Risedronate pharmacokinetics and intra- and inter-subject variability upon single-dose intravenous and oral administration

Unexpected chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cell activation by bisphosphonates

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of the elderly, often presenting comorbidities like osteoporosis and requiring, in a relevant proportion of cases, treatment with bisphosphonates (BPs). This class of drugs was shown in preclinical investigations to also possess anticancer properties. We started an in vitro study of the effects of BPs on CLL B cells activated by microenvironment-mimicking stimuli and observed that, depending on drug concentration, hormetic effects were induced on the leukemic cells. Higher doses induced cytotoxicity whereas at lower concentrations, more likely occurring in vivo, the drugs generated a protective effect from spontaneous and chemotherapy-induced apoptosis, and augmented CLL B cell activation/proliferation. This CLL-activation effect promoted by the BPs was associated with markers of poor CLL prognosis and required the presence of bystander stromal cells. Functional experiments suggested that this phenomenon involves the release of soluble factors and is increased by cellular contact between stroma and CLL B cells. Since CLL patients often present comorbidities such as osteoporosis and considering the diverse outcomes in both CLL disease progression and CLL response to treatment among patients, illustrating this phenomenon holds potential significance in driving additional investigations.

Micronanoparticled risedronate exhibits potent vaccine adjuvant effects

Micro/Nano-scale particles are widely used as vaccine adjuvants to enhance immune response and improve antigen stability. While aluminum salt is one of the most common adjuvants approved for human use, its immunostimulatory capacity is suboptimal. In this study, we modified risedronate, an immunostimulant and anti-osteoporotic drug, to create zinc salt particle-based risedronate (Zn-RS), also termed particulate risedronate. Compared to soluble risedronate, micronanoparticled Zn-RS adjuvant demonstrated increased recruitment of innate cells, enhanced antigen uptake locally, and a similar antigen depot effect as aluminum salt. Furthermore, Zn-RS adjuvant directly and quickly stimulated immune cells, accelerated the formulation of germinal centers in lymph nodes, and facilitated the rapid production of antibodies. Importantly, Zn-RS adjuvant exhibited superior performance in both young and aged mice, effectively protecting against respiratory diseases such as SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Consequently, particulate risedronate showed great potential as an immune-enhancing vaccine adjuvant, particularly beneficial for vaccines targeting the susceptible elderly.

Risedronate-loaded aerogel scaffolds for bone regeneration

Sugarcane bagasse-derived nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), a type of cellulose with a fibrous structure, is potentially used in the pharmaceutical field. Regeneration of this cellulose using a green process offers a more accessible and less ordered cellulose II structure (amorphous cellulose; AmC). Furthermore, the preparation of cross-linked cellulose (NFC/AmC) provides a dual advantage by building a structural block that could exhibit distinct mechanical properties. 3D aerogel scaffolds loaded with risedronate were prepared in our study using NFC or cross-linked cellulose (NFC/AmC), then combined with different concentrations of chitosan. Results proved that the aerogel scaffolds composed of NFC and chitosan had significantly improved the mechanical properties and retarded drug release compared to all other fabricated aerogel scaffolds. The aerogel scaffolds containing the highest concentration of chitosan (SC-T3) attained the highest compressive strength and mean release time values (415 ± 41.80 kPa and 2.61 ± 0.23 h, respectively). Scanning electron microscope images proved the uniform highly porous microstructure of SC-T3 with interconnectedness. All the tested medicated as well as unmedicated aerogel scaffolds had the ability to regenerate bone as assessed using the MG-63 cell line, with the former attaining a higher effect than the latter. However, SC-T3 aerogel scaffolds possessed a lower regenerative effect than those composed of NFC only. This study highlights the promising approach of the use of biopolymers derived from agro-wastes for tissue engineering.

Pharmacological options in the treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta: A comprehensive review of clinical and potential alternatives

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetically heterogeneous connective tissue disorder characterized by bone fragility and different extra-skeletal manifestations. The severity of these manifestations makes it possible to classify OI into different subtypes based on the main clinical features. This review aims to outline and describe the current pharmacological alternatives for treating OI, grounded on clinical and preclinical reports, such as antiresorptive agents, anabolic agents, growth hormone, and anti-TGFβ antibody, among other less used agents. The different options and their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties will be reviewed and discussed, focusing on the variability of their response and the molecular mechanisms involved to attain the main clinical goals, which include decreasing fracture incidence, improving pain, and promoting growth, mobility, and functional independence.

Beyond Antiresorptive Activity: Risedronate-Based Coordination Complexes To Potentially Treat Osteolytic Metastases

Coordination of clinically employed bisphosphonate, risedronate (RISE), to bioactive metals, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, and Zn²⁺, allowed the formation of bisphosphonate-based coordination complexes (BPCCs). Three RISE-based BPCCs, RISE-Ca, RISE-Mg, and RISE-Zn, were produced, and their structures were elucidated by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Interestingly, the addition of an auxiliary ligand, etidronic acid (HEDP), resulted in the recrystallized protonated form of the ligand, H-RISE. The pH-dependent structural stability of the RISE-based BPCCs was measured by means of dissolution profiles under neutral and acidic simulated physiological conditions (PBS and FaSSGF, respectively). In comparison to RISE (Actonel), the complexes showed a lower equilibrium solubility (∼70-85% in 18-24 h) in PBS, while a higher equilibrium solubility (∼100% in 3 h) in acidic media. The results point to the capacity to release this BP in a pH-dependent manner from the RISE-based BPCCs. Subsequently, the particle size of RISE-Ca was reduced, from 300 μm to ∼350 d.nm, employing the phase inversion temperature (PIT)-nanoemulsion method, resulting in nano-Ca@RISE. Aggregation measurements of nano-Ca@RISE in 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS):H₂O was monitored after 24, 48, and 72 h to study the particle size longevity in physiological media, showing that the suspended material has the potential to maintain its particle size over time. Furthermore, binding assays were performed to determine the potential binding of nano-Ca@RISE to the bone, where results show higher binding (∼1.7×) for the material to hydroxyapatite (HA, 30%) when compared to RISE (17%) in 1 d. The cytotoxicity effects of nano-Ca@RISE were compared to those of RISE against the human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 and normal osteoblast-like hFOB 1.19 cell lines by dose-response curves and relative cell viability assays in an in vitro setting. The results demonstrate that nano-Ca@RISE significantly decreases the viability of MDA-MB-231 with high specificity, at concentrations ∼2-3× lower than the ones reported employing other third-generation BPs. This is supported by the fact that when normal osteoblast cells (hFOB 1.19), which are part of the tissue microenvironment at metastatic sites, were treated with nano-Ca@RISE no significant decrease in viability was observed. This study expands on the therapeutic potential of RISE beyond its antiresorptive activity through the design of BPCCs, specifically nano-Ca@RISE, that bind to the bone and degrade in a pH-dependent manner under acidic conditions.

An open-label randomized study of the relative absorption of gastro-resistant risedronate taken fasted or with food versus immediate-release risedronate

Patients with osteoporosis often take oral bisphosphonates with food, rendering these medications ineffective. This study compared the relative absorption of four formulations of gastro‐resistant (GR; formulations 1–4) risedronate 35 mg versus immediate‐release (IR) risedronate 35 mg taken fasted. Secondarily, it compared the relative absorption of GR formulations administered fed and fasted, and determined the site of disintegration. Healthy participants (N = 160) were randomized to one of nine treatment groups: IR risedronate taken fasted (group A) or formulations 1–4 taken fasted or fed (groups B–I). Fasted groups fasted for 8 h pre‐dose and 4 h post‐dose. Fed groups fasted for 7.5 h, then took risedronate with breakfast. Urine was collected until 72 h post‐dose and analyzed using liquid chromatography. From each group, up to seven participants underwent scintigraphic monitoring to assess tablet disintegration. The percentage of total dose recovered in urine (A’_e) was ~0.5% for group A. The A’_e of formulations 1–4 taken fasted was 0.220% (90% confidence interval 0.124–0.389), 0.298% (0.122–0.730), 0.154% (0.090–0.264), and 0.108% (0.051–0.231), respectively. With food, the A’_e of formulation 1 decreased least versus fasted (−27%) compared with the A’_e of formulations 2, 3, and 4 (−73%, −80%, and −65%, respectively). Formulations 1–3 disintegrated in the small intestine, formulation 4 closer to the large intestine. All GR formulations were well tolerated and in line with the known safety profile for IR risedronate. Formulation 2 had the highest absorption when taken fasted, whereas the absorption of formulation 1 was least affected by food.

Osteoporosis treatment with risedronate: a population pharmacokinetic model for the description of its absorption and low plasma levels

To develop a population pharmacokinetic model that describes the absorption and low plasma levels of risedronate in the body. The impact of patients' characteristics on risedronate kinetics is investigated. Simulations revealed the high variability in the concentration levels after different dosage schemes. No dosage adjustment is required in renal impairment.

INTRODUCTION

Risedronate exhibits very low plasma levels and high residence time in the body. The aim of this study is to describe and explain the risedronate transit through the body. The impact of volunteers' characteristics on the kinetics of risedronate is also investigated. Simulations are used to compare the risedronate plasma levels after different dosage schemes and assess the need for dose adjustment in patients with impaired kidney functionality.

METHODS

Plasma concentration-time data were obtained from a four-period, two sequence, single-dose, crossover bioequivalence study. The effects of several covariates (e.g., weight, albumin, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, and calcium) on model parameters were tested. Non-linear mixed-effect modeling was applied and a variety of models were evaluated placing emphasis on absorption and disposition properties. The modeling and simulation work was implemented in Monolix^TM 2020R1.

RESULTS

Following oral administration, the kinetics of risedronate was best described by a two-compartment model with lag time, first-order absorption, and elimination. The extent of peripheral distribution (i.e., bones) was found to be remarkably high. No volunteer characteristics were identified to affect significantly the disposition of risedronate. Using simulations, risedronate plasma profiles were obtained for different doses and frequencies of administration.

CONCLUSION

The absorption and disposition kinetics of risedronate were successfully characterized. Simulations revealed the high discrepancy in the concentration levels observed after different dosage regimens, implying the safety profile of risedronate. In virtual patients with renal impairment, the blood levels of risedronate are increased, but not in an extent requiring dose adaptation.

Chronobiology and Chronotherapy of Osteoporosis

Physiological circadian (ie, 24-hour) rhythms are critical for bone health. Animal studies have shown that genes involved in the intrinsic molecular clock demonstrate potent circadian expression patterns in bone and that genetic disruption of these clock genes results in a disturbed bone structure and quality. More importantly, circulating markers of bone remodeling show diurnal variation in mice as well as humans, and circadian disruption by, eg, working night shifts is associated with the bone remodeling disorder osteoporosis. In this review, we provide an overview of the current literature on rhythmic bone remodeling and its underlying mechanisms and identify critical knowledge gaps. In addition, we discuss novel (chrono)therapeutic strategies to reduce osteoporosis by utilizing our knowledge on circadian regulation of bone. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Bisphosphonates, Old Friends of Bones and New Trends in Clinics

Bisphosphonates, used for a long time in osteoporosis management, are currently the target of intensive research, from pre-formulation studies to more advanced stages of clinical practice. This review presents an overview of the contributions of this family of compounds to human health, starting with the chemistry and clinical uses of bisphosphonates. Following this, their pharmacology is described, highlighting administration-borne handicaps and undesirable effects. The last three sections of the review describe the research efforts that seek to curb delivery-related issues and expand bisphosphonate use. Innovative routes and strategies of administration, such as nano-encapsulation for oral intake or injectable cements for local or in-bone delivery are presented, as well as the latest results of case studies or preclinical studies proposing new therapeutic indications for the clinically approved bisphosphonates. Finally, a selection of anti-infectious bisphosphonate new drug candidates is shown, with focus on the molecules reported in the last two decades.

On the pharmacological evaluation of bisphosphonates in humans

One of the key parameters for a successful treatment with any drug is the use of an optimal dose regimen. Bisphosphonates (BPs) have been in clinical use for over five decades and during this period clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) evaluations have been instrumental for the identification of optimal dose regimens in patients. Ideal clinical PK and PD studies help drug developers explain variability in responses and enable the identification of a dose regimen with an optimal effect. PK and PD studies of the unique and rather complex pharmacological properties of BPs also help determine to a significant extent ideal dosing for these drugs. Clinical PK and PD evaluations of BPs preferably use study designs and assays that enable the assessment of both short- (days) and long-term (years) presence and effect of these drugs in patients. BPs are mainly used for metabolic bone diseases because they inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and the best way to quantify their effects in humans is therefore by measuring biochemical markers of bone resorption in serum and urine. In these very same samples BP concentrations can also be measured. Short-term serum and urine data after both intravenous (IV) and oral administration enable the assessment of oral bioavailability as well as the amount of BP delivered to the skeleton. Longer-term data provide information on the anti-resorptive effect as well as the elimination of the BP from the skeleton. Using PK-PD models to mathematically link the anti-resorptive action of the BPs to the amount of BP at the skeleton provides a mechanism-based explanation of the pattern of bone resorption during treatment. These models have been used successfully during the clinical development of BPs. Newer versions of such models, which include systems pharmacology and disease progression models, are more comprehensive and include additional PD parameters such as BMD and fracture risk. Clinical PK and PD studies of BPs have been useful for the identification of optimal dose regimens for metabolic bone diseases. These analyses will also continue to be important for newer research directions, such as BP use in the delivery of other drugs to the bone to better treat bone metastases and bone infections, as well as the potential benefit of BPs at non-skeletal targets for the prevention and treatments of soft tissue cancers, various fibroses, and other cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, and reduction in mortality and extension of lifespan.

Evaluation of Cell-Penetrating Peptides as Versatile, Effective Absorption Enhancers: Relation to Molecular Weight and Inherent Epithelial Drug Permeability

PURPOSE

The poor permeability of new drug candidates across intestinal epithelial membranes complicates their development in oral form. This study investigated the potential of cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) to improve the intestinal permeation and absorption of low-permeable low-molecular-weight (low-MW) drugs.

METHODS

The in vitro epithelial permeation of six different drugs (metformin, risedronate, zanamivir, methotrexate [MTX], tacrolimus, and vincristine [VCR]) across Caco-2 cell monolayers was examined in the presence and absence of L- or D-penetratin, and the correlation between permeation enhancement efficiency and the properties of tested drugs was analyzed. In addition, a rat closed ileal loop absorption study was conducted to determine the in vivo effects of penetratin.

RESULTS

MTX and VCR efficiently permeated Caco-2 monolayers in the presence of L- and D-penetratin, suggesting that CPPs enhanced the epithelial permeation of drugs with relatively high molecular weight and resultant limited intrinsic permeability. The in vivo rat closed ileal loop absorption study revealed the stimulatory effect of L- and D-penetratin on the intestinal absorption of MTX and VCR.

CONCLUSIONS

CPPs are useful as oral absorption enhancers for low-permeable drugs.

Solid-in-oil nanodispersions as a novel delivery system to improve the oral bioavailability of bisphosphate, risedronate sodium

The aim of the current study was to modify the oral absorption of risedronate sodium (RS) using solid-in-oil nanodispersions (SONDs) technology. The oral therapeutic effect of RS is limited in vivo because of its low membrane permeability and the formation of insoluble precipitates with bivalent cations (such as Ca²⁺) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.We used SONDs to prepare medium-chain triglyceride (MCT)-based nanodispersions of the hydrophilic drug, which used the oral absorption mechanism of MCT digestion to improve bioavailability of RS in vivo. SONDs exhibited high encapsulation efficiency of RS and excellent enzymatic degradation-dependent release behavior. The result of an everted gut sac test showed that the P_app value of the SONDs was 6.29-fold (p<0.05) higher than that of RS aqueous solutions in simulated intestinal fluid containing 5 mM Ca²⁺, this was because MCT can be digested to form the fatty acids C₈ and C₁₀, which have an adsorption-promoting effect on RS. Further, solid-in-oil-in-water (S/O/W) emulsion droplets formedafter emulsification by bile salts and MCT digestionwere effective in disrupting epithelial tight junctions (TJs), facilitating the paracellular permeation of RS throughout the intestine. Moreover, in vivo absorption study in rats revealed that the AUC_0-12h of RS in SONDs was approximately 4.56-fold (p<0.05) higher than with RS aqueous solutions at the same dose (15 mg/kg). This approach demonstrates a potential drug delivery system to improve the bioavailability of risedronate sodium.

History of risedronate

Herein we review the discovery, development, commercial history and legacy of risedronate or NE-58095, a potent N-containing bisphosphonate developed by scientists at the Cincinnati Miami Valley Laboratories and the Norwich Eaton Laboratories of Procter and Gamble. It is characterized by a hydroxyl substituent (R₁) and a pyridyl-methylene substituent (R₂) at the carbon bridging two phosphonate moieties. It was shown to have greater potency than alendronate in cell-based systems while binding affinity to bone matrix was lower than alendronate, accounting for the relatively rapid offset of bone turnover inhibition when therapy is discontinued. Risedronate was shown to significantly reduce serum alkaline phosphatase and clinical features in patients with Paget's disease and was approved for this indication, at a dose of 30 mg daily for 2 months, in 1998. Formal dose response testing for treatment of osteoporosis was not performed. In large Phase 3 studies, 5 mg risedronate daily increased bone mineral density more than did the 2.5 mg dose. As a result, the 2.5 mg dose was dropped from most of the Phase 3 studies after 12 months. The 5 mg daily dose was approved for treating and preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in 2000. The drug was subsequently approved for treating men with osteoporosis. Following the leads of other companies, weekly and monthly preparations were developed and approved, based on non-inferiority BMD studies vs the 5 mg daily oral dose as was a unique dosing regimen of 75 mg given on 2 consecutive days each month. Finally, to overcome the effect of food on limiting the already poor gastrointestinal absorption of the drug, a once-weekly oral preparation containing the chelating agent EDTA and with an enteric coating delaying dissolution until the tablet was in the small intestine was approved in 2010 to be administered after breakfast. The Alliance for Better Bone Health, a collaboration between Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and sanofi-aventis U.S. was formed to market risedronate as Actonel® and, subsequently, Actonel-EC® or Atelvia®. These drugs are still marketed by sanofi-aventis in some countries. The sale of the pharmaceutical division of Procter & Gamble to Warner Chilcott (US) was based, in large part, on the perceived value and marketability of the risedronate drugs. When marketing targets of Warner-Chilcott were not met, the rights of risedronate were sold to Allergan USA, Inc. which never actively promoted the drug. Generic forms of risedronate were introduced into the United States in 2015 but are rarely used, although several generic forms are actively marketed in other countries.

Mechanism of Action, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile, and Clinical Applications of Nitrogen-containing Bisphosphonates

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (nBPs) are bone-specific agents that inhibit farnesyl diphosphate synthase. nBPs’ strong affinity for bone, and not for other tissues, makes them potent inhibitors of bone resorption and bone remodeling activity, with limited potential for side-effects in non-skeletal tissues. Five nBPs are currently approved in the United States. The primary indications are for treatment of osteoporosis (alendronate, ibandronate, and risedronate) and treatment/prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in multiple myeloma and breast and prostate cancer patients (ibandronate, pamidronate, and zoledronic acid). nBPs are the most efficacious drugs available for these diseases, reducing osteoporotic fracture risk by 50–60% in persons with low bone mass or prior osteoporotic fracture, and SREs by one-third in cancer patients. The absorbed nBP dose for cancer patients is from seven to ten times that in osteoporosis patients. nBPs are unique in that they first exert profound pharmacodynamic effects long after their blood levels reach zero. Current pharmacokinetic studies indicate that approximately half of any nBP dose reaches the skeleton, with an early half-life of ten days, and a terminal half-life of about ten years. Practical study design limitations and theoretical considerations suggest that both the half-life and the amount of nBP retained in the skeletons of patients on long-term nBP therapy are substantially overestimated by extrapolation directly from current pharmacokinetic data. In fact, the amount of nBP being released from skeletal tissues of long-term-treated patients, particularly in osteoporosis patients, becomes insufficient to maintain full pharmacodynamic efficacy relatively soon after dosing is interrupted.

Effects of risedronate on the morphology and viability of gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Risedronate has been used for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. The present study was performed to evaluate the effects of risedronate on the morphology and viability of human stem cells derived from the gingiva. Stem cells derived from the gingiva were grown in the presence of risedronate at concentrations that ranged from 1 to 10 µM. The morphology of the cells was viewed under an inverted microscope, and cell proliferation was analyzed with a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) on days 2, 4 and 7. The untreated control group showed a spindle-shaped, fibroblast-like morphology. The shapes of the cells treated with 1 and 5 µM risedronate were similar to that of the control group on day 2. However, morphology of the 10 µM group markedly differed from that of the control group. The shapes of the cells in the 1, 5 and 10 µM groups were rounder, and pronounced alterations when compared with the untreated control group were noted in all groups on day 7. The cultures growing in the presence of risedronate showed decreased CCK-8 values on day 7. In conclusion, risedronate produced notable alterations in the morphology of the cells and reduced the viability of gingival mesenchymal stem cells.

Atypical femur fracture during bisphosphonate drug holiday: a case series

Recent studies have noted an increased risk of low energy subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures termed "atypical femur fractures" (AFFs) associated with long-term bisphosphonate use. As such, many clinicians have begun recommending a "drug holiday" to reduce the risks associated with long-term bisphosphonate use. We present two cases of AFFs occurring during a 4-year or greater drug holiday following long-term bisphosphonate use. These findings highlight the need to reevaluate optimal bisphosphonate therapy duration, dosage, as well as initiation and duration of a drug holiday with continued monitoring in the prevention of AFFs.

Biodegradable intranasal nanoparticulate drug delivery system of risedronate sodium for osteoporosis

CONTEXT

Osteoporosis (OP) is the most common metabolic bone disease predominantly found in elderly people. It is associated with reduced bone mineral density, results in a higher probability of fractures, especially of the hip, vertebrae, and distal radius. Worldwide prevalence of OP is considered a serious public health concern.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present work was to develop and evaluate polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) of risedronate sodium (RIS) for the treatment of OP using intranasal (IN) route in order to reduce peripheral toxic effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Polymeric NPs of RIS were prepared by nanoprecipitation methods. Formulations were developed and evaluated in context to in vitro drug release, ex vivo permeation, in vivo study, and biochemical studies.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

The particles size, entrapment efficiency (EE) (%), and loading capacity (LC) (%) of optimized formulations were found to be 127.84 ± 6.33 nm, 52.65 ± 5.21, and 10.57 ± 1.48, respectively. Release kinetics showed diffusion-controlled, Fickian release pattern. Ex vivo permeation study showed RIS from PLGA-NPs permeated significantly (p < 0.05) through nasal mucosa. In vivo study showed a marked difference in micro-structure (trabeculae) in bone internal environment. Biochemical estimation of treated group and RIS PLGA indicated a significant recovery (p < 0.01) as compared with the toxic group.

CONCLUSION

Polymeric NPs of RIS were prepared successfully using biodegradable polymer (PLGA). Intranasal delivery showed a good result in in vivo study. Thus PLGA-NPs have great potential for delivering the RIS for the treatment and prevention of OP after clinical evaluation in near future.

Preparation of risedronate nanoparticles by solvent evaporation technique

One approach for the enhancement of oral drug bioavailability is the technique of nanoparticle preparation. Risedronate sodium (Biopharmaceutical Classification System Class III) was chosen as a model compound with high water solubility and low intestinal permeability. Eighteen samples of risedronate sodium were prepared by the solvent evaporation technique with sodium dodecyl sulfate, polysorbate, macrogol, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose and sodium carboxymethyl dextran as nanoparticle stabilizers applied in three concentrations. The prepared samples were characterized by dynamic light scattering and scanning electron microscopy. Fourier transform mid-infrared spectroscopy was used for verification of the composition of the samples. The particle size of sixteen samples was less than 200 nm. Polysorbate, sodium carboxymethyl dextran and macrogol were determined as the most favourable excipients; the particle size of the samples of risedronate with these excipients ranged from 2.8 to 10.5 nm.

Ionic complex of risedronate with positively charged deoxycholic acid derivative: evaluation of physicochemical properties and enhancement of intestinal absorption in rats

Risedronate is widely used clinically to treat osteoporosis, Paget's disease, hypercalcemia, bone metastasis, and multiple myeloma. However, its oral efficacy is restricted due to its low bioavailability and severe gastrointestinal adverse effects. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of deoxycholic acid derivatives on the permeability and oral bioavailability of risedronate by increasing its lipophilicity and affinity to bile transporters. We synthesized two bile acid derivatives, N(α)-deoxycholyl-L-lysyl-methylester (DCK) and N(α)-deoxycholyl-L-lysyl-hydroxide (HDCK) as oral absorption enhancers. After ionic complex formation with the bile acid derivatives, the complexes were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction. Their artificial membrane permeabilities and bioavailabilities in rats were investigated in comparison with pure risedronate. Complex formation with DCK or HDCK demonstrated that risedronate existed in an amorphous form in the complex. A physical complex of risedronate with DCK enhanced the apparent membrane permeability of risedronate significantly but pure risedronate was not permeable. An in vivo study revealed that the C max and AUClast of risedronate/DCK (1:2) complex were 1.92- and 2.64-fold higher than those of pure risedronate, respectively. Thus, the risedronate/DCK complex can improve the oral absorption of risedronate and patient compliance by reducing dose frequency and adverse reactions.

Eliminating the need for fasting with oral administration of bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates are the major treatment of choice for osteoporosis, given that they are attached preferentially by bone and significantly reduce the risk of fractures. Oral bisphosphonates are poorly absorbed (usually less than 1% for nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates) and when taken with food or beverages create complexes that cannot be absorbed. For this reason, they must be taken on an empty stomach, and a period of up to 2 hours must elapse before the consumption of any food or drink other than plain water. This routine is not only inconvenient but can lead to discontinuation of treatment, and when mistakenly taken with food, may result in misdiagnosis of resistance to or failure of treatment. The development of an enteric-coated delayed-release formulation of risedronate with the addition of the calcium chelator, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), a widely used food stabilizer, eliminates the need for fasting without affecting the bioavailability of risedronate or its efficacy.

Quantitation of small intestinal permeability during normal human drug absorption

BACKGROUND

Understanding the quantitative relationship between a drug's physical chemical properties and its rate of intestinal absorption (QSAR) is critical for selecting candidate drugs. Because of limited experimental human small intestinal permeability data, approximate surrogates such as the fraction absorbed or Caco-2 permeability are used, both of which have limitations.

METHODS

Given the blood concentration following an oral and intravenous dose, the time course of intestinal absorption in humans was determined by deconvolution and related to the intestinal permeability by the use of a new 3 parameter model function ("Averaged Model" (AM)). The theoretical validity of this AM model was evaluated by comparing it to the standard diffusion-convection model (DC). This analysis was applied to 90 drugs using previously published data. Only drugs that were administered in oral solution form to fasting subjects were considered so that the rate of gastric emptying was approximately known. All the calculations are carried out using the freely available routine PKQuest Java (http://www.pkquest.com) which has an easy to use, simple interface.

RESULTS

Theoretically, the AM permeability provides an accurate estimate of the intestinal DC permeability for solutes whose absorption ranges from 1% to 99%. The experimental human AM permeabilities determined by deconvolution are similar to those determined by direct human jejunal perfusion. The small intestinal pH varies with position and the results are interpreted in terms of the pH dependent octanol partition. The permeability versus partition relations are presented separately for the uncharged, basic, acidic and charged solutes. The small uncharged solutes caffeine, acetaminophen and antipyrine have very high permeabilities (about 20 x 10-4 cm/sec) corresponding to an unstirred layer of only 45 μm. The weak acid aspirin also has a large AM permeability despite its low octanol partition at pH 7.4, suggesting that it is nearly completely absorbed in the first part of the intestine where the pH is about 5.4.

CONCLUSIONS

The AM deconvolution method provides an accurate estimate of the human intestinal permeability. The results for these 90 drugs should provide a useful benchmark for evaluating QSAR models.

Prosthodontic treatment of a patient taking nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates to preserve the integrity of the epithelial attachment: a clinical report

Osteonecrosis of the jaw has been identified in recent years as an unfortunate potential side effect for patients taking nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Many authors have attempted unsuccessfully to elucidate the mechanism behind this drug-induced malady, leaving dentists with unclear guidelines on how to treat these patients. Recent literature suggests a threshold-related impairment of epithelial cell migration over bone. A conservative, non-invasive approach aimed at preserving the epithelial attachment in a patient on a long-term oral alendronate protocol is described. The advantage of this approach is to prevent a highly destructive bone degenerative process that does not have a clear and predictable treatment protocol.

ACUTE AND SUBACUTE ORAL TOXICITY TESTS OF SINTERED DICALCIUM PYROPHOSPHATE ON OVARIECTOMIZED RATS FOR OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT

Sintered dicalcium pyrophosphate (SDCP) is a synthetic pyrophosphate analog that could be utilized in the treatment for osteoporosis. In this study, an ovariectomized rat model is used to evaluate the systematic toxicity of orally administered SDCP relative to its effects on bone mass. Ovariectomized Wistar rats were treated with experimental medication with different dosing strategies (0.5 mg/kg five days weekly, and 2.5 mg/kg once weekly) for once (acute oral toxicity test) and four weeks (subacute oral toxicity test) followed by recovery period. Clinical signs of toxicity, body weight, and food consumption of rats were recorded. Blood samples were collected for hematological and blood biochemical analyses. Rats were sacrificed for necropsy and major visceral organs were harvested for histological examination after the recovery period. Long bones of four limbs were harvested to evaluate the effects of SDCP on bone mass. Results showed that there was no change in clinical signs, body weight, food consumption, hematology, blood biochemistry, necropsy, and histological examination attributable to the oral administration with SDCP to rats during the dosing period and the recovery period. Analysis of bone ashes revealed that the ovariectomized rats ingested with 0.5 mg/kg SDCP five days weekly continually for four weeks increased bone mineral contents significantly. In the ovariectomized rats ingested with 2.5 mg/kg SDCP once weekly continually for four weeks, the bone mineral contents were increased to normal bone quality. This study indicates that the SDCP can increase bone mass in the ovariectomized rat with no deleterious effects.

Topically administered Risedronate shows powerful anti-osteoporosis effect in ovariectomized mouse model

We investigated the therapeutic effect of topical Risedronate (RIS) on a mouse model of estrogen-deficient osteoporosis. Fourteen-week-old female mice were ovariectomized and assigned to 4 groups: SHAM-operated (SHAM), OVX mice treated with vehicle (OVX-V), OVX mice treated with 0.2% RIS (OVX-0.2% RIS), and OVX-mice treated with 0.02% RIS (OVX-0.02% RIS). Topical samples containing RIS were prepared in 10% (w/w) polyethylene glycol (PEG, MW 400) and 80 μg of sample was spread on the mice's mid-backs every 3 days for 5 weeks. Micro-CT analysis of femora demonstrated that OVX-0.2% RIS exhibited a 29% greater bone mineral density and 24% greater bone volume fraction than that of OVX-V group. Investigation of the trabecular bone in OVX-0.2% RIS revealed a 24% higher bone volume (BV/TV), 51% higher trabecular number (Tb.N), and 40% lower trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) compared to OVX-V mice. Additionally, bone phenotypes of tibiae were further confirmed by histological analysis. OVX-0.2% RIS group exhibited a 494% greater BV/TV, 464% less Tb.Sp, 81% greater active osteoclast surface (Oc.S/BS) and 26% less osteoclast number (N.Oc/BS) than that of OVX-V group. Collectively, these results indicated that topical delivery of RIS has powerful pharmaceutical effects on the prevention of osteoporosis and bone turnover.

The kidney and bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates are eliminated from the human body by the kidney. Renal clearance is both by glomerular filtration and proximal tubular secretion. Bisphosphonates given rapidly in high doses in animal models have induced a variety of adverse renal effects, from glomerular sclerosis to acute tubular necrosis. Nevertheless in the doses that are registered for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO), oral bisphosphonates have never been shown to adversely affect the kidney, even (in post-hoc analysis of clinical trial data) down to estimated glomerular filtration rates of 15 ml/min. In addition fracture risk reduction has also been observed in these populations with stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) with age-related reductions in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Intravenous zoledronic acid is safe when the infusion rate is no faster than 15 min though there have been short-term (days 9-11 post-infusion) increases in serum creatinine concentrations in a small sub-set of patients from the postmenopausal registration trials. For these reasons intravenous zoledronic acid should be avoided in patients with GFR levels <35 ml/min; and the patients should be well hydrated and have avoided the concomitant use of any agent that may impair renal function. Intravenous ibandronate has not to date been reported to induce acute changes in serum creatinine concentrations in the PMO clinical trial data, but the lack of head-to-head comparative data between ibandronate and zoledronic acid precludes knowing if one intravenous bisphosphonate is safer than the other. In patients with GFR levels <30-35 ml/min, the correct diagnosis of osteoporosis becomes more complex since other forms of renal bone disease, which require different management strategies than osteoporosis, need to be excluded before the assumption can be made that fractures and/or low bone mass are due to osteoporosis. In addition, in patients who may have pre-existing adynamic renal bone disease, there is a lack of evidence of any beneficial effect or harm by reducing bone turnover by any pharmacological agent, including bisphosphonates on bone strength or vascular calcification. Bisphosphonates are safe and effective for the management of osteoporosis when used in the right dose and in the right patient population for the right duration.

Bisphosphonates for post-menopausal osteoporosis: are they all the same?

The primary goal of treatment for post-menopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is reduction in fracture risk. Therefore, clinicians must recommend therapies that are safe and have proven anti-fracture efficacy. Bisphosphonates have long been established as first-line therapy for osteoporosis and several of these drugs significantly reduce osteoporotic fracture risk. However, choosing among different bisphosphonates can represent a difficult clinical decision. This review outlines the pharmacology of various bisphosphonates, discusses how their pharmacological characteristics affect their efficacy, and summarizes clinical safety and efficacy data. Clinical trial data and the opinions of expert bodies suggest that alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate and zoledronic acid all provide fracture protection for patients with PMO. However, there are differences among these agents. For example, all four agents have demonstrated efficacy in preventing vertebral fractures, but only zoledronic acid and risedronate significantly reduce non-vertebral fracture risk in pivotal trials. Moreover, reduction in hip fracture risk has only been established for alendronate, risedronate and zoledronic acid. Current data suggest that ibandronate and zoledronic acid have the most persistent antifracture effect. Bisphosphonates have been associated with a number of side effects, the evidence for which is summarized in this review. The most pertinent of these when choosing a bisphosphonate for a particular patient are the well-documented associations between gastrointestinal adverse events and oral administration, and between acute phase reactions and intravenous administration. Ultimately, selection of a specific bisphosphonate for treatment of PMO should be based on efficacy, risk profile, cost-effectiveness and patient preference.

The effect of risedronate on posterior lateral spinal fusion in a rat model

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential effects of risedronate (RIS) which shows a higher anti-resorptive effect among bisphosphonates, after a posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process spinal fusion using both autograft and allograft in a rat model.

METHODS

A totoal of 28 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into 2 study groups. A posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process spinal fusion was peformed using both autograft and allograft in a rat model. Group I (control) received 0.1 mL of steril saline (placebo) and Group II (treatment) received risedronate, equivalent to human dose (10 microg/kg/week) for 10-weeks period.

RESULTS

The fusion rates as determined by manual palpation were 69% in the group I and 46% in the group II (p = 0.251). According to radiographic score, the spinal segment was considered to be fused radiographically in 7 (53%) of the 13 controls and 9 (69%) of the 13 rats treated with RIS (p = 0.851). The mean histological scores were 5.69 +/- 0.13 and 3.84 +/- 0.43 for the control and treatment groups, respectively. There was a significant difference between the both groups (p = 0.001). The mean bone density of the fusion masses was 86.9 +/- 2.34 in the control group and 106.0 +/- 3.54 in the RIS treatment group. There was a statistical difference in mean bone densities of the fusion masses comparing the two groups (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this study, risedronate appears to delay bone fusion in a rat model. This occurs as a result of uncoupling the balanced osteoclastic and osteoblastic activity inherent to bone healing. These findings suggest that a discontinuation of risedronate postoperatively during acute fusion period may be warranted.

Risedronate on two consecutive days per month

Risedronate, an orally administered pyridinal bisphosphonate, is effective in the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Efforts to optimize patient adherence and persistence with, and hence the effectiveness of, therapy have led to the development of a 75 mg tablet to be taken on two consecutive days each month (2CDM). After 1 year of treatment, risedronate 75 mg 2CDM was noninferior to risedronate 5 mg once daily in improving lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in an ongoing (2-year) randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multinational trial in 1229 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Mean percentage increases in BMD from baseline at 12 months were 3.4% and 3.6% in the 75 mg 2CDM and 5 mg once-daily groups; the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the treatment difference (5 mg once daily - 75 mg 2CDM; -0.19%, 0.62%) did not exceed the predefined noninferiority margin (1.5%). In general, improvements in hip BMD and reductions in bone turnover markers with the 75 mg 2CDM regimen were not significantly different from those with the 5 mg once-daily regimen; there was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of new vertebral fractures at 12 months. The tolerability profile (including the incidence of upper gastrointestinal tract adverse events) of risedronate 75 mg 2CDM in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis was similar to that of risedronate 5 mg once daily.

Mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates: similarities and differences and their potential influence on clinical efficacy

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are well established as the leading drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis. There is new knowledge about how they work. The differences that exist among individual BPs in terms of mineral binding and biochemical actions may explain differences in their clinical behavior and effectiveness.

INTRODUCTION

The classical pharmacological effects of bisphosphonates (BPs) appear to be the result of two key properties: their affinity for bone mineral and their inhibitory effects on osteoclasts.

DISCUSSION

There is new information about both properties. Mineral binding affinities differ among the clinically used BPs and may influence their differential distribution within bone, their biological potency, and their duration of action. The antiresorptive effects of the nitrogen-containing BPs (including alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate) appear to result from their inhibition of the enzyme farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS) in osteoclasts. FPPS is a key enzyme in the mevalonate pathway, which generates isoprenoid lipids utilized for the post-translational modification of small GTP-binding proteins that are essential for osteoclast function. Effects on other cellular targets, such as osteocytes, may also be important. BPs share several common properties as a drug class. However, as with other families of drugs, there are obvious chemical, biochemical, and pharmacological differences among the individual BPs. Each BP has a unique profile that may help to explain potential clinical differences among them, in terms of their speed and duration of action, and effects on fracture reduction.

Preventive effect of risedronate on bone loss in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

AIM

Androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer decreases bone mineral density and increases the risk of fracture. The effect of risedronate, a potent third-generation oral bisphosphonate, on bone loss during androgen deprivation therapy was investigated.

METHODS

Sixty-one prostate cancer patients with a mean age (+/- SD) of 79 +/- 6 years who had received androgen deprivation therapy for 42 +/- 29 months were enrolled, and were treated with 2.5 mg of risedronate daily for six months. Bone mineral density was measured at the femoral neck, lumbar spine, and ultradistal radius by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The percent change of bone mineral density after treatment with risedronate was calculated as the primary efficacy variable. Urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen was measured as a bone resorption marker.

RESULTS

Bone mineral density remained stable in the femoral neck and radius during risedronate therapy. In contrast, the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine showed a significant increase from 1069 +/- 488 mg/cm(2)-1112 +/- 497 mg/cm(2) (P < 0.001), representing a gain of 4.9 +/- 8.9%. Urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen decreased significantly (P < 0.001) after three months of risedronate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Risedronate could prevent and reverse bone loss in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer by inhibiting bone resorption.

Factors affecting long-term compliance of osteoporotic patients with bisphosphonate treatment and QOL assessment in actual practice: alendronate and risedronate

The aim of our study was to examine compliance with a daily dose of 5 mg alendronate (ALN) and 2.5 mg risedronate (RDN) in actual practice, and to determine the causes of noncompliance through a questionnaire. In addition, we studied the quality of life (QOL) of patients through another disease-related questionnaire. The overall compliance rate remained at approximately 40% one year after the initial dose. The rates did not differ significantly between the ALN group (783 patients) and the RDN group (491 patients). The compliances in the female group and the rheumatism group were better than in the male group and the nonrheumatism group. From the questionnaire, 36% of noncompliant patients showed adverse effects (AEs), and the other noncompliant patients stopped the medication in spite of having no AEs. A logistic regression analysis of factors that might have affected long-term compliance included AEs, an understanding of the disease, the method of ingestion, visiting medical facilities, the shape of the tablet, the cost of the drug, and the explanation of the doctor or pharmacist. This analysis showed that noncompliance occurred mainly due to AEs, the inconvenience of visiting a medical facility, unusual methods of ingestion, and a poor understanding of the disease. According to the results of the questionnaire for QOL assessment, the patients who continued the medication for more than 1 year had improved scores for pain in both the ALN and RDN groups. Osteoporotic treatment needs long-term patient compliance. To improve compliance, it is very important that doctors and pharmacists ensure that patients understand the purpose of this therapy.

Novel insights into actions of bisphosphonates on bone: differences in interactions with hydroxyapatite

Bisphosphonates are now the most widely used drugs for diseases associated with increased bone resorption, such as osteoporosis. Although bisphosphonates act directly on osteoclasts, and interfere with specific biochemical processes such as protein prenylation, their ability to adsorb to bone mineral also contributes to their potency and duration of action. The aim of the present study was to compare the binding affinities for hydroxyapatite (HAP) of 6 bisphosphonates currently used clinically and to determine the effects of these bisphosphonates on other mineral surface properties including zeta potential and interfacial tension. Affinity constants (K(L)) for the adsorption of bisphosphonates were calculated from kinetic studies on HAP crystal growth using a constant composition method at 37 degrees C and at physiological ionic strength (0.15 M). Under conditions likely to simulate bisphosphonate binding onto bone, there were significant differences in K(L) among the bisphosphonates for HAP growth (pH 7.4) with a rank order of zoledronate > alendronate > ibandronate > risedronate > etidronate > clodronate. The measurements of zeta potential show that the crystal surface is modified by the adsorption of bisphosphonates in a manner best explained by molecular charges related to the protonation of their side-chain moieties, with risedronate showing substantial differences from alendronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate. The studies of the solid/liquid interfacial properties show additional differences among the bisphosphonates that may influence their mechanisms for binding and inhibiting crystal growth and dissolution. The observed differences in kinetic binding affinities, HAP zeta potentials, and interfacial tension are likely to contribute to the biological properties of the various bisphosphonates. In particular, these binding properties may contribute to differences in uptake and persistence in bone and the reversibility of effects. These properties, therefore, have potential clinical implications that may be important in understanding differences among potent bisphosphonates, such as the apparently more prolonged duration of action of alendronate and zoledronate compared with the more readily reversible effects of etidronate and risedronate.

Risedronate for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Risedronate sodium is an N-containing bisphosphonate that has been approved for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. An increase in the rate of bone remodelling is a regular feature of oestrogen withdrawal during the menopausal transition, but excessive remodelling leads to bone fragility. Risedronate and similar compounds reduce the rate of bone remodelling by suppressing the action of osteoclasts. The antifracture efficacy of risedronate is impressive. In large clinical trials of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis-related fracture(s) at entry, the risk of incident vertebral and non-vertebral fractures was reduced by approximately 40%. In older women at risk for hip fracture, incident hip fractures were also reduced by approximately 40%. Antifracture efficacy develops within the first 6 months, and treatment has been followed for as long as 5 years without deleterious effects on bone. We await reports of experience with risedronate in 'real-world' cases of greater complexity (i.e., in patients with co-morbidities and medications that would have excluded them from published clinical trials).

Oral ibandronate: a less frequently administered therapeutic option for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a severe condition, associated with significant disability as a result of fragility fractures and increased mortality. Oral bisphosphonates effectively reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture and are generally well tolerated. Unfortunately, patient outcomes are often compromised by suboptimal therapeutic adherence. In other disease areas, reduced dosing frequency has been shown to improve therapeutic adherence. A positive impact for adherence has been observed with a reduction in the bisphosphonate dosing frequency from daily to weekly. However, overall adherence remains suboptimal. Ibandronate is a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate specifically designed for less frequent than weekly administration, without compromise for efficacy or tolerability. This article reviews the pharmacology, efficacy and tolerability of oral ibandronate when administered with extended dosing intervals in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Biological properties and mechanism of action of ibandronate: application to the treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates, with their proven efficacy and safety, are the most commonly prescribed treatment for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis; however, optimal efficacy is often not achieved due to poor patient adherence to medication. Poor adherence leads to an increased risk of fracture, which itself results in morbidity, elevated healthcare costs and potentially, mortality. Although weekly rather than daily dosing of bisphosphonates has improved adherence, there remains a significant problem, and dosing less frequently than weekly has been suggested as a possible means for further improving adherence. Ibandronate is a new bisphosphonate that has a specific structure and set of characteristics that enable less frequent dosing than currently available bisphosphonates. This review provides details of the general structural features of all bisphosphonates and how these are understood to contribute to their functions in osteoporosis treatment. From this, the unique structure of ibandronate is described, along with how this translates into the high antiresorptive potency, favorable bone-binding, persistence in bone, and good tolerability that permits less frequent dosing. Finally, the clinical evidence for ibandronate is briefly presented, demonstrating the viability of less frequent dosing, with its potential benefits for patient convenience and adherence to therapy.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of bisphosphonates: use for optimisation of intermittent therapy for osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates suppress osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and are widely used in the management of osteoporosis. Daily oral administration of alendronic acid and risedronic acid have been shown to reduce the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Once-weekly regimens with these bisphosphonates are pharmacologically equivalent to daily regimens. Regimens with treatment-free intervals longer than 1 week present an attractive therapeutic option as they may offer additional patient convenience and long-term adherence to treatment. However, until recently, such regimens, usually referred to as intermittent or cyclical, have not shown any convincing antifracture efficacy in clinical trials, probably because of the empirical manner in which the design of these regimens has been approached. Investigation of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of bisphosphonates may help in the design of effective intermittent dosage regimens. Bisphosphonates are poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and about 50% of the absorbed drug is taken up selectively by the skeleton, while the rest is excreted unaltered in urine. Bisphosphonates exert their action at the bone surface, where they are taken up by the osteoclasts during bone resorption. Therefore, when describing the pharmacokinetics of bisphosphonates in relation to the pharmacodynamics, the amount of bisphosphonate at the skeleton should be accounted for. Few of the reported clinical pharmacokinetic studies addressed this issue. This is partly due to the absence of study design elements to account for skeletal binding of the drugs. Pharmacokinetic studies have also been hampered by technical difficulties in determining the concentration of bisphosphonates in serum and urine. Moreover, most clinical pharmacokinetic (but also pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic) studies have primarily used noncompartmental analysis, leaving out the distinct advantages of modelling and simulation techniques. Clinically, the primary action of bisphosphonates can be assessed by the measurement of biochemical markers of bone resorption. Recent studies indicate that the pattern of these markers during bisphosphonate treatment may be predictive of antifracture efficacy; however, only limited data are available for the development of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models that are able to predict the response of these markers to different treatment regimens with bisphosphonates. Recently, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models for response to bisphosphonates have been described and, at present, some of them are being used in the design of bisphosphonate regimens with long drug-free intervals.

Discovery, clinical development, and therapeutic uses of bisphosphonates

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature concerning the history, development, and therapeutic uses of bisphosphonates.

DATA SOURCES

English-language articles were identified through a search of MEDLINE (through December 2004) using the key word bisphosphonate. Reference lists of pivotal studies, reviews, and full prescribing information for the approved agents were also examined.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Selected studies included those that discussed the discovery and initial applications of bisphosphonates, as well as their historical development, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and current therapeutic uses.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Bisphosphonates structurally resemble pyrophosphates (naturally occurring polyphosphates) and have demonstrated similar physicochemical effects to pyrophosphates. In addition, bisphosphonates reduce bone turnover and resist hydrolysis when administered orally. The information gained from initial work with etidronate generated a considerable scientific effort to design new and more effective bisphosphonates. The PCP moiety in the general bisphosphonate structure is essential for binding to hydroxyapatite and allows for a number of chemical variations by changing the 2 lateral side chains (designated R(1) and R(2)). The R(1) side chain determines binding affinity to hydroxyapatite, and the R(2) side chain determines antiresorptive potency. Accordingly, each bisphosphonate has its own characteristic profile of activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The bisphosphonates reduce bone turnover, increase bone mass, and decrease fracture risk and therefore have a significant place in the management of skeletal disorders including osteoporosis, Paget's disease, bone metastases, osteogenesis imperfecta, and heterotopic ossification.

Extemporaneous Procedures for Dissolving Risedronate Tablets for Oral Administration and for Feeding Tubes

BACKGROUND:

Risedronate (Actonel, Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals) is commercially available only as film-coated tablets. Extemporaneous procedures for dissolving tablets for feeding tubes and for preparation of an oral liquid have not previously been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate procedures for dissolving risedronate sodium tablets for administration in liquid form and drug recovery following dissolution in cups and following passage through different types of feeding tubes.

METHODS:

Tablets (5 and 35 mg) were individually dispersed in 2 oz of water. After 2 minutes, the solution was stirred for 30 seconds, dispensed, and rinsed with an additional 4 oz of water. The sample was filtered and analyzed by HPLC. Ten replicates were performed using the various cups. Gastrostomy and nasoenteric tubes were flushed with 1 oz of water. Individual tablets were dispersed in 2 oz of water; after 2 minutes, the solution was stirred for 30 seconds and poured through the tube and flushed with 1 oz of water. Samples were filtered and analyzed by HPLC. Ten replicates were performed for each type of feeding tube.

RESULTS:

For cups, the mean amount of drug recovered ranged from 95.7% to 100.5% of the label claim, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) range of 1.1–6.3%. For gastrostomy and nasoenteric tubes, the mean amount of drug recovered ranged from 98.3% to 101.9% of label claim, with an RSD range of 0.9–3.3%.

CONCLUSIONS:

A simple and accurate procedure was developed for dissolving risedronate tablets in water to prepare a liquid formulation for administration orally or through feeding tubes.

Pharmacokinetic Considerations in Determining the Terminal Elimination Half-Lives of Bisphosphonates

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Bisphosphonates are commonly used to treat and prevent osteoporosis. These compounds have unusual pharmacokinetic characteristics because they bind strongly to bone, and a portion becomes buried under newly formed bone. Once incorporated into bone tissue, the subsequent release during bone remodeling is probably the rate-limiting step in the terminal elimination of bisphosphonates. Because of this unique property of bisphosphonates, pharmacokinetic studies with insufficient lengths of follow-up might entirely miss the true terminal elimination phase. A terminal half-life (t((1/2)gamma)) of approximately 11 years, similar to that of calcium and other minerals in bone, was reported from an 18-month study of alendronic acid in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. We are not aware of any other published reports in which the elimination of a bisphosphonate has been followed for more than a few weeks post-dose. The purpose of the present study was to reanalyse the alendronic acid data to examine the effect of truncating the length of follow-up on the calculated t((1/2)gamma).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (mean age 66 years) received intravenous alendronic acid 30mg over 4 consecutive days (7.5 mg/day), and urinary excretion of alendronic acid was monitored over the following 18-24 months. Terminal elimination half-life was originally calculated by log-linear regression of the percentage retained versus time curve between days 240 and 540 and substituting the slope of the regression line into the equation, t((1/2)gamma) = -log 2/slope. These data were reanalysed based on the period up to 30 days.

RESULTS

Data were sufficient for analysis of pharmacokinetics in 11 patients. A mean t((1/2)gamma) of approximately 11 years was reported previously, based on analysis of data between days 240 and 540. Recalculating the 'terminal' half-life of alendronic acid using only data from the first 30 days resulted in an 'observed' half-life of only 11 days.

CONCLUSION

This analysis illustrates the importance of sufficient length of follow-up to accurately characterise the true terminal elimination half-life of bisphosphonates. The relatively short (expressed in units of days rather than years) terminal elimination half-lives reported for some bisphosphonates based on only 30 days of follow-up or less are likely to substantially underestimate the true terminal elimination half-lives.

Ibandronate: a clinical pharmacological and pharmacokinetic update

Ibandronate is a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate. It has a strong affinity for bone mineral and potently inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. Ibandronate is effective for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy, metastatic bone disease, postmenopausal osteoporosis, corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, and Paget's disease. Oral ibandronate is rapidly absorbed (t(max) < 1 hour), with a low bioavailability (0.63%) that is further reduced (by up to 90%) in the presence of food. Ibandronate has a wide therapeutic index and is not metabolized and, therefore, has a low potential for drug interactions. Given its metabolic stability, ibandronate is eliminated from the blood by partitioning into bone (40%-50%) and through renal clearance (CL(R) approximately 60 mL/min). The CL(R) of ibandronate is linearly related to creatinine clearance. The sequestration of ibandronate in bone (V(D) > 90 L) results in a multiphasic elimination (t((1/2)) range approximately 10-60 hours), characterized by the slow release of ibandronate from the bone compartment. The potency of ibandronate and its sequestration into bone allow ibandronate to be developed as oral and intravenous injection formulations that can be administered with convenient extended between-dose intervals.

Intra-Subject Variability in Lung Dose in Healthy Volunteers Using Five Conventional Portable Inhalers

High intra-subject variability in lung dose achieved when using aerosol delivery systems may impact on the efficacy of treatment in clinical practice. While the dose delivered by metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) is highly reproducible when tested in vitro, the variability in dose delivered to the lungs is known to be high. It has been suggested that newer delivery systems such as dry powder inhalers (DPIs) or breath actuated pMDIs significantly reduce the intra-subject variability in lung dose, but this remains untested. The 30-min urinary salbutamol technique was used to assess intra-subject variability in lung dose for five portable inhaler devices. Thirteen healthy adult subjects inhaled salbutamol from five different devices. Each device was used at five separate study days, a total of 25 visits. The devices studied were the Evohaler pMDI, a pMDI with Volumatic (pMDI + HC), the Easibreath, the Accuhaler and the Turbohaler. Subjects inhaled 400 microg of salbutamol and produced a urine sample exactly 30 min later. Quantities of salbutamol contained in the urine were determined using an HPLC technique. The mean coefficient of variation (CV% and range) for lung dose were 31.8% (20.1-87.4) for the pMDI + HC, Easi-breathe 35.9% (10.4-66.2), Accuhaler 40.4% (15.6-75.2), Turbohaler 42.4% (20.7-74.2), and 52.0% (27.1-49.3) for the pMDI alone. There was no significant statistical significant difference between any of the devices. In seven of 13 subjects, the greatest lung dose was achieved with the Volumatic. The observed intra-subject in health volunteers is similar to the reported intra-subject variability of bioavailability for a number of oral medications. Though there was trend towards higher variability when using the pMDI, this was not statistically significant and was largely attributable to one subject in with a poor technique.

Bone safety of long-term bisphosphonate treatment

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are widely used in osteoporosis and other bone diseases. Treatment of osteoporosis would, in many instances, involve continued use of BP for a number of years, so it is pertinent to examine skeletal consequences of long-term BP use. Through a non-systematic review of the literature, this commentary considers the reduction in bone turnover and retention in the skeleton with regard to the long-term safety of BP use. BPs normalize bone turnover rates within weeks and no further suppression is seen during long term use, documented up to 10 years. This indicates that the BP retained in bone does not augment or contribute to the pharmacological activity of newly administered BP. Therefore, pharmacologically, long term treatment is not different from short term treatment. Multiple studies have shown that reductions in bone turnover are associated with increased bone density, more homogeneous mineralization, and reduced fracture risk. The amount of BP retained in bone after 10 years of alendronate treatment was estimated at 75 mg per 2 kg mineral, using a pharmacokinetic model for a dose of 10 mg per day. This small fraction, which is unevenly distributed between cancellous and cortical bone, seems unlikely to change bone mechanical properties. Taken together, the known mechanism of action of potent BPs and the experience accrued from treating a large number of patients, including up to 10 years follow-up in controlled trials, have identified only beneficial BP effects on bone.