1
|
Azzopardi MJ, Calleja-Agius J, Calleja N, Galea D, Ellul B, Micallef R, O'Toole SA, Savona-Ventura C. Rare gynaecological cancers in Malta - An analysis of incidence between 2010 and 2021. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2025; 51:109971. [PMID: 40148197 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2025] [Accepted: 03/10/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Whilst about 18 % of all cancers in females are gynaecological cancers, more than 50 % of these can be classified as rare tumours (defined as an annual incidence of <6 per 100,000). Such cancers represent an important challenge for small countries like Malta where the small caseload may limit the expertise of clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of such cancers. METHODOLOGY The study uses data from the Maltese population-based cancer registry to examine trends in incidence rate of the rare gynaecological cancers for the 12-year period between 2010 and 2021. It employs the RARECAREnet list to identify the rare gynaecological cancers by major rare gynaecological cancer categories and histological types and analyses the number of cases and incidence rates in Malta to monitor trends and provide an insight of the burden of such cancers. RESULTS A total of 709 new cases of rare gynaecological cancers were discovered during the 12-year period. Globally, these rare gynae cancers, constituted 42.6 % of all the gynae cancers that occurred during this period. Most of these rare cancers were ovarian (399 cases, 56.3 %), followed by rare cancers of the vulva and vagina (122 cases, 17.21 %), rare cancers of the corpus uteri (93 cases, 13.12 %) and rare cancers of the cervix uteri (73 cases, 10.3 %). Other rare gynaecological cancers (10 cases, 1.41 %) and cancers of the placenta (2 cases, 0.04 %) were much rarer. The outcomes in terms of 5-year survival was worse for the rare cancers compared with the commoner types of gynae cancers with an overall 5-year survival of 45.10 % and 45.48 % for rare gynae cancers for the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 cohorts respectively and an overall 5-year survival of 69.94 % and 73.44 % for the common gynae cancers for the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 cohorts respectively. CONCLUSION The study shows that globally rare gynaecological cancers in a small state like Malta are in fact not so rare - with a total of 709 rare gynaecological cancers in 12 years for Malta. These cases are however few when considering that they are divided into over 30 different histopathological groups. Numbers are also small when it comes to accumulating statistical power for analysis. The caseload for the individual sub-categories is small and will often be shared amongst the different individual gynaecologists and/or their clinical team. Thus, it might be difficult for these specialists to gather enough technical expertise that is crucial for early diagnosis and the treatment of these rare cancers. This study provides a rationale for international collaboration where there is scope for joint research and sharing of expertise. Establishment of common databases for the various types of rare gynaecological tumours will provide statistical power, enabling analysis of outcomes for these rare cancers and establishment of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam J Azzopardi
- Directorate for Health Information and Research, 95, G'Mangia Hill, Pietà, PTA 1313, Malta.
| | - Jean Calleja-Agius
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, MSD 2080, Msida, Malta.
| | - Neville Calleja
- Directorate for Health Information and Research, 95, G'Mangia Hill, Pietà, PTA 1313, Malta.
| | - Darren Galea
- Directorate for Health Information and Research, 95, G'Mangia Hill, Pietà, PTA 1313, Malta.
| | - Bridget Ellul
- Centre for Molecular Medicine & Biobanking, University of Malta, MSD 2080, Msida, Malta.
| | - Rita Micallef
- Directorate for Health Information and Research, 95, G'Mangia Hill, Pietà, PTA 1313, Malta.
| | - Sharon A O'Toole
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Histopathology, Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland.
| | - Charles Savona-Ventura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, MSD 2080, Msida, Malta.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luvero D, Angioli R, Notaro E, Plotti F, Terranova C, Angioli AM, Festa A, Stermasi A, Manco S, Diserio M, Montera R. Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma (STIC): A Review of the Literature on the Incidence at the Time of Prophylactic Surgery. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:2577. [PMID: 39594243 PMCID: PMC11592719 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2024] [Revised: 11/10/2024] [Accepted: 11/14/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is an early-stage cancerous lesion found in the fallopian tubes, often at the fimbrial end. It is strongly associated with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), a highly aggressive type of ovarian cancer. STIC is considered a precursor to many HGSC cases, originating in the fallopian tubes. Its development is frequently linked to mutations in the TP53 gene, leading to the formation of a p53 signature, an early abnormality that may progress to HGSC. This signature is more common in BRCA mutation carriers, explaining the higher incidence of STIC in this group. The aim of this review is to evaluate the literature on the incidence of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma in patients (both BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative) undergoing preventive salpingo-oophorectomy, analysing the available data and identifying associations between specific characteristics and the onset of STIC. METHODS A comprehensive review of the literature from 2016 to 2023 was conducted using PubMed, focusing on studies analysing the incidence of STIC in BRCA-positive patients undergoing preventive salpingo-oophorectomy. Data on patient characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and incidence of STIC were extracted and analysed. RESULTS Nine international studies were included in the review, reporting varying incidences of STIC among patients undergoing salpingo-oophorectomy. The overall incidence of STIC in all the women included in the studies was 7.31%, while that in the BRCA-mutated women was approximately 6.08%. Notably, the presence of the TP53 signature was significantly associated with the occurrence of STIC. CONCLUSIONS The etiopathogenesis of STIC involves complex interactions between genetic, environmental, and molecular factors. Further research is needed to fully understand its mechanisms and identify additional risk factors beyond BRCA mutations. Establishing a national database of STIC cases could facilitate future research and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Luvero
- Department of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Department of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Research Unit of Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Erika Notaro
- Department of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Plotti
- Department of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Research Unit of Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Corrado Terranova
- Department of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Research Unit of Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Angioli
- Research Unit of Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Asia Festa
- Department of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Andi Stermasi
- Department of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Serena Manco
- Department of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Miriana Diserio
- Department of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Roberto Montera
- Department of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Research Unit of Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He C, Lv X, Liu J, Ruan J, Chen P, Huang C, Angeletti PC, Hua G, Moness ML, Shi D, Dhar A, Yang S, Murphy S, Montoute I, Chen X, Islam KN, George S, Ince TA, Drapkin R, Guda C, Davis JS, Wang C. HPV-YAP1 oncogenic alliance drives malignant transformation of fallopian tube epithelial cells. EMBO Rep 2024; 25:4542-4569. [PMID: 39271776 PMCID: PMC11467260 DOI: 10.1038/s44319-024-00233-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
High grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most common and aggressive ovarian malignancy. Accumulating evidence indicates that HGSOC may originate from human fallopian tube epithelial cells (FTECs), although the exact pathogen(s) and/or molecular mechanism underlying the malignant transformation of FTECs is unclear. Here we show that human papillomavirus (HPV), which could reach FTECs via retrograde menstruation or sperm-carrying, interacts with the yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) to drive the malignant transformation of FTECs. HPV prevents FTECs from natural replicative and YAP1-induced senescence, thereby promoting YAP1-induced malignant transformation of FTECs. HPV also stimulates proliferation and drives metastasis of YAP1-transformed FTECs. YAP1, in turn, stimulates the expression of the putative HPV receptors and suppresses the innate immune system to facilitate HPV acquisition. These findings provide critical clues for developing new strategies to prevent and treat HGSOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunbo He
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Olson Center for Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
| | - Xiangmin Lv
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Olson Center for Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
| | - Jiyuan Liu
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Jinpeng Ruan
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China
| | - Peichao Chen
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Cong Huang
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Peter C Angeletti
- Nebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA
| | - Guohua Hua
- Olson Center for Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China
| | - Madelyn Leigh Moness
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Davie Shi
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Anjali Dhar
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Siyi Yang
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Savannah Murphy
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Isabelle Montoute
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Xingcheng Chen
- Fred & Pamela Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
| | - Kazi Nazrul Islam
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Sophia George
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Tan A Ince
- New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital and Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Ronny Drapkin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Chittibabu Guda
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
| | - John S Davis
- Olson Center for Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
- Fred & Pamela Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
- Western Iowa and Nebraska Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68105, USA
| | - Cheng Wang
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
- Olson Center for Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang T, Bin Y, Zhao L, Li Q. Positive Rate of Malignant Cells in Endometrial Cytology Samples of Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Cytol 2023; 40:51-57. [PMID: 37388400 PMCID: PMC10305903 DOI: 10.4103/joc.joc_49_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
To estimate the feasibility of diagnosing ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer through endometrial cytology, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to calculate the pooled positive rate of malignant cells in endometrial cytology samples. We queried PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails from inception to November 12, 2020 for studies estimating positive rates of malignant cells in endometrial cytology samples from patients with ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer. The positive rates of the included studies were calculated as pooled positive rate through meta-analyses of proportion. Subgroup analysis based on different sampling methods was conducted. Seven retrospective studies involving 975 patients were included. Pooled positive rate of malignant cells in endometrial cytology specimens of ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer patients was 23% (95% CI: 16% - 34%). Statistical heterogeneity between the included studies was considerable (I2 = 89%, P < 0.01). The pooled positive rates of the group of brushes and the group of aspiration smears were 13% (95% CI: 10% - 17%, I2 = 0, P = 0.45) and 33% (95% CI: 25% - 42%, I2 = 80%, P < 0.01), respectively. Although endometrial cytology is not an ideal diagnostic tool for ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer, it is a convenient, painless, and easy-to-implement adjunct to other tools. Sampling method is one of the factors that affect the detection rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiantian Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, China
| | - Yadi Bin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, China
| | - Lanbo Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, China
| | - Qiling Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yu H, Wang J, Wu B, li J, Chen R. Prognostic significance and risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in type I and type II ovarian cancer: a large population-based database analysis. J Ovarian Res 2023; 16:28. [PMID: 36717897 PMCID: PMC9885671 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01102-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the prognosis of lymphatic metastasis in type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) and to identify the risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastases (PLNs) and para-aortic lymph node metastases (PALNs). METHODS Patients diagnosed with epithelial OC were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify independent predictors of survival. RESULTS A total of 11,275 patients with OC were enrolled, including 31.2% with type I and 68.8% with type II. Type II and high tumour stage were risk factors for lymph node involvement (p < 0.05). The overall rate of lymph node metastasis in type I was 11.8%, and that in type II was 36.7%. In the type I group, the lymph node metastasis rates in stages T1, T2, T3 and TXM1 were 3.2%, 14.5%, 40.4% and 50.0%, respectively. In the type II group, these rates were 6.4%, 20.4%, 54.1% and 61.1%, respectively. Age and tumour size had little effect on lymph node metastasis, and grade 3 was not always a risk factor. For the type I group, the 10-year CSS rates of LN(-), PLN( +), PALN( +), and PLN + PALN( +) were 80.6%, 46.6%, 36.3%, and 32.3%, respectively. The prognosis of PLN ( +) was better than that of PALN ( +) in the type I group (p > 0.05). For the type II group, the 10-year CSS rates of LN(-), PLN( +), PALN( +), and PLN + PALN( +) were 55.6%, 18.5%, 25.7%, and 18.2%, respectively. PALN ( +) had a significantly better prognosis than PLN ( +) in the type II group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients with type I and type II OC differed greatly. Patients with type II and higher tumour stages had poorer prognoses. Type I with PALN metastasis and type II with PLN metastasis indicated a worse prognosis. Patients with stage TI did not require lymph node dissection, especially in the type I group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailin Yu
- grid.8547.e0000 0001 0125 2443Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jieyu Wang
- grid.8547.e0000 0001 0125 2443Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Beibei Wu
- grid.8547.e0000 0001 0125 2443Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun li
- grid.8547.e0000 0001 0125 2443Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruifang Chen
- grid.8547.e0000 0001 0125 2443Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beirne JP, Gilmore A, McInerney CE, Roddy A, Glenn McCluggage W, Harley IJ, Abdullah Alvi M, Prise KM, McArt DG, Mullan PB. A bespoke target selection tool to guide biomarker discovery in tubo-ovarian cancer. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2022; 20:3359-3371. [PMID: 35832628 PMCID: PMC9260242 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cancers presenting at advanced stages inherently have poor prognosis. High grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common and aggressive form of tubo-ovarian cancer. Clinical tests to accurately diagnose and monitor this condition are lacking. Hence, development of disease-specific tests are urgently required. Methods The molecular profile of HGSC during disease progression was investigated in a unique patient cohort. A bespoke data browser was developed to analyse gene expression and DNA methylation datasets for biomarker discovery. The Ovarian Cancer Data Browser (OCDB) is built in C# with a.NET framework using an integrated development environment of Microsoft Visual Studio and fast access files (.faf). The graphical user interface is easy to navigate between four analytical modes (gene expression; methylation; combined gene expression and methylation data; methylation clusters), with a rapid query response time. A user should first define a disease progression trend for prioritising results. Single or multiomics data are then mined to identify probes, genes and methylation clusters that exhibit the desired trend. A unique scoring system based on the percentage change in expression/methylation between disease stages is used. Results are filtered and ranked using weighting and penalties. Results The OCDB’s utility for biomarker discovery is demonstrated with the identified target OSR2. Trends in OSR2 repression and hypermethylation with HGSC disease progression were confirmed in the browser samples and an independent cohort using bioassays. The OSR2 methylation biomarker could discriminate HGSC with high specificity (95%) and sensitivity (93.18%). Conclusions The OCDB has been refined and validated to be an integral part of a unique biomarker discovery pipeline. It may also be used independently to aid identification of novel targets. It carries the potential to identify further biomarker assays that can reduce type I and II errors within clinical diagnostics.
Collapse
|
7
|
Silva EG, Lawson BC, Ramalingam P, Liu J, Shehabeldin A, Marques-Piubelli ML, Malpica A. Precursors in the Ovarian Stroma, Another Pathway to Explain the Origin of Ovarian Serous Neoplasms. Hum Pathol 2022; 127:136-145. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
8
|
Gorski JW, Dietrich CS, Davis C, Erol L, Dietrich H, Per NJ, Ferrell EL, McDowell AB, Riggs MJ, Hutchcraft ML, Baldwin-Branch LA, Miller RW, DeSimone CP, Gallion HH, Ueland FR, van Nagell JR, Pavlik EJ. Significance of Pelvic Fluid Observed during Ovarian Cancer Screening with Transvaginal Sonogram. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12010144. [PMID: 35054310 PMCID: PMC8774702 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The primary objective was to examine the role of pelvic fluid observed during transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) in identifying ovarian malignancy. A single-institution, observational study was conducted within the University of Kentucky Ovarian Cancer Screening trial from January 1987 to September 2019. We analyzed true-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), true-negative (TN), and false-negative (FN) groups for the presence of pelvic fluid during screening encounters. Measured outcomes were the presence and duration of fluid over successive screening encounters. Of the 48,925 women surveyed, 2001 (4.1%) had pelvic fluid present during a TVS exam. The odds ratio (OR) of detecting fluid in the comparison group (TN screen; OR = 1) significantly differed from that of the FP cases (benign pathology; OR: 13.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.1–19.8), the TP cases with a low malignant potential (LMP; OR: 28; 95% CI: 26.5–29.5), TP ovarian cancer cases (OR: 50.4; 95% CI: 27.2–93.2), and FN ovarian cancer cases (OR: 59.3; 95% CI: 19.7–178.1). The mean duration that pelvic fluid was present for women with TN screens was 2.2 ± 0.05 encounters, lasting 38.7 ± 1.3 months. In an asymptomatic screening population, free fluid identified in TVS exams was more associated with ovarian malignancy than in the control group or benign ovarian tumors. While pelvic free fluid may not solely discriminate malignancy from non-malignancy, it appears to be clinically relevant and warrants thoughtful consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin W. Gorski
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Charles S. Dietrich
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Caeli Davis
- Denison University, Granville, OH 43023, USA;
| | - Lindsay Erol
- Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI 96859, USA;
| | | | - Nicholas J. Per
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (N.J.P.); (E.L.F.)
| | - Emily Lenk Ferrell
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (N.J.P.); (E.L.F.)
| | - Anthony B. McDowell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - McKayla J. Riggs
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Megan L. Hutchcraft
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Lauren A. Baldwin-Branch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Rachel W. Miller
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Christopher P. DeSimone
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Holly H. Gallion
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Frederick R. Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - John R. van Nagell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Edward J. Pavlik
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Teng K, Ford MJ, Harwalkar K, Li Y, Pacis AS, Farnell D, Yamanaka N, Wang YC, Badescu D, Ton Nu TN, Ragoussis J, Huntsman DG, Arseneau J, Yamanaka Y. Modeling High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Using a Combination of In Vivo Fallopian Tube Electroporation and CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing. Cancer Res 2021; 81:5147-5160. [PMID: 34301761 PMCID: PMC9397628 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-1518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic cancer to date. High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) accounts for most ovarian cancer cases, and it is most frequently diagnosed at advanced stages. Here, we developed a novel strategy to generate somatic ovarian cancer mouse models using a combination of in vivo electroporation and CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing. Mutation of tumor suppressor genes associated with HGSOC in two different combinations (Brca1, Tp53, Pten with and without Lkb1) resulted in successfully generation of HGSOC, albeit with different latencies and pathophysiology. Implementing Cre lineage tracing in this system enabled visualization of peritoneal micrometastases in an immune-competent environment. In addition, these models displayed copy number alterations and phenotypes similar to human HGSOC. Because this strategy is flexible in selecting mutation combinations and targeting areas, it could prove highly useful for generating mouse models to advance the understanding and treatment of ovarian cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: This study unveils a new strategy to generate genetic mouse models of ovarian cancer with high flexibility in selecting mutation combinations and targeting areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Teng
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Matthew J Ford
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Keerthana Harwalkar
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - YuQi Li
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alain S Pacis
- Canadian Centre for Computational Genomics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - David Farnell
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Nobuko Yamanaka
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Yu-Chang Wang
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- McGill University and Genome Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dunarel Badescu
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- McGill University and Genome Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Tuyet Nhung Ton Nu
- Department of Pathology, McGill University Hospital Research Institute, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jiannis Ragoussis
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- McGill University and Genome Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Bioengineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Jocelyne Arseneau
- Department of Pathology, McGill University Hospital Research Institute, Montreal, Canada
| | - Yojiro Yamanaka
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
D'Alessandro G, Frigerio M, Barra F, Costantini S, Gustavino C, Ferrero S. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in reducing risk of ovarian cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 156:418-424. [PMID: 33969485 PMCID: PMC9290617 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Ovarian carcinoma (OC) is one of the most widespread tumors in the world and is characterized by low survival rates. Objective To determine whether the levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system (LNG‐IUS) can prevent OC. Search strategy The literature until December 2020 were systematically reviewed according to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42019137957). Selection criteria Studies assessing the impact of LNG‐IUS on the risk of OC were included. Data collection and analysis Data were extracted independently by two authors to ensure accuracy and consistency. Main results A total of 34 323 records were obtained, of which three satisfied the inclusion criteria. In total, 1687 events of OC in a population of 20 461 311 person‐years were considered. Data pooling revealed that the use of LNG‐IUS did not confer a lower risk of OC relative to the never‐use of LNG‐IUS, with an estimated odds ratio of 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.41–1.08; I2 = 84%; P = 0.002). Conclusion The meta‐analysis did not demonstrate a preventive role of LNG‐IUS on OC. However, it was carried out on a few papers, and a definitive conclusion on the topic still cannot be drawn. Further studies are indicated in the future to define the impact of LNG‐IUS on OC. The meta‐analysis carried out on three papers did not demonstrate a preventive role of the levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine device on ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria D'Alessandro
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Barra
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Sergio Costantini
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Claudio Gustavino
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pisanic TR, Wang Y, Sun H, Considine M, Li L, Wang TH, Wang TL, Shih IM. Methylomic Landscapes of Ovarian Cancer Precursor Lesions. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:6310-6320. [PMID: 32817081 PMCID: PMC7710556 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The current paradigm in the development of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) proposes that the majority of HGSCs arise from precursor serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) lesions of the fallopian tube. Here we survey genome-wide methylation in HGSC precursor lesions to identify genomic regions that exhibit high-specificity differential hypermethylation for potential use as biomarkers for detecting STIC and HGSC at stages when curative intervention likely remains feasible. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We first identified quality control criteria for performing reliable methylomic analysis of DNA-limited tubal precursor lesions with the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC array. We then used this platform to compare genome-wide methylation among 12 STICs with paired adjacent-normal epithelia, one p53 signature lesion and two samples of concurrent HGSC. The resulting methylomic data were analyzed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering and multidimensional analysis. Regions of high-confidence STIC-specific differential hypermethylation were identified using selective bioinformatic criteria and compared with published MethylationEPIC data from 23 HGSC tumors and 11 healthy fallopian tube mucosae. RESULTS Unsupervised analysis showed that STICs largely clustered with HGSCs, but were clearly distinct from adjacent-normal fallopian tube epithelia. Forty-two genomic regions exhibited high-confidence STIC-specific differential hypermethylation, of which 17 (40.5%) directly overlapped with HGSC-specific differentially methylated regions. Methylation at these shared loci was able to completely distinguish STIC and HGSC samples from normal and adjacent-normal specimens. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that most STICs are epigenetically similar to HGSCs and share regions of differential hypermethylation that warrant further evaluation for potential use as biomarkers for early detection of ovarian HGSC.See related commentary by Ishak and De Carvalho, p. 6083.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Pisanic
- Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Yeh Wang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hanru Sun
- Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael Considine
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lihong Li
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tza-Huei Wang
- Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tian-Li Wang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kehoe S. FIGO staging in ovarian carcinoma and histological subtypes. J Gynecol Oncol 2020; 31:e70. [PMID: 32519520 PMCID: PMC7286752 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Kehoe
- FIGO Gynaecological Cancer Committee, Institute of Cancer & Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Feeney L, Harley IJG, McCluggage WG, Mullan PB, Beirne JP. Liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer: Catching the silent killer before it strikes. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:868-889. [PMID: 33312883 PMCID: PMC7701910 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i11.868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynaecological malignancy in the western world. The majority of women presenting with the disease are asymptomatic and it has been dubbed the "silent killer". To date there is no effective minimally invasive method of stratifying those with the disease or screening for the disease in the general population. Recent molecular and pathological discoveries, along with the advancement of scientific technology, means there is a real possibility of having disease-specific liquid biopsies available within the clinical environment in the near future. In this review we discuss these discoveries, particularly in relation to the most common and aggressive form of EOC, and their role in making this possibility a reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Feeney
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - Ian JG Harley
- Northern Ireland Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BL, United Kingdom
| | - Paul B Mullan
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - James P Beirne
- Trinity St James Cancer Institute, St. James’ Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tao T, Lin W, Wang Y, Zhang J, Chambers SK, Li B, Lea J, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zheng W. Loss of tubal ciliated cells as a risk for "ovarian" or pelvic serous carcinoma. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10:3815-3827. [PMID: 33294269 PMCID: PMC7716167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances suggest the fallopian tube as the main anatomic site for high-grade ovarian or pelvic serous carcinoma (O/PSC). Many studies on the biologic role of tubal secretory cells in O/PSC development has been performed in the last decade. However, the role of tubal ciliated cells in this regard has rarely been explored. The purpose of this study was to determine if the change of the tubal ciliated cells is associated with serous neoplasia within the female pelvis. This study included 3 groups (low-risk or benign control, high-risk, and O/PSC) of patients and they were age-matched. Age of patients ranged from 20 to 85 and the age-associated data was stratified by 10-year intervals. The number of tubal ciliated cells was determined by microscopy and by tubulin immunohistochemical staining. The data was then professionally analyzed. The results showed that the absolute number of tubal ciliated cells decreased significantly with age within each age group. A reduction in ciliated cell counts within the tubal segments remained a significant risk factor for the development of serous cancers within the female pelvis after age adjustment. A dramatic decrease of tubal ciliated cells was identified in patients with high-risk and with O/PSC compared to those in the benign control or low-risk group (P < 0.001). Further, within the tubal fimbria, the number of ciliated cells reduction was more prominent in the high-risk group when compared to those of O/PSC patients. Our findings suggest that a decreased number of ciliated cells within women's fallopian tubes represents another histologic hallmark for early serous carcinogenesis. There is a relationship between loss of tubal ciliated cells and aging, the presence of high-risk factors for tubal-ovarian cancer, and co-existing O/PSCs. This represents an initial study identifying the role of tubal ciliated cells in the development of high-grade serous carcinoma in women's pelvis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Tao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Henan University People’s HospitalZhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Wanrun Lin
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
| | - Jing Zhang
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
| | - Setsuko K Chambers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of ArizonaTucson, AZ, USA
- Arizona Cancer Center, University of ArizonaTucson, AZ, USA
| | - Bo Li
- Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics and Department of Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
- Harold C Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
| | - Jayanthi Lea
- Harold C Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
| | - Yiying Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Henan University People’s HospitalZhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Yue Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Henan University People’s HospitalZhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Wenxin Zheng
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
- Harold C Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pavlik EJ, Smith C, Dennis TS, Harvey E, Huang B, Chen Q, West Piecoro D, Burgess BT, McDowell A, Gorski J, Baldwin LA, Miller RW, DeSimone CP, Dietrich C, Gallion HH, Ueland FR, van Nagell JR. Disease-Specific Survival of Type I and Type II Epithelial Ovarian Cancers-Stage Challenges Categorical Assignments of Indolence & Aggressiveness. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10020056. [PMID: 31973035 PMCID: PMC7168156 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10020056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC) consist of several sub-types based on histology, clinical, molecular and epidemiological features that are termed “histo-types”, which can be categorized into less aggressive Type I and more aggressive Type II malignancies. This investigation evaluated the disease-specific survival (DSS) of women with Type I and II EOC using histo-type, grade, and stage. A total of 47,789 EOC cases were identified in the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. Survival analysis and log rank test were performed to identify a 2-tiered classification (grade 1 vs. grade 2 & 3) for serous EOC. DSS of early stage serous EOC for grade 2 was significantly different from grade 3 indicating that a 2-tier classification for serous EOC applied only to late stage. DSS of Type I EOC was much better than Type II. However, DSS was 33–52% lower with late stage Type I than with early stage Type I indicating that Type I ovarian cancers should not be considered indolent. Early stage Type II EOC had much better DSS than late stage Type II stressing that stage has a large role in survival of both Type I and II EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J. Pavlik
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-859-323-3830
| | - Christopher Smith
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | | | - Elizabeth Harvey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 43023, USA;
| | - Bin Huang
- Division of Cancer Biostatistics, College of Public Health & Biostatistics Shared Resource Facility, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (B.H.); (Q.C.)
| | - Quan Chen
- Division of Cancer Biostatistics, College of Public Health & Biostatistics Shared Resource Facility, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (B.H.); (Q.C.)
| | - Dava West Piecoro
- Department of Pathology and the Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA;
| | - Brian T. Burgess
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Anthony McDowell
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Justin Gorski
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Lauren A. Baldwin
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Rachel W. Miller
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Christopher P. DeSimone
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Charles Dietrich
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Holly H. Gallion
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Frederick R. Ueland
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - John R. van Nagell
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (C.S.); (B.T.B.); (A.M.); (J.G.); (L.A.B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (C.D.III); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Xian W, George S. Meeting report from the 2018 12th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium detection and prevention of ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:s2-s6. [PMID: 31462541 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this review is to summarize recent research advances in the detection and prevention of ovarian cancer and discuss the experts' opinions of future directions. The 12th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium was held in Seattle, Washington, in September 2018. At this meeting, experts in ovarian cancer research gathered to present and discuss recent breakthroughs and their visions of future ovarian cancer research. Session 1 of the symposium focused on the detection and prevention of ovarian cancer. It included two invited oral presentations from Ranjit Manchanda, MD, PhD (Barts Cancer Institute) and Rosana Risques, PhD (University of Washington). Another eight oral presentations were selected from abstract submissions. Fifteen abstracts were presented in poster format. These presentations covered topics including cellular origin of high-grade serous cancer, risk factors for ovarian cancer, new methods for early detection of ovarian cancer, mechanisms underlying ovarian cancer development, and new therapeutic approaches for preventing ovarian cancer from forming or progressing. In conclusion, a clear understanding of the cellular origin and molecular mechanisms underlying the initiation of high-grade serous cancer is essential for developing effective means for early detection and prevention of this most devastating type of ovarian cancer. Recognizing the complexity of ovarian cancer and appreciating that ovarian cancer is not a single disease will help us to generate proper models, design rational experiments, and collect and analyze patient data in a meaningful way. A concerted effort in the field will help to bridge the basic science and clinical applications and lead to more precise and effective detection and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wa Xian
- IMM, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sophia George
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Preclinical Models of Ovarian Cancer: Pathogenesis, Problems, and Implications for Prevention. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2018; 60:789-800. [PMID: 28719396 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Preclinical models are relatively underutilized and underfunded resources for modeling the pathogenesis and prevention of ovarian cancers. Several reviews have detailed the numerous published models of ovarian cancer. In this review, we will provide an overview of experimental model systems, their strengths and limitations, and use selected models to illustrate how they can be used to address specific issues about ovarian cancer pathogenesis. We will then highlight some of the preclinical prevention studies performed to date and discuss experiments needed to address important unanswered questions about ovarian cancer prevention strategies.
Collapse
|
18
|
Low-Stage High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinomas: Support for an Extraovarian Origin. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2017; 35:222-9. [PMID: 26630225 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Many adnexal high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) may derive from microscopic precursors in the fallopian tube. By studying a series of low-stage ovarian carcinomas, we anticipated that HGSCs would be distributed in a pattern suggesting secondary involvement, helping to indirectly validate the fallopian tube origin theory, and that most ovarian carcinomas other than serous carcinomas would demonstrate features consistent with derivation from precursors located in or transplanted to the ovary. Seventy-six patients with low-stage (FIGO I/II) sporadic ovarian carcinoma who underwent primary surgical management at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 1980 to 2000 were included in the study. Histologic type was assigned using Gilks' criteria. Similar to the approach taken when distinguishing primary and metastatic mucinous or endometrioid carcinoma involving ovary, cases interpreted as showing a "primary" pattern of ovarian involvement had ≥3 of the following features: unilateral tumor, size >12 cm, no surface involvement, no multinodularity, and no destructive stromal invasion. All other cases were considered to show a "metastatic" pattern of ovarian involvement. Cases were evaluated for p53 and WT-1 expression, using standard techniques on a tissue microarray. TP53 gene sequencing was also performed. Cases comprised HGSC (n=22), endometrioid carcinoma (n=30), clear cell carcinoma (n=13), and mucinous carcinoma (n=11). HGSCs displayed substantially more "metastatic features" than the non-HGSC group and a mean overall size that was smaller (8.85 vs. 14.1 cm). Statistically significant differences were found for bilaterality (63% vs. 7.3%), P=0.0001; multinodularity (55% vs. 7.3%), P=0.0001; tumor size, P=0.003; and surface involvement (50% vs. 13%), P=0.002. Five of 22 (23%) of HGSCs showed a "primary pattern" of ovarian involvement. There were no significant differences between these cases and "metastatic pattern" HGSCs when comparing morphology, immunophenotype, TP53 mutational status, and clinical outcomes. Most low-stage HGSCs demonstrate patterns of ovarian involvement that suggest metastasis from another source, such as the fallopian tube. Both metastatic pattern HGSCs and unilateral, low-stage HGSCs can behave aggressively.
Collapse
|
19
|
Xie X, Yang M, Ding Y, Chen J. Microbial infection, inflammation and epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Lett 2017; 14:1911-1919. [PMID: 28789426 PMCID: PMC5529868 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most common, and life-threatening, type of female gynecological cancer. The etiology of ovarian cancer remains unclear, and there are currently no effective screening or treatment methods for the disease. Microbial infection serves a marked function in inducing carcinogenesis. A number of studies have identified pelvic inflammatory disease as a risk factor for epithelial ovarian cancer. Thus, it is hypothesized that microbial infection may contribute to ovarian cancer. In the present review, the microorganisms that have been identified to be associated with ovarian cancer and the underlying molecular mechanisms involved are discussed. Infection-induced chronic inflammation is considered an important process for carcinogenesis, cancer progression and metastasis. Therefore, the pathological process and associated inflammatory factors are reviewed in the present paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaohui Xie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410001, P.R. China
| | - Mengyuan Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410001, P.R. China
| | - Yiling Ding
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410001, P.R. China
| | - Jianlin Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410001, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ormsby EL, Pavlik EJ, McGahan JP. Ultrasound Monitoring of Extant Adnexal Masses in the Era of Type 1 and Type 2 Ovarian Cancers: Lessons Learned From Ovarian Cancer Screening Trials. Diagnostics (Basel) 2017; 7:diagnostics7020025. [PMID: 28452952 PMCID: PMC5489945 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics7020025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Women that are positive for an ovarian abnormality in a clinical setting can have either a malignancy or a benign tumor with probability favoring the benign alternative. Accelerating the abnormality to surgery will result in a high number of unnecessary procedures that will place cost burdens on the individual and the health delivery system. Surveillance using serial ultrasonography is a reasonable alternative that can be used to discover if changes in the ovarian abnormality will occur that favor either a malignant or benign interpretation. Several ovarian cancer screening trials have had extensive experiences with changes in subclinical ovarian abnormalities in normal women that can define growth, stability or resolution and give some idea of the time frame over which changes occur. The present report examines these experiences and relates them to the current understanding of ovarian cancer ontology, presenting arguments related to the benefits of surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor L Ormsby
- Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Kaiser Permanente Sacramento, 2025 Morse Ave, CA 95825, USA.
| | - Edward J Pavlik
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center-Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
| | - John P McGahan
- Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Smith CG. A Resident's Perspective of Ovarian Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2017; 7:E24. [PMID: 28448435 PMCID: PMC5489944 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics7020024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Revised: 04/12/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Identifying, understanding, and curing disease is a lifelong endeavor for any medical practitioner. Equally as important is to be cognizant of the impact a disease has on the individual suffering from it, as well as on their family. Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancies. Symptoms are vague, and the disease is generally at an advanced stage at diagnosis. Efforts have been made to develop methods to identify ovarian cancer at earlier stages, thus improving overall mortality. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), with and without laboratory tests, can be used to screen for ovarian cancer. For over thirty years, the University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Ovarian Cancer Screening Program has been studying the efficacy of TVUS for detecting early stage ovarian cancer. After 285,000+ TVUS examinations provided to over 45,000 women, the program has demonstrated that regular TVUS examinations can detect ovarian cancer at early stages, and that survival is increased in those women whose ovarian cancer was detected with screening and who undergo standard treatment. These results demonstrate the utility of TVUS as an efficacious method of ovarian cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Smith
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Molecular Alterations of TP53 are a Defining Feature of Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Rereview of Cases Lacking TP53 Mutations in The Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Study. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2017; 35:48-55. [PMID: 26166714 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The Cancer Genome Atlas has reported that 96% of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) have TP53 somatic mutations suggesting that mutation of this gene is a defining feature of this neoplasm. In the current study, 5 gynecologic pathologists independently evaluated hematoxylin and eosin slides of 14 available cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas classified as HGSC that lacked a TP53 mutation. The histologic diagnoses rendered by these pathologists and the accompanying molecular genetic data are the subject of this report. Only 1 case (Case 5), which contained a homozygous deletion of TP53, had unanimous interobserver agreement for a diagnosis of pure HGSC. In 1 case (Case 3), all 5 observers (100%) rendered a diagnosis of HGSC; however, 3 observers (60%) noted that the histologic features were not classic for HGSC and suggested this case may have arisen from a low-grade serous carcinoma (arisen from an alternate pathway compared with the usual HGSC). In 2 cases (Cases 4 and 12), only 3 observers (60%) in each case, respectively, interpreted it as having a component of HGSC. In the remaining 10 (71%) of tumors (Cases 1, 2, 6-11, 13, and 14), the consensus diagnosis was not HGSC, with individual diagnoses including low-grade serous carcinoma, high-grade endometrioid carcinoma, HGSC, metastatic carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, atypical proliferative (borderline) serous tumor, and adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified. Therefore, 13 (93%) of the tumors (Cases 1-4 and 6-14) were either not a pure HGSC or represented a diagnosis other than HGSC, all with molecular results not characteristic of HGSC. Accordingly, our review of the TP53 wild-type HGSCs reported in The Cancer Genome Atlas suggests that 100% of de novo HGSCs contain TP53 somatic mutations or deletions, with the exception of the rare HGSCs that develop from a low-grade serous tumor precursor. We, therefore, propose that lack of molecular alterations of TP53 are essentially inconsistent with the diagnosis of ovarian HGSC and that tumors diagnosed as such should be rigorously reassessed to achieve correct classification.
Collapse
|
23
|
Baldwin LA, Chen Q, Tucker TC, White CG, Ore RN, Huang B. Ovarian Cancer Incidence Corrected for Oophorectomy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2017; 7:E19. [PMID: 28368298 PMCID: PMC5489939 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics7020019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2016] [Revised: 03/01/2017] [Accepted: 03/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Current reported incidence rates for ovarian cancer may significantly underestimate the true rate because of the inclusion of women in the calculations who are not at risk for ovarian cancer due to prior benign salpingo-oophorectomy (SO). We have considered prior SO to more realistically estimate risk for ovarian cancer. Kentucky Health Claims Data, International Classification of Disease 9 (ICD-9) codes, Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes, and Kentucky Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Data were used to identify women who have undergone SO in Kentucky, and these women were removed from the at-risk pool in order to re-assess incidence rates to more accurately represent ovarian cancer risk. The protective effect of SO on the population was determined on an annual basis for ages 5-80+ using data from the years 2009-2013. The corrected age-adjusted rates of ovarian cancer that considered SO ranged from 33% to 67% higher than age-adjusted rates from the standard population. Correction of incidence rates for ovarian cancer by accounting for women with prior SO gives a better understanding of risk for this disease faced by women. The rates of ovarian cancer were substantially higher when SO was taken into consideration than estimates from the standard population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren A Baldwin
- The Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 800 Rose Street, 330 Whitney-Hendrickson Building, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
| | - Quan Chen
- Division of Cancer Biostatistics, College of Public Health & Biostatistics Shared Resource Facility, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
| | - Thomas C Tucker
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health & Kentucky Cancer Registry, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
| | - Connie G White
- Kentucky Department for Public Health, Frankfort, KY 40601, USA.
| | - Robert N Ore
- The Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 800 Rose Street, 330 Whitney-Hendrickson Building, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
| | - Bin Huang
- Division of Cancer Biostatistics, College of Public Health & Biostatistics Shared Resource Facility, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Baldwin LA, Pavlik EJ, Ueland E, Brown HE, Ladd KM, Huang B, DeSimone CP, van Nagell JR, Ueland FR, Miller RW. Complications from Surgeries Related to Ovarian Cancer Screening. Diagnostics (Basel) 2017; 7:diagnostics7010016. [PMID: 28282907 PMCID: PMC5373025 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics7010016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2016] [Revised: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate complications of surgical intervention for participants in the Kentucky Ovarian Cancer Screening Program and compare results to those of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial. A retrospective database review included 657 patients who underwent surgery for a positive screen in the Kentucky Ovarian Cancer Screening Program from 1988–2014. Data were abstracted from operative reports, discharge summaries, and office notes for 406 patients. Another 142 patients with incomplete records were interviewed by phone. Complete information was available for 548 patients. Complications were graded using the Clavien–Dindo (C–D) Classification of Surgical Complications and considered minor if assigned Grade I (any deviation from normal course, minor medications) or Grade II (other pharmacological treatment, blood transfusion). C–D Grade III complications (those requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiologic intervention) and C–D Grade IV complications (those which are life threatening) were considered “major”. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 software. Complications were documented in 54/548 (10%) subjects. For women with malignancy, 17/90 (19%) had complications compared to 37/458 (8%) with benign pathology (p < 0.003). For non-cancer surgery, obesity was associated with increased complications (p = 0.0028). Fifty patients had minor complications classified as C–D Grade II or less. Three of 4 patients with Grade IV complications had malignancy (p < 0.0004). In the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial, 212 women had surgery for ovarian malignancy, and 95 had at least one complication (45%). Of the 1080 women with non-cancer surgery, 163 had at least one complication (15%). Compared to the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial, the Kentucky Ovarian Cancer Screening Program had significantly fewer complications from both cancer and non-cancer surgery (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Complications resulting from surgery performed as a result of the Kentucky Ovarian Cancer Screening Program were infrequent and significantly fewer than reported in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial. Complications were mostly minor (93%) and were more common in cancer versus non-cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren A Baldwin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and the Markey Cancer Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA.
| | - Edward J Pavlik
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and the Markey Cancer Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA.
| | - Emma Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and the Markey Cancer Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA.
| | - Hannah E Brown
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and the Markey Cancer Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA.
| | - Kelsey M Ladd
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and the Markey Cancer Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA.
| | - Bin Huang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and the Markey Cancer Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA.
| | - Christopher P DeSimone
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and the Markey Cancer Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA.
| | - John R van Nagell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and the Markey Cancer Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA.
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and the Markey Cancer Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA.
| | - Rachel W Miller
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and the Markey Cancer Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Primary Fallopian Tube Carcinoma: A Single-Institution Experience of 101 Cases: A Retrospective Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:424-30. [PMID: 26825825 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors for primary fallopian tube carcinoma. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted of the patients treated with primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from February 2003 to December 2010. Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate survival analysis. RESULTS Included in this study were 101 patients with a median follow-up of 64 months and a mean age of 57 years. Latzko triad symptom of abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding or discharge, and palpable pelvic mass was reported in 14 patients, and elevated CA 125 (≥ 35 U/mL) was found in 63. Four patients were classified as grade 1, 31 were grade 2, and 66 were grade 3. The distribution of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage was 33 at stage I, 28 at stage II, 39 at stage III, and 1 at stage IV. Ninety patients underwent optimal tumor debulking in which residual tumor was no larger than 1 cm, and 67 patients received no fewer than 6 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin (TP)-based regimen. Recurrence occurred in 44 patients after a median of 20 months (range, 1-72 months). The 5-year overall survival rate was 67.7%, and the 5-year disease-free survival was 57.4%. Multivariate analysis revealed that International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (I-II) [hazard ratio (HR), 2.670; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.316-5.418; P = 0.007 vs HR, 2.716; 95% CI, 1.416-5.211; P = 0.003], pelvic lymphadenectomy (HR, 0.274; 95% CI, 0.136-0.555; P < 0.001 vs HR, 0.449; 95% CI, 0.227-0.888; P = 0.021), and cycles (≥ 6) of chemotherapy (HR, 0.480; 95% CI, 0.246-0.937; P = 0.031 vs HR, 0.521; 95% CI, 0.276-0.985; P = 0.045) might serve as independent predictors of both overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative diagnosis of fallopian tube carcinoma is difficult due to the silent course of this neoplasm. Comprehensive surgical staging including pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by adequate cycles of chemotherapy is an important strategy to improve patients' prognosis.
Collapse
|
26
|
Soini T, Hurskainen R, Grénman S, Mäenpää J, Paavonen J, Pukkala E. Impact of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use on the cancer risk of the ovary and fallopian tube. Acta Oncol 2016; 55:1281-1284. [PMID: 27148621 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1175660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is used for contraception and heavy menstrual bleeding. A long-term hormone therapy can modify the risk of gynecologic cancers. Little is known about the impact of LNG-IUS use on the risk for invasive and borderline ovarian tumor subtypes or for primary fallopian tube carcinoma. We examined the associations of LNG-IUS use with these tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS We identified from the national Medical Reimbursement Registry of Finland the women aged 30-49 years who had used LNG-IUS for menorrhagia in 1994-2007, and from the Finnish Cancer Registry ovarian cancers and primary fallopian tube carcinomas diagnosed before the age of 55 and by the end of 2013. RESULTS A total of 77 invasive ovarian cancers and seven primary fallopian tube carcinoma cases were diagnosed in a cohort of 93 843 LNG-IUS users during the follow-up of 1 083 126 women-years. The LNG-IUS users had decreased risk for both invasive ovarian cancer [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.73] and for borderline ovarian tumors (SIR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-0.99) as compared to the background population. The risk of primary fallopian tube carcinoma was not increased (SIR 1.22, 95% CI 0.49-2.50). Decreased risks for mucinous (SIR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-0.87), endometrioid (SIR 0.55, 95% CI 0.28-0.98), and serous ovarian carcinomas (SIR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55-0.99) were seen in LNG-IUS users. CONCLUSIONS LNG-IUS use associated with decreased risk for both invasive and borderline ovarian tumors. The incidence of primary fallopian tube carcinoma did not significantly differ between LNG-IUS users and the background population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuuli Soini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyvinkää Hospital, Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Ritva Hurskainen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyvinkää Hospital, Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Seija Grénman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Johanna Mäenpää
- School of Medicine, University of Tampere, University of Tampere, Finland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jorma Paavonen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eero Pukkala
- School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pavlik EJ. Ovarian cancer screening effectiveness: A realization from the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 12:475-479. [PMID: 27595999 DOI: 10.1177/1745505716666096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2016] [Revised: 07/13/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Effects on survival in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) was reported in The Lancet, and demonstrate that reductions in disease-specific mortality in this randomized control trial (RCT) indicate that ovarian cancer screening works. The UKCTOCS was large enough for sufficient accrual and follow-up, using two intervention arms: MMS (a multimodal strategy using the biomarker Ca125 combined with ultrasound as a secondary test) and USS (ultrasound alone) compared against a no-screen control group. MMS and USS performed similarly, showing a statistically significant reduction in mortality that increased with follow-up surveillance (8% reduction in years 0-7 vs 28% in years 7-14). The data led to the estimate that 641 screens are needed to prevent one ovarian cancer death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Pavlik
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and the Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sherman ME, Drapkin RI, Horowitz NS, Crum CP, Friedman S, Kwon JS, Levine DA, Shih IM, Shoupe D, Swisher EM, Walker J, Trabert B, Greene MH, Samimi G, Temkin SM, Minasian LM. Rationale for Developing a Specimen Bank to Study the Pathogenesis of High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Review of the Evidence. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2016; 9:713-20. [PMID: 27221539 PMCID: PMC5010984 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-15-0384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 05/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Women with clinically detected high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) generally present with advanced-stage disease, which portends a poor prognosis, despite extensive surgery and intensive chemotherapy. Historically, HGSCs were presumed to arise from the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE), but the inability to identify early-stage HGSCs and their putative precursors in the ovary dimmed prospects for advancing our knowledge of the pathogenesis of these tumors and translating these findings into effective prevention strategies. Over the last decade, increased BRCA1/2 mutation testing coupled with performance of risk-reducing surgeries has enabled studies that have provided strong evidence that many, but probably not all, HGSCs among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers appear to arise from the fallopian tubes, rather than from the ovaries. This shift in our understanding of the pathogenesis of HGSCs provides an important opportunity to achieve practice changing advances; however, the scarcity of clinically annotated tissues containing early lesions, particularly among women at average risk, poses challenges to progress. Accordingly, we review studies that have kindled our evolving understanding of the pathogenesis of HGSC and present the rationale for developing an epidemiologically annotated national specimen resource to support this research. Cancer Prev Res; 9(9); 713-20. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Sherman
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Ronny I Drapkin
- The Penn Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher P Crum
- Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sue Friedman
- Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE), Tampa, Florida
| | - Janice S Kwon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Donna Shoupe
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth M Swisher
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Joan Walker
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mark H Greene
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Goli Samimi
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sarah M Temkin
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lori M Minasian
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Botesteanu DA, Lipkowitz S, Lee JM, Levy D. Mathematical models of breast and ovarian cancers. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2016; 8:337-62. [PMID: 27259061 DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Revised: 04/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Women constitute the majority of the aging United States (US) population, and this has substantial implications on cancer population patterns and management practices. Breast cancer is the most common women's malignancy, while ovarian cancer is the most fatal gynecological malignancy in the US. In this review, we focus on these subsets of women's cancers, seen more commonly in postmenopausal and elderly women. In order to systematically investigate the complexity of cancer progression and response to treatment in breast and ovarian malignancies, we assert that integrated mathematical modeling frameworks viewed from a systems biology perspective are needed. Such integrated frameworks could offer innovative contributions to the clinical women's cancers community, as answers to clinical questions cannot always be reached with contemporary clinical and experimental tools. Here, we recapitulate clinically known data regarding the progression and treatment of the breast and ovarian cancers. We compare and contrast the two malignancies whenever possible in order to emphasize areas where substantial contributions could be made by clinically inspired and validated mathematical modeling. We show how current paradigms in the mathematical oncology community focusing on the two malignancies do not make comprehensive use of, nor substantially reflect existing clinical data, and we highlight the modeling areas in most critical need of clinical data integration. We emphasize that the primary goal of any mathematical study of women's cancers should be to address clinically relevant questions. WIREs Syst Biol Med 2016, 8:337-362. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1343 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana-Adriana Botesteanu
- Department of Mathematics and Center for Scientific Computation and Mathematical Modeling (CSCAMM), University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.,Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stanley Lipkowitz
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jung-Min Lee
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Doron Levy
- Department of Mathematics and Center for Scientific Computation and Mathematical Modeling (CSCAMM), University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Botesteanu DA, Lee JM, Levy D. Modeling the Dynamics of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Progression for Transvaginal Ultrasound-Based Screening and Early Detection. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0156661. [PMID: 27257824 PMCID: PMC4892570 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) represents the majority of ovarian cancers and accounts for the largest proportion of deaths from the disease. A timely detection of low volume HGSOC should be the goal of any screening studies. However, numerous transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) detection-based population studies aimed at detecting low-volume disease have not yielded reduced mortality rates. A quantitative invalidation of TVU as an effective HGSOC screening strategy is a necessary next step. Herein, we propose a mathematical model for a quantitative explanation on the reported failure of TVU-based screening to improve HGSOC low-volume detectability and overall survival.We develop a novel in silico mathematical assessment of the efficacy of a unimodal TVU monitoring regimen as a strategy aimed at detecting low-volume HGSOC in cancer-positive cases, defined as cases for which the inception of the first malignant cell has already occurred. Our findings show that the median window of opportunity interval length for TVU monitoring and HGSOC detection is approximately 1.76 years. This does not translate into reduced mortality levels or improved detection accuracy in an in silico cohort across multiple TVU monitoring frequencies or detection sensitivities. We demonstrate that even a semiannual, unimodal TVU monitoring protocol is expected to miss detectable HGSOC. Lastly, we find that circa 50% of the simulated HGSOC growth curves never reach the baseline detectability threshold, and that on average, 5-7 infrequent, rate-limiting stochastic changes in the growth parameters are associated with reaching HGSOC detectability and mortality thresholds respectively. Focusing on a malignancy poorly studied in the mathematical oncology community, our model captures the dynamic, temporal evolution of HGSOC progression. Our mathematical model is consistent with recent case reports and prospective TVU screening population studies, and provides support to the empirical recommendation against frequent HGSOC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana-Adriana Botesteanu
- Department of Mathematics and Center for Scientific Computation and Mathematical Modeling (CSCAMM), University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
- Women’s Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jung-Min Lee
- Women’s Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Doron Levy
- Department of Mathematics and Center for Scientific Computation and Mathematical Modeling (CSCAMM), University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lefringhouse JR, Neward E, Ueland FR, Baldwin LA, Miller RW, DeSimone CP, Kryscio RJ, van Nagell JR, Pavlik EJ. Probability of fallopian tube and ovarian detection with transvaginal ultrasonography in normal women. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 12:303-11. [PMID: 27189894 PMCID: PMC5384515 DOI: 10.2217/whe.15.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Some ovarian malignancies may originate in the fallopian tube. The feasibility of ultrasonographically visualizing the fallopian tube is presented. Methods: In total, 549 normal women participated in the fallopian tube visualization trial, while ovarian visualization was studied in 43,521. Chi-square analysis, t-tests and multivariate analysis determined significance and interactions. Results: Ovaries were observed in 82.7% while fallopian tubes were detected in 77.2% of women and 85.2% of the time when an ovary was detected. Age, BMI or parity was not significantly different when one or both fallopian tubes were visualized. Elevated BMI had slightly greater influence than age in limiting visualization of the fallopian tubes in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Fallopian tubes can often be identified sonographically. Ovarian visualization provides the strongest indicator favoring fallopian tube detection. Thus, ultrasonographic examinations for adnexal cancer could include evaluation of fallopian tubes even in women >60 years and in women with BMI ≥25.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason R Lefringhouse
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center-Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA
| | - Erin Neward
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center-Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center-Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA
| | - Lauren A Baldwin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center-Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA
| | - Rachel W Miller
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center-Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA
| | - Christopher P DeSimone
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center-Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA
| | - Richard J Kryscio
- Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA
| | - John R van Nagell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center-Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA
| | - Edward J Pavlik
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center-Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536-0293, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Srivastava S, Reid BJ, Ghosh S, Kramer BS. Research Needs for Understanding the Biology of Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening. J Cell Physiol 2016; 231:1870-5. [PMID: 26505642 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.25227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2015] [Accepted: 10/26/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Many cancers offer an extended window of opportunity for early detection and therapeutic intervention that could lead to a reduction in cause-specific mortality. The pursuit of early detection in screening settings has resulted in decreased incidence and mortality for some cancers (e.g., colon and cervical cancers), and increased incidence with only modest or no effect on cause-specific mortality in others (e.g., breast and prostate). Whereas highly sensitive screening technologies are better at detecting a number of suspected "cancers" that are indolent and likely to remain clinically unimportant in the lifetime of a patient, defined as overdiagnosis, they often miss cancers that are aggressive and tend to present clinically between screenings, known as interval cancers. Unrecognized overdiagnosis leads to overtreatment with its attendant (often long-lasting) side effects, anxiety, and substantial financial harm. Existing methods often cannot differentiate indolent lesions from aggressive ones or understand the dynamics of neoplastic progression. To correctly identify the population that would benefit the most from screening and identify the lesions that would benefit most from treatment, the evolving genomic and molecular profiles of individual cancers during the clinical course of progression or indolence must be investigated, while taking into account an individual's genetic susceptibility, clinical and environmental risk factors, and the tumor microenvironment. Practical challenges lie not only in the lack of access to tissue specimens that are appropriate for the study of natural history, but also in the absence of targeted research strategies. This commentary summarizes the recommendations from a diverse group of scientists with expertise in basic biology, translational research, clinical research, statistics, and epidemiology and public health professionals convened to discuss research directions. J. Cell. Physiol. 231: 1870-1875, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudhir Srivastava
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Brian J Reid
- Divisions of Human Biology and Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Departments of Genome Sciences and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sharmistha Ghosh
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Barnett S Kramer
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wang Y, Li L, Wang Y, Tang SN, Zheng W. Fallopian tube secretory cell expansion: a sensitive biomarker for ovarian serous carcinogenesis. Am J Transl Res 2016; 8:230-238. [PMID: 27069556 PMCID: PMC4759432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 11/07/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances suggest that precancerous lesions of pelvic serous carcinoma originate from tubal secretory cells. The purpose of our study was to determine if an increased number of secretory cells vary with age or location in the fallopian tube and to examine its association with serous neoplasia. Three groups (benign control, high-risk, and pelvic serous carcinoma) of age-matched patients were studied. The age data were stratified into 10-year intervals ranging from 20-29 to older than 80. The number of secretory and ciliated cells from both tubal fimbria and ampulla segments was counted by microscopy and immunohistochemical staining methods. The data were analyzed by standard contingency table and Poisson distribution methods after age justification. We found that the absolute number of tubal secretory cells increased significantly with age in all three groups. But a more dramatic increase of secretory cells was observed in high-risk and pelvic serous carcinoma patients. Secretory cell expansion is more prevalent than secretory cell outgrowth in both fimbria and ampulla tubal segments and is significantly associated with serous neoplasia (p < 0.001). Furthermore, age remained a significant risk factor for serous neoplasia after age adjustment. These findings suggest that secretory cell expansion could serve as a potential sensitive biomarker for early serous carcinogenesis within the fallopian tube. The study also supports a relationship between serous neoplasia and increased secretory to ciliated cell ratios, and the relationship between frequency of secretory cell expansion within the fallopian tube and increasing age and-more significantly-presence of high-risk factors or co-existing serous cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiying Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henan Province People’s HospitalZhengzhou, China
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX USA
| | - Li Li
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX USA
- Department of Pathology, Shandong University, School of MedicineJinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yue Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henan Province People’s HospitalZhengzhou, China
| | | | - Wenxin Zheng
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Arizona College of MedicineTucson, AZ, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong UniversityChina
- Simon Cancer Center, University of TexasDallas, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wang Y, Li L, Wang Y, Tang SN, Zheng W. Fallopian tube secretory cell expansion: a sensitive biomarker for ovarian serous carcinogenesis. Am J Transl Res 2015; 7:2082-2090. [PMID: 26692952 PMCID: PMC4656785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 10/08/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances suggest that precancerous lesions of pelvic serous carcinoma originate from tubal secretory cells. The purpose of our study was to determine if an increased number of secretory cells varies with age or location in the fallopian tube and to examine its association with serous neoplasia. Three groups (benign control, high-risk, and pelvic serous carcinoma) of age-matched patients were studied. The age data were stratified into 10-year intervals ranging from 20-29 to older than 80. The number of secretory and ciliated cells from both tubal fimbria and ampulla segments was counted by microscopy and immunohistochemical staining methods. The data were analyzed by standard contingency table and Poisson distribution methods after age justification. We found that the absolute number of tubal secretory cells increased significantly with age in all three groups. But a more dramatic increase of secretory cells was observed in high-risk and pelvic serous carcinoma patients. Secretory cell expansion is more prevalent than secretory cell outgrowth in both fimbria and ampulla tubal segments and is significantly associated with serous neoplasia (P < 0.001). Furthermore, age remained a significant risk factor for serous neoplasia after age adjustment. These findings suggest that secretory cell expansion could serve as a potential sensitive biomarker for early serous carcinogenesis within the fallopian tube. The study also supports a relationship between serous neoplasia and increased secretory to ciliated cell ratios, and the relationship between frequency of secretory cell expansion within the fallopian tube and increasing age and-more significantly-presence of high-risk factors or co-existing serous cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiying Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henan Province People’s HospitalZhengzhou, China
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
| | - Li Li
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
- Department of Pathology, Shandong University, School of MedicineJinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yue Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henan Province People’s HospitalZhengzhou, China
| | | | - Wenxin Zheng
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Arizona College of MedicineTucson, AZ, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong UniversityChina
- Simon Cancer Center, University of TexasDallas, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
The stem-cell profile of ovarian surface epithelium is reproduced in the oviductal fimbriae, with increased stem-cell marker density in distal parts of the fimbriae. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2015; 32:444-53. [PMID: 23896717 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0b013e3182800ad5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas are the most common and most lethal ovarian cancers, but their histologic origin is still controversial. Current evidence suggests that they may originate in the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) and/or epithelium of oviductal fimbriae (FE). To further investigate this question we compared the stem-cell profiles of these epithelia. Formalin-fixed sections of normal FE (N=21) and ovaries (N=21) were stained immunohistochemically for the stem-cell markers NANOG, SFRP1, LHX9, ALDH1A1, and ALDH1A2. All markers were detected in both OSE and FE. A total of 75% to 100% of surface OSE expressed all markers except ALDH1A1, which occurred in about 25% of cells. Among epithelial inclusion cysts with flat-to-cuboidal epithelium, resembling OSE, ALDH1A1 was significantly increased, whereas SFRP1 was reduced compared with surface OSE, suggesting an increased trend towards malignant transformation. Similarly, among cysts lined by columnar cells resembling FE, SFRP1 expression was low, whereas ALDH1A1 approached 100% of the cysts. FE exhibited considerable variation between and within specimens. In about half of the samples, SFRP1 and NANOG were detected in ≤25% FE. The most widespread markers were ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2. The highest proportion of all markers occurred in the distal parts of the FE, the site of the putative ovarian cancer precursors. Marker expression in tubal ampullae was low or absent except for ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2. The results provide an explanation for the characteristic distal location of fimbrial high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma precursor lesions, and indicate that both OSE and FE have the capacity to undergo neoplastic transformation.
Collapse
|
36
|
Quantitative analysis of γ-H2AX and p53 nuclear expression levels in ovarian and fallopian tube epithelium from risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2015; 33:309-16. [PMID: 24681744 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0b013e31829c673b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer an increased lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Increased lifetime ovarian cancer risk among BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers can be substantially decreased by risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), which also provides material for molecular research on early pathogenesis of serous ovarian cancer. RRSO studies have suggested fallopian tube as a primary site of serous high-grade ovarian cancer. In this study, the nuclear expression levels of γ-H2AX and p53 using immunohistochemical (IHC) study was quantitatively assessed in ovarian and fallopian tube epithelium derived from RRSOs in 29 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and in 1 patient with a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer but showing an unknown BRCA status. Both p53 and γ-H2AX nuclear staining levels were significantly higher in BRCA1/2 mutation-positive fallopian tube epithelium compared with the control fallopian tube epithelium (P<0.006 and P=0.011, respectively). Nuclear expression levels of p53 and γ-H2AX were similar between the BRCA1/2 mutation-positive ovarian epithelium and controls. Both γ-H2AX and p53 showed significantly higher nuclear expression levels in BRCA1/2 mutation-positive fallopian tube epithelium compared with BRCA1/2 mutation-positive ovarian epithelium (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively). BRCA1/2 mutation-positive fallopian tube epithelium showed a positive correlation between the γ-H2AX and p53 nuclear expression levels (Pearson r=0.508, P=0.003). Our results of quantitative nuclear p53 and γ-H2AX expression levels in ovarian and fallopian tube epithelium derived from RRSO in high-risk patients support the previously suggested role of fallopian tube epithelium serving as a possible site of initial serous ovarian carcinogenesis.
Collapse
|
37
|
Lee JY, Lim W, Jo G, Bazer FW, Song G. Estrogen regulation of phosphoserine phosphatase during regression and recrudescence of female reproductive organs. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2015; 214:40-6. [PMID: 25776463 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2015] [Revised: 03/06/2015] [Accepted: 03/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Phosphoserine phosphatase (PSPH) is a well-known mediator of l-serine biosynthesis in a variety of tissues and its dysregulation causes various diseases, specifically most cancers. However, little is known about the expression and hormonal regulation of PSPH gene in the female reproductive tract. Therefore, in the current study, we focused on relationships between PSPH expression and estrogen during growth, development, differentiation, remodeling and recrudescence of the chicken oviduct and in the progression of epithelial-derived ovarian carcinogenesis in laying hens. The results revealed that PSPH mRNA and protein levels increased in the glandular (GE) and luminal epithelial (LE) cells in the developing oviduct of chicks treated with exogenous estrogen. Additionally, PSPH mRNA and protein expression was up-regulated in GE and LE of the oviduct in response to endogenous estrogen during the recrudescence phase after induced molting. Furthermore, PSPH mRNA and protein were predominantly detected in GE of cancerous, but not normal ovaries. In conclusion, PSPH is a novel estrogen-responsive gene involved in development of the oviduct of chicks and recrudescence of the oviduct of laying hens after molting. PSPH is also a potential target molecule that may help elucidate mechanism responsible for the progression of epithelial cell-derived ovarian carcinogenesis and be of use in therapeutic applications as a biomarker for early diagnosis of epithelial cell-derived ovarian cancer in laying hen as well as women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Young Lee
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Whasun Lim
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gahee Jo
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Fuller W Bazer
- Center for Animal Biotechnology and Genomics and Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Gwonhwa Song
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: an incidental finding at the time of prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2015; 2015:760429. [PMID: 25802782 PMCID: PMC4352759 DOI: 10.1155/2015/760429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2014] [Revised: 02/07/2015] [Accepted: 02/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is a precursor lesion for high-grade pelvic serous carcinoma. The incidence of STIC is estimated to occur in 0.6% to 6% of women who are BRCA positive or have a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Case. A 56-year-old woman underwent robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy, rectocele repair, and concurrent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for recurrent stage 3 pelvic organ prolapse and reported family history of ovarian cancer. Histopathologic examination of her left fallopian tube revealed STIC. Conclusion. We report this rare occurrence of STIC in a patient undergoing surgery primarily for pelvic organ prolapse and having a family history of ovarian cancer. Possible management options include observation with annual physical exam and CA-125, surgical staging, or empiric chemotherapy. However, due to the lack of consensus regarding management options, referral to a gynecologic oncologist is recommended.
Collapse
|
39
|
Sherman ME, Piedmonte M, Mai PL, Ioffe OB, Ronnett BM, Van Le L, Ivanov I, Bell MC, Blank SV, DiSilvestro P, Hamilton CA, Tewari KS, Wakeley K, Kauff ND, Yamada SD, Rodriguez G, Skates SJ, Alberts DS, Walker JL, Minasian L, Lu K, Greene MH. Pathologic findings at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: primary results from Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial GOG-0199. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3275-83. [PMID: 25199754 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.54.1987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) lowers mortality from ovarian/tubal and breast cancers among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Uncertainties persist regarding potential benefits of RRSO among high-risk noncarriers, optimal surgical age, and anatomic origin of clinically occult cancers detected at surgery. To address these topics, we analyzed surgical treatment arm results from Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol-0199 (GOG-0199), the National Ovarian Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS This analysis included asymptomatic high-risk women age ≥ 30 years who elected RRSO at enrollment. Women provided risk factor data and underwent preoperative cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) serum testing and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU). RRSO specimens were processed according to a standardized tissue processing protocol and underwent central pathology panel review. Research-based BRCA1/2 mutation testing was performed when a participant's mutation status was unknown at enrollment. Relationships between participant characteristics and diagnostic findings were assessed using univariable statistics and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Invasive or intraepithelial ovarian/tubal/peritoneal neoplasms were detected in 25 (2.6%) of 966 RRSOs (BRCA1 mutation carriers, 4.6%; BRCA2 carriers, 3.5%; and noncarriers, 0.5%; P < .001). In multivariable models, positive BRCA1/2 mutation status (P = .0056), postmenopausal status (P = .0023), and abnormal CA-125 levels and/or TVU examinations (P < .001) were associated with detection of clinically occult neoplasms at RRSO. For 387 women with negative BRCA1/2 mutation testing and normal CA-125 levels, findings at RRSO were benign. CONCLUSION Clinically occult cancer was detected among 2.6% of high-risk women undergoing RRSO. BRCA1/2 mutation, postmenopausal status, and abnormal preoperative CA-125 and/or TVU were associated with cancer detection at RRSO. These data can inform management decisions among women at high risk of ovarian/tubal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Sherman
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Marion Piedmonte
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Phuong L Mai
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Olga B Ioffe
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brigitte M Ronnett
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Linda Van Le
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Iouri Ivanov
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maria C Bell
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephanie V Blank
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Paul DiSilvestro
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Krishnansu S Tewari
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Katie Wakeley
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Noah D Kauff
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Diane Yamada
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo Rodriguez
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven J Skates
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David S Alberts
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joan L Walker
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lori Minasian
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Karen Lu
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mark H Greene
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jo G, Lim W, Bae SM, Bazer FW, Song G. Avian SERPINB12 expression in the avian oviduct is regulated by estrogen and up-regulated in epithelial cell-derived ovarian carcinomas of laying hens. PLoS One 2014; 9:e99792. [PMID: 25020046 PMCID: PMC4096396 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Serine protease inhibitors (SERPINs) are involved in a variety of biological processes such as blood clotting, angiogenesis, immune system, and embryogenesis. Although, of these, SERPINB12 is identified as the latest member of clade B in humans, little is known of it in chickens. Thus, in this study, we investigated SERPINB12 expression profiles in various tissues of chickens and focused on effects of steroid hormone regulation of its expression. In the chicken oviduct, SERPINB12 mRNA and protein are abundant in the luminal (LE) and glandular (GE) epithelia of the magnum in response to endogenous or exogenous estrogen. Furthermore, SERPINB12 mRNA and protein increase significantly in GE of cancerous ovaries of laying hens with epithelia-derived ovarian cancer. Collectively, these results indicate that SERPINB12 is a novel estrogen-stimulated gene that is up-regulated by estrogen in epithelial cells of the chicken oviduct and that it is a potential biomarker for early detection of ovarian carcinomas in laying hens and women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gahee Jo
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Whasun Lim
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Min Bae
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Fuller W. Bazer
- Center for Animal Biotechnology and Genomics and Department of Animal Science, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America
| | - Gwonhwa Song
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wang Y, Wang Y, Li D, Li L, Zhang W, Yao G, Jiang Z, Zheng W. IMP3 signatures of fallopian tube: a risk for pelvic serous cancers. J Hematol Oncol 2014; 7:49. [PMID: 25014991 PMCID: PMC4230642 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-014-0049-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 06/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent advances suggest fallopian tube as the main cellular source for women’s pelvic serous carcinoma (PSC). In addition to TP53 mutations, many other genetic changes are involved in pelvic serous carcinogenesis. IMP3 is an oncofetal protein which has recently been observed to be overexpressed in benign-looking tubal epithelia. Such findings prompted us to examine the relationship between IMP3 over-expression, patient age and the likelihood of development of PSC. Methods Fallopian tubes from three groups (low-risk, high-risk, and PSC) of patients with matched ages were studied. Age was recorded in 10 years intervals ranging from age 20 to older than 80. The number of IMP3 signatures (defined by 10 or more tubal secretory cells stained positively and continuously in benign appearing tubal mucosa) from both tubal fimbria and ampulla segments was measured. The data was analyzed by standard contingency table and Poisson distribution methods after age adjustment. IMP3 overexpression was also examined in serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and PSC. Results The positive IMP3-stained cells are mainly tubal secretory cells. The absolute number of tubal IMP3 signatures increased significantly within each age group. Age remained a significant risk factor for serous neoplasia after age adjustment. IMP3 signatures were more frequent in the patients of both high-risk and PSC groups. The presence of IMP3 signatures in tubal mucosa was significantly associated with tubal or pelvic serous carcinogenesis (p < 0.001). Conclusions The findings suggest that tubal secretory cells with IMP3 signatures showing growth advantage could potentially serve as a latent precancer biomarker for tubal or pelvic serous carcinomas in women.
Collapse
|
42
|
Bae H, Lim W, Bae SM, Bazer FW, Choi Y, Song G. Avian Prostatic Acid Phosphatase: Estrogen Regulation in the Oviduct and Epithelial Cell-Derived Ovarian Carcinomas1. Biol Reprod 2014; 91:3. [DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.118893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
43
|
Sama AR, Schilder RJ. Refractory fallopian tube carcinoma - current perspectives in pathogenesis and management. Int J Womens Health 2014; 6:149-57. [PMID: 24511245 PMCID: PMC3913505 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s40889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Fallopian tube carcinoma (FTC) is considered a rare malignancy, but recent evidence shows that its incidence may have been underestimated. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA)-positive women has provided a unique opportunity to study the pathogenesis of FTC and ovarian carcinomas. Newer data now suggest that most high-grade serous cancers of the ovary originate in the fimbrial end of the fallopian tube. Due to the presumed rarity of FTC, most current and more recent ovarian cancer clinical trials have now included patients with FTC. The treatment guidelines recommend similar overall management and that the same chemotherapy regimens be used for epithelial ovarian cancers and FTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin R Sama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Russell J Schilder
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Taniguchi F, Harada T, Kobayashi H, Hayashi K, Momoeda M, Terakawa N. Clinical Characteristics of Patients in Japan with Ovarian Cancer Presumably Arising from Ovarian Endometrioma. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2014; 77:104-10. [DOI: 10.1159/000357819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2013] [Accepted: 11/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
45
|
van Nagell JR, Hoff JT. Transvaginal ultrasonography in ovarian cancer screening: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health 2013; 6:25-33. [PMID: 24379701 PMCID: PMC3873201 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s38347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) is an integral part of all major ovarian cancer screening trials. TVS is accurate in detecting abnormalities in ovarian volume and morphology, but is less reliable in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian tumors. When used as the only screening test, TVS is sensitive, but has a low positive predictive value. Therefore, serum biomarkers and tumor morphology indexing are used together with TVS to identify ovarian tumors at high risk for malignancy. This allows preoperative triage of high-risk cases to major cancer centers for therapy while decreasing unnecessary surgery for benign disease. Ovarian cancer screening has been associated with a decrease in stage at detection in most trials, thereby allowing treatment to be initiated when the disease is most curable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R van Nagell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center/Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - John T Hoff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center/Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Menon U, Griffin M, Gentry-Maharaj A. Ovarian cancer screening--current status, future directions. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 132:490-5. [PMID: 24316306 PMCID: PMC3991859 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2013] [Revised: 11/22/2013] [Accepted: 11/25/2013] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Evidence of a mortality benefit continues to elude ovarian cancer (OC) screening. Data from the US Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial which used a screening strategy incorporating CA125 cut-off and transvaginal ultrasound has not shown mortality benefit. The United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) is using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer (ROC) time series algorithm to interpret CA125, which has shown an encouraging sensitivity and specificity however the mortality data will only be available in 2015. The article explores the impact of growing insights into disease aetiology and evolution and biomarker discovery on future screening strategies. A better understanding of the target lesion, improved design of biomarker discovery studies, a focus on detecting low volume disease using cancer specific markers, novel biospecimens such as cervical cytology and targeted imaging and use of time series algorithms for interpreting markers profile suggests that a new era in screening is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usha Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK.
| | - Michelle Griffin
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Crum CP, Herfs M, Ning G, Bijron JG, Howitt BE, Jimenez CA, Hanamornroongruang S, McKeon FD, Xian W. Through the glass darkly: intraepithelial neoplasia, top-down differentiation, and the road to ovarian cancer. J Pathol 2013; 231:402-12. [PMID: 24030860 PMCID: PMC3947463 DOI: 10.1002/path.4263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2013] [Revised: 09/08/2013] [Accepted: 09/09/2013] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
It is currently hoped that deaths from extra-uterine high-grade serous cancer (HGSC) will be reduced via opportunistic salpingectomy in healthy women. Accumulated data implicate the fimbria as a site of origin and descriptive molecular pathology and experimental evidence strongly support a serous carcinogenic sequence in the Fallopian tube. Both direct and indirect ('surrogate') precursors suggest that the benign tube undergoes important biological changes after menopause, acquiring abnormalities in gene expression that are often shared with malignancy, including PAX2, ALDH1, LEF1, RCN1, RUNX2, beta-catenin, EZH2, and others. However, the tube can be linked to only some HGSCs, recharging arguments that nearby peritoneum/ovarian surface epithelium (POSE) also hosts progenitors to this malignancy. A major sticking point is the difference in immunophenotype between POSE and Müllerian epithelium, essentially requiring mesothelial to Müllerian differentiation prior to or during malignant transformation to HGSC. However, emerging evidence implicates an embryonic or progenitor phenotype in the adult female genital tract with the capacity to differentiate, normally or during neoplastic transformation. Recently, a putative cell of origin for cervical cancer has been identified in the squamo-columnar (SC) junction, projecting a model whereby Krt7+ embryonic progenitors give rise to immunophenotypically distinct progeny under stromal influences via 'top down' differentiation. Similar differentiation can be seen in the endometrium with a parallel in juxtaposed mesothelial and Müllerian differentiation in the ovary. Abrupt mesothelial-Müllerian transitions remain to be proven, but would explain the rapid evolution, short asymptomatic interval, and absence of a defined epithelial starting point in many HGSCs. Resolving this question will require accurately distinguishing progenitor from progeny tumour cells in HGSC and pinpointing where initial transformation and trans-differentiation occur, whether in the tube or POSE. Both will be critical to expectations from prophylactic salpingectomy and future approaches to pelvic serous cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Crum
- Department of Pathology, Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Erickson BK, Conner MG, Landen CN. The role of the fallopian tube in the origin of ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:409-14. [PMID: 23583217 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 193] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2013] [Revised: 04/02/2013] [Accepted: 04/08/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Advanced cases of epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, and primary tubal malignancies have a relatively poor prognosis and collectively remain the most deadly of all gynecologic malignancies. Although traditionally thought of as one disease process, ongoing research suggests that there is not 1 single site or cell type from which these cancers arise. A majority of the serous tumors appear to originate from dysplastic lesions in the distal fallopian tube. Therefore, what we have traditionally considered "ovarian" cancer may in fact be tubal in origin. In this article, we will review epithelial ovarian cancer classification and genetics, theories regarding cells of origin with a focus on tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, and implications for prevention and screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britt K Erickson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rodriguez EF, Lum D, Guido R, Austin RM. Cytologic findings in experimental in vivo fallopian tube brush specimens. Acta Cytol 2013; 57:611-8. [PMID: 24107657 DOI: 10.1159/000353825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2013] [Accepted: 06/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The fallopian tube is now recognized as a primary source of precursor neoplastic lesions for pelvic serous adenocarcinomas. Cytologic features of fallopian tube brushings from low-risk patients have not been well described. STUDY DESIGN We describe the cytomorphology of tubal epithelium from prospectively collected experimental in vivo brushings from normal fallopian tubes of 7 low-risk patients. Liquid-based cytology slides and cell blocks were prepared and reviewed on all specimens. RESULTS Fifteen brush cytology specimens were obtained, ten by laparoscopy, four by hysteroscopy and one following hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on an ex vivo specimen. Variable cytologic features were documented for background, cellularity, cellular architecture, cilia, nuclear overlap, mitoses, nuclear pleomorphism, nuclear membrane changes and nucleoli. Negative P53 and Ki-67 stain results were documented in available cell blocks. Histopathologic salpingectomy findings and clinical follow-up were benign. CONCLUSION Moderate nuclear pleomorphism and nuclear overlap, prominent single and multiple nucleoli and background granular debris were common challenging cytologic findings in fallopian tube brushings from low-risk patients. With experience, cellular changes can be recognized as benign. Recognition of the range of normal fallopian tube cytology should help to minimize false-positive interpretations of cytology specimens obtained in association with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika F Rodriguez
- Department of Pathology, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa., USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Li J, Ning Y, Abushahin N, Yuan Z, Wang Y, Wang Y, Yuan B, Cragun JM, Chambers SK, Hatch K, Kong B, Zheng W. Secretory cell expansion with aging: risk for pelvic serous carcinogenesis. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 131:555-60. [PMID: 24060413 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2013] [Revised: 09/04/2013] [Accepted: 09/14/2013] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recent advances suggest that precancerous lesions of pelvic serous carcinoma (PSC) originate from tubal secretory cells. The purpose of our study was to determine if increased number of secretory cells shows difference in age and location and to examine their association with serous neoplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three groups (benign control, high-risk, and PSC) of patients with matched ages were studied. The age data was stratified into 10-year intervals ranging from age 20 to older than 80. The number of secretory and ciliated cells from both tubal fimbria and ampulla segments was counted by microscopy and immunohistochemical staining methods. The data was analyzed by standard contingency table and Poisson distribution methods after age justification. RESULTS We found that the absolute number of tubal secretory cells increased significantly with age within each age group. Age remained a significant risk factor for serous neoplasia after age adjustment. In addition, a dramatic increase of secretory cells was observed in high-risk and PSC patients. Further, secretory cell expansion (SCE) was more prevalent than secretory cell outgrowth in both fimbria and ampulla tubal segments and was significantly associated with serous neoplasia (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that SCE could potentially serve as a sensitive biomarker for early serous carcinogenesis within the fallopian tube. Findings support a relationship between serous neoplasia and increased secretory to ciliated cell ratios. Findings also support a relationship between frequency of SCE and increasing age, presence of high-risk factors and co-existing serous cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, China; Department of Pathology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|