Recurrent KRAS mutations in papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity

Small papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (≤ 15 mm) may challenge the current diagnostic criteria of papillary adenoma

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP), currently categorized as a papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) variant in the 5th edition of the WHO Classification, has shown increasing evidence of clinicopathological and molecular distinctions from conventional papillary RCC. Therefore, PRNRP should be separated from papillary RCC. Our analysis of 35 PRNRP cases with a mean tumor size of 15.0 mm demonstrated clinicopathological features consistent with prior reports. Uniform histological findings showed tumors with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and apically oriented low-grade nuclei, complemented by a consistent immunohistochemical profile of keratin 7 positivity and GATA3 expression. AMACR and vimentin expression were frequently negative. Fluorescence in situ hybridization detected abnormalities in chromosomes 7/17/Y in 4 cases. KRAS mutations were identified in 23 cases. Novel observations included that cystic architecture was more frequently observed in tumors exceeding 15 mm compared to their smaller counterparts (≤ 15 mm). Fifteen ≤ 15 mm PRNRP cases demonstrated an absence of fibrous capsule, meeting diagnostic criteria for papillary adenoma. However, comparative analysis of 45 papillary adenoma cases revealed distinct clinicopathological differences from PRNRP. These findings reinforce current proposals for distinguishing PRNRP from conventional papillary RCC. Furthermore, our data highlight a diagnostic conundrum regarding small (≤ 15 mm) PRNRP cases lacking fibrous capsules, which challenge current diagnostic boundaries between PRNRP and papillary adenoma. Future classification should address both the separation from papillary RCC and the need to refine the diagnostic criteria of papillary adenoma.

Genomic profiling of urological malignancies using tissue-based next generation sequencing

Advances in understanding genomic drivers of human malignancies have evolved from morphologic evaluations to in-depth DNA and RNA analyses and gene expression profiling. In urologic malignancies, these molecular diagnostics are integral to patient management, aiding pathological diagnosis, providing prognostic and predictive relevance, and identifying therapeutic options for advanced diseases. For instance, renal cell carcinoma frequently harbors alterations in VHL, PBRM1, and BAP1, influencing therapeutic responses, while urothelial carcinoma is characterized by FGFR3 mutations and TERT promoter alterations, which have implications for targeted therapy. Prostate cancer commonly involves TMPRSS2-ERG fusions and BRCA2 mutations, affecting treatment strategies, and penile squamous cell carcinoma follows distinct HPV-dependent and HPV-independent pathways, with mutations in TP53 and CDKN2A genes. These advances in molecular pathology have deepened our understanding of these complex diseases and facilitated the introduction of novel targeted therapies. While these advances promise improved diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment options, many questions remain regarding the variable patient responses within the same histologic types. Addressing these will enable optimal management strategies and the development of personalized treatments targeting specific molecular alterations to improve patient outcomes.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity shows benign behavior: Results from a 77-case clinicopathological and molecular study

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a low-grade renal tumor characterized by oncocytic cells with apical nuclei, GATA3 expression, and frequent KRAS mutations. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize and determine prognostic significance of PRNRP by conducting clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and genetic analyses while reviewing prior reports. A total of 506 patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) who underwent curative nephrectomy from 1989 to 2023 were analyzed, leading to the reclassification of 77 cases (17 %) as PRNRP. All cases were pT1 tumors with a median size of 1.5 cm. Initially, 40 %, 31 %, and 18 % were diagnosed as PRCC type 1, PRNRP, and PRCC type 2, respectively. PRNRP cases consistently displayed characteristic features; however, two tumors exhibited high-grade nuclear atypia resembling WHO/ISUP grade 3, highlighting the existence of atypical subgroups. Immunohistochemical analysis showed GATA3 expression in 97 % of cases. Transcription factor EB (TFEB) expression was observed in 86 % of cases. KRAS exon 2 mutations were identified in all cases, including the two atypical PRNRPs. Neither recurrence nor disease-specific death occurred throughout a median follow-up period of 46 months. This study highlights the necessity of thorough diagnostic evaluation, incorporating unique histological features, GATA3 positivity, and KRAS mutation analysis, especially in the presence of atypical morphology, while reaffirming the benign nature of PRNRP.

Acceptance of emerging renal oncocytic neoplasms: a survey of urologic pathologists

Oncocytic renal neoplasms are a major source of diagnostic challenge in genitourinary pathology; however, they are typically nonaggressive in general, raising the question of whether distinguishing different subtypes, including emerging entities, is necessary. Emerging entities recently described include eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT), and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP). A survey was shared among 65 urologic pathologists using SurveyMonkey.com (Survey Monkey, Santa Clara, CA, USA). De-identified and anonymized respondent data were analyzed. Sixty-three participants completed the survey and contributed to the study. Participants were from Asia (n = 21; 35%), North America (n = 31; 52%), Europe (n = 6; 10%), and Australia (n = 2; 3%). Half encounter oncocytic renal neoplasms that are difficult to classify monthly or more frequently. Most (70%) indicated that there is enough evidence to consider ESC RCC as a distinct entity now, whereas there was less certainty for LOT (27%), EVT (29%), and PRNRP (37%). However, when combining the responses for sufficient evidence currently and likely in the future, LOT and EVT yielded > 70% and > 60% for PRNRP. Most (60%) would not render an outright diagnosis of oncocytoma on needle core biopsy. There was a dichotomy in the routine use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the evaluation of oncocytoma (yes = 52%; no = 48%). The most utilized IHC markers included keratin 7 and 20, KIT, AMACR, PAX8, CA9, melan A, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)B, and fumarate hydratase (FH). Genetic techniques used included TSC1/TSC2/MTOR (67%) or TFE3 (74%) genes and pathways; however, the majority reported using these very rarely. Only 40% have encountered low-grade oncocytic renal neoplasms that are deficient for FH. Increasing experience with the spectrum of oncocytic renal neoplasms will likely yield further insights into the most appropriate work-up, classification, and clinical management for these entities.

Multinucleated tumor cells and micropapillary morphology appear to be predictors of poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma with papillary and oncocytic features

Renal cell carcinoma with papillary and oncocytic features (RCC-PO) are poorly understood, partially due to conflicting results in multiple studies. The histological features that predict behavior of RCC-PO have not been elucidated. The aim is to review clinicopathologic features and to correlate clinical outcomes of patients with RCC-PO to further expand our knowledge on these heterogeneous tumors. An archival search was done for "RCC" and "papillary," and tumors with >50% papillary and oncocytic features were included. Clinicopathologic data including tumor size, grade, stage, molecular and immunohistochemical testing when performed, and follow-up data were collected. Using multivariate analyses, correlation between histological features, tumor stage and prognosis were analyzed. Sixty-one patients with RCC-PO were identified of which 49 (80%) were male with a median age of 65 (range: 36-93) years, and a mean tumor size of 5.2 (range: 1-21.5) cm. Micropapillary features were seen in 4, bizarre nuclei (at least 3 times larger or with irregular shape) in 6, multinucleated tumor cells (MTC) in 15, single or small clusters (SSC) (made of 2-3 tumor cells) located away from areas of necrosis in 16, and striking eosinophilic cytoplasmic inclusions in 3 tumors, respectively. Thirty-six (59%) tumors were high-grade (WHO/ISUP grade 3-4), and 23 (38%) had a high stage (≥pT3 or pN1). Tumors were positive for AMACR (15/16) and CK7 (13/17), with preserved FH (7/7) staining and were all negative for CD117 (0/7), ALK, TFE3, cathepsin K, Melan A, and HMB45 (0/4, each). Three tumors underwent chromosomal microarray (CMA) plus gene fusion assay, and FISH and germline testing for FLCN and MET gene alterations by PCR were done on 1 each. Ten (16%) patients had a local recurrence (LR) or metastasis after nephrectomy; 4 died of disease (2 had tumors with micropapillary features), with a median follow-up of 7 (range: 0.01-19) years. Tumors with micropapillary features showed significantly higher RCC-PO-related mortality (50% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, SSC correlated with a higher stage (HR: 11.95; p = 0.005); micropapillary features (HR: 18.42; p = 0.017) and MTC (HR: 180.22; p = 0.036) with presence of metastasis/LR; and micropapillary features with a higher RCC-PO-related mortality (HR: 60.35; p = 0.036). RCC-PO are cytogenetically heterogeneous with overlapping features of various renal neoplasms. Micropapillary features and MTC appear to be independent predictors of poor outcomes in these tumors.

Contemporary review of papillary renal cell carcinoma-current state and future directions

Historically, papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) was divided into two types, type 1 and type 2, based solely on morphology. However, it is apparent that PRCC is far more complex and represents a histological, clinical, and molecular spectrum. There has been a significant evolution in our understanding of PRCC, highlighted by the recognition of new and molecularly defined entities that were previously included in PRCC type 2. This contemporary review addresses the evolving concepts regarding the PRCC, including why it is no longer needed to subtype PRCC, the current molecular landscape, prognostic parameters, and PRCC variants, including biphasic PRCC, papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, and Warthin-like PRCC. Pathologists should also be aware of the potential mimickers of both low-grade and high-grade PRCCs as well as some new and emerging entities that may show papillary growth that should be excluded in the diagnostic workup. The evolving knowledge of PRCC biomarkers, morphologic patterns, and PRCC variants could also have important implications for clinical management. Lastly, the heterogeneity within the PRCC spectrum needs to be further studied, aiming to better stratify PRCC for appropriate clinical management and systemic therapy.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity has low frequency of alterations in chromosomes 7, 17, and Y

In papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP), the status of chromosomal copy number alterations, especially chromosomes 7/17 gain and chromosome Y loss, has remained controversial. In the literatures, there is a discrepancy among the results of chromosomal alteration in PRNRP depending on the analytical methods. Here, we comprehensively analyzed the status of chromosomal abnormalities in PRNRP. Nineteen PRNRP cases were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), five of which were additionally subjected to array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis. Fifteen cases of PRCC were used as controls. From the aCGH results, no genome copy number abnormalities were found in the five PRNRP cases. By FISH, numbers of nuclei with abnormal chromosomal signals in PRNRP (centromere 7 gain: 11-21% of nuclei, centromere 17 gain: 11% of nuclei, centromere Y loss: 14-31% of nuclei) were similar to those in non-neoplastic tubular cells (centromere 7 gain: 11-15% of nuclei, centromere 17 gain: 12-15% of nuclei, centromere Y loss: 13-45% of nuclei). c-MET immunohistochemical overexpression, a substitute marker for chromosome 7 trisomy, was observed in 0 of 19 PRNRP cases, consistent with the analyses by aCGH and NGS regarding chromosome 7 gain. Taken together, the frequency of chromosomal alterations in PRNRP is similar to that in non-neoplastic tubular cells, and lower than that in PRCC. Our data suggest that PRNRP has a different tumorigenesis and is a distinct entity from PRCC.

Non-coding RNA and gene expression analyses of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) reveal distinct pathological mechanisms from other renal neoplasms

Papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity (PRNRP) is a recently described rare renal neoplasm. Traditionally, it was considered a variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). However, several studies reported significant differences between PRNRP and PRCC in terms of clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features. Nonetheless, PRNRP remains a poorly understood entity. We used microarray analysis to elucidate the non-coding RNA (ncRNA) and gene expression profiles of 10 PRNRP cases and compared them with other renal neoplasms. Unsupervised cluster analysis showed that PRNRP had distinct expression profiles from either clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) or PRCC cases at the level of ncRNA but were less distinct at the level of gene expression. An integrated omic approach determined miRNA:gene interactions that distinguished PRNRP from PRCC and we validated 10 differentially expressed miRNAs and six genes by quantitative RT-PCR. We found that levels of the miRNAs, miR-148a, miR-375 and miR-429, were up-regulated in PRNRP cases compared to ccRCC and PRCC. miRNA target genes, including KRAS and VEGFA oncogenes, and CXCL8, which regulates VEGFA, were also differentially expressed between renal neoplasms. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) determined different activation of metabolic pathways between PRNRP and PRCC cases. Overall, this study is by far the largest molecular study of PRNRP cases and the first to investigate either ncRNA expression or their gene expression by microarray assays.

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evolving Classification by Combined Morphologic and Molecular Means

Papillary renal cell carcinoma classification has evolved as a result of attentive morphologic observations by pathologists coupled with specific immunohistochemical, molecular, and clinical data. Refinement of this relatively common diagnostic category of renal neoplasia has resulted in the parsing out of specific renal cell carcinoma subtypes that no longer belong in the papillary renal cell carcinoma category and can have distinct familial and prognostic implications (eg, fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinomas). In addition, evolving classification has enabled more accurate diagnosis by surgical pathologists (through the description of recognizable morphologic variants). In many cases, molecular findings have aided and confirmed morphologic categorization. The combination of morphologic and molecular findings continues to provide important prognostic information for patients and their clinicians.

Concordance of MTOR Pathway Mutations and the Diagnosis of Renal Low-Grade Oncocytic Tumor (LOT)

The differential diagnosis for oncocytic renal tumors spans the spectrum from benign entities to more aggressive renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Recent work has characterized a provisional renal oncocytic neoplasm, namely the low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), which demonstrates overlapping morphologic features with oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, but also has a unique immunoprofile (ie, diffusely positive for KRT7, negative for KIT) and a high rate (80% to 100%) of mTOR pathway gene alterations. Given the diagnostic overlap among oncocytic tumors, we looked for concordance between mTOR pathway mutations and LOT. Thirty low-grade renal oncocytic neoplasms underwent histologic review and immunohistochemistry for KRT7 and KIT. Tumors were classified as "determinate" (eg, LOT) for tumors with solid, nested or vaguely tubular growth and diffuse KRT7 staining and negative KIT, or "indeterminate" if the morphology and/or immunostains did not fully support a definitive LOT diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing was performed without any knowledge of the diagnoses, and identified mTOR pathway mutations in 80% (12/15) of the determinate tumors, compared with 7% (1/15) in the indeterminate group. One determinate tumor was reclassified as papillary RCC (MTOR mutation negative) and 6 indeterminate tumors were confirmed to be oncocytoma (N = 4), clear cell RCC or papillary RCC with reverse polarity, respectively. Overall, integration of morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular data enabled a final definitive diagnosis for 70% of tumors (21 of the total 30), with a high concordance (93%) for LOT specifically in the determinate group; the remaining 9 tumors (30%) were classified as renal oncocytic neoplasm, not otherwise specified.

Inverted apicobasal polarity in health and disease

Apicobasal epithelial polarity controls the functional properties of most organs. Thus, there has been extensive research on the molecular intricacies governing the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity. Whereas loss of apicobasal polarity is a well-documented phenomenon associated with multiple diseases, less is known regarding another type of apicobasal polarity alteration - the inversion of polarity. In this Review, we provide a unifying definition of inverted polarity and discuss multiple scenarios in mammalian systems and human health and disease in which apical and basolateral membrane domains are interchanged. This includes mammalian embryo implantation, monogenic diseases and dissemination of cancer cell clusters. For each example, the functional consequences of polarity inversion are assessed, revealing shared outcomes, including modifications in immune surveillance, altered drug sensitivity and changes in adhesions to neighboring cells. Finally, we highlight the molecular alterations associated with inverted apicobasal polarity and provide a molecular framework to connect these changes with the core cell polarity machinery and to explain roles of polarity inversion in health and disease. Based on the current state of the field, failure to respond to extracellular matrix (ECM) cues, increased cellular contractility and membrane trafficking defects are likely to account for most cases of inverted apicobasal polarity.

Genomic alterations and diagnosis of renal cancer

The application of molecular profiling has made substantial impact on the classification of urogenital tumors. Therefore, the 2022 World Health Organization incorporated the concept of molecularly defined renal tumor entities into its classification, including succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC), FH-deficient RCC, TFE3-rearranged RCC, TFEB-altered RCC, ALK-rearranged RCC, ELOC-mutated RCC, and renal medullary RCC, which are characterized by SMARCB1-deficiency. This review aims to provide an overview of the most important molecular alterations in renal cancer, with a specific focus on the diagnostic value of characteristic genomic aberrations, their chromosomal localization, and associations with renal tumor subtypes. It may not yet be the time to completely shift to a molecular RCC classification, but undoubtedly, the application of molecular profiling will enhance the accuracy of renal cancer diagnosis, and ultimately guide personalized treatment strategies for patients.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity: a clinicopathologic study of 43 cases with a focus on the expression of KRAS signaling pathway downstream effectors

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a renal tumor with frequent KRAS mutations. In this study, we aimed to report the clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical characteristics of PRNRP and the protein expression of various KRAS signaling pathway downstream effectors in PRNRP. PRNRP samples from patients who underwent surgical resection at Seoul National University Hospital over an 11-year period (January 2011 to December 2021) were analyzed. We identified 43 PRNRPs, defined as papillary renal tumors with a thin papillary architecture, eosinophilic finely granular cytoplasm, and apical nuclear position. Immunohistochemistry revealed typical characteristics of PRNRP, including exclusively positive GATA3 (43/43); highly positive L1CAM (43/43), PAX8 (43/43), and EMA (43/43); and low positive AMACR (4/43), RCC (1/43), and vimentin (1/43). KRAS signaling pathway effectors, such as p-ERK, RalA, and RalB, were highly expressed in PRNRP compared to papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) with low or high nuclear grade (P < .001, all). Compared to pRCC with high nuclear grade, patients with PRNRP exhibited significantly longer progression-free survival (P < .001). PRNRP showed the best clinical outcome, with no disease progression in any of the cases. Our study analyzed the largest number of PRNRP cases and is the first to analyze the association between PRNRP and the KRAS downstream signaling pathway. PRNRP was found at a high frequency among all papillary renal tumors (43/207) and demonstrated a very good prognosis. PRNRP showed high GATA3, L1CAM, PAX8, and EMA protein expression as well as high p-ERK, RalA, and RalB protein expression.

Cytomorphology of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse nuclear polarity (PRNRP) is an emerging oncocytic renal tumor. Cytomorphologic features of this tumor have not been described in the literature before. The objective of this study was to review the cytomorphology of a case PRNRP and compare with cytomorphologic features of papillary renal cell carcinomas (pRCCs) reported in the literature. 1 case of core needle biopsy (CNB) with touch preparation (TP) of a renal mass diagnosed as PRNRP was reviewed retrospectively. Clinical presentation, cytomorphologic features, ancillary tests and histopathology results were analyzed. The touch preparation was cellular and showed tight 3-D clusters of cuboidal epithelial cells with variable presence of fibrovascular cores (FC), granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, round apically located grade 1 nuclei compared to cases of pRCC that consistently showed presence of FCs lined by cuboidal to columnar epithelial cells with variable degree of cytologic atypia. Features characteristic of pRCC like foamy macrophages, hemosiderin laden macrophages, nuclear grooves or psammoma bodies were not present. No necrosis or mitosis were identified. By immunohistochemistry (IHC) the tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 7, GATA-3 and AMACR (focal) and negative for CA-IX, CD117 and vimentin. Cytomorphologic features of PRNRP are unique and characterized by tight 3-D clusters (with or without FCs) of cuboidal cells with small round apically located nuclei and finely granular oncocytic cytoplasm. Specific diagnosis of PRNRP on cytology or CNB is feasible along with use of ancillary tests IHC and /or molecular tests.

Ipsilateral synchronous papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity and urothelial carcinoma in a renal transplant recipient: a rare case report with molecular analysis and literature review

BACKGROUND

Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) have a 3- to 5-fold higher risk of developing malignant tumors than the general population, with new malignant tumors after transplantation considered to be the leading cause of death in RTRs. In pathological practice, it is rare for neoplasms with different histology to be located in the same organ. We report the first case of a synchronous papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the ipsilateral kidney in an RTR. Molecular detection was conducted by next-generation sequencing.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 68-year-old female suffered from uremia 19 years ago and underwent renal transplantation (RT) after receiving dialysis for 6 months. Hematuria occurred one month ago and an enhanced CT showed that there were two abnormal density foci in the middle and lower parts of the autologous left kidney. A laparoscopic left nephrectomy and ureterectomy were performed. Gross examination revealed a mass (I) in the left renal parenchyma, 2*1.8*1.5 cm in size, that protruded from the renal capsule, and a cauliflower-like mass (II), 5*2.5*2 cm in size, adjacent to the mass (I). Microscopic findings revealed these lesions were PRNRP and UC, respectively. PCR analysis revealed a KRAS gene mutation (G12D in exon 2) in the PRNRP, while NGS analysis revealed FGFR3 (S249C in exon 7) and KDM6A (Q271Ter in exon 10 and A782Lfs in exon 17) mutations in the UC.

CONCLUSIONS

We report here for the first time an extraordinarily rare case of synchronous renal tumors of a PRNRP and UC in the ipsilateral kidney of an RTR. We identified simultaneous KRAS, FGFR3, and KDM6A mutations in two different renal masses in the ipsilateral kidney. Pathologic assessment with comparative molecular analysis of mutational profiles facilitates tumor studies after RT and may be of great value in clinical management strategies.

Rare papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity: A case report and review of the literature

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a rare renal tumour and was newly named in 2019. This study reported a case of a 30-year-old female patient with a left renal tumour without any clinical symptoms and whose CT scan of her left kidney showed a mass of 2.6 cm×2.3 cm, which was considered to be renal clear cell carcinoma. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed, and histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, which had unique clinicopathological features, immunophenotype, KRAS gene mutation and relatively indolent biological behaviour. As newly diagnosed cases, rigorous and regular follow-up is necessary. In addition, a literature review was performed from 1978 to 2022, and 97 cases of papillary renal neoplasms with reverse polarity were identified and analysed.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity: A case report

As a recently named rare renal tumor of epithelial origin, papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) has unique histomorphological features and immunophenotypes, often associated with KRAS mutations and showing indolent biological behavior. In this study, we report a case of PRNRP. In this report, nearly all tumor cells were positive for GATA-3, KRT7, EMA, E-Cadherin, Ksp-Cadherin, 34βE12, and AMACR in varying intensities, focally positive for CD10 and Vimentin, while negative for CD117, TFE3, RCC, and CAIX. KRAS mutations (exon 2) were detected by amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR), while no NRAS (exon 2-4) and BRAF V600 mutations (exon 15) were detected. A transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy was performed on the reported patient. No recurrence or metastasis was found during the 18 months of follow-up.

Papillary renal cell neoplasm with reverse polarity: A new subtype of renal tumour with favorable prognosis

INTRODUCTION

Papillary renal cell neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) has recently been recognized as an entity separate from the traditional classification of papillary renal cell carcinomas, due to its specific histopathological, immunophenotypic and molecular characteristics, as well as its indolent behavior.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We provide 6 new cases and a review of the literature published until the present time, which comprises a total number of 104 cases.

RESULTS

Our PRNRP cases correspond to 5 men and one woman aged between 47 and 91 years. In 5 of the 6 cases, the PRNRP was an incidental finding in nephrectomy specimens. Nephrectomy had been indicated due to the presence of another renal tumor, except for one case, in which surgical intervention was indicated due to PRNRP. Our cases present mass sizes between 2 and 13 mm, as well as papillary histology with a monolayered lining of eosinophilic cells with low-grade nuclei in apical location. Immunohistochemically, they show a constant positivity for GATA3 and negativity for vimentin. KRAS mutations were identified in 50% of our cases. After a follow-up ranging between one and 60 months, 5 of the cases were still alive without recurrences or metastases, and one died from urothelial carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cases agree with the clinical and pathological characteristics described in the PRNRP cases published to date. With the present study, we provide the first series of national cases corroborating the existence of well-defined and constant diagnostic criteria that allow PRNRP to be considered as a distinctive entity.

How New Developments Impact Diagnosis in Existing Renal Neoplasms

In recent years, several emerging diagnostic entities have been described in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, our understanding of well-known and established entities has also grown. Clear cell papillary RCC is now relabeled as a tumor rather than carcinoma in view of its nonaggressive behavior. Renal tumors with a predominantly infiltrative pattern are very important for recognition, as most of these have aggressive behavior, including fumarate hydratase-deficient RCC, SMARCB1-deficient medullary carcinoma, collecting duct carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and metastases from other cancers.

Tumors masquerading as type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma: pathologists' ever-expanding differential diagnosis for a heterogeneous group of entities

Although papillary renal cell carcinoma has historically been classified as either type 1 or type 2, data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has demonstrated significant genomic heterogeneity in tumors classified as "type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma" (T2PRCC). Papillary renal cell carcinoma is expected to have a favorable clinical course compared to clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). However, tumors with poor outcome more similar to CCRCC were included in the T2PRCC cohort studied by the TCGA. The differential diagnosis for T2PRCC includes a variety of other renal tumors, including aggressive entities such as TFE3 translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma, TFEB-amplified renal cell carcinoma, fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma, high-grade CCRCC, and collecting duct carcinoma. Accurate classification of these tumors is important for prognostication and selection of therapy.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity-a comparative study with CCPRCC, OPRCC, and PRCC1

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly defined entity with distinct histomorphology and recurrent KRAS mutation. In this study, we aimed to identify and analyze the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical (IHC), and molecular features of PRNRP in our center and to evaluate its differential diagnosis with other tumors with which it is easily confused: clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC), oncocytic papillary renal cell carcinoma (OPRCC), and papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 (PRCC1). Nephrectomy specimens of PRNRP (n = 15), CCPRCC (n = 11), and OPRCC (n = 12) were retrieved from our pathology archives. We also selected typical cases of PRCC1 (n = 15) as a control group. PRNRP accounted for 3.05% (15/492) of all PRCC cases at our center. The median follow-up period was 41.3 months. All PRNRP cases were pT1N0M0, and only one involved recurrence (1 year after surgery). IHC analysis showed diffuse staining of CK7, EMA, and GATA3 but weak or negative staining of CD10, CD117, p504s, and vimentin in the PRNRP samples and distinctive IHC features in the other three tumor types. KRAS mutation was detected in 4/10 PRNRP cases. Among the 40 most commonly mutated genes identified, 5 (BCLAF1, PDE4DIP, NCOR1, PARP4, and PABPC1) have actionable alterations. Our study supports the suggestion that PRNRP is an entity distinct from CCPRCC, OPRCC, and PRCC1.

The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of urogenital tumours (WHO "Blue Book"), published in 2022, contains significant revisions. This review summarises the most relevant changes for renal, penile, and testicular tumours. In keeping with other volumes in the fifth edition series, the WHO classification of urogenital tumours follows a hierarchical classification and lists tumours by site, category, family, and type. The section "essential and desirable diagnostic criteria" included in the WHO fifth edition represents morphologic diagnostic criteria, combined with immunohistochemistry and relevant molecular tests. The global introduction of massive parallel sequencing will result in a diagnostic shift from morphology to molecular analyses. Therefore, a molecular-driven renal tumour classification has been introduced, taking recent discoveries in renal tumour genomics into account. Such novel molecularly defined epithelial renal tumours include SMARCB1-deficient medullary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFEB-altered RCC, Alk-rearranged RCC, and ELOC-mutated RCC. Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC is a novel morphologically defined RCC entity. The diverse morphologic patterns of penile squamous cell carcinomas are grouped as human papillomavirus (HPV) associated and HPV independent, and there is an attempt to simplify the morphologic classification. A new chapter with tumours of the scrotum has been introduced. The main nomenclature of testicular tumours is retained, including the use of the term "germ cell neoplasia in situ" (GCNIS) for the preneoplastic lesion of most germ cell tumours and division from those not derived from GCNIS. Nomenclature changes include replacement of the term "primitive neuroectodermal tumour" by "embryonic neuroectodermal tumour" to separate these tumours clearly from Ewing sarcoma. The term "carcinoid" has been changed to "neuroendocrine tumour", with most examples in the testis now classified as "prepubertal type testicular neuroendocrine tumour".

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity with a favorable prognosis: Two cases report and literature review

Background

Papillary Renal Neoplasm (PRN) with polarity inversion is a less common subtype of kidney cancer with an apparently recognizable morphology, distinct immunohistochemical profiles, and frequent KRAS mutations. It has been estimated to account 4% of previously diagnosed PRN.

Case presentation

This is a retrospective case report of two patients diagnosed with PRNRP. Two males were found to have kidney mass accidentally through imaging examination in clinic. Both of the patients had no obvious discomfort and abnormal test indicators. Subsequently, they underwent partial nephrectomy in our center by the same surgeon and followed up closely with an impressive clinical outcome. The pathology reports indicated that their pathological features were consistent with PRNRP. The HE staining showed a monolayer of papillary or tubular structures, with small nuclei away from the cytoplasmic top of the basement membrane. The immunohistochemical results were GATA3 (+), vimentin (-).

Conclusion

Our case reports and literature review suggested that PRNRP should be separated from traditional PRN and partial nephrectomy is a robust modality for PRNRP. The morphological, immunohistochemical, and genetic information of the cases we presented would provide important material for PRNRP to become a distinct category with benign clinical outcome.

WHO 2022 landscape of papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary and Male Genital Systems contains relevant revisions and introduces a group of molecularly defined renal tumour subtypes. Herein we present the World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 perspectives on papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with emphasis on their evolving classification, differential diagnosis, and emerging entities. The WHO 2022 classification eliminated the type 1/2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) subcategorization, given the recognition of frequent mixed tumour phenotypes and the existence of entities with a different molecular background within the type 2 pRCC category. Additionally, emerging entities such as biphasic squamoid alveolar RCC, biphasic hyalinising psammomatous RCC, papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, and Warthin-like pRCC are included as part of the pRCC spectrum, while additional morphological and molecular data are being gathered. In addition to oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), a category of 'other oncocytic tumours' with oncocytoma/chRCC-like features has been introduced, including emerging entities, most with TSC/mTOR pathway alterations (eosinophilic vacuolated tumour and so-called 'low-grade' oncocytic tumour), deserving additional research. Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC was accepted as a new and independent tumour entity. Finally, a highly reproducible and clinically relevant universal grading system for chRCC is still missing and is another niche of ongoing investigation. This review discusses these developments and highlights emerging morphological and molecular data relevant for the classification of renal cell carcinoma.

The 2022 revision of World Health Organization classification of tumors of the urinary system and male genital organs: advances and challenges

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of urinary and male genital organ tumors has been recently published in 2022. The application of molecular profiling has made a substantial impact on classification of urologic tumors. The new WHO classification introduces a group of molecularly well-defined renal tumor subtypes. The significant changes include addition of a category of "other oncocytic tumors" with oncocytoma/chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC)-like features, elimination of the subcategorization of type1/2 papillary RCC and inclusion of eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC as an independent tumor entity. The WHO/ISUP grading now has been recommended for all RCCs. Major nomenclature changes include replacement of histologic 'variants' by 'subtypes', 'clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma' to 'clear cell renal cell tumor','TCEB1-mutated RCC' to 'ELOC-mutated RCC', 'hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma' to 'fumarate hydratase-deficient RCC', 'RCC-Unclassified' to 'RCC-NOS', 'primitive neuroectodermal tumor' to 'embryonic neuroectodermal tumor', 'testicular carcinoid' to 'testicular neuroendocrine tumor', and 'basal cell carcinoma of the prostate' to 'adenoid-cystic (basal-cell) carcinoma of the prostate'. Metastatic, hematolymphoid, mesenchymal, melanocytic, soft tissue and neuroendocrine tumors are collectively discussed in separate chapters. It has been suggested that the morphological classification of urothelial cancer be replaced with a new molecular taxonomic classification system.

Recurrent KRAS mutations are early events in the development of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity

We evaluated the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of mostly incidentally detected, small, papillary renal neoplasms with reverse polarity (PRNRP). The cohort comprised 50 PRNRP from 46 patients, divided into 2 groups. The clinically undetected (<5 mm) neoplasms (n = 34; 68%) had a median size of 1.1 mm (range 0.2-4.3 mm; mean 1.4 mm), and the clinically detected (≥5 mm) neoplasms (n = 16; 32%) which had a median size of 13 mm (range 9-30 mm; mean 16 mm). Neoplasms were positive for GATA3 (n = 47; 100%) and L1CAM (n = 34/38; 89%) and were negative for vimentin (n = 0/44; 0%) and, to a lesser extent, AMACR [(n = 12/46; 26%; weak = 9, weak/moderate = 3)]. KRAS mutations were found in 44% (n = 15/34) of the clinically undetected PRNRP and 88% of the clinically detected PRNRP (n = 14/16). The two clinically detected PRNRP with wild-type KRAS gene were markedly cystic and contained microscopic intracystic tumors. In the clinically undetected PRNRP, the detected KRAS mutations rate was higher in those measuring ≥1 mm vs <1 mm [n = 14/19 (74%) vs n = 1/15 (7%)]. Overall, the KRAS mutations were present in exon 2-codon 12: c.35 G > T (n = 21), c.34 G > T (n = 3), c.35 G > A (n = 2), c.34 G > C (n = 2) resulting in p.Gly12Val, p. Gly12Asp, p.Gly12Cys and p.Gly12Arg, respectively. One PRNRP had a G12A/V/D complex mutation. Twenty-six PRNRP were concurrently present with other tumors of different histologic subtypes in the ipsilateral kidney; molecular testing of 8 of the latter showed wild-type KRAS gene despite the presence of KRAS mutations in 5 concurrent PRNRP. On follow up, no adverse pathologic events were seen (range 1-160 months; mean 44 months). In conclusion, the presence of KRAS mutations in small, clinically undetected PRNRP provides a unique finding to this entity and supports its being an early event in the development of these neoplasms.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity may be a novel renal cell tumor entity with low malignant potential

AIMS

This study retrospectively investigated the morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic features of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP), a recently described renal tumor.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eleven cases of PRNRP were collected, and 16 cases of type I and 9 cases of type II papillary renal cell carcinoma were included as a control series. Pathological features were evaluated based on HE staining and immunohistochemistry. KRAS exon 2 and BRAF V600E mutations were detected by Real-time PCR and Sanger sequencing. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was conducted for identification of chromosomal abnormalities. Hemosiderin deposition was found in a small amount of tumor cells in 6 cases. Multifocal or patchy necrosis (5/11), small focal invasion of the pseudocapsules or renal parenchyma (6/11), and breakthrough of renal capsule with nerve invasion (1/11) were revealed, inconsistent with the previous view that the tumor lacks necrosis and intercellular hemosiderin. Immunohistochemical staining (diffusely positive for CK7 and GATA3, negative for CD117 and vimentin, and negative to weakly positive for P504S) and high frequency of KRAS mutations in exon 2 (9/10) supported the identification and inclusion of our cases. Chromosome 7 trisomy (1/7), chromosome 17 trisomy (0/7) and chromosome Y deletion (0/5 male patients) were seldom detected in this tumor. All patients were alive without metastasis or recurrence at the end of the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our findings may highlight the possibility of a low malignant potential of this emerging entity. We suggest that the tumor be classified as a novel renal cell tumor subtype independent of papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity: A clinicopathological and molecular genetic characterization of 16 cases with expanding the morphologic spectrum and further support for a novel entity

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a recently described, rare renal tumor that differs clinically, morphologically, and molecularly from papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To further characterize the pathological spectrum of this rare tumor, in this study, we retrospectively identified 16 cases of PRNRP from three institutions to comprehensively investigate the clinicopathological and molecular genetic features, using immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). The patients included nine men and seven women, with age ranging from 47 to 80 years (median = 67.5 years, mean = 65 years). The tumor size ranged from 0.4 to 9.5 cm in the greatest dimension (median = 1.8 cm, mean = 2.6 cm). Most tumors (12/16) were incidentally identified by imaging studies. By AJCC stage, 15 were categorized as pT1 and 1 was pT2. Follow-up showed no recurrences, metastases, or disease-related deaths in all the 16 patients. Grossly, 14 cases demonstrated at least a partially cystic appearance. Microscopically, all PRNRPs except 1 (case 13) were composed predominantly of thin, branching papillary architecture covered by a single layer of cuboidal cells with finely granular cytoplasm, and low-grade nuclei typically located toward the apical surface away from the basement. Case 13 consisted mostly of solid, densely packed tubules with only a minor papillary component (5%). Other commonly seen histological features included hyalinized or edematous papillae (n = 11), lymphocyte aggregation in fibrovascular cores (n = 10), mast cell infiltration (n = 8), and intralesional hemorrhage (n = 7). Uncommonly seen histological features included lymphoid cuff (n = 4), hemosiderin deposition (n = 5), foci of clear cell change (n = 4), intracytoplasmic vacuoles (n = 4), eosinophilic hobnail cells (n = 2), and infarct-type necrosis (n = 1). Two PRNRPs were concurrent with ipsilateral clear cell papillary RCC and clear cell RCC, respectively. By IHC, the tumors were consistently positive for GATA3, CK7, and PAX8. Fourteen out of 16 tumors showed a basolateral-membranous E-cadherin expression pattern, and 12/16 cases were positive for 34βE12.The expression of AMACR, CD10, and vimentin was either absent or only weak and focal. By targeted NGS, 13/14 evaluated PRNRPs harbored KRAS missense mutations involving c.35G>T resulting in p.G12V (7/13), c.35G>A resulting in p.G12D (4/13), and c.34G>T resulting in p.G12C (2/13). By FISH, 1/15 had gains of chromosomes 7 and 17, and 2/8 male cases had deletion of chromosomes Y. In conclusion, our study confirms that PRNRP is an indolent renal cell neoplasm with unique morphology, consistent immunohistochemical profile, and recurrent KRAS mutation. Our study expands the morphologic spectrum of PRNRP and provides further evidence supporting it as a novel entity.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma: current and controversial issues

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the second most frequent renal cancer subtype and represents 15-20% of all RCC. Classification of pRCC is changing because novel tumour entities have been discovered in the last years. In this review, we summarise recent studies relevant for the understanding of the molecular complexity and the broader differential diagnosis of pRCC.

RECENT FINDINGS

It has been 25 years ago, that pRCC was morphologically subdivided into type 1 and type 2. Recently described tumour entities in the 2022 WHO classification challenged this concept and allow a new view on the molecular background in pRCC. Biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC and papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity are emerging tumour entities derived from the new concept of molecularly defined RCC subtypes. Immune checkpoint inhibition and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been introduced as the new backbone in the first-line treatment of advanced pRCCs. To identify novel targeted treatments for patients with pRCC it is crucial to investigate the specific molecular background of pRCC considering emerging pRCC subtypes.

SUMMARY

In the future, a deeper understanding of the correlation between molecular aberrations and new pRCC subtypes may improve the classification of pRCC patients and could reveal potential predictive biomarkers for each subgroup.

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity with a favorable prognosis should be separated from papillary renal cell carcinoma

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly documented renal entity with an easily recognizable morphology, distinct immunohistochemical profiles, and frequent KRAS mutations. The latest practice guidelines regard PRNRP as a subtype of papillary renal cell carcinoma due to the documented chromosomal alterations of 7, 17, and Y. This study included 20 patients with PRNRP and 30 patients with PRCC. Statistically significant differences were observed in size, WHO/ISUP grade, macrophages in the papillae, reverse polarity, CK7, basolateral positivity for Claudin7, GATA3 expression, KRAS mutation, and chromosomal alterations. No adverse events such as perinephric invasion, lymphovascular invasion, sarcomatoid of rhabdoid differentiation, metastasis, or recurrence were found in PRNRP. However, PRCC can cause these adverse events. Basolateral positivity for Claudin7 together with GATA3 expression indicated distal tubule derivation of PRNRP. KRAS mutations were detected in 89% (16/18) of PRNRP. No KRAS mutations were detected in PRCC. Six patients with PRNRP had one chromosomal alteration and the other 12 had no chromosomal alterations. However, only four patients with PRCC showed no chromosomal alterations. Eighteen patients had two or three chromosomal alterations. PRCC can metastasize, recur, and even cause death, whereas PRNRP has a favorable prognosis. We recommend that PRNRP should be separated from PRCC and partial nephrectomy is more suitable for PRNRP.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma: a single institutional study of 199 cases addressing classification, clinicopathologic and molecular features, and treatment outcome

The morphologic spectrum of type 1 papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is not well-defined, since a significant proportion of cases have mixed type 1 and 2 histology. We analyzed 199 cases of PRCC with any (even if focal) type 1 features, with a median follow-up of 12 years, to identify clinicopathological features associated with outcome. Ninety-five tumors (48%) of the cohort contained some type 2 component (median amount: 25%; IQR: 10%, 70%). As a group they showed high rates of progression-free (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Tumor size, mitotic rate, lymphovascular invasion, sarcomatoid differentiation, sheet-like architecture, and lack of tumor circumscription were significantly associated with CSS (p ≤ 0.015) on univariate analysis. While predominant WHO/ISUP nucleolar grade was associated with PFS (p = 0.013) and CSS (p = 0.030), the presence of non-predominant (<50%) nucleolar grade did not show association with outcome (p = 0.7). PFS and CSS showed no significant association with the presence or the amount of type 2 morphology. We compared the molecular alterations in paired type 1 and type 2 areas in a subset of 22 cases with mixed type 1 and 2 features and identified 12 recurrently mutated genes including TERT, ARID1A, KDM6A, KMT2D, NFE2L2, MET, APC, and TP53. Among 78 detected somatic mutations, 61 (78%) were shared between the paired type 1 and type 2 areas. Copy number alterations, including chromosome 7 and 17 gains, were similar between type 1 and 2 areas. These findings support that type 2 features in a PRCC with mixed histology represent either morphologic variance or clonal evolution. Our study underscores the notion that PRCC with any classic type 1 regions is best considered as type 1 PRCC and assigned the appropriate WHO/ISUP nucleolar grade. It provides additional evidence that type 2 PRCC as a separate category should be re-assessed and likely needs to be abandoned.

Papillary Renal Neoplasm With Reverse Polarity Is Often Cystic: Report of 7 Cases and Review of 93 Cases in the Literature

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly proposed entity with distinct histology and frequent KRAS mutations. To date, 93 cases of PRNRPs have been reported. In this study, we present 7 new cases of PRNRP and review the literature. Most of the pathologic features in our 7 cases are similar to those previously reported cases. However, all 7 of our cases showed at least partial cystic changes, which was not stressed in prior studies. Single-nucleotide polymorphism-microarray based chromosomal analysis demonstrated no trisomy or other alteration of chromosomes 7 or 17; and no loss or other alteration of chromosome Y was detected in all 7 cases. Next-generation sequencing detected KRAS missense mutations in 4 of 7 cases. No fusion genes were detected. In summary, PRNRP is a small, well-circumscribed often encapsulated and cystic neoplasm with loose papillary formations. Cuboidal tumor cells always have eosinophilic cytoplasm and nuclei located at the pole opposite the basement membrane with a low World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Urologic Pathologists (ISUP) nuclear grade. The fibrovascular cores can be hyalinized or edematous. Macrophage aggregates and intracellular hemosiderin are uncommon, and no psammoma bodies or necrosis should be seen. Immunophenotypically, this tumor is always positive for CK7 and GATA3, and negative for CD117 and vimentin. CD10 and AMACR can be positive, but often weakly and focally. PRNRP often has KRAS mutations, however, only 32% of cases have chromosomal abnormalities in chromosomes 7, 17, and Y. No recurrences, metastases, or tumor-related deaths have been reported following complete resection.

What's new in the WHO 2022 classification of kidney tumours?

The World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 classification of urinary and male genital tumours (5th edition) has significantly improved our understanding of the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics of renal tumours. The aim of this review is to outline the most important changes and diagnostic updates in the WHO 2022 classification of kidney tumours. A major change in this edition is the grouping of renal tumours into broader categories that include "clear cell renal tumours", "papillary renal tumours", "oncocytic and chromophobe renal tumours", "collecting duct tumours" as well as adding two categories of "other renal tumours" and "molecularly defined renal carcinomas". Novel entities included in the WHO 2022 classification are eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged RCC and ELOC (formerly TCEB1)-mutated RCC. The category of "other renal tumours" includes a group of diverse, unrelated renal tumours that do not fit into other categories. The group of "molecularly defined renal carcinomas" reflects recent discoveries in the renal tumour genomics. These molecularly-defined renal entities demonstrate a set of morphologic features reflecting genotype-phenotype relationships. Final diagnosis of such entities rests on phenotypic and immunohistochemical (IHC) correlation, usually associated with IHC surrogate makers that reflect specific genetic abnormalities.

Immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of renal epithelial neoplasms

Despite the increasing number of newly identified renal neoplasms, the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can usually be reached with careful histologic examination and a limited immunohistochemical (IHC) panel. Clear cell, papillary, chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma account for more than 90% of renal neoplasia in adults, and sophisticated ancillary tools are usually unnecessary. Renal tumors with entity-defining genetic alterations may ultimately require molecular confirmation via cytogenetics or sequencing technologies, such as RCC with TFE3, TFEB, or ALK gene rearrangements, or TFEB amplified RCC. In fumarate hydratase-deficient and succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC, highly specific IHC markers can strongly suggest the diagnosis. In the metastatic setting, PAX8 and carbonic anhydrase 9 are among the most helpful markers for confirming RCC and clear cell type, respectively; however, caution should be exercised in the absence of a current or historical renal mass. In diagnostically challenging cases, such as renal eosinophilic tumors with low-grade nuclear features, or infiltrative high-grade tumors, careful examination coupled with a judicious panel of IHC markers usually resolves the diagnosis. This review offers concise algorithms for diagnosis of kidney neoplasia with the latest recognized, provisional, and emerging entities to daily pathology practice.

EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion renal cell carcinoma: a recurrent gene fusion characterizing thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinoma

Thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinoma is an uncommon kidney tumor with no distinct molecular alteration described to date. This cohort of eight women with mean and median ages of 45 and 46 years, respectively (range 19-65 years), had unencapsulated, well-circumscribed tumors composed of tightly packed anastomosing follicle-like cysts filled with eosinophilic colloid-like material and lined by cuboidal cells with high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios, oval to elongated nuclei with perpendicular arrangement toward the lumens, and prominent nuclear overlapping. The stroma between these was minimal with the exception of two tumors. Calcifications and necrosis were absent. Immunohistochemically, the tumors were positive for KRT19 (7/7), PAX8 (5/5), cyclin D1 (6/6), KRT7 (5/7), and AMACR (1/5; focal, weak), and were negative for WT1, TTF1 (transcription termination factor-1), and thyroglobulin. In three of three tumors tested molecularly, EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion was identified by RNA sequencing and confirmed by RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing. Over a follow-up period of 1-7 years, no evidence of recurrence or metastasis has been detected. The EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion has been recognized as a recurrent alteration in a subset of round to spindle cell sarcomas with EWSR1-non-ETS fusions (EWSR1-PATZ1 sarcoma) and in several central nervous system tumors. The finding of an EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion in all three of the thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinomas for which sufficient tissue was available for genomic profiling provides the first distinct molecular abnormality in thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinomas, supporting its designation as a distinct diagnostic entity.

New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) reviewed recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, to provide an update on existing entities, including diagnostic criteria, molecular correlates, and updated nomenclature. Key prognostic features for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain WHO/ISUP grade, AJCC/pTNM stage, coagulative necrosis, and rhabdoid and sarcomatoid differentiation. Accrual of subclonal genetic alterations in clear cell RCC including SETD2, PBRM1, BAP1, loss of chromosome 14q and 9p are associated with variable prognosis, patterns of metastasis, and vulnerability to therapies. Recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines increasingly adopt immunotherapeutic agents in advanced RCC, including RCC with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid changes. Papillary RCC subtyping is no longer recommended, as WHO/ISUP grade and tumor architecture better predict outcome. New papillary RCC variants/patterns include biphasic, solid, Warthin-like, and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. For tumors with 'borderline' features between oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, a term "oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, not further classified" is proposed. Clear cell papillary RCC may warrant reclassification as a tumor of low malignant potential. Tubulocystic RCC should only be diagnosed when morphologically pure. MiTF family translocation RCCs exhibit varied morphologic patterns and fusion partners. TFEB-amplified RCC occurs in older patients and is associated with more aggressive behavior. Acquired cystic disease (ACD) RCC-like cysts are likely precursors of ACD-RCC. The diagnosis of renal medullary carcinoma requires a negative SMARCB1 (INI-1) expression and sickle cell trait/disease. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) can be distinguished from papillary RCC with overlapping morphology by losses of chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 22. MTSCC with adverse histologic features shows frequent CDKN2A/2B (9p) deletions. BRAF mutations unify the metanephric family of tumors. The term "fumarate hydratase deficient RCC" ("FH-deficient RCC") is preferred over "hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome-associated RCC". A low threshold for FH, 2SC, and SDHB immunohistochemistry is recommended in difficult to classify RCCs, particularly those with eosinophilic morphology, occurring in younger patients. Current evidence does not support existence of a unique tumor subtype occurring after chemotherapy/radiation in early childhood.

Distal Tubular Hyperplasia: A Proposal for a Unique Form of Renal Tubular Proliferation Distinct From Papillary Adenoma

We identified an unusual pattern of renal tubular proliferation associated with chronic renal disease, found in 23 patients, diffusely (n=12), or focally (n=11). Incidence was 5% of end-stage renal disease kidneys from one institution (8/177) and 7/23 patients with acquired cystic kidney disease-associated renal cell carcinoma from another. Most (19 patients) had 1 or more neoplasms including papillary (n=9), acquired cystic kidney disease (n=8), clear cell (n=4), or clear cell papillary (n=3) renal cell carcinoma. All (20 men, 3 women) had end-stage renal disease. The predominant pattern (n=18) was the indentation of chronic inflammation into renal tubules forming small polypoid structures; however, 5 had predominantly hyperplastic epithelium with less conspicuous inflammation. In 14 patients both patterns were appreciable, whereas the remainder had only the inflammatory pattern. Immunohistochemistry was positive for cytokeratin 7, high-molecular-weight cytokeratin, PAX8, and GATA3. Staining for alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase was negative or weak, dramatically less intense than papillary neoplasms or proximal tubules. CD3 and CD20 showed a mixture of B and T lymphocytes in the inflammatory areas. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed no trisomy 7 or 17 or loss of Y (n=9). We describe a previously uncharacterized form of renal tubular proliferation that differs from papillary adenoma (with weak or negative alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase, lack of trisomy 7 or 17, and sometimes diffuse distribution). On the basis of consistent staining for high-molecular-weight cytokeratin and GATA3, we propose the name distal tubular hyperplasia for this process. Future studies will be helpful to assess preneoplastic potential and etiology.

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma in Lynch/Muir-Torre Syndrome with Germline Pathogenic Variant in MSH6 and Molecular Analysis: Report of a Case and Review of the Literature

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder due to pathogenic variations in the mismatch repair genes, which predisposes to malignancies, most commonly colon and endometrial carcinoma. Muir-Torre syndrome is a subset of LS with cutaneous sebaceous adenoma and keratoacanthoma in addition to the malignancies. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with LS is extremely rare. Only 26 cases have been reported and among them, only two cases of papillary RCC. We report a case of synchronous papillary RCC and colonic adenocarcinoma in an 85-year-old male with Lynch/Muir-Torre syndrome. The LS was diagnosed when he presented with multiple sebaceous adenomas and genetic testing showed a pathogenic variant in MSH6 mismatch repair gene. A colonoscopy at that time showed multiple tubular adenomas with high-grade dysplasia. He was lost to follow-up and presented with gastrointestinal bleeding after 20 years. A right colonic mass, and a solid mass in the lower pole of the right kidney, was detected by imaging. Right Colectomy showed a T3N0 mucin-producing adenocarcinoma. Right nephrectomy showed a T3a papillary RCC which was microsatellite stable with MSH6, and KRAS mutation. The 36-month follow-up exams showed additional sebaceous neoplasms, and an absence of metastatic carcinoma. Analysis of the reported cases of RCC in LS show clear cell RCC as the most common type. These tumors showed MLH1 mutation most commonly, unlike the urothelial malignancies in LS which involve MSH2. Among the 4 cases of RCC with MSH6 mutation, three were in females, indicating some gender differences.

Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity and its renal papillary adenoma analogue

AIMS

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly defined entity with distinct histomorphology and recurrent KRAS mutation. It has been estimated to constitute 4% of previously diagnosed papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). Renal papillary adenoma (PA) is suggested to be the precursor of PRCC. This study aimed to investigate the association between PRNRP and PA, particularly the morphologically similar type D PA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nephrectomy specimens of PRCC and PA from our 10-year pathology archives were retrieved and reviewed. GATA3 immunohistochemistry and RAS/BRAF testing were performed in all cases reclassified as PRNRP and all PAs with sufficient materials. Overall, PRNRP accounted for 9.1% (10 of 110) of PRCC and there was no recurrence/metastasis with a mean follow-up period of 39 months. Three novel morphological features were described, including clear cell change, mast cell infiltration and metaplastic ossification. Nine of the 10 PRNRPs showed diffuse and strong GATA3 expression and KRAS missense mutations at codon 12. One case exhibited moderate GATA3 staining on 80% of the tumour cells and RAS/BRAF wild-type. In a total of 73 PAs, 11 were classified as type D. GATA3 expression was significantly more frequent in type D versus non-type D PAs (100 versus 35%, P < 0.01). KRAS missense mutations were identified in six of eight (75%) of the type D PAs but none of the 18 non-type D PAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Type D PA was different from other types of PA and represented an analogue or a small-sized PRNRP for their identical morphology, immunophenotype and molecular signature.

Morphological, immunohistochemical, and genomic analyses of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a recently proposed entity of renal tumor. It shows a far better prognosis than papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) and frequently has KRAS missense mutation. In this study, we compared 14 cases of PRNRP and 10 cases of PRCC type 1 (PRCC1) and type 2 (PRCC2) from clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular biological perspectives. We subjected all PRNRP and PRCC cases to immunohistochemical analysis. Whole-exome sequencing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for six cases of PRNRP, three cases of PRCC1, and four cases of PRCC2. A search for KRAS gene mutation in the remaining eight cases of PRNRP was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sequencing. The results showed that all cases of PRNRP were pT1N0M0, none of which followed a course of recurrence or tumor-related death. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed diffuse staining of CK7, EMA, PAX8, and GATA3 but weak or negative staining of CD10, CD15, and AMACR in PRNRP. By NGS and PCR, KRAS missense mutation was detected in 11 of 14 PRNRP cases, although pathogenic KRAS mutation was not observed in PRCC1 and PRCC2. NGS analysis revealed less tumor mutation burden in PRNRP than in PRCC. PRNRP also showed no specific chromosomal copy number abnormalities, including gains of 7 and 17. In conclusion, we propose that PRNRP is a distinct condition from PRCC.

Towards a new WHO classification of renal cell tumor: what the clinician needs to know-a narrative review

In 1952, renal cell carcinomas had been divided into 2 categories—clear cell or granular cell—depending upon their cytoplasmic staining characteristics. In the following years, the inventory of renal epithelial tumors has expanded by the addition of tumors named by their architectural pattern (i.e., papillary RCC, tubulocystic RCC), anatomic location (i.e., collecting duct carcinoma, renal medullary carcinoma), associated diseases (i.e., acquired cystic disease-associated RCCs). With the extensive application of molecular diagnostic techniques, it becomes possible to detect genetic distinctions between various types of renal neoplasm and discover new entities, otherwise misdiagnosed or diagnosed as unclassified RCC. Some tumors such as ALK rearrangement-associated RCC, MiT family translocation renal carcinomas, SDH-deficient renal cancer or FH-deficient RCC, are defined by their molecular characteristics. The most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal neoplasms account for more than 50 entities and provisional entities. New entities might be included in the upcoming WHO classification. The aim of this review is to summarise and discuss the newly acquired data and evidence on the clinical, pathological, molecular features and on the prognosis of new RCC entities, which will hopefully increase the awareness and the acceptance of these entities among clinicians and improve prognostication for individual patients.

Renal neoplasia with papillary architecture involving the pelvicalyceal system

Pelvicalyceal system (PS) involvement by renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is staged as pT3a disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC], 8th edition). As papillary RCC (PRCC) has been infrequently represented in studies looking at the prognostic impact of PS involvement, we reviewed our institutional cohort of 8225 cases for PS involvement by PRCC. Nine such cases were subjected to histopathologic review and immunohistochemistry. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for TFE3/TFEB alterations was performed if indicated. One case each (1 of 9, 11%) was classified as TFE3-rearranged and FH-deficient RCC. The majority were high grade (World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology grade 3: 8 of 9, 89%) or had features of aggressive disease, including hilar fat (6 of 9, 67%) and regional lymph node involvement (5 of 7, 71%). One low-grade 3.3-cm tumor with isolated PS involvement with a germline heterozygous FH p.Lys477dup alteration with retained FH, lack of increased S-(2-succino)-cysteine expression, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry positivity, and lack of trisomy 7/17 on chromosomal microarray was identified, arguing against an FH-deficient and conventional PRCC. Our study shows that PS involvement by renal neoplasia with papillary architecture is a rare event. Aside from PRCC, it is important to note that these may include other aggressive and nonaggressive subtypes of renal neoplasia with papillary architecture. One case of isolated PS involvement by a low-grade, noninvasive tumor that we refer to as nephrogenic papillary neoplasm was identified. At present, there are insufficient data to stage such tumors as pT3a (AJCC, 8th edition), and additional studies are needed to address this question.

Unilateral synchronous papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a case report with KRAS and PIK3CA mutations

Background

The presence of histologically different neoplasms in the same organ is rare in pathologic practice. We report the first case of synchronous clear cell renal cell carcinoma (clear cell RCC) and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) with comprehensive immunohistochemical and molecular characterization using next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Case presentation

A 61-year-old man was incidentally found to have a left renal mass on imaging studies performed for workup of left back pain and urine color change for 1 week. A laparoscopic left radical nephrectomy was performed. Gross examination showed lobulated masses measuring 5.6 × 4.0 × 3.3 cm in the upper to mid pole and 1.1 × 1.0 × 1.0 cm in the lower pole. Microscopic findings revealed these to be two different separate masses of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. NGS analyses revealed KRAS gene mutation (c.35G > T/p.G12V in exon 2) in the papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, with PIK3CA gene mutation restricted to the clear cell renal cell carcinoma (c.1624G > A/p.E542K in exon 10).

Conclusions

We report here an extraordinarily rare case of synchronous renal tumors of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity and clear cell renal cell carcinoma. We identified simultaneous KRAS and PIK3CA mutations in two different renal masses in the same kidney for the first time. New pathologic assessment with comparative molecular analysis of mutational profiles may be helpful for tumor studies.

High WHO/ISUP Grade and Unfavorable Architecture, Rather Than Typing of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma, May Be Associated With Worse Prognosis

Conflicting data have been published on the prognostic significance of histologic parameters in papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of clinical and histologic parameters in PRCC in nephrectomies and their impact on prognosis, with an emphasis on World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, tumor architecture (solid, micropapillary, and hobnail), and PRCC type. A total of 185 PRCC cases were evaluated, 117 (63.2%) type 1, 45 (24.3%) type 2, and 11 (5.9%) mixed type 1 and type 2. Using WHO/ISUP grading criteria, PRCCs were graded as follows: 6 (3.2%) grade 1; 116 (62.7%) grade 2; 61 (33.0%) grade 3; and 2 (1.1%) grade 4. The solid architecture was present in 3 cases (1.6%) and comprised 10%, 10%, and 30% of the tumor area. Micropapillary architecture was present in 10 cases (5.4%), ranging from 5% to 30% of the tumor (mean=11%; median=10%). Hobnail architecture was seen in 9 cases (4.9%), with mean percentage of 23% (median=15%; range: 5% to 50%) involvement of tumor area. Parameters associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the univariate analysis included WHO/ISUP grade, pathologic stage, tumor size, and solid, micropapillary, or hobnail architecture (P<0.05). The pathologic stage and WHO/ISUP grade were significantly associated with both DFS and OS in stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis (P<0.05). In addition, micropapillary architecture and type 1 histology were linked with an adverse impact on OS (P<0.05). We found no difference in DFS (P=0.8237) and OS (P=0.8222) for type 1 versus type 2 PRCC in our patient cohort. In addition, we performed a meta-analysis with data from studies with reported hazard ratios (HRs) on PRCC type in relation to DFS and OS. We identified 5 studies that reported DFS and found no significant effect for type 2 PRCC (P=0.30; HR=1.43; 95% confidence interval: 0.73-2.80). We identified 7 studies that reported OS and found no significant association between type 2 PRCC and worse OS (P=0.41; HR: 1.21; 95% confidence interval: 0.77-1.91). Our findings suggest that high WHO/ISUP grade and unfavorable architecture (solid, micropapillary, or hobnail), rather than typing of PRCC, are associated with worse outcomes.

Frequent KRAS mutations in oncocytic papillary renal neoplasm with inverted nuclei

AIMS

Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly documented rare tumour type. Its molecular pathological features have thus far been very little studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

There were 13 PRNRP cases including 3 The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cases and our 10 cases in this study. The 3 TCGA cases were found by a combined analysis of GATA3 mRNA expression levels and digital slides from the TCGA papillary renal cell carcinoma project. KRAS codon 12 mutations were identified in the three PRNRPs from TCGA. Of our 10 PRNRP cases, the mutations were also discovered using Sanger sequencing in seven (77.8%) of nine cases with available DNA, where KRAS p.G12V (n = 3), p.G12D (n = 2), p.G12R (n = 1) and p.G12C (n = 1) alterations were found. PRNRP shared similar gene expression profiles with renal distal tubules via an interprofile correlation analysis. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that genes involved in 'KEGG aldosterone regulated sodium reabsorption' or 'hallmark apical surface' were enriched in PRNRP. Moreover, polarised immunostaining patterns for L1CAM and EMA in the distal tubule were maintained in PRNRP.

CONCLUSIONS

These results imply that the tumour potentially originates from the distal tubule, especially from the cortical collecting duct, and probably retains its cell polarity, except for nuclear inversion. We therefore propose that oncocytic papillary renal neoplasm with inverted nuclei (OPRNIN) is a better name for this tumour type. OPRNIN is a kidney site-specific KRAS mutation neoplasm different from conventional papillary renal cell carcinoma.