Management of failed cycles in an IVF/GIFT programme with the combination of a GnRH analogue and HMG

Hotspots and frontiers in luteal phase defect research: An in-depth global trend bibliometric and visualization analysis over a 52-year period

Luteal phase defect (LPD) is a common female reproductive endocrine defect，which is associated not only with certain diseases but also with the menstrual cycle and fertility in women. With the development of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in recent years, the incidence of luteal phase defect is high among patients using assisted reproductive technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate worldwide research on luteal phase defects using bibliometric analysis. A total of 631 documents related to the study of luteal phase defect were identified over the last 52 years. The current status and trend of globalization can be comprehended by analyzing the annual number of publications, institutions, authors, countries and regions of corresponding authors, journals, influential luteal phase defect publications (which were highly cited), highly cited references in luteal phase defect publications (cocitation analysis) and keywords. The study results provide a comprehensive overview of the development of scientific literature and are of great significance for the future development of the field，especially infertility and early pregnancy loss.

Individualized luteal phase support after fresh embryo transfer: unanswered questions, a review

Background

Luteal phase support (LPS) is an important part of assisted reproductive technology (ART), and adequate LPS is crucial for embryo implantation. At present, a great number of studies have put emphasis on an individualized approach to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and endometrium preparation of frozen- thawed embryo transfer (FET); However, not much attention has been devoted to the luteal phase and almost all ART cycles used similar LPS protocol bases on experience.

Main body

This review aims to concisely summarize individualized LPS protocols in fresh embryo transfer cycles with hCG trigger or GnRH-a trigger. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched using the keywords: (luteal phase support or LPS) AND (assisted reproductive technology or ART or in vitro fertilization or IVF). We performed comprehensive literature searches in the English language describing the luteal phase support after ART, since 1978 and ending in May 2019. Recent studies have shown that many modified LPS programs were used in ART cycle. In the cycle using hCG for final oocyte maturation, the progesterone with or without low dose of hCG may be adequate to maintain pregnancy. In the cycle using GnRH-a for trigger, individualized low dose of hCG administration with or without progesterone was suggested. The optimal timing to start the LPS would be between 24 and 72 h after oocyte retrieval and should last at least until the pregnancy test is positive. Addition of E₂ and the routes of progesterone administration bring no beneficial effect on the outcomes after ART.

Conclusions

Individualized LPS should be applied, according to the treatment protocol, the patients’ specific characteristics, and desires.

Luteal phase support (LPS) is an important part of assisted reproductive technology (ART). In the cycle using hCG for final oocyte maturation, the progesterone with or without low dose of hCG may be adequate to maintain pregnancy. In the cycle using GnRH-a for trigger, individualized low dose of hCG administration with or without progesterone was suggested. The optimal timing to start the LPS would be between 24 and 72 h after oocyte retrieval and should last at least until the pregnancy test is positive. Addition of E₂ and the routes of progesterone administration bring no beneficial effect on the outcomes after ART. Individualized LPS should be applied, according to the treatment protocol, the patients’ specific characteristics, and desires.

Ovarian manipulation in ART: going beyond physiological standards to provide best clinical outcomes

Current knowledge on ovarian physiology has challenged the traditional concept of folliculogenesis, creating the basis for novel ovarian stimulation protocols in assisted reproduction technology. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of novel clinical interventions that could aid clinicians in individualizing their protocols to patients' characteristics and personal situations. We conducted a literature review of the available evidence on new approaches for ovarian stimulation from both retrospective and prospective studies in the PubMed database. Here, we present some of the most important interventions, including follicle growth in the gonadotropin-independent and dependent stage, manipulation of estradiol production throughout ovarian stimulation, control of mid-cycle gonadotropin surges, and luteal phase support after different stimulation protocols and trigger agents. The latest research on IVF has moved physicians away from the classical physiology, allowing the development of new strategies to decouple organ functions from the female reproductive system and challenging the traditional concept of IVF.

Oral medications including clomiphene citrate or aromatase inhibitors with gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation

BACKGROUND

Gonadotropins are the most commonly used medications for controlled ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilisation (IVF). However, they are expensive and invasive, and are associated with the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Recent calls for more patient-friendly regimens have led to growing interest in the use of clomiphene citrate (CC) and aromatase inhibitors with or without gonadotropins to reduce the burden of hormonal injections. It is currently unknown whether regimens using CC or aromatase inhibitors such as letrozole (Ltz) are as effective as gonadotropins alone.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of regimens including oral induction medication (such as clomiphene citrate or letrozole) versus gonadotropin-only regimens for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register (searched January 2017), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL CRSO), MEDLINE (1946 to January 2017), Embase (1980 to January 2017), and reference lists of relevant articles. We also searched trials registries ClinicalTrials.gov (clinicaltrials.gov/) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (www.who.int/trialsearch/Default.aspx). We handsearched relevant conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes were live-birth rate (LBR) and OHSS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias. We calculated risk ratios (RR) and Peto odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. We analyzed the general population of women undergoing IVF treatment and (as a separate analysis) women identified as poor responders. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 27 studies in the updated review. Most of the new trials in the updated review included poor responders and evaluated Ltz protocols. We could perform meta-analysis with data from 22 studies including a total of 3599 participants. The quality of the evidence for different comparisons ranged from low to moderate. The main limitations in the quality of the evidence were risk of bias associated with poor reporting of study methods, and imprecision.In the general population of women undergoing IVF, it is unclear whether CC or Ltz used with or without gonadotropins compared to use of gonadotropins along with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or antagonists resulted in a difference in live birth (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.27, 4 RCTs, n = 493, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence) or clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.16, 12 RCTs, n = 1998, I2 = 3%, moderate-quality evidence). This means that for a typical clinic with 23% LBR using a GnRH agonist regimen, switching to CC or Ltz protocols would be expected to result in LBRs between 15% and 30%. Clomiphene citrate or Ltz protocols were associated with a reduction in the incidence of OHSS (Peto OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.41, 5 RCTs, n = 1067, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence). This means that for a typical clinic with 6% prevalence of OHSS associated with a GnRH regimen, switching to CC or Ltz protocols would be expected to reduce the incidence to between 0.5% and 2.5%. We found evidence of an increase in cycle cancellation rate with the CC protocol compared to gonadotropins in GnRH protocols (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.45, 9 RCTs, n = 1784, I2 = 61%, low-quality evidence). There was moderate quality evidence of a decrease in the mean number of ampoules used,) and mean number of oocytes collected with CC with or without gonadotropins compared to the gonadotropins in GnRH agonist protocols, though data were too heterogeneous to pool.Similarly, in the poor-responder population, it is unclear whether there was any difference in rates of live birth (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.79, 2 RCTs, n = 357, I2 = 38%, low-quality evidence) or clinical pregnancy (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.12, 8 RCTs, n = 1462, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence) following CC or Ltz with or without gonadotropin versus gonadotropin and GnRH protocol. This means that for a typical clinic with a 5% LBR in the poor responders using a GnRH protocol, switching to CC or Ltz protocols would be expected to yield LBRs between 2% to 14%. There was low quality evidence that the CC or Ltz protocols were associated with an increase in the cycle cancellation rate (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.81, 10 RCTs, n = 1601, I2 = 64%) and moderate quality evidence of a decrease in the mean number of gonadotropin ampoules used and the mean number of oocytes collected, though data were too heterogeneous to pool. The adverse effects of these protocols were poorly reported. In addition, data on foetal abnormalities following use of CC or Ltz protocols are lacking.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no conclusive evidence indicating that clomiphene citrate or letrozole with or without gonadotropins differed from gonadotropins in GnRH agonist or antagonist protocols with respect to their effects on live-birth or pregnancy rates, either in the general population of women undergoing IVF treatment or in women who were poor responders. Use of clomiphene or letrozole led to a reduction in the amount of gonadotropins required and the incidence of OHSS. However, use of clomiphene citrate or letrozole may be associated with a significant increase in the incidence of cycle cancellations, as well as reductions in the mean number of oocytes retrieved in both the general IVF population and the poor responders. Larger, high-quality randomized trials are needed to reach a firm conclusion before they are adopted into routine clinical practice.

The luteal phase after ovarian stimulation

Evaluation of the luteal phase after ovarian stimulation presents several difficulties. Until today, it has not been proved that in cycles stimulated with clomiphene citrate/human menopausal gonadotrophins, luteal supplementation with progesterone significantly increases implantation rate. On the contrary, it is accepted that in cycles stimulated with GnRH agonists/gonadotrophins, support of the luteal phase is essential for the achievement of pregnancy. In GnRH antagonist cycles luteal supplementation, although widely practised, is not at present supported by randomized controlled trials. Finally, it appears that the combination of gonadotrophin stimulation with human chorionic gonadotrophin results in an inadequate luteal phase with or without the use of either agonists or antagonists.

Estradiol supplementation in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with thin endometrium

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of estradiol supplementation starting on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) in patients with thin endometrium in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

METHODS

A total of 117 consecutive patients with the endometrial thickness on the hCG day ≤ 8 mm were reviewed. Estradiol supplementation was given in 57 patients and the remaining 60 patients were accepted as control group. Estradiol supplemented (ES) group received estradiol hemihydrate 4 mg/day started on the day of hCG. Luteal phase was supported using the vaginal progesterone gel in both groups. Clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, endometrial thickness on the day of oocyte pick-up and on the day of embryo transferred were accepted as main outcome measures.

RESULTS

There were no statistical differences in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (28.1% vs. 23.3%), implantation rate (16% vs. 10.4%), miscarriage rate (21% vs. 31.6%), endometrial thickness on the oocyte pick-up day (8.5 ± 1.8 vs. 8.4 ± 1.4, mm) and embryo transferred day (9.6 ± 2.9 vs. 10.3 ± 2.4, mm) in the ES group vs. control group.

CONCLUSION

Estradiol supplementation starting on the hCG day for the patients with thin endometrium does not provide any benefit on the pregnancy outcome in ICSI cycles.

Clomiphene citrate in combination with gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization

BACKGROUND

Gonadotropins are the most commonly used medication for controlled ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, they are expensive, invasive and are associated with risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). With recent calls for patient friendly IVF, there has been an interest in the use of clomiphene citrate with or without gonadotropins to reduce the burden of injections. However, it is not known whether regimens using clomiphene are at least as effective as gonadotropins alone.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether clomiphene citrate with gonadotropins (with or without mid-cycle antagonist) is more effective than gonadotropins with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (searched March 2012), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, first quarter), MEDLINE (1970 to March 2012), EMBASE (1985 to Mar 2012) and reference lists of articles. Relevant conference proceedings were handsearched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) were included. Live birth rate (LBR) per woman was the primary outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility and quality of trials

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included in the review. Meta-analysis could be performed with the data of 12 included studies, with a total of 2536 participants. There was no evidence that clomiphene along with gonadotropins for IVF, with or without mid-cycle GnRH antagonist, differed from gonadotropins alone in GnRH agonist protocols in terms of live births (5 RCTs, 1079 women; OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.69 to1.24) or clinical pregnancy (11 RCTs, 1864 women; OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.85 to1.33). This means that for a typical clinic with 23% LBR using a GnRH agonist regimen, switching to clomiphene protocols would be expected to result in LBRs between 16% and 26%. There was a significant reduction in the incidence of OHSS (5 RCTs, 1559 women; OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.52). This means that for a typical clinic with 3.5% prevalence of OHSS using a GnRH agonist regimen, switching to clomiphene citrate protocols would be expected to reduce the incidence to between 0.8% and 1.8%. The trials included in this review were very old and outcomes such as live births, multiple pregnancy, OHSS and miscarriages have not been reported by most studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence to indicate that clomiphene with gonadotropins (with or without GnRH antagonist) differed significantly from gonadotropins in GnRH agonist protocols for women undergoing IVF treatment, in terms of live births or pregnancy rates. Meanwhile, use of clomiphene led to a reduction in the incidence of OHSS. However, these results were based on data from a small number of underpowered randomised trials with few participants. Hence there was insufficient evidence to recommend use of clomiphene citrate in routine IVF practice. Larger trials with adequate power are required.

Oral micronized progesterone combined with vaginal progesterone gel for luteal support

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and satisfaction rate of combined therapy of oral micronized progesterone capsules and vaginal progesterone gel versus monotherapy with vaginal progesterone gel in luteal support. A case-control study was performed on a total number of 370 women aged <45 years undergoing IVF-ET treatment. The patients received either combination of Crinone 8% vaginal gel, 90 mg daily dose and Utrogestan oral capsules 3 x 100 mg, or Crinone 8% vaginal gel, 90 mg daily. Progesterone supplementation begun on the day of oocyte retrieval and continued until pregnancy was tested and in the case of pregnancy until week 8. The comparable rates of ongoing pregnancies were noted with use of combined-progesterone therapy (39.5%) and progesterone-monotherapy (33.5%). Abortion rate (6.4% vs. 15.6%) was significantly lower with the use of combined therapy. Tolerability and satisfaction of both supplements was almost equal but bleeding occurred more frequently in the progesterone-monotherapy group. In conclusion, the efficacy, satisfaction and tolerability of combined and vaginal progesterone supplements were comparable, but bleeding in early pregnancy and abortion rate presented more frequently with the use of vaginal progesterone.

The effect of luteal phase support protocol on cycle outcome and luteal phase hormone profile in long agonist protocol intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of luteal phase support protocol on cycle outcome and luteal phase hormone profile, in long agonist protocol intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized trial.

SETTING

Private infertility center.

PATIENT(S)

Two hundred seventy-four women undergoing first ICSI cycles were randomized after ovum pickup into three groups of luteal support.

INTERVENTION(S)

Group I received IM P (P(4)) only, group II received P(4) + oral E(2) valerate, group III received P(4) + hCG.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy rate (PR), implantation rate, rates of multiple pregnancy and miscarriage, and midluteal serum E(2) and P(4), and midluteal E(2):P(4) ratio.

RESULT(S)

The PR and implantation rates were significantly higher in group II compared to group I and the miscarriage rate was significantly lower in group II compared with group I. Midluteal E(2) was significantly higher in group II compared with group I. The decline in E(2) after ovum pickup was lowest in group II, highest in group I. The midluteal E(2):P(4) ratio was significantly higher in group II compared with groups I and III.

CONCLUSION(S)

The E(2) luteal phase supplementation in long GnRH-agonist (GnRH-a) protocol ICSI cycles resulted in better cycle outcome and better luteal phase hormone profile.

Oral progestogen versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal support after assisted reproductive technology treatment: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of oral progestogen, chlormadinone acetate, and intramuscular (IM) progesterone for luteal support in patients, undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment, who were treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa).

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized study of 40 patients with normal and high response (serum estradiol > 2,000 pg/ml) in GnRHa down-regulation. Patients were randomized to receive either oral chlormadinone acetate or IM progesterone. The outcomes of ART treatment, including pregnancy and embryo implantation rates, were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rates (25 vs. 20%) and in the implantation rates (12.7 vs. 9.1%) of patients who received IM progesterone and oral chlormadinone acetate. Endometrial thickness was also comparable between oral chlormadinone acetate and IM progesterone.

CONCLUSION

Oral progestogen, chlormadinone acetate showed a comparable pregnancy rate and live birth rate with IM progesterone as luteal support for the high responders. The optimal methods for luteal support may be dependent on responses to stimulation with gonadotropin, although it is not concluded that oral chlormadinone acetate is recommended as an option for luteal support in high responders.

Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in poor-responder women: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of luteinizing hormone supplementation on in vitro fertilization cycles

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively assess the effect of using a combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) on ovarian stimulation parameters and treatment outcome among poor-responder patients.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized trial.

SETTING

University-associated private medical center.

PATIENT(S)

Eighty-four patients who had a basal FSH level of >or=10 mIU/mL, who were >or=40 years of age, and who were undergoing their first IVF cycle participated in this controlled trial.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were randomly allocated into two study groups: group A, in which ovarian stimulation included GnRH analogue and rFSH and rLH, and group B, in which patients received GnRH analogue and rFSH without further LH addition.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Primary outcome measures included the ongoing pregnancy rate per retrieval and implantation rate per embryo transferred. The number of days of gonadotropin treatment, E(2) level on rHCG administration day, number of developed follicles, number of retrieved oocytes, number of normally fertilized zygotes (at the two-pronuclear [2PN] stage), cumulative embryo score, and number of transferred embryos were also evaluated.

RESULT(S)

The overall pregnancy rate was 22.61% (19 pregnancies among 84 couples). The pregnancy wastage rate was 30.00% in group A and 22.22% in group B. There were no differences in either primary or secondary end points.

CONCLUSION(S)

The results of this prospective and randomized trial show that the addition of rLH at a given time of follicular development produces no further benefit in the patient population of our study. A reduced ovarian response cannot be overcome by changes in the stimulation protocol.

Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of two vaginal progesterone formulations, Crinone⁎ 8% gel and Utrogestan† capsules, used for luteal support

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of two different types of vaginal progesterone (P), Crinone 8% gel (Fleet Laboratories Ltd., Watford, United Kingdom) and Utrogestan capsules (Laboratories Besins International, Paris, France), used for luteal support after in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

In Vitro Fertilization Polyclinic, Zagreb, Croatia.

PATIENTS

A total of 285 women aged < or =37 years undergoing IVF-embryo transfer treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were treated with either Crinone 8% vaginal P gel (90 mg) administered daily, or Utrogestan vaginal capsules (2 x 100 mg) administered three times daily. Progesterone was administered from the day of oocyte retrieval (day 0) to menses or, in a case of pregnancy, until week 12.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Clinical pregnancy rate. The tolerability and acceptability of both preparations were determined by a questionnaire given to patients.

RESULTS

The similar rates of clinical pregnancies (33.1% vs. 30.9%) [corrected] were obtained by using either Crinone 8% vaginal P gel or Utrogestan vaginal capsules. Overall tolerability and acceptability were significantly better in the Crinone group than in the Utrogestan group.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of the two vaginal P formulations was nearly the same, but the tolerability and acceptability of Crinone 8% gel were superior, in the opinion of patients.

Comparison between two forms of vaginally administered progesterone for luteal phase support in assisted reproduction cycles

The use of progesterone for luteal phase support has been demonstrated to be beneficial in assisted reproduction cycles using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa). Two micronized progesterone preparations are available for vaginal administration: capsules and gel. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of these two forms for luteal phase support in assisted reproduction cycles. A total of 244 couples undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were included in the study and were randomly allocated (sealed envelopes) into two groups: group 1 (122) received vaginal capsules of 200 mg of micronized progesterone (Utrogestan), 3 times daily, and group 2 (122) received micronized progesterone in gel (Crinone 8%), once daily. Both groups received progesterone for 13 days beginning day 1 after oocyte retrieval, continuing until the pregnancy test was performed and until 12 weeks of pregnancy. Groups were compared by clinical data and assisted reproduction results and had similar ages and causes of infertility. Although the pregnancy rate was higher for those receiving progesterone gel than capsules (44.26 and 36.06% respectively), this difference was not statistically significant. The study showed that vaginal progesterone gel and capsules used for luteal phase support in assisted reproduction cycles with long protocol GnRHa result in similar pregnancy rates.

Progesterone supplementation to prevent recurrent miscarriage and to reduce implantation failure in assisted reproduction cycles

Implantation failure has been questioned for many cases of recurrent miscarriage and unsuccessful assisted reproduction. The exact cause of implantation failure is not known, but luteal phase defect is encountered in many of these cases. Consequently, women with recurrent miscarriages have been treated with progesterone supplementation with various degrees of success, and a recent meta-analysis has shown trends for improved live birth rates in those women. Progesterone probably acts as an immunological suppressant blocking T-helper (Th)1 activity and inducing release of Th2 cytokines. Numerous studies have confirmed that ovarian stimulation used in assisted reproduction is associated with luteal phase insufficiency, even when gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists are used. In those patients, advanced endometrial histological maturity and a decrease in the concentration of cytoplasmic progesterone receptors are observed. Progesterone supplementation results in a trend towards improved ongoing and clinical pregnancy rates, except in patients treated with human menopausal gonadotrophin-only regimens, in whom ongoing pregnancy rates increase significantly. More randomized controlled trials are needed to increase the power of the currently available meta-analyses to further evaluate progesterone supplementation in both conditions.

Spuriously elevated serum estradiol concentrations measured by an automated immunoassay rarely cause unnecessary cancellation of in vitro fertilization cycles

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of a patient in whom serum E2, as measured by an automated E2 assay, remained elevated at levels corresponding to the periovulatory phase (>380 pg/mL), despite 3 weeks of treatment by a GnRH agonist (GnRH-a).

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

Tertiary-care academic center.

PATIENT(S)

A 39-year-old patient accepted for IVF treatment. In view of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, down-regulation by a GnRH-a was monitored by serum E2 measurement.

INTERVENTION(S)

Obvious causes for high serum E2 levels (pregnancy, E2-producing ovarian cysts, and noncompliance of the patient) were excluded. The IVF cycle was canceled.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Serum samples were analyzed retrospectively by radioimmunoassay (RIA), and ether extraction of the samples was performed before measurement by the automated E2 assay.

RESULT(S)

Radioimmunoassay revealed adequately suppressed serum E2 levels under GnRH-a treatment (<15 pg/mL). Ether extraction revealed an interfering component that was soluble in the aqueous phase.

CONCLUSION(S)

If a patient on a long controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF protocol still has high serum E2 levels after 2 to 3 weeks of down-regulation, and obvious reasons for this (pregnancy, E2 producing ovarian cysts, noncompliance of the patient) are excluded, E2 immunoassay interference should be excluded to avoid unnecessary cancellation of the IVF cycle.

Urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is more effective than recombinant FSH in older women in a controlled randomized study

OBJECTIVE

The following study was conducted to determine which FSH, recombinant or urinary, works better in older women.

DESIGN

We conducted a controlled randomized study in a single university IVF center.

SETTING

University IVF center.

PATIENT(S)

Women (N = 257) over 39 years old undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

The patients were randomized into two study groups at their first IVF cycle: 121 patients were treated with recombinant FSH, and 120 patients were treated with urinary FSH. Both groups were suppressed with a long GnRH analog protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Days of stimulation, E2 at the day of hCG, total amount of FSH administered, number of oocytes collected, amount of FSH per oocyte, and number of embryos obtained.

RESULT(S)

Patients treated with urinary FSH required a significantly lower total amount of FSH, and a lower amount of FSH per oocyte than women treated with recombinant FSH. The other measures evaluated did not show any statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our study showed that urinary FSH performed better in older women than recombinant FSH when associated with the long protocol.

Impact of leuprolide acetate on luteal phase function in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the combination of leuprolide acetate (LA) and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) results in luteal phase dysfunction.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

A tertiary care university fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred thirty-five couples with various etiologies of infertility.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either hMG and intrauterine insemination (IUI) or luteal phase down-regulation with LA, hMG, and IUI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Serum luteal phase progesterone (P) and luteal phase estradiol (E2) were obtained 9 days after hCG administration. Twenty-four-hour urinary P and luteinizing hormone (LH) were analyzed 9 days after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Endometrial biopsies were performed 11 days after hCG and evaluated for luteal phase defects (LPD) using Noyes' criteria.

RESULT(S)

No significant differences in the incidence of LPD (11.9% vs. 13.9%), cycle fecundity (16.6% vs. 16.3%), or luteal phase hormone profiles were observed between the groups receiving and not receiving LA. A significant difference in E2 levels (on the day of hCG administration) between cycles with a luteal phase defect (967 pg/mL +/- 106) and without a luteal phase defect (1,422 pg/mL +/- 83) was observed (P<.05).

CONCLUSION(S)

Pituitary down-regulation with LA combined with hMG did not result in luteal phase dysfunction. The E2 levels on the day of hCG administration in both groups were lower in women with documented luteal phase defects.

Timing luteal phase support in GnRH agonist down-regulated IVF/embryo transfer cycles

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of three different times of onset of luteal phase support on ongoing pregnancy rate in infertile patients undergoing treatment with GnRH down-regulated IVF and embryo transfer (IVF/ET).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive eligible patients planned to undergo their first IVF treatment cycle were randomly allocated to receive vaginal progesterone as luteal support at three different time points, that is, after HCG administration for final oocyte maturation (HCG group), at the day of oocyte retrieval (OR group) or at the day of ET (ET group). The primary endpoint of this study was ongoing pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

A total of 385 women were randomized, 130 were allocated to the HCG group, 128 to the OR group and 127 to the ET group. An ongoing pregnancy rate of 20.8% was found in the HCG group versus 22.7 and 23.6% in the OR group and ET group, respectively. The mean number and quality of the retrieved oocytes and the transferred embryos did not differ.

CONCLUSION

Based on this data, an 18% difference in ongoing pregnancy rate between the three different times of onset of luteal phase support in GnRH agonist down-regulated IVF/ET cycles can be refuted. Smaller clinically meaningful differences may be present.

Short versus long gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue suppression protocols for superovulation in patients ≥40 years old undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the short or long protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation works better in older patients undergoing IVF.

DESIGN

Controlled, randomized study.

SETTING

A single private IVF center.

PATIENT(S)

Two hundred twenty infertile women aged > or = 40 years undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

At their first IVF cycle, the women were randomized into two study groups according to a computer-generated number sequence: 110 patients were treated with a long protocol, and the other 110 were treated with a short protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Days of stimulation, E2 level at the day of hCG administration, amount of FSH administered, number of oocytes collected, number of embryos obtained, pregnancy rate, implantation rate.

RESULT(S)

Patients treated with a long protocol showed a significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved, a higher number of embryos obtained, and a higher pregnancy rate, both for cycle and transfer, compared with the short-protocol patients. The other parameters evaluated did not show any statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our study showed that the long protocol performed better than the short protocol in older women. Our findings demonstrated that flare-up in older women might be detrimental.

Achievement of pregnancy three times in the same patient during luteal GnRH agonist administration

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administration from the mid-luteal phase onwards is considered the gold standard of ovarian stimulation for IVF treatment. It might, however, coincide with an implanting spontaneous pregnancy. Concerns have therefore been raised with regard to the evolution of the resulting pregnancies and long-term outcome of the children born. The current case report describes the achievement of three pregnancies in the same patient during luteal administration of GnRHa. One pregnancy ended in spontaneous abortion and the other two resulted in the delivery of two female infants. The children have so far been followed for 3.5 and 7 years. The physical examination of both children was unremarkable. However, the older child has recently been diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and dyslexia.

Efficacy and tolerability of vaginal progesterone capsules (Utrogest™ 200) compared with progesterone gel (Crinone™ 8%) for luteal phase support during assisted reproduction

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of capsules containing 200 mg of P (Utrogest 200) or Crinone 8% gel for luteal phase and early pregnancy support during assisted reproduction techniques (ART).

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open, parallel-group Phase III trial.

SETTING

Seventeen German IVF centers.

PATIENT(S)

Four hundred thirty women who underwent their first IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle were randomized after successful transfer of two or three embryos from July 1999 through September 2001.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients vaginally applied capsules containing 200 mg of P (Utrogest 200) three times per day or containing Crinone 8% gel twice per day. Therapy was started in the evening of the ET day and continued up to 10 weeks in pregnant women. If the pregnancy test proved to be negative, application was stopped.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Ongoing pregnancy rate at the end of the study (12th week of gestation). Secondary outcomes were rate of implantation and abortion, number and reasons of withdrawals, as well as adverse events, assessment of tolerability, and acceptance.

RESULT(S)

There were no relevant differences in demographic and other characteristics between the two groups. Ongoing pregnancy rates were 25.2% in the Utrogest 200 group and 22.2% in the Crinone 8% group when patients were analyzed who normally completed the trial. In the Utrogest 200 vs. the Crinone 8% group, the implantation rate (14.7% vs. 11.9%) and abortion rate (18.2% vs. 19.1%) were not statistically different. The rate of withdrawals at the individual visits also did not differ between treatment groups. Tolerability of both drugs was good, and very few study drug-related adverse events were observed in both groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

The luteal phase support in ART cycles with Utrogest 200 capsules (three times per day) or Crinone 8% gel (two times per day) by the vaginal route resulted in similar outcomes with respect to implantation, ongoing pregnancy, and abortion rates. The two recommended regimens of P supplementation in ART proved to be equivalent and safe.

Emerging drugs in assisted reproduction

Infertility affects approximately 15% of couples of reproductive age. In assisted reproductive technology (ART), medications play a crucial role in stimulating ovaries to produce several oocytes and prepare the endometrium to be receptive after replacing one or more embryos into the uterine cavity. The availability of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone and human chorionic gonadotrophin; of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists; and of luteal supplementation with progesterone have allowed the tailoring of several stimulation schemes, which have enhanced the pregnancy outcome after ART treatment. However, the remaining risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, the still low implantation rates, the unacceptably high rates of multiple pregnancies and the daily parenteral administration of medications do not constitute the features of a patient-friendly procedure. Therefore, a number of molecules with gonadotrophin-like activity, inhibition of GnRH receptor ability, or endometrium receptivity enhancement properties are currently under active investigation. Orally bioactive therapeutic preparations, in particular, may revolutionize in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment in the near future. Nevertheless, the implementation of mild ovarian stimulation protocols with single embryo transfer policy and further development of oocyte in vitro maturation techniques may lead to a less drug orientated IVF treatment.

The midluteal decline in serum estradiol levels is drastic but not deleterious for implantation after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in patients with normal or high responses

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of the peak E(2) level and its midluteal decline on IVF-ET outcome in a group of normal- and high-responding patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of IVF-ET data.

SETTING

Tertiary-care, university-affiliated teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 100 patients aged </=38 years and receiving up to three embryos per transfer who underwent a similar standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET.

INTERVENTION(S)

Morning blood was collected on days 0 (hCG day), +9, and +14.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Treatment cycle hormonal characteristics and percent midluteal E(2) decline in conception and nonconception cycles.

RESULT(S)

Among all cycles, a mean decline of 95.0% in serum E(2) was observed at the midluteal phase. No significant differences were found in various parameters comparing conception with nonconception cycles. Occurrence of conception did not correlate with the absolute E(2) level or with percent E(2) decline in good and high responders. Early spontaneous abortion occurred more frequently in high responders with >98% E(2) decline; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION(S)

Multifactorial analysis refutes the negative role of supraphysiologic levels of E(2) on the day of hCG administration or its dramatic decline at the midluteal phase on the success rate after embryo transfer. A possibly increased rate of early spontaneous abortion in the high-response group warrants further verification.

Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and endometrial receptivity

The influence of ovarian stimulation on endometrium receptivity has been inadequately addressed in medical literature. Hormonal effects of ovarian stimulation on endometrial changes as compared with the natural cycle should be elucidated and correlated with the potential of the embryo to implant. It is important to distinguish between the endometrial effect of induction of ovulation in anovulatory women and those of ovarian (super)ovulation in ovulatory women. Induction of ovulation leads to in vivo conception whereas ovarian stimulation results in in vitro fertilization. The available data in the field indicate that endometrial changes have an impressive negative influence on the potential of embryonic implantation. The aim of this review is to analyse the effects of gonadotropin, GnRH-agonist and GnRH-antagonist administration on endometrial behaviour, to highlight the gaps in current knowledge and to propose areas in which research is needed.

Endometrial integrin expression in the early luteal phase in natural and stimulated cycles for in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of ovarian stimulation on integrin expression in the early luteal phase.

STUDY DESIGN

Seven endometrial biopsies were taken 2 days after the oocyte retrieval from stimulated cycles for IVF and 23 from natural cycles, 2 days after ovulation.

RESULT

Endometrium was in-phase in 22/23 and 7/7 biopsies from the natural and stimulated cycles, respectively. Integrins alpha(1) and alpha(4) were simultaneously positive in 43.4% from the natural and in all (100%) the stimulated cycles (P<0.03). On the day of the endometrial biopsy, progesterone serum values were higher in the stimulated cycles (55.2+/-9.5 microg/l versus 8.5+/-3.8 microg/l) (P<0.001). HSCORE value was significantly higher in stimulated cycles for both integrins.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial integrin expression is more consistently present in the early luteal phase in stimulated cycles than in natural cycles and this may be related to the higher serum progesterone concentration and/or the more advanced endometrial histological features.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and reproductive medicine

The hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is a key regulator of the reproductive system, mainly through its effects on pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) release. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues are modifications of the natural decapeptide, being either agonists (GnRHa) or antagonists. GnRHa may imitate the native hormone and induce an endogenous LH surge; however, sustained treatment with GnRHa results in complete refractoriness of LH and FSH production. This aspect of GnRHa action is the main application of the GnRHa in reproduction today. The hypogonadotropic hypogonadal state that results from the sustained treatment is the basis for additional applications of the GnRHa. The agonists appear to be effective, to some extent, for the treatment of endometriosis and were proved to be beneficial prior to surgery for fibroma uteri. GnRHa is used in assisted reproduction for both induction of an endogenous LH surge and for induction of ovulation, and its capacity to cause refractoriness of the pituitary may be used to avoid a premature LH surge. It is suggested that the GnRHa have a direct effect on ovarian steroidogenesis, which is independent of its action on the pituitary. This unwanted effect and other possible drawbacks of the agonists are thought to be eliminated with the use of the antagonists. The mechanism of action of these antagonists is through competitive blocking of the GnRH receptor, which results in a rapid but reversible suppression of gonadotropin secretion. As for GnRHa, GnRH antagonists have been proven effective to prevent the LH surge and to reduce the incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles.

Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone: a scientific step to clinical improvement

Urinary-derived follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) preparations have been used clinically for many years. Although effective, these have a number of disadvantages, not least of which is their variable composition. The availability of recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH), produced from CHO cells, with its constant composition and exceptionally high purity, has, therefore, aroused great interest. This review focuses on the use of r-hFSH for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology protocols and the treatment of World Health Organization Group I and II anovulation. The use of r-hFSH has been shown to lead to improvements in efficacy over urinary-derived preparations, particularly in assisted reproductive treatment, and a recent meta-analysis has shown higher ongoing pregnancy rates with the recombinant product. Although the two available recombinant products from CHO cells (follitropin alpha [Gonal-F((R))] and beta [Puregon((R))]) are similar from a physicochemical perspective, some minor advantages have been reported for follitropin alpha in relation to pregnancy rates and better local tolerance to injections. The apparent higher bioactivity of r-hFSH has led to reduced total FSH consumption over shorter treatment periods compared with conventional preparations, thus reducing overall exposure for patients. This is likely to confer not only safety benefits, but also cost-effectiveness as demonstrated through pharmaco-economic modelling.

Luteal phase support

Assisted reproductive techniques have become a routine treatment for infertility. The extended use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in assisted reproductive techniques has made luteal phase support mandatory, as it has been clearly demonstrated that they alter luteal LH pulsatility. For luteal support, HCG administration, though effective, has a high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Progesterone continues to be the gold standard for supplementation. Vaginal progesterone represents a highly effective alternative to painful intramuscular injections. The vaginal route is mainly characterized by direct delivery of the progesterone to the endometrium, thus producing high levels at the target tissue and a very low incidence of side effects.

Effect of highly purified urinary follicle-stimulating hormone on oocyte and embryo quality

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of ovarian stimulation with highly purified urofollitropin on oocyte and embryo quality.

DESIGN

Parallel randomized open-label clinical study.

SETTING

Assisted reproduction centers.

PATIENT(S)

Two hundred sixty-seven infertile couples undergoing IVF/ICSI.

INTERVENTION(S)

All participants underwent standard down-regulation with GnRH analogue. One hundred thirty-three participants received highly purified urinary FSH and 134 controls received recombinant FSH.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Primary end points were number of morphologically mature oocytes retrieved, embryo quality, and pregnancy and implantation rates. Secondary end points were: total number of days of FSH stimulation, total dose of gonadotropin administered, fertilization rate per number of retrieved oocytes, embryo cleavage rate, live birth and miscarriage rates, endometrial thickness and estradiol level on the day of hCG administration, cancellation rate, and incidence of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

RESULT(S)

Pregnancy and implantation rates were nonsignificantly higher in the urinary FSH group than the recombinant FSH group (46.5% vs. 36.8% and 22.1% vs. 15.8%, respectively). The grade 1 embryo score was significantly higher in the urinary FSH group than the recombinant FSH (42.1% vs. 33.5%), and the live birth rate was nonsignificantly higher in the former group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Highly purified urinary FSH is as effective, efficient, and safe for clinical use as recombinant FSH.

Clinical validation of a fully automated 17beta-estradiol and progesterone assay (VIDAS) for use in monitoring assisted reproduction treatment

Measurement of serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (PRG) allows monitoring of follicular growth and prediction of the day of ovulation in natural cycles. In combination with vaginal ultrasonography, serum E2 and PRG are used for the monitoring of ovarian superovulation for assisted reproduction. We carried out a clinical evaluation of the VIDAS E2 and PRG assays on a fully automated random access analyzer (miniVIDAS, bioMérieux) by retrospective analysis of frozen serum samples obtained from 16 natural cycles monitored for frozen embryo transfer (FRET) and in superovulation cycles. The superovulation cycles consisted of 28 long gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol cycles and 15 GnRH antagonist protocol cycles. In FRET cycles we found a good correlation between serum E2 and the diameter of the dominant follicle measured by ovarian ultrasonography. Serum E2 values measured throughout the cycles and follicular phase PRG values were representative of normo-ovulatory cycles. In GnRH agonist long protocols, we found serum E2 and PRG values compatible with castration levels induced by pituitary desensitization. During gonadotropin treatment a close, highly significant correlation was observed between serum E2 and ultrasonographic follicle measurements with both GnRH analogue protocols. Serum PRG measured for 5 days prior to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration in the agonist cycles was compatible with the absence of premature luteinization. In conclusion, VIDAS E2 and PRG assays are precise and sensitivetoolsforevaluating natural cycles (based on the results in FRET cycles) and for monitoring ovarian superovulation.

Clinical evaluation of three different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in an IVF programme: a prospective study

The efficacy and safety of short acting buserelin and nafarelin intranasal spray were compared to long acting leuprorelin depot intramuscular or subcutaneous injection in this prospective study of 157 women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Patients were allocated to three groups to receive buserelin 150 microg nasal spray three times daily (Group B), nafarelin nasal spray 400 microg twice daily (Group N), or leuprorelin depot 3.75 mg once by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection (Group L) for pituitary desensitisation prior to commencing COH with human menopausal gonadotrophins (hMG) according to the Centre's protocol. The mean (+/-S.D.) age (years) (32.6+/-3.8: Group B, 32.1+/-3.3: Group N versus 32.1+/-3.3: Group L); mean (+/-S.D.) total dosage of hMG (ampoules) (37.5+/-16.1: Group B, 39.8+/-14.2: Group N versus 41.9+/-12.6: Group L) and mean daily dosage of hMG (ampoules) (3.1: Group B, 2.8: Group N versus 3.0: Group L) seen were not statistically significantly different. The duration between starting the different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRHa) and the beginning of the next menstrual period was also not seen to be statistically significantly different between the three groups (Group B: 10+/-5.5, Group N: 9.1+/-4.1 versus Group L: 8.2+/-3, days). The number of abandoned cycles was higher in Group L (17% versus 11.8%: Group B and 11.3%: Group N) but this difference did not reach statistical significance. The clinical pregnancy rates per oocyte retrieval and per embryo transfer procedure were respectively, 31.1, 35% in Group B, 12.8, 14% in Group N versus 20.5, 23.7 in Group L and were not seen to be statistically significantly different even when ongoing pregnancy rates were compared. Apart from a statistically significantly greater incidence of allergic nasal reactions in the nafarelin group (P=0.001), all other side-effects were not shown to be statistically significantly different between the three groups. We conclude that a single dose of leuprorelin depot can be considered to be as an equally effective alternative to multiple doses of buserelin or nafarelin for pituitary desensitisation in women undergoing COH for IVF.

Laser assisted immobilization of spermatozoa prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection in humans

BACKGROUND

The conventional method of immobilization of spermatozoa prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is mechanical breakage of the tail by pressing it against the bottom of the injection dish.

METHODS

This prospective self-controlled study was set up to evaluate the potential of a non-contact 1.48 microm wavelength diode laser in terms of immobilization. In addition, the fertilization rate and further development potential of such zygotes were investigated. The patients included in our study (n = 60) had oestradiol concentrations >2000 pg/ml, and thus a relatively high number of MII oocytes could be expected. Approximately half the oocytes were injected with laser treated spermatozoa (n = 262, study group) and the other half with mechanically immobilized spermatozoa (n = 252, control group).

RESULTS

No significant differences between the two groups in terms of fertilization rate, early cleavage or blastocyst formation were observed. However, time required for identification, aspiration and injection of a potential spermatozoa was significantly shorter in the laser immobilized sperm group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a non-contact diode laser for sperm immobilization prior to ICSI is a potentially useful alternative to the conventional mechanical approach.

Ovulation induction disrupts luteal phase function

Abnormalities in the luteal phase have been detected in virtually all the stimulation protocols used in in vitro fertilization, on both the hormonal and endometrial levels. Supraphysiological follicular or luteal sex steroid serum concentrations, altered estradiol: progesterone (E2/P) ratio, and disturbed luteinizing hormone pituitary secretion leading to corpus luteum insufficiency or a direct drug effect have been postulated as the main etiologic factors. Luteinizing hormone supports corpus luteum function, and low LH levels have been described after human menopausal gonadotropin treatment, after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist treatment, or after GnRH-antagonist treatment. These low luteal LH levels may lead to an insufficient corpus luteum function and consequently to a shortened luteal phase or to the low luteal progesterone concentrations frequently described after ovulation induction. A direct effect of the GnRH agonist or GnRH antagonist on human corpus luteum or on human endometrium and thus on endometrial receptivity cannot be excluded, as GnRH receptors have been described in both compartments. Endometrial histology has revealed a wide range of abnormalities during the various stimulation protocols. In GnRH-agonist cycles, mid-luteal biopsies have revealed increased glandulo-stromal dyssynchrony and delay in endometrial development, strong positivity of endometrial glands for progesterone receptors, decreased alphavbeta3-integrin subunit expression, and earlier appearance of surface epithelium pinopodes. These factors suggest a shift forwards of the implantation window. Progesterone supplementation improves endometrial histology, and its necessity has been well established, at least in cycles using GnRH agonists.

Embryo fragmentation in vitro and its impact on treatment and pregnancy outcome

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of embryo fragmentation on pregnancy, obstetric, and perinatal outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of embryo transfers that were homogeneous in regard to the degree of fragmentation.

SETTING

Fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

A cohort of 460 fresh embryo transfers.

INTERVENTION(S)

A total of 164 pregnancies were analyzed for the incidence of antepartum complications during gestation, obstetric (multiple pregnancy, preterm delivery, cesarean section), and perinatal outcome (sex, birth weight, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, malformations).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Implantation and clinical pregnancy rate, obstetric and perinatal outcome.

RESULT(S)

Embryo fragmentation and number of embryos per transfer showed a significant influence on clinical pregnancy and implantation rate. No such relation was found concerning complications, multiple pregnancy rate, incidence of cesarean section, gestation week, birth weight, and average time at the neonatology. On the other hand, pregnancies derived from bad-quality embryos had a significantly higher rate of malformations.

CONCLUSION(S)

The higher percentage of malformations found in bad-quality embryos may be due to a higher percentage of apoptotic features and chromosomal disorders. For ethical reasons, the transfer of embryos with >50% fragmentation should be considered only after consultation with the patient.

Progesterone supplementation during early gestation after in vitro fertilization has no effect on the delivery rate

OBJECTIVE

To compare the delivery rate with IVF or ICSI in women who did and did not receive progesterone supplementation in the first 3 weeks after a positive hCG test result.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

PATIENT(S)

200 pregnant women who did not receive progesterone (intervention group) and 200 pregnant women who received progesterone for 3 weeks after a positive hCG result.

INTERVENTION(S)

In the study group, vaginal progesterone therapy was withdrawn on the day of positive hCG result. In the control group, treatment with progesterone, 600 mg/d, was continued for 3 weeks after a positive hCG result. Both groups received 600 mg of progesterone starting on the day of embryo replacement until testing positive for pregnancy 14 days after embryo transfer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Delivery rate.

RESULT(S)

The number of deliveries was 126 in the study group and 128 in the control group.

CONCLUSION(S)

The delivery rate was the same in pregnant women who received and those who did not receive progesterone for 3 weeks after a positive hCG result. Progesterone supplementation for more than 2 weeks after embryo transfer may therefore yield no benefit in terms of pregnancy.

Analysis of the bleeding pattern in assisted reproduction cycles with luteal phase supplementation using vaginal micronized progesterone

This study was designed to determine the effects of a vaginal micronized progesterone preparation on bleeding patterns and pregnancy outcomes after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). The study population consisted of 149 consecutive women who had undergone IVF-ICSI using 'long-protocol' stimulation with buserelin-human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). A retrospective chart analysis of computerized medical records was undertaken. Vaginal progesterone (200 mg three times daily) was begun the day before oocyte retrieval and continued for a minimum of 16-19 days following human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Occurrence of bleeding following HCG injection, pregnancy rate and outcomes, and serum concentrations of oestradiol were measured. Women undergoing IVF and embryo transfer with ICSI and using vaginal progesterone for luteal support had normal luteal phase lengths (day of HCG minus day of onset of bleeding). In the absence of pregnancy, bleeding occurred after 19.2 +/- 3.9 days (mean +/- SD). Out of the pregnant group only three women bled within 19 days of HCG administration: two had biochemical pregnancies which spontaneously vanished and one evolved to term. The results reflect the normal bleeding pattern to be expected when vaginal progesterone is used for luteal support in IVF and embryo transfer, an approach whose efficacy has been amply proven. No shortened luteal phases were observed using vaginally administered progesterone.

Follicular and luteal phase characteristics following early cessation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist during ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are widely used in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) for the prevention of a premature rise in luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations. However, the administration of GnRHa during the follicular phase may also impair subsequent luteal function due to retarded recovery of pituitary gonadotrophin secretion. Therefore, luteal supplementation is generally applied. The present study was designed to determine whether a premature LH surge would still be prevented after early cessation of GnRHa during ovarian stimulation and whether subsequent luteal phase LH production would be sufficient to support progesterone synthesis by the corpus luteum. Sixty patients were randomized for three groups: (i) A long GnRHa/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) protocol with luteal support by repeated human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) (n = 20), (ii) early follicular phase cessation of GnRHa without luteal support (n = 20), and (iii) a long GnRHa protocol without luteal support (n = 20). Frequent ultrasound and blood sampling was performed during the entire IVF cycle. Forty normo-ovulatory women served as controls. No premature LH surges were found after early cessation of GnRHa. In this group, some pituitary recovery occurred during the late luteal phase, but this did not affect corpus luteum function. Progesterone concentrations were shown to be dependent on disappearance of the pre-ovulatory bolus of HCG. Pregnancies occurred in all three groups. In conclusion, early follicular phase cessation of GnRHa is still effective in the prevention of a premature rise in LH. Although some pituitary recovery was observed thereafter, corpus luteum function is still abnormal due to early luteolysis.

Elective transfer of embryos selected on the basis of first polar body morphology is associated with increased rates of implantation and pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between first polar body morphology and implantation rate and pregnancy rate (PR), to facilitate decision making concerning elective ET.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients (173 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles) resulting in embryo transfers.

INTERVENTION(S)

In our study group, priority in ET was given to embryos derived from well-shaped first polar bodies, whereas selection of embryos for transfer in the control group was based exclusively on the degree of embryo fragmentation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Total numbers of implantations and pregnancies, PR and implantation rate, and rates of multiple pregnancy and miscarriage.

RESULT(S)

In the study cohort, 212 embryos were transferred. In the control group, 313 embryos were transferred. The implantation rate and PR were significantly lower in the control group than in the study cohort. In addition, the rate of multiple pregnancy was significantly higher in the study group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Elective transfer of embryos selected on the basis of first polar body morphology results in higher implantation and pregnancy rates. Multiple pregnancy can be avoided by transferring a reduced number of embryos selected on the basis of first polar body morphology.

Reproducibility of transvaginal three-dimensional endometrial volume measurements during ovarian stimulation

Before estimating the clinical role of a method, the reproducibility has to be evaluated precisely. This study aimed to document the reproducibility of the endometrial volume measurement by three-dimensional (3D)-ultrasound. The volume measurements were done on 57 consecutive in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients with either the full planar (contour) or the three distance method. A paired t-test provided no statistically significant difference between the two methods. Linear regression analysis, using the full planar method as independent and the other as dependent variables, yielded the following results: intercept = 0.348, not statistically different from 0; slope = 0.962, statistically different from 1 (P < 0.01). Interobserver reliability for the three distance method was 0.6667 and for the full planar method was 0.9565. Intra-observer reliability for the three distance method was 0.8426 and for the full planar method 0.9394. The correspondence between and within observers seemed to be good. Both methods are reliable, but the full planar method seems to provide slightly better reproducibility in regard to endometrium volume measurement.

Subpopulations of human granulosa-luteal cells obtained from gonadotropin- or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/gonadotropin-treated follicles in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to find the differences in granulosa-luteal cells obtained from gonadotropin-versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist/gonadotropin-treated follicles in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles.

METHODS

Granulosa-luteal cells were obtained from 45 follicles of women undergoing IVF-ET with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and from 45 follicles of women with hMG IVF-ET cycles. Subpopulations of granulosa-luteal cells were observed by computerized image analysis in which human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was localized using immunoperoxidase staining.

RESULTS

The luteinized granulosa-luteal cells from hMG-treated follicles were larger than those from GnRH agonist/hMG-treated follicles. The hMG-treated follicles contained more hCG-stained cells, particularly those with cytoplasmic hCG localization.

CONCLUSIONS

We found differences in morphometric characteristics and hCG localization in granulosa-luteal cells obtained from hMG-versus GnRH agonist/hMG-treated follicles. We presume that the results indicate the influence and importance of luteal-phase support on the clinical pregnancy rate in GnRH agonist/hMG-treated IVF-ET cycles.

Luteal support with micronized progesterone following in-vitro fertilization using a down-regulation protocol with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist: a comparative study between vaginal and oral administration

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of micronized progesterone administered as luteal support following ovulation induction for in-vitro fertilization (IVF)- embryo transfer in cycles using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, either orally (200 mgx4/day) or vaginally (100 mgx2/day) and to characterize the luteal phase hormonal profile during such treatments. A total of 64 high responder patients requiring intracytoplasmic sperm injection due to male factor infertility were prospectively randomized into two treatment groups. Patients treated orally or vaginally were comparable in age (31.9 +/- 6.1 versus 30.6 +/- 5.2; mean +/- SD), number of oocytes retrieved (17 +/- 8.2 versus 18 +/- 7.0), and number of embryos transferred (3.1 +/- 1.2 versus 2.7 +/- 0.9) per cycle. Following low dose vaginal treatment, a significantly higher implantation rate (30.7 versus 10.7%, P < 0.01), but similar clinical pregnancy rate (47.0 versus 33.3%) and ongoing pregnancy rate (41.1 versus 20.0%) was observed, compared with oral treatment. In conception cycles, luteal serum progesterone and oestrogen concentrations did not differ between the treatment groups. In non-conception cycles, late luteal progesterone concentrations were significantly lower following vaginal treatment. As low dose micronized progesterone administered vaginally is simple, easy and well tolerated, it could be recommended as the method of choice for luteal support, especially for high responder patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Luteal phase and clinical outcome after human menopausal gonadotrophin/gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist treatment for ovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles

The luteal phase hormonal profile and the clinical outcome of 69 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) after ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) and the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist Cetrorelix were analysed. Twenty-four patients received Cetrorelix 0.5 mg (group I) while in 45 patients Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was administered (group II). Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was used as luteal support. Nine clinical pregnancies were obtained in group I (37.5%) and 12 in group II (26. 6%). These results were not significantly different. Serum progesterone and oestradiol concentrations did not differ between the two groups either in pregnant or non-pregnant patients. An expected decrease of the same hormones was observed 8 days after the pre-ovulatory HCG injection in non-pregnant women. With regard to serum luteinizing hormone concentrations, a decrease was observed 2 days after the pre-ovulatory HCG injection and was maintained at almost undetectable levels throughout the entire luteal phase in both conception and non-conception cycles of group I and group II. This study demonstrates that different doses of GnRH antagonist do not have any impact on the luteal phase of IVF/ICSI cycles when hormonal support is given.