The time course of cardioprotection induced by GR79236, a selective adenosine A1-receptor agonist, in myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury in the pig

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists lead to increased adenosine bioavailability and modulate contractile cardiac parameters

Activation of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) is cardioprotective; however, this property is lost upon blockade or inactivation of adenosine (ADO) receptor A_2b. In this study, we investigated whether the effects of MRAs are mediated by an interaction between cardioprotective ADO receptors A₁ and A₃. Spironolactone (SPI) or eplerenone (EPL) increased ADO levels in the plasma of treated animals compared to control animals. SPI or EPL increased the protein and activity levels of ecto-5'-nucleotidase (NT5E), an enzyme that synthesizes ADO, compared to control. The levels of ADO deaminase (ADA), which degrades ADO, were not affected by SPI or EPL; however, the activity of ADA was reduced in SPI-treated rats compared to control. Using an isolated cardiomyocyte model, we found inotropic and chronotropic effects, and increased calcium transient [Ca²⁺]_i in cells treated with ADO receptor A₁ or A₃ antagonists compared to control groups. Upon co-treatment with MRAs, EPL and SPI fully and partially reverted the effects of receptor A₁ or A₃ antagonism, respectively. Collectively, MRAs in vivo lead to increased ADO bioavailability. In vitro, the rapid effects of SPI and EPL are mediated by an interaction between ADO receptors A₁ and A₃.

Pharmacological postconditioning of the rabbit heart with non-selective, A1, A2A and A3 adenosine receptor agonists

Objectives

We investigated the effects of novel selective and non-selective adenosine receptor agonists (ARs) on cardioprotection.

Methods

Male rabbits divided into six groups were subjected to 30-min heart ischaemia and 3-h reperfusion: (1) control group, (2) postconditioning (PostC) group, (3) group A: treated with the non-selective agonist (S)-PHPNECA, (4) group B: treated with the A1 agonist CCPA, (5) group C: treated with the A2A agonist VT 7 and (6) group D: treated with the A3 agonist AR 170. The infarcted (I) and the areas at risk (R) were estimated as %I/R. In additional rabbits of all groups, heart samples were taken for determination of Akt, eNOS and STAT 3 at the 10th reperfusion minute.

Key findings

(S)-PHPNECA and CCPA reduced the infarct size (17.2 ± 2.9% and 17.9 ± 2.0% vs 46.8 ± 1.9% in control, P < 0.05), conferring a benefit similar to PostC (26.4 ± 0.3%). Selective A2A and A3 receptor agonists did not reduce the infarct size (39.5 ± 0.8% and 38.7 ± 3.5%, P = NS vs control). Akt, eNOS and STAT 3 were significantly activated after non-selective A1 ARs and PostC.

Conclusions

Non-selective and A1 but not A2A and A3 ARs agonists are essential for triggering cardioprotection. The molecular mechanism involves both RISK and the JAK/STAT pathways.

Baicalein Preconditioning Protects Cardiomyocytes from Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via Mitochondrial Oxidant Signaling

Previous studies suggest baicalein, in addition to its antioxidant effects, protects against hypoxia/reoxygenation injury via its pro-oxidant properties. We hypothesize that a brief period of baicalein treatment prior to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) may trigger preconditioning protection via a mitochondrial pro-oxidant mechanism. Using an established chick cardiomyocyte model of I/R, cells were preconditioned with baicalein (10 μM) for 10 min followed by 10-min wash prior to I/R. Intracellular oxidants were measured using 2′, 7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH/DA). Cell viability was assessed by propidium iodide and apoptosis determined by DNA fragmentation. Baicalein induced a transient but significant increase of DCF fluorescence within the 10-min preconditioning period, and led to significant reduction of cell death (38.9 ± 1.8% vs. 58.7 ± 1.2% in I/R control, n = 6, p < 0.001) and DNA fragmentation after I/R. Cotreatment with N-acetylcysteine (500 μM), mitochondrial complex III electron transport chain inhibitor myxothiazol (1 μM), mitochondrial KATP channel blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate-Na (5-HD, 500 μM) or anion channel inhibitor 4′, 4′-diisothiocyanato-stilbene-2, 2′-disulfonic acid (DIDS, 200 μM) resulted in significant abrogation of oxidant increase during induction as well as the protection conferred by baicalein preconditioning. These results suggest that baicalein preconditioning exhibits significant anti-apoptotic protection against cardiomyocyte I/R injury by mitochondrial oxidant signaling, which was in part mediated by mitochondrial KATP channel and anion channel opening.

Pathophysiology of myocardial reperfusion injury: preconditioning, postconditioning, and translational aspects of protective measures

Heart diseases due to myocardial ischemia, such as myocardial infarction or ischemic heart failure, are major causes of death in developed countries, and their number is unfortunately still growing. Preliminary exploration into the pathophysiology of ischemia-reperfusion injury, together with the accumulation of clinical evidence, led to the discovery of ischemic preconditioning, which has been the main hypothesis for over three decades for how ischemia-reperfusion injury can be attenuated. The subcellular pathophysiological mechanism of ischemia-reperfusion injury and preconditioning-induced cardioprotection is not well understood, but extensive research into components, including autacoids, ion channels, receptors, subcellular signaling cascades, and mitochondrial modulators, as well as strategies for modulating these components, has made evolutional progress. Owing to the accumulation of both basic and clinical evidence, the idea of ischemic postconditioning with a cardioprotective potential has been discovered and established, making it possible to apply this knowledge in the clinical setting after ischemia-reperfusion insult. Another a great outcome has been the launch of translational studies that apply basic findings for manipulating ischemia-reperfusion injury into practical clinical treatments against ischemic heart diseases. In this review, we discuss the current findings regarding the fundamental pathophysiological mechanisms of ischemia-reperfusion injury, the associated protective mechanisms of ischemic pre- and postconditioning, and the potential seeds for molecular, pharmacological, or mechanical treatments against ischemia-reperfusion injury, as well as subsequent adverse outcomes by modulation of subcellular signaling mechanisms (especially mitochondrial function). We also review emerging translational clinical trials and the subsistent clinical comorbidities that need to be overcome to make these trials applicable in clinical medicine.

Adenosine A₂A and A₂B receptors are both required for adenosine A₁ receptor-mediated cardioprotection

All four adenosine receptor subtypes have been shown to play a role in cardioprotection, and there is evidence that all four subtypes may be expressed in cardiomyocytes. There is also increasing evidence that optimal adenosine cardioprotection requires the activation of more than one receptor subtype. The purpose of this study was to determine whether adenosine A(2A) and/or A(2B) receptors modulate adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated cardioprotection. Isolated perfused hearts of wild-type (WT), A(2A) knockout (KO), and A(2B)KO mice, perfused at constant pressure and constant heart rate, underwent 30 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. The adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; 200 nM) was administrated 10 min before ischemia and for the first 10 min of reperfusion. Treatment with CHA significantly improved postischemic left ventricular developed pressure (74 ± 4% vs. 44 ± 4% of preischemic left ventricular developed pressure at 60 min of reperfusion) and reduced infarct size (30 ± 2% with CHA vs. 52 ± 5% in control) in WT hearts, effects that were blocked by the A(1) antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (100 nM). Treatments with the A(2A) receptor agonist CGS-21680 (200 nM) and the A(2B) agonist BAY 60-6583 (200 nM) did not exert any beneficial effects. Deletion of adenosine A(2A) or A(2B) receptor subtypes did not alter ischemia-reperfusion injury, but CHA failed to exert a cardioprotective effect in hearts of mice from either KO group. These findings indicate that both adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptors are required for adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated cardioprotection, implicating a role for interactions among receptor subtypes.

Adenosine receptor-mediated cardioprotection: are all 4 subtypes required or redundant?

Adenosine is a purine nucleoside, which is produced primarily through the metabolism of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), therefore its levels increase during stressful situations when ATP utilization increases. Adenosine exerts potent cardioprotective effects on the ischemic/reperfused heart, reducing reversible and irreversible myocardial injury. Adenosine receptors (ARs) are G-protein-coupled receptors, and 4 subtypes exist--A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3), all of which have been shown to be cardioprotective. Adenosine receptors are expressed on multiple cardiac cells, including fibroblasts, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and myocytes. Activation of both A(1) and A(3) receptors prior to ischemia has been shown in multiple experimental models to reduce ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiac injury. Additionally, activation of the A(2A) receptor at the onset of reperfusion has been shown to reduce injury. Most recently, there is evidence that the A(2B) receptor has cardioprotective effects upon its activation. However, controversy remains regarding the precise timing of activation of these receptors required to induce cardioprotection, as well as their involvement in ischemic preconditioning and postconditioning. Adenosine receptors have been suggested to reduce cell death through actions at the mitochondrial ATP-dependent potassium (K(ATP)) channel, as well as protein kinase C and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. Additionally, the ability of ARs to interact has been documented, and several recent reports suggest that these interactions play a role in AR-mediated cardioprotection. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the cardioprotective effects of each AR subtype, as well as the proposed mechanisms of AR cardioprotection. Additionally, the role of AR interactions in cardioprotection is discussed.

Adenosine and its receptors in the heart: regulation, retaliation and adaptation

The purine nucleoside adenosine is an important regulator within the cardiovascular system, and throughout the body. Released in response to perturbations in energy state, among other stimuli, local adenosine interacts with 4 adenosine receptor sub-types on constituent cardiac and vascular cells: A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3)ARs. These G-protein coupled receptors mediate varied responses, from modulation of coronary flow, heart rate and contraction, to cardioprotection, inflammatory regulation, and control of cell growth and tissue remodeling. Research also unveils an increasingly complex interplay between members of the adenosine receptor family, and with other receptor groups. Given generally favorable effects of adenosine receptor activity (e.g. improving the balance between myocardial energy utilization and supply, limiting injury and adverse remodeling, suppressing inflammation), the adenosine receptor system is an attractive target for therapeutic manipulation. Cardiovascular adenosine receptor-based therapies are already in place, and trials of new treatments underway. Although the complex interplay between adenosine receptors and other receptors, and their wide distribution and functions, pose challenges to implementation of site/target specific cardiovascular therapy, the potential of adenosinergic pharmacotherapy can be more fully realized with greater understanding of the roles of adenosine receptors under physiological and pathological conditions. This review addresses some of the major known and proposed actions of adenosine and adenosine receptors in the heart and vessels, focusing on the ability of the adenosine receptor system to regulate cell function, retaliate against injurious stressors, and mediate longer-term adaptive responses.

Endogenous adenosine selectively modulates oxidant stress via the A1 receptor in ischemic hearts

We tested the impact of A1 adenosine receptor (AR) deletion on injury and oxidant damage in mouse hearts subjected to 25-min ischemia/45-min reperfusion (I/R). Wild-type hearts recovered approximately 50% of contractile function and released 8.2 +/- 0.7 IU/g of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). A1AR deletion worsened dysfunction and LDH efflux (15.2 +/- 2.6 IU/g). Tissue cholesterol and native cholesteryl esters were unchanged, whereas cholesteryl ester-derived lipid hydroperoxides and hydroxides (CE-O(O)H; a marker of lipid oxidation) increased threefold, and alpha-tocopherylquinone [alpha-TQ; oxidation product of alpha-tocopherol (alpha-TOH)] increased sixfold. Elevations in alpha-TQ were augmented by two- to threefold by A1AR deletion, whereas CE-O(O)H was unaltered. A(1)AR deletion also decreased glutathione redox status ([GSH]/[GSSG + GSH]) and enhanced expression of the antioxidant response element heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) during I/R: fourfold elevations in HO-1 mRNA and activity were doubled by A1AR deletion. Broad-spectrum AR agonism (10 microM 2-chloroadenosine; 2-CAD) countered effects of A1AR deletion on oxidant damage, HO-1, and tissue injury, indicating that additional ARs (A(2A), A(2B), and/or A3) can mediate similar actions. These data reveal that local adenosine engages A1ARs during I/R to limit oxidant damage and enhance outcome selectively. Control of alpha-TOH/alpha-TQ levels may contribute to A1AR-dependent cardioprotection.

Adenosine A1 receptor activation reduces opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores in hypoxic cardiomyocytes

1. Adenosine A(1) receptors (A(1)R) play an important role in cardioprotection against hypoxic damage and the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores (MPTP) is central to the regulation of cell apoptosis and necrosis. However, it is still unclear whether A(1)R open MPTP in hypoxic cardiomyocytes. 2. The present study used primary cardiomyocyte cultures from neonatal rats to investigate the mechanisms of A(1)R activation and the effects of A(1)R on MPTP opening under hypoxic conditions. 3. Hypoxia increased both MPTP opening and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), while decreasing cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential (Deltapsi). The A(1)R agonist 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA; 500 nmol/L) blocked the increase in MPTP opening and ROS production and maintained cell viability and Deltapsi under hypoxic conditions. 4. The protective effects of CCPA were eliminated by both the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor chelerythine (2 micromol/L) and the mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K(+) channel (mitoK(ATP)) inhibitor 5-hydroxydecanoate (500 micromol/L). Moreover, CCPA significantly increased the PKC content in both total protein and membrane protein of cardiomyocytes. 5-Hydroxydecanoate did not prevent these CCPA-induced increases in PKC. 5. These results demonstrate that CCPA reduces MPTP opening in hypoxic cardiomyocytes, possibly by activating PKC, stabilizing Deltapsi and reducing ROS production following the opening of mitoK(ATP). Consequently, fewer MPTP open.

Adenosine receptors and reperfusion injury of the heart

Adenosine, a catabolite of ATP, exerts numerous effects in the heart, including modulation of the cardiac response to stress, such as that which occurs during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Over the past 20 years, substantial evidence has accumulated that adenosine, administered either prior to ischemia or during reperfusion, reduces both reversible and irreversible myocardial injury. The latter effect results in a reduction of both necrosis or myocardial infarction (MI) and apoptosis. These effects appear to be mediated via the activation of one or more G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), referred to as A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3) adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes. Experimental studies in different species and models suggest that activation of the A(1) or A(3)ARs prior to ischemia is cardioprotective. Further experimental studies reveal that the administration of A(2A)AR agonists during reperfusion can also reduce MI, and recent reports suggest that A(2B)ARs may also play an important role in modulating myocardial reperfusion injury. Despite convincing experimental evidence for AR-mediated cardioprotection, there have been only a limited number of clinical trials examining the beneficial effects of adenosine or adenosine-based therapeutics in humans, and the results of these studies have been equivocal. This review summarizes our current knowledge of AR-mediated cardioprotection, and the roles of the four known ARs in experimental models of ischemia-reperfusion. The chapter concludes with an examination of the clinical trials to date assessing the safety and efficacy of adenosine as a cardioprotective agent during coronary thrombolysis in humans.

Pharmacologic therapeutics for cardiac reperfusion injury

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in industrial societies, with myocardial infarction as the primary assassin. Pharmacologic agents, including the myocardial cell membrane receptor agonists adenosine, bradykinin/angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, opioids and erythropoietin or the mixed cell membrane and intracellular agonists, glucose insulin potassium, and volatile anesthetics, either clinically or experimentally reduce the extent of myocardial injury when administered just prior to reperfusion. Agents that specifically target proteins, transcription factors or ion channels, including PKC agonists/antagonists, PPAR, Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, 3-Hydroxy-3-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase and the ATP-dependent potassium channel are also promising. However, no agent has been specifically approved to reduce reperfusion injury clinically. In this review, we will discuss the advantages and limitations of agents to combat reperfusion injury, their market development status and findings reported in both clinical and preclinical studies. The molecular pathways activated by these agents that preserve myocardium from reperfusion injury, which appear to commonly involve glycogen synthase kinase 3beta and mitochondrial permeability transition pore inhibition, are also described.

Adenosine instead of supranormal potassium in cardioplegic solution improves cardioprotection

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether adenosine instead of supranormal potassium in cold crystalloid cardioplegia gives satisfactory cardiac arrest and improved cardioprotection. Cold crystalloid cardioplegia with adenosine, procaine and magnesium (A) was compared with standard cold crystalloid hyperkalemic cardioplegia (K).

METHODS

Sixteen pigs were randomized to receive either cold K (n=8) or A (n=8), where hyperkalemia was substituted with 1.2 mM adenosine. The cold (6 degrees C) cardioplegia was given intermittently and antegradely, with an aortic cross-clamp time of 1 h. Hemodynamic data was continuously measured and pressure-volume conductance catheters were used to determine global left ventricular systolic and diastolic function. Coronary flow and O2 content differences allowed determination of left ventricular energetics. Blood samples, and left ventricular microdialysis were used to measure parameters of ischemia. Measurements were done at 1 and 2 h after cross-clamp release.

RESULTS

Mean arterial pressure was reduced with 55 mmHg (standard deviation, SD: 19) in the K group versus 30 mmHg (SD: 14) in the A group 2 h after cross-clamp release (p=0.030). Left ventricular contractility expressed as slope of the preload recruitable stroke work index (Mw) was reduced to 53% (SD: 14) in the K group versus 78% (SD: 23) in the A group 2h after cross-clamp release (p=0.046). Reduction of maximum of first derivate of pressure with respect to time (dP/dtmax) was 804 mmHg/s (SD: 189) in the K group versus 538 mmHg/s (SD: 184) in the A group (p=0.033). The slope of the myocardial oxygen consumption-pressure volume area was at 2 h reperfusion increased from 1.37 (SD: 0.64) to 2.86 (SD: 1.27) in the K group, whereas no shift was detected in the A group (p=0.019). Cardiac troponin T measured in the coronary sinus 1 h after cross-clamp release was 1.25 microg/l (SD: 0.64) in the K group versus 0.73 microg/l (SD: 0.31) in the A group (p=0.046).

CONCLUSION

Adenosine instead of supranormal potassium in cold crystalloid cardioplegia gives satisfactory cardiac arrest, improves post cardioplegic left ventricular systolic function and efficiency, and attenuates myocardial cell damage.

Diadenosine tetraphosphate stimulates atrial ANP release via A(1) receptor: involvement of K(ATP) channel and PKC

Diadenosine polyphosphates (APnAs) are endogenous compounds and exert diverse cardiovascular functions. However, the effects of APnAs on atrial ANP release and contractility have not been studied. In this study, the effects of diadenosine tetraphosphate (AP4A) on atrial ANP release and contractility, and their mechanisms were studied using isolated perfused rat atria. Treatment of atria with AP4A resulted in decreases in atrial contractility and extracellular fluid (ECF) translocation whereas ANP secretion and cAMP levels in perfusate were increased in a dose-dependent manner. These effects of AP4A were attenuated by A(1) receptor antagonist but not by A(2A) or A(3) receptor antagonist. Other purinoceptor antagonists also did not show any effects on AP4A-induced ANF release and contractility. The increment of ANP release and negative inotropy induced by AP4A was similar to those induced by AP3A, AP5A, and AP6A. Protein kinase A inhibitors accentuated AP4A-induced ANP secretion. In contrast, an inhibitor of phospholipase C, protein kinase C or sarcolemma K(ATP) channel completely blocked AP4A-induced ANP secretion. However, an inhibitor of adenylyl cyclase or mitochondria K(ATP) channel had no significant modification of AP4A effects. These results suggest that AP4A regulates atrial inotropy and ANP release mainly through A(1) receptor signaling involving phospholipase C-protein kinase C and sarcolemmal K(ATP) channel and that protein kinase A negatively modulates the effects of AP4A.

Human recombinant chromogranin A-derived vasostatin-1 mimics preconditioning via an adenosine/nitric oxide signaling mechanism

The acidic protein chromogranin A (CgA) is the precursor of several regulatory peptides generated by specific proteolytic processes. Human recombinant CgA NH(2)-terminal fragment STA-CgA(1-78) (hrSTA-CgA(1-78)), containing vasostatin-1 (CgA(1-76)) domain, exerts a negative inotropic effect and counteracts the beta-adrenergic positive inotropic effect on the rat heart. We hypothesized an involvement of nitric oxide (NO)-dependent pathway in both cardiodepression and cardioprotection by hrSTA-CgA(1-78). We also hypothesized an involvement of adenosine A(1) receptor and protein kinase C (PKC) in cardioprotection by hrSTA-CgA(1-78). Therefore, we evaluated whether 1) the cardioinhibition mediated by hrSTA-CgA(1-78) involves the G(i/o) proteins/NO-dependent signal transduction cascade, 2) hrSTA-CgA(1-78) induces ischemic preconditioning-like protective effects on the myocardium, and 3) inhibition of NO synthase (NOS), adenosine A(1) receptor, or PKC affects hrSTA-CgA(1-78) protection. Using the isolated rat heart, we found that the reduction of left ventricular pressure (LVP), rate-pressure product, and maximal values of the first derivative of LVP elicited by hrSTA-CgA(1-78) at 33 nM is abolished by blocking G(i/o) proteins with pertussis toxin, scavenging NO with hemoglobin, and blocking NOS activity with N(G)-monomethyl-l-arginine or N(5)-(iminoethyl)-l-ornithine, soluble guanylate cyclase with 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazole-[4,4-a]quinoxalin-1-one, and protein kinase (PKG) with KT5823. Data suggest the involvement of the G(i/o) proteins/NO-cGMP-PKG pathway in the hrSTA-CgA(1-78)-dependent cardioinhibition. When given before 30 min of ischemia, hrSTA-CgA(1-78) significantly reduced the size of the infarct from 64 +/- 4 to 32 +/- 3% of the left ventricular mass. This protective effect was abolished by either NOS inhibition or PKC blockade and was attenuated, but not suppressed, by the blockade of A(1) receptors. These results suggest that hrSTA-CgA(1-78) activity triggers two different pathways: one of these pathways is mediated by A(1) receptors, and the other is mediated by NO release. As with repeated brief preconditioning ischemia, hrSTA-CgA(1-78) may be considered a stimulus strong enough to trigger both pathways, which may converge on PKC.

A Novel Role for Protein Phosphatase 2A in Receptor-mediated Regulation of the Cardiac Sarcolemmal Na+/H+ Exchanger NHE1

G(q) protein-coupled receptor stimulation increases sarcolemmal Na(+)/H(+) exchanger (NHE1) activity in cardiac myocytes by an ERK/RSK-dependent mechanism, most likely via RSK-mediated phosphorylation of the NHE1 regulatory domain. Adenosine A(1) receptor stimulation inhibits this response through a G(i) protein-mediated pathway, but the distal inhibitory signaling mechanisms are unknown. In cultured adult rat ventricular myocytes (ARVM), the A(1) receptor agonist cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) inhibited the increase in NHE1 phosphorylation induced by the alpha(1)-adrenoreceptor agonist phenylephrine, without affecting activation of the ERK/RSK pathway. CPA also induced significant accumulation of the catalytic subunit of type 2A protein phosphatase (PP2A(c)) in the particulate fraction, which contained the cellular NHE1 complement; this effect was abolished by pretreatment with pertussis toxin to inactivate G(i) proteins. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopic imaging of CPA-treated ARVM revealed significant co-localization of PP2A(c) and NHE1, in intercalated disc regions. In an in vitro assay, purified PP2A(c) dephosphorylated a GST-NHE1 fusion protein containing aa 625-747 of the NHE1 regulatory domain, which had been pre-phosphorylated by recombinant RSK; such dephosphorylation was inhibited by the PP2A-selective phosphatase inhibitor endothall. In intact ARVM, the ability of CPA to attenuate the phenylephrine-induced increase in NHE1 phosphorylation and activity was lost in the presence of endothall. These studies reveal a novel role for the PP2A holoenzyme in adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated regulation of NHE1 activity in ARVM, the mechanism of which appears to involve G(i) protein-mediated translocation of PP2A(c) and NHE1 dephosphorylation.

Amelioration of Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Myocardial Infarction by the 2-Alkynyladenosine Derivative 2-Octynyladenosine (YT-146)

The present study was aimed at determining whether the novel adenosine A2-agonist YT-146 may have cardioprotective effects against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Anesthetized open-chest dogs underwent 90-min occlusion of the left anterior descending artery and subsequent 300-min reperfusion. The animals were randomly assigned to receive vehicle, 3, or 10 microg/kg YT-146 or ischemic preconditioning (4 episodes of 5 min occlusion followed by 5 min of reperfusion). Blood pressure, heart rate, and regional myocardial blood flow throughout the experiment were measured, as was the myocardial infarct size after reperfusion. The infarct size of the vehicle-treated dog was 56.2% +/- 2.7% (n = 5), whereas that of 3 or 10 microg/kg YT-146-treated dog was smaller (ie, 29.5% +/- 8.7% or 20.2% +/- 7.0%, respectively; n = 5). The infarct size of the dog treated with 10 microg/kg YT-146 was reduced to a degree similar to that of the ischemic preconditioning (19.2% +/- 6.3%, n = 5). YT-146 at both doses elicited a dose-dependent increase in acute hyperemic coronary flow immediately after reperfusion. The cardioprotective effect may be attributed to the limitation of the infarct size, probably via A2-receptor-mediated coronary artery dilatation during the early period of reperfusion.

Lack of effect of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist, GR79236, on capsaicin-induced CGRP release in anaesthetized pigs

Migraine is a common neurological disorder that is associated with an increase in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) levels. CGRP, a potent vasodilator released from the activated trigeminal sensory nerves, dilates intracranial blood vessels and transmits vascular nociception. Hence, inhibition of trigeminal CGRP release may prevent neurotransmission and, thereby, ameliorate migraine headache. Therefore, the present study in anaesthetized pigs investigates the effects of a selective adenosine A(1) receptor agonist, GR79236 (3, 10 and 30 microg/kg, i.v.) on capsaicin-induced carotid haemodynamic changes and on plasma CGRP release. Intracarotid (i.c.) infusion of capsaicin (10 microg/kg/min, i.c.) increased the total carotid blood flow and conductance as well as carotid pulsations, but decreased the difference between arterial and jugular venous oxygen saturations. These responses to capsaicin were dose-dependently attenuated by GR79236. However, the increases in the plasma CGRP concentrations by capsaicin remained essentially unmodified after GR79236 treatment. The above results suggest that GR79236 may have an antimigraine potential due to its postjunctional effects (carotid vasoconstriction) rather than to prejunctional inhibition of trigeminal CGRP release.

Adenosine-stimulated atrial natriuretic peptide release through A1 receptor subtype

Adenosine acts as an important protector of ischemic myocardium through coronary vasodilation and the depression of cardiac contractility. The protective effect of adenosine may partly relate to the cardiac hormone atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP). The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of adenosine and the adenosine receptor subtype on atrial hemodynamics and ANP release using isolated perfused beating rat atria. Adenosine, a nonselective adenosine receptor agonist, increased the ANP release with negative inotropism in a dose-dependent manner. Adenosine-stimulated ANP release was attenuated by a selective A1 antagonist but not A(2A) antagonist or A3 antagonist. The order of potency of the various agonists for the ANP release was A1 agonists>>A3 agonist=adenosine>A(2A) agonist. The order of potency for the negative inotropy was A1 agonists>adenosine=A(2A) agonist>A3 agonist. The negative inotropism and ANP release by a specific A1 agonist (N6-cyclopentyl-adenosine) were also attenuated by A1 antagonist but not A(2A) antagonist or A3 antagonist. Treatment with A1 agonist resulted in a decrease of cAMP contents in atria and perfusates. The agonist-stimulated ANP release was significantly attenuated in the presence of forskolin, isoproterenol 8-Br-cAMP, or an adenylyl cyclase inhibitor. These results suggest that the A1 receptor subtype is responsible for the adenosine-induced ANP release and negative inotropism through adenylyl cyclase-cAMP pathway.

Adenosine receptor agonists: from basic medicinal chemistry to clinical development

Adenosine is a physiological nucleoside which acts as an autocoid and activates G protein-coupled membrane receptors, designated A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3). Adenosine plays an important role in many (patho)physiological conditions in the CNS as well as in peripheral organs and tissues. Adenosine receptors are present on virtually every cell. However, receptor subtype distribution and densities vary greatly. Adenosine itself is used as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of supraventricular paroxysmal tachycardia and arrhythmias and as a vasodilatatory agent in cardiac imaging. During the past 20 years, a number of selective agonists for A(1), A(2A) and A(3) adenosine receptors have been developed, all of them structurally derived from adenosine. Several such compounds are currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases (A(1)and A(2A)), pain (A(1)), wound healing (A(2A)), diabetic foot ulcers (A(2A)), colorectal cancer (A(3)) and rheumatoid arthritis (A(3)). Clinical evaluation of some A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptor agonists has been discontinued. Major problems include side effects due to the wide distribution of adenosine receptors; low brain penetration, which is important for the targeting of CNS diseases; short half-lifes of compounds; or a lack of effects, in some cases perhaps due to receptor desensitisation or to low receptor density in the targeted tissue. Partial agonists, inhibitors of adenosine metabolism (adenosine kinase and deaminase inhibitors) or allosteric activators of adenosine receptors may be advantageous for certain indications, as they may exhibit fewer side effects.

Adenosine A1/A2a receptor agonist AMP-579 induces acute and delayed preconditioning against in vivo myocardial stunning

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the adenosine A1/A2a receptor agonist AMP-579 induces acute and delayed preconditioning against in vivo myocardial stunning. Regional stunning was produced by 15 min of coronary artery occlusion and 3 h of reperfusion (RP) in anesthetized open-chest pigs. In acute protection studies, animals were pretreated with saline, low-dose AMP-579 (15 microg/kg iv bolus 10 min before ischemia), or high-dose AMP-579 (50 microg/kg iv at 14 microg/kg bolus + 1.2 microg.kg(-1).min(-1) for 30 min before coronary occlusion). The delayed preconditioning effects of AMP-579 were evaluated 24 h after administration of saline vehicle or high-dose AMP-579 (50 microg/kg iv). Load-insensitive contractility was assessed by measuring regional preload recruitable stroke work (PRSW) and PRSW area. Acute preconditioning with AMP-579 dose dependently improved regional PRSW: 129 +/- 5 and 100 +/- 2% in high- and low-dose AMP-579 groups, respectively, and 78 +/- 5% in the control group at 3 h of RP. Administration of the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (0.7 mg/kg) blocked the acute protective effect of high-dose AMP-579, indicating that these effects are mediated through A1 receptor activation. Delayed preconditioning with AMP-579 significantly increased recovery of PRSW area: 64 +/- 5 vs. 33 +/- 5% in control at 3 h of RP. In isolated perfused rat heart studies, kinetics of the onset and washout of AMP-579 A1 and A2a receptor-mediated effects were distinct compared with those of other adenosine receptor agonists. The unique nature of the adenosine agonist AMP-579 may play a role in its ability to induce delayed preconditioning against in vivo myocardial stunning.

Acute adenosinergic cardioprotection in ischemic-reperfused hearts

Cells of the cardiovascular system generate and release purine nucleoside adenosine in increasing quantities when constituent cells are "stressed" or subjected to injurious stimuli. This increased adenosine can interact with surface receptors in myocardial, vascular, fibroblast, and inflammatory cells to modulate cellular function and phenotype. Additionally, adenosine is rapidly reincorporated back into 5'-AMP to maintain the adenine nucleotide pool. Via these receptor-dependent and independent (metabolic) paths, adenosine can substantially modify the acute response to ischemic insult, in addition to generating a more sustained ischemia-tolerant phenotype (preconditioning). However, the molecular basis for acute adenosinergic cardioprotection remains incompletely understood and may well differ from more widely studied preconditioning. Here we review current knowledge and some controversies regarding acute cardioprotection via adenosine and adenosine receptor activation.

Receptor and non-receptor-dependent mechanisms of cardioprotection with adenosine

The relative roles of mitochondrial (mito) ATP-sensitive K(+) (mitoK(ATP)) channels, protein kinase C (PKC), and adenosine kinase (AK) in adenosine-mediated protection were assessed in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts subjected to 20-min ischemia and 45-min reperfusion. Control hearts recovered 72 +/- 3 mmHg of ventricular pressure (50% preischemia) and released 23 +/- 2 IU/g lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Adenosine (50 microM) during ischemia-reperfusion improved recovery (149 +/- 8 mmHg) and reduced LDH efflux (5 +/- 1 IU/g). Treatment during ischemia alone was less effective. Treatment with 50 microM diazoxide (mitoK(ATP) opener) during ischemia and reperfusion enhanced recovery and was equally effective during ischemia alone. A(3) agonism [100 nM 2-chloro-N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide], A(1) agonism (N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine), and AK inhibition (10 microM iodotubercidin) all reduced necrosis to the same extent as adenosine, but less effectively reduced contractile dysfunction. These responses were abolished by 100 microM 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD, mitoK(ATP) channel blocker) or 3 microM chelerythrine (PKC inhibitor). However, the protective effects of adenosine during ischemia-reperfusion were resistant to 5-HD and chelerythrine and only abolished when inhibitors were coinfused with iodotubercidin. Data indicate adenosine-mediated protection via A(1)/A(3) adenosine receptors is mitoK(ATP) channel and PKC dependent, with evidence for a downstream location of PKC. Adenosine provides additional and substantial protection via phosphorylation to 5'-AMP, primarily during reperfusion.

New 2,N6-disubstituted adenosines: potent and selective A1 adenosine receptor agonists

A number of adenosine analogues substituted in the 2- and N6-positions were synthesized and evaluated for affinity, functional potency and intrinsic activity at the A1 and A2A adenosine receptors (AR). Three classes of N6-substituents were tested; norbornen-2-yl (series 1), norborn-2-yl (series 2) and 5,6-epoxynorborn-2-yl (series 3). The halogens; fluoro, bromo, and iodo were evaluated as C-2 substituents. All compounds showed relatively high affinity (nanomolar) for the A1AR and high potency for inhibiting (-)isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP accumulation in hamster smooth muscle DDT1 MF-2 cells with the 2-fluoro derivatives from each series having the highest affinity. All of the derivatives showed the same intrinsic activity as CPA. At the A2AAR, all of the derivatives showed relatively low affinity and potency (micromolar) for stimulating cAMP accumulation in rat pheochromocytoma PC-12 cells. The intrinsic activity of the derivatives compared to CGS 21680 was dependent upon the halogen substituent in the C-2 position with most showing partial agonist activity. Of particular interest is 2-iodo-N6-(2S-endo-norborn-2-yl)adenosine (5e), which is over 100-fold selective for the A1AR, is a full agonist at this receptor subtype and has no detectable agonist activity at the A2AAR.

Platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1-directed immunotargeting to cardiopulmonary vasculature

Therapeutic molecules conjugated with antibodies to the platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) accumulate in the pulmonary endothelium after i.v. injection in mice. In this study, we characterized PECAM-directed targeting to the lung and heart after local versus systemic intravascular administration in a large animal model, pigs. Radiolabel tracing showed that 1 h post-i.v. injection, 35% of anti-PECAM versus 2.5% of control IgG had accumulated in the lungs. Infusion of anti-PECAM via a catheter placed in the right pulmonary artery (RPA) resulted in a 3-fold elevation of the uptake in the right lower lobe and 2-fold reduction of uptake in the left lobes in the lung. Cardiac uptake of anti-PECAM was negligible after i.v. and RPA infusion. In contrast, delivery with a catheter placed in the right coronary artery (RCA) resulted in a 4-fold elevation of cardiac uptake of anti-PECAM, but not IgG, compared with i.v. injection. To estimate the targeting of an active reporter enzyme, streptavidin-conjugated beta-galactosidase (beta-Gal) was coupled to anti-PECAM or IgG (anti-PECAM/beta-Gal and IgG/beta-Gal) and injected into the RCA. Beta-Gal activity was markedly elevated in the heart and lungs (5- and 25-fold increased, respectively) after injection of anti-PECAM/beta-Gal, but not IgG/beta-Gal. Image analysis confirmed endothelial targeting of anti-PECAM/beta-Gal in the heart and lung. In summary, anti-PECAM antibody conjugates deliver agents to the pulmonary endothelium regardless of injection route, whereas local arterial infusion permits targeting to the cardiac vasculature. This paradigm may be useful for drug targeting to endothelium in lungs, heart, and possibly other organs.

Does a selective adenosine A(1) receptor agonist protect against exercise induced ischaemia in patients with coronary artery disease?

BACKGROUND

The "warm up" effect in angina may represent ischaemic preconditioning, which is mediated by adenosine A(1) receptors in most models.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of a selective A(1) agonist, GR79236 (GlaxoSmithKline), on exercise induced angina and ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

A double blind crossover study.

PATIENTS

25 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

INTERVENTIONS

On mornings one week apart, patients received intravenous GR79236 10 microgram/kg or placebo, and then carried out two supine bicycle exercise tests separated by 30 minutes. Equilibrium radionuclide angiography was done before and during exercise.

RESULTS

The onset of chest pain or 1 mm ST depression was delayed and occurred at a higher rate-pressure product during the second exercise test following either placebo or GR79236. Compared with placebo, GR79236 did not affect these indices during equivalent tests. GR79236 reduced resting global ejection fraction from (mean (SD)) 63 (7)% to 61 (5)% (p < 0.05) by a selective reduction in the regional ejection fraction of "ischaemic" left ventricular sectors (those where the ejection fraction fell during the first exercise test following placebo). Ischaemic sectors showed increased function during the second test following placebo (72 (21)% v 66 (20)%; p = 0.0001), or during the first test following GR79236 (69 (21)% v 66 (20)%; p = 0.0001). Sequential exercise further increased the function of ischaemic sectors even after drug administration.

CONCLUSIONS

GR79236 failed to mimic the warm up effect, and warm up occurred even in the presence of this agent. This suggests that ischaemic preconditioning is not an important component of this type of protection. The complex actions of the drug on regional left ventricular function at rest and during exercise suggest several competing A(1) mediated actions.

Pharmacological modulation, preclinical studies, and new clinical features of myocardial ischemic preconditioning

The term "ischemic preconditioning (PC)" was first applied to canine myocardium subjected to brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion that tolerated a more prolonged episode of ischemia better than myocardium not previously exposed to ischemia. Protective effect of myocardial ischemic PC was demonstrated in several animal species, resulting in the strongest endogenous form of protection against myocardial injury, jeopardized myocardium, infarct size, and arrhythmias other than early reperfusion. New onset angina before acute myocardial infarction, episodes of myocardial ischemia during coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery, and the "warm-up" phenomenon may represent clinical counterparts of the PC phenomenon in humans. Here, we have attempted to summarize pharmacological modulation, preclinical studies, and new clinical features of ischemic PC. To date, the pathophysiological basis of the "chemical PC" is still not well established, and "putting PC in a bottle" for clinical applications still remains a new pharmacological venture.

Intrinsic A(1) adenosine receptor activation during ischemia or reperfusion improves recovery in mouse hearts

We assessed the role of A(1) adenosine receptor (A(1)AR) activation by endogenous adenosine in the modulation of ischemic contracture and postischemic recovery in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts subjected to 20 min of total ischemia and 30 min of reperfusion. In control hearts, the rate-pressure product (RPP) and first derivative of pressure development over time (+dP/dt) recovered to 57 +/- 3 and 58 +/- 3% of preischemia, respectively. Diastolic pressure remained elevated at 20 +/- 2 mmHg (compared with 3 +/- 1 mmHg preischemia). Interstitial adenosine, assessed by microdialysis, rose from approximately 0.3 to 1.9 microM during ischemia compared with approximately 15 microM in rat heart. Nonetheless, these levels will near maximally activate A(1)ARs on the basis of effects of exogenous adenosine and 2-chloroadenosine. Neither A(1)AR blockade with 200 nM 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) during the ischemic period alone nor A(1)AR activation with 50 nM N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine altered rapidity or extent of ischemic contracture. However, ischemic DPCPX treatment significantly depressed postischemic recovery of RPP and +dP/dt (44 +/- 3 and 40 +/- 4% of preischemia, respectively). DPCPX treatment during the reperfusion period alone also reduced recovery of RPP and +dP/dt (to 44 +/- 2 and 47 +/- 2% of preischemia, respectively). These data indicate that 1) interstitial adenosine is lower in mouse versus rat myocardium during ischemia, 2) A(1)AR activation by endogenous adenosine or exogenous agonists does not modify ischemic contracture in murine myocardium, 3) A(1)AR activation by endogenous adenosine during ischemia attenuates postischemic stunning, and 4) A(1)AR activation by endogenous adenosine during the reperfusion period also improves postischemic contractile recovery.

Adenosine A(1) receptor stimulation inhibits alpha(1)-adrenergic activation of the cardiac sarcolemmal Na(+)/H(+) exchanger

Sarcolemmal Na(+)/H(+) exchanger (NHE) activity is increased by stimulation of G(q) protein-coupled receptors (G(q)PCRs), but the roles of other GPCRs are largely unknown. We determined the effects of N-[(1S,trans)-2-hydroxycyclopentyl]adenosine (GR79236), a selective agonist of the G(i)PCR adenosine A(1) receptor, on sarcolemmal NHE activity in adult rat ventricular myocytes (n=8-10 per group). NHE activity was indexed by the H(+) efflux rate after intracellular acidification, measured by microepifluorescence. GR79236 alone (0.01-10 microM) had no effect on NHE activity. However, co-administration of GR79236 inhibited, in a concentration-dependent manner, the stimulation of NHE activity by the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine (10 microM). The inhibitory effect of GR79236 (10 microM) was abolished by (1) the selective A(1) antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (0.1 microM), confirming an A(1) receptor-mediated action, and (2) pre-treatment with pertussis toxin (5 microgram ml(-1) for 60 min), indicating a G(i) protein-mediated mechanism. Our data suggest the existence of inhibitory crosstalk between the G(i)PCR adenosine A(1) receptor and the G(q)PCR alpha(1)-adrenoceptor in the regulation of sarcolemmal NHE activity.

Intravenous AMP 579, a novel adenosine A(1)/A(2a) receptor agonist, induces a delayed protection against myocardial infarction in minipig

The aim of the study was to probe if acute administration of [1S-[1a, 2b,3b, 4a(S*)]]-4-[7-[[2-(3-chloro-2-thienyl)-1-methylpropyl]amino]-3H-imida zo[4,5-b] pyridin-3-yl] cyclopentane carboxamide (AMP 579) could provide a delayed protection against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury after 24 h. Anesthetized Yucatan minipigs were given an intravenous (i.v.) loading dose (3 microg/kg) of AMP 579 in 2 min followed by a 68-min infusion (0.3 microg/kg/min) and were allowed to recover. After 24 h, the animals were subjected to an open-chest operation and the left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 40 min, followed by 3 h of reperfusion. Results indicated that there were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters between vehicle- and drug-treated groups either during drug infusion or ischemia-reperfusion. Both groups had similar area at risk (24.9% for vehicle and 25.1% for AMP 579-treated). However, the infarct size was 36.5% of area at risk in vehicle group (n=8) and 12.5% in AMP 579 group (n=8), representing a 66% reduction of infarct size by AMP 579 (p=0.011). This is the first report to demonstrate that in a large animal model, a hemodynamically silent, single i.v. dose of an adenosine receptor agonist can result in a delayed protection against myocardial infarction.

The effect of body temperature on myocardial protection conferred by ischaemic preconditioning or the selective adenosine A1 receptor agonist GR79236, in an anaesthetized rabbit model of myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion

1 The cardioprotective effect of N-[(1S, trans)-2-hydroxycyclopentyl]adenosine (GR79236), an adenosine A1 receptor agonist, was compared with that produced by ischaemic preconditioning in an anaesthetized rabbit model of myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion. In addition, we examined the effect of different body core temperatures on GR79236- or ischaemic preconditioning-induced cardioprotection when administered prior to ischaemia, and on cardioprotection induced by GR79236 administered 10 min prior to the onset of reperfusion. 2 When rabbits were subjected to 30 min occlusion of the left coronary artery, followed by 2 h reperfusion, GR79236 (3 x 10(-8) mol kg-1 i.v. (10.5 microg kg-1 i.v.)) or ischaemic preconditioning (5 min ischaemia followed by 5 min reperfusion), administered or applied 10 min prior to the occlusion, significantly limited the development of infarction. The cardioprotective effect of ischaemic preconditioning was significantly greater than that seen after administration of GR79236. Pre-treatment with the selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, 3.3 x 10(-6) mol kg-1 (1 mg kg-1 i.v.)), prevented the cardioprotective effect of GR79236, but not that of ischaemic preconditioning. 3 Maintaining body core temperature at 38.5 degrees C rather than at 37.0 degrees C did not influence infarct size in control groups of rabbits, but reduced the cardioprotective effect of GR79236 when administered 10 min prior to occlusion or 10 min prior to the onset of reperfusion. The cardioprotective effect of ischaemic preconditioning was not temperature-dependent. 4 In conclusion, myocardial protection conferred by GR79236 in anaesthetized rabbits is mediated via adenosine A1 receptors. Myocardial protection can be conferred when GR79236 is administered before the onset of ischaemia or reperfusion, and is reduced when body core temperature is maintained at 38.5 degrees C rather than at 37.0 degrees C. In contrast, myocardial protection conferred by ischaemic preconditioning is not reduced by adenosine A1 receptor blockade, or by maintaining body core temperature at 38.5 degrees C rather than at 37.0 degrees C. These findings point to distinct differences in the mechanisms of induction of myocardial protection by adenosine A1 receptor agonist and ischaemic preconditioning. They also highlight the need for careful control of body core temperature when investigating the phenomenon of cardioprotection.