Carcinoma of the collecting ducts of Bellini and renal medullary carcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis of 52 cases of rare aggressive subtypes of renal cell carcinoma with a focus on their interrelationship

Isolated Lymph Node Metastasis as Initial Presentation of Collecting Duct Carcinoma on 68 Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT

ABSTRACT

A 64-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with low back pain. Enhanced CT imaging revealed an isolated retroperitoneal mass. Since primary retroperitoneal lymphoma could not be ruled out, the patient was enrolled in our clinical trial of 68 Ga-pentixafor PET/CT. The mass exhibited intense uptake of 68 Ga-pentixafor and was subsequently confirmed as lymph node metastasis originating from collecting duct carcinoma. Our case demonstrated that 68 Ga-pentixafor may lack specificity in distinguishing primary retroperitoneal lymphomas from other conditions.

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of renal cell carcinoma: Differences between subtypes and clinical evaluation

This review discusses the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RCC is a malignancy with different histopathological subtypes, constituting approximately 90% of adult kidney tumors. It has been reported that these subtypes show significant differences in terms of clinical behavior, treatment response, and prognosis. In the study, CT and MRI findings of subtypes such as clear cell RCC (ccRCC), papillary RCC (pRCC), chromophobe RCC (chRCC), medullary RCC (mRCC), collecting duct RCC (cdRCC), and multiloculated cystic RCC (mcRCC) were compared. It was stated that CT is the first-choice imaging method in the staging and surgical planning of RCC and provides detailed information about the tumor size, vascularity, and metastatic spread. On the other hand, it has been emphasized that MRI allows better characterization of RCC subtypes with its soft-tissue resolution and contrast agent usage advantage. The study draws attention to the different imaging features of each subtype and details the role of these findings in the clinical decision-making process. It has been stated that ccRCC exhibits intense contrast enhancement and rapid washout pattern in the corticomedullary phase on CT and appears hyperintense on T2A and hypointense on T1 weighted imaging (T1A) on MRI. It has been stated that pRCC has hypovascular features, has lower contrast enhancement, and has homogeneous borders. It has been stated that chRCC has a less vascular structure and exhibits moderate contrast enhancement in the corticomedullary phase. It has been reported that mRCC has invasive features and is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage while cdRCC has a very aggressive clinical course. It has been stated that mcRCC contains distinct cystic areas between the septa, has a well-circumscribed structure, and generally has a low malignancy potential. As a result, it has been stated that detailed evaluation of CT and MRI findings of RCC subtypes plays a critical role in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of these subtypes. It has been emphasized that the findings presented in this study will contribute to the development of more targeted treatment approaches in RCC management.

Immune-Based and Novel Therapies in Variant Histology Renal Cell Carcinomas

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous disease that represents the most common type of kidney cancer. The classification of RCC is primarily based on distinct morphological and molecular characteristics, with two broad categories: clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC). Clear cell RCC is the predominant subtype, representing about 70-80% of all RCC cases, while non-clear cell subtypes collectively make up the remaining 20-30%. Non-clear cell RCC encompasses many histopathological variants, each with unique biological and clinical characteristics. Additionally, any RCC subtype can undergo sarcomatoid dedifferentiation, which is associated with poor prognosis and rapid disease progression. Recent advances in molecular profiling have also led to the identification of molecularly defined variants, further highlighting the complexity of this disease. While immunotherapy has shown efficacy in some RCC variants and subpopulations, significant gaps remain in the treatment of rare subtypes. This review explores the outcomes of immunotherapy across RCC subtypes, including rare variants, and highlights opportunities for improving care through novel therapies, biomarker-driven approaches, and inclusive clinical trial designs.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of collecting duct carcinoma in the renal: a case report misdiagnosed as renal abscess on computed tomography scan

Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC), also known as Bellini duct carcinoma, is a rare malignancy with significant challenges in early diagnosis. This paper presents a case report of CDC that was misdiagnosed as renal abscess on computed tomography (CT). A 49-year-old male patient was admitted to the hospital with bilateral lumbar pain, exacerbated on the left side, accompanied by hematuria. Following laboratory tests, CT scan, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), the CT diagnosis was renal abscess, whereas CEUS suggested a malignant tumor. After a multidisciplinary discussion, the patient underwent surgery and was diagnosed with CDC. Previous studies indicate that two-dimensional ultrasound of CDC often lack typical features, while CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan usually show mild enhancement. CEUS has a unique advantage in visualizing the microvasculature, which aids in the diagnosis of CDC.

Italian Registry on Rare Urological Tumors (Meet-URO-23): The First Analysis on Collecting Duct Carcinoma of the Kidney

INTRODUCTION

Rare genitourinary tumors are lacking of randomized and observational data. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) through the Meet-URO 23/I-RARE database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a multicentric retrospective-prospective study within the Meet-URO network, enrolling patients from March 2021 (retrospectively up from 2011) until March 2023. The primary objective was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with CDC, the secondary objectives were to assess the oncological outcomes in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) to treatment.

RESULTS

37 patients with CDC were enrolled. Four patients underwent only surgery, 33 received first-line systemic therapy. Median OS was 22.1 months (95% CI, 8.9-31.9). Median RFS for patients with localized disease at onset (n = 30) was 3.7 months (95% CI, 1.9-12.8), median PFS for first-line treatment was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.7-9.9), with an ORR of 27%. Female sex and good performance status (PS) were associated with longer PFS (P = .072 and P < .01, respectively) and OS (P = .030 and P = .141, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CDC had dismal prognosis, with scarce benefit from the available treatments. Female sex and good PS seemed to be associated with better prognosis.

The New WHO Category of "Molecularly Defined Renal Carcinomas": Clinical and Diagnostic Features and Management Implications

The evolution of classification of renal tumors has been impacted since the turn of the millennium by rapid progress in histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular genetics. Together, these features have enabled firm recognition of specific, classic types of renal cell carcinomas, such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma, that in current practice trigger histologic-type specific management and treatment protocols. Now, the fifth Edition World Health Classification's new category of "Molecularly defined renal carcinomas" changes the paradigm, defining a total of seven entities based specifically on their fundamental molecular underpinnings. These tumors, which include TFE3-rearranged, TFEB-altered, ELOC-mutated, fumarate hydratase-deficient, succinate dehydrogenase-deficient, ALK-rearranged, and SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma, encompass a wide clinical and histopathologic phenotypic spectrum of tumors. Already, important management aspects are apparent for several of these entities, while emerging therapeutic angles are coming into view. A brief, clinically-oriented introduction of the entities in this new category, focusing on relevant diagnostic, molecular, and management aspects, is the subject of this review.

The incidence, pathogenesis, and management of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer and is divided into two distinct subtypes, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). Although many treatments exist for RCC, these are largely based on clinical trials performed in ccRCC and there are limited studies on the management of nccRCC. Non-clear cell RCC consists of multiple histological subtypes: papillary, chromophobe, translocation, medullary, collecting duct, unclassified, and other rare histologies. Due to variations in pathogenesis and therapeutic response, therapy should be tailored to specific variant histologies. For patients with localized nccRCC, surgical resection remains the gold standard. In the metastatic setting, the standard of care has yet to be clearly defined, and most guidelines recommend clinical trial participation. General therapeutic options include immunotherapy, either as monotherapy or in combination, targeted therapies such as vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and MET inhibitors, and chemotherapy in certain subtypes. Here we present a review of the incidence and pathogenesis of the various subtypes, as well as available clinical data to support therapeutic recommendations for these subtypes. We also highlight currently available clinical trials in nccRCC and future directions in investigating novel treatment modalities tailored to patients with variant histology.

A Rare Case of Collecting Duct Carcinoma With Extensive Coagulative Necrosis

Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is an aggressive renal malignancy with limited diagnostic and therapeutic consensus. We report a case of a 69-year-old male with CDC and extensive coagulative necrosis who presented with lower extremity swelling, abdominal distention, and an enlarged left kidney causing grade IV hydronephrosis. Initial treatment with a left percutaneous nephrostomy was followed by clinical deterioration and a diagnosis of emphysematous pyelonephritis. Pathological examination of drainage material revealed extensive coagulative necrosis and was suggestive of a necrotic neoplasm. Subsequent left nephrectomy confirmed CDC with high-grade features, stromal desmoplasia, and extensive coagulative necrosis. Immunohistochemistry studies supported the diagnosis. This study highlights the diagnostic complexity of CDC and emphasizes the need for accurate reporting of atypical presentations. CDC remains a formidable clinical entity with limited treatment options and poor outcomes. Further research is essential to enhance our understanding and management of this rare and aggressive renal malignancy.

SMARCB1 regulates a TFCP2L1-MYC transcriptional switch promoting renal medullary carcinoma transformation and ferroptosis resistance

Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is an aggressive tumour driven by bi-allelic loss of SMARCB1 and tightly associated with sickle cell trait. However, the cell-of-origin and oncogenic mechanism remain poorly understood. Using single-cell sequencing of human RMC, we defined transformation of thick ascending limb (TAL) cells into an epithelial-mesenchymal gradient of RMC cells associated with loss of renal epithelial transcription factors TFCP2L1, HOXB9 and MITF and gain of MYC and NFE2L2-associated oncogenic and ferroptosis resistance programs. We describe the molecular basis for this transcriptional switch that is reversed by SMARCB1 re-expression repressing the oncogenic and ferroptosis resistance programs leading to ferroptotic cell death. Ferroptosis resistance links TAL cell survival with the high extracellular medullar iron concentrations associated with sickle cell trait, an environment propitious to the mutagenic events associated with RMC development. This unique environment may explain why RMC is the only SMARCB1-deficient tumour arising from epithelial cells, differentiating RMC from rhabdoid tumours arising from neural crest cells.

Surgical and oncological management of renal medullary carcinoma in a young patient: a case report

Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a rare form of renal cell carcinoma that has a poor prognosis. It is known to be associated with sickle cell trait or disease, although the exact underlying mechanisms are still unclear. The diagnosis is made through immunochemical staining for SMARCB1 (INI1). In this report, we present a case of a 31-year-old male patient with sickle cell trait who was diagnosed with stage III right RMC. Despite the poor prognosis, the patient survived for a remarkable duration of 37 months. Radiological assessment and follow-up were primarily performed using 18F-FDG PET/MRI. The patient underwent upfront cisplatin-based cytotoxic chemotherapy before surgical removal of the right kidney and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Identical adjuvant chemotherapy was administered post-surgery. Disease relapses were detected in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes; these were managed with chemotherapy and surgical rechallenges. We also discuss the oncological and surgical management of RMC, which currently relies on perioperative cytotoxic chemotherapy strategies, as there are no known alternative therapies that have been shown to be superior to date.

Collecting Duct Carcinoma of the Kidney: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 23 Cases

Objective: To explore the clinical, imaging, pathologic features, treatment, and prognostic outcomes in 23 cases of collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) from a single center. Methods: The clinical and imaging findings, pathological features, treatment methods, and outcomes of the 23 patients with CDC confirmed by microscopic examination between 2003 and 2020 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Descriptive statistics of demographic and clinical variables were applied. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival data and log-rank test statistic survival differences between groups. Cox regression analysis was employed to identify variables independently related to overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 23 patients with CDC were identified. The mean age was 50.8 years. Stage III or IV tumors were diagnosed in 82.6% of the patients at diagnosis. The average size of the tumor was 6.58 cm, and the left kidney was more involved than the right. The median OS was 12 months. The OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 43.5% and 26.1%, respectively. Twenty patients underwent nephrectomy, 3 underwent nephroureterectomy, and 9 (39.1%) patients received subsequent therapeutic interventions following surgery. Distant metastasis and no symptoms at initial diagnosis proved to be an independent factor of unfavorable survival in Cox regression analysis. Conclusions: CDC is a rare and highly aggressive malignant renal tumor, and most patients present at an advanced stage at initial diagnosis. More than half of the patients died within 1 year after surgery. Distant metastasis and no clinical symptoms at initial diagnosis were independent risk prognostic factors for patients with CDC.

"Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: diagnosis and implications for management"

Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney is a rare and aggressive subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising from the distal convoluted tubules. At the time of diagnosis, patients are more frequently symptomatic, with advanced locoregional stage, and have metastatic disease. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System defined diagnostic criteria for this entity. However, the diagnostic features continue to evolve, with typical, but not entirely specific, histologic and immunophenotypic characteristics. In addition, the lack of consistent molecular alterations makes collecting duct carcinoma a diagnosis of exclusion, with historical cases being re-classified as fumarate hydratase deficient RCC, ALK rearranged RCC, renal medullary carcinoma or high-grade urothelial carcinoma. The rarity and poor prognosis of the tumor makes it difficult to reach consensus guidelines to guide therapy. In this manuscript we review the clinicopathologic features of collecting duct carcinoma including pathologic diagnostic criteria, molecular characteristics and differential diagnosis, and their possible implications for management.

Tumors masquerading as type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma: pathologists' ever-expanding differential diagnosis for a heterogeneous group of entities

Although papillary renal cell carcinoma has historically been classified as either type 1 or type 2, data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has demonstrated significant genomic heterogeneity in tumors classified as "type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma" (T2PRCC). Papillary renal cell carcinoma is expected to have a favorable clinical course compared to clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). However, tumors with poor outcome more similar to CCRCC were included in the T2PRCC cohort studied by the TCGA. The differential diagnosis for T2PRCC includes a variety of other renal tumors, including aggressive entities such as TFE3 translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma, TFEB-amplified renal cell carcinoma, fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma, high-grade CCRCC, and collecting duct carcinoma. Accurate classification of these tumors is important for prognostication and selection of therapy.

Impact of treatment modalities on prognosis of patients with metastatic renal collecting duct carcinoma

Although patients with renal collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) benefit from surgery, the value of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CNx) for the prognosis of patients with metastatic CDC remains unclear. Hence, in this study, we used data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry to investigate the prognostic factors and the impact of CNx on the outcomes in patients with metastatic CDC. Data of 521 patients, diagnosed with CDC between 2000 and 2018, were retrieved from the SEER database. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to compare the survival differences between the CNx group and non-surgical group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with metastatic CDC. Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis guided by directed acyclic graphs (DAG) was used to unfold the impact of CNx and chemotherapy on OS and CSS. 86 patients were identified to have metastatic CDC. The median OS and CSS time were 5 and 6 months, respectively. The OS rates at 1-, 2- and 5-years were 24.4%, 15.1% and 2.3%, respectively. Whereas, the CSS rates at 1-, 2- and 5-years were 27.0%, 17.9% and 2.8%, respectively. Old patients and those receiving CNx or chemotherapy exhibited better survival outcomes. The multivariate regression model identified non-surgical treatment as the only independent prognostic factor for both, OS and CSS. However, DAG-guided multivariate Cox regression model showed that both, CNx and chemotherapy, were associated with both, OS and CSS. Patients with metastatic CDC exhibited worse clinical outcomes. However, CNx improved the prognosis of patients with metastatic CDC. Additionally, surgical resection of visible lesions and suitable chemotherapy were identified as alternative treatment strategies.

Molecular Characterization of the Tumor Microenvironment in Renal Medullary Carcinoma

Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a highly aggressive disease associated with sickle hemoglobinopathies and universal loss of the tumor suppressor gene SMARCB1. RMC has a relatively low rate of incidence compared with other renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) that has hitherto made molecular profiling difficult. To probe this rare disease in detail we performed an in-depth characterization of the RMC tumor microenvironment using a combination of genomic, metabolic and single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments on tissue from a representative untreated RMC patient, complemented by retrospective analyses of archival tissue and existing published data. Our study of the tumor identifies a heterogenous population of malignant cell states originating from the thick ascending limb of the Loop of Henle within the renal medulla. Transformed RMC cells displayed the hallmarks of increased resistance to cell death by ferroptosis and proteotoxic stress driven by MYC-induced proliferative signals. Specifically, genomic characterization of RMC tumors provides substantiating evidence for the recently proposed dependence of SMARCB1-difficient cancers on proteostasis modulated by an intact CDKN2A-p53 pathway. We also provide evidence that increased cystine-mTORC-GPX4 signaling plays a role in protecting transformed RMC cells against ferroptosis. We further propose that RMC has an immune landscape comparable to that of untreated RCCs, including heterogenous expression of the immune ligand CD70 within a sub-population of tumor cells. The latter could provide an immune-modulatory role that serves as a viable candidate for therapeutic targeting.

Recent Advances in Renal Medullary Carcinoma

Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a rare renal malignancy that has been associated with sickle hemoglobinopathies. RMC is aggressive, difficult to treat, and occurs primarily in adolescents and young adults of African ancestry. This cancer is driven by the loss of SMARCB1, a tumor suppressor seen in a number of primarily rare childhood cancers (e.g., rhabdoid tumor of the kidney and atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor). Treatment options remain limited due in part to the limited knowledge of RMC biology. However, significant advances have been made in unraveling the biology of RMC, from genomics to therapeutic targets, over the past 5 years. In this review, we will present these advances and discuss what new questions exist in the field.

Updates in Grading of Renal Cell Carcinomas Beyond Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and papillary RCC using the WHO/International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, which is primarily based on nuclear features. As the spectrum of RCC continues to evolve, with more recently described subtypes in the past decade, literature evidence on grading these subtypes is limited or not available for some tumor types. Herein, we outline a pragmatic approach to the topic of grading RCC, dividing the contemporarily described RCC subtypes into 7 categories based on the potential clinical applicability of grading as a useful prognostic parameter: (1) RCC subtypes that are reasonably validated and recommended for WHO/ISUP grading; (2) RCC subtypes where WHO/ISUP is not applicable; (3) RCC subtypes where WHO/ISUP grading is potentially clinically useful; (4) inherently aggressive RCC subtypes where histologic classification itself confers an aggressive biologic potential; (5) renal epithelial tumors where WHO/ISUP grading provides potentially misleading prognostic implication; (6) renal epithelial neoplasms where low WHO/ISUP grade features are a prerequisite for accurate histologic classification; and (7) renal epithelial neoplasms with no or limited data on grading or incomplete understanding of the biologic potential. Our aim in outlining this approach is 2-fold: (a) identify the gaps in understanding and application of grading in RCC subtypes so that researchers in the field may perform additional studies on the basis of which the important pathologic function of assignment of grade may be recommended to be performed as a meaningful exercise across a wider spectrum of RCC; and (b) to provide guidance in the interim to surgical pathologists in terms of providing clinically useful grading information in RCC based on currently available clinicopathologic information.

Impact of Treatment Modalities on Prognosis in Patients With Renal Collecting Duct Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study

Objective

Renal collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is an extremely rare disease with few studies, and the current understanding of its prognosis is limited. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data to explore the prognostic factors and effect of treatment modalities on the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with CDC.

Methods

Patients’ information of CDCs diagnosed by pathological examination between 2000 and 2018 was extracted from the SEER database. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate OS and CSS and log-rank tests to evaluate the differences in OS and CSS. The associations between clinicopathological variables and survival outcomes were assessed with the Cox proportional hazard model. A directed acyclic graph (DAG) was drawn to recognize confounding factors and to obtain the multivariable regression model, and the impact of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy on OS and CSS was analyzed, respectively.

Results

A total of 242 patients with CDC were enrolled. The median OS and CSS time were 17 and 21 months, respectively. The OS rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 56.9%, 41.9%, and 30.0%, respectively, while the CSS rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 60.1%, 47.5%, and 34.8%, respectively. Patients who had a large tumor size, poor pathological grade, and advanced TNM classification exhibited worse survival outcomes. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that surgery, chemotherapy, T stage, N stage, and M stage were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS. The DAG-guided multivariate Cox regression model revealed that surgery and chemotherapy improved OS and CSS.

Conclusions

CDC is an exceedingly rare disease and has malignant behavior. Most patients have a high pathological grade and advanced TNM stage at diagnosis and exhibited poor survival. Resection of all visible tumors including metastatic lesions or chemotherapy can be beneficial to prognosis, while healthier benefits are less likely to receive radiotherapy. More relevant studies with larger samples are needed to verify the value of surgery and adjuvant therapy in the treatment of CDCs.

Metastatic Renal Medullary and Collecting Duct Carcinoma in the Era of Antiangiogenic and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Multicentric Retrospective Study

Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) and renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) are two rare subtypes of kidney cancer with a poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. Beyond first-line treatment, there are no standard-of-care therapies. This retrospective study assessed the efficacy of treatments after first-line chemotherapy in 57 patients with metastatic (m) CDC (n = 35) or RMC (n = 22) treated between 2010 and 2019 at 11 French centers. The median age was 53 years; overall, 60% (n = 34) of patients were metastatic at diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 13 months, the median overall survival was 12 (95% CI, 11−16) months. All patients received first-line platinum chemotherapy ± bevacizumab, with a median time to progression of 7.27 (95% CI, 7−100 months and an objective response rate (ORR) of 39% (95% CI, 26−52%). Patients received a median of two (1−5) treatment lines. Subsequent treatments included tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n = 12), chemotherapy (n = 34), and checkpoint inhibitors (n = 20), with ORR ranging 10−15% and disease control rates ranging 24−50%. The duration of response for all treatments was ~2 months. Notably, nine patients with CDC were still alive > two years after metastatic diagnosis. Beyond first-line therapy, treatments showed very low antitumor activity in mCDC/RMC. A better understanding of the biology of those rare tumors is urgently needed in order to identify potential targets.

A Novel Machine Learning Algorithm Combined With Multivariate Analysis for the Prognosis of Renal Collecting Duct Carcinoma

Objectives

To investigate the clinical and non-clinical characteristics that may affect the prognosis of patients with renal collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) and to develop an accurate prognostic model for this disease.

Methods

The characteristics of 215 CDC patients were obtained from the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s surveillance, epidemiology and end results database from 2004 to 2016. Univariate Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to compare the impact of different factors on overall survival (OS). 10 variables were included to establish a machine learning (ML) model. Model performance was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and calibration plots for predictive accuracy and decision curve analysis (DCA) were obtained to estimate its clinical benefits.

Results

The median follow-up and survival time was 16 months during which 164 (76.3%) patients died. 4.2, 32.1, 50.7 and 13.0% of patients were histological grade I, II, III, and IV, respectively. At diagnosis up to 61.9% of patients presented with a pT3 stage or higher tumor, and 36.7% of CDC patients had metastatic disease. 10 most clinical and non-clinical factors including M stage, tumor size, T stage, histological grade, N stage, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, age at diagnosis, surgery and the geographical region where the care delivered was either purchased or referred and these were allocated 95, 82, 78, 72, 49, 38, 36, 35, 28 and 21 points, respectively. The points were calculated by the XGBoost according to their importance. The XGBoost models showed the best predictive performance compared with other algorithms. DCA showed our models could be used to support clinical decisions in 1-3-year OS models.

Conclusions

Our ML models had the highest predictive accuracy and net benefits, which may potentially help clinicians to make clinical decisions and follow-up strategies for patients with CDC. Larger studies are needed to better understand this aggressive tumor.

A Rare Collecting Duct Carcinoma With Widespread Metastasis Visualized by 18F-FDG PET/CT

ABSTRACT

Collecting duct carcinoma is a rare and highly aggressive renal tumor with a poor prognosis. The presence of metastasis is common at collecting duct carcinoma diagnosis, but widespread metastases involving multiple soft tissues are extremely unusual. Here, we describe a 65-year-old man presenting with fever and lower leg pain as the first and main manifestations. After receiving anti-infective therapy for over 6 weeks without improvement, 18F-FDG PET/CT revealed a primary renal carcinoma with widespread metastases. A biopsy from the tubercle of fascicular spinal muscle indicated a diagnosis of collecting duct carcinoma.

Kidney Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC typically undergo surgery and/or receive systemic therapy. Tumor histology and risk stratification of patients is important in therapy selection. The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer stratify treatment recommendations by histology; recommendations for first-line treatment of ccRCC are also stratified by risk group. To further guide management of advanced RCC, the NCCN Kidney Cancer Panel has categorized all systemic kidney cancer therapy regimens as "Preferred," "Other Recommended Regimens," or "Useful in Certain Circumstances." This categorization provides guidance on treatment selection by considering the efficacy, safety, evidence, and other factors that play a role in treatment selection. These factors include pre-existing comorbidities, nature of the disease, and in some cases consideration of access to agents. This article summarizes surgical and systemic therapy recommendations for patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC.

Characterizing the tumor microenvironment in rare renal cancer histological types

The tumor microenvironment (TME), including immune cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, endothelial cells, adjacent normal cells, and others, plays a crucial role in influencing tumor behavior and progression. Here, we characterized the TME in 83 primary renal tumors and matched metastatic or recurrence tissue samples (n = 15) from papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) types 1 (n = 20) and 2 (n = 49), collecting duct carcinomas (CDC; n = 14), and high-grade urothelial carcinomas (HGUC; n = 5). We investigated 10 different markers of immune infiltration, vasculature, cell proliferation, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by using machine learning image analysis in conjunction with immunohistochemistry. Marker expression was compared by Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests and correlations across markers using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Multivariable Poisson regression analysis was used to compare marker expression between histological types, while accounting for variation in tissue size. Several immune markers showed different rates of expression across histological types of renal carcinoma. Using pRCC1 as reference, the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of CD3+ T cells (IRR [95% confidence interval, CI] = 2.48 [1.53-4.01]) and CD20+ B cells (IRR [95% CI] = 4.38 [1.22-5.58]) was statistically significantly higher in CDC. In contrast, CD68+ macrophages predominated in pRCC1 (IRR [95% CI] = 2.35 [1.42-3.9]). Spatial analysis revealed CD3+ T-cell and CD20+ B-cell expressions in CDC to be higher at the proximal (p < 0.0001) and distal (p < 0.0001) tumor periphery than within the central tumor core. In contrast, expression of CD68+ macrophages in pRCC2 was higher in the tumor center compared to the proximal (p = 0.0451) tumor periphery and pRCC1 showed a distance-dependent reduction, from the central tumor, in CD68+ macrophages with the lowest expression of CD68 marker at the distal tumor periphery (p = 0.004). This study provides novel insights into the TME of rare kidney cancer types, which are often understudied. Our findings of differences in marker expression and localization by histological subtype could have implications for tumor progression and response to immunotherapies or other targeted therapies.

Persistent Response to a Combination Treatment Featuring a Targeted Agent and an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in a Patient With Collecting Duct Renal Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is a rare and highly aggressive subtype of kidney cancer that is associated with a poor prognosis. At present, there is no effective treatment for CDC. Herein, we report a case of metastatic CDC treated with a combination of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and an immune checkpoint inhibitor. A 67-year-old male was diagnosed with CDC with lung and bone metastasis. Pazopanib and camrelizumab were administered after cytoreductive nephrectomy. The patient achieved a partial response after one cycle of treatment; however, he then experienced serious drug-induced hepatic injury. Therefore, we discontinued camrelizumab and administered monotherapy with pazopanib. Three months later, the cancer had progressed and axitinib and sintilimab were administered. The patient achieved a partial response, accompanied by the complete disappearance of the metastatic lesion in the lung. The patient had an excellent physical status after 11 months. This is the first reported case of metastatic CDC successfully treated with a combination of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and an immune checkpoint inhibitor. This form of combination treatment may be an effective option for treating metastatic CDC.

Incidence, Clinical Characteristics, and Survival of Collecting Duct Carcinoma of the Kidney: A Population-Based Study

Objective

To investigate the exact age‐adjusted incidence (AAI), clinical characteristics, and survival data of collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney (CDCK) recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of the National Cancer Institute.

Methods

Patients with CDCK confirmed by microscopic examination from 2004 to 2018 were selected from the SEER database. AAI rates were calculated using SEER*Stat software (version 8.3.9). The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates according to tumor size, tumor stage, and treatment methods, and differences among these variables were assessed by the log‐rank test. Cox regression analysis was employed to identify variables independently related to CSS.

Results

A total of 286 patients with CDCK were identified from the database. The majority of the patients were white (69.2%), male (67.5%), and married (60.5%), and the median age was 59 years. Most patients with CDCK (74.4%) presented with stages III or IV disease. The diameter of most (59.4%) tumors was less than 7 cm, and the tumors were more commonly found on the left than on the right (55.2% vs. 44.8%). The incidence of CDCK decreased over time. The median CSS time was 17 months. In terms of the treatment modalities used, 83.9% of the patients underwent surgery; 32.9% underwent chemotherapy, and 13.6% underwent radiotherapy. The CSS rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 57.3%, 43.2%, and 30.7%, respectively. In patients with stage IV CDCK treated with surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, and surgery plus chemotherapy, the median survival time was 5 months, 9 months, and 14 months, respectively (P =0.024). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed surgery, chemotherapy, stage, regional lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were independent prognostic factors for patients with CDCK.

Conclusions

CDCK is an uncommon malignant renal carcinoma, and its incidence is decreasing based on the analysis of current data. CDCK is a high stage, regional lymph-nodes positive, and metastatic disease. Compared with surgery alone or chemotherapy alone, patients with stage IV could gain survival benefit from surgery combined with chemotherapy.

Inhibitors of TGFβR1/ALK4/JNK3/Flt1 Kinases in Cynomolgus Macaques Lead to the Rapid Induction of Renal Epithelial Tumors

Two young cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) given a small molecule kinase inhibitor ((S)-4-((2-(5-chloro-2-fluorophenyl)-5-isopropylpyrimidin-4-yl)amino)-N-(2-hydroxypropyl)nicotinamide [SCIO-120]) via nasogastric intubation gavage, once-daily for 21 days at 400 mg/kg/day, developed an unusual epithelial proliferative process in the renal parenchyma. Morphological and immunohistochemical characterization of the lesions confirmed an invasive malignant epithelial neoplasm (carcinoma). A similar renal neoplasm was seen in a third macaque after a 14-day exposure to a second kinase inhibitor in the same chemical series ((S) 4-((2-(5-chloro-2-fluorophenyl)-5-methoxypyrimidin-4-yl)amino)-N-cyclopropylnicotinamide [SCIO-974]). Despite remarkably short latency periods, exposure to these kinase inhibitors was likely causally associated with the induction of the renal tumors, as renal carcinomas are exceedingly rare spontaneously in macaques. Both SCIO-120 and SCIO-974 were designed as potent TGFβR1 inhibitors (IC50s 37 and 39 nM, respectively). SCIO-120 and SCIO-974 inhibited additional kinases, most notably closely related ALK4 (IC50 = 34  and 20 nM, respectively), c-Jun n-Terminal kinase 3 (JNK3, IC50 = 10 and 20 nM, respectively), and Fms-related tyrosine kinase 1 (29  and 76 nM, respectively). TGFβR1 has been specifically implicated in epithelial proliferative disorders, including neoplasia. Neither SCIO-120 nor SCIO-974 was genotoxic based on bacterial reverse mutation and/or clastogenicity screening assays. The rapid appearance of renal carcinomas in primates following short-term treatment with nongenotoxic kinase inhibitors is remarkable and suggests that the compounds had noteworthy tumor-enhancing effects, hypothetically linked to their TGFβR1 inhibition activity. These observations have implications for mechanisms of carcinogenesis and TGFβR1 biology.

New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) reviewed recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, to provide an update on existing entities, including diagnostic criteria, molecular correlates, and updated nomenclature. Key prognostic features for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain WHO/ISUP grade, AJCC/pTNM stage, coagulative necrosis, and rhabdoid and sarcomatoid differentiation. Accrual of subclonal genetic alterations in clear cell RCC including SETD2, PBRM1, BAP1, loss of chromosome 14q and 9p are associated with variable prognosis, patterns of metastasis, and vulnerability to therapies. Recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines increasingly adopt immunotherapeutic agents in advanced RCC, including RCC with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid changes. Papillary RCC subtyping is no longer recommended, as WHO/ISUP grade and tumor architecture better predict outcome. New papillary RCC variants/patterns include biphasic, solid, Warthin-like, and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. For tumors with 'borderline' features between oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, a term "oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, not further classified" is proposed. Clear cell papillary RCC may warrant reclassification as a tumor of low malignant potential. Tubulocystic RCC should only be diagnosed when morphologically pure. MiTF family translocation RCCs exhibit varied morphologic patterns and fusion partners. TFEB-amplified RCC occurs in older patients and is associated with more aggressive behavior. Acquired cystic disease (ACD) RCC-like cysts are likely precursors of ACD-RCC. The diagnosis of renal medullary carcinoma requires a negative SMARCB1 (INI-1) expression and sickle cell trait/disease. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) can be distinguished from papillary RCC with overlapping morphology by losses of chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 22. MTSCC with adverse histologic features shows frequent CDKN2A/2B (9p) deletions. BRAF mutations unify the metanephric family of tumors. The term "fumarate hydratase deficient RCC" ("FH-deficient RCC") is preferred over "hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome-associated RCC". A low threshold for FH, 2SC, and SDHB immunohistochemistry is recommended in difficult to classify RCCs, particularly those with eosinophilic morphology, occurring in younger patients. Current evidence does not support existence of a unique tumor subtype occurring after chemotherapy/radiation in early childhood.

Integrative Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Distinctive Molecular Traits and Novel Subtypes of Collecting Duct Carcinoma

Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is a rare and highly aggressive kidney cancer subtype with poor prognosis and no standard treatments. To date, only a few studies have examined the transcriptomic portrait of CDC. Through integration of multiple datasets, we compared CDC to normal tissue, upper-tract urothelial carcinomas, and other renal cancers, including clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe histologies. Association between CDC gene expression signatures and in vitro drug sensitivity data was evaluated using the Cancer Therapeutic Response Portal, Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer datasets, and connectivity map. We identified a CDC-specific gene signature that predicted in vitro sensitivity to different targeted agents and was associated to worse outcome in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. We showed that CDC are transcriptionally related to the principal cells of the collecting ducts providing evidence that this tumor originates from this normal kidney cell type. Finally, we proved that CDC is a molecularly heterogeneous disease composed of at least two subtypes distinguished by cell signaling, metabolic and immune-related alterations. Our findings elucidate the molecular features of CDC providing novel biological and clinical insights. The identification of distinct CDC subtypes and their transcriptomic traits provides the rationale for patient stratification and alternative therapeutic approaches.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of metastatic collecting duct carcinoma, renal medullary carcinoma, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Unlike clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) and renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) are rare tumors that progress rapidly and appear resistant to current systemic therapies. We queried comprehensive genomic profiling to uncover opportunities for targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

DNA was extracted from 40 microns of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen from relapsed, mCDC (n = 46), mRMC (n = 24), and refractory and metastatic (m) mCCRCC (n = 626). Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed, and Tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) were calculated. We analyzed all classes of genomic alterations.

RESULTS

mCDC had 1.7 versus 2.7 genomic alterations/tumor in mCCRCC ( = 0.04). Mutations in VHL (P < 0.0001) and TSC1 (P = 0.04) were more frequent in mCCRCC. SMARCB1 (P < 0.0001), NF2 (P = 0.0007), RB1 (P = 0.02) and RET (P = 0.0003) alterations were more frequent in mCDC versus mCCRCC. No VHL alterations in mRMC and mCDC were identified. SMARCB1 genomic alterations were significantly more frequent in mRMC than mCDC (P = 0.0002), but were the most common alterations in both subtypes. Mutations to EGFR, RET, NF2, and TSC2 were more frequently identified in mCDC versus mRMC. The median TMB and MSI-High status was low with <1% of mCCRC, mCDC, and mRMC having ≥ 20 mut/Mb.

CONCLUSION

Genomic alteration patterns in mCDC and mRMC differ significantly from mCCRCC. Targeted therapies for mCDC and mRMC appear limited with rare opportunities to target alterations in receptor tyrosine kinase and MTOR pathways. Similarly, TMB and absence of MSI-High status in mCDC and mRMC suggest resistance to immunotherapies.

Towards a new WHO classification of renal cell tumor: what the clinician needs to know-a narrative review

In 1952, renal cell carcinomas had been divided into 2 categories—clear cell or granular cell—depending upon their cytoplasmic staining characteristics. In the following years, the inventory of renal epithelial tumors has expanded by the addition of tumors named by their architectural pattern (i.e., papillary RCC, tubulocystic RCC), anatomic location (i.e., collecting duct carcinoma, renal medullary carcinoma), associated diseases (i.e., acquired cystic disease-associated RCCs). With the extensive application of molecular diagnostic techniques, it becomes possible to detect genetic distinctions between various types of renal neoplasm and discover new entities, otherwise misdiagnosed or diagnosed as unclassified RCC. Some tumors such as ALK rearrangement-associated RCC, MiT family translocation renal carcinomas, SDH-deficient renal cancer or FH-deficient RCC, are defined by their molecular characteristics. The most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal neoplasms account for more than 50 entities and provisional entities. New entities might be included in the upcoming WHO classification. The aim of this review is to summarise and discuss the newly acquired data and evidence on the clinical, pathological, molecular features and on the prognosis of new RCC entities, which will hopefully increase the awareness and the acceptance of these entities among clinicians and improve prognostication for individual patients.

Tumor Type Agnostic Therapy Carrying BRAF Mutation: Case Reports and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Precision medicine is based on molecular and genotypic patient characterization to define specific target treatment. BRAF mutation is an oncogenic driver, and the Cancer Genome Atlas has identified BRAF mutations in different cancer types. Tumor type agnostic therapy is based on targeting genomic alterations, regardless of tumor origin. In this context, novel therapeutic agents including BRAF and MEK inhibitors based on the molecular landscape in solid tumors have been investigated. Case presentation, Case 1: The first case is chemotherapy-refractory, BRAF V600E mutated intrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma treated with vemurafenib and cobimetinib as third line therapy. In this setting the dual BRAF and MEK inhibition resulted in improved progression-free survival and quality of life; Case 2: The second case shows aBRAF G466A mutated Bellini duct carcinoma (BDC), treated with dabrafenib and trametinib in second line therapy. The disease remained under control for 11 months after the first relapse.

DISCUSSION

In the literature there is strong evidence that melanoma, colorectal cancer, non small cell lung cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer with BRAF mutations are good targets for BRAF/MEK pathway inhibitors. The VE-BASKET and ROAR basket trials explored the efficacy of vemurafenib and the combination of dabrafenib/trametinib, respectively, in BRAF V600 mutation-positive cancers other than melanoma, papillary thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer and non small cell lung cancer. Within the concept of tumor type agnostic therapy, we decided to treat our BRAF-mutated tumors with the association of BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the emerging importance of molecular tumor profiling for the successful management of cancer, and the potential of BRAF-targeted therapy in the treatment of rare solid tumors with poor prognosis and no clinical benefit from systemic therapies with.

The Differential Diagnosis of Medullary-Based Renal Masses

CONTEXT.—

Renal malignancies can be divided into cortical- and medullary-based tumors, the latter of which classically infiltrate the renal parenchyma by extending between nonneoplastic structures. Although high-grade cortical tumors can rarely exhibit the same growth pattern, the infiltrative morphology should elicit a differential diagnosis to be considered in each case. However, these diagnoses can be challenging to distinguish, especially on small renal biopsy samples.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide an overview of the clinical, gross, and microscopic findings; genetic and molecular alterations; and immunohistochemical evaluation of medullary-based renal tumors and other tumor types with overlapping morphologies and growth patterns.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and personal observations were used to compile the information in this review.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Collecting duct carcinoma is a prototypical medullary-based tumor, and although diagnostic criteria exist, it remains a diagnosis of exclusion, especially with ancillary techniques aiding the recognition of established as well as more recently described neoplasms. Other medullary-based malignancies included in the differential diagnosis include renal medullary carcinoma/renal cell carcinoma unclassified with medullary phenotype, fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma, and upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Moreover, other rare entities should be excluded, including metastatic carcinoma, lymphoma, and melanoma. In addition to potential prognostic differences, accurate diagnoses can have important surgical and clinical management implications.

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma syndrome-associated renal cell carcinoma: Morphological appraisal with a comprehensive review of differential diagnoses

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) is an autosomal dominant syndrome wherein affected individuals are at risk for the development of cutaneous leiomyomas, early-onset multiple uterine leiomyomas, and an aggressive subtype of renal cell cancer. HLRCC is caused by germline mutations in the fumarate hydratase (FH) gene, which inactivates the enzyme and alters the function of the tricarboxylic acid/Krebs cycle. This article reviews the hitherto described morphologic features of HLRCC-associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and outlines the differential diagnosis and ancillary use of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics for these tumors. The morphologic spectrum of HLRCC-associated RCC is wide and histologic features, including tumor cells with prominent nucleoli, perinucleolar halos, and multiple architectural patterns within the same tumor, which are suggestive of this diagnosis. FH immunohistochemistry in conjunction with genetic counseling and germline FH testing are the important parameters for detection of this entity. These kidney tumors warrant prompt treatment as even smaller sized lesions can demonstrate aggressive behavior and systemic oncologic treatment in metastatic disease should, if possible, be part of a clinical trial. Screening procedures in HLRCC families should preferably be evaluated in large cohorts.

Concomitant Drug Treatment and Elimination in the RCC-affected Kidneys: Can We Kill Two Birds with One Stone?

BACKGROUND

The kidneys are vital organs acting as the body's filters that eliminate drugs and other waste products from the body. For effective cancer therapy, a delicate balance is required in the drug treatment and its elimination, which is critical for drug accumulation, toxicity, and kidney malfunction. However, how renal cell carcinoma (RCC) affects the kidneys in safely eliminating the byproducts of drug treatments in patients with severely dysregulated kidney functions had remained elusive. Recent advancements in dose adjustment have added to our understanding regarding how drug treatments could be effectively regulated in aberrant kidney cells, driving safe elimination and reducing drug accumulation and toxicity at the right time and space. Dose adjustment is the only standard systemic way applicable; however, it presents certain limitations. There is significant room for developing new strategies and alternatives to improve it.

OBJECTIVES

Our analysis of the available treatments in literature discusses the treatment and their safe eliminations. In this study, we give an overview of the measures that could be taken to maintain the elimination gradient of anti-cancer drugs and restore normal kidney function in RCC. Differential therapeutics of RCC/mRCC in various clinical phase trials and the interaction of targeted therapeutics in response to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were also discussed.

CONCLUSION

Such information might suggest a new direction in controlling treatment with safe elimination through dose adjustment and its associated alternatives in a judicious manner. A strategy to systematically focus on the safe elimination of anti-cancer drugs in RCC strongly needs advocating.

Rhabdoid collecting duct carcinoma with lymphangitic carcinomatosis causing acute lethal chylopericardium

Collecting duct carcinoma is a rare neoplasm of the kidney, accounting for only 1–2% of renal tumors. These tumors arise from the principal cells of the renal collecting ducts of Bellini. The majority of patients have lymph node involvement and metastases to lungs, liver, bone, adrenal glands, and brain. We present a case of a 48 year old woman who came to the hospital with a clinical presentation suspicious for pneumonia. One week later her symptoms aggravated. A CT chest and abdominal imaging showed bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, and left hydroureteronephrosis. She expired after developing acute respiratory failure. An autopsy was performed which revealed chylopericadium of 150 cc; bilateral reticular pattern on the surfaces of the lungs; neck, mediastinal and retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, and a 5.1 cm left kidney mass located in the mid portion medulla. The kidney tumor was a rhabdoid collecting duct carcinoma. The lungs showed diffuse subpleural lymphangitic spread of the carcinoma. We report a rare case of chylopericardium due to lymphangitic carcinomatosis from a 5.1 cm rhabdoid collecting duct carcinoma not suspected clinically or radiologically. This case highlights the importance of performing autopsies in an era when clinicians heavily rely on high-tech imaging diagnostic modalities.

Renal Cell Tumors: Molecular Findings Reshaping Clinico-pathological Practice

Over the past 20 years, the number of subtypes of renal epithelial cell neoplasia has grown. This growth has resulted from detailed histological and immunohistochemical characterization of these tumors and their correlation with clinical outcomes. Distinctive molecular phenotypes have validated the unique nature of many of these tumors. This growth of unique renal neoplasms has continued after the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours. A consequence is that both the pathologists who diagnose the tumors and the clinicians who care for these patients are confronted with a bewildering array of renal cell carcinoma variants. Many of these variants have important clinical features, i.e. familial or syndromic associations, genomics alterations that can be targeted with systemic therapy, and benignancy of tumors previously classified as carcinomas. Our goal in the review is to provide a practical guide to help recognize these variants, based on small and distinct sets of histological features and limited numbers of immunohistochemical stains, supplemented, as necessary, with molecular features.

Genomic profiling in renal cell carcinoma

The treatment landscape of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been revolutionized over the past two decades, bringing forth an era in which more than a dozen therapeutic agents are now available to treat patients. As a consequence, personalized care has become a critical part of developing effective treatment guidelines and improving patient outcomes. One of the most important emerging aspects of precision medicine in cancer is matching patients and treatments based on the genomic characteristics of an individual and their tumour. Despite the lack of a single genomic predictor of treatment response or prognostication feature in RCC, emerging research suggests that the identification of such markers remains promising. Mutations in VHL and alterations in its downstream pathways are the mainstay of RCC development and progression. However, the predictive value of VHL mutations has been questioned. Further research has examined mutations in genes involved in chromosome remodelling (for example, PBRM1, BAP1 and SETD2), DNA methylation and DNA damage repair, all of which have been associated with clinical outcomes. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of genomic evidence in the context of RCC and its potential predictive and prognostic value.

Clinical Features and Prognostic Outcome of Renal Collecting Duct Carcinoma: 12 Cases from a Single Institution

Purpose

Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is extremely rare and has high malignancy and poor prognosis. The purpose of this research is to explore the clinical characteristic, imaging, pathological diagnosis, treatment and prognostic outcome of CDCs.

Materials and Methods

The clinical data of 12 CDC cases who had been surgically treated between August 2007 and August 2017 and verified the diagnosis of CDC by postoperative pathological and/or immunohistochemical staining (IHC) results were retrospectively analyzed, and related works of literature were reviewed. And Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to draw the survival curve and to calculate the survival rate and the median survival time.

Results

According to the TNM stage system, 4 cases were in stage I, 2 in stage II,3 in stage III, and 3 in stage IV. On the computed tomograph and magnetic resonance imaging, CDC displayed that various shapes, unclear boundary and invasive growth into the renal parenchyma. Compared with small CDCs which did not change the contour of the kidney, large CDCs presented various imaging features. Microscopically, the typical morphology of CDCs was that collecting ducts or tubules were obviously infiltrated by tumor cells. A tubular, papillary, tubulopapillary or solid architectures with desmoplasia were often presented. And tumor cells had high-grade cytology or an infiltrative growth pattern. Necrosis of tumor cells also was common in many cases. The expression of biomarkers, such as PAX-8, INI-1, 34βE12, CK19, PAX-2, and vimentin, in most patients was detected by IHC. Eleven of all 12 cases received radical surgery, of whom 5 patients died 3–11 months after surgery, and 1 case having undergone interventional embolization therapy died at 6 months after treatment due to multiple metastases. And 1 lost to contact. The overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 45.5%, 36.4%, and 8.8%, respectively, and the median survival time (MST) was 11 months.

Conclusion

CDC has an aggressive clinical course, with a poor prognosis. The best way to treat CDC suspected by imaging examinations is radical surgery which can contribute to confirm the correct histopathological type. And post-operation follow-up is necessary.

Comprehensive Molecular Characterization Identifies Distinct Genomic and Immune Hallmarks of Renal Medullary Carcinoma

Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a highly lethal malignancy that mainly afflicts young individuals of African descent and is resistant to all targeted agents used to treat other renal cell carcinomas. Comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic profiling of untreated primary RMC tissues was performed to elucidate the molecular landscape of these tumors. We found that RMC was characterized by high replication stress and an abundance of focal copy-number alterations associated with activation of the stimulator of the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase interferon genes (cGAS-STING) innate immune pathway. Replication stress conferred a therapeutic vulnerability to drugs targeting DNA-damage repair pathways. Elucidation of these previously unknown RMC hallmarks paves the way to new clinical trials for this rare but highly lethal malignancy.

An Algorithmic Immunohistochemical Approach to Define Tumor Type and Assign Site of Origin

Immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable complement to an epidemiology and morphology-driven approach to tumor diagnosis and site of origin assignment. This review reflects the state of my current practice, based on 15-years' experience in Pathology and a deep-dive into the literature, always striving to be better equipped to answer the age old questions, "What is it, and where is it from?" The tables and figures in this manuscript are the ones I "pull up on the computer" when I am teaching at the microscope and turn to myself when I am (frequently) stuck. This field is so exciting because I firmly believe that, through the application of next-generation immunohistochemistry, we can provide better answers than ever before. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) broad tumor classification and associated screening markers; (2) the role of cancer epidemiology in determining pretest probability; (3) broad-spectrum epithelial markers; (4) noncanonical expression of broad tumor class screening markers; (5) a morphologic pattern-based approach to poorly to undifferentiated malignant neoplasms; (6) a morphologic and immunohistochemical approach to define 4 main carcinoma types; (7) CK7/CK20 coordinate expression; (8) added value of semiquantitative immunohistochemical stain assessment; algorithmic immunohistochemical approaches to (9) "garden variety" adenocarcinomas presenting in the liver, (10) large polygonal cell adenocarcinomas, (11) the distinction of primary surface ovarian epithelial tumors with mucinous features from metastasis, (12) tumors presenting at alternative anatomic sites, (13) squamous cell carcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms, including (14) the distinction of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, site of origin assignment in (15) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and (16) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and (17) the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; it concludes with (18) a discussion of diagnostic considerations in the broad-spectrum keratin/CD45/S-100-"triple-negative" neoplasm.

Renal Tumors of Childhood-A Histopathologic Pattern-Based Diagnostic Approach

Renal tumors comprise approximately 7% of all malignant pediatric tumors. This is a highly heterogeneous group of tumors, each with its own therapeutic management, outcome, and association with germline predispositions. Histopathology is the key in establishing the correct diagnosis, and therefore pathologists with expertise in pediatric oncology are needed for dealing with these rare tumors. While each tumor shows different histologic features, they do have considerable overlap in cell type and histologic pattern, making the diagnosis difficult to establish, if based on routine histology alone. To this end, ancillary techniques, such as immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis, can be of great importance for the correct diagnosis, resulting in appropriate treatment. To use ancillary techniques cost-effectively, we propose a pattern-based approach and provide recommendations to aid in deciding which panel of antibodies, supplemented by molecular characterization of a subset of genes, are required.

Five decades of urologic pathology: the accelerating expansion of knowledge in renal cell neoplasia

Those who are knowledgeable in cosmology inform us that the expansion of the universe is such that the velocity at which a distant galaxy is receding from the observer is continually increasing with time. We humbly paraphrase that as "The bigger the universe gets, the faster it gets bigger." This is an interesting analogy for the expansion of knowledge in the field of renal tumor pathology over the past 30 to 50 years. It is clear that a multitude of dedicated investigators have devoted incalculable amounts of time and effort to the pursuit of knowledge about renal epithelial neoplasms. As a consequence of the contributions of numerous investigators over many decades, the most recent World Health Organization classification of renal neoplasms includes about 50 well defined and distinctive renal tumors, as well as various miscellaneous and metastatic tumors. In addition, a number of emerging or provisional new entities are under active investigation and may be included in future classifications. In this review, we will focus on a number of these tumors, tracing as accurately as we can the origins of their discovery, relating relevant additions to the overall knowledge base surrounding them, and in some instances addressing changes in nomenclature.

Distinctive mechanisms underlie the loss of SMARCB1 protein expression in renal medullary carcinoma: morphologic and molecular analysis of 20 cases

Renal medullary carcinoma is a rare but highly aggressive type of renal cancer occurring in patients with sickle cell trait or rarely with other hemoglobinopathies. Loss of SMARCB1 protein expression, a core subunit of the switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex, has emerged as a key diagnostic feature of these tumors. However, the molecular mechanism underlying this loss remains unclear. We retrospectively identified 20 patients diagnosed with renal medullary carcinoma at two institutions from 1996 to 2017. All patients were confirmed to have sickle cell trait, and all tumors exhibited a loss of SMARCB1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. The status of SMARCB1 locus was examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using 3-color probes, and somatic alterations were detected by targeted next-generation sequencing platforms. FISH analysis of all 20 cases revealed 11 (55%) with concurrent hemizygous loss and translocation of SMARCB1, 6 (30%) with homozygous loss of SMARCB1, and 3 (15%) without structural or copy number alterations of SMARCB1 despite protein loss. Targeted sequencing revealed a pathogenic somatic mutation of SMARCB1 in one of these 3 cases that were negative by FISH. Tumors in the 3 subsets with different FISH findings largely exhibited similar clinicopathologic features, however, homozygous SMARCB1 deletion was found to show a significant association with the solid growth pattern, whereas tumors dominated by reticular/cribriform growth were enriched for SMARCB1 translocation. Taken together, we demonstrate that different molecular mechanisms underlie the loss of SMARCB1 expression in renal medullary carcinoma. Biallelic inactivation of SMARCB1 occurs in a large majority of cases either via concurrent hemizygous loss and translocation disrupting SMARCB1 or by homozygous loss.

Collecting ducts carcinoma: An orphan disease. Literature overview and future perspectives

Collecting ducts carcinoma (CDC) is a rare and aggressive histological subtype of renal cancer accounting for only 1% of renal tumors. Usually patients present in bad clinical conditions due to a symptomatic disease with synchronous metastasis. Due to the rarity of CDC, data from prospective trials evaluating the best treatment for these patients are limited. The prognosis is poor with a median overall survival of around 11 months for patients with metastatic disease. The best treatment option today is considered a doublet chemotherapy with platinum salt plus gemcitabine as a result from a prospective phase II trial, but survival outcomes remain unsatisfactory. The interest in the in-depth understanding the biology of this orphan disease is growing, leading to find potential new biological-driven treatment approaches. Here we review the up-to-date literature evidences to address the best management of this rare and unfavorable clinical condition.

Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome (HLRCC): A Contemporary Review and Practical Discussion of the Differential Diagnosis for HLRCC-Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma

CONTEXT.—

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma syndrome (HLRCC) is an uncommon disorder with germline-inactivating mutations in the fumarate hydratase ( FH) gene. The kidney cancers that develop in patients with HLRCC are often unilateral and solitary, with a potentially aggressive clinical course; morphologic identification of suspicious cases is of the utmost importance.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review classic morphologic features of HLRCC-associated renal cell carcinoma, the reported morphologic spectrum of these tumors and their mimics, and the evidence for use of immunohistochemistry and molecular testing in diagnosis of these tumors.

DATA SOURCES.—

University of Michigan cases and review of pertinent literature about HLRCC and the morphologic spectrum of HLRCC-associated renal cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Histologic features, such as prominent nucleoli with perinucleolar halos and multiple architectural patterns within one tumor, are suggestive of HLRCC-associated renal cell carcinoma. However, the morphologic spectrum is broad. Appropriate use of FH immunohistochemistry and referral to genetic counseling is important for detection of this syndrome.

The Complete Spectrum of Infiltrative Renal Masses: Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Implications

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the full spectrum of patients presenting with radiologically-identified infiltrative renal masses (IRMs), including those managed surgically or otherwise, with focus on clinical presentation/prognosis.

METHODS

All 280 patients presenting with radiologically-identified renal mass with infiltrative features (2008-2017) were retrospectively reviewed. Poorly-defined interface between tumor and parenchyma and irregular shape (nonelliptical) in one or more distinct/unequivocal areas were required for classification as IRM. IRM was confirmed in 265 and clinical characteristics and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Median age/tumor size were 65-years/6.9 cm, respectively, and 225 patients (85%) were R.E.N.A.L. = 10-12. Overall, 181 patients (68%) presented symptomatically, locally-advanced cancer (cT3-T4) was observed in 176 (66%) and disseminated disease and/or lymphadenopathy (>2 cm) in 181(68%). Clinical/radiographic findings were suggestive of etiology and could direct evaluation, but were nonspecific for definitive diagnosis. Renal-mass biopsy was performed in 103 patients and diagnostic in 97 (94%). Renal surgery was only performed in 82 patients (31%) and partial nephrectomy in 3 (1.1%). Overall, 72 patients (27%) received systemic chemotherapy and 59 (22%) targeted therapy. Final-diagnosis was renal cell carcinoma in 94 patients (35%), including 49 with highly-aggressive histology (sarcomatoid/rhabdoid/collecting-duct/medullary/unclassified). High-grade urothelial-carcinoma was found in 70 (26%), and lymphoma/metastatic cancer in 26 (10%)/25 (9%), respectively. Overall, 153 patients (58%) died; 138 (52%) cancer-related at median of 5 months. The majority of patients with renal cell carcinoma, urothelial-carcinoma, and renal metastasis died, almost exclusively cancer-related, at medians of 8, 3, and 2 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our series includes the full spectrum of IRMs and confirms predominance of symptomatic, poorly-differentiated, highly-lethal malignancies. Our study highlights the overriding importance of identifying infiltrative features, a simple radiologic diagnosis, during assessment of renal masses.

Renal Medullary Carcinoma

Renal medullary carcinoma, also referred to as the seventh sickle cell nephropathy, typically affects young African Americans with sickle cell trait, or, less frequently, patients with sickle cell disease. The existence of renal medullary carcinoma without a concomitant hemoglobinopathy is a topic of controversy. The typical patient is a young male of African or Mediterranean descent, with hematuria and/or flank pain. Most patients have metastatic disease at the time of presentation. The tumor is characteristically a poorly circumscribed mass in the medullary region, commonly showing variable amounts of hemorrhage and necrosis. Microscopically, a characteristic reticular or cribriform pattern with a striking desmoplastic stromal response and a robust mixed inflammatory infiltrate is observed. Collecting duct carcinoma, malignant rhabdoid tumor, urothelial carcinoma, and other subtypes of renal cell carcinoma are in the differential diagnosis. Because of the advanced stage of disease at presentation and the aggressive nature of this malignant neoplasm, survival is poor even with chemotherapy; however, isolated reports of prolonged survival have been documented.

Reappraisal of Morphologic Differences Between Renal Medullary Carcinoma, Collecting Duct Carcinoma, and Fumarate Hydratase-deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal medullary carcinomas (RMCs) and collecting duct carcinomas (CDCs) are rare subsets of lethal high-stage, high-grade distal nephron-related adenocarcinomas with a predilection for the renal medullary region. Recent findings have established an emerging group of fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient tumors related to hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC-RCCs) syndrome within this morphologic spectrum. Recently developed, reliable ancillary testing has enabled consistent separation between these tumor types. Here, we present the clinicopathologic features and differences in the morphologic patterns between RMC, CDC, and FH-deficient RCC in consequence of these recent developments. This study included a total of 100 cases classified using contemporary criteria and ancillary tests. Thirty-three RMCs (SMARCB1/INI1-deficient, hemoglobinopathy), 38 CDCs (SMARCB1/INI1-retained), and 29 RCCs defined by the FH-deficient phenotype (FH/2SC or FH/2SC with FH mutation, regardless of HLRCC syndromic stigmata/history) were selected. The spectrum of morphologic patterns was critically evaluated, and the differences between the morphologic patterns present in the 3 groups were analyzed statistically. Twenty-five percent of cases initially diagnosed as CDC were reclassified as FH-deficient RCC on the basis of our contemporary diagnostic approach. Among the different overlapping morphologic patterns, sieve-like/cribriform and reticular/yolk sac tumor-like patterns favored RMCs, whereas intracystic papillary and tubulocystic patterns favored FH-deficient RCC. The tubulopapillary pattern favored both CDCs and FH-deficient RCCs, and the multinodular infiltrating papillary pattern favored CDCs. Infiltrating glandular and solid sheets/cords/nested patterns were not statistically different among the 3 groups. Viral inclusion-like macronucleoli, considered as a hallmark of HLRCC-RCCs, were observed significantly more frequently in FH-deficient RCCs. Despite the overlapping morphology found among these clinically aggressive infiltrating high-grade adenocarcinomas of the kidney, reproducible differences in morphology emerged between these categories after rigorous characterization. Finally, we recommend that definitive diagnosis of CDC should only be made if RMC and FH-deficient RCC are excluded.