Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis and Development of a Prediction Model

About 7% of patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) develop a recurrence during anticoagulant treatment. Identification of high-risk patients may help guide treatment decisions.To identify clinical predictors and develop a prediction model for on-treatment recurrent CAT.For this individual patient data meta-analysis, we used data from four randomized controlled trials evaluating low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for CAT (Hokusai VTE Cancer, SELECT-D, CLOT, and CATCH). The primary outcome was adjudicated on-treatment recurrent CAT during a 6-month follow-up. A clinical prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression analysis with backward selection. This model was validated using internal-external cross-validation. Performance was assessed by the c-statistic and a calibration plot.After excluding patients using vitamin K antagonists, the combined dataset comprised 2,245 patients with cancer and acute CAT who were treated with edoxaban (23%), rivaroxaban (9%), dalteparin (47%), or tinzaparin (20%). Recurrent on-treatment CAT during the 6-month follow-up occurred in 150 (6.7%) patients. Predictors included in the final model were age (restricted cubic spline), breast cancer (odds ratio [OR]: 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.87), metastatic disease (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.01-2.05), treatment with DOAC (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.44-0.98), and deep vein thrombosis only as an index event (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.31-2.27). The c-statistic of the model was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.72) after internal-external cross-validation. Calibration varied across studies.The prediction model for recurrent CAT included five clinical predictors and has only modest discrimination. Prediction of recurrent CAT at the initiation of anticoagulation remains challenging.

A predictive model for hospital death in cancer patients with acute pulmonary embolism using XGBoost machine learning and SHAP interpretation

The prediction of in-hospital mortality in cancer patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) remains a significant clinical challenge. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model using XGBoost to predict in-hospital mortality in this vulnerable population. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the MIMIC-IV 2.2 database and external data from the intensive care unit of Cancer hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, collected between May 1, 2021, and April 30, 2023. A total of 448 cancer patients with APE were included from the MIMIC-IV 2.2 database, divided into a training set (70%, n = 314) and an internal validation set (30%, n = 134). An external validation cohort consisted of 56 patients. An XGBoost model was trained and the SHAP (SHapley Additive Explanations) method was used to identify the top 10 predictors of in-hospital mortality. These predictors included Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, albumin, platelet count, age, serum creatinine, hemoglobin, presence of metastasis, lactate, creatine kinase (CK), and types of cancer. The XGBoost model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.806 (95% CI: 0.717-0.896) in the internal validation set and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.686-0.901) in the external validation set. Calibration curves indicated good model fit, and decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated a high clinical benefit across both the internal and external validation cohorts. The XGBoost model, leveraging SHAP for interpretation, effectively predicts in-hospital mortality in cancer patients with APE. This model provides valuable insights for clinical decision-making and has the potential to improve patient outcomes through early intervention and personalized treatment strategies. Further validation in diverse clinical settings is warranted to confirm its generalizability.

Evaluation of the efficacy of step-down therapy with oral minocycline for complicated pyelonephritis caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing enterobacterales: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) infections present significant treatment challenges owing to limited oral antibiotic options. Minocycline is active against ESBL-E; however, its efficacy remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy of step-down therapy using oral minocycline for complicated pyelonephritis (cPN) caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study, conducted at Tohoku Rosai Hospital (2018-2023), included hospitalized patients with cPN and ESBL-E infection. Seventy-two patients receiving intravenous antibiotics followed by oral therapy were classified into the conventional or minocycline therapy groups. Primary outcomes were recurrence within 30 and 90 days post-treatment, whereas secondary outcomes included resolution of fever within 48 h, hospital stay, and adverse events. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in recurrence or fever resolution; however, hospital stay was shorter in the minocycline group than in the conventional group (PSM: p = 0.027; IPTW: p = 0.033, respectively). No adverse effects were noted, although one Clostridioides difficile infection case occurred in the conventional group. ESBL-producing E. coli was detected more frequently in the minocycline therapy group (p = 0.005), and patients with minocycline minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥4 μg/mL had higher relapse rates (p = 0.006) than those in the conventional group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among ESBL-E, particularly in E. coli, step-down therapy using oral minocycline for cPN appears as effective as conventional therapy and may shorten hospital stays. However, as minocycline MICs ≥4 μg/mL may be associated with recurrence, clinicians should verify MIC values before prescribing minocycline.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Are Comparable to Low Molecular Weight Heparin at Sustaining the Circulating Extracellular Vesicle and Inflammatory Profiles of Cancer Associated Thrombosis Patients: An Observational Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Cancer patients face a 4 to 7-fold higher risk of developing thrombotic events compared to individuals without cancer. This elevated risk is driven by the underlying tumour biology and the effects of cancer treatments, significantly increasing the mortality rates of these patients. While low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the gold standard anticoagulation, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are emerging as effective alternatives. Recent clinical evidence indicates reduced recurrent VTE upon DOAC treatment compared to LMWH; however, there is limited understanding of the underlying mechanistic pathways. Of interest, extracellular vesicles (EVs), released from a multitude of cells including platelets and tumour cells, are known as potent intercellular communication mediators, capable of progressing coagulation, thrombosis, as well as tumour growth and metastasis.

METHODS

We characterised the extracellular vesicles and inflammatory markers associated with hypercoagulability and thrombosis in cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) patients, comparing those treated for 8 weeks with DOACs to those receiving LMWH. This pilot observational study recruited 28 CAT patients (21 baseline, 13 treated with DOACs, 8 treated with LMWH; 14 paired) and quantified their circulating, platelet-derived, and endothelial-derived EVs using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis and flow cytometry. Proteomics was performed on the EV cargo and patient plasma, quantifying the inflammatory profiles of the patients under both treatment arms.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We demonstrated that DOAC treatment maintained hypercoagulable and prothrombotic EV profiles similar to LMWH treatment, showing a remarkably stable EV cargo proteome. Inflammatory profiles were also comparable between treatment arms, with a trend toward a DOAC-mediated reduction of circulating cytokines, highlighting potential anti-inflammatory effects.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrates that DOACs sustain the circulating EV and inflammatory profiles to the same extent as LMWH, supporting this clinical shift in anticoagulant treatment in the cancer setting.

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a comprehensive review

It has been 200 years since the first case of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) was reported. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Malignant tumors interact with the coagulation system in complex ways. CAT continues to pose a significant challenge in clinical practice. The risk factors for CAT are complex and multifactorial, primarily including patient, cancer, and therapy-related factors. We have introduced assessment models for CAT and bleeding risk, but the performance of these models has been less than satisfactory. Currently, the main anticoagulant drugs for treating CAT include vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We have provided a detailed overview of the advantages and disadvantages of these three types of drugs and suggestions on choosing the appropriate type of medication for different clinical scenarios. CAT incidence, pathophysiology, risk factors, risk prediction models, and recent advancements in treatment and management are summarized in this review.

Bleeding Risk in Patients with Cancer

The hemostatic system and cancer display a tight interconnection, and hemostatic imbalance frequently occurs in patients with cancer. While extensive knowledge about thrombotic risk has been generated, less is known about bleeding risk and associated risk factors. However, bleeding risk is of high significance as patients with cancer frequently receive therapeutic anticoagulation for various indications and/or are candidates for primary thromboprophylaxis. The risk of bleeding in patients with cancer is variable and difficult to assess in clinical practice. Certain clinical settings such as hospitalization, specific underlying risk factors (e.g., tumor type), and medications (e.g., anticoagulation) can contribute to the individual bleeding risk of a patient with cancer. In addition, some dynamic factors such as platelet count or kidney function have an impact. Particularly, data on baseline risk of bleeding are lacking to allow for risk assessment in cancer patients without anticoagulation. In contrast, risk assessment models for the prediction of bleeding events in cancer patients receiving anticoagulation have been developed; however, these have yet to be validated. The recognition of the importance of bleeding risk in cancer patients is growing, leading to an increasing number of studies investigating and reporting bleeding complications. As study designs and reporting of bleeding events vary, it is challenging to offer a clear synthesis of evidence. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of currently available data about incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact of bleeding events in patients with cancer, and critically review risk assessment models for bleeding in cancer patients during anticoagulant therapy.

Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: An Update

Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Treatment of VTE remains challenging due to a significant risk of both VTE recurrence and bleeding compared with patients without underlying malignancy. Moreover, patients with cancer often present with several comorbidities such as tumor- or treatment-induced bone marrow failure, renal impairment, and extensive concomitant anticancer or supportive medication, resulting in potential drug-drug interactions. Further challenging circumstances include gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, in the context of a GI intraluminal tumor itself, GI surgery, or systemic therapy-induced GI toxicity. However, treatment options and study data in the management of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) have expanded over the last few years. As a result, it is becoming increasingly important to assess the patient's individual risk of bleeding and its comorbidities, and the patient's personal preferences. Prospectively, further therapeutic strategies such as factor XIa inhibitors are under clinical investigation. The aim of our narrative review is to summarize the current literature on therapy options for CAT, including common treatment situations encountered in the management of patients with cancer.

Long-Chain Polysaturated Fatty Acid in Atrial Fibrillation-Associated Stroke: Lipidomic-GWAS Study

This study aimed to explore the relationship between lipidomic domains, particularly free fatty acids (FFAs), and the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with acute stroke, and to identify mechanisms of AF-associated stroke through genetic studies.A total of 483 stroke patients without AF (n = 391) and with AF (n = 92) were selected from a prospectively collected stroke registry. Lipidomic profiling was conducted, and the lipid components associated with AF were explored using fold-change analyses and clustering. Genotyping was conducted through trait comparison. Colocalization was also performed.Among the lipidomic domains, the free fatty acid (FFA) class was positively associated with AF. Long-chain fatty acids with 14 to 24 carbons and unsaturated FFAs distinguished AF. Clustering analysis based on FFAs revealed differences in AF proportion across groups. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified two loci associated with clustered groups of FFA metabolites: near MIR548F3 associated with FFA 20:1, FFA 20:2, FFA 22:5, and FFA 22:6; and near RPL37A associated with FFA 22:5 and FFA 22:6. These loci were associated with increased fibrinogen levels. In the GWAS for the FFA metabolite, quantitative trial locus analysis, loci near rs28456 and rs3770088, and FFA 20:4-QTLs were co-localized with the eQTLs of FADS2, a gene involved in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-related signaling pathway, in the whole blood, left ventricle, and atrial appendage tissue.Elevated FFA levels, especially those of long-chain unsaturated FFAs, are strongly associated with AF-associated stroke. This relationship is regulated by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma-related signaling pathway.

Anticoagulants: From chance discovery to structure-based design

Taking a historical perspective, we review the discovery, pharmacology, and clinical evaluation of the old and new anticoagulants that have been approved for clinical use. The drugs are discussed chronologically, starting in the 1880s, and progressing through to 2024. The innovations in technology used to develop novel anticoagulants came in fits and starts and reflected the advances in science and technology over these decades, whereas the shift from anecdote to evidence-based use of anticoagulants was delayed until the principles of epidemiology and biostatistics were introduced into clinical trial design and to the approval process. Hirudin, heparin, and vitamin K antagonists were discovered by chance, and were used clinically before their mechanism of action was elucidated and before their net clinical benefits were evaluated in randomized clinical trials. Subsequent anticoagulants were designed based on a better understanding of the structure and function of coagulation proteins, including antithrombin, thrombin, and factor Xa, and underwent more rigorous preclinical and clinical evaluation before regulatory approval. By simplifying oral anticoagulation, the direct oral anticoagulants have revolutionized anticoagulation care and have enhanced the uptake of anticoagulation, but bleeding has not been eliminated and there is a need for more effective and convenient anticoagulants for thrombosis triggered by the contact pathway of coagulation. The newly developed factor XIa and XIIa inhibitors have the potential to address these unmet clinical needs and are undergoing clinical evaluation for several indications. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of treatment and prevention of thrombosis, which remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Elucidation of the structure and function of coagulation enzymes, their cofactors, and inhibitors, coupled with advances in structure-based design led to the discovery of more convenient, safer, and more effective anticoagulants that have revolutionized the management of thrombotic disorders.

Multifaceted role of heparin in oncology: from anticoagulation to anticancer mechanisms and clinical implications

Heparin, traditionally known for its anticoagulant properties, has recently been identified as a potential agent in cancer therapy. Its derivatives, including low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH), are being investigated for their multifaceted roles in oncology. This review focuses on the expanding exploration of heparin's anticancer effects and its possible integration into cancer treatment protocols. The primary aim is to consolidate and analyze current research on the anticancer properties of heparin and its derivatives. It seeks to illuminate the mechanisms by which these compounds influence cancer progression, including their impact on angiogenesis, tumor cell proliferation, immune response modulation, and the inhibition of cancer cell migration and invasion. Additionally, the review aims to evaluate the potential of heparin and its derivatives in complementing existing chemotherapy treatments. An extensive literature review was conducted, encompassing in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies. Sources included a range of scientific databases, employing keywords related to heparin and oncology. The selected studies were critically reviewed to extract relevant data on the efficacy, mechanisms, and potential clinical applications of heparin in cancer therapy. The results reveals that heparin and its derivatives exhibit significant anticancer activity across various research settings; key findings include the inhibition of angiogenesis, reduction in tumor cell proliferation, stimulation of immune responses, and the limitation of cancer cell migration and invasion. The compounds also show promise as adjuncts to conventional chemotherapy, potentially enhancing the efficacy of existing cancer treatments. This review highlights the burgeoning role of heparin and its derivatives in the realm of cancer therapy, marking a shift from their traditional use as anticoagulants. While promising, the research underscores the need for further comprehensive studies to fully understand the mechanisms of action, optimal dosing, potential side effects, and patient selection criteria. The potential integration of heparin into cancer treatment regimens opens new therapeutic possibilities warranting continued investigation in this rapidly evolving field.

Emerging advances in drug delivery systems (DDSs) for optimizing cancer complications

The management and treatment of tumor complications pose continuous challenges due to the inherent complexity. However, the advent of drug delivery systems (DDSs) brings promising opportunities to address the tumor complications using innovative technological approaches. This review focuses on common oncological complications, including cancer thrombosis, malignant serous effusion, tumor-associated infections, cancer pain, and treatment-related complications. Emphasis was placed on the application and potential of DDSs in mitigating and treating these tumor complications, and we delved into the underlying mechanisms of common cancer-associated complications, discussed the limitations of conventional treatments, and outlined the current status and potential development of DDSs for various complications in this review. Moreover, we have discussed the existing challenges in DDSs research, underscoring the need for addressing issues related to biocompatibility and targeting of DDSs, optimizing drug delivery routes, and enhancing delivery efficiency and precision. In conclusion, DDSs offer promising avenues for treating cancer complications, offering the potential for the development of more effective and safer drug delivery strategies, thereby improving the quality of life and survival rates of cancer patients.

Assessing the Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin and Rivaroxaban for Cancer Associated Thrombosis: Experience From a Resource Limited Setting

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic events are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. While direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been established as the preferred agents of anticoagulation in most patients with cancer, data in resource-limited settings is limited.

AIMS

The study aims to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of warfarin and rivaroxaban for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in a resource-limited setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on 201 patients who were on follow-up from September 2021 to August 2023. The patients were categorized into two groups (1) warfarin and (2) rivaroxaban. They were then retrospectively followed for 12 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding event, or all-cause mortality. The Cox regression model was used to compare the outcome of the two groups. The baseline mean (standard deviation) age of the patients was 48.4 (15.0) and 140 (69.7%) of them were female. 41.3% of the participants had one or more comorbidities, and the most common types of cancer were gynecologic (28.9%), hematologic (21.4%), and intra-abdominal (16.9%). The most common type of thrombosis was deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (77.1%). The primary composite outcome of VTE recurrence, major bleeding event, and all-cause mortality occurred in 25 (24.3%) patients in the warfarin group and 11 (11.2%) in the rivaroxaban group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.24-0.97; p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban was found to be more efficacious and safer than warfarin for patients with CAT in a resource-limited setting. This finding is congruent with reports from resource-abundant countries and recommendations from major international societies.

Reduced- versus full-dose anticoagulants for the extended treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in Thai patients

Background

Reduced-dose anticoagulant therapy for extended treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been used to avoid bleeding. However, it may increase the risk of recurrent VTE.

Objectives

To study the rate of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications in Thai patients with cancer-associated VTE who were treated with full-dos/e or reduced-dose anticoagulants.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a single-center academic hospital. Electronic medical records were reviewed from 2016-2023. Patients with cancer-associated VTE who received anticoagulants for at least 3 months were evaluated. Reduced-dose anticoagulant was defined as a dose that was lower than the recommended standard dosage. The primary outcome was recurrent VTE. The secondary outcomes were major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.

Results

A total of 229 patients were included. The median age was 65 years (IQR, 54-72). In the reduced-dose group, age and history of previous bleeding were higher than in the full-dose group. There were 169 (74%) patients and 60 (26%) patients who received full- and reduced-dose anticoagulants. The median time to reduce the dose was 3.6 months (IQR, 0.7-5.5). Of a total of 7 (3.1%) recurrent VTEs, 4 (2.4%) occurred in the full-dose and 3 (5.0%) in the reduced-dose groups (P = .4), respectively. The median time to recurrent VTE was 7.2 months (IQR, 3.5-12.4). There were 8 (3.5%) bleeding events, 7 (4.1%) and 1 (1.7%) in the full and reduced-dose anticoagulant groups (P = .35), respectively. The median follow-up time was 1.5 years (IQR, 1-3.1).

Conclusion

Older age and a history of previous bleeding were associated with the use of reduced-dose anticoagulants. Patients with cancer-associated VTE receiving reduced-dose anticoagulants had a numerically higher risk of recurrent VTE and lower bleeding outcomes compared with those receiving full-dose anticoagulants.

Anticoagulant management of cancer-associated thrombosis and thrombocytopenia: a retrospective chart review

Background

Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) are at an increased risk of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding, especially if there is treatment- or disease-related thrombocytopenia. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used in the management of CAT, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) continues to be recommended for CAT with thrombocytopenia.

Objectives

This study aimed to identify the rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding in patients with CAT and thrombocytopenia treated with DOACs compared with LMWH.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients with CAT and thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000/μL) was conducted. Primary outcomes included rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding over 90 days.

Results

Forty-two patients met the inclusion criteria; 20 (47.6%) had a solid organ malignancy while 22 (52.4%) had a hematologic malignancy. Within the first 7 days of VTE, 3 (7.1%) patients had a platelet count <25,000/μL, 9 (21.4%) had 25,000 to 50,000/μL, and 19 (45.2%) had 50,000 to 100,000/μL. Sixteen patients (38.1%) received a DOAC for initial treatment, while 19 (45.2%) received LMWH. Among patients treated with DOACs, there were no recurrent VTEs, 2 clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (12.5%) within the first 2 weeks, and 1 minor bleed (6.3%) in the second month, while those treated with LMWH had 1 recurrent VTE (5.3%) in the second month and 2 clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (10.5%) within the first 2 months.

Conclusion

Rates of thrombosis and major bleeding were similar among thrombocytopenic patients with CAT treated with DOACs and LMWH, although differences in baseline patient characteristics can be confounders. Further prospective research on the optimal anticoagulant management of CAT with thrombocytopenia is needed.

Acute Concurrent Cardiocerebral Infarction Associated With Trousseau Syndrome: A Case Report

This case report describes a 66-year-old woman presenting with acute aphasia and right hemiplegia caused by multiple cerebral infarctions. Diagnostic evaluation confirmed an asymptomatic myocardial infarction (MI), as evidenced by elevated troponin I levels (3.1 ng/mL); ST-segment elevation in leads II, III, and aVF on electrocardiography; and coronary angiography showing a thrombotic occlusion in the distal portion of the left anterior descending artery. Elevated tumor markers and imaging identified stage IB endometrioid uterine carcinoma. She had a malignant tumor and multiple thrombotic events and was diagnosed with Trousseau syndrome. Management involved hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy followed by chemotherapy and anticoagulation therapy, initiated with heparin and transitioned to apixaban due to the desire to minimize impact on the quality of life by using an oral medication. The patient achieved a favorable recovery without recurrent thrombotic events. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with Trousseau syndrome associated with stage IB uterine cancer developing acute cardiocerebral infarction (CCI). This case highlights the importance of identifying Trousseau syndrome in patients with multiple cerebral infarctions and underscores the need to screen for and asymptomatic MI, even in the absence of cardiac symptoms.

2024 Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) recommendations for the management of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Vennous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication associated to greater mortality in patients with cancer. Its etiology is multifactorial and depends on the characteristics and co-morbidities of the patient, the tumor type and extension, and the oncological treatment. The management of VTE is more complex in patients with cancer due to an increased risk of recurrence and major bleeding complications during anticoagulation compared to the general non-oncological population. The above differences have led to the development of specific clinical trials to assess the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer. The present clinical guidelines are intended to provide general recommendations on the management of cancer-associated VTE according to updated according to the most recent scientific evidence.

Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in preventing venous thromboembolism in postoperative patients with gynecological malignancies: protocol for a randomised controlled open-label trial (G-alfalfa trial)

INTRODUCTION

Compared with the guideline-recommended use of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for 28 days to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) after cytoreductive surgery, oral rivaroxaban avoids the pain and inconvenience of daily injections and reduces medical expenses. The proposed randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin in preventing VTE in patients after surgery for gynaecological malignancies and to provide a reference for clinical medication prevention.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-centre, randomised, controlled, open-label and assessor-blind clinical trial. Patients undergoing surgery for gynaecological malignancies will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an oral rivaroxaban study group and a subcutaneous injection enoxaparin control group for anticoagulant prophylaxis. The medication administration begins 12-24 hours after surgery and continues for 28 days, with a 30-day follow-up after surgery. Clinical events during the treatment and the follow-up period will be observed. The primary endpoint will be any VTE. Secondary endpoints will be any bleeding event, medication compliance rate, rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics. The sample size required for the G-alfalfa trial is derived based on power calculations of the VTE incidence in the two intervention regimens in previous literature.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital on 2 April 2024 (Approval No.:2023KY174-03). The results of the trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) 2300078535.

Trousseau syndrome: management of refractory VTE

Managing recurrent and refractory venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer presents unique challenges. This review outlines the complexities and therapeutic strategies for recurrent VTE in cancer patients, which includes distinguishing thrombus acuity, differentiating between tumor and bland thrombi, and evaluating potential contributing factors including anticoagulant adherence, extrinsic tumor compression, drug interactions, and anticoagulant-specific considerations such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or antithrombin deficiency. Different anticoagulation strategies are discussed, including the administration of escalated-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as well as the indications and rationale for switching between direct oral anticoagulants or LMWH.

Preventative and curative treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in cancer patients

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) is common in patients with cancer and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of CAT continues to rise, complicating patient care and burdening healthcare systems. Patients with cancer experiencing VTE face poorer prognoses, making prevention and effective management imperative. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving systemic therapy and acute treatment strategies for CAT. Risk assessment models (e.g., Khorana score) aid in identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from thromboprophylaxis. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been shown to reduce the risk of CAT without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding complications. However, implementation of risk-based strategies remains limited in clinical practice. For acute CAT management, LMWHs have been the standard of care, but DOACs are increasingly favored due to their convenience and efficacy. However, challenges persist, including bleeding risks and drug interactions. Emerging therapies targeting Factor XI inhibitors present promising alternatives, potentially addressing current limitations in anticoagulation management for CAT.

Early Thrombus Removal for Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Update on Inclusion, Technical Aspects, and Postprocedural Management

Acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common disorder with significant associated morbidity, including pain and swelling, as well as the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and chronic debilitating post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Anticoagulation is standard of care for DVT treatment. It assists in reducing thrombus progression and the occurrence of PE, but incomplete DVT resolution increases the risk of recurrent VTE, valvular insufficiency, and PTS. Endovascular DVT interventions, such as catheter-directed thrombolysis, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and large-bore mechanical thrombectomy offer an alternative therapeutic strategy for DVT management. This paper will discuss technical factors and current issues when performing lower extremity DVT interventions including patient selection, anticoagulation, choice of device for endovascular thrombus removal, adjunctive techniques, and venous stent management.Level of Evidence: No level of evidence for: review articles, basic science, laboratory investigations, and experimental study articles.

Management challenges of recurrent venous thromboembolism in advanced digestive cancers: Case studies and therapeutic strategies

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant challenge in cancer patients, particularly those with advanced malignancies. The management of recurrent VTE is complicated by the need for effective anticoagulation while addressing the underlying cancer progression.

CASES

We present two clinical cases from the gastroenterology department at Percy French military hospital involving patients with progressive malignant digestive diseases. Patient 1, a 62-year-old woman, developed recurrent pulmonary embolism despite appropriate anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). After treatment adjustments, she ultimately succumbed to tumor progression. Patient 2, a 54-year-old man hospitalized for pulmonary embolism, faced upper gastrointestinal bleeding and delayed anticoagulation initiation. Although he showed initial improvement with immunotherapy and stabilization of thrombotic events, he experienced oncological progression and recurrent VTE, leading to palliative care.

DISCUSSION

These cases illustrate the difficulties of managing recurrent VTE, even with curative anticoagulation and dose escalation. In case of VTE recurrence, it is essential to investigate for cancer progression and ensure patient adherence to treatment. A comprehensive management strategy should involve both the malignancy and the thrombotic complications.

CONCLUSION

The management of recurrent VTE in cancer patients requires a multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulation adjustments. These clinical cases highlight the necessity for integrated care that addresses both oncological and thrombotic concerns, emphasizing the importance of timely intervention and collaboration among healthcare providers.

SEOM clinical guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer (2023)

The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) last published clinical guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer in 2019, with a partial update in 2020. In this new update to the guidelines, SEOM seeks to incorporate recent evidence, based on a critical review of the literature, to provide practical current recommendations for the prophylactic and therapeutic management of VTE in patients with cancer. Special clinical situations whose management and/or choice of currently recommended therapeutic options (low-molecular-weight heparins [LMWHs] or direct-acting oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) is controversial are included.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Novel Anticoagulants for the Management of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Cancer patients face a four- to sevenfold higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than the general population. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) provide convenient alternatives to traditional therapies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, targeting studies that examined the use of NOACs in cancer-associated VTE. The search included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Selected studies compared NOACs with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in cancer patients diagnosed with VTE. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was applied to estimate pooled effect sizes for outcomes.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, we included 12 RCTs. Results showed NOACs were more effective than LMWH in preventing VTE recurrence (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.83, p = 0.0004). Compared with VKAs, NOACs showed no significant difference (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.34-1.15, p = 0.13). However, this finding is limited by the small patient sample. Major bleeding outcomes were similar between NOACs and LMWH/VKAs (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.85-1.80, p = 0.28; RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.39-1.53, p = 0.46, respectively). Meta-regression analysis indicated a statistically significant positive correlation between mortality and major bleeding events when comparing NOACs with LMWH (p = 0.049). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between patients treated with NOACs and those treated with LMWH (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92-1.18, p = 0.54) or VKAs (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72-1.23, p = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis shows NOACs, especially factor Xa inhibitors, reduce VTE recurrence in cancer patients more effectively than LMWH. Comparison between NOACs and VKAs is inconclusive due to limited patient data. Further research is needed to assess NOACs' efficacy and safety against VKAs.

Polymeric Microbubble Shell Engineering: Microporosity as a Key Factor to Enhance Ultrasound Imaging and Drug Delivery Performance

Microbubbles (MB) are widely used as contrast agents for ultrasound (US) imaging and US-enhanced drug delivery. Polymeric MB are highly suitable for these applications because of their acoustic responsiveness, high drug loading capability, and ease of surface functionalization. While many studies have focused on using polymeric MB for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, relatively little attention has thus far been paid to improving their inherent imaging and drug delivery features. This study here shows that manipulating the polymer chemistry of poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) (PBCA) MB via temporarily mixing the monomer with the monomer-mimetic butyl cyanoacetate (BCC) during the polymerization process improves the drug loading capacity of PBCA MB by more than twofold, and the in vitro and in vivo acoustic responses of PBCA MB by more than tenfold. Computer simulations and physisorption experiments show that BCC manipulates the growth of PBCA polymer chains and creates nanocavities in the MB shell, endowing PBCA MB with greater drug entrapment capability and stronger acoustic properties. Notably, because BCC can be readily and completely removed during MB purification, the resulting formulation does not include any residual reagent beyond the ones already present in current PBCA-based MB products, facilitating the potential translation of next-generation PBCA MB.

Apixaban vs Aspirin in Patients With Cancer and Cryptogenic Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ARCADIA Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Approximately 10% to 15% of ischemic strokes are associated with cancer; cancer-associated stroke, particularly when cryptogenic, is associated with high rates of recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of different antithrombotic strategies in patients with cancer and cryptogenic stroke.

Objective

To compare apixaban vs aspirin for the prevention of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with history of cancer and cryptogenic stroke.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Post hoc analysis of data from 1015 patients with a recent cryptogenic stroke and biomarker evidence of atrial cardiopathy in the Atrial Cardiopathy and Antithrombotic Drugs in Prevention After Cryptogenic Stroke (ARCADIA) trial, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted from 2018 to 2023 at 185 stroke centers in North America. Data analysis was performed from October 15, 2023, to May 23, 2024.

Exposures

Oral apixaban, 5 mg (or 2.5 mg if criteria met), twice daily vs oral aspirin, 81 mg, once daily. Subgroups of patients with and without cancer at baseline were examined.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome for this post hoc analysis was a composite of major ischemic or major hemorrhagic events. Major ischemic events were recurrent ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, and symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Major hemorrhagic events included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and any major extracranial hemorrhage.

Results

Among 1015 participants (median [IQR] age, 68 [60-76] years; 551 [54.3%] female), 137 (13.5%) had a history of cancer. The median (IQR) follow-up was 1.5 (0.6-2.5) years for patients with history of cancer and 1.5 (0.6-3.0) years for those without history of cancer. Participants with history of cancer, compared with those without history of cancer, had a higher risk of major ischemic or major hemorrhagic events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.10-2.71). Among those with history of cancer, 8 of 61 participants (13.1%) randomized to apixaban and 16 of 76 participants (21.1%) randomized to aspirin had a major ischemic or major hemorrhagic event; however, the risk was not significantly different between groups (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.26-1.43). Comparing participants randomized to apixaban vs aspirin among those with cancer, events included recurrent stroke (5 [8.2%] vs 9 [11.8%]), major ischemic events (7 [11.5%] vs 14 [18.4%]), and major hemorrhagic events (1 [1.6%] vs 2 [2.6%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

Among participants in the ARCADIA trial with history of cancer, the risk of major ischemic and hemorrhagic events did not differ significantly with apixaban compared with aspirin.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03192215.

Cancer-associated thrombosis: the role of inherited thrombophilia

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a common complication and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with active cancers. CAT is common in various malignancies, particularly pancreatic, ovarian, gastric, colorectal, and hematologic cancers. In fact, CAT is a complicated multifactorial complication that may be influenced by the type of cancer as well as by the genetic background and inheritance of thrombophilic variants and elevated concentrations of coagulation factors. Several studies have shown the prominent role of inherited thrombophilias, such as prothrombin 20210, factor V Leiden, factor XIII Val34Leu, MTHFR C677T, in the occurrence of CAT, while others have found no correlation between them and CAT. In the present review, we have attempted to investigate the possible role of inherited thrombophilia in the occurrence of CAT.

Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A practical approach

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and potentially life-threatening complication in patients with cancer. Both cancer and its treatments increase the risk of developing VTE. Specific cancer types and individual patient comorbidities increase the risk of developing cancer-associated VTE, and the risk of bleeding is increased with anticoagulation therapies. The aims of this article are to summarize the latest evidence for treating cancer-associated VTE, discuss the practical considerations involved, and share best practices for VTE treatment in patients with cancer. The article pays particular attention to challenging contexts including patients with brain, lung, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tumors and those with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, the article summarizes specific clinical scenarios that require additional treatment considerations, including extremes of body weight, nausea and gastrointestinal disturbances, compromised renal function, and anemia, and touches upon the relevance of drug-drug interactions. Historically, vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been used as therapy for cancer-associated VTE. The development of direct oral anticoagulants has provided additional treatment options, which, in certain instances, offer advantages over LMWHs. There are numerous factors that need to be considered when treating cancer-associated VTE, and although various treatment guidelines are helpful, they do not reflect each unique scenario that may arise in clinical practice. This article provides a summary of the latest evidence and a practical approach for treating cancer-associated VTE.

Paraneoplastic leukocytosis induces NETosis and thrombosis in bladder cancer PDX model

Paraneoplastic leukocytosis (PNL) in genitourinary cancer, though rare, can indicate aggressive behavior and poor outcomes. It has been potentially linked to cancer expressing G-CSF and GM-CSF, along with their respective receptors, exerting an autocrine/paracrine effect. In our study, we successfully established four patient-derived xenograft (PDX) lines and related cell lines from urothelial cancer (UC), conducting next-generation sequencing (NGS) for genetic studies. UC-PDX-LN1, originating from bladder cancer, exhibited two druggable targets - HRAS and ERCC2 - responding well to chemotherapy and targeted therapy, though not to tipifarnib, an HRAS inhibitor. Transcriptome analysis post-treatment illuminated potential mechanisms, with index protein analysis confirming their anticancer pathways. Mice implanted with UC-PDX-LN1 mirrored PNL observed in the patient's original tumor. Cytokine array and RT-PCR analyses revealed high levels of G-CSF and GM-CSF in our PDX and cell lines, along with their presence in culture media and tumor cysts.Leukocytosis within small vessels in and around the tumor, associated with NETosis and thrombus formation, suggested a mechanism wherein secreted growth factors were retained, further fueling tumor growth via autocrine/paracrine signaling. Disrupting this cancer cell-NETosis-thrombosis cycle, we demonstrated that anti-neutrophil or anticoagulant interventions enhanced chemotherapy's antitumor effects or prolonged survival in mice, even though these drugs lacked direct antitumor efficacy when used independently. Clinical observations in bladder cancer patients revealed PNL in 1.61% of cases (35/2162) with associated poor prognosis. These findings propose a novel approach, advocating for the combination of anticancer/NETosis/thrombosis strategies for managing UC patients presenting with PNL in clinical settings.

Postoperative Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Brain Metastases Receiving Acetylsalicylic Acid Perioperatively

Cranial operations are associated with a high risk of postoperative intracranial hemorrhage (pICH) and venous thromboembolic events, along with increased mortality and morbidity. With the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for prophylaxis becoming more prevalent, the risk of bleeding when ASA is administered preoperatively is unknown, as are the effects of discontinuation upon the occurrence of thromboembolic events, especially in societies with aging demographics. To address these questions, a retrospective analysis was performed using medical records and radiological images of 1862 patients subjected to brain tumor surgery over a decade in our department. The risk of pICH was compared in patients with metastases receiving ASA treatment versus patients not receiving ASA treatment. The occurrence of venous thromboembolic events after surgery was also evaluated. The study group consisted of 365 patients with different types of brain metastases. In total, 20 patients suffered pICH and 7 of these were associated with clinical neurological deterioration postoperatively. Of the 58 patients who took ASA preoperatively, 2 patients experienced pICH, compared with 5 patients in the non-ASA impact group (p = 0.120). Patients who took ASA were not at significantly higher risk of pICH and therefore a worse outcome compared to the group without ASA. Therefore, these data suggest that in patients at high cardiovascular risk, ASA can be safely continued during elective brain tumor surgery.

Association of Transcranial Doppler Microembolic Signal With Short-Term Mortality in Acute Ischemic Stroke and Active Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to clarify the characteristics and survival prediction value of transcranial Doppler microembolic signals (MES) in patients with acute cerebral infarction and active cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2022, 1089 cases of acute cerebral infarction were recorded within 7 days of disease onset. Among them, transcranial Doppler was successful in 33 patients who had active cancer, and these data were analyzed in this study. The primary outcomes were stroke recurrence and mortality at 3 months. The study population had the following characteristics [median (interquartile range)]: age, 70 years (63-78); body mass index, 21.6 (20-24), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 3 (1-6), and modified Rankin Scale score at discharge 1 (1-4). The most common cancer types were lung (24%), pancreatic (24%), and intestinal (18%). MES was present in 16 of 33 patients (48.5%). The presence and number of MES were significantly associated with the levels of D-dimer (P <0.001) and C-reactive protein (P=0.012). Moreover, the presence of MES was associated with multiple ischemic lesions and the 3-territory sign on magnetic resonance imaging. Of the 33 patients, 9 died at 3 months, and 1 had stroke recurrence. On Cox multivariate analysis, using the MES-negative group as a reference, the presence of MES was significantly associated with all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio, 12.19 [95% CI, 1.45-216.85]; P=0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute ischemic stroke and active cancer, the presence of MES was associated with D-dimer and C-reactive protein levels and multiple and 3-territory ischemic lesions, and was predictive of short-term survival.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Cancer Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: Daily Practice Recommendations by the Hemostasis Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) and the Society for Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research (GTH e.V.)

Active cancer by itself but also chemotherapy is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and especially coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The frequency of CVD, CAD, and AF varies depending on comorbidities (particularly in older patients), cancer type, and stage, as well as the anticancer therapeutic being taken. Many reports exist for anticancer drugs being associated with CVD, CAD, and AF, but robust data are often lacking. Because of this, each patient needs an individual structured approach concerning thromboembolic and bleeding risk, drug-drug interactions, as well as patient preferences to evaluate the need for anticoagulation therapy and targeting optimal symptom control. Interruption of specific cancer therapy should be avoided to reduce the potential risk of cancer progression. Nevertheless, additional factors like thrombocytopenia and anticoagulation in the elderly and frail patient with cancer cause additional challenges which need to be addressed in daily clinical management. Therefore, the aim of these recommendations is to summarize the available scientific data on antithrombotic therapy (both antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy) in cancer patients with CVD and in cases of missing data providing guidance for optimal careful decision-making in daily routine.

Quality of life in oncological patients with venous thromboembolic disease

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is a significant medical problem in cancer patients, as it is associated with substantial morbidity and increased mortality. Cancer survivors with VTE experience important changes in their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Over the past few years, HRQOL and its measurement have been incorporated in clinical studies of anticoagulation therapy, as well as in qualitative and quantitative studies for the examination of the impact of VTE in cancer patients. While there are several tools available to assess HRQOL, few are specific to cancer patients and VTE. More importantly, those same tools are yet to be incorporated in routine clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to describe the available tools for the assessment of HRQOL in cancer patients with a focus on VTE, as well as the characteristics of those tools, their strengths, limitations, and potential applicability in clinical practice.

Cancer-associated venous thrombosis in adults (second edition): A British Society for Haematology Guideline

A shared decision on the most appropriate agent for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis should consider the following factors, which should be reassessed as patients continue along their cancer care pathway: risk of bleeding; tumour site; suitability of oral medications; potential for drug-drug interactions; and patient preference and values regarding choice of drug. Continuing anticoagulation beyond 6 months in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism and active cancer is recommended.

Single center evaluation on the use of conditionally ordered low molecular weight heparins in malignant hematology patients with venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Cancer and cancer-related treatments are significant independent risk factors for malignant hematology (MH) patients in developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Treatment of VTE in MH patients at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre is predominantly initiated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in accordance with guidelines. While guidelines recommend against LMWH use in patients with thrombocytopenia, prescribers may order LMWH conditionally based on platelet values. Currently, there is a lack of consistent practice with variation in both the use of conditional orders as well as the threshold of platelet values for conditional orders. The objectives of the study were to (a) describe the use of conditionally ordered LMWH based on platelet values; (b) determine its safety by measuring administration concordance with conditional orders and bleeding event rates during inpatient admission; and (c) determine its efficacy by measuring the rate of worsening VTE or recurrence during inpatient admission.

METHODS

Electronic records of MH inpatients admitted between January 2017 and December 2019 and who were administered at least one dose of an LMWH for the treatment of VTE were screened.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients were screened to obtain 50 eligible patients with a median age of 59 years (SD = ±18.8 years). The most frequent MH diagnosis was acute lymphoblastic leukemia (30%). Sixty percent (n = 30) of patients received conditional orders. Out of 571 administrations, 543 (95%) were administered concordantly (Χ2(1) = 472, p < 0.0001). In this group of patients, 8 patients had either documented bleeding or experienced a drop in hemoglobin >10 g/L within a 72 h time frame. No patients experienced a recurrent VTE during inpatient treatment (for up to 40 days post-admission).

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that conditionally ordered LMWH can be concordantly administered and is safe and effective in the treatment of VTE in MH patients experiencing thrombocytopenia. There were no reports of worsening or new VTE in our small sample.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Management of cancer-associated thromboembolism in vulnerable population"]

Although all patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) have a high morbidity and mortality risk, certain groups of patients are particularly vulnerable. This may expose the patient to an increased risk of thrombotic recurrence or bleeding (or both), as the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulant treatment may be modified. Treatment thus needs to be chosen with care. Such vulnerable groups include older patients, patients with renal impairment or thrombocytopenia, and underweight and obese patients. However, these patient groups are poorly represented in clinical trials, limiting the available data on which treatment decisions can be based. Meta-analysis of data from randomised clinical trials suggests that the relative treatment effect of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (DXIs) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with respect to major bleeding could be affected by advanced age. No evidence was obtained for a change in the relative risk-benefit profile of DXIs compared to LMWH in patients with renal impairment or of low body weight. The available, albeit limited, data do not support restricting the use of DXIs in patients with TAC on the basis of renal impairment or low body weight. In older patients, age is not itself a critical factor for choice of treatment, but frailty is such a factor. Patients over 70 years of age with CAT should undergo a systematic frailty evaluation before choosing treatment and modifiable bleeding risk factors should be addressed. In patients with renal impairment, creatine clearance should be assessed and monitored regularly thereafter. In patients with an eGFR less than 30mL/min/1.72m2, the anticoagulant treatment may need to be adapted. Similarly, platelet count should be assessed prior to treatment and monitored regularly. In patients with grade 3-4, thrombocytopenia (less than 50,000platelets/μL) treatment with a LMWH at a reduced dose should be considered. For patients with CAT and low body weight, standard anticoagulant treatment recommendations are appropriate, whereas in obese patients, apixaban may be preferred.

Clinical features and prognostic factors of patients with cancer-associated stroke

BACKGROUND

Cerebrovascular diseases in cancer patients significantly aggravate their condition and prognosis; therefore, prompt and accurate diagnosis and treatment are important. The purpose of this study was to investigate patient demographics, laboratory data, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and prognosis among patients with stroke and cancer, especially cancer-associated ischemic stroke (CAIS).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, single-center study. We enrolled consecutive patients who had acute stroke and were admitted to our hospital between January 2011 and December 2021. We collected general demographic characteristics, cancer histopathological type, laboratory data, brain MRI findings, and prognosis data.

RESULTS

Among 2040 patients with acute stroke, a total of 160 patients (7.8%) had active cancer. The types of strokes were cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and transient ischemic attack in 124, 25, 5, and 6 patients, respectively. Among the patients with ischemic stroke, there were 69 cases of CAIS. Pancreas and adenocarcinoma were the most frequent types of primary tumor and histopathology. Patients with adenocarcinoma and those with cerebral infarctions in both bilateral anterior and posterior cerebral circulation areas showed higher D-dimer levels. Pancreatic cancer and high plasma D-dimer levels were associated with poor survival rate.

CONCLUSION

CAIS was seen more frequently in patients with pancreatic cancer and adenocarcinoma. Pancreatic cancer and high plasma D-dimer levels were potential factors of poor prognosis in patients with CAIS.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Navigating Through Clinical Challenges

PURPOSE

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved, for over a decade, by both European and American medicine agencies, for treatment and prevention of several cardiovascular conditions. Since then, an increasing amount of data has been added to the medical literature day by day, resulting in a dichotomy in selection of the appropriate agent, dosage, and duration of treatment for special populations with multiple comorbidities. Considering these issues, we have prepared a comprehensive review for the clinical practitioner, to optimize the DOAC utilization in clinical practice.

METHODS

A thorough literature search and review was conducted, concerning mainly the last decade. Our review focused on the current guidelines and the most recently published studies in PubMed, Science Direct Scopus, and Google Scholar to date.

CONCLUSION

The purpose of this study is to provide guidance for healthcare professionals for making proper decisions when confronted with clinical challenges. Nevertheless, further research is required to establish DOAC superiority in complicated cases, where there is clinical uncertainty.

Incidence of Arterial Thrombotic and Bleeding Events in Patients Who Develop Cancer after ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

Objective Cancers increase the risk of both arterial thrombosis and bleeding. The present study investigated whether or not comorbid new-onset cancers increase arterial thrombosis and bleeding events in patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods Among 918 consecutive STEMI patients, excluding 300 who used mechanical hemodynamic supportive devices, the 67 with cancer and 851 without cancer were compared with respect to the frequency of thrombotic events, consisting of myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke, and bleeding events during the trackable observation period in this observational study. The predictive accuracy for bleeding events evaluated by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) high bleeding risk (HBR) criteria and the patients receiving stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score was assessed by C-statistics. Bleeding events were defined as type 3 or 5 according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. Results During the 1,233.3±1,284.4-day observation period, thrombotic events were observed in 13.4% of patients with cancer and 7.1% of patients without cancer (p=0.06; incidence rates, 2.4 vs. 2.4/100 person-years). MI and ischemic stroke were observed in 6.0% of patients with cancer and 3.5% of patients without cancer (p=0.23; incidence rates, 1.0 vs. 1.2/100 person-years) and 7.5% of patients with cancer and 3.6% of patients without cancer (p=0.18; incidence rates, 1.0 vs. 1.2/100 person-years), respectively. Bleeding events were observed in 26.9% of patients with cancer and 7.6% of patients without cancer (p<0.01; incidence rates, 4.4 vs. 2.4/100 person-years). The C-statistics for predicting bleeding events in patients with and without cancer were 0.65 vs. 0.71 using the ARC-HBR criteria and 0.67 vs. 0.71 using the PRECISE-DAPT scores, respectively. Conclusion Cancers increase unpredictable bleeding but not arterial thrombotic events in patients after STEMI.

Cancer-Associated Stroke: Thrombosis Mechanism, Diagnosis, Outcome, and Therapeutic Strategies

Cancer can induce hypercoagulability, which may lead to stroke. This occurs when tumor cells activate platelets as part of their growth and metastasis. Tumor cells activate platelets by generating thrombin and expressing tissue factor, resulting in tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation. Histopathological studies of thrombi obtained during endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute stroke and active cancer have shown a high proportion of platelets and thrombin. This underscores the crucial roles of platelets and thrombin in cancer-associated thrombosis. Cancer-associated stroke typically occurs in patients with active cancer and is characterized by distinctive features. These features include multiple infarctions across multiple vascular territories, markedly elevated blood D-dimer levels, and metastasis. The presence of cardiac vegetations on echocardiography is a robust indicator of cancer-associated stroke. Suspicion of cancer-associated stroke during endovascular thrombectomy arises when white thrombi are detected, particularly in patients with active cancer. Cancer-associated stroke is almost certain when histopathological examination of thrombi shows a very high platelet and a very low erythrocyte composition. Patients with cancer-associated stroke have high risks of mortality and recurrent stroke. However, limited data are available on the optimal treatment regimen for stroke prevention in these patients. Thrombosis mechanism in cancer is well understood, and distinct therapeutic targets involving thrombin and platelets have been identified. Therefore, direct thrombin inhibitors and/or antiplatelet agents may effectively prevent stroke recurrence. Additionally, this strategy has potential benefits in cancer treatment as accumulating evidence suggests that aspirin use reduces cancer progression, metastasis, and cancer-related mortality. However, clinical trials are necessary to assess the efficacy of this strategy involving the use of direct thrombin inhibitors and/or antiplatelet therapies.

Practical guidance for direct oral anticoagulant use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism in primary and metastatic brain tumor patients

Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors (BT) is challenging because of the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). There are no prospective clinical trials evaluating safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), specifically in patients with BT, but they are widely used for VTE in this population. A group of neuro-oncology experts convened to provide practical clinical guidance for the off-label use of DOACs in treating VTE in patients with BT. We searched PubMed for the following terms: BTs, glioma, glioblastoma (GBM), brain metastasis, VTE, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH), DOACs, and ICH. Although prospective clinical trials are needed, the recommendations presented aim to assist clinicians in making informed decisions regarding DOACs for VTE in patients with BT.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Management of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with malignant brain tumours"]

This article addresses the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with malignant brain tumours, including both primary and secondary (metastatic) tumours. The available data on patients on venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding risks in patients with brain tumours is limited, since these patients have been excluded from most randomised, interventional, head-to-head, clinical trials comparing low molecular weight heparins to vitamin K antagonists or to direct oral factor Xa inhibitors. More information is available from retrospective observational studies, which however were generally small, and carried a high risk of confounding. Their findings suggest that direct factor Xa inhibitor use is associated with lower rates of intracranial haemorrhage compared with low molecular weight heparins. Overall, the safety profile of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors when used to prevent venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with either primary or secondary brain tumours appears to be favourable. The available data are in favour of using an anticoagulant at a full therapeutic dose in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours experiencing a venous thromboembolism, although they are not yet sufficiently robust to permit recommending a direct factor Xa inhibitor over low-molecular weight heparin.

Cancer-associated thrombosis in hematologic malignancies

Patients with hematologic malignancies are often complicated not only by severe bleeding due to thrombocytopenia and disseminated intravascular coagulation but also by thromboembolic events, just like in patients with solid cancers, and these events can negatively impact patient outcomes. Nevertheless, the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in hematologic malignancies has not been adequately investigated due to the limited size, heterogeneity, and unique pathophysiology of the patient population. This article summarizes the current understanding, risk factors, prediction models, and optimal prevention and treatment strategies of CAT in hematologic malignancies on a disease-by-disease basis, including acute leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma, and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Specific considerations of novel molecular targeted therapeutics introduced in recent years, such as immunomodulatory drugs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are also discussed based on the latest clinical trials.

An epidemiologic study comparing cancer- and noncancer-associated venous thromboembolism in a racially diverse Southeastern United States county

Background

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Despite poor outcomes, there is an ongoing knowledge gap in epidemiologic data related to this association.

Objectives

To compare venous thromboembolism (VTE) characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes between patients with and without active cancer in a racially diverse population.

Methods

Our surveillance project occurred at the 3 hospitals in Durham County, North Carolina, from April 2012 through March 2014. Electronic and manual methods were used to identify unique Durham County residents with VTE.

Results

We identified 987 patients with VTE during the surveillance period. Of these, 189 patients had active cancer at the time of their VTE event. Patients with CA-VTE were older (median age: 69 years vs 60 years, P < .0001) and had a lower body mass index (median body mass index: 26.0 kg/m2 vs 28.4 kg/m2, P = .0001) than noncancer patients. The most common cancers in our cohort were gastrointestinal, breast, genitourinary, and lung. The proportion of VTE cases with pulmonary embolism (PE) was greater in the cancer cohort compared with that in the noncancer cohort (58.2% vs 44.0%, P = .0004). Overall survival was lower in the CA-VTE group than in patients without cancer (P < .0001). Black patients with CA-VTE had lower proportion of PE (52.3% vs 67.1%, P = .05) but had decreased survival (P < .0003) in comparison with White patients.

Conclusion

Future studies may be needed to continue to evaluate local and national VTE data to improve VTE prevention strategies and CA-VTE outcomes.

Clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment of CAT in Japan and other countries

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is an important prognostic factor for an increasing number of cancer patients. Understanding of CAT among cancer care providers has grown in recent years, and guidelines for the prevention and treatment of CAT have been published in Japan and around the world. In this article, we introduce these major guidelines and discuss differences we identified between the Japanese guidelines and those of other countries, with a focus on problems and issues. Insurance coverage of low-molecular-weight heparin and indications for primary prevention with direct oral anticoagulants in particular require urgent consideration.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Recurrent venous thromboembolism in anticoagulated cancer patients: diagnosis and treatment"]

Patients with cancer are at significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), due both to the impact of malignant disease itself and to the impact of certain anticancer drugs on haemostasis. This is true both for first episode venous thromboembolism and recurrence. The diagnosis and management of VTE recurrence in patients with cancer poses particular challenges, and these are reviewed in the present article, based on a systematic review of the relevant scientific literature published over the last decade. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether diagnostic algorithms for venous thromboembolism, validated principally in untreated non-cancer patients, are also valid in anticoagulated cancer patients: the available data suggests that clinical decision rules and D-dimer testing perform less well in this clinical setting. In patients with cancer, computed tomography pulmonary angiography and venous ultrasound appear to be the most reliable diagnostic tools for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis respectively. Options for treatment of venous thromboembolism include low molecular weight heparins (at a therapeutic dose or an increased dose), fondaparinux or oral direct factor Xa inhibitors. The choice of treatment should take into account the nature (pulmonary embolism or VTE) and severity of the recurrent event, the associated bleeding risk, the current anticoagulant treatment (type, dose, adherence and possible drug-drug interactions) and cancer progression.

A ten-year comparison of treatment and outcomes of cancer-associated thrombosis to non-cancer venous thromboembolism: from traditional anticoagulants to direct oral anticoagulants

DOACs have emerged as first-line treatment in most cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), representing a paradigm shift in its management. However, CAT management remains challenging and requires careful risk-benefit considerations. A retrospective analysis of CAT presentations to a tertiary referral centre from January 2011 to December 2020. Outcomes in CAT patients were compared to VTE patients without malignancy. Subgroup analysis was also conducted for CAT according to anticoagulation type. 514 CAT cases from 491 patients were identified from 3230 total VTE cases. CAT patients had higher rates of major VTE (PE and/or proximal DVT) compared to patients without malignancy (78.4% vs. 66.8%, p < 0.001). CAT patients also had higher rates of VTE recurrence (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.23-2.26), major bleeding (HR 3.41, 95%CI 2.36-4.93), VTE-related mortality (HR 2.59, 95%CI 1.46-4.62) and bleeding-related mortality (HR 2.66, 95%CI 1.05-6.73). There were no significant differences in rates of VTE recurrence, major bleeding, VTE-related mortality or fatal bleeding between CAT patients treated with DOACs, enoxaparin or warfarin. In the subgroup of CAT treated with DOACs, there was no significant difference in rates of GI bleeding compared to the enoxaparin subgroup (HR 0.17, 95%CI 0.02-1.26). CAT was associated with a larger clot burden and higher rates of VTE recurrence, major bleeding and mortality compared to VTE patients without malignancy in this large real-world study. This study demonstrated no significant differences in complication rates for CAT patients treated with DOACs over enoxaparin, suggesting that DOACs can be safely used in most cases of CAT.

The incidence of major bleeding in adult patients with urogenital and gynecological cancer being treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the mainstay of treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), with or without an underlying cancer. Patients with cancer have a 2-3-fold increase in risk for bleeding complications compared to non-cancer patients taking anticoagulant therapy, however the incidence of bleeding for urogenital and gynecological cancers on DOACs are uncertain.

AIMS

To assess the bleeding risk associated with the use of DOACs in patients with urogenital and/or gynecological cancers.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies to address the safety of DOACs for VTE and AF when used in patients with urogenital and/or gynecological malignancy. The primary outcomes assessed were major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNMB) bleeding, with minor bleeding considered as a secondary outcome. MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE Central Registry of Controlled Trials were searched up to and including Oct 28, 2022. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022370981). Studies were independently assessed for inclusion and data extracted in duplicate.

RESULT

Seven studies met our inclusion criteria (Fig. 1): 2 RCTs and 5 prospective cohort studies. A total of 676 patients treated with DOACs were included, 628 (92.8%) had VTE and 48 (7.1%) had AF. In patients with VTE treated with DOACs, the pooled major bleeding rate was 2.1%, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.9-3.3% (Fig. 2). Pooled estimates could not be determined for AF patients given small event and patient numbers.

CONCLUSION

Major bleeding rates in urogenital and/or gynecological cancer patients treated with DOACs are similar to that of the general cancer population.