1
|
Yu J, Deng J, Ren L, Hua L, Wu T, Hui Y, Shao C, Gong Y. A high content clonogenic survival drug screening identifies maytansine as a potent radiosensitizer for meningiomas. Front Immunol 2025; 16:1557165. [PMID: 40170861 PMCID: PMC11959303 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1557165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2025] [Accepted: 02/28/2025] [Indexed: 04/03/2025] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiation resistance significantly hinders the efficacy of radiotherapy for meningiomas, posing a primary obstacle. The clinical inadequacy of therapeutic drugs and radiosensitizers for treating meningiomas further exacerbates the challenge. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify potential radiosensitizers for treating meningiomas. Methods A high content clonogenic survival drug screening was employed to evaluate 166 FDA-approved compounds across varied concentration ranges. Cell viability, apoptosis, and radiosensitization were assessed using CCK-8 assays, Annexin V-FITC/PI assays and standard colony formation assays. Transcriptome sequencing, immunofluorescence and cell cycle experiments were conducted to assess transcriptional profile, DNA double-strand break damage and cell cycle distribution. Finally, the radiosensitizing effect of Maytansine was assessed in vivo through subcutaneous tumor implantation in nude mice. Results The proportion of maytansine exhibiting SRF≥1.5 within the detectable concentration range was 100%. CCK-8 assay indicated the IC50 values of maytansine for IOMM-Lee and CH157 were 0.26 ± 0.06 nM and 0.31 ± 0.01 nM, respectively. Standard clonogenic survival assays and Annexin V-FITC/PI assays revealed maytansine had a notable radiosensitizing effect on meningioma cells. Transcriptome sequencing analysis demonstrated that maytansine can modulate cell cycle and DNA damage repair. Immunofluorescence analysis of γ-H2AX and cell cycle experiments demonstrated that Maytansine enhances DNA double-strand breaks and induces G2/M phase arrest. Moreover, in vivo studies had indicated that Maytansine augments the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy. Conclusion This study highlighted the potential of maytansine as a potent inhibitor and radiosensitizer for meningiomas by inducing G2/M phase cell cycle arrest and enhancing DNA double-strand break damage. These findings opened up a promising path in the development of radiosensitizers aimed at treating this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinxiu Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function Restoration and Neural Regeneration, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiaojiao Deng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function Restoration and Neural Regeneration, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Leihao Ren
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function Restoration and Neural Regeneration, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lingyang Hua
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function Restoration and Neural Regeneration, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianqi Wu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Hui
- Translational Medical Center for Stem Cell Therapy, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunlin Shao
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ye Gong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function Restoration and Neural Regeneration, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santo G, di Santo G, Cicone F, Virgolini I. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with somatostatin analogs beyond gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Neuroendocrinol 2025; 37:e70013. [PMID: 40064181 PMCID: PMC11919479 DOI: 10.1111/jne.70013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2025] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025]
Abstract
First isolated by Brazeau et al. in 1972, somatostatin (SST) is a neuropeptide known for regulating various signaling pathways through its specific cell surface receptors. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) comprise a family of five G protein-coupled receptors that are widely distributed across the human body and are expressed by various tumor types. The growing understanding of their clinical potential led to the introduction of both cold and radiolabeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs), which have revolutionized the management of several cancers, especially neuroendocrine tumors. As a direct consequence, advances in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) over the last 30 years led to the approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs). Theoretically, any cancer patients whose tumors express SSTR, as demonstrated in vivo through SSTR-based molecular imaging, could be candidates for PRRT, especially those with limited treatment options. However, evidence on the efficacy of PRRT in non-GEPNET SSTR-expressing tumors is limited, and mainly derived from small retrospective studies. Given the limited therapeutic options for advanced/metastatic patients, there is a clear need for randomized trials to formally approve PRRT with SSAs for patients who may benefit from this treatment, particularly in certain types of neuroendocrine neoplasms such as lung carcinoids, paragangliomas, and meningiomas, where high rates of disease control (up to 80%) can be achieved. In addition, emerging evidence supports the potential of combination therapies, alpha emitters, and non-SSTR-based radionuclide therapy in tumors beyond GEPNET. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of PRRT's role in cancers beyond GEPNET, exploring new possibilities and future directions for most SSTR highly expressing tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Santo
- Department of Nuclear MedicineMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine“Magna Graecia” University of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly
| | - Gianpaolo di Santo
- Department of Nuclear MedicineMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine“Magna Graecia” University of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear MedicineMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mair MJ, Hartenbach S, Tomasich E, Maas SLN, Bosch SA, Widhalm G, Eckert F, Sahm F, Hainfellner JA, Hartenbach M, Berghoff AS, Preusser M, Albert NL. Expression of SSTR2a, FAP, HER2 and HER3 as potential radionuclide therapy targets in higher-grade meningioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025:10.1007/s00259-025-07075-8. [PMID: 39969538 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07075-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2024] [Accepted: 12/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE High-grade meningiomas have high recurrence rates and limited prognosis. Radioligand therapies are approved in extracranial malignancies, but their value in brain tumours including meningiomas is unclear, as data on target expression is scarce. METHODS CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 meningioma samples were immunohistochemically stained for somatostatin receptor 2a (SSTR2a), fibroblast activation protein (FAP), and human epidermal growth factor receptors 2/3 (HER2/HER3). Target expression was correlated with (epi-)genetic tumour subtyping by DNA methylation analysis, genetic alterations, and survival. RESULTS Meningioma samples of 58 patients were included. SSTR2a expression (membranous/cytoplasmic) was observed in 43/55 (78.2%), and FAP expression in 15/58 (25.9%) evaluable samples, with HER2 and HER3 expression in one specimen each (1.7%). Membranous SSTR2a expression was strong in 18 (32.7%), intermediate in 12 (21.8%), and weak in 11 (20.0%) samples. While SSTR2a expression was more homogenous and mainly seen in regions with higher cellularity, FAP immunoreactivity was predominantly seen in tumour stroma and regions of lower cellularity. SSTR2a immunoreactivity was associated with TRAF7 wildtype status (p = 0.034). FAP expression was more frequent in meningiomas of CNS WHO grade 3 (vs. CNS WHO 2; p < 0.001), and samples with NF2 mutations (p = 0.032) or CDKN2A/B deletions (p = 0.013) compared to wildtype. FAP and SSTR2a expression (present vs. absent) were not associated with overall survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION SSTR2a and FAP are expressed in high-grade meningioma samples to a variable extent, and differences across meningioma subtypes underscore the need for biomarkers to improve patient selection. Spatial heterogeneity of target expression should be considered in radioligand therapy design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian J Mair
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Erwin Tomasich
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sybren L N Maas
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah A Bosch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg Widhalm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Franziska Eckert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes A Hainfellner
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anna S Berghoff
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mair MJ, Tabouret E, Johnson DR, Sulman EP, Wen PY, Preusser M, Albert NL. Radioligand therapies in meningioma: Evidence and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S215-S228. [PMID: 38702966 PMCID: PMC11631075 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common intracranial neoplasms in adults. While most meningiomas are cured by resection, further treatment by radiotherapy may be needed, particularly in WHO grades 2 and 3 tumors which have an increased risk of recurrence, even after conventional therapies. Still, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies after the exhaustion of local treatment approaches. Radionuclide therapies combine the specificity of tumor-specific antibodies or ligands with the cytotoxic activity of radioactive emitters. Alongside this, integrated molecular imaging allows for a noninvasive assessment of predictive biomarkers as treatment targets. Whereas the concept of "theranostics" has initially evolved in extracranial tumors such as thyroid diseases, neuroendocrine tumors, and prostate cancer, data from retrospective case series and early phase trials underscore the potential of this strategy in meningioma. This review aims to explore the available evidence of radionuclide treatments and ongoing clinical trial initiatives in meningioma. Moreover, we discuss optimal clinical trial design and future perspectives in the field, including compound- and host-specific determinants of the efficacy of "theranostic" treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian J Mair
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Emeline Tabouret
- Aix-Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, GlioME Team, plateforme PETRA, CHU Timone, Service de Neurooncologie, Marseille, France
| | - Derek R Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Brain and Spine Tumor Center, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weller M, Albert NL, Galldiks N, Bink A, Preusser M, Sulman EP, Treyer V, Wen PY, Tonn JC, Le Rhun E. Targeted radionuclide therapy for gliomas: Emerging clinical trial landscape. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S208-S214. [PMID: 39107236 PMCID: PMC11631073 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024] Open
Abstract
According to the new WHO classification of 2021, gliomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors with very different histology, molecular genetics, and prognoses. In addition to glioblastomas, the most common gliomas, there are also numerous less common gliomas, some of which have a very favorable prognosis. Targeted radionuclide therapy is a therapeutic option that can be attractive if a tumor can be targeted based on its molecular characteristics. It is particularly useful when tumors cannot be completely resected or when conventional imaging does not fully capture the extent of the tumor. Numerous approaches to radionuclide therapy for gliomas are in early development. The most advanced approaches for patients with gliomas in the clinic employ L-type amino acid transporter 1 as an uptake mechanism for radiolabeled amino acids or target somatostatin receptor 2 or gastrin-releasing peptide receptor. Here, we discuss the various target structures of radionuclide therapy in gliomas and provide an outlook for which glioma entities radionuclide therapy could most likely provide a therapeutic alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (IMN-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Cologne, Germany
| | - Andrea Bink
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Valerie Treyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joerg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Amerein A, Maurer C, Kircher M, Gäble A, Krebold A, Rinscheid A, Viering O, Pfob CH, Bundschuh RA, Behrens L, Braat AJ, Berlis A, Lapa C. Intraarterial Administration of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Advanced Meningioma: Initial Safety and Efficacy. J Nucl Med 2024:jnumed.124.268217. [PMID: 39448269 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a treatment option for patients with advanced meningioma. Recently, intraarterial application of the radiolabeled somatostatin receptor agonists has been introduced as an alternative to standard intravenous administration. In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of intraarterial PRRT in patients with advanced, progressive meningioma. Methods: Patients with advanced, progressive meningioma underwent intraarterial PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE. The safety of PRRT was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Treatment response was assessed according to the proposed Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria for meningiomas and somatostatin receptor-directed PET/CT. Results: Thirteen patients (8 women, 5 men; mean age, 65 ± 13 y) with advanced meningioma underwent 1-4 cycles (median, 4 cycles) of intraarterial PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE (mean activity per cycle, 7,428 ± 237 MBq; range, 6,000-7,700 MBq). Treatment was well tolerated with mainly grade 1-2 hematologic toxicity. Ten of 13 patients showed radiologic disease control at follow-up after therapy (1/10 complete remission, 1/10 partial remission, 8/10 stable disease), and 9 of 13 patients showed good control of clinical symptoms. Conclusion: Intraarterial PRRT in patients with advanced meningioma is feasible and safe. It may result in improved radiologic and clinical disease control compared with intravenous PRRT. Further research to validate these initial findings and to investigate long-term outcomes is highly warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Amerein
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Maurer
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Malte Kircher
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Gäble
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Anne Krebold
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | - Oliver Viering
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christian H Pfob
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ralph A Bundschuh
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Lars Behrens
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Jat Braat
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
- Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ansgar Berlis
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang J, Zhang X, Liu Q, Gong F, Huang Y, Huang S, Fu L, Tang G. 68Ga/ 177Lu-Labeled Theranostic Pair for Targeting Fibroblast Activation Protein with Improved Tumor Uptake and Retention. J Med Chem 2024; 67:17785-17795. [PMID: 39321030 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is specifically expressed on cancer-associated fibroblasts in over 90% of tumors and is considered a promising target for cancer theranostics. Here, we developed a novel tracer, DOTA-FAPT, and labeled it with gallium-68 and lutetium-177 as a theranostic pair. [68Ga]Ga/[177Lu]Lu-FAPT exhibited high stability and hydrophilicity, as well as strong affinity to the FAP target. Micro-PET/CT imaging revealed that [68Ga]Ga-FAPT exhibited significantly increased uptake in tumors and extended retention in A549-FAP and U87MG tumor xenografts as compared to [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, demonstrating favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics in vivo. Therapeutic studies showed that [177Lu]Lu-FAPT had higher tumor accumulation compared to [177Lu]Lu-FAPI-04, leading to stronger tumor growth inhibition. The first-in-human evaluation also revealed that [68Ga]Ga-FAPT has good in vivo distribution and superior diagnostic efficacy on primary and lymph node metastases in a patient with lung cancer. Our encouraging results suggest that 68Ga/177Lu-labeled DOTA-FAPT is a theranostic pair with broad application prospect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiawen Huang
- GDMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Control and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510515, China
| | - Xiaojun Zhang
- GDMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Control and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510515, China
| | - Qingxing Liu
- GDMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Control and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510515, China
| | - Fengping Gong
- GDMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Control and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510515, China
| | - Yanchao Huang
- GDMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Control and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510515, China
| | - Shun Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Tenth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Dongguan 523059, P. R. China
| | - Lilan Fu
- GDMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Control and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510515, China
| | - Ganghua Tang
- GDMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Control and Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510515, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Albert NL, Preusser M, Traub-Weidinger T, Tolboom N, Law I, Palmer JD, Guedj E, Furtner J, Fraioli F, Huang RY, Johnson DR, Deroose CM, Herrmann K, Vogelbaum M, Chang S, Tonn JC, Weller M, Wen PY, van den Bent MJ, Verger A, Ivanidze J, Galldiks N. Joint EANM/EANO/RANO/SNMMI practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:3662-3679. [PMID: 38898354 PMCID: PMC11445317 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06783-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands. METHODS This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO). RESULTS Positron emission tomography (PET) using somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands can detect meningioma tissue with high sensitivity and specificity and may provide clinically relevant information beyond that obtained from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. SSTR-directed PET imaging can be particularly useful for differential diagnosis, delineation of meningioma extent, detection of osseous involvement, and the differentiation between posttherapeutic scar tissue and tumour recurrence. Moreover, SSTR-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging investigational treatment approach for meningioma. CONCLUSION These practice guidelines will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with meningiomas and related SSTR-targeted PRRTs in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers, facilitate comparability of studies, and to collect larger databases. The current document provides additional information to the evidence-based recommendations from the PET/RANO Working Group regarding the utilization of PET imaging in meningiomas Galldiks (Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(12):1576-87). The information provided should be considered in the context of local conditions and regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Clinic Donaustadt, Vienna Health Care Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Princess Máxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Division Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Eric Guedj
- Institut Fresnel, Nuclear Medicine Department, APHM, CNRS, Timone Hospital, CERIMED, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - Julia Furtner
- Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence (MIAAI), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, 3500, Krems, Austria
| | - Francesco Fraioli
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Christophe M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) - University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy and IADI INSERM UMR 1254, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Jana Ivanidze
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Severi S, Grassi I, Bongiovanni A, Nicolini S, Marini I, Arpa D, Ranallo N, Azzali I, Di Iorio V, Sarnelli A, Manuela M, Amadori E, Fabbri L, Bartolini D, Tosatto L, Di Meco F, Gurrieri L, Riva N, Calabro L, Matteucci F, Paganelli G, Sansovini M. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Advanced Refractory Meningiomas: Efficacy and Toxicity in a Long Follow-up. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1409-1415. [PMID: 39142827 PMCID: PMC11372258 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Recurrence of meningiomas after surgery and radiotherapy deserves specific attention because of the lack of active third-line therapies. Somatostatin receptors are usually overexpressed on the cell membrane of meningiomas, and this has led the way to a radionuclide theranostic approach. Diagnoses with 68Ga-DOTA-octreotide and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 90Y/177Lu-DOTA-octreotide are currently possible options within experimental protocols or as compassionate use in small patient groups. Methods: From October 2009 to October 2021, 42 meningioma patients with radiologic recurrence after standard therapies were treated with 90Y-DOTATOC (dosage of 1.1 or 5.5 GBq) or with 177Lu-DOTATATE (dosage of 3.7 or 5.5 GBq) in a mean of 4 cycles. All patients showed intense uptake at diagnostic 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT or in an 111In-octreotide scan. Results: Of 42 patients treated, 5 patients received 90Y-DOTATOC with a cumulative activity of 11.1 GBq and 37 patients received 177Lu-DOTATATE with a cumulative activity of 22 GBq. The disease control rate was 57%. With a median follow-up of 63 mo, median progression-free survival was 16 mo, and median overall survival was 36 mo. Retreatment 177Lu-PRRT was performed in 6 patients with an administered median activity of 13 GBq in a mean of 5 cycles. With a 75.8-mo follow-up, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.5 and 17 mo, respectively. Only 1 patient discontinued the treatment because of grade 3 platelet toxicity. A rapidly transient grade 2 neutropenia was recorded in 1 retreated patient. Conclusion: PRRT in patients with advanced meningiomas overexpressing somatostatin receptor 2 was active and well tolerated, showing a 57% disease control rate. Furthermore, PRRT could represent a potential retreatment option. Further studies, also in combination with other treatments, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Severi
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Ilaria Grassi
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Alberto Bongiovanni
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumor Center, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy;
| | - Silvia Nicolini
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Irene Marini
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Donatella Arpa
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Emilia Romagna, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Ranallo
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumor Center, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Irene Azzali
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Valentina Di Iorio
- Oncological Pharmacy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Emilia Romagna, Italy
| | - Anna Sarnelli
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Monti Manuela
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Elena Amadori
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Lucia Fabbri
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Emilia Romagna, Italy
| | | | - Luigino Tosatto
- Department of Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Division "M Bufalini" Hospital, Cesena, Emilia Romagna, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Meco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lorena Gurrieri
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumor Center, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Nada Riva
- Osteoncology and Rare Tumor Center, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Luana Calabro
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Ferrara, Cona, Italy; and
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Federica Matteucci
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Giovanni Paganelli
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Maddalena Sansovini
- Nuclear Medicine and Radiometabolic Units, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Immler M, Wolfram M, Oevermann A, Walter I, Wolfesberger B, Tichy A, Gradner G. Expression of somatostatin receptors in canine and feline meningioma. Vet Med Sci 2024; 10:e1537. [PMID: 39011594 PMCID: PMC11250153 DOI: 10.1002/vms3.1537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The standard treatment for canine and feline meningiomas includes radiotherapy, surgical excision or combined therapy. However, new therapeutic approaches are required due to the possible recurrence or progression of meningiomas despite initial therapy. Adjunctive therapy with synthetic long-acting somatostatin (SST) analogues has been described in humans with SST-expressing tumours. The expression of SST receptors (SSTRs) by feline meningiomas is currently unknown, and there are little data about canine meningiomas. We hypothesized that SSTR is expressed by canine and feline meningiomas (S1). METHODS Seven canines and 11 felines with histologically confirmed meningiomas underwent STTR screening. RNA expressions of SSTR1, SSTR2, SSTR3 and SSTR5 (canine) and SSTR1-SSTR 5 (feline) in fresh frozen and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples were investigated using real-time (RT)-qPCR. The expression of SSTR1 and SSTR2 in FFPE samples was evaluated using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The specificity of applied antibodies for canine and feline species was confirmed by western blotting. RESULTS In canine meningiomas (n = 7), RNA expression of SSTR1, SSTR2 and SSTR5 was detected in all samples; SSTR3 RNA expression was detected in only 33% of samples. In feline meningiomas (n = 12), RNA expression of SSTR1, SSTR4, SSTR5 and SSTR2 was detected in 91%, 46%, 46% and 36% of samples, respectively; SSTR3 was not expressed. Overall, the detection rate was lower in FFPE samples. IHC revealed the expression of SSTR1 and SSTR2 in all samples from both species. However, it is important to exercise caution when interpreting IHC results due to the presence of diffuse background staining. CONCLUSIONS SSTRs are widely expressed in canine and feline meningiomas, thereby encouraging further studies investigating SSTR expression to conduct trials about the effect of adjunctive therapy with long-acting SST-analogues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Immler
- University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (Vetmeduni), Veterinaerplatz 1ViennaAustria
| | - Michael Wolfram
- University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (Vetmeduni), Veterinaerplatz 1ViennaAustria
| | - Anna Oevermann
- Division of Neurological SciencesVetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 109a, 3012BernSwitzerland
| | - Ingrid Walter
- University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (Vetmeduni), Veterinaerplatz 1ViennaAustria
| | - Birgitt Wolfesberger
- University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (Vetmeduni), Veterinaerplatz 1ViennaAustria
| | - Alexander Tichy
- University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (Vetmeduni), Veterinaerplatz 1ViennaAustria
| | - Gabriele Gradner
- University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (Vetmeduni), Veterinaerplatz 1ViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim JT, Chang SJC, Haghdel A, Ramakrishna RR, Pannullo SC, Schwartz TH, Osborne JR, Magge RS, Fine HA, Cisse B, Stieg P, Lin E, Roytman M, Palmer JD, Karakatsanis NA, Pisapia D, Liechty B, Knisely JP, Ivanidze J. DOTATATE PET/MR Imaging Differentiates Secondary-Progressive from de Novo World Health Organization Grade 3 Meningiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024; 45:773-780. [PMID: 38604734 PMCID: PMC11288599 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a8219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE WHO grade 3 meningiomas are rare and poorly understood and have a higher propensity for recurrence, metastasis, and worsened clinical outcomes compared with lower-grade meningiomas. The purpose of our study was to prospectively evaluate the molecular profile, PET characteristics, and outcomes of patients with World Health Organization grade 3 meningiomas who were imaged with gallium 68 (68Ga) DOTATATE PET/MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with World Health Organization grade 3 meningiomas enrolled in our prospective observational cohort evaluating the utility of (68Ga) DOTATATE PET/MR imaging in somatostatin receptor positive brain tumors were included. We stratified patients by de novo-versus-secondary-progressive status and evaluated the differences in the PET standard uptake value, molecular profiles, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Patients met the inclusion criteria (secondary-progressive: 7/14; de novo: 7/14). The secondary-progressive cohort had a significantly higher per-patient number of surgeries (4.1 versus 1.6; P = .011) and trended toward a higher number of radiation therapy courses (2.4 versus 1.6; P = .23) and cumulative radiation therapy doses (106Gy versus 68.3Gy; P = .31). The secondary-progressive cohort had a significantly lower progression-free survival compared with the de novo cohort (4.8 versus 37.7 months; P = .004). Secondary-progressive tumors had distinct molecular pathology profiles with higher numbers of mutations (3.5 versus 1.2; P = .024). Secondary-progressive tumors demonstrated higher PET standard uptake values (17.1 versus 12.4; P = .0021). CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms prior work illustrating distinct clinical outcomes in secondary-progressive and de novo World Health Organization grade 3 meningiomas. Furthermore, our findings support (68Ga) DOTATATE PET/MR imaging as a useful management strategy in World Health Organization grade 3 meningiomas and provide insight into meningioma biology, as well as clinical management implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joon Tae Kim
- From the Weill Cornell Medical College (J.T.K., S.J.C.C., A.H.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Se Jung Chris Chang
- From the Weill Cornell Medical College (J.T.K., S.J.C.C., A.H.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Arsalan Haghdel
- From the Weill Cornell Medical College (J.T.K., S.J.C.C., A.H.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Rohan R. Ramakrishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery (R.R.R., S.C.P., T.H.S., B.C., P.S.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Susan C. Pannullo
- Department of Neurological Surgery (R.R.R., S.C.P., T.H.S., B.C., P.S.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Theodore H. Schwartz
- Department of Neurological Surgery (R.R.R., S.C.P., T.H.S., B.C., P.S.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Joseph R. Osborne
- Departments of Radiology (J.R.O., E.L., M.R., N.A.K., J.I.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Rajiv S. Magge
- Department of Neurology (R.S.M., H.A.F.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Howard A. Fine
- Department of Neurology (R.S.M., H.A.F.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Babacar Cisse
- Department of Neurological Surgery (R.R.R., S.C.P., T.H.S., B.C., P.S.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Philip Stieg
- Department of Neurological Surgery (R.R.R., S.C.P., T.H.S., B.C., P.S.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Eaton Lin
- Departments of Radiology (J.R.O., E.L., M.R., N.A.K., J.I.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Michelle Roytman
- Departments of Radiology (J.R.O., E.L., M.R., N.A.K., J.I.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Neuro-Oncology (J.D.P.), Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Nicolas A. Karakatsanis
- Departments of Radiology (J.R.O., E.L., M.R., N.A.K., J.I.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - David Pisapia
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (D.P., B.L.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Benjamin Liechty
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (D.P., B.L.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan P.S. Knisely
- Department of Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Jana Ivanidze
- Departments of Radiology (J.R.O., E.L., M.R., N.A.K., J.I.), Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Graillon T, Salgues B, Horowitz T, Padovani L, Appay R, Tabouret E, Guedj E, Chinot O. Peptide radionuclide radiation therapy with Lutathera in multirecurrent nonanaplastic meningiomas: antitumoral activity study by growth rate analysis. J Neurooncol 2024; 167:427-436. [PMID: 38451361 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04622-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Several retrospective studies and meta-analyses of Peptide Radionuclide Radiation Therapy in meningiomas suggest six-month progression-free survival improvement for WHO grade 1 and 2 meningiomas. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of such treatment on three-dimensional volume growth rate (3DVGR) in nonanaplastic meningiomas. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective study including eight patients treated with Lutathera®. Millimetric 3D T1-weighted with gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging sequences were requested for volume measurement. Then, tumor growth rate was classified following a previously described 3DVGR classification (Graillon et al.). RESULTS Patients harbored seven WHO grade 2 meningiomas and one aggressive WHO grade 1. All patients, except one, underwent four treatment cycles. 3DVGR significantly decreased at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment initiation analyzing each lesion separately. Mean and median 3DVGR from all patients were respectively at 29.5% and 44.5%/6 months before treatment initiation, then at 16.5% and 25%/6 months at three months post-treatment initiation, 9.5% and 4.5%/6 months after 6 months, as well as 9.5% and 10.5%/6 months after 12 months. At 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment initiation, 4/8, 6/7, and 5/6 patients were class 2 (stabilization or severe 3DVGR slowdown), respectively. No patient was class 1 at 6 and 12 months, suggesting a lack of drug response. CONCLUSION In nonanaplastic meningiomas, Lutathera®'s antitumoral activity appeared delayed and more likely observed at six months, while no major response was observed under treatment. Moreover, its antitumoral activity persisted for 12-18 months following treatment initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Graillon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, APHM, MMG, UMR1251, Marmara Institute, La Timone Hospital, 264 rue Saint-Pierre, 13005, Marseille, France.
| | - Betty Salgues
- CERIMED, Nuclear Medicine Department, APHM, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel, Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Tatiana Horowitz
- CERIMED, Nuclear Medicine Department, APHM, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel, Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | | | - Romain Appay
- Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, APHM, CHU Timone, Marseille, France
- Inst Neurophysiopathol, GlioME Team, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, PETRA network, Marseille, France
| | - Emeline Tabouret
- Neuro-Oncology Department, APHM, Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Ecole Centrale Marseille, UMR 7249, Institut Fresnel, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Guedj
- CERIMED, Nuclear Medicine Department, APHM, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel, Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Olivier Chinot
- Neuro-Oncology Department, APHM, Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tolboom N, Verger A, Albert NL, Fraioli F, Guedj E, Traub-Weidinger T, Morbelli S, Herrmann K, Zucchetta P, Plasschaert SLA, Yakushev I, Weller M, Glas M, Preusser M, Cecchin D, Barthel H, Van Weehaeghe D. Theranostics in Neurooncology: Heading Toward New Horizons. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:167-173. [PMID: 38071569 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic approaches to brain tumors remain a challenge, with considerable limitations regarding delivery of drugs. There has been renewed and increasing interest in translating the popular theranostic approach well known from prostate and neuroendocrine cancer to neurooncology. Although far from perfect, some of these approaches show encouraging preliminary results, such as for meningioma and leptomeningeal spread of certain pediatric brain tumors. In brain metastases and gliomas, clinical results have failed to impress. Perspectives on these theranostic approaches regarding meningiomas, brain metastases, gliomas, and common pediatric brain tumors will be discussed. For each tumor entity, the general context, an overview of the literature, and future perspectives will be provided. Ongoing studies will be discussed in the supplemental materials. As most theranostic agents are unlikely to cross the blood-brain barrier, the delivery of these agents will be dependent on the successful development and clinical implementation of techniques enhancing permeability and retention. Moreover, the international community should strive toward sufficiently large and randomized studies to generate high-level evidence on theranostic approaches with radioligand therapies for central nervous system tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelleke Tolboom
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Antoine Verger
- IADI, INSERM, UMR 1254, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Francesco Fraioli
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eric Guedj
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital de la Timone, CERIMED, Institut Fresnel, Aix Marseille University, APHM, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silvia Morbelli
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Pietro Zucchetta
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Igor Yakushev
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich and Munich Center for Neurosciences-Brain and Mind, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Glas
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University Medicine Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Diego Cecchin
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Boursier C, Zaragori T, Bros M, Bordonne M, Melki S, Taillandier L, Blonski M, Roch V, Marie PY, Karcher G, Imbert L, Verger A. Semi-automated segmentation methods of SSTR PET for dosimetry prediction in refractory meningioma patients treated by SSTR-targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:7089-7098. [PMID: 37148355 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09697-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Tumor dosimetry with somatostatin receptor-targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (SSTR-targeted PRRT) by 177Lu-DOTATATE may contribute to improved treatment monitoring of refractory meningioma. Accurate dosimetry requires reliable and reproducible pretherapeutic PET tumor segmentation which is not currently available. This study aims to propose semi-automated segmentation methods to determine metabolic tumor volume with pretherapeutic 68Ga-DOTATOC PET and evaluate SUVmean-derived values as predictive factors for tumor-absorbed dose. METHODS Thirty-nine meningioma lesions from twenty patients were analyzed. The ground truth PET and SPECT volumes (VolGT-PET and VolGT-SPECT) were computed from manual segmentations by five experienced nuclear physicians. SUV-related indexes were extracted from VolGT-PET and the semi-automated PET volumes providing the best Dice index with VolGT-PET (Volopt) across several methods: SUV absolute-value (2.3)-threshold, adaptative methods (Jentzen, Otsu, Contrast-based method), advanced gradient-based technique, and multiple relative thresholds (% of tumor SUVmax, hypophysis SUVmean, and meninges SUVpeak) with optimal threshold optimized. Tumor-absorbed doses were obtained from the VolGT-SPECT, corrected for partial volume effect, performed on a 360° whole-body CZT-camera at 24, 96, and 168 h after administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE. RESULTS Volopt was obtained from 1.7-fold meninges SUVpeak (Dice index 0.85 ± 0.07). SUVmean and total lesion uptake (SUVmeanxlesion volume) showed better correlations with tumor-absorbed doses than SUVmax when determined with the VolGT (respective Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.78, 0.67, and 0.56) or Volopt (0.64, 0.66, and 0.56). CONCLUSION Accurate definition of pretherapeutic PET volumes is justified since SUVmean-derived values provide the best tumor-absorbed dose predictions in refractory meningioma patients treated by 177Lu-DOTATATE. This study provides a semi-automated segmentation method of pretherapeutic 68Ga-DOTATOC PET volumes to achieve good reproducibility between physicians. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT SUVmean-derived values from pretherapeutic 68Ga-DOTATOC PET are predictive of tumor-absorbed doses in refractory meningiomas treated by 177Lu-DOTATATE, justifying to accurately define pretherapeutic PET volumes. This study provides a semi-automated segmentation of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET images easily applicable in routine. KEY POINTS • SUVmean-derived values from pretherapeutic 68Ga-DOTATOC PET images provide the best predictive factors of tumor-absorbed doses related to 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT in refractory meningioma. • A 1.7-fold meninges SUVpeak segmentation method used to determine metabolic tumor volume on pretherapeutic 68Ga-DOTATOC PET images of refractory meningioma treated by 177Lu-DOTATATE is as efficient as the currently routine manual segmentation method and limits inter- and intra-observer variabilities. • This semi-automated method for segmentation of refractory meningioma is easily applicable to routine practice and transferrable across PET centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Boursier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France.
- Université de Lorraine, IADI, INSERM U1254, F-54000, Nancy, France.
- Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, F-54000, Nancy, France.
| | | | - Marie Bros
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Manon Bordonne
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Saifeddine Melki
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Luc Taillandier
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy CRAN, UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Marie Blonski
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy CRAN, UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Veronique Roch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
- Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Marie
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
- Université de Lorraine, IADI, INSERM U1254, F-54000, Nancy, France
- Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Gilles Karcher
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
- Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Laëtitia Imbert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
- Université de Lorraine, IADI, INSERM U1254, F-54000, Nancy, France
- Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, F-54000, Nancy, France
| | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Université de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, F-54000, Nancy, France
- Université de Lorraine, IADI, INSERM U1254, F-54000, Nancy, France
- Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, F-54000, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Iglseder S, Iglseder A, Beliveau V, Heugenhauser J, Gizewski ER, Kerschbaumer J, Stockhammer G, Uprimny C, Virgolini I, Dudas J, Nevinny-Stickel M, Nowosielski M, Scherfler C. Somatostatin receptor subtype expression and radiomics from DWI-MRI represent SUV of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET in patients with meningioma. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:711-720. [PMID: 37707754 PMCID: PMC10589159 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04414-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This retrospective study aimed to analyse the correlation between somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR 1-5) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in meningioma patients using Gallium-68 DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide Positron Emission Tomography ([68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET). Secondly, we developed a radiomic model based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps derived from diffusion weighted magnetic resonance images (DWI MRI) to reproduce SUVmax. METHOD The study included 51 patients who underwent MRI and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET before meningioma surgery. SUVmax values were quantified from PET images and tumour areas were segmented on post-contrast T1-weighted MRI and mapped to ADC maps. A total of 1940 radiomic features were extracted from the tumour area on each ADC map. A random forest regression model was trained to predict SUVmax and the model's performance was evaluated using repeated nested cross-validation. The expression of SSTR subtypes was quantified in 18 surgical specimens and compared to SUVmax values. RESULTS The random forest regression model successfully predicted SUVmax values with a significant correlation observed in all 100 repeats (p < 0.05). The mean Pearson's r was 0.42 ± 0.07 SD, and the root mean square error (RMSE) was 28.46 ± 0.16. SSTR subtypes 2A, 2B, and 5 showed significant correlations with SUVmax values (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.669; p = 0.001, R2 = 0.393; and p = 0.012, R2 = 0.235, respectively). CONCLUSION SSTR subtypes 2A, 2B, and 5 correlated significantly with SUVmax in meningioma patients. The developed radiomic model based on ADC maps effectively reproduces SUVmax using [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Iglseder
- Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Anna Iglseder
- Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Technical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vincent Beliveau
- Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
- Neuroimaging Research Core Facility, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Elke R Gizewski
- Neuroimaging Research Core Facility, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Neuroradiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | | | - Christian Uprimny
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jozsef Dudas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Martha Nowosielski
- Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Christoph Scherfler
- Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Neuroradiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Patel D, Nguyen A, Fleeting C, Patel AB, Mumtaz M, Lucke-Wold B. Precision medicine in neurosurgery: The evolving role of theranostics. INNOSC THERANOSTICS & PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2023; 6:417. [PMID: 37601162 PMCID: PMC10439809 DOI: 10.36922/itps.417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
Theranostics in neurosurgery is a rapidly advancing field of precision medicine that combines diagnostic and therapeutic modalities to optimize patient outcomes. This approach has the potential to provide real-time feedback during therapy and diagnose a condition while simultaneously providing treatment. One such form of theranostics is focused ultrasound, which has been found to be effective in inducing neuroablation and neuromodulation and improving the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs by disrupting the blood-brain barrier. Targeted radionuclide therapy, which pairs positron emission tomography tracers with therapeutic effects and imaging modalities, is another promising form of theranostics for neurosurgery. Automated pathology analysis is yet another form of theranostics that can provide real-time feedback during the surgical resection of tumors. Electrical stimulation has also shown promise in optimizing therapies for patients with cerebral palsy. Overall, theranostics is a cost-effective way to optimize medical care for patients in neurosurgery. It is a relatively new field, but the advancements made so far show great promise for improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drashti Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Andrew Nguyen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Chance Fleeting
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Anjali B. Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Mohammed Mumtaz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Brandon Lucke-Wold
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Burkett BJ, Bartlett DJ, McGarrah PW, Lewis AR, Johnson DR, Berberoğlu K, Pandey MK, Packard AT, Halfdanarson TR, Hruska CB, Johnson GB, Kendi AT. A Review of Theranostics: Perspectives on Emerging Approaches and Clinical Advancements. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2023; 5:e220157. [PMID: 37477566 PMCID: PMC10413300 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.220157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Theranostics is the combination of two approaches-diagnostics and therapeutics-applied for decades in cancer imaging using radiopharmaceuticals or paired radiopharmaceuticals to image and selectively treat various cancers. The clinical use of theranostics has increased in recent years, with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of lutetium 177 (177Lu) tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid octreotate (DOTATATE) and 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen vector-based radionuclide therapies. The field of theranostics has imminent potential for emerging clinical applications. This article reviews critical areas of active clinical advancement in theranostics, including forthcoming clinical trials advancing FDA-approved and emerging radiopharmaceuticals, approaches to dosimetry calculations, imaging of different radionuclide therapies, expanded indications for currently used theranostic agents to treat a broader array of cancers, and emerging ideas in the field. Keywords: Molecular Imaging, Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Molecular Imaging-Clinical Translation, Molecular Imaging-Target Development, PET/CT, SPECT/CT, Radionuclide Therapy, Dosimetry, Oncology, Radiobiology © RSNA, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J. Burkett
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - David J. Bartlett
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Patrick W. McGarrah
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Akeem R. Lewis
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Derek R. Johnson
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Kezban Berberoğlu
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Mukesh K. Pandey
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Annie T. Packard
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Carrie B. Hruska
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Geoffrey B. Johnson
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - A. Tuba Kendi
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wijethilake N, MacCormac O, Vercauteren T, Shapey J. Imaging biomarkers associated with extra-axial intracranial tumors: a systematic review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1131013. [PMID: 37182138 PMCID: PMC10167010 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1131013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Extra-axial brain tumors are extra-cerebral tumors and are usually benign. The choice of treatment for extra-axial tumors is often dependent on the growth of the tumor, and imaging plays a significant role in monitoring growth and clinical decision-making. This motivates the investigation of imaging biomarkers for these tumors that may be incorporated into clinical workflows to inform treatment decisions. The databases from Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, and Medline were searched from 1 January 2000 to 7 March 2022, to systematically identify relevant publications in this area. All studies that used an imaging tool and found an association with a growth-related factor, including molecular markers, grade, survival, growth/progression, recurrence, and treatment outcomes, were included in this review. We included 42 studies, comprising 22 studies (50%) of patients with meningioma; 17 studies (38.6%) of patients with pituitary tumors; three studies (6.8%) of patients with vestibular schwannomas; and two studies (4.5%) of patients with solitary fibrous tumors. The included studies were explicitly and narratively analyzed according to tumor type and imaging tool. The risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability were assessed using QUADAS-2. Most studies (41/44) used statistics-based analysis methods, and a small number of studies (3/44) used machine learning. Our review highlights an opportunity for future work to focus on machine learning-based deep feature identification as biomarkers, combining various feature classes such as size, shape, and intensity. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42022306922.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navodini Wijethilake
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oscar MacCormac
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neurosurgery, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Vercauteren
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Shapey
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neurosurgery, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Clynch AL, Norrington M, Mustafa MA, Richardson GE, Doherty JA, Humphries TJ, Gillespie CS, Keshwara SM, McMahon CJ, Islim AI, Jenkinson MD, P Millward C, Brodbelt AR. Cranial meningioma with bone involvement: surgical strategies and clinical considerations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:1355-1363. [PMID: 36877330 PMCID: PMC10140130 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05535-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intracranial meningioma with bone involvement and primary intraosseous meningioma is uncommon. There is currently no consensus for optimal management. This study aimed to describe the management strategy and outcomes for a 10-year illustrative cohort, and propose an algorithm to aid clinicians in selecting cranioplasty material in such patients. METHODS A single-centre, retrospective cohort study (January 2010-August 2021). All adult patients requiring cranial reconstruction due to meningioma with bone involvement or primary intraosseous meningioma were included. Baseline patient and meningioma characteristics, surgical strategy, and surgical morbidity were examined. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS v24.0. Data visualisation was performed using R v4.1.0. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were identified (mean age 56 years; SD 15) There were 19 females. Twenty-nine patients had secondary bone involvement (88%). Four had primary intraosseous meningioma (12%). Nineteen had gross total resection (GTR; 58%). Thirty had primary 'on-table' cranioplasty (91%). Cranioplasty materials included pre-fabricated polymethyl methacrylate (pPMMA) (n = 12; 36%), titanium mesh (n = 10; 30%), hand-moulded polymethyl methacrylate cement (hPMMA) (n = 4; 12%), pre-fabricated titanium plate (n = 4; 12%), hydroxyapatite (n = 2; 6%), and a single case combining titanium mesh with hPMMA cement (n = 1; 3%). Five patients required reoperation for a postoperative complication (15%). CONCLUSION Meningioma with bone involvement and primary intraosseous meningioma often requires cranial reconstruction, but this may not be evident prior to surgical resection. Our experience demonstrates that a wide variety of materials have been used successfully, but that pre-fabricated materials may be associated with fewer postoperative complications. Further research within this population is warranted to identify the most appropriate operative strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail L Clynch
- School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK.
| | - Max Norrington
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, L9 7LJ, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mohammad A Mustafa
- School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK
| | - George E Richardson
- School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK
| | - John A Doherty
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, L9 7LJ, Liverpool, UK
| | - Thomas J Humphries
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, L9 7LJ, Liverpool, UK
| | - Conor S Gillespie
- School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK
| | - Sumirat M Keshwara
- School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK
| | - Catherine J McMahon
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, L9 7LJ, Liverpool, UK
| | - Abdurrahman I Islim
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, L9 7LJ, Liverpool, UK.,Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK
| | - Michael D Jenkinson
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, L9 7LJ, Liverpool, UK.,Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK
| | - Christopher P Millward
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, L9 7LJ, Liverpool, UK.,Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK
| | - Andrew R Brodbelt
- School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK.,The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, L9 7LJ, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Minczeles NS, Bos EM, de Leeuw RC, Kros JM, Konijnenberg MW, Bromberg JEC, de Herder WW, Dirven CMF, Hofland J, Brabander T. Efficacy and safety of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in 15 patients with progressive treatment-refractory meningioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1195-1204. [PMID: 36454268 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06044-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is no evidence-based systemic therapy for patients with progressive meningiomas for whom surgery or external radiotherapy is no longer an option. In this study, the efficacy and safety of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with progressive, treatment-refractory meningiomas were evaluated. METHODS Retrospective analysis of all meningioma patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE from 2000 to 2020 in our centre. Primary outcomes were response according to RANO bidimensional and volumetric criteria and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) and tumour growth rate (TGR) were secondary endpoints. TGR was calculated as the percentage change in surface or volume per month. RESULTS Fifteen meningioma patients received [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (7.5-29.6 GBq). Prior to PRRT, all patients had received external radiotherapy, and 14 patients had undergone surgery. All WHO grades were included WHO 1 (n=3), WHO 2 (n=5), and WHO 3 (n=6). After PRRT, stable disease was observed in six (40%) patients. The median PFS was 7.8 months with a 6-month PFS rate of 60%. The median OS was 13.6 months with a 12-month OS rate of 60%. All patients had progressive disease prior to PRRT, with an average TGR of 4.6% increase in surface and 14.8% increase in volume per month. After PRRT, TGR declined to 3.1% in surface (p=0.016) and 5.0% in volume (p=0.013) per month. CONCLUSION In this cohort of meningioma patients with exhaustion of surgical and radiotherapeutic options and progressive disease, it was shown that PRRT plays a role in controlling tumour growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noémie S Minczeles
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Eelke M Bos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reinoud C de Leeuw
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan M Kros
- Department of Pathology, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark W Konijnenberg
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wouter W de Herder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes Hofland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Brabander
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wirsching HG, Weller M. Immunotherapy for Meningiomas. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2023; 1416:225-234. [PMID: 37432631 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-29750-2_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
Systemic treatment approaches are urgently needed for a subset of meningioma patients who do not achieve local tumor control with surgery and radiotherapy. Classical chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic agents exert only very limited activity in these tumors. Long-term survival of patients with advanced metastatic cancer following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, i.e., monoclonal antibodies designed to unleash suppressed anticancer immune responses, has fostered hopes for benefit from similar approaches in patients with meningiomas that recur after standard local therapy. Moreover, a plethora of immunotherapy approaches beyond these drugs have entered clinical development or clinical practice for other cancer entities, including (i) novel immune checkpoint inhibitors that may act independently of T cell activity, (ii) cancer peptide or dendritic cell vaccines to induce anticancer immunity utilizing cancer-associated antigens, (iii) cellular therapies utilizing genetically modified peripheral blood cells to directly target cancer cells, (iv) T cell engaging recombinant proteins that link tumor antigen-binding sites to effector cell activating or recognition domains, or to immunogenic cytokines, and (v) oncolytic virotherapy utilizing attenuated viral vectors designed to specifically infect cancer cells, seeking to elicit systemic anticancer immunity. This chapter provides an overview of the principles of immunotherapy, summarizes ongoing immunotherapy clinical trials in meningioma patients, and discusses the applicability of established and emerging immunotherapy concepts to meningioma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Georg Wirsching
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Galldiks N, Hattingen E, Langen KJ, Tonn JC. Imaging Characteristics of Meningiomas. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2023; 1416:21-33. [PMID: 37432617 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-29750-2_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
Contemporary neuroimaging of meningiomas has largely relied on computed tomography, and more recently magnetic resonance imaging. While these modalities are frequently used in nearly all clinical settings where meningiomas are treated for the routine diagnosis and follow-up of these tumors, advances in neuroimaging have provided novel opportunities for prognostication and treatment planning (including both surgical planning and radiotherapy planning). These include perfusion MRIs, and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging modalities. Here we will summarize the contemporary uses for neuroimaging in meningiomas, and future applications of novel, cutting edge imaging techniques that may be routinely implemented in the future to enable more precise treatment of these challenging tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jörg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Clinical Management of Supratentorial Non-Skull Base Meningiomas. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235887. [PMID: 36497370 PMCID: PMC9737260 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Supratentorial non-skull base meningiomas are the most common primary central nervous system tumor subtype. An understanding of their pathophysiology, imaging characteristics, and clinical management options will prove of substantial value to the multi-disciplinary team which may be involved in their care. Extensive review of the broad literature on the topic is conducted. Narrowing the scope to meningiomas located in the supratentorial non-skull base anatomic location highlights nuances specific to this tumor subtype. Advances in our understanding of the natural history of the disease and how findings from both molecular pathology and neuroimaging have impacted our understanding are discussed. Clinical management and the rationale underlying specific approaches including observation, surgery, radiation, and investigational systemic therapies is covered in detail. Future directions for probable advances in the near and intermediate term are reviewed.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kong MJ, Yang AF, Vora SA, Ross JS, Yang M. The Complementary Role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Diagnosis of Recurrent Meningioma. J Nucl Med Technol 2022; 50:jnmt.122.263949. [PMID: 36041874 DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.122.263949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Contrast-enhanced brain MRI is the choice of imaging modality in diagnosis and posttreatment evaluation, its role is limited in distinguishing recurrent lesion from postoperative change. 68Ga-DOTATATE is a somatostatin analog PET tracer which has high affinity to meningioma expressing somatostatin receptor. Methods and subjects: In this case series review, we described 8 patients with brain MRI suspected of recurrent meningioma who underwent focused 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan for radiation treatment planning. Results: The combined brain MRI and PET/CT allowed improved conspicuity of the lesions and aided radiation treatment planning. The time from the initial surgery to PET/CT scans varied widely ranging from 1 year to 12 years. Three patients had PET/CT shortly after the initial surgery (1-3 years) and underwent targeted radiation therapy. Subsequent imaging showed no evidence of recurrence. Four patients had prolonged time between the PET/CT and the initial surgery (7-12 years) which showed extensive tumor burden. All four patients expired shortly after the last PET/CT scan. Conclusion: 68Ga-DOTATATE PET shows promising complementary role in detection and treatment planning of recurrent meningioma.
Collapse
|
25
|
Jensen LR, Maier AD, Lomstein A, Graillon T, Hrachova M, Bota D, Ruiz-Patiño A, Arrieta O, Cardona AF, Rudà R, Furtner J, Roeckle U, Clement P, Preusser M, Scheie D, Broholm H, Kristensen BW, Skjøth-Rasmussen J, Ziebell M, Munch TN, Fugleholm K, Walter MA, Mathiesen T, Mirian C. Somatostatin analogues in treatment-refractory meningioma: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual patient data. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45:3067-3081. [PMID: 35984552 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01849-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Treatment-refractory meningiomas have a dismal prognosis and limited treatment options. Meningiomas express high-densities of somatostatin receptors (SSTR), thus potentially susceptible to antitumorigenic effects of somatostatin analogues (SSA). Evidence for SSA in meningiomas is scarce, and it is unclear if published literature would either (1) support wider use of SSA, if (2) more evidence is desirable, or if (3) available evidence is sufficient to discard SSA. We addressed the need for more evidence with a systematic review and meta-analysis. We performed an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Main outcomes were toxicity, best radiological response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. We applied multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the effect of SSA on the probability of obtaining radiological disease control. The predictive performance was evaluated using area under the curve and Brier scores. We included 16 studies and compiled IPD from 8/9 of all previous cohorts. Quality of evidence was overall ranked "very low." Stable disease was reported in 58% of patients as best radiological response. Per 100 mg increase in total SSA dosage, the odds ratios for obtaining radiological disease control was 1.42 (1.11 to 1.81, P = 0.005) and 1.44 (1.00 to 2.08, P = 0.05) for patients treated with SSA as monodrug therapy vs SSA in combination with everolimus, respectively. Low quality of evidence impeded exact quantification of treatment efficacy, and the association between response and treatment may represent reverse causality. Yet, the SSA treatment was well tolerated, and beneficial effect cannot be disqualified. A prospective trial without bias from inconsistent study designs is warranted to assess SSA therapy for well-defined meningioma subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lasse Rehné Jensen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andrea Daniela Maier
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Center of Diagnostic Investigation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Atle Lomstein
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Thomas Graillon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital La Timone, Aix Marseille University, APHM, INSERM, MMG, Marseille, France
| | - Maya Hrachova
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma, OK, USA
| | - Daniela Bota
- Department of Neurology, UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | | | - Oscar Arrieta
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCaN), Mexico City, México
| | | | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto/Treviso, Treviso, Italy
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, City of Health and Science Hospital and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Julia Furtner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrich Roeckle
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Paul Clement
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David Scheie
- Department of Pathology, Center of Diagnostic Investigation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helle Broholm
- Department of Pathology, Center of Diagnostic Investigation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bjarne Winther Kristensen
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Section for Neurosurgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Biotech Research and Innovation Center (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Ziebell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tina Nørgaard Munch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kåre Fugleholm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin A Walter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Gesundheitswissenschaften Und Medizin EN, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Tiit Mathiesen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Mirian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Okano A, Miyawaki S, Teranishi Y, Ohara K, Hongo H, Sakai Y, Ishigami D, Nakatomi H, Saito N. Advances in Molecular Biological and Translational Studies in World Health Organization Grades 2 and 3 Meningiomas: A Literature Review. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2022; 62:347-360. [PMID: 35871574 PMCID: PMC9464479 DOI: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of World Health Organization (WHO) grades 2 and 3 meningiomas remains difficult and controversial. The pathogenesis of high-grade meningiomas was expected to be elucidated to improve treatment strategies. The molecular biology of meningiomas has been clarified in recent years. High-grade meningiomas have been linked to NF2 mutations and 22q deletion. CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion and TERT promoter mutations are independent prognostic factors for WHO grade 3 meningiomas. In addition to 22q loss, 1p, 14p, and 9q loss have been linked to high-grade meningiomas. Meningiomas enriched in copy number alterations may be biologically invasive. Furthermore, several new comprehensive classifications of meningiomas have been proposed based on these molecular biological features, including DNA methylation status. The new classifications may have implications for treatment strategies for refractory aggressive meningiomas because they provide a more accurate prognosis compared to the conventional WHO classification. Although several systemic therapies, including molecular targeted therapies, may be effective in treating refractory aggressive meningiomas, these drugs are being tested. Systemic drug therapy for meningioma is expected to be developed in the future. Thus, this review aims to discuss the distinct genomic alterations observed in WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas, as well as their diagnostic and therapeutic implications and systemic drug therapies for high-grade meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Okano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | - Satoru Miyawaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | - Yu Teranishi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | - Kenta Ohara
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | - Hiroki Hongo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | - Yu Sakai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | - Daiichiro Ishigami
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | - Hirofumi Nakatomi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University
| | - Nobuhito Saito
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Somatostatin Receptor Theranostics for Refractory Meningiomas. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5550-5565. [PMID: 36005176 PMCID: PMC9406720 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) represents a promising approach for treatment-refractory meningiomas progressing after surgery and radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to provide outcomes of patients harboring refractory meningiomas treated by 177Lu-DOTATATE and an overall analysis of progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) of the same relevant studies in the literature. Eight patients with recurrent and progressive WHO grade II meningiomas were treated after multimodal pretreatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE between 2019 and 2022. Primary and secondarily endpoints were progression-free survival at 6-months (PFS-6) and toxicity, respectively. PFS-6 analysis of our case series was compared with other similar relevant studies that included 86 patients treated with either 177Lu-DOTATATE or 90Y-DOTATOC. Our retrospective study showed a PFS-6 of 85.7% for WHO grade II progressive refractory meningiomas. Treatment was clinically and biologically well tolerated. The overall analysis of the previous relevant studies showed a PFS-6 of 89.7% for WHO grade I meningiomas (n = 29); 57.1% for WHO grade II (n = 21); and 0 % for WHO grade III (n = 12). For all grades (n = 86), including unknown grades, PFS-6 was 58.1%. SSTR-targeted PRRT allowed us to achieve prolonged PFS-6 in patients with WHO grade I and II progressive refractory meningiomas, except the most aggressive WHO grade II tumors. Large scale randomized trials are warranted for the better integration of PRRT in the treatment of refractory meningioma into clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
|
28
|
Filippi L, Palumbo I, Bagni O, Schillaci O, Aristei C, Palumbo B. Somatostatin Receptor Targeted PET-Imaging for Diagnosis, Radiotherapy Planning and Theranostics of Meningiomas: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:1666. [PMID: 35885570 PMCID: PMC9321668 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The aims of the present systematic review are to: (1) assess the diagnostic performance of somatostatin receptor (SSR)targeted positron emission tomography (PET) with different tracers and devices in patients affected by meningiomas; and (2) to evaluate the theranostic applications of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in meningiomas. A systematic literature search according to PRISMA criteria was made by using two main databases. Only studies published from 2011 up to March 2022 in the English language with ≥10 enrolled patients were selected. Following our research strategy, 17 studies were included for the assessment. Fourteen studies encompassed 534 patients, harboring 733 meningiomas, submitted to SSR-targeted PET/CT (n = 10) or PET/MRI (n = 4) for de novo diagnosis, recurrence detection, or radiation therapy (RT) planning (endpoint 1), while 3 studies included 69 patients with therapy-refractory meningiomas submitted to PRRT (endpoint 2). A relevant variation in methodology was registered among diagnostic studies, since only a minority of them reported histopathology as a reference standard. PET, especially when performed through PET/MRI, resulted particularly useful for the detection of meningiomas located in the skull base (SB) or next to the falx cerebri, significantly influencing RT planning. As far as it concerns PRRT studies, stable disease was obtained in the 66.6% of the treated patients, being grade 1-2 hematological toxicity the most common side effect. Of note, the wide range of the administered activities, the various utilized radiopharmaceuticals (90Y-DOTATOC and/or 177Lu-DOTATATE), the lack of dosimetric studies hamper a clear definition of PRRT potential on meningiomas' management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Filippi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy;
| | - Isabella Palumbo
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Piazza Lucio Severi 1, 06132 Perugia, Italy; (I.P.); (C.A.)
| | - Oreste Bagni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, “Santa Maria Goretti” Hospital, Via Antonio Canova, 04100 Latina, Italy;
| | - Orazio Schillaci
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy;
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Piazza Lucio Severi 1, 06132 Perugia, Italy; (I.P.); (C.A.)
| | - Barbara Palumbo
- Section of Nuclear Medicine and Health Physics, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Degli Studi di Perugia, Piazza Lucio Severi 1, 06132 Perugia, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
The Role of [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET Radiotracers in Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Ongoing Clinical Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122925. [PMID: 35740591 PMCID: PMC9221214 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging has recently been introduced in the management of patients with brain tumors, mostly meningiomas and pituitary adenomas or carcinomas. The current literature demonstrated the superior diagnostic accuracy of this imaging modality, especially for lesions difficult to be detected or characterized on conventional imaging protocols, such as skull base or transosseous meningiomas. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers also seem to provide superior volume contouring for radiotherapy planning and may also be used to evaluate the tumor’s overexpression of somatostatin receptors for devising patient-tailored peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. In this review, we comprehensively analyzed the current literature discussing the implementation of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging in brain tumors, further presenting ongoing clinical trials and suggesting potential future applications. Abstract Background: The development of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers has garnered interest in neuro-oncology, to increase accuracy in diagnostic, radiation planning, and neurotheranostics protocols. We systematically reviewed the literature on the current uses of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in brain tumors. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to include published studies and ongoing trials utilizing [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in patients with brain tumors. Results: We included 63 published studies comprising 1030 patients with 1277 lesions, and 4 ongoing trials. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET was mostly used for diagnostic purposes (62.5%), followed by treatment planning (32.7%), and neurotheranostics (4.8%). Most lesions were meningiomas (93.6%), followed by pituitary adenomas (2.8%), and the DOTATOC tracer (53.2%) was used more frequently than DOTATATE (39.1%) and DOTANOC (5.7%), except for diagnostic purposes (DOTATATE 51.1%). [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies were mostly required to confirm the diagnosis of meningiomas (owing to their high SSTR2 expression and tracer uptake) or evaluate their extent of bone invasion, and improve volume contouring for better radiotherapy planning. Some studies reported the uncommon occurrence of SSTR2-positive brain pathology challenging the diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for meningiomas. Pre-treatment assessment of tracer uptake rates has been used to confirm patient eligibility (high somatostatin receptor-2 expression) for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) (i.e., neurotheranostics) for recurrent meningiomas and pituitary carcinomas. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies may revolutionize the routine neuro-oncology practice, especially in meningiomas, by improving diagnostic accuracy, delineation of radiotherapy targets, and patient eligibility for radionuclide therapies.
Collapse
|
30
|
Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [ 68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma. Sci Rep 2022; 12:9256. [PMID: 35661809 PMCID: PMC9166786 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13467-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple approaches with [68Ga]-DOTATATE, a somatostatin analog PET radiotracer, have demonstrated clinical utility in evaluation of meningioma but have not been compared directly. Our purpose was to compare diagnostic performance of different approaches to quantitative brain [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with suspected meningioma recurrence and to establish the optimal diagnostic threshold for each method. Patients with suspected meningioma were imaged prospectively with [68Ga]-DOTATATE brain PET/MRI. Lesions were classified as meningiomas and post-treatment change (PTC), using follow-up pathology and MRI as reference standard. Lesions were reclassified using the following methods: absolute maximum SUV threshold (SUV), SUV ratio (SUVR) to superior sagittal sinus (SSS) (SUVRsss), SUVR to the pituitary gland (SUVRpit), and SUVR to the normal brain parenchyma (SUVRnorm). Diagnostic performance of the four methods was compared using contingency tables and McNemar’s test. Previously published pre-determined thresholds were assessed where applicable. The optimal thresholds for each method were identified using Youden’s J statistics. 166 meningiomas and 41 PTC lesions were identified across 62 patients. SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm of meningioma were significantly higher than those of PTC (P < 0.0001). The optimal thresholds for SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm were 4.7, 3.2, 0.3, and 62.6, respectively. At the optimal thresholds, SUV had the highest specificity (97.6%) and SUVRsss had the highest sensitivity (86.1%). An ROC analysis of SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm revealed AUC of 0.932, 0.910, 0.915, and 0.800, respectively (P < 0.0001). Developing a diagnostic threshold is key to wider clinical translation of [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningioma evaluation. We found that the SUVRsss method may have the most robust combination of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of meningioma in the post-treatment setting, with the optimal threshold of 3.2. Future studies validating our findings in different patient populations are needed to continue optimizing the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningioma patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04081701. Registered 9 September 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04081701.
Collapse
|
31
|
Wiggins RH, Hoffman JM, Fine GC, Covington MF, Salem AE, Koppula BR, Morton KA. PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-V. Head and Neck and Neuro Oncology. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112726. [PMID: 35681709 PMCID: PMC9179458 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT) has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With PET-CT, a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan, performed at the same time, provides information to facilitate attenuation correction, so that radioactivity from deep or dense structures can be better visualized, but with head and neck malignancies it is critical to provide correlating detailed anatomic imaging. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging, and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging and interpretive strategies of PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The fifth report in this series provides a review of PET-CT imaging in head and neck and neuro oncology. Abstract PET-CT is an advanced imaging modality with many oncologic applications, including staging, assessment of response to therapy, restaging, and longitudinal surveillance for recurrence. The goal of this series of six review articles is to provide practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for specific oncologic indications, and the potential pitfalls and nuances that characterize these applications. In addition, key tumor-specific clinical information and representative PET-CT images are provided to outline the role that PET-CT plays in the management of oncology patients. Hundreds of different types of tumors exist, both pediatric and adult. A discussion of the role of FDG PET for all of these is beyond the scope of this review. Rather, this series of articles focuses on the most common adult malignancies that may be encountered in clinical practice. It also focuses on FDA-approved and clinically available radiopharmaceuticals, rather than research tracers or those requiring a local cyclotron. The fifth review article in this series focuses on PET-CT imaging in head and neck tumors, as well as brain tumors. Common normal variants, key anatomic features, and benign mimics of these tumors are reviewed. The goal of this review article is to provide the imaging professional with guidance in the interpretation of PET-CT for the more common head and neck malignancies and neuro oncology, and to inform the referring providers so that they can have realistic expectations of the value and limitations of PET-CT for the specific type of tumor being addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard H. Wiggins
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.); (G.C.F.); (M.F.C.); (A.E.S.); (B.R.K.)
| | - John M. Hoffman
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.); (G.C.F.); (M.F.C.); (A.E.S.); (B.R.K.)
| | - Gabriel C. Fine
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.); (G.C.F.); (M.F.C.); (A.E.S.); (B.R.K.)
| | - Matthew F. Covington
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.); (G.C.F.); (M.F.C.); (A.E.S.); (B.R.K.)
| | - Ahmed Ebada Salem
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.); (G.C.F.); (M.F.C.); (A.E.S.); (B.R.K.)
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Intervention, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
| | - Bhasker R. Koppula
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.); (G.C.F.); (M.F.C.); (A.E.S.); (B.R.K.)
| | - Kathryn A. Morton
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; (R.H.W.); (J.M.H.); (G.C.F.); (M.F.C.); (A.E.S.); (B.R.K.)
- Intermountain Healthcare Hospitals, Summit Physician Specialists, Murray, UT 84123, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-801-581-7553
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fodi CK, Schittenhelm J, Honegger J, Castaneda-Vega SG, Behling F. The Current Role of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Meningiomas. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092364. [PMID: 35566491 PMCID: PMC9104797 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors. The majority of patients can be cured by surgery, or tumor growth can be stabilized by radiation. However, the management of recurrent and more aggressive tumors remains difficult because no established alternative treatment options exist. Therefore, innovative therapeutic approaches are needed. Studies have shown that meningiomas express somatostatin receptors. It is well known from treating neuroendocrine tumors that peptide radioreceptor therapy that targets somatostatin receptors can be effective. As yet, this therapy has been used for treating meningiomas only within individual curative trials. However, small case series and studies have demonstrated stabilization of the disease. Therefore, we see potential for optimizing this therapeutic option through the development of new substances and specific adaptations to the different meningioma subtypes. The current review provides an overview of this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina-Katharina Fodi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (C.-K.F.); (J.H.)
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Honegger
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (C.-K.F.); (J.H.)
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Salvador Guillermo Castaneda-Vega
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Felix Behling
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotechnology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (C.-K.F.); (J.H.)
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-707129-80235; Fax: +49-707129-4549
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ivanidze J, Roytman M, Skafida M, Kim S, Glynn S, Osborne JR, Pannullo SC, Nehmeh S, Ramakrishna R, Schwartz TH, Knisely JPS, Lin E, Karakatsanis NA. Dynamic 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI in the Diagnosis and Management of Intracranial Meningiomas. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2022; 4:e210067. [PMID: 35275019 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.210067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate dynamic gallium 68 (68Ga) tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid octreotate (DOTATATE) brain PET/MRI as an adjunct modality in meningioma, enabling multiparametric standardized uptake value (SUV) and Patlak net binding rate constant (Ki) imaging, and to optimize static acquisition period. Materials and Methods In this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT04081701, DOMINO-START), 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI-derived time-activity curves (TACs) were measured in 84 volumes of interest in 19 participants (mean age, 63 years; range, 36-89 years; 13 women; 2019-2021) with meningiomas. Region- and voxel-specific Ki were determined using Patlak analysis with a validated population-based reference tissue TAC model built from an independent data set of nine participants. Mean and maximum absolute and relative-to-superior-sagittal-sinus SUVs were extracted from the entire 50 minutes (SUV50) and last 10 minutes (SUV10) of acquisition. SUV versus Ki Spearman correlation, SUV and Ki meningioma versus posttreatment-change Mann-Whitney U tests, and SUV50 versus SUV10 Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests were performed. Results Absolute and relative maximum SUV50 demonstrated a strong positive correlation with Patlak Ki in meningioma (r = 0.82, P < .001 and r = 0.85, P < .001, respectively) and posttreatment-change lesions (r = 0.88, P = .007 and r = 0.83, P = .02, respectively). Patlak Ki images yielded higher lesion contrast by mitigating nonspecific background signal. All SUV50 and SUV10 metrics differed between meningioma and posttreatment-change regions (P < .001). Within the meningioma group, SUV10 attained higher mean scores than SUV50 (P < .001). Conclusion Combined SUV and Patlak K i 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI enabled multiparametric evaluation of meningioma, offering the potential to enhance lesion contrast with Ki imaging and optimize the SUV measurement postinjection window. Keywords: Molecular Imaging-Clinical Translation, Neuro-Oncology, PET/MRI, Dynamic, Patlak ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT04081701 © RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Ivanidze
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Michelle Roytman
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Myrto Skafida
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Sean Kim
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Shannon Glynn
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Susan C Pannullo
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Sadek Nehmeh
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Rohan Ramakrishna
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Theodore H Schwartz
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Jonathan P S Knisely
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Eaton Lin
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Nicolas A Karakatsanis
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: An Update and Overview of a Rapidly Growing Area. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051103. [PMID: 35267411 PMCID: PMC8909369 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique which plays an increasingly important role in the management of brain tumors. Owing different radiotracers, PET allows to image different metabolic aspects of the brain tumors. This review outlines currently available PET radiotracers and their respective indications in neuro-oncology. It specifically focuses on the investigation of gliomas, meningiomas, primary central nervous system lymphomas as well as brain metastases. Recent advances in the production of PET radiotracers, image analyses and translational applications to peptide radionuclide receptor therapy, which allow to treat brain tumors with radiotracers, are also discussed. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of PET imaging’s potential in neuro-oncology as an adjunct to brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Abstract PET plays an increasingly important role in the management of brain tumors. This review outlines currently available PET radiotracers and their respective indications. It specifically focuses on 18F-FDG, amino acid and somatostatin receptor radiotracers, for imaging gliomas, meningiomas, primary central nervous system lymphomas as well as brain metastases. Recent advances in radiopharmaceuticals, image analyses and translational applications to therapy are also discussed. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of PET imaging’s potential in neuro-oncology as an adjunct to brain MRI for all medical professionals implicated in brain tumor diagnosis and care.
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhang-Yin JT, Girard A, Bertaux M. What Does PET Imaging Bring to Neuro-Oncology in 2022? A Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040879. [PMID: 35205625 PMCID: PMC8870476 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is increasingly used to supplement MRI in the management of patient with brain tumors. In this article, we provide a review of the current place and perspectives of PET imaging for the diagnosis and follow-up of from primary brain tumors such as gliomas, meningiomas and central nervous system lymphomas, as well as brain metastases. Different PET radiotracers targeting different biological processes are used to accurately depict these brain tumors and provide unique metabolic and biologic information. Radiolabeled amino acids such as [18F]FDOPA or [18F]FET are used for imaging of gliomas while both [18F]FDG and amino acids can be used for brain metastases. Meningiomas can be seen with a high contrast using radiolabeled ligands of somatostatin receptors, which they usually carry. Unconventional tracers that allow the study of other biological processes such as cell proliferation, hypoxia, or neo-angiogenesis are currently being studied for brain tumors imaging. Abstract PET imaging is being increasingly used to supplement MRI in the clinical management of brain tumors. The main radiotracers implemented in clinical practice include [18F]FDG, radiolabeled amino acids ([11C]MET, [18F]FDOPA, [18F]FET) and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR, targeting glucose metabolism, L-amino-acid transport and somatostatin receptors expression, respectively. This review aims at addressing the current place and perspectives of brain PET imaging for patients who suffer from primary or secondary brain tumors, at diagnosis and during follow-up. A special focus is given to the following: radiolabeled amino acids PET imaging for tumor characterization and follow-up in gliomas; the role of amino acid PET and [18F]FDG PET for detecting brain metastases recurrence; [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for guiding treatment in meningioma and particularly before targeted radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antoine Girard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Marc Bertaux
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Roytman M, Kim S, Glynn S, Thomas C, Lin E, Feltus W, Magge RS, Liechty B, Schwartz TH, Ramakrishna R, Karakatsanis NA, Pannullo SC, Osborne JR, Knisely JPS, Ivanidze J. PET/MR Imaging of Somatostatin Receptor Expression and Tumor Vascularity in Meningioma: Implications for Pathophysiology and Tumor Outcomes. Front Oncol 2022; 11:820287. [PMID: 35155210 PMCID: PMC8832502 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.820287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Meningiomas, the most common primary intracranial tumor, are vascular neoplasms that express somatostatin receptor-2 (SSTR2). The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate if a relationship exists between tumor vascularity and SSTR2 expression, which may play a role in meningioma prognostication and clinical management. Materials and Methods Gallium-68-DOTATATE PET/MRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion was prospectively performed. Clinical and demographic patient characteristics were recorded. Tumor volumes were segmented and superimposed onto parametric DCE maps including flux rate constant (Kep), transfer constant (Ktrans), extravascular volume fraction (Ve), and plasma volume fraction (Vp). Meningioma PET standardized uptake value (SUV) and SUV ratio to superior sagittal sinus (SUVRSSS) were recorded. Pearson correlation analyses were performed. In a random subset, analysis was repeated by a second investigator, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were determined. Results Thirty-six patients with 60 meningiomas (20 WHO-1, 27 WHO-2, and 13 WHO-3) were included. Mean Kep demonstrated a strong significant positive correlation with SUV (r = 0.84, p < 0.0001) and SUVRSSS (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001). When stratifying by WHO grade, this correlation persisted in WHO-2 (r = 0.91, p < 0.0001) and WHO-3 (r = 0.92, p = 0.0029) but not WHO-1 (r = 0.26, p = 0.4, SUVRSSS). ICC was excellent (0.97–0.99). Conclusion DOTATATE PET/MRI demonstrated a strong significant correlation between tumor vascularity and SSTR2 expression in WHO-2 and WHO-3, but not WHO-1 meningiomas, suggesting biological differences in the relationship between tumor vascularity and SSTR2 expression in higher-grade meningiomas, the predictive value of which will be tested in future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Roytman
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sean Kim
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Shannon Glynn
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Charlene Thomas
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Eaton Lin
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Whitney Feltus
- Departments of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rajiv S. Magge
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Benjamin Liechty
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Theodore H. Schwartz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rohan Ramakrishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nicolas A. Karakatsanis
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Susan C. Pannullo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Joseph R. Osborne
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan P. S. Knisely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jana Ivanidze
- Departments of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
- *Correspondence: Jana Ivanidze,
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fodi C, Skardelly M, Hempel JM, Hoffmann E, Castaneda S, Tabatabai G, Honegger J, Tatagiba M, Schittenhelm J, Behling F. The immunohistochemical expression of SSTR2A is an independent prognostic factor in meningioma. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 45:2671-2679. [PMID: 34601710 PMCID: PMC9349155 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01651-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The expression of somatostatin receptors in meningioma is well established. First, suggestions of a prognostic impact of SSTRs in meningioma have been made. However, the knowledge is based on few investigations in small cohorts. We recently analyzed the expression of all five known SSTRs in a large cohort of over 700 meningiomas and demonstrated significant correlations with WHO tumor grade and other clinical characteristics. We therefore expanded our dataset and additionally collected information about radiographic tumor recurrence and progression as well as clinically relevant factors (gender, age, extent of resection, WHO grade, tumor location, adjuvant radiotherapy, neurofibromatosis type 2, primary/recurrent tumor) for a comprehensive prognostic multivariate analysis (n = 666). The immunohistochemical expression scores of SSTR1, 2A, 3, 4, and 5 were scored using an intensity distribution score ranging from 0 to 12. For recurrence-free progression analysis, a cutoff at an intensity distribution score of 6 was used. Univariate analysis demonstrated a higher rate of tumor recurrence for increased expression scores for SSTR2A, SSTR3, and SSTR4 (p = 0.0312, p = 0.0351, and p = 0.0390, respectively), while high expression levels of SSTR1 showed less frequent tumor recurrences (p = 0.0012). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, a higher intensity distribution score showed a favorable prognosis for SSTR1 (p = 0.0158) and an unfavorable prognosis for SSTR2A (0.0143). The negative prognostic impact of higher SSTR2A expression remained a significant factor in the multivariate analysis (RR 1.69, p = 0.0060). We conclude that the expression of SSTR2A has an independent prognostic value regarding meningioma recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Fodi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, Tübingen, Germany.,Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marco Skardelly
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, Tübingen, Germany.,Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Johann-Martin Hempel
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Elgin Hoffmann
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Salvador Castaneda
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, Tübingen, Germany.,Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Honegger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, Tübingen, Germany.,Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, Tübingen, Germany.,Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Felix Behling
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, Tübingen, Germany. .,Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. .,Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Noh KW, Buettner R, Klein S. Shifting Gears in Precision Oncology-Challenges and Opportunities of Integrative Data Analysis. Biomolecules 2021; 11:biom11091310. [PMID: 34572523 PMCID: PMC8465238 DOI: 10.3390/biom11091310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
For decades, research relating to modification of host immunity towards antitumor response activation has been ongoing, with the breakthrough discovery of immune-checkpoint blockers. Several biomarkers with potential predictive value have been reported in recent studies for these novel therapies. However, with the plethora of therapeutic options existing for a given cancer entity, modern oncology is now being confronted with multifactorial interpretation to devise “the best therapy” for the individual patient. Into the bargain come the multiverse guidelines for established and emerging diagnostic biomarkers, as well as the complex interplay between cancer cells and tumor microenvironment, provoking immense challenges in the therapy decision-making process. Through this review, we present various molecular diagnostic modalities and techniques, such as genomics, immunohistochemistry and quantitative image analysis, which have the potential of becoming powerful tools in the development of an optimal treatment regime when analogized with patient characteristics. We will summarize the underlying complexities of these methods and shed light upon the necessary considerations and requirements for data integration. It is our hope to provide compelling evidence to emphasize on the need for inclusion of integrative data analysis in modern cancer therapy, and thereupon paving a path towards precision medicine and better patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka-Won Noh
- Institute for Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (K.-W.N.); (R.B.)
| | - Reinhard Buettner
- Institute for Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (K.-W.N.); (R.B.)
| | - Sebastian Klein
- Gerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-251-83-57670
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy and Primary Brain Tumors: An Overview. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14090872. [PMID: 34577572 PMCID: PMC8470698 DOI: 10.3390/ph14090872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary brain tumors (PBTs) are some of the most difficult types of cancer to treat, and despite advancements in surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, new strategies for the treatment of PBTs are needed, especially for those with poor prognosis such as inoperable/difficult-to-reach lesions or relapsing disease. In regard to the last point, malignant primary brain tumors remain some of the most lethal types of cancer. Nuclear medicine may provide exciting new weapons and significant contributions in the treatment of PBTs. In this review, we performed literature research in order to highlight the possible role of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in the treatment of PBTs with radiolabeled molecules that bind with high-affinity transmembrane receptors such as somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), neurokinin type-1 receptor and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). These receptors are overexpressed in some cancer types such as gliomas, meningiomas, pituitary tumors and medulloblastomas. A comprehensive overview of possible applications in this field will be shown, providing knowledge about benefits, feasibility, developments and limitations of PRRT in this type of tumor, also revealing new advantages in the management of the disease.
Collapse
|
40
|
Galldiks N, Niyazi M, Grosu AL, Kocher M, Langen KJ, Law I, Minniti G, Kim MM, Tsien C, Dhermain F, Soffietti R, Mehta MP, Weller M, Tonn JC. Contribution of PET imaging to radiotherapy planning and monitoring in glioma patients - a report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:881-893. [PMID: 33538838 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with glioma usually requires multimodality treatment including surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. Accurate neuroimaging plays a central role for radiotherapy planning and follow-up after radiotherapy completion. In order to maximize the radiation dose to the tumor and to minimize toxic effects on the surrounding brain parenchyma, reliable identification of tumor extent and target volume delineation is crucial. The use of positron emission tomography (PET) for radiotherapy planning and monitoring in gliomas has gained considerable interest over the last several years, but Class I data are not yet available. Furthermore, PET has been used after radiotherapy for response assessment and to distinguish tumor progression from pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis. Here, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group provides a summary of the literature and recommendations for the use of PET imaging for radiotherapy of patients with glioma based on published studies, constituting levels 1-3 evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Cologne and Aachen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Cologne and Aachen, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Frederic Dhermain
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.,Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Assadi M, Rekabpour SJ, Amini A, Dadgar H, Nemati R, Gholamrezanezhad A, Nabipour I, Jafari E, Ahmadzadehfar H. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE in a Case of Concurrent Neuroendocrine Tumors and Meningioma: Achieving Two Things in a Single Action. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2021; 30:107-109. [PMID: 34082512 PMCID: PMC8185482 DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2020.69783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a partial response of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE in a case of concurrent neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and meningioma. In addition to the valuable role of PRRT in inoperable NETs, it has been demonstrated that this treatment can be a promising therapy for progressive meningioma, especially in patients with low grade and refractory to standard regime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Assadi
- Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr Medical University Hospital, The Persian Gulf Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Seyed Javad Rekabpour
- Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr Medical University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Abdullatif Amini
- Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr Medical Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Habibollah Dadgar
- Cancer Research Center, RAZAVI Hospital, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Reza Nemati
- Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr Medical University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Ali Gholamrezanezhad
- University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Iraj Nabipour
- Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr Medical University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Esmail Jafari
- Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr Medical University Hospital, The Persian Gulf Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy, Bushehr, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chen K, Si Y, Ou J, Guan JS, Kim S, Ernst P, Zhang Y, Zhou L, Han X, Liu X(M. Antibody-Drug Conjugate to Treat Meningiomas. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14050427. [PMID: 34063284 PMCID: PMC8147502 DOI: 10.3390/ph14050427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are primary tumors of the central nervous system with high recurrence. It has been reported that somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) is highly expressed in most meningiomas, but there is no effective targeted therapy approved to control meningiomas. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an anti-SSTR2 antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) to target and treat meningiomas. The meningioma targeting, circulation stability, toxicity, and anti-tumor efficacy of SSTR2 ADC were evaluated using cell lines and/or an intracranial xenograft mouse model. The flow cytometry analysis showed that the anti-SSTR2 mAb had a high binding rate of >98% to meningioma CH157-MN cells but a low binding rate of <5% to the normal arachnoidal AC07 cells. The In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) imaging demonstrated that the Cy5.5-labeled ADC targeted and accumulated in meningioma xenograft but not in normal organs. The pharmacokinetics study and histological analysis confirmed the stability and minimal toxicity. In vitro anti-cancer cytotoxicity indicated a high potency of ADC with an IC50 value of <10 nM. In vivo anti-tumor efficacy showed that the anti-SSTR2 ADC with doses of 8 and 16 mg/kg body weight effectively inhibited tumor growth. This study demonstrated that the anti-SSTR2 ADC can target meningioma and reduce the tumor growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Chen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 1825 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (K.C.); (Y.S.); (J.O.); (S.K.); (Y.Z.); (L.Z.)
| | - Yingnan Si
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 1825 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (K.C.); (Y.S.); (J.O.); (S.K.); (Y.Z.); (L.Z.)
| | - Jianfa Ou
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 1825 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (K.C.); (Y.S.); (J.O.); (S.K.); (Y.Z.); (L.Z.)
| | - Jia-Shiung Guan
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 703 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (J.-S.G.); (P.E.)
| | - Seulhee Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 1825 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (K.C.); (Y.S.); (J.O.); (S.K.); (Y.Z.); (L.Z.)
| | - Patrick Ernst
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 703 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (J.-S.G.); (P.E.)
| | - Ya Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 1825 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (K.C.); (Y.S.); (J.O.); (S.K.); (Y.Z.); (L.Z.)
| | - Lufang Zhou
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 1825 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (K.C.); (Y.S.); (J.O.); (S.K.); (Y.Z.); (L.Z.)
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 703 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (J.-S.G.); (P.E.)
| | - Xiaosi Han
- Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA;
| | - Xiaoguang (Margaret) Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 1825 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (K.C.); (Y.S.); (J.O.); (S.K.); (Y.Z.); (L.Z.)
- O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-205-996-1042; Fax: +1-205-996-4701
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Holzgreve A, Albert NL, Galldiks N, Suchorska B. Use of PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncological Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092093. [PMID: 33926002 PMCID: PMC8123649 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in neuro-oncological surgery is an exciting field with thriving perspectives. Increasing evidence exists for amino acid-based PET to facilitate interpretation of imaging findings following therapeutic interventions in patients with glioma and brain metastases. In meningioma patients, radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands provide an improved tumor tissue visualization in lesions located in the vicinity of the skull base and differentiate between scar tissue and tumor recurrence. Moreover, they can be applied as an individual treatment option in recurrent atypical and anaplastic meningioma not eligible for further surgery and radiotherapy. With a focus on its clinical application, this review provides an overview of the emerging field of PET imaging in neuro-oncological surgery. Abstract This review provides an overview of current applications and perspectives of PET imaging in neuro-oncological surgery. The past and future of PET imaging in the management of patients with glioma and brain metastases are elucidated with an emphasis on amino acid tracers, such as O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET). The thematic scope includes surgical resection planning, prognostication, non-invasive prediction of molecular tumor characteristics, depiction of intratumoral heterogeneity, response assessment, differentiation between tumor progression and treatment-related changes, and emerging new tracers. Furthermore, the role of PET using specific somatostatin receptor ligands for the management of patients with meningioma is discussed. Further advances in neuro-oncological imaging can be expected from promising new techniques, such as hybrid PET/MR scanners and the implementation of artificial intelligence methods, such as radiomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (N.L.A.)
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (N.L.A.)
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sana Kliniken Duisburg, 47055 Duisburg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-203-733-2401
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Differences in the expression of SSTR1-5 in meningiomas and its therapeutic potential. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 45:467-478. [PMID: 33899156 PMCID: PMC8827401 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01552-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Beyond microsurgical resection and radiation therapy, there are currently no established treatment alternatives for meningioma patients. In selected cases, peptide radio receptor therapy (PRRT) can be implemented. For this purpose, a radionuclide is bound to a substance targeting specific receptors in meningiomas. One of them is somatostatin receptor 2, which can be found in most meningiomas. However, other somatostatin receptors (SSTR) exist, but their expressions have only been described in small case series. In this study, we analyzed the expression of SSTR1, 2A, 3, 4, and 5 in a large cohort of meningiomas in order to enable further refinement of this innovative treatment option. Overall, 726 tumor samples were processed into tissue microarrays and stained for SSTR1, 2A, 3, 4, and 5 immunohistochemically. Microscopic evaluation was done with an established semiquantitative score regarding percentual quantification and staining intensity, and results were correlated with clinical data. There was a significant lower rate of SSTR1 expression in meningiomas of male patients. Older age was associated with higher expression of SSTR1, 2A, and 5 and lower scores for SSTR3 and 4. Tumors treated with radiotherapy before resection showed lower rates of SSTR1 and 5 expression, while recurrent meningiomas had lower SSTR1 scores. Tumor tissue from patients suffering from neurofibromatosis type 2 had lower expression scores for SSTR1, 2, and 5. For SSTR3 and 4, NF2 patients showed higher scores than sporadic tumors. Spinal meningiomas had higher scores for SSTR1, 4, and 5 compared tumor location of the skull base and convexity/falx. Overall, higher WHO grade was associated with lower SSTR scores. While all SSTRs were expressed, there are marked differences of SSTR expression between meningioma subgroups. This has the potential to drive the development of more selective PRRT substances with higher treatment efficacy.
Collapse
|
45
|
Mirian C, Duun-Henriksen AK, Maier A, Pedersen MM, Jensen LR, Bashir A, Graillon T, Hrachova M, Bota D, van Essen M, Spanjol P, Kreis C, Law I, Broholm H, Poulsgaard L, Fugleholm K, Ziebell M, Munch T, Walter MA, Mathiesen T. Somatostatin Receptor-Targeted Radiopeptide Therapy in Treatment-Refractory Meningioma: Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:507-513. [PMID: 32859705 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.249607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) represents a promising approach for treatment-refractory meningiomas. Methods: We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis, including all published data on meningioma patients treated with SSTR-targeted PRRT. The main outcomes were toxicity, response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). We applied the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate survival probabilities and report incidence rates per 100 person-years. We applied Cox proportional hazards models to determine the effect of covariates. Results: We screened 537 papers and identified 6 eligible cohort studies. We included a total of 111 patients who had treatment-refractory meningioma and received SSTR-targeted PRRT. Disease control was achieved in 63% of patients. The 6-mo PFS rates were 94%, 48%, and 0% for World Health Organization grades I, II, and III, respectively. The risk of disease progression decreased by 13% per 1,000-MBq increase in the total applied activity. The 1-y OS rates were 88%, 71%, and 52% for World Health Organization grades I, II, and III, respectively. The risk of death decreased by 17% per 1,000-MBq increase in the total applied activity. The main side effects comprised transient hematotoxicity, such as anemia in 22% of patients, leukopenia in 13%, lymphocytopenia in 24%, and thrombocytopenia in 17%. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this individual patient data meta-analysis represents the most comprehensive analysis of the benefits of and adverse events associated with SSTR-targeted PRRT for treatment-refractory meningioma. The treatment was well tolerated, achieved disease control in most cases, and showed promising results regarding PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Mirian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Andrea Maier
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Møller Pedersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lasse Rehné Jensen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Asma Bashir
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Graillon
- APHM, Department of Neurosurgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Maya Hrachova
- Department of Neurology, UC Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California
| | - Daniela Bota
- Department of Neurology, UC Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California
- Department of Neurosurgery, UC Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California
| | - Martjin van Essen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Petar Spanjol
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian Kreis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helle Broholm
- Department of Neuropathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Poulsgaard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kåre Fugleholm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Ziebell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tina Munch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; and
| | - Martin A Walter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tiit Mathiesen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zahid A, Johnson DR, Kizilbash SH. Efficacy of 177Lu-Dotatate Therapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Meningioma. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2021; 5:236-240. [PMID: 33718799 PMCID: PMC7930777 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
A 62-year-old man presented with a history of atypical meningioma (World Health Organization grade II) and recurrent as anaplastic meningioma (World Health Organization grade III). His previous treatments included multiple surgical resections, fractionated radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, everolimus/octreotide long-acting release, bevacizumab, and hydroxyurea. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed rapid volumetric progression over the prior 9 months, with a near tripling in size from 29.9 cm3 to 80.4 cm3. Indium In 111 octreotide scanning confirmed the presence of somatostatin receptors within the tumor. Lutetium Lu 177 dotatate was administered intravenously at a dose of 200 mCi per dose every 8 weeks for 4 cycles. Treatment was tolerated very well, with no notable adverse events. Tumor volume initially increased to 98.3 cm3 after cycle 1 of treatment and subsequently decreased to 91.2 cm3 after cycle 2. Eight months after treatment onset, the tumor volume remained stable (93.4 cm3).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anza Zahid
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Derek R. Johnson
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Shortened Tracer Uptake Time in GA-68-DOTATOC-PET of Meningiomas Does Not Impair Diagnostic Accuracy and PET Volume Definition. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10121084. [PMID: 33322125 PMCID: PMC7763245 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10121084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET/MRI can affect the planning target volume (PTV) definition of meningiomas before radiosurgery. A shorter tracer uptake time before image acquisition could allow the examination of more patients. The aim of this study was to investigate if shortening uptake time is possible without compromising diagnostic accuracy and PET volume. Fifteen patients (f = 12; mean age 52 years (34-80 years)) with meningiomas were prospectively examined with dynamic [68Ga]Ga-68-labeled [DOTA0-Phe1-Tyr3] octreotide (Ga-68-DOTATOC)-PET/MRI over 70 min before radiosurgery planning. Meningiomas were delineated manually in the PET dataset. PET volumes at each time point were compared to the reference standard 60 min post tracer injection (p.i.) using the Friedman test followed by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Bonferroni correction. In all patients, the earliest time point with 100% lesion detection compared to 60 min p.i. was identified. PET volumes did not change significantly from 15 min p.i. (p = 1.0) compared to 60 min p.i. The earliest time point with 100% lesion detection in all patients was 10 min p.i. In patients with meningiomas undergoing Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET, the tracer uptake time can safely be reduced to 15 min p.i. with comparable PET volume and 100% lesion detection compared to 60 min p.i.
Collapse
|
48
|
Kebir S, Schmidt T, Weber M, Lazaridis L, Galldiks N, Langen KJ, Kleinschnitz C, Hattingen E, Herrlinger U, Lohmann P, Glas M. A Preliminary Study on Machine Learning-Based Evaluation of Static and Dynamic FET-PET for the Detection of Pseudoprogression in Patients with IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113080. [PMID: 33105661 PMCID: PMC7690380 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pseudoprogression detection in glioblastoma patients remains a challenging task. Although pseudoprogression has only a moderate prevalence of 10–30% following first-line treatment of glioblastoma patients, it bears critical implications for affected patients. Non-invasive techniques, such as amino acid PET imaging using the tracer O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET), expose features that have been shown to provide useful information to distinguish tumor progression from pseudoprogression. The usefulness of FET-PET in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma exclusively, however, has not been investigated so far. Recently, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been shown to offer great potential particularly when multiparametric data is available. In this preliminary study, a Linear Discriminant Analysis-based ML algorithm was deployed in a cohort of newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (n = 44) and demonstrated a significantly better diagnostic performance than conventional ROC analysis. This preliminary study is the first to assess the performance of ML in FET-PET for diagnosing pseudoprogression exclusively in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and demonstrates its potential. Abstract Pseudoprogression (PSP) detection in glioblastoma remains challenging and has important clinical implications. We investigated the potential of machine learning (ML) in improving the performance of PET using O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) for differentiation of tumor progression from PSP in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. We retrospectively evaluated the PET data of patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma following chemoradiation. Contrast-enhanced MRI suspected PSP/TP and all patients underwent subsequently an additional dynamic FET-PET scan. The modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria served to diagnose PSP. We trained a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)-based classifier using FET-PET derived features on a hold-out validation set. The results of the ML model were compared with a conventional FET-PET analysis using the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve. Of the 44 patients included in this preliminary study, 14 patients were diagnosed with PSP. The mean (TBRmean) and maximum tumor-to-brain ratios (TBRmax) were significantly higher in the TP group as compared to the PSP group (p = 0.014 and p = 0.033, respectively). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for TBRmax and TBRmean was 0.68 and 0.74, respectively. Using the LDA-based algorithm, the AUC (0.93) was significantly higher than the AUC for TBRmax. This preliminary study shows that in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, ML-based PSP detection leads to better diagnostic performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sied Kebir
- Department of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany; (S.K.); (T.S.); (L.L.)
- DKFZ-Division Translational Neurooncology at the WTZ, DKTK partner site, University Hospital Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, D-53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.W.); (U.H.)
| | - Teresa Schmidt
- Department of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany; (S.K.); (T.S.); (L.L.)
- DKFZ-Division Translational Neurooncology at the WTZ, DKTK partner site, University Hospital Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Weber
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, D-53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.W.); (U.H.)
| | - Lazaros Lazaridis
- Department of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany; (S.K.); (T.S.); (L.L.)
- DKFZ-Division Translational Neurooncology at the WTZ, DKTK partner site, University Hospital Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, D-50937 Cologne, Germany;
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, D-52428 Juelich, Germany; (K.-J.L.); (P.L.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, D-52428 Juelich, Germany; (K.-J.L.); (P.L.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Kleinschnitz
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, D-60528 Frankfurt, Germany;
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, D-53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.W.); (U.H.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, D-52428 Juelich, Germany; (K.-J.L.); (P.L.)
| | - Martin Glas
- Department of Neurology, Division of Clinical Neurooncology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany; (S.K.); (T.S.); (L.L.)
- DKFZ-Division Translational Neurooncology at the WTZ, DKTK partner site, University Hospital Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, D-53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.W.); (U.H.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-723-6519; Fax: +49-201-723-6985
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wu W, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Liu L, Lou J, Deng Y, Zhao P, Shao A. Clinical Significance of Somatostatin Receptor (SSTR) 2 in Meningioma. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1633. [PMID: 33014821 PMCID: PMC7494964 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 2, widely expressed in meningioma, is a G-protein-coupled receptor and can be activated by somatostatin or its synthetic analogs. SSTR2 is therefore extensively studied as a marker and target for the diagnosis and treatment of meningioma. Accumulating studies have revealed the crucial clinical significance of SSTR2 in meningioma. Summarizing the progress of these studies is urgently needed as it may not only provide novel and better management for patients with meningioma but also indicate the direction of future research. Pertinent literature is reviewed to summarize the recent collective knowledge and understanding of SSTR2’s clinical significance in meningioma in this review. SSTR2 offers novel ideas and approaches in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic prediction for meningioma, but more and further studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yunxiang Zhou
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yali Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lihong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianyao Lou
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yongchuan Deng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Peng Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Anwen Shao
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Galldiks N, Langen KJ, Albert NL, Chamberlain M, Soffietti R, Kim MM, Law I, Le Rhun E, Chang S, Schwarting J, Combs SE, Preusser M, Forsyth P, Pope W, Weller M, Tonn JC. PET imaging in patients with brain metastasis-report of the RANO/PET group. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:585-595. [PMID: 30615138 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) from extracranial cancer are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Effective local treatment options are stereotactic radiotherapy, including radiosurgery or fractionated external beam radiotherapy, and surgical resection. The use of systemic treatment for intracranial disease control also is improving. BM diagnosis, treatment planning, and follow-up is most often based on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, anatomic imaging modalities including standard MRI have limitations in accurately characterizing posttherapeutic reactive changes and treatment response. Molecular imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) characterize specific metabolic and cellular features of metastases, potentially providing clinically relevant information supplementing anatomic MRI. Here, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group provides recommendations for the use of PET imaging in the clinical management of patients with BM based on evidence from studies validated by histology and/or clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 3, 4, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 3, 4, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Chamberlain
- Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Lille, Lille, France
| | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Julian Schwarting
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I and Comprehensive Cancer Centre CNS Tumours Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Forsyth
- Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Whitney Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California , USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jörg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|