1
|
Santoso AP, Vinogradskiy Y, Robin TP, Goodman KA, Schefter TE, Miften M, Jones BL. Clinical and Dosimetric Impact of 2D kV Motion Monitoring and Intervention in Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101409. [PMID: 38298328 PMCID: PMC10828584 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Positional errors resulting from motion are a principal challenge across all disease sites in radiation therapy. This is particularly pertinent when treating lesions in the liver with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). To achieve dose escalation and margin reduction for liver SBRT, kV real-time imaging interventions may serve as a potential solution. In this study, we report results of a retrospective cohort of liver patients treated using real-time 2D kV-image guidance SBRT with emphasis on the impact of (1) clinical workflow, (2) treatment accuracy, and (3) tumor dose. Methods and Materials Data from 33 patients treated with 41 courses of liver SBRT were analyzed. During treatment, planar kV images orthogonal to the treatment beam were acquired to determine treatment interventions, namely treatment pauses (ie, adequacy of gating thresholds) or treatment shifts. Patients were shifted if internal markers were >3 mm, corresponding to the PTV margin used, from the expected reference condition. The frequency, duration, and nature of treatment interventions (ie, pause vs shift) were recorded, and the dosimetric impact associated with treatment shifts was estimated using a machine learning dosimetric model. Results Of all fractions delivered, 39% required intervention, which took on average 1.9 ± 1.6 minutes and occurred more frequently in treatments lasting longer than 7 minutes. The median realignment shift was 5.7 mm in size, and the effect of these shifts on minimum tumor dose in simulated clinical scenarios ranged from 0% to 50% of prescription dose per fraction. Conclusion Real-time kV-based imaging interventions for liver SBRT minimally affect clinical workflow and dosimetrically benefit patients. This potential solution for addressing positional errors from motion addresses concerns about target accuracy and may enable safe dose escalation and margin reduction in the context of liver SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew P. Santoso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tyler P. Robin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Karyn A. Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Tracey E. Schefter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Moyed Miften
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Bernard L. Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fei B, Mo Z, Yang J, Wang Z, Li S. Nanodrugs Reprogram Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Normalize Tumor Vasculatures for Sequentially Enhancing Photodynamic Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Nanomedicine 2023; 18:6379-6391. [PMID: 37954460 PMCID: PMC10638926 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s429884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The failure of cancer photodynamic therapy (PDT) is largely ascribed to excessive stroma and defective vasculatures that restrain the photosensitizer permeation and the oxygen perfusion in tumors. Method and Results In this study, a nanodrug that integrated the cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) regulation with tumor vessel normalization was tailored to sequentially sensitize PDT. The nanodrug exhibited high targeting towards CAFs and efficiently reversed the activated CAFs into quiescence, thus decreasing collagen deposition in the tumor microenvironment (TME), which overcame the protective physical barrier. Furthermore, the nanodrug regulated vascular endothelial cells and restored the tumor vasculatures, thereby improving vascular permeability. Based on the combined effects of reprogramming the TME, the nanodrug improved tumor accumulation of photosensitizers and alleviated hypoxia in the TME, which facilitated the subsequent PDT. Importantly, the nanodrug regulated the immunosuppressive TME by favoring the infiltration of immunostimulatory cells over immunosuppressive cells, which potentiated the PDT-induced immune response. Conclusion Our work demonstrates a sequential treatment strategy in which the combination of the CAF regulation and tumor vasculature normalization, followed by PDT, could be a promising modality for sensitizing tumor to PDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingyuan Fei
- Department of Gastrointestinal Colorectal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhanhao Mo
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Jinghui Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Zheng Wang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Nano-Bio Interface Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuo Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hernando-Requejo O, Chen X, López M, Sánchez E, García J, García P, Alonso R, Montero A, Ciervide R, Álvarez B, Zucca D, García Aranda M, Valero J, Fernández Letón P, Rubio C. Real-world effectiveness and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases with different respiratory motion management techniques. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:1000-1010. [PMID: 37728734 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02147-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been firmly established as a treatment choice for patients with oligometastases, as it has demonstrated both safety and efficacy by consistently achieving high rates of local control. Moreover, it offers potential survival benefits for carefully selected patients in real-world clinical settings. METHODS Between January 2008 and May 2020, a total of 149 patients (with 414 liver metastases) received treatment. The Active Breathing Coordinator device was used for 68 patients, while respiratory gating was used for 65 and abdominal compression was used for 16 patients. The most common histological finding was colorectal adenocarcinoma, with 37.6% of patients having three or more metastases, and 18% having two metastases. The prescribed dose ranged from 36 to 60 Gy, delivered in 3-5 fractions. RESULTS Local control rates at 2 and 3 years were 76.1% and 61.2%, respectively, with no instances of local recurrence after 3 years. Factors negatively impacting local control included colorectal histology, lower prescribed dose, and the occurrence of new liver metastases. The median overall survival from SBRT was 32 months, with the presence of metastases outside the liver and the development of new liver metastases after SBRT affecting survival. The median disease-free survival was 10 months. No substantial differences in both local control and survival were observed between the respiratory motion control techniques employed. Treatment tolerance was excellent, with only one patient experiencing acute grade IV thrombocytopenia and two patients suffering from ≥ grade II chronic toxicity. CONCLUSION For radical management of single or multiple liver metastases, SBRT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option. Regardless of the technology employed, experienced physicians can achieve similarly positive outcomes. However, additional studies are required to elucidate prognostic factors that can facilitate improved patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Hernando-Requejo
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain.
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
| | - X Chen
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain
| | - M López
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Sánchez
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - J García
- Radiation Physics Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain
| | - P García
- Radiation Physics Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Alonso
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Montero
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Ciervide
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Álvarez
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - D Zucca
- Radiation Physics Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - M García Aranda
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Valero
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Fernández Letón
- Radiation Physics Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Rubio
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hallemeier CL, Sharma N, Anker C, Selfridge JE, Lee P, Jabbour S, Williams V, Liu D, Kennedy T, Jethwa KR, Kim E, Kumar R, Small W, Tchelebi L, Russo S. American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of liver-directed therapies for nonsurgical management of liver metastases: Systematic review and guidelines. Cancer 2023; 129:3193-3212. [PMID: 37409678 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
The liver is a common site of cancer metastases. Systemic therapy is widely accepted as the standard treatment for liver metastases (LM), although select patients with liver oligometastases may be candidates for potentially curative liver resection. Recent data support the role of nonsurgical local therapies such as ablation, external beam radiotherapy, embolization, and hepatic artery infusion therapy for management of LM. Additionally, for patients with advanced, symptomatic LM, local therapies may provide palliative benefit. The American Radium Society gastrointestinal expert panel, including members representing radiation oncology, interventional radiology, surgical oncology, and medical oncology, performed a systemic review and developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of nonsurgical local therapies for LM. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology was used. These studies were used to inform the expert panel, which then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in seven representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). A summary of recommendations is outlined to guide practitioners on the use of nonsurgical local therapies for patients with LM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, York, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - J Eva Selfridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Salma Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Vonetta Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Liu
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Birth Columbia, Canada
| | - Timothy Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ed Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Leila Tchelebi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Suzanne Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Klement RJ, Sweeney RA. Metabolic factors associated with the prognosis of oligometastatic patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2023; 42:927-940. [PMID: 37261610 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-023-10110-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, it has been established that cancer patients with oligometastases, i.e., only a few detectable metastases confined to one or a few organs, may benefit from an aggressive local treatment approach such as the application of high-precision stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Specifically, some studies have indicated that achieving long-term local tumor control of oligometastases is associated with prolonged overall survival. This motivates investigations into which factors may modify the dose-response relationship of SBRT by making metastases more or less radioresistant. One such factor relates to the uptake of the positron emission tomography tracer 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) which reflects the extent of tumor cell glycolysis or the Warburg effect, respectively. Here we review the biological mechanisms how the Warburg effect drives tumor cell radioresistance and metastasis and draw connections to clinical studies reporting associations between high FDG uptake and worse clinical outcomes after SBRT for oligometastases. We further review the evidence for distinct metabolic phenotypes of metastases preferentially seeding to specific organs and their possible translation into distinct radioresistance. Finally, evidence that obesity and hyperglycemia also affect outcomes after SBRT will be presented. While delivered dose is the main determinant of a high local tumor control probability, there might be clinical scenarios when metabolic targeting could make the difference between achieving local control or not, for example when doses have to be compromised in order to spare neighboring high-risk organs, or when tumors are expected to be highly therapy-resistant due to heavy pretreatment such as chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer J Klement
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany.
| | - Reinhart A Sweeney
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van der Lei S, Dijkstra M, Nieuwenhuizen S, Schulz HH, Vos DJW, Versteeg KS, Buffart TE, Swijnenburg RJ, de Vries JJJ, Bruynzeel AME, van den Tol MP, Scheffer HJ, Puijk RS, Haasbeek CJA, Meijerink MR. Unresectable Intermediate-Size (3-5 cm) Colorectal Liver Metastases: Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy Versus Microwave Ablation (COLLISION-XL): Protocol of a Phase II/III Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00270-023-03498-8. [PMID: 37430016 PMCID: PMC10382334 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03498-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although microwave ablation (MWA) has a low complication rate and good efficacy for small-size (≤ 3 cm) colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), local control decreases with increasing size. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining interest as a potential means to treat intermediate-size CRLM and might be less susceptible to increasing volume. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of MWA to SBRT in patients with unresectable, intermediate-size (3-5 cm) CRLM. METHODS In this two-arm, multicentre phase II/ III randomized controlled trial, 68 patients with 1-3 unresectable, intermediate-size CRLM suitable for both MWA and SBRT, will be included. Patients will be treated with MWA or SBRT as randomised. The Primary endpoint is local tumour progression-free survival (LTPFS) at 1 year (intention-to-treat analysis). Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall and distant progression-free survival (DPFS), local control (LC) and procedural morbidity and mortality and assessment of pain and quality of life. DISCUSSION Current guidelines lack clear recommendations for the local treatment of liver only intermediate-size, unresectable CRLM and studies comparing curative intent SBRT and thermal ablation are scarce. Although safety and feasibility to eradicate tumours ≤ 5 cm have been established, both techniques suffer from lower LTPFS and LC rates for larger-size tumours. For the treatment of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM clinical equipoise has been reached. We have designed a two-armed phase II/ III randomized controlled trial directly comparing SBRT to MWA for unresectable CRLM 3-5 cm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 1, phase II/ III Randomized controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04081168, September 9th 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan van der Lei
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Madelon Dijkstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne Nieuwenhuizen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hannah H Schulz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle J W Vos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kathelijn S Versteeg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke E Buffart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan J J de Vries
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hester J Scheffer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, NWZ Hospital Group, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert S Puijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Haasbeek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pérez Haas Y, Ludwig R, Dal Bello R, Tanadini-Lang S, Unkelbach J. Adaptive fractionation at the MR-linac. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36596262 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acafd4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Fractionated radiotherapy typically delivers the same dose in each fraction. Adaptive fractionation (AF) is an approach to exploit inter-fraction motion by increasing the dose on days when the distance of tumor and dose-limiting organs at risk (OAR) is large and decreasing the dose on unfavorable days. We develop an AF algorithm and evaluate the concept for patients with abdominal tumors previously treated at the MR-linac in 5 fractions.Approach. Given daily adapted treatment plans, inter-fractional changes are quantified by sparing factorsδtdefined as the OAR-to-tumor dose ratio. The key problem of AF is to decide on the dose to deliver in fractiont, givenδtand the dose delivered in previous fractions, but not knowing futureδts. Optimal doses that maximize the expected biologically effective dose in the tumor (BED10) while staying below a maximum OAR BED3constraint are computed using dynamic programming, assuming a normal distribution overδwith mean and variance estimated from previously observed patient-specificδts. The algorithm is evaluated for 16 MR-linac patients in whom tumor dose was compromised due to proximity of bowel, stomach, or duodenum.Main Results. In 14 out of the 16 patients, AF increased the tumor BED10compared to the reference treatment that delivers the same OAR dose in each fraction. However, in 11 of these 14 patients, the increase in BED10was below 1 Gy. Two patients with large sparing factor variation had a benefit of more than 10 Gy BED10increase. For one patient, AF led to a 5 Gy BED10decrease due to an unfavorable order of sparing factors.Significance. On average, AF provided only a small increase in tumor BED. However, AF may yield substantial benefits for individual patients with large variations in the geometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Pérez Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - R Ludwig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - R Dal Bello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Potential benefits of using radioactive ion beams for range margin reduction in carbon ion therapy. Sci Rep 2022; 12:21792. [PMID: 36526710 PMCID: PMC9758201 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26290-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Sharp dose gradients and high biological effectiveness make ions such as 12C an ideal tool to treat deep-seated tumors, however, at the same time, sensitive to errors in the range prediction. Tumor safety margins mitigate these uncertainties, but during the irradiation they lead to unavoidable damage to the surrounding healthy tissue. To fully exploit the Bragg peak benefits, a large effort is put into establishing precise range verification methods. Despite positron emission tomography being widely in use for this purpose in 12C therapy, the low count rates, biological washout, and broad activity distribution still limit its precision. Instead, radioactive beams used directly for treatment would yield an improved signal and a closer match with the dose fall-off, potentially enabling precise in vivo beam range monitoring. We have performed a treatment planning study to estimate the possible impact of the reduced range uncertainties, enabled by radioactive 11C ions treatments, on sparing critical organs in tumor proximity. Compared to 12C treatments, (i) annihilation maps for 11C ions can reflect sub- millimeter shifts in dose distributions in the patient, (ii) outcomes of treatment planning with 11C significantly improve and (iii) less severe toxicities for serial and parallel critical organs can be expected.
Collapse
|
9
|
Daly M, McWilliam A, Radhakrishna G, Choudhury A, Eccles CL. Radiotherapy respiratory motion management in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies: a systematic review of patient factors influencing effectiveness of motion reduction with abdominal compression. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:833-841. [PMID: 35611555 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2073186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of abdominal compression for motion management in hepatobiliary-pancreatic (HPB) radiotherapy has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS & MATERIALS A systematic review was carried out using PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases up to 1 July 2021. No date restrictions were applied. Additional searches were carried out using the University of Manchester digital library, Google Scholar and of retrieved papers' reference lists. Studies conducted evaluating respiratory motion utilising imaging with and without abdominal compression in the same patients available in English were included. Studies conducted in healthy volunteers or majority non-HPB sites, not providing descriptive motion statistics or patient characteristics before and after compression in the same patients or published without peer-review were excluded. A narrative synthesis was employed by tabulating retrieved studies and organising chronologically by abdominal compression device type to help identify patterns in the evidence. RESULTS The inclusion criteria were met by 6 studies with a total of 152 patients. Designs were a mix of retrospective and prospective quantitative designs with chronological, non-randomised recruitment. Abdominal compression reduced craniocaudal respiratory motion in the majority of patients, although in four studies there were increases seen in at least one direction. The influence of patient comorbidities on effectiveness of compression, and/or comfort with compression was not evaluated in any study. CONCLUSION Abdominal compression may not be appropriate for all patients, and benefit should be weighed with potential increase in motion or discomfort in patients with small initial motion (<5 mm). Patient factors including male sex, and high body mass index (BMI) were found to impact the effectiveness of compression, however with limited evidence. High-quality studies are warranted to fully assess the clinical impact of abdominal compression on treatment outcomes and toxicity prospective in comparison to other motion management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairead Daly
- Division of Clinical Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Alan McWilliam
- Division of Clinical Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHSFT, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ananya Choudhury
- Division of Clinical Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHSFT, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Cynthia L Eccles
- Division of Clinical Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHSFT, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Menichelli C, Casamassima F, Aristei C, Ingrosso G, Borghesi S, Arcidiacono F, Lancellotta V, Franzese C, Arcangeli S. Stereotactic radiotherapy for liver oligometastases. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:32-39. [PMID: 35402041 PMCID: PMC8989451 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The liver is the first metastatic site in 15–25% of colorectal cancer patients and one of the first metastatic sites for lung and breast cancer patients. A computed tomography (CT ) scan with contrast medium is a standard procedure for assessing liver lesions but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characterizes small lesions better thanks to its high soft-tissue contrast. Positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT ) plays a complementary role in the diagnosis of liver metastases. Triphasic (arterial, venous and time-delayed) acquisition of contrast-medium CT images is the first step in treatment planning. Since the liver exhibits a relatively wide mobility due to respiratory movements and bowel filling, appropriate techniques are needed for target identification and motion management. Contouring requires precise recognition of target lesion edges. Information from contrast MRI and/or PET-CT is crucial as they best visualize metastatic disease in the parenchyma. Even though different fractionation schedules were reported, doses and fractionation schedules for liver stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) have not yet been established. The best local control rates were obtained with BED10 values over 100 Gy. Local control rates from most retrospective studies, which were limited by short follow-ups and included different primary tumors with intrinsic heterogeneity, ranged from 60% to 90% at 1 and 2 years. The most common SRT-related toxicities are increases in liver enzymes, hyperbilirubinemia and hypoalbuminemia. Overall, late toxicity is mild even in long-term follow-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | | | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico S. Gerardo and University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li W, Feng SS, Wu H, Deng J, Zhou WY, Jia MX, Shi Y, Ma L, Zeng XX, Zuberi Z, Fu D, Liu X, Chen Z. Comprehensive Analysis of CDK1-Associated ceRNA Network Revealing the Key Pathways LINC00460/LINC00525-Hsa-Mir-338-FAM111/ZWINT as Prognostic Biomarkers in Lung Adenocarcinoma Combined with Experiments. Cells 2022; 11:cells11071220. [PMID: 35406786 PMCID: PMC8997540 DOI: 10.3390/cells11071220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, and effective biomarkers are still lacking for early detection and prognosis prediction. Here, based on gene expression profiles of LUAD patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), 806 long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), 122 microRNAs (miRNAs) and 1269 mRNAs associated with CDK1 were identified. The regulatory axis of LINC00460/LINC00525-hsa-mir-338-FAM111B/ZWINT was determined according to the correlation between gene expression and patient prognosis. The abnormal up-regulation of FAM111B/ZWINT in LUAD was related to hypomethylation. Furthermore, immune infiltration analysis suggested FAM111B/ZWINT could affect the development and prognosis of cancer by regulating the LUAD immune microenvironment. EMT feature analysis suggested that FAM111B/ZWINT promoted tumor spread through the EMT process. Functional analysis showed FAM111B/ZWINT was involved in cell cycle events such as DNA replication and chromosome separation. We analyzed the HERB and GSCALite databases to identify potential target medicines that may play a role in the treatment of LUAD. Finally, the expression of LINC00460/LINC00525-hsa-mir-338-FAM111B/ZWINT axis was verified in LUAD cells by RT-qPCR, and these results were consistent with bioinformatics analysis. Overall, we constructed a CDK1-related ceRNA network and revealed the LINC00460/LINC00525-hsa-mir-338-FAM111/ZWINT pathways as potential diagnostic biomarkers or therapeutic targets of LUAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Li
- College of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China; (W.L.); (S.-S.F.); (J.D.); (L.M.); (X.-X.Z.)
- National Engineering Research Center of Rice and Byproduct Deep Processing, College of Food Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China; (H.W.); (M.-X.J.); (Y.S.)
| | - Shan-Shan Feng
- College of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China; (W.L.); (S.-S.F.); (J.D.); (L.M.); (X.-X.Z.)
| | - Hao Wu
- National Engineering Research Center of Rice and Byproduct Deep Processing, College of Food Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China; (H.W.); (M.-X.J.); (Y.S.)
| | - Jing Deng
- College of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China; (W.L.); (S.-S.F.); (J.D.); (L.M.); (X.-X.Z.)
| | - Wang-Yan Zhou
- Department of Medical Record, Hengyang Medical School, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China;
| | - Ming-Xi Jia
- National Engineering Research Center of Rice and Byproduct Deep Processing, College of Food Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China; (H.W.); (M.-X.J.); (Y.S.)
| | - Yi Shi
- National Engineering Research Center of Rice and Byproduct Deep Processing, College of Food Science and Engineering, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China; (H.W.); (M.-X.J.); (Y.S.)
| | - Liang Ma
- College of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China; (W.L.); (S.-S.F.); (J.D.); (L.M.); (X.-X.Z.)
| | - Xiao-Xi Zeng
- College of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China; (W.L.); (S.-S.F.); (J.D.); (L.M.); (X.-X.Z.)
| | - Zavuga Zuberi
- Department of Science and Laboratory Technology, Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 2958, Tanzania;
| | - Da Fu
- Central Laboratory for Medical Research, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China;
| | - Xiang Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hengyang Medical School, The Second Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China
- Correspondence: (X.L.); (Z.C.); Tel.: +86-0734-889-9990 (X.L.); +86-158-6971-6968 (Z.C.)
| | - Zhu Chen
- College of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China; (W.L.); (S.-S.F.); (J.D.); (L.M.); (X.-X.Z.)
- Correspondence: (X.L.); (Z.C.); Tel.: +86-0734-889-9990 (X.L.); +86-158-6971-6968 (Z.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The Role of Ablative Radiotherapy to Liver Oligometastases from Colorectal Cancer. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-021-00472-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
This review describes recent data supporting locoregional ablative radiation in the treatment of oligometastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Recent Findings
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) demonstrates high rates of local control in colorectal cancer liver metastases when a biologically equivalent dose of > 100 Gy is delivered. Future innovations to improve the efficacy of SBRT include MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) to enhance target accuracy, systemic immune activation to treat extrahepatic disease, and genomic customization. Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) with y-90 is an intra-arterial therapy that delivers high doses to liver metastases internally which has shown to increase liver disease control in phase 3 trials. Advancements in transarterial radioembolization (TARE) dosimetry could improve local control and decrease toxicity.
Summary
SBRT and SIRT are both promising options in treating unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases. Identification of oligometastatic patients who receive long-term disease control from either therapy is essential. Future advancements focusing on improving radiation design and customization could further improve efficacy and toxicity.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kuznetsova S, Sinha R, Thind K, Ploquin N. Direct visualization and correlation of liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment delivery accuracy with interfractional motion. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:129-138. [PMID: 34240556 PMCID: PMC8364285 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This study used the visualization of hypo‐intense regions on liver‐specific MRI to directly quantify stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) spatial delivery accuracy. Additionally, the interfractional motion of the liver region was determined and compared with the MRI‐based evaluation of liver SBRT spatial treatment delivery accuracy. Primovist®‐enhanced MRI scans were acquired from 17 patients, 8–12 weeks following the completion of liver SBRT treatment. Direct visualization of radiation‐induced focal liver reaction in the form of hypo‐intensity was determined. The auto‐delineation approach was used to localize these regions, and center‐of‐mass (COM) discrepancy was quantified between the MRI hypo‐intensity and the CT‐based treatment plan. To assess the interfractional motion of the liver region, a planning CT was registered to a Cone Beam CT obtained before each treatment fraction. The interfractional motion assessed from this approach was then compared against the localized hypo‐intense MRI regions. The mean ± SD COM discrepancy was 1.4 ± 1.3 mm in the left‐right direction, 2.6 ± 1.8 mm in an anteroposterior direction, and 1.9 ± 2.6 mm in the craniocaudal direction. A high correlation was observed between interfractional motion of visualized hypo‐intensity and interfractional motion of planning treatment volume (PTV); the quantified Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.96. The lack of correlation was observed between Primovist® MRI‐based spatial accuracy and interfractional motion of the liver, where Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from −0.01 to −0.26. The highest random and systematic errors quantified from interfractional motion were in the craniocaudal direction. This work demonstrates a novel framework for the direct evaluation of liver SBRT spatial delivery accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kuznetsova
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - R Sinha
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - K Thind
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - N Ploquin
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mayinger M, Ludwig R, Christ SM, Dal Bello R, Ryu A, Weitkamp N, Pavic M, Garcia Schüler H, Wilke L, Guckenberger M, Unkelbach J, Tanadini-Lang S, Andratschke N. Benefit of replanning in MR-guided online adaptive radiation therapy in the treatment of liver metastasis. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:84. [PMID: 33947429 PMCID: PMC8097956 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01813-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effects of daily adaptive MR-guided replanning in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of liver metastases based on a patient individual longitudinal dosimetric analysis. METHODS Fifteen patients assigned to SBRT for oligometastatic liver metastases underwent daily MR-guided target localization and on-table treatment plan re-optimization. Gross tumor volume (GTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were adapted to the anatomy-of-the-day. A reoptimized plan (RP) and a rigidly shifted baseline plan (sBP) without re-optimization were generated for each fraction. After extraction of DVH parameters for GTV, planning target volume (PTV), and OARs (stomach, duodenum, bowel, liver, heart) plans were compared on a per-patient basis. RESULTS Median pre-treatment GTV and PTV were 14.9 cc (interquartile range (IQR): 7.7-32.9) and 62.7 cc (IQR: 42.4-105.5) respectively. SBRT with RP improved PTV coverage (V100%) for 47/75 of the fractions and reduced doses to the most proximal OARs (D1cc, Dmean) in 33/75 fractions compared to sBP. RP significantly improved PTV coverage (V100%) for metastases within close proximity to an OAR by 4.0% (≤ 0.2 cm distance from the edge of the PTV to the edge of the OAR; n = 7; p = 0.01), but only by 0.2% for metastases farther away from OAR (> 2 cm distance; n = 7; p = 0.37). No acute grade 3 treatment-related toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS MR-guided online replanning SBRT improved target coverage and OAR sparing for liver metastases with a distance from the edge of the PTV to the nearest luminal OAR < 2 cm. Only marginal improvements in target coverage were observed for target distant to critical OARs, indicating that these patients do not benefit from daily adaptive replanning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany.
| | - Roman Ludwig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| | - Riccardo Dal Bello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| | - Alex Ryu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| | - Nienke Weitkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| | - Matea Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| | - Helena Garcia Schüler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| | - Lotte Wilke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yamada S, Takiyama H, Isozaki Y, Shinoto M, Makishima H, Yamamoto N, Tsuji H. Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Colorectal Cancer. JOURNAL OF THE ANUS RECTUM AND COLON 2021; 5:113-120. [PMID: 33937550 PMCID: PMC8084540 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2020-082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Heavy-ion radiotherapy (RT) is a kind of particle RT, and carbon-ion beam constitutes the primary delivery method of heavy-ion RT. Unlike the conventional photon modalities, particle RT, in particular carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT), offers unique physical and biological advantages. Particle therapy allows for substantial dose delivery to tumors with minimal surrounding tissue damage. In addition, CIRT in particular possesses biological advantages such as inducing increased double-strand breaks in DNA structures, causing irreversible cell damage independently of cell cycle or oxygenation, more so than proton or photon. It can be expected that CIRT is effective on radioresistant cancers such as colorectal cancers (CRCs). We introduced the results of CIRT for local recurrent rectal cancer, lung metastasis, liver metastasis, and lymph node metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeru Yamada
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Takiyama
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuka Isozaki
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Makoto Shinoto
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Makishima
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoyoshi Yamamoto
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Long-Term Results of a Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Trial and Subsequent Institutional Experience of Single-Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1387-1395. [PMID: 33340601 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report long-term outcomes from our phase 1 dose-escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of single-fraction liver SABR pooled with our subsequent single institutional experience with patients treated postprotocol at the highest dose level (40 Gy) established from the phase 1 study. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with liver metastases from solid tumors located outside of the central liver zone were treated with single-fraction SABR on a phase 1 dose escalation trial. At least 700 cc of normal liver had to receive <9.1 Gy. Seven patients with 10 liver metastases received the initial prescription dose of 35 Gy, and dose was then escalated to 40 Gy for 7 more patients with 7 liver metastases. An additional 19 postprotocol patients with 22 liver metastases were treated to 40 Gy in a single fraction. Patients were followed for toxicity and underwent serial imaging to assess local control. RESULTS Median imaging follow-up for the combined cohort (n = 33, 39 lesions) was 25.9 months; 38.9 months for protocol patients and 20.2 months for postprotocol patients. Median lesion size was 2.0 cm (range, 0.5-5.0 cm). There were no dose-limiting toxicities observed for protocol patients, and only 3 grade 2 toxicities were observed in the entire cohort, with no grade ≥3 toxicities attributable to treatment. Four-year actuarial local control of irradiated lesions in the entire cohort was 96.6%, 100% in the protocol group and 92.9% in the subsequent patients. Two-year overall survival for all treated patients was 82.0%. CONCLUSIONS For selected patients with liver metastases, single-fraction SABR at doses of 35 and 40 Gy was safe and well-tolerated, and shows excellent local control with long-term follow-up; results in subsequent patients treated with single-fraction SABR doses of 40 Gy confirmed our earlier results.
Collapse
|
17
|
Modern therapeutic approaches for the treatment of malignant liver tumours. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 17:755-772. [PMID: 32681074 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-020-0314-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Malignant liver tumours include a wide range of primary and secondary tumours. Although surgery remains the mainstay of curative treatment, modern therapies integrate a variety of neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies and have achieved dramatic improvements in survival. Extensive tumour loads, which have traditionally been considered unresectable, are now amenable to curative treatment through systemic conversion chemotherapies followed by a variety of interventions such as augmentation of the healthy liver through portal vein occlusion, staged surgeries or ablation modalities. Liver transplantation is established in selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma but is now emerging as a promising option in many other types of tumour such as perihilar cholangiocarcinomas, neuroendocrine or colorectal liver metastases. In this Review, we summarize the available therapies for the treatment of malignant liver tumours, with an emphasis on surgical and ablative approaches and how they align with other therapies such as modern anticancer drugs or radiotherapy. In addition, we describe three complex case studies of patients with malignant liver tumours. Finally, we discuss the outlook for future treatment, including personalized approaches based on molecular tumour subtyping, response to targeted drugs, novel biomarkers and precision surgery adapted to the specific tumour.
Collapse
|
18
|
de la Peña C, Gonzalez MF, González C, Salazar JM, Cruz B. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases: Clinical outcomes and literature review. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:637-642. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
19
|
Sheth N, Osborn V, Lee A, Schreiber D. Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Fractionation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States. Cureus 2020; 12:e8675. [PMID: 32699675 PMCID: PMC7370686 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study aims to analyze the patterns of care, including fractionation and utilization, of hypofractionated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with HCC from 2004 to 2014 and treated with SABR in three, four, or five fractions in 15-20Gy, 10-13Gy, or 6-12Gy per fraction, respectively. Patients with stage IV and Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index > 0 were excluded in order to avoid bias resulting from the selection of poorer prognosis patients. The patients were then stratified based on several characteristics including biologically equivalent doses (BEDs) of =/> 100 Gy and <100 Gy to determine whether there was an association with overall survival (OS) and a multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to assess for potential confounding factors. Results There were 462 patients identified in whom the most common SABR fractionation regimen was 10Gy x five fractions (25.3%), followed by 8Gy x five fractions (17.7%), and 15-16Gy x three fractions (26.4%). A total of 152 patients were treated to a BED < 100Gy, which was associated with a median OS of 20.8 months (95% CI 14.55-27.11). Three hundred and ten patients were treated to a BED =/> 100Gy, which was associated with a median OS of 30.8 months (95% CI 5.25-32.08). On MVA, BED =/> 100Gy was not significantly associated with improved OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64-1.14, p = 0.28). Factors that were associated with significantly worse survival were tumor size in the largest quartile (HR 2.197 CI 1.440-3.354, p < 0.0001) and T3a disease (HR 2.474 CI 1.472-4.158, p = 0.001 compared to T1). Conclusion SABR fractionation schemes vary widely, but are most commonly 10Gy x five fractions followed by 8Gy x five fractions and 15Gy x three fractions. BED of at least 100Gy is not associated with improved OS. Further studies are needed to best identify the optimal SABR dose and fractionation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niki Sheth
- Radiation Oncology, State University of New York - Downstate Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Virginia Osborn
- Radiation Oncology, NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst, New York, USA
| | - Anna Lee
- Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - David Schreiber
- Radiation Oncology, Summit Medical Group, Berkeley Heights, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lu L, Ouyang Z, Lin S, Mastroianni A, Stephans KL, Xia P. Dosimetric assessment of patient-specific breath-hold reproducibility on liver motion for SBRT planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:77-83. [PMID: 32337841 PMCID: PMC7386188 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the impact of breath-hold reproducibility on liver motion using a respiratory motion management device. METHODS Forty-four patients with hepatic tumors, treated with SBRT with breath-hold, were randomly selected for this study. All patients underwent three consecutive computed tomography (CT) scans using active breath-hold coordinator (ABC) with three repeated single breath-hold during simulation. The three CT scans were labeled as ABC1-CT, ABC2-CT, and ABC3-CT. Displacements of centroids of the entire livers among the three ABC-CTs were measured as a surrogate for intrafractional motion. For each patient, two different treatment plans were prepared: (a) a clinical plan using a 5-mm expansion of an ITV that encompassed all three GTVs from each of the three ABC-CTs, and (b) a research plan using a 5-mm expansion of the GTV from only ABC1-CT to create PTV. The clinical plan acceptance criteria were that 95% of the PTV and 99% of the GTV received 100% of the prescription dose. Dosimetric endpoints were analyzed and compared for the two plans. RESULTS All shifts in the medial-lateral direction (range: -3.9 to 2.0 mm) were within 5 mm while 7% of shifts in the anterior-posterior direction (range: -10.5 to 16.7 mm) and 11% of shifts in the superior-inferior direction (range: -17.0 to 8.7 mm) exceeded 5 mm. Six patients (14%) had an intrafraction motion greater than 5 mm in any direction. For these six patients, if a plan was created based on a PTV from a single CT (ex. ABC1-CT), 5 of 12 GTVs captured from other ABC-CTs would fail to meet the clinical acceptance criteria due to poor breath-hold reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS Non-negligible intrafractional motion occurs in patients with poor breath-hold reproducibility. To identify this subgroup of patients, acquiring three CTs with active breath-hold during simulation is a feasible practical method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Zi Ouyang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sara Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Anthony Mastroianni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kevin L Stephans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ping Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Siddiqui O, Pollock A, Samanta S, Kaiser A, Molitoris JK. Proton Beam Therapy in Liver Malignancies. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22:30. [PMID: 32108284 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-0889-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Proton beam therapy (PBT) allows for improved sparing of surrounding normal tissues compared with X-ray-based radiation therapy. This is especially important in the setting of liver malignancies, where an increase in integral dose leads to a higher risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) as well as close proximity to vital gastrointestinal (GI) organs. RECENT FINDINGS We have data from multiple centers demonstrating that PBT can safely deliver high, ablative doses of radiation therapy conferring excellent local control with good tolerance of treatment. PBT is an effective treatment with longstanding evidence of efficacy that is increasing in availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Ariel Pollock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Santanu Samanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Adeel Kaiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Jason K Molitoris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pei S, Chen K, Yang Y, Chen L, Zhu X. A retrospective cohort study of low-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for unresectable liver metastases. J Int Med Res 2019; 48:300060519892382. [PMID: 31885298 PMCID: PMC7607147 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519892382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the treatment of unresectable liver metastases. METHODS Twenty-five patients with unresectable liver metastases treated with IMRT were enrolled from January 2003 to September 2016. The median longest diameter of the lesions was 3.3 cm (range, 1.6-16.7 cm). The fraction dose ranged from 2 to 5.2 Gy, with a median total dose of 50 Gy (range, 30-60 Gy). RESULTS The median follow-up was 9.2 months (range, 2.1-48.8 months). The overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 46.4% and 27.4%, respectively. The 1-year local control rate was 69.8%. The 1-year progression-free survival rate was 26.3%. One patient had grade 4 liver dysfunction. One case of grade 4 leukopenia and one case of grade 3 leukopenia occurred, and one case of grade 3 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia was observed. CONCLUSION IMRT may be a promising and safe treatment for unresectable liver metastases and can be used as a treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Pei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Kaihua Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Yunli Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Long Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Xiaodong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.,Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor (Guangxi Medical University), Ministry of Education, Nanning, Guangxi, China.,Guangxi Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shimohigashi Y, Doi Y, Kouno Y, Yotsuji Y, Maruyama M, Kai Y, Toya R. Image quality evaluation of in-treatment four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography in volumetric-modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiation therapy. Phys Med 2019; 68:10-16. [PMID: 31726265 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, the image quality of in-treatment four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (In-4D-CBCT) obtained with various prescription doses (PDs) were quantitatively evaluated in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of the lungs and liver. To assess image quality, we used a dynamic thorax phantom and three-dimensional (3D) abdominal phantom; In-4D-CBCT images were acquired with various PDs (from 5 to 12 Gy). The In-4D-CBCT with various PDs were compared with the reference images (pre-4D-CBCT). The image quality was evaluated using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The fiducial marker positions with various PDs were compared with those of the reference images. For the dynamic thorax phantom, the difference between pre- and In-4D-CBCT in terms of SNR and CNR decreased, as the PD increased from 6 to 12 Gy. The median DSC ranged from 0.7 to 0.74, and showed good similarity. For the 3D abdominal phantom, the difference between pre- and In-4D-CBCT in terms of SNR and CNR decreased as the PD increased from 5 to 6 Gy; conversely, it increased as the PD increased from 7 to 8 Gy. The fiducial marker positions were within 1.0 mm for all PDs. We concluded that the image quality of In-4D-CBCT degraded compared with the reference image; however, it was sufficiently accurate for assessing the intra-fractional tumor position in VMAT for SBRT of the lungs and liver both in terms of the target volume similarity and accuracy of the fiducial marker position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yasuhiro Doi
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yumiko Kouno
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yohei Yotsuji
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Masato Maruyama
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yudai Kai
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Ryo Toya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Li WZ, Liang ZW, Cao Y, Cao TT, Quan H, Yang ZY, Li Q, Dai ZT. Estimating intrafraction tumor motion during fiducial-based liver stereotactic radiotherapy via an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:185. [PMID: 31665054 PMCID: PMC6820939 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1401-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor motion may compromise the accuracy of liver stereotactic radiotherapy. In order to carry out a precise planning, estimating liver tumor motion during radiotherapy has received a lot of attention. Previous approach may have difficult to deal with image data corrupted by noise. The iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm is widely used for estimating the rigid registration of three-dimensional point sets when these data were dense or corrupted. In the light of this, our study estimated the three-dimensional (3D) rigid motion of liver tumors during stereotactic liver radiotherapy using reconstructed 3D coordinates of fiducials based on the ICP algorithm. METHODS Four hundred ninety-five pairs of orthogonal kilovoltage (KV) images from the CyberKnife stereo imaging system for 12 patients were used in this study. For each pair of images, the 3D coordinates of fiducial markers inside the liver were calculated via geometric derivations. The 3D coordinates were used to calculate the real-time translational and rotational motion of liver tumors around three axes via an ICP algorithm. The residual error was also investigated both with and without rotational correction. RESULTS The translational shifts of liver tumors in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP),and superior-inferior (SI) directions were 2.92 ± 1.98 mm, 5.54 ± 3.12 mm, and 16.22 ± 5.86 mm, respectively; the rotational angles in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions were 3.95° ± 3.08°, 4.93° ± 2.90°, and 4.09° ± 1.99°, respectively. Rotational correction decreased 3D fiducial displacement from 1.19 ± 0.35 mm to 0.65 ± 0.24 mm (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The maximum translational movement occurred in the SI direction. Rotational correction decreased fiducial displacements and increased tumor tracking accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu-Zhou Li
- School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Zhi-Wen Liang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Yi Cao
- School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Ting-Ting Cao
- School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Hong Quan
- School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Zhi-Yong Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Qin Li
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Zhi-Tao Dai
- School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430022, China. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen Center, Shenzhen, 518100, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
[Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy: Clinical features and technical consequences, results. Which treatment machine in which situation?]. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:636-650. [PMID: 31444078 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.07.159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy is a developing technique for the treatment of primary tumours and metastases. Its implementation is complex because of the particularities of the treated organ and the comorbidities of the patients. However, this technique is a treatment opportunity for patients otherwise in therapeutic impasse. The scientific evidence of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy has been considered by the French health authority as insufficient for its widespread use outside specialized and experienced centers, despite a growing and important number of retrospective and prospective studies, but few comparative data. This article focuses on the specific features of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver treatments and the results of published studies of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy performed with classic linear accelerators and dedicated radiosurgery units.
Collapse
|
26
|
Gargett M, Haddad C, Kneebone A, Booth JT, Hardcastle N. Clinical impact of removing respiratory motion during liver SABR. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:93. [PMID: 31159840 PMCID: PMC6547575 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1300-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Liver tumors are subject to motion with respiration, which is typically accounted for by increasing the target volume. The prescription dose is often reduced to keep the mean liver dose under a threshold level to limit the probability of radiation induced liver toxicity. A retrospective planning study was performed to determine the potential clinical gains of removal of respiratory motion from liver SABR treatment volumes, which may be achieved with gating or tumor tracking. Methods Twenty consecutive liver SABR patients were analysed. The treated PTV included the GTV in all phases of respiration (ITV) with a 5 mm margin. The goal prescription was 50Gy/5# (BED 100 Gy10) but was reduced by 2.5 Gy increments to meet liver dose constraints. Elimination of motion was modelled by contouring the GTV in the expiration phase only, with a 5 mm PTV margin. All patients were replanned using the no-motion PTV and tumor dose was escalated to higher prescription levels where feasible given organ-at-risk constraints. For the cohort of patients with metastatic disease, BED gains were correlated to increases in tumour control probability (TCP). The effect of the gradient of the TCP curve on the magnitude of TCP increase was evaluated by repeating the study for an additional prescription structure, 54Gy/3# (BED 151 Gy10). Results Correlation between PTV size and prescribed dose exists; PTVs encompassing < 10% of the liver could receive the highest prescription level. A monotonically increasing correlation (Spearman’s rho 0.771, p = 0.002) between the degree of PTV size reduction and motion vector magnitude was observed for GTV sizes <100cm3. For 11/13 patients initially planned to a decreased prescription, tumor dose escalation was possible (5.4Gy10–21.4Gy10 BED) using the no-motion PTV. Dose escalation in excess of 20 Gy10 increased the associated TCP by 5% or more. A comparison of TCP gains between the two fractionation schedules showed that, for the same patient geometry, the absolute increase in BED was the overarching factor rather than the gradient of the TCP curve. Conclusions In liver SABR treatments unable to be prescribed optimal dose due to exceeding mean liver thresholds, eliminating respiratory motion allowed dose escalation in the majority of patients studied and substantially increased TCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Gargett
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - C Haddad
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A Kneebone
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J T Booth
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - N Hardcastle
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Li D, Xu Y. Buforin IIb induced cell cycle arrest in liver cancer. Anim Cells Syst (Seoul) 2019; 23:176-183. [PMID: 31231581 PMCID: PMC6566800 DOI: 10.1080/19768354.2019.1595139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The inhibitory effect of buforin IIb on different types of cancer, although not liver cancer, has been demonstrated previously. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of buforin IIb on the progression of liver cancer. The human liver cancer cell line HepG2 was treated with purified buforin IIb and the cell activity was determined by MTT, colony formation and transwell assays. The protein expression levels of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and cyclins were analyzed by western blotting and immunofluorescent cell staining. A tumor growth model was constructed using nude mice, and buforin IIb treatment was administered. The levels of CDK2 and cyclin A in the tumor tissues were detected by western blotting. Buforin IIb treatment depressed cell viability and colony formation and induced apoptosis significantly, and 1.0 µM concentration of buforin IIb was found to be the optimal dosage. The cell cycle was arrested at the G2/M phase following buforin IIb treatment. CDK2 and cyclin A were downregulated by treatment of the cells with 1.0 µM buforin IIb for 24 h. Treatment with buforin IIb also inhibited the migration of liver cancer cells in vitro. Furthermore, 50 nmol buforin IIb injection suppressed HepG2 cell subcutaneous tumor growth in the nude mouse model. Similar to the in vitro results, buforin IIb injection reduced the expression of CDK2 and cyclin A in the tumor tissue. these results demonstrate that buforin IIb inhibited liver cancer cell growth via the regulation of CDK2 and cyclin A expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Li
- Department of Geriatrics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong Xu
- Blood Purification Center, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Doi Y, Shimohigashi Y, Yotsuji Y, Maruyama M, Kai Y, Toya R. Target volume and motion position evaluation of four-dimensional cone-beam CT: comparison with 4D-CT using dynamic thorax phantom. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2019. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab1054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
29
|
Klement RJ, Abbasi-Senger N, Adebahr S, Alheid H, Allgaeuer M, Becker G, Blanck O, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Duma M, Eble MJ, Ernst I, Gerum S, Habermehl D, Hass P, Henkenberens C, Hildebrandt G, Imhoff D, Kahl H, Klass ND, Krempien R, Lewitzki V, Lohaus F, Ostheimer C, Papachristofilou A, Petersen C, Rieber J, Schneider T, Schrade E, Semrau R, Wachter S, Wittig A, Guckenberger M, Andratschke N. The impact of local control on overall survival after stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer: a combined analysis of 388 patients with 500 metastases. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:173. [PMID: 30808323 PMCID: PMC6390357 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5362-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this analysis was to model the effect of local control (LC) on overall survival (OS) in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver or lung metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS The analysis is based on pooled data from two retrospective SBRT databases for pulmonary and hepatic metastases from 27 centers from Germany and Switzerland. Only patients with metastases from colorectal cancer were considered to avoid histology as a confounding factor. An illness-death model was employed to model the relationship between LC and OS. RESULTS Three hundred eighty-eight patients with 500 metastatic lesions (lung n = 209, liver n = 291) were included and analyzed. Median follow-up time for local recurrence assessment was 12.1 months. Ninety-nine patients with 112 lesions experienced local failure. Seventy-one of these patients died after local failure. Median survival time was 27.9 months in all patients and 25.4 months versus 30.6 months in patients with and without local failure after SBRT. The baseline risk of death after local failure exceeds the baseline risk of death without local failure at 10 months indicating better survival with LC. CONCLUSION In CRC patients with lung or liver metastases, our findings suggest improved long-term OS by achieving metastatic disease control using SBRT in patients with a projected OS estimate of > 12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer J Klement
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - N Abbasi-Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - S Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - H Alheid
- Strahlentherapie Bautzen, Bautzen, Germany
| | - M Allgaeuer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Barmherzige Brueder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - G Becker
- RadioChirurgicum CyberKnife Suedwest, Goeppingen, Germany
| | - O Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| | - J Boda-Heggemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - T Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Duma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar- Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany
| | - M J Eble
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - I Ernst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - S Gerum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - D Habermehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar- Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Hass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - C Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hanover, Germany
| | - G Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - D Imhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - H Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - N D Klass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - R Krempien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - V Lewitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - F Lohaus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - C Ostheimer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - A Papachristofilou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - J Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - E Schrade
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Germany
| | - R Semrau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Wachter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Passau, Passau, Germany
| | - A Wittig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - N Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yu J, Li N, Tang Y, Wang X, Tang Y, Wang SL, Song YW, Liu YP, Li YX, Jin J. Outcomes after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for colorectal cancer oligometastases. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119:532-538. [PMID: 30609038 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and the effect of biologic effective dose (BED) on outcomes treated by hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) oligometastases. METHODS Patients with CRC oligometastases treated at our hospital between 2009 and 2016 were included. The relationship between BED and risk of local recurrence was assessed. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to evaluate the effect of BED on outcomes. RESULTS A total of 48 patients were included in this study. Median follow-up time of surviving patient was 15 months (range, 3-82 months). The 1-year local control rate was 85%. The risk of local recurrence decreased sharply when BED was >90 Gy10 . RPA showed BED of 100 Gy 10 was the appropriate dose for recurrence risk stratification. BED ≥ 100 Gy 10 was significantly better than BED < 100 Gy 10 for achieving 1-year local control (94.4% vs 63.2%; P = 0.022) and 1-year OS (100% vs 73.4%; P = 0.028). One patient who received long-term antiangiogenic treatment died of massive intestinal hemorrhage; no other grade 3 or above early or late events were observed. CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy provides favorable outcomes with acceptable toxicities in CRC oligometastases. BED ≥ 100 Gy is associated with better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Shu-Lian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong-Wen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yue-Ping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye-Xiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Makishima H, Yasuda S, Isozaki Y, Kasuya G, Okada N, Miyazaki M, Mohamad O, Matsufuji N, Yamada S, Tsuji H, Kamada T. Single fraction carbon ion radiotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis: A dose escalation study. Cancer Sci 2018; 110:303-309. [PMID: 30417485 PMCID: PMC6317930 DOI: 10.1111/cas.13872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Prognosis is usually grim for those with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) who cannot receive resection. Radiation therapy can be an option for those unsuitable for resection, with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) being more effective and less toxic than X-ray due to its physio-biological characteristics. The objective of this study is to identify the optimal dose of single fraction CIRT for colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Thirty-one patients with liver metastasis from CRC were enrolled in the present study. Twenty-nine patients received a single-fraction CIRT, escalating the dose from 36 Gy (RBE) in 5% to 10% increments until unacceptable incidence of dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade ≥3 acute toxicity attributed to radiotherapy. The prescribed doses were as follows: 36 Gy (RBE) (3 cases), 40 Gy (2 cases), 44 Gy (4 cases), 46 Gy (6 cases), 48 Gy (3 cases), 53 Gy (8 cases) and 58 Gy (3 cases). Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed, but late grade 3 liver toxicity due to biliary obstruction was observed in 2 patients at 53 Gy (RBE). Both cases had lesions close to the hepatic portal region, and, therefore, the dose was escalated to 58 Gy (RBE), limited to peripheral lesions. The 3-year actuarial overall survival rate of all 29 patients was 78%, and the median survival time was 65 months. Local control improved significantly at ≥53 Gy (RBE), with a 3-year actuarial local control rate of 82%, compared to 28% in lower doses. Treatment for CRC liver metastasis with single-fraction CIRT appeared to be safe up to 58 Gy (RBE) as long as the central hepatic portal region was avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirokazu Makishima
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shigeo Yasuda
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuka Isozaki
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Goro Kasuya
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naomi Okada
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaru Miyazaki
- Mita Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osama Mohamad
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan.,University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Naruhiro Matsufuji
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yamada
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tsuji
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kamada
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Sciences and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Onal C, Guler OC, Yildirim BA. Treatment outcomes of breast cancer liver metastasis treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Breast 2018; 42:150-156. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
|
33
|
Deodato F, Macchia G, Cilla S, Ianiro A, Sallustio G, Cammelli S, Buwenge M, Mattiucci GC, Valentini V, Morganti AG. Dose escalation in extracranial stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (DESTROY-1): A multiarm Phase I trial. Br J Radiol 2018; 92:20180422. [PMID: 30325662 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A multiarm Phase I clinical trial was performed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered by non-coplanar conformal beams or volumetric modulated arc therapy technique in seven predefined clinical settings. METHODS: The (a) and (b) arms investigated primary and metastatic lung cancer differentiated by site of onset, arm (c) included primary or metastatic lesions outside the thorax, the (d) and (e) arms were for in-field reirradiation of recurrence, and finally, the (f) and (g) arms were for boost irradiation to the lesions after an adjuvant RT prescribed dose. A 4 months cut-off after previous irradiation course was fixed to distinguish the boost from the retreatment (<4 vs >4 months, respectively). Patients were prospectively enrolled in study arms according to tumor site, clinical stage and previous treatment. The total dose prescribed to the isocenter, ranged from 20 to 50 Gy according to the protocol design and the doses per fraction ranged from 4 to 10 Gy in 5 days. RESULTS: A total of 281 patients (M/F: 167/114; median age: 69 years) with 376 lesions underwent SBRT. No acute toxicity was reported in 175 patients (62.3%) while 106 (37.7%) experienced only low-grade (G < 2) acute toxicity. Four patients (all previously irradiated in the same site) showed >Grade 2 toxicity within 6 months from SBRT. With a median follow-up of 19 months, 204 patients (72.6%) did not experience late toxicity, and 77 (27.4%) experienced low grade late toxicity. On per-lesion basis, the 12-and 24 months actuarial local control inside the SBRT field were 84.3 and 73.7 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT delivered in five consecutive fractions up to the doses evaluated is well tolerated. The MTD was reached in four (a, b, c and f) of the seven study arms. Recruitment for (d), (e) and (g) arms is still ongoing. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In a prospective dose-escalation trial, the MTD of 50 Gy/10 Gy fraction and 35 Gy/7 Gy fraction were defined for primary and metastatic lesions and as boost after prior RT dose ≤50 Gy, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Deodato
- 1 Radiotherapy Unit, "Giovanni Paolo II" Foundation, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- 1 Radiotherapy Unit, "Giovanni Paolo II" Foundation, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- 2 Medical Physics Unit, "Giovanni Paolo II" Foundation, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Anna Ianiro
- 2 Medical Physics Unit, "Giovanni Paolo II" Foundation, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Giuseppina Sallustio
- 3 Radiology Unit, "Giovanni Paolo II" Foundation, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Campobasso , Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- 4 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine -DIMES, Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- 4 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine -DIMES, Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- 5 Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Gemelli ART (Advanced Radiation Therapy) - Interventional Oncology Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- 5 Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Gemelli ART (Advanced Radiation Therapy) - Interventional Oncology Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- 4 Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine -DIMES, Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is considered as incurable. The group of patients with oligometastatic disease (a few metastatic lesions and organs involved) apparently have better prognosis. It is claimed that, these patients could be treated with curative intent, and multidisciplinary aggressive approach should be considered. Despite the lack of strong data it is increasingly accepted in clinical practice. Currently, the appropriate candidate would be young woman with good performance status, low tumour burden with long disease-free interval. Because for them with already favorable nature of their disease, aggressive treatment has greater chances to improve survivals. Local ablative treatment (radiotherapy/surgery) has a crucial role in this setting. Available mainly from retrospective in nature long-term results are encouraging but need confirmation in prospective randomized studies. In this review, I discuss the definition of oligometastatic disease, its nature, currently available data and ongoing prospective randomized trials dedicated to oligometastatic breast cancer patients.
Collapse
|
35
|
Choi SH, Seong J. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Does It Have a Role in Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma? Yonsei Med J 2018; 59:912-922. [PMID: 30187697 PMCID: PMC6127430 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.8.912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a form of radiotherapy that delivers high doses of irradiation with high precision in a small number of fractions. However, it has not frequently been performed for the liver due to the risk of radiation-induced liver toxicity. Furthermore, liver SBRT is cumbersome because it requires accurate patient repositioning, target localization, control of breathing-related motion, and confers a toxicity risk to the small bowel. Recently, with the advancement of modern technologies including intensity-modulated RT and image-guided RT, SBRT has been shown to significantly improve local control and survival outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), specifically those unfit for other local therapies. While it can be used as a stand-alone treatment for those patients, it can also be applied either as an alternative or as an adjunct to other HCC therapies (e.g., transarterial chemoembolization, and radiofrequency ablation). SBRT might be an effective and safe bridging therapy for patients awaiting liver transplantation. Furthermore, in recent studies, SBRT has been shown to have a potential role as an immunostimulator, supporting the novel combination strategy of immunoradiotherapy for HCC. In this review, the role of SBRT with some technical issues is discussed. In addition, future implications of SBRT as an immunostimulator are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seo Hee Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastatic patients: developing of a response predictive model. Med Oncol 2018; 35:146. [PMID: 30218407 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1206-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Treatment of oligometastatic patients is a current challenge in radiation oncology. Aim of this study is to define a dose-response relationship for hypofractionated radiotherapy of oligometastases. METHODS Retrospective analysis of metastases treated by hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was performed. Delivered dose was calculated both as biological effective dose (BED10), and as ratio between BED10 and the logarithm of metastasis volume (BED10 logVolume Ratio, BVR). Two dose-response models were defined by logistic regression. The fitted outcome was the Metastases Complete Response (MCR). Performances of the models were assessed by area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and by bootstrap calibration of original data. BED10 and BVR impact on survival outcomes has been evaluated. RESULTS Fifty-three patients with 79 metastases were analyzed. AUC and calibration of BVR-based logistic model showed better accuracy in predicting MCR with respect to BED10-based model. No significant difference between the two ROCs was observed (De Long test p value > 0.05), but significant discordance in calibration resulted in the BED10 model (p value < 0.05 in Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of fit test). BVR returned also better results in multivariate analyses for survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The ratio between BED10 and the logarithm of metastasis volume (BVR), as a corrective factor for fitting the probability of metastases response to stereotactic radiotherapy, could be a tool for evaluating and prescribing treatments for oligometastatic disease. BVR can be useful for producing more reliable survival statistics too.
Collapse
|
37
|
A Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 4:142-149. [PMID: 30706022 PMCID: PMC6349638 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Revised: 08/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Daily magnetic resonance (MR)–guided radiation has the potential to improve stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for tumors of the liver. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) introduces unique variables that are untested clinically: electron return effect, MRI geometric distortion, MRI to radiation therapy isocenter uncertainty, multileaf collimator position error, and uncertainties with voxel size and tracking. All could lead to increased toxicity and/or local recurrences with SBRT. In this multi-institutional study, we hypothesized that direct visualization provided by MR guidance could allow the use of small treatment volumes to spare normal tissues while maintaining clinical outcomes despite the aforementioned uncertainties in MR-guided treatment. Methods and materials Patients with primary liver tumors or metastatic lesions treated with MR-guided liver SBRT were reviewed at 3 institutions. Toxicity was assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. Freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and χ2 test. Results The study population consisted of 26 patients: 6 hepatocellular carcinomas, 2 cholangiocarcinomas, and 18 metastatic liver lesions (44% colorectal metastasis). The median follow-up was 21.2 months. The median dose delivered was 50 Gy at 10 Gy/fraction. No grade 4 or greater gastrointestinal toxicities were observed after treatment. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival in this cohort is 69% and 60%, respectively. At the median follow-up, FFLP for this cohort was 80.4%. FFLP for patients with hepatocellular carcinomas, colorectal metastasis, and all other lesions were 100%, 75%, and 83%, respectively. Conclusions This study describes the first clinical outcomes of MR-guided liver SBRT. Treatment was well tolerated by patients with excellent local control. This study lays the foundation for future dose escalation and adaptive treatment for liver-based primary malignancies and/or metastatic disease.
Collapse
|
38
|
Gill S, Liu DM, Green HM, Sharma RA. Beyond the Knife: The Evolving Nonsurgical Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018; 38:209-219. [PMID: 30231355 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_200941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
In patients with liver-limited oligometastatic disease, the goal of treatment can be curative intent. Historically, this was accomplished in patients presenting with upfront resectable disease. The availability of increasingly efficacious chemotherapy and biologic combinations with encouraging response rates led to the potential to convert unresectable disease to resectability. Beyond the backbone of surgery, we now have a portfolio of locoregional strategies to consider.From an interventional radiology perspective, the use of portal vein embolization can facilitate hypertrophy of the liver in anticipation of resection, thus converting unresectable disease to one amenable to a surgical approach with curative intent. Technological advances in liver-directed ablative therapies have afforded the possibility of eliminate radiographically evident disease with the hope for long-term disease control. Advanced radiotherapy techniques are further increasing the therapeutic options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Improvements in external-beam radiotherapy over the past 2 decades include image-guided radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and proton-beam therapy. Finally, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with microspheres labeled with the β-emitter 90Y enable targeted delivery of radiation to hepatic tumors. A coordinated multidisciplinary approach is required to integrate these nonsurgical adjuncts in an evidence-based manner to optimize outcomes for patients with potentially resectable metastatic disease. In this article, we summarize recent developments in systemic therapy, radiotherapy, and interventional liver-directed therapies that have changed the treatment landscape for patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharlene Gill
- From the BC Cancer-Vancouver and Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College, London, United Kingdom
| | - David M Liu
- From the BC Cancer-Vancouver and Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Harshani M Green
- From the BC Cancer-Vancouver and Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ricky A Sharma
- From the BC Cancer-Vancouver and Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Andratschke N, Alheid H, Allgäuer M, Becker G, Blanck O, Boda-Heggemann J, Brunner T, Duma M, Gerum S, Guckenberger M, Hildebrandt G, Klement RJ, Lewitzki V, Ostheimer C, Papachristofilou A, Petersen C, Schneider T, Semrau R, Wachter S, Habermehl D. The SBRT database initiative of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO): patterns of care and outcome analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver oligometastases in 474 patients with 623 metastases. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:283. [PMID: 29534687 PMCID: PMC5851117 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4191-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The intent of this pooled analysis as part of the German society for radiation oncology (DEGRO) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) initiative was to analyze the patterns of care of SBRT for liver oligometastases and to derive factors influencing treated metastases control and overall survival in a large patient cohort. METHODS From 17 German and Swiss centers, data on all patients treated for liver oligometastases with SBRT since its introduction in 1997 has been collected and entered into a centralized database. In addition to patient and tumor characteristics, data on immobilization, image guidance and motion management as well as dose prescription and fractionation has been gathered. Besides dose response and survival statistics, time trends of the aforementioned variables have been investigated. RESULTS In total, 474 patients with 623 liver oligometastases (median 1 lesion/patient; range 1–4) have been collected from 1997 until 2015. Predominant histologies were colorectal cancer (n = 213 pts.; 300 lesions) and breast cancer (n = 57; 81 lesions). All centers employed an SBRT specific setup. Initially, stereotactic coordinates and CT simulation were used for treatment set-up (55%), but eventually were replaced by CBCT guidance (28%) or more recently robotic tracking (17%). High variance in fraction (fx) number (median 1 fx; range 1–13) and dose per fraction (median: 18.5 Gy; range 3–37.5 Gy) was observed, although median BED remained consistently high after an initial learning curve. Median follow-up time was 15 months; median overall survival after SBRT was 24 months. One- and 2-year treated metastases control rate of treated lesions was 77% and 64%; if maximum isocenter biological equivalent dose (BED) was greater than 150 Gy EQD2Gy, it increased to 83% and 70%, respectively. Besides radiation dose colorectal and breast histology and motion management methods were associated with improved treated metastases control. CONCLUSION After an initial learning curve with regards to total cumulative doses, consistently high biologically effective doses have been employed translating into high local tumor control at 1 and 2 years. The true impact of histology and motion management method on treated metastases control deserve deeper analysis. Overall survival is mainly influenced by histology and metastatic tumor burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Andratschke
- University Hospital Zürich, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - H. Alheid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Strahlentherapie Bautzen, Bautzen, Germany
| | - M. Allgäuer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - G. Becker
- RadioChirurgicum CyberKnife Südwest, Radiation Oncology, Göppingen, Germany
| | - O. Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, /Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - J. Boda-Heggemann
- University Hospital Mannheim, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - T. Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M. Duma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar- Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - S. Gerum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich – LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M. Guckenberger
- University Hospital Zürich, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - G. Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - R. J. Klement
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - V. Lewitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - C. Ostheimer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - A. Papachristofilou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - C. Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T. Schneider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Strahlenzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - R. Semrau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - S. Wachter
- Klinikum Passau, Radiation Oncology, Passau, Germany
| | - D. Habermehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Toesca DAS, Ibragimov B, Koong AJ, Xing L, Koong AC, Chang DT. Strategies for prediction and mitigation of radiation-induced liver toxicity. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2018; 59:i40-i49. [PMID: 29432550 PMCID: PMC5868188 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrx104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Although well described in the 1960s, liver toxicity secondary to radiation therapy, commonly known as radiation-induced liver disease (RILD), remains a major challenge. RILD encompasses two distinct clinical entities, a 'classic' form, composed of anicteric hepatomegaly, ascites and elevated alkaline phosphatase; and a 'non-classic' form, with liver transaminases elevated to more than five times the reference value, or worsening of liver metabolic function represented as an increase of 2 or more points in the Child-Pugh score classification. The risk of occurrence of RILD has historically limited the applicability of radiation for the treatment of liver malignancies. With the development of 3D conformal radiation therapy, which allowed for partial organ irradiation based on computed tomography treatment planning, there has been a resurgence of interest in the use of liver irradiation. Since then, a large body of evidence regarding the liver tolerance to conventionally fractionated radiation has been produced, but severe liver toxicities has continued to be reported. More recently, improvements in diagnostic imaging, radiation treatment planning technology and delivery systems have prompted the development of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), by which high doses of radiation can be delivered with high target accuracy and a steep dose gradient at the tumor - normal tissue interface, offering an opportunity of decreasing toxicity rates while improving tumor control. Here, we present an overview of the role SBRT has played in the management of liver tumors, addressing the challenges and opportunities to reduce the incidence of RILD, such as adaptive approaches and machine-learning-based predictive models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego A S Toesca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Bulat Ibragimov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Amanda J Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Albert C Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Daniel T Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Choi SH, Seong J. Strategic application of radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2018; 24:114-134. [PMID: 29439305 PMCID: PMC6038936 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2017.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
With increasing clinical use, radiotherapy (RT) has been considered reliable and effective method for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, depending on extent of disease and patient characteristics. RT for HCC can improve therapeutic outcomes through excellent local control, downstaging, conversion from unresectable to resectable status, and treatments of unresectable HCCs with vessel invasion or multiple intrahepatic metastases. In addition, further development of modern RT technologies, including image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy, has expanded the indication of RT. An essential feature of IGRT is that it allows image guidance therapy through in-room images obtained during radiation delivery. Compared with 3D-conformal RT, distinctions of IMRT are inverse treatment planning process and use of a large number of treatment fields or subfields, which provide high precision and exquisitely conformal dose distribution. These modern RT techniques allow more precise treatment by reducing inter- and intra-fractional errors resulting from daily changes and irradiated dose at surrounding normal tissues. More recently, particle therapy has been actively investigated to improve effectiveness of RT. This review discusses modern RT strategies for HCC, as well as optimal selection of RT in multimodal approach for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seo Hee Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pollock S, Tse R, Martin D, McLean L, Pham M, Tait D, Estoesta R, Whittington G, Turley J, Kearney C, Cho G, Hill R, Pickard S, Aston P, Makhija K, O'Brien R, Keall P. Impact of audiovisual biofeedback on interfraction respiratory motion reproducibility in liver cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 62:133-139. [PMID: 29405637 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Irregular breathing motion exacerbates uncertainties throughout a course of radiation therapy. Breathing guidance has demonstrated to improve breathing motion consistency. This was the first clinical implementation of audiovisual biofeedback (AVB) breathing guidance over a course of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) investigating interfraction reproducibility. METHODS Five liver cancer patients underwent a screening procedure prior to CT sim during which patients underwent breathing conditions (i) AVB, or (ii) free breathing (FB). Whichever breathing condition was more regular was utilised for the patient's subsequent course of SBRT. Respiratory motion was obtained from the Varian respiratory position monitoring (RPM) system (Varian Medical Systems). Breathing motion reproducibility was assessed by the variance of displacement across 10 phase-based respiratory bins over each patient's course of SBRT. RESULTS The screening procedure yielded the decision to utilise AVB for three patients and FB for two patients. Over the course of SBRT, AVB significantly improved the relative interfraction motion by 32%, from 22% displacement difference for FB patients to 15% difference for AVB patients. Further to this, AVB facilitated sub-millimetre interfraction reproducibility for two AVB patients. CONCLUSION There was significantly less interfraction motion with AVB than FB. These findings demonstrate that AVB is potentially a valuable tool in ensuring reproducible interfraction motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Pollock
- Sydney Medical School - Central, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Regina Tse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Darren Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lisa McLean
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melissa Pham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Tait
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Reuben Estoesta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Grant Whittington
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jessica Turley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher Kearney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gwi Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robin Hill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sheila Pickard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Aston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kuldeep Makhija
- Sydney Medical School - Central, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ricky O'Brien
- Sydney Medical School - Central, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Keall
- Sydney Medical School - Central, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Local Control After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 110:188-195. [PMID: 29395629 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantitatively evaluate published experiences with hepatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), to determine local control rates after treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors and to examine whether outcomes are affected by SBRT dosing regimen. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified published articles that reported local control rates after SBRT for primary or metastatic liver tumors. Biologically effective doses (BEDs) were calculated for each dosing regimen using the linear-quadratic equation. We excluded series in which a wide range of BEDs was used. Individual lesion data for local control were extracted from actuarial survival curves, and data were aggregated to form a single dataset. Actuarial local control curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method after grouping lesions by disease type and BED (<100 Gy10 vs >100 Gy10). Comparisons were made using log-rank testing. RESULTS Thirteen articles met all inclusion criteria and formed the dataset for this analysis. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial local control rates after SBRT for primary liver tumors (n = 431) were 93%, 89%, and 86%, respectively. Lower 1- (90%), 2- (79%), and 3-year (76%) actuarial local control rates were observed for liver metastases (n = 290, log-rank P = .011). Among patients treated with SBRT for primary liver tumors, there was no evidence that local control is influenced by BED within the range of schedules used. For liver metastases, on the other hand, outcomes were significantly better for lesions treated with BEDs exceeding 100 Gy10 (3-year local control 93%) than for those treated with BEDs of ≤100 Gy10 (3-year local control 65%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary liver tumors provides high rates of durable local control, with no clear evidence for a dose-response relationship among commonly utilized schedules. Excellent local control rates are also seen after SBRT for liver metastases when BEDs of >100 Gy10 are utilized.
Collapse
|
44
|
Hanna GG, Murray L, Patel R, Jain S, Aitken KL, Franks KN, van As N, Tree A, Hatfield P, Harrow S, McDonald F, Ahmed M, Saran FH, Webster GJ, Khoo V, Landau D, Eaton DJ, Hawkins MA. UK Consensus on Normal Tissue Dose Constraints for Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:5-14. [PMID: 29033164 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2017] [Revised: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Six UK studies investigating stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are currently open. Many of these involve the treatment of oligometastatic disease at different locations in the body. Members of all the trial management groups collaborated to generate a consensus document on appropriate organ at risk dose constraints. Values from existing but older reviews were updated using data from current studies. It is hoped that this unified approach will facilitate standardised implementation of SABR across the UK and will allow meaningful toxicity comparisons between SABR studies and internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G G Hanna
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK.
| | - L Murray
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - R Patel
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - S Jain
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - K L Aitken
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - K N Franks
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - N van As
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - P Hatfield
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - S Harrow
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - F McDonald
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Ahmed
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - F H Saran
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - G J Webster
- Department of Radiotherapy, Worcester Oncology Centre, Worcester, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Landau
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - D J Eaton
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - M A Hawkins
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shimohigashi Y, Araki F, Maruyama M, Yonemura K, Nakaguchi Y, Kai Y, Toya R. Image quality of four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography obtained at various gantry rotation speeds for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy with fiducial markers. Phys Med 2017; 45:19-24. [PMID: 29472086 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 11/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, qualities of 4D cone-beam CT (CBCT) images obtained using various gantry rotation speeds (GRSs) for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with fiducial markers were quantitatively evaluated. Abdominal phantom containing a fiducial marker was moved along a sinusoidal waveform, and 4D-CBCT images were acquired with GRSs of 50-200° min-1. We obtained the 4D-CBCT projection data from six patients who underwent liver SBRT and generated 4D-CBCT images at GRSs of 67-200° min-1, by varying the number of projection data points. The image quality was evaluated based on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and structural similarity index (SSIM). The fiducial marker positions with different GRSs were compared with the setup values and a reference position in the phantom and clinical studies, respectively. The root mean square errors (RMSEs) were calculated relative to the reference positions. In the phantom study, the mean SNR, CNR, and SSIM decreased from 37.6 to 10.1, from 39.8 to 10.1, and from 0.9 to 0.7, respectively, as the GRS increased from 50 to 200° min-1. The fiducial marker positions were within 2.0 mm at all GRSs. Similarly, in the clinical study, the mean SNR, CNR, and SSIM decreased from 50.4 to 13.7, from 24.2 to 6.0, and from 0.92 to 0.73, respectively. The mean RMSEs were 2.0, 2.1, and 3.6 mm for the GRSs of 67, 100, and 200° min-1, respectively. We conclude that GRSs of 67 and 85° min-1 yield images of acceptable quality for 4D-CBCT in liver SBRT with fiducial markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinobu Shimohigashi
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan; Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
| | - Fujio Araki
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Masato Maruyama
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Keisuke Yonemura
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Nakaguchi
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yudai Kai
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Ryo Toya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kuo HT, Que J, Lin LC, Yang CC, Koay LB, Lin CH. Impact of tumor size on outcome after stereotactic body radiation therapy for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e9249. [PMID: 29390360 PMCID: PMC5815772 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000009249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) offers excellent local control rates. This study retrospectively analyzed the influence of different tumor size on treatment outcomes after SBRT.Between December 2008 and February 2014, 141 HCC patients were treated with Cyberknife SBRT. Patients were divided into 3 groups namely small tumors (≤4 cm), intermediate-sized (>4-<10 cm), and large (≥10 cm) tumors. Treatment outcomes, prognoses, and safety at each tumor size were compared and analyzed.A total of 52 patients with small tumors, 55 with intermediate tumors, and 34 patients with large tumors were retrospectively analyzed with a median follow-up of 16 months. Objective responses were achieved at 96.15%, 90.90%, and 76.47% for small, intermediate, and large tumors, respectively (P ≤ .0001) and the 3-year local control rates were 97.85%, 71.99%, and 82.14%, respectively (P = .0035). The 3-year overall survival rates were 50.26%, 45.29%, and 33.38% for small, intermediate, and large tumors, respectively (P = .3757). No significant differences were found in overall-survival, intra-hepatic recurrence free survival, disease-progression free survival, or distant metastasis-free survival.SBRT offers the best effective local control rate and response rate for small HCCs. However, tumor size did not significantly affect the overall survival rate, intra-hepatic recurrence free rate, or disease-progression free rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsing-Tao Kuo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hepatology, Chi Mei Medical Center
- Department of Senior Citizen Service Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Jenny Que
- Department of Radiation Oncology
- Department of Hospital and Health Care Administration
| | - Li-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology
- Department of Optometry, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology
| | | | - Lok-Beng Koay
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hepatology, Chi Mei Medical Center
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Liu X, Song Y, Liang P, Su T, Zhang H, Zhao X, Yuan Z, Wang P. Analysis of the factors affecting the safety of robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Onco Targets Ther 2017; 10:5289-5295. [PMID: 29158680 PMCID: PMC5683791 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s142025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the safety of robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and its related factors. Methods A total of 74 HCC patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) Class A were included in a multi-institutional, single-arm Phase II trial (NCT 02363218) between February 2013 and August 2016. All patients received SBRT treatment at a dose of 45 Gy/3f. The liver function was compared before and after SBRT treatment by the analysis of adverse hepatic reactions and changes in CTP classification. Results After SBRT treatment, eight patients presented with decreases in CTP classification and 13 patients presented with ≥ grade 2 hepatic adverse reactions. For patients presenting with ≥ grade 2 hepatic adverse reactions, the total liver volume of ≤1,162 mL and a normal liver volume (total liver volume - gross tumor volume [GTV]) of ≤1,148 mL were found to be independent risk factors and statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The total liver volume and normal liver volume are associated with the occurrence of ≥ grade 2 hepatic adverse reactions after SBRT treatment on HCC patients. Therefore, if the fractionated scheme of 45 Gy/3f is applied in SBRT for HCC patients, a total liver volume >1,162 mL and a normal liver volume >1,148 mL should be ensured to improve therapeutic safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojie Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy,Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin
| | - Yongchun Song
- Department of Radiotherapy,Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin
| | - Ping Liang
- Cyberknife Center, Ruikang Hospital, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning
| | - Tingshi Su
- Cyberknife Center, Ruikang Hospital, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning
| | - Huojun Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Xianzhi Zhao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiyong Yuan
- Department of Radiotherapy,Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy,Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) often presents as oligometastatic disease. Currently available intensive systemic treatment regimens, including combination chemotherapy and molecular targeted agents, result in tumor response and transient to long-term disease control in a high percentage of patients, thus raising the question of further management. Secondary resection and ablation, e.g. by surgery or radiofrequency may contribute to long-term survival and even be curative or at least allow a relevant chemotherapy-free interval. These approaches are often limited by the anatomical site, invasiveness and morbidity of the respective procedure. With stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) metastases can be treated with very high efficiency in only a few sessions and achieving long-term control. OBJECTIVES Identification of clinical studies investigating the use of SBRT for treatment of oligometastases in CRC patients. Control rates in liver and lung metastases and survival after SBRT. Toxicity and side effects of the treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS A literature search was carried out for prospective and retrospective studies on local SBRT. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION The SBRT procedure has become a valid treatment option for patients with oligometastatic CRC and should also be considered in clinical practice as an alternative to surgical treatment of metastases or other local ablative techniques.
Collapse
|
49
|
Riou O, Azria D, Mornex F. [Stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver tumors: State of the art]. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:563-573. [PMID: 28888744 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.07.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 07/18/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Thanks to the improvement in radiotherapy physics, biology, computing and imaging, patients presenting with liver tumors can be efficiently treated by radiation. Radiotherapy has been included in liver tumors treatment guidelines at all disease stages. Liver stereotactic radiotherapy has to be preferred to standard fractionated radiotherapy whenever possible, as potentially more efficient because of higher biological equivalent dose. Liver stereotactic radiotherapy planning and delivery require extensive experience and optimal treatment quality at every step, thus limiting its availability to specialized centres. Multicentre studies are difficult to develop due to a large technical heterogeneity. Respiratory management, image guidance and immobilization are considerations as important as machine type. The use of multimodal planning imaging is compulsory to achieve expected contouring quality. Treatment efficacy is difficult to assess following liver stereotactic radiotherapy, but local control is high and toxicity unusual. As a consequence, liver stereotactic radiotherapy is part of multimodal and multidisciplinary management of liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Riou
- Département de cancérologie radiothérapie, ICM-Val d'Aurelle, rue de la Croix-Verte, 34298 Montpellier, France; Institut de recherche en cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France; Inserm U1194, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France; Université de Montpellier 1, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France.
| | - D Azria
- Département de cancérologie radiothérapie, ICM-Val d'Aurelle, rue de la Croix-Verte, 34298 Montpellier, France; Institut de recherche en cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France; Inserm U1194, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France; Université de Montpellier 1, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France
| | - F Mornex
- Département de radiothérapie-oncologie, centre hospitalier Lyon sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France; EMR 3738, université Claude-Bernard Lyon-1, domaine Rockefeller, 8, avenue Rockefeller, 69373 Lyon cedex 08, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gottumukkala S, Tumati V, Hrycushko B, Folkert M. Endoluminal and Interstitial Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Malignancies: a Systematic Review. Curr Oncol Rep 2017; 19:2. [PMID: 28110462 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-017-0561-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is an integral component in the multimodality management of many gastrointestinal (GI) cancers at all stages of clinical presentation. With recent advances in technology and radiation delivery, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can be delivered with reduced toxicity. However, despite these advances, EBRT doses are still limited by the presence of radiosensitive serial structures near clinical targets in the GI tract. Relative to EBRT techniques, brachytherapy techniques have a lower integral dose and more rapid fall-off, allowing for high-dose delivery with little normal tissue exposure. Given the unique characteristics of brachytherapy, it is an attractive strategy to treat GI malignancies. This review addresses the application of both high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDRBT) to multiple GI malignancies for both definitive and palliative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujana Gottumukkala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vasu Tumati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Brian Hrycushko
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michael Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|