1
|
Ganaie SS, Schwarz MM, McMillen CM, Price DA, Feng AX, Albe JR, Wang W, Miersch S, Orvedahl A, Cole AR, Sentmanat MF, Mishra N, Boyles DA, Koenig ZT, Kujawa MR, Demers MA, Hoehl RM, Moyle AB, Wagner ND, Stubbs SH, Cardarelli L, Teyra J, McElroy A, Gross ML, Whelan SPJ, Doench J, Cui X, Brett TJ, Sidhu SS, Virgin HW, Egawa T, Leung DW, Amarasinghe GK, Hartman AL. Lrp1 is a host entry factor for Rift Valley fever virus. Cell 2021; 184:5163-5178.e24. [PMID: 34559985 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is a zoonotic pathogen with pandemic potential. RVFV entry is mediated by the viral glycoprotein (Gn), but host entry factors remain poorly defined. Our genome-wide CRISPR screen identified low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (mouse Lrp1/human LRP1), heat shock protein (Grp94), and receptor-associated protein (RAP) as critical host factors for RVFV infection. RVFV Gn directly binds to specific Lrp1 clusters and is glycosylation independent. Exogenous addition of murine RAP domain 3 (mRAPD3) and anti-Lrp1 antibodies neutralizes RVFV infection in taxonomically diverse cell lines. Mice treated with mRAPD3 and infected with pathogenic RVFV are protected from disease and death. A mutant mRAPD3 that binds Lrp1 weakly failed to protect from RVFV infection. Together, these data support Lrp1 as a host entry factor for RVFV infection and define a new target to limit RVFV infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safder S Ganaie
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Madeline M Schwarz
- Center for Vaccine Research, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Cynthia M McMillen
- Center for Vaccine Research, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David A Price
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Annie X Feng
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Joseph R Albe
- Center for Vaccine Research, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Wenjie Wang
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Shane Miersch
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anthony Orvedahl
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Aidan R Cole
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Monica F Sentmanat
- Genome Engineering and iPSC Center (GEiC), Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Nawneet Mishra
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Devin A Boyles
- Center for Vaccine Research, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Zachary T Koenig
- Center for Vaccine Research, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael R Kujawa
- Center for Vaccine Research, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew A Demers
- Center for Vaccine Research, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ryan M Hoehl
- Center for Vaccine Research, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Austin B Moyle
- Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Nicole D Wagner
- Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sarah H Stubbs
- Department of Microbiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lia Cardarelli
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joan Teyra
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anita McElroy
- Center for Vaccine Research, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Disease, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael L Gross
- Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sean P J Whelan
- Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - John Doench
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Xiaoxia Cui
- Genome Engineering and iPSC Center (GEiC), Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Tom J Brett
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sachdev S Sidhu
- The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Herbert W Virgin
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Current address: Vir Biotechnology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Takeshi Egawa
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Daisy W Leung
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gaya K Amarasinghe
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Amy L Hartman
- Center for Vaccine Research, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kurasawa JH, Shestopal SA, Karnaukhova E, Struble EB, Lee TK, Sarafanov AG. Mapping the binding region on the low density lipoprotein receptor for blood coagulation factor VIII. J Biol Chem 2013; 288:22033-41. [PMID: 23754288 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m113.468108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) was shown to mediate clearance of blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) from the circulation. To elucidate the mechanism of interaction of LDLR and FVIII, our objective was to identify the region of the receptor necessary for binding FVIII. Using surface plasmon resonance, we found that LDLR exodomain and its cluster of complement-type repeats (CRs) bind FVIII in the same mode. This indicated that the LDLR site for FVIII is located within the LDLR cluster. Similar results were obtained for another ligand of LDLR, α-2-macroglobulin receptor-associated protein (RAP), a common ligand of receptors from the LDLR family. We further generated a set of recombinant fragments of the LDLR cluster and assessed their structural integrity by binding to RAP and by circular dichroism. A number of fragments overlapping CR.2-5 of the cluster were positive for binding RAP and FVIII. The specificity of these interactions was tested by site-directed mutagenesis of conserved tryptophans within the LDLR fragments. For FVIII, the specificity was also tested using a single-chain variable antibody fragment directed against the FVIII light chain as a competitor. Both cases resulted in decreased binding, thus confirming its specificity. The mutagenic study also showed an importance of the conserved tryptophans in LDLR for both ligands, and the competitive binding results showed an involvement of the light chain of FVIII in its interaction with LDLR. In conclusion, the region of CR.2-5 of LDLR was defined as the binding site for FVIII and RAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James H Kurasawa
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lillis AP, Van Duyn LB, Murphy-Ullrich JE, Strickland DK. LDL receptor-related protein 1: unique tissue-specific functions revealed by selective gene knockout studies. Physiol Rev 2008; 88:887-918. [PMID: 18626063 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00033.2007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 516] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The LDL receptor-related protein (originally called LRP, but now referred to as LRP1) is a large endocytic receptor that is widely expressed in several tissues. LRP1 is a member of the LDL receptor family that plays diverse roles in various biological processes including lipoprotein metabolism, degradation of proteases, activation of lysosomal enzymes, and cellular entry of bacterial toxins and viruses. Deletion of the LRP1 gene leads to lethality in mice, revealing a critical, but as of yet, undefined role in development. Tissue-specific gene deletion studies reveal an important contribution of LRP1 in the vasculature, central nervous system, macrophages, and adipocytes. Three important properties of LRP1 dictate its diverse role in physiology: 1) its ability to recognize more than 30 distinct ligands, 2) its ability to bind a large number of cytoplasmic adaptor proteins via determinants located on its cytoplasmic domain in a phosphorylation-specific manner, and 3) its ability to associate with and modulate the activity of other transmembrane receptors such as integrins and receptor tyrosine kinases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna P Lillis
- Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases and Department of Surgery and Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Greenaway J, Lawler J, Moorehead R, Bornstein P, Lamarre J, Petrik J. Thrombospondin-1 inhibits VEGF levels in the ovary directly by binding and internalization via the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 (LRP-1). J Cell Physiol 2007; 210:807-18. [PMID: 17154366 PMCID: PMC3412056 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.20904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
VEGF is a potent pro-angiogenic factor whose effects are opposed by a host of anti-angiogenic proteins, including thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1). We have previously shown that VEGF has important extravascular roles in the ovary and that VEGF and TSP-1 are inversely expressed throughout the ovarian cycle. To date, however, a causal interaction between TSP-1 and VEGF has not been identified. Here, we show that TSP-1 has a direct inhibitory effect on VEGF by binding the growth factor and internalizing it via LRP-1. Mice lacking TSP-1 are subfertile and exhibited ovarian hypervascularization and altered ovarian morphology. Treatment of ovarian cells with TSP-1 decreased VEGF levels and rendered the cells more susceptible to TNFalpha-induced apoptosis. Knockdown of TSP-1, through RNA interference, resulted in overexpression of VEGF and reduced cytokine-induced apoptosis. In conclusion, we demonstrate a direct inhibitory effect of TSP-1 on VEGF in the ovary. TSP-1's regulation of VEGF appears to be an important mediator of ovarian angiogenesis and follicle development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Greenaway
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
| | - Jack Lawler
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Roger Moorehead
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
| | - Paul Bornstein
- Departments of Biochemistry and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jonathan Lamarre
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
| | - Jim Petrik
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Contreras-Alcantara S, Godby JA, Delos SE. The Single Ligand-binding Repeat of Tva, a Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein, Contains Two Ligand-binding Surfaces. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:22827-38. [PMID: 16769730 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m512599200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The receptor for avian sarcoma/leukosis virus subtype A (ASLV-A), Tva, is the simplest member of the low density lipoprotein receptor family containing a single ligand-binding repeat (LBR). Most LBRs contain a central Trp (Trp33 in Tva) that is important for ligand binding and, for the low density lipoprotein receptor, is associated with familial hypercholesterolemia. The Tva ligand-binding module contains a second Trp (Trp48) that is part of a DEW motif present in a subset of LBRs. Trp48 is important for ASLV-A infectivity. A soluble Tva (sTva) ligand-binding module is sufficient for ASLV-A infectivity. Tva interacts with the viral glycoprotein, and a soluble receptor-binding domain (SUA) binds sTva with picomolar affinity. We investigated whether Tva, a retroviral receptor, could behave as a classic LBR by assessing sTva interactions with the universal receptor-associated protein (RAP) and comparing these interactions with those between sTva and its viral ligand (SUA). To address the role of the two Trp residues in Tva function, we prepared sTva harboring mutations of Trp33, Trp48, or both and determined the binding kinetics with RAP and SUA. We found that sTva behaved as a "normal" receptor toward RAP, requiring both calcium and Trp33 for binding. However, sTva binding to SUA required neither calcium nor Trp33. Furthermore, sTva could bind both RAP and SUA simultaneously. These results show that the single LBR of Tva has two ligand-binding sites, raising the possibility that other LBRs may also.
Collapse
|
12
|
Sottile J, Chandler J. Fibronectin matrix turnover occurs through a caveolin-1-dependent process. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 16:757-68. [PMID: 15563605 PMCID: PMC545909 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e04-08-0672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Extracellular matrix remodeling occurs during development, tissue repair, and in a number of pathologies, including fibrotic disorders, hypertension, and atherosclerosis. Extracellular matrix remodeling involves the complex interplay between extracellular matrix synthesis, deposition, and degradation. Factors that control these processes are likely to play key roles in regulating physiological and pathological extracellular matrix remodeling. Our data show that fibronectin polymerization into the extracellular matrix regulates the deposition and stability of other extracellular matrix proteins, including collagen I and thrombospondin-1 (Sottile and Hocking, 2002. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 3546). In the absence of continual fibronectin polymerization, there is a loss of fibronectin matrix fibrils, and increased levels of fibronectin degradation. Fibronectin degradation occurs intracellularly after endocytosis and can be inhibited by chloroquine, an inhibitor of lysosomal degradation, and by caveolae-disrupting agents. Down-regulation of caveolin-1 by RNAi inhibits loss of fibronectin matrix fibrils, fibronectin internalization, and fibronectin degradation; these processes can be restored by reexpression of caveolin-1. These data show that fibronectin matrix turnover occurs through a caveolin-1-dependent process. Caveolin-1 regulation of fibronectin matrix turnover is a novel mechanism regulating extracellular matrix remodeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Sottile
- Center for Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|