Nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: results from exploratory phase I cohorts of CheckMate 143

Trends in the immunotherapy for glioblastoma: A two-decade bibliometric analysis

Glioblastoma is a life-threatening primary malignant brain tumor with an unfavorable prognosis. Contributing factors to its poor outcome include tumor heterogeneity, low mutational burden, and immunosuppression within the tumor microenvironment. Recognizing these challenges, immunotherapeutic strategies have emerged as a promising avenue for glioblastoma treatment. Although several dynamic research and scientific trend have increasingly taken pace in the immunotherapeutic approaches to glioblastoma, systematic bibliometric studies on such trends are few. On this note, this study explores a bibliometric analysis of the research hotspots and trends in glioblastoma immunotherapy. We conducted a search in the Web of Science Core Collection database for articles on glioblastoma immunotherapy published between 2004 and 2024. Using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software, we analyzed collected articles to explore aspects such as country of origin, journal of publication, affiliated institute, authorship, keywords, and citation patterns. As of May 1, 2024, we retrieved 3,729 papers on Glioblastoma Immunotherapy. In the field of glioblastoma immunotherapy, the United States stands out as the leading contributor, with 1,708 publications and a substantial 90,590 citations. Following closely, China has made significant contributions through 926 publications, earning 17,533 citations, while Germany adds to the body of knowledge with 349 publications and 16,355 citations. Furthermore, Authoritative journals in this field include Clinical Cancer Research and Neuro-Oncology. The top five keywords during this period were temozolomide, radiotherapy, dendritic cell, cytotoxic T lymphocyte, and vaccination. Moreover, Hotspots in the field include immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Regulatory T cell depletion promotes myeloid cell activation and glioblastoma response to anti-PD1 and tumor-targeting antibodies

Glioblastoma is invariably lethal and responds poorly to immune checkpoint blockade. Here, we examined the impact of regulatory T (Treg) cell depletion on glioblastoma progression and immunotherapy responsiveness. In human glioblastoma, elevated Treg cell signatures correlated with poorer survival outcomes, with these cells expressing high levels of CD25. In Nf1-/-Pten-/-EGFRvIII+ glioblastoma-bearing mice, a single dose of non-interleukin-2 (IL-2) blocking (NIB) anti-CD25 (anti-CD25NIB) antibody depleted Treg cells and promoted CD8+ T cell clonal expansion and partial tumor control, further enhanced by programmed cell death-1 (PD1)-blockade. Treg cell depletion induced interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-dependent tumor microenvironment remodeling, increasing Fcγ receptor (FcγR) expression on intratumoral myeloid cells and enhancing phagocytosis. Combination of anti-CD25NIB with anti-EGFRvIII tumor-targeting antibodies resulted in complete tumor control. Anti-human CD25NIB treatment of glioblastoma patient-derived tumor fragments effectively depleted Treg cells and activated CD8+ T cells. These findings underscore the therapeutic relevance of Treg targeting in glioblastoma and unveil potent combination strategies for anti-CD25NIB based on innate cell activation.

Targeting the kynurenine pathway in gliomas: Insights into pathogenesis, therapeutic targets, and clinical advances

Gliomas, the most prevalent primary brain tumors, continue to present significant challenges in oncology due to poor patient prognosis despite advances in treatment such as immunotherapy and cancer vaccines. Recent research highlights the potential of targeting tryptophan metabolism, particularly the kynurenine pathway (KP) and combinatorial approaches with immunotherapies, as a promising strategy in cancer research. The key enzymes of the kynurenine pathway, such as IDO1, IDO2, and TDO, and metabolites like kynurenine, kynurenic acid, and quinolinic acid, are implicated in fostering an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and promoting glioma cell survival. In glioblastoma, a highly aggressive glioma subtype, elevated IDO and TDO expression correlates with reduced survival rates. KP metabolites, such as kynurenine (KYN), 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-HK), kynurenic acid (KYNA), and quinolinic acid (QUIN), are involved in modulating immune responses, oxidative stress, neuroprotection, and neurotoxicity. This review synthesizes recent findings on the kynurenine pathway involvement in glioma pathogenesis, examining potential therapeutic targets within this pathway and discussing ongoing clinical trials that draw attention to treatments based on this pathway. Furthermore, it highlights novel findings on the post-translational modifications of kynurenine pathway enzymes and their regulatory roles, presenting their potential as therapeutic targets in gliomas.

PILRα on tumor cells interacts with the T cell surface protein CD99 to suppress antitumor immunity

Immune checkpoint blockade using anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 antibody effectively targets the tumor-T cell interaction in cancer treatment, yet the overall response rate of less than 30% necessitates the identification of additional immune checkpoints modulating T cell function. Here, we identified the tumor cell-expressed paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor alpha (PILRα) as an immune suppressor targeting T cells using high-throughput screening. PILRα inhibits T cell activation, proliferation and effector function by targeting CD99, a T cell surface antigen, suppressing ZAP70/NFAT/IL-2/JAK/STAT signaling. A cluster of O-glycosylated serine and threonine residues within the stalk region is critical for PILRα-CD99 interactions. Blocking these interactions with a stalk-targeting anti-PILRα antibody enhances T cell antitumor immunity and suppresses tumor growth. When combined with programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, anti-PILRα antibody shows synergistic tumor suppression. Notably, PILRα is highly expressed in several human cancers and predicts poor prognosis. These findings unveil PILRα as an immune checkpoint with therapeutic potential for clinical cancer immunotherapy.

New approaches to targeted drug therapy of intracranial tumors

Intracranial tumors encompass a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, including gliomas, meningiomas, pituitary adenomas, schwannomas, craniopharyngiomas, ependymomas, medulloblastomas, and primary central nervous system lymphomas. These tumors present significant challenges due to their diverse molecular characteristics, critical locations, and the unique obstacles posed by the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-tumor barrier (BTB), which limit the efficacy of systemic therapies. Recent advances in molecular biology and genomics have enabled the identification of specific molecular pathways and targets, paving the way for innovative precision therapies. This review examines the current state of targeted therapies for intracranial tumors, including receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitors, PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, RAF/MEK/ERK pathway inhibitors, IDH mutation inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and CAR-T cell therapies. Emphasis is placed on the role of the BBB and BTB in modulating drug delivery and therapeutic outcomes. Strategies to overcome these barriers, such as focused ultrasound, nanoparticle-based delivery systems, and convection-enhanced delivery, are also explored. Furthermore, the manuscript reviews clinical trial data, highlighting successes and limitations across different tumor types. It delves into emerging therapeutic approaches, including combination of regimens and personalized treatments based on molecular profiling. By synthesizing the latest research, this article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the advancements and ongoing challenges in the targeted treatment of intracranial tumors. The findings underscore the necessity for innovative delivery systems and more extensive clinical trials to optimize therapeutic strategies. This review aspires to inform future research and clinical practices, aiming to improve patient outcomes and quality of life in the management of these complex and life-threatening conditions.

Blocking Feedback Immunosuppression of Antigen Presentation in Brain Tumor During Oncolytic Virotherapy with oHSV-mshPKR

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent malignant brain tumor. We recently discovered that oncolytic herpes simplex virus engineered to disable tumor-intrinsic protein kinase R (PKR) signaling (oHSV-shPKR) could increase oHSV oncolysis and antitumor immune response. However, in this study, we show that disabling tumor-intrinsic PKR signaling can also induce the activation of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) signaling pathway. Both GBM tumor progression and oHSV intratumoral therapy increased infiltration of IDO+CD11c+ dendritic cells (DC) into the tumor. The coculture of oHSV-infected human GBM neurospheres with monocyte-derived DCs (MoDC) dramatically increased IDO signaling activation in MoDCs through type-I IFN signaling. Addition of IDO inhibitor (indoximod) in the coculture significantly increased MoDC activation and reduced the consumption of tryptophan. Combining indoximod and oHSV significantly inhibited tumor growth and induced antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell activation. These results suggest that inhibition of the IDO pathway could significantly block feedback immunosuppression during oncolytic virotherapy of GBM.

Intratumoral gene delivery of 4-1BBL boosts IL-12-triggered anti-glioblastoma immunity

The standard of care in high-grade gliomas has remained unchanged in the past 20 years. Efforts to replicate effective immunotherapies in non-cranial tumors have led to only modest therapeutical improvements in glioblastoma (GB). Here, we demonstrate that intratumoral administration of recombinant interleukin-12 (rIL-12) promotes local cytotoxic CD8 POS T cell accumulation and conversion into an effector-like state, resulting in a dose-dependent survival benefit in preclinical GB mouse models. This tumor-reactive CD8 T cell response is further supported by intratumoral rIL-12-sensing dendritic cells (DCs) and is accompanied by the co-stimulatory receptor 4-1BB expression on both cell types. Given that DCs and CD8 POS T cells are functionally suppressed in the tumor microenvironments of de novo and recurrent glioma patients, we tested whether anti-tumor response at the rIL-12-inflamed tumor site could be enhanced with 4-1BBL, the ligand of 4-1BB. 4-1BBL was delivered using an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector targeting GFAP-expressing cells and resulted in prolonged survival of rIL-12 treated GB-bearing mice. This study establishes that tumor antigen-specific CD8 T cell activity can be directed using an AAV-vector-mediated gene therapy approach, effectively enhancing anti-GB immunity.

Overcoming immune evasion with innovative multi-target approaches for glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) cells leverage complex endogenous and environmental regulatory mechanisms to drive proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. Tumor immune evasion, facilitated by a multifactorial network, poses a significant challenge to effective therapy, as evidenced by the limited clinical benefits of monotherapies, highlighting the adaptive nature of immune evasion. This review explores glioblastoma's immune evasion mechanisms, the role of ICIs in the tumor microenvironment, and recent clinical advancements, offering theoretical insights and directions for monotherapy and combination therapy in glioblastoma management.

Infiltrating plasma cells maintain glioblastoma stem cells through IgG-Tumor binding

Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive primary brain tumor with glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) enforcing the intra-tumoral hierarchy. Plasma cells (PCs) are critical effectors of the B-lineage immune system, but their roles in glioblastoma remain largely unexplored. Here, we leverage single-cell RNA and B cell receptor sequencing of tumor-infiltrating B-lineage cells and reveal that PCs are aberrantly enriched in the glioblastoma-infiltrating B-lineage population, experience low level of somatic hypermutation, and are associated with poor prognosis. PCs secrete immunoglobulin G (IgG), which stimulates GSC proliferation via the IgG-FcγRIIA-AKT-mTOR axis. Disruption of IgG-FcγRIIA paracrine communication inhibits GSC proliferation and self-renewal. Glioblastoma-infiltrating PCs are recruited to GSC niches via CCL2-CCR2 chemokine program. GSCs further derive pro-proliferative signals from broadly utilized monoclonal antibody-based immune checkpoint inhibitors via FcγRIIA signaling. Our data generate an atlas of B-lineage cells in glioblastoma with a framework for combinatorial targeting of both tumor cell-intrinsic and microenvironmental dependencies.

Anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies for glioma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive adult glioma (16-month median survival). Its immunosuppressive microenvironment limits the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of the ICIs antibodies anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) in treating adults with diffuse glioma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and clinical trials registers on 8 March 2024.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating adults with diffuse glioma treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 compared to placebo or other therapies used alone or with other ICIs. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and serious adverse events (SAE). Secondary outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), quality of life (QoL), and less serious AEs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed standard Cochrane methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven RCTs evaluating anti-PD-1 treatment in recurrent (N = 4) and newly diagnosed (N = 3) grade 4 glioma participants. The analysis encompassed 1953 participants; sample sizes ranged from 35 to 716. Meta-analyses were not possible due to heterogeneity and the small number of studies. Most trials had high risk of bias. Nivolumab versus bevacizumab in people with recurrent GBM (1 trial, 369 participants) Nivolumab probably does not increase OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 1.30; 1.3% more, 95% CI 6.30 fewer to 7.80 more; 369 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or PFS (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.57 to 2.48; 16.40% more, 95% CI 12.40 more to 19.00 more; 369 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence for SAE is very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 1.20, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.92; 347 participants). Nivolumab probably does not increase ORR (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.63; 309 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but may not increase less serious AEs (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.10; 347 participants; low-certainty evidence). Nivolumab plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg versus nivolumab plus bevacizumab 3 mg/kg in people with recurrent GBM (1 trial, 90 participants) Nivolumab plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg may not increase OS (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.25; 9.90% more, 95% CI 5.20 fewer to 18.80 more; 90 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence for PFS (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.93; 5.80% more, 95% CI 8.20 fewer to 14.20 more; 90 participants) and SAE (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.79; 90 participants) is very uncertain. Nivolumab may not increase less serious AEs (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.09; low-certainty evidence; 90 participants). Pembrolizumab plus bevacizumab versus pembrolizumab in people with recurrent GBM (1 trial, 80 participants) The evidence for OS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.63; 0.30% more, 95% CI 7.60 fewer to 2.90 more; 80 participants), PFS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.54: 0.40% fewer, 95% CI 9.20 fewer to 2.80 more; 80 participants), SAE (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.42; 80 participants), and ORR (RR 12.76, 95% CI 0.77 to 210.27; 80 participants) is very uncertain. Pembrolizumab plus bevacizumab may not increase less serious AEs (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.13; 80 participants; low-certainty evidence). Neoadjuvant (before surgical resection) and adjuvant (after surgical resection) pembrolizumab versus adjuvant-only pembrolizumab in people with recurrent GBM (1 trial, 35 participants) The evidence for OS (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.92; 25.20% fewer, 95% CI 37.10 fewer to 2.10 fewer; 35 participants), PFS (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.91; 30.10% fewer, 95% CI 52.20 fewer to 3.60 fewer; 35 participants), and SAE (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.31 to 3.28; 32 participants) is very uncertain. Nivolumab plus radiotherapy versus temozolomide plus radiotherapy in people with newly diagnosed unmethylated GBM (1 trial, 560 participants) Nivolumab plus radiotherapy probably does not increase OS (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.58 months; 8.30% more, 95% CI 2.80 more to 12.90 more; 560 participants) and PFS (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.65 months; 7.50% more, 95% CI 3.60 more to 10.30 more; 560 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence for SAE is very uncertain (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.18; 553 participants). It may not increase ORR (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.69; 560 participants; low-certainty evidence) and probably does not increase less serious AEs (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.04; 560 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence for time to deterioration of QoL is very uncertain (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.99; 560 participants). Nivolumab plus temozolomide plus radiotherapy versus placebo plus temozolomide plus radiotherapy in people with newly diagnosed methylated GBM (1 trial, 716 participants) Nivolumab plus temozolomide plus radiotherapy probably does not increase OS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.32; 3.50 more, 95% CI 3.80 fewer to 9.60 more; 716 participants) and PFS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.32; 3.00 more, 95% CI 3.50 fewer to 7.90 more; 716 participants), and probably increases SAE (RR 2.91, 95% CI 2.05 to 4.12; 709 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). It does not increase less serious AEs (RR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.04; 709 participants; high-certainty evidence). Adjuvant nivolumab plus temozolomide versus temozolomide in older people with GBM (1 trial, 103 participants) Nivolumab plus temozolomide probably does not increase OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.33; 3.10 fewer, 95% CI 15.80 fewer to 3.60 more; 103 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and PFS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.19; 5.40 fewer, 95% CI 19.10 fewer to 2.40 more; 103 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence for SAE is very uncertain (RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.81; 103 participants). The evidence for QoL is very uncertain (results only reported graphically; 103 participants).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In recurrent GBM, nivolumab alone probably has no benefit. Anti-PD1 plus bevacizumab may also be ineffective based on low- to very low-certainty evidence. Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant pembrolizumab may improve OS and PFS, but this was based on only one small trial and very low-certainty evidence. In newly diagnosed GBM, nivolumab plus radiotherapy in unmethylated and plus radiotherapy plus temozolomide in methylated GBM probably has no benefit. In older participants, adjuvant nivolumab probably offers no benefit.

Phase 1 trial of hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation in combination with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and bevacizumab for recurrent high-grade gliomas

Background

Our previous clinical investigation suggested that hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (HFSRT) and PD-1 blockade may act synergistically to enhance the immune response against glioma. This subsequent trial investigated the dual blockade of CTLA4 and PD-1 in combination with HFSRT and bevacizumab.

Methods

This phase I study enrolled eligible patients with bevacizumab-naïve recurrent glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma. Participants received nivolumab, ipilimumab, and bevacizumab concurrently with HFSRT (3000 cGy in 5 fractions). Subsequently, nivolumab, ipilimumab, and bevacizumab were administered for a total of 4 cycles followed by nivolumab and bevacizumab until progression. The primary end point of this study was the safety and tolerability of HFSRT in combination with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent HGGs. Secondary end points included 6-month survival and 9-month survival.

Results

Twenty-six patients were treated. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade 3 or 4 were observed in 12 (48%) evaluable patients with no unexpected TRAEs. Six months and 9 months survival were 92% (95% CI, 82-100%) and 75% (95% CI, 60-95%), respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.2-12.2) and 15.6 months (95% CI, 11.3-27.0), respectively.

Conclusions

The combination of HFSRT with ipilimumab, nivolumab, and bevacizumab is safe. Our results underscore the potential synergies between stereotactic re-irradiation and checkpoint immunotherapy in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Glioblastoma IDHwt Treatment: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

A glioblastoma (GBM) is a primary brain tumor with significant unmet therapeutic needs. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have marked therapeutic benefits in many different cancers but have yet to show benefit for most GBM patients in phase III trials.

METHODS

A systematic review querying ClinicalTrials.gov for prospective clinical trials investigating ICI in GBM between 1950 and July 2024 was performed. Search terms comprised 11 distinct ICIs. Data abstracted include clinical trial NCT numbers with study titles and status, enrollment information, interventions, and more. Clinical trial identifying information, interventions, and outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen clinical trials were identified; four were phase 3. Most involved PD-1 or CTLA-4 blockade as monotherapy or in combination with standard-of-care. The large, randomized trials included CHECKMATE 143, CHECKMATE 498, CHECKMATE 548, and NRG BN007. These showed no improvement in median overall survival or progression-free survival in unselected patients. Biomarker-directed analyses suggest that a subset of GBM patients may benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI for the treatment of GBM has not demonstrated clear evidence of efficacy thus far. This review serves as a quick reference of ICI trial results in GBM. Biomarker-driven patient selection and/or novel approaches to overcome resistance mechanisms remain areas of viable inquiry.

Immunotherapy for glioblastoma: current state, challenges, and future perspectives

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and lethal type of brain tumor in human adults. The standard of care offers minimal clinical benefit, and most GBM patients experience tumor recurrence after treatment. In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the development of novel immunotherapies or other therapeutic strategies that can overcome immunotherapy resistance in many advanced cancers. However, the benefit of immune-based treatments in GBM is limited because of the unique brain immune profiles, GBM cell heterogeneity, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In this review, we present a detailed overview of current immunotherapeutic strategies and discuss the challenges and potential molecular mechanisms underlying immunotherapy resistance in GBM. Furthermore, we provide an in-depth discussion regarding the strategies that can overcome immunotherapy resistance in GBM, which will likely require combination therapies.

Glioblastoma-associated macrophages: A key target in overcoming glioblastoma therapeutic resistance

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is recognized as the most aggressive and malignant form of brain cancer, characterized by a highly heterogeneous phenotype, poor prognosis, and a median survival time of less than 16 months. Recent studies have highlighted the critical role of glioblastoma-associated macrophages (GAMs) in promoting tumor progression and resistance not only to immunotherapy but also to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. GAMs actively suppress immune responses, promote angiogenesis, facilitate tumor metastasis, and induce therapy resistance, through various mechanisms such as cytokines production, signaling pathways regulation, and angiogenesis. In this context, understanding these regulatory mechanisms is essential for developing efficient therapies. Preclinical studies have investigated diverse approaches to target these cells, both as monotherapies or in combination with other treatments. While these approaches have shown promise in strengthening antitumor immune responses in animal models, their clinical success remains to be fully determined. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of GAMs's role in GBM therapeutic resistance and summarizes existing approaches to target GAMs in overcoming tumor resistance.

Co-expression of immune checkpoints in glioblastoma revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most malignant tumors of the central nervous system. The pattern of immune checkpoint expression in GBM remains largely unknown. We performed snRNA-Seq and spatial transcriptomic (ST) analyses on untreated GBM samples. 8 major cell types were found in both tumor and adjacent normal tissues, with variations in infiltration grade. Neoplastic cells_6 was identified in malignant cells with high expression of invasion and proliferator-related genes, and analyzed its interactions with microglia, MDM cells and T cells. Significant alterations in ligand-receptor interactions were observed, particularly between Neoplastic cells_6 and microglia, and found prominent expression of VISTA/VSIG3, suggesting a potential mechanism for evading immune system attacks. High expression of TIM-3, VISTA, PSGL-1 and VSIG-3 with similar expression patterns in GBM, may have potential as therapeutic targets. The prognostic value of VISTA expression was cross-validated in 180 glioma patients, and it was observed that patients with high VISTA expression had a poorer prognosis. In addition, multimodal cross analysis integrated SnRNA-seq and ST, revealing complex intracellular communication and mapping the GBM tumor microenvironment. This study reveals novel molecular characteristics of GBM, co-expression of immune checkpoints, and potential therapeutic targets, contributing to improving the understanding and treatment of GBM.

Metabolic checkpoints in glioblastomas: targets for new therapies and non-invasive detection

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant tumor of the central nervous system that remains intractable despite advancements in current tumor treatment modalities, including immunotherapy. In recent years, metabolic checkpoints (aberrant metabolic pathways underlying the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment) have gained attention as promising therapeutic targets and sensitive biomarkers across various cancers. Here, we briefly review the existing understanding of tumor metabolic checkpoints and their implications in the biology and management of GBM. Additionally, we discuss techniques that could evaluate metabolic checkpoints of GBM non-invasively, thereby potentially facilitating neo-adjuvant treatment and dynamic surveillance.

GelMA microneedle-loaded bio-derived nanovaccine shows therapeutic potential for gliomas

Glioma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the central nervous system in adults. Although immunotherapy, especially tumor vaccines, has made some progress in the treatment of gliomas compared with surgery and radiotherapy. However, the lack of specific or relevant tumor antigens severely limits the further development of tumor vaccines. Here, we report a bio-derived vaccine (TMV@CpG) derived from glioma cell membrane vesicles and carrying TLR9 agonist CpG as adjuvant, which was loaded onto the GelMA microneedle to obtain the microneedle vaccine (MN-TMV@CpG). Microneedle vaccine fully utilize the innate immune cells rich in the skin, inducing stronger cellular immune responses. In subcutaneous tumor models, MN-TMV@CpG reversed the immune-suppressing microenvironment of tumor, and effectively inhibited tumor progression. In an intracranial tumor model, MN-TMV@CpG significantly prolonged the survival duration and induced stronger immune memory responses in tumor bearing mice when combined with anti-PD1 mAb. These results suggest that bio-derived nanovaccines can be used as a potential antitumor immunotherapy strategy.

Initial feasibility cohort of temporally modulated pulsed proton re-irradiation (TMPPR) for recurrent high-grade intracranial malignancies

Recurrent high-grade intracranial malignancies have a grim prognosis and uniform management guidelines are lacking. Re-irradiation is underused due to concerns about irreversible side effects. Pulsed-reduced dose rate radiotherapy (PRDR) aims to reduce toxicity while improving tumor control by exploiting dose-rate effects. We share our initial experience with temporally modulated pulsed proton re-irradiation (TMPPR), focusing on workflow, safety, feasibility, and outcomes for the first patient cohort. TMPPR was administered to patients with recurrent or progressive central nervous system malignancies using intensity modulated proton therapy with three fields. Patient and treatment data were collected, responses categorized using RANO assessment, and toxicities graded using CTCAE v5.0. Five patients received TMPPR between October 2022 and May 2023, with a median age of 54 years (Range: 32-72), and a median time from initial radiotherapy to re-RT of 23 months (Range 14-40). Treatment was completed without delay, with a median dose of 60 GyRBE in 30 fractions. Initial treatment response assessment showed complete (n = 1) or partial (n = 3) responses. Limited toxicity was observed, primarily grade 2 alopecia and one case of radiation necrosis graded at 2. This early experience demonstrates the feasibility of TMPPR delivery, highlighting the importance of prospective evaluations in the re-irradiation setting.

Fc-enhanced anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, doxorubicin, and ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening: A novel combinatorial immunotherapy regimen for gliomas

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive brain cancer that is resistant to conventional immunotherapy strategies. Botensilimab, an Fc-enhanced anti-CTLA-4 antibody (FcE-aCTLA-4), has shown durable activity in "cold" and immunotherapy-refractory cancers.

METHODS

We evaluated the efficacy and immune microenvironment phenotype of a mouse analogue of FcE-aCTLA-4 in treatment-refractory preclinical models of glioblastoma, both as a monotherapy and in combination with doxorubicin delivered via low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and microbubbles (LIPU/MB). Additionally, we studied 4 glioblastoma patients treated with doxorubicin, anti-PD-1 with concomitant LIPU/MB to investigate the novel effect of doxorubicin modulating FcγR expressions in tumor-associated macrophages/microglia (TAMs).

RESULTS

FcE-aCTLA-4 demonstrated high-affinity binding to FcγRIV, the mouse ortholog of human FcγRIIIA, which was highly expressed in TAMs in human glioblastoma, most robustly at diagnosis. Notably, FcE-aCTLA-4-mediated selective depletion of intratumoral regulatory T cells (Tregs) via TAM-mediated phagocytosis, while sparing peripheral Tregs. Doxorubicin, a chemotherapeutic drug with immunomodulatory functions, was found to upregulate FcγRIIIA on TAMs in glioblastoma patients who received doxorubicin and anti-PD-1 with concomitant LIPU/MB. In murine models of immunotherapy-resistant gliomas, a combinatorial regimen of FcE-aCTLA-4, anti-PD-1, and doxorubicin with LIPU/MB, achieved a 90% cure rate, that was associated robust infiltration of activated CD8+ T cells and establishment of immunological memory as evidenced by rejection upon tumor rechallenge.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that FcE-aCTLA-4 promotes robust immunomodulatory and anti-tumor effects in murine gliomas and is significantly enhanced when combined with anti-PD-1, doxorubicin, and LIPU/MB. We are currently investigating this combinatory strategy in a clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT05864534).

GBM immunotherapy: Exploring molecular and clinical frontiers

GBM is the most common, aggressive, and intracranial primary brain tumor; it originates from the glial progenitor cells, has poor overall survival (OS), and has limited treatment options. In this decade, GBM immunotherapy is in trend and preferred over several conventional therapies, due to their better patient survival outcome. This review explores the clinical trials of several immunotherapeutic approaches (immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs), CAR T-cell therapy, cancer vaccines, and adoptive cell therapy) with their efficacy and safety. Despite significant progress, several challenges (viz., immunosuppressive microenvironment, heterogeneity, and blood-brain barrier (BBB)) were experienced that hamper their immunotherapeutic potential. Furthermore, these challenges were clinically studied to be resolved by multiple combinatorial approaches, discussed in the later part of the review. Thus, this review suggests the clinical use and potential of immunotherapy in GBM and provides the holistic recent knowledge and future perspectives.

Amino Acid Deprivation in Glioblastoma: The Role in Survival and the Tumour Microenvironment-A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumour, characterised by its invasive nature and complex metabolic profile. Emerging research highlights the role of amino acids (AAs) in glioblastoma metabolism, influencing tumour growth and the surrounding microenvironment.

METHODS

This narrative review synthesises recent pre-clinical studies focusing on the metabolic functions of AAs in glioblastoma. Key areas include the effects of AA deprivation on tumour growth, adaptive mechanisms, and the tumour microenvironment.

RESULTS

The effects related to arginine, glutamine, methionine, and cysteine deprivation have been more extensively reported. Arginine deprivation in arginine-auxotrophic glioblastomas induces apoptosis and affects cell adhesion, while glutamine deprivation disrupts metabolic pathways and enhances autophagy. Methionine and cysteine deprivation impact lipid metabolism and ferroptosis. Tumour adaptive mechanisms present challenges, and potential compensatory responses have been identified. The response of the microenvironment to AA deprivation, including immune modulation, is critical to determining therapeutic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting AA metabolism offers a promising approach for glioblastoma treatment, with potential targeted drugs showing clinical promise. However, the complexity of tumour adaptive mechanisms and their impact on the microenvironment necessitates further research to optimise combination therapies and improve therapeutic efficacy.

Therapeutic approaches to modulate the immune microenvironment in gliomas

Immunomodulatory therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, have drastically changed outcomes for certain cancer types over the last decade. Gliomas are among the cancers that have seem limited benefit from these agents, with most trials yielding negative results. The unique composition of the glioma immune microenvironment is among the culprits for this lack of efficacy. In recent years, several efforts have been made to improve understanding of the glioma immune microenvironment, aiming to pave the way for novel therapeutic interventions. In this review, we discuss some of the main components of the glioma immune microenvironment, including macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, neutrophils and microglial cells, as well as lymphocytes. We then provide a comprehensive overview of novel immunomodulatory agents that are currently in clinical development, namely oncolytic viruses, vaccines, cell-based therapies such as CAR-T cells and CAR-NK cells as well as antibodies and peptides.

Glioblastoma and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Glance at Available Treatment Options and Future Directions

Glioblastoma is known to be one of the most aggressive and fatal human cancers, with a poor prognosis and resistance to standard treatments. In the last few years, many solid tumor treatments have been revolutionized with the help of immunotherapy. However, this type of treatment has failed to improve the results in glioblastoma patients. Effective immunotherapeutic strategies may be developed after understanding how glioblastoma achieves tumor-mediated immune suppression in both local and systemic landscapes. Biomarkers may help identify patients most likely to benefit from this type of treatment. In this review, we discuss the use of immunotherapy in glioblastoma, with an emphasis on immune checkpoint inhibitors and the factors that influence clinical response. A Pubmed data search was performed for all existing information regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors used for the treatment of glioblastoma. All data evaluating the ongoing clinical trials involving the use of ICIs either as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs was compiled and analyzed.

Mechanism and Application Prospects of NLRC3 Regulating cGAS-STING Pathway in Lung Cancer Immunotherapy

NLRC3, a negative regulator, exhibits considerable potential in the realm of lung cancer immunotherapy by virtue of its profound impact on the immune response intensity, primarily through its regulatory effects on the cGAS-STING pathway. The inhibition of NLRC3 has been found to augment the activity of the aforementioned pathway, thereby enhancing the anti-tumor immune response. This comprehensive review endeavors to elucidate the molecular and genetic structures of NLRC3, its role within the immune system, and its interaction with the cGAS-STING pathway, with a particular emphasis on its potential applications in lung cancer immunotherapy. Existing research underscores NLRC3's capacity to mitigate excessive immune responses via the negative regulation of the cGAS-STING pathway, thus underscoring its significant regulatory role in lung cancer immunotherapy. The development of pharmaceutical interventions and gene therapy strategies targeting NLRC3 presents a promising avenue for the creation of novel therapeutic options for individuals afflicted with lung cancer. Nonetheless, the clinical application of these therapies is confronted with both technical and biological challenges. This review aims to provide a theoretical foundation for related research endeavors and delineate future research directions in this field.

Allogeneic stem cells engineered to release interferon β and scFv-PD1 target glioblastoma and alter the tumor microenvironment

Highly malignant brain tumors, glioblastomas (GBM), are immunosuppressive, thereby limiting current promising immunotherapeutic approaches. In this study, we created interferon receptor 1 knockout allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) to secrete dual-function pro-apoptotic and immunomodulatory interferon (IFN) β (MSCKO-IFNβ) using a single lentiviral vector CRISPR/Cas9 system. We show that MSCKO-IFNβ induces apoptosis in GBM cells and upregulates the cell surface expression of programmed death ligand-1 in tumor cells. Next, we engineered MSCKO to release a secretable single-chain variable fragment (scFv) to block programmed death (PD)-1 and show the ability of MSCKO-scFv-PD1 to enhance T-cell activation and T-cell-mediated tumor cell killing. To simultaneously express both immune modulators, we engineered MSCKO-IFNβ to co-express scFv-PD1 (MSCKO-IFNβ-scFv-PD1) and show the expression of both IFNβ and scFv-PD1 in vitro leads to T-cell activation and lowers the viability of tumor cells. Furthermore, to mimic the clinical scenario of GBM tumor resection and subsequent treatment, we show that synthetic extracellular matrix (sECM) encapsulated MSCKO-IFNβ-scFv-PD1 treatment of resected tumors results in the increase of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, mature conventional dendritic cells type II and activation of microglia as compared to the control treatment group. Overall, these results reveal the ability of MSCKO-IFNβ-scFv-PD1 to shape the tumor microenvironment and enhance therapeutic outcomes in GBM.

MAPK/ERK signaling in gliomas modulates interferon responses, T cell recruitment, microglia phenotype, and immune checkpoint blockade efficacy

Background

Glioblastoma (GB) remains a formidable challenge in neuro-oncology, with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) showing limited efficacy in unselected patients. We previously recently established that MAPK/ERK signaling is associated with overall survival following anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 treatment in recurrent GB. However, the causal relationship between MAPK/ERK signaling and susceptibility to ICB, as well as the mechanisms underlying this association, remain poorly understood.

Method

We conducted in vivo kinome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screenings in murine gliomas to identify key regulators of susceptibility to anti-PD-1 and CD8+ T cell responses and performed survival studies to validate the most relevant genes. Additionally, paired single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) with p-ERK staining, spatial transcriptomics on GB samples, and ex-vivo slice culture of a BRAFV600E mutant GB tumor treated with BRAFi/MEKi were used to determine the causal relationship between MAPK signaling, tumor cell immunogenicity, and modulation of microglia phenotype.

Results

CRISPR/Cas9 screens identified the MAPK pathway, particularly the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway, as the most critical modulator of glioma susceptibility to CD8+ T cells, and anti-PD-1 across all kinases. Experimentally-induced ERK phosphorylation in gliomas enhanced survival with ICB treatment, led to durable anti-tumoral immunity upon re-challenge and memory T cell infiltration in long-term survivors. Elevated p-ERK in glioma cells correlated with increased interferon responses, antigen presentation and T cell infiltration in GB. Moreover, spatial transcriptomics and scRNA-seq analysis revealed the modulation of interferon responses by the MAPK/ERK pathway in BRAFV600E human GB cells with ERK1/2 knockout and in slice cultures of human BRAFV600E GB tissue. Notably, BRAFi/MEKi treatment disrupted the interaction between tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages/microglia in slice cultures from BRAFV600E mutant GB.

Conclusion

Our data indicate that the MAPK/ERK pathway is a critical regulator of GB cell susceptibility to anti-tumoral immunity, modulating interferon responses, and antigen-presentation in glioma cells, as well as tumor cell interaction with microglia. These findings not only elucidate the mechanistic underpinnings of immunotherapy resistance in GB but also highlight the MAPK/ERK pathway as a promising target for enhancing immunotherapeutic efficacy in this challenging malignancy.

NRG-BN002: Phase I study of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and the combination in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have efficacy in several solid tumors but limited efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM). This study evaluated the safety of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 ICIs alone or in combination in newly diagnosed GBM after completion of standard radiochemotherapy with the subsequent intent to test combinatorial ICIs in this setting.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for adults with unifocal, supratentorial newly diagnosed GBM after resection and chemoradiation. Ipilimumab and nivolumab were tested separately and in combination with a planned expansion cohort dependent upon DLT results.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled at 9 institutions: 6 to each DLT assessment cohort and 14 to the expansion cohort. Median age: 55 years, 67.7% male, 83.9% White. Treatment was well tolerated with 16% Grade 4 events; the combination did not have unexpectedly increased toxicity, with no Grade 5 events. One DLT was seen in each single-agent treatment; none were observed in the combination, leading to expanded accrual of the combined treatment. The median follow-up was 19.6 months. For all patients receiving combination treatment, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 20.7 and 16.1 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IPI and NIVO are safe and tolerable with toxicities similar to those noted with other cancers when given in combination with adjuvant temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM. Combination IPI + NIVO is not substantially more toxic than single agents. These results support a subsequent efficacy trial to test the combination of ICIs in Phase II/III for patients with newly diagnosed GBM.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION

NCT02311920.

Spatial computational modelling illuminates the role of the tumour microenvironment for treating glioblastoma with immunotherapies

Glioblastoma is the most common and deadliest brain tumour in adults, with a median survival of 15 months under the current standard of care. Immunotherapies like immune checkpoint inhibitors and oncolytic viruses have been extensively studied to improve this endpoint. However, most thus far have failed. To improve the efficacy of immunotherapies to treat glioblastoma, new single-cell imaging modalities like imaging mass cytometry can be leveraged and integrated with computational models. This enables a better understanding of the tumour microenvironment and its role in treatment success or failure in this hard-to-treat tumour. Here, we implemented an agent-based model that allows for spatial predictions of combination chemotherapy, oncolytic virus, and immune checkpoint inhibitors against glioblastoma. We initialised our model with patient imaging mass cytometry data to predict patient-specific responses and found that oncolytic viruses drive combination treatment responses determined by intratumoral cell density. We found that tumours with higher tumour cell density responded better to treatment. When fixing the number of cancer cells, treatment efficacy was shown to be a function of CD4 + T cell and, to a lesser extent, of macrophage counts. Critically, our simulations show that care must be put into the integration of spatial data and agent-based models to effectively capture intratumoral dynamics. Together, this study emphasizes the use of predictive spatial modelling to better understand cancer immunotherapy treatment dynamics, while highlighting key factors to consider during model design and implementation.

Combination of locoregional radiotherapy with a TIM-3 aptamer improves survival in diffuse midline glioma models

Pediatric diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) with altered H3-K27M are aggressive brain tumors that arise during childhood. Despite advances in genomic knowledge and the significant number of clinical trials testing new targeted therapies, patient outcomes are still poor. Immune checkpoint blockades with small molecules, such as aptamers, are opening new therapeutic options that represent hope for this orphan disease. Here, we demonstrated that a TIM-3 aptamer (TIM-3 Apt) as monotherapy increased the immune infiltration and elicited a strong specific immune response with a tendency to improve the overall survival of treated DMG-bearing mice. Importantly, combining TIM-3 Apt with radiotherapy increased the overall median survival and led to long-term survivor mice in 2 pediatric DMG orthotopic murine models. Interestingly, TIM-3 Apt administration increased the number of myeloid populations and the proinflammatory CD8-to-Tregs ratios in the tumor microenvironment as compared with nontreated groups after radiotherapy. Importantly, the depletion of T cells led to a major loss of the therapeutic effect achieved by the combination. This work uncovers TIM-3 targeting as an immunotherapy approach to improve the radiotherapy outcome in DMGs and offers a strong foundation for propelling a phase I clinical trial using radiotherapy and TIM-3 blockade combination as a treatment for these tumors.

Research hotspots and trend of glioblastoma immunotherapy: a bibliometric and visual analysis

Background

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the common malignant tumors of the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by rapid proliferation, heterogeneity, aggressiveness, proneness to recurrence after surgery, and poor prognosis. There is increasing evidence that tumorigenesis is inextricably linked to immune escape, and immunotherapy is undoubtedly an important complement to clinical treatment options for GBM, and will be a focus and hot topic in GBM treatment research. The purpose of this study was to visualize and analyze the scientific results and research trends of immunotherapy for GBM.

Methods

Publications concerning immunotherapy for GBM were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOScc) database. Bibliometric and visual analysis was performed mainly using CiteSpace and R software, and the Online Analysis Platform of Literature Metrology (https://bibliometric.com/app) for countries/regions, authors, journals, references and keywords related to publications in the field.

Results

Among totally 3491 publications retrieved in this field, 1613 publications were finally obtained according to the screening criteria, including 1007 articles (62.43%) and 606 reviews (37.57%). The number of publications increased year by year, with an average growth rate (AGR) of 17.41%. Such a number was the largest in the USA (717, 44.45%), followed by China (283, 17.55%), and the USA showed the strongest international collaboration. Among the research institutions, Duke Univ (94, 5.83%) was the largest publisher in the field, followed by Harvard Med Sch (70, 4.34%). In addition, the most prolific authors in this field were OHN H SAMPSON (51) and MICHAEL LIM (43), and the degree of collaboration (DC) between authors was 98.26%. Among the co-cited authors, STUPP R (805) was the most cited author, followed by REARDON DA (448). The journal with the most published publications was FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY (75), and the most cited journal in terms of co-citation was CLIN CANCER RES (1322), followed by CANCER RES (1230). The high-frequency keyword included glioblastoma (672) and immunotherapy (377). Cluster analysis was performed on the basis of keyword co-occurrence analysis, yielding 17 clusters, based on which the current research status and future trends in the field of immunotherapy for GBM were identified.

Conclusion

Immunotherapy is currently a novel treatment strategy for GBM that has attracted much attention. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen cooperation and exchanges between countries and institutions towards relevant research to promote the development of this field. Immunotherapy is expected to be an important part of the future treatment strategy for GBM, and it has already become a hot spot of current research and will be the key focus of future research.

Integration analysis of cell division cycle-associated family genes revealed potential mechanisms of gliomagenesis and constructed an artificial intelligence-driven prognostic signature

Cell division cycle-associated (CDCA) gene family members are essential cell proliferation regulators and play critical roles in various cancers. However, the function of the CDCA family genes in gliomas remains unclear. This study aims to elucidate the role of CDCA family members in gliomas using in vitro and in vivo experiments and bioinformatic analyses. We included eight glioma cohorts in this study. An unsupervised clustering algorithm was used to identify novel CDCA gene family clusters. Then, we utilized multi-omics data to elucidate the prognostic disparities, biological functionalities, genomic alterations, and immune microenvironment among glioma patients. Subsequently, the scRNA-seq analysis and spatial transcriptomic sequencing analysis were carried out to explore the expression distribution of CDCA2 in glioma samples. In vivo and in vitro experiments were used to investigate the effects of CDCA2 on the viability, migration, and invasion of glioma cells. Finally, based on ten machine-learning algorithms, we constructed an artificial intelligence-driven CDCA gene family signature called the machine learning-based CDCA gene family score (MLCS). Our results suggested that patients with the higher expression levels of CDCA family genes had a worse prognosis, more activated RAS signaling pathways, and more activated immunosuppressive microenvironments. CDCA2 knockdown inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of glioma cells. In addition, the MLCS had robust and favorable prognostic predictive ability and could predict the response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy drug sensitivity.

The Role of Mesenchymal Reprogramming in Malignant Clonal Evolution and Intra-Tumoral Heterogeneity in Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common yet uniformly fatal adult brain cancer. Intra-tumoral molecular and cellular heterogeneities are major contributory factors to therapeutic refractoriness and futility in GBM. Molecular heterogeneity is represented through molecular subtype clusters whereby the proneural (PN) subtype is associated with significantly increased long-term survival compared to the highly resistant mesenchymal (MES) subtype. Furthermore, it is universally recognized that a small subset of GBM cells known as GBM stem cells (GSCs) serve as reservoirs for tumor recurrence and progression. The clonal evolution of GSC molecular subtypes in response to therapy drives intra-tumoral heterogeneity and remains a critical determinant of GBM outcomes. In particular, the intra-tumoral MES reprogramming of GSCs using current GBM therapies has emerged as a leading hypothesis for therapeutic refractoriness. Preventing the intra-tumoral divergent evolution of GBM toward the MES subtype via new treatments would dramatically improve long-term survival for GBM patients and have a significant impact on GBM outcomes. In this review, we examine the challenges of the role of MES reprogramming in the malignant clonal evolution of glioblastoma and provide future perspectives for addressing the unmet therapeutic need to overcome resistance in GBM.

Biological Insights and Radiation-Immuno-Oncology Developments in Primary and Secondary Brain Tumors

Malignant central nervous system (CNS) cancers include a group of heterogeneous dis-eases characterized by a relative resistance to treatments and distinguished as either primary tumors arising in the CNS or secondary tumors that spread from other organs into the brain. Despite therapeutic efforts, they often cause significant mortality and morbidity across all ages. Radiotherapy (RT) remains the main treatment for brain cancers, improving associated symptoms, improving tumor control, and inducing a cure in some. However, the ultimate goal of cancer treatment, to improve a patient's survival, remains elusive for many CNS cancers, especially primary tumors. Over the years, there have thus been many preclinical studies and clinical trials designed to identify and overcome mechanisms of resistance to improve outcomes after RT and other therapies. For example, immunotherapy delivered concurrent with RT, especially hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT, is synergistic and has revolutionized the clinical management and outcome of some brain tumors, in particular brain metastases (secondary brain tumors). However, its impact on gliomas, the most common primary malignant CNS tumors, remains limited. In this review, we provide an overview of radioresistance mechanisms, the emerging strategies to overcome radioresistance, the role of the tumor microenviroment (TME), and the selection of the most significant results of radiation-immuno-oncological investigations. We also identify novel therapeutic opportunities in primary and secondary brain tumors with the purpose of elucidating current knowledge and stimulating further research to improve tumor control and patients' survival.

High expression of BTN3A1 is associated with clinical and immunological characteristics and predicts a poor prognosis in advanced human gliomas

Introduction

Gliomas represent the most prevalent and aggressive tumors within the central nervous system. Despite the current standard treatments, the median survival time for glioblastoma patients remains dismal, hovering around 14 months. While attempts have been made to inhibit the PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4/CD80-CD86 axes through immunotherapy, the outcomes have yet to demonstrate significant efficacy. The immune checkpoint Butyrophilin 3A1 (BTN3A1) can either be involved in advantageous or detrimental function depending on the cancer type.

Methods

In our study, we utilized a Moroccan cohort to delve into the role of BTN3A1 in gliomas. A transcriptomic analysis was conducted on 34 patients, which was then corroborated through a protein analysis in 27 patients and validated using the TCGA database (n = 667).

Results

Our results revealed an elevated expression of BTN3A1 in glioblastoma (grade 4), as evidenced in both the TCGA database and our cohort of Moroccan glioma patients. Within the TCGA cohort, BTN3A1 expression was notably higher in patients with wild-type IDH. We observed a positive correlation between BTN3A1 expression and immune infiltration of B cells, CD8+ T cells, naive CD4+ T cells, and M2 macrophages. Patients exhibiting increased BTN3A1 expression also presented elevated levels of TGF-β, IL-10, and TIM-3 compared to those with reduced BTN3A1 expression. Notably, patients with high BTN3A1 expression were associated with a poorer prognosis than their counterparts with lower expression.

Conclussion

Our findings suggest that BTN3A1 might promote the establishment of an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Consequently, targeting BTN3A1 could offer novel therapeutic avenues for the management of advanced gliomas.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy compared to nivolumab monotherapy in advanced cancers (excluding melanoma): a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab (Nivo) and ipilimumab (Ipi) have revolutionized cancer treatment by targeting different pathways. Their combination shows promising results in various cancers, including melanoma, but not all studies have demonstrated significant benefits. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Nivo-Ipi compared to Nivo alone in advanced cancer types (excluding melanoma).

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a meta-analysis up to September 30, 2023, searching databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We focused on advanced solid malignancies (excluding melanoma) with specific Nivo and Ipi dosing. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs), and treatment-related discontinuations. Secondary outcomes included specific adverse events. Statistical analysis in Review Manager included hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR), assessing heterogeneity (Higgins I2).

RESULTS

Nine RCTs, involving 2152 patients covering various malignancies, were analyzed. The Nivo plus Ipi group exhibited a median OS of 12.3 months and a median PFS of 3.73 months, compared to monotherapy with 11.67 months and 3.98 months, respectively. OS showed no significant difference between Nivo and Ipi combination and Nivo alone (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.08, p = 0.61). PFS had a slight improvement with combination therapy (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.00, p = 0.04). Treatment-related cumulative grades 3-4 adverse events were higher with Nivo and Ipi (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.78, p < 0.00001), as were treatment-related discontinuations (RR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.46 to 2.70, p < 0.0001). Hepatotoxicity (RR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.39 to 4.24, p = 0.002), GI toxicity (RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.44 to 5.59, p = 0.002), pneumonitis (RR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.24 to 2.23, p = 0.008), dermatitis (RR = 2.96, 95% CI: 1.08 to 8.14, p = 0.04), and endocrine dysfunction (RR = 6.22, 95% CI: 2.31 to 16.71, p = 0.0003) were more frequent with Nivo and Ipi.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining nivolumab and ipilimumab did not significantly improve overall survival compared to nivolumab alone in advanced cancers (except melanoma). However, it did show slightly better PFS at the cost of increased toxicity, particularly grades 3-4 adverse events. Specific AEs occurred more frequently in the combination group. Further trials are needed to fully assess this combination in treating advanced cancers.

Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ sub-populations in primary and recurrent glioblastoma: An in-silico study

Background

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains an incurable primary brain tumor. CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) can target malignant cells; however, their anti-tumoral immune responses mostly do not lead to GBM rejection in GBM patients. We profiled the sub-populations of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T-cells, i.e., naïve, cytotoxic, and exhausted cells, in primary and recurrent GBM tissues and provided a blueprint for future precision-based GBM immunotherapy.

Method

We re-analyzed the raw data of single-cell RNA sequencing on the cells residing in the GBM microenvironment and leveraged tumor bulk RNA analyses to study the significance of CD8+ TILs sub-populations in primary and recurrent GBM. We investigated cell-cell interaction between exhausted CD8+ TILs and other immune cells residing in the primary and recurrent GBM microenvironments and profiled the expression changes following CD8+ TILs' transition from primary GBM to recurrent GBM.

Results

Exhausted CD8+ TILs are the majority of CD8+ TILs sub-populations in primary and recurrent GBM, and cytotoxic CD8+ TILs display decreased expression of inhibitory immune checkpoint (IC) molecules in the primary and recurrent GBM. In the primary and recurrent GBM microenvironment, exhausted CD8+ TILs interact most with tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the profiles of CD8+ TILs sub-populations in primary and recurrent GBM and provides a proof-of-concept for future precision-based GBM immunotherapy.

Deciphering Glioblastoma: Fundamental and Novel Insights into the Biology and Therapeutic Strategies of Gliomas

Gliomas constitute a diverse and complex array of tumors within the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by a wide range of prognostic outcomes and responses to therapeutic interventions. This literature review endeavors to conduct a thorough investigation of gliomas, with a particular emphasis on glioblastoma (GBM), beginning with their classification and epidemiological characteristics, evaluating their relative importance within the CNS tumor spectrum. We examine the immunological context of gliomas, unveiling the intricate immune environment and its ramifications for disease progression and therapeutic strategies. Moreover, we accentuate critical developments in understanding tumor behavior, focusing on recent research breakthroughs in treatment responses and the elucidation of cellular signaling pathways. Analyzing the most novel transcriptomic studies, we investigate the variations in gene expression patterns in glioma cells, assessing the prognostic and therapeutic implications of these genetic alterations. Furthermore, the role of epigenetic modifications in the pathogenesis of gliomas is underscored, suggesting that such changes are fundamental to tumor evolution and possible therapeutic advancements. In the end, this comparative oncological analysis situates GBM within the wider context of neoplasms, delineating both distinct and shared characteristics with other types of tumors.

Spatially Resolved Microglia/Macrophages in Recurrent Glioblastomas Overexpress Fatty Acid Metabolism and Phagocytic Genes

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) tumors are rich in tumor-associated microglia/macrophages. Changes associated with treatment in this specific cell population are poorly understood. Therefore, we studied changes in gene expression of tumor-associated microglia/macrophages (Iba1+) cells in de novo versus recurrent GBMs.

METHODS

NanoString GeoMx® Digital Spatial Transcriptomic Profiling of microglia/macrophages (Iba1+) and glial cells (Gfap+) cells identified on tumor sections was performed on paired de novo and recurrent samples obtained from three IDH-wildtype GBM patients. The impact of differentially expressed genes on patient survival was evaluated using publicly available data.

RESULTS

Unsupervised analyses of the NanoString GeoMx® Digital Spatial Profiling data revealed clustering based on the transcriptomic data from Iba1+ and Gfap+ cells. As expected, conventional differential gene expression and enrichment analyses revealed upregulation of immune-function-related genes in Iba1+ cells compared to Gfap+ cells. A focused differential gene expression analysis revealed upregulation of phagocytosis and fatty acid/lipid metabolism genes in Iba1+ cells in recurrent GBM samples compared to de novo GBM samples. Importantly, of these genes, the lipid metabolism gene PLD3 consistently correlated with survival in multiple different publicly available datasets.

CONCLUSION

Tumor-associated microglia/macrophages in recurrent GBM overexpress genes involved in fatty acid/lipid metabolism. Further investigation is needed to fully delineate the role of PLD phospholipases in GBM progression.

Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future

Glioblastoma (GB) stands out as the most prevalent and lethal form of brain cancer. Although great efforts have been made by clinicians and researchers, no significant improvement in survival has been achieved since the Stupp protocol became the standard of care (SOC) in 2005. Despite multimodality treatments, recurrence is almost universal with survival rates under 2 years after diagnosis. Here, we discuss the recent progress in our understanding of GB pathophysiology, in particular, the importance of glioma stem cells (GSCs), the tumor microenvironment conditions, and epigenetic mechanisms involved in GB growth, aggressiveness and recurrence. The discussion on therapeutic strategies first covers the SOC treatment and targeted therapies that have been shown to interfere with different signaling pathways (pRB/CDK4/RB1/P16ink4, TP53/MDM2/P14arf, PI3k/Akt-PTEN, RAS/RAF/MEK, PARP) involved in GB tumorigenesis, pathophysiology, and treatment resistance acquisition. Below, we analyze several immunotherapeutic approaches (i.e., checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, CAR-modified NK or T cells, oncolytic virotherapy) that have been used in an attempt to enhance the immune response against GB, and thereby avoid recidivism or increase survival of GB patients. Finally, we present treatment attempts made using nanotherapies (nanometric structures having active anti-GB agents such as antibodies, chemotherapeutic/anti-angiogenic drugs or sensitizers, radionuclides, and molecules that target GB cellular receptors or open the blood-brain barrier) and non-ionizing energies (laser interstitial thermal therapy, high/low intensity focused ultrasounds, photodynamic/sonodynamic therapies and electroporation). The aim of this review is to discuss the advances and limitations of the current therapies and to present novel approaches that are under development or following clinical trials.

Combination of Oncolytic Virotherapy with Different Antitumor Approaches against Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is one of the most malignant and aggressive tumors of the central nervous system. Despite the standard therapy consisting of maximal surgical resection and chemo- and radiotherapy, the median survival of patients with this diagnosis is about 15 months. Oncolytic virus therapy is one of the promising areas for the treatment of malignant neoplasms. In this review, we have focused on emphasizing recent achievements in virotherapy, both as a monotherapy and in combination with other therapeutic schemes to improve survival rate and quality of life among patients with glioblastoma.

Lessons learned from phase 3 trials of immunotherapy for glioblastoma: Time for longitudinal sampling?

Glioblastoma (GBM)'s median overall survival is almost 21 months. Six phase 3 immunotherapy clinical trials have recently been published, yet 5/6 did not meet approval by regulatory bodies. For the sixth, approval is uncertain. Trial failures result from multiple factors, ranging from intrinsic tumor biology to clinical trial design. Understanding the clinical and basic science of these 6 trials is compelled by other immunotherapies reaching the point of advanced phase 3 clinical trial testing. We need to understand more of the science in human GBMs in early trials: the "window of opportunity" design may not be best to understand complex changes brought about by immunotherapeutic perturbations of the GBM microenvironment. The convergence of increased safety of image-guided biopsies with "multi-omics" of small cell numbers now permits longitudinal sampling of tumor and biofluids to dissect the complex temporal changes in the GBM microenvironment as a function of the immunotherapy.

T Cell Features in Glioblastoma May Guide Therapeutic Strategies to Overcome Microenvironment Immunosuppression

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and lethal primary brain tumor, bearing a survival estimate below 10% at five years, despite standard chemoradiation treatment. At recurrence, systemic treatment options are limited and the standard of care is not well defined, with inclusion in clinical trials being highly encouraged. So far, the use of immunotherapeutic strategies in GBM has not proved to significantly improve patients' prognosis in the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM, nor in the recurrent setting. Probably this has to do with the unique immune environment of the central nervous system, which harbors several immunosuppressive/pro-tumorigenic factors, both soluble (e.g., TGF-β, IL-10, STAT3, prostaglandin E2, and VEGF) and cellular (e.g., Tregs, M2 phenotype TAMs, and MDSC). Here we review the immune composition of the GBMs microenvironment, specifically focusing on the phenotype and function of the T cell compartment. Moreover, we give hints on the therapeutic strategies, such as immune checkpoint blockade, vaccinations, and adoptive cell therapy, that, interacting with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, might both target in different ways the tumor microenvironment and potentiate the activity of standard therapies. The path to be followed in advancing clinical research on immunotherapy for GBM treatment relies on a twofold strategy: testing combinatorial treatments, aiming to restore active immune anti-tumor responses, tackling immunosuppression, and additionally, designing more phase 0 and window opportunity trials with solid translational analyses to gain deeper insight into the on-treatment shaping of the GBM microenvironment.

Clinical activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab, and TMZ in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

PURPOSE

There are limited and no standard therapies for recurrent glioblastoma. We herein report the antitumour activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab and temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent glioblastoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed eight patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with sintilimab (200 mg) every three weeks + bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every three weeks + TMZ (200 mg/m²orally) (5 days orally every 28 days for a total of four weeks). The primary objective was investigator-assessed median progression-free survival(mPFS). Secondary objectives were to assess the 6-month PFS, objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) accroding to RANO criteria.

RESULTS

The mPFS time for 8 patients was 3.340 months (95% CI: 2.217-4.463), The longest PFS was close to 9 months. Five patients were assessed to have achieved partial response (PR), with an overall remission rate of 62.5%, Four patients experienced a change in tumour volume at the best response time of greater than 60% shrinkage from baseline, and one patient remained progression free upon review, with a DOR of more than 6.57 months. The 6-month PFS was 25% (95% CI: 5.0-55.0%). Three patients had a treatment-related adverse events, though no grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

In this small retrospective study, the combination regimen of sintilimab, bevacizumab and TMZ showed promising antitumour activity in treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, with a good objective remission rate.

Glioma-Immune Cell Crosstalk in Tumor Progression

Glioma progression is a complex process controlled by molecular factors that coordinate the crosstalk between tumor cells and components of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Among these, immune cells play a critical role in cancer survival and progression. The complex interplay between cancer cells and the immune TME influences the outcome of immunotherapy and other anti-cancer therapies. Here, we present an updated view of the pro- and anti-tumor activities of the main myeloid and lymphocyte cell populations in the glioma TME. We review the underlying mechanisms involved in crosstalk between cancer cells and immune cells that enable gliomas to evade the immune system and co-opt these cells for tumor growth. Lastly, we discuss the current and experimental therapeutic options being developed to revert the immunosuppressive activity of the glioma TME. Knowledge of the complex interplay that elapses between tumor and immune cells may help develop new combination treatments able to overcome tumor immune evasion mechanisms and enhance response to immunotherapies.

Glioma stem cells remodel immunotolerant microenvironment in GBM and are associated with therapeutic advancements

Glioma is the most common primary tumor of the central nervous system (CNS). Glioblastoma (GBM) is incurable with current treatment strategies. Additionally, the treatment of recurrent GBM (rGBM) is often referred to as terminal treatment, necessitating hospice-level care and management. The presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) gives GBM a more challenging or "cold" tumor microenvironment (TME) than that of other cancers and gloma stem cells (GSCs) play an important role in the TME remodeling, occurrence, development and recurrence of giloma. In this review, our primary focus will be on discussing the following topics: niche-associated GSCs and macrophages, new theories regarding GSC and TME involving pyroptosis and ferroptosis in GBM, metabolic adaptations of GSCs, the influence of the cold environment in GBM on immunotherapy, potential strategies to transform the cold GBM TME into a hot one, and the advancement of GBM immunotherapy and GBM models.

Immunoediting Dynamics in Glioblastoma: Implications for Immunotherapy Approaches

Glioblastoma is an aggressive primary brain tumor that poses many therapeutic difficulties because of the high rate of proliferation, genetic variability, and its immunosuppressive microenvironment. The theory of cancer immunoediting, which includes the phases of elimination, equilibrium, and escape, offers a paradigm for comprehending interactions between the immune system and glioblastoma. Immunoediting indicates the process by which immune cells initially suppress tumor development, but thereafter select for immune-resistant versions leading to tumor escape and progression. The tumor microenvironment (TME) in glioblastoma is particularly immunosuppressive, with regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells being involved in immune escape. To achieve an efficient immunotherapy for glioblastoma, it is crucial to understand these mechanisms within the TME. Existing immunotherapeutic modalities such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been met with some level of resistance because of the heterogeneous nature of the immune response to glioblastoma. Solving these issues is critical to develop novel strategies capable of modulating the TME and re-establishing normal immune monitoring. Further studies should be conducted to identify the molecular and cellular events that underlie the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in glioblastoma. Comprehending and modifying the stages of immunoediting in glioblastoma could facilitate the development of more potent and long-lasting therapies.

Magnetic resonance imaging and o-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine positron emission tomography for early response assessment of nivolumab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytic glioma

Background

In the present study, early response assessment by o-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were investigated in a phase II open-label single-center study of nivolumab plus bevacizumab for recurrent high-grade astrocytic glioma.

Methods

Twenty patients with nonresectable first recurrence of high-grade astrocytic glioma after EORTC/NCIC protocol underwent [18F]FET PET/MRI at baseline and after 2 cycles of treatment. Whole brain values of contrast-enhancing volume on MRI (CEV), of the mean (TBRmean) and maximal tumor-to-background ratio (TBRmax), and of metabolically active volume (MTV) on [18F]FET PET were obtained. Regional changes in [18F]FET uptake were assessed by parametric response mapping (PRM). Prediction of overall survival (OS) and response (OS > 11 months) were assessed by Cox and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, respectively. Also, MRI (response assessment in neuro-oncology [RANO] 2.0) and PET-based (PET RANO 1.0) response assessment criteria were compared.

Results

In ROC analysis responders were separated (P < .05) from nonresponders by lower MTV at follow-up (AUC 0.771, cutoff 18.3 mL), larger decrease in MTV (AUC 0.757, cutoff -5.3 mL), larger decrease in both TBRmax (AUC 0.814, cutoff -0.53) and relative TBRmax (AUC 0.829, cutoff -11%) and smaller PRM progressive volume (AUC 0.843, cutoff 4.0 mL). Change in CEV did not predict response. RANO 2.0 and PET RANO response assessment criteria had similar and only borderline prognostic values.

Conclusions

The study indicates that [18F]FET PET is superior to contrast-enhanced MRI for early response assessment in patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytic glioma treated with nivolumab and bevacizumab.

Microglia in Glioma

Myeloid cells are fundamental constituents of the brain tumor microenvironment. In this chapter, we describe the state-of-the-art knowledge on the role of microglial cells in the cross-talk with the most common and aggressive brain tumor, glioblastoma. We report in vitro and in vivo studies related to glioblastoma patients and glioma models to outline the symbiotic interactions that microglia develop with tumoral cells, highlighting the heterogeneity of microglial functions in shaping the brain tumor microenvironment.

Somatic POLE Mutation and Ultra-Hypermutated Genotype in a De Novo High-Grade, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild-Type Glioma: Treatment Implications

Pembrolizumab leads to a durable response in ultra-hypermutated, high-grade, glioma.

Limited Effects of Class II Transactivator-Based Immunotherapy in Murine and Human Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

The major histocompatibility complex type II is downregulated in glioblastoma (GB) due to the silencing of the major transcriptional regulator class II transactivator (CIITA). We investigated the pro-immunogenic potential of CIITA overexpression in mouse and human GB.

METHODS

The intracerebral growth of wildtype GL261-WT cells was assessed following contralateral injection of GL261-CIITA cells or flank injections with GL261-WT or GL261-CIITA cells. Splenocytes obtained from mice implanted intracerebrally with GL261-WT, GL261-CIITA cells or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were transferred to other mice and subsequently implanted intracerebrally with GL261-WT. Human GB cells and (syngeneic) GB-infiltrating immune cells were isolated from surgical samples and co-cultured with GB cells expressing CIITA or not, followed by RT-qPCR assessment of the expression of key immune regulators.

RESULTS

Intracerebral vaccination of GL261-CIITA significantly reduced the subsequent growth of GL261-WT cells implanted contralaterally. Vaccination with GL261-WT or -CIITA subcutaneously, however, equivalently retarded the intracerebral growth of GL261 cells. Adoptive cell transfer experiments showed a similar antitumor potential of lymphocytes harvested from mice implanted intracerebrally with GL261-WT or -CIITA. Human GB-infiltrating myeloid cells and lymphocytes were not activated when cultured with CIITA-expressing GB cells. Tumor-infiltrating NK cells remained mostly inactivated when in co-culture with GB cells, regardless of CIITA.

CONCLUSION

these results question the therapeutic potential of CIITA-mediated immunotherapy in glioblastoma.