1
|
C H A, Maddaly R. Applications of Premature Chromosome Condensation technique for genetic analysis. Toxicol In Vitro 2024; 94:105736. [PMID: 37984482 DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2023.105736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Cytogenetic techniques are used to detect aberrations in the genetic material and such techniques have a wide range of applications including for disease diagnosis, drug discovery and for the detection and quantification of mutagenic exposures. Although different types of cytogenetic techniques are in use, the Premature Chromosome Condensation (PCC) is one which is unique by virtue of it not requiring culture of peripheral blood mononucleate cells (PBMNCs) to detect chromatid and chromosomal aberrations. Such an advantage is useful in situations where rapid assessments of genetic damage is required, for example, during radiation exposures. PCC utilizes condensation of interphase chromatin by either biological or chemical means. The most widely used application of PCC is for biodosimetry. However, the rapidness of aberration detection has made PCC a useful technique for other applications such as for cancer diagnosis, drug-induced genotoxicity and preimplantation or assisted reproductive techniques. Also, PCC can be utilized for understanding the fundamental cellular mechanisms involved in chromatin condensation and chromosome morphologies. We present here the various approaches to obtain PCC, its applications and the endpoints which are used while using PCC as a cytogenetic technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali C H
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Technology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600116, India
| | - Ravi Maddaly
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Technology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600116, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Port M, Barquinero JF, Endesfelder D, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Terzoudi G, Trompier F, Vral A, Abe Y, Ainsbury L, Alkebsi L, Amundson S, Badie C, Baeyens A, Balajee A, Balázs K, Barnard S, Bassinet C, Beaton-Green L, Beinke C, Bobyk L, Brochard P, Brzoska K, Bucher M, Ciesielski B, Cuceu C, Discher M, D,Oca M, Domínguez I, Doucha-Senf S, Dumitrescu A, Duy P, Finot F, Garty G, Ghandhi S, Gregoire E, Goh V, Güçlü I, Hadjiiska L, Hargitai R, Hristova R, Ishii K, Kis E, Juniewicz M, Kriehuber R, Lacombe J, Lee Y, Lopez Riego M, Lumniczky K, Mai T, Maltar-Strmečki N, Marrale M, Martinez J, Marciniak A, Maznyk N, McKeever S, Meher P, Milanova M, Miura T, Gil OM, Montoro A, Domene MM, Mrozik A, Nakayama R, O’Brien G, Oskamp D, Ostheim P, Pajic J, Pastor N, Patrono C, Pujol-Canadell M, Rodriguez MP, Repin M, Romanyukha A, Rößler U, Sabatier L, Sakai A, Scherthan H, Schüle S, Seong K, Sevriukova O, Sholom S, Sommer S, Suto Y, Sypko T, Szatmári T, Takahashi-Sugai M, Takebayashi K, Testa A, Testard I, Tichy A, Triantopoulou S, Tsuyama N, Unverricht-Yeboah M, Valente M, Van Hoey O, Wilkins R, Wojcik A, Wojewodzka M, Younghyun L, Zafiropoulos D, Abend M. RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: Inter-Assay Comparison of Eight Dosimetry Assays. Radiat Res 2023; 199:535-555. [PMID: 37310880 PMCID: PMC10508307 DOI: 10.1667/rade-22-00207.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Tools for radiation exposure reconstruction are required to support the medical management of radiation victims in radiological or nuclear incidents. Different biological and physical dosimetry assays can be used for various exposure scenarios to estimate the dose of ionizing radiation a person has absorbed. Regular validation of the techniques through inter-laboratory comparisons (ILC) is essential to guarantee high quality results. In the current RENEB inter-laboratory comparison, the performance quality of established cytogenetic assays [dicentric chromosome assay (DCA), cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay (CBMN), stable chromosomal translocation assay (FISH) and premature chromosome condensation assay (PCC)] was tested in comparison to molecular biological assays [gamma-H2AX foci (gH2AX), gene expression (GE)] and physical dosimetry-based assays [electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), optically or thermally stimulated luminescence (LUM)]. Three blinded coded samples (e.g., blood, enamel or mobiles) were exposed to 0, 1.2 or 3.5 Gy X-ray reference doses (240 kVp, 1 Gy/min). These doses roughly correspond to clinically relevant groups of unexposed to low exposed (0-1 Gy), moderately exposed (1-2 Gy, no severe acute health effects expected) and highly exposed individuals (>2 Gy, requiring early intensive medical care). In the frame of the current RENEB inter-laboratory comparison, samples were sent to 86 specialized teams in 46 organizations from 27 nations for dose estimation and identification of three clinically relevant groups. The time for sending early crude reports and more precise reports was documented for each laboratory and assay where possible. The quality of dose estimates was analyzed with three different levels of granularity, 1. by calculating the frequency of correctly reported clinically relevant dose categories, 2. by determining the number of dose estimates within the uncertainty intervals recommended for triage dosimetry (±0.5 Gy or ±1.0 Gy for doses <2.5 Gy or >2.5 Gy), and 3. by calculating the absolute difference (AD) of estimated doses relative to the reference doses. In total, 554 dose estimates were submitted within the 6-week period given before the exercise was closed. For samples processed with the highest priority, earliest dose estimates/categories were reported within 5-10 h of receipt for GE, gH2AX, LUM, EPR, 2-3 days for DCA, CBMN and within 6-7 days for the FISH assay. For the unirradiated control sample, the categorization in the correct clinically relevant group (0-1 Gy) as well as the allocation to the triage uncertainty interval was, with the exception of a few outliers, successfully performed for all assays. For the 3.5 Gy sample the percentage of correct classifications to the clinically relevant group (≥2 Gy) was between 89-100% for all assays, with the exception of gH2AX. For the 1.2 Gy sample, an exact allocation to the clinically relevant group was more difficult and 0-50% or 0-48% of the estimates were wrongly classified into the lowest or highest dose categories, respectively. For the irradiated samples, the correct allocation to the triage uncertainty intervals varied considerably between assays for the 1.2 Gy (29-76%) and 3.5 Gy (17-100%) samples. While a systematic shift towards higher doses was observed for the cytogenetic-based assays, extreme outliers exceeding the reference doses 2-6 fold were observed for EPR, FISH and GE assays. These outliers were related to a particular material examined (tooth enamel for EPR assay, reported as kerma in enamel, but when converted into the proper quantity, i.e. to kerma in air, expected dose estimates could be recalculated in most cases), the level of experience of the teams (FISH) and methodological uncertainties (GE). This was the first RENEB ILC where everything, from blood sampling to irradiation and shipment of the samples, was organized and realized at the same institution, for several biological and physical retrospective dosimetry assays. Almost all assays appeared comparably applicable for the identification of unexposed and highly exposed individuals and the allocation of medical relevant groups, with the latter requiring medical support for the acute radiation scenario simulated in this exercise. However, extreme outliers or a systematic shift of dose estimates have been observed for some assays. Possible reasons will be discussed in the assay specific papers of this special issue. In summary, this ILC clearly demonstrates the need to conduct regular exercises to identify research needs, but also to identify technical problems and to optimize the design of future ILCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Port
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - J. Moquet
- UK Health Security Agency, Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | | | - G. Terzoudi
- National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Health Physics, Radiobiology & Cytogenetics Laboratory, Agia Paraskevi, Greece
| | - F. Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France
| | - A. Vral
- Ghent University, Radiobiology Research Unit, Gent, Belgium
| | - Y. Abe
- Department of Radiation Biology and Protection, Nagasaki University, Japan
| | - L. Ainsbury
- UK Health Security Agency and Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Cytogenetics and Pathology Group, Oxfordshire, England
| | - L Alkebsi
- Department of Radiation Measurement and Dose Assessment, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - S.A. Amundson
- Columbia University, Irving Medical Center, Center for Radiological Research, New York, New York
| | - C. Badie
- UK Health Security Agency, Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - A. Baeyens
- Ghent University, Radiobiology Research Unit, Gent, Belgium
| | - A.S. Balajee
- Cytogenetic Biodosimetry Laboratory, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - K. Balázs
- Radiation Medicine Unit, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - S. Barnard
- UK Health Security Agency, Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - C. Bassinet
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France
| | | | - C. Beinke
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | - L. Bobyk
- Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), Bretigny Sur Orge, France
| | | | - K. Brzoska
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M. Bucher
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - B. Ciesielski
- Medical University of Gdansk, Department of Physics and Biophysics, Gdansk, Poland
| | - C. Cuceu
- Genevolution, Porcheville, France
| | - M. Discher
- Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Department of Environment and Biodiversity, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - M.C. D,Oca
- Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica “Emilio Segrè,” Palermo, Italy
| | - I. Domínguez
- Universidad de Sevilla, Departamento de Biología Celular, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - A. Dumitrescu
- National Institute of Public Health, Radiation Hygiene Laboratory, Bucharest, Romania
| | - P.N. Duy
- Dalat Nuclear Research Institute, Radiation Technlogy & Biotechnology Center, Dalat City, Vietnam
| | - F. Finot
- Genevolution, Porcheville, France
| | - G. Garty
- Columbia University, Irving Medical Center, Center for Radiological Research, New York, New York
| | - S.A. Ghandhi
- Columbia University, Irving Medical Center, Center for Radiological Research, New York, New York
| | - E. Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France
| | - V.S.T. Goh
- Department of Radiobiology, Singapore Nuclear Research and Safety Initiative (SNRSI), National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - I. Güçlü
- TENMAK, Nuclear Energy Research Institute, Technology Development and Nuclear Research Department, Türkey
| | - L. Hadjiiska
- National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - R. Hargitai
- Radiation Medicine Unit, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - R. Hristova
- National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - K. Ishii
- Department of Radiation Measurement and Dose Assessment, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - E. Kis
- Radiation Medicine Unit, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - M. Juniewicz
- Medical University of Gdansk, Department of Physics and Biophysics, Gdansk, Poland
| | - R. Kriehuber
- Department of Safety and Radiation Protection, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - J. Lacombe
- University of Arizona, Center for Applied Nanobioscience & Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Y. Lee
- Laboratory of Biological Dosimetry, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - K. Lumniczky
- Radiation Medicine Unit, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - T.T. Mai
- Dalat Nuclear Research Institute, Radiation Technlogy & Biotechnology Center, Dalat City, Vietnam
| | - N. Maltar-Strmečki
- Ruðer Boškovic Institute, Division of Physical Chemistry, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - M. Marrale
- Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica “Emilio Segrè,” Palermo, Italy
| | - J.S. Martinez
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay aux Roses, France
| | - A. Marciniak
- Medical University of Gdansk, Department of Physics and Biophysics, Gdansk, Poland
| | - N. Maznyk
- Radiation Cytogenetics Laboratory, S.P. Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology and Oncology of Ukrainian National Academy of Medical Science, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - S.W.S. McKeever
- Radiation Dosimetry Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
| | | | - M. Milanova
- University of Defense, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - T. Miura
- Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - O. Monteiro Gil
- Instituto Superior Técnico/ Campus Tecnológico e Nuclear, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - A. Montoro
- Servicio de Protección Radiológica. Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Valencia, Spain
| | - M. Moreno Domene
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Laboratorio de dosimetría biológica, Madrid, Spain
| | - A. Mrozik
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - R. Nakayama
- Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - G. O’Brien
- UK Health Security Agency, Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
| | - D. Oskamp
- Department of Safety and Radiation Protection, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - P. Ostheim
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | - J. Pajic
- Serbian Institute of Occupational Health, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - N. Pastor
- Universidad de Sevilla, Departamento de Biología Celular, Sevilla, Spain
| | - C. Patrono
- Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Rome, Italy
| | | | - M.J. Prieto Rodriguez
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Laboratorio de dosimetría biológica, Madrid, Spain
| | - M. Repin
- Columbia University, Irving Medical Center, Center for Radiological Research, New York, New York
| | | | - U. Rößler
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | | | - A. Sakai
- Department of Radiation Life Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - H. Scherthan
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | - S. Schüle
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | - K.M. Seong
- Laboratory of Biological Dosimetry, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - S. Sholom
- Radiation Dosimetry Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
| | - S. Sommer
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Y. Suto
- Department of Radiation Measurement and Dose Assessment, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - T. Sypko
- Radiation Cytogenetics Laboratory, S.P. Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology and Oncology of Ukrainian National Academy of Medical Science, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - T. Szatmári
- Radiation Medicine Unit, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - M. Takahashi-Sugai
- Department of Radiation Life Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - K. Takebayashi
- Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - A. Testa
- Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Rome, Italy
| | - I. Testard
- CEA-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
| | - A. Tichy
- University of Defense, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - S. Triantopoulou
- National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Health Physics, Radiobiology & Cytogenetics Laboratory, Agia Paraskevi, Greece
| | - N. Tsuyama
- Department of Radiation Life Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - M. Unverricht-Yeboah
- Department of Safety and Radiation Protection, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - M. Valente
- CEA-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
| | - O. Van Hoey
- Belgian Nuclear Research Center SCK CEN, Mol, Belgium
| | | | - A. Wojcik
- Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M. Wojewodzka
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Lee Younghyun
- Laboratory of Biological Dosimetry, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - D. Zafiropoulos
- Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Legnaro, Italy
| | - M. Abend
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bucher M, Weiss T, Endesfelder D, Trompier F, Ristic Y, Kunert P, Schlattl H, Giussani A, Oestreicher U. Dose Variations Using an X-Ray Cabinet to Establish in vitro Dose-Response Curves for Biological Dosimetry Assays. Front Public Health 2022; 10:903509. [PMID: 35655448 PMCID: PMC9152255 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.903509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In biological dosimetry, dose-response curves are essential for reliable retrospective dose estimation of individual exposure in case of a radiation accident. Therefore, blood samples are irradiated in vitro and evaluated based on the applied assay. Accurate physical dosimetry of the irradiation performance is a critical part of the experimental procedure and is influenced by the experimental setup, especially when X-ray cabinets are used. The aim of this study was to investigate variations and pitfalls associated with the experimental setups used to establish calibration curves in biological dosimetry with X-ray cabinets. In this study, irradiation was performed with an X-ray source (195 kV, 10 mA, 0.5 mm Cu filter, dose rate 0.52 Gy/min, 1st and 2nd half-value layer = 1.01 and 1.76 mm Cu, respectively, average energy 86.9 keV). Blood collection tubes were irradiated with a dose of 1 Gy in vertical or horizontal orientation in the center of the beam area with or without usage of an additional fan heater. To evaluate the influence of the setups, physical dose measurements using thermoluminescence dosimeters, electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry and ionization chamber as well as biological effects, quantified by dicentric chromosomes and micronuclei, were compared. This study revealed that the orientation of the sample tubes (vertical vs. horizontal) had a significant effect on the radiation dose with a variation of -41% up to +49% and contributed to a dose gradient of up to 870 mGy inside the vertical tubes due to the size of the sample tubes and the associated differences in the distance to the focal point of the tube. The number of dicentric chromosomes and micronuclei differed by ~30% between both orientations. An additional fan heater had no consistent impact. Therefore, dosimetric monitoring of experimental irradiation setups is mandatory prior to the establishment of calibration curves in biological dosimetry. Careful consideration of the experimental setup in collaboration with physicists is required to ensure traceability and reproducibility of irradiation conditions, to correlate the radiation dose and the number of aberrations correctly and to avoid systematical bias influencing the dose estimation in the frame of biological dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Bucher
- Department of Effects and Risks of Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Tina Weiss
- Department of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - David Endesfelder
- Department of Effects and Risks of Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Francois Trompier
- Department of External Dosimetry, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Yoann Ristic
- Department of External Dosimetry, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Patrizia Kunert
- Department of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Helmut Schlattl
- Department of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Augusto Giussani
- Department of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Ursula Oestreicher
- Department of Effects and Risks of Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gnanasekaran TS. Cytogenetic biological dosimetry assays: recent developments and updates. Radiat Oncol J 2021; 39:159-166. [PMID: 34610654 PMCID: PMC8497872 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2021.00339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Biological dosimetry is the measurement of radiation-induced changes in the human to measure short and long-term health risks. Biodosimetry offers an independent means of obtaining dose information and also provides diagnostic information on the potential for “partial-body” exposure information using biological indicators and otherwise based on computer modeling, dose reconstruction, and physical dosimetry. A variety of biodosimetry tools are available and some features make some more valuable than others. Among the available biodosimetry tool, cytogenetic biodosimetry methods occupy an exclusive and advantageous position. The cytogenetic analysis can complement physical dosimetry by confirming or ruling out an accidental radiological exposure or overexposures. We are discussing the recent developments and adaptability of currently available cytogenetic biological dosimetry assays.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ainsbury EA, Moquet J, Sun M, Barnard S, Ellender M, Lloyd D. The future of biological dosimetry in mass casualty radiation emergency response, personalized radiation risk estimation and space radiation protection. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 98:421-427. [PMID: 34515621 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1980629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this brief personal, high level review is to consider the state of the art for biological dosimetry for radiation routine and emergency response, and the potential future progress in this fascinating and active field. Four areas in which biomarkers may contribute to scientific advancement through improved dose and exposure characterization, as well as potential contributions to personalized risk estimation, are considered: emergency dosimetry, molecular epidemiology, personalized medical dosimetry, and space travel. CONCLUSION Ionizing radiation biodosimetry is an exciting field which will continue to benefit from active networking and collaboration with the wider fields of radiation research and radiation emergency response to ensure effective, joined up approaches to triage; radiation epidemiology to assess long term, low dose, radiation risk; radiation protection of workers, optimization and justification of radiation for diagnosis or treatment of patients in clinical uses, and protection of individuals traveling to space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Ainsbury
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, UK.,Environmental Research Group within the School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine at Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jayne Moquet
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, UK
| | - Mingzhu Sun
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, UK
| | - Stephen Barnard
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, UK
| | - Michele Ellender
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, UK
| | - David Lloyd
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Short Assay Design for Micronucleus Detection in Human Lymphocytes. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:2322257. [PMID: 34552982 PMCID: PMC8452413 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2322257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
There has been a constant need to develop new and faster cytogenetic assays to measure the instability induced by genotoxic agents in the field of cytogenetic research, an example of which is the micronucleus assay. Micronuclei are fragments or complete chromosomes that remain in the cytoplasm during mitosis. With their high sensitivity and specificity detection, their presence can indicate environmental and occupational genotoxic effects. However, the prolonged periods of cell incubation this assay necessitates are costly and extensive. Hence, it is essential to develop an improved assay that can achieve standardization by being reproducible in practice. The standard protocol for the detection of micronuclei in lymphocytes uses a total assay time of 72 hours. Theoretically, it is possible to reduce the incubation period, and consequently, the total assay time, considering a lymphocyte, completes its mitosis in 24 hours. This study, after careful review of literature, proposes an experimental design to reduce the incubation period and demonstrates its usefulness in practice through the design of a collaborative trial.
Collapse
|
7
|
Endesfelder D, Oestreicher U, Kulka U, Ainsbury EA, Moquet J, Barnard S, Gregoire E, Martinez JS, Trompier F, Ristic Y, Woda C, Waldner L, Beinke C, Vral A, Barquinero JF, Hernandez A, Sommer S, Lumniczky K, Hargitai R, Montoro A, Milic M, Monteiro Gil O, Valente M, Bobyk L, Sevriukova O, Sabatier L, Prieto MJ, Moreno Domene M, Testa A, Patrono C, Terzoudi G, Triantopoulou S, Histova R, Wojcik A. RENEB/EURADOS field exercise 2019: robust dose estimation under outdoor conditions based on the dicentric chromosome assay. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 97:1181-1198. [PMID: 34138666 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1941380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Biological and/or physical assays for retrospective dosimetry are valuable tools to recover the exposure situation and to aid medical decision making. To further validate and improve such biological and physical assays, in 2019, EURADOS Working Group 10 and RENEB performed a field exercise in Lund, Sweden, to simulate various real-life exposure scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the dicentric chromosome assay (DCA), blood tubes were located at anthropomorphic phantoms positioned in different geometries and were irradiated with a 1.36 TBq 192Ir-source. For each exposure condition, dose estimates were provided by at least one laboratory and for four conditions by 17 participating RENEB laboratories. Three radio-photoluminescence glass dosimeters were placed at each tube to assess reference doses. RESULTS The DCA results were homogeneous between participants and matched well with the reference doses (≥95% of estimates within ±0.5 Gy of the reference). For samples close to the source systematic underestimation could be corrected by accounting for exposure time. Heterogeneity within and between tubes was detected for reference doses as well as for DCA doses estimates. CONCLUSIONS The participants were able to successfully estimate the doses and to provide important information on the exposure scenarios under conditions closely resembling a real-life situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ulrike Kulka
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, BfS, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Eric Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Juan S Martinez
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - François Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Yoann Ristic
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Clemens Woda
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Lovisa Waldner
- Department of Translational Medicine, Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Anne Vral
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Joan-Francesc Barquinero
- Department of Animal Biology, Plant Biology and Ecology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Alfredo Hernandez
- Department of Animal Biology, Plant Biology and Ecology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.,Independent Researcher, London, UK
| | | | - Katalin Lumniczky
- Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Rita Hargitai
- Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, National Public Health Centre, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Alegría Montoro
- Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Servicio de Protección Radiológica Hospital, Universitario Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mirta Milic
- Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health Mutagenesis Unit, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Octávia Monteiro Gil
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marco Valente
- Department of Radiation Biological, Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France
| | - Laure Bobyk
- Department of Radiation Biological, Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France
| | - Olga Sevriukova
- Department of Expertise and Exposure Monitoring, Radiation Protection Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Laure Sabatier
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.,Graduate School Life Science and Health, Université Paris, Saclay, France
| | - María Jesús Prieto
- Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes Moreno Domene
- Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonella Testa
- Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, L'energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile, Rome, Italy
| | - Clarice Patrono
- Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, L'energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile, Rome, Italy
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- Health Physics, Radiobiology and Cytogenetics Laboratory, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, Greece
| | - Sotiria Triantopoulou
- Health Physics, Radiobiology and Cytogenetics Laboratory, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, Greece
| | - Rositsa Histova
- Department of Radiobiology, National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Andrzej Wojcik
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Sweden.,Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Refined premature chromosome condensation (G 0-PCC) with cryo-preserved mitotic cells for rapid radiation biodosimetry. Sci Rep 2021; 11:13498. [PMID: 34188100 PMCID: PMC8242027 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92886-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Mitotic cell fusion induced Premature Chromosome Condensation (G0-PCC) assay in human lymphocytes allows rapid detection of cytogenetic damage in interphase stage, within few hours after blood collection. Hence, it is the most suitable method for rapid and high dose biodosimetry. Mitotic cells, used for G0-PCC could be either freshly isolated or previously cryo-preserved. However, under emergency scenarios, only cryo-preserved cells can be relied upon, fresh isolation will only delay the process by 18–24 h. Impact of cryopreservation on mitotic cells and their efficacy to induce PCC are not reported. In the present study, we investigated effect of cryopreservation on mitotic cells and refined the parameters for G0-PCC. More than 95% of the cells were recoverable after 4 months of cryopreservation, within 20 min recovery at 37 °C, without significant change in the mitotic index or viability. Recovered mitotic cells have shown mitotic index of 89 ± 4% and viability of 90 ± 4%, similar to that of freshly isolated cells. Decrease in metaphases was observed within 40 min after recovery as the mitotic cells progressed through cell cycle and reduced to 21% at 1 h. Nevertheless, in presence of Colcemid, the cells progressed slowly and considerably high metaphase index (60%) persisted up to ~ 2 h. The recovered cells efficiently fused with lymphocytes and induced PCC. Average PCC index varied from 10 to 20%, which did not change with cryopreservation duration. Post fusion incubation duration of 2 h was found to be optimum for proper chromosome condensation. In conclusion, use of cryo-preserved mitotic cells is the most practical approach for rapid biodosimetry. The cells can be recovered quickly and efficiently without alteration in viability or mitotic index. Recovered cells are fully competent to induce G0-PCC.
Collapse
|
9
|
Nikitaki Z, Pariset E, Sudar D, Costes SV, Georgakilas AG. In Situ Detection of Complex DNA Damage Using Microscopy: A Rough Road Ahead. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3288. [PMID: 33172046 PMCID: PMC7694657 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Complexity of DNA damage is considered currently one if not the primary instigator of biological responses and determinant of short and long-term effects in organisms and their offspring. In this review, we focus on the detection of complex (clustered) DNA damage (CDD) induced for example by ionizing radiation (IR) and in some cases by high oxidative stress. We perform a short historical perspective in the field, emphasizing the microscopy-based techniques and methodologies for the detection of CDD at the cellular level. We extend this analysis on the pertaining methodology of surrogate protein markers of CDD (foci) colocalization and provide a unique synthesis of imaging parameters, software, and different types of microscopy used. Last but not least, we critically discuss the main advances and necessary future direction for the better detection of CDD, with important outcomes in biological and clinical setups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zacharenia Nikitaki
- Physics Department, School of Applied Mathematical and Physical Sciences, DNA Damage Laboratory, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), 15780 Zografou, Athens, Greece
| | - Eloise Pariset
- Space Biosciences Division, Radiation Biophysics Laboratory, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; (E.P.); (S.V.C.)
- Universities Space Research Association (USRA), Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
| | - Damir Sudar
- Life Sciences Department, Quantitative Imaging Systems LLC, Portland, OR 97209, USA;
| | - Sylvain V. Costes
- Space Biosciences Division, Radiation Biophysics Laboratory, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; (E.P.); (S.V.C.)
| | - Alexandros G. Georgakilas
- Physics Department, School of Applied Mathematical and Physical Sciences, DNA Damage Laboratory, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), 15780 Zografou, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shuryak I, Ghandhi SA, Turner HC, Weber W, Melo D, Amundson SA, Brenner DJ. Dose and Dose-Rate Effects in a Mouse Model of Internal Exposure from 137Cs. Part 2: Integration of Gamma-H2AX and Gene Expression Biomarkers for Retrospective Radiation Biodosimetry. Radiat Res 2020; 196:491-500. [PMID: 33064820 DOI: 10.1667/rade-20-00042.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Inhalation and ingestion of 137Cs and other long-lived radionuclides can occur after large-scale accidental or malicious radioactive contamination incidents, resulting in a complex temporal pattern of radiation dose/dose rate, influenced by radionuclide pharmacokinetics and chemical properties. High-throughput radiation biodosimetry techniques for such internal exposure are needed to assess potential risks of short-term toxicity and delayed effects (e.g., carcinogenesis) for exposed individuals. Previously, we used γ-H2AX to reconstruct injected 137Cs activity in experimentally-exposed mice, and converted activity values into radiation doses based on time since injection and 137Cs-elimination kinetics. In the current study, we sought to assess the feasibility and possible advantages of combining γ-H2AX with transcriptomics to improve 137Cs activity reconstructions. We selected five genes (Atf5, Hist2h2aa2, Olfr358, Psrc1, Hist2h2ac) with strong statistically-significant Spearman's correlations with injected activity and stable expression over time after 137Cs injection. The geometric mean of log-transformed signals of these five genes, combined with γ-H2AX fluorescence, were used as predictors in a nonlinear model for reconstructing injected 137Cs activity. The coefficient of determination (R2) comparing actual and reconstructed activities was 0.91 and root mean squared error (RMSE) was 0.95 MBq. These metrics remained stable when the model was fitted to a randomly-selected half of the data and tested on the other half, repeated 100 times. Model performance was significantly better when compared to our previous analysis using γ-H2AX alone, and when compared to an analysis where genes are used without γ-H2AX, suggesting that integrating γ-H2AX with gene expression provides an important advantage. Our findings show a proof of principle that integration of radiation-responsive biomarkers from different fields is promising for radiation biodosimetry of internal emitters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Shuryak
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York 10032
| | - Shanaz A Ghandhi
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York 10032
| | - Helen C Turner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York 10032
| | - Waylon Weber
- Lovelace Biomedical, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
| | | | - Sally A Amundson
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York 10032
| | - David J Brenner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York 10032
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sun M, Moquet J, Lloyd D, Ainsbury E. A faster and easier biodosimetry method based on calyculin A-induced premature chromosome condensation (PCC) by scoring excess objects. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2020; 40:892-905. [PMID: 32590374 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aba085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Dicentric analysis and the ring PCC assay as established biodosimetry methods both have limitations in the estimation of absorbed doses in suspected overexposure cases between 5 and 10 Gy. The proposed method based on calyculin A-induced PCC overcomes these limitations by scoring excess objects as the endpoint. This new scoring method can potentially serve as a faster and up-scalable approach that complements the existing methods with higher accuracy at different dose ranges. It can also potentially be performed by less skilled workers when no automated system is available in mass casualty emergency cases to assist with the triage of patients. Additionally, it offers the possibility to further reduce the sample size and PCC induction time. In this pilot study, a calibration curve for excess objects was constructed using the new scoring method for the first time and a blind validation test composed of three unknown doses was carried out. Almost all the dose estimates were within the 95% confidence limits of the actual test doses by scoring only 50-100 PCC spreads. This method was found to be more accurate than ring PCC for doses below 10 Gy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Interphase Cytogenetic Analysis of G0 Lymphocytes Exposed to α-Particles, C-Ions, and Protons Reveals their Enhanced Effectiveness for Localized Chromosome Shattering-A Critical Risk for Chromothripsis. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092336. [PMID: 32825012 PMCID: PMC7563219 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
For precision cancer radiotherapy, high linear energy transfer (LET) particle irradiation offers a substantial advantage over photon-based irradiation. In contrast to the sparse deposition of low-density energy by χ- or γ-rays, particle irradiation causes focal DNA damage through high-density energy deposition along the particle tracks. This is characterized by the formation of multiple damage sites, comprising localized clustered patterns of DNA single- and double-strand breaks as well as base damage. These clustered DNA lesions are key determinants of the enhanced relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of energetic nuclei. However, the search for a fingerprint of particle exposure remains open, while the mechanisms underlying the induction of chromothripsis-like chromosomal rearrangements by high-LET radiation (resembling chromothripsis in tumors) await to be elucidated. In this work, we investigate the transformation of clustered DNA lesions into chromosome fragmentation, as indicated by the induction and post-irradiation repair of chromosomal damage under the dynamics of premature chromosome condensation in G0 human lymphocytes. Specifically, this study provides, for the first time, experimental evidence that particle irradiation induces localized shattering of targeted chromosome domains. Yields of chromosome fragments and shattered domains are compared with those generated by γ-rays; and the RBE values obtained are up to 28.6 for α-particles (92 keV/μm), 10.5 for C-ions (295 keV/μm), and 4.9 for protons (28.5 keV/μm). Furthermore, we test the hypothesis that particle radiation-induced persistent clustered DNA lesions and chromatin decompaction at damage sites evolve into localized chromosome shattering by subsequent chromatin condensation in a single catastrophic event—posing a critical risk for random rejoining, chromothripsis, and carcinogenesis. Consistent with this hypothesis, our results highlight the potential use of shattered chromosome domains as a fingerprint of high-LET exposure, while conforming to the new model we propose for the mechanistic origin of chromothripsis-like rearrangements.
Collapse
|
13
|
Yadav U, Bhat NN, Shirsath KB, Mungse US, Sapra BK. Multifaceted applications of pre-mature chromosome condensation in radiation biodosimetry. Int J Radiat Biol 2020; 96:1274-1280. [PMID: 32689847 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2020.1798545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biodosimetry with persistent cytogenetic indicators in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) plays crucial role in regulatory/medical management of individuals overexposed to radiation. Conventional methods require ∼48 h culture and have limited dose range (0.1-5Gy) applications due to checkpoint arrest/poor stimulation. G0-Phase Premature chromosome condensation (G0-PCC) allows chromosome aberration analysis within hours after blood collection. Due to high skill demand, applications of G0-PCC were not very well explored and being re-visited worldwide. Among all aberrations, analysis of excess chromosomal fragments is quickest. Radiation dose response curve for the fragments has been reported. PURPOSE In present study, excess fragment analysis has been addressed in detail, in addition to validation of radiation dose response curve, gender variation in the response, dose dependent repair kinetics, minimum detection limit (MDL), duration and accuracy of final dose estimation with 5blindfolded, ex vivo irradiated samples have been studied. In extension, feasibility of multiparametric dosimetry with Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) based endpoints were qualitatively explored. MATERIAL AND METHODS PBLs were exposed to Gamma-Radiation and G0-PCC was performed at different time points. Decay kinetics and dose response curve were established. Gender Variation of the frequency of the fragments was assessed at 0, 2 and 4 Gy. FISH was performed with G0-PCC applying centromere probe, whole chromosome paints, multi-color FISH and multi-color banding probes. RESULTS Radiation response curve for fragments was found to be linear (Slope 1.09 ± 0.031 Gy-1). Background frequency as well as dose response did not show significant gender bias. Based on variation in background frequency of fragments MDL was calculated to be ∼0.3 Gy. Kinetics of fragment tested at 0, 4, 8, 16 and 24 h showed exponential decay pattern from 0 to 8 h and without further decay. Final dose estimation of five samples was completed within 13 man-hours. Dicentric chromosomes, translocations, insertions and breaks were identifiable in combination with centromere FISH and WCP. Advanced methods employing multicolor FISH and multi-color banding were also demonstrated with PCC spreads. CONCLUSION G0-PCC, can be useful tool for high dose biodosimetry with quick assessment of fragment frequency. Further, it holds potential for multi-parametric dosimetry in combination with FISH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usha Yadav
- Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India.,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Nagesh Nagabhushana Bhat
- Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India.,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Utkarsha Sagar Mungse
- Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Balvinder Kaur Sapra
- Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India.,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Attia AMM, Aboulthana WM, Hassan GM, Aboelezz E. Assessment of absorbed dose of gamma rays using the simultaneous determination of inactive hemoglobin derivatives as a biological dosimeter. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2020; 59:131-144. [PMID: 31734721 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-019-00821-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/03/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Biological dosimetry based on sulfhemoglobin (SHb), methemoglobin (MetHb), and carboxyhemoglobin (HbCO) levels was evaluated. SHb, MetHb and HbCO levels were estimated in erythrocytes of mice irradiated by γ rays from a 60Co source using the method of multi-component spectrophotometric analysis developed recently. In this method, absorption measurements of diluted aqueous Hb-solution were made at λ = 500, 569, 577 and 620 nm, and using the mathematical formulas based on multi-component spectrophotometric analysis and the mathematical Gaussian elimination method for matrix calculation, the concentrations of various Hb-derivatives and total Hb in mice blood were estimated. The dose range of γ rays was from 0.5 to 8 Gy and the dose rate was 0.5 Gy min-1. Among all Hb-derivatives, MetHb, SHb and HbCO demonstrated an unambiguous dose-dependent response. For SHb and MetHb, the detection limits were about 0.5 Gy and 1 Gy, respectively. After irradiation, high levels of MetHb, SHb and HbCO persisted for at least 10 days, and the maximal increase of MetHb, SHb and HbCO occurred up to 24 h following γ irradiation. The use of this "MetHb + SHb + HbCO"-derivatives-based absorbed dose relationship showed a high accuracy. It is concluded that simultaneous determination of MetHb, SHb and HbCO, by multi-component spectrophotometry provides a quick, simple, sensitive, accurate, stable and inexpensive biological indicator for the early assessment of the absorbed dose in mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M M Attia
- Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Division, Biochemistry Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
| | - W M Aboulthana
- Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Division, Biochemistry Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
| | - G M Hassan
- Division of Thermometry and Ionizing Radiation Metrology, Department of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, National Institute of Standards, Giza, Egypt.
| | - E Aboelezz
- Division of Thermometry and Ionizing Radiation Metrology, Department of Ionizing Radiation Metrology, National Institute of Standards, Giza, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shuryak I, Turner HC, Perrier JR, Cunha L, Canadell MP, Durrani MH, Harken A, Bertucci A, Taveras M, Garty G, Brenner DJ. A High Throughput Approach to Reconstruct Partial-Body and Neutron Radiation Exposures on an Individual Basis. Sci Rep 2020; 10:2899. [PMID: 32076014 PMCID: PMC7031285 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59695-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Biodosimetry-based individualized reconstruction of complex irradiation scenarios (partial-body shielding and/or neutron + photon mixtures) can improve treatment decisions after mass-casualty radiation-related incidents. We used a high-throughput micronucleus assay with automated scanning and imaging software on ex-vivo irradiated human lymphocytes to: a) reconstruct partial-body and/or neutron exposure, and b) estimate separately the photon and neutron doses in a mixed exposure. The mechanistic background is that, compared with total-body photon irradiations, neutrons produce more heavily-damaged lymphocytes with multiple micronuclei/binucleated cell, whereas partial-body exposures produce fewer such lymphocytes. To utilize these differences for biodosimetry, we developed metrics that describe micronuclei distributions in binucleated cells and serve as predictors in machine learning or parametric analyses of the following scenarios: (A) Homogeneous gamma-irradiation, mimicking total-body exposures, vs. mixtures of irradiated blood with unirradiated blood, mimicking partial-body exposures. (B) X rays vs. various neutron + photon mixtures. The results showed high accuracies of scenario and dose reconstructions. Specifically, receiver operating characteristic curve areas (AUC) for sample classification by exposure type reached 0.931 and 0.916 in scenarios A and B, respectively. R2 for actual vs. reconstructed doses in these scenarios reached 0.87 and 0.77, respectively. These encouraging findings demonstrate a proof-of-principle for the proposed approach of high-throughput reconstruction of clinically-relevant complex radiation exposure scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Shuryak
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Helen C Turner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jay R Perrier
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lydia Cunha
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Pujol Canadell
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mohammad H Durrani
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Harken
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antonella Bertucci
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Taveras
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Guy Garty
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David J Brenner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Selvan Gnana Sekaran T, Ricoul M, Brochard P, Herate C, Sabatier L. An alternative approach for the induction of premature chromosome condensation in human peripheral blood lymphocytes using mitotic Akodon cells. Int J Radiat Biol 2019; 96:214-219. [PMID: 31622124 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1625493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The premature chromosome condensation (PCC) technique is used to study exposure to external radiation through the determination of chromosome fragments observed in interphase cells. The presence of large telomeric signals in CHO cells interferes with the detection of PCC fragments and the identification of dicentric chromosomes. We present an improved method for the fusion of G0-lymphocytes with mitotic Akodon cells (few chromosomes and weakly-staining telomeric sequences) to induce PCC in combination with rapid quantification of dicentric chromosomes and centric rings as an alternative to the classical CHO cell fusion technique.Materials and methods: Whole blood from three healthy volunteers was γ-irradiated with 0, 2, or 4 Gy. Following a 24 h incubation post-exposure at 37 °C, chromosome spreads of isolated lymphocytes were prepared by standard PCC procedures using mitotic Akodon cells.Results: The percentage of scorable fusions, measured by telomere/centromere (T/C) staining, for Akodon-induced PCC was higher than that for CHO-induced PCC, irrespective of radiation exposure. Importantly, both techniques gave the same result for biodosimetry evaluation.Conclusion: The mitotic Akodon cell-induced PCC fusion assay, in combination with the scoring of dicentric chromosomes and rings by T/C staining of G0-lymphocytes is a suitable alternative for fast and reliable dose estimation after accidental radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamizh Selvan Gnana Sekaran
- PROCyTox, French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), University Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Michelle Ricoul
- PROCyTox, French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), University Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Patricia Brochard
- PROCyTox, French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), University Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Cecile Herate
- PROCyTox, French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), University Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Laure Sabatier
- PROCyTox, French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), University Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ryan TL, Pantelias AG, Terzoudi GI, Pantelias GE, Balajee AS. Use of human lymphocyte G0 PCCs to detect intra- and inter-chromosomal aberrations for early radiation biodosimetry and retrospective assessment of radiation-induced effects. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0216081. [PMID: 31059552 PMCID: PMC6502328 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A sensitive biodosimetry tool is required for rapid individualized dose estimation and risk assessment in the case of radiological or nuclear mass casualty scenarios to prioritize exposed humans for immediate medical countermeasures to reduce radiation related injuries or morbidity risks. Unlike the conventional Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA), which takes about 3–4 days for radiation dose estimation, cell fusion mediated Premature Chromosome Condensation (PCC) technique in G0 lymphocytes can be rapidly performed for radiation dose assessment within 6–8 hrs of sample receipt by alleviating the need for ex vivo lymphocyte proliferation for 48 hrs. Despite this advantage, the PCC technique has not yet been fully exploited for radiation biodosimetry. Realizing the advantage of G0 PCC technique that can be instantaneously applied to unstimulated lymphocytes, we evaluated the utility of G0 PCC technique in detecting ionizing radiation (IR) induced stable and unstable chromosomal aberrations for biodosimetry purposes. Our study demonstrates that PCC coupled with mFISH and mBAND techniques can efficiently detect both numerical and structural chromosome aberrations at the intra- and inter-chromosomal levels in unstimulated T- and B-lymphocytes. Collectively, we demonstrate that the G0 PCC technique has the potential for development as a biodosimetry tool for detecting unstable chromosome aberrations (chromosome fragments and dicentric chromosomes) for early radiation dose estimation and stable chromosome exchange events (translocations) for retrospective monitoring of individualized health risks in unstimulated lymphocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terri L. Ryan
- Cytogenetic Biodosimetry Laboratory, Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training site, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Antonio G. Pantelias
- Health Physics, Radiobiology & Cytogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Nuclear & Radiological Sciences & Technology, Energy & Safety, National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Ag. Paraskevi, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgia I. Terzoudi
- Health Physics, Radiobiology & Cytogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Nuclear & Radiological Sciences & Technology, Energy & Safety, National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Ag. Paraskevi, Athens, Greece
| | - Gabriel E. Pantelias
- Health Physics, Radiobiology & Cytogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Nuclear & Radiological Sciences & Technology, Energy & Safety, National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Ag. Paraskevi, Athens, Greece
| | - Adayabalam S. Balajee
- Cytogenetic Biodosimetry Laboratory, Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training site, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rawojć K, Miszczyk J, Możdżeń A, Swakoń J, Sowa-Staszczak A. Evaluation of the premature chromosome condensation scoring protocol after proton and X-ray irradiation of human peripheral blood lymphocytes at high doses range. Int J Radiat Biol 2018; 94:996-1005. [PMID: 30295106 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1490038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY One of the main difficulties in radiation dose assessment is cells inability to reach mitosis after exposure to acute radiation. Premature chromosome condensation (PCC) has become an important method used in biological dosimetry in case of exposure to high doses. Various ways to induce PCC including mitotic cells fusion, chemical stimulation with calyculin A or okadaic acid give wide spectrum of application. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of drug-induced PCC scoring procedure by testing 2 experimental modes where 150 and 75 G2/M-PCC phase cells were analyzed after exposure to high dose proton and X-ray radiation. Another aim is to determine the differences in cellular response induced by proton and photon radiation using a HPBL in vitro model as a further extension of our previous studies involving doses up to 4.0 Gy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Total body exposure was simulated by irradiating whole blood collected from a healthy donor. Whole blood samples were exposed to two radiation types: 60 MeV protons and 250 kVp X-rays in the dose range of 5.0-20.0 Gy, the dose rate for protons was 0.075 and 0.15 Gy/s for X-rays. Post 48 h of human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBL) culture, calyculin A was added. After Giemsa staining, chromosome spreads were photographed and manually analyzed by scorers in the G2/M-PCC phase. In order to check the consistency of obtained results all scorers followed identical scoring criteria. Additionally, PCC index kinetics was evaluated for first 500 cells scored. CONCLUSIONS Here we provide a different method of results analysis. Presented dose-response curves were obtained by calculating the value of counted excess chromosome fragments. The results indicated that obtained dose estimates as adequate in the high dose range till 18.0 Gy for both studied radiation types, giving an opportunity to further improve PCC assay procedure and shorten the analysis time i.e. in case of partial-body exposure. Moreover, the study presents preliminary results of HPBL cellular response after proton irradiation at high doses range showing differences of PCC index kinetics for different cell classes and cell distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Rawojć
- a Department of Endocrinology , Nuclear Medicine Unit, The University Hospital , Kraków , Poland
| | - J Miszczyk
- b Department of Experimental Physics of Complex Systems , Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences , Kraków , Poland
| | - A Możdżeń
- b Department of Experimental Physics of Complex Systems , Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences , Kraków , Poland
| | - J Swakoń
- c Proton Radiotherapy Group, Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences , Kraków , Poland
| | - A Sowa-Staszczak
- a Department of Endocrinology , Nuclear Medicine Unit, The University Hospital , Kraków , Poland.,d Chair and Department of Endocrinology , Jagiellonian University, Medical College , Kraków , Poland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ravi M, Lal AS, Begum SK. Prophasing interphase chromatin for assessing genetic damages-The evolution, applications and the future prospects. Mutat Res 2018; 810:19-32. [PMID: 29906650 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2018.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Premature chromosome condensation (PCC) involves induction of near-chromosome-like morphology to interphase chromatin. Experimental induction of PCC was achieved by somatic cell hybridization (SCH), an approach which evolved into a chemical-induction process. PCC presents most probably the only way in which cytogenetic assessment of damages can be analyzed in special situations such as availability of limited numbers of sample cells and for cells which have lost their ability to divide. Initial experiments on PCC were reported in late 1960s and the technique has evolved into one with wide range of applications owing to its increased efficiency in detecting primary DNA damages. Biodosimetry remains as the primary area which utilizes PCC technique to the maximum efficiency with several multiple-groups participating in collaborative exercises for biodosimetric applications. However, in spite of the advantages that the technique offers, it is yet to reach its full potential. This is due to the inherent limitations of the manner in which PCC is induced currently; by the somatic cell hybridization and chemical-induction processes. An approach which combines these two would sure help in taking PCC to its highest potential as the preferred technique for assessment of primary DNA damages. We present the chronological events of evolution of the PCC technique along with its applications. Also, the limitations of the technique along with the suggestions for further refinement of the PCC technique are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maddaly Ravi
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Technology and Research, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai 600116, India.
| | - Aswathy S Lal
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Technology and Research, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai 600116, India
| | - S Kauser Begum
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Technology and Research, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai 600116, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Suresh Kumar MA, Laiakis EC, Ghandhi SA, Morton SR, Fornace AJ, Amundson SA. Gene Expression in Parp1 Deficient Mice Exposed to a Median Lethal Dose of Gamma Rays. Radiat Res 2018; 190:53-62. [PMID: 29746213 DOI: 10.1667/rr14990.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
There is a current interest in the development of biodosimetric methods for rapidly assessing radiation exposure in the wake of a large-scale radiological event. This work was initially focused on determining the exposure dose to an individual using biological indicators. Gene expression signatures show promise for biodosimetric application, but little is known about how these signatures might translate for the assessment of radiological injury in radiosensitive individuals, who comprise a significant proportion of the general population, and who would likely require treatment after exposure to lower doses. Using Parp1-/- mice as a model radiation-sensitive genotype, we have investigated the effect of this DNA repair deficiency on the gene expression response to radiation. Although Parp1 is known to play general roles in regulating transcription, the pattern of gene expression changes observed in Parp1-/- mice 24 h postirradiation to a LD50/30 was remarkably similar to that in wild-type mice after exposure to LD50/30. Similar levels of activation of both the p53 and NFκB radiation response pathways were indicated in both strains. In contrast, exposure of wild-type mice to a sublethal dose that was equal to the Parp1-/- LD50/30 resulted in a lower magnitude gene expression response. Thus, Parp1-/- mice displayed a heightened gene expression response to radiation, which was more similar to the wild-type response to an equitoxic dose than to an equal absorbed dose. Gene expression classifiers trained on the wild-type data correctly identified all wild-type samples as unexposed, exposed to a sublethal dose or exposed to an LD50/30. All unexposed samples from Parp1-/- mice were also correctly classified with the same gene set, and 80% of irradiated Parp1-/- samples were identified as exposed to an LD50/30. The results of this study suggest that, at least for some pathways that may influence radiosensitivity in humans, specific gene expression signatures have the potential to accurately detect the extent of radiological injury, rather than serving only as a surrogate of physical radiation dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Suresh Kumar
- a Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Evagelia C Laiakis
- b Department of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Shanaz A Ghandhi
- a Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Shad R Morton
- a Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Albert J Fornace
- b Department of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Sally A Amundson
- a Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Development of an automatable micro-PCC biodosimetry assay for rapid individualized risk assessment in large-scale radiological emergencies. MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS 2018; 836:65-71. [PMID: 30389164 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Revised: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
In radiation accidents and large-scale radiological emergencies, a fast and reliable triage of individuals according to their degree of exposure is important for accident management and identification of those who need medical assistance. In this work, the applicability of cell-fusion-mediated premature chromosome condensation (PCC) in G0-lymphocytes is examined for the development of a rapid, minimally invasive and automatable micro-PCC assay, which requires blood volumes of only 100 μl and can be performed in 96-well plates, towards risk assessments and categorization of individuals based on dose estimates. Chromosomal aberrations are visualized for dose-estimation analysis within two hours, without the need of blood culturing for two days, as required by conventional cytogenetics. The various steps of the standard-PCC procedure were adapted and, for the first time, lymphocytes in blood volumes of 100 μl were successfully fused with CHO-mitotics in 96-well plates of 2 ml/well. The plates are advantageous for high-throughput analysis since the various steps required are applied to all 96-wells simultaneously. Interestingly, the use of only 1.5 ml hypotonic and Carnoy's fixative per well offers high quality PCC-images, and the morphology of lymphocyte PCCs is identical to that obtained using the conventional PCC-assay, which requires much larger blood volumes and 15 ml tubes. For dose assessments, appropriate calibration curves were constructed and for PCC analysis specialized software (MetaSystems) was used. The micro-PCC assay can be combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), using simultaneously centromeric/telomeric (C/T) peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes. This allows dose assessments on the basis of accurate scoring of dicentric and centric ring chromosomes in G0-lymphocyte PCCs, which is particularly helpful when further evaluation into treatment-level categories of exposed individuals is needed. The micro-PCC assay has significant advantages for early triage biodosimetry when compared to other cytogenetic biodosimetry assays. It is rapid, cost-effective, and could pave the way to its subsequent automation.
Collapse
|
22
|
Ainsbury EA, Samaga D, Della Monaca S, Marrale M, Bassinet C, Burbidge CI, Correcher V, Discher M, Eakins J, Fattibene P, Güçlü I, Higueras M, Lund E, Maltar-Strmecki N, McKeever S, Rääf CL, Sholom S, Veronese I, Wieser A, Woda C, Trompier F. UNCERTAINTY ON RADIATION DOSES ESTIMATED BY BIOLOGICAL AND RETROSPECTIVE PHYSICAL METHODS. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2018; 178:382-404. [PMID: 28981844 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Biological and physical retrospective dosimetry are recognised as key techniques to provide individual estimates of dose following unplanned exposures to ionising radiation. Whilst there has been a relatively large amount of recent development in the biological and physical procedures, development of statistical analysis techniques has failed to keep pace. The aim of this paper is to review the current state of the art in uncertainty analysis techniques across the 'EURADOS Working Group 10-Retrospective dosimetry' members, to give concrete examples of implementation of the techniques recommended in the international standards, and to further promote the use of Monte Carlo techniques to support characterisation of uncertainties. It is concluded that sufficient techniques are available and in use by most laboratories for acute, whole body exposures to highly penetrating radiation, but further work will be required to ensure that statistical analysis is always wholly sufficient for the more complex exposure scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Ainsbury
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxford OX11 ORQ, UK
| | - Daniel Samaga
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Sara Della Monaca
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Marrale
- Department of Physics and Chemistry and Advanced Technologies Network Center, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Edificio 18, 90128 Palermo, Italy
| | - Celine Bassinet
- Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire, BP 17 - 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex 31, Avenue de la Division Leclerc 92260 Fontenay-aux-Roses, Paris, France
| | - Christopher I Burbidge
- Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiological Protection, 3 Clonskeagh Square, Clonskeagh Road, Dublin 14, Ireland
| | - Virgilio Correcher
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, Centro de la Moncloa, Complutense, 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Michael Discher
- University of Salzburg, Department of Geography and Geology, Hellbrunnerstraße 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jon Eakins
- Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Chilton, Didcot, Oxford OX11 ORQ, UK
| | - Paola Fattibene
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Inci Güçlü
- Turkish Atomic Energy Authority, Mustafa Kemal Mahallesi, Dumlupinar Bulvari, No: 192, 06510, Çankaya - Ankara, Turkey
| | - Manuel Higueras
- Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, Alameda de Mazarredo 14, E-48009 Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain
| | - Eva Lund
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nadica Maltar-Strmecki
- Ruder Boškovic Institute, Division of Physical Chemistry, Laboratory for Magnetic Resonances, Bijenicka cesta 54,10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Stephen McKeever
- Oklahoma State University, 145 Physical Sciences, Campus, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
| | - Christopher L Rääf
- Medicinsk strålningsfysik, Institutionen för Translationell Medicin, Lunds universitet, Skånes universitetssjukhus SUS, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden
| | - Sergey Sholom
- Oklahoma State University, 145 Physical Sciences, Campus, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
| | - Ivan Veronese
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Physics and National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Milan, Via Celoria 16, 20133 - Milano, Italy
| | - Albrecht Wieser
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt, Institute of Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Woda
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt, Institute of Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Francois Trompier
- Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire, BP 17 - 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex 31, Avenue de la Division Leclerc 92260 Fontenay-aux-Roses, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wojcik A, Oestreicher U, Barrios L, Vral A, Terzoudi G, Ainsbury E, Rothkamm K, Trompier F, Kulka U. The RENEB operational basis: complement of established biodosimetric assays. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 93:15-19. [DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1235296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Wojcik
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden and Jan Kochanowski University, Institute for Biology, Kielce, Poland
| | - Ursula Oestreicher
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Anne Vral
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Kai Rothkamm
- Public Health England, CRCE, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, UK
- University Medical Center Hamburg, Laboratory of Radiation Biology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francois Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Ulrike Kulka
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Trompier F, Baumann M, Barrios L, Gregoire E, Abend M, Ainsbury E, Barnard S, Barquinero JF, Bautista JA, Brzozowska B, Perez-Calatayud J, De Angelis C, Domínguez I, Hadjidekova V, Kulka U, Mateos JC, Meschini R, Monteiro Gil O, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Montoro Pastor A, Quintens R, Sebastià N, Sommer S, Stoyanov O, Thierens H, Terzoudi G, Villaescusa JI, Vral A, Wojcik A, Zafiropoulos D, Roy L. Investigation of the influence of calibration practices on cytogenetic laboratory performance for dose estimation. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 93:118-126. [DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1213455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- François Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-roses, France
| | - Marion Baumann
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-roses, France
| | | | - Eric Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-roses, France
| | - Michael Abend
- Bundeswehr Institut für Radiologie in verbindung mit der Universtität Ulm, Germany
| | - Elizabeth Ainsbury
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
| | - Stephen Barnard
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
| | | | | | - Beata Brzozowska
- Stockholm University, Department of Molecular Biosciences, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | - Ulrike Kulka
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Octávia Monteiro Gil
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela-LRS, Portugal
| | - Jayne Moquet
- Public Health England Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE), Chilton, UK
| | - Ursula Oestreicher
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Roel Quintens
- Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK-CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Hubert Thierens
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Health Physics, Radiobiology & Cytogenetics, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Anne Vral
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Andrzej Wojcik
- Stockholm University, Department of Molecular Biosciences, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Laurence Roy
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-roses, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kulka U, Abend M, Ainsbury E, Badie C, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Beinke C, Bortolin E, Cucu A, De Amicis A, Domínguez I, Fattibene P, Frøvig, AM, Gregoire E, Guogyte K, Hadjidekova V, Jaworska A, Kriehuber R, Lindholm C, Lloyd D, Lumniczky K, Lyng F, Meschini R, Mörtl S, Della Monaca S, Monteiro Gil O, Montoro A, Moquet J, Moreno M, Oestreicher U, Palitti F, Pantelias G, Patrono C, Piqueret-Stephan L, Port M, Prieto MJ, Quintens R, Ricoul M, Romm H, Roy L, Sáfrány G, Sabatier L, Sebastià N, Sommer S, Terzoudi G, Testa A, Thierens H, Turai I, Trompier F, Valente M, Vaz P, Voisin P, Vral A, Woda C, Zafiropoulos D, Wojcik A. RENEB – Running the European Network of biological dosimetry and physical retrospective dosimetry. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 93:2-14. [DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1230239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Kulka
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Michael Abend
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affiliated to the University of Ulm, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Christina Beinke
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affiliated to the University of Ulm, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David Lloyd
- affiliated to Public Health England, CRCE, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, UK
| | - Katalin Lumniczky
- National Public Health Centre – National Research Directorate for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Fiona Lyng
- Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Simone Mörtl
- HelmholtzZentrum München, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | - Octávia Monteiro Gil
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela-LRS, Portugal
| | - Alegria Montoro
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe de la Comunidad Valenciana, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jayne Moquet
- Public Health England, CRCE, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, UK
| | - Mercedes Moreno
- Servicio Madrileño de Salud – Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ursula Oestreicher
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | | | - Clarice Patrono
- Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, ĹEnergia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile, Rome, Italy
| | - Laure Piqueret-Stephan
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Matthias Port
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affiliated to the University of Ulm, Munich, Germany
| | - María Jesus Prieto
- Servicio Madrileño de Salud – Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Michelle Ricoul
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Horst Romm
- Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Laurence Roy
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Géza Sáfrány
- National Public Health Centre – National Research Directorate for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Laure Sabatier
- PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Natividad Sebastià
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe de la Comunidad Valenciana, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Georgia Terzoudi
- National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos, Athens, Greece
| | - Antonella Testa
- Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, ĹEnergia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile, Rome, Italy
| | - Hubert Thierens
- Universiteit Gent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent, Belgium
| | - Istvan Turai
- affiliated to National Public Health Centre – National Research Directorate for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Budapest, Hungary
| | - François Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | - Pedro Vaz
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela-LRS, Portugal
| | - Philippe Voisin
- affiliated to Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Anne Vral
- Universiteit Gent, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent, Belgium
| | - Clemens Woda
- HelmholtzZentrum München, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | - Andrzej Wojcik
- Stockholm University, Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ainsbury EA, Higueras M, Puig P, Einbeck J, Samaga D, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Brzozowska B, Fattibene P, Gregoire E, Jaworska A, Lloyd D, Oestreicher U, Romm H, Rothkamm K, Roy L, Sommer S, Terzoudi G, Thierens H, Trompier F, Vral A, Woda C. Uncertainty of fast biological radiation dose assessment for emergency response scenarios. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 93:127-135. [PMID: 27572921 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1227106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reliable dose estimation is an important factor in appropriate dosimetric triage categorization of exposed individuals to support radiation emergency response. MATERIALS AND METHODS Following work done under the EU FP7 MULTIBIODOSE and RENEB projects, formal methods for defining uncertainties on biological dose estimates are compared using simulated and real data from recent exercises. RESULTS The results demonstrate that a Bayesian method of uncertainty assessment is the most appropriate, even in the absence of detailed prior information. The relative accuracy and relevance of techniques for calculating uncertainty and combining assay results to produce single dose and uncertainty estimates is further discussed. CONCLUSIONS Finally, it is demonstrated that whatever uncertainty estimation method is employed, ignoring the uncertainty on fast dose assessments can have an important impact on rapid biodosimetric categorization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Ainsbury
- a Public Health England Centre for Radiation , Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE) , Chilton , UK
| | - Manuel Higueras
- a Public Health England Centre for Radiation , Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE) , Chilton , UK.,b Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Pedro Puig
- b Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Jochen Einbeck
- c Department of Mathematical Sciences , Durham University , Durham , UK
| | - Daniel Samaga
- d Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS) , Munich , Germany
| | | | | | - Beata Brzozowska
- e Stockholm University , Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Molecular Bioscience, The Wenner-Gren Institute , Stockholm , Sweden.,f University of Warsaw , Faculty of Physics, Department of Biomedical Physics , Warsaw , Poland
| | | | - Eric Gregoire
- h Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire (IRSN) , Paris , France
| | - Alicja Jaworska
- i Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority (NRPA) , Østerås , Norway
| | - David Lloyd
- a Public Health England Centre for Radiation , Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE) , Chilton , UK
| | | | - Horst Romm
- d Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BfS) , Munich , Germany
| | - Kai Rothkamm
- a Public Health England Centre for Radiation , Chemical and Environmental Hazards (PHE) , Chilton , UK.,j University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Laurence Roy
- h Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire (IRSN) , Paris , France
| | - Sylwester Sommer
- k Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology (ICHTJ) , Warsaw , Poland
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- l National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos , Athens , Greece
| | | | - Francois Trompier
- h Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire (IRSN) , Paris , France
| | - Anne Vral
- m Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium
| | - Clemens Woda
- n Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) , Neuherberg , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brzozowska B, Ainsbury E, Baert A, Beaton-Green L, Barrios L, Barquinero JF, Bassinet C, Beinke C, Benedek A, Beukes P, Bortolin E, Buraczewska I, Burbidge C, De Amicis A, De Angelis C, Della Monaca S, Depuydt J, De Sanctis S, Dobos K, Domene MM, Domínguez I, Facco E, Fattibene P, Frenzel M, Monteiro Gil O, Gonon G, Gregoire E, Gruel G, Hadjidekova V, Hatzi VI, Hristova R, Jaworska A, Kis E, Kowalska M, Kulka U, Lista F, Lumniczky K, Martínez-López W, Meschini R, Moertl S, Moquet J, Noditi M, Oestreicher U, Orta Vázquez ML, Palma V, Pantelias G, Montoro Pastor A, Patrono C, Piqueret-Stephan L, Quattrini MC, Regalbuto E, Ricoul M, Roch-Lefevre S, Roy L, Sabatier L, Sarchiapone L, Sebastià N, Sommer S, Sun M, Suto Y, Terzoudi G, Trompier F, Vral A, Wilkins R, Zafiropoulos D, Wieser A, Woda C, Wojcik A. RENEB accident simulation exercise. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 93:75-80. [PMID: 27559844 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1206230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The RENEB accident exercise was carried out in order to train the RENEB participants in coordinating and managing potentially large data sets that would be generated in case of a major radiological event. MATERIALS AND METHODS Each participant was offered the possibility to activate the network by sending an alerting email about a simulated radiation emergency. The same participant had to collect, compile and report capacity, triage categorization and exposure scenario results obtained from all other participants. The exercise was performed over 27 weeks and involved the network consisting of 28 institutes: 21 RENEB members, four candidates and three non-RENEB partners. RESULTS The duration of a single exercise never exceeded 10 days, while the response from the assisting laboratories never came later than within half a day. During each week of the exercise, around 4500 samples were reported by all service laboratories (SL) to be examined and 54 scenarios were coherently estimated by all laboratories (the standard deviation from the mean of all SL answers for a given scenario category and a set of data was not larger than 3 patient codes). CONCLUSIONS Each participant received training in both the role of a reference laboratory (activating the network) and of a service laboratory (responding to an activation request). The procedures in the case of radiological event were successfully established and tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beata Brzozowska
- a Stockholm University , Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute , Stockholm , Sweden.,b University of Warsaw , Faculty of Physics, Department of Biomedical Physics , Warsaw , Poland
| | | | - Annelot Baert
- d Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Celine Bassinet
- g Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire , France
| | - Christina Beinke
- h Bundeswehr Institut für Radiobiologie in Verbindung mit der Universtität Ulm , Munich , Germany
| | - Anett Benedek
- i National Public Health Centre - National Research Directorate for Radiobiology & Radiohygiene , Budapest , Hungary
| | - Philip Beukes
- j NRF iThemba LABS - Laboratory for Accelerator Based Sciences , Cape Town , South Africa
| | | | | | - Christopher Burbidge
- m Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares , Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa , Bobadela-LRS , Portugal
| | | | | | | | - Julie Depuydt
- d Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium
| | | | - Katalin Dobos
- i National Public Health Centre - National Research Directorate for Radiobiology & Radiohygiene , Budapest , Hungary
| | - Mercedes Moreno Domene
- o Laboratorio de Dosimetría Biológica, Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica , Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón , Madrid , Spain
| | | | - Eva Facco
- q Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare , Italy
| | | | - Monika Frenzel
- r PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives , Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay , France
| | - Octávia Monteiro Gil
- m Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares , Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa , Bobadela-LRS , Portugal
| | - Géraldine Gonon
- g Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire , France
| | - Eric Gregoire
- g Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire , France
| | - Gaëtan Gruel
- g Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire , France
| | | | - Vasiliki I Hatzi
- t National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos , Athens , Greece
| | - Rositsa Hristova
- s National Centre for Radiobiology and Radiation Protection , Bulgaria
| | | | - Enikő Kis
- i National Public Health Centre - National Research Directorate for Radiobiology & Radiohygiene , Budapest , Hungary
| | - Maria Kowalska
- v Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection , Warsaw , Poland
| | - Ulrike Kulka
- w Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz , Oberschleissheim , Germany
| | - Florigio Lista
- n Army Medical and Veterinary Research Center , Rome , Italy
| | - Katalin Lumniczky
- i National Public Health Centre - National Research Directorate for Radiobiology & Radiohygiene , Budapest , Hungary
| | | | | | - Simone Moertl
- z Helmholtz Zentrum München , Oberschleissheim , Germany
| | - Jayne Moquet
- c Public Health England , Chilton , United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Valentina Palma
- ab Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile , Italy
| | - Gabriel Pantelias
- t National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos , Athens , Greece
| | | | - Clarice Patrono
- ab Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile , Italy
| | - Laure Piqueret-Stephan
- r PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives , Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay , France
| | | | - Elisa Regalbuto
- n Army Medical and Veterinary Research Center , Rome , Italy
| | - Michelle Ricoul
- r PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives , Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay , France
| | | | - Laurence Roy
- g Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire , France
| | - Laure Sabatier
- r PROCyTOX, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives , Fontenay-aux-Roses, and Université Paris-Saclay , France
| | | | | | - Sylwester Sommer
- l Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology , Warsaw , Poland
| | - Mingzhu Sun
- c Public Health England , Chilton , United Kingdom
| | - Yumiko Suto
- ad National Institute of Radiological Sciences , Chiba , Japan
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- t National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos , Athens , Greece
| | | | - Anne Vral
- d Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Clemens Woda
- z Helmholtz Zentrum München , Oberschleissheim , Germany
| | - Andrzej Wojcik
- a Stockholm University , Centre for Radiation Protection Research, Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute , Stockholm , Sweden.,ae Jan Kochanowski University , Kielce , Poland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gregoire E, Ainsbury L, Barrios L, Bassinet C, Fattibene P, Kulka U, Oestreicher U, Pantelias G, Terzoudi G, Trompier F, Voisin P, Vral A, Wojcik A, Roy L. The harmonization process to set up and maintain an operational biological and physical retrospective dosimetry network: QA QM applied to the RENEB network. Int J Radiat Biol 2016; 93:81-86. [DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1206232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Gregoire
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
| | - Liz Ainsbury
- Public Health England, CRCE, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, UK
| | | | - Céline Bassinet
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
| | | | - Ulrike Kulka
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Ursula Oestreicher
- Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Gabriel Pantelias
- National Centre for Scientific Research ‘Demokritos’, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgia Terzoudi
- National Centre for Scientific Research ‘Demokritos’, Athens, Greece
| | - Francois Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
| | - Philippe Voisin
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
| | - Anne Vral
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Laurence Roy
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
| |
Collapse
|