GATA3 immunoreactivity expands the transcription factor profile of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone/Growth Hormone Cosecreting Pituitary Adenoma With Normal Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Level

Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH; thyrotropin) adenoma is a rare pituitary tumor that can be missed due to its subtle symptoms. We are reporting a 67-year-old man with history of ventricular fibrillation on amiodarone who presented with acute headache and right third cranial nerve palsy. His computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a 2.2-cm suprasellar mass, consistent with pituitary apoplexy, and he underwent pituitary tumor resection. Preoperational hormonal workup revealed TSH 0.25 mIU/mL (0.25 IU/L) (normal reference range: 0.35-4.94 mIU/mL; 0.35-4.94 IU/L), free thyroxine (T4) 3.17 ng/dL (40.80 pmol/L) (normal reference range: 0.7-1.48 ng/dL; 9.78-19.05 pmol/L), and total triiodothyronine (T3) 91 ng/dL (140 nmol/L) (normal reference range: 58-159 ng/dL; 89-244 nmol/L). Initial differential diagnoses included TSH-producing pituitary adenoma (TSH-oma) and amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis. His free T4 declined significantly postoperatively, favoring a TSH-oma diagnosis. The pathology report showed a TSH and growth hormone (GH) cosecreting adenoma. Furthermore, he had a normal thyroid uptake scan, as well as negative thyroid antibodies, making primary thyroid diseases less likely. A high free T4 with normal TSH 3 years ago, prior to the start of amiodarone, suggested a long disease duration. This case demonstrates challenges in diagnosing TSH-oma, especially in patients with normal TSH and concurrent amiodarone use.

Non-recurrent mutations and copy number changes predominate pituitary adenoma genomes

OBJECTIVE

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are common neoplasms. Our current understanding of the molecular basis of PA formation is incomplete. Routine implementation of targeted genomics has enabled the discovery of rare, potentially clinically actionable events.

METHODS

We used a cancer-focused gene panel to sequence a cohort of 171 PAs from patients who underwent surgery at Brigham and Women's Hospital from 2012 to 2020.

RESULTS

We identified known genetic variants enriched in specific PA subtypes: GNAS (somatotroph) and USP8 (Cushing's disease). Total mutational burden did not vary across adenoma subtypes; most adenomas possessed a few non-recurrent mutations in various established oncogenes and tumor suppressors. In contrast, the burden of copy number alterations varied widely across adenoma subtypes and was associated with higher MIB1 labeling index. We identified frequent deletions spanning MEN1 in prolactinomas and silent corticotroph adenomas, and subtype-specific copy number changes including 16p, 16q alterations in somatotroph adenomas without GNAS mutations. Within the corticotroph lineage, adenomas leading to Cushing's disease had few copy number alterations while silent corticotroph adenomas had numerous.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights a role for individualized genetic events in PA formation and suggests that divergent patterns of genomic instability may facilitate tumorigenesis even within the same lineage. Taken together, we demonstrate how gene panels may illuminate novel biology in endocrine tumors.

Comprehensive Classification of Surgically Resected Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Updates From a Single-Institution Experience Based on the WHO 5th Edition

BACKGROUND

The 5th edition of WHO classification (WHO5) renamed pituitary adenoma as pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET), aligning with NET nomenclature from other sites. This study investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of surgically resected PitNET based on the WHO5 classification.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 210 cases of surgically resected and pathologically confirmed PitNET treated at Seoul National University Hospital from 2021 to 2023. The tumors were graded using the French five-tiered grading system proposed by Trouillas et al. Detailed information on grade 3 metastatic PitNET cases is provided.

RESULTS

The cohort's median age was 53 years (age range: 8-84 years), with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.1. Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm (range: 0.1-6.5 cm). Macroadenomas predominated (91.9%), followed by microadenoma (6.7%), and giant tumors (1.4%), with 56.2% extending suprasellarly. SF1-lineage PitNET was most prevalent (49.5%), followed by PIT1-lineage (23.3%) and TPIT-lineage (17.1%). Null cell tumors (5.7%) and unclassified plurihormonal PitNET (4.3%) were rare. PIT1-lineage PitNET comprised somatotrophs (47.0%), mature plurihormonal PIT1 lineage tumors (18.4%), thyrotrophs (16.3%), immature PIT1-lineage tumors (16.3%), and acidophilic stem cell tumors (n=1), however, there was no lactotroph PitNET. Among SF1-lineage tumors, serologically non-functional tumors predominated (79%), while, immunohistochemically, 71.2% were gonadotrophin (FSH/LH)-positive. Tumor grades by the French five-tiered classification system were distributed as follows: grade 1a (58.1%), 1b (17.6%), 2a (16.2%), 2b (7.1%), and 3 (1.0%). Two cases of metastatic corticotroph PitNET were observed: The first case, a 50-year-old female had liver metastasis and experienced tumor recurrence 7 years after his initial diagnosis of PitNET, ultimately dying 9.5 years later. The primary tumor appeared bland, but the metastatic tumor exhibited a high mitotic rate and a Ki-67 index was 48%. The second case involved a 44-year-old man with metastases to the paranasal sinus, liver, and bone. Despite showing initial bland histopathology and a low proliferation index, this tumor displayed aggressive behavior. The patient had a recurrence 1.5 years after diagnosis, with additional metastases emerging 3 years later. He survived for 8.0 years and is currently disease-free following surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive analysis of surgically resected PitNETs using the new WHO5 classification provides valuable insights into the distribution of the subtypes in the surgical cohort. Key findings were the predominant gonadotroph PitNET, the absence of lactotroph PitNET, and the rarity of null cell tumors in surgical cases. The lack of lactotrophs was mainly due to medical treatment. This study highlights the discrepancy between serological and immunohistochemical findings of SF1-lineage PitNETs. While metastatic PitNET cases showed poor prognosis, the predictive value of the French grading system for PitNET requires further validation through extended follow-up.

Clinicopathologic Correlates of PIT1 and SF1-Multilineage Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors and the Diagnostic Utility of NKX2.2 Immunohistochemistry in Pituitary Pathology

CONTEXT.—

PIT1 and SF1-multilineage pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) have been defined since the classification of adenohypophysial tumors based on the PIT1, SF1, and TPIT transcription factors.

OBJECTIVE.—

To describe the clinicopathologic features of PIT1 and SF1-multilineage PitNETs and to contribute to the pituitary pathology practice by questioning the expression of NKX2.2 in PitNETs.

DESIGN.—

We reviewed 345 PitNETs and described the clinicopathologic features of 8 PIT1 and SF1-multilineage tumors. NKX2.2 positivity and staining pattern were compared to those of 45 PitNETs from the control group.

RESULTS.—

PIT1 and SF1-multilineage PitNET patients had a mean age of 41.13 (range, 14-58 years) and a mean tumor diameter of 14.0 mm (range, 8-20 mm). The most common clinical presentation was acromegaly (6 of 8), and postoperative remission was achieved in all patients. On histomorphologic examination, a pseudopapillary pattern was seen in 5 of the tumors, either focally or diffusely. In addition to PIT1 and SF1, there was a diffuse staining with growth hormone and a predominantly perinuclear staining with cytokeratin 18. With NKX2.2, all multilineage tumors were positive, of which 5 were diffuse and 3 were focal. In the control group, 8 tumors (8 of 45) were positive, of which only 1 was diffuse and 7 were focal.

CONCLUSIONS.—

In conclusion, NKX2.2 is a transcription factor that can be used as an additional tool in pituitary pathology, and PIT1 and SF1-multilineage PitNETs are specific tumors that usually present with acromegaly, show signs of a nonaggressive clinical course, have a pseudopapillary histomorphology, and express NKX2.2.

The Molecular Classification of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: Discovering the Genomic and Immune Landscape of Metastatic Disease

Pheochromocytomas (PCCs) and paragangliomas (PGLs, together PPGLs) are the most hereditary tumors known. PPGLs were considered benign, but the fourth edition of the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification redefined all PPGLs as malignant neoplasms with variable metastatic potential. The metastatic rate differs based on histopathology, genetic background, size, and location of the tumor. The challenge in predicting metastatic disease lies in the absence of a clear genotype-phenotype correlation among the more than 20 identified genetic driver variants. Recent advances in molecular clustering based on underlying genetic alterations have paved the way for improved cluster-specific personalized treatments. However, despite some clusters demonstrating a higher propensity for metastatic disease, cluster-specific therapies have not yet been widely adopted in clinical practice. Comprehensive genomic profiling and transcriptomic analyses of large PPGL cohorts have identified potential new biomarkers that may influence metastatic potential. It appears that no single biomarker alone can reliably predict metastatic risk; instead, a combination of these biomarkers may be necessary to develop an effective prediction model for metastatic disease. This review evaluates current guidelines and recent genomic and transcriptomic findings, with the aim of accurately identifying novel biomarkers that could contribute to a predictive model for mPPGLs, thereby enhancing patient care and outcomes.

Multilineage Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors Expressing TPIT and SF1: A Clinicopathological Series of Six Tumors

Tumors of adenohypophysial hormone-secreting cells, now classified as pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs), have been subclassified based on cell differentiation. Normal adenohypophysial cells have three lineages of differentiation driven by the transcription factors PIT1, TPIT, and SF1 which are responsible for the regulation of hormone gene expression; PIT1 drives expression of GH, PRL, and TSH, TPIT is required for POMC expression that gives rise to ACTH, and SF1 is the transcription factor responsible for FSH and LH expression. The vast majority of PitNETs follow these three lineage differentiation pathways but rare PitNETs show either no lineage differentiation or express biomarkers of more than one lineage. The recent WHO classification continued the terminology "plurihormonal" for tumors that have features of more than one lineage but a better term is "multilineage" since some tumors may express more than one lineage-specific transcription factor without the hormones that are driven by those factors. Recent data indicate that tumors with expression of PIT1 and SF1 are the most common multilineage PitNETs. Here we report the existence of rare PitNETs that express TPIT and SF1. The 6 patients (5 female, 1 male; mean age 54.8 years; range 35-84 years) represent less than 1% of patients in our series of PitNETs. Most patients had clinically silent tumors with no evidence of hormone excess and variable degrees of hypopituitarism; two had Cushing disease. All patients had macrotumors with a mean tumor size of 2.46 cm (range 1.1-5.0 cm). Crooke's hyaline change was identified in the nontumorous adenohypophysis of the two patients with Cushing disease. The mean Ki67 labeling index was 2.91% (range 2.03-3.94%). All tumors were negative for PIT1 and PIT1-lineage hormones (GH, PRL, and TSH). TPIT was focal in one tumor, and the remaining tumors had diffuse reactivity in more than 50% of tumor cells. SF1 expression was focal in 5 tumors and diffuse in one. Three tumors had variable expression of at least one gonadotropin (FSH or LH). GATA3 was expressed in two tumors. Variable ER-alpha expression was noted in three tumors. CAM5.2 was positive in all tumors. With the exception of two tumors causing Cushing disease, p27 expression was intact. Our study confirms that multilineage PitNETs expressing TPIT and SF1 occur but are extremely rare; they can be clinically non-functional or can cause Cushing disease. Irrespective of functional status of a PitNET, routine application of pituitary transcription factors is warranted to identify these tumors. Data on the molecular correlates and clinical significance are still needed for these rare multilineage PitNETs.

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors and granular cell pituicytomas at autopsy: Incidence, cell types, locations, and histogenesis in 150 pituitary glands

OBJECTIVES

The incidence of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors has been reported high at autopsy. This study aimed to detect many tumors in both anterior and posterior lobes to prove tumor histogenesis.

METHODS

In total, 150 pituitary glands were studied from the University of Kansas Medical Center from 1995 to 2000. The pituitary gland was sagittally sliced from anterior to posterior into 6 to 8 sections. When H&E-stained sections revealed tumors, the tumors were immunohistochemically stained for 6 pituitary hormones.

RESULTS

Among 150 autopsy cases, 38 (25.3%) harbored microadenomas, including 4 cases with double tumors. Twenty-three (54.7%) cases were negative to all pituitary hormones. Of the remaining 19 tumors, 13 (30.9%) were lactotrophs, with 4 cases being concomitantly somatotrophs and gonadotrophs, and 2 cases were corticotropes. More than 85% of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors were adjacent to the capsule. Thirteen (8.7%) granular cell pituicytomas were found in the posterior lobe. There were pituicytes transforming into granular cell tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence was 25.3% for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors and 8.7% for granular cell pituicytomas. Since most pituitary neuroendocrine tumors were adjacent to the pituitary capsule, the capsule appeared to be the germinal center. Both pituitary tumors belonged to the 2 different transcription factor lineages.

Reassessment of Plurihormonal Pituitary Adenomas/PitNETs

Plurihormonal pituitary adenomas/neuroendocrine tumors express multiple pituitary hormones and/or transcription factors, as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Three types exist based on Endocrine WHO 2022 classification: mature plurihormonal PIT1 (pituitary-specific POU-class homeodomain factor-1), immature PIT1-lineage tumors, and a third type with unusual combinations of pituitary hormones and/or transcription factors. However, since then, "somatogonatotroph"/"multilineage" tumors with PIT1/SF1 (steroidogenic factor 1) co-expression have been described, possibly confounding this classification. We performed a database search, from 2018 to 2023, to identify and reclassify tumors, correlating with neuroimaging and endocrinological features at presentation. We identified 22 cases: M 9:F 13, mean age at surgery 51±16 years. The most common symptoms at initial presentation were headaches and/or vision changes (6/22) and acromegaly (5/22). All tumors were macroadenomas, mean diameter of 25±17mm; 11/22 (50%) had cavernous sinus invasion. More than 70% of tumors clinically secreted at least 1 hormone, and 27% tumors secreted at least 2 different hormones. Four patients underwent >1 surgical intervention. Reclassification by IHC yielded almost exclusively 2 types: immature PIT1-lineage (9/22) and "somatogonadotroph"/"multilineage tumors" with PIT1/SF1 co-expression (12/22), the latter replacing mature plurihormonal tumors. One true unusual plurihormonal tumor was identified. The extent of growth hormone, prolactin, thyroid stimulating hormone, PIT1, and SF1 IHC was variable, but immunopositivity for follicle-stimulating hormone and/or luteinizing hormone was nearly confined to co-expressors, distinguishing these from immature PIT1-lineage tumors. In conclusion, tumor size, invasiveness, and endocrinopathies do not distinguish PIT1/SF1 co-expressing tumors from immature PIT1-lineage tumors preoperatively; only full IHC pituitary workup allows distinction.

Uncovering the shared genetic components of thyroid disorders and reproductive health

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to map the shared genetic component and relationships between thyroid and reproductive health traits to improve the understanding of the interplay between those domains.

DESIGN

A large-scale genetic analysis of thyroid traits (hyper- and hypothyroidism, and thyroid-stimulating hormone levels) was conducted in up to 743 088 individuals of European ancestry from various cohorts.

METHODS

We evaluated genetic associations using genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis, GWAS Catalog lookup, gene prioritization, mouse phenotype lookup, and genetic correlation analysis.

RESULTS

GWAS meta-analysis results for thyroid phenotypes showed that 50 lead variants out of 253 (including 5/52 of the novel hits) were linked to reproductive health in previous literature. Genetic correlation analyses revealed significant correlations between hypothyroidism and reproductive phenotypes. The results showed that 31.9% of thyroid-associated genes also had an impact on reproductive phenotypes, with the most affected functions being related to genitourinary tract issues.

CONCLUSIONS

The study discovers novel genetic loci linked to thyroid phenotypes and highlights the shared genetic determinants between thyroid function and reproductive health, providing evidence for the genetic pleiotropy and shared biological mechanisms between these traits in both sexes.

Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of a Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma With Invasion of the Medial Wall of the Cavernous Sinus

Thyroid-stimulating hormone-secreting adenomas (TSH-oma) are exceptionally rare.1 The primary treatment is surgical resection with radiation and pharmacotherapy postoperatively if subtotal resection, especially with cavernous sinus invasion.2 We present the case of a 29-year-old man with TSH-oma with cavernous sinus medial wall invasion. This is the first documented case with selective resection of the cavernous sinus medial wall to achieve a complete resection and biochemical remission in TSH-oma through endoscopic endonasal approach. The patient had elevated TSH and thyroid hormones with symptoms of weight loss, palpitations, excess sweating, and decreased endurance. MRI revealed a 1.3 × 2.1 × 1.2 cm contrast-enhancing sellar mass with rightward pituitary gland displacement without evidence of cavernous sinus invasion (Knosp 2). The patient consented to procedure/publication. No institutional review board approval needed per institution. We performed standard resection of the firm sellar tumor portion and noted that there was tumor invasion into the left cavernous sinus medial wall dura. The bony opening was expanded to expose the anterior wall of the cavernous sinus, which was opened to identify the cavernous internal carotid artery and the medial wall attachments. The thickened medial wall was completely resected. We achieved a complete tumor resection, and the patient's TSH and thyroid hormone dropped to a desired threshold.3 Tumor stained for GATA3 and PIT1, characterizing the TSH-oma.4,5 Understanding cavernous sinus vascular and ligamentous anatomy allows for safe separation of invaded medial wall dura from the cavernous internal carotid artery,6 allowing for a more complete tumor resection, improving surgical cure rates, and sparing the patient from future radiation and pharmacotherapy.

Does New WHO 2022 Nomenclature of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors Offer an Extra Edge to the Neurosurgeons for Its Management? A Narrative Review

The new World Health Organization nomenclature of pituitary tumors was introduced in the year 2022 after much deliberation. This nomenclature clearly demarcates the anterior lobe (adenohypophyseal), posterior lobe (neurohypophyseal), and hypothalamic tumors. There is also focus on other tumors arising in the sellar region. The nomenclature has also advocated the routine use of immunohistochemistry in describing the pituitary transcription factors that plays a fundamental role in distinguishing the cell lineage of these tumors. However, the nomenclature is complex in understanding due to inclusion of pathological correlates like transcription factors, hormones, biomarkers, and various controversies that have emerged regarding the renaming of pituitary adenomas (PA) as PiTNETs ("Pituitary Neuroendocrine tumors") because majority of the adenomas are benign and have rare metastatic behavior while classifying them as PiTNETs will create unnecessary misinterpretation of these as aggressive tumors that will lead to apprehension among the patients. The new classification gives deeper insight into the histological picture of the various pituitary tumors but other than contributing to the follow-up strategy and postsurgery management, this classification does not add anything new that could be advantageous for the neurosurgeons in clinical practice and decision making, especially in deciding the plan of action for surgery. Hence, there is need of a more comprehensive, integrated, neuroradiological-based classification with more emphasis on the invasiveness of these tumors that would assist the neurosurgeons in planning the treatment strategy and managing patients of pituitary tumors.

Histopathology of growth hormone-secreting pituitary tumors: State of the art and new perspectives

Somatotroph (GH) adenomas/PitNETs typically arise from adenohypophysis and are biochemically active, leading to acromegaly and gigantism. More rarely, they present with ectopic origin and do not present overt biochemical or clinical features (silent variants). Histopathological examination should consider the clinical and radiological background, and include multiple steps assessing tumor morphology, pituitary transcription factors (PTFs), hormone secretion, proliferation markers, granulation, and somatostatin receptors (STRs), aimed at depicting as better as possible tumor origin (in case of non-functioning and/or metastatic tumor), and clinical behavior, including response to treatment. GH-secreting tumors are part of the Pit-1 family tumors and can secrete GH only (pure somatotrophs) or co-secrete prolactin (mixed tumors; in this case, various histological subtypes have been identified). Each subtype presents unique radiological, biochemical, and clinical characteristic. Therefore, the integration of biochemical, clinical, radiological, and histopathological elements is fundamental for proper diagnosis and management of pituitary adenomas/PitNETs, to be performed in referral Centers. In more recent times, the importance of genetic and epigenetic evaluation in the characterization of pituitary tumors (i.e., early identification of aggressive variants) has been outlined by some large studies, with the intention of improving targeted treatments.

Hand2 Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis of Paragangliomas and Other Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Hand2 is a core transcription factor responsible for chromaffin cell differentiation. However, its potential utility in surgical pathology has not been studied. Thus, we aimed to investigate its expression in paragangliomas, other neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), and additional non-neuroendocrine tumors. We calibrated Hand2 immunohistochemistry on adrenal medulla cells and analyzed H-scores in 46 paragangliomas (PGs), 9 metastatic PGs, 21 cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors (CENETs), 48 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), 8 olfactory neuroblastomas (ONBs), 110 well-differentiated NETs (WDNETs), 10 adrenal cortical carcinomas, 29 adrenal cortical adenomas, 8 melanomas, 41 different carcinomas, and 10 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Both tissue microarrays (TMAs) and whole sections (WSs) were studied. In 171 NENs, previously published data on Phox2B and GATA3 were correlated with Hand2. Hand2 was positive in 98.1% (54/55) PGs, but only rarely in WDNETs (9.6%, 10/104), CENETs (9.5%, 2/21), NECs (4.2%, 2/48), or ONBs (12.5%, 1/8). Any Hand2 positivity was 98.1% sensitive and 91.7% specific for the diagnosis of PG. The Hand2 H-score was significantly higher in primary PGs compared to Hand2-positive WDNETs (median 166.3 vs. 7.5; p < 0.0001). Metastatic PGs were positive in 88.9% (8/9). No Hand2 positivity was observed in any adrenal cortical neoplasm or other non-neuroendocrine tumors, with exception of 8/10 GISTs. Parasympathetic PGs showed a higher Hand2 H-score compared to sympathetic PGs (median H-scores 280 vs. 104, p < 0.0001). Hand2 positivity in NENs serves as a reliable marker of primary and metastatic PG, since other NENs only rarely exhibit limited Hand2 positivity.

Transcription Factor Immunohistochemistry in the Classification of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor/Adenoma: Proposal in a Limited-Resource Setting

CONTEXT.—

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/adenomas are common intracranial tumors that require accurate subtyping because each tumor differs in its biologic behavior and response to treatment. Pituitary-specific transcription factors allow for improved lineage identification and diagnosis of newly introduced variants.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess the usefulness of transcription factors and design a limited panel of immunostains for classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/adenoma.

DESIGN.—

A total of 356 tumors were classified as per expression of pituitary hormones and transcription factors T-box family member TBX19 (TPIT), pituitary-specific POU-class homeodomain (PIT1), and steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1). The resultant classification was correlated with patients' clinical and biochemical features. The performance and relevance of individual immunostains were analyzed.

RESULTS.—

Reclassification of 34.8% (124 of 356) of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/adenoma was done after application of transcription factors. The highest agreement with final diagnosis was seen using a combination of hormone and transcription factors. SF-1 had higher sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value compared with follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. On the other hand, TPIT and PIT1 had similar performance and Allred scores compared with their respective hormones.

CONCLUSIONS.—

SF-1 and PIT1 should be included in the routine panel for guiding the classification. PIT1 positivity needs to be followed by hormone immunohistochemistry, especially in nonfunctional cases. TPIT and adrenocorticotropin can be used interchangeably as per availability of the lab.

Differences in invasiveness and recurrence rate among nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors depending on tumor subtype

PURPOSE

To clarify the invasiveness to surrounding structures and recurrence rate of each subtype of nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (Pit-NETs) according to the WHO 2022 classification.

METHODS

This retrospective study utilized data from 292 patients with nonfunctioning Pit-NETs treated with initial transsphenoidal surgery. Recurrence was evaluated on 113 patients who were available for a magnetic resonance imaging follow-up ≥ 60 months. All tumors were assessed by immunohistochemical staining for Pit-1, T-PIT, and GATA3. Invasiveness to surrounding structures was evaluated based on intraoperative findings.

RESULTS

Cavernous sinus invasion was found in 47.5% of null cell tumors, 50.0% of Pit-1 lineage tumors, 31.8% of corticotroph tumors, and 18.3% of gonadotroph tumors. Dura mater defects in the floor of sellar turcica, indicating dural invasion, were found in 44.3% of null cell tumors, 36.4% of corticotroph tumors, 16.7% of Pit-1 lineage tumors, and 17.3% of gonadotroph tumors. In logistic regression analysis, Pit-1 (OR 5.90, 95% CI 1.71-20.4, P = 0.0050) and null tumors (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.86-9.23, P = 0.0005) were associated with cavernous sinus invasion. Recurrence was found in 8 (4.9%) patients, but without significant differences between tumor subtypes. The presence of cavernous sinus invasion was correlated with recurrence (HR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.10-3.46, P = 0.0227).

CONCLUSION

Among nonfunctioning Pit-NETs, Pit-1 lineage tumors tend to invade the cavernous sinus, corticotroph tumors may produce dura mater defects, and null cell tumors tend to cause both. Pit-NETs with cavernous sinus invasion require a careful attention to recurrence.

Mimickers of neuroendocrine tumors on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirate material: Need for caution

Cytologic diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors can be straightforward on cytologic preparations, given the classical neuroendocrine morphology and expression of neuroendocrine markers confirmed by immunohistochemistry. However, overreliance on neuroendocrine markers can lead to misdiagnosis even if individual cell features suggest a neuroendocrine tumor. We present three unusual cases, two of which were initially diagnosed as neuroendocrine tumors and the third one carried preliminary diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates. These cases subsequently turned out to be cholangioblastic cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic melanoma, and gastric glomus tumor, respectively. We suggest approaches that could have pointed us towards the correct diagnosis at the outset and discuss potential pitfalls.

A Case of an Immature PIT1-Lineage Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Nasopharynx

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) located in the nasopharynx are a rare occurrence. This case report highlights a case of a 64-year-old female diagnosed with a PitNET incidentally found in her nasopharynx. The tumor was initially seen on MRI, excised, and analyzed with immunohistochemistry, ultimately confirming an immature pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1 (PIT1)-positive-lineage pituitary neuroendocrine tumor. The tumor contained thyrotropes, somatotrophs, and lactotrophs expressing thyroid stimulating hormone, growth hormone, and prolactin, respectively. These tumors have the potential to exhibit aggressive behavior and can disrupt the surrounding tissue. Furthermore, they can be clinically silent or, conversely, secrete multiple hormones, causing hyperthyroidism, hyperprolactinemia, and acromegaly. For these reasons, they are deemed high risk. Treatment includes surgical excision with or without anti-hormone medications prior to surgery. Medications such as somatostatin analogs are used to decrease tumor size and reduce excessive hormone excretion.

Unveiling the identities of null cell tumours: Epigenomics corroborate subtle histological cues in pituitary neuroendocrine tumour/adenoma classification

AIMS

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumour (PitNET)/adenoma classification is based on cell lineage and requires immunopositivity for adenohypophysial hormones and/or transcription factors (TFs) steroidogenic factor 1 (SF1), T-box transcription factor TBX19 (TPIT) or pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1 (PIT1). PitNET/adenomas lacking lineage affiliation are termed 'null cell' tumours (NCTs). NCT diagnosis may be afflicted by methodological limitations and inconsistent diagnostic approaches. Previous studies have questioned the existence of true NCTs. In this study, we explore the epigenomic identities of PitNET/adenomas lacking clear TF immunopositivity.

METHODS

Seventy-four hormone-negative PitNET/adenomas were immunostained and scored for SF1, TPIT and PIT1 expression. All tumours were classified as gonadotroph, corticotroph, PIT1-positive or 'null cell'. NCTs were subjected to global DNA methylation analysis. Epigenomic profiles of NCTs were compared to reference tumours using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) plotting and methylation-based classification.

RESULTS

TF immunostaining revealed definite lineage identity in 59 of 74 (79.7%) hormone-negative PitNET/adenomas. Of the remaining 15 NCTs, 13 demonstrated minimal and inconclusive nuclear SF1 or TPIT expression (5 and 8, respectively). Two NCTs were entirely immunonegative. UMAP plotting and methylation-based classification demonstrated that the epigenomes of NCTs with minimal SF1 or TPIT expression were adequately affiliated with gonadotroph or corticotroph lineages, respectively. The two immunonegative NCTs were located near the corticotroph PitNET/adenomas via UMAP, whereas the methylation classifier could not match these two cases to predefined tumour classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Epigenomic analyses substantiate lineage identification based on minimal TF immunopositivity in PitNET/adenomas. This strategy dramatically decreases the incidence of NCTs and further challenges the legitimacy of NCTs as a distinct PitNET/adenoma subtype. Our study may be useful for guiding diagnostic efforts and future considerations of PitNET/adenoma classification.

Phox2B is a sensitive and reliable marker of paraganglioma-Phox2B immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms

Phox2B is a transcription factor responsible for chromaffin cell phenotype. Although it is used routinely for diagnosis of neuroblastoma, previous reports concerning its utility in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms have been conflicting. We assessed Phox2b immunoreactivity in different neuroendocrine neoplasms. Tissue microarrays or whole sections of 36 paragangliomas (PGs), 91 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours of different organs (WDNETs), 31 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), and 6 olfactory neuroblastomas (ONBs) were stained with Phox2B antibody (EP312) and GATA3. The percentage of positive cells and intensity was analysed using H-score. Phox2B immunoreactivity was seen in 97.2% (35/36) PGs, 11% (10/91) WDNETs, 9.7% (3/31) NECs, and 16.7% (1/6) ONBs. PGs were significantly more often positive (p < 0.001, χ²) than other neuroendocrine tumours, showing highest H-score (mean 144.9, SD ± 75.1) and percentage of positive cells (median 81.3%, IQR 62.5-92.5%). Compared to Phox2B-positive WDNETs, PGs showed significantly higher H-score (median 145 vs 7.5, p < 0.001) and percentage of positive cells (median 82.5% vs 4.5%, p < 0.001). Phox2B positivity was 97.2% sensitive and 89% specific for the diagnosis of PG. GATA3 was 100% sensitive and 88% specific for the diagnosis of PG. When combined, any Phox2B/GATA3 coexpression was 97.1% sensitive and 99.1% specific for the diagnosis of paraganglioma. Widespread Phox2B immunoreactivity is a highly characteristic feature of PGs and it can be used as an additional marker in differential diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumours.

An Overview of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors (PitNET) and Algorithmic Approach to Diagnosis

The diagnostic algorithm and nomenclature of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors have evolved over the past decade, beginning with simpler categorical schemes focused on histomorphologic features and moving to a more sophisticated lineage-specific categorization. This contemporary overview highlights a multimodal approach to pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with a focus on changes in nomenclature, classification, and subclassification; including, brief comments on treatment, and new guidelines for genetic screening, particularly for young patients with such neoplasms.

Transcription Factor Expression in Sinonasal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Olfactory Neuroblastoma (ONB): Hyams' Grades 1-3 ONBs Expand the Spectrum of SATB2 and GATA3-Positive Neoplasms

Sinonasal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SN-NENs) are rare and mostly include neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), whereas neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is exceptional in this site. Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a malignant neuroectodermal neoplasm arising in the nasal cavity. Albeit crucial for correct patients' management, the distinction of high grade ONB from NEC is challenging and requires additional diagnostic markers. The transcription factor SATB2 has been recently introduced in routine diagnostics as an immunohistochemical marker of distal intestine differentiation. No specific data are available about SATB2 and GATA3 expression in SN-NENs. GATA3, SATB2, and, for comparison, CDX2 expression were investigated in a series of epithelial and non-epithelial SN-NENs. We collected 26 cases of ONB and 7 cases of epithelial SN-NENs diagnosed and treated in our Institution. ONBs were graded according to Hyams' system and epithelial NENs were reclassified into 5 NECs, 1 MiNEN, and 1 amphicrine carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed using standard automated protocols. Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs stained diffusely and intensely for SATB2, whereas grade 4 ONBs and NECs were globally negative. The non-neuroendocrine component of MiNEN and the amphicrine carcinoma were strongly positive. GATA3 was heterogeneously and unpredictably expressed in Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs, whereas grade 4 ONBs and NECs were completely negative. CDX2 was negative in all cases. Our study identifies, for the first time, SATB2 and GATA3 expression as features of Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs, expands the spectrum of SATB2 and GATA3-positive neoplasms, and suggests that Hyams' grade 4 ONBs are not only clinically but also biologically different from low graded ONBs.

Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Head and Neck Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

This review article provides a brief overview of the new WHO classification by adopting a question-answer model to highlight the spectrum of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms which includes epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas) arising from upper aerodigestive tract and salivary glands, and special neuroendocrine neoplasms including middle ear neuroendocrine tumors (MeNET), ectopic or invasive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET; formerly known as pituitary adenoma) and Merkel cell carcinoma as well as non-epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (paragangliomas). The new WHO classification follows the IARC/WHO nomenclature framework and restricts the diagnostic term of neuroendocrine carcinoma to poorly differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms. In this classification, well-differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms are termed as neuroendocrine tumors (NET), and are graded as G1 NET (no necrosis and < 2 mitoses per 2 mm²; Ki67 < 20%), G2 NET (necrosis or 2-10 mitoses per 2 mm², and Ki67 < 20%) and G3 NET (> 10 mitoses per 2 mm² or Ki67 > 20%, and absence of poorly differentiated cytomorphology). Neuroendocrine carcinomas (> 10 mitoses per 2 mm², Ki67 > 20%, and often associated with a Ki67 > 55%) are further subtyped based on cytomorphological characteristics as small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. Unlike neuroendocrine carcinomas, head and neck NETs typically show no aberrant p53 expression or loss of RB reactivity. Ectopic or invasive PitNETs are subtyped using pituitary transcription factors (PIT1, TPIT, SF1, GATA3, ER-alpha), hormones and keratins (e.g., CAM5.2). The new classification emphasizes a strict correlation of morphology and immunohistochemical findings in the accurate diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms. A particular emphasis on the role of biomarkers in the confirmation of the neuroendocrine nature of a neoplasm and in the distinction of various neuroendocrine neoplasms is provided by reviewing ancillary tools that are available to pathologists in the diagnostic workup of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms. Furthermore, the role of molecular immunohistochemistry in the diagnostic workup of head and neck paragangliomas is discussed. The unmet needs in the field of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms are also discussed in this article. The new WHO classification is an important step forward to ensure accurate diagnosis that will also form the basis of ongoing research in this field.

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas

This review summarizes the classification of tumors of the adrenal medulla and extra-adrenal paraganglia as outlined in the 5th series of the WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. The non-epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) known as paragangliomas produce predominantly catecholamines and secrete them into the bloodstream like hormones, and they represent a group of NENs that have exceptionally high genetic predisposition. This classification discusses the embryologic derivation of the cells that give rise to these lesions and the historical evolution of the terminology used to classify their tumors; paragangliomas can be sympathetic or parasympathetic and the term pheochromocytoma is used specifically for intra-adrenal paragangliomas that represent the classical sympathetic form. In addition to the general neuroendocrine cell biomarkers INSM1, synaptophysin, and chromogranins, these tumors are typically negative for keratins and instead have highly specific biomarkers, including the GATA3 transcription factor and enzymes involved in catecholamine biosynthesis: tyrosine hydroxylase that converts L-tyrosine to L-DOPA as the rate-limiting step in catecholamine biosynthesis, dopamine beta-hydroxylase that is present in cells expressing norepinephrine, and phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase, which converts norepinephrine to epinephrine and therefore can be used to distinguish tumors that make epinephrine. In addition to these important tools that can be used to confirm the diagnosis of a paraganglioma, new tools are recommended to determine genetic predisposition syndromes; in addition to the identification of precursor lesions, molecular immunohistochemistry can serve to identify associations with SDHx, VHL, FH, MAX, and MEN1 mutations, as well as pseudohypoxia-related pathogenesis. Paragangliomas have a well-formed network of sustentacular cells that express SOX10 and S100, but this is not a distinctive feature, as other epithelial NENs also have sustentacular cells. Indeed, it is the presence of such cells and the association with ganglion cells that led to a misinterpretation of several unusual lesions as paragangliomas; in the 2022 WHO classification, the tumor formerly known as cauda equina paraganglioma is now classified as cauda equina neuroendocrine tumor and the lesion known as gangliocytic paraganglioma has been renamed composite gangliocytoma/neuroma and neuroendocrine tumor (CoGNET). Since the 4th edition of the WHO, paragangliomas have no longer been classified as benign and malignant, as any lesion can have metastatic potential and there are no clear-cut features that can predict metastatic behavior. Moreover, some tumors are lethal without metastatic spread, by nature of local invasion involving critical structures. Nevertheless, there are features that can be used to identify more aggressive lesions; the WHO does not endorse the various scoring systems that are reviewed but also does not discourage their use. The identification of metastases is also complex, particularly in patients with germline predisposition syndromes, since multiple lesions may represent multifocal primary tumors rather than metastatic spread; the identification of paragangliomas in unusual locations such as lung or liver is not diagnostic of metastasis, since these may be primary sites. The value of sustentacular cells and Ki67 labeling as prognostic features is also discussed in this new classification. A staging system for pheochromocytoma and extra-adrenal sympathetic PGLs, introduced in the 8th Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, is now included. This paper also provides a summary of the criteria for the diagnosis of a composite paragangliomas and summarizes the classification of neuroblastic tumors. This review adopts a practical question-answer framework to provide members of the multidisciplinary endocrine oncology team with a most up-to-date approach to tumors of the adrenal medulla and extra-adrenal paraganglia.

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

In this review, we detail the changes and the relevant features that are applied to neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in the 2022 WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. Using a question-and-answer approach, we discuss the consolidation of the nomenclature that distinguishes neuronal paragangliomas from epithelial neoplasms, which are divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The criteria for these distinctions based on differentiation are outlined. NETs are generally (but not always) graded as G1, G2, and G3 based on proliferation, whereas NECs are by definition high grade; the importance of Ki67 as a tool for classification and grading is emphasized. The clinical relevance of proper classification is explained, and the importance of hormonal function is examined, including eutopic and ectopic hormone production. The tools available to pathologists for accurate classification include the conventional biomarkers of neuroendocrine lineage and differentiation, INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranins, and somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), but also include transcription factors that can identify the site of origin of a metastatic lesion of unknown primary site, as well as hormones, enzymes, and keratins that play a role in functional and structural correlation. The recognition of highly proliferative, well-differentiated NETs has resulted in the need for biomarkers that can distinguish these G3 NETs from NECs, including stains to determine expression of SSTRs and those that can indicate the unique molecular pathogenetic alterations that underlie the distinction, for example, global loss of RB and aberrant p53 in pancreatic NECs compared with loss of ATRX, DAXX, and menin in pancreatic NETs. Other differential diagnoses are discussed with recommendations for biomarkers that can assist in correct classification, including the distinctions between epithelial and non-epithelial NENs that have allowed reclassification of epithelial NETs in the spine, in the duodenum, and in the middle ear; the first two may be composite tumors with neuronal and glial elements, and as this feature is integral to the duodenal lesion, it is now classified as composite gangliocytoma/neuroma and neuroendocrine tumor (CoGNET). The many other aspects of differential diagnosis are detailed with recommendations for biomarkers that can distinguish NENs from non-neuroendocrine lesions that can mimic their morphology. The concepts of mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine (MiNEN) and amphicrine tumors are clarified with information about how to approach such lesions in routine practice. Theranostic biomarkers that assist patient management are reviewed. Given the significant proportion of NENs that are associated with germline mutations that predispose to this disease, we explain the role of the pathologist in identifying precursor lesions and applying molecular immunohistochemistry to guide genetic testing.

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors

This review summarizes the changes in the 5th Edition of the WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors that relate to the pituitary gland. The new classification clearly distinguishes anterior lobe (adenohypophyseal) from posterior lobe (neurohypophyseal) and hypothalamic tumors. Other tumors arising in the sellar region are also discussed. Anterior lobe tumors include (i) well-differentiated adenohypophyseal tumors that are now classified as pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs; formerly known as pituitary adenomas), (ii) pituitary blastoma, and (iii) the two types of craniopharyngioma. The new WHO classification provides detailed histological subtyping of a PitNET based on the tumor cell lineage, cell type, and related characteristics. The routine use of immunohistochemistry for pituitary transcription factors (PIT1, TPIT, SF1, GATA3, and ERα) is endorsed in this classification. The major PIT1, TPIT, and SF1 lineage-defined PitNET types and subtypes feature distinct morphologic, molecular, and clinical differences. The "null cell" tumor, which is a diagnosis of exclusion, is reserved for PitNETs with no evidence of adenohypophyseal lineage differentiation. Unlike the 2017 WHO classification, mammosomatotroph and acidophil stem cell tumors represent distinct PIT1-lineage PitNETs. The diagnostic category of PIT1-positive plurihormonal tumor that was introduced in the 2017 WHO classification is replaced by two clinicopathologically distinct PitNETs: the immature PIT1-lineage tumor (formerly known as silent subtype 3 tumor) and the mature plurihormonal PIT1-lineage tumor. Rare unusual plurihormonal tumors feature multi-lineage differentiation. The importance of recognizing multiple synchronous PitNETs is emphasized to avoid misclassification. The term "metastatic PitNET" is advocated to replace the previous terminology "pituitary carcinoma" in order to avoid confusion with neuroendocrine carcinoma (a poorly differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasm). Subtypes of PitNETs that are associated with a high risk of adverse biology are emphasized within their cell lineage and cell type as well as based on clinical variables. Posterior lobe tumors, the family of pituicyte tumors, include the traditional pituicytoma, the oncocytic form (spindle cell oncocytoma), the granular cell form (granular cell tumor), and the ependymal type (sellar ependymoma). Although these historical terms are entrenched in the literature, they are nonspecific and confusing, such that oncocytic pituicytoma, granular cell pituicytoma, and ependymal pituicytoma are now proposed as more accurate. Tumors with hypothalamic neuronal differentiation are classified as gangliocytomas or neurocytomas based on large and small cell size, respectively. This classification sets the standard for a high degree of sophistication to allow individualized patient management approaches.

An Update on Silent Corticotroph Adenomas: Diagnosis, Mechanisms, Clinical Features, and Management

Simple Summary

The 2017 World Health Organization classification of endocrine tumors defines pituitary adenomas based on their cell lineages. T-PIT can serve as a complimentary tool for further identification of silent corticotroph adenomas (SCAs). Unlike functioning corticotroph adenomas in patients with Cushing’s disease, SCAs present no clinical and biochemical features of Cushing’s syndrome. SCAs have been shown to exhibit a more aggressive course characterized by a higher probability of recurrence and resistance to conventional treatment due to their intrinsic histological features. The aim of our review is to offer an update on the diagnosis, mechanisms, clinical features and management of SCAs. Studies of the molecular mechanisms of SCA pathogenesis will provide new directions for the diagnosis and management of SCAs.

Abstract

With the introduction of 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of endocrine tumors, T-PIT can serve as a complementary tool for identification of silent corticotroph adenomas (SCAs) in some cases if the tumor is not classifiable by pituitary hormone expression in pathological tissue samples. An increase of the proportion of SCAs among the non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) has been witnessed under the new rule with the detection of T-PIT-positive ACTH-negative SCAs. Studies of molecular mechanisms related to SCA pathogenesis will provide new directions for the diagnosis and management of SCAs. A precise pathological diagnosis can help clinicians better identify SCAs. Understanding clinical features in the context of the pathophysiology of SCAs is critical for optimal management. It could provide information on appropriate follow-up time and aid in early recognition and treatment of potentially aggressive forms. Management approaches include surgical, radiation, and/or medical therapies.

Clinical Relevance of New World Health Organization Classification System for Pituitary Adenomas: A Validation Study With 2-Year Experience

Background

The new World Health Organization (WHO) classification system proposed a cell lineage-based classification scheme for pituitary adenomas in which transcription factors (TFs) play a major role as key classifiers. We aimed to evaluate clinical relevance of the new classification system in a clinical setting.

Methods

TF staining was retrospectively performed for 153 clinically and histologically well characterized pituitary adenomas. Then, 484 pituitary adenomas were prospectively stained for TFs and then for relevant pituitary hormones. TF and hormone stain-based diagnoses were compared, and differences in clinical manifestations were evaluated.

Results

The accuracies of antibodies for three TFs were successfully validated and had an overall matching rate was 89.6%. We identified 50 (10.4%) cases with discrepancies between TF and pituitary hormone stains. Gonadotroph adenomas lacking follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone stains account for most discrepancies. Null cell adenomas may be more prevalent than reported and may be clinically more aggressive than gonadotroph adenomas.

Conclusion

The new WHO classification is mostly well matched with the traditional classification. However, until the new classification is further validated and interpreted in the context of long-term clinical outcomes, routine histological examination should include full slate of immunostains for pituitary hormones as well as TFs.

Role of GATA3 in tumor diagnosis: A review

GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) belongs to a family of transcription factors comprising six members. These proteins identify G-A-T-A containing sequences in the target gene and bind to DNA target via two zinc-finger domains. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of GATA3 in the diagnosis of tumors and its value as a prognostic marker. To perform this review, a comprehensive search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases from 1985 to 2020. Articles were considered thoroughly by independent reviewers and data were extracted in predefined forms. Final synthesis was conducted by using appropriate data from included articles in each topic. Studies have shown that GATA3 has a critical role in the development of epithelial structures in both embryonic and adult tissues. The majority of studies regarding GATA3 expression in tumor evaluation focused on breast and urothelial neoplasms, whether primary or metastatic. Its sensitivity in these neoplasms has been reported to be high and made this marker more valuable than other available immunohistochemistry markers. However, GATA3 expression was not restricted to these tumors. Studies have shown that GATA3 immunostaining could be a useful tool in various tumors in kidney, salivary gland, endocrine system, hematopoietic system, and skin. GATA3 can also be used as a useful prognostic tool. Although GATA3 is a multi-specific immunohistochemical stain, it is a valuable marker in the panel for confirming many epithelial or mesenchymal neoplasms as both a diagnostic and prognostic tool.

[Recommendations on the pathological report of pituitary tumors. A consensus of experts of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition and the Spanish Society of Pathology]

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) constitute, together with other tumors of the sellar region, 15-25% of intracranial neoplasms. In 2017, the World Health Organization proposed a new classification of PitNETs. The main innovation with respect to the 2004 classification was the recommendation to include in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PitNETs the determination of the transcription factors of the 3 pituitary cell lineages: Pit-1, Tpit and SF-1. Additionally, other clinicopathological classifications with a predictive capacity of tumor behavior during follow-up were proposed. Given these changes, it is appropriate to adapt the knowledge generated during the last 15 years to the daily practice of the treatment and monitoring of PitNETs at the Centers of Excellence in Pituitary Pathology. This document includes the positioning of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) on the classification and denomination of the PitNETs and the information that the pathologist should provide to the clinician to facilitate the treatment and monitoring of these tumors.

Recommendations on the pathological report of pituitary tumors. A consensus of experts of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition and the Spanish Society of Pathology

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) constitute, together with other tumors of the sellar region, 15-25% of intracranial neoplasms. In 2017, the World Health Organization proposed a new classification of PitNETs. The main innovation with respect to the 2004 classification was the recommendation to include in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PitNETs the determination of the transcription factors of the 3 pituitary cell lineages: Pit-1, Tpit and SF-1. Additionally, other clinicopathological classifications with a predictive capacity of tumor behavior during follow-up were proposed. Given these changes, it is appropriate to adapt the knowledge generated during the last 15 years to the daily practice of the treatment and monitoring of PitNETs at the Centers of Excellence in Pituitary Pathology. This document includes the positioning of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) on the classification and denomination of the PitNETs and the information that the pathologist should provide to the clinician to facilitate the treatment and monitoring of these tumors.

Challenges in the Diagnosis of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

Detailed analysis of cytodifferentiation and hormone production has classified pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) in a formal system that reflects the lineage differentiation of nontumorous adenohypophysial cells as well as subtypes of tumors that have predictive value. In addition, tumors composed of cells that lack terminal differentiation are well characterized. To comply with the proposal to create an overarching classification of neuroendocrine neoplasia, these tumors are now called PitNETs rather than adenomas. The next important step will be to relinquish the term "pituitary carcinoma" for metastatic PitNETs that remain well differentiated, and to alter the terminology used for tumors that are not terminally differentiated to reflect only their immature lineage. The existence of mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) similar to those at other body sites is proven by mixed craniopharyngiomas with PitNETs. As with other NETs, these neoplasms should be reported with synoptic data that guide completeness of reporting. A formal system of grading should be created, but not only based on proliferation, as these tumors have shown the prognostic value of cytodifferentiation. A formal system of staging should also be devised to complement grade in the thorough and accurate diagnosis of tumors that arise from adenohypophysial cells.

An Update on Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors Leading to Acromegaly and Gigantism

An excess of growth hormone (GH) results in accelerated growth and in childhood, the clinical manifestation is gigantism. When GH excess has its onset after epiphyseal fusion at puberty, the overgrowth of soft tissue and bone results in acromegaly. Persistent GH excess in gigantism also causes acromegalic features that become evident in the adult years. The causes of GH excess are primarily lesions in the pituitary, which is the main source of GH. In this review, we provide an update on the clinical, radiological and pathologic features of the various types of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) that produce GH. These tumors are all derived from PIT1-lineage cells. Those composed of somatotrophs may be densely granulated, resembling normal somatotrophs, or sparsely granulated with unusual fibrous bodies. Those composed of mammosomatotrophs also produce prolactin; rare plurihormonal tumors composed of cells that resemble mammosomatotrophs also produce TSH. Some PitNETs are composed of immature PIT1-lineage cells that do not resemble differentiated somatotrophs, mammosomatotrophs, lactotroph or thyrotrophs; these tumors may cause GH excess. An unusual oncocytic PIT1-lineage tumor known as the acidophil stem cell tumor is predominantly a lactotroph tumor but may express GH. Immature PIT1-lineage cells that express variable amounts of hormones alone or in combination can sometimes cause GH excess. Unusual tumors that do not follow normal lineage differentiation may also secrete GH. Exceptional examples of acromegaly/gigantism are caused by sellar tumors composed of hypothalamic GHRH-producing neurons, alone or associated with a sparsely granulated somatotroph tumor. Each of these various tumors has distinct clinical, biochemical and radiological features. Data from careful studies based on morphologic subtyping indicate that morphologic classification has both prognostic and predictive value.

Cytokeratin 8/18-negative somatotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs, adenomas) show variable morphological features and do not represent a clinicopathologically distinct entity

AIMS

In somatotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (adenomas), a pattern of cytokeratin (CK) 18 expression is used for tumour subclassification, with possible clinical implications. Rare somatotroph tumours do not express CK 18. We aimed to characterise this subset clinically and histologically.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical and pathological data for the study were derived from a previously published data set of a cohort of 110 patients with acromegaly. Data included serum levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), growth hormone (GH), prolactin and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), tumour diameter, tumour invasion defined by Knosp grade and immunohistochemical data concerning the expression of Ki67, p53, E-cadherin, somatostatin receptor (SSTR)1, SSTR2A, SSTR3, SSTR5 and D2 dopamine receptor. Additional immunohistochemical analysis (AE1/3, CK 8/18, vimentin, neurofilament light chain, internexin-α) was performed. CK 18 was negative in 10 of 110 (9.1%) tumours. One of these tumours was immunoreactive with CK 8/18 antibody, while the remainder expressed only internexin-α intermediate filament in patterns similar to CK 18 (perinuclear fibrous bodies). CK-negative tumours showed no significant differences with respect to biochemical, radiological or pathological features. They showed significantly higher expression of SSTR2A compared to the sparsely granulated subtype and significantly lower expression of E-cadherin compared to the non-sparsely granulated subtypes of tumours. The tumours showed divergent morphology and hormonal expression: two corresponded to densely granulated tumours and three showed co-expression of prolactin and morphology of either mammosomatotroph or somatotroph-lactotroph tumours. Four tumours showed morphology and immunoprofile compatible with plurihormonal Pit1-positive tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

CK-negative somatotroph tumours do not represent a distinct subtype of somatotroph tumours, and can be further subdivided according to their morphology and immunoprofile.

Expression of additional transcription factors is of prognostic value for aggressive behavior of pituitary adenomas

OBJECTIVE

According to the latest WHO classification of tumors of endocrine organs in 2017, plurihormonal adenomas are subclassified by their transcription factor (TF) expression. In the group of plurihormonal adenomas with unusual immunohistochemical combinations (PAWUC), the authors identified a large fraction of adenomas expressing TFs for gonadotroph adenoma (TFGA) cells in addition to other TFs. The aim of this study was to compare clinicopathological parameters of PAWUC with TFGA expression to gonadotroph adenomas that only express TFGA.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center series comprises 73 patients with TFGA-positive pituitary adenomas (SF1, GATA3, estrogen receptor α): 22 PAWUC with TFGA (TFGA-plus group) and 51 with TFGA expression only (TFGA-only group). Patient characteristics, outcome parameters, rate of invasiveness (assessed by direct endoscopic inspection), and MIB1 and MGMT status were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Patients in the TFGA-plus group were significantly younger than patients in the TFGA-only group (age 46 vs 56 years, respectively; p = 0.007). In the TFGA-only group, pituitary adenomas were significantly larger (diameter 25 vs 18.3 mm, p = 0.002). Intraoperatively, signs of invasiveness were significantly more common in the TFGA-plus group than in the TFGA-only group (50% vs 16%, p = 0.002). Gross-total resection was significantly lower in the nonfunctioning TFGA-plus group than in the TFGA-only group (44% vs 86%, p = 0.004). MIB1 and MGMT status showed no significant difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest a more aggressive behavior of TFGA-positive adenomas if an additional TF is expressed within the tumor cells. Shorter radiographic surveillance and earlier consideration for retreatment should be recommended in these adenoma types.

Recommendations on the pathological report of pituitary tumors. A consensus of experts of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition and the Spanish Society of Pathology

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) constitute, together with other tumors of the sellar region, 15-25% of intracranial neoplasms. In 2017, the World Health Organization proposed a new classification of PitNETs. The main innovation with respect to the 2004 classification was the recommendation to include in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PitNETs the determination of the transcription factors of the 3 pituitary cell lineages: Pit-1, Tpit and SF-1. Additionally, other clinicopathological classifications with a predictive capacity of tumor behavior during follow-up were proposed. Given these changes, it is appropriate to adapt the knowledge generated during the last 15 years to the daily practice of the treatment and monitoring of PitNETs at the Centers of Excellence in Pituitary Pathology. This document includes the positioning of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) on the classification and denomination of the PitNETs and the information that the pathologist should provide to the clinician to facilitate the treatment and monitoring of these tumors.

TGFBR3L-An Uncharacterised Pituitary Specific Membrane Protein Detected in the Gonadotroph Cells in Non-Neoplastic and Tumour Tissue

Simple Summary

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours originate from the endocrine cells of the anterior pituitary gland and may develop from any of the cell lineages responsible for producing the different pituitary hormones. The details related to tumour differentiation and hormone production in these tumours are not fully understood. The aim of our study was to investigate an uncharacterised pituitary enriched protein, transforming growth factor beta-receptor 3 like (TGFBR3L). The TGFBR3L protein is highly expressed in the pituitary compared to other organs. We found the protein to be gonadotroph-specific, i.e., detected in the cells that express follicle-stimulating and luteinizing hormones (FSH/LH). The gonadotroph-specific nature of TGFBR3L, a correlation to both FSH and LH as well as an inverse correlation to membranous E-cadherin and oestrogen receptor β suggests a role in gonadotroph cell development and function and, possibly, tumour progression.

Abstract

Here, we report the investigation of transforming growth factor beta-receptor 3 like (TGFBR3L), an uncharacterised pituitary specific membrane protein, in non-neoplastic anterior pituitary gland and pituitary neuroendocrine tumours. A polyclonal antibody produced within the Human Protein Atlas project (HPA074356) was used for TGFBR3L staining and combined with SF1 and FSH for a 3-plex fluorescent protocol, providing more details about the cell lineage specificity of TGFBR3L expression. A cohort of 230 pituitary neuroendocrine tumours were analysed. In a subgroup of previously characterised gonadotroph tumours, correlation with expression of FSH/LH, E-cadherin, oestrogen (ER) and somatostatin receptors (SSTR) was explored. TGFBR3L showed membranous immunolabeling and was found to be gonadotroph cell lineage-specific, verified by co-expression with SF1 and FSH/LH staining in both tumour and non-neoplastic anterior pituitary tissues. TGFBR3L immunoreactivity was observed in gonadotroph tumours only and demonstrated intra-tumour heterogeneity with a perivascular location. TGFBR3L immunostaining correlated positively to both FSH (R = 0.290) and LH (R = 0.390) immunostaining, and SSTR3 (R = 0.315). TGFBR3L correlated inversely to membranous E-cadherin staining (R = −0.351) and oestrogen receptor β mRNA (R = −0.274). In conclusion, TGFBR3L is a novel pituitary gland specific protein, located in the membrane of gonadotroph cells in non-neoplastic anterior pituitary gland and in a subset of gonadotroph pituitary tumours.

Gonadotroph tumours with a low SF-1 labelling index are more likely to recur and are associated with enrichment of the PI3K-AKT pathway

AIMS

The gonadotroph tumour (GT) is the most frequently resected pituitary neuroendocrine tumour. Although many symptomatic GT are successfully resected, some recur. We sought to identify histological biomarkers that may predict recurrence and explore biological mechanisms that explain this difference in behaviour.

METHODS

SF-1 immunohistochemistry of 51 GT, a subset belonging to a longitudinal prospective cohort study (n = 25), was reviewed. Four groups were defined: Group 1-recently diagnosed GT (n = 20), Group 2-non-recurrent GT with long-term follow up (n = 11), Group 3-initial resections of GT that recur (n = 7) and Group 4-recurrent GT (n = 13). The percentage of SF-1 immunolabelling in the lowest staining fields (SF-1 labelling index (SLI)) was assessed and RNA sequencing was performed on 5 GT with SLI <80% and 5 GT with SLI >80%.

RESULTS

Diffuse, strong SF-1 immunolabelling was the most frequent pattern in Groups 1/2, whereas patchy SF-1 staining predominated in Groups 3/4. There was a lower median SLI in Groups 3/4 than 1/2. Overall, GT with SLI <80% recurred earlier than GT with SLI >80%. Differential expression analysis identified 89 statistically significant differentially expressed genes (FDR <0.05) including over-expression of pituitary stem cell genes (SOX2, GFRA3) and various oncogenes (e.g. BCL2, ERRB4) in patchy SF-1 GT. Gene set enrichment analysis identified significant enrichment of genes involved in the PI3K-AKT pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

We speculate that patchy SF-1 labelling in GT reflects intratumoural heterogeneity and are less differentiated tumours than diffusely staining GT. SF-1 immunolabelling patterns may have prognostic significance in GT, but confirmatory studies are needed for further validation.

Proposal of a clinically relevant working classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors based on pituitary transcription factors

The immunohistochemistry (IHC) characterization of pituitary transcription factors (PTFs) PIT1, TPIT, and SF1, which enable the identification of three different adenohypophyseal cell lines, has been incorporated into the latest classification system of the World Health Organization (WHO) for pituitary adenomas. This change overturns the concept of the adenoma as solely a hormone producer and classifies these tumors based on their cell lineage. The aim of the study was to provide a diagnostic algorithm, based on IHC expression of hypophyseal hormones with potential use in diagnostic practice, contributing to an improved classification of pituitary adenomas. Our sample included 146 pituitary adenomas previously classified based on hormonal subtypes by IHC (former 2004 WHO criteria) and re-evaluated after the IHC quantification of PIT1, TPIT, and SF1 expression, under WHO 2017 recommendations. We assessed the correlation between expression of PTFs and the classification as per hormonal IHC and correlated clinicopathological profiles based on PTFs. The IHC study of PTFs allowed reclassification of 82% of tumors that were negative for all pituitary hormones, with 21 positive cases for SF1 (reclassified as gonadotroph tumors), 1 positive case for TPIT (reclassified as a corticotroph tumor), and 4 positive cases for PIT1. Using SF1 enabled detection of a substantial portion of gonadotroph tumors, reducing the estimated prevalence of null cell tumors to less than 5%, and identification of plurihormonal pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with PIT1-SF1 coexpression and hormone-negative PIT1s, a group in which we did not observe differences in the clinical behavior compared with the rest of the tumors of the same cell lineage.Our results suggest that applying a diagnostic algorithm based on the study of PTFs could contribute to improving the classification of pituitary adenomas. By adding TPIT assessment, we propose a two-step algorithm, with hypophyseal hormones being used in a selective modality, depending on initial results.

Structure, Function, and Morphology in the Classification of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: the Importance of Routine Analysis of Pituitary Transcription Factors

The traditional approach to the diagnosis of primary adenohypophyseal cell proliferations uses hormone immunohistochemistry to classify pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). The routine application of immunolocalization of pituitary transcription factors (SF1, PIT1, TPIT, ERα, and recently GATA3) along with adenohypophyseal hormones has taught us critical lessons that are discussed in this communication. We point out that appropriate patient care requires accurate diagnosis and is critical in the era of precision medicine. A misdiagnosis can result in far greater health care costs than the cost of accurate tumor classification and may have other unintended consequences. We provide additional insights about confusing findings in genomic studies, emphasizing that high-quality pathology is essential for strong science and translational research.

World Health Ozganization 2017 Classification of Pituitary Tumors

The 2017 (fourth edition) World Health Organization Classification of Endocrine Tumors has recommended major changes in classification of tumors of the pituitary gland and region. In addition to the accurate tumor subtyping, assessment of the tumor proliferative potential (mitotic and/or Ki-67 index) and other clinical parameters such as tumor invasion is strongly recommended in individual cases for consideration of clinically aggressive adenomas. It is expected that this new WHO classification will establish more uniform biologically and clinically groups of pituitary tumors and contribute to understanding of clinical outcomes for patients harboring pituitary tumors.

Immunohistochemical distinction of paragangliomas from epithelial neuroendocrine tumors-gangliocytic duodenal and cauda equina paragangliomas align with epithelial neuroendocrine tumors

Distinction of paraganglioma (PGL) from epithelial neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be difficult as they can mimic each other by nested architecture and expression of neuroendocrine markers. In this study, we examined differential diagnostic markers in 262 PGLs (142 adrenal pheochromocytomas and 120 extra-adrenal PGLs), 9 duodenal gangliocytic PGLs and 3 cauda equina PGLs, and 286 NETs (81 GI, 78 pancreatic, 42 thoracic, 37 medullary thyroid carcinomas, and 48 high-grade NETs including 32 small cell carcinomas of lung). While keratin expression was nearly uniform in NETs with the exception of few tumors, extensive keratin expression was seen in only one PGL (<1%) and focal expression in 5% PGLs. GATA3 was present in >90% of PGLs but only in 2% of NETs, usually focally. Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) was expressed in >90% of adrenal, abdominal, and thoracic PGLs but only in 37% of head and neck PGLs, reflecting their variable catecholamine synthesis. Focal or occasional extensive TH-expression was detected in 10% of NETs. CDX2 was a helpful discriminator seen in 28% of pancreatic and most GI NETs but in no PGLs. SOX10 detected sustentacular cells in 85% of PGLs and 7% of NETs, whereas GFAP detected sustentacular cells mainly in PGLs of neck and was absent in NETs. Duodenal gangliocytic PGLs (n = 9) and all cauda equina PGLs (n = 3) expressed keratins, lacked GATA3, showed no or minimal TH expression as some NETs, and contained SOX10 and S100 protein-positive spindle cells negative for GFAP. Ganglion-like epithelioid cells were keratin-positive and negative for TH and SOX10 differing from true ganglion cells. We conclude that duodenal gangliocytic and cauda equina PGLs have a NET-like immunoprofile and differ from ordinary PGLs. NETs can be distinguished from PGLs by their expression of keratins and general lack of GATA3, TH, and GFAP-positive sustentacular cells, and sometimes by expression of CDX2 or TTF1.

Utility of GATA-3 Expression in the Analysis of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumour (PitNET) Transcription Factors

With the introduction of the WHO 2017 classification of endocrine neoplasms, the use of the pituitary transcription factors PIT-1, Tpit and SF-1 has become the standard of care. However, immunohistochemistry for these transcription factors is not available in all institutions, and their reliability has been questioned. We read with interest the findings of Mete et al. that GATA-3 expression was detected in some pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNET). We therefore sort to validate this in our large cohort of PitNETs. We searched the database of Royal North Shore Hospital for PitNETs between 1998 and 2012, constructed a tissue microarray and reclassified these entities based on their expression for PIT-1, Tpit and SF-1. We then scored the expression of GATA-3 immunohistochemistry on a scale of 0-2, where 0 was no staining, 1 was patchy or weak staining and 2 was strong and diffuse staining. 265 of 346 tumours were able to be classified into a specific tumour subtype, and 263 tumours had tissue available for GATA-3 immunohistochemistry. 89% of gonadotrophs and 93% of triple-negative tumours with expression for luteinising hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone were positive for GATA-3. In the triple-negative group, GATA-3 was positive in 1 mammosomatotroph and 80% of tumours with thyroid-stimulating hormone expression. In the triple-negative hormone-negative group, 21 of 33 tumours were positive (64%). The results demonstrate that GATA-3 is a useful marker to supplement the existing pituitary transcription factors, albeit slightly less sensitive and specific than previously reported. GATA-3 may be employed in addition to the current array of immunohistochemical transcription factors, especially in the resource poor setting. However, given its potential cross-reactivity with other entities of the Sella, positive staining should be interpreted with caution and in the morphological and clinical context.

How to Classify the Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors (PitNET)s in 2020

Adenohypophyseal tumors, which were recently renamed pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET), are mostly benign, but may present various behaviors: invasive, “aggressive” and malignant with metastases. They are classified into seven morphofunctional types and three lineages: lactotroph, somatotroph and thyrotroph (PIT1 lineage), corticotroph (TPIT lineage) or gonadotroph (SF1 lineage), null cell or immunonegative tumor and plurihormonal tumors. The WHO 2017 classification suggested that subtypes, such as male lactotroph, silent corticotroph and Crooke cell, sparsely granulated somatotroph, and silent plurihormonal PIT1 positive tumors, should be considered as “high risk” tumors. However, the prognostic impact of these subtypes and of each morphologic type remains controversial. In contrast, the French five-tiered classification, taking into account the invasion, the immuno-histochemical (IHC) type, and the proliferative markers (Ki-67 index, mitotic count, p53 positivity), has a prognostic value validated by statistical analysis in 4 independent cohorts. A standardized report for the diagnosis of pituitary tumors, integrating all these parameters, has been proposed by the European Pituitary Pathology Group (EPPG). In 2020, the pituitary pathologist must be considered as a member of the multidisciplinary pituitary team. The pathological diagnosis may help the clinician to adapt the post-operative management, including appropriate follow-up and early recognition and treatment of potentially aggressive forms.

Pangenomic Classification of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are common, with five main histological subtypes: lactotroph, somatotroph, and thyrotroph (POU1F1/PIT1 lineage); corticotroph (TBX19/TPIT lineage); and gonadotroph (NR5A1/SF1 lineage). We report a comprehensive pangenomic classification of PitNETs. PitNETs from POU1F1/PIT1 lineage showed an epigenetic signature of diffuse DNA hypomethylation, with transposable elements expression and chromosomal instability (except for GNAS-mutated somatotrophs). In TPIT lineage, corticotrophs were divided into three classes: the USP8-mutated with overt secretion, the USP8-wild-type with increased invasiveness and increased epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and the large silent tumors with gonadotroph transdifferentiation. Unexpected expression of gonadotroph markers was also found in GNAS-wild-type somatotrophs (SF1 expression), challenging the current definition of SF1/gonadotroph lineage. This classification improves our understanding and affects the clinical stratification of patients with PitNETs.

The Clinicopathological Spectrum of Acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly results from a persistent excess in growth hormone with clinical features that may be subtle or severe. The most common cause of acromegaly is a pituitary tumor that causes excessive production of growth hormone (GH), and rare cases are due to an excess of the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) or the ectopic production of GH.

OBJECTIVE

Discuss the different diseases that present with manifestations of GH excess and clinical acromegaly, emphasizing the distinct clinical and radiological characteristics of the different pathological entities.

METHODS

We performed a narrative review of the published clinicopathological information about acromegaly. An English-language search for relevant studies was conducted on PubMed from inception to 1 August 2019. The reference lists of relevant studies were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Pituitary tumors that cause GH excess have several variants, including pure somatotroph tumors that can be densely or sparsely granulated, or plurihormonal tumors that include mammosomatotroph, mixed somatotroph-lactotroph tumors and mature plurihomonal Pit1-lineage tumors, acidophil stem cell tumors and poorly-differentiated Pit1-lineage tumors. Each tumor type has a distinct pathophysiology, resulting in variations in clinical manifestations, imaging and responses to therapies.

CONCLUSION

Detailed clinicopathological information will be useful in the era of precision medicine, in which physicians tailor the correct treatment modality to each patient.

Plurihormonal Pituitary Tumor of Pit-1 and SF-1 Lineages, with Synchronous Collision Corticotroph Tumor: a Possible Stem Cell Phenomenon

Thyrotropin (TSH)-secreting pituitary tumors are the rarest functioning pituitary tumors. Nonetheless, they are not infrequently plurihormonal, as they may express/secrete hormones made by other pituitary cells derived from the Pit-1 lineage such as growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL), and α-subunit (αSU). However, adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) or gonadotropin secretion by such a tumor is exceptional. Although double pituitary tumors are rare, they often combine ACTH and GH secretion. A 41-year-old presented almost 2 years after delivering her 10th child; she had thyrotoxicosis (goiter and palpitations) masquerading as autoimmune postpartum thyroiditis. She was still breastfeeding and amenorrheic. She proved to have TSH, GH, PRL, and ACTH hypersecretion. Imaging revealed an invasive pituitary macrotumor. She had stigmata neither of Cushing's disease nor of acromegaly. Prior to surgery, hormonal control was achieved for close to 1 year by combined octreotide and cabergoline treatment with significant shrinking of the tumor. Following surgery, pathology revealed a collision tumor; the dominant lesion was positive for GH, βTSH, βFSH, and αSU and expressed both Pit-1 and SF-1.The smaller lesion was a corticotroph tumor. We report an unusual plurihormonal tumor co-expressing Pit-1 and SF-1 along with hormones made by cells of both lineages. Its simultaneous occurrence adjacent to a corticotroph tumor raises questions regarding the pathogenesis of these tumors. We propose the possibility of a stem cell tumor with multiple lineage differentiation. We hypothesize that pregnancy might have played a permissive role in tumorigenesis.