Coactivator assembly at the promoter: efficient recruitment of SRC2 is coupled to cooperative DNA binding by the progesterone receptor

The Role of Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer

The progesterone receptor (PR) modulates estrogen receptors α (ERα) action in breast cancer; it is an upregulated target gene of ER, and its expression is dependent on estrogen. PR is also a valuable prognostic biomarker in breast cancer, especially in hormone-positive breast cancer. High expression of PR is more frequently observed in tumors with a better baseline prognosis (ie, luminal A) than tumors with a poor baseline prognosis (ie, luminal B). In the following review, we present the role of PR in breast cancer, including the genomic characteristics and pathways in breast cancer, PR and endocrine therapy.

Progesterone Receptor Isoforms, Nuclear Corepressor-1 and Steroid Receptor Coactivator-1 and B-Cell Lymphoma 2 and Akt and Akt Phosphorylation Status in Uterine Myomas after Ulipristal Acetate Treatment: A Systematic Immunohistochemical Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether ulipristal acetate (UPA) treatment modifies the expression of progesterone receptor (PR), its nuclear cofactors steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC1) and nuclear corepressor-1 (NCoR1), prosurvival factor B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), and Akt in uterine myomas.

PATIENTS

Prospective study of 59 women with symptomatic myomas undergoing myomectomy. Forty-two patients were treated preoperatively with UPA; the remaining 17 were not and they served as controls.

METHOD

Tissue microarrays were obtained from surgical specimens and immunohistochemistry was performed. Blinded quantification of expression of PR (PR-A vs. PR-B), coactivator SRC1 and corepressor NCoR1, and prosurvival factor Bcl-2, and Akt and evaluation of Akt phosphorylation levels.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, UPA does not alter PR protein levels or expression patterns in myomas, and the PR-A/PR-B ratio was similar, as well as cytoplasmic or nuclear expression of cofactors SRC1 and NCoR1. Bcl-2 was heterogeneously expressed throughout the samples and no significant modification in expression was evidenced. No significant difference was found in Akt expression and phosphorylation between treated and untreated myomas.

CONCLUSION

This study did not find any significant change in the expression of the studied factors in myomas after UPA exposure. In conclusion, various theories on myomas cells proposed on the basis of in vitro studies are not supported in vivo.

Synergistic Regulation of Coregulator/Nuclear Receptor Interaction by Ligand and DNA

Nuclear receptor (NR) transcription factors bind various coreceptors, small-molecule ligands, DNA response element sequences, and transcriptional coregulator proteins to affect gene transcription. Small-molecule ligands and DNA are known to influence receptor structure, coregulator protein interaction, and function; however, little is known on the mechanism of synergy between ligand and DNA. Using quantitative biochemical, biophysical, and solution structural methods, including ¹³C-detected nuclear magnetic resonance and hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX) mass spectrometry, we show that ligand and DNA cooperatively recruit the intrinsically disordered steroid receptor coactivator-2 (SRC-2/TIF2/GRIP1/NCoA-2) receptor interaction domain to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-retinoid X receptor alpha (PPARγ-RXRα) heterodimer and reveal the binding determinants of the complex. Our data reveal a thermodynamic mechanism by which DNA binding propagates a conformational change in PPARγ-RXRα, stabilizes the receptor ligand binding domain dimer interface, and impacts ligand potency and cooperativity in NR coactivator recruitment.

Efficient prediction of progesterone receptor interactome using a support vector machine model

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) is essential for almost all cellular processes and identification of PPI is a crucial task for biomedical researchers. So far, most computational studies of PPI are intended for pair-wise prediction. Theoretically, predicting protein partners for a single protein is likely a simpler problem. Given enough data for a particular protein, the results can be more accurate than general PPI predictors. In the present study, we assessed the potential of using the support vector machine (SVM) model with selected features centered on a particular protein for PPI prediction. As a proof-of-concept study, we applied this method to identify the interactome of progesterone receptor (PR), a protein which is essential for coordinating female reproduction in mammals by mediating the actions of ovarian progesterone. We achieved an accuracy of 91.9%, sensitivity of 92.8% and specificity of 91.2%. Our method is generally applicable to any other proteins and therefore may be of help in guiding biomedical experiments.

A view through a chromatin loop: insights into the ecdysone activation of early genes in Drosophila

The early genes are a key group of ecdysone targets that function at the top of the signaling hierarchy. In the presence of ecdysone, early genes exhibit a highly characteristic rapid and powerful induction that represents a primary response. Multiple isoforms encoded by early genes then coordinate the activation of a larger group of late genes. While the general mechanism of ecdysone-dependent transcription is well characterized, it is not known whether a distinct mechanism governs the hormonal response of early genes. We previously found that one of the Drosophila early genes, E75, harbors multiple functional ecdysone response elements (EcREs). In this study we extended the analysis to Broad and E74 and found that EcRE multiplicity is a general feature of the early genes. Since most of the EcREs within early gene loci are situated distantly from promoters, we employed the chromosome conformation capture method to determine whether higher order chromatin structure facilitates hormonal activation. For each early gene we detected chromatin loops that juxtapose their promoters and multiple distant EcREs prior to ecdysone activation. Our findings suggest that higher order chromatin structure may serve as an important mechanism underlying the distinct response of early genes to ecdysone.

Post-translational modifications of the progesterone receptors

Progesterone plays a key role in the development, differentiation and maintenance of female reproductive tissues and has multiple non-reproductive neural functions. Depending on the cell and tissue, the hormonal environment, growth conditions and the developmental stage, progesterone can either stimulate cell growth or inhibit it while promoting differentiation. Progesterone receptors (PRs) belong to the steroid hormone receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. PR proteins are subject to extensive post-translational modifications that include phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination and SUMOylation. The interplay among these modifications is complex with alteration of the receptors by one factor influencing the impact of another. Control over these modifications is species-, tissue- and cell-specific. They in turn regulate multiple functions including PR stability, their subcellular localization, protein-protein interactions and transcriptional activity. These complexities may explain how tissue- and gene-specific differences in regulation are achieved in the same organism, by the same receptor protein and hormone. Here we review current knowledge of PR post-translational modifications and discuss how these may influence receptor function focusing on human breast cancer cells. There is much left to be learned. However, our understanding of this may help to identify therapeutic agents that target PR activity in tissue-specific, even gene-specific ways.

Analysis of a glucocorticoid-estrogen receptor chimera reveals that dimerization energetics are under ionic control

Steroid receptors assemble at DNA response elements as dimers, resulting in coactivator recruitment and transcriptional activation. Our work has focused on dissecting the energetics associated with these events and quantitatively correlating the results with function. A recent finding is that different receptors dimerize with large differences in energetics. For example, estrogen receptor-α (ER-α) dimerizes with a ΔG=-12.0 kcal/mol under conditions in which the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) dimerizes with a ΔG≤-5.1 kcal/mol. To determine the molecular forces responsible for such differences, we created a GR/ER chimera, replacing the hormone-binding domain (HBD) of GR with that of ER-α. Cellular and biophysical analyses demonstrate that the chimera is functionally active. However, GR/ER dimerization energetics are intermediate between the parent proteins and coupled to a strong ionic linkage. Since the ER-α HBD is the primary contributor to dimerization, we suggest that GR residues constrain an ion-regulated HBD assembly reaction.

The structural basis of direct glucocorticoid-mediated transrepression

A newly discovered negative glucocorticoid response element (nGRE) mediates DNA-dependent transrepression by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) across the genome and plays a major role in immunosuppressive therapy. The nGRE differs dramatically from activating response elements and the mechanism driving GR binding and transrepression is unknown. To unravel the mechanism of nGRE-mediated transrepression by the glucocorticoid receptor, we characterize the interaction between GR and a nGRE in the thymic stromal lymphopoetin (TSLP) promoter. We show using structural and mechanistic approaches that nGRE binding represents a new mode of sequence recognition by human GR and that nGREs prevent receptor dimerization through a unique GR-binding orientation and strong negative cooperativity, ensuring the presence of monomeric GR at repressive elements.

Glucocorticoid receptor-DNA interactions: binding energetics are the primary determinant of sequence-specific transcriptional activity

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a member of the steroid receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors. A long-standing question has focused on how GR and other receptors precisely control gene expression. One difficulty in addressing this is that GR function is influenced by multiple factors including ligand and coactivator levels, chromatin state, and allosteric coupling. Moreover, the receptor recognizes an array of DNA sequences that generate a range of transcriptional activities. Such complexity suggests that any single parameter-DNA binding affinity, for example-is unlikely to be a dominant contributor to function. Indeed, a number of studies have suggested that for GR and other receptors, binding affinity toward different DNA sequences is poorly correlated with transcriptional activity. As a step toward determining the factors most predictive of GR function, we rigorously examined the relationship between in vitro GR-DNA binding energetics and in vivo transcriptional activity. We first demonstrate that previous approaches for assessing affinity-function relationships are problematic due to issues of data transformation and linearization. Thus, the conclusion that binding energetics and transcriptional activity are poorly correlated is premature. Using more appropriate analyses, we find that energetics and activity are in fact highly correlated. Furthermore, this correlation can be quantitatively accounted for using simple binding models. Finally, we show that the strong relationship between energetics and transcriptional activity is recapitulated in multiple promoter contexts, cell lines, and chromatin environments. Thus, despite the complexity of GR function, DNA binding energetics are the primary determinant of sequence-specific transcriptional activity.

Control of progesterone receptor transcriptional synergy by SUMOylation and deSUMOylation

Background

Covalent modification of nuclear receptors by the Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO) is dynamically regulated by competing conjugation/deconjugation steps that modulate their overall transcriptional activity. SUMO conjugation of progesterone receptors (PRs) at the N-terminal lysine (K) 388 residue of PR-B is hormone-dependent and suppresses PR-dependent transcription. Mutation of the SUMOylation motif promotes transcriptional synergy.

Results

The present studies address mechanisms underlying this transcriptional synergy by using SUMOylation deficient PR mutants and PR specifically deSUMOylated by Sentrin-specific proteases (SENPs). We show that deSUMOylation of a small pool of receptors by catalytically competent SENPs globally modulates the cooperativity-driven transcriptional synergy between PR observed on exogenous promoters containing at least two progesterone-response elements (PRE₂). This occurs in part by raising PR sensitivity to ligands. The C-terminal ligand binding domain of PR is required for the transcriptional stimulatory effects of N-terminal deSUMOylation, but neither a functional PR dimerization interface, nor a DNA binding domain exhibiting PR specificity, are required.

Conclusion

We conclude that direct and reversible SUMOylation of a minor PR protein subpopulation tightly controls the overall transcriptional activity of the receptors at complex synthetic promoters. Transcriptional synergism controlled by SENP-dependent PR deSUMOylation is dissociable from MAPK-catalyzed receptor phosphorylation, from SRC-1 coactivation and from recruitment of histone deacetylases to promoters. This will provide more information for targeting PR as a part of hormonal therapy of breast cancer. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the SUMOylation/deSUMOylation pathway is an interesting target for therapeutic treatment of breast cancer.

Steroid receptor coactivators 1, 2, and 3: critical regulators of nuclear receptor activity and steroid receptor modulator (SRM)-based cancer therapy

Coactivators are a diverse group of non-DNA binding proteins that induce structural changes in agonist-bound nuclear receptors (NRs) that are essential for NR-mediated transcriptional activation. Once bound, coactivators function to bridge enhancer binding proteins to the general transcription machinery, as well as to recruit secondary coactivators that modify promoter and enhancer chromatin in a manner permissive for transcriptional activation. In the following review article, we focus on one of the most in-depth studied families of coactivators, the steroid receptor coactivators (SRC) 1, 2, and 3. SRCs are widely implicated in NR-mediated diseases, especially in cancers, with the majority of studies focused on their roles in breast cancer. We highlight the relevant literature supporting the oncogenic activity of SRCs and their future as diagnostic and prognostic indicators. With much interest in the development of selective receptor modulators (SRMs), we focus on how these coactivators regulate the interactions between SRMs and their respective NRs; and, importantly, the influence that coactivators have on the functional output of SRMs. Furthermore, we speculate that coactivator-specific inhibitors could provide powerful, all-encompassing treatments that target multiple modes of oncogenic regulation in cancers resistant to typical anti-endocrine treatments.

Structural and functional analysis of domains of the progesterone receptor

Steroid hormone receptors are multi-domain proteins composed of conserved well-structured regions, such as ligand (LBD) and DNA binding domains (DBD), plus other naturally unstructured regions including the amino-terminal domain (NTD) and the hinge region between the LBD and DBD. The hinge is more than just a flexible region between the DBD and LBD and is capable of binding co-regulatory proteins and the minor groove of DNA flanking hormone response elements. Because the hinge can directly participate in DNA binding it has also been termed the carboxyl terminal extension (CTE) of the DNA binding domain. The CTE and NTD are dynamic regions of the receptor that can adopt multiple conformations depending on the environment of interacting proteins and DNA. Both regions have important regulatory roles for multiple receptor functions that are related to the ability of the CTE and NTD to form multiple active conformations. This review focuses on studies of the CTE and NTD of progesterone receptor (PR), as well as related work with other steroid/nuclear receptors.

Thermodynamic dissection of estrogen receptor-promoter interactions reveals that steroid receptors differentially partition their self-association and promoter binding energetics

Steroid receptors define a family of ligand-activated transcription factors. Recent work has demonstrated that the receptors regulate distinct but overlapping gene networks, yet the mechanisms by which they do so remain unclear. We previously determined the microscopic binding energetics for progesterone receptor (PR) isoform assembly at promoters containing multiple response elements. We found that the two isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) share nearly identical dimerization and intrinsic DNA binding free energies but maintain large differences in cooperative free energy. Moreover, cooperativity can be modulated by monovalent ion binding and promoter layout, suggesting that differences in cooperativity might control isoform-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor function. To determine whether cooperative binding energetics are common to other members of the steroid receptor family, we dissected the thermodynamics of estrogen receptor-α (ER-α):promoter interactions. We find that the ER-α intrinsic DNA binding free energy is identical to that of the PR isoforms. This was expected, noting that receptor DNA binding domains are highly conserved. Unexpectedly, ER-α generates negligible cooperativity-orders of magnitude less than predicted based on our studies of the PR isoforms. However, analysis of the cooperativity term suggests that it reflects a balance between highly favorable cooperative stabilization and unfavorable promoter bending. Moreover, ER-α cooperative free energy is compensated for by a large increase in dimerization free energy. Collectively, the results demonstrate that steroid receptors differentially partition not only cooperative energetics but also dimerization energetics. We speculate that this ability serves as a framework for regulating receptor-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor-specific gene regulation.

Dissecting the linkage between transcription factor self-assembly and site-specific DNA binding: the role of the analytical ultracentrifuge

A long-standing goal of biomedical research has been to determine the quantitative mechanisms responsible for gene regulation and transcriptional activation. These events occur through numerous protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions, many of which are allosterically coupled. For systems where highly purified protein is available, analytical ultracentrifugation provides a means to study these linked reactions, allosteric or otherwise. Sedimentation velocity is an ultracentrifugation technique that provides rigorous insight into protein self-association, homogeneity, and gross structure. Because self-association is often in dynamic equilibrium with other reactions such as DNA binding, an explicit and independent analysis of each interaction is critical to revealing mechanism. This chapter details a protocol for using sedimentation velocity to dissect the linkage between transcription factor self-association and site-specific DNA binding.

From steroid receptors to cytokines: the thermodynamics of self-associating systems

Since 1987, the Gibbs Conference on Biothermodynamics has maintained a focus on understanding the quantitative aspects of gene regulatory systems. These studies coupled rigorous techniques with exact theory to dissect the linked reactions associated with bacterial and lower eukaryotic gene regulation. However, only in the last ten years has it become possible to apply this approach to clinically relevant, human gene regulatory systems. Here we summarize our work on the thermodynamics of human steroid receptors and their interactions with multi-site promoter sequences, highlighting results not available from more traditional biochemical and structural approaches. Noting that the Gibbs Conference has also served as a vehicle to promote the broader use of thermodynamics in understanding biology, we then discuss collaborative work on the hydrodynamics of a cytokine implicated in tumor suppression, prostate derived factor (PDF).

Affinity of estrogens for human progesterone receptor A and B monomers and risk of breast cancer: a comparative molecular modeling study

Background

The human progesterone receptor (hPR) belongs to the steroid receptor family. It may be found as monomers (A and B) and or as a dimer (AB). hPR is regarded as the prognostic biomarker for breast cancer. In a cellular dimer system, AB is the dominant species in most cases. However, when a cell coexpresses all three isoforms of hPR, the complexity of the action of this receptor increases. For example, hPR A suppresses the activity of hPR B, and the ratio of hPR A to hPR B may determine the physiology of a breast tumor. Also, persistent exposure of hPRs to nonendogenous ligands is a common risk factor for breast cancer. Hence we aimed to study progesterone and some nonendogenous ligand interactions with hPRs and their molecular docking.

Methods and results

A pool of steroid derivatives, namely, progesterone, cholesterol, testosterone, testolectone, estradiol, estrone, norethindrone, exemestane, and norgestrel, was used for this in silico study. Dockings were performed on AutoDock 4.2. We found that estrogens, including estradiol and estrone, had a higher affinity for hPR A and B monomers in comparison with the dimer, hPR AB, and that of the endogenous progesterone ligand. hPR A had a higher affinity to all the docked ligands than hPR B.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the exposure of estrogens to hPR A as well as hPR B, and more particularly to hPR A alone, is a risk factor for breast cancer.

Nuclear receptor coactivators are coexpressed with steroid receptors and regulated by estradiol in mouse brain

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The steroid hormones, including estradiol (E) and progesterone, act in the brain to regulate female reproductive behavior and physiology. These hormones mediate many of their biological effects by binding to their respective intracellular receptors. The receptors for estrogens (ER) and progestins (PR) interact with nuclear receptor coactivators to initiate transcription of steroid-responsive genes. Work from our laboratory and others reveals that nuclear receptor coactivators, including steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) and SRC-2, function in brain to modulate ER-mediated induction of the PR gene and hormone-dependent behaviors. In order for steroid receptors and coactivators to function together, both must be expressed in the same cells.

METHODS

Triple-label immunofluorescence was used to determine if E-induced PR cells also express SRC-1 or SRC-2 in reproductively relevant brain regions of the female mouse.

RESULTS

The majority of E-induced PR cells in the medial preoptic area (61%), ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus (63%) and arcuate nucleus (76%) coexpressed both SRC-1 and SRC-2. A smaller proportion of PR cells expressed either SRC-1 or SRC-2, while a few PR cells expressed neither coactivator. In addition, compared to control animals, 17β-estradiol benzoate (EB) treatment increased SRC-1 levels in the arcuate nucleus, but not the medial preoptic area or the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus. EB did not alter SRC-2 expression in any of the three brain regions analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, the present findings identify a population of cells in which steroid receptors and nuclear receptor coactivators may interact to modulate steroid sensitivity in brain and regulate hormone-dependent behaviors in female mice. Given that cell culture studies reveal that SRC-1 and SRC-2 can mediate distinct steroid-signaling pathways, the present findings suggest that steroids can produce a variety of complex responses in these specialized brain cells.

Steroid receptor coactivator-2 expression in brain and physical associations with steroid receptors

Estradiol and progesterone bind to their respective receptors in the hypothalamus and hippocampus to influence a variety of behavioral and physiological functions, including reproduction and cognition. Work from our lab and others has shown that the nuclear receptor coactivators, steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) and SRC-2, are essential for efficient estrogen receptor (ER) and progestin receptor (PR) transcriptional activity in brain and for hormone-dependent behaviors. While the expression of SRC-1 in brain has been studied extensively, little is known about the expression of SRC-2 in brain. In the present studies, we found that SRC-2 was highly expressed throughout the hippocampus, amygdala and hypothalamus, including the medial preoptic area (MPOA), ventral medial nucleus (VMN), arcuate nucleus (ARC), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, supraoptic nucleus and suprachiasmatic nucleus. In order for coactivators to function with steroid receptors, they must be expressed in the same cells. Indeed, SRC-2 and ER(alpha) were coexpressed in many cells in the MPOA, VMN and ARC, all brain regions known to be involved in female reproductive behavior and physiology. While in vitro studies indicate that SRC-2 physically associates with ER and PR, very little is known about receptor-coactivator interactions in brain. Therefore, we used pull-down assays to test the hypotheses that SRC-2 from hypothalamic and hippocampal tissue physically associate with ER and PR subtypes in a ligand-dependent manner. SRC-2 from both brain regions interacted with ER(alpha) bound to agonist, but not in the absence of ligand or in the presence of the selective ER modulator, tamoxifen. Analysis by mass spectrometry confirmed these ligand-dependent interactions between ER(alpha) and SRC-2 from brain. In dramatic contrast, SRC-2 from brain showed little to no interaction with ERbeta. Interestingly, SRC-2 from both brain regions interacted with PR-B, but not PR-A, in a ligand-dependent manner. Taken together, these findings reveal that SRC-2 is expressed in brain regions known to mediate a variety of steroid-dependent functions. Furthermore, SRC-2 is expressed in many ER(alpha) containing cells in the hypothalamus. Finally, SRC-2 from brain interacts with ER and PR in a subtype-specific manner, which may contribute to the functional differences of these steroid receptor subtypes in brain.

Na(+) and K(+) allosterically regulate cooperative DNA binding by the human progesterone receptor

Cooperativity is a common mechanism used by transcription factors to generate highly responsive yet stable gene regulation. For the two isoforms of human progesterone receptor (PR-A and PR-B), differences in cooperative DNA binding energetics may account for their differing transcriptional activation properties. Here we report on the molecular origins responsible for cooperativity, finding that it can be activated or repressed with Na(+) and K(+), respectively. We demonstrate that PR self-association and DNA-dependent cooperativity are linked to a monovalent cation binding event and that this binding is coupled to modulation of receptor structure. K(+) and Na(+) are therefore allosteric effectors of PR function. Noting that the apparent binding affinities of Na(+) and K(+) are comparable to their intracellular concentrations and that PR isoforms directly regulate the genes of a number of ion pumps and channels, these results suggest that Na(+) and K(+) may additionally function as physiological regulators of PR action.

Progesterone action in human tissues: regulation by progesterone receptor (PR) isoform expression, nuclear positioning and coregulator expression

Progesterone is a critical regulator of normal female reproductive function, with diverse tissue-specific effects in the human. The effects of progesterone are mediated by its nuclear receptor (PR) that is expressed as two isoforms, PRA and PRB, which are virtually identical except that PRA lacks 164 amino acids that are present at the N-terminus of PRB. Considerable in vitro evidence suggests that the two PRs are functionally distinct and in animals, tissue-specific distribution patterns of PRA and PRB may account for some of the diversity of progesterone effects. In the human, PRA and PRB are equivalently expressed in most target cells, suggesting that alternative mechanisms control the diversity of progesterone actions. PR mediates the effects of progesterone by association with a range of coregulatory proteins and binding to specific target sequences in progesterone-regulated gene promoters. Ligand activation of PR results in redistribution into discrete subnuclear foci that are detectable by immunofluorescence, probably representing aggregates of multiple transcriptionally active PR-coregulator complexes. PR foci are aberrant in cancers, suggesting that the coregulator composition and number of complexes is altered. A large family of coregulators is now described and the range of proteins known to bind PR exceeds the complement required for transcriptional activation, suggesting that in the human, tissue-specific coregulator expression may modulate progesterone response. In this review, we examine the role of nuclear localization of PR, coregulator association and tissue-specific expression in modulating progesterone action in the human.

Mechanism of strand-specific smooth muscle alpha-actin enhancer interaction by purine-rich element binding protein B (Purbeta)

Expression of the smooth muscle alpha-actin gene in growth-activated vascular smooth muscle cells and stromal fibroblasts is negatively regulated by members of the Pur family of single-stranded DNA/RNA-binding proteins. In particular, Puralpha and Purbeta are postulated to repress transcription by forming helix-destabilizing complexes with the sense strand of an asymmetric polypurine-polypyrimidine tract containing a canonical MCAT enhancer motif in the 5' region of the gene. Herein, we establish the mechanism of Purbeta binding to the purine-rich strand of the enhancer using quantitative methods and purified components. Initial evaluation of DNA-binding specificity and equilibrium stoichiometry via colorimetric-, autoradiographic-, and fluorescence-based assays suggested that Purbeta interacts with two distinct G/A-rich sites within the nominal single-stranded enhancer element to form a high-affinity 2:1 protein:DNA complex. Statistical mechanical analyses of band shift titrations of the nominal element in conjunction with DNase I footprint titrations of the extended smooth muscle alpha-actin 5'-flanking region demonstrated that assembly of the nucleoprotein complex likely occurs in a sequential, cooperative, and monomer-dependent fashion. Resolution of the microscopic energetics of the system indicated that monomer association with two nonidentical sites flanking the core MCAT motif accounts for the majority of the intrinsic binding affinity of Purbeta with intersite cooperativity contributing an approximately 12-fold increase to the stability of the nucleoprotein complex. These findings offer new insights into the mechanism, energetics, and sequence determinants of Purbeta repressor binding to a biologically relevant, contractile phenotype-regulating cis-element while also revealing the thermodynamic confines of putative Purbeta-mediated effects on DNA structure.

DNA affects ligand binding of the ecdysone receptor of Drosophila melanogaster

The heterodimers of all three ecdysone receptor (EcR) isoforms with Ultraspiracle (Usp), the invertebrate orthologue of RXR, bind Ponasterone A with the same affinity in the absence of DNA. Ligand binding is stimulated by ecdysone response elements (EcREs) to different degrees depending on the receptor isoform, the heterodimerization partner, and the type of EcRE. Ligand binding to heterodimers with wtUsp is enhanced 5-fold with hsp27, Pal-1 and DR-1. In the presence of DNA substantial differences in ligand binding were observed, when the AB-domain of wtUsp is replaced by the N-terminus of VP16, which is routinely used for the determination of transcriptional activity to overcome the inhibitory action of the AB-domain of Usp. Enhanced dimerization in the presence of hormone response elements increases mainly the number of binding sites resulting in improved ligand binding, which is observed even if the C-domain of Usp is deleted. RXR, which can partially replace Usp function, confers high affinity ligand binding only in the presence of an EcRE.

Using thermodynamics to understand progesterone receptor function: method and theory

Progesterone receptors (PRs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors. The mechanisms by which receptors such as PR assemble at a promoter and recruit coactivators are well understood at the biochemical level. However, a rigorous and thus quantitatively predictive understanding of function is entirely lacking. This is so in part because the study of receptor function has largely been carried out using semiquantitative or qualitative approaches. These types of analyses are limited in their ability to resolve thermodynamically valid and physically meaningful microscopic interaction parameters. This includes resolution of intrinsic binding constants and cooperativity terms, as well as the mathematical framework for integrating these values into a larger molecular code for function. Here we present our experimental and theoretical approach for dissecting the linked reactions associated with PR and coactivator assembly at complex promoter sequences. We discuss the use of analytical ultracentrifugation and quantitative DNase footprint titration and their coupling to exact theoretical treatments. We then highlight the major findings of these studies and their implications for understanding and reevaluating receptor function.

What goes on behind closed doors: physiological versus pharmacological steroid hormone actions

Steroid-hormone-activated receptor proteins are among the best-understood class of factors for altering gene transcription in cells. Steroid receptors are of major importance in maintaining normal human physiology by responding to circulating concentrations of steroid in the nM range. Nonetheless, most studies of steroid receptor action have been conducted using the supra-physiological conditions of saturating concentrations (> or =100 nM) of potent synthetic steroid agonists. Here we summarize the recent developments arising from experiments using two clinically relevant conditions: subsaturating concentrations of agonist (to mimic the circulating concentrations in mammals) and saturating concentrations of antagonists (which are employed in endocrine therapies to block the actions of endogenous steroids). These studies have revealed new facets of steroid hormone action that could not be uncovered by conventional experiments with saturating concentrations of agonist steroids, such as a plethora of factors/conditions for the differential control of gene expression by physiological levels of steroid, a rational approach for examining the gene-specific variations in partial agonist activity of antisteroids, and a dissociation of steroid potency and efficacy that implies the existence of separate, and possibly novel, mechanistic steps and cofactors.

Quantitative DNase footprint titration: a tool for analyzing the energetics of protein-DNA interactions

A major goal in biomedical research is to determine the mechanisms responsible for gene regulation. However, the promoters and operators that control transcription are often complex in nature, containing multiple-binding sites with which DNA-binding proteins can interact cooperatively. Quantitative DNase footprint titration is one of the few techniques capable of resolving the microscopic binding affinities responsible for the macroscopic assembly process. Here, we present a step-by-step protocol for carrying out a footprint titration experiment. We then describe how to quantify the resultant images to generate individual-site binding curves. Finally, we derive basic equations for binding at each site and present an overview of the fitting process, applying it to the anticipated results. Users should anticipate that the footprinting experiment will take 3-5 d starting from DNA template isolation to image acquisition and quantitation.

Thermodynamic dissection of progesterone receptor interactions at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter: monomer binding and strong cooperativity dominate the assembly reaction

Progesterone receptors (PRs) play critical roles in eukaryotic gene regulation, yet the mechanisms by which they assemble at their promoters are poorly understood. One of the few promoters amenable to analysis is the mouse mammary tumor virus gene regulatory sequence. Embedded within this sequence are four progesterone response elements (PREs) corresponding to a palindromic PRE and three half-site PREs. Early mutational studies indicated that the presence of all four sites generated a synergistic and strong transcriptional response. However, DNA binding analyses suggested that receptor assembly at the promoter occurred in the absence of significant cooperativity. Taken together, the results indicated that cooperative interactions among PREs could not account for the observed functional synergy. More broadly, the studies raised the question of whether cooperativity was a common feature of PR-mediated gene regulation. As a step toward obtaining a quantitative and, thus, predictive understanding of receptor function, we have carried out a thermodynamic dissection of PR A-isoform interactions at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Utilizing analytical ultracentrifugation and quantitative footprinting, we have resolved the microscopic energetics of PR A-isoform binding, including cooperativity terms. Our results reveal a model contrary to that inferred from previous biochemical investigations. Specifically, the binding unit at a half-site is not a receptor dimer but is instead a monomer; monomers bound at half-sites are capable of significant pairwise cooperative interactions; occupancy of all three half-sites is required to cooperatively engage the palindromic-bound dimer; and finally, large unfavorable forces accompany assembly. Overall, monomer binding accounts for the majority of the intrinsic binding energetics and cooperativity contributes an approximately 1000-fold increase in receptor-promoter stability. Finally, the partitioning of cooperativity suggests a framework for interpreting in vivo transcriptional synergy. These results highlight the insight available from rigorous analysis and demonstrate that receptor-promoter interactions are considerably more complex than typically envisioned.