Immunohistochemistry can help distinguish metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas from bile duct adenomas and hamartomas of the liver

Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Small Biopsies From the Bile Duct and Ampulla

CONTEXT.—

Histopathologic evaluation of bile duct and ampullary biopsies can be challenging. Biopsies from these sites are often tiny, scant, and/or fragmented. When assessing these biopsies, there is significant overlap between reactive atypia and malignancy, in situ precursor lesions can be misinterpreted as malignancy, and nonprimary tumors can mimic primary disease.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide diagnostic pearls and pitfalls in the evaluation of small biopsies from the biliary tract.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review of published studies and the author's own observations.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Because the procedures for obtaining specimens from the bile duct and ampulla are invasive, pathologists need to try to make definitive diagnoses. Diagnostic clues/pearls, ancillary studies, and recognition of various pitfalls can assist in providing accurate and confident diagnoses.

Ancillary tests for hepatobiliary neoplasms: what we know and what we need to know

Ancillary tests are commonly used in the surgical pathology setting for diagnosing challenging neoplastic diseases of the liver and biliary tract, while histology and clinical correlation remain to be critically important. With continuous discoveries, more and more useful ancillary tests have become available, which can help distinguish between malignant and benign hepatocellular neoplasms, malignant and benign biliary tract entities, and intrahepatic and metastatic carcinomas. This review will focus on existing and emerging biomarkers (such as glutamine synthetase, organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B3, insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA binding protein-3, S100P, SMAD4, enhancer of zeste homolog 2, albumin, hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β, etc.) that can be used for the diagnosis, classification and prognostication of hepatobiliary neoplasms.

Implementation of deep learning in liver pathology optimizes diagnosis of benign lesions and adenocarcinoma metastasis

INTRODUCTION

Differentiation of histologically similar structures in the liver, including anatomical structures, benign bile duct lesions, or common types of liver metastases, can be challenging with conventional histological tissue sections alone. Accurate histopathological classification is paramount for the diagnosis and adequate treatment of the disease. Deep learning algorithms have been proposed for objective and consistent assessment of digital histopathological images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present study, we trained and evaluated deep learning algorithms based on the EfficientNetV2 and ResNetRS architectures to discriminate between different histopathological classes. For the required dataset, specialized surgical pathologists annotated seven different histological classes, including different non-neoplastic anatomical structures, benign bile duct lesions, and liver metastases from colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a large patient cohort. Annotation resulted in a total of 204.159 image patches, followed by discrimination analysis using our deep learning models. Model performance was evaluated on validation and test data using confusion matrices.

RESULTS

Evaluation of the test set based on tiles and cases revealed overall highly satisfactory prediction capability of our algorithm for the different histological classes, resulting in a tile accuracy of 89% (38 413/43 059) and case accuracy of 94% (198/211). Importantly, the separation of metastasis versus benign lesions was certainly confident on case level, confirming the classification model performed with high diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, the whole curated raw data set is made publically available.

CONCLUSIONS

Deep learning is a promising approach in surgical liver pathology supporting decision making in personalized medicine.

Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Origin: Application of Immunohistochemistry With Emphasis to Different Cytokeratin 7 and 20 Staining Patterns

BACKGROUND

Although the primary origin of some carcinomas may be obscure to clinicians, its identification is crucial as it affects prognosis and treatment (especially novel targeted therapies). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) may be helpful in identifying the primary origin of carcinomas. This retrospective survey aimed to evaluate the frequency and accuracy of each IHC marker used to determine the origin of carcinomas.

METHODS

The review of pathology department archives revealed 307 cases of cancer of unknown primary origin (CUP) between 2015 and 2020, which were accessible in the department archives. Demographic information, site of biopsy, clinical and pathologic diagnoses, and IHC results of the patients were collected.

RESULTS

The patients included 157 (51.15%) men and 150 (48.85%) women. The age of the patients ranged from 14 to 92 years, including 106 (34.5%) expired cases. In 27% of cases, the primary origin of carcinoma remained unknown. The agreement between pathologic and clinical diagnoses was 59%. The most common pattern of cytokeratin (CK) expression in CUP was CK7+/CK20- (55.3%), followed by CK7-/CK20- (19%), CK7+/CK20+ (15%), and CK7-/CK20+ (10.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The IHC analysis may improve the diagnosis of CUPs. However, the origin of some cases remains unknown despite an IHC analysis, thereby necessitating the use of more diagnostic procedures or gene expression studies for reaching a definitive diagnosis.

Impact of LBC fixative type and fixation time on molecular analysis of pancreatic cancer cells: A comparative study of cell morphology, antigenicity and nucleic acids

Introduction:

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has been widely used since 2000. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis of residual specimens in LBC fixative may also be performed for pancreatic cancer in the near future. We examined cell morphology, antigenicity and nucleic acids in pancreatic cancer cells at different fixation times using two types of LBC fixatives.

Methods:

PANC-1 cells were fixed in 1 ml CytoRich Red (CR), CytoRich Blue (CB), 95% ethanol (95% AL) or 10% neutral buffered formalin (10% NBF) and evaluated for cell area, antigenicity and nucleic acids with fixation times of 1 hour and 1, 3, 9, and 14 days. Antigenicity was evaluated by immunocytochemical staining for p53 and CK20, and nucleic acid fragmentation was assessed by real-time PCR.

Results:

There was no difference in total cell area between 1 hour and 14 day fixation times for the CR group, but the CB group showed cell contraction with 9 days fixation. In immunocytochemical staining, the CR group showed high p53 and CK20 positivity even after 14 days fixation. The CB group had a lower p53 positive rate than the CR group from 1 hour fixation. For nucleic acid fragmentation, Ct values for the CR group increased with fixation time. The CB group had consistently low Ct values.

Conclusion:

Different LBC fixatives and fixation time can have varying effects on cell morphology, antigenicity and nucleic acids in pancreatic cancer cells. Therefore, fixative type and fixation time should be considered for molecular testing on residual samples in LBC fixatives.

Mesothelin is Commonly Expressed in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma but Unrelated to Cancer Aggressiveness

Data on Mesothelin (MSLN) expression in human normal and cancerous tissues is controversial. We employed immunohistochemistry (IHC) on a tissue microarray (TMA) from 599 pancreatic cancers and 12 large tissue sections of pancreatitis. MSLN expression was highest in pancreatic adenocarcinomas (89%) and adenocarcinomas of the ampulla Vateri (79%), infrequent in pancreatitis and absent in 6 acinus cell carcinomas and normal pancreas. MSLN expression was unrelated to pathological tumor stage, grade, metastasis, and tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes. In conclusion, pancreatic cancer may be ideally suited for putative anti- MSLN therapies, and MSLN may represent a suitable biomarker for pancreatic cancer diagnosis, especially on small biopsies.

Plastin-3 is a diagnostic and prognostic marker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and distinguishes from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Altered Plastin-3 (PLS3; an actin-binding protein) expression was associated with human carcinogenesis, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). This study first assessed differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and then bioinformatically and experimentally confirmed PLS3 to be able to predict PDA prognosis and distinguish PDA from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

This study screened multiple online databases and revealed DEGs among PDA, normal pancreas, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and normal lymph node tissues and then focused on PLS3. These DEGs were analyzed for Gene Ontology (GO) terms, Kaplan-Meier curves, and the log-rank test to characterize their association with PDA prognosis. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted, and Spearman's tests were performed. Differential PLS3 expression in different tissue specimens (n = 30) was evaluated by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

RESULTS

There were a great number of DEGs between PDA and lymph node, between PDA and DLBCL, and between PDA and normal pancreatic tissues. Five DEGs (NET1, KCNK1, MAL2, PLS1, and PLS3) were associated with poor overall survival of PDA patients, but only PLS3 was further verified by the R2 and ICGC datasets. The ROC analysis showed a high PLS3 AUC (area under the curve) value for PDA diagnosis, while PLS3 was able to distinguish PDA from DLBCL. The results of Spearman's analysis showed that PLS3 expression was associated with levels of KRT7, SPP1, and SPARC. Differential PLS3 expression in different tissue specimens was further validated by RT-qPCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Altered PLS3 expression was useful in diagnosis and prognosis of PDA as well as to distinguish PDA from DLBCL.

The Role of Mesothelin as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Target in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

Mesothelin is a tumor differentiation antigen, which is highly expressed in several solid neoplasms, including pancreatic cancer. Its selective expression on malignant cells and on only a limited number of healthy tissues has made it an interesting candidate for investigation as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and as a therapeutic target. Based on a strong preclinical rationale, a number of therapeutic agents targeting mesothelin have entered clinical trials, including immunotoxins, monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, cancer vaccines, and adoptive T cell therapies with chimeric antigen receptors. In pancreatic cancer, mesothelin has been investigated mainly to address two unmet issues: the urgent need for new laboratory techniques for early tumor detection and the lack of successfully targetable oncogenic alterations for patients' treatment. In this review, we describe the clinicopathological significance of mesothelin expression in pancreatic cancer initiation and progression, we summarize available studies evaluating mesothelin as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in this disease, and we discuss current evidence and future perspectives of preclinical and clinical studies testing mesothelin as a molecular target for pancreatic cancer treatment.

Semen AMACR protein as a novel method for detecting prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Alpha methylacyl A coenzyme racemase (AMACR) has shown to be an excellent immunohistological biomarker for prostate cancer (CaP). Given the connection between prostate and urethra, we hypothesized that semen ejaculate would be an ideal specimen for detection of CaP specific biomarkers, such as AMACR. This study explores the detection of semen AMACR protein in men with and without CaP.

METHODS

Semen ejaculates from 28 biopsy proven CaP patients prior to radical prostatectomy and 15 age-comparable controls were analyzed. An indirect sandwich ELISA chemiluminescence assay was used to detect semen AMACR, PSA, and Matriptase proteins. Tissue AMACR protein was quantified in 12 corresponding prostatectomy specimens using automated quantitative analysis (AQUA).

RESULTS

Semen AMACR protein was detected in 23 of 28 (82%) CaP patients and 23 of 24 (96%) CaP patients with significant tumor volume (>0.5 cc or 0.3 g). Among the 5 cancer patients with undetectable semen AMACR, 4 patients had small tumor volumes (<1% or 0.3 g). Semen AMACR protein was also detected in 7 of 15 (47%) control noncancer patients. Using 76 ng/ml as a cutoff value, 20 of 28 (71%) patients and 20 of 24 (83%) patients with significant tumor volume were positive for semen AMACR protein, whereas only 5 of 15 (33%) age-comparable controls were positive. AMACR levels degrade with time.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate that AMACR protein is detectable in semen ejaculate. The higher AMACR levels detected in cancer patients suggests that semen AMACR protein may be useful as a noninvasive test for prostate cancer. Further validation is warranted.

Initial Features of Hepatic Metastases From Pancreatic Cancer: Histological and Radiolographical Appraisal of Hepatic Micrometastases Detected by Real-Time Fluorescent Imaging

OBJECTIVE

The pathophysiology of primary-stage hepatic metastases from gastrointestinal cancers may provide clues to their formation. We investigated initial features of hepatic metastases from pancreatic cancer by examining the histologies of radiographically occult hepatic micrometastases.

METHODS

We examined 133 consecutive pancreatic cancer patients with no evident hepatic metastases on preoperative imaging. An indocyanine green near-infrared camera system was used to detect hepatic metastases during surgery; preoperatively acquired images of patients were then retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Hepatic micrometastases were histologically confirmed in 20 patients (15%). Immunohistochemically, the metastatic cells were with higher positivity of carcinoembryonic antigen (100%), p53 overexpression (40%), and Ki-67 labeling index (38%, median). All the micrometastases were portal thromboemboli in the intrahepatic portal triad that invaded extravenous structures, causing desmoplasis, local biliary obstruction, and indocyanine green-contained bile stasis A review of preoperative dynamic computed tomography or magnetic resonance images revealed focal circular alterations presenting as arterioportal shunts in 50% of the patient with micrometastases and 11% of those without (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic metastasis from pancreatic cancer involves portal vein thrombosis that alters local circulation and bile stasis at the portal triad; this is detectable by presurgical radiological examination or intraoperative fluorescent imaging.

Immunohistochemical Typing of Adenocarcinomas of the Pancreatobiliary System Improves Diagnosis and Prognostic Stratification

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Adenocarcinomas of the pancreatobiliary system are currently classified by their primary anatomical location. In particular, the pathological diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is still considered as a diagnosis of exclusion of metastatic adenocarcinoma. Periampullary cancers have been previously classified according to the histological type of differentiation (pancreatobiliary, intestinal), but overlapping morphological features hinder their differential diagnosis. We performed an integrative immunohistochemical analysis of pancreato-biliary tumors to improve their diagnosis and prediction of outcome.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational cohort study on patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreatobiliary system who underwent diagnostic core needle biopsy or surgical resection at a tertiary referral center. 409 tumor samples were analyzed with up to 27 conventional antibodies used in diagnostic pathology. Immunohistochemical scoring system was the percentage of stained tumor cells. Bioinformatic analysis, internal validation, and survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Hierarchical clustering and differential expression analysis identified three immunohistochemical tumor types (extrahepatic pancreatobiliary, intestinal, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) and the discriminant markers between them. Among patients who underwent surgical resection of their primary tumor with curative intent, the intestinal type showed an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.19 for overall survival (95% confidence interval 0.05-0.72; p value = 0.014) compared to the extrahepatic pancreatobiliary type.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrative immunohistochemical classification of adenocarcinomas of the pancreatobiliary system results in a characteristic immunohistochemical profile for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and intestinal type adenocarcinoma, which helps in distinguishing them from metastatic and pancreatobiliary type adenocarcinoma, respectively. A diagnostic immunohistochemical panel and additional extended panels of discriminant markers are proposed as guidance for their pathological diagnosis.

Albumin expression distinguishes bile duct adenomas from metastatic adenocarcinoma

AIMS

Bile duct adenomas may be difficult to distinguish from metastatic carcinomas, particularly well-differentiated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Prior studies have evaluated the utility of various immunohistochemical markers, although these markers are notable for low sensitivity and/or specificity. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of albumin and BRAFV600E expression in distinguishing between metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and bile duct adenoma.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 26 bile duct adenomas, three bile duct hamartomas, and 158 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Branched-chain in-situ hybridization (bISH) for albumin was performed; bISH is based on the branched DNA technology, wherein signal amplification is achieved via a series of sequential steps. Additionally, BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on a subset of cases. Twenty-three of 25 (92%) bile duct adenomas were positive for albumin; 18 (72%) showed diffuse staining, and five showed focal staining (20%), including two challenging examples. Two bile duct hamartomas also stained positively. All pancreatic adenocarcinomas were negative for albumin. Seven of 16 (44%) bile duct adenomas and five of 106 (5%) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas were positive for BRAFV600E by IHC. The sensitivity and specificity of expression of albumin, as detected by bISH, for distinguishing bile duct adenomas from metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas were 92% and 100%, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of BRAFV600E IHC for distinguishing bile duct adenomas from metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas were 43.8% and 95.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostically challenging examples of bile duct adenoma may be distinguished from metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma by the use of albumin bISH.

Therapeutic Approaches for Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Since the US Food and Drug Administration's approval of gemcitabine in 1996, numerous randomized trials have investigated treatment programs to further improve the quality of life and survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. After little progress over the ensuing 15 years, 2 combination treatment programs recently conferred improved survival compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: FOLFIRINOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Importantly, our understanding of the biology of pancreatic cancer continues to grow. This improved biologic understanding holds great promise for integrating new targeted and immune-modifying therapies into current treatment programs.

Utility of immunohistochemistry in the pancreatobiliary tract

CONTEXT

Immunohistochemistry has become a useful ancillary study in the identification and classification of pancreatic neoplasms. The diagnostic accuracy has been significantly improved because of the continuous discoveries of tumor-associated biomarkers and the development of effective immunohistochemical panels.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and classify pancreatic neoplasms by immunohistochemistry.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review and authors' research data and personal practice experience were used.

CONCLUSIONS

To better guide therapeutic decisions and predict the prognostic outcome, it is crucial to make an accurate diagnosis of a pancreatic neoplasm. Application of appropriate immunohistochemical panels enables pathologists to differentiate pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinomas from reactive conditions and to identify rare types of pancreatic neoplasms. Knowing the utilities and pitfalls of each tumor-associated biomarker is essential to avoiding a potential diagnostic error because an absolutely cancer-specific biomarker does not exist. This article reviews frequently used tumor-associated biomarkers, provides lists of effective immunohistochemical panels, and recommends a diagnostic algorithm as a standard approach to pancreatic neoplasms.

Prognostıc value of increased HER2 expression in cancers of pancreas and biliary tree

Increased HER2 expression has a prognostic, and predictive value in many solid cancer types, predominantly in breast cancer. However the effects of HER2 on survival from cancers of pancreas, gall bladder, cholangiocellular, and ampullary region are not known. In this study, the effects of increased HER2 expression on these types of cancer have been analyzed. Immunohistochemical HER2 staining was performed in 31 (44.9 %) female, and 38 (55.1 %) male patients with a mean age of 65 ± 10 years, and various parameters, mostly survival rates of patients with pancreas (n = 30; 43.5 %), gall bladder (n = 17; 24.6 %), cholangiocellular (n = 12; 17.4 %), and ampullary region (n = 10; 14.5 %) carcinomas were evaluated. Strong (3 +) membranous staining for HER2 was observed in 2 patients with gall bladder cancers (11.76 % of all gall bladder cancers). In 2.90 % of all cases strong membranous staining (2+ or 3+) was observed. Weak (1+) membranous staining was noted in one (3.33 %) pancreatic, and one cholangiocellular (8.33 %) cancer patient, and in none of the ampullary region patient membranous staining for HER2 was observed. Since only scarce number of patients demonstrated membranous staining for HER2, survival analysis was not performed on these patients. Based on cytoplasmic HER2 staining scores, the patients were divided into weakly (0-3 pts; n = 17 patients; 24.66 %), moderate (4-5 pts; n = 22; 31.88 %), and strongly (6-7 pts; n = 30; 43.46 %) stained groups. Patients whose specimens demonstrated borderline statistical significant (p = 0.052) low staining for HER2 had higher survival rates when compared with other cases. Increased HER2 expression has no prognostic, and predictive value in cancers of pancreas, biliary tract, and ampulla vateri. If HER2 will be evaluated in these types of cancer, membranous, as well as cytoplasmic staining properties should be taken into account.

mTOR is a promising therapeutical target in a subpopulation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a highly lethal disease, unusually resistant against therapy. It is generally felt that stratification of patients for personalized medicine is the way forward. Here, we report that a subpopulation of PDACs shows strong activation of the mTOR signaling cassette. Moreover, we show that inhibition of mTOR in pancreatic cancer cell lines showing high levels of mTOR signaling is associated with cancer cell death. Finally, we show using fine needle biopsies the existence of a subpopulation of PDAC patients with high activation of the mTOR signaling cassette and provide evidence that inhibition of mTOR might be clinically useful for this group. Thus, our results define an unrecognized subpopulation of PDACs, characterized by high activation of mTOR and show that identification of this specific patient group in the early phase of diagnosis is feasible.

Diffusion-weighted MRI in intrahepatic bile duct adenoma arising from the cirrhotic liver

A 64-year-old male patient with liver cirrhosis underwent a CT study for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, which demonstrated a 1.4-cm hypervascular subcapsular tumor in the liver. On gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, the tumor showed brisk arterial enhancement and persistent hyperenhancement in the portal phase, but hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase. On diffusion-weighted MRI, the tumor showed an apparent diffusion coefficient twofold greater than that of the background liver parenchyma, which suggested that the lesion was benign. The histologic diagnosis was intrahepatic bile duct adenoma with alcoholic liver cirrhosis.

Value of claudin-4 immunostaining in the diagnosis of mesothelioma

Claudin-4 (CL-4) is a tight junction-associated protein that is expressed in most epithelial cells but absent in mesothelial cells. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of CL-4 immunostaining for assisting in the differential diagnosis of mesothelioma. Sixty mesotheliomas (40 epithelioid, 10 biphasic, and 10 sarcomatoid), 185 carcinomas of different origins that can potentially be confused with mesotheliomas, 37 soft-tissue sarcomas, and 5 melanomas were investigated for CL-4 expression. All 60 mesotheliomas were CL-4 negative. In contrast, 169 (91%) of 185 carcinomas expressed this marker. Five of 8 desmoplastic small round cell tumors and the epithelial component of all 5 biphasic synovial sarcomas were CL-4 positive, whereas none of the remaining soft-tissue sarcomas or melanomas expressed this marker. It is concluded that CL-4 is a highly specific and sensitive immunohistochemical marker for assisting in distinguishing epithelioid mesotheliomas from metastatic carcinomas to the serosal membranes.

Reevaluation and identification of the best immunohistochemical panel (pVHL, Maspin, S100P, IMP-3) for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

CONTEXT

Differentiation of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas from nonneoplastic pancreatic tissues can be challenging, especially in small biopsy and fine-needle aspiration specimens.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utility of 26 immunohistochemical markers (CAM 5.2, CK [cytokeratin] 7, CK20, CK17, CK19, MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC6, p53, DPC4/SMAD4, CDX2, pVHL [von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene protein], S100P, IMP-3 [insulin-like growth factor 2 messenger RNA binding protein 3], maspin, mesothelin, claudin 4, claudin 18, annexin A8, fascin, PSCA [prostate stem cell antigen], MOC31, CEA [carcinoembryonic antigen], and CA19-9 [cancer antigen 19-9]) in the diagnosis of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

DESIGN

Immunohistochemical staining for these markers was performed in 60 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on routine and tissue microarray sections. In addition, immunohistochemical staining for maspin, S100P, IMP-3, and pVHL was performed on cell blocks from 67 pancreatic fine-needle aspiration cases, including 44 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that (1) more than 90% of cases of ductal adenocarcinoma were positive for maspin, S100P, and IMP-3; (2) nearly all adenocarcinoma cases were negative for pVHL, whereas nonneoplastic ducts and acini were positive for pVHL in all cases; (3) normal/reactive pancreatic ducts were frequently positive for CK7, CK19, MUC1, MUC6, CA19-9, MOC31, PSCA, mesothelin, annexin A8, claudin 4, and claudin 18; (4) normal pancreatic ducts were usually negative for IMP-3, maspin, S100P, CK17, MUC2, MUC4, and MUC5AC; (5) 60% of adenocarcinomas were negative for DPC4/SMAD4; and (6) strong background staining was frequently seen with fascin, PSCA, and annexin A8.

CONCLUSIONS

pVHL, maspin, S100P, and IMP-3 constitute the best diagnostic panel of immunomarkers for confirming the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in both surgical and fine-needle aspiration specimens.

Immunohistochemical features of the gastrointestinal tract tumors

Gastrointestinal tract tumors include a wide variety of vastly different tumors and on a whole are one of the most common malignancies in western countries. These tumors often present at late stages as distant metastases which are then biopsied and may be difficult to differentiate without the aid of immunohistochemical stains. With the exception of pancreatic and biliary tumors where there are no distinct immunohistochemical patterns, most gastrointestinal tumors can be differentiated by their unique immunohistochemical profile. As the size of biopsies decrease, the role of immunohistochemical stains will become even more important in determining the origin and differentiation of gastrointestinal tract tumors.

The novel monoclonal antibody HPC2 and N-cadherin distinguish pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from cholangiocarcinoma

Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and primary cholangiocarcinoma are morphologically very similar and, therefore, challenging to distinguish in liver biopsies. The distinction is important because surgical management and prognosis differ significantly. Several immunohistochemical markers have been evaluated to aid this diagnosis, but aside from N-cadherin, which labels cholangiocarcinoma, few provide the combination of good sensitivity and specificity. Our laboratory recently developed the novel monoclonal antibody human pancreatic cancer fusion #2 (HPC2) that recognizes pancreatic cancer. We hypothesized that the combination of our new marker and N-cadherin can assist in distinguishing metastatic pancreatic cancer from cholangiocarcinoma. We immunostained resections of 60 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and 31 cholangiocarcinomas for the HPC2 and N-cadherin antigens. We also stained 24 gallbladder adenocarcinomas, 11 ampullary adenocarcinomas, and 10 metastatic colonic adenocarcinomas to the liver. Sections were independently scored by 2 pathologists with good agreement using both markers (κ statistics, 0.62-0.64; P < .0001). HPC2 was observed in 80% of pancreatic cancers (48/60), 82% of ampullary (9/11), and 32% (10/31) of cholangiocarcinomas. N-cadherin stained 27% (16/60) of the pancreas cases and 58% (18/31) of the cholangiocarcinomas. Gallbladder and colon cancers were usually double negative (18/24 and 8/10, respectively). Each marker provided significant likelihood ratios to separate pancreatic cancer (HPC2, 2.48 [1.46-4.19]; P < .0001) from cholangiocarcinoma (N-cadherin, 2.17 [1.3-3.64]; P < .01). The combination of both markers provided even better specificity and positive likelihood ratios. We conclude that HPC2 and N-cadherin significantly improve accurate classification of pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma.

Pathology for the HPB Surgeon

Optimal care of a patient implies a good professional understanding between all the medical personnel involved in that patient's care. Similarly a basic understanding of the areas where surgery and pathology interact would go a long way, in clarifying the disease process in the patient. This review aims to cover a few topics in liver lesions, FNAC Vs core biopsy, IHC, Margin examination, and frozen sections, in order to improve the communication between these two specialities.

Keratin 19 epithelial patterns in cirrhotic stroma parallel hepatocarcinogenesis

Cirrhotic septa harbor vessels and inflammatory, fibrogenic, and ductular epithelial cells, collectively referred to as the ductular reaction (DR). Lack of the DR in the stromal compartment around hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been documented; however, the relationship of epithelial keratin 19 (K19) structures to progression of intralesional carcinogenesis has not been explored. K19 immunoreactivity in the stromal compartment around 176 nodules in cirrhotic explants was examined. Quantitative differences (P < 0.0001) were manifested in three distinct histologically identifiable patterns: "complex" around cirrhotic nodules (CN), "attenuated" around dysplastic nodules (DN), and "absent" around HCC. Markers of necrosis or apoptosis could not explain the perinodular K19 epithelial loss; however, multicolor immunolabeling for K19, vimentin, E-Cadherin, SNAIL, and fibroblast-specific protein 1 (FSP-1) demonstrated discrepancies in immunophenotype and cytomorphologic features. Variability of cellular features was accompanied by an overall decrease in epithelial markers and significantly increased fractions of SNAIL- and FSP-1-positive cells in the DR around DN when compared with CN (P < 0.0001). Immunolabeling of transforming growth factor-β signaling components (TGFβR1, SMAD3, and pSMAD2/3) demonstrated increased percentages of pSMAD2/3 around DN when compared with CN (P < 0.0001). These findings collectively suggest marked alterations in cellular identity as an underlying mechanism for the reproducible extralesional K19 pattern that parallels progressive stages of intranodular hepatocarcinogenesis. Paracrine signaling is proposed as a link that emphasizes the importance of the epithelial-stromal compartment in malignant progression of HCC in cirrhosis.

Role of p63 in cancer development

Since their initial identification p53 homologues p63 and p73 have been expected to play a role in cancer development due to their close homology to p53, notoriously one of the most mutated genes in cancer. However soon after their discovery the awareness that these genes were rarely mutated in cancer seemed to indicate that they did not play a role in its development. However a large number of data collected in the following years indicated that altered expression rather than mutation could be found in different neoplasia and play a role in its biology. In particular p63 due to its fundamental role in epithelial development seems to play a role in a number of tumors of epithelial origin. In this review we summarize some of the evidence linking p63 to carcinogenesis.

Imaging findings of intrahepatic bile duct adenoma (peribiliary gland hamartoma): a case report and literature review

Intrahepatic bile duct adenoma is a rare benign epithelial hepatic tumor derived from bile duct cells. We report the imaging findings of a patient with bile duct adenoma, which appeared as a small heterogeneously enhancing mass with focal small cystic change on CT and MRI. Follow-up images at seven months showed a slight increase in tumor size, which could be partly explained by intratumoral hemorrhage on pathologic examination. Although rare, bile duct adenoma should be considered as a differential diagnosis of a small hypervascular tumor located in the periphery of liver. Focal cystic change and intratumoral hemorrhage may occur.

Soluble mesothelin-related protein in pleural effusion from patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive neoplasm primarily arising from surface serosal cells of the pleura and is strongly associated with asbestos exposure. Patients with MPM often develop pleural fluid as initial presentation. However, cytological diagnosis using pleural fluid is usually difficult and has limited utility. A useful molecular marker for differential diagnosis particularly with lung cancer (LC) is urgently needed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the diagnostic value of soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP) in pleural fluid. Pleural fluids were collected from 23 patients with MPM, 38 with LC, 26 with benign asbestos pleurisy (BAP), 5 with tuberculosis pleurisy (TP) and 4 with chronic heart failure (CHF), and the SMRP concentration was determined. All data were analyzed by using non-parametric two-sided statistical tests. The median concentration of SMRP in MPM, LC, BAP, TP and CHF were 11.5 (range 0.90-82.80), 5.20 (0.05-36.40), 6.65 (1.45-11.25), 3.20 (1.65-6.50) and 2.03 (1.35-2.80) nmol/l, respectively. The SMRP concentration was significantly higher in MPM than in the other diseases (P=0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of the MPM diagnosis was 0.75 for the differential diagnosis from the other groups. Based on the cut-off value of 8 nmol/l, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of MPM were 70.0 and 68.4%, respectively. These results indicate that the SMRP concentration in pleural fluid is a useful marker for the diagnosis of MPM.

CDX2, cytokeratins 7 and 20 immunoreactivity in rectal adenocarcinoma

There are limited data regarding CDX2 expression in rectal carcinoma. The CK20/CK7 immunoprofile of colorectal adenocarcinoma has been described in studies, which have mostly lumped colonic and rectal tumors together. In this study, we investigated the diagnostic utility of immunohistochemical stains for CK7, CK20, and CDX2 in a series of rectal adenocarcinoma. Fifty-five specimens of rectal adenocarcinomas were retrieved and immunostained for CK7 (Dako-M7018), CK20 (NovoCastra NCL-L-CK20), and CDX2 (NovoCastra NCL-CDX2). Thirty cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 15 cholangiocarcinomas were also studied as a comparison group. CK7 was expressed in 12/55 (22%) and CK20 in 48/55 (87%) cases of rectal adenocarcinoma. The CK7-/CK20+ immunophenotype was identified in 36/55 (65%), CK7+/CK20+ in 12/55 (22%), and CK7-/CK20- in 7/55 (13%) rectal adenocarcinoma. CDX2 showed moderate-strong positivity in all cases and was not related to tumor differentiation. Benign rectal mucosa was available in 37 cases and showed the following results: CK7-/CK20+ in 25/37 (67%), CK7+/CK20+ in 8/37 (22%) and CK7-/CK20- in 4/37 (11%) cases. In pancreatic adenocarcinomas and cholangiocarcinomas, 29/45 (64%) were CK7+/CK20+ and 16/45 (36%) were CK7+/CK20-. CDX2 was positive in only 3/45 (7%) of these cases; all were pancreatic adenocarcinomas. In conclusion, CK7 can be expressed in rectal adenocarcinoma, and should not be used as the sole basis for excluding a rectal primary. CDX2 is a sensitive marker for rectal origin of adenocarcinoma. It can be helpful in cases with metastatic rectal carcinoma, especially those with CK7+/CK20+ or CK20-/CK7- immunophenotype. In this study, CDX2 expression was not influenced by the grade (differentiation) of rectal adenocarcinoma.

Pathologic evaluation of unknown primary cancer

The pathologic approach to metastases of unknown primary cancer (UPC) is stepwise and uses the clinical context, morphology, and, where necessary, immunohistochemistry (IHC). This review covers the initial approach to a UPC biopsy; the diagnosis of malignancy and broad tumor typing into carcinoma, melanoma, lymphoma, or sarcoma; and further subtyping of carcinoma into germ cell (broadly included), squamous, neuroendocrine, and solid organ including liver and renal, and adenocarcinomas. Finally, for adenocarcinoma, the prediction of primary tumor site, including lung, pancreas, stomach, colon, ovary, prostate, and breast, is discussed. For each tumor type, the morphologic features are presented alongside established useful IHC markers, with a description of their staining patterns and common diagnostic dilemmas. Optimal tissue handling and IHC interpretation, quality assurance, and limitations also are discussed. The target readership is oncologists, but other clinicians and trainee pathologists also may find the content of use.

The pathology and genetics of metastatic pancreatic cancer

CONTEXT

Metastatic disease is the most critical determinant of resectability of pancreatic cancer and accounts for the poor outcome of patients with this disease. Thus, a better understanding of metastatic pancreatic cancer will afford new opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and discuss the current understanding of the clinical and molecular features of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Published literature on advanced stage pancreatic cancer, pancreatic cancer metastasis, and autopsy findings in patients with pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In the clinical setting, it can be difficult to distinguish a metastatic pancreatic carcinoma from primary neoplasms in the liver, lung, or ovary. However, immunolabeling for DPC4 protein as part of a diagnostic panel is useful for making this distinction. Emerging data from a variety of investigators now indicate that overexpression of EphA2, loss of DPC4 and MKK4, and aberrant activation of the Hedgehog signaling pathway are associated with metastatic propensity of pancreatic cancers, providing novel therapeutic targets for the most lethal stage of this disease.

Mesothelin is a specific biomarker of invasive cancer in the Barrett-associated adenocarcinoma progression model: translational implications for diagnosis and therapy

Esophageal adenocarcinoma arises in the backdrop of Barrett metaplasia-dysplasia sequence, with the vast majority of patients presenting with late-stage malignancy. Mesothelin, a glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored protein, is aberrantly overexpressed on the surface of many solid cancers. Mesothelin expression was assessed in esophageal tissue microarrays encompassing the entire histological spectrum of Barrett-associated dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Mesothelin expression was observed in 24/84 (29%) of invasive adenocarcinomas and in 5/34 (15%) lymph node metastases. In contrast, normal squamous and cardiac mucosa, as well as noninvasive Barrett lesions, failed to label with mesothelin. Mesothelin was expressed in the esophageal adenocarcinoma cell line JH-EsoAd1 but not in primary human esophageal epithelial cells. Anti-mesothelin antibody-conjugated CdSe/CDS/ZnS quantum rods were synthesized, and confocal bioimaging confirmed robust binding to JH-EsoAd1 cells. Anti-mesothelin antibody-conjugated nanoparticles can be useful for the diagnosis and therapy of mesothelin-overexpressing esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Mesothelin is a malignant factor and therapeutic vaccine target for pancreatic cancer

Given the high fatality rate of pancreatic cancer, an effective treatment for this devastating disease is urgently needed. We have shown that mesothelin expression was higher in human pancreatic cancer cells than in human pancreatic duct epithelial cells, and mesothelin mRNA was substantially overexpressed in 18 of 21 (86%) clinical pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens when compared with the surrounding normal tissues. However, the biological functions of mesothelin in tumor progression are not clearly understood. Here we studied the effects of mesothelin overexpression in pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and migration in vitro and pancreatic cancer progression in vivo. We found that forced expression of mesothelin significantly increased tumor cell proliferation and migration by 90% and 300%, respectively, and increased tumor volume by 4-fold in the nude mice xenograft model when compared with the vector control cell line. Silencing of mesothelin inhibited cell proliferation and migration in pancreatic cancer cells and ablated tumor progression in vivo. Vaccination with chimeric virus-like particles that contain human mesothelin substantially inhibited tumor progression in C57BL/6J mice. The increases in mesothelin-specific antibodies and CTL activity and the decrease in regulatory T cells correlated with reduced tumor progression and prolonged survival. This study revealed novel functions of mesothelin and suggested a new therapeutic vaccine strategy whereby mesothelin is targeted to control pancreatic cancer progression.

Application of immunohistochemistry to liver and gastrointestinal neoplasms: liver, stomach, colon, and pancreas

CONTEXT

Immunohistochemistry has become an integral component of the practice of pathology. Newer antibodies allow for increasingly precise diagnoses for tumors that previously could not be easily identified. Recently, immunohistochemical evaluations have begun to allow pathologists to actively assist in determining prognosis and even in selecting therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the usefulness of currently available immunostains for the study of liver and gastrointestinal system neoplasms and to make recommendations for panels of immunostains that can be particularly helpful.

DATA SOURCES

Information has been collected from recent literature as well as from personal experience and practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Many immunostains are now available for the practicing pathologist that allow for increasing accuracy in diagnosis of liver and gastrointestinal tract neoplasms. Panels of immunostains can be used to differentiate between various tumors and also to identify site of origin in the case of a metastatic neoplasm. Immunostains that allow for prognostic determinations and for guidance in the selection of chemotherapeutic agents can also be used by pathologists to assist in the management of patients with malignant tumors affecting the liver and gastrointestinal tract.

New markers of pancreatic cancer identified through differential gene expression analyses: claudin 18 and annexin A8

BACKGROUND

New markers to distinguish benign reactive glands from infiltrating ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas are needed.

DESIGN

The gene expression patterns of 24 surgically resected primary infiltrating ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas were compared with 18 non-neoplastic samples using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 Arrays and the Gene Logic GeneExpress Software System. Gene fragments from 4 genes (annexin A8, claudin 18, CXCL5, and S100 A2) were selected from the fragments found to be highly expressed in infiltrating adenocarcinomas when compared with normal tissues. The protein expression of these genes was examined using immunohistochemical labeling of tissue microarrays.

RESULTS

Claudin 18 labeled infiltrating carcinomas in a membranous pattern. When compared with normal and reactive ducts, claudin 18 was overexpressed, at least focally, in 159 of 166 evaluable carcinomas (96%). Strong and diffuse claudin 18 overexpression was most often seen in well-differentiated carcinomas (P=0.02). Claudin 18 was overexpressed in 51 of 52 cases (98%) of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Annexin A8 was at least focally overexpressed in 149 of 154 evaluable infiltrating carcinomas (97%). S100 A2 was at least focally overexpressed in 118 of 154 evaluable infiltrating carcinomas (77%). Non-neoplastic glands also frequently expressed S100 A2 diminishing its potential diagnostic utility. Immunolabeling with antibodies directed against CXCL5 did not reveal any significant differences in protein expression between infiltrating adenocarcinomas and normal pancreatic ducts.

CONCLUSIONS

Claudin 18 and annexin A8 are frequently highly overexpressed in infiltrating ductal adenocarcinomas when compared with normal reactive ducts, suggesting a role for these molecules in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Furthermore, these may serve as diagnostic markers, as screening tests and as therapeutic targets.

Detection of micrometastases in peritoneal washings of pancreatic cancer patients by the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer patients with positive (+) peritoneal cytology have a prognosis similar to stage IV patients. We studied the ability of quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to detect micrometastases in patients undergoing staging laparoscopy.

METHODS

Peritoneal washes were obtained prospectively from 35 consecutive patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing staging laparoscopy and 16 patients undergoing laparoscopy for benign disease. Each sample was assessed by cytologic examination and RT-PCR analysis for tumor markers: CEA, CK7, Kras2, and MUC1. Markers and their combinations were evaluated on the basis of their deviance from the ideal marker.

RESULTS

Pathologic stages for pancreatic cancer patients were: 1A-1 (3%), IB-1 (3%), IIA-5 (15%), IIB-13 (38%), III-5 (15%), IV-9 (26%). Eight patients were cytology (+) and stages IIA-1, IIB-2, IV-5. Twenty-five patients were RT-PCR (+). The optimal threshold for cycle amplification was 35 based on a receiver operating characteristic curve. CEA had the best profile of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and the smallest deviance.

CONCLUSION

RT-PCR using a panel of tumor markers, including CEA, was comparable in sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV to cytology. RT-PCR could represent a more sensitive method for detection of subclinical peritoneal tumor dissemination; this may be useful in patient selection for operative management and clinical trials.

α-Methylacyl-CoA-Racemase Expression in Adenocarcinoma, Dysplasia and Non-Neoplastic Epithelium of the Stomach

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (AMACR) is an essential enzyme in the oxidation of bile acid intermediates and branched-chain fatty acids. This study aims to examine the expression pattern, as well as diagnostic and prognostic significance, of AMACR in carcinoma, dysplasia and non-neoplastic epithelium of the stomach. A total of 158 cases, including 66 cases of gastric carcinoma (GC), 48 cases of dysplasia and 44 cases of non-neoplastic gastric mucosa, were examined by immunohistochemistry for AMACR. AMACR expression was divided into two categories: negative (negative-weak staining intensity) and positive (moderate-strong staining intensity). AMACR immunoreactivity was detected in only 2 of 44 (4.5%) cases of non-neoplastic epithelium. A significantly high frequency of AMACR expression was found in 40 of 48 (83.3%) cases of dysplasia and 34 of 66 (51.5%) carcinoma cases compared with cases of non-neoplastic epithelium (p < 0.05). The frequency of AMACR expression was significantly higher in dysplasia than in carcinoma cases (p < 0.05). AMACR expression was higher in intestinal- than diffuse-type GC (p < 0.05). In conclusion, this study suggests that AMACR immunostaining aids in distinguishing malignant or precancerous lesions from reactive epithelial atypia in gastric biopsy specimens. It also suggests that AMACR expression is more likely to be associated with intestinal-type adenocarcinoma in gastric carcinogenesis.

Immunocytochemical study of the expression of mesothelin in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Mesothelin is a potential marker of pancreatic adenocarcinoma that was recently identified by serial analysis of gene expression. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of mesothelin as a marker of pancreatic adenocarcinoma on destained Papanicolaou (Pap) smears and unstained cellblocks from 28 patients using a monoclonal antibody to mesothelin. Intensity and proportion of staining was semiquantitatively graded on a scale of 1-3, and as 0%, 1 to <10%, 10-50%, or >50%. Positive staining for mesothelin was seen in 64% of the direct smears and in 36% of cell block sections. Focal positivity for mesothelin was noted in benign pancreatic tissue in one of 10 cases. Staining was most often focal (<50% of cells) in both direct smears and cell block sections. The overall sensitivity and specificity of mesothelin as a marker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were 68% and 90%, respectively. Sensitivity was higher in Pap smears than in cell block sections (64% versus 36%). The presence of occasional mesothelin expression in benign tissue, its very focal expression in malignant tissue may limit the utility of mesothelin as a marker of pancreatic adenocarcinomas in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens.

Emerging role of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta inhibition in radioimmunotherapy of experimental pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Thus far, the therapy of pancreatic cancer remains an insurmountable challenge. Not a solitary therapeutic modality in the battery of available therapeutic options is capable to cure or, at the very least, stop the progression of this disease in any meaningful way. The purpose of reported here studies was to implement a multimodality approach to radioimmunotherapy of pancreatic cancer and, ultimately, to develop a course of therapy with the clinical value.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Animal model was NCr-nu/nu mouse bearing s.c. xenografts of SW1990 pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radioimmunotherapy based on (131)ICC49, a TAG-72-targeting monoclonal antibody, was augmented with imatinib, a potent inhibitor of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta. The postulated interactions between these two modalities depended on the imatinib-induced drop in the tumor interstitial fluid pressure and the subsequent increase of (131)ICC49 uptake into the tumor, resulting in improved tumor responses to radioimmunotherapy.

RESULTS

Biodistribution studies revealed a 50% improvement in the tumor uptake of (131)ICC49 in mice treated with imatinib. Tumor development was practically arrested for approximately 3 weeks in response to the treatment composed of (131)ICC49 and imatinib with tumor quadrupling time (T(Q)) of 40.8 days. (131)ICC49 alone and imatinib alone also delayed the tumor growth to T(Q) of 30.2 and 31.2 days, respectively. Unanticipated was the significant response of SW1990 to a brief treatment with imatinib given i.p. at 100 mg/kg b.i.d. for 3 days. Xenografts in control mice receiving injection of PBS had T(Q) of 23 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of imatinib in the radioimmunotherapy regimen is beneficial and it does not produce any overt side effects. The improved responses of pancreatic cancer xenografts to the multimodality treatment comprising radioimmunotherapy and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta inhibition suggest that this approach to therapy of pancreatic cancer may also be successful in patients.

Cytomorphology and B72.3 labeling of benign and malignant ductal epithelium in pancreatic lesions compared to gastrointestinal epithelium

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic fine-needle aspiration biopsy very frequently produces gastrointestinal epithelial contamination (GIC). We studied the cytomorphology and B72.3 immunoreactivity of lesional epithelium of benign and malignant ductal lesions of the pancreas and compared the findings to our previously established template of GIC. Air-dried smears, fixed smears, and ThinPrep (TP) specimens were obtained using a cytobrush, directly from benign and malignant ductal lesions of 18 Whipple specimens, to ensure purity of the epithelium studied. Smear background, cell architecture, and cellular features were analyzed. Immunocytochemical staining with B72.3 was performed in 14 cases. Epithelium of ductal carcinoma was distinguished from benign ductal epithelium in chronic pancreatitis and GIC primarily by crowded architecture and atypical cellular features, including high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio, irregular nuclei, nucleoli, and vacuolated cytoplasm. Benign ductal and GIC epithelium were only distinguished by architecture (goblet cells and brush borders), but not consistently, especially gastric epithelium that lacked these features. B72.3 shows promise in the differentiation between GIC and benign and malignant ductal epithelium, with no staining supporting benign ductal cells, fine punctate perinuclear staining correlating with GIC, and strong cytoplasmic staining supporting malignancy.

Comparative immunohistochemical expression of p63 in human cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

p63 helps regulate differentiation and proliferation in epithelial progenitor cells. Its expression is often higher in malignant tissue compared with normal tissue, and poorly differentiated carcinomas often show a larger number of p63-positive cells than well-differentiated tumors. The aim of the present study was to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of p63 in human cholangiocarcinomas (CC) and hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC).

METHODS

Sixteen cases of CC and 37 cases of HCC were selected for the present study. Paraffin-embedded sections were submitted to immunohistochemical double-staining to identify p63 and cytokeratin 19.

RESULTS

p63 was diffusely expressed in 100% of CC, while it was negative in all HCC. In addition, cytokeratin 19, a marker for hepatic progenitor cells, was colocalized in all p63-positive cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The nuclear immunostaining for p63 in all CC cases indicates that the p63 protein can act to promote neoplastic growth in bile duct epithelium, but it is not important for hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Co-localization of p63 and cytokeratin 19 in CC cells suggests that CC may be derived from undifferentiated progenitor cells (hepatic oval cells). Furthermore, p63 can be useful in the differential diagnosis between CC and HCC in biopsy samples.

Bedeutung der Immunhistochemie für die Diagnose des Cholangiokarzinoms

The correct diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is often confounded by the small size of the diagnostic specimen and the wide morphological range of carcinomas metastasising to the liver. Expression analysis of cytokeratins, glycoproteins, mucoproteins, adhesion molecules, receptors and transcription factors has been shown to be a valuable adjunct in the typing of carcinomas. For this study, the expression pattern of 30 well documented antibodies to CC and the most common metastatic adenocarcinomas of the liver were studied. CC show a rather distinct immunophenotype with co-expression of CK7, CK17, CD7 and a lack of CDX2. Although this pattern allows the separation of CC from most metastatic carcinomas, pancreatic carcinomas show a broad overlap with this expression pattern.

Soluble mesothelin-related peptides in the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma is a challenging issue. Potential markers in mesothelioma diagnosis include soluble mesothelin-related peptides (SMRPs) and osteopontin, but no subsequent validation has been published yet.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated SMRPs in serum and pleural effusion from patients with mesothelioma (n = 74), pleural metastasis of carcinomas (n = 35), or benign pleural lesions associated with asbestos exposure (n = 28), recruited when first suspected for mesothelioma.

FINDINGS

Mean serum SMRP level was higher in patients with mesothelioma (2.05 +/- 2.57 nM/L [median +/- interquartile range]) than in patients with metastasis (1.02 +/- 1.79 nM/L) or benign lesions (0.55 +/- 0.59 nM/L). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for serum SMRP was 0.872 for differentiating mesothelioma and benign lesions, cut-off = 0.93 nM/L (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 82.6%). The AUC for serum SMRP differentiating metastasis and mesothelioma was 0.693, cut-off = 1.85 nM/L (sensitivity = 58.3%, specificity = 73.3%). SMRP values in pleural fluid were higher than in serum in all groups (mesothelioma: 46.1 +/- 83.2 nM/L; benign lesions: 6.4 +/- 11.1 nM/L; metastasis: 6.36 +/- 21.73 nM/L). The AUC for pleural SMRP-differentiating benign lesions and mesothelioma was 0.831, cut-off = 10.4 nM/L (sensitivity = 76.7%, specificity = 76.2%). The AUC for pleural SMRP-differentiating metastasis and mesothelioma was 0.793.

INTERPRETATION

We show that SMRPs may be a promising marker for mesothelioma diagnosis when measured either in serum or pleural fluid. The diagnostic value of SMRPs was similar in both types of samples, but pleural fluid SMRPs may better discriminate mesothelioma from pleural metastasis.

New monoclonal antibodies to mesothelin useful for immunohistochemistry, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, Western blotting, and ELISA

PURPOSE

Mesothelin is a cell surface protein that is highly expressed in some malignant tumors, and is a promising target for immunotherapy. Recent data suggests that mesothelin is an adhesive protein and may have a role in the metastases of ovarian cancer. Although a few monoclonal antibodies (MAb) to mesothelin have been produced, they have limitations for the study of expression of native mesothelin because of their low affinity or reactivity only with denatured mesothelin protein. We have produced novel MAbs to mesothelin to help study mesothelin function and to develop improved diagnosis and immunotherapy of mesothelin-expressing tumors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Mesothelin-deficient mice were immunized with plasmid cDNA encoding mesothelin, and boosted with a mesothelin-rabbit IgG Fc fusion protein prior to cell fusion. Hybridomas were screened by an ELISA using plates coated with mesothelin-Fc protein.

RESULTS

Seventeen hybridomas producing anti-mesothelin antibodies were established and shown to react with two epitopes on mesothelin. One group reacts with the same epitope as the low affinity antibody K1 that was originally used to identify mesothelin. The other is a new group that reacts with a new epitope. One antibody from each group was chosen for further study and shown to react strongly on ELISA, on immunohistochemistry, and by fluorescence-activated cell sorting on living cells.

CONCLUSION

Our two newly established MAbs, MN and MB, have different and useful properties compared with current antibodies used for the detection of mesothelin by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, ELISA, and Western blotting.