, when recombinant hPTH1R, G alpha(s)-, and beta gamma-subunits were reconstituted in phospholipid vesicles. The methods described will enable structural studies of the hPTH1R, and they provide an efficient and general technique to purify proteins, particularly those of the class II G protein-coupled receptor family.

Five amino acids of the Xenopus laevis CRF (corticotropin-releasing factor) type 2 receptor mediate differential binding of CRF ligands in comparison with its human counterpart

The ligand selectivity of human (hCRF(2A)) and Xenopus laevis (xCRF(2)) forms of the corticotropin-releasing factor type 2 (CRF(2)) receptor differs. The purpose of this study was to identify amino acids in these two CRF(2) receptors conferring these differences. An amino acid triplet in the third extracellular domain (Asp(262)Leu(263)Val(264) in hCRF(2A) or Lys(264)Tyr(265)Ile(266) in xCRF(2)) was found to diverge between both receptors. When binding and signaling characteristics of receptor mutants hR2KYI and xR2DLV were assessed, the tri-amino acid motif replacement produced receptors with binding properties resembling the xCRF(2) receptor. The converse mutation created a mutant receptor with a binding pharmacology identical to the profile of the hCRF(2A) receptor. This effect was most notable for xR2DLV, which possessed a binding affinity for astressin approximately 15-fold greater for astressin than sauvagine. In contrast, the binding profiles of the hCRF(2A) receptor and hR2KYI did not differ. These data indicate that another domain of the xCRF(2) receptor mediated low-affinity binding of astressin. Two amino acids in the first extracellular domain differ in xCRF(2) (Asp(69)Ser(70)) and hCRF(2A) (Glu(66)Tyr(67)) receptors. The hCRF(2A) receptor mutant (hR2DS-KYI) bound astressin with a low affinity indistinguishable from the xCRF(2) receptor. Therefore, these data demonstrate that ligand selectivity differences between amphibian and human forms of the CRF(2A) receptor are governed by these two motifs of the extracellular domains of the xCRF(2) receptor.