Subsequent primary cancer risk among five-year survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers

Engagement with Programmatic Electronic Communications Among Young Adults with Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

We sought to better understand the engagement and interest in topics conveyed via electronic (e-)communications to young adults with breast cancer to inform clinical programming, resource creation, and communication strategy for this patient population.

METHODS

The Young and Strong (Y&S) program at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) utilizes Emma©, a HIPAA-compliant communications platform, to create and share e-communications with all patients aged 44 or younger at breast cancer diagnosis, seen at least once at DFCI, including satellite sites. Program faculty and staff curate and contribute relevant clinical and research news, resources, and events, including research opportunities, support groups, webinars, and in-person events. We exploratorily analyzed recipient data using Emma to describe patient engagement with monthly and standalone e-communications from September 2020 to April 2023, including open rates (number opened/number successful deliveries) and click-to-open rates (number clicks/number opened).

RESULTS

An average of 3915 young patients were emailed monthly e-communications (range 3202-4380). The open rate steadily increased from 19.3 to 53.0% over 31 months. The topics with the highest click rate were content related to virtual or in-person peer- and social work-led support meetings (15%), healthy lifestyle and integrative therapy (15%), DFCI-organized conferences/series (13%), and managing the details of life (10%). One topic of interest was that of fertility and childrearing, comprising almost 50% of all clicks between March 2021 and June 2021, and almost 20% between December 2022 and March 2023.

CONCLUSION

Young patients with breast cancer engage heavily with programmatic e-communications focused on information about opportunities to interact with peers or experts, whether support meetings or informational events. This group appears eager for additional information on the unique lifestyle and reproductive challenges that they may face.

Cancer Burden in Adolescents and Young Adults in Belgium: Trends to Incidence Stabilisation in Recent Years with Improved Survival

Background/Objectives: This population-based study examined epidemiological trends of primary cancers in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) to enhance the understanding of the specific spectrum of cancers impacting AYAs in Belgium. Methods: Data on incidence, prevalence, mortality, and survival were obtained from the Belgian Cancer Registry (2004-2020, N = 43,535). (A)APC statistics were compared with children (5-14 years) and adults (40-49 years). Results: Cancer incidence increased by 0.4% annually from 66 to 80 per 100,000 person-years (ESR2013) but stabilised after 2015, except for Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic myeloid neoplasms, and testicular and breast cancer, which continued to rise. Mortality decreased by 1% annually, from 10 to 7 per 100,000 person-years (2004-2019). Five-year relative survival (RS) was 87% but remained low for certain cancers, including ovary (78%), central nervous system (67%), precursor haematopoietic neoplasms (64%), gastrointestinal (excl. colorectal) (49%), and lung-bronchus-trachea cancers (42%). Conclusions: From 2004-2020, the cancer burden among AYAs in Belgium increased due to improved survival, while incidence stabilised after 2015. Five-year RS exceeds 80% overall but remains lower for some cancers compared to children (e.g., precursor haematopoietic neoplasms) or older adults (e.g., breast cancer, sarcoma). The Belgian epidemiological trends align with those in neighbouring countries (Netherlands, France, Germany).

Treatment, toxicity, and mortality after subsequent breast cancer in female survivors of childhood cancer

Childhood cancer survivors, particularly those who received chest radiotherapy, are at high risk for developing subsequent breast cancer. Minimizing long-term toxicity risks associated with additional radiotherapy and chemotherapy is a priority, but therapeutic tradeoffs have not been comprehensively characterized and their impact on survival is unknown. In this study, 431 female childhood cancer survivors with subsequent breast cancer from a multicenter retrospective cohort study were evaluated. Compared with one-to-one matched females with first primary breast cancer, survivors are as likely to be prescribed guideline-concordant treatment (N = 344 pairs; survivors: 94%, controls: 93%), but more frequently undergo mastectomy (survivors: 81%, controls: 60%) and are less likely to be treated with anthracyclines (survivors: 47%, controls: 66%) or radiotherapy (survivors: 18%, controls: 61%). Despite this, survivors have nearly 3.5-fold (95% CI = 2.17-5.57) greater mortality risk. Here, we show survivors with subsequent breast cancer face excess mortality despite therapeutic tradeoffs and require specialized treatment guidelines.

Subsequent primary cancer risk and mortality among premenopausal breast cancer survivors

Patients with premenopausal breast cancer (preBC) usually have long-term survivorship. However, less is known about the risk pattern of subsequent primary cancer (SPC) and noncancer diseases among them. Here, this study aimed to evaluate the risk of developing SPCs and mortality among preBC survivors. In this population-based, retrospective cohort study, 5-year preBC survivors diagnosed at age 20-59 years during 1992-2014, in the 11 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result registries were included. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) were estimated for SPCs and mortality by cause, respectively. Among 181,947 survivors (mean age at diagnosis, 49.1 years; 65.9% White), there were 12,503 SPC cases, 4,280 SPC-related deaths, and 10,591 noncancer-related deaths. SPC risk was increased compared with the general population (SIR 1.06, [95% CI, 1.04-1.08]). The elevated risk was primarily associated with soft tissue cancer, bones/joints cancer, and acute non-lymphocytic leukemia (SIRs 2.01 [95% CI, 1.73-2.33], 1.78 [95% CI, 1.21-2.53], and 1.68 [95% CI, 1.46-1.93], respectively). Young-onset, Asian survivors, those with hormone receptor-negative BC, and initially treated with chemo-radiotherapy were at high-risk. The risk of dying from SPCs was also increased (SMR 1.07, [95% CI, 1.04-1.10]) and featured with similarly vulnerable subpopulations. Survivors of non-White ethnicity had a higher risk of dying from noncancer diseases. This study highlighted the excess risk of developing and dying from SPCs among preBC survivors, suggesting that targeted healthcare is warranted. Strategies for SPCs and noncancer comorbidity management are in great demand to achieve better long-term survivorship among preBC patients.

Second primary malignancy for early-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by SEER17 registries

OBJECTIVE

Investigating treatment modalities' association with second primary malignancy risk in early-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

Data of 5-year survivors of early-stage (stages I-II, seventh TNM staging manual) HNSCC from 2000 to 2020 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Standardized incidence ratio and excess absolute risk were used to assess second primary malignancy (SPM) development externally. Relative risk was estimated to compare SPM risk within groups. Fine-Gray's model estimated cumulative incidence of second primary malignancy.

RESULTS

Overall, 8957 5-year survivors with early-stage HNSCC were enrolled. Patients receiving definitive radiotherapy had poorer survival than surgery patients. Surgery correlated with lower risk of second primary malignancy (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.99), especially for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.82). Differences in the risk of second primary malignancy among subgroups based on clinical characteristics were not significant. Treatment modalities did not significantly affect risk of second primary malignancy within each subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery led to better survival and lower risk of second primary malignancy compared to definitive radiotherapy in 5-year survivors. Incidence and sites of second primary malignancy varied by primary sites, emphasizing targeted long-term surveillance's importance.

Risk of Developing a Subsequent Primary Cancer among Adult Cancer Survivors

BACKGROUND

Improvements in cancer control have led to a drastic increase in cancer survivors who may be at an elevated risk of developing subsequent primary cancers (SPC). In this study, we assessed the risk and patterns of SPC development among 196,858 adult cancer survivors in Alberta, Canada.

METHODS

We used data from the Alberta Cancer Registry to identify all first primary cancers occurring between 2004 and 2020. A SPC was considered as the next primary cancer occurring in a different site. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for SPC development as the observed number of SPC (O) divided by the expected number of SPC (E), in which E is a weighted sum of the population-based year-age-sex-specific incidence rates and the corresponding person-years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The risk of developing a SPC up to 15 years after an initial cancer was 16.2% for males and 12.2% for females. Overall, both males (SIR = 1.50) and females (SIR = 1.58) had an increased risk of a SPC. There were significant increases in SPC risk for nearly all age groups, with a greater than five-fold increase for survivors diagnosed between ages 18 and 39. Screen-detectable cancers including colorectal, lung, cervix, and breast accounted for 46% and 27% of SPC among females and males, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survivors of nearly every initial site had substantially increased risk of a SPC, compared with the cancer risk in the general population.

IMPACT

Screen-detectable cancers were common SPC sites and highlight the need to investigate optimal strategies for screening the growing population of cancer survivors.

Overall and late mortality among 24 459 survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer in Alberta, Canada: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors are at an increased risk of premature mortality due to their cancer and its treatment. Herein, we aimed to quantify the excess risks of mortality among AYA cancer survivors and identify target populations for intervention.

METHODS

The Alberta AYA Cancer Survivor Study is a retrospective, population-based cohort of individuals diagnosed with a first primary neoplasm at age 15-39 years in Alberta, Canada, between 1983 and 2017. We assessed cancer survivors (ie, all individuals included in the cohort) overall and for 2-year and 5-year survivorship subpopulations. We calculated standardised mortality ratios and absolute excess risks (AERs; per 10 000 person-years) compared with the general population, and cumulative mortality probability. Causes of death were categorised as deaths due to recurrence or progression (of the first primary neoplasm), deaths due to a subsequent primary neoplasm (SPN), and deaths due to non-neoplastic causes.

FINDINGS

Among the 24 459 individuals included in the cohort, 5916 deaths were observed, which was 11·4 times (95% CI 11·1-11·7) that expected for the general population, equating to 191·6 (186·2-196·9) excess deaths; correspondingly, 5-year survivors had 4·2 times (4·0-4·4) more deaths than expected, equating to 74·3 (69·8-78·8) excess deaths. Increased age at diagnosis, poorer neighbourhood income quintile at diagnosis, first primary neoplasm type, and initial treatment plan were identified as important risk factors for mortality. While recurrence or progression was the main cause of excess mortality (AER 172·2 [167·4-177·1]), the majority of deaths beyond 10 years from diagnosis were due to SPNs and non-neoplastic causes among survivors of endometrial cancer, testicular cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma. The cumulative mortality probability significantly decreased among more recently diagnosed survivors for all-cause mortality (p<0·0001) as well as recurrence or progression deaths (p<0·0001) and SPN deaths (p=0·0070), suggesting that long-term survival is improving.

INTERPRETATION

AYA cancer survivors have substantial excess mortality. Given the high burden of late SPN and non-neoplastic deaths, survivors of endometrial cancer, testicular cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma are notable populations that might benefit from primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies.

FUNDING

None.

Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Adult Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers: A Missed Opportunity

Introduction Studies assessing human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination uptake in survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancers are sparse. We examined HPV vaccine uptake between survivors of CAYA cancer aged 18-35 and 18-35-year-old respondents without a cancer diagnosis in the United States. Methods We used the 2017-2018 National Health Interview Survey, a national, annual cross-sectional national dataset that monitors health-related information on the non-institutionalized civilian population in the United States. Outcome variables included: 1) self-reported initiation of the HPV vaccine, defined as having received ≥1 dose, and 2) self-reported completion of the HPV vaccine, defined as having received ≥3 doses. The exposure variable was cancer survivorship, dichotomized as CAYA cancer survivors (those diagnosed with cancer during childhood, adolescence, or young adulthood) versus non-cancer survivors (no cancer diagnosis). -Weighted multivariable logistic regression models estimated the association between cancer survivorship and HPV vaccine initiation and completion, adjusting for socioeconomic covariates and factors related to healthcare access. Results A total of 2677 respondents were included in the study, of which 177 (5.3%) were CAYA cancer survivors. Overall, 28.0% of the study cohort initiated and 17.1% completed the HPV vaccine series. When stratified by cancer survivorship, initiation of the HPV vaccine (27.1%) and completion of the vaccine series (20.3%) among CAYA cancer survivors were comparable to respondents without cancer diagnosis (initiation: 28.1%, completion: 16.9%). After we controlled for covariates, cancer survivorship had neither a significant association with initiation of HPV vaccine (aOR=1.12; 95% CI, 0.71-1.79; P=0.6242) nor completion of HPV vaccine (aOR=1.37; 95% CI, 0.84-2.22; P=0.2055). Conclusions There was low HPV vaccination initiation and completion among both cohorts. CAYA may benefit the most from HPV vaccination, given that they are at a higher risk of developing secondary HPV-related cancer.

Risk of second primary cancers in nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients by primary lymph node location: a retrospective cohort population-based study

Background

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a diverse group of blood cancers with increasing incidence and survival rates due to advancements in treatment and early detection. However, NHL survivors are at significant risk of developing second primary cancers, which can adversely impact their long-term survival.

Methods

This retrospective population-based cohort study utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, covering 17 geographic areas in the United States from 2000 to 2021. The authors included patients diagnosed with nodal NHL as a first primary cancer and excluded those diagnosed at autopsy or via death certificate only. Standardized Incidence Ratios, Absolute Excess Risks, and Person-Years at Risk were calculated to evaluate the risk of developing SPCs according to the primary lymph node site and stratified by latency periods following the initial NHL diagnosis.

Results

The cohort included 54 012 NHL patients. The authors' results showed that for most SPCs, the risk of development was different for different primary NHL lymph node locations. The highest risks were observed for thyroid cancer, acute myeloid leukemia, and Hodgkin lymphoma. Notably, the risk for thyroid cancer was highest in the first year post-diagnosis, while hematological malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia and Hodgkin lymphoma showed elevated risks in the intermediate and late latency periods.

Conclusion

NHL survivors are at an increased risk of developing SPCs, influenced by the primary lymph node site and latency period. These findings highlight the need for tailored surveillance strategies and preventive measures to mitigate the long-term risks of SPCs in NHL survivors. Further research is necessary to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and to develop targeted interventions for this high-risk population.

HLA diversity unveils susceptibility and organ-specific occurrence of second primary cancers: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Up to 17% of cancer survivors have been reported to develop second primary cancers (SPC), which cause significant physical and economic distress and often complicate clinical decision-making. However, understanding of SPC remains limited and superficial. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is characterized by its polymorphism and has been associated with various diseases. This study aims to explore the role of HLA diversity in SPC incidence.

METHODS

We analyzed a cohort of 47,550 cancer patients from the UK Biobank. SNP-derived HLA alleles were used and SPC-related HLA alleles were identified using logistic regression, followed by stepwise filtering based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and permutation tests. Additionally, we examined the association between extragenetic factors and the risk of SPC in patients carrying hazardous HLA alleles.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 3.11 years, a total of 2894 (6.09%) participants developed SPC. We identified three protective HLA alleles (DRB1*04:03 and DPA1*02:02 for males and DRB5*01:01 for females) and two hazardous alleles (A*26:01 for males and DPB1*11:01 for females) about SPC. The presence of the protective alleles was associated with a reduced SPC risk (males: hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.89; females: HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.93), while the hazardous alleles were linked to an increased risk (males: HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.03-1.56; females: HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.70). The hazardous allele A*26:01 indicated skin-lung organ-specific SPC occurrence in males. Animal fat and vitamin C were associated with SPC risk in males carrying the hazardous alleles, while free sugar and vegetable fat were linked to SPC risk in females.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that HLA alleles may serve as biomarkers for the susceptibility and organ-specific occurrence of SPC, while dietary modulation may mitigate hazardous alleles-related SPC risk, potentially aiding in the early prediction and prevention of SPC.

Survivorship after adolescent and young adult cancer: models of care, disparities, and opportunities

Survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA; age 15-39 years at diagnosis) cancer are a growing population with the potential to live for many decades after treatment completion. Survivors of AYA cancer are at risk for adverse long-term outcomes including chronic conditions, secondary cancers, impaired fertility, poor psychosocial health and health behaviors, and financial toxicity. Furthermore, survivors of AYA cancer from racially minoritized and low socioeconomic status populations experience disparities in these outcomes, including lower long-term survival. Despite these known risks, most survivors of AYA cancer do not receive routine survivorship follow-up care, and research on delivering high-quality, evidence-based survivorship care to these patients is lacking. The need for survivorship care was initially advanced in 2006 by the Institute of Medicine. In 2019, the Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework (QCSCF) was developed to provide an evidence-based framework to define key components of optimal survivorship care. In this commentary focused on survivors of AYA cancer, we apply the QCSCF framework to describe models of care that can be adapted for their unique needs, multilevel factors limiting equitable access to care, and opportunities to address these factors to improve short- and long-term outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Survival prediction in second primary breast cancer patients with machine learning: An analysis of SEER database

BACKGROUND

Studies have found that first primary cancer (FPC) survivors are at high risk of developing second primary breast cancer (SPBC). However, there is a lack of prognostic studies specifically focusing on patients with SPBC.

METHODS

This retrospective study used data from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. We selected female FPC survivors diagnosed with SPBC from 12 registries (from January 1998 to December 2018) to construct prognostic models. Meanwhile, SPBC patients selected from another five registries (from January 2010 to December 2018) were used as the validation set to test the model's generalization ability. Four machine learning models and a Cox proportional hazards regression (CoxPH) were constructed to predict the overall survival of SPBC patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used for feature selection. Model performance was assessed using time-dependent area under the ROC curve (t-AUC) and integrated Brier score (iBrier).

RESULTS

A total of 10,321 female FPC survivors with SPBC (mean age [SD]: 66.03 [11.17]) were included for model construction. These patients were randomly split into a training set (mean age [SD]: 65.98 [11.15]) and a test set (mean age [SD]: 66.15 [11.23]) with a ratio of 7:3. In validation set, a total of 3,638 SPBC patients (mean age [SD]: 66.28 [10.68]) were finally enrolled. Sixteen features were selected for model construction through univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Among five models, random survival forest model showed excellent performance with a t-AUC of 0.805 (95 %CI: 0.803 - 0.807) and an iBrier of 0.123 (95 %CI: 0.122 - 0.124) on testing set, as well as a t-AUC of 0.803 (95 %CI: 0.801 - 0.807) and an iBrier of 0.098 (95 %CI: 0.096 - 0.103) on validation set. Through feature importance ranking, the top one and other top five key predictive features of the random survival forest model were identified, namely age, stage, regional nodes positive, latency, radiotherapy, and surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The random survival forest model outperformed CoxPH and other machine learning models in predicting the overall survival of patients with SPBC, which was helpful for the monitoring of high-risk populations.

Addition of synthetic polymers to a conventional cryoprotectant solution in the vitrification of bovine ovarian tissue

Some synthetic polymers can be used at low concentrations to reduce the toxicity of conventional cryoprotectant agents. In this study we investigated whether the addition of synthetic polymers to a conventional cryoprotectant solution would improve the cryopreservation of bovine ovarian tissue. Freshly collected ovaries from ten adult crossbred cows were incised using a scalpel in the frontal section. From each cow, ovarian cortical slices of 1 mm thickness were divided into 30 fragments of 3 × 3 mm, of which 10 served as fresh controls, 10 were vitrified with conventional cryoprotectant agents (2.93 M glycerol, 27 % w/v; 4.35 M ethylene glycol, 27 % w/v), and 10 were vitrified using the same cryoprotectant agents in addition to synthetic polymers (0.2 % PVP K-12, 0.2 % SuperCool X-1000 ™ w/v and 0.4 % SuperCool Z-1000 ™ w/v). After warming, histology was used to assess follicular quantity and integrity, while in vitro culture of mechanically isolated follicles encapsulated in an alginate matrix was performed for 15 days to assess their growth and hormonal production. Vitrified ovarian tissues presented abnormal morphology, a higher percentage of atretic follicles, and their isolated follicles had lower survival rates and lower frequency of antrum formation during in vitro culture compared to those from fresh tissue. At the end of culture, the follicles that had been cryopreserved produced less estradiol and progesterone than the fresh ones. The addition of synthetic polymers during tissue vitrification did not modify any of these parameters. We conclude that, under the conditions of this study, the use of this combination of synthetic polymers for tissue vitrification did not enhance the preservation of the morphological or functional integrity of bovine ovarian follicles.

Second primary non-breast cancers in young breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

We evaluated the incidence, timing, and risk factors for second primary non-breast cancers (SPNBC) among young breast cancer (BC) survivors.

METHODS

This study included participants of the Young Women's BC Study (YWS) who were diagnosed with stage 0-III BC between 2006 and 2016 and age 40 or younger at diagnosis (N = 1,230). Patient characteristics, treatment information, and clinical events were collected via serial surveys. Tumor and treatment data were obtained from medical record review. Five- and 10-year risks of SPNBCs were estimated via the cumulative incidence function, considering death, metastasis, or second primary BC as competing events. Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models estimated subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for SPNBC risk based on risk factors including demographics, germline genetics, primary BC characteristics, and treatments.

RESULTS

Among 1,230 women, over a median follow-up of 10.1 years, 47 patients (4%) developed an SPNBC. Types of malignancy included melanoma (n = 10), thyroid (n = 10), ovarian (n = 4), sarcoma (n = 4), uterine (n = 3), rectal (n = 3), bladder (n = 2), cervical (n = 2), head/neck (n = 2), lung (n = 2), lymphoma (n = 2), pancreatic (n = 2), and renal (n = 1). Five and 10-year cumulative incidence were 1.4% and 3.2%, respectively. Median time between primary BC and SPNBC was 7.3 years. No patient factors, primary tumor characteristics, or treatments were statistically significantly associated with SPNBC in univariable or multivariable models.

CONCLUSION

In this population, five-year cumulative incidence was higher than that reported among healthy women under 50 years of age, highlighting the importance of long-term surveillance for new non-breast cancers in young adult BC survivors.

Risk of Subsequent Primary Cancers Among Adult-Onset 5-Year Cancer Survivors in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The number of cancer survivors who develop subsequent primary cancers (SPCs) is expected to increase.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the overall and cancer type-specific risks of SPCs among adult-onset cancer survivors by first primary cancer (FPC) types considering sex and age.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment database of South Korea including 5-year cancer survivors diagnosed with an FPC in 2009 to 2010 and followed them until December 31, 2019. We measured the SPC incidence per 10,000 person-years and the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) compared with the incidence expected in the general population.

RESULTS

Among 266,241 survivors (mean age at FPC: 55.7 years; 149,352/266,241, 56.1% women), 7348 SPCs occurred during 1,003,008 person-years of follow-up (median 4.3 years), representing a 26% lower risk of developing SPCs (SIR 0.74, 95% CI 0.72-0.76). Overall, men with 14 of the 20 FPC types had a significantly lower risk of developing any SPCs; women with 7 of the 21 FPC types had a significantly lower risk of developing any SPCs. The risk of developing any SPC type differed by age; the risk was 28% higher in young (<40 years) cancer survivors (SIR 1.28, 95% CI 1.16-1.42; incidence: 30 per 10,000 person-years) and 27% lower in middle-aged and older (≥40 years) cancer survivors (SIR 0.73, 95% CI 0.71-0.74; incidence: 80 per 10,000 person-years) compared with the age-corresponding general population. The most common types of FPCs were mainly observed as SPCs in cancer survivors, with lung (21.6%) and prostate (15.2%) cancers in men and breast (18.9%) and lung (12.2%) cancers in women. The risks of brain cancer in colorectal cancer survivors, lung cancer in laryngeal cancer survivors, and both kidney cancer and leukemia in thyroid cancer survivors were significantly higher for both sexes. Other high-risk SPCs varied by FPC type and sex. Strong positive associations among smoking-related cancers, such as laryngeal, head and neck, lung, and esophageal cancers, were observed. Substantial variation existed in the associations between specific types of FPC and specific types of SPC risk, which may be linked to hereditary cancer syndrome: for women, the risks of ovarian cancer for breast cancer survivors and uterus cancers for colorectal cancer survivors, and for men, the risk of pancreas cancer for kidney cancer survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

The varying risk for SPCs by age, sex, and FPC types in cancer survivors implies the necessity for tailored prevention and screening programs targeting cancer survivors. Lifestyle modifications, such as smoking cessation, are essential to reduce the risk of SPCs in cancer survivors. In addition, genetic testing, along with proactive cancer screening and prevention strategies, should be implemented for young cancer survivors because of their elevated risk of developing SPCs.

Burden of Morbidity and Mortality in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors

There are an estimated 650,00 survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers in the United States, a number that is expected to markedly increase in the coming decades. The recognition of the potential for some cancer treatments to affect the health of patients for many years after the initial diagnosis has prompted investigators to examine the evolving burden of late morbidity and mortality in AYAs with cancer after treatment completion. Studies in large international cohorts of AYA cancer survivors have now shown that the burden of late effects in survivors treated during the past four decades is substantial, affecting the health and well-being of the survivor, health systems' preparedness to meet their health care needs in the future, and societal economic costs that are largely affected by loss of productivity. We highlight the unique considerations for AYA cancer survivors, identify gaps in knowledge for future research, and provide an overview of emerging efforts to mitigate late effects in these survivors. Ongoing multidisciplinary bench-to-bedside collaborations are critical to understanding the biology of late effects in AYA cancer survivors and to developing personalized interventions to mitigate them. The growing population of AYA cancer survivors makes it imperative that these efforts extend across the cancer care continuum, which will allow survivors to ultimately live to their fullest potential.

Health Care Transitions Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer

Survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers, defined as individuals diagnosed with a primary malignancy between age 15 and 39 years, are a growing population with unique developmental, psychosocial, and health-related needs. These individuals are at excess risk of developing a wide range of chronic comorbidities compared with the general population and, therefore, require lifelong, risk-based, survivorship care to optimize long-term health outcomes. The health care needs of survivors of AYA cancers are particularly complicated given the often heterogeneous and sometimes fragmented care they receive throughout the cancer care continuum. For example, AYA survivors are often treated in disparate settings (pediatric v adult) on dissimilar protocols that include different recommendations for longitudinal follow-up. Specialized tools and techniques are needed to ensure that AYA survivors move seamlessly from acute cancer care to survivorship care and, in many cases, from pediatric to adult clinics while still remaining engaged in long-term follow-up. Systematic, age-appropriate transitional practices involving well-established clinical models of care, survivorship care plans, and survivorship guidelines are needed to facilitate effective transitions between providers. Future studies are necessary to enhance and optimize the clinical effectiveness of transition processes in AYA cancer survivors.

Health Care Access Barriers and Self-Reported Health Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors

Purpose: Adolescents and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors (15-39 years at diagnosis) are at risk for treatment-related late effects but face barriers in accessing survivorship care. We examined the prevalence of five health care access (HCA) barriers: affordability, accessibility, availability, accommodation, and acceptability. Methods: We identified AYA survivors from the University of North Carolina (UNC) Cancer Survivorship Cohort who completed a baseline questionnaire in 2010-2016. Participants had a history of cancer, were ≥18 years of age, and receiving care at a UNC oncology clinic. The sample was restricted to AYA survivors who were interviewed ≥1 year postdiagnosis. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) for the association between HCA barriers and self-reported fair or poor health, adjusted for sociodemographic and cancer characteristics. Results: The sample included 146 AYA survivors who were a median age of 39 at the time of the survey. The majority (71%)-and 92% of non-Hispanic Black survivors-reported at least one HCA barrier, including acceptability (40%), accommodation (38%), or affordability (31%). More than one-quarter of survivors (28%) reported fair or poor health. Affordability barriers (PR: 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-3.18) and acceptability barriers (PR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.96-2.66) were associated with a higher prevalence of fair/poor health, as were the cumulative effects of multiple HCA dimensions reported as barriers. Conclusions: Barriers across multiple HCA dimensions were prevalent and associated with worse health in AYA survivors. Findings highlight the need to better understand and target specific barriers to care for diverse AYA survivors to improve their long-term health.

Long-term second primary cancer risk in adolescent and young adult (15-39 years) cancer survivors: a population-based study in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2018

BACKGROUND

Few studies have comprehensively investigated the long-term second cancer risk among adolescent and young adult (AYA, aged 15-39 years) cancer survivors. This study investigated the long-term second cancer risk by including the full range of first and second cancer combinations with at least 10 observations in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2018.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First and second primary cancer data of all 6-month AYA cancer survivors were obtained from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Excess cancer risk compared to the general population was assessed with standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and absolute excess risk (AER) statistics up to 25 years after diagnosis. Cumulative incidences were estimated, using death as a competing risk factor. Analyses were carried out with and without applying multiple cancer rules.

RESULTS

The cohort included 99 502 AYA cancer survivors. Male survivors had a 2-fold higher risk of developing any cancer compared to the general population, whereas this was around 1.3-fold in females. AERs were 17.5 and 10.1 per 10 000 person-years for males and females. The long-term excess risk of cancer was significantly higher for most first and second primary cancer combinations, but comparable and lower risk estimates were also observed. Application of the multiple cancer rules resulted in a noticeable risk underestimation in melanoma, testicular, and breast cancer survivors. Risk outcomes remained similar in most cases otherwise. The cumulative incidence of second cancer overall increased over time up to 8.9% in males and 10.3% in females at 25 years' follow-up. Highest long-term cumulative incidences were observed among lymphoma survivors (13.3% males and 18.9% females).

CONCLUSIONS

AYA cancer survivors have a higher cancer risk compared to the general population for most cancers up to 25 years after their initial cancer diagnosis. Additional studies that investigate risk factors for the specific cancer type combinations are needed to develop personalized follow-up strategies.

Have we made progress in taking care of adolescents and young adults with cancer? Results of a European multi-professional survey

BACKGROUND

It is well documented that traditional health care models do not meet the specific needs of Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) cancer patients.

METHODS

We explore a map of the development of age-specific AYA cancer care across Europe, from the perspective of healthcare professionals with an interest in AYA care, in order to understand the specific challenges and map progress over time. An on-line survey was developed by international professional cancer organisations.

RESULTS

We had 377 respondents from 60 countries. The majority of respondents were physicians 298 (79%), a minority of survey respondents (39, 10.4%) work exclusively with AYA patients, most respondents declared substantial and routine clinical service collaborations to provide care and treatment to AYA with cancer. Policy for the multidisciplinary management of AYA cancer patients commonly appears in Europe now, and was reported by 234 (78.52%) respondents. Specific professional training for AYA cancer care is not uniformly available.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable opportunity for many organisations to work together in raising the profile of AYA cancer related issues, in providing education and in encouraging research and collaboration.

Opportunities to Improve HPV Vaccination Among Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors by Engaging both Oncology and Primary Care Teams

The incidence of second primary cancers is rising particularly among pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (PAYA) cancer survivors. While human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers can be prevented by vaccination, their uptake is lower and delayed in this group. Because a recommendation from a health care provider is the strongest predictor of HPV vaccination, there are great opportunities for PAYA cancer care providers to positively impact HPV vaccination rates. Prioritizing PAYA cancer care provider education as well as improving the education of and coordination with primary care providers are viewed as opportunities to encourage HPV vaccine uptake and prevent future cancers. See related article by Garcia et al., p. 581.

Risk of second primary cancers in patients with rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis

Background

While an elevated risk of second primary cancers (SPCs) has been observed in many other cancers, risk of SPCs has not been quantified in patients with rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

Methods

Survivors of primary rectal NENs diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 registries. Relative risk of SPCs was estimated as the standardized incidence ratio (SIR), which was calculated using SEER*Stat software.

Results

Between 2000 and 2018, a total of 15836 patients diagnosed with rectal NENs, of whom 1436 (9.1%) received diagnosis of SPCs (SIR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.13-1.26). The majority of patients were aged 50-69 and had their first cancer diagnosed at the localized stage. Male survivors had a higher propensity for developing SPCs overall, while female survivors exhibited higher risks of specific SPCs. Age at diagnosis of rectal NENs influenced the risk of SPCs, with younger patients having greater risks. A statistically significant increase in the incidence of SPCs was observed among patients aged 30-64 years. Black patients had higher relative risks of certain SPCs, while White patients had a lower risk of subsequent melanoma. Trend analysis revealed that the highest excess burden of SPCs was observed in the years 2000 to 2002. Risk of SPCs remained elevated within the first four years post-diagnosis for survivors of rectal NENs, but diminished thereafter.

Conclusion

The study revealed that individuals who survived rectal NENs were at an elevated risk of developing SPCs compared to the general population. Our results hold important implications for the formulation of lifelong surveillance recommendations for cancer survivors.

Risk of second primary malignancies in survivors of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from 2000 to 2018

BACKGROUND AND AIM

As a result of improved survival, cancer survivors continue to remain at risk of developing second primary malignancies (SPMs). However, the association between first primary pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) and SPMs has not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-18 database, patients histologically diagnosed with PanNENs as their first malignancy between 2000 and 2018 were identified. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and excess absolute risks per 10 000 person-years of SPMs were calculated to estimate the risk of being diagnosed with subsequent cancers compared with the general population.

RESULTS

A total of 489 (5.7%) PanNENs survivors developed an SPM during the follow up, with a median latency between first and second cancer diagnoses of 32.0 months. The overall SIR of SPMs was 1.30 (95% CI: 1.19, 1.42) and the excess absolute risk was 35.67 cases per 10 000 person-years in comparison with the general population. Age 25-64 years at PanNENs diagnosis was associated with statistically higher risks for SPMs of all cancers combined. Latency stratification was significant for elevated SPMs risk between 2-23 and 84+ months after diagnosis. White patients were found to have a significantly increased incidence of SPMs (SIR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.35), mainly owing to the higher risk of stomach, small intestine, pancreas, kidney and renal pelvis, and thyroid cancers.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms survivors experience a significant increase in the burden of SPMs compared with the reference population. The heightened relative risk calls for careful long-term scrutiny as part of survivorship care plans.

Reducing Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Outcome Disparities Through Optimized Care Delivery: A Blueprint from the Children's Oncology Group

Achieving equitable, high-quality cancer care delivery across socioeconomically and biologically diverse populations requires multilevel interventions, including those at the patient, provider, institution, and policy levels that influence cost, quality, and access to care. For adolescent and young adults (AYAs), who experience suboptimal health outcomes compared with younger and older people with cancer, cancer care delivery is influenced by additional contextual factors unique to the patients' developmental stage, psychosocial and economic status, and cancer subtype. In this review, we highlight the most pressing research needs in AYA cancer care delivery and opportunities to improve outcomes for this population.

Sex differences in comorbid conditions, health behaviors, health care utilization, and health-related quality of life among young adult cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Although cancer experiences and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) differ by sex, little is known about how sex affects comorbid conditions, health behaviors, health service utilization, and HRQOL in young adult (YA) cancer survivors. We sought to determine the relationship of sex to these factors in this population.

METHODS

This matched case-control, cross-sectional study used data from the Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for 2015-2019. YA survivors aged 18-39 years, were matched to controls. Chi-square and multiple logistic regressions were used to assess the relationship between sex and the measured factors.

RESULTS

The analysis included 276 YA survivors and 828 controls. Male survivors were more likely than male controls to have a depressive disorder (OR = 3.06, p = 0.007), smoke (OR = 3.87, p < 0.001), and forgo health care because of cost (OR = 5.60, p < 0.001). Female survivors were more likely than female controls to have at least one comorbidity (OR = 3.52, p < 0.001), forgo health care because of cost (OR = 3.03, p < 0.001), and report poorer HRQOL (aORs = 1.52-2.22, p < 0.05). Female survivors were more likely to have at least one comorbid condition (aOR = 1.70, p = 0.02) than male survivors.

CONCLUSION

YA cancer survivors differed in their health outcomes from both the general population and by sex. Tailored, sex-based interventions are needed to decrease long-term morbidity and improve HROQL in this population.

Adolescent and young adult cancers: unmet needs and closing the gaps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is a growing population of adolescent and young adult (AYA, ages 15-39 years) cancer patients and survivors, and the field of AYA oncology is rapidly evolving. Despite an increased focus on survival and quality of life for AYAs, gaps in knowledge remain. The current review focuses on what is known across several domains unique to AYA cancer care as well as areas of improvement and future directions in research and intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Due to the developmental stages included in the AYA age range, a cancer diagnosis and treatment can affect relationships, education and employment, finances, and long-term health differently than diagnoses in younger or older populations. Recent studies that have focused on these unique aspects of AYA cancer care, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), fertility, financial toxicity, barriers to clinical trial enrollment, genetic predisposition, and survivorship care are included in the current review.

SUMMARY

Although studies have described many of the challenges faced by AYAs across the cancer continuum from diagnosis to survivorship, more work is needed, particularly in systematically measuring HRQoL, eliminating barriers to clinical trial enrollment, addressing financial toxicity, and increasing access to fertility preservation and high-quality survivorship care.