Cancers of the nasopharynx and oropharynx and formaldehyde exposure

Formation of formaldehyde as an artifact peak in head space GC analysis resulting from decomposition of sample diluent DMSO: A GC-MS investigation with deuterated DMSO

During our method development for residual formaldehyde detection in a drug substance, unusually high levels of formaldehyde were detected when using a mixed solvent of EtOH/DMSO (4:1, v/v) as sample diluent in headspace GC analysis (HS-GC). Initial investigation found that formaldehyde is used in the preparation for one of the starting materials of the drug substance. Nevertheless, there is neither other source of formaldehyde in the manufacturing process of the drug substance, nor would formaldehyde be generated during the process. In the ensuing root cause investigation, it was found that once the solvent DMSO is replaced by other solvent [e.g., N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF)], while keeping other method parameters unchanged in the HS-GC analysis, the level of formaldehyde in the same batch of the drug substance became undetectable (LOD: 3 ppm). All the evidence suggested that the observed formaldehyde in the HS-GC analysis might be due to the decomposition of DMSO, which could be facilitated by the presence of this particular drug substance. In other words, the presence of the drug substance (in the form of HCl salt) would cause a minor decomposition of DMSO to produce formaldehyde. To prove this hypothesis, a GC-MS experiment of the drug substance was conducted in which deuterated DMSO (DMSO-_d6) was used in place of regular DMSO; the expected deuterated derivatization product, i.e., diethoxymethane-_d2 (C₂H₅OCD₂OC₂H₅), was observed in the HS-GC-MS analysis. Therefore, it became clear that this drug substance facilitates the minor decomposition of DMSO in the HS-GC analysis. In such a case, formaldehyde is an artifact peak, or ghost peak, rather than a true impurity of the drug substance. The false positive results of formaldehyde were also found in other four compounds (three drug substances and one reagent) which are all in the form of HCl or HBr salts, suggesting that generation of formaldehyde from DMSO could be a widely occurred phenomenon in HS-GC analysis of alkyl amines in the form of HCl or HBr salts, when DMSO-containing diluents are used during sample preparation.

New insights into the mortality risk from nasopharyngeal cancer in the national cancer institute formaldehyde worker cohort study

Background

Indications were found that a diagnostic bias could have contributed to the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) suggestion of a persistent increased mortality risk for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).

Methods

NCI provided the cohort data updated through 2004. We computed local county rate-based standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for NPC and all other entities of the pharynx for two time periods. Moreover, SMRs were calculated for pharyngeal cancer in relation to study site by cumulative exposure to formaldehyde (FA).

Results

Overall, our results corroborate the indications of a diagnostic bias by strong but contrary temporal trends for NPC and pharynx, not specified. Moreover, it was shown that mortality risks were increased in the Wallingford cohort for all pharyngeal cancer combined and for pharyngeal cancer excluding NPC. In contrast, no increased risks for these categories were found in the nine other study sites combined.

Conclusions

Our re-analysis provided little or no evidence to support NCI's suggestion of a persistent association between FA exposure and mortality from NPC.

Spraying urea solution reduces formaldehyde levels during gross anatomy courses

Formaldehyde (FA) is frequently used to embalm human cadavers that are employed to teach gross anatomy to medical and dental students. However, exposure to FA is harmful to both students and educators. The aim of this study was to reduce the FA levels in the anatomy dissection hall by spraying an FA scavenger solution. We measured the changes in FA levels after administering FA scavenger solutions to liquid, wet paper towels, organs, and cadavers containing FA. Among L-cysteine, N-ethyl urea, and urea, the latter was found to have the strongest scavenging power towards the FA in the liquid. The molar concentration of urea that most efficiently reduced the levels of volatilized FA from the wet paper towels was the same as that of the FA. After spraying the urea solution, the volatilized FA levels immediately decreased, reaching their minimum at 60 min, and remained low even after 240 min. Spraying the urea solution onto the organs reduced the levels of FA volatilized from the surfaces of organs but not those from the insides of the organs. In the dissection hall used for the gross anatomy course at Tokyo Medical University, the FA levels were significantly decreased after spraying the urea solution onto the cadavers. Moreover, dissection could be performed without the cadavers putrefying during the 4-month course. These results indicate that various institutes could use urea solution spray to effectively reduce the FA levels in the dissection hall and thus ensure the safety of students and educators.

Pharyngeal cancer mortality among chemical plant workers exposed to formaldehyde

Objectives: To assess the possible relationship between formaldehyde exposure and mortality risk from pharyngeal cancer (PC), in particular nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Methods: Subjects were 7328 workers employed at a plastics-producing plant (1941-1984). Vital status for 98% of the cohort and cause of death for 95% of 2872 deaths were determined. Reconstructed exposures to formaldehyde, particulates and pigment were used to compute several exposure measures. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were computed for several demographic, work history and formaldehyde exposure variables. In a nested case-control study, seven cases of NPC and 15 cases of other PC were matched on race, sex, age and year of birth to four controls from the cohort. Among interviewed subjects, lifetime smoking history was determined using respondents or proxies for all but one control subject. Results: Statistically significant 2.23-fold and fivefold excesses for PC and NPC, respectively, were observed. Fivefold range NPC excesses were observed for both short (B / 1 year) and long-term workers and were concentrated among workers hired during 1947-1956. Only three NPC cases were exposed to formaldehyde for longer than one year, and each had low average intensity of formaldehyde exposure (0.03-0.60 ppm). Only a few exposure measures revealed some evidence of an association with all PC or NPC. For all PC combined, adjustment for smoking and year-of-hire in the case-control study generally corroborated findings from the cohort study. Conclusions: Overall, the pattern of findings suggests that the large, persistent nasopharyngeal and other PC excesses observed among the Wallingford workforce are not associated with formaldehyde exposure, and may reflect the influence of nonoccupational risk factors or occupational risk factors associated with employment outside the Wallingford plant.

Bayesian analysis of a rat formaldehyde DNA-protein cross-link model

As the initial effort in a multi-step uncertainty analysis of a biologically based cancer model for formaldehyde, a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis was performed for a compartmental model that predicts DNA-protein cross-links (DPX) produced by formaldehyde exposure. The Bayesian approach represented by the MCMC analysis integrates existing knowledge of the model parameters with observed, formaldehyde-DPX-specific data, providing a statistically sound basis for estimating model output uncertainty. Uncertainty and variability were evaluated through a hierarchical structure, where interindividual variability was considered for all model parameters and that variability was assumed to be uncertain on population levels. The uncertainty of the population mean and that of the population variance were significantly reduced through the MCMC analysis. Our investigation highlights several issues that must be dealt with in many real-world analyses (e.g., issues of parameters' nonidentifiability due to limited data) while demonstrating the feasibility of conducting a comprehensive quantitative uncertainty evaluation. The current analysis can be viewed as a case study, for a relatively simple model, illustrating some of the constraints that analysts will face when applying Bayesian approaches to biologically or physiologically based models of increasing complexity.

Work in the metal industry and nasopharyngeal cancer mortality among formaldehyde-exposed workers

OBJECTIVE

To investigate further the possibility that the large nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) mortality excess among a cohort of formaldehyde-exposed workers may be related to occupational factors external to the study plant.

METHODS

Subjects were 7345 workers employed at a plastics-producing plant (1941-1984) in Wallingford, Connecticut evaluated independently as part of a National Cancer Institute cohort study. Vital status for 98% of the cohort and cause of death for 95% of 2872 deaths were determined through 2003. Reconstructed worker exposures to formaldehyde were used to compute unlagged and lagged exposure measures. We computed standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) based on US and local county rates. In a nested case-control study we evaluated mortality risks from NPC and from all other pharyngeal cancers combined (AOPC) in relation to formaldehyde exposure while accounting for potential confounding or effect modification by smoking or external (non-Wallingford) employment. Job applications, Connecticut commercial city directories and a previous survey were used to assign subjects to three external job groups.

RESULTS

We observed no new deaths from NPC and one additional AOPC death (pharynx unspecified) yielding, respectively, SMRs of 4.43 (7 deaths, 95% CI=1.78-9.13) and 1.71 (16 deaths, 95% CI=1.01-2.72). Five of seven NPC cases worked in silver smithing (including brass plating and other jobs related to silver or brass) or other metal work (including steel working and welding), and this type of work was relatively rare in the remaining study population (OR=14.41, 95% CI=1.08-82.1). For AOPC, we found a moderate increase in risk for other metal work (OR=1.40, 95% CI=.31-5.1). Interaction models suggested that NPC and AOPC risks were not elevated in subjects exposed only to formaldehyde.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our nested case-control study suggest that the large nasopharyngeal cancer mortality excess in the Wallingford cohort may not be due to formaldehyde exposure, but rather reflects the influence of external employment in the ferrous and non-ferrous metal industries of the local area that entailed possible exposures to several suspected risk factors for upper respiratory system cancer (e.g., sulfuric acid mists, mineral acid, metal dusts and heat). Our findings may also help to explain why the associations with formaldehyde and nasopharyngeal cancer reported in the 1994 update of the 10-plant NCI formaldehyde cohort study were unique to the Wallingford plant (Plant 1 in NCI study). Further updates of the NCI formaldehyde cohort study should include co-exposure data on silver smithing and other metal work for all study plants to help explain the unique findings for nasopharyngeal cancer in Plant 1 compared with the other nine plants.

The enigmatic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has a unique and complex etiology that is not completely understood. Although NPC is rare in most populations, it is a leading form of cancer in a few well-defined populations, including natives of southern China, Southeast Asia, the Arctic, and the Middle East/North Africa. The distinctive racial/ethnic and geographic distribution of NPC worldwide suggests that both environmental factors and genetic traits contribute to its development. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge regarding the epidemiology of NPC and to propose new avenues of research that could help illuminate the causes and ultimately the prevention of this remarkable disease. Well-established risk factors for NPC include elevated antibody titers against the Epstein-Barr virus, consumption of salt-preserved fish, a family history of NPC, and certain human leukocyte antigen class I genotypes. Consumption of other preserved foods, tobacco smoking, and a history of chronic respiratory tract conditions may be associated with elevated NPC risk, whereas consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables and other human leukocyte antigen genotypes may be associated with decreased risk. Evidence for a causal role of various inhalants, herbal medicines, and occupational exposures is inconsistent. Other than dietary modification, no concrete preventive measures for NPC exist. Given the unresolved gaps in understanding of NPC, there is a clear need for large-scale, population-based molecular epidemiologic studies to elucidate how environmental, viral, and genetic factors interact in both the development and the prevention of this disease.

Risk assessment of formaldehyde for the general population in Japan

Formaldehyde is used in the production of resins, molding compounds, photographic film, bactericide, and tissue preservative. The purpose of this study was to provide an up-to-date critical review of the information to the toxicological profile of formaldehyde, and to assess the risk of formaldehyde for the general population in Japan. Inhaled formaldehyde is an effective sensory irritant at a dosage of 0.5 ppm in mice. Following inhalation in laboratory animals, more than 6 ppm formaldehyde causes degenerative non-neoplastic effects in mice and monkeys and nasal tumors in rats. It is considered that formaldehyde induces genotoxic effects directly in vitro and secondarily in vivo. Sensory irritation of the eyes and respiratory tract in response to inhalation exposure to formaldehyde has been reported at 0.08 ppm and above in human study. Formaldehyde is carcinogenic at the site of contact as a consequence of epithelial cell regenerative proliferation resulting from cytotoxicity and mutation, based on studies in both animals and humans. Levels of formaldehyde in atmosphere detected in rural, suburban, and urban areas in Japan were 2.5-3.2 ppb from 1998 to 2003. The majority of the population is exposed to atmosphere concentrations of formaldehyde less than those associated with sensory irritation. The reference concentration of formaldehyde in atmosphere for the Japanese general population is recommended to be 0.01 ppm.

Reevaluation of mortality risks from nasopharyngeal cancer in the formaldehyde cohort study of the National Cancer Institute

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) recent suggestion of a causal association between formaldehyde exposure and mortality from nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is robust with respect to alternative methods of data analysis and alternative categorizations of formaldehyde exposure.

METHODS

The original authors provided the cohort data. We computed U.S. and local county (regional) rate-based standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and internal cohort rate-based relative risks (RR) by categories of four formaldehyde exposure metrics (highest peak, average intensity, cumulative, and duration of exposure), using both NCI categories and an alternative categorization based on tertiles of all NPC deaths among exposed subjects. We computed SMRs and RRs for each of 10 study plants and by plant group (Plant 1 (n = 4261) vs. Plants 2-10 (n = 21,358)).

RESULTS

Six of 10 NPC deaths observed in the NCI study occurred in only one plant (Plant 1) and the remaining four cases occurred individually in four of the other nine plants studied. A large, statistically significant, regional rate-based NPC SMR of 10.32 (95% CI = 3.79-22.47) among formaldehyde-exposed workers in Plant 1 contrasted sharply with a 35% deficit in NPC deaths (SMR = .65, 95% CI = .08-2.33) among exposed workers in Plants 2-10 combined. The statistically significant exposure-response relationship with formaldehyde and NPC reported in the NCI study for highest peak exposure was driven entirely by a large, statistically significant excess NPC risk in Plant 1 for the highest peak exposure category (4+ ppm). For the remaining nine plants, RRs for all non-baseline highest peak exposure categories were less than 1.0, and we observed no evidence of an exposure-response relationship. Most of the observed NPC excesses for the non-baseline categories of the other exposure metrics (average intensity, cumulative, and duration of formaldehyde exposure) were concentrated in Plant 1, and by contrast to the NCI findings, none of the corresponding exposure-response relationships was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our reanalysis provided little evidence to support NCI's suggestion of a causal association between formaldehyde exposure and mortality from NPC. NCI's conclusion of a possible causal association was driven heavily by anomalous findings in one study plant (Plant 1). An independent and larger study of Plant 1 by the current authors concluded the NPC excess was not associated with formaldehyde exposure. Our findings cast considerable additional uncertainty regarding the validity of NCI's suggested causal association.

Inhaled formaldehyde: exposure estimation, hazard characterization, and exposure-response analysis

Formaldehyde has been assessed as a Priority Substance under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Probabilistic estimates of exposure of the general population in Canada to formaldehyde in ambient and indoor air are presented. Critical health effects include sensory irritation and the potential to induce tumors in the upper respiratory tract (the nasal region in rodents and potentially the lungs of humans). The majority of the general population is exposed to airborne concentrations of formaldehyde less than those typically associated with sensory irritation (i.e., 0.1 mg/m3). Based primarily upon data derived from laboratory studies, the inhalation of formaldehyde under conditions that induce cytotoxicity and sustained regenerative proliferation within the respiratory tract is considered to present a carcinogenic hazard to humans. At airborne levels for which the prevalence of sensory irritation is minimal (i.e., 0.1 mg/m3), risks of respiratory-tract cancers for the general population estimated on the basis of a biologically motivated case-specific model are exceedingly low. This biologically motivated case-specific model incorporates two-stage clonal expansion and is supported by dosimetry calculations from computational fluid dynamics analyses of formaldehyde flux in various regions of the nose and single-path modeling for the lower respiratory tract. The degree of confidence in the underlying database and uncertainties in estimates of exposure and in characterization of hazard and dose response are delineated.

Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and wood dust and nasopharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether occupational exposures to formaldehyde and wood dust increase the risk of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).

METHODS

A multicentered, population based case-control study was carried out at five cancer registries in the United States participating in the National Cancer Institute's SEER program. Cases (n=196) with a newly diagnosed NPC between 1987 and 1993, and controls (n=244) selected over the same period from the general population through random digit dialing participated in structured telephone interviews which inquired about suspected risk factors for the disease, including a lifetime history of occupational and chemical exposure. Histological type of cancer was abstracted from clinical records of the registries. Potential exposure to formaldehyde and wood dust was assessed on a job by job basis by experienced industrial hygienists who were blinded as to case or control status.

RESULTS

For formaldehyde, after adjusting for cigarette use, race, and other risk factors, a trend of increasing risk of squamous and unspecified epithelial carcinomas was found for increasing duration (p=0.014) and cumulative exposure (p=0.033) but not for maximum exposure concentration. The odds ratio (OR) for people cumulatively exposed to >1.10 ppm-years was 3.0 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.3 to 6.6) compared with those considered unexposed. In analyses limited to jobs considered definitely exposed, these trends became stronger. The associations were most evident among cigarette smokers. By contrast, there was no association between potential exposure to formaldehyde and undifferentiated and non-keratinising carcinomas. There was little evidence that exposure to wood dust increased risk of NPC, as modest crude associations essentially disappeared after control for potential exposure to formaldehyde.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the hypothesis that occupational exposure to formaldehyde, but not wood dust, increases risk of NPC. This association seems to be specific to squamous cell carcinomas. Established cohorts of workers exposed to formaldehyde and wood dust should continue to be monitored for NPC and other respiratory cancers. Future studies of NPC should take into account histological type in assessing risk from environmental and host factors.

Occupational risk factors for pancreatic cancer: a case-control study based on death certificates from 24 U.S. states

BACKGROUND

The relation between occupational exposure and pancreatic cancer is not well established. A population-based case-control study based on death certificates from 24 U.S. states was conducted to determine if occupations/industries or work-related exposures to solvents were associated with pancreatic cancer death.

METHODS

The cases were 63,097 persons who died from pancreatic cancer occurring in the period 1984-1993. The controls were 252,386 persons who died from causes other than cancer in the same time period.

RESULTS

Industries associated with significantly increased risk of pancreatic cancer included printing and paper manufacturing; chemical, petroleum, and related processing; transport, communication, and public service; wholesale and retail trades; and medical and other health-related services. Occupations associated with significantly increased risk included managerial, administrative, and other professional occupations; technical occupations; and sales, clerical, and other administrative support occupations. Potential exposures to formaldehyde and other solvents were assessed by using a job exposure matrix developed for this study. Occupational exposure to formaldehyde was associated with a moderately increased risk of pancreatic cancer, with ORs of 1.2, 1.2, 1.4 for subjects with low, medium, and high probabilities of exposure and 1.2, 1.2, and 1.1 for subjects with low, medium, and high intensity of exposure, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study did not suggest that industrial or occupational exposure is a major contributor to the etiology of pancreatic cancer. Further study may be needed to confirm the positive association between formaldehyde exposure and pancreatic cancer. Published 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

An updated meta-analysis of formaldehyde exposure and upper respiratory tract cancers

In this study, we summarize 47 epidemiologic studies related to formaldehyde exposure and use meta-analytic techniques to assess findings for cancers of the lung, nose/nasal sinuses, and nasopharynx. Our analyses indicate that workers with formaldehyde exposure have essentially null findings for lung cancer and a slight deficit of sinonasal cancer. Nasopharyngeal cancer rates were elevated moderately in a minority of studies. Most studies, however, did not find any nasopharyngeal cancers, and many failed to report their findings. After correcting for underreporting, we found a meta relative risk of 1.0 for cohort studies. Case-control studies had a meta relative risk of 1.3. Our review of the exposure literature indicated that the nasopharyngeal cancer case-control studies represented much lower and less certain exposures than the cohort studies. We conclude that the available studies do not support a causal relation between formaldehyde exposure and nasopharyngeal cancer. This conclusion conflicts with conclusions from two previous meta-analyses, primarily because of our consideration of unreported data.

Formaldehyde vapour effects in chicken embryo

A total of 763 fertile chicken eggs were divided in two groups. The eggs of the first group were manipulated intact. The shell of each egg of the second group was drilled at the air chamber position. The eggs of both groups were divided in 6 subgroups and they were placed in an automatic incubator. Between the second and the fourth day of incubation each subgroup of eggs was moved to another incubator saturated with formaldehyde vapour, and it was exposed for a certain time. The hatched chicks were examined, measured, and processed, in order to search for any external, visceral, and skeletal malformation. Although the chicks of the first group did not show any particular abnormalities after their exposure to formaldehyde vapours, those of the second group were found to be affected in a rate of about 29:100. The observed embryotoxic effects of the hatched chicks of the second group were mainly early and late prenatal deaths, extensive and limited congenital anomalies as well as reduction deformities.

Mortality among chemical workers in a factory where formaldehyde was used

OBJECTIVES

An independent and updated historical cohort mortality study was conducted among chemical plant workers to investigate further an association between exposures to formaldehyde and particulates and cancers of the nasopharynx and lung reported in an earlier National Cancer Institute study of the same plant.

METHODS

Subjects were 7359 workers who were first employed between 1941 and 1984 in a factory in Wallingford, Connecticut where formaldehyde was used. Vital status was determined on 31 December 1984 for 96% of the cohort and death certificates were obtained for 93% of 1531 known deaths. Exposures of individual workers were estimated quantitatively for formaldehyde, product particulates, and non-product particulates, and qualitatively for pigment. Statistical analyses focused on 6039 white men in 1945-84. Cohort data that could not have been included in the National Cancer Institute study were also analysed separately.

RESULTS

Mortality among long term workers (employed > or = 1 y) was generally similar to or more favourable than that of the general population, and there was little evidence of a relation between either rates of lung cancer or standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) and several measures of exposure to formaldehyde, particulates, and pigment. For several causes including lung cancer, death rates among short term workers (employed < 1 y) were significantly increased. Short term workers did not seem to differ from long term workers for the exposures considered. Among all white men, a significant SMR of 550 (local comparison) for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) was based on the same four index cases identified in the earlier study of this plant. Only one case of nasopharyngeal cancer had any appreciable exposure to formaldehyde. No new cases of nasopharyngeal cancers were found among the cohort data that could not have been included in the National Cancer Institute study--that is, extended observation time and additional study members.

CONCLUSIONS

Among workers employed for at least one year, this study provides little evidence that the risk of lung cancer is associated with exposure to formaldehyde alone or in combination with particulates or pigment. The significant increases in both the rates and SMRs for lung cancer seem to be primarily a phenomenon of short term workers, but the possibility remains that unmeasured occupational or non-occupational factors may have played a part.

Formaldehyde mechanistic data and risk assessment: endogenous protection from DNA adduct formation

Exposures of rodents to airborne formaldehyde (FA) produce dose-related toxicity, enhanced cell proliferation and squamous cell carcinomas in the nasal passages. The mechanism of FA-induced tumor formation involves DNA-protein crosslink formation and enhanced cell proliferation secondarily to cytotoxicity. The mucociliary apparatus and glutathione protect against low-dose FA-induced effects. Consequently, the mechanistic information is consistent with a very sublinear dose-response curve for tumor formation. The sublinear dose-response of nasal DNA-protein crosslinks levels in rodents and monkeys has been used in the risk assessment of FA.

Formaldehyde and cancer: a critical review

Formaldehyde is a naturally occurring chemical found in every human cell. It has been in widespread use for over a century as a disinfectant and preservative agent, and more recently in a number of industrial products. Animal studies indicate that formaldehyde is a rat carcinogen at high levels (> or = 10 ppm) of exposure. Results for lower levels of exposure show less clear-cut carcinogenic effects, and some species, such as mice and hamsters, appear much less sensitive to any carcinogenic potential of formaldehyde. Epidemiologic studies of the effects of formaldehyde exposure among humans provide inconsistent results. In general, these nonexperimental studies suffer from a number of biases and flaws. The epidemiologic studies fall into three categories: formaldehyde industry workers, case-control studies, and studies of professionals who use formaldehyde. Studies of industry workers with known exposure to formaldehyde report little evidence of an excess cancer risk. Nasopharyngeal cancer, the one cancer considered most strongly linked to formaldehyde among humans, appears after close examination to be likely a result of multiple subgroup analyses and misclassification. The case-control studies usually lack any direct measure of formaldehyde exposure and rely instead on hypothetical exposure based on occupational exposure matrices. Most of these studies, after adjustment for confounding factors, fail to find a significant association with putative formaldehyde exposure. The studies that do report a significant association suffer from methodologic problems limiting their interpretation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Perspectives on formaldehyde toxicity: separating fact from fantasy

Formaldehyde (IUPAC name, methanal) is one of the simplest, most ubiquitous molecules in our environment and troposphere. Exposure to large amounts of formaldehyde can produce a variety of respiratory and dermatologic problems in humans, in both the home and the workplace. However, in spite of anecdotal reports on formaldehyde-induced illness over the past 20 years there is a paucity of data regarding its potential as either an allergen or an antigen in humans. In addition, many of our current impressions about formaldehyde are based on studies of dubious scientific validity. In this review, we discuss the biological and chemical properties of formaldehyde and its presence in materials which we come in contact with, and finally attempt to put in perspective our current understanding of the detrimental effects of formaldehyde on our health, or lack thereof. There is no evidence at present that formaldehyde causes immunological diseases. Finally, and unfortunately, many of the studies have drawn invalid conclusions and are based on poorly controlled anecdotal observations.

Indoor air pollution: an edifice complex

The collision of escalating technological sophistication and surging environmental awareness has caused the reexamination of many societal paradigms. Horror stories about lethal chemical exposures involving isolated cases of ignorance, carelessness or greed have caused the public to demand constant vigilance to prevent exposure to potentially hazardous substances. Accordingly, much time and resource has been expanded by the U.S. government and citizens to abate and prevent air and water pollution. While these efforts have met with measurable success, there is increasing public concern about a new generation of pollution-related human illness in office, home and transportation environments. New instances of Sick Building Syndrome or Building Related Illness are reported daily by the popular press. Human health effects such as cancer, infectious disease, allergy and irritation have been ascribed to indoor air pollution. The clinical aspects of indoor air pollution are often discounted by consulting engineers and industrial hygienists involved in indoor air quality. Physicians and clinically-trained scientists have received a "Macedonian call" to sift clinical relevance from the emotional aspects of indoor air quality problems. Point sources of pollutants, associated human health effects, and problem solving approaches associated with indoor air pollution are described. Regulatory and litigational aspects of indoor air pollution are also discussed.

Role of epidemiology in health risk assessment

Human health risk assessment has been the object of systematic study in recent years, with formal models of risk assessment and risk management having been proposed by several national and international health agencies. The particular model developed by the Environmental Health Directorate of Health and Welfare Canada was examined in some detail and used to focus on the role of epidemiology in the overall process of risk assessment. In addition to providing information fundamental to the identification of environmental carcinogens and the estimation of carcinogenic risks, epidemiology may also play a role in shaping risk perception and in improving risk communication practices. Taken collectively, epidemiologic data on health risks provide a basis for improved disease surveillance and prioritization of public health concerns. Both descriptive and analytic epidemiologic protocols may be used to gather information on disease etiology. Because of the potential for bias and confounding in observational studies of human populations, epidemiological data should be subjected to careful evaluation in accordance with established criteria before a causal relationship between exposure and disease is inferred. Toxicological studies using nonhuman test systems may be used to avoid these problems, but at the expense of obtaining indirect information on human health risks. Nonetheless, toxicological data provide an important complement to epidemiological data, providing information on potential health risks in advance of human exposure and offering a means of indirectly assessing risks in situations where human studies fail to provide informative results. The complementary roles of epidemiology and toxicology in health risk assessment were examined using four case studies. While the epidemiological evidence linking tobacco consumption to lung cancer is now unequivocal, the corresponding data on involuntary smoking, although strongly suggestive of increasing the relative risk of lung cancer, requires further confirmation before providing the same degree of evidence as now exists for active smoking. At present, the best estimates suggest that overall mortality attributable to active smoking may exceed that due to passive smoking by roughly 100-fold. Despite this large difference in health impact, passive smoking continues to be the focus of much public concern, in part because of the involuntary nature of the risk involved. Because of the abundance of good epidemiological data on tobacco, toxicology has assumed a secondary role in defining the health risks associated with smoking. In contrast, while epidemiological studies with saccharin and formaldehyde have provided unequivocal evidence of carcinogenic effects in animals exposed to high doses, thereby raising concerns over potential human carcinogenicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mortality from lung cancer among workers employed in formaldehyde industries

A historical cohort of 26,561 workers employed in ten facilities was assembled to evaluate cancer risks associated with exposure to formaldehyde. Historical exposures to formaldehyde by job, work area, plant, and calendar time were estimated using monitoring data available from participating plants, comments from long-term workers and company officials, exposure evaluations from walk-through surveys conducted by project industrial hygienists, and results from monitoring specifically performed for this project. A previous report of findings from this study noted a 30% excess mortality from lung cancer among wage workers. The relative risk for lung cancer (whether estimated by SMRs or SRRs) 20 or more years after first exposure did not generally rise with increasing exposure to formaldehyde. Various estimates of exposure were investigated including duration, intensity, peak, cumulative, and average, and by exposures lagged by 5, 10, 20, and 30 years. The excess did not appear to arise gradually, but emerged suddenly among workers whose total cumulative exposure was less than 0.1 ppm-years. Slightly positive, but nonsignificant, exposure-response associations between lung cancer and level of formaldehyde occurred in only a few out of a large number of comparisons (e.g., for persons hired before the start dates for the study and for workers also exposed to particulates). There was a lack of consistency among the various plants for risk of lung cancer, with six plants having elevated SMRs and four plants having deficits. Mortality from lung cancer was more strongly associated with exposure to other substances including phenol, melamine, urea, and wood dust than with exposure to formaldehyde. Workers exposed to formaldehyde without exposure to these substances did not experience an elevated mortality from lung cancer. The risk did not increase with cumulative levels of formaldehyde among those exposed to other substances and there was a slightly negative trend for those exposed to formaldehyde alone. Although some role for formaldehyde, particularly in association with other substances, in the excess of lung cancer seen among these workers cannot be ruled out, these findings suggest that exposure to phenol, melamine, urea, wood dust or other exposures also occurring in the area where these substances were used (i.e., production of resin and molding compounds) may play a more primary role. This association should be further evaluated in other studies that include workers from resin and molding compound operations.

Mortality of U.S. embalmers and funeral directors

The causes of mortality of 3,649 white and 397 non-white male U.S. embalmers and funeral directors, who had died between 1975 and 1985, were examined in a proportional mortality study. Non-significant excesses were found for malignancies of the buccal cavity and pharynx (PMR = 120) and for nasopharyngeal cancer (PMR = 216). No sinonasal cancers were observed, while 1.7 were expected. A statistically significant excess of colon cancer (PMR = 127) was found and a non-significant excess of brain and other CNS cancer was noted among whites only (PMR = 123). Statistically significant excesses of malignancies of the lymphatic and hematopoietic systems were found in whites (PMR = 131) and non-whites (PMR = 241). Myeloid leukemia (PMR = 157) and leukemia of other and unspecified cell types (PMR = 228) were in excess, while no excess of lymphatic leukemia was noted. Elevations in risk were also found for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis. Non-whites showed a marked excess of multiple myeloma (PMR = 369). Chronic nephritis was in excess among whites (PMR = 215) and non-whites (PMR = 257). No excess of cirrhosis of the liver was found. Excesses of malignancies of the lymphatic and hematopoietic systems could not be directly related to job held in the funeral industry. Further case-control studies are planned to rule out the possibility that the observed associations are artifactual, by assessing the association between specific work practices and disease risk.

Statistical considerations in the interpretation of negative carcinogenicity data

The regulation of toxic substances present in the environment requires that carcinogens be distinguished from noncarcinogens on the strength of the available toxicological and epidemiological evidence for carcinogenicity. In this article, we consider the difficulties associated with establishing strong evidence against carcinogenicity. In particular, the ability of both animal and human studies to detect small increases in tumor occurrence rates is evaluated in statistical terms. Consideration is also given to resolving apparent conflicts between the toxicological and the epidemiological sources of data.

Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and histopathological changes in the nasal mucosa

To study the cytotoxic effect of formaldehyde on the human nasal mucosa 75 men with occupational exposure to formaldehyde or to formaldehyde and wood dust, were examined, looking particularly at early signs of irritative effects and histopathological changes in the nasal mucosa. All men underwent a medical examination and a nasal biopsy specimen was examined by a pathologist and graded from 0-8 according to the morphological changes. A high frequency of nasal symptoms, mostly a running nose and crusting, was related to exposure to formaldehyde. Only three men had a normal mucosa; the remainder had loss of cilia and goblet cell hyperplasia (11%) and squamous metaplasia (78%); in six cases (8%) there was a mild dysplasia. The histological grading showed a significantly higher score when compared with unexposed contents (2.9 v 1.8). There was no dose response relation, no malignancies, and no difference in the histological score between those exposed to formaldehyde or to formaldehyde and wood dust.

Species comparisons in evaluating carcinogenicity in humans

Some species and strains of experimental animals have such unique mechanisms of developing cancer that the extrapolation of such bioassay results to the human situation would be fraudulent. This fraudulent extrapolation could occur both qualitatively and quantitatively. Although it will be expensive, species other than the rat, mouse, and hamster should be tested, and tested at wider dose ranges than presently used, before risk assessors will have sufficient data to make legitimate risk estimates. Both species- and strain-unique mechanisms and pharmacokinetic information must be made available to the risk assessors before their estimates can be any better than "guesstimates." As more and more data become available, it will become essential that newer techniques of visualization of the data be used in order to evaluate the weight of evidence that an animal carcinogen is or is not a human carcinogen.

Epidemiology of chronic occupational exposure to formaldehyde: report of the Ad Hoc Panel on Health Aspects of Formaldehyde. Universities Associated for Research and Education in Pathology, Inc

An independent, international panel of scientists reviewed and evaluated the relevant literature on occupational and environmental exposure to formaldehyde and subsequent epidemiology of cancer in exposed populations. Studies of topical sites (respiratory tract and skin) were considered separately from non-topical sites (other major organ systems) and individual assessments were made of evidence of site-specific cancer risk within the broader categories. In addition to the studies per se, the Panel also took into account critiques and reviews of the published reports. The Panel concluded that: 1) for no malignancy in man is there convincing evidence of a relationship with formaldehyde exposure and 2) furthermore, that if a relationship does exist, the excess risk, in absolute terms, must be small. An apparent lack of consistency among the studies in site-specific cancer risk and uncertainty resulting from unresolved confounding by known risk factors were identified by the Panel as significant obstacles to more definitive conclusions.