Therapeutic drug monitoring may improve safety outcomes of long-term treatment with linezolid in adult patients

Population pharmacokinetics and thrombocytopenia risk assessment of linezolid in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Linezolid is a commonly prescribed antibiotic for multidrug-resistant enterococcal infections in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). However, changes in pharmacokinetics due to fluctuations in liver and renal functions, combined with the increased risk of thrombocytopenia, complicate its clinical use. This study aimed to characterize the exposure-thrombocytopenia risk relationship of linezolid in LTRs, and to identify safe dosing thresholds to promote rational drug use.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult LTRs treated with linezolid at Zhongshan Hospital between January 2019 and May 2022. A population exposure-safety model was developed and used to establish a thrombocytopenia risk threshold and optimize initial dosing strategies through Monte Carlo simulations. An area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) calculator was developed to facilitate individualized dose adjustments.

RESULTS

Exposure-safety analysis revealed that an AUCss,24h threshold of 291.7 mg/L·h was associated with an increased risk of thrombocytopenia. Monte Carlo simulations showed that current covariate-based initial dosing recommendations were suboptimal, highlighting the necessity of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to improve outcomes in LTRs. The online AUC calculator developed in this study offers a practical tool for clinicians to implement timely dose adjustments (https://optimaldose.shinyapps.io/LinezolidAUC/).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first comprehensive analysis of linezolid exposure and its relationship to thrombocytopenia risk in LTRs. The findings underscore the importance of AUC-guided dosing and TDM in optimizing treatment outcomes.

Management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a comprehensive narrative review of available evidence focusing on current controversies and the challenges ahead

INTRODUCTION

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by Staphylococcus aureus are common worldwide, representing one of the most relevant issues in clinical infectious diseases practice. In particular, BSIs by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA-BSI) are still today a challenge since mortality burden remains elevated although decades of research.

AREAS COVERED

The following topics regarding MRSA-BSI were reviewed and discussed by resorting to best available evidence retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE up to October 2024: i) epidemiology; ii) microbiology; iii) classification, with a focus on complicated and not complicated forms; iv) the structured approach to the patient; v) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the main antimicrobial options; vi) controversies regarding the best therapeutic approach.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite ongoing efforts to better stratify and manage MRSA-BSI, there is no universally accepted classification system accurately distinguishing between uncomplicated/low risk and complicated/high risk forms. Biomarkers such as interleukin(IL)-10 hold promise in order to enable a more precise stratification, premise for an appropriate treatment plan. There is a theoretical rationale for implementing a combination therapy including a beta-lactam agent upfront, especially for patients considered at higher risk of unfavorable outcomes, but further data are necessary, and the same applies to newer adjuvants. Novel microbiological techniques may help in guiding antimicrobial duration.

Clinical research for saliva-based therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid

AIMS

Linezolid is primarily used to treat of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis infections. Thrombocytopenia due to linezolid usage is a concern, and therapeutic drug monitoring has been reported to be effective in its prevention. Plasma concentrations provide valuable information for treatment decisions; however, collecting plasma samples can be burdensome for both patients and healthcare providers. Therefore, there is interest in saliva as an alternative for monitoring, considering its potential to replace plasma samples.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized at Hokkaido University Hospital and Hokkaido Spinal Cord Injury Center between April 2022 and July 2024, who received oral or intravenous linezolid treatment, were enrolled. The concentrations of linezolid were simultaneously measured in plasma and saliva samples. We determined the concentration profiles of linezolid in the saliva and examined the correlation between saliva and plasma linezolid concentrations.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients receiving linezolid were enrolled. The average of saliva/plasma (S/P) concentration ratios of linezolid were 1.018. A strong correlation was found between the salivary and plasma concentrations of linezolid (R = .833, P < .001). Notably, in patients receiving intravenous administration of linezolid, the correlation was even more pronounced (R = .885, P < .001). Additionally, when focusing on the S/P ratio of the trough concentrations in the morning and at night, the S/P ratios at night were much closer to 1.0.

CONCLUSION

The concentrations of linezolid in plasma and saliva were similar, indicating their potential applicability in clinical settings. The monitoring of linezolid concentrations in saliva has been shown to be particularly suitable for patients receiving intravenous administration.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized adults

BACKGROUND

Linezolid (LZD) is used to treat infectious diseases caused by Gram-positive bacteria, but thrombocytopenia is one of the main adverse reactions to LZD administration. Early prediction of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia (LI-TP) is of great importance to improve the clinical outcomes and prognoses. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a prediction model for LI-TP.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of hospitalized adults receiving LZD therapy (January 2014-June 2022) was analyzed. Independent risk factors for LI-TP were identified via logistic regression in the training set (n = 757). A nomogram model for LI-TP were developed based on independent risk factors, and verified in validation set (n = 123).

RESULTS

The incidence of LI-TP was 13.5% (102/757). A logistic regression model was developed based on the seven independent risk factors, including age (≥ 60 y), duration of LZD therapy (> 11 d), bPLT (< 308 × 109/L), ALT (> 100 IU/L), Ccr (< 67.5 mL/min), and concomitant use with VPA or Tac (p < 0.01) and transformed into a quantifiable nomogram. The nomogram demonstrated strong discrimination with AUCs of 0.760 in training (95% CI: 0.709-0.812, P < 0.001) and 0.767 in validation (95% CI: 0.635-0.899, P < 0.001). The calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests confirmed good reliability and specificity of the nomogram model.

CONCLUSION

This nomogram provides a practical tool for stratifying LI-TP risk, which provide an important reference for enabling timely clinical interventions to enhance LZD safety.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid in a case of pulmonary nocardiosis: a case report

This clinical case discusses a man between 60 and 70 years old with lung adenocarcinoma who developed a Nocardia cyriacigeorgica infection. Because it is an intracellular bacterium, we need to start antibiotic treatment and maintain for a year. For initial therapy, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) is the preferred antibiotic, but it can cause side effects, such as liver damage. Linezolid is another valid alternative.Pharmacokinetic monitoring of linezolid was essential in managing the patient because the drug can cause significant side effects like myelosuppression. The pharmacist tracked serum levels over 7 months, allowing for dose adjustments that minimised toxicity and ensured effective treatment. Elevated linezolid levels were linked to thrombocytopenia, prompting timely dosage modifications that improved the patient's haemoglobin and platelet counts.This case highlights the critical role of pharmacokinetic monitoring in optimising linezolid therapy. The pharmacist's involvement enhanced treatment efficacy, but also safeguarded the patient from serious adverse effects, demonstrating the importance of collaborative healthcare.

Exploring the impact of baseline platelet count on linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia: a retrospective single-center observation study

BACKGROUND

Patients treated with linezolid (LZD) frequently develop thrombocytopenia, and previous studies have identified the risk factors for this condition. However, the relationship between the development of LZD-induced thrombocytopenia and baseline platelet count has varied according to different reports.

AIM

To explore the relationship between platelet count and the development of LZD-induced thrombocytopenia.

METHOD

Patients who underwent LZD at Hokkaido University Hospital in Japan from September 2008 to March 2023 were included. We collected data on patient characteristics and platelet counts at baseline and during LZD therapy from the electronic medical records. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a decrease in platelet count by 30% or more from baseline, or a platelet level < 100,000/µL.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety-five patients who received LZD were included in this study, of whom 34.9% developed thrombocytopenia. In the early days of LZD treatment, the thrombocytopenia group showed a nearly 5% decrease in platelet count, while the non-thrombocytopenia group exhibited an increase of over 5%. Additionally, focusing on early onset thrombocytopenia (within 5 days), a baseline platelet count of < 150,000/µL was identified as a risk factor for early thrombocytopenia. Conversely, it was also observed that 24.7% of patients with a baseline platelet count ≥ 150,000/µL still developed early thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that while a baseline platelet count of < 150,000/µL is a risk factor for the early onset of thrombocytopenia, vigilant monitoring of platelet counts by clinical pharmacists in the early stages of LZD treatment is essential, regardless of baseline platelet levels.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antibiotics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: an updated narrative review for clinicians

BACKGROUND

Infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are associated with high mortality rates. Optimal antibiotic dosage plays a crucial role in reducing MRSA burden; thus, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the clinical practice, especially of new drugs such as ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, and oritavancin, should be implemented.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to examine and summarize the available evidence about TDM of anti-MRSA molecules, with a focus on pneumonia, endocarditis and vascular infections, and bone and joint infections.

SOURCES

We applied 'therapeutic drug monitoring' and 'Staphylococcus aureus' as search terms in PubMed, considering a time frame of 24 years (2001-2024). Articles in English language, non-duplicated, evaluating antibiotic therapeutic target, and role of TDM were included in the study.

CONTENT

In this review, available data for therapeutic target and TDM were critically analysed and summarized and suggestions about the use of old and new anti-MRSA antibiotics were provided, focusing on optimal dosages, tissue penetration according to infection types, and toxicity. Limitations to the widespread use of TDM in clinical practice were discussed.

IMPLICATIONS

The use of TDM may play an important role for the optimal management of patients with MRSA infections and may impact on patient outcomes by increasing efficacy and reducing the risk of adverse events. TDM may be implemented in clinical practice; however, several limitations such as the wide variability in the methodology and the need for skilled personnel need to be considered.

PK/PD-Guided Strategies for Appropriate Antibiotic Use in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical global health threat, necessitating the optimal use of existing antibiotics. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) principles provide a scientific framework for optimizing antimicrobial therapy, particularly to respond to evolving resistance patterns. This review examines PK/PD strategies for antimicrobial dosing optimization, focusing on three key aspects. First, we discuss the importance of drug concentration management for enhancing efficacy while preventing toxicity, considering various patient populations, including pediatric and elderly patients with their unique physiological characteristics. Second, we analyze different PK modeling approaches: the classic top-down approach exemplified by population PK analysis, the bottom-up approach represented by physiologically based PK modeling, and hybrid models combining both approaches for enhanced predictive performance. Third, we explore clinical applications, including nomogram-based dosing strategies, Bayesian estimation, and emerging artificial intelligence applications, for real-time dose optimization. Critical challenges in implementing PK/PD simulation are addressed, particularly the selection of appropriate PK models, the optimization of PK/PD indices, and considerations concerning antimicrobial concentrations at infection sites. Understanding these principles and challenges is crucial for optimizing antimicrobial therapy and combating AMR through improved dosing strategies.

Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Tedizolid in Japanese Patients

Background/Objective: Tedizolid (TZD), an oxazolidinone, causes fewer adverse events than linezolid (LZD). However, studies on the long-term efficacy and safety of TZD, particularly in patients with hematological malignancies (HMs), remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of long-term TZD use in Japanese patients, including those with HM. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients aged 15 years and older who received TZD treatment at St. Luke's International Hospital between 2018 and 2023. Patient demographics, treatment duration, adverse events, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Data from 35 patients and 40 treatment episodes were analyzed, including 13 episodes in patients with HM, of whom 65.0% were male, with a median age of 69.0 years (IQR: 24.5 years). The median treatment duration was 13.5 days (IQR: 46.8), with a maximum of 203 days. TZD was switched from other anti-MRSA agents in 82.5% of cases, including 42.5% from LZD. One patient discontinued TZD due to liver dysfunction, attributed to concomitant medication use. Clinical cure rates were significantly higher in the non-HM group compared to the HM group (88.9% vs. 38.5%). The 90-day mortality rate differed notably between the HM and non-HM groups (69.2% and 3.7%). Despite 100% microbiological eradication, infection-related mortality rates were 3.7% in the non-HM and 38.5% in the HM group. No reported cases of optic neuritis, Clostridioides difficile colitis, or major bleeding; Conclusions: TZD appears to be safe for long-term use, regardless of HM status, with no major complications observed in this cohort.

Optimizing the dosing regimens of linezolid against gram-positive cocci in critically ill patients with different renal functions: a Monte Carlo simulation

To promote the accurate administration of linezolid, this study aimed to evaluate its dosage regimens in critically ill patients with varying renal functions. This evaluation was based on a combined analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and toxicodynamic (TD) indices. The percentage of therapeutic target attainment (PTTA) was used as the index for PK/PD/TD, defined as simultaneously meeting two PK/PD criteria (AUC0-24h/MIC ≥ 100 and Css between 2.6-7.8 mg/L) and adjusted for toxicity probability, with MICs ranging from 0.5 to 8 mg/L. The recommended doses of linezolid for patients: 600 mg every 12 h for normal renal function or mild renal impairment, 300 mg every 12 h for severe renal impairment, 450 mg every 12 h for moderate renal impairment, and 600 mg every 8 h for supra-normal renal function. In conclusion, specific dosing regimens should be adopted for patients with varying renal functions, combined with therapeutic drug monitoring, to ensure the safety and efficacy of linezolid.

Evaluation and application of population pharmacokinetic models for optimising linezolid treatment in non-adherence multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients

BACKGROUND

Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models can optimise linezolid dosage regimens in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB); however, unknown cross-centre precision and poor adherence remain problematic. This study aimed to assess the predictive ability of published models and use the most suitable model to optimise dosage regimens and manage compliance.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-eight linezolid plasma concentrations from 27 patients with MDR-TB were used to assess the predictive performance of published models. Prediction-based metrics and simulation-based visual predictive checks were conducted to evaluate predictive ability. Individualised remedial dosing regimens for various delayed scenarios were optimised using the most suitable model and Monte Carlo simulations. The influence of covariates, scheduled dosing intervals, and patient compliance were assessed.

RESULTS

Seven popPK models were identified. Body weight and creatinine clearance were the most frequently identified covariates influencing linezolid clearance. The model with the best performance had a median prediction error (PE%) of -1.62 %, median absolute PE of 29.50 %, and percentages of PE within 20 % (F20, 36.97 %) and 30 % (F30, 51.26 %). Monte Carlo simulations indicated that a twice-daily 300 mg linezolid dose may be more efficient than 600 mg once daily. For the 'typical' patient treated with 300 mg twice daily, half the dosage should be taken after a delay of ≥ 3 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Monte Carlo simulations based on popPK models can propose remedial regimens for delayed doses of linezolid in patients with MDR-TB. Model-based compliance management patterns are useful for balancing efficacy, adverse reactions, and resistance suppression.

Hapten Synthesis, Antibody Generation, and Immunoassay Development for Linezolid Therapeutic Monitoring

Linezolid (LNZ) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic used for the treatment of severe Gram+ infections. Significant pharmacokinetic variability in different groups of patients requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to ensure optimal therapy. This article presents the first description of the development of immunoanalytical TDM systems for LNZ. Four LNZ derivatives (H1-H4) with spacer arms of a different length (0-6.2-9.4-11.8 Å) and chemistry (aliphatic and heterocyclic) were synthesized to prepare H1-H3-immunogens and H1/H4-coating antigens or H1/H2-enzyme tracers. Three distinct antibody types against H1-H3 haptens were generated in rabbits and served as the basis for the development of ELISAs in heterologous coated antigen and coated antibody formats. The length of the spacer in the immunogen had an insignificant effect on the quality of the antibody generated or the performance of the designed coated antibody-ELISA formats (IC50 = 0.48-0.75 ng/mL) and coated antigen ELISAs (IC50 = 11.5-28.3 ng/mL). The coated antigen-based assays were considered more appropriate for monitoring therapeutic levels of LNZ due to their more convenient reduced sensitivity but wider dynamic range than the coated antibody-based assays (2.0-160 vs 0.16-2.1 ng/mL). The best recovery of LNZ (82.1-99.6%) from spiked human serum among the sample pretreatments examined was provided by the trichloroacetic acid deproteinization procedure. Serum samples derived from surgical patients with superimposed Gram-positive infections treated with LNZ were evaluated by parallel ELISAs using different immunoreagents. The results obtained in the various assays were found to be concordant, thereby confirming the reliability of the measurements and the developed assay systems suitable for TDM purposes.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic target attainment and hematological toxicity of linezolid in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Linezolid is commonly used to treat severe and/or resistant Gram-positive infections. Few studies have assessed its pharmacokinetic (PK) target attainment in pediatrics.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the percentage of pediatrics achieving the PK targets of linezolid with standard dosing regimens and to assess the incidence and risk factors associated with its hematologic toxicity.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included pediatric patients aged 0-14 who received linezolid for suspected or proven Gram-positive infections. Linezolid trough concentrations and the 24-h area under the curve (AUC24) were estimated, and hematologic toxicity was assessed.

RESULTS

Seventeen pediatric patients (5 neonates and 12 older pediatrics) were included. A wide variability was observed in linezolid's trough and AUC24 (ranging from 0.5 to 14.4 mg/L and from 86 to 700 mg.h/L, respectively). The median AUC24 was significantly higher in neonates than older pediatrics (436 [350-574] vs. 200 [134-272] mg,h/L, P = 0.01). Out of all patients, only 41% achieved adequate drug exposure (AUC24 160-300 mg.h/L and trough 2-7 mg/L), with 24% having subtherapeutic, and 35% having higher-than-optimal exposures. Hematological toxicity was observed in 53% of cases. Identified risk factors include treatment duration over 7 days, baseline platelet counts below 150 × 109/L, sepsis/septic shock, and concomitant use of meropenem.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid's standard dosing failed to achieve its PK targets in approximately half of our pediatric cohort. Our findings highlight the complex interplay between the risk factors of linezolid-associated hematological toxicity and underscore the importance of its vigilant use and monitoring, particularly in pediatrics with concomitant multiple risk factors.

Antibiotic dose optimisation in the critically ill: targets, evidence and future strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the recent evidence for antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) in enhancing patient outcomes in sepsis and septic shock. We also summarise the limitations of available data and describe future directions for research to support translation of antibiotic dose optimisation to the clinical setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Sepsis and septic shock are associated with poor outcomes and require antibiotic dose optimisation, mostly due to significantly altered pharmacokinetics. Many studies, including some randomised controlled trials have been conducted to measure the clinical outcome effects of antibiotic dose optimisation interventions including use of therapeutic drug monitoring. Current data support antibiotic dose optimisation for the critically ill. Further investigation is required to evolve more timely and robust precision antibiotic dose optimisation approaches, and to clearly quantify whether any clinical and health-economic benefits support expanded use of this treatment intervention.

SUMMARY

Antibiotic dose optimisation appears to improve outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock, however further research is required to quantify the level of benefit and develop a stronger knowledge of the role of new technologies to facilitate optimised dosing.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid and exploring optimal regimens and a toxicity-related nomogram in elderly patients: a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study

BACKGROUND

The concentrations of linezolid, its optimal regimen and the associated side effects in elderly patients remain unclear.

METHODS

In this multicentre, prospective study, elderly patients receiving linezolid at four tertiary hospitals in Beijing between May 2021 and December 2022 were included. Linezolid concentrations and haematological toxicity were monitored dynamically. Risk factors for linezolid overexposure and moderate-to-severe linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia (M/S LIT) were analysed, and a predictive model of M/S LIT was developed.

RESULTS

A total of 860 linezolid concentrations were measured in 313 patients. The median trough concentrations of linezolid were 24.4 (15.3, 35.8) mg/L at 36-72 h and 26.1 (17.0, 38.1) mg/L at 5-10 days (P = 0.132). Severe linezolid exposure was independently associated with age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the worst SOFA score (SOFA1), and we further recommended dose regimens for elderly patients based on these findings. The incidences of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia(LIT) and M/S LIT were 73.5% and 47.6%, respectively. M/S LIT was independently correlated with treatment duration, average trough concentration (TDMa), baseline platelet count, eGFR and baseline SOFA score (SOFA0). The developed nomogram predicted M/S LIT with an area under the curve of 0.767 (95% CI 0.715-0.820), a sensitivity of 71.1% and a specificity of 73.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid trough concentrations increased dramatically in the elderly, by about 10 mg/L in patients aged 65-80 years, followed by a further increase of 10 mg/L for every 10 years of age. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in elderly patients receiving linezolid. The developed nomogram may predict M/S LIT and guide dosage adjustments of linezolid. Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100045707.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Linezolid in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients: Clinical Factors and Hematological Toxicities

Purpose

Previous studies have indicated that the development of severe adverse events is associated with linezolid peak concentration (Cmax), but the factors affecting linezolid Cmax and evidences on therapeutic drug monitoring to anticipate toxicity in drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) patients have not been clarified clearly. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing linezolid Cmax and investigate the association between linezolid concentration and hematological toxicity.

Patients and Methods

This study included patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis treated with linezolid from January 2022 to September 2023. We analyzed the factors affecting linezolid Cmax using chi-squared and binary logistic regression. The diagnostic utility of linezolid Cmax in predicting hematological toxicity was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

A total of 76 patients were enrolled in the study. 63.20% met the standard rates for linezolid Cmax. Age (P=0.036), weight (P=0.0016), and creatinine clearance (P=0.0223) significantly correlated with the Cmax. Hematological toxicity was observed in 46.05% (35/76) of patients, characterized by thrombocytopenia (31.58%, 24/76), anemia (6.58%, 5/76), and leukopenia (21.05%, 16/76). ROC curve analysis confirmed the predictive value of linezolid Cmax for thrombocytopenia with an area under curve of 0.728.

Conclusion

Suboptimal linezolid Cmax was prevalent among patients with DR-TB, with age, weight, and renal function emerging as influential factors. Elevated linezolid Cmax increases the risk of thrombocytopenia. Meticulous monitoring of linezolid Cmax is imperative during anti-DR-TB therapy to tailor treatment and mitigate hematological toxicity.

The effects of drug-drug interaction on linezolid pharmacokinetics: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Linezolid is a commonly used antibiotic in the clinical treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections. The impacts of drug interactions on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid are often overlooked. This manuscript aims to review the medications that affect the pharmacokinetics of linezolid.

METHODS

In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we queried the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for publications from database establishment to November 3, 2023, using the search terms: "Linezolid" and "interaction," or "interact," or "drug-drug interaction," or "co-treatment," or "cotreatment," or "combined," or "combination."

RESULTS

A total of 24 articles were included. Among the reported medication interactions, rifampicin, levothyroxine, venlafaxine, and phenobarbital could reduce the concentration of linezolid; clarithromycin, digoxin, cyclosporine, proton pump inhibitors, and amiodarone could increase the concentration of linezolid, while aztreonam, phenylpropanolamine, dextromethorphan, antioxidant vitamins, and magnesium-containing antacids had no significant effects on linezolid pharmacokinetics. The ratio of mean (ROM) of linezolid AUC in co-treatment with rifampicin to monotherapy was 0.67 (95%CI 0.58-0.77) and 0.63 (95%CI 0.43-0.91), respectively, in 2 studies, and co-treatment with 500 mg clarithromycin to monotherapy was 1.81 (95%CI 1.49-2.13).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review found that numerous drugs have an impact on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid, and the purported main mechanism may be that linezolid is the substrate of P-glycoprotein. In clinical practice, it is prudent to pay attention to the changes in linezolid pharmacokinetics caused by interactions. Conducting therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is beneficial to improve efficacy and reduce adverse reactions of linezolid.

Predictive Modeling of Drug-Related Adverse Events with Real-World Data: A Case Study of Linezolid Hematologic Outcomes

Electronic health records (EHRs) provide meaningful knowledge of drug-related adverse events (AEs) that are not captured in standard drug development and postmarketing surveillance. Using variables obtained from EHR data in the University of California San Francisco de-identified Clinical Data Warehouse, we aimed to evaluate the potential of machine learning to predict two hematological AEs, thrombocytopenia and anemia, in a cohort of patients treated with linezolid for 3 or more days. Features for model input were extracted at linezolid initiation (index), and outcomes were characterized from index to 14 days post-treatment. Random forest classification (RFC) was used for AE prediction, and reduced feature models were evaluated using cumulative importance (cImp) for feature selection. Grade 3+ thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred in 31% of 2,171 and 56% of 2,170 evaluable patients, respectively. Of the total 53 features, as few as 7 contributed at least 50% cImp, resulting in prediction accuracies of 70% or higher and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.886 for grade 3+ thrombocytopenia and 0.759 for grade 3+ anemia. Sensitivity analyses in strictly defined patient subgroups revealed similarly high predictive performance in full and reduced feature models. A logistic regression model with the same 50% cImp features showed similar predictive performance as RFC and good concordance with RFC probability predictions after isotonic calibration, adding interpretability. Collectively, this work demonstrates potential for machine learning prediction of AE risk in real-world patients using few variables regularly available in EHRs, which may aid in clinical decision making and/or monitoring.

Salivary Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antimicrobial Therapy: Feasible or Futile?

Personalised drug dosing through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is important to maximise efficacy and to minimise toxicity. Hurdles preventing broad implementation of TDM in routine care include the need of sophisticated equipment and highly trained staff, high costs and lack of timely results. Salivary TDM is a non-invasive, patient-friendly alternative to blood sampling, which has the potential to overcome barriers with traditional TDM. A mobile UV spectrophotometer may provide a simple solution for analysing drug concentrations in saliva samples. Salivary TDM utilising point-of-care tests can support personalised dosing in various settings including low-resource as well as remote settings. In this opinion paper, we describe how hurdles of implementing traditional TDM may be mitigated by salivary TDM with new strategies for patient-friendly point-of-care testing.

Optimizing Antibiotic Therapy for Intravenous Drug Users: A Narrative Review Unraveling Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Challenges

Intravenous drug users (IVDUs) face heightened susceptibility to life-threatening gram-positive bacterial infections, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). While the standard antibiotic dosing strategies for special patients, such as obese or critically ill individuals, are known to be inadequate, raising concerns about treatment efficacy, a similar sort of understanding has not been assessed for IVDUs yet. With this in mind, this review examines the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of antibiotics commonly used against gram-positive bacteria in IVDUs. Focusing on daptomycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, aminoglycosides, and the novel lipoglycopeptide dalbavancin, the study reveals significant pharmacokinetic variations in IVDUs, suggesting the need for personalized dosing. Concomitant opioid substitution therapy and other factors, such as malnutrition, contribute to altered pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, emphasizing the importance of targeted therapeutic drug monitoring. Overall, our study calls for increased awareness among clinicians regarding the unique pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic challenges in IVDUs and advocates for tailored antibiotic dosing strategies to enhance treatment outcomes in this marginalized population.

Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Linezolid and Probability of Target Attainment in Patients with COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome on Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-A Step toward Correct Dosing

During veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv ECMO) therapy, antimicrobial drugs are frequently used, and appropriate dosing is challenging due to there being limited data to support the dosage. Linezolid is effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens frequently isolated in ECMO patients. In total, 53 steady-state linezolid levels were obtained following 600 mg intravenous (IV) injections every 8 h, and these were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) on vv ECMO. The data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulation generated 5000 patients' individual PK parameters and corresponding concentration-time profiles using the PopPK model, following the administration of 600 mg/8 h (a higher-than-standard dosing) and 600 mg/12 h (standard). The probabilities of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of responses (CFR) for three pathogens were calculated and compared between the two dosing scenarios. Linezolid 600 mg/8 h was predicted to achieve greater than or equal to 85%Tf>MIC in at least 90% of the patients with CARDS on vv ECMO compared to only approximately two thirds of the patients after dosing every 12 h at a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 mg/L. In addition, for the same MIC, fAUC24/MIC ≥ 80 was achieved in almost three times the number of patients following an 8-h versus a 12-h interval. PopPK simulation predicted that a significantly higher proportion of the patients with CARDS on vv ECMO would achieve the PK/PD targets following the 8-h dosing interval compared to standard linezolid dosing. Nevertheless, the safety concern, in particular, for thrombocytopenia, with higher-than-standard linezolid dosage is reasonable, and consequently, monitoring is essential.

Towards a better detection of patients at-risk of linezolid toxicity in clinical practice: a prospective study in three Belgian hospital centers

Introduction: Linezolid is a last-resort antibiotic for infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms. It is widely used for off-label indications and for longer than recommended treatment durations, exposing patients at higher risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), notably thrombocytopenia. This study aimed to investigate ADR incidence and risk factors, identify thrombocytopenia-related trough levels based on treatment duration, and evaluate the performance of predictive scores for ADR development. Methods: Adult in- and outpatients undergoing linezolid therapy were enrolled in three hospitals and ADRs and linezolid trough levels prospectively monitored over time. A population pharmacokinetic (pop-PK model) was used to estimate trough levels for blood samples collected at varying times. Results: A multivariate analysis based on 63 treatments identified treatment duration ≥10 days and trough levels >8 mg/L as independent risk factors of developing thrombocytopenia, with high trough values correlated with impaired renal function. Five patients treated for >28 days did not develop thrombocytopenia but maintained trough values in the target range (<8 mg/L). The Buzelé predictive score, which combines an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index with treatment duration, demonstrated 77% specificity and 67% sensitivity to predict the risk of ADR. Conclusion: Our work supports the necessity of establishing guidelines for dose adjustment in patients with renal insufficiency and the systematic use of TDM in patients at-risk in order to keep trough values ≤8 mg/L. The Buzelé predictive score (if ≥7) may help to detect these at-risk patients, and pop-PK models can estimate trough levels based on plasma samples collected at varying times, reducing the logistical burden of TDM in clinical practice.

Antibiotic Resistance to Molecules Commonly Prescribed for the Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens: What Is Relevant for the Clinician?

Antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive pathogens is a relevant concern, particularly in the hospital setting. Several antibiotics are now available to treat these drug-resistant pathogens, such as daptomycin, dalbavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and fosfomycin. However, antibiotic resistance can also affect these newer molecules. Overall, this is not a frequent phenomenon, but it is a growing concern in some settings and can compromise the effectiveness of these molecules, leaving few therapeutic options. We reviewed the available evidence about the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance to these antibiotics and the main molecular mechanisms of resistance, particularly methicillin-resistant Sthaphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. We discussed the interpretation of susceptibility tests when minimum inhibitory concentrations are not available. We focused on the risk of the emergence of resistance during treatment, particularly for daptomycin and fosfomycin, and we discussed the strategies that can be implemented to reduce this phenomenon, which can lead to clinical failure despite appropriate antibiotic treatment. The judicious use of antibiotics, epidemiological surveillance, and infection control measures is essential to preserving the efficacy of these drugs.

Rifampicin reduces plasma concentration of linezolid in patients with infective endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Linezolid in combination with rifampicin has been used in treatment of infective endocarditis especially for patients infected with staphylococci.

OBJECTIVES

Because rifampicin has been reported to reduce the plasma concentration of linezolid, the present study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of linezolid for the purpose of quantifying an effect of rifampicin cotreatment. In addition, the possibility of compensation by dosage adjustments was evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pharmacokinetic measurements were performed in 62 patients treated with linezolid for left-sided infective endocarditis in the Partial Oral Endocarditis Treatment (POET) trial. Fifteen patients were cotreated with rifampicin. A total of 437 linezolid plasma concentrations were obtained. The pharmacokinetic data were adequately described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination.

RESULTS

We demonstrated a substantial increase of linezolid clearance by 150% (95% CI: 78%-251%), when combined with rifampicin. The final model was evaluated by goodness-of-fit plots showing an acceptable fit, and a visual predictive check validated the model. Model-based dosing simulations showed that rifampicin cotreatment decreased the PTA of linezolid from 94.3% to 34.9% and from 52.7% to 3.5% for MICs of 2 mg/L and 4 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial interaction between linezolid and rifampicin was detected in patients with infective endocarditis, and the interaction was stronger than previously reported. Model-based simulations showed that increasing the linezolid dose might compensate without increasing the risk of adverse effects to the same degree.

Derivation and Clinical Utility of Safety Targets for Linezolid-Related Adverse Events in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment

Long-term usage of linezolid can result in adverse events such as peripheral neuropathy, anemia and thrombocytopenia. Therapeutic drug monitoring data from 75 drug-resistant tuberculosis patients treated with linezolid were analyzed using a time-to-event (TTE) approach for peripheral neuropathy and anemia and indirect response modelling for thrombocytopenia. Different time-varying linezolid pharmacokinetic exposure indices (AUC0-24h,ss, Cav, Cmax and Cmin) and patient characteristics were investigated as risk factors. A treatment duration shorter than 3 months was considered dropout and was modelled using a TTE approach. An exposure-response relationship between linezolid Cmin and both peripheral neuropathy and anemia was found. The exposure index which best described the development of thrombocytopenia was AUC0-24h. The final TTE dropout model indicated an association between linezolid Cmin and dropout. New safety targets for each adverse event were proposed which can be used for individualized linezolid dosing. According to the model predictions at 6 months of treatment, a Cmin of 0.11 mg/L and 1.4 mg/L should not be exceeded to keep the cumulative probability to develop anemia and peripheral neuropathy below 20%. The AUC0-24h should be below 111 h·mg/L or 270 h·mg/L to prevent thrombocytopenia and severe thrombocytopenia, respectively. A clinical utility assessment showed that the currently recommended dose of 600 mg once daily is safer compared to a 300 mg BID dosing strategy considering all four safety endpoints.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid: HPLC-based assays for routine quantification of linezolid in human serum and cerebrospinal fluid

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of linezolid can prevent over- and under-dosing in critically ill patients and can be crucial to successful antibiotic treatment. Quick and simple high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assays for the detection of linezolid in human serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were developed in this study.

METHODS

The methods used an Atlantis T3 5.0 µm stationary phase. The mobile phase A contained water (99.4% m/m) and formic acid (0.6% m/m) (pH 2.30). The mobile phase B contained acetonitrile (93.6% m/m), water (6% m/m) and formic acid (0.4% m/m). The methods were isocratic, using 23% of mobile phase B and 77% of mobile phase A. Ultraviolet absorbance detection at 252 nm was used. For sample preparation an internal standard was added, and acetonitrile/methanol was added for protein precipitation.

RESULTS

The methods were investigated for linearity, specificity, accuracy, and precision. Stability of linezolid and internal standard was assessed. The retention times of linezolid were 8.5 min and 8.1 min, and the single run time was 15 min. Linezolid was quantified from the lower limit of quantification (0.2 mg/L) to the upper limit of quantification (50 mg/L, 75 mg/L, and 100 mg/L). In routine analysis a high variability of serum and CSF levels was observed and the mean CSF/serum ratio was 0.71±0.16.

CONCLUSION

The developed assays enable the study of correlations between the applied dosage, serum concentration and CSF concentration. Additionally, studies with a higher number of samples can be performed to investigate the penetration of linezolid into the central nervous system.

Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Resistant Gram-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infections Using an Oral Linezolid-Based Antibiotic Regime

BACKGROUND

Increasing antibiotic resistance has been reported as an issue in the systemic treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Linezolid offers the advantages of high oral bioavailability and little resistance; however, efficacy in the treatment of PJI varies considerably, and studies reporting consistent surgical treatment are scarce.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of two-stage revisions performed between 2008 and 2017. We identified 111 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Oral linezolid was given for 28 days following 14 days of intravenous tailored antibiotics in resistant gram-positive PJI. A total of 64% of the patients had methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. The median follow-up was 43 (interquartile range (IQR) 30-57) months.

RESULTS

22% (24/111) of the patients underwent surgery for subsequent infection. The 5-year infection-free survival probability was 77% (95% confidence interval (CI) 69-85). A total of 5% of the patients (6/111) had the same organism at the time of reinfection. The patients with infections caused by other organisms than Coagulase-negative staphylococci tended to have a worse reinfection-free survivorship at five years (70% vs. 81%, p = 0.09). Furthermore, the patients with obesity tended to have reduced reinfection-free survivorship at five years (69% vs. 84%, p = 0.08). Overall, 5% (6/111) of the patients had blood count abnormalities with no treatment discontinuations.

CONCLUSION

Two-stage revision arthroplasty with systemic oral linezolid treatment for resistant gram-positive PJI results in an infection control of 77% at the mid-term.

Contemporary pharmacologic treatments of MRSA for hospitalized adults: rationale for vancomycin versus non-vancomycin therapies as first line agents

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains an important pathogen in the hospital setting and causes significant morbidity and mortality each year. Since the initial discovery over 60 years ago, vancomycin has remained a first-line treatment for many different types of MRSA infections. However, significant concerns related to target attainment and nephrotoxicity have spurred efforts to develop more effective agents in the last two decades.

AREAS COVERED

Newer anti-MRSA antibiotics that have been approved since 2000 include linezolid, daptomycin, and ceftaroline. As clinical evidence has accumulated, these newer agents have become more frequently used, and some are now recommended as co-first-line options (along with vancomycin) in clinical practice guidelines. For this review, a scoping review of the literature was conducted to support our findings and recommendations.

EXPERT OPINION

Vancomycin remains an important standard of care for MRSA infections but is limited with respect to nephrotoxicity and rapid target attainment. Newer agents such as linezolid, daptomycin, and ceftaroline have specific indications for treating different types of MRSA infections; however, newer agents also have unique attributes which require consideration during therapy.

The expert clinical pharmacological advice program for tailoring on real-time antimicrobial therapies with emerging TDM candidates in special populations: how the ugly duckling turned into a swan

INTRODUCTION

The growing spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens makes the need of tailoring antimicrobial therapies by means of a 'patient-centered' approach fundamental. In this scenario, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of emerging antimicrobial candidates may be a valuable approach, but expert interpretation of TDM results should be granted for making them more clinically useful. The MD Clinical Pharmacologist may take over this task since this specialist may couple PK/PD expertise on drugs with a medical background and may provide expert interpretation of TDM results of antimicrobials for tailoring therapy on real-time in each single patient based on specific both drug/pathogen issues and patient issues.

AREAS COVERED

This article aims to highlight the main key-points and organizational aspects for implementing a successful TDM-based expert clinical pharmacological advice (ECPA) program for tailoring antimicrobial therapies on real-time in different hospitalized patient special populations.

EXPERT OPINION

TDM-based ECPA programs lead by the MD Clinical Pharmacologist may represent a way forward for maximizing clinical efficacy and for minimizing the risk of resistance developments and/or toxicity of antimicrobials. Stakeholders should be aware of the fact that this innovative approach may be cost-effective.

Monitoring Salivary Concentrations of Tedizolid and Linezolid Using Rats

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an effective tool for the management of patients who are administered linezolid. The use of saliva for TDM has potential advantages over the use of plasma; however, only a few reports have compared drug concentrations in the saliva and plasma. Moreover, there are no reports on the salivary concentration of tedizolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic similar to linezolid. In the present study, the concentrations of tedizolid and linezolid in rat submandibular saliva were compared with those measured in the plasma.

METHODS

Tedizolid (10 mg/kg, n = 6) and linezolid (12 mg/kg, n = 5) were administered via the rat tail vein. Submandibular saliva and plasma samples were collected for up to 8 h after the initiation of drug administration, and assayed for the concentrations of tedizolid and linezolid.

RESULTS

A strong correlation was found between the saliva and plasma concentrations of tedizolid (r = 0.964, p < 0.001) and linezolid (r = 0.936, p < 0.001). The value of tedizolid maximum concentration of drug (C_max) was 0.99 ± 0.08 µg/mL in the saliva and 14.46 ± 1.71 µg/mL in the plasma. Meanwhile, the C_max of linezolid was 8.01 ± 1.42 µg/mL in the saliva and 13.00 ± 1.90 µg/mL in the plasma. According to these results, the saliva/plasma concentration ratios of tedizolid and linezolid in rats were 0.0513 ± 0.0080 and 0.6341 ± 0.0339, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the correlation between saliva and plasma concentrations of tedizolid and linezolid, as well as the characteristics of saliva, the results of this study suggest that saliva is a useful matrix for TDM.

Therapeutics for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with high morbidity and mortality rates. They are pathogens of global concern with a limited treatment pipeline. Significant challenges exist in the management of VRE BSI, including drug dosing, the emergence of resistance, and the optimal treatment for persistent bacteremia and infective endocarditis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antimicrobial therapy is evolving for VRE-active agents; however, there are significant gaps in the literature for predicting antimicrobial efficacy for VRE BSIs. To date, TDM has the greatest evidence for predicting drug toxicity for the three main VRE-active antimicrobial agents daptomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin. This article presents an overview of the treatment options for VRE BSIs, the role of antimicrobial dose optimization through TDM in supporting clinical infection management, and challenges and perspectives for the future.

Bayesian prediction-based individualized dosing of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treatment: Recent advancements and prospects in therapeutic drug monitoring

As one of the efficient techniques for TDM, the population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model approach for dose individualization has been developed due to the rapidly growing innovative progress in computer technology and has recently been considered as a part of model-informed precision dosing (MIPD). Initial dose individualization and measurement followed by maximum a posteriori (MAP)-Bayesian prediction using a popPK model are the most classical and widely used approach among a class of MIPD strategies. MAP-Bayesian prediction offers the possibility of dose optimization based on measurement even before reaching a pharmacokinetically steady state, such as in an emergency, especially for infectious diseases requiring urgent antimicrobial treatment. As the pharmacokinetic processes in critically ill patients are affected and highly variable due to pathophysiological disturbances, the advantages offered by the popPK model approach make it highly recommended and required for effective and appropriate antimicrobial treatment. In this review, we focus on novel insights and beneficial aspects of the popPK model approach, especially in the treatment of infectious diseases with anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents represented by vancomycin, and discuss the recent advancements and prospects in TDM practice.

Infant Exposure to Antituberculosis Drugs via Breast Milk and Assessment of Potential Adverse Effects in Breastfed Infants: Critical Review of Data

Infants of mothers treated for tuberculosis might be exposed to drugs via breast milk. The existing information on the exposure of breastfed infants lacks a critical review of the published data. We aimed to evaluate the quality of the existing data on antituberculosis (anti-TB) drug concentrations in the plasma and milk as a methodologically sound basis for the potential risk of breastfeeding under therapy. We performed a systematic search in PubMed for bedaquiline, clofazimine, cycloserine/terizidone, levofloxacin, linezolid, pretomanid/pa824, pyrazinamide, streptomycin, ethambutol, rifampicin and isoniazid, supplemented with update references found in LactMed^®. We calculated the external infant exposure (EID) for each drug and compared it with the recommended WHO dose for infants (relative external infant dose) and assessed their potential to elicit adverse effects in the breastfed infant. Breast milk concentration data were mainly not satisfactory to properly estimate the EID. Most of the studies suffer from limitations in the sample collection, quantity, timing and study design. Infant plasma concentrations are extremely scarce and very little data exist documenting the clinical outcome in exposed infants. Concerns for potential adverse effects in breastfed infants could be ruled out for bedaquiline, cycloserine/terizidone, linezolid and pyrazinamide. Adequate studies should be performed covering the scenario in treated mothers, breast milk and infants.

Risk factors for mortality after linezolid treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bloodstream infection

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed the risk factors affecting linezolid treatment outcome in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infection (BSI).

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter observational study of patients who received linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for VRE BSI. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The estimated area under the concentration-time curve and trough concentration were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used for the outcome analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 170 patients were included: 114 (67.1%) survived and 56 (32.9%) did not. A total of 26 (18.2%) isolates showed a linezolid minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤1 mg/l, 113 (79.0%) of 2 mg/l, and 4 (2.8%) of 4 mg/l. The univariable analysis showed that the linezolid MIC and concentration-time curve/MIC were not associated with mortality (P = 0.95 and P = 0.42, respectively). After adjusting for underlying comorbidity and disease severity, the linezolid dose per body weight (LDBW), body height, and interaction between them were independent risks for mortality. Marginal analysis showed that increasing the LDBW was protective in patients with a body height <160 cm. A trough concentration of >12.2 mg/l was a risk factor for thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

The LDBW and body height were interactively associated with clinical outcomes of linezolid treatment for VRE BSI.

Use of Japanese big data from electronic medical records to investigate risk factors and identify their high-risk combinations for linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE

Thrombocytopenia is a major event associated with linezolid (LZD) therapy. Factors affecting LZD-induced thrombocytopenia (LIT) have been reported in previous studies. However, several issues pertaining to LIT have not yet been clarified. In the present study, we used Japanese big data to investigate associated factors and their high-risk combinations that influence LIT.

METHODS

Patients administered LZD between May 2006 and October 2020 were included in this study. LIT was defined as either a 30% or more reduction from the baseline platelets or platelet values of < 100,000/µL. We evaluated factors affecting LIT and combinations of factors that alter LIT risk according to a decision tree (DT) analysis, a typical machine learning method.

RESULTS

We successfully enrolled 1399 patients and LIT occurred in 44.7% of the patients (n = 626). We classified the laboratory data on renal function, LZD duration, age, and body weight (BW) into smaller categories. The results of multivariate analysis showed that prolonged LZD therapy, BW < 45 kg, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m², and dialysis were risk factors for LIT. The DT analysis revealed that the highest risk was a combination of LZD duration ≥ 14 days and eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m².

CONCLUSIONS

The present study extracted four risk factors and identified high-risk combinations for LIT. Patients with these risk factors should be closely monitored.

Hematological toxicities associated with linezolid therapy in adults: key findings and clinical considerations

INTRODUCTION

Linezolid can cause serious adverse effects including thrombocytopenia and anemia. Here, we focus specifically on linezolid-related hematological toxicity in adult patients requiring prolonged drug treatment.

AREAS COVERED

We review the available evidence on the likelihood of hematological toxicity in adult patients treated with linezolid, with a focus on the main risk factors and strategies to prevent this adverse event. A MEDLINE PubMed search for articles published from January 2000 to May 2022 was completed matching the terms linezolid, hematology, hematological toxicity, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Moreover, additional studies were identified from the reference lists of retrieved articles.

EXPERT OPINION

Thrombocytopenia is the major concern with administration of linezolid for Gram-positive infections, whereas anemia is more common in patients with tuberculosis. The important clinical risk factors for the development of linezolid-related thrombocytopenia are aging, renal dysfunction, low baseline platelet count, duration of treatment, and linezolid plasma trough concentrations >8 mg/L. Patients receiving linezolid for extended periods of time or patient populations with increased risk of altered drug pharmacokinetics would benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring or from the availability of toxico-dynamic predictive models to optimize linezolid dosing.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Regimen Optimization of Linezolid in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma of Post-operative Neurosurgical Patients

BACKGROUND

Linezolid is a valuable therapeutic option for infections of the central nervous system caused by multi-drug resistant Gram-positive pathogens. Data regarding linezolid pharmacokinetics in cerebrospinal fluid from post-operative neurosurgical patients have revealed wide inter-individual variability. The objectives of this study were to establish a population pharmacokinetic model for linezolid in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, as well as to optimize dosing strategies in this susceptible population.

METHODS

This was a prospective pharmacokinetic study in post-operative neurosurgical patients receiving intravenous linezolid. Parallel blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected and analyzed. The population pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the Phoenix NLME software.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model (central plasma and cerebrospinal fluid compartments) fit the linezolid data well, with creatinine clearance and serum procalcitonin as significant variables. Linezolid demonstrated highly variable penetration into cerebrospinal fluid, with a mean cerebrospinal fluid/plasma ratio of 0.53. A strong correlation was found between plasma trough concentration and cerebrospinal fluid exposure of linezolid. Based on simulation results, optimal dosage regimens stratified by various renal functions and inflammatory status were proposed.

CONCLUSION

A modeling and simulating strategy was employed in dose individualization to improve the efficacy and safety of linezolid treatment.

A 600 mg of fixed-dose linezolid in renally impaired patients versus 15 mg/kg intermittent dose-optimized vancomycin in renally non-impaired patients: A single centre retrospective analysis for adult patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVES

Both linezolid and vancomycin are approved by USFDA and IDSA guidelines for the management of nosocomial pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in clinical practice. Baseline creatinine clearance is the criterion for prescribing vancomycin or linezolid for hospital-acquired pneumonia in our institution. However, patients with renal function impairment are far more difficult to manage in intensive care. Thus, the objectives of the study were to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of 600 mg of fixed-dose linezolid with intermittent dose-optimised vancomycin in hospital-acquired pneumonia due to MRSA and to evaluate parameters of clinical cure.

METHODS

Analysis of a review of patients' charts. Patients with creatinine clearance <80 ml/min received 600 mg linezolid/12 h (n = 139, LN cohort), and patients with creatinine clearance ≥80 ml/min received intravenous 15 mg/kg vancomycin/12 h for 1-2 weeks consecutively or 3 weeks in case of bacteremia (n = 152, VC cohort) for management of hospital-acquired pneumonia due to MRSA.

RESULTS

A 59% of patients from the LN cohort and 47% of patients from the VC cohort were clinically cured. Administration of systemic steroids (p = 0.0412) and ≥ 80 ml/min creatinine clearance (p = 0.0498) were the independent parameters for the clinical cure of patients. Nephrotoxicity was higher among patients of the VC cohort than the LN cohort (p = 0.0464). Treatment failed in 41% of patients from the LN cohort and in 53% of patients from the VC cohort (p = 0.0200).

CONCLUSIONS

A 600 mg of fixed-dose linezolid is an ideal alternative to intermittent dose-optimised vancomycin for better clinical outcomes for patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia due to MRSA, especially for patients with renal impairment.

Association Between Increased Linezolid Plasma Concentrations and the Development of Severe Toxicity in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment

BACKGROUND

Treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis with linezolid is characterized by high rates of adverse events. Evidence on therapeutic drug monitoring to predict drug toxicity is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the association of linezolid trough concentrations with severe toxicity.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed consecutive patients started on linezolid for MDR tuberculosis between 2011 and 2017. The primary outcome was severe mitochondrial toxicity (SMT) due to linezolid, defined as neurotoxicity or myelotoxicity leading to drug discontinuation. The impact of plasma linezolid trough concentrations >2 mg/L was assessed in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models including time-varying covariates.

RESULTS

SMT occurred in 57 of 146 included patients (39%) at an incidence rate of 0.38 per person-year (95% confidence interval, .30-.49). A maximum linezolid trough concentration >2 mg/L was detected in 52 patients (35.6%), while the mean trough concentration was >2 mg/L in 22 (15%). The adjusted hazard ratio for SMT was 2.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.38; P = .01) in patients with a mean trough concentration >2 mg/L and 2.63 (1.55-4.47; P < .01) for SMT after the first detection of a trough concentration >2 mg/L. In an exploratory analysis, higher maximum trough concentrations were dose-dependently associated with toxicity, while lowering elevated trough concentrations did not restore baseline risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid trough concentrations >2 mg/L are strongly associated with the development of severe treatment-emergent toxicity in patients treated for MDR tuberculosis. Pending further prospective evidence, an individual risk-benefit assessment on the continuation of linezolid treatment is warranted in any patient with trough concentrations >2 mg/L.

Linezolid pharmacokinetics: a systematic review for the best clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the pharmacokinetics of linezolid to optimize the dosing regimen in special populations.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in three largest medical databases, including Embase, Scopus, and PubMed. The main applied keywords were linezolid and pharmacokinetics. Of 3663 retrieved publications in the English language, 35 original research articles, clinical studies, and case reports about linezolid pharmacokinetics in different populations such as pregnant women, pediatrics, elderly subjects, obese people, individuals with organ dysfunction, and critically ill patients were included. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Dose adjustment is not currently recommended for linezolid in patients with mild to moderate renal or hepatic impairment, older adults, and pregnant women. Although dose adjustment is not recommended in patients with severe renal or hepatic impairment, it should be considered that these patients are more vulnerable to linezolid adverse effects and drug interactions. In pediatrics, reducing the linezolid dosing interval to 8 h is suggested. Despite the lack of sufficient information in obese individuals, dosing based on body weight or use of higher dose seems to be justifiable to prevent sub-therapeutic concentrations. Although dose adjustment of linezolid is not recommended in critically ill patients, administration of linezolid as continuous intravenous infusion is suggested in this population. Blood level monitoring should be considered in populations that are vulnerable to linezolid underexposure (such as critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance, pediatrics, overweight, and obese patients) or overexposure (such as elderly, patients with hepatic and renal impairment). To assess the efficacy and safety of linezolid, the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC0-24 h/MIC) equal to 80-120, percentage of time above the MIC ≥ 85%, and serum trough concentration between 2 and 7 mg/L are suggested.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulation for the quantitative risk assessment of linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Linezolid (LZD) may cause thrombocytopenia, which can result in discontinuation of treatment. In this study, the blood LZD trough concentration was estimated based on population pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters derived from two previously published models in the Japanese population to determine the rate of achieving the target trough value when the risk of thrombocytopenia is low and to clarify its relationship with the onset of thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

This study included adult patients hospitalized at Shimane University Hospital, who received LZD treatment for at least 4 days from January 2010 to December 2017. Patients whose platelet count fell below 70% before LZD administration were categorized as the thrombocytopenic group. Patient PK parameters were calculated based on the population PK models described by Matsumoto et al. and Sasaki et al., and these parameters were designated A and B, respectively. Based on these parameters, the rate of achieving an LZD trough concentration of less than 8 μg/ml, which is the safety target achievement rate, was calculated using a random simulation for each patient. We further analysed the association between the incidence of thrombocytopenia and patient factors, including safety target achievement rate, through univariate, multivariate, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Patients (n = 77) aged 72 ± 11 years and weighing 56.7 ± 10.9 kg, with a creatinine clearance (CL_cr ) of 60.5 ± 47.2 ml/min and a cirrhosis prevalence of 9.1%, were analysed. All patients received LZD at a dose of 600 mg twice daily for a total of 10.9 ± 8.9 days. Univariate analyses revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the duration of LZD therapy, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, LZD clearance, and the safety target achievement rate for parameters A and B between the thrombocytopenic and non-thrombocytopenic groups. A multivariate analysis of these factors stratified with the cutoff values obtained by ROC analysis revealed that the duration of LZD therapy and the safety target achievement rates for parameters A and B were significant factors (odds ratios for duration of LZD therapy: 7.436 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.918-28.831] and 4.712 [95% CI: 1.567-14.163]; odds ratio for safety target achievement rate: 0.060 [95% CI: 0.016-0.232] and 0.167 [95% CI: 0.056-0.498] for parameters A and B, respectively). When the safety target achievement rates for patients treated with LZD were compared between the thrombocytopenic and non-thrombocytopenic groups, the safety target achievement rate was higher in the non-thrombocytopenic group in both the patients treated with LZD for less than 10 days and those for 10 days or more. Therefore, the safety target achievement rate estimated by the PK/PD simulation may represent to be an important index for risk assessment of LZD-induced thrombocytopenia.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The risk of LZD-induced thrombocytopenia, which increased with the duration of LZD therapy, may be predicted using the safety target achievement rate obtained by the blood concentration simulation.

Evaluating linezolid dose regimens against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus based on renal function in populations with different body weight

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Linezolid is an alternative first-line agent for MRSA pneumonia. This study assessed whether dose adjustments of linezolid against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections were needed based on renal function in populations with different body weight.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate renal function in relation to the probability of target attainment (PTA) in three population groups with different body weight. Area under the concentration time curve (AUC)/ minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio and percentage of time above the MIC (%T > MIC) were regarded as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. The PTA and cumulative fractions of response (CFR) were calculated to assess the efficacy. Regarding safety, trough plasma concentration (C_min ) > 8 mg/L was used as target for toxicity.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Using AUC/MIC >100 as the target pharmacodynamic (PD) index, the CFR of linezolid at the standard dose (600 mg every 12 h [q12h]) were 57.01%, 93.22%, and 99.93% in patients with normal renal function, patients with renal dysfunction and low body weight patients with renal dysfunction, respectively. Using 100%T > MIC as the target PD index, all the CFR of three population groups were more than 90% at the standard dose. The percentages of C_min  > 8 mg/L at the standard dose of linezolid were 24.16%, 53.24%, and 90.10% in three population groups on day 7.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The risk of thrombocytopenia of linezolid was extremely higher in low body weight patients with renal impairment when receiving standard linezolid dose compared with patients with normal renal function. 450 mg q12h and 300 mg q12h might be effective and safe against MRSA infection in patients with renal dysfunction and low body weight patients with renal dysfunction, respectively.

Safety of linezolid in patients with decreased renal function and trough monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Linezolid causes hematological toxicity, mostly thrombocytopenia, which leads to treatment discontinuation and failure. Recent studies revealed that during linezolid therapy, the incidence of treatment-related hematological toxicity is significantly higher in patients with decreased renal function (DRF) than in those with normal renal function. Linezolid monitoring is necessary due to the high frequency of hematological toxicity in patients with DRF and the relationship between blood concentration and safety. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety correlation between DRF and trough monitoring.

METHODS

Articles published before June 24, 2022, on MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically analyzed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and the variable effects model.

RESULTS

The incidence of hematological toxicity was significantly higher in patients with DRF than in those without DRF (OR = 2.37; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis, performed according to hematotoxicity classification, including thrombocytopenia, anemia, and pancytopenia, revealed a significantly higher incidence of thrombocytopenia (OR = 2.45; p < 0.001) and anemia (OR = 2.31; p = 0.006) in patients with DRF than in those without; pancytopenia (OR = 1.41; p = 0.80) incidences were not significantly higher. Based on a systematic review, linezolid trough concentrations > 6-7 μg/mL may be associated with an increased incidence of thrombocytopenia. However, no confidential threshold values for the development of thrombocytopenia were found in the area under the concentration curve values for children or adults.

CONCLUSION

We observed a high frequency of hematological toxicity during linezolid therapy in patients with DRF. To ensure safety, linezolid trough concentrations should be ≤6-7 μg/mL.

Intensified tuberculosis treatment to reduce the mortality of HIV-infected and uninfected patients with tuberculosis meningitis (INTENSE-TBM): study protocol for a phase III randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most lethal and disabling form of tuberculosis (TB), particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Current anti-TB treatment is poorly effective since TBM mortality reaches 40% in HIV-negative patients and up to 70% in HIV-co-infected patients. To reduce TBM-induced morbidity and mortality, the INTENSE-TBM trial evaluates two interventions in both HIV-infected and uninfected patients: an anti-TB treatment intensification using oral high-dose rifampicin (35 mg/kg daily) and linezolid (1200 mg daily and then 600 mg daily) during the first 8 weeks of the anti-TB treatment and the use of adjunctive aspirin (200 mg daily).

METHODS

This is a randomized controlled, phase III, multicenter, 2 × 2 factorial plan superiority trial. The trial has four arms, combining the two experimental treatments (intensified TBM regimen and aspirin) with the two reference treatments (WHO standard TB treatment and placebo), and is open-label for anti-TB treatment and double-blind placebo-controlled for aspirin treatment. This trial is conducted in adults or adolescents of age ≥15 years with TBM defined as "definite," "probable," or "possible" using Tuberculosis Meningitis International Research Consortium criteria, in four African countries: Ivory Coast, Madagascar, Uganda, and South Africa. The primary outcome is all-cause death between inclusion and week 40.

DISCUSSION

The INTENSE-TBM trial represents a key opportunity to enhance TBM treatment with widely available existing drugs notably in high-incidence settings of both TB and HIV. The trial design is pragmatic and the results will permit early and effective applications in TBM patient care, in both HIV and TB high-incidence countries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04145258. Registered on October 30, 2019.

Minocycline intra-bacterial pharmacokinetic hysteresis as a basis for pharmacologic memory and a backbone for once-a-week pan-tuberculosis therapy

Background: There is need for shorter duration regimens for the treatment of tuberculosis, that can treat patients regardless of multidrug resistance status (pan-tuberculosis).

Methods: We combined minocycline with tedizolid, moxifloxacin, and rifampin, in the hollow fiber system model of tuberculosis and mimicked each drugs’ intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics for 28 days. Minocycline-tedizolid was administered either as a once-a-week or a daily regimen. In order to explore a possible explanation for effectiveness of the once-a-week regimen, we measured systemic and intra-bacterial minocycline pharmacokinetics. Standard daily therapy (rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide) was the comparator. We then calculated γ_f or kill slopes for each regimen and ranked the regimens by time-to-extinction predicted in patients.

Results: The steepest γ_f and shortest time-to-extinction of entire bacterial population was with daily minocycline-rifampin combination. There was no difference in γ_f between the minocycline-tedizolid once-a-week versus the daily therapy (p = 0.85). Standard therapy was predicted to cure 88% of patients, while minocycline-rifampin would cure 98% of patients. Minocycline concentrations fell below minimum inhibitory concentration after 2 days of once-weekly dosing schedule. The shape of minocycline intra-bacterial concentration-time curve differed from the extracellular pharmacokinetic system and lagged by several days, consistent with system hysteresis. Hysteresis explained the persistent microbial killing after hollow fiber system model of tuberculosis concentrations dropped below the minimum inhibitory concentration.

Conclusion: Minocycline could form a backbone of a shorter duration once-a-week pan-tuberculosis regimen. We propose a new concept of post-antibiotic microbial killing, distinct from post-antibiotic effect. We propose system hysteresis as the basis for the novel concept of pharmacologic memory, which allows intermittent dosing.

Serum linezolid concentrations are reduced in critically ill patients with pulmonary infections: A prospective observational study

RATIONALE

The concentration-time profile of linezolid varies considerably in critically ill patients. Question of interest is, if the site of infection influences linezolid serum concentrations.

METHODS

68 critically ill patients, treated with linezolid, were included. The concentration-time-profile for linezolid was determined using maximum a-posteriori predictions. A trough concentration (C_min) between 2 and 10 mg/L was defined as the target. A generalized linear model (GLM) was established to evaluate potential covariates.

RESULTS

The indications for linezolid therapy were in descending order: peritonitis (38.2%), pneumonia (25.0%), infectious acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (19.1%), and other non-pulmonary infection (17.7%). 27.2 and 7.9% of C_min were subtherapeutic and toxic, respectively. In the GLM, ARDS (mean: -2.1 mg/L, CI: -3.0 to -1.2 mg/L) and pneumonia (mean: -2.2 mg/L, CI: -2.8 to -1.6 mg/L) were significant (p < 0.001) determinants of C_min. Patients with ARDS (mean: 2.3 mg/L, 51.2% subtherapeutic, 0.0% toxic) and pneumonia (mean: 3.5 mg/L, 41.5% subtherapeutic, 7.7% toxic) had significantly (p < 0.001) lower C_min than those with peritonitis (mean: 5.5 mg/L, 14.4% subtherapeutic, 9.3% toxic) and other non-pulmonary infection (mean: 5.2 mg/L, 3.3% subtherapeutic, 16.5% toxic).

CONCLUSION

Linezolid serum concentrations are reduced in patients with pulmonary infections. Future studies should investigate if other linezolid thresholds are needed in those patients due to linezolid pooling in patients´ lung.

Linezolid Exposure Is Associated with Cytopenias in Patients Treated for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Although linezolid is effective for multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) tuberculosis treatment, it is associated with cytopenias after 4 weeks of administration. Data on toxicities with long-term use of linezolid and drug pharmacodynamics in MDR-TB treatment are limited, and concerns about toxicity present barriers to wider implementation. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients treated for MDR-TB in the country of Georgia from 2015 to 2017. Intensive blood sampling 4 to 6 weeks after treatment initiation with linezolid 600 mg daily was performed for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis, including linezolid trough concentration (Cmin) and area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24). Linezolid exposure was defined using literature-reported thresholds. Cytopenias were defined using an NIH adverse event (AE) scale. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between linezolid exposure and cytopenias. Among 76 patients receiving linezolid in their baseline treatment regimen and who had PK data available, cytopenia AEs occurred in 30 (39.5%) for an incidence rate of 46 per 100 person-years. The median duration of linezolid therapy was 526 days. No patients required dose reduction or interruption due to cytopenias. Median linezolid Cmin was 0.235 mg/L (interquartile range [IQR], 0.069 to 0.529), and median AUC0-24 was 89.6 mg·h/L (IQR, 69.2 to 116.2). Cytopenias were associated with linezolid PK parameters (Cmin > 2 mg/L and AUC0-24 > 160 mg·h/L). Cytopenias occurred frequently with long-term use of linezolid 600 mg/day and were associated with PK parameters but did not result in the need for treatment interruption in the management of a cohort of patients with MDR-TB.