1
|
Williams JTB, Kurlandsky K, Breslin K, Durfee MJ, Stein A, Hurley L, Shoup JA, Reifler LM, Daley MF, Lewin BJ, Goddard K, Henninger ML, Nelson JC, Vazquez-Benitez G, Hanson KE, Fuller CC, Weintraub ES, McNeil MM, Hambidge SJ. Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccines Among Pregnant and Recently Pregnant Individuals. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e245479. [PMID: 38587844 PMCID: PMC11002697 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Pregnant people and infants are at high risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. Understanding changes in attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant and recently pregnant people is important for public health messaging. Objective To assess attitudinal trends regarding COVID-19 vaccines by (1) vaccination status and (2) race, ethnicity, and language among samples of pregnant and recently pregnant Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) members from 2021 to 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional surveye study included pregnant or recently pregnant members of the VSD, a collaboration of 13 health care systems and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Unvaccinated, non-Hispanic Black, and Spanish-speaking members were oversampled. Wave 1 took place from October 2021 to February 2022, and wave 2 took place from November 2022 to February 2023. Data were analyzed from May 2022 to September 2023. Exposures Self-reported or electronic health record (EHR)-derived race, ethnicity, and preferred language. Main Outcomes and Measures Self-reported vaccination status and attitudes toward monovalent (wave 1) or bivalent Omicron booster (wave 2) COVID-19 vaccines. Sample- and response-weighted analyses assessed attitudes by vaccination status and 3 race, ethnicity, and language groupings of interest. Results There were 1227 respondents; all identified as female, the mean (SD) age was 31.7 (5.6) years, 356 (29.0%) identified as Black race, 555 (45.2%) identified as Hispanic ethnicity, and 445 (36.3%) preferred the Spanish language. Response rates were 43.5% for wave 1 (652 of 1500 individuals sampled) and 39.5% for wave 2 (575 of 1456 individuals sampled). Respondents were more likely than nonrespondents to be White, non-Hispanic, and vaccinated per EHR. Overall, 76.8% (95% CI, 71.5%-82.2%) reported 1 or more COVID-19 vaccinations; Spanish-speaking Hispanic respondents had the highest weighted proportion of respondents with 1 or more vaccination. Weighted estimates of somewhat or strongly agreeing that COVID-19 vaccines are safe decreased from wave 1 to 2 for respondents who reported 1 or more vaccinations (76% vs 50%; χ21 = 7.8; P < .001), non-Hispanic White respondents (72% vs 43%; χ21 = 5.4; P = .02), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic respondents (76% vs 53%; χ21 = 22.8; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance Decreasing confidence in COVID-19 vaccine safety in a large, diverse pregnant and recently pregnant insured population is a public health concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T. B. Williams
- Ambulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | - Kate Kurlandsky
- Ambulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado
| | - Kristin Breslin
- Ambulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado
| | - M. Joshua Durfee
- Ambulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado
| | - Amy Stein
- Ambulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado
| | - Laura Hurley
- Ambulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado
| | - Jo Ann Shoup
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Liza M. Reifler
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Matthew F. Daley
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Candace C. Fuller
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric S. Weintraub
- Immunization Safety Office, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michael M. McNeil
- Immunization Safety Office, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Simon J. Hambidge
- Ambulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Razai MS, Mansour R, Goldsmith L, Freeman S, Mason-Apps C, Ravindran P, Kooner P, Berendes S, Morris J, Majeed A, Ussher M, Hargreaves S, Oakeshott P. Interventions to increase vaccination against COVID-19, influenza and pertussis during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Travel Med 2023; 30:taad138. [PMID: 37934788 PMCID: PMC10755181 DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taad138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women and their babies face significant risks from three vaccine-preventable diseases: COVID-19, influenza and pertussis. However, despite these vaccines' proven safety and effectiveness, uptake during pregnancy remains low. METHODS We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42023399488; January 2012-December 2022 following PRISMA guidelines) of interventions to increase COVID-19/influenza/pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. We searched nine databases, including grey literature. Two independent investigators extracted data; discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models to estimate pooled effect sizes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistics. RESULTS From 2681 articles, we identified 39 relevant studies (n = 168 262 participants) across nine countries. Fifteen studies (39%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs); the remainder were observational cohort, quality-improvement or cross-sectional studies. The quality of 18% (7/39) was strong. Pooled results of interventions to increase influenza vaccine uptake (18 effect estimates from 12 RCTs) showed the interventions were effective but had a small effect (risk ratio = 1.07, 95% CI 1.03, 1.13). However, pooled results of interventions to increase pertussis vaccine uptake (10 effect estimates from six RCTs) showed no clear benefit (risk ratio = 0.98, 95% CI 0.94, 1.03). There were no relevant RCTs for COVID-19. Interventions addressed the 'three Ps': patient-, provider- and policy-level strategies. At the patient level, clear recommendations from healthcare professionals backed by text reminders/written information were strongly associated with increased vaccine uptake, especially tailored face-to-face interventions, which addressed women's concerns, dispelled myths and highlighted benefits. Provider-level interventions included educating healthcare professionals about vaccines' safety and effectiveness and reminders to offer vaccinations routinely. Policy-level interventions included financial incentives, mandatory vaccination data fields in electronic health records and ensuring easy availability of vaccinations. CONCLUSIONS Interventions had a small effect on increasing influenza vaccination. Training healthcare providers to promote vaccinations during pregnancy is crucial and could be enhanced by utilizing mobile health technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad S Razai
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Rania Mansour
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Lucy Goldsmith
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Samuel Freeman
- Primary Care Unit, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Sussex, UK
| | - Charlotte Mason-Apps
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Pahalavi Ravindran
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Foundation Trust, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Sima Berendes
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Joan Morris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
- Institute of Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Sally Hargreaves
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
- The Migrant Health Research Unit, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - Pippa Oakeshott
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ha L, Levian C, Greene N, Goldfarb I, Hirsch A, Naqvi M. Association between acceptance of routine pregnancy vaccinations and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant patients. J Infect 2023; 87:551-555. [PMID: 37865294 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE COVID-19 vaccination is a key approach to reduce morbidity and mortality in pregnant patients and their newborns. Anti-vaccine sentiment has recently increased with unclear impact on pregnant patients. We examined the association between acceptance of tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza vaccines, considered to be routine pregnancy vaccines, and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Secondarily, we identified other predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake and described pregnancy outcomes in patients who were and were not vaccinated during pregnancy. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of all patients who delivered at a single site from December 2020 - March 2022. Demographic, pregnancy, neonatal, and vaccination data were abstracted from the electronic medical record, which imports vaccine history from the California Immunization Registry. The relationship between influenza and Tdap vaccine acceptance, other baseline characteristics, and COVID-19 vaccine uptake was assessed using univariable and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS Of the 7857 patients who delivered during the study period, 4410 (56.1%) accepted the COVID-19 vaccine. Of those who received the COVID-19 vaccine, 3363 (97.6%) and 3049 (88.5%) received influenza and Tdap vaccines, respectively. Patients were more likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine if they had advanced maternal age, obesity, Asian race, and private insurance. After adjustment for baseline differences, COVID vaccine acceptance was associated with receipt of Tdap (aOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.90-2.33) and influenza vaccines (aOR 2.83, 95% CI 2.55-3.14). There were no differences in preterm birth, low birthweight, and NICU admission between patients who received and did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSION Patients were more likely to accept COVID-19 vaccination if they received Tdap or influenza vaccinations. Older age, obesity, Asian race, and private insurance were independent predictors of vaccine uptake. Disparities in COVID-19 vaccination uptake bear further exploration to guide efforts in equitable and widespread vaccine distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Ha
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Candace Levian
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Naomi Greene
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Ilona Goldfarb
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Anna Hirsch
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Mariam Naqvi
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gianfredi V, Berti A, Stefanizzi P, D’Amico M, De Lorenzo V, Moscara L, Di Lorenzo A, Venerito V, Castaldi S. COVID-19 Vaccine Knowledge, Attitude, Acceptance and Hesitancy among Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Systematic Review of Hospital-Based Studies. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1697. [PMID: 38006029 PMCID: PMC10675759 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11111697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The risk of unfavourable outcomes for SARS-CoV-2 infection is significant during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Vaccination is a safe and effective measure to lower this risk. This study aims at reviewing the literature concerning the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine's acceptance/hesitancy among pregnant and breastfeeding women attending hospital facilities. A systematic review of literature was carried out. Hospital-based observational studies related to vaccination acceptance, hesitancy, knowledge and attitude among pregnant and breastfeeding women were included. Determinants of acceptance and hesitancy were investigated in detail. Quality assessment was done via the Johann Briggs Institute quality assessment tools. After literature search, 43 studies were included, 30 of which only focused on pregnant women (total sample 25,862 subjects). Sample size ranged from 109 to 7017 people. Acceptance of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine ranged from 16% to 78.52%; vaccine hesitancy ranged between 91.4% and 24.5%. Fear of adverse events for either the woman, the child, or both, was the main driver for hesitancy. Other determinants of hesitancy included religious concerns, socioeconomic factors, inadequate information regarding the vaccine and lack of trust towards institutions. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy in hospitalized pregnant women appears to be significant, and efforts for a more effective communication to these subjects are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Gianfredi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Via Pascal, 36, 20133 Milan, Italy; (V.G.); (A.B.); (M.D.); (V.D.L.); (S.C.)
| | - Alessandro Berti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Via Pascal, 36, 20133 Milan, Italy; (V.G.); (A.B.); (M.D.); (V.D.L.); (S.C.)
| | - Pasquale Stefanizzi
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70121 Bari, Italy; (L.M.); (A.D.L.)
| | - Marilena D’Amico
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Via Pascal, 36, 20133 Milan, Italy; (V.G.); (A.B.); (M.D.); (V.D.L.); (S.C.)
| | - Viola De Lorenzo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Via Pascal, 36, 20133 Milan, Italy; (V.G.); (A.B.); (M.D.); (V.D.L.); (S.C.)
| | - Lorenza Moscara
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70121 Bari, Italy; (L.M.); (A.D.L.)
| | - Antonio Di Lorenzo
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70121 Bari, Italy; (L.M.); (A.D.L.)
| | - Vincenzo Venerito
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine, Jonic Area, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy;
| | - Silvana Castaldi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Via Pascal, 36, 20133 Milan, Italy; (V.G.); (A.B.); (M.D.); (V.D.L.); (S.C.)
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza, 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kern J, Schippert C, Fard D, Bielfeld AP, von Versen-Höynck F. Fear of fertility side effects is a major cause for COVID-19 vaccine hesitance in infertile patients. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1178872. [PMID: 37324157 PMCID: PMC10267368 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1178872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study aims to investigate the acceptance, hesitance and attitudes of infertile female patients toward the COVID-19 vaccination. Methods An anonymous cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 28th of January to 10th of August 2022. The questionnaire consisted of 35 questions on demographics, COVID-19 vaccination status, prior concerns of the vaccinated participants and reasons for not vaccinating among unvaccinated participants, and factors influencing the decision not to vaccinate. Results Of 406 participants who answered all questions, 92.1% reported having received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, 7.9% were unvaccinated. Factors associated with the decision for vaccination were full time or part time employment (p = 0.05), high trust in the principle of vaccination (p < 0.001), high willingness for other vaccination during fertility treatment (p < 0.001) and risk factors for severe COVID-19 (p = 0.007). Concerns about directly occurring adverse effects after vaccination (42.0%), about impact on own fertility (21.9%) or on the fertility treatment (27.5%) were the main concerns beforehand of vaccinated participants. Correlations between fertility concerns and mistrust in the general principle of vaccination were found. Beside general health concerns, unvaccinated participants reported fears about fertility impairment as the most important arguments against a COVID-19 vaccination (median of 5.0 on a five-point-Likert scale). Conclusion Both vaccinated and unvaccinated participants stated having concerns and fears about side effects of the COVID-19 vaccination on their fertility. To increase patients' trust in medical recommendations, such as vaccination, to avoid mistrust in the medical system and to maintain patient's compliance, there should be additional educational services that address infertile patients and their needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Kern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Cordula Schippert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Delnaz Fard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Alexandra Petra Bielfeld
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, UniKiD/UniCareD, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Frauke von Versen-Höynck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Harrison S, Quigley MA, Fellmeth G, Stein A, Alderdice F. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on postnatal depression: analysis of three population-based national maternity surveys in England (2014-2020). THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2023:100654. [PMID: 37363795 PMCID: PMC10183799 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Background Few studies have evaluated postnatal depression before and during the Covid-19 pandemic using comparable data across time. We used data from three national maternity surveys in England to compare prevalence and risk factors for postnatal depression before and during the pandemic. Methods Analysis was conducted using population-based surveys carried out in 2014 (n = 4571), 2018 (n = 4509), and 2020 (n = 4611). Weighted prevalence estimates for postnatal depression (EPDS score ≥13) were compared across surveys. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) for the association between sociodemographic, pregnancy- and birth-related, and biopsychosocial factors, and postnatal depression. Findings Prevalence of postnatal depression increased from 10.3% in 2014 to 16.0% in 2018 (difference = +5.7% (95% CI: 4.0-7.4); RR = 1.55 (95% CI: 1.36-1.77)) and to 23.9% in 2020 (difference = +7.9% (95% CI: 5.9-9.9); RR = 1.49 (95% CI: 1.34-1.66)). Having a long-term mental health problem (aRR range = 1.48-2.02), antenatal anxiety (aRR range = 1.73-2.12) and antenatal depression (aRR range = 1.44-2.24) were associated with increased risk of postnatal depression, whereas satisfaction with birth (aRR range = 0.89-0.92) and social support (aRR range = 0.73-0.78) were associated with decreased risk before and during the pandemic. Interpretation This analysis indicates that Covid-19 had an important negative impact on postnatal women's mental health and may have accelerated an existing trend of increasing prevalence of postnatal depression. Risk factors for postnatal depression were consistent before and during the pandemic. Timely identification, intervention and follow-up are key to supporting women at risk, and it is essential that mechanisms to support women are strengthened during times of heightened risk such as the pandemic. Funding NIHR Policy Research Programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siân Harrison
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Maria A Quigley
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Gracia Fellmeth
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Alan Stein
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, UK
- MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- African Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Fiona Alderdice
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pinkney JA, Bogart LM, Carroll KN, Bryan L, Witter G, Ashour D, Shebl FM, Hurtado RM, Goldfarb IT, Hyle EP, Psaros C, Ojikutu BO. Factors Associated With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Uptake Among Pregnant Women and Nonpregnant Women of Reproductive Age in Jamaica. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad201. [PMID: 37234512 PMCID: PMC10208745 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite high rates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related maternal mortality, Jamaica currently has little data on COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey of 192 reproductive-aged women in Jamaica from February 1 to 8, 2022. Participants were recruited from a convenience sample of patients, providers, and staff at a teaching hospital. We assessed self-reported COVID-19 vaccination status and COVID-19-related medical mistrust (operationalized as vaccine confidence, government mistrust, and race-based mistrust). We used multivariable modified Poisson regression to test the association between vaccine uptake and pregnancy. Results Of 192 respondents, 72 (38%) were pregnant. Most (93%) were Black. Vaccine uptake was 35% in pregnant women versus 75% in nonpregnant women. Pregnant women were more likely to cite healthcare providers versus the government as trustworthy sources of COVID-19 vaccine information (65% vs 28%). Pregnancy, low vaccine confidence, and government mistrust were associated with a lower likelihood of COVID-19 vaccination (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 0.68 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .49-.95], aPR = 0.61 [95% CI, .40-.95], and aPR = 0.68 [95% CI, .52-.89], respectively). Race-based mistrust was not associated with COVID-19 vaccination in the final model. Conclusions Pregnancy, low vaccine confidence, and government mistrust were associated with a lower likelihood of COVID-19 vaccination among reproductive-aged women in Jamaica. Future studies should evaluate the efficacy of strategies proven to improve maternal vaccination coverage, including standing "opt-out" vaccination orders and collaborative provider and patient-led educational videos tailored for pregnant individuals. Strategies that decouple vaccine messaging from government agencies also warrant evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodian A Pinkney
- Correspondence: Jodian A. Pinkney, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Cox 5, Boston, MA 02114 (); Laura Bogart, PhD, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA ()
| | - Laura M Bogart
- Correspondence: Jodian A. Pinkney, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Cox 5, Boston, MA 02114 (); Laura Bogart, PhD, RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA ()
| | | | - Lenroy Bryan
- University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica
| | | | - Dina Ashour
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fatma M Shebl
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rocio M Hurtado
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ilona T Goldfarb
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Emily P Hyle
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christina Psaros
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lubrano C, Mancon A, Anelli GM, Gagliardi G, Corneo R, Bianchi M, Coco C, Dal Molin G, Vignali M, Schirripa I, Di Simone N, Pavone G, Pellegrino A, Gismondo MR, Savasi VM, Cetin I. Immune Response and Transplacental Antibody Transfer in Pregnant Women after COVID-19 Vaccination. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040689. [PMID: 37109075 PMCID: PMC10141882 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 infection is associated with increased risk of pregnancy complications, making vaccination during pregnancy critical for mother-neonate dyads. Few data, often with an unrepresentative sample size, are available on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced humoral and cell-mediated response. Here, we evaluated anti-S antibody and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production elicited by SARS-CoV-2 immunization in maternal and neonatal plasma. Pregnant women (n = 230) were prospectively enrolled and classified as unvaccinated (n = 103) and vaccinated (n = 127); after serological screening for previous infections, assays were performed on 126 dyads, 15 mothers and 17 newborns. Positive anti-S antibodies were found in most of the vaccinated subjects, regardless of timespan between immunization and delivery (range: 7-391 days). A total of 89 of 92 vaccinated women showed a broad response to COVID-19 immunization and highly effective placental transfer, as attested by anti-S positive rates (maternal = 96.7%, cord = 96.6%). Most of our subjects had indeterminate results in an IGRA assay, preventing a conclusive evaluation of IFN-γ production. Indeed, pregnancy-related hormonal changes may influence T-cell response with an impact on IFN-γ production. Positive pregnancy and perinatal outcomes reinforce the evidence that the anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunization is effective and well-tolerated in pregnant women and also protective for the fetus/neonate, even though it was not possible to define the related IFN-γ production and role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Lubrano
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mancon
- Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Virology and Bioemergencies, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Luigi Sacco Hospital, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Maria Anelli
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Gloria Gagliardi
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Corneo
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Micol Bianchi
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Coco
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Dal Molin
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Macedonio Melloni Hospital-ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Vignali
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Macedonio Melloni Hospital-ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Irene Schirripa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Di Simone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Pavone
- Department of Woman, Child and Neonate, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20157 Milan, Italy
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, 23900 Lecco, Italy
| | - Antonio Pellegrino
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, 23900 Lecco, Italy
| | - Maria Rita Gismondo
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
- Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Virology and Bioemergencies, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Luigi Sacco Hospital, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Maria Savasi
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
- Department of Woman, Child and Neonate, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Irene Cetin
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
- Department of Woman, Mother and Neonate, Buzzi Children's Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20154 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Galanis P, Vraka I, Katsiroumpa A, Siskou O, Konstantakopoulou O, Zogaki E, Kaitelidou D. Psychosocial Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake among Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in Greece. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:269. [PMID: 36851147 PMCID: PMC9967309 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
An understanding of the factors associated with the COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women is paramount to persuade women to get vaccinated against COVID-19. We estimated the vaccination rate of pregnant women against COVID-19 and evaluated psychosocial factors associated with vaccine uptake among them. We conducted a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample. In particular, we investigated socio-demographic data of pregnant women (e.g., age, marital status, and educational level), COVID-19 related variables (e.g., previous COVID-19 diagnosis and worry about the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines), and stress due to COVID-19 (e.g., danger and contamination fears, fears about economic consequences, xenophobia, compulsive checking and reassurance seeking, and traumatic stress symptoms about COVID-19) as possible predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Among pregnant women, 58.6% had received a COVID-19 vaccine. The most important reasons that pregnant women were not vaccinated were doubts about the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines (31.4%), fear that COVID-19 vaccines could be harmful to the fetus (29.4%), and fear of adverse side effects of COVID-19 vaccines (29.4%). Increased danger and contamination fears, increased fears about economic consequences, and higher levels of trust in COVID-19 vaccines were related with vaccine uptake. On the other hand, increased compulsive checking and reassurance seeking and increased worry about the adverse side effects of COVID-19 vaccines reduced the likelihood of pregnant women being vaccinated. An understanding of the psychosocial factors associated with increased COVID-19 vaccine uptake in pregnant women could be helpful for policy makers and healthcare professionals in their efforts to persuade women to get vaccinated against COVID-19. There is a need for targeted educational campaigns to increase knowledge about COVID-19 vaccines and reduce vaccine hesitancy in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Galanis
- Clinical Epidemiology Laboratory, Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Irene Vraka
- Department of Radiology, P. & A. Kyriakou Children’s Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Aglaia Katsiroumpa
- Clinical Epidemiology Laboratory, Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Olga Siskou
- Department of Tourism Studies, University of Piraeus, 18534 Piraeus, Greece
| | - Olympia Konstantakopoulou
- Center for Health Services Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Eleftheria Zogaki
- Faculty of Midwifery, University of West Attica, West Attica, 12243 Aigaleo, Greece
| | - Daphne Kaitelidou
- Center for Health Services Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Midwives' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination for Pregnant Women: A Nationwide Web-Based Survey in Italy. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11020222. [PMID: 36851098 PMCID: PMC9961665 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
This cross-sectional survey investigated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning the COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women among midwives in Italy and the associated factors. Midwives with at least five years of midwifery education and who had received information about the COVID-19 vaccination from official government organizations or scientific journals were more likely to know in which trimester this vaccine can be administered. A higher perceived utility of this vaccination was observed among midwives working in the public sector, in those concerned by being infected by SARS-CoV-2, who have received at least one dose of this vaccination, in those who considered COVID-19 a severe disease for pregnant women and their fetus, and who believed that the vaccination is safe. One-third of the midwives routinely provided information and half recommended this vaccination. Midwives with more years of activity, who received information about the vaccination from official government organizations or scientific journals, those who had never assisted patients with SARS-CoV-2, and those who believed in midwives' role in COVID-19 prevention were more likely to routinely provide information. Participants who perceived a higher utility of this vaccination, those who believed in midwives' role in COVID-19 prevention, those who received information from official government organizations or scientific journals were more likely to routinely provide a recommendation for the vaccine. Midwives' knowledge must be improved for ensuring that they communicate and recommend the vaccination to their patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Calvert C, Carruthers J, Denny C, Donaghy J, Hopcroft LEM, Hopkins L, Goulding A, Lindsay L, McLaughlin T, Moore E, Taylor B, Loane M, Dolk H, Morris J, Auyeung B, Bhaskaran K, Gibbons CL, Katikireddi SV, O'Leary M, McAllister D, Shi T, Simpson CR, Robertson C, Sheikh A, Stock SJ, Wood R. A population-based matched cohort study of major congenital anomalies following COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Commun 2023; 14:107. [PMID: 36609574 PMCID: PMC9821346 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35771-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Evidence on associations between COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection and the risk of congenital anomalies is limited. Here we report a national, population-based, matched cohort study using linked electronic health records from Scotland (May 2020-April 2022) to estimate the association between COVID-19 vaccination and, separately, SARS-CoV-2 infection between six weeks pre-conception and 19 weeks and six days gestation and the risk of [1] any major congenital anomaly and [2] any non-genetic major congenital anomaly. Mothers vaccinated in this pregnancy exposure period mostly received an mRNA vaccine (73.7% Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and 7.9% Moderna mRNA-1273). Of the 6731 babies whose mothers were vaccinated in the pregnancy exposure period, 153 had any anomaly and 120 had a non-genetic anomaly. Primary analyses find no association between any vaccination and any anomaly (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 1.01, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.83-1.24) or non-genetic anomalies (aOR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.81-1.22). Primary analyses also find no association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and any anomaly (aOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.66-1.60) or non-genetic anomalies (aOR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.57-1.54). Findings are robust to sensitivity analyses. These data provide reassurance on the safety of vaccination, in particular mRNA vaccines, just before or in early pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Calvert
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | - Lisa E M Hopcroft
- Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland
- Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Anna Goulding
- Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK
| | | | | | | | - Bob Taylor
- Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Maria Loane
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK
| | - Helen Dolk
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK
| | - Joan Morris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Bonnie Auyeung
- School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Krishnan Bhaskaran
- Department of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - David McAllister
- School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ting Shi
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Colin R Simpson
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- School of Health, Wellington Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Chris Robertson
- Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sarah J Stock
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Rachael Wood
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sarantaki A, Kalogeropoulou VE, Taskou C, Nanou C, Lykeridou A. COVID-19 Vaccination and Related Determinants of Hesitancy among Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10122055. [PMID: 36560464 PMCID: PMC9785275 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10122055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Mass vaccination against COVID-19 is necessary to control the pandemic. COVID-19 vaccines are now recommended during pregnancy to prevent the disease. A systematic review of the literature in the electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE was performed and we aimed to investigate the attitude of documents towards COVID-19 vaccination and the prognostic factors of vaccination hesitation. A meta-analysis was also conducted to estimate the overall percentage of pregnant women who were willing to be vaccinated or had been vaccinated against COVID-19. A total of 18 studies were included in the review and meta-analysis. The acceptance rate of vaccination against COVID-19 among pregnant women ranged from 17.6% to 84.5%. The pooled proportion of acceptance of vaccination against COVID-19 in pregnant women was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.44-0.61). Predictors of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination were older age, White race, occupational status, higher level of education, comorbidities, third trimester of pregnancy, influenza vaccination, knowledge about COVID-19, and confidence that vaccines for COVID-19 are safe and effective. The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women is low. Targeted information campaigns are needed to increase vaccine education in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antigoni Sarantaki
- Midwifery Department, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence:
| | | | | | - Christina Nanou
- Midwifery Department, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|