Different Hypercoagulable Profiles in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Internal Medicine Ward and the Intensive Care Unit

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19 During the Delta and Omicron Waves in North America

Clinical outcomes for patients with severe acute respiratory failure caused by different variants of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are incompletely understood. Clinical characteristics, pre-ECMO management, and hospital mortality at 90 days for adults with COVID-19 who received venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) at North American centers during waves predominated by Delta (August 16 to December 12, 2021) and Omicron (January 31 to May 31, 2022) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants were compared in a competing risks framework. One thousand seven hundred and sixty-six patients (1,580 Delta, 186 Omicron) received VV-ECMO for COVID-19 during the Delta- and Omicron-predominant waves in North American centers. In the unadjusted competing risks model, no significant difference was observed in risk of hospital mortality at 90 days between patients during the Delta- versus Omicron-predominant wave (subhazard ratio [sHR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.19), but patients supported with VV-ECMO during the Omicron-predominant wave had a significantly lower adjusted risk of hospital mortality at 90 days (subhazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99). Patients receiving VV-ECMO during the Omicron-predominant wave had a similar unadjusted risk of hospital mortality at 90 days, but a significantly lower adjusted risk of hospital mortality at 90 days than those receiving VV-ECMO during the Delta-predominant wave.

The COVID-19 thrombus: distinguishing pathological, mechanistic, and phenotypic features and management

A heightened risk for thrombosis is a hallmark of COVID-19. Expansive clinical experience and medical literature have characterized small (micro) and large (macro) vessel involvement of the venous and arterial circulatory systems. Most events occur in patients with serious or critical illness in the hyperacute (first 1-2 weeks) or acute phases (2-4 weeks) of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, thrombosis involving the venous, arterial, and microcirculatory systems has been reported in the subacute (4-8 weeks), convalescent (> 8-12 weeks) and chronic phases (> 12 weeks) among patients with mild-to-moderate illness. The purpose of the current focused review is to highlight the distinguishing clinical features, pathological components, and potential mechanisms of venous, arterial, and microvascular thrombosis in patients with COVID-19. The overarching objective is to better understand the proclivity for thrombosis, laying a solid foundation for screening and surveillance modalities, preventive strategies, and optimal patient management.

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss during the Covid-19 pandemic; experience of a tertiary referral center

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to highlight the differences in the clinical management and treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) due to the impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

This study compared patients diagnosed with SSNHL between March 2020 and March 2022, following the first reported case of COVID-19 in our country, with patients diagnosed between March 2018 and March 2020. The evaluation encompassed demographic characteristics, comorbidities, other ear-related complaints, hearing loss thresholds at each frequency, medical treatment administered, treatment duration, and post-treatment follow-up audiograms.

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics and comorbidities of patients before and during the pandemic showed similar distribution. There was no significant difference in the duration from the onset of symptoms to hospital admission during the pandemic compared to the previous period. When evaluating the treatment responses of hospitalized and treated patients according to Siegel's criteria during the pandemic, a similar trend to the pre-pandemic period was observed. It was noted that the use of systemic steroids and hyperbaric oxygen therapy decreased during the pandemic period, while the use of antivirals increased.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study conducted as a reference center, we want to emphasize that no clear data indicating a relationship between COVID-19 infection and NHL. Also, we believe that COVID-19 infection does not affect the course and prognosis of SSNHL.

Thrombotic Long-Term Consequences of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients with Compensated Cirrhosis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a U.S. Database

BACKGROUND

Cirrhosis causes an imbalance in the coagulation pathway and leads to a tendency for both bleeding and clotting. SARS-CoV-2 has been reported to be associated with a hypercoagulable state. This study examines SARS-CoV-2's impact on hemostasis in compensated patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

We analyzed the US Collaborative Network, which comprises 63 HCOs in the U.S.A. Compensated cirrhosis patients were split into two groups: SARS-CoV-2-positive and -negative. Patients' baseline characteristics were used in a 1:1 propensity score-matched module to create comparable cohorts. We compared the risk of portal vein thrombosis (PVT), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE) at 6 months, and 1 and 3 years.

RESULTS

Of 330,521 patients, 27% tested positive and 73% remained negative. After PSM, both cohorts included 74,738 patients. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 had a higher rate of PVT compared to those without at 6 months (0.63% vs 0.5%, p < 0.05), 1 year (0.8% vs 0.6%, p < 0.05), and 3 years (1% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.05), a higher rate of DVT at 6 months (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.05), 1 year (1% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.05), and 3 years (1.4% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.05), and a higher rate of PE at 6 months (0.6% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.05), 1 year (0.7% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.05), and 3 years (1% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with compensated cirrhosis was associated with a higher rate of PVT, DVT, and PE at 6 months, and 1 and 3 years.

Calcifediol or Corticosteroids in the Treatment of COVID-19: An Observational Study

Medical treatment of coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19) is a therapeutic challenge. The available data strongly suggest that calcifediol treatment may reduce the severity of COVID-19, and corticosteroids are the treatment of choice worldwide for severe COVID-19. Both have a very similar action profile, and their combined use in patients may modify the contribution of each administered compound.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how treatment with calcifediol and/or corticosteroids in medical practice modified the need for ICU admission, death, or poor prognosis of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the first outbreaks.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND SETTING

A retrospective observational cohort study of patients admitted for COVID-19 to the Pneumology Unit of the Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (Córdoba, Spain).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were treated with calcifediol or/and corticosteroids with the best available therapy and standard care, according to clinical practice guidelines.

MEASUREMENTS

Admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or death during hospitalization and poor prognosis.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and twenty-eight patients were included. According to the treatment received, they were included in four groups: calcifediol (n = 68), glucocorticoids (n = 112), both (n = 510), or neither (n = 38). Of the 578 patients treated with calcifediol, 88 were admitted to the ICU (15%), while of the 150 not treated with calcifediol, 39 required ICU admission (26%) (p < 0.01). Among the patients taking calcifediol without glucocorticoids, only 4 of 68 (5.8%) required ICU admission, compared to 84 of 510 (16.5%) treated with both (p = 0.022). Of the 595 patients who had a good prognosis, 568 (82.01%) had received treatment with calcifediol versus the 133 patients with a poor prognosis, of whom 90 (67.66%) had received calcifediol (p < 0.001). This difference was not found for corticosteroids.

INTERPRETATION

The treatment of choice for hospitalized patients with moderate or mild COVID-19 could be calcifediol, not administering corticosteroids, until the natural history of the disease reaches a stage of hyperinflammation.

The impact of gender differences on the clinical characteristics of critically ill patients with venous thromboembolism: A retrospective, observational study

The aim of this study is to describe the general information, disease and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in critically ill patients, to explore the characteristics of severe patients with deep venous VTE and provide clinical reference data for the prevention and treatment of VTE in critically ill patients. This study carried out a retrospective study on the medical records of patients who were treated in the intensive care unit of Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College from 2020 to 2022. The general data, general conditions, drug use, past history, VTE prevention measures, post-VTE conditions, and Padua risk score of 297 patients with VTE during the period of hospitalization in intensive care unit (ICU) were classified and statistically analyzed. A total of 297 including 171 male and 126 male patient medical records were included in the analysis, we compared multiple clinical indicators between male and female patients. Compared to women, male patients have a higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score(APACHE-II score) (P = .027), a higher state of consciousness (P = .003), a higher rate of smoking and drinking history (P < .001), a lower rate of heart failure (P = .003) and chronic depression (P = .013), and a higher rate of recommended operations for male patients after VTE (P = .031). The prothrombin time (PT) (P = .041) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (P = .040) of male patients were significantly higher than those of female patients, while triglyceride (P = .009) and total cholesterol (TC) (P = .001) were significantly lower than those of female patients. The difference in D-dimer (P = .739) was not significant. This study shows that male and female patients with VTE in the ICU have significant differences in general characteristics, general clinical conditions, history of past illness, thrombosis character, and examination items, this may be the reason for the different rates of VTE between male and female patients in the ICU.

Neonatal hemostasis and the use of thromboelastography/rotational thromboelastometry in the neonatal period

Developmental hemostasis refers to age-related alterations related to the progressive maturation of the hemostatic system. Although the conventional coagulation tests, such as prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), are indeed helpful in coagulation workup, they do not accurately delineate the hemostasis in vivo. The viscoelastic tests, namely thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), seem to reflect hemostasis more accurately since they measure various clot parameters without excluding the cellular coagulation components. TEG and ROTEM have shown redaction in blood product administration when used in therapeutic algorithms in older children and adults, but their use in neonates is limited. This review summarizes the current literature regarding using these tests in the neonatal population. Several studies tried to resolve the lack of neonatal reference values of the TEG/ROTEM parameters by publishing neonatal reference ranges for various gestational age groups. Moreover, few studies concerning therapeutic hypothermia, neonates undergoing surgery, and critically ill neonates have shown some predictive value of these tests regarding bleeding events. Even though their results seem promising, larger studies of higher quality are needed to clarify any discrepancies and point out whether these tests have significant predictive value. In conclusion, viscoelastic tests need to be increasingly part of the NICUs' clinical routine and should be used along with conventional coagulation tests in transfusion therapy.

Complications during Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) presents a significant challenge in critical care settings, characterized by compromised gas exchange, necessitating in the most severe cases interventions such as veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) when conventional therapies fail. Critically ill ARDS patients on vv-ECMO may experience several complications. Limited data exist comparing complication rates between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients undergoing vv-ECMO. This retrospective observational study aimed to assess and compare complications in these patient cohorts. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of all patients receiving vv-ECMO for ARDS between March 2020 and March 2022. We recorded the baseline characteristics, the disease course and complication (barotrauma, bleeding, thrombosis) before and after ECMO cannulation, and clinical outcomes (mechanical ventilation and ECMO duration, intensive care unit, and hospital lengths of stay and mortalities). Data were compared between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. In addition, we compared survived and deceased patients. Results: Sixty-four patients were included. COVID-19 patients (n = 25) showed higher rates of pneumothorax (28% vs. 8%, p = 0.039) with subcutaneous emphysema (24% vs. 5%, p = 0.048) and longer non-invasive ventilation duration before vv-ECMO cannulation (2 [1; 4] vs. 0 [0; 1] days, p = <0.001), compared to non-COVID-19 patients (n = 39). However, complication rates and clinical outcomes post-vv-ECMO were similar between groups. Survival analysis revealed no significant differences in pre-vv-ECMO complications, but non-surviving patients had a trend toward higher complication rates and more pleural effusions post-vv-ECMO. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients on vv-ECMO exhibit higher pneumothorax rates with subcutaneous emphysema pre-cannulation; post-cannulation complications are comparable to non-COVID-19 patients.

A challenging issue in COVID-19 infection: The relationship between PA1-1 and TAFI levels in patients with coagulation disorder: A retrospective and observational study

COVID-19 disrupts the balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis. Especially in the clinical course of serious disease, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI), and tissue plasminogen activator levels increase in association with hypercoagulable state and hypofibrinolysis. This explains the increased incidence of thrombosis seen in COVID-19 infection. In this study, we aimed to examine the changes in PAI-1 and TAFI levels of COVID-19 patients. Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Dişkapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital-Ankara Turkey, between April 1 and May 7, 2021. Patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 were included in this retrospective study. TAFI and PAI-1 levels were analyzed from the samples that had been stored at -80 °C formerly. One hundred thirty-five patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and followed up in the service or intensive care unit were included in the study. Thirty-four (25.2%) patients required follow-up in the intensive care unit. Mortality rate was 10.4%, the coagulation tests of these patients were also compared. PA1-1 levels were found to be statistically significantly higher in intensive care unit patients (median: 133 pg/mL vs 31 pg/mL; P < .001), and there was no significant difference in TAFI levels (median:7.31 ng/mL vs 9.80 ng/mL; P = .171) between the 2 groups. TAFI levels were found to be higher in patients who died. In COVID-19 infection, as the severity of the disease increases, the coagulation balance deteriorates and eventually a hypercoagulable state occurs with an increase in PAI-1 and TAFI levels. Markers such as PAI and TAFI can be illuminating in further studies in determining prognosis and mortality and developing new treatment options.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Is an Independent Risk Factor for Decompensation in Cirrhosis Patients

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 causes varied gastrointestinal symptoms. Cirrhosis patients face higher mortality rates from it, especially those with decompensated cirrhosis. This study examines SARS-CoV-2's impact on decompensation in previously compensated cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

We analyzed the Global Collaborative Network, comprising 98 healthcare organizations across sixteen countries, using TriNetX's deidentified research database. Compensated cirrhosis patients were split into two groups: one with SARS-CoV-2-positive patients and another testing negative. Using a 1:1 propensity score matching model based on baseline characteristics and comorbidities, we created comparable cohorts. We then assessed decompensation, mortality, and GI bleed at 1 and 3 months.

RESULTS

Out of 252,631 identified compensated cirrhosis patients, 27.3% (69,057) tested SARS-CoV-2-positive, while 72.6% (183,574) remained negative. Post PSM, 61,963 patients were in each group. SARS-CoV-2-positive patients showed significantly higher decompensation rates (4.4% vs. 1.9% at 1 month; 6% vs. 2.6% overall). Rates of complications, like ascites, SBP, HE, and HRS, increased notably. Mortality (2.5% vs. 1.7% at 1 month; 3.6% vs. 2.7% at 3 months) and GI bleed (1.3% vs. 0.9% at 1 month; 1.9% vs. 1.2% at 3 months) were also elevated in SARS-CoV-2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SARS-CoV-2 increases decompensation over 2-fold in compensated cirrhosis patients and raises mortality and increases rates of complications at 1 and 3 months.

Risk of Arterial and Venous Thrombotic Events Among Patients with COVID-19: A Multi-National Collaboration of Regulatory Agencies from Canada, Europe, and United States

Purpose

Few studies have examined how the absolute risk of thromboembolism with COVID-19 has evolved over time across different countries. Researchers from the European Medicines Agency, Health Canada, and the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration established a collaboration to evaluate the absolute risk of arterial (ATE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the 90 days after diagnosis of COVID-19 in the ambulatory (eg, outpatient, emergency department, nursing facility) setting from seven countries across North America (Canada, US) and Europe (England, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, and Spain) within periods before and during COVID-19 vaccine availability.

Patients and Methods

We conducted cohort studies of patients initially diagnosed with COVID-19 in the ambulatory setting from the seven specified countries. Patients were followed for 90 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. The primary outcomes were ATE and VTE over 90 days from diagnosis date. We measured country-level estimates of 90-day absolute risk (with 95% confidence intervals) of ATE and VTE.

Results

The seven cohorts included 1,061,565 patients initially diagnosed with COVID-19 in the ambulatory setting before COVID-19 vaccines were available (through November 2020). The 90-day absolute risk of ATE during this period ranged from 0.11% (0.09-0.13%) in Canada to 1.01% (0.97-1.05%) in the US, and the 90-day absolute risk of VTE ranged from 0.23% (0.21-0.26%) in Canada to 0.84% (0.80-0.89%) in England. The seven cohorts included 3,544,062 patients with COVID-19 during vaccine availability (beginning December 2020). The 90-day absolute risk of ATE during this period ranged from 0.06% (0.06-0.07%) in England to 1.04% (1.01-1.06%) in the US, and the 90-day absolute risk of VTE ranged from 0.25% (0.24-0.26%) in England to 1.02% (0.99-1.04%) in the US.

Conclusion

There was heterogeneity by country in 90-day absolute risk of ATE and VTE after ambulatory COVID-19 diagnosis both before and during COVID-19 vaccine availability.

Whole blood viscoelastic testing profile and mortality in patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19 pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have evaluated the possible association between whole blood viscoelastic testing (VET) parameters in patients hospitalized for acute Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and mortality. A few studies found no significant differences between survivors and non-survivors, though other studies identified potential predictors of COVID-19-related mortality. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the possible association between standard thromboelastometry/graphy parameters and mortality in patients hospitalized for acute COVID-19 pneumonia.

METHODS

Relevant studies were searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar from their inception until 15th June 2023. We aimed to identify any study including: i) adults admitted to intensive care units (ICU) or medicine wards (MW) for acute COVID-19 pneumonia; ii) viscoelastic testing; iii) mortality.

RESULTS

We included 13 studies: nine prospective and four retrospective, 231 (30.4 %) non-survivors and 528 (69.6 %) survivors. Mortality rates ranged from 12.8 % to 67.5 %. The studies using the TEG apparatus found a significant difference in K time in the Kaolin test among survivors vs. non-survivors (mean difference [MD] 0.20, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.12, 0.28, I2 0%). The studies using the rotational thromboelastometry apparatus found a significant difference in CT-INTEM (MD -17.14, 95 % CI -29.23, -5.06, I2 0%) and LI60-EXTEM (MD -1.00, 95 % CI -1.00, -1.00, I2 0%) assays among survivors vs. non-survivors.

CONCLUSION

We identified no specific hypercoagulable or hypocoagulable profile associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia. Large prospective studies are needed to explore the possible prognostic role of VET in this subset of patients.

Characteristics of blood clotting on thromboelastography in patients with early burns

BACKGROUND

Thromboelastography (TEG) is a viscoelastic test that may be used to evaluate the hemostatic function of whole blood, and it may be useful for burn patients with multiple hemostatic defects.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited patients with burns between January 2019 and July 2021. Blood samples were drawn on admission and subjected to coagulation parameter assessment, including conventional coagulation tests and TEG assessment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to predict the occurrence of complications in patients with early burns.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients with early burns met the inclusion criteria. Patients with minor, moderate, severe, and extremely severe burns accounted for 19.4 %, 36.6 %, 16.1 %, and 27.9 % of all patients, respectively. Compared with the healthy controls, patients with early burns showed significant reductions in the R and K values, and significant elevation in the maximum amplitude (MA), coagulation index (CI), and alpha angle. Compared with minor and moderate burn patients, patients with severe and extremely severe burns had lower K values and thrombin time and higher alpha angle, CI, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, D-dimer, and fibrin degradation products. Patients with hypercoagulation had lower R and K values, longer MA, longer CI, and greater alpha angle. After ROC analysis, the areas under the ROC curve for acute lung injury, acute kidney injury, and bleeding were 0.789, 0.802, and 0.900, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TEG provides insight into the hemostatic state of patients with early burns, and can predict complications in early burn patients when combined with conventional coagulation tests.

Variant-derived SARS-CoV-2 spike protein does not directly cause platelet activation or hypercoagulability

Thrombosis has been associated with severity and mortality in COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infects the host via its spike protein. However, direct effects of spike proteins from SARS-CoV-2 variants on platelet activity and coagulability have not been examined. An ethically approved ex vivo study was performed under a preplanned power analysis. Venous blood was collected from 6 healthy subjects who gave prior written consent. The samples were divided into 5 groups: without spike proteins (group N) and with spike proteins derived from alpha, beta, gamma, and delta SARS-CoV-2 variants (groups A, B, C, and D, respectively). Platelet aggregability, P-selectin expression, platelet-associated complement-1 (PAC-1) binding, platelet count, and mean platelet volume (MPV) were measured in all 5 groups, and thromboelastography (TEG) parameters were measured in groups N and D. The % change in each parameter in groups A to D was calculated relative to the value in group N. Data were analyzed by Friedman test, except for TEG parameters, which were evaluated by Wilcoxon matched pairs test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. This study included 6 participants based on a power analysis. There were no significant differences in platelet aggregability under stimulation with adenosine diphosphate 5 µg/ml, collagen 0.2 or 0.5 µg/ml, and Ser-Phe-Leu-Leu-Arg-Asn-amide trifluoroacetate salt (SFLLRN) 0.5 or 1 µM in groups A-D compared to group N. There were also no significant differences in P-selectin expression and PAC-1 binding under basal conditions or SFLLRN stimulation, and no significant differences in platelet count, MPV and TEG parameters. Platelet hyperactivity and blood hypercoagulability have been reported in COVID-19 patients, but spike proteins at 5 µg/ml from SARS-CoV-2 variants (alpha, beta, gamma, delta) did not directly cause these effects in an ex vivo study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kyoto University Hospital (R0978-1) on March 06, 2020.

Liver Damage and Impaired Coagulation in COVID-19 Patients: A Case Series

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has generated an unprecedented challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. Currently, the scientific community wonders if liver injury in patients suffering from severe forms is a direct consequence of the virus or secondary manifestations of systemic inflammation. The liver plays an essential role in the development of the inflammatory storm typical of this disease, and its involvement is associated with worse clinical outcomes and a higher risk of morbidity and mortality from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

Ten patients suffering from severe COVID-19 disease who died between January 2020 and December 2021 were included in the present analysis. These subjects underwent a post mortem examination with a focused evaluation of the hepatic injury. Also, several laboratory parameters have been evaluated, with a primary focus on prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, antithrombin III, and D-dimers to detect coagulative changes.

RESULTS

The main cause of death was represented by pulmonary thromboembolism events (50%). The analysis of coagulation laboratory parameters and liver biomarkers revealed a statistically significant rise in aPTT and ALP, and a decrease in albumin, when comparing the blood value at admission and death. We also found high levels of D-dimers in most of the subjects at the time of hospitalization. Interestingly, the post mortem analysis of the liver showed ample morphologic variability, with several disease features. In detail, the liver histology revealed the following: the presence of a variable degree of micro- and macrovacuolar steatosis, inflammation (also, hepato-cholangitis), and variable fibrosis. Of mention, we were also able to detect organized fibrinous material.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that in subjects with a severe form of COVID-19, liver disease is related to changes in coagulative and fibrinolytic pathways. In particular, we noted low fibrinogen levels and high D-dimer levels with histological liver findings. Our data suggest that fibrinogen and D-dimers may be used as prognostic markers to detect the severity of liver disease in patients with COVID-19. Finally, we underline the crucial role of coagulation balance in subjects with severe forms of COVID-19.

Hemostatic Profile and Serological Response of Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura after Receiving BNT162b2 Vaccine: A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

 Coronavirus disease is a clinical challenge for patients with autoimmune conditions. Patients affected by immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) are particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Protecting these patients with vaccination is therefore mandatory, although concerns may exist on a possible increased thrombotic risk or risk of disease relapse after vaccine exposure. So far, there is no information on serological response and hemostatic activation in iTTP patients after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 In this study, in April 2021, we enrolled iTTP patients in clinical remission and on regular outpatient follow-up to receive the first and second dose BNT162b2 vaccine as a part of a prospective trial aimed at monitoring for 6 months after vaccination the occurrence of subclinical laboratory signs of clotting activation, as well as overt thrombotic complications or disease relapse. The seroconversion response was monitored in parallel. The results were compared with those of control non-iTTP subjects.

RESULTS

 A moderate decrease of ADAMTS-13 activity was recorded at 3 and 6 months in five patients with normal values at baseline, while an ADAMTS-13 relapse occurred at 6 months in one patient. Abnormalities in the endothelium activation biomarkers postvaccination were observed in iTTP patients compared with controls. The immunological response to vaccine was overall positive. No clinical iTTP relapses or thrombotic events manifested in the 6 month-follow-up after vaccination.

CONCLUSION

 The results of this study are in favor of efficacy and safety of mRNA vaccines in patients with iTTP, and highlight the importance of long-term monitoring of iTTP patients.

Predictive value of coagulation variables and glycocalyx shedding in hospitalized COVID-19 patients - a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

Covid-19 disease causes an immense burden on the healthcare system. It has not yet been finally clarified which patients will suffer from a severe course and which will not. Coagulation disorders can be detected in many of these patients. The aim of the present study was therefore to identify variables of the coagulation system including standard and viscoelastometric tests as well as components of glycocalyx damage that predict admission to the intensive care unit.

METHODS

Adult patients were included within 24 h of admission. Blood samples were analyzed at hospital admission and at ICU admission if applicable. We analyzed group differences and furthermore performed receiver operator characteristics (ROC).

RESULTS

This study included 60 adult COVID-19 patients. During their hospital stay, 14 patients required ICU treatment. Comparing ICU and non-ICU patients at time of hospital admission, D-dimer (1450 µg/ml (675/2850) vs. 600 µg/ml (500/900); p = 0.0022; cut-off 1050 µg/ml, sensitivity 71%, specificity 89%) and IL-6 (47.6 pg/ml (24.9/85.4 l) vs. 16.1 pg/ml (5.5/34.4); p = 0.0003; cut-off 21.25 pg/ml, sensitivity 86%, specificity 65%) as well as c-reactive protein (92 mg/dl (66.8/131.5) vs. 43.5 mg/dl (26.8/83.3); p = 0.0029; cutoff 54.5 mg/dl, sensitivity 86%, specificity 65%) were higher in patients who required ICU admission. Thromboelastometric variables and markers of glycocalyx damage (heparan sulfate, hyaluronic acid, syndecan-1) at the time of hospital admission did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

General inflammatory variables continue to be the most robust predictors of a severe course of a COVID-19 infection. Viscoelastometric variables and markers of glycocalyx damage are significantly increased upon admission to the ICU without being predictors of ICU admission.

Integral assays of hemostasis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 on admission and during heparin thromboprophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Blood coagulation abnormalities play a major role in COVID-19 pathophysiology. However, the specific details of hypercoagulation and anticoagulation treatment require investigation. The aim of this study was to investigate the status of the coagulation system by means of integral and local clotting assays in COVID-19 patients on admission to the hospital and in hospitalized COVID-19 patients receiving heparin thromboprophylaxis.

METHODS

Thrombodynamics (TD), thromboelastography (TEG), and standard clotting assays were performed in 153 COVID-19 patients observed in a hospital setting. All patients receiving treatment, except extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients (n = 108), were administered therapeutic doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) depending on body weight. The ECMO patients (n = 15) were administered unfractionated heparin (UFH).

RESULTS

On admission, the patients (n = 30) had extreme hypercoagulation by all integral assays: TD showed hypercoagulation in ~75% of patients, while TEG showed hypercoagulation in ~50% of patients. The patients receiving treatment showed a significant heparin response based on TD; 77% of measurements were in the hypocoagulation range, 15% were normal, and 8% remained in hypercoagulation. TEG showed less of a response to heparin: 24% of measurements were in the hypocoagulation range, 59% were normal and 17% remained in hypercoagulation. While hypocoagulation is likely due to heparin treatment, remaining in significant hypercoagulation may indicate insufficient anticoagulation for some patients, which is in agreement with our clinical findings. There were 3 study patients with registered thrombosis episodes, and all were outside the target range for TD parameters typical for effective thromboprophylaxis (1 patient was in weak hypocoagulation, atypical for the LMWH dose used, and 2 patients remained in the hypercoagulation range despite therapeutic LMWH doses).

CONCLUSION

Patients with COVID-19 have severe hypercoagulation, which persists in some patients receiving anticoagulation treatment, while significant hypocoagulation is observed in others. The data suggest critical issues of hemostasis balance in these patients and indicate the potential importance of integral assays in its control.

How Dexamethasone Used in Anti-COVID-19 Therapy Influenced Antihypertensive Treatment in Patients with SARS-CoV-2

BACKGROUND

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic period, in the treatment approved by the WHO, along with antivirals, antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anticoagulants, dexamethasone was always used. This study started from the professional concern related to the vasopressor effect of cortisone on blood pressure (BP).

METHODS

The study group was achieved by selecting, from a total of 356 patients hospitalized in the clinic, the patients with known hypertensive status at admission for SARS-CoV-2. Dexamethasone was part of the anti-COVID-19 treatment, with an administration of 4-6-8 mg/day, depending on bodyweight, for 10 days. All patients with hypertension received antihypertensive treatment in adjusted doses according to the recorded BP values.

RESULTS

Monitoring of BP in hospitalized patients was performed daily, in the morning and evening. If on the 2nd day of treatment, 84% of the patients partially responded to the treatment with a moderate decrease in BP, on the 3rd therapy day, the situation clearly improved: more than 75% of the patients had values of BP that can be classified as high-normal (38.23%) and normal (40.03%).

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection did not have a notable influence on increasing BP, because the doses were low-moderate and prescribed for a short time.

Circulating Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor as a Predictive Indicator for COVID-19-Associated Acute Kidney Injury and Mortality: Clinical and Bioinformatics Analysis

Urokinase receptors regulate the interplay between inflammation, immunity, and blood clotting. The soluble urokinase plasminogen activator system is an immunologic regulator affecting endothelial function and its related receptor; the soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has been reported to impact kidney injury. This work aims to measure serum levels of suPAR in COVID-19 patients and correlate the measurements with variable clinicolaboratory parameters and patient outcomes. In this prospective cohort study, 150 COVID-19 patients and 50 controls were included. The circulating suPAR levels were quantified by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Routine COVID-19 laboratory assessments, including CBC, CRP, LDH, serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rates, were performed. The need for oxygen therapy, CO-RAD score, and survival rates was assessed. Bioinformatic analysis and molecular docking were run to explore the urokinase receptor structure/function and to characterize molecules as potential anti-suPAR therapeutic targets, respectively. We found higher circulating suPAR levels in COVID-19 patients vs. controls (p < 0.001). Circulating suPAR levels positively correlated with COVID-19 severity, the need for O2 therapy, the total leukocytes count, and the neutrophils to lymphocyte ratio, while they were negatively correlated with the O2 saturation level, albumin, blood calcium, lymphocytic count, and GFR. In addition, the suPAR levels were associated with poor prognostic outcomes such as a high incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality rate. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a lower survival rate with higher suPAR levels. The logistic regression analysis confirmed the significant association of suPAR levels with the occurrence of AKI related to COVID-19 and with increased mortality probability within three months of COVID-19 follow-up. Some compounds that can act similarly to uPAR were discovered and tested by molecular docking to identify the possible ligand-protein interactions. In conclusion, higher circulating suPAR levels were associated with COVID-19 severity and could be considered a putative predictor of AKI development and mortality.

Variant-Related Differences in Laboratory Biomarkers among Patients Affected with Alpha, Delta and Omicron: A Retrospective Whole Viral Genome Sequencing and Hospital-Setting Cohort Study

During the COVID-19 pandemic, different SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) with specific characteristics have emerged and spread worldwide. At the same time, clinicians routinely evaluate the results of certain blood tests upon patient admission as well as during hospitalization to assess disease severity and the overall patient status. In the present study, we searched for significant cell blood count and biomarker differences among patients affected with the Alpha, Delta and Omicron VOCs at admission. Data from 330 patients were retrieved regarding age, gender, VOC, cell blood count results (WBC, Neut%, Lymph%, Ig%, PLT), common biomarkers (D-dimers, urea, creatinine, SGOT, SGPT, CRP, IL-6, suPAR), ICU admission and death. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis test, two-way ANOVA, Chi-square, T-test, the Mann-Whitney test and logistic regression was performed where appropriate using SPSS v.28 and STATA 14. Age and VOC were significantly associated with hospitalization, whereas significant differences among VOC groups were found for WBC, PLT, Neut%, IL-6, creatinine, CRP, D-dimers and suPAR. Our analyses showed that throughout the current pandemic, not only the SARS-CoV-2 VOCs but also the laboratory parameters that are used to evaluate the patient's status at admission are subject to changes.

Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: Second update 2022

BACKGROUND

Management of peri-operative bleeding is complex and involves multiple assessment tools and strategies to ensure optimal patient care with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. These updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aim to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for healthcare professionals to help ensure improved clinical management.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search from 2015 to 2021 of several electronic databases was performed without language restrictions. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies and to formulate recommendations. A Delphi methodology was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

These searches identified 137 999 articles. All articles were assessed, and the existing 2017 guidelines were revised to incorporate new evidence. Sixteen recommendations derived from the systematic literature search, and four clinical guidances retained from previous ESAIC guidelines were formulated. Using the Delphi process on 253 sentences of guidance, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97% and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 3%.

DISCUSSION

Peri-operative bleeding management encompasses the patient's journey from the pre-operative state through the postoperative period. Along this journey, many features of the patient's pre-operative coagulation status, underlying comorbidities, general health and the procedures that they are undergoing need to be taken into account. Due to the many important aspects in peri-operative nontrauma bleeding management, guidance as to how best approach and treat each individual patient are key. Understanding which therapeutic approaches are most valuable at each timepoint can only enhance patient care, ensuring the best outcomes by reducing blood loss and, therefore, overall morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

All healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients at risk for surgical bleeding should be aware of the current therapeutic options and approaches that are available to them. These guidelines aim to provide specific guidance for bleeding management in a variety of clinical situations.

High Plasma tPAPAI-1C Levels May Be Related to a Poor Prognosis in Patients with Severe or Critical COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Severe novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients have a high incidence of thrombotic complications and mortality. The pathophysiology of coagulopathy involves fibrinolytic system impairment and vascular endothelial damage. This study examined coagulation and fibrinolytic markers as outcome predictors. In an observational study of 164 COVID-19 patients admitted to our emergency intensive care unit, hematological parameters on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 were retrospectively compared between survivors and nonsurvivors. Nonsurvivors had a higher APACHE II score, SOFA score, and age than survivors. Nonsurvivors also had a significantly lower platelet count and significantly higher plasmin/α2plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC), tissue plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 complex (tPAPAI-1C), D-dimer, and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product (FDP) levels than survivors throughout the measurement period. The 7-day maximum or minimum values of the tPAPAI-1C, FDP, and D-dimer levels were significantly higher in nonsurvivors. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the maximum tPAPAI-1C (OR = 1.034; 95% CI,1.014-1.061; p = 0.0041) was an independent factor affecting mortality, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.713 (optimum cut-off of 51 ng/mL; sensitivity, 69.2%; and specificity, 68.4%). COVID-19 patients with poor outcomes exhibit exacerbated coagulopathy with fibrinolysis inhibition and endothelial damage. Consequently, plasma tPAPAI-1C might be a useful predictor of the prognosis in patients with severe or critical COVID-19.

Extracellular vesicle proteomics and phosphoproteomics identify pathways for increased risk in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Recent studies suggest that extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a role in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the severity of COVID-19. However, their role in the interaction between COVID-19 and type 2 diabetes (T2D) has not been addressed. Here, we characterized the circulating EV proteomic and phosphoproteomic landscape in patients with and without T2D hospitalized with COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 acute respiratory illness (RSP). We detected differentially expressed protein and phosphoprotein signatures that effectively characterized the study groups. The trio of immunomodulatory and coagulation proteins C1QA, C1QB, and C1QC appeared to be a central cluster in both the COVID-19 and T2D functional networks. PKCβ appeared to be retained in cells by being diverted from EV pathways and contribute to the COVID-19 and T2D interaction via a PKC/BTK/TEC axis. EV-shuttled CASP3 and ROCK1 appeared to be coregulated and likely contribute to disease interactions in patients with COVID-19 and T2D. Predicted activation of AMPK, MAPK, and SYK appeared to also play important roles driving disease interaction. These results suggest that activated cellular kinases (i.e., PKC, AMPK, MAPK, and SYK) and multiple EV-shuttled kinases (i.e., PKCβ, BTK, TEC, MAP2K2, and ROCK1) may play key roles in severe COVID-19, particularly in patients with comorbid diabetes.

Successful Treatment of a COVID 19-Associated Multisystem Thrombotic Event in a Young Patient in a Neurocritical Care Unit

This case report describes a young patient with no comorbidities, who presented with two systemic thrombotic events within 24 hours of admission. She presented with a right middle cerebral artery territory infarct and developed an inferior wall myocardial infarction soon after. The hypotension was refractory to inotropes and required emergency intra-aortic balloon pump insertion. She was evaluated for prothrombotic states and other causes of stroke in young. However, the workup for the same was negative. Coronavirus disease-2019 immunoglobulin G antibody titer and inflammatory markers were found to be extremely elevated, which suggested recent severe infection. This case report throws light on the multidisciplinary management of thrombotic events, most probably secondary to coronavirus infection.

Pilot study to evaluate hypercoagulation and inflammation using rotational thromboelastometry and calprotectin in COVID-19 patients

INTRODUCTION

Abnormal coagulation and inflammation are hallmarks of SARs-COV-19. Stratifying affected patients on admission to hospital may help identify those who at are risk of developing severe disease early on. Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a point of care test that can be used to measure abnormal coagulation and calprotectin is a measure of inflammation.

AIM

Assess if ROTEM can measure hypercoagulability on admission and identify those who will develop severe disease early on. Assess if calprotectin can measure inflammation and if there is a correlation with ROTEM and calprotectin.

METHODS

COVID-19 patients were recruited on admission and ROTEM testing was undertaken daily for a period of 7 days. Additionally inflammatory marker calprotectin was also tested for the same period.

RESULTS

33 patients were recruited to the study out of which 13 were admitted to ITU and 20 were treated on the ward. ROTEM detected a hypercoagulable state on admission but did not stratify between those admitted to a ward or escalated to ITU. Calprotectin levels were raised but there was no statistical difference (p = 0.73) between patients admitted to a ward or escalated to ITU. Significant correlations were observed between FIBA5 (r = 0.62; p<0.00), FIBCFT (r = -0.57; p<0.00), FIBMCF (r = 0.64; p<0.00) and INMCF (r = 0.57; p<0.00) and calprotectin.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 patients were hypercoagulable on admission. The correlations between ROTEM and calprotectin underline the interactions between inflammation and coagulation.

Continuous renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: implications in the COVID-19 era

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19)) was identified as the causative agent of viral pneumonias in Wuhan, China in December 2019, and has emerged as a pandemic causing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiple organ dysfunction. Interim guidance by the World Health Organization states that extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) should be considered as a rescue therapy in COVID-19-related ARDS. International registries tracking ECMO in COVID-19 patients reveal a 21%-70% incidence of acute renal injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) during ECMO support. The indications for initiating RRT in patients on ECMO are similar to those for patients not requiring ECMO. RRT can be administered during ECMO via a temporary dialysis catheter, placement of a circuit in-line hemofilter, or direct connection of continuous RRT in-line with the ECMO circuit. Here we review methods for RRT during ECMO, RRT initiation and timing during ECMO, anticoagulation strategies, and novel cytokine filtration approaches to minimize COVID-19's pathophysiological impact.

Utility of probability scores for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Clinical prediction models determine the pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) and assess the need for tests for these patients. Coronavirus infection is associated with a greater risk of PE, increasing its severity and conferring a worse prognosis. The pathogenesis of PE appears to be different in patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection. This systematic review aims to discover the utility of probability models developed for PE in patients with COVID-19 by reviewing the available literature.

METHODS

A literature search on the PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases was carried out. All studies that reported data on the use of clinical prediction models for PE in patients with COVID-19 were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomized studies.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies that evaluated five prediction models (Wells score, Geneva score, YEARS algorithm, and PERC and PEGeD clinical decision rules) were included. The different scales were used in 1,187 patients with COVID-19. Overall, the models showed limited predictive ability. The two-level Wells score with low (or unlikely) clinical probability in combination with a D-dimer level <3000ng/mL or a normal bedside lung ultrasound showed an adequate correlation for ruling out PE.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review suggests that the clinical prediction models available for PE that were developed in the general population are not applicable to patients with COVID-19. Therefore, their use is in clinical practice as the only diagnostic screening tool is not recommended. New clinical probability models for PE that are validated in these patients are needed.

Thrombosis-Related Loss of Arterial Lines in the First Wave of COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit Patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can present with severe respiratory distress requiring intensive care unit (ICU)-level care. Such care often requires placement of an arterial line for monitoring of pulmonary disease progression, hemodynamics, and laboratory tests. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, experienced physicians anecdotally reported multiple attempts, decreased insertion durations, and greater need for replacement of arterial lines in patients with COVID-19 due to persistent thrombosis. Because invasive procedures in patients with COVID-19 may increase the risk for caregiver infection, better defining difficulties in maintaining arterial lines in COVID-19 patients is important. We sought to explore the association between COVID-19 infection and arterial line thrombosis in critically ill patients.

METHODS

In this primary exploratory analysis, a multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model was used to retrospectively estimate the association between critically ill COVID-19 (versus sepsis/acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]) patients and the risk of arterial line removal for thrombosis (with arterial line removal for any other reason treated as a competing risk). As a sensitivity analysis, we compared the number of arterial line clots per 1000 arterial line days between critically ill COVID-19 and sepsis/ARDS patients using multivariable negative binomial regression.

RESULTS

We retrospectively identified 119 patients and 200 arterial line insertions in patients with COVID-19 and 54 patients and 68 arterial line insertions with non-COVID ARDS. Using a Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model, we found the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) for arterial line clot to be 2.18 (1.06-4.46) for arterial lines placed in COVID-19 patients versus non-COVID-19 sepsis/ARDS patients ( P = .034). Patients with COVID-19 had 36.3 arterial line clots per 1000 arterial line days compared to 19.1 arterial line clots per 1000 arterial line days in patients without COVID-19 (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] [95% CI], 1.78 [0.94-3.39]; P = .078).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that arterial line complications due to thrombosis are more likely in COVID-19 patients and supports the need for further research on the association between COVID-19 and arterial line dysfunction requiring replacement.

[Utility of probability scores for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review]

Background and objective

Clinical prediction models determine the pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) and assess the need for tests for these patients. Coronavirus infection is associated with a greater risk of PE, increasing its severity and conferring a worse prognosis. The pathogenesis of PE appears to be different in patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection. This systematic review aims to discover the utility of probability models developed for PE in patients with COVID-19 by reviewing the available literature.

Methods

A literature search on the PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases was carried out. All studies that reported data on the use of clinical prediction models for PE in patients with COVID-19 were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomized studies.

Results

Thirteen studies that evaluated five prediction models (Wells score, Geneva score, YEARS algorithm, and PERC and PEGeD clinical decision rules) were included. The different scales were used in 1,187 patients with COVID-19. Overall, the models showed limited predictive ability. The two-level Wells score with low (or unlikely) clinical probability in combination with a D-dimer level < 3000 ng/mL or a normal bedside lung ultrasound showed an adequate correlation for ruling out PE.

Conclusions

Our systematic review suggests that the clinical prediction models available for PE that were developed in the general population are not applicable to patients with COVID-19. Therefore, their use is in clinical practice as the only diagnostic screening tool is not recommended. New clinical probability models for PE that are validated in these patients are needed.

Autopsy Findings and Inflammatory Markers in SARS-CoV-2: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose

The systemic inflammatory response related to COVID-19 can be easily investigated in living patients. Unfortunately, not every biomarker is suitable for postmortem analysis since several factors may interfere. The aim of this study was to summarize key histopathological findings within each organ system due to COVID-19 and to assess if serological inexpensive and widely available biomarkers such as CRP, IL-6, fibrinogen and d-Dimers, associated with adverse outcomes in COVID-19, can be implemented in a post-mortem assessment.

Patients and Methods

A total of 60 subjects divided in 2 groups were included. All subjects died outside a hospital setting and therefore did not receive specific or symptomatic therapies that could have modulated the inflammatory response. The first group included 45 subjects in which mandatory autopsy was performed in order to establish the cause of death and macroscopic examination of the lungs was highly suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection. As controls (Group 2), 20 subjects who died from polytrauma in high velocity car accidents and suicide were selected. Bronchial fluids collected during the autopsy procedure were used for the RT-PCR diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and serum samples were sent for analysis of IL-6, CRP, d-Dimers and fibrinogen.

Results

Compared with the control group, the subjects of the COVID-19 group were older (59±19.5 vs.38±19.15 years, p=0.0002) and had more underlying comorbidities such as hypertension (60% vs 35%, p=0.06) or were overweight (53.3% vs 30%, p=0.08). The levels of CRP, IL-6, fibrinogen and d-Dimers in postmortem plasma samples were significantly higher in COVID-19 subjects than in control group (p< 0.0001). Moreover, the level of IL-6 was significantly higher in overweight patients (r=0.52, P<0.001). In all COVID-19 subjects, the histological examination revealed features corresponding to the exudative and/or proliferative phases of diffuse alveolar damage. Large pulmonary emboli were observed in 7 cases. Gross cardiac enlargement with left ventricular hypertrophy was observed in 19 cases. The most frequent pathological finding of the central nervous system was acute/early-subacute infarction.

Conclusion

Due to the complexity of the inflammatory response, we postulate that a combination of biomarkers, rather than a single laboratory parameter, might be more effective in obtaining a reliable postmortem COVID-19 diagnosis.

Disposable Voltammetric Immunosensor for D-Dimer Detection as Early Biomarker of Thromboembolic Disease and of COVID-19 Prognosis

In this work, we report on the development of a simple electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of D-dimer protein in human plasma samples. The immunosensor is built by a simple drop-casting procedure of chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) as biocompatible support, Protein A (PrA), to facilitate the proper orientation of the antibody sites to epitopes as a capture biomolecule, and the D-dimer antibody onto a carboxyl functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes screen printed electrode (MWCNTs-SPE). The CSNPs have been morphologically characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) techniques. Successively, the electrochemical properties of the screen-printed working electrode after each modification step have been characterized by differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The resulting MWCNTs-CSNPs-PrA-D-dimer Ab immunosensor displays an optimal and promising platform for antibody immobilization and specific D-dimer detection. DPV has been used to investigate the antigen/antibody interaction at different D-dimer concentrations. The proposed voltammetric immunosensor allowed a linear range from 2 to 500 μg L^-1 with a LOD of 0.6 μg L^-1 and a sensitivity of 1.3 μA L μg^-1 cm^-2. Good stability and a fast response time (5 s) have been reported. Lastly, the performance of the voltammetric immunosensor has been tested in human plasma samples, showing satisfactory results, thus attesting to the promising feasibility of the proposed platform for detecting D-dimer in physiological samples.

Investigation of differences in coagulation characteristics between hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variant infection using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM): A single-center, retrospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron variant has a low rate of serious illness, is highly contagious, and has spread rapidly since January 2022. The number of severe cases and deaths remains problematic. Here, we aimed to elucidate the coagulation pathology of Omicron-infected patients using rotational thromboelastometry.

METHODS

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019, hospitalized and treated from January 2021 to April 2022, were included. The Alpha-Delta and Omicron groups were defined during admission. Blood tests, clinical course, and rotational thromboelastometry measurements were compared using a propensity score-matched cohort.

RESULTS

Both groups had 21 patients each. Lactate dehydrogenase (Alpha-Delta group [interquartile range] vs. Omicron group [interquartile range]; 449 [368-518] U/L vs. 241 [196-398] U/L, p = 0.01) and ferritin (1428 [1145-3061] ng/dl vs. 481 [188-881] ng/dl, p = 0.0002) levels were significantly lower in the Omicron group. In rotational thromboelastometry, the thrombus hardness indexes FIBTEM A5 (29 [23-34] mm vs. 23 [18-28] mm, p = 0.034) and maximum clot firmness (34 [27-40] mm vs. 26 [21-33] mm, p = 0.021) were significantly lower in the Omicron group, whereas the fibrinolysis index FIBTEM LI60 (98 [92-100] % vs. 100 [100-100] %, p = 0.0082) was higher.

CONCLUSION

Severe coagulation abnormalities may be less likely in Omicron-infected patients than in those infected with the previous Alpha and Delta variants.

Hypercoagulability in critically ill patients with COVID 19, an observational prospective study

OBJECTIVE

COVID 19 is often associated with hypercoagulability and thromboembolic (TE) events. The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics of hypercoagulability and its relationship with new-onset TE events and the composite outcome of need for intubation and/or death in intensive care unit (ICU) patients admitted for COVID.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Monocentric, intensive care, University Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, France.

PATIENTS

Patients admitted to intensive care from January 2020 to May 2021 for COVID-19 pneumonia.

INTERVENTIONS

Standard hemostatic tests and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) were performed on admission and on day 4. Hypercoagulability was defined by at least one of the following criteria: D-dimers > 3000 μg/dL, fibrinogen > 8 g/L, EXTEM CFT below the normal range, EXTEM A5, MCF, Li 60 above the normal range, and EXTEM G-score ((5000 x MCF) / (100-MCF)) ≥ 11 dyne/cm2.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 133 patients included, 17 (12.7%) developed new-onset TE events, and 59 (44.3%) required intubation and/or died in the ICU. ROTEM was performed in 133 patients on day 1 and in 67 on day 4. Hypercoagulability was present on day 1 in 115 (86.4%) patients. None of the hypercoagulability indices were associated with subsequent new-onset TE events on days 1 and 4 nor with the need for intubation and/or ICU death. Hyperfibrinogenemia > 8g/dL, higher D-dimers and higher EXTEM Li 60 on day 4 were predictive of need for intubation and/or of ICU death.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed that most COVID-19 ICU patients have hypercoagulability on admission and almost all on day 4. Hyperfibrinogenemia or fibrinolysis shutdown on day 4 were associated with unfavorable outcome.

High Plasma Levels of Activated Factor VII-Antithrombin Complex Point to Increased Tissue Factor Expression in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: A Potential Link with COVID-19 Prothrombotic Diathesis

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causal agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in which coagulation abnormalities and endothelial dysfunction play a key pathogenic role. Tissue factor (TF) expression is triggered by endothelial dysfunction. Activated factor VII-antithrombin (FVIIa-AT) complex reflects indirectly FVIIa-TF interaction and has been proposed as a potential biomarker of prothrombotic diathesis. FVIIa-AT plasma concentration was measured in 40 patients (30 males and 10 females; 64.8 ± 12.3 years) admitted with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia during the first pandemic wave in Italy. Two sex- and age-matched cohorts without COVID-19, with or without signs of systemic inflammation, were used to compare FVIIa-AT data. The FVIIa-AT plasma levels in COVID-19 patients were higher than those in non-COVID-19 subjects, either with or without inflammation, while no difference was observed among non-COVID-19 subjects. The association between COVID-19 and FVIIa-AT levels remained significant after adjustment for sex, age, C-reactive protein, renal function, fibrinogen, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time. Our results indicate that SARS-CoV-2 infection, at least during the first pandemic wave, was characterized by high FVIIa-AT levels, which may suggest an enhanced FVIIa-TF interaction in COVID-19, potentially consistent with SARS-CoV-2-induced endotheliopathy.

Bivalirudin vs. Enoxaparin in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

(1) Background: In COVID-19 patients, the occurrence of thromboembolic complications contributes to disease progression and mortality. In patients at increased risk for thrombotic complications, therapeutic enoxaparin should be considered. However, critically ill COVID-19 patients could develop resistance to enoxaparin. Bivalirudin, a thrombin inhibitor, may be an alternative. This pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial aims to ascertain if bivalirudin may reduce the time spent under invasive mechanical ventilation, as compared to enoxaparin. (2) Methods: Intubated COVID-19 patients at risk for thrombo-embolic complications were randomized to receive therapeutic doses of enoxaparin or bivalirudin. We ascertained the time spent under invasive mechanical ventilation during the first 28 days from Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. A standardized weaning protocol was implemented in all centers. In addition, we assessed the occurrence of thromboembolic complications, the number of patients requiring percutaneous tracheostomy, the gas exchange, the reintubation rate, the ICU length of stay, the ICU and 28-days mortalities. (3) Results: We enrolled 58 consecutive patients. Bivalirudin did not reduce the time spent under invasive mechanical ventilation as compared to enoxaparin (12 [8; 13] vs. 13 [10; 15] days, respectively; p = 0.078). Thrombotic (p = 0.056) and embolic (p = 0.423) complications, need for tracheostomy (p = 0.423) or reintubation (p = 0.999), the ICU length of stay (p = 0.076) and mortality (p = 0.777) were also similar between treatments. Patients randomized to bivalirudin showed a higher oxygenation at day 7 and 15 after randomization, when compared to enoxaparin group. (4) Conclusions: In intubated COVID-19 patients at increased risk for thromboembolic complications, bivalirudin did not reduce the time spent under invasive mechanical ventilation, nor improved any other clinical outcomes.

Targeting thromboinflammation in COVID-19 - A narrative review of the potential of C1 inhibitor to prevent disease progression

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a clinical spectrum ranging from asymptomatic carriers to critically ill patients with complications including thromboembolic events, myocardial injury, multisystemic inflammatory syndromes and death. Since the beginning of the pandemic several therapeutic options emerged, with a multitude of randomized trials, changing the medical landscape of COVID-19. The effect of various monoclonal antibodies, antiviral, anti-inflammatory and anticoagulation drugs have been studied, and to some extent, implemented into clinical practice. In addition, a multitude of trials improved the understanding of the disease and emerging evidence points towards a significant role of the complement system, kallikrein-kinin, and contact activation system as drivers of disease in severe COVID-19. Despite their involvement in COVID-19, treatments targeting these plasmatic cascades have neither been systematically studied nor introduced into clinical practice, and randomized studies with regards to these treatments are scarce. Given the multiple-action, multiple-target nature of C1 inhibitor (C1-INH), the natural inhibitor of these cascades, this drug may be an interesting candidate to prevent disease progression and combat thromboinflammation in COVID-19. This narrative review will discuss the current evidence with regards to the involvement of these plasmatic cascades as well as endothelial cells in COVID-19. Furthermore, we summarize the evidence of C1-INH in COVID-19 and potential benefits and pitfalls of C1-INH treatment in COVID-19.

Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers and Chest CT Findings as Predictors of Acute Limb Ischemia Risk, Intensive Care Unit Admission, and Mortality in COVID-19 Patients

Background: Numerous tools, including inflammatory biomarkers and lung injury severity scores, have been evaluated as predictors of thromboembolic events and the requirement for intensive therapy in COVID-19 patients. This study aims to verify the predictive role of inflammatory biomarkers [monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammatory index (SII), Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), and Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation (AISI)] and the CT Severity Score in acute limb ischemia (ALI) risk, intensive unit care (ICU) admission, and mortality in COVID-19 patients.; Methods: The present study was designed as an observational, analytical, retrospective cohort study and included all patients older than 18 years of age with a diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, confirmed through real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and admitted to the County Emergency Clinical Hospital of Targu-Mureș, Romania, and Modular Intensive Care Unit of UMFST “George Emil Palade” of Targu Mures, Romania between January 2020 and December 2021. Results: Non-Survivors and “ALI” patients were associated with higher incidence of cardiovascular disease [atrial fibrillation (AF) p = 0.0006 and p = 0.0001; peripheral arterial disease (PAD) p = 0.006 and p < 0.0001], and higher pulmonary parenchyma involvement (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed a high baseline value for MLR, NLR, PLR, SII, SIRI, AISI, and the CT Severity Score independent predictor of adverse outcomes for all recruited patients (all p < 0.0001). Moreover, the presence of AF and PAD was an independent predictor of ALI risk and mortality. Conclusions: According to our findings, higher MLR, NLR, PLR, SII, SIRI, AISI, and CT Severity Score values at admission strongly predict ALI risk, ICU admission, and mortality. Moreover, patients with AF and PAD had highly predicted ALI risk and mortality but no ICU admission.

Relative Hypercoagulopathy of the SARS-CoV-2 Beta and Delta Variants when Compared to the Less Severe Omicron Variants Is Related to TEG Parameters, the Extent of Fibrin Amyloid Microclots, and the Severity of Clinical Illness

Earlier variants of SARS-CoV-2 have been associated with plasma hypercoagulability (as judged by thromboelastography) and an extensive formation of fibrin amyloid microclots, which are considered to contribute to the pathology of the coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19). The newer Omicron variants appear to be far more transmissible, but less virulent, even when taking immunity acquired from previous infections or vaccination into account. We here show that while the clotting parameters associated with Omicron variants are significantly raised over those of healthy, matched controls, they are only raised to levels significantly lower than those seen with more severe variants such as beta and delta. We also observed that individuals infected with omicron variants manifested less extensive microclot formation in platelet-poor plasma compared with those harboring the more virulent variants. The measurement of clotting effects between the different variants acts as a kind of "internal control" that demonstrates the relationship between the extent of coagulopathies and the virulence of the variant of interest. This adds to the evidence that microclots may play an important role in reflecting the severity of symptoms observed in COVID-19.

Circulating cell clusters aggravate the hemorheological abnormalities in COVID-19

Microthrombi and circulating cell clusters are common microscopic findings in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at different stages in the disease course, implying that they may function as the primary drivers in disease progression. Inspired by a recent flow imaging cytometry study of the blood samples from patients with COVID-19, we perform computational simulations to investigate the dynamics of different types of circulating cell clusters, namely white blood cell (WBC) clusters, platelet clusters, and red blood cell clusters, over a range of shear flows and quantify their impact on the viscosity of the blood. Our simulation results indicate that the increased level of fibrinogen in patients with COVID-19 can promote the formation of red blood cell clusters at relatively low shear rates, thereby elevating the blood viscosity, a mechanism that also leads to an increase in viscosity in other blood diseases, such as sickle cell disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. We further discover that the presence of WBC clusters could also aggravate the abnormalities of local blood rheology. In particular, the extent of elevation of the local blood viscosity is enlarged as the size of the WBC clusters grows. On the other hand, the impact of platelet clusters on the local rheology is found to be negligible, which is likely due to the smaller size of the platelets. The difference in the impact of WBC and platelet clusters on local hemorheology provides a compelling explanation for the clinical finding that the number of WBC clusters is significantly correlated with thrombotic events in COVID-19 whereas platelet clusters are not. Overall, our study demonstrates that our computational models based on dissipative particle dynamics can serve as a powerful tool to conduct quantitative investigation of the mechanism causing the pathological alterations of hemorheology and explore their connections to the clinical manifestations in COVID-19.

Lung Organoids as Model to Study SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a global pandemic and has severely affected socio-economic conditions and people’s life. The lung is the major target organ infected and (seriously) damaged by SARS-CoV-2, so a comprehensive understanding of the virus and the mechanism of infection are the first choices to overcome COVID-19. Recent studies have demonstrated the enormous value of human organoids as platforms for virological research, making them an ideal tool for researching host–pathogen interactions. In this study, the various existing lung organoids and their identification biomarkers and applications are summarized. At the same time, the seven coronaviruses currently capable of infecting humans are outlined. Finally, a detailed summary of existing studies on SARS-CoV-2 using lung organoids is provided and includes pathogenesis, drug development, and precision treatment. This review highlights the value of lung organoids in studying SARS-CoV-2 infection, bringing hope that research will alleviate COVID-19-associated lung infections.

Dispensing anti-osteoporotic drugs changed during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVES

Caring for osteoporosis patients has proven challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic due to repeated lockdowns in Austria. The distinct possibility of insufficient treatment regimens is therefore a matter of pressing concern. The aim of the study was to assess alterations in dispensing anti-osteoporotic drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PATIENTS/METHODS

This study was a nationwide retrospective register-based observational study which included all patients in Austria aged ≥50 who received at least one prescription for anti-osteoporotic medication between January 2016 and November 2020. Pseudonymised individual-level patients' data were obtained from social insurance authorities. Anti-osteoporotic agents were divided into: (i) oral bisphosphonates, (ii) intravenous bisphosphonates, (iii) selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), (iv) teriparatide (TPTD) and (v) denosumab (DMAB). We used interrupted time series analysis with autoregressive integrated moving average models (ARIMA) to predict drug dispensing.

RESULTS

There were 2,884,374 dispensations of anti-osteoporotic drugs to 224,598 patients between 2016 and 2020. The mean monthly prescriptions for oral bisphosphonates (-14.5 %) and SERMs (-12.9 %) decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared to the non-COVID-19 period. Dispensing for intravenous bisphosphonates (1.7 %) and teriparatide (9.5 %) increased. Prescriptions for DMAB decreased during the first lock-down, however increased by 29.1 % for the total observation time. The Arima models showed that in March 2020 (beginning of the 1st COVID-19 lockdown), there was a decrease of 778 dispensings, with a further increase of 14 dispensings every month for denosumab; a decrease by 178 dispensings, with a further increase of 23 dispensings every month for zolendronic acid; a decrease by 2950 dispensings, but with a further increase of 236 dispensings every other month for ibandronate and a decrease by 1443 dispensing with a further decrease of 29 dispensings for alendronate than predicted, had the lockdown not occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The total number of prescriptions dispensed to patients treated with anti-osteoporotic medications declined rapidly during first COVID-19 lockdown. The observed decrease of DMAB during the first lockdown rebounded in the following months. Considering the massive treatment gap for osteoporosis, and the related fracture risk, clinicians should continue treatment, even during a pandemic.

SARS-CoV-2 and Skin: New Insights and Perspectives

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has disrupted global health systems and brought the entire globe to its knees. Although born as a disease of the respiratory system, COVID-19 can affect different parts of the body, including the skin. Reports of ongoing skin manifestations of COVID-19 have gradually multiplied, pushing researchers to investigate the etiopathogenic mechanisms underlying these phenomena in more depth. In an attempt to investigate the possible association between SARS-CoV-2, ACE2, TMPRSS2 and skin manifestations, we performed immunohistochemical investigations of the ACE2 receptor and TMPRSS2 in nine skin samples from SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared to a cohort of healthy controls. Furthermore, after consulting public databases regarding ACE2 mRNA expression in various cell populations resident in the skin, we conducted a literature review aimed at outlining the current state of this topic. We did not find statistically different immuno-expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 between the group of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (nine skin biopsies) and the control group. Regarding ACE2, major immunolabeling was present in the epidermal keratinocytes and, rarely, in the fibroblasts and in the adenomeres of the eccrine sweat glands. Regarding the immune expression of TMPRSS2, we found no significant differences between the two groups, with a weak immune staining only in some skin cytotypes. From the review of the literature, we isolated 35 relevant articles according to the inclusion criteria adopted. ACE2 appears to be a target of SARS-CoV-2, although, other receptor molecules may potentially be implicated, such as TMPRSS2. Future studies with large cases and different molecular investigative methods are needed to further elucidate the mechanisms underlying the skin manifestations of SARS-CoV-2.

Sweetness and positivity together aren't a happy ending: Case controlled study amongst severe COVID-19 for impact of diabetes mellitus on survival

Background

India is the epicenter of diabetes mellitus (DM). The relationship between COVID and DM in age/gender-matched non-diabetics has not been studied yet. The role of DM in predicting the disease severity and outcome in COVID patients might provide new insight for effective management.

Methods

We conducted a prospective comparative study at a COVID care center from 25th April-31st May 2021. Among 357 severe-COVID patients screened, all consecutive diabetes (n-113) and age/gender-matched non-diabetes (n-113) patients were recruited. All diabetics and non-diabetics at admission were subjected to high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) chest and inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, ferritin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR)) before starting anti- COVID therapy. Statistical analysis was done using JMP 15·0 ver·3·0·0.

Results

The prevalence of DM among the screened population (n-357) was 38·37%. The mean age of the study population was 61y with male preponderance (57%). There was no statistical difference in the HRCT-score or inflammatory markers in the two groups except for higher NLR (p-0·0283) in diabetics. Diabetics had significantly inferior overall survival (OS) (p-0·0251) with a 15d-OS of diabetics vs. non-diabetics being 58·87%, 72·67%, and 30d-OS of diabetics vs. non-diabetics being 46·76%, 64·61%, respectively. The duration of the hospital stay was not statistically different in the two groups (p-0·2).

Conclusion

The mortality is significantly higher in severe-COVID patients with DM when compared to age/gender-matched non-diabetics. There was no significant difference in most inflammatory markers/CT at admission between the two groups.

Trend of fluctuations of antithrombin in plasma of patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Antithrombin is considered as one of the accused markers for the development of thrombosis in patients with COVID-19. Because plasma levels of antithrombin vary in patients with COVID-19, a meta-analysis was performed to determine the trend of antithrombin levels in patients with COVID-19.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science to find papers on antithrombin levels in patients with COVID-19. After removing of duplicate papers, inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The full texts of the articles were read to select relevant articles and then to identify the data needed. All meta-analyses were performed using Stata software v16.0.

RESULTS

Testing for differences between subgroups showed a significant difference between ICU and non-ICU patients. Analysis showed a significant decrease in antithrombin level in patients with severe COVID-19. Analysis showed that the mean value of antithrombin level was 89.65% in all patients. The antithrombin level was significantly lower in the non-survivor group (87.52%) than in the survivor group (92.38%).

CONCLUSION

: The determination of antithrombin may be useful to determine the susceptibility of COVID-19 patients to hypercoagulability and to indicate the severity of COVID-19 infection.

The Prevalence of Dizziness and Vertigo in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review

Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 include symptoms of vertigo and dizziness, which is rather unsurprising, since SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism may inflict a broad spectrum of neuropathic effects. The widespread nature of central and peripheral audiovestibular pathways suggests that there may be several probable pathophysiological mechanisms. The cytokine storm, CNS infiltration of the virus through ACE 2 receptors, and other systemic factors can be responsible for the significant number of COVID-19 patients reported to experience symptoms of vertigo and dizziness. In this paper, we present a systematic review of clinical studies reporting the detection of dizziness and vertigo as clinical manifestations of COVID-19 and discuss their etiopathogenesis.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Vascular Liver Diseases

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Vascular liver diseases (VLDs) are represented mainly by portosinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD), noncirrhotic splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), and Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS). It is unknown whether patients with VLDs constitute a high-risk population for complications and greater coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related mortality from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Our objective was to assess the prevalence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with VLDs, as well as to assess its impact on hepatic decompensation and survival.

METHODS

This is an observational international study analyzing the prevalence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in VLDs between March 2020 and March 2021, compared with the general population (GP). Patients from Spain (5 centers; n = 493) and France (1 center; n = 475) were included.

RESULTS

Nine hundred sixty-eight patients were included: 274 with PSVD, 539 with SVT, and 155 with BCS. Among them, 138 (14%) were infected with SARS-CoV-2: 53 with PSVD, 77 with SVT, and 8 with BCS. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with PSVD (19%) and SVT (14%) was significantly higher than in the GP (6.5%; P < .05), whereas it was very similar in patients with BCS (5%). In terms of infection severity, patients with VLDs also presented a higher need of hospital admission (14% vs 7.3%; P < .01), intensive care unit admission (2% vs 0.7%; P < .01), and mortality (4% vs 1.5%; P < .05) than the GP. Previous history of ascites (50% vs 8%; P < .05) and post-COVID-19 hepatic decompensation (50% vs 4%; P < .05) were associated with COVID-19 mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PSVD and SVT could be at higher risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2 and at higher risk of severe COVID-19 disease.

Rotational thromboelastometry in patients with type 2 diabetes and mild COVID-19 pneumonia: A pilot prospective study

BACKGROUND

It was repeatedly demonstrated that patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, as well as patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have higher risk of thromboembolic complications. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) is a viscoelastic hemostatic assay which allows complex assessment of hemostasis in whole blood. The aim of this study was to compare changes in hemostasis measured by ROTEM® in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia.

METHODS

We performed a pilot, prospective, observational study and enrolled 33 consecutive patients (14 with T2D and 19 nondiabetic ones) admitted to regular ward with mild COVID-19 pneumonia. The control group consisted from 11 healthy, nondiabetic blood donors. Blood samples were tested with ROTEM® using INTEM® and EXTEM® reagents.

RESULTS

We detected significant differences in EXTEM® clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), and maximum clot firmness (MCF) comparing patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia and healthy donors. However, there were no significant differences in EXTEM®, INTEM®, and HEPTEM® parameters (CT, CFT, and MCF) according to diabetes status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated hypercoagulation in patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia. T2D did not affected ROTEM® parameters in patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia.