Loss of the epithelial marker CDX1 predicts poor prognosis in early-stage CRC patients

BACKGROUND

We have previously shown that non-curative chemotherapy imposes fetal conversion and high metastatic capacity to cancer cells. From the set of genes differentially expressed in Chemotherapy Resistant Cells, we obtained a characteristic fetal intestinal cell signature that is present in a group of untreated tumors and is sufficient to predict patient prognosis. A feature of this fetal signature is the loss of CDX1.

METHODS

We have analyzed transcriptomic data in public datasets and performed immunohistochemistry analysis of paraffin embedded tumor samples from two cohorts of colorectal cancer patients.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that low levels of CDX1 are sufficient to identify patients with poorest outcome at the early tumor stages II and III. Presence tumor areas that are negative for CDX1 staining in stage I cancers is associated with tumor relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results reveal the actual possibility of incorporating CDX1 immunostaining as a valuable biomarker for CRC patients.

Machine-Learning Identifies a Strategy for Differentiation Therapy in Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

Although differentiation therapy can cure some hematologic malignancies, its curative potential remains unrealized in solid tumors. This is because conventional computational approaches succumb to the thunderous noise of inter-/intratumoral heterogeneity. Using colorectal cancers (CRCs) as an example, here we outline a machine learning(ML)-based approach to track, differentiate, and selectively target cancer stem cells (CSCs).

METHODS

A transcriptomic network was built and validated using healthy colon and CRC tissues in diverse gene expression datasets (~5,000 human and >300 mouse samples). Therapeutic targets and perturbation strategies were prioritized using ML, with the goal of reinstating the expression of a transcriptional identifier of the differentiated colonocyte, CDX2, whose loss in poorly differentiated (CSC-enriched) CRCs doubles the risk of relapse/death. The top candidate target was then engaged with a clinical-grade drug and tested on 3 models: CRC lines in vitro, xenografts in mice, and in a prospective cohort of healthy (n = 3) and CRC (n = 23) patient-derived organoids (PDOs).

RESULTS

The drug shifts the network predictably, induces CDX2 and crypt differentiation, and shows cytotoxicity in all 3 models, with a high degree of selectivity towards all CDX2-negative cell lines, xenotransplants, and PDOs. The potential for effective pairing of therapeutic efficacy (IC50) and biomarker (CDX2-low state) is confirmed in PDOs using multivariate analyses. A 50-gene signature of therapeutic response is derived and tested on 9 independent cohorts (~1700 CRCs), revealing the impact of CDX2-reinstatement therapy could translate into a ~50% reduction in the risk of mortality/recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings not only validate the precision of the ML approach in targeting CSCs, and objectively assess its impact on clinical outcome, but also exemplify the use of ML in yielding clinical directive information for enhancing personalized medicine.

ZEB1 hypermethylation is associated with better prognosis in patients with colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer (CC) is a heterogeneous disease that is categorized into four Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS) according to gene expression. Patients with loco-regional CC (stages II/III) lack prognostic factors, making it essential to analyze new molecular markers that can delineate more aggressive tumors. Aberrant methylation of genes that are essential in crucial mechanisms such as epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) contributes to tumor progression in CC. We evaluate the presence of hyper- and hypomethylation in subrogate IHC markers used for CMS classification (CDX2, FRMD6, HTR2B, ZEB1) of 144 stage II/III patients and CC cell lines by pyrosequencing. ZEB1 expression was also studied in control and shRNA-silenced CC cell lines and in paired normal tissue/tumors by quantitative PCR. The pattern of ZEB1 staining was also analyzed in methylated/unmethylated tumors by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

We describe for the first time the hypermethylation of ZEB1 gene and the hypomethylation of the FRMD6 gene in 32.6% and 50.9% of tumors, respectively. Additionally, we confirm the ZEB1 re-expression by epigenetic drugs in methylated cell lines. ZEB1 hypermethylation was more frequent in CMS1 patients and, more importantly, was a good prognostic factor related to disease-free survival (p = 0.015) and overall survival (p = 0.006) in our patient series, independently of other significant clinical parameters such as patient age, stage, lymph node involvement, and blood vessel and perineural invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

Aberrant methylation is present in the subrogate genes used for CMS classification. Our results are the first evidence that ZEB1 is hypermethylated in CC and that this alteration is an independent factor of good prognosis.

The prognostic potential of CDX2 in colorectal cancer: Harmonizing biology and clinical practice

Adjuvant chemotherapy following surgical intervention remains the primary treatment option for patients with localized colorectal cancer (CRC). However, a significant proportion of patients will have an unfavorable outcome after current forms of chemotherapy. While reflecting the increasing complexity of CRC, the clinical application of molecular biomarkers provides information that can be utilized to guide therapeutic strategies. Among these, caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) emerges as a biomarker of both prognosis and relapse after therapy. CDX2 is a key transcription factor that controls intestinal fate. Although rarely mutated in CRC, loss of CDX2 expression has been reported mostly in right-sided, microsatellite-unstable tumors and is associated with aggressive carcinomas. The pathological assessment of CDX2 by immunohistochemistry can thus identify patients with high-risk CRC, but the evaluation of CDX2 expression remains challenging in a substantial proportion of patients. In this review, we discuss the roles of CDX2 in homeostasis and CRC and the alterations that lead to protein expression loss. Furthermore, we review the clinical significance of CDX2 assessment, with a particular focus on its current use as a biomarker for pathological evaluation and clinical decision-making. Finally, we attempt to clarify the molecular implications of CDX2 deficiency, ultimately providing insights for a more precise evaluation of CDX2 protein expression.

Association of CDX2 and mucin expression with chemotherapeutic benefits in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Better predictors of patients with stage II/III gastric cancer (GC) most likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy are urgently needed. This study aimed to assess the ability of CDX2 and mucin markers to predict prognosis and fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy benefits.

METHODS

CDX2 and mucin protein expressions were examined by immunohistochemistry and compared with survival and adjuvant chemotherapy benefits in a prospective evaluation cohort of 782 stage II/III GC patients. Then, the main findings were validated in an independent validation cohort (n = 386) and an external mRNA sequencing dataset (ACRG cohort, n = 193).

RESULTS

In the evaluation cohort, CDX2, CD10, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6 expressions were observed in 59.7%, 26.7%, 27.6%, 55.1%, and 57.7% of patients, respectively. However, only the expression of CDX2 was found to be associated with adjuvant chemotherapy benefits. Most importantly, CDX2-negative patients had a poorer prognosis when treated with surgery only, while the prognosis of CDX2-negative and CDX2-positive patients was similar when receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Further analysis revealed that patients with CDX2 negative tumors benefited from chemotherapy (5-year overall survival rates: 60.0% with chemotherapy vs. 23.2% with surgery-only, p < 0.001), whereas patients with CDX2 positive tumors did not (pinteraction  = 0.004). Consistent results were obtained in the validation and ACRG cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative expression of CDX2 is an independent risk factor for survival in stage II/III GC, but subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy is able to compensate for this unfavorable effect. Therefore, active chemotherapy is more urgent for patients with negative CDX2 expression than for patients with positive CDX2 expression.

Cobind: quantitative analysis of the genomic overlaps

Motivation

Analyzing the overlap between two sets of genomic intervals is a frequent task in the field of bioinformatics. Typically, this is accomplished by counting the number (or proportion) of overlapped regions, which applies an arbitrary threshold to determine if two genomic intervals are overlapped. By making binary calls but disregarding the magnitude of the overlap, such an approach often leads to biased, non-reproducible, and incomparable results.

Results

We developed the cobind package, which incorporates six statistical measures: the Jaccard coefficient, Sørensen-Dice coefficient, Szymkiewicz-Simpson coefficient, collocation coefficient, pointwise mutual information (PMI), and normalized PMI. These measures allow for a quantitative assessment of the collocation strength between two sets of genomic intervals. To demonstrate the effectiveness of these methods, we applied them to analyze CTCF's binding sites identified from ChIP-seq, cancer-specific open-chromatin regions (OCRs) identified from ATAC-seq of 17 cancer types, and oligodendrocytes-specific OCRs identified from scATAC-seq. Our results indicated that these new approaches effectively re-discover CTCF's cofactors, as well as cancer-specific and oligodendrocytes-specific master regulators implicated in disease and cell type development.

Availability and implementation

The cobind package is implemented in Python and freely available at https://cobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

Potential predictors for CDX2 expression loss and mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer

CDX2 expression loss is commonly associated with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there are only a few studies that have attempted to correlate CDX2 expression loss with specific MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). This is a retrospective study of 327 patients who underwent surgery due to CRC. Nine patients (2.9%) had two synchronous CRCs, making the total sample 336 CRC. Histopathological data such as tumor type, tumor grade, perineural, lymphatic, and vascular invasion, pT stage, pN stage, peritumoral and intratumoral lymphocytic infiltration were collected and recorded in the database. After immunohistochemical analysis, CDX2 expression, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 deficiency were also recorded. CDX2 expression loss was detected in 19 out of 336 CRCs (5.9%) and was associated with ascending colon CRC, partially mucinous adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated carcinoma, and dMMR. Forty-four (13.1%) of CRCs were dMMR. We found a statistically significant association between CDX2 expression loss and MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency. Considering that most expression phenotypes include pairs of MMR genes, we analyzed MLH1/PMS2 and MSH2/MSH6 as heterodimers. Analysis of heterodimers showed a similar result, namely, that MLH1/PMS2 heterodimer deficiency was significantly associated with CDX2 expression loss. We also constructed a regression model for CDX2 expression loss and for dMMR. Poor tumor differentiation and MLH1/PMS2 heterodimer deficiency have been identified as potential predictors for CDX2 expression loss. CRC in the ascending colon and CDX2 expression loss have been identified as positive potential predictors of dMMR with rectal cancer as negative potential predictor of dMMR. Our study showed a significant association between CDX2 expression loss and MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency in CRC. We also managed to produce a regression model for CDX2 expression and showed that poor tumor differentiation and MLH1/PMS2 heterodimer deficiency are independent factors for CDX2 expression loss. We were the first to include CDX2 expression in a regression model for dMMR and showed that CDX2 expression loss can be used as a predictive factor for dMMR, which should be confirmed by further studies.

The Regulatory Role of Neuropeptide Gene Glucagon in Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Bioinformatic Analysis

Background

Colorectal cancer is highly prevalent and causes high global mortality, and glucagon axis has been implicated in colon cancer. The present study is aimed at investigating the regulating mechanisms of glucagon involvement in colorectal cancer.

Methods

Publicly available data from the TCGA database was utilized to explore the expression pattern and regulating role of glucagon (GCG) in colorectal cancer (COADREAD) including colon adenocarcinomas (COAD) and rectum adenocarcinomas (READ). Statistical analyses were performed using the R software packages and public web servers. The expression pattern and prognostic significance of GCG gene in pan-cancer and TCGA-COADREAD data were investigated by performing unpaired and paired sample analyses. The association of GCG expression with clinical characteristics was investigated using logistic regression analysis. Univariate cox regression analysis was performed to test the prognostic value of GCG expression for overall survival in COADREAD patients. GCG-significantly correlated genes were obtained. Biological functions and signaling pathways were identified by performing functional enrichment analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Additionally, the potential involvement of GCG in tumor immunity was researched by investigating the correlation between GCG expression and 24 tumor infiltrating immune cells.

Results

GCG was found to be significantly downregulated in COADREAD tumor samples compared with healthy control samples. GCG gene was shown to be associated with the prognostic outcomes of COADREAD, whereby its upregulation predicted improved survival outcomes. Functional enrichment analysis showed that the top 100 positively and top 100 negatively GCG-correlated genes were mainly enriched in three signaling pathways including ribosome, nitrogen metabolism, and proximal tubule bicarbonate reclamation. The GSEA showed that GCG-significantly correlated genes were mainly enriched in cell cycle-related pathways (reactome cell cycle, reactome cell cycle mitotic, reactome cell cycle checkpoints, reactome M phase, Reactome G2 M DNA damage checkpoint, and Reactome G2 M checkpoints), neuropeptide ligand receptor interaction, RHO GTPases signaling, WNT signaling, RUNX1 signaling, NOTCH signaling, ESR signaling, HCMV infection, and oxidative stress-related signaling. GCG was positively correlated with Th17 cells, pDC, macrophages, TFH cells, iDC, Tem, B cells, dendritic cells, neutrophils, mast cells, and eosinophils and was negatively associated with NK cells.

Conclusions

GCG dysregulation with high prognostic value in COADREAD was noted. Several tumor progression-related pathways and tumor immune-modulatory cells were linked to GCG expression in COADREAD. Therefore, GCG may be regarded as a potential therapeutic target for treating colorectal cancer.

Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is still a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Less than half of cases are diagnosed when the cancer is locally advanced. CRC is a heterogenous disease associated with a number of genetic or somatic mutations. Diagnostic markers are used for risk stratification and early detection, which might prolong overall survival. Nowadays, the widespread use of semi-invasive endoscopic methods and feacal blood tests characterised by suboptimal accuracy of diagnostic results has led to the detection of cases at later stages. New molecular noninvasive tests based on the detection of CRC alterations seem to be more sensitive and specific then the current methods. Therefore, research aiming at identifying molecular markers, such as DNA, RNA and proteins, would improve survival rates and contribute to the development of personalized medicine. The identification of “ideal” diagnostic biomarkers, having high sensitivity and specificity, being safe, cheap and easy to measure, remains a challenge. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advances in novel diagnostic biomarkers for tumor tissue, blood and stool samples in CRC patients.

A Novel Prognostic Biomarker Panel for Early-Stage Colon Carcinoma

Molecular characterization of colorectal cancer has helped us understand better the biology of the disease. However, previous efforts have yet to provide significant clinical value in order to be integrated into clinical practice for patients with early-stage colon cancer (CC). The purpose of this study was to assess PD-L1, GLUT-1, e-cadherin, MUC2, CDX2, and microsatellite instability (dMMR) and to propose a risk-panel with prognostic capabilities. Biomarkers were immunohistochemically assessed through tissue microarrays in a cohort of 144 patients with stage II/III colon cancer. A biomarker panel consisting of PD-L1, GLUT-1, dMMR, and potentially CDX2 was constructed that divided patients into low, medium, and high risk of overall survival or disease-free survival (DFS) in equally sized groups. Compared with low-risk patients, medium-risk patients have almost twice the risk of death (HR = 2.10 (0.99-4.46), p = 0.054), while high-risk patients have almost four times the risk (HR = 3.79 (1.77-8.11), p = 0.001). The multivariate goodness of fit was 0.756 and was correlated with Kaplan-Meier curves (p = 0.002). Consistent results were found for DFS. This study provides a critical basis for the future development of an immunohistochemical assessment capable of discerning early-stage CC patients as a function of their prognosis. This tool may aid with treatment personalization in daily clinical practice and improve survival outcomes.

Loss of CDX2 in colorectal cancer is associated with histopathologic subtypes and microsatellite instability but is prognostically inferior to hematoxylin-eosin-based morphologic parameters from the WHO classification

BACKGROUND

Immunohistochemical loss of CDX2 has been proposed as a biomarker of dismal survival in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), especially in UICC Stage II/III. However, it remains unclear, how CDX2 expression is related to central hematoxylin-eosin (HE)-based morphologic parameters defined by 2019 WHO classification and how its prognostic relevance is compared to these parameters.

METHODS

We evaluated CDX2 expression in 1003 CRCs and explored its prognostic relevance compared to CRC subtypes, tumour budding and WHO grade in the overall cohort and in specific subgroups.

RESULTS

CDX2-low/absent CRCs were enriched in specific morphologic subtypes, right-sided and microsatellite-instable (MSI-H) CRCs (P < 0.001) and showed worse survival characteristics in the overall cohort/UICC Stage II/III (e.g. DFS: P = 0.005) and in microsatellite stable and left-sided CRCs, but not in MSI-H or right-sided CRCs. Compared with CDX2, all HE-based markers showed a significantly better prognostic discrimination in all scenarios. In multivariate analyses including all morphologic parameters, CDX2 was not an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

CDX2 loss has some prognostic impact in univariate analyses, but its prognostic relevance is considerably lower compared to central HE-based morphologic parameters defined by the WHO classification and vanishes in multivariate analyses incorporating these factors.

Detection of postoperative plasma circulating tumour DNA and lack of CDX2 expression as markers of recurrence in patients with localised colon cancer

Background

Colon cancer (CC) is a heterogeneous disease. Novel prognostic factors beyond pathological staging are required to accurately identify patients at higher risk of relapse. Integrating these new biological factors, such as plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), CDX2 staining, inflammation-associated cytokines and transcriptomic consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) classification, into a multimodal approach may improve our accuracy in determining risk of recurrence.

Methods

One hundred and fifty patients consecutively diagnosed with localised CC were prospectively enrolled in our study. ctDNA was tracked to detect minimal residual disease by droplet digital PCR. CDX2 expression was analysed by immunostaining. Plasma levels of cytokines potentially involved in disease progression were measured using ELISAs. A 96 custom gene panel for nCounter assay was used to classify CC into colorectal cancer assigner and CMS.

Results

Most patients were classified into CMS4 (37%) and CMS2 (28%), followed by CMS1 (20%) and CMS3 (15%) groups. CDX2-negative tumours were enriched in CMS1 and CMS4 subtypes. In univariable analysis, prognosis was influenced by primary tumour location, stage, vascular and perineural invasion together with high interleukin-6 plasma levels at baseline, tumours belonging to CMS 1 vs CMS2 +CMS3, ctDNA presence in plasma and CDX2 loss. However, only positive ctDNA in plasma samples (HR 13.64; p=0.002) and lack of CDX2 expression (HR 23.12; p=0.001) were found to be independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival in the multivariable model.

Conclusions

ctDNA detection after surgery and lack of CDX2 expression identified patients at very high risk of recurrence in localised CC.

CDX2 inducible microRNAs sustain colon cancer by targeting multiple DNA damage response pathway factors

Meta-analysis of transcripts in colon adenocarcinoma patient tissues led to the identification of a DNA damage responsive miR signature called DNA damage sensitive miRs (DDSMs). DDSMs were experimentally validated in the cancerous colon tissues obtained from an independent cohort of colon cancer patients and in multiple cellular systems with high levels of endogenous DNA damage. All the tested DDSMs were transcriptionally upregulated by a common intestine-specific transcription factor, CDX2. Reciprocally, DDSMs were repressed via the recruitment of HDAC1/2-containing complexes onto the CDX2 promoter. These miRs downregulated multiple key targets in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, namely BRCA1, ATM, Chk1 (also known as CHEK1) and RNF8. CDX2 directly regulated the DDSMs, which led to increased tumor volume and metastasis in multiple preclinical models. In colon cancer patient tissues, the DDSMs negatively correlated with BRCA1 levels, were associated with decreased probability of survival and thereby could be used as a prognostic biomarker. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Loss of CDX-2 expression is an independent poor prognostic biomarker in patients with early-stage deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer

AIM

To investigate the clinicopathological factors, molecular features, and prognostic implications associated with loss of Caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX-2) expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry for CDX-2 expression was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary CRC tissue samples from 449 patients. Correlation between CDX-2 expression and clinicopathological and molecular characteristics was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to determine the prognostic value of loss of CDX-2 expression.

RESULTS

Of 449 patients, 84% were stage I-III. CDX-2-negative expression was identified in 18 of 441 (4.1%) patients. Loss of CDX-2 expression was more commonly found in patients with right-sided tumors rather than left-sided tumors (odds ratio [OR] = 3.57; p = 0.009), deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) compared to proficient MMR (pMMR) (OR = 3.7; p = 0.012), and BRAF mutation compared to BRAF wild type (OR = 8.06; p = 0.002). Univariate analysis revealed that stage I-III CRC patients with loss of CDX-2 expression had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than those with positive CDX-2 expression (5-year OS = 33.3% vs. 74.6%, respectively; p < 0.001, and 5-year DFS: 42.9% vs. 69.5%, respectively; p = 0.004). Loss of CDX-2 expression remained significantly associated with worse OS compared to positive CDX-2 expression in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-5.11; p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of CDX-2 expression was found to be associated with right-sided tumor, dMMR status, and BRAF mutation. Moreover, loss of CDX-2 expression is a poor prognostic factor for OS in stage I-III, even among patients with dMMR tumors.

Clinical Value of Consensus Molecular Subtypes in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) capture tumor heterogeneity at the gene-expression level. Currently, a restricted number of molecular features are used to guide treatment for CRC. We summarize the evidence on the clinical value of the CMSs.

Methods

We systematically identified studies in Medline and Embase that evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of CMSs in CRC patients. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed on prognostic data. Predictive data were summarized.

Results

In local disease, CMS4 tumors were associated with worse overall survival (OS) compared with CMS1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.27 to 8.47) and CMS2 cancers (HR = 2.60, 95% confidence interval = 1.93 to 3.50). In metastatic disease, CMS1 consistently had worse survival than CMS2-4 (OS HR range = 0.33-0.55; progression-free survival HR range = 0.53-0.89). Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III CRC was most beneficial for OS in CMS2 and CMS3 (HR range = 0.16-0.45) and not effective in CMS4 tumors. In metastatic CMS4 cancers, an irinotecan-based regimen improved outcome compared with oxaliplatin (HR range = 0.31-0.72). The addition of bevacizumab seemed beneficial in CMS1, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy improved outcome for KRAS wild-type CMS2 patients.

Conclusions

The CMS classification holds clear potential for clinical use in predicting both prognosis and response to systemic therapy, which seems to be independent of the classifier used. Prospective studies are warranted to support implementation of the CMS taxonomy in clinical practice.

PD-L1 as a Prognostic Factor in Early-Stage Colon Carcinoma within the Immunohistochemical Molecular Subtype Classification

BACKGROUND

There is a patent need to better characterize early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression has been proposed as a prognostic factor but yields mixed results in different settings. The Consensus Molecular Subtype (CMS) classification has yet to be integrated into clinical practice. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression overall and within CMS in early-stage colon cancer patients, in the hope of assisting treatment choice in this setting.

METHODS

Tissue-microarrays were constructed from tumor samples of 162 stage II/III CRC patients. They underwent automatic immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 and the proposed CMS panel. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression was significantly and independently associated with better prognosis (HR = 0.46 (0.26-0.82), p = 0.009) and was mostly seen in immune cells of the tumor-related stroma. CMS4 five-folds the risk of mortalitycompared with CMS1 (HR = 5.58 (1.36, 22.0), p = 0.034). In the subgroup CMS2/CMS3 analysis, PD-L1 expression significantly differentiated individuals with better OS (p = 0.004) and DFS (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that PD-L1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in patients with stage II/III colon cancer. Additionally, it successfully differentiates patients with better prognosis in the CMS2/CMS3 group and may prove significant for the clinical relevance of the CMS classification.

Mismatch repair phenotype determines the implications of tumor grade and CDX2 expression in stage II-III colon cancer

Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is an indicator of good prognosis in localized colon cancer but also associated with lack of expression of caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) and high tumor grade; markers that in isolation indicate a poor prognosis. Our study aims to identify clinically relevant prognostic subgroups by combining information about tumor grade, MMR phenotype, and CDX2 expression. Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins and CDX2 was performed in 544 patients with colon cancer stage II-III, including a cohort from a randomized trial. In patients with proficient MMR (pMMR) and CDX2 negativity, hazard ratio (HR) for cancer death was 2.93 (95% CI 1.23-6.99, p = 0.015). Cancer-specific survival for pMMR/CDX2-negative cases was 35.8 months (95% CI 23.4-48.3) versus 52.1-53.5 months (95% CI 45.6-58.6, p = 0.001) for the remaining cases (CDX2-positive tumors or deficient MMR (dMMR)/CDX2-negative tumors). In our randomized cohort, high tumor grade was predictive of response to adjuvant fluorouracil-levamisole in pMMR patients, with a significant interaction between tumor grade and treatment (p = 0.036). For pMMR patients, high tumor grade was a significant marker of poor prognosis in the surgery-only group (HR 4.60 (95% CI 1.68-12.61), p = 0.003) but not in the group receiving chemotherapy (HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.15-3.00), p = 0.587). To conclude, patients with pMMR and CDX2 negativity have a very poor prognosis. Patients with pMMR and high-graded tumors have a poor prognosis but respond well to adjuvant chemotherapy. CDX2 expression and tumor grade did not impact prognosis in patients with dMMR.

Quantitative analysis of CDX2 protein expression improves its clinical utility as a prognostic biomarker in stage II and III colon cancer

AIM

Better stratification of patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer for risk of recurrence is urgently needed. The present study aimed to validate the prognostic value of CDX2 protein expression in colon cancer tissue by routine immunohistochemistry and to evaluate its performance in a head-to-head comparison with tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

PATIENT AND METHODS

CDX2 protein expression was evaluated in 386 stage II and III primary colon cancers by immunohistochemical staining of tissue microarrays and by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections of a matched subset of 23 recurrent and 23 non-recurrent colon cancers. Association between CDX2 expression and disease-specific survival (DSS) was investigated.

RESULTS

Low levels of CDX2 protein expression in stage II and III colon cancer as determined by immunohistochemistry was associated with poor DSS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-3.06); p = 0.002). Based on analysis of a selected sample subset, CDX2 prognostic value was more pronounced when detected by LC-MS/MS (HR = 7.56 (95% CI: 2.49-22.95); p < 0.001) compared to detection by immunohistochemistry (HR = 1.60 (95% CI: 0.61-4.22); p = 0.34).

CONCLUSION

This study validated CDX2 protein expression as a prognostic biomarker in stage II and III colon cancer, conform previous publications. CDX2 prognostic value appeared to be underestimated when detected by routine immunohistochemistry, probably due to the semiquantitative and subjective nature of this methodology. Quantitative analysis of CDX2 substantially improved its clinical utility as a prognostic biomarker. Therefore, development of routinely applicable quantitative assays for CDX2 expression is needed to facilitate its clinical implementation.

Investigation of colorectal cancer in accordance with consensus molecular subtype classification

The classification of colorectal cancer (CRC) plays a pivotal role in predicting a patient's prognosis and determining treatment strategies. The consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classification system was constructed by analyzing genetic information from 18 CRC data sets, containing 4151 CRC samples. CRC was classified into four subtypes with distinct molecular and biological characteristics: CMS1 (microsatellite instability immune), CMS2 (canonical), CMS3 (metabolic), and CMS4 (mesenchymal). Since their designation in 2015, these classifications have been applied to basic and translational research of CRC, with the hope that understanding these subsets will influence a clinician's approach to therapeutic treatment and improve clinical outcomes. We reviewed CRC investigations in accordance with CMSs published in the last 5 years to further explore the clinical significance of these subtypes and identify underlying trends that may direct relevant future research. We determined that CMSs linked common features of CRC cell lines and PDX models in various studies. Furthermore, associations between prognosis and clinicopathological findings, including pathological grade and the stage of carcinogenesis, tumor budding, and tumor location, were correlated with CMS classification. Novel prognostic factors were identified, and the relationship between chemotherapeutic drug resistance and CMS has been fortified by our compilation of research; thus, indicating that this review provides advanced insight into clinical questions and treatment strategies for CRC.

The role of transcription factor caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most malignant tumors in humans and causes mass mortality. In the age of precise medicine, more and more subtypes of CRC were classified. The caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) is an intestine-specific transcription factor which is implicated in differentiation, proliferation, cell-adhesion, and migration. The loss of CDX2 in immunohistochemical stain was reported to be a prognostic factor of colon cancer, but the clinical application remained controversial. Most of the CRCs expressed or over-expressed CDX2. Homeobox genes can display either an oncogenic or a tumor-suppressing activity. CDX2 regulates the developing intestinal epithelium and CRC by different pathways. The complex regulation of CDX2 and its complex targets cause the difficulties of application for CDX2 in the prediction of prognosis. However, CDX2 is a potential biomarker applied in the precise classification of CRC for personalized medicine. This review partially clarifies the role of CDX2 in CRC.

CDX2 Loss With Microsatellite Stable Phenotype Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome in Stage II Colorectal Carcinoma

Current risk factors in stage II colorectal carcinoma are insufficient to guide treatment decisions. Loss of CDX2 has been shown to associate with poor clinical outcome and predict benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III colorectal carcinoma. The prognostic relevance of CDX2 in stage II disease has not been sufficiently validated, especially in relation to clinical risk factors, such as microsatellite instability (MSI) status, BRAF mutation status, and tumor budding. In this study, we evaluated the protein expression of CDX2 in tumor center and front areas in a tissue microarrays material of stage II colorectal carcinoma patients (n=232). CDX2 expression showed a partial or total loss in respective areas in 8.6% and 10.9% of patient cases. Patients with loss of CDX2 had shorter disease-specific survival when scored independently either in tumor center or tumor front areas (log rank P=0.012; P=0.012). Loss of CDX2 predicted survival independently of other stage II risk factors, such as MSI status and BRAF mutation status, pT class, and tumor budding (hazard ratio=5.96, 95% confidence interval=1.55-22.95; hazard ratio=3.70, 95% confidence interval=1.30-10.56). Importantly, CDX2 loss predicted inferior survival only in patients with microsatellite stable, but not with MSI-high phenotype. Interestingly, CDX2 loss associated with low E-cadherin expression, tight junction disruption, and high expression of ezrin protein. The work demonstrates that loss of CDX2 is an independent risk factor of poor disease-specific survival in stage II colorectal carcinoma. Furthermore, the study suggests that CDX2 loss is linked with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition independently of tumor budding.

Expression pattern of placenta specific 8 and keratin 20 in different types of gastrointestinal cancer

The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of keratin 20 (KRT20) and placenta specific 8 (PLAC8) in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer with various differentiation phenotypes. The present study retrospectively investigated archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 12 patients at different stages of GI cancer [four with gastric cancer, four with pancreatic cancer and four with colorectal cancer (CRC)]. The stages were pre-determined, according to differentiation phenotypes, by a pathologist of the Department of Pathology at Sijhih Cathay General Hospital. KRT20 and PLAC8 expression levels were assessed using immunohistochemistry. The CRC cell lines SW620 and Caco-2 were used to assess interactions between KRT20 and PLAC8 via reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. PLAC8 and KRT20 expression was observed consistently only in the well-differentiated CRC tissue samples. Low KRT20 expression levels were observed in the PLAC8 knockdown SW620 cells. In addition, there was a positive association between PLAC8 and KRT20 expression in the differentiated Caco-2 cells. According to the results of the present study, the differentiation status of GI cancer influenced KRT20 expression, particularly in CRC, which may explain why patients with well-differentiated CRC display better clinical outcomes. Therefore, the prognostic significance of KRT20 and PLAC8 may be particularly crucial for patients with CRC displaying a well-differentiated phenotype.

SATB2 and CDX2 are prognostic biomarkers in DNA mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer

DNA mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer frequently displays reduced CDX2 expression, and recent literature has suggested that negative CDX2 expression is a poor prognostic biomarker in colon cancer. We have recently demonstrated that SATB2 is an immunohistochemical marker that is complementary to CDX2. Using a tissue microarray approach, we evaluated SATB2 and CDX2 immunohistochemical expression in 514 patients with colonic adenocarcinoma including 146 with mismatch repair protein deficient tumors and correlated expression with histopathologic variables, molecular alterations, and survival. Overall, SATB2-negative and/or CDX2-negative expression was identified in 33% of mismatch repair protein deficient tumors compared with only 15% of mismatch repair protein proficient tumors (p < 0.001) and in 36% of BRAF V600E mutated compared with only 13% of BRAF wild-type tumors (p < 0.001). Both SATB2-negative and CDX2-negative colonic adenocarcinomas more often displayed lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and perineural invasion (all with p < 0.05). SATB2-negative expression was also more frequently identified in tumors with mucinous or signet ring cell differentiation (p < 0.01 for both). In a multivariable analysis of survival in patients with mismatch repair protein deficient tumors (n = 131), only tumor stage (p = 0.01) and SATB2-negative and/or CDX2-negative expression (p = 0.009) independently predicted disease-specific survival. Of the 99 patients with stage II or III mismatch repair protein deficient tumors, death from disease only occurred in patients with either SATB2-negative or CDX2-negative tumors, and no patients with SATB2-positive/CDX2-positive tumors developed recurrence or died of disease. SATB2 and CDX2 expression had no effect on patient survival in mismatch repair protein proficient, BRAF-mutated, or KRAS-mutated tumors. In summary, our results suggest that SATB2 and CDX2 are prognostic biomarkers in patients with mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer and that inclusion of SATB2 and CDX2 immunohistochemistry may be helpful as part of a comprehensive pathologic risk assessment in mismatch repair protein deficient colon cancer.

Long noncoding RNA MIR31HG is a bona fide prognostic marker with colorectal cancer cell-intrinsic properties

Elevated miR-31 expression is associated with poor outcome in colorectal cancer (CRC). Whether the prognostic information is independent of known molecular subgroups and gene expression-based consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) is currently unknown. To investigate this, we analyzed nearly 2000 CRC biopsies and preclinical models. The expression of miR-31-5p and its host transcript, long noncoding RNA MIR31HG, was strongly correlated (Spearman's ρ > 0.80). MIR31HG outlier expression was observed in 158/1265 (12%) of pCRCs and was associated with depletion of CMS2-canonical subgroup (odds ratio = 0.21 [0.11-0.35]) and shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) in multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.2 [1.6-3.0]). For stage II disease, 5-year RFS for patients with MIR31HG outlier status was 49% compared to 77% for those with normal-like expression. MIR31HG outlier status was associated with inferior outcome also within clinical high risk groups and within the poor prognostic CMS4-mesenchymal gene expression subtype specifically. Preclinical models with MIR31HG outlier expression were characterized by reduced expression of MYC targets as well as elevated epithelial-mesenchymal transition, TNF-α/NFκB, TGF-β, and IFN-α/γ gene expression signatures, indicating cancer cell-intrinsic properties resembling the CMS4 subgroup-associations which were recapitulated in patient biopsies. Moreover, the prognostic value of MIR31HG outlier status was independent of cytotoxic T lymphocyte and fibroblast infiltration. We here present evidence that MIR31HG expression provides clinical stratification beyond major gene expression phenotypes and tumor immune and stromal cell infiltration and propose a model where increased expression is an indicator of a cellular state conferring intrinsic invasive and/or immuno-evasive capabilities.

CDX2 and Muc2 immunohistochemistry as prognostic markers in stage II colon cancer

The treatment for colorectal cancer is largely surgical followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk cases. In patients with stage II cancer, there is no clear benefit for chemotherapy, and the current tools for assessment of risk are inadequate. A recent study identified that colorectal cancer with a gene signature similar to undifferentiated colonic stem cells was associated with a worse outcome. It was later shown that loss of CDX2 detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) alone resulted in a worse prognosis and that this could be used to predict patients who would benefit from chemotherapy. Having observed that CDX2 expression can be patchy, we elected to validate these prior results for clinical practice using whole-slide IHC. The pathology of all cases was reviewed, and 3 blocks were selected for CDX2 IHC. We also expanded the panel beyond CDX2 to assess whether other markers in the gene signature including CDX1, Muc2, GPX2, and villin could better predict outcome. Among 210 cases, CDX2 expression was diffusely lost in 11% and focally lost in 23% of cases. There was no difference in survival based on CDX2 expression, but Muc2 loss was associated with reduced survival (hazard ratio, 3.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 9.20). No significant differences in outcome were identified based on CDX1, GPX2, or villin expression. In keeping with this, assessment of The Cancer Genome Atlas gene expression data demonstrated that decreased Muc2 expression was associated with reduced overall survival. Our results with whole-slide IHC are different from the previous studies and caution against the use of CDX2 in isolation as a prognostic marker in clinical practice. We have identified that loss of Muc2 is associated with reduced survival. This supports the use of the colonic differentiation gene expression signature to identify high-risk patients but cautions against the use of any one IHC-based marker in isolation.

Study of histopathologic parameters to define the prognosis of stage II colon cancer

PURPOSE

Stage II colon cancer (CC) represents a challenging scenario for the choice of adjuvant chemotherapy; here, histologic factors need to be weighed up to establish the risk of recurrence. Tumor budding (TB) has recently been indicated as a confident predictor of clinical outcome in CC. Likewise, the presence of poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) in a tumor has been pointed out as a leading criterion of a tumor grading system. Our aim was to evaluate in patients with stage II CC the relationship between these features and clinical outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 174 cases of stage II CC; histopathologic parameters such as TB, PDCs, microsatellite instability (MSI), and CDX2 expression were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 107 (70.9%), 32 (21.2%), and 12 (7.9%) TB scored 1, 2, and 3 respectively; 113 (72.9%), 30 (19.4%), and 12 (7.7%) tumors showed grade 1, 2, and 3 PDCs respectively. A high-MSI was detected in 32 cases (18.4%) while CDX2 was negative in 20 (11.5%) tumor samples. In the whole study population, only the TB was found to be associated with disease-specific survival (P = 0.01). No parameter apart from age (P = 0.04) was a significant prognostic factor for overall survival (P < 0.05). Other commonly reported variables, including tumor size, degree of tumor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, number of lymph nodes harvested ≥ 12, MSI, and PDCs, were not shown to have significant results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although confirmatory studies are awaited, our work supports the role of the TB in defining risk groups of the stage II CC.

Prognostic value of low CDX2 expression in colorectal cancers with a high stromal content - a short report

PURPOSE

Lack of expression of the intestinal transcription factor CDX2 in colorectal cancer (CRC) identifies patients with a poor prognosis. This biomarker has previously been suggested to be prognostic in CRCs with a high stromal content based on mRNA expression data. We investigated the prognostic value of CDX2 expression in microsatellite stable CRC stratified by stromal content using microscopy-based techniques.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included a cohort of 236 patients with stage I-IV CRC. We assessed by microscopy the tumour-stroma ratio (TSR) and the immunohistochemical CDX2 intensity. We found that patients of the stroma-high group had a worse prognosis compared to those of the stroma-low group [disease-free survival in a multivariate analysis (DFS_multivariate) HR 1.52 (95% CI 1.05-2.21)]. In our cohort, low CDX2 expression (14.6%) showed prognostic value for DFS_multivariate [HR 1.93 (95% CI 1.16-3.23)]. Interestingly, when stratifying the cohort by TSR, no prognostic difference was observed related to CDX2 expression in stroma-low tumours. However, CDX2 expression was found to be prognostic within the stroma-high group [DFS_multivariate HR 3.02 (95% CI 1.49-6.13)]. The p value for interaction between TSR and CDX2 status was borderline significant in DFS (p = 0.071).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study confirms a poor outcome of patients with stroma-high tumours. Low CDX2 expression in tumours with a high stromal content identified patients with a particularly poor prognosis. The present study did not reveal a clear difference in TSR associated with CDX2 status and survival. This method, solely based on microscopy, identifies patients who have a high risk of relapse and a poor outcome, and who may benefit from targeted therapy.

Early-stage serrated adenocarcinomas are divided into several molecularly distinct subtypes

Serrated adenocarcinoma (SAC) is considered the end stage of the serrated neoplasia pathway. Although SAC prognosis is not widely recognized, the serrated pathway-associated subtype consistently exhibits unfavorable prognosis in genetic studies. Herein, we classified molecularly distinct subtypes of serrated adenocarcinomas and clarified their associated clinicopathological characteristics and genetic changes. We examined 38 early-stage colorectal SACs. Of these, 24 were classified into three molecularly distinct groups by colon cancer subtyping (CCS). The clinicopathological characteristics, Ki 67 labeling index (LI), and SAC epithelial serration were assessed. The DNA from carcinomas and normal tissue/adenoma was extracted by laser microdissection and sequenced by next-generation sequencing, and mutation numbers and patterns of a 15-oncogene panel were determined. The CCS groups included CCS1 (CDX2+, HTR2B-, FRMD6-, ZEB1-, and microsatellite instable-low [MSI-L]/microsatellite stable [MSS]; 14 cases), CCS2 (microsatellite instable-high [MSI-H], 5 cases), and CCS3 (CDX2-, HTR2B+, FRMD6+, ZEB1+, and MSI-L/MSS; 5 cases). Invasive cancer was significantly more frequent in CCS3 than in CCS1 (5/5 versus 3/14, respectively). Ki67 LI and epithelial serration were higher in CCS3 than in CCS1 (83.0 ± 5.8 versus 65.4 ± 4.0 and 5/5 versus 3/14, respectively; p = 0.031 and 0.0048). CCS2 showed the highest mutation number, whereas KRAS and BRAF mutation numbers were higher in CCS3 than in CCS1. Early-stage SACs were classified into three molecularly distinct subtypes with different clinicopathological and genetic characteristics.

Sidedness Matters: Surrogate Biomarkers Prognosticate Colorectal Cancer upon Anatomic Location

BACKGROUND

Anatomic location of primary tumors across the colon correlate with survival in the metastatic setting, whereas left-sided tumors may exhibit superior survival compared with right-sided tumors. The Oncotype Recurrence Score (RS) assay is a clinically validated predictor of recurrence risk in patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). Previous studies had indicated that without adjuvant chemotherapy, CDX2-negative stage II CRC tumors are associated with a lower rate of disease-free survival than CDX2-positive stage II CRC tumors. We aimed to evaluate whether these two validated prognostic biomarkers may correlate with primary tumor location, and whether tumor location may reflect differential prognosis in stage II CRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with T3 mismatch repair-proficient (MMR-P) stage II CRC for whom RS assay was performed. Pathological report was reviewed for exact primary tumor location and CDX2 immunostaining. RS and CDX2 expression were correlated with primary tumor location.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1,147 patients with MMR-P stage II CRC (median age 69 years [range 29-93]). Tumor distribution across the colon was as follows: 46% (n = 551) were right-sided and 54% (n = 596) were left-sided. RS was higher in right-sided tumors (p = .01). The RS results gradually decreased across the colon (cecum, highest score; sigmoid, lowest score; p = .04). Right-sided tumors exhibited more CDX2-negative tumors (p = .07).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that right-sided colorectal tumors may display worse prognosis compared with left-sided tumors in MMR-P stage II CRC. Primary tumor location may serve as a prognostic factor that should be taken into account for recurrence risk assessment and consideration of adjuvant treatment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Sidedness matters, even in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). Using two previously established prognostic tools, the Oncotype DX assay and CDX2 expression, this study found that right-sided tumors may display worse prognosis compared with left-sided tumors in mismatch repair-proficient stage II CRC. Therefore, primary tumor location should be taken into account for recurrence risk assessment and consideration of adjuvant treatment.

Prognostic impact of CDX2 in stage II colon cancer: results from two nationwide cohorts

Background

The aim of the present study was to validate the prognostic impact of CDX2 in patients with stage II colon cancer.

Methods

Two unbiased population-based cohorts representing all patients operated for stage II colon cancer in Denmark in 2002 and 2003. The CDX2 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on whole tumour sections. Patients were classified into three groups, CDX2-positive, -moderate, and -negative, for comparison with the clinical data.

Results

A total of 1157 patients were included. We found a significant relationship between loss of CDX2 expression and poor disease-free survival in both cohorts, p = 0.0267 and 0.0118, respectively. Five-year disease-free survival rates were 66%, 72% and 74% in the first cohort and 62%, 65%, and 75% in the second cohort for the negative, moderate, and positive CDX2 expression groups, respectively. Multiple Cox regression analysis performed on the combined cohorts confirmed an independent prognostic impact of CDX2 on disease-free survival, hazard ratio 1.543 (95% confidence interval 1.129–2.108), p = 0.0065.

Conclusions

This retrospective study provides validation regarding the prognostic impact of CDX2 in patients with stage II colon cancer. The results justify prospective validation clarifying its clinical impact.

Prognostic, predictive, and pharmacogenomic assessments of CDX2 refine stratification of colorectal cancer

We aimed to refine the value of CDX2 as an independent prognostic and predictive biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) according to disease stage and chemotherapy sensitivity in preclinical models. CDX2 expression was evaluated in 1045 stage I–IV primary CRCs by gene expression (n = 403) or immunohistochemistry (n = 642) and in relation to 5‐year relapse‐free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and chemotherapy. Pharmacogenomic associations between CDX2 expression and 69 chemotherapeutics were assessed by drug screening of 35 CRC cell lines. CDX2 expression was lost in 11.6% of cases and showed independent poor prognostic value in multivariable models. For individual stages, CDX2 was prognostic only in stage IV, independent of chemotherapy. Among stage I–III patients not treated in an adjuvant setting, CDX2 loss was associated with a particularly poor survival in the BRAF‐mutated subgroup, but prognostic value was independent of microsatellite instability status and the consensus molecular subtypes. In stage III, the 5‐year RFS rate was higher among patients with loss of CDX2 who received adjuvant chemotherapy than among patients who did not. The CDX2‐negative cell lines were significantly more sensitive to chemotherapeutics than CDX2‐positive cells, and the multidrug resistance genes MDR1 and CFTR were significantly downregulated both in CDX2‐negative cells and in patient tumors. Loss of CDX2 in CRC is an adverse prognostic biomarker only in stage IV disease and appears to be associated with benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III. Early‐stage patients not qualifying for chemotherapy might be reconsidered for such treatment if their tumor has loss of CDX2 and mutated BRAF.

Effects of CDX2 on prognosis and chemotherapy responsiveness in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer

Background

Caudal‐related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) is an intestine‐specific transcription factor implicated in tumour differentiation, proliferation, cell adhesion and migration. Negative CDX2 status (CDX2−) is associated with worse prognosis in colorectal cancer and may identify high‐risk stage II disease that benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy. This observational study investigated whether CDX2− is associated with prognosis or response to chemotherapy in the mismatch repair‐deficient (dMMR) phenotype of colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients with resectable dMMR colorectal cancer were eligible for inclusion. The prognostic and predictive value of CDX2 expression on the presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival was investigated. CDX2 status was determined via immunohistochemistry using the Leica Bond™ CDX2 (clone EP25) ready‐to‐use primary antibody.

Results

Some 235 of 238 consecutive dMMR tumours were assessed for CDX2 status. CDX2− was observed in 15·7 per cent of colorectal cancer. Interobserver agreement was excellent (κ = 0·863; P < 0·001). CDX2− was significantly associated with female sex, increased size, advanced stage, worse conventional and poorly differentiated cluster (PDC) grade, mucinous morphology, perineural and lymphovascular invasion, and pN status (all P ≤ 0·038). CDX2− was not associated with LNM or survival in multivariable analysis. Independent predictors of LNM were PDC grade (odds ratio (OR) 4·12, 95 per cent c.i. 1·76 to 9·63; P = 0·001) and extramural venous invasion (OR 3·79, 1·62 to 8·85; P = 0·002). Budding (hazard ratio (HR) 2·79, 95 per cent c.i. 1·60 to 4·87; P < 0·001), pT status (HR 3·59, 1·29 to 10·01; P = 0·015) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2·07, 1·15 to 3·74; P = 0·016) were independently associated with worse disease‐free survival.

Conclusion

CDX2− does not confer a worse prognosis in the dMMR phenotype of colorectal cancer. The MMR status of patients with colorectal cancer should be determined before assessing CDX2 status.

Homeobox protein CDX2 as a prognostic biomarker in solid malignancies: a meta-analysis

Background

CDX2 is a caudal-homeobox gene and its expression is abnormal in numerous tumour cell types. Nevertheless, its prognostic value for solid tumours requires further investigation. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the significance of CDX2 as a prognostic biomarker in solid malignancies systematically.

Materials and Methods

We performed a systematic literature search in PUBMED and EMBASE up to May 2017. Retrospective studies comparing the prognostic value of different CDX2 levels in human malignancies were included. Data extractions and methodological assessments were performed separately by two investigators using a standard procedure. The statistical procedures were performed using Review Manager 5.3 and STATA/MP 14.0.

Results

A total of 26 retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria and comprised 5008 participants. Patients with CDX2 overexpression had significantly better 3-year, 5-year, 10-year and disease-free survival outcomes in solid malignancies, regardless of the cancer type, mean age, and source region. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the patients from Europe. The expression level of CDX2 was not statistically associated with cancer relapse. Moreover, our analysis showed that CDX2 overexpression is correlated to better responses to chemotherapy in patients with TNM IV stage cancers. The stability of the pooled outcomes was verified by sensitivity analysis. The funnel plots, Egger's test and Begg's test jointly confirmed that there was no publication bias.

Conclusions

Overexpression of CDX2 is a reliable biomarker of a better prognosis in solid malignancies.

How and when adjuvant treatment should be intensified in stage III colorectal cancers?

The adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX) represents the standard of care in stage III colon cancer with some exceptions in old patients. Adjuvant treatment must also be discussed in high-risk stage II colon cancer. However, 40-50% of patients develop disease recurrence after curative R0 surgical resection. The liver was the most common site of recurrence followed by peritoneum. Although adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival and overall survival, 5-year overall survival remains less than 55% in stage III colon cancer. Different strategies could be adopted to escalate the standard adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients going from aggressive intravenous chemotherapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to adding targeted therapies or immunotherapies. We reported in this review the published and ongoing trials evaluating these treatment modalities in colon cancer.