Current methods of testing for human papillomavirus

Different Methods in HPV Genotyping of Anogenital and Oropharyngeal Lesions: Comparison between VisionArray® Technology, Next Generation Sequencing, and Hybrid Capture Assay

(1) Background: Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are known to be related to the development of about 5% of all human cancers. The clinical relevance of HPV infection has been deeply investigated in carcinomas of the oropharyngeal area, uterine cervix, and anogenital area. To date, several different methods have been used for detecting HPV infection. The aim of the present study was to compare three different methods for the diagnosis of the presence of the HPV genome. (2) Methods: A total of 50 samples were analyzed. Twenty-five of them were tested using both next generation sequencing (NGS) and VisionArray® technology, the other 25 were tested using Hybrid Capture (HC) II assay and VisionArray® technology. (3) Results: A substantial agreement was obtained using NGS and VisionArray® (κ = 0.802), as well as between HC II and VisionArray® (κ = 0.606). In both analyses, the concordance increased if only high risk HPVs I(HR-HPVs) were considered as “positive”. (4) Conclusions: Our data highlighted the importance of technical choice in HPV characterization, which should be guided by the clinical aims, costs, starting material, and turnaround time for results.

Methylation in the promoter regions of WT1, NKX6-1 and DBC1 genes in cervical cancer tissues of Uygur women in Xinjiang

This study aimed to explore: 1) DNA methylation in the promoter regions of Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1), NK6 transcription factor related locus 1 gene (NKX6-1) and Deleted in bladder cancer 1 (DBC1) gene in cervical cancer tissues of Uygur women in Xinjiang, and 2) the correlation of gene methylation with the infection of HPV16/18 viruses. We detected HPV16/18 infection in 43 normal cervical tissues, 30 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions (CIN) and 48 cervical cancer tissues with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Methylation in the promoter regions of the WT1, NKX6-1 and DBC1 genes in the above-mentioned tissues was measured by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and cloning sequencing. The expression level of these three genes was measured by real-time PCR (qPCR) in 10 methylation-positive cervical cancer tissues and 10 methylation-negative normal cervical tissues. We found that the infection of HPV16 in normal cervical tissues, CIN and cervical cancer tissues was 14.0, 36.7 and 66.7%, respectively. The infection of HPV18 was 0, 6.7 and 10.4%, respectively. The methylation rates of WT1, NKX6-1 and DBC1 genes were 7.0, 11.6 and 23.3% in normal cervical tissues, 36.7, 46.7 and 30.0% in CIN tissues, and 89.6, 77.1 and 85.4% in cervical cancer tissues. Furthermore, WT1, NKX6-1 and DBC1 genes were hypermethylated in the high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN2, CIN3) and in the cervical cancer tissues with infection of HPV16/18 (both P< 0.05). The expression of WT1, NKX6-1 and DBC1 was significantly lower in the methylation-positive cervical cancer tissues than in methylation-negative normal cervical tissues. Our findings indicated that methylation in the promoter regions of WT1, NKX6-1 and DBC1 is correlated with cervical cancer tumorigenesis in Uygur women. The infection of HPV16/18 might be correlated with methylation in these genes. Gene inactivation caused by methylation might be related to the incidence and development of cervical cancer.

Viral and cellular biomarkers in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer

Cervical cancer arises from cells localized in the ectoendocervical squamocolumnar junction of the cervix persistently infected with one of about 13 human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes. The majority of HPV infections induces low grade squamous epithelial lesions that in more than 90% of cases spontaneously regress and in about 10% eventually progress to high grade lesions and even less frequently evolve to invasive cancer. Tumor progression is characterized by (1) increased expression of E6 and E7 genes of high risk HPVs, known to bind to and inactivate p53 and pRb oncosuppressors, respectively; (2) integration of viral DNA into host genome, with disruption of E2 viral genes and host chromosomal loci; and (3) molecular alterations of key regulators of cell cycle. Molecular markers with high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating viral infections associated with cellular abnormalities with high risk of progression are strongly needed for cervical cancer screening and triage. This review will focus on the analysis of clinical validated or candidate biomarkers, such as HPV DNA, HPV E6/E7 mRNA, HPV proteins, p16(INK4a) and Ki67, TOP2A and MCM2 cellular factors, and DNA methylation profiles, which will likely improve the identification of premalignant lesions that have a high risk to evolve into invasive cervical cancer.

Electrochemical detection of human papillomavirus DNA type 16 using a pyrrolidinyl peptide nucleic acid probe immobilized on screen-printed carbon electrodes

An electrochemical biosensor based on an immobilized anthraquinone-labeled pyrrolidinyl peptide nucleic acid (acpcPNA) probe was successfully developed for the selective detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 DNA. A 14-mer acpcPNA capture probe was designed to recognize a specific 14 nucleotide region of HPV type 16 L1 gene. The redox-active label anthraquinone (AQ) was covalently attached to the N-terminus of the acpcPNA probe through an amide bond. The probe was immobilized onto a chitosan-modified disposable screen-printed carbon electrode via a C-terminal lysine residue using glutaraldehyde as a cross-linking agent. Hybridization with the target DNA was studied by measuring the electrochemical signal response of the AQ label using square-wave voltammetric analysis. The calibration curve exhibited a linear range between 0.02 and 12.0 µM with a limit of detection and limit of quantitation of 4 and 14 nM, respectively. This DNA sensing platform was successfully applied to detect the HPV type 16 DNA from a PCR amplified (240 bp fragment of the L1 gene) sample derived from the HPV type 16 positive human cancer cell line (SiHa), and failed to detect the HPV-negative c33a cell line. The sensor probe exhibited very high selectivity for the complementary 14 base oligonucleotide over the non-complementary oligonucleotides with sequences derived from HPV types 18, 31 and 33. The proposed sensor provides an inexpensive tool for the early stage detection of HPV type 16, which is an important biomarker for cervical cancer.

New technology for cervical cancer screening

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women worldwide. With the introduction of organized cervical cytological screening programs, the incidence of cervical cancer has been dramatically reduced.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the new technology that can potentially afford unique advantages for cervical cancer screening.

METHODS

Cervical specimens collected in PreservCyt were processed for ThinPrep cytological test, the new technology test and human papillomavirus detection.

RESULTS

The concordance between the new technology and ThinPrep cytological test was 96.34%, with 931 cases positive and 148 cases negative with both tests (κ = 0.857). The sensitivity and the specificity of the new technology were 99.04% (931/940) and 82.22% (148/180), respectively. Youden index was 0.81. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were 96.68% (931/963) and 94.27% (148/157), respectively. In the 124 positive cases of the new technology, human papillomavirus DNA test was positive in 109 cases (87.9%) and negative in 15 cases (12.1%). Compared to the histopathological diagnosis, the sensitivity and the negative predictive value of the new technology were 98.57% (69/70) and 95.45% (21/22), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The screening design will enable evaluation of several competing screening technologies in reducing the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer. In particular, if the new technology is used as the screening test, it can be a quick screening test and does not depend on the subjective judgment of the doctors. As such, it could potentially afford unique advantages for screening.

Biomarkers of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma

Although cervical cytology screening has decreased the incidence of cervical cancer in industrialized countries, HPV-related cervical disease, including premalignant and malignant lesions, continues to represent a major burden on the health care system. Some of the problems include the potential for either under- or overtreatment of women due to decreased specificity of screening tests as well as significant interobserver variability in the diagnosis of cervical dysplastic lesions. Although not completely elucidated, the HPV-driven molecular mechanisms underlying the development of cervical lesions have provided a number of potential biomarkers for both diagnostic and prognostic use in the clinical management of these women.

Clinical significance of human papillomavirus genotype by linear array assay in Japanese women with uterine cervical lesions and type 16 physical status by in situ hybridization

The aim of this study was to clarify the relation of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes and physical status in the cervical neoplasm of Japanese patients with the grade of the disease. Human papillomavirus genotype was detected using a linear array genotyping assay. Human papillomavirus status, diffuse or punctate signal pattern, was studied by biotynyl-tyramide-based in situ hybridization for positive cases of HPV-16. Human papillomavirus types 16, 52, 58, and 31, in descending order of frequency, were prevalent. The rates of HPV infection in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were significantly higher than those in patients without cervical lesions. The frequency of HPV single infection in SCC was higher than that in CIN1 or CIN2. In an unspecified-risk HPV, types 66 and 70 were found in SCC and 62, 71, and 82 were detected in CIN3. The diffuse pattern was more frequent in CIN, and the punctate pattern was more frequent in SCC. Human papillomavirus types 16, 52, 58, and 31 were frequently detected in Japanese women with cervical neoplasias, and several unspecified-risk HPVs might be high-risk types. A single infection of HPV and a punctate signal pattern seemed to be closely correlated with cervical carcinogenesis.

A novel method of HPV genotyping using Hybrid Capture sample preparation method combined with GP5+/6+ PCR and multiplex detection on Luminex XMAP

A novel DNA detection assay comprising Hybrid Capture sample preparation, GP5+/6+ PCR with modifications and Luminex 100 detection was developed and applied to genotyping of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical samples. Target-specific sample preparation was performed using magnetic beads conjugated with Hybrid Capture (HC) antibody. DNA-RNA hybrids were formed between DNA target and RNA probes and captured on HC-beads. DNA on magnetic beads was amplified without elution using consensus GP5+/6+ PCR and then genotyped on Luminex beads using hybridization probes for the 17 high-risk HPV types 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, 73, 82 and an internal control. This new sequence-specific Hybrid Capture sample preparation is fast, efficient and allows direct HPV genotyping by PCR. Compared to traditional non-sequence-specific sample preparation methods, HC sample preparation demonstrated slightly better detection of multiple HPV infections. The clinical utility of this method was demonstrated on cervical samples positive for HR HPV by the Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2) screening assay.

Pap cytopathology and the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus in SurePath™ liquid preservative and Digene cervical sampler specimens

The Digene Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) identified 92 (28.7%) infected women by testing 320 SurePath liquid-based Pap samples and a hybrid capture 2 (HC2) sampler collection. HPV positivity was predictive for high-grade lesions. A majority of women had normal cervical readings although 15.8% were HPV-positive. Half of the patients with a reading of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (n=16) were HPV-positive.

Human papillomavirus testing and molecular markers of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the etiologic agent for the vast majority of premalignant and malignant lesions, and high-risk HPV types can be detected in almost all cases of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma. HPV testing has been widely adopted for the triage of patients after a cervical cytology screening test (Papanicolaou smear or liquid-based cervical cytology such as ThinPrep or SurePath) interpretation of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), and HPV testing is increasingly used for screening in conjunction with cervical cytology. Although cervical cytology is a highly effective screening test for cancer, it has limited specificity for clinically significant lesions in cases with low-grade cytologic abnormalities. Up to a quarter of all patients may have a false-negative result on the basis of cervical cytology testing alone. This review focuses on HPV testing methods and molecular markers and their clinical relevance. HPV testing and surrogate molecular markers of HPV infection (p16INK4a) may help identify cases that are associated with underlying high-grade premalignant or malignant lesions and may also reduce aggressive treatment of patients with low-grade lesions.

[Prevention of cervical cancer: screening, progress and perspectives]

Worldwide, cervical cancer is diagnosed annually in more than 500,000 women and accounts for 270,000 deaths, making it the second leading cause of cancer in women. In Europe, where many countries have set up screening program, cervical cancer ranks third among cancers in women. In France, cervical cancer is diagnosed in 3400-4500 women each year and kills 1000-1600. Since its introduction, Pap smear screening has transformed cervical cancer from a fatal disease into a rare condition. Despite the considerable success of this cytologic screening, Pap smears have not, as was first hoped, reduced incidence on a large scale. The principal reasons are related to the difficulties in ensuring optimum coverage of the population to be screened and in maximizing women's adherence: the success of screening depends on strict compliance with the calendar from 25 to 65 years of age. In 1/3 of cases, invasive cancers are found in women who undergo regular screening, because Pap smears are insufficiently sensitive. In 5% of cases, cancers are observed in women who were inappropriately managed after an abnormal Pap smear finding. The contribution of the HPV test to primary screening opens up promising perspectives of optimum protection. The test's sensitivity for high-grade lesions exceeds 95% and its negative predictive value exceeds 99%. The HPV test is the only test available for which a negative result provides instantaneous assurance that there is no risk of cervical cancer. The Pap smear alone, with its sensitivity of less than 70%, cannot provide this certainty. European and American guidelines recommend screening strategies based on a combined test using the Pap smear and HPV test after the age of 30 years. The impending availability of prophylactic HPV vaccines, which are expected to provide 70% protection against cervical cancer, will not affect the practice of screening, which must continue.

Prospective evaluation of the Hybrid Capture 2 and AMPLICOR human papillomavirus (HPV) tests for detection of 13 high-risk HPV genotypes in atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance

The use of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology in population-based screening programs is currently based on DNA hybridization and PCR assays. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of the Hybrid Capture 2 test (HC2; Digene Corporation) in comparison with that of the recently developed PCR-based AMPLICOR HPV test (Roche Molecular Systems) for the detection of 13 hrHPV types. A reverse line blot hybridization assay (Innogenetics) was used as an internal reference standard in discordant cases. Two hundred seventy-one patients with atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (ASCUS) in cervical samples underwent hrHPV testing. The chi-square test was performed to compare respective proportions. Totals of 160/271 (59%) and 156/271 (58%) were found to be positive for hrHPV with HC2 and AMPLICOR, respectively. Concordant results were obtained for 235 (86.7%) of the 271 samples (kappa statistic, 0.73 +/- 0.04). Considering types 26, 53, and 66 as oncogenic types, negative predictive values (NPVs) of HC2 and AMPLICOR were 92.8% and 87.8%, respectively (difference was not significant), and their respective accuracies were 94.8% and 91.9% (difference was not significant). Considering types 26, 53, and 66 as not oncogenic, the respective HC2 and AMPLICOR NPVs were 92.8% and 97.4% (difference was not significant), and accuracy was significantly higher for the AMPLICOR assay (95.9% versus 90.8% for HC2) (P<0.05). For ASCUS samples, the NPV was 92.8% for HC2 testing and might be compromised if the copy number of HPV DNA was low. The NPV was 97.4% for the AMPLICOR assay and might be compromised if HPV types 26, 53, and 66 were considered oncogenic. The accuracy of these two assays is good and is compatible with routine clinical use in the triage of ASCUS cases.

Simultaneous amplification and identification of 25 human papillomavirus types with Templex technology

The majority of existing human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assays are based on multiplex PCR using consensus or degenerate primers. We developed a Templex HPV assay that simultaneously detects and identifies 25 common HPV genotypes in a single-tube reaction using type-specific primers for the HPV-specific E6 and E7 genes. The analytical sensitivities of the Templex assay for HPV type 16 (HPV-16), -18, and -56 were 20, 100, and 20 copies per reaction mixture, respectively. The Templex assay provides semiquantitative information on each type when multiple HPV types coexist in one reaction. We tested 109 clinical cervical specimens previously evaluated with the Digene HC2 high-risk HPV DNA test and found 95.4% concordance between the assay results. The Templex assay provided type-specific results and found multiple types in 29.2% (14 of 48) of high-risk HPV-positive samples. The entire Templex procedure, including DNA extraction, can be completed within 5 hours, providing a rapid and reliable diagnostic tool for HPV detection and typing that is amenable to automation.

Resolving repeatedly borderline results of Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA Test using polymerase chain reaction and genotyping

The Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA Test (hc2) (Digene Corporation, Gaithersburg, MD) is at present the only FDA approved assay for routine detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. A significant analytical inaccuracy of the hc2 near to cut-off was reported recently. To address this problem, 240 samples with repeatedly borderline/equivocal/indeterminate hc2 results (samples with repeated RLU/CO values between 0.4 and 4.0) were tested using the PGMY09/PGMY11 consensus PCR and genotyping in order to resolve their high-risk HPV status. All PGMY09/PGMY11 PCR negative samples were tested in addition using CPI/IIg consensus PCR. A false negative rate of 11.3% and false positive rate of 19.1% were recorded in the samples with repeatedly borderline hc2 results. The corresponding hc2 false reactivity rates in 95 samples selected at random which were clearly hc2 negative (samples with RLU/CO values less than 0.4) and 124 samples selected at random which were clearly hc2 positive (samples with RLU/CO values more than 4.0) were 4.2% and 5.6%, respectively. The proportion of hc2 false reactivity increased with proximity to the hc2 cut-off value. According to the results of the present study, the introduction of an hc2 grey-zone and retesting of samples with repeatedly borderline hc2 results by an alternate HPV detection method, such as the PGMY09/PGMY11 consensus PCR and genotyping, is recommended.

DNA recovery from Hybrid Capture II samples stored in specimen transport medium with denaturing reagent, for the detection of human papillomavirus by PCR

The purpose of this study was to examine the quality of DNA recovered for human papillomavirus (HPV) detection using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in samples that had been collected for Hybrid Capture II (HCII), testing and stored in specimen transport medium (STM) with denaturing reagent at -20 degrees C for 18 months. Endocervical tissue was collected from 92 women for HCII assay using the Digene STM, and a Papanicolaou smear was carried out in all cases. Seven women had normal colposcopy results. The remaining 85 patients underwent colposcopy-directed biopsy or cervical conization for histological investigation. Of the 92 samples tested, 84 were HCII-positive and 8 were negative. Quality control for amplification was carried out with beta-globin primers G73 and G74, and HPV was tested using PGMY09 and PGMY11. DNA was recovered from 83 of the 92 samples (90%). Among the 84 samples HCII-positive initially, HPV was detected by PCR in 56 (67%). PCR did not detect HPV DNA in the eight samples that were HCII-negative, although five of them were positive for beta-globin. This paper describes a novel DNA extraction technique that may permit exact HPV typing in stored samples collected originally for HCII testing, making it possible to carry out retrospective investigations to retrieve information on specific HPV types in large HCII series.

Presence of high-risk mucosal human papillomavirus genotypes in primary melanoma and in acquired dysplastic melanocytic naevi

BACKGROUND

Some studies have shown that cutaneous and mucosal melanoma biopsy specimens harbour human papillomavirus (HPV), suggesting that this virus may play a role in development and progression of the tumour.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the presence of HPV DNA and the prevalence of different high-risk mucosal HPV genotypes in primary melanoma (PM) and in acquired dysplastic melanocytic naevi (ADMN).

METHODS

Fifty-one PMs from 18 men and 33 women (median age 55.5 years), 33 ADMN from 15 men and 18 women (median age 35.1 years) and 20 control skin samples from nine men and 11 women (median age 43.5 years) were studied. All diagnoses were made after histological analysis. HPV DNA analysis was made using two different polymerase chain reaction-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA) methods, namely MY-PCR and GP-PCR.

RESULTS

Using GP-PCR, mucosal HPVs were detected in 14 PMs (27%; P = 0.0166) and eight ADMN (24%; P = 0.0367), while with MY-PCR, mucosal HPVs were found in 11 PMs (22%; P = 0.04) and five ADMN (15%; P not significant). All control skin samples were negative for mucosal HPVs with both DNA amplification procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Using our PCR-ELISA methods, the detection of mucosal high-risk HPV genotypes in 24% of precursor lesions (ADMN) and in 27% of PMs adds to the body of evidence indicating a colocalization of mucosal HPV and tumoral melanocytic pathologies.

DNA- versus RNA-based methods for human papillomavirus detection in cervical neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

To compare DNA-based and mRNA-based methods for detection of high-grade cervical neoplasia in Norway.

METHODS

HPV prevalence was analyzed in 383 women with positive index cytology, selected from gynecology clinics. All patients were investigated by a new PAP smear, histology, and two commercially available HPV tests: Hybrid Capture II (Digene, Gaithersburg, MD) and the Pre Tect HPV-Proofer (NorChip AS). Cases with positive DNA test and negative mRNA test and cases with high-grade histology and negative HPV tests were retested with PCR and sequencing. We regarded the infection as latent or transient if sequencing revealed an HPV type included in both assays.

RESULTS

High-risk HPV was detected in 99.7% of the histological confirmed high-grade lesions (CIN2+) (290/291). The DNA test was positive in 95% (275/291), and the mRNA test was positive in 77% (225/291) of the histological confirmed high-grade lesions. All invasive carcinomas were mRNA positive. The DNA test was significantly more often positive in benign and low-grade lesions, some of which were found to be false positive due to cross-contamination with unrelated types. High-grade histology was detected in 83% of women with normal cytology and positive mRNA test. Latent or transient infections were detected in 11 low-grade and 12 high-grade preinvasive lesions. Sequencing revealed high-risk HPV types included only in the DNA test in 35 high-grade preinvasive lesions, HPV 52 and 58 were the most prevalent HPV types.

CONCLUSIONS

These HPV tests have the potential to improve the detection rate of high-grade cervical neoplasia, with some limitations. The mRNA test seems to be more appropriate for risk-evaluation. Larger scale, population based studies are necessary to evaluate the predictive values of HPV testing in Norway.

Performance assessment of eight high-throughput PCR assays for viral load quantitation of oncogenic HPV types

Infection with mucosotropic human papillomavirus (HPV) is the necessary cause of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Several epidemiological studies suggest that HPV viral load can be a risk factor of cervical dysplasia. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a methodology to determine HPV viral load of eight oncogenic HPV types (16, 18, 31, 39, 45, 51, 52, and 58). The quantitation assay is based on a high-throughput real-time PCR. The E6-E7 region of HPV types 16, 18, 45, and 51 were used to amplify specific DNA sequences and cloned into a plasmid vector. The constructs for HPV types 16, 18, 45, and 51, and the whole genome for HPV types 31, 39, 52, and 58 were quantitated using a limiting dilution analysis and used to create standard curves. Type-specific HPV clones were used to determine specificity, linearity, and intra- and inter-assay variation. The sensitivity of our assay covered a dynamic range of up to seven orders of magnitude with a coefficient of intra-assay variation less than 6% and the inter-assay variation less than 20%. No cross-reactivity was observed on any of the type-specific standard curves when phylogenetically close HPV types were used as templates. Our real-time PCR methodologies are highly reproducible, sensitive, and specific over a sevenfold magnitude dynamic range.

Human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical cancers in Mozambique

The distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) types in cervical cancers is essential for design and evaluation of HPV type-specific vaccines. To follow up on a previous report that HPV types 35 and 58 were the dominant HPV types in cervical neoplasia in Mozambique, the HPV types in a consecutive case series of 74 invasive cervical cancers in Mozambique were determined. The most common worldwide major oncogenic HPV types 16 and 18 were present in 69 % of cervical cancers, suggesting that a vaccine targeting HPV-16 and -18 would have a substantial impact on cervical cancer also in Mozambique.

Molecular markers in cervical cytology

It is expected that in the near future, the high sensitivity of array-based technologies and identification of panels of molecular fingerprints that are specific for each disease process will allow the pathologist to analyze cytologic samples and tissue biopsies by these technologies in conjunction with morphologic evaluation. This approach could lead to a new era in diagnosis and patient management, where each patient may receive individualized treatment according to the molecular characteristics of the disease that are obtained from a minute amount of tissue. Therefore, it is important for pathologists and other clinical specialists to have an understanding of these molecular technologies. It is hoped that this article will allow practitioners to incorporate these concepts into their training, and, eventually, into their daily practice.

Cervical response to vaccination against HPV16 E7 in case of severe dysplasia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the tolerance to vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV)16 E7 (in SB adjuvant ASO2B) and its histological and immunohistological effects on HPV16 associated high-grade cervical dysplasias associated with HPV16.

STUDY DESIGN

Five patients with histologically demonstrated severe cervical dysplasia (CIN3) HPV16 positive were injected three times before conization was performed 2 months after the first injection. We studied cytological, histological, proliferative pattern and immune profile before and after vaccination. The slides were compared with those obtained from non-injected patients.

RESULTS

The injections were well tolerated and the specimens displayed a limited regression of the lesions. Nevertheless, massive CD4 and CD8 T cell lymphocytic infiltration was noticed after vaccination.

DISCUSSION

We conclude that the vaccination we used provides an obvious immune histological reaction in the HPV infected cervix and that the 2 months delay before the final step (conization) is done is probably too short.

Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

Infection with human papilloma virus (HPV) is the main cause of cervical cancer, but the risk associated with the various HPV types has not been adequately assessed.

METHODS

We pooled data from 11 case-control studies from nine countries involving 1918 women with histologically confirmed squamous-cell cervical cancer and 1928 control women. A common protocol and questionnaire were used. Information on risk factors was obtained by personal interviews, and cervical cells were collected for detection of HPV DNA and typing in a central laboratory by polymerase-chain-reaction-based assays (with MY09/MY11 and GP5+/6+ primers).

RESULTS

HPV DNA was detected in 1739 of the 1918 patients with cervical cancer (90.7 percent) and in 259 of the 1928 control women (13.4 percent). With the GP5+/6+ primer, HPV DNA was detected in 96.6 percent of the patients and 15.6 percent of the controls. The most common HPV types in patients, in descending order of frequency, were types 16, 18, 45, 31, 33, 52, 58, and 35. Among control women, types 16, 18, 45, 31, 6, 58, 35, and 33 were the most common. For studies using the GP5+/6+ primer, the pooled odds ratio for cervical cancer associated with the presence of any HPV was 158.2 (95 percent confidence interval, 113.4 to 220.6). The odds ratios were over 45 for the most common and least common HPV types. Fifteen HPV types were classified as high-risk types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68, 73, and 82); 3 were classified as probable high-risk types (26, 53, and 66); and 12 were classified as low-risk types (6, 11, 40, 42, 43, 44, 54, 61, 70, 72, 81, and CP6108). There was good agreement between our epidemiologic classification and the classification based on phylogenetic grouping.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to HPV types 16 and 18, types 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68, 73, and 82 should be considered carcinogenic, or high-risk, types, and types 26, 53, and 66 should be considered probably carcinogenic.

Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis

This study investigated regional variations in the contribution made by different human papilloma (HPV) types to invasive cervical cancer (ICC). A total of 85 studies using polymerase chain reaction to estimate HPV prevalence in ICC were identified. Data on HPV prevalence were extracted separately for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and for adeno- and adenosquamous-carcinoma (ADC). A total of 10 058 cases (8550 SCC, 1508 ADC) were included in pooled analyses. The most common HPV types in ICC were, in order of decreasing prevalence, HPV16, 18, 45, 31, 33, 58, 52, 35, 59, 56, 6, 51, 68, 39, 82, 73, 66 and 70. In SCC, HPV16 was the predominant type (46-63%) followed by HPV18 (10-14%), 45 (2-8%), 31 (2-7%) and 33 (3-5%) in all regions except Asia, where HPV types 58 (6%) and 52 (4%) were more frequently identified. In ADC, HPV prevalence was significantly lower (76.4%) than in SCC (87.3%), and HPV18 was the predominant type in every region (37-41%), followed by 16 (26-36%) and 45 (5-7%). The overall detection of HPV DNA was similar in different regions (83-89%). A majority of ICC was associated with HPV16 or 18 in all regions, but approximately a quarter of all ICC cases were associated with one of 16 other HPV types, their distribution varying by region.

Hybrid Capture II HPV Test detects at least 15 human papillomavirus genotypes not included in its current high-risk probe cocktail

BACKGROUND

Hybrid Capture II HPV Test (HCII) (Digene Corporation, Gaithersburg, MD) is a signal amplified hybridization microplate-based assay designated to detect 18 human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes using two probe cocktails, for high-risk HPV genotypes 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59 and 68 and low-risk HPV genotypes 6, 11, 42, 43 and 44. At present, HCII is the only commercially available HPV assay with sufficient scientific data to support its performance in the clinical setting.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the specificity and accuracy of HCII high-risk probe cocktail for detection of 13 HPV genotypes included in the high-risk probe cocktail.

STUDY DESIGN

Cervical samples obtained from 325 women recognized as HPV positive using the HCII high-risk probe cocktail were included in the study. HPV genotypes were determined by restriction fragment analysis of PGMY09/PGMY11 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products using seven restriction endonucleases.

RESULTS

A 450 bp fragment of HPV L1 gene was successfully amplified from 312 out of 325 samples. Of the 312 PCR-positive samples, 280 samples were associated with the expected high-risk HPV genotypes and 32 samples with the HPV genotypes not included in the HCII high-risk probe cocktail. Thus, HPV53 was detected in 8 samples, HPV66 in 4 samples, HPV54 in 3 samples, HPV6, HPV26, HPV70 each in 2 samples, and HPV11, HPV40, HPV42, HPV61, HPV73, HPV81, MM4, IS39, CP6108 each in 1 sample. In 2 samples, we were not able to determine the HPV genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that HCII high-risk probe cocktail detects at least 15 HPV genotypes not included in the current HCII high-risk probe cocktail. The potential impact of HCII high-risk probe cocktail cross-reactivity with phylogenetically related and unrelated HPV genotypes, including genotypes currently considered to be low-risk HPVs, remains to be determined.