Time to Recognition of Sepsis in the Emergency Department Using Electronic Health Record Data: A Comparative Analysis of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

Association Between In-Hospital Antibiotic Use and Long-Term Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients

Objective

To assess whether antibiotic duration (AD) and one-year antibiotic-free days (AFD) are associated with key in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes among critically ill adults.

Design

Retrospective observational study.

Setting

Quaternary care academic medical center in the United States.

Patients

A total of 126 critically ill adults, mean age 68.1 years (±15.6), 51.6% male, median APACHE II score of 20.5 (IQR 15-25); 71.4% met sepsis criteria.

Methods

Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, antibiotic use, and outcomes were collected over one year. Secondary infection was defined as ≥3 consecutive antibiotic days within a year following the index sepsis admission. Multivariate analyses adjusted for age, APACHE II score, gender, and glucocorticosteroid dose.

Results

Within 30 days, longer AD correlated with increased hospital stay (p<0.001) with each additional day of antibiotics associated with 0.37 - 0.39 extra days of hospitalization in univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. In septic patients specifically, AFD significantly correlated with hospital length-of-stay in both univariate (p=0.023) and multivariate analyses (p=0.002), with no impact from infection type on AD or AFD. Fewer AFD correlated with higher secondary bacteremia rates in unadjusted analysis (p=0.023 overall), but this effect was not significant after multivariable adjustment. Neither AD nor AFD predicted one-year mortality or readmission.

Conclusions

Extended antibiotic duration in critically ill patients prolonged hospital stays without providing mortality or readmission benefits. These findings underscore the importance of robust antibiotic stewardship, where shorter, targeted regimens can reduce unintended complications and improve overall outcomes.

The smell of sepsis: Electronic nose measurements improve early recognition of sepsis in the ED

OBJECTIVE

Early recognition of sepsis is essential for timely initiation of adequate care. However, this is challenging as signs and symptoms may be absent or nonspecific. The cascade of events leading to organ failure in sepsis is characterized by immune-metabolic alterations. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are metabolic byproducts released in expired air. We hypothesize that measuring the VOC profile using electronic nose technology (eNose) could improve early recognition of sepsis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this cohort study, bedside eNose measurements were collected prospectively from ED patients with suspected infections. Sepsis diagnosis was retrospectively defined based on Sepsis-3 criteria. eNose sensor data were used in a discriminant analysis to evaluate the predictive performance for early sepsis recognition. The dataset was randomly split into training (67 %) and validation (33 %) subsets. The derived discriminant function from the training subset was then applied to classify new observations in the validation subset. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and predictive values.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 160 eNose measurements. The eNose measurements had an area under the ROC (AUROC) of 0.78 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.87) for diagnosing sepsis, with a sensitivity of 72 %, specificity of 73 %, and an overall accuracy of 73 %. The validation model showed an AUC of 0.83 (95 % CI: 0.71-0.94), sensitivity of 71 %, specificity of 83 %, and an accuracy of 80 %.

CONCLUSION

eNose measurements can identify sepsis among patients with a suspected infection at the ED.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study is embedded in the Acutelines data-biobank (www.acutelines.nl), registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04615065).

Comparing the Predictive Value of SOFA and SIRS for Mortality in the Early Hours of Hospitalization of Sepsis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sepsis, a deadly infection causing organ failure and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), is detected early in hospitalization using the SIRS criteria, while sequential organ failure (SOFA) assesses organ failure severity. A systematic review and meta-analysis was evaluated to investigate the predictive value of the SIRS criteria and the SOFA system for mortality in early hospitalization of sepsis patients.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were full reports in peer-reviewed journals with data on sepsis assessment using SOFA and SIRS, and their relationship with outcomes. For quality assessment, we considered study population, sepsis diagnosis criteria, and outcomes. The area under the curve (AUC) of these criteria was extracted for separate meta-analysis and forest plots.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies included an average of 56.1% males and a mean age of 61.9 (±6.1) among 32,979 patients. The pooled AUC was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.73) for SIRS and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84) for SOFA. Significant heterogeneity between studies was indicated by an I2 above 50%, leading to a meta-regression analysis. This analysis, with age and patient number as moderators, revealed age as the major cause of heterogeneity in comparing the predictive value of the SOFA score with SIRS regarding the in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The SOFA score outperformed the SIRS criteria in predicting mortality, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach that combines clinical judgment and other diagnostic tools for better patient management and outcomes.

State of the art of sepsis care for the emergency medicine clinician

Sepsis impacts 1.7 million Americans annually. It is a life-threatening disruption of organ function because of the body's host response to infection. Sepsis remains a condition frequently encountered in emergency departments (ED) with an estimated 850,000 annual visits affected by sepsis each year in the United States. The pillars of managing sepsis remain timely identification, initiation of antimicrobials while aiming for source control and resuscitation with a goal of restoring tissue perfusion. The focus herein is current evidence and best practice recommendations for state-of-the-art sepsis care that begins in the ED.

Evaluation of ERCP-related perforation: a single-center retrospective study

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related perforation is a rare and serious adverse event. The aim of our study was to evaluate the risk factors and management of ERCP-related perforation, and to further determine the predictive factors associated with perforation outcome.

Methods

A total of 27,018 ERCP procedures performed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (Nanchang, China) between January 2007 and March 2022 were included in the investigation of ERCP-related perforation. Medical records and endoscopic data were extracted to analyse the risk factors, management, and clinical outcome of ERCP-related perforation.

Results

Seventy-six patients (0.28%) were identified as having experienced perforation following ERCP. Advanced age, Billroth II anatomy, precut sphincterotomy, and papillary balloon dilatation were significantly associated with ERCP-related perforation. Most patients with perforation (n = 65) were recognized immediately during ERCP whereas 11 were recognized later on. The delay in recognition primarily resulted from stent migration (n = 9). In addition, 12 patients experienced poor clinical outcome including death or hospice discharge (n = 3), ICU admission for >3 days (n = 6), and prolonged hospital stay for >1 month due to perforation (n = 3). Cancer and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) are associated with a higher risk of poor outcome.

Conclusions

Advanced age, Billroth II anatomy, precut sphincterotomy, and balloon dilation increase the risk of ERCP-related perforation whereas cancer and SIRS independently predicted poor clinical outcome.

Associations Between Volume of Early Intravenous Fluid and Hospital Outcomes in Septic Patients With and Without Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relationship between early IV fluid volume and hospital outcomes, including death in-hospital or discharge to hospice, in septic patients with and without heart failure (HF).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study using logistic regression with restricted cubic splines to assess for nonlinear relationships between fluid volume and outcomes, stratified by HF status and adjusted for propensity to receive a given fluid volume in the first 6 hours. An ICU subgroup analysis was performed. Secondary outcomes of vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in survivors were assessed.

SETTING

An urban university-based hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 9613 adult patients were admitted from the emergency department from 2012 to 2021 that met electronic health record-based Sepsis-3 criteria. Preexisting HF diagnosis was identified by the International Classification of Diseases codes.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There were 1449 admissions from patients with HF. The relationship between fluid volume and death or discharge to hospice was nonlinear in patients without HF, and approximately linear in patients with HF. Receiving 0-15 mL/kg in the first 6 hours was associated with lower likelihood of death or discharge to hospice compared with 30-45 mL/kg (odds ratio = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.90; p = 0.01) in HF patients, but no significant difference for non-HF patients. A similar pattern was identified in ICU admissions and some secondary outcomes. Volumes larger than 15-30 mL/kg for non-HF patients and 30-45 mL/kg for ICU-admitted non-HF patients were not associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Early fluid resuscitation showed distinct patterns of potential harm and benefit between patients with and without HF who met Sepsis-3 criteria. Restricted cubic splines analysis highlighted the importance of considering nonlinear fluid outcomes relationships and identified potential points of diminishing returns (15-30 mL/kg across all patients without HF and 30-45 mL/kg when admitted to the ICU). Receiving less than 15 mL/kg was associated with better outcomes in HF patients, suggesting small volumes may be appropriate in select patients. Future studies may benefit from investigating nonlinear fluid-outcome associations and a focus on other conditions like HF.

The Hospitalist Movement 25 Years Later

Hospitalists are generalists who specialize in the care of hospitalized patients. In the 25 years since the term hospitalist was coined, the field of hospital medicine has grown exponentially and established a substantial footprint in the medical community. There are now more hospitalists than practicing physicians in any other internal medicine subspecialty. Several key forces catalyzed the growth in the field of hospital medicine, including the quality, safety, and value movements; residency duty hour restrictions; the emergence of electronic health records; and the COVID-19 pandemic. Looking ahead, we see new opportunities in the realms of technology and telemedicine, and challenges persist in regard to balancing financial considerations with increasing workload and burnout. Hospitalists must remain nimble and seize emerging opportunities to continue supporting the field's prominence and growth.

Prognostic evaluation of quick sequential organ failure assessment score in ICU patients with sepsis across different income settings

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting evidence on association between quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and sepsis mortality in ICU patients. The primary aim of this study was to determine the association between qSOFA and 28-day mortality in ICU patients admitted for sepsis. Association of qSOFA with early (3-day), medium (28-day), late (90-day) mortality was assessed in low and lower middle income (LLMIC), upper middle income (UMIC) and high income (HIC) countries/regions.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of the MOSAICS II study, an international prospective observational study on sepsis epidemiology in Asian ICUs. Associations between qSOFA at ICU admission and mortality were separately assessed in LLMIC, UMIC and HIC countries/regions. Modified Poisson regression was used to determine the adjusted relative risk (RR) of qSOFA score on mortality at 28 days with adjustments for confounders identified in the MOSAICS II study.

RESULTS

Among the MOSAICS II study cohort of 4980 patients, 4826 patients from 343 ICUs and 22 countries were included in this secondary analysis. Higher qSOFA was associated with increasing 28-day mortality, but this was only observed in LLMIC (p < 0.001) and UMIC (p < 0.001) and not HIC (p = 0.220) countries/regions. Similarly, higher 90-day mortality was associated with increased qSOFA in LLMIC (p < 0.001) and UMIC (p < 0.001) only. In contrast, higher 3-day mortality with increasing qSOFA score was observed across all income countries/regions (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that qSOFA remained associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted RR 1.09 (1.00-1.18), p = 0.038) even after adjustments for covariates including APACHE II, SOFA, income country/region and administration of antibiotics within 3 h.

CONCLUSIONS

qSOFA was independently associated with 28-day mortality in ICU patients admitted for sepsis. In LLMIC and UMIC countries/regions, qSOFA was associated with early to late mortality but only early mortality in HIC countries/regions.

Development and validation of the UCSS score, a novel method to predict septic shock after PCNL

OBJECTIVE

To develop an objective and easily recognizable model to predict septic shock following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

First, we identified differences between 431 patients who underwent PCNL with or without septic shock. These data were used to develop existing models and examine their improvement. Multivariate analysis was applied to identify risk factors of septic shock after PCNL based on the scores allocated to the PCNL postoperative test indicators. Finally, we developed a predictive nomogram using the selected factors and compared its performance with that of the existing nomograms SOFA, qSOFA, and SIRS.

RESULTS

Twelve (2.8%) of the patients met the criteria for postoperative septic shock after PCNL. Baseline data analysis revealed differences in sex, preoperative drainage, urinary culture, and urinary leukocyte between groups. After transforming patient data into measurement-level data, we investigated each index score in these conditions, and found that the incidence of septic shock generally increased with the score. Multivariate analysis and early optimization screening revealed that septic shock factors could be predicted using platelets, leukocytes, bilirubin, and procalcitonin levels. We further compared the prediction accuracy of urinary calculi-associated septic shock (UCSS), SOFA, qSOFA, and SIRS scores using the AUC of the ROC curve. As compared to SIRS [AUC 0.938 (95% CI 0.910-0.959)] and qSOFA [AUC 0.930 (95% CI 0.901-0.952)], UCSS [AUC 0.974 (95% Cl 0.954-0.987)] and SOFA [AUC 0.974 (95% CI 0.954-0.987)] scored better at discriminating septic shock after PCNL. We further compared the ROC curves of UCSS with SOFA (95% CI - 0.800 to 0.0808, P = 0.992), qSOFA (95% CI - 0.0611 to 0.0808, P = 0.409), and SIRS (95% CI - 0.0703 to 0.144, P = 0.502), finding that UCSS was non-inferior to these models.

CONCLUSIONS

UCSS, a new convenient and cost-effective model, can predict septic shock following PCNL and provide more accurate discriminative and corrective capability than existing models by including only objective data. The predictive value of UCSS for septic shock after PCNL was greater than that of qSOFA or SIRS scores.

Sex differences in clinical presentation and mortality in emergency department patients with sepsis

BACKGROUND

There is growing awareness that sex differences are associated with different patient outcomes in a variety of diseases. Studies investigating the effect of patient sex on sepsis-related mortality remain inconclusive and mainly focus on patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the intensive care unit. We therefore investigated the association between patient sex and both clinical presentation and 30-day mortality in patients with the whole spectrum of sepsis severity presenting to the emergency department (ED) who were admitted to the hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In our multi-centre cohort study, we retrospectively investigated adult medical patients with sepsis in the ED. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the association between patient sex and all-cause 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of 2065 patients included, 47.6% were female. Female patients had significantly less comorbidities, lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and abbreviated Mortality Emergency Department Sepsis score, and presented less frequently with thrombocytopenia and fever, compared to males. For both sexes, respiratory tract infections were predominant while female patients more often had urinary tract infections. Females showed lower 30-day mortality (10.1% vs. 13.6%; p = .016), and in-hospital mortality (8.0% vs. 11.1%; p = .02) compared to males. However, a multivariable logistic regression model showed that patient sex was not an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.67-1.22; p = .51).

CONCLUSIONS

Females with sepsis presenting to the ED had fewer comorbidities, lower disease severity, less often thrombocytopenia and fever and were more likely to have a urinary tract infection. Females had a lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality compared to males, but sex was not an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. The lower mortality in female patients may be explained by differences in comorbidity and clinical presentation compared to male patients.KEY MESSAGESOnly limited data exist on sex differences in sepsis patients presenting to the emergency department with the whole spectrum of sepsis severity.Female sepsis patients had a lower incidence of comorbidities, less disease severity and a different source of infection, which explains the lower 30-day mortality we found in female patients compared to male patients.We found that sex was not an independent predictor of 30-day mortality; however, the study was probably underpowered to evaluate this outcome definitively.

Evidence-based updates to the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines: Part 1: Background, pathophysiology, and emerging treatments

ABSTRACT

Sepsis identification and treatment has changed significantly over the last few decades. Despite this, sepsis is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This first of a two-part series reviews the history of modern sepsis and presents new research in pathophysiology, treatment, and postsepsis care.

Predictive values of the SOFA score and procalcitonin for septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

To investigate the value of combination of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and procalcitonin (PCT) for prediction of septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A total of 1328 patients receiving PCNL for renal calculi were allocated into control group (without septic shock) and septic shock group, and related data were retrospectively collected. Univariate analysis was firstly performed, and the variables with two sided P < 0.10 were then included in logistic regression analysis to determine independent risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to evaluate the predictive values. Area under curve (AUC) was compared using Z test. Postoperative septic shock was developed in 61 patients (4.6%) and not developed in 1267 patients (95.3%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SOFA score (OR: 1.316, 95% CI 1.125–1.922), PCT (OR: 1.205, 95% CI 1.071–1.696) and operative time (OR: 1.108, 95% CI 1.032–1.441) were independent risk factors for septic shock with adjustment for sex, history of urolithiasis surgery, positive history of urine culture and history of PCNL. The ROC curves demonstrated that the AUCs of SOFA score and PCT for predicting septic shock after PCNL were 0.896 (95% CI 0.866–0.927) and 0.792 (95% CI 0.744–0.839), respectively. The AUC of their combination was 0.971 (95% CI 0.949–0.990), which was higher than those of individual predictions (vs 0.896, Z = 4.086, P < 0.001; vs 0.792, Z = 6.983, P < 0.001). Both the SOFA score and PCT could be applied in predicting septic shock after PCNL, and their combination could further elevate the diagnostic ability.

The diagnostic utility of IL-10, IL-17, and PCT in patients with sepsis infection

Objective

The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic value and net clinical benefit of interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-17 (IL-17), procalcitonin (PCT), and combination tests in patients with sepsis, which will serve as a standard for sepsis early detection.

Patients and methods

An investigation of 84 sepsis patients and 81 patients with local inflammatory diseases admitted to the ICU of Tongji University Hospital in 2021. In addition to comparing inter-group variability, indicators relevant to sepsis diagnosis and therapy were screened.

Results

LASSO regression was used to examine PCT, WBC, CRP, IL-10, IFN-, IL-12, and IL-17. Multivariate logistic regression linked IL-10, IL-17, and PCT to sepsis risk. The AUC values of IL-10, IL-17, PCT, and the combination of the three tests were much higher than those of standard laboratory infection indicators. The combined AUC was greater than the sum of IL-10, IL-17, and PCT (P < 0.05). A clinical decision curve analysis of IL-10, IL-17, PCT, and the three combined tests found that the three combined tests outperformed the individual tests in terms of total clinical benefit rate. To predict the risk of sepsis using IL-10, IL-17, and PCT had an AUC of 0.951, and the model's predicted probability was well matched. An examination of the nomogram model's clinical value demonstrated a considerable net therapeutic benefit between 3 and 87%.

Conclusion

The IL-10, IL-17, and PCT tests all have a high diagnostic value for patients with sepsis, and the combination of the three tests outperforms the individual tests in terms of diagnostic performance, while the combined tests have a higher overall clinical benefit rate.

Prognostic nutrition index is associated with the all‐cause mortality in sepsis patients: A retrospective cohort study

Background

The study aimed at evaluating the prognostic utility of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for patients with sepsis.

Methods

Data in the present study were obtained from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care Database III. The calculation for PNI was as follows: serum albumin concentration (g/L) +0.005 × total lymphocyte count. 30‐day mortality was considered as the primary outcome, while 90‐day mortality and one‐year mortality were the secondary outcomes. Cox proportional risk models and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were used to analyze the association between PNI and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. To assess the predictive value of PNI for 30‐day mortality, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed.

Results

A total of 2669 patients were in the study. After the confounding factors were adjusted, PNI ≥ 29.3 was identified as an independent predictive prognostic factor for the 30‐day all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56–0.76; p < 0.00001). Moreover, PSM analysis further validated the prognostic predictive value of PNI for patients with sepsis. The AUC of the PNI was 0.6436 (95% CI: 0.6204–0.6625) which was significantly high than the AUC of NLR (0.5962, 95% CI: 0.5717–0.6206) (p = 0.0031), the RDW (0.5878, 95% CI: 0.5629–0.6127) (p < 0.0001), and PLR (0.4979, 95% CI: 0.4722–0.5235) (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The findings suggested that PNI was also a significant risk factor for sepsis.

Implementation and evaluation of sepsis surveillance and decision support in medical ICU and emergency department

OBJECTIVE

To improve the timely diagnosis and treatment of sepsis many institutions implemented automated sepsis alerts. Poor specificity, time delays, and a lack of actionable information lead to limited adoption by bedside clinicians and no change in practice or clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare sepsis care compliance before and after a multi-year implementation of a sepsis surveillance coupled with decision support in a tertiary care center.

DESIGN

Single center before and after study.

SETTING

Large academic Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) and Emergency Department (ED).

POPULATION

Patients 18 years of age or older admitted to *** Hospital MICU and ED from 09/4/2011 to 05/01/2018 with severe sepsis or septic shock.

INTERVENTIONS

Electronic medical record-based sepsis surveillance system augmented by clinical decision support and completion feedback.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There were 1950 patients admitted to the MICU with the diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock during the study period. The baseline characteristics were similar before (N = 854) and after (N = 1096) implementation of sepsis surveillance. The performance of the alert was modest with a sensitivity of 79.9%, specificity of 76.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 27.9%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 97.2%. There were 3424 unique alerts and 1131 confirmed sepsis patients after the sniffer implementation. During the study period average care bundle compliance was higher; however after taking into account improvements in compliance leading up to the intervention, there was no association between intervention and improved care bundle compliance (Odds ratio: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.89; p-value 0.554). Similarly, the intervention was not associated with improvement in hospital mortality (Odds ratio: 1.55; 95% CI: 0.95 to 2.52; p-value: 0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

A sepsis surveillance system incorporating decision support or completion feedback was not associated with improved sepsis care and patient outcomes.

[Sepsis in out-of-hospital emergency medicine]

Background

Sepsis is a challenge in emergency medicine, as this life-threatening organ dysfunction, caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection, presents manifold and therefore is often recognized too late.

Objectives

Recently published surviving sepsis campaign and German S3 guidelines provide recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of sepsis in an in-hospital or intensive care setting, but do not particularly address out-of-hospital emergency medical care. We aim to work out the evidence base with regard to the out-of-hospital care of patients with suspected sepsis and to derive treatment recommendations for emergency medical services.

Conclusions

Therapy of sepsis and septic shock is summarized in bundles, whereby the first bundle should ideally be completed within the first hour-in analogy to "golden hour" concepts in other emergency medical entities, such as trauma care. In the out-of-hospital setting, therapy focuses on securing vital parameters, according to the ABCDE scheme, with a particular focus on volume therapy. Further procedures within the 1 h bundle, such as lactate measurement, obtaining microbiological samples, and starting an anti-infective therapy, are broadly available in hospital only. The aim is to control the site of infection as soon as possible. Therefore, an appropriate designated hospital should be chosen carefully and informed in advance, in order to initiate and pave the way for further clinical diagnostic and treatment paths. Moreover, structured and target-oriented handovers, as well as regular training, are required.

The Use of Different Sepsis Risk Stratification Tools on the Wards and in Emergency Departments Uncovers Different Mortality Risks: Results of the Three Welsh National Multicenter Point-Prevalence Studies

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

To compare the performance of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Red Flag Sepsis, and National Institute of Clinical Excellence sepsis risk stratification tools in the identification of patients at greatest risk of mortality from sepsis in nonintensive care environments.

Diagnostic Value of sIL-2R, TNF-α and PCT for Sepsis Infection in Patients With Closed Abdominal Injury Complicated With Severe Multiple Abdominal Injuries

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), procalcitonin (PCT), and combined detection for sepsis infection in patients with closed abdominal injury complicated with severe multiple abdominal injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred forty patients with closed abdominal injury complicated with severe multiple abdominal injuries who were diagnosed and treated from 2015 to 2020 were divided into a sepsis group (n = 70) and an infection group (n = 70).

RESULTS

The levels of sIL-2R, TNF-α, and PCT in the sepsis group were higher than those in the infection group (p < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of sIL-2R, TNF-α, PCT and sIL-2R+TNF-a+PCT were 0.827, 0.781, 0.821, and 0.846, respectively, which were higher than those of white blood cells (WBC, 0.712), C-reactive protein (CRP, 0.766), serum amyloid A (SAA, 0.666), and IL-6 (0.735). The AUC of the three combined tests was higher than that of TNF-α, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the AUCs of sIL-2R and TNF-α, sIL-2R and PCT, TNF-α and PCT, the three combined tests and sIL-2R, and the three combined tests and PCT (p > 0.05). When the median was used as the cut point, the corrected sIL-2R, TNF-α, and PCT of the high-level group were not better than those of the low-level group (p > 0.05). When the four groups were classified by using quantile as the cut point, the OR risk values of high levels of TNF-α and PCT (Q4) and the low level of PCT (Q1) after correction were 7.991 and 21.76, respectively, with statistical significance (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of sIL-2R, TNF-α, and PCT has good value in the diagnosis of sepsis infection in patients with closed abdominal injury complicated with severe multiple abdominal injuries. The high concentrations of PCT and TNF-α can be used as predictors of the risk of septic infection.

Hypernatremia and moderate-to-severe hyponatremia are independent predictors of mortality in septic patients at emergency department presentation: A sub-group analysis of the need-speed trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Early risk stratification of septic patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is challenging. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic role of plasmatic sodium level (_PNa⁺) derangements at ED presentation in septic patients.

METHODS

According to _PNa⁺ at ED presentation patients were divided in eunatremic (136-145 mEq/L), hypernatremic (>145 mEq/L) and hyponatremic (<136 mEq/L). Hyponatremic patients were subsequently divided in mild (130-135 mEq/L), moderate (125-129 mEq/L) and severe (<125 mEq/L). 7 and 30-day mortality was evaluated according to _PNa⁺ derangements and the degree of hyponatremia. The same analysis was then performed only in respiratory tract infection-related (RTI-r) sepsis patients.

RESULTS

879 septic patients were included in this analysis, 40.3% had hyponatremia, 5.7% hypernatremia. Hypernatremia showed higher mortality rates at both endpoints compared to eunatremia and hyponatremia (p<0.0001 for both). Eunatremia and mild hyponatremia were compared vs. moderate-to-severe hyponatremia showing a significant difference in terms of 7 and 30-day survival (p = 0.004 and p = 0.007, respectively). The Cox proportional model identified as independent predictors of 7 and 30-day mortality moderate-to-severe hyponatremia (HR 4.89[2.38-10.03] and 1.79[1.07-3.01], respectively) and hypernatremia (HR 3.52[1.58-7.82] and 2.14[1.17-3.92], respectively). The same analysis was performed in patients with respiratory tract infection-related sepsis (n = 549), with similar results.

CONCLUSION

Both hypernatremia and moderate-to-severe hyponatremia at ED presentation independently predict mortality in septic patients, allowing early risk stratification and suggesting more aggressive therapeutic strategies.

A neutrophil subset defined by intracellular olfactomedin 4 is associated with mortality in sepsis

Sepsis is a heterogeneous syndrome clinically and biologically, but biomarkers of distinct host response pathways for early prognostic information and testing targeted treatments are lacking. Olfactomedin 4 (OLFM4), a matrix glycoprotein of neutrophil-specific granules, defines a distinct neutrophil subset that may be an independent risk factor for poor outcomes in sepsis. We hypothesized that increased percentage of OLFM4⁺ neutrophils on sepsis presentation would be associated with mortality. In a single-center, prospective cohort study, we enrolled adults admitted to an academic medical center from the emergency department (ED) with suspected sepsis [identified by 2 or greater systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria and antibiotic receipt] from March 2016 through December 2017, followed by sepsis adjudication according to Sepsis-3. We collected 200 µL of whole blood within 24 h of admission and stained for the neutrophil surface marker CD66b followed by intracellular staining for OLFM4 quantitated by flow cytometry. The predictors for 60-day mortality were 1) percentage of OLFM4⁺ neutrophils and 2) OLFM4⁺ neutrophils at a cut point of ≥37.6% determined by the Youden Index. Of 120 enrolled patients with suspected sepsis, 97 had sepsis and 23 had nonsepsis SIRS. The mean percentage of OLFM4⁺ neutrophils was significantly increased in both sepsis and nonsepsis SIRS patients who died (P ≤ 0.01). Among sepsis patients with elevated OLFM4⁺ (≥37.6%), 56% died, compared with 18% with OLFM4⁺ <37.6% (P = 0.001). The association between OLFM4⁺ and mortality withstood adjustment for age, sex, absolute neutrophil count, comorbidities, and standard measures of severity of illness (SOFA score, APACHE III) (P < 0.03). In summary, OLFM4⁺ neutrophil percentage is independently associated with 60-day mortality in sepsis and may represent a novel measure of the heterogeneity of host response to sepsis.

[Assessment of outcomes of implementing the Sepsis Code in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital]

INTRODUCTION

A Sepsis Code (CS) is a comprehensive multidisciplinary system which has the aim of optimising the identification and intervention times of patients with sepsis, as well as improving their monitoring and treatment adjustments in order to reduce their mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To present the outcomes of the first year of introducing the CS in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-centre retrospective descriptive observational study was conducted on all patients in whom the CS was activated in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital during the first year of implementation. The variables included: demographics, CS activation, comorbidities, focus of infection, microbiology, antibiotic treatment, and mortality.

RESULTS

CS was activated in 555 patients, of which 302 (54.4%) had a definitive diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock on discharge from the emergency department. The degree of completion of the protocol variables was variable (41.8-95%).The large majority (86.1%) of the patients received antibiotics in the first hour, and in 76.2% blood cultures were collected prior to the antibiotic. Of the blood cultures performed, 13.3% of the isolated germs were multi-resistant and the level of contamination of blood cultures was 9.1%. All patients received empirical treatment and recommendations were followed in patients with septic shock in 28.3%. During follow-up, 64.4% the antibiotic treatment was targeted, and 39.5% received sequential therapy. In-hospital mortality was 32.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Areas of improvement in the completion of the variables, contamination of blood cultures, and empirical treatment received were detected, with the strong points being the early administration of the antibiotic and the collection of blood cultures.

Prognostic performance of endothelial biomarkers to early predict clinical deterioration of patients with suspected bacterial infection and sepsis admitted to the emergency department

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of endothelial biomarkers to early predict clinical deterioration of patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected sepsis. This was a prospective, multicentre, international study conducted in EDs. Adult patients with suspected acute bacterial infection and sepsis were enrolled but only those with confirmed infection were analysed. The kinetics of biomarkers and organ dysfunction were collected at T0, T6 and T24 hours after ED admission to assess prognostic performances of sVEGFR2, suPAR and procalcitonin (PCT). The primary outcome was the deterioration within 72 h and was defined as a composite of relevant outcomes such as death, intensive care unit admission and/or SOFA score increase validated by an independent adjudication committee.

RESULTS

After adjudication of 602 patients, 462 were analysed including 124 who deteriorated (27%). On admission, those who deteriorated were significantly older (73 [60-82] vs 63 [45-78] y-o, p < 0.001) and presented significantly higher SOFA scores (2.15 ± 1.61 vs 1.56 ± 1.40, p = 0.003). At T0, sVEGFR2 (5794 [5026-6788] vs 6681 [5516-8059], p < 0.0001), suPAR (6.04 [4.42-8.85] vs 4.68 [3.50-6.43], p < 0.0001) and PCT (7.8 ± 25.0 vs 5.4 ± 17.9 ng/mL, p = 0.001) were associated with clinical deterioration. In multivariate analysis, low sVEGFR2 expression and high suPAR and PCT levels were significantly associated with early deterioration, independently of confounding parameters (sVEGFR2, OR = 1.53 [1.07-2.23], p < 0.001; suPAR, OR = 1.57 [1.21-2.07], p = 0.003; PCT, OR = 1.10 [1.04-1.17], p = 0.0019). Combination of sVEGFR2 and suPAR had the best prognostic performance (AUC = 0.7 [0.65-0.75]) compared to clinical or biological variables.

CONCLUSIONS

sVEGFR2, either alone or combined with suPAR, seems of interest to predict deterioration of patients with suspected bacterial acute infection upon ED admission and could help front-line physicians in the triage process.

Gender-related differences in the performance of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

The study aims to identify whether gender differences exist in the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score to the extent of affecting its predictive accuracy for septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A retrospective study of 612 patients undergoing PCNL was performed. The SOFA scores of male and female groups were compared to identify any gender differences. The ROC curve was used to find differences between the original and adjusted SOFA scores. Postoperative septic shock developed in 21 (3.43%) cases. A marginally significant discrepancy in median SOFA scores between genders was discovered in a subgroup of patients < 40 years old (p = 0.048). A gender difference existed in the SOFA score after PCNL, with greater proportion of high scores in female patients (p = 0.011). Male patients had a higher proportion of ≥ 2 sub-score in hepatic and renal systems than female patients, caused by their higher preoperative bilirubin and creatinine (p < 0.05). An adjusted SOFA score was created to replace the original postoperative SOFA score with the perioperative changed values of bilirubin and creatinine. Performance of the adjusted SOFA score for predicting septic shock was comparable with the original SOFA score (AUC 0.987 vs. 0.985, p = 0.932). Under the premise of ensuring 100% sensitivity, the adjusted SOFA score reduced the 43.7% (31/71) false-positive rate for predicting septic shock compared with the original SOFA score. In conclusion, the gender should not be neglected when applying SOFA score for patients after PCNL. The adjusted SOFA score eliminates negative effects caused by gender differences in predicting septic shock.