Randomized phase II-III study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer: results from the IFCT-0802 trial†

Recent advances and future strategies in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC

Recent advancements in treating extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have been significantly marked by incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into platinum-based chemotherapy, leading to modest yet notable improvements in patient outcomes, which become more evident with longer follow-up. However, critical challenges persist, such as identifying effective biomarkers for accurate patient selection or finding more effective drugs. This review delves into the current and evolving treatment landscape for ES-SCLC, focusing on the most promising therapeutic strategies under investigation. We discuss the latest developments in the use of newer ICIs, antiangiogenic agents, PARP inhibitors (PARPi), lurbinectedin, and anti-DLL3 agents, offering insights into potential future directions in the management of this aggressive cancer.

Chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab for small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: A case report

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a common and aggressive subtype of lung cancer. It is characterized by rapid growth and a high mortality rate. Approximately 10% of patients with SCLC present with brain metastases at the time of diagnosis, which is associated with a median survival of 5 mo. This study aimed to summarize the effect of bevacizumab on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival of patients with brain metastasis of SCLC.

CASE SUMMARY

A 62-year-old man was referred to our hospital in February 2023 because of dizziness and numbness of the right lower extremity without headache or fever for more than four weeks. The patient was diagnosed with limited-stage SCLC. He received 8 cycles of chemotherapy combined with maintenance bevacizumab therapy and achieved a PFS of over 7 mo.

CONCLUSION

The combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan effectively alleviated brain metastasis in SCLC and prolonged PFS.

Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on the management of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2022. Outcomes of interest included response rates, overall survival, disease-free survival or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 95 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address systemic therapy options, timing of therapy, treatment in patients who are older or with poor performance status, role of biomarkers, and use of myeloid-supporting agents in patients with small-cell lung cancer.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Therapeutic effectiveness of anlotinib combined with etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a single-arm, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) achieves good efficacy, but there is still room for improvement. This clinical study examined the effectiveness of anlotinib plus etoposide for maintenance therapy in ES-SCLC.

METHODS

The current single-arm, prospective phase II study was performed at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (March 2019 to March 2022). After successful primary etoposide-based therapy, anlotinib was administered at 12 mg/day on days 1 to 14 of 21-day cycles until disease progression or consent withdrawal. All patients also received etoposide at 50 mg/day on days 1 to 14 of 21-day cycles for a maximum of six cycles. Progression-free survival (PFS) constituted the primary study endpoint. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. In addition, adverse events (AEs) were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were treated. Median PFS and OS were 8.02 (95%CI 5.36-10.67) and 11.04 (95%CI 10.37-11.68) months, respectively. Totally 9 and 18 participants showed a partial response and stable disease, respectively; ORR and DCR were 32.14% and 96.43%, respectively. The commonest all-grade AEs were fatigue (n = 11, 39.28%), hypertension (n = 11, 39.28%), loss of appetite (n = 9, 32.14%), oral mucositis (n = 7, 25.00%) and proteinuria (n = 6, 21.40%). Grade 3-4 AEs included fatigue (n = 4, 14.28%), hypertension (n = 2, 7.14%), hand and foot syndrome (n = 2, 7.14%), oral mucositis (n = 1, 3.57%), hemoptysis (n = 1, 3.57%), proteinuria (n = 1, 3.57%), gingival bleeding (n = 1, 3.57%), and serum creatinine elevation (n = 1, 3.57%).

CONCLUSION

Maintenance anlotinib plus etoposide achieves promising PFS and OS in clinical ES-SCLC.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1800019421.

Novel Therapeutic Options for Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to focus on the recent advances in the molecular knowledge of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and potential promising new treatment strategies, like targeting the DNA damage pathway, epigenetics, angiogenesis, and oncogenic drivers.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last few years, the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy has led to significant improvements in clinical outcomes in this complex neoplasia. Nevertheless, the prognosis remains dismal. Recently, numerous genomic alterations have been identified, and they may be useful to classify SCLC into different molecular subtypes (SCLC-A, SCLC-I, SCLC-Y, SCLC-P). SCLC accounts for 10-20% of all lung cancers, most patients have an extensive disease at the diagnosis, and it is characterized by poor prognosis. Despite the progresses in the knowledge of the disease, efficacious targeted treatments are still lacking. In the near future, the molecular characterisation of SCLC will be fundamental to find more effective treatment strategies.

Small Cell Lung Cancer: Emerging Targets and Strategies for Precision Therapy

Small cell lung cancer is an aggressive subtype of lung cancer with limited treatment options. Precision medicine has revolutionized cancer treatment for many tumor types but progress in SCLC has been slower due to the lack of targetable biomarkers. This review article provides an overview of emerging strategies for precision therapy in SCLC. Targeted therapies include targeted kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, angiogenesis inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, PARP inhibitors, and epigenetic modulators. Angiogenesis inhibitors and DNA-damaging agents, such as PARP and ATR inhibitors, have been explored in SCLC with limited success to date although trials are ongoing. The potential of targeting DLL3, a NOTCH ligand, through antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers, and CAR T-cell therapy, has opened up new therapeutic options moving forward. Additionally, new research in epigenetic therapeutics in reversing transcriptional repression, modulating anti-tumor immunity, and utilizing antibody-drug conjugates to target cell surface-specific targets in SCLC are also being investigated. While progress in precision therapy for SCLC has been challenging, recent advancements provide optimism for improved treatment outcomes. However, several challenges remain and will need to be addressed, including drug resistance and tumor heterogeneity. Further research and biomarker-selected clinical trials are necessary to develop effective precision therapies for SCLC patients.

Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Prospects

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by aggressive disease progression and tendency to metastasize. Although chemotherapy for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) has remained unchanged for decades, immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the primary therapy for ES-SCLC. However, the number of patients benefiting from immunotherapy is limited, and the treatment outcomes remain unsatisfactory. In addition, predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy have not yet been identified. Recent reports have shed light on the genomics of SCLC and defined four distinct molecular subtypes based on transcription factor expression. This may increase our understanding of the biology of SCLC and identify novel therapeutic targets and drugs. In this article, we review the current standard management of ES-SCLC and present the most recent reports to further our understanding of molecular classification, predictive biomarkers, and prospective therapies, including immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy.

Camrelizumab as a novel third or post-third-line treatment strategy in small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study of 12 patients

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) constitutes 15% of all lung cancer cases, with a comparatively low survival rate. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided new alternatives for treating SCLC. However, the effectiveness of camrelizumab in the treatment of SCLC remains unclear. This retrospective case series was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in SCLC patients.

Methods

The study enrolled SCLC patients recorded as having received more than one cycle of camrelizumab in the electronic medical record system. Data related to clinical and survival times were collected and statistically analyzed.

Results

From August 2019 to December 2021, the study enrolled 12 SCLC patients. The objective response rate was 41.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.2%-72.3%). The disease control rate was 83.3% (95% CI: 51.6%-97.9%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 4.0 months. Notably, the median PFS of patients in third- or post-third-line subgroups was 7 months (95% CI: 1.12-12.88 months). The median overall survival (OS) for all eligible patients was 10.0 months (95% CI: 7.35-12.65 months), with a 1-year survival rate of 25%. Notably, the OS of patients treated with third- or post-third-line therapy was 5-34 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 75%. The two most prevalent non-hematological adverse events associated with the immune response were pneumonitis (44.4%) and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (44.4%). One patient experienced an exacerbation of preexisting diabetes and reached grade 3 hyperglycemia. There were no grade 4/5 immune-related adverse events.

Conclusion

This case series highlights the potential benefits and safety concerns of camrelizumab in SCLC patients. These findings suggest a possible strategy for third- and post-third-line treatments of SCLC. However, the conclusion is limited due to the study's retrospective nature and small sample size. Therefore, large-scale randomized controlled studies are needed to determine its efficacy.

Iris metastasis as resistance mechanism to atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide but responds to additional irinotecan and anlotinib in a small cell lung cancer patient

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy associated with poor prognosis. Metastasis to sites outside the chest at the time of initial diagnosis, such as bone, brain, and liver metastasis have been found in most SCLC patients. Iris metastases from SCLC have rarely been previously reported, and often cause eye pain and blindness in patients. Here, we report a patient with SCLC who presented with iris metastasis in the right eye and metastasis in the left adrenal gland due to disease progression on first-line therapy, which subsequently caused pain and blindness in the right eye. The patient was treated with second-line irinotecan combined with anlotinib and atezolizumab and did not receive any local treatment in the right eye. After only one cycle of treatment, the iris metastases in the right eye were smaller than before, and the visual acuity in the right eye recovered. At the same time, her left adrenal metastases were also significantly smaller than before. Our case suggests that systemic therapy with effective treatment options can similarly improve iris metastases in patients.

Challenges in the treatment of small cell lung cancer in the era of immunotherapy and molecular classification

For many years the standard of care for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has remained unchanged. Despite decades of active research, current treatment options are limited and the prognosis of patients with extended disease (ED) SCLC remains poor. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents an exception and the only recent approval for ED-SCLC. However, the magnitude of benefit obtained with immunotherapy in SCLC is much more modest than that observed in other malignancies. Different pro-immunogenic or immunosuppressive features within the tumor microenvironment of SCLC may either modulate the sensitivity to immunotherapy or conversely dampen the efficacy of ICIs. Beside immunotherapy, a deeper understanding of the molecular biology of SCLC has led to the identification of new therapeutic targets for this lethal malignancy. Recent epigenetic and gene expression studies have resulted into a new molecular classification of four distinct subtypes of SCLC, defined by the relative expression of key transcription regulators and each characterized by specific therapeutic vulnerabilities. This review discusses the rationale for immunotherapy in SCLC and summarizes the main ICIs-trials in this tumor. We provide also an overview of new potential therapeutic opportunities and their integration with the new molecular classification of SCLC.

The efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A Chinese multicenter real-world study

Background

Patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have high recurrence rates and bleak prognosis. This multicenter real-world study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC.

Methods

Pathologically confirmed ES-SCLC patients receiving anlotinib plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy as the first-line treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse reactions. The Cox regression analyses were employed to investigate the independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS of these individuals.

Results

In total, 58 patients were included in this study. The median PFS was 6.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.5-8.5], and the median OS was 10.5 months (95%CI 8.7-12.3). Thirty-four patients achieved partial response (PR), 18 patients achieved stable disease (SD), and 6 patients achieved progressive disease (PD). The ORR and DCR were 58.6% and 89.6%. The main treatment-related adverse reactions were generally tolerated. Myelosuppression (44.8%) was the most common adverse reaction, followed by hypertension (41.4%), fatigue (34.5%), gastrointestinal reaction (32.7%), and hand-foot syndrome (24.1%). Multivariate analysis showed that post-medication hand-foot syndrome [PFS 8.5 vs. 5.5 months, Hazards Ratio (HR)=0.23, 95%CI 0.07-0.72, P =0.012] was the independent predictor of PFS, and hypertension (OS 15.9 vs. 8.3 months, HR=0.18, 95%CI 0.05-0.58, P =0.005) was the independent predictor of OS.

Conclusion

Anlotinib combined with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for ES-SCLC appears to be effective and well-tolerated in the real-world. Well-designed large-scale prospective studies are urgently needed in the future to verify our findings.

Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) as a predictive biomarker in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Endothelial activation and insult may contribute to the aggressive clinical course of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, no predictive biomarker for this pathogenesis has been identified.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical impact of the endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) in SCLC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, the EASIX was calculated from measurements of serum lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, and platelet levels. A total of 264 patients with SCLC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were stratified into high and low EASIX groups.

RESULTS

Complete and objective response rates in the limited-stage (LD) were 19.5% vs. 33.3% (P= 0.050) and 85.4% vs. 97.9% (P= 0.028) in the high and low EASIX groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the response rate between the two groups in the extensive-stage (ED). The median overall survival was 9.8 vs. 40.5 months in LD (P< 0.001) and 7.2 vs. 11.9 months in ED (P< 0.001) in the high and low EASIX groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses, a high EASIX level was an independent prognostic factor for worse progression-free and overall survival irrespective of stage.

CONCLUSION

EASIX may be a potential predictive biomarker of SCLC.

The Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study

Purpose

Anlotinib, an antiangiogenic multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has shown favorable anticancer efficacy and acceptable safety in treating extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in some clinical studies. This research aimed to explore the real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib in ES-SCLC.

Methods

Pathologically confirmed ES-SCLC patients receiving anlotinib were enrolled for this retrospective study. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse reactions.

Results

In total, 202 patients were included in this study. The median PFS of all patients was 4.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.9–5.7], and the median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI 6.5–8.7). Respectively, the overall ORR and DCR were 30.2% and 87.1%. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≤1, plus chemotherapy or immunotherapy, plus radiotherapy, and post-medication hypertension might have longer PFS and OS. The PFS and OS were significantly prolonged in combination group than that in monotherapy group [PFS 6.0 vs 3.6 months, hazards ratio (HR)=0.49, 95% CI 0.34–0.70, P < 0.001; OS 9.2 vs 4.8 months, HR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.32–0.72, P < 0.001]. The main treatment-related adverse reactions were generally tolerated. The incidence of adverse reactions in combination group was higher than that in monotherapy group (75.0% vs 52.6%, P = 0.001). The most common adverse reaction was hypertension, followed by hand-foot syndrome and fatigue, regardless of monotherapy or combination group.

Conclusion

Anlotinib is effective and well tolerated in patients with ES-SCLC in the real-world. The clinical efficacy of anlotinib combined with chemotherapy or immunotherapy is better than that of monotherapy. Further investigations are needed for prospective studies with larger sample size.

New perspectives in the management of small cell lung cancer

The treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a challenge for all specialists involved. New treatments have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium in recent months, but efforts must continue to improve both survival and quality of life. Advances in surgery and radiotherapy have resulted in prolonged survival times and fewer complications, while more careful patient selection has led to increased staging accuracy. Developments in the field of systemic therapy have resulted in changes to clinical guidelines and the management of patients with advanced disease, mainly with the introduction of immunotherapy. In this article, we describe recent improvements in the management of patients with SCLC, review current treatments, and discuss future lines of research.

A phase II study of anlotinib combined with etoposide and platinum-based regimens in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective, pilot, single-arm phase II trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib combined with etoposide and platinum-based regimens in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

This phase II study was conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between December 2018 and December 2020. All patients received standard chemotherapy (etoposide plus cisplatin/carboplatin) consisting of four courses and anlotinib at 12 mg once per day for 2 weeks followed by a one-week rest. Anlotinib administration was continued until disease progression, intolerable adverse events (AEs) or patient withdrawal from the study. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcome measures were overall survival (OS), objective control rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and AEs.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were included in this study, and 30 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. ORR and DCR were 90.0% and 96.7%, respectively. The estimated PFS and OS were 6.0 months (95% CI: 1.1-11.9 months) and 14.0 months (95% CI: 8.6-19.4 months), respectively. No unexpected adverse effects were reported. Hypertension (20/37, 54.1%), anemia (16/37, 43.2%), alopecia (15/37, 40.5%), elevated transaminases (9/37, 24.3%) and alkaline phosphatase (9/37, 24.3%) were the most commonly reported AEs. Thirteen patients (35.1%) reported grade 3-5 AEs. No treatment-related deaths occurred during this study.

CONCLUSION

The addition of anlotinib to standard etoposide/platinum chemotherapy achieved encouraging PFS and OS in previously untreated ES-SCLC patients, with an acceptable tolerability profile and no new safety signals observed.

Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) provide recommended management for patients with SCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. This selection for the journal focuses on metastatic (known as extensive-stage) SCLC, which is more common than limited-stage SCLC. Systemic therapy alone can palliate symptoms and prolong survival in most patients with extensive-stage disease. Smoking cessation counseling and intervention should be strongly promoted in patients with SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. The "Summary of the Guidelines Updates" section in the SCLC algorithm outlines the most recent revisions for the 2022 update, which are described in greater detail in this revised Discussion text.

Effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab in extensive-disease small cell lung cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly invasive and poorly prognostic. The effects of chemotherapy with bevacizumab are promising on other tumors but unclear in extensive-disease SCLC (ED-SCLC). A systemic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the efficacy and toxicity in ED-SCLC patients.

Methods

A review of current studies was performed on electronic databases and other sources to identify publications of ED-SCLC patients who received bevacizumab. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and complications.

Results

Nine relevant articles with six single-arm and three two-arm studies were identified. Four hundred seventy-six patients were included, of which 368 and 108 were untreated and relapse patients. Most patients were performance status 0–1 (71.6%) and male (58.1%). The comparisons showed CT/bevacizumab slightly prolonged OS (HR =0.84) but significantly improved PFS (HR =0.74). The ORRs of untreated and relapse patients were 71% and 19%, though no significant difference was observed than CT/placebo. The most grade 3–4 complication and bevacizumab-associated complications were neutropenia and hypertension, whose rates were 33% and 6%. Patients who received CT/bevacizumab had a higher hypertension rate than CT/placebo (6% vs. 2%). No different complication rate was observed between high and lose dose groups.

Discussion

The present study suggests that bevacizumab in the combination of standard chemotherapy provides better PFS than chemotherapy alone. Although the combined regimen is well-tolerated, no superiority in OS or response rate is observed.

Risk of hypertension with anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 105 phase II/III randomized controlled trials

We performed a meta-analysis to fully investigate the hypertension of anti-VEGF mAbs in cancer patients. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) treated with anti-VEGF mAbs till January 2021. The relevant RCTs in cancer patients treated with anti-VEGF mAbs were retrieved and the systematic evaluation was conducted. One hundred and five RCTs and 65358 patients were included. Our study suggests that anti-VEGF mAbs significantly increased the risks of all-grade (RR, 3.22; 95%CI, 2.83-3.65; p < 0.00001; I²=71%) and high-grade (RR, 6.15; 95%CI, 5.58-6.78; p < 0.00001; I²=48%) hypertension in cancer patients. Those risks may be dependent on drug type. Icrucumab did not association with an increased risk of hypertension. The RR of hypertension did not vary significantly according to the type of cancer, line of therapy, and treatment duration. The available data suggested that the use of anti-VEGF mAbs were associated with a significantly increased risk of hypertension.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Inhibition of angiogenesis has been demonstrated to be an efficacious strategy in treating several tumors. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the most important protein with proangiogenic functions and it is overexpressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against VEGF, showed a promising activity in combination with etoposide and cisplatin as first-line treatment of patients with extended stage (ES)-SCLC and two randomized studies confirmed that bevacizumab improved PFS, but failed to prolong OS. Instead, disappointing results have been observed with endostar, sunitinib, sorafenib, vandetanib, and thalidomide in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line setting, with sunitinib in the maintenance setting, with sunitinib, cediranib and nintedanib as single agents or ziv-aflibercept in combination with topotecan in second-line setting. Only anlotinib improved OS and PFS as third-line therapy in Chinese patients with SCLC, and it was approved with this indication in China. Future challenges are the evaluation of the role of angiogenesis inhibitors in combination with immune- checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy in SCLC patients and the identification of predictive biomarkers of response to both agents.

Apatinib with etoposide capsules as a third- or further-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial

Background

Patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have a particularly poor prognosis. And the treatment options for patients with relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC are limited. Thus, we conducted an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus etoposide capsules as the third- or further-line treatment in ES-SCLC patients.

Methods

Patients with ES-SCLC who experienced disease progression following 2 to 3 previous therapies from 11 medical centers in China were enrolled to receive apatinib (250 mg/d, continuously) and etoposide capsules (50 mg/d, on day 1–21, per 28 days). The treatment continued until disease progression, treatment intolerance, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Fifty-six patients with relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC were enrolled from January 2018 to February 2020 and 53 of them were eventually included in the evaluation population. The median follow-up was 9.8 months. At the data cut-off time (March 5, 2020), 39 patients (74%) had died and 44 (83%) had progressed. The median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.1–3.9) and the median OS was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.6–6.4). No complete responses were seen. Eleven patients (21%) showed a best response of partial response and 37 (70%) patients achieved stable disease. The ORR was 20.8% (11/53), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 90.6% (48/53). The 6-month OS rate was 40.1% (95% CI, 26.2–54). After 12 months, the OS rate was 18.4% (95% CI, 4.7–32.1). Possible treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events included leukopenia [8 (15.1%)], neutropenia [7 (13.2%)], anemia [4 (7.4%)], and hand-foot syndrome [2 (3.8%)]. During the study, no mortality occurred as a consequence of treatment.

Conclusions

Apatinib combined with etoposide capsules exhibits efficacy and has an acceptable safety profile. It could be used as a later-line treatment for ES-SCLC patients who have been heavily pretreated with standard therapies. Further exploration of apatinib combined with etoposide capsules in phase III trials is warranted.

Myeloid cell leukemia-1 is an important predictor of survival and progression of small cell lung cancer

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most fatal malignancy for which more effective therapies are urgently needed. Overexpression of myeloid cell leukemia-1 (Mcl-1) has been demonstrated to be one of the most common genetic alterations among different types of tumor/cancer, which induces resistance against various anti-cancer therapies including cisplatin. The study aimed to explore the role of Mcl-1 in the prognosis and resistance to anti-cancer therapy in patients with SCLC.

Methods

Patients with SCLC were recruited from those enrolled/treated in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Their specimens were collected for immunohistochemical evaluation. We compared the baseline characteristics, response to chemotherapy and overall survival (OS) of the patients with different expression levels of Mcl-1.

Results

The expression level of Mcl-1 was significantly lower in patients with limited stage SCLC than in those with extensive stage SCLC (P=0.014). Based on the median value of Mcl-1 expression level, the patients were divided into high and low Mcl-1 groups, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that low Mcl-1 expression was associated with a significant improvement in OS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.538. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic value of Mcl-1 expression level (P=0.014). Moreover, we found a significantly close relationship between higher Mcl-1 expression level and shorter time to progression (TTP) of the patients received chemotherapy (P=0.040).

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrated that Mcl-1 expression level was a prognostic biomarker for survival outcomes and cancer progression in the patients with SCLC. Thus, it could be used as a valuable biomarker in identifying those patients with high risk of treatment failure.

Comparison of First-Line Treatments for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Combinations of chemotherapy with immunotherapy or bevacizumab in first-line treatments of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have been evaluated in various clinical trials. However, it remains unclear what the optimal combination regimen is.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify which first-line combination regimen is associated with the best tumor response among patients with ES-SCLC.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science) were systematically searched to extract eligible literature from database inception to December 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Head-to-head randomized clinical trials on first-line treatments for patients with ES-SCLC were included with outcomes and toxic effects reported, including objective response rate (ORR, involving complete response and partial response), disease control rate (DCR, involving complete response, partial response, and stable disease), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) of grades 3 to 5. Of 199 eligible articles, 14 were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were independently extracted and collected by 2 reviewers based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Main outcomes were OS, PFS, DCR, ORR, and TRAEs of grades 3 to 5.

RESULTS

A total of 3 phase 2 and 11 phase 3 randomized clinical trials involving 4838 patients were included. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor (durvalumab and atezolizumab) plus etoposide-based chemotherapy, compared with etoposide-based chemotherapy alone, showed the most favorable OS (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09-1.80) and the best DCR (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.81). Bevacizumab plus etoposide-based chemotherapy provided the best PFS compared with etoposide-based chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09-2.27), although this was not translated into OS benefit. The addition of PD-L1 inhibitors to etoposide-platinum chemotherapy caused no more toxic effects in general (compared with etoposide-based chemotherapy alone: OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.36-2.31), while bevacizumab plus etoposide-platinum regimen induced the most TRAEs grades 3 to 5 among all first-line treatments (eg, compared with irinotecan-platinum regimen: OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.26-14.57). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve value, PD-L1 inhibitor plus etoposide-platinum had the highest probability of being ranked first for OS (0.87) and DCR (0.97).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this systematic review and network meta-analysis suggest that the combination of a PD-L1 inhibitor (durvalumab and atezolizumab) and etoposide-based chemotherapy may be an optimal first-line treatment option for patients with ES-SCLC patients.

A Prospective Study of Apatinib in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure of Two or More Lines of Chemotherapy

Background

Because of rapid disease progression and lack of optimal treatment strategies beyond the second‐line, the prognosis of patients with extensive‐stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) still remains depressing. Alternative treatment strategies are required to improve their prognosis. In this prospective clinical study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of single‐agent apatinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as a treatment option for patients with ES‐SCLC after failure of at least two prior chemotherapy regimens.

Materials and Methods

Twenty‐two patients with ES‐SCLC treated with 500 mg single‐agent apatinib as subsequent‐line regimen in our institution from November 2016 to August 2018 were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Clinical outcomes included partial response in 3 patients (13.6%), stable disease in 18 patients (81.8%), and disease progression in 1 patient (4.5%), with an ORR of 13.6% and DCR of 95.5%. The median PFS and OS were 5.4 and 10.0 months, respectively. Apatinib demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile, with grade I–III secondary hypertension and proteinuria as the most common AEs. No grade IV and V AEs were observed among the patients. Multivariate analysis revealed secondary hypertension as an independent predictor of OS (p = .047); however, the association became insignificant after Q correction (p = .455).

Conclusions

Apatinib was safe and effective in the management of patients with ES‐SCLC and can be considered as a treatment option after failure of at least two prior chemotherapy regimens. http://ClinicalTrials.govidentifier. NCT02995187

Implications for Practice

This study indicated the acceptable toxicity profile and promising efficacy of apatinib in the management of patients with extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer after failure from at least two prior chemotherapy regimens. Secondary hypertension can be a potential prognostic factor for apatinib treatment.

Alternative treatment strategies are needed to improve prognosis for patients with small‐cell lung cancer. This article evaluates the feasibility of single‐agent apatinib as a treatment option for patients with extensive‐stage small‐cell lung cancer.

Development and Validation of a Simplified Prognostic Score in SCLC

Introduction

This study aimed at generating a new simplified prognostic score (SPS) using common clinical and biological variables to discriminate a limited number of subgroups of patients with SCLC differing by their overall survival (OS).

Methods

The SPS was developed exploring the Montpellier University Hospital retrospective database of 401 patients over a 16-year period. All patients had received etoposide - platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. The SPS development took into account significant determinants of OS in the Cox model, weighted by their regression β coefficients. Validation of the consequent SPS has been done separately in a combined population of 213 patients accrued from two different published trials (NCT03059667 and NCT00930891).

Results

The significant independent determinants of OS included the following: (1) American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage IV (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.91–3.33); (2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than 1 (HR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.79–2.87); (3) the presence of liver metastases (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.29–2.15); and (4) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio greater than 4 (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.11–1.92). The SPS generated with these four variables, segregated three groups (good, intermediate, and poor prognosis) with respective median OS of 26.9 months (95% CI: 20.1–38.9), 11.5 months (95% CI: 9.8–13.0), and 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.8–8.3; log-rank p < 10^–4). Harrell's C statistic estimate was 0.68 ± 0.012, suggesting goodness of calibration. In the validation cohort, the SPS segregated the aforementioned three subgroups in a nearly similar manner, with respective median OS: 27.2, 12.3, and 8.6 months (log-rank p < 10^–3; Harrell’s C statistic: 0.58 ± 0.02).

Conclusions

The SPS is easy to calculate in real-life practice and efficiently discriminates three populations with different prognoses. This study deserves further validation of this score in patients with SCLC receiving immunochemotherapy.

Latest advances in management of small cell lung cancer and other neuroendocrine tumors of the lung

Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung are a diverse group of diseases with distinct pathological, molecular, and clinical characteristics. The most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification identifies two types of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung: small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), and the less common large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC). Systemic treatments for these aggressive tumors have largely remained unchanged for years. With the advancement in genomic sequencing and identification of novel targetable pathways over the last decade, a myriad of therapeutic options have emerged, addressing unmet needs for this patient population. In this review, we summarize the latest advances in the management of SCLC and LCNEC, and discuss promising endeavors in development.

Strong Antitumor Activity of Bevacizumab and Aflibercept in Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: In-Depth Preclinical Study

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare and very aggressive tumor. It has been greatly understudied, and very little is known about optimal treatment strategy for patients with this disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo whether anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs could be a therapeutic alternative for these tumors with a poor prognosis.

METHODS

We have developed 2 xenograft models using either human cell line derived from lung (H460) or from colon (COLO320) NEC to assess the effect of 2 antiangiogenic drugs, aflibercept and bevacizumab, on tumor growth and their pathological characteristics. Additionally, tumors were subjected to immunohistochemistry staining and proteins were measured with Western blot and ELISA.

RESULTS

Both aflibercept and bevacizumab showed significant antitumor activity (p < 0.001). In the H460 model, aflibercept resulted in 94% tumor growth inhibition (TGI) and bevacizumab treatment resulted in 72.2% TGI. Similarly, in the COLO320 model, aflibercept and bevacizumab resulted in 89.3 and 84% TGI, respectively. Moreover, antitumor activity occurs early after treatment initiation. Using Tumor Control Index score, which address the kinetics of tumor growth in a way comparable to the methods used in human clinical studies, we confirmed that both drugs inhibit significantly tumor growth. When tumor stabilization was evaluated, aflibercept shows higher ability to stabilize NEC tumors than bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

Results derived from this study strongly support anti-VEGF therapies, especially aflibercept, as a novel therapeutic option in NECs. Further studies are necessary, but our observations encourage the evaluation of antiangiogenics in clinical trials combined with standard chemotherapy.

Third-Generation TKI Resistance Due to SCLC Transformation: A Case Report and Brief Review

Objective

We reported a case of pathologic type transformed from adenocarcinoma to small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) after being treated with third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI).

Materials and methods

The lung cancer pathologic type was transformed from adenocarcinoma to SCLC after the treatment of third-generation EGFR-TKI for 4.3 months. Four times of lung biopsies were conducted at a different time and different lesions. And the patient was treated with a variety of regimens after SCLC transformation, including etoposide combined with carboplatin (EC), irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin (IO), Abraxane, and Apatinib. These treatments got a good response, but quick progression. We also monitored the dynamic change of serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and pro-gastrin releasing peptide (Pro-GRP).

Results

Adenocarcinoma could transform into SCLC after the treatment of TKI. Tumor cells were heterogeneity, so adenocarcinoma and SCLC could be co-existed. The fluctuation of the NSE was consistent with the response of treatment and the progression of the tumor.

Conclusion

Regimens for the primary SCLC were also available for the transformed SCLC, but the duration of the response was short. NSE could be an effective biomarker for dynamic monitoring of the efficacy in SCLC transformation.

Low-dose apatinib monotherapy in advanced chemotherapy-refractory small cell lung cancer: a case series and literature review

The therapeutic regimen for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has changed little in the past several decades. Apatinib is a small molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase. Apatinib has demonstrated efficacy against advanced gastric cancer and breast cancer, and recent studies have also reported its successful use in non-SCLC; however, its efficacy in SCLC remains unclear. In this study, we used apatinib as salvage therapy for chemotherapy-refractory SCLC. Five male patients with advanced SCLC were administered oral apatinib (250 mg/day) as 2nd- to 4th-line treatment. One patient showed a partial response to apatinib, one showed stable disease, and three patients showed progressive disease. The progression-free survival durations in the patients with stable disease and partial response were 1.5 and 3 months, respectively. Only three patients showed adverse effects, including mild hypertension, vomiting, and hand–foot syndrome, respectively, all of which were manageable. Apatinib might thus be a salvage option in patients with advanced SCLC after chemotherapy.

Targeted therapy for solid tumors and risk of hypertension: a meta-analysis of 68077 patients from 93 phase III studies

Objective: Hypertension is a common adverse event with targeted agents in cancer patients and can lead to serious and sometimes lethal cardiovascular complications. The authors performed a meta-analysis of clinical trials aiming to evaluate the incidence and Relative Risk (RR) of developing all-grade and high-grade Hypertension Events (HE) in patients with solid tumors receiving targeted therapy.Methods: A review of citations from PubMed was performed and studies were selected based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The search was limited to randomized phase III trials published in English focused on the efficacy and safety of targeted agents in cancer patients, reporting data on HE. Incidence, RR and relative 95% CIs were analyzed using random or fixed-effects models. Overall incidences were calculated and further compared with the chi-squared test for proportions.Results: Ninety-three phase III trials were included, with a total of 68,077 patients. Prostate cancer was the most represented (18.9%), followed by breast cancer (17.3%) and colorectal cancer (16.4%). The incidence of all- and high-grade HE was 23.47% and 8.57%, respectively, with the highest incidence of serious HE reported by adjuvant Sunitib/Sorafenib (29.03%). The highest RR of high-grade HE was observed with Bevacizumab in patients with advanced cervical cancer. By drug category, the highest RR of high-grade HE was reported by VEGFR/EGFR TKIs.Conclusion: According to these data, monitoring this class of toxicities is of primary importance to avoid hypertension worsening and, thus, the risk of major cardiovascular events.

Apatinib in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer after second-line or third-line chemotherapy: a phase II, single-arm, multicentre, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains an aggressive cancer with short-term survival due to limited therapeutic options. Apatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with extensive-stage (EC) SCLC who had progressed after two or three previous therapies.

METHODS

Eligible patients were histologically confirmed ES-SCLC after two or three previous treatments, including a platinum-based regimen. Patients received apatinib at an initial dose of 500 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled. At the data cut-off time (November 15, 2018), the median follow-up was 7.4 months; no patients remained on treatment, and five were still in follow-up. An objective response was achieved in 7 of 40 patients (17.5%) in the intention-to-treat population, and 7 of 38 patients (18.4%) in the per-protocol population. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.0 months and 5·8 months, respectively. The most commonly observed grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, increased L-gamma-glutamyltransferase.

CONCLUSIONS

Apatinib exhibited efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in previously heavily-treated ES-SCLC patients. Further exploration of apatinib in phase III trials is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02945852.

The impact of angiogenesis inhibitors on survival of patients with small cell lung cancer

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly invasive and lethal neuroendocrine tumor. Antiangiogenic drugs have been reported in the treatment of SCLC. We aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of angiogenic inhibitors on SCLC survival using network meta‐analysis.

Methods

The impact of five angiogenesis inhibitors, that is, vandetanib (Van), bevacizumab (Bev), Rh‐endostatin (End), sunitinib (Sun), and thalidomide (Tha), on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated by conducting a network meta‐analysis. RNA sequencing data were downloaded from publicly available databases.

Results

Nine phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), that involved 1599 participants, that investigated angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of SCLC were included in this meta‐analysis. Sun and Bev achieved better PFS than Tha (Bev VS. Tha, HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79‐0.98, Sun VS. Tha, HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65‐1.00). Moreover, Sun and Bev were superior to placebo in terms of PFS (Bev VS. Placebo, HR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.81‐0.97, Sun VS. Placebo, HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66‐1.00). Based on this study, we found no significant difference of OS of SCLC. The angiogenesis pathway and expression of target genes were globally deactivated in SCLC tissue.

Conclusion

Results of this network meta‐analysis indicate that the PFS outcome of SCLC with Sun or Bev drugs is superior to that of Tha. The improved therapeutic impact of angiogenesis inhibitors on SCLC needs more evidence, such as long‐term observation in clinical trials, to be validated.

Initial management of small-cell lung cancer (limited- and extensive-stage) and the role of thoracic radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy: a systematic review

Background

Patients with limited-stage (ls) or extensive-stage (es) small-cell lung cancer (sclc) are commonly given platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Standard chemotherapy for patients with ls sclc includes a platinum agent such as cisplatin combined with the non-platinum agent etoposide. The objective of the present systematic review was to investigate the efficacy of adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy in patients with es sclc and to determine the appropriate timing, dose, and schedule of chemotherapy or radiation for patients with sclc.

Methods

The medline and embase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (rcts) comparing treatment with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy against treatment with chemotherapy alone in patients with es sclc. Identified rcts were also included if they compared various timings, doses, and schedules of treatment for patients with es sclc or ls sclc.

Results

Sixty-four rcts were included. In patients with ls sclc, overall survival was greatest with platinum-etoposide compared with other chemotherapy regimens. In patients with es sclc, overall survival was greatest with chemotherapy containing platinum-irinotecan than with chemotherapy containing platinum-etoposide (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 0.95; p = 0.006). The addition of radiation to chemotherapy for patients with es sclc showed mixed results. There was no conclusive evidence that the timing, dose, or schedule of thoracic radiation affected treatment outcomes in sclc.

Conclusions

In patients with ls sclc, cisplatin-etoposide plus radiotherapy should remain the standard therapy. In patients with es sclc, the evidence is insufficient to recommend the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy as standard practice to improve overall survival. However, on a case-by-case basis, radiotherapy might be added to reduce local recurrence. The most commonly used chemotherapy is platinum-etoposide; however, platinum-irinotecan can be considered.

Anti-angiogenesis treatment in a patient with appendix metastasis of small cell lung cancer: A case report

RATIONALE

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a common pathological type of lung cancer, but appendiceal metastasis of SCLC was rare. At present, clinical studies on the maintenance therapy of SCLC have not reached a significant conclusion.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We reported on a 52-year-old man who diagnosed as extensive stage SCLC with abdominal pain for 2 months, aggravated for 2 days.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC, relapsed with appendix metastasis after treatment by emergency abdominal surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient received systemic treatments, including surgery, bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone was continued as maintenance therapy.

OUTCOMES

The patient had an overall survival would more than 23 months, and he gained another 8 months of progression-free survival after first-line radiochemotherapy.

LESSONS

Although SCLC appendix metastasis is rare, continuous anti-angiogenic therapy combined with bevacizumab maintenance therapy after surgical treatment can prolong survival.

Solvent-based paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel for heavily treated relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer: Retrospective single-institution observational study

Treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer (R/R SCLC) are limited, and the efficacy of salvage therapies for heavily treated patients should be assessed. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of paclitaxel (PTX) in R/R SCLC patients.A single-institute retrospective chart review was conducted. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), whereas the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, disease control rate (DCR), and safety.Thirty-one patients (median age, 69 [range, 56-80] years) were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 122 (range, 28-1121) days. The median OS and PFS were 4.4 and 2.2 months, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher, other than hematological toxicity, were febrile neutropenia and neuropathy. Multivariate analyses identified the following independent predictors of poor OS: performance status and lactate dehydrogenase at the upper limit of normal.PTX monotherapy showed moderate efficacy with acceptable toxicity in heavily treated patients with R/R SCLC patients.

Apatinib as maintenance therapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: results from a single-center retrospective study

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of maintenance apatinib after chemotherapy for extensive-stage (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Patients and methods

This was a retrospective analysis of 23 cases of extensive-stage SCLC admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2015 to December 2017. The patients without progression after induction chemotherapy received apatinib 250 mg per day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. We analyzed the median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS) and safety.

Results

Of 23 enrolled patients, 1 was lost to follow-up. The median PFS from the time of maintenance therapy was 4.1 months (95% CI 3.63–4.57 months). The median PFS from the time of induction chemotherapy was 8.3 months (95% CI 7.20–9.40 months). The median OS from the time of maintenance therapy was 12.5 months (95% CI 5.51–19.49 months). The median OS from the time of induction chemotherapy was 17.0 months (95% CI 9.86–24.14 months). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were hand–foot syndrome (43.5%, 10/23) and secondary hypertension (30.4%, 7/23), followed by fatigue, proteinuria, nausea, and oral mucositis (17.4%, 13.0%, 13.0%, and 8.7%, respectively). Hematologic toxicity included thrombocytopenia (30.4%), leucopenia (26.1%), and anemia (17.4%). The main grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hand–foot syndrome (8.7%, 2/23) and hypertension (4.3%, 1/23).

Conclusion

Maintenance apatinib was safe and achieved encouraging PFS and OS in extensive-stage SCLC.

Risk of bleeding associated with antiangiogenic monoclonal antibodies bevacizumab and ramucirumab: a meta-analysis of 85 randomized controlled trials

Aim

Bevacizumab and ramucirumab are antiangiogenic monoclonal antibodies, which target vascular endothelial growth factor-A and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, respectively, used in various cancers. Bleeding events have been described with these two agents. We conducted an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine the relative risk (RR) associated with the use of antiangiogenic monoclonal antibodies, bevacizumab and ramucirumab.

Methods

This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed after searching PubMed, American Society for Clinical Oncology Abstracts, European Society for Medical Oncology Abstracts, and the proceedings of major conferences for relevant clinical trials. RR and 95% CIs were calculated by random-effects or fixed-effects models for all-grade and high-grade bleeding events related to the angiogenesis inhibitors.

Results

Eighty-five randomized controlled trials were selected for the meta-analysis, covering 46,630 patients. The results showed that antiangiogenic monoclonal antibodies significantly increased the risk of all-grade (RR: 2.38, 95% CI: 2.09–2.71, p<0.00001) and high-grade (RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.48–1.97, p<0.00001) bleeding compared with control arms. In the subgroup analysis, bevacizumab significantly increased the risk of all-grade (RR: 2.73, 95% CI: 2.24–3.33, p<0.00001) and high-grade bleeding (RR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.68–2.34, p<0.00001), but ramucirumab only increased the risk of all-grade bleeding (RR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.76–2.13, p<0.00001) and no difference was observed for the risk of high-grade bleeding (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.78–1.39, p=0.79) compared with the control group. For lung cancer patients, bevacizumab significantly increased the risk of all-grade (RR: 4.72, 95% CI: 1.99–11.19, p=0.0004) and high-grade pulmonary hemorrhage (RR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.70–9.29, p=0.001), but no significant differences in the risk of all-grade (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.76–1.57, p=0.64) and high-grade (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.35–4.21, p=0.75) pulmonary hemorrhage were observed for ramucirumab. The increased risk of all-grade and high-grade bleeding was also observed in colorectal cancer or non-colorectal tumors and low-dose or high-dose angiogenesis inhibitors.

Conclusion

Antiangiogenic monoclonal antibodies are associated with a significant increase in the risk of all-grade and high-grade bleeding. Ramucirumab may be different from bevacizumab in terms of the risk of high-grade bleeding and the risk of all-grade and high-grade pulmonary hemorrhage in lung cancer patients.

Current and future therapeutic approaches for the treatment of small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very aggressive disease characterized by a high response rate to first-line chemotherapy, but most patients relapse within 1 year with disappointing results to second-line treatments. Chemotherapy has reached a plateau of effectiveness and new therapeutic strategies are needed to change the natural history of SCLC. Areas covered: This review will focus on the current results and the future development of the therapeutic approaches for the treatment of SCLC. Expert commentary: Immunotherapy is becoming a new frontier for the management of SCLC with preliminary interesting results. To date, no targeted drugs have been approved for clinical practice but several novel agents are in an advanced stage of clinical development in SCLC.

The role of tumor microenvironment in resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy

Anti-angiogenic therapy has been demonstrated to increase progression-free survival in patients with many different solid cancers. Unfortunately, the benefit in overall survival is modest and the rapid emergence of drug resistance is a significant clinical problem. Over the last decade, several mechanisms have been identified to decipher the emergence of resistance. There is a multitude of changes within the tumor microenvironment (TME) in response to anti-angiogenic therapy that offers new therapeutic opportunities. In this review, we compile results from contemporary studies related to adaptive changes in the TME in the development of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. These include preclinical models of emerging resistance, dynamic changes in hypoxia signaling and stromal cells during treatment, and novel strategies to overcome resistance by targeting the TME.

Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

Totally, 16 controlled trials (1898 cases) involving angiogenesis inhibitors plus chemotherapy (ACT group) versus chemotherapy alone group (CT group) were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Wanfang Data before March 2016.

RESULTS

Compared with CT group, ACT group obtained a significant benefit on objective response rate (ORR) (RR = 1.34; 95% CI = 1.19-1.51; P < 0.00001) and a trend of prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.73-1.01; P = 0.07) without improving overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.94-1.17; P = 0.36). Remarkably, subgroup analysis showed that the antibodies targeting VEGF significantly prolonged PFS (HR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.64-0.90; P = 0.001). With regard to toxicity, there was no significant difference in severe adverse events (AEs, Grade≥3) between two groups except that gastrointestinal symptom, hypertension, metabolic disorders, neurology and pain were higher in ACT group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with chemotherapy alone, antibodies targeting VEGF plus chemotherapy significantly improved ORR and prolonged PFS with an acceptable toxicity profile for patients with SCLC. Therefore, angiogenesis inhibitors, especially antibodies targeting VEGF, combining with chemotherapy may be a potential promising strategy in managing SCLC.

A phase II trial of Ifosfamide combination with recommended supportive therapy for recurrent SCLC in second-line and heavily treated setting

PURPOSE

The response rate of ifosfamide (IFM) monotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is reported as 42.4% in Japanese package insert. However, these efficacy data are based on clinical studies conducted in 1970s. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of IFM combination with recommended current supportive therapy for recurrent SCLC in second-line and heavily treated setting.

METHODS

Recurrent SCLC patients pretreated with one to three prior regimens received IFM monotherapy (1.5 g/m² for 3 days every 3 weeks). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled in the study from June 2009 to January 2013. The study was early terminated at interim analysis due to futility stop. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age was 65 years, 11 were males (91.7%) and eight (66.7%) and four (33.3%) were Performance Status 0 and 1, respectively. Four patients (33.3%) enrolled in second-line setting were all refractory relapse SCLC and 8 (66.7%) were heavily treated patients. No patient showed objective response. Stable disease was observed in 3 patients. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 0.9 months (95% CI, 0.3-1.5) and 4.8 months (95% CI, 1.6-9.9), respectively. Although one grade 4 amylase increase possibly related to IFM was observed, toxicity profile was totally favorable.

CONCLUSIONS

IFM monotherapy should not be used for refractory relapse or heavily treated SCLC, and no further investigation is required in these populations.

A recurrence-free survivor with chemotherapy-refractory small cell lung cancer after pneumonectomy: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

The optimal therapeutic regimen for chemotherapy-refractory and node-positive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is criticizable for the lack of evidence.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A patient with locally advanced SCLC was insensitive to the first-line chemotherapy of etoposide, irinotecan, and cisplatin.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was diagnosed as SCLC with mediastinal lymph node metastasis by pathological staining.

INTERVENTIONS

Salvage pneumonectomy and systematic lymph node dissection combined with oral apatinib and mediastinal radiotherapy were performed for him.

OUTCOMES

The patient survived for more than 2 years without recurrence after the operation and adjuvant therapy.

LESSONS

For patients with chemotherapy-resistant but resectable SCLC, a timely resection combined with postoperative radiotherapy and apatinib might be effective.

Bevacizumab in advanced lung cancer: state of the art

Despite recent advances in metastatic lung cancer treatment with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecules targeting addictive genomic abnormalities, prognosis of most of the patients remains unfavorable. Combination approaches with older drugs, such as bevacizumab, should be thus envisioned. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody, approved by the US FDA and the EMA in first-line and maintenance settings of advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, in association with platinum-based chemotherapy. In the years to come, bevacizumab might be associated with new molecular therapies or immuno-oncology drugs, in order to optimize response rates and overcome resistances. This review summarizes the pharmacologic properties, clinical efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in advanced lung cancer treatment, with a focus on NSCLC, EGFR-mutant NSCLC and small-cell lung cancer.

Treatment advances in small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor characterized by rapid doubling time and high propensity for early development of disseminated disease. Although most patients respond to initial therapy with a platinum doublet, the majority of those with limited stage and virtually all patients with metastatic disease eventually develop tumor progression for which there are limited treatment options. There have been no recent changes in the treatment of SCLC, with platinum plus etoposide and topotecan as the standard first-line and second-line respectively, neither showing survival benefit over the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine, which was developed in the 1970s. More recently, a new understanding of the biology of SCLC has led to the development of novel drugs, of which the most promising are the immune checkpoint inhibitors and the antibody drug conjugate rovalpituzumab tesirine.

Meta-analysis of the role of bevacizumab in extensive stage small cell lung cancer

Progress in the treatment options for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains poor. Concerns exist regarding the efficacy of bevacizumab in SCLC. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab in extensive stage (ES)-SCLC. A meta-analysis on studies conducted and listed on the Medline, Cochrane Trials, ASCO, ESMO and ClinicalTrial databases, and Chinese databases prior to April 2015 was performed. All clinical trials in which patients with ES-SCLC were treated with bevacizumab were considered. Survival rates at specific time points were extracted from the reported survival curves. Hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), rates for PFS, OS, overall response rate (ORR), and side-effects were synthesized using random-effects or fixed-effects model. Two randomized control trials (RCT) (176 patients) and six single-arm trials (292 patients) were identified. In RCTs, no statistically significant differences were observed in PFS [HR, 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41–1.19; P=0.19] or OS (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.84–1.75; P=0.31). In the first-line trials, pooled 6-month and 1-year PFS rates were 57% (95% CI, 39–76%) and 10% (95% CI, 4–16%), respectively. Synthesized 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 45% (95% CI, 36–54%) and 10% (95% CI, 6–14%), respectively. Reported median PFS and OS times for pretreated patients were 2.7–4.0 months and 6.3–7.4 months, respectively. Pooled ORRs were 71% (95% CI, 59–82%) in the first-line trials and 18% (95% CI, 11–25%) in the second-line trials. The most common types of reported toxicities were chemotherapy-associated, including neutropenia, leukopenia, fatigue and thrombocytopenia. According to the RCTs, bevacizumab did not appear to improve the PFS or OS for patients with ES-SCLC, with low quality of evidence. Due to the disappointing pooled efficacy in the single-arm trials, more clinical studies on bevacizumab in SCLC may not be valuable, although the evidence was with low quality.

Bevacizumab significantly increases the risks of hypertension and proteinuria in cancer patients: A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis

Published data regarding the overall risks and incidence of hypertension and proteinuria associated with bevacizumab were still unclear. To quantify the precise risks and incidence, we performed this comprehensive meta-analysis of 72 published clinical trials including 21902 cases and 20608 controls. The overall incidence, risk ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using a fixed or random-effect model based on the heterogeneity. The incidence of all-grade and high-grade hypertension were 25.3% (95% CI: 21.5%−29.5%) and 8.2% (95% CI: 7%−9.8%) for patients treated with bevacizumab. And the incidence of all-grade and high-grade proteinuria were 18% (95% CI: 11.7%−26.6%) and 2.4% (95% CI: 1.8%−3.2%), respectively. Compared with controls, bevacizumab significantly increased the risks of all-grade (RR: 3.595, 95% CI: 2.952−4.378) and high-grade hypertension (RR: 5.173, 95% CI: 4.188−6.390). Obviously increased risks of all-grade (RR: 3.369, 95% CI: 2.492−4.556) and high-grade proteinuria (RR: 5.494, 95% CI: 3.991−7.564) were also observed. In the subgroup analysis, the risks of hypertension and proteinuria may significantly vary with bevacizumab dosage, cancer types and concomitant drugs. Whereas, no obvious difference were discovered when stratified based on phase of trials, age of patients, treatment line and duration. So, close monitor and effective management were highly recommended for the safe use of bevacizumab.