Postoperative Complications After Esophagectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus Are Related to Timing of Death Due to Recurrence

Early prediction of postoperative infection using inflammatory markers after cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Major postoperative complications have proved to be an independent adverse prognostic factor for long-term survival in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammatory marker that is reportedly a useful tool for the early prediction of postoperative complications, as is the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). In patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, postoperative CRP levels on days 2 to 4 are predictors of early complications after CRS plus HIPEC.

AIM

To determine the usefulness of CRP and NLR for the early detection of overall postoperative infections (OPIs) after CRS +/- HIPEC.

METHODS

Patients treated on a peritoneal carcinomatosis program at a tertiary care hospital, in whom complete or optimal cytoreduction was achieved, were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 111 patients were included in this study. CRP and NRL values prior to surgery and during the first four postoperative days (PODs) were recorded, along with immunonutrition intake. Their association with OPI and intra-abdominal infections during the first week after surgery was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 111 patients included, 19 presented OPI and 8 intra-abdominal infections. Patients with infections had a higher number of digestive anastomoses than those without (1 vs 0.5, P = 0.053 and 1.2 vs 0.6, P = 0.049) and longer length of stay (19 vs 14.9 days, P = 0.022 and 22.3 vs 15.1 days, P = 0.006). CRP values above 118 mg/L on POD3 yielded a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 74.2% to detect OPI. No differences in NLR values were observed. Patients with immunonutrition intake had higher CRP levels regardless of whether they presented OPI. Subsequently, on POD3 and POD4, patients with OPI presented with higher levels of CRP than patients without infection, regardless of the immunonutrition intake.

CONCLUSION

CRP levels are useful to detect early OPI in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing CRS. A cut-off value of 118 mg/L on POD3 yields the best sensitivity and specificity.

The prognostic value of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in predicting survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the utility of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) has become increasingly significant in diagnostic settings. This study provides a five-year follow-up on a previous pilot study that demonstrated the feasibility of PET/MRI in predicting the resectability of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). We aimed to evaluate whether this imaging modality could further serve as a prognostic tool for survival in AEG patients.

METHODS

A total of 22 patients were included in the initial pilot study, with 17 of them undergoing surgery. All patients underwent three series of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NT). This follow-up study retrospectively analyzed the correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standard uptake value (SUV) measurements of the primary tumor from the original study with overall survival and recurrence. ADC and SUV values were measured prior to initiation of NT, and again 17-21 days into the first cycle of NT-administration, and the differences between the scans were calculated as ∆SUVmax, ∆ADCb0, and ∆ADCb50. Early treatment response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Binary logistic regression was employed to evaluate the predictive values of ADC and SUV parameters, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

As of January 7, 2022, 8 of the 22 patients were still alive. The AUC was calculated to assess the association of imaging parameters with long-term survival: ∆SUVmax: AUC = 0.74, sensitivity, 87.5%, specificity 62.5% (p = 0.037). ∆ADCb0: AUC = 0.62, sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 57.1% (p = 0.400). ∆ADCb50: AUC = 0.78, sensitivity 78.6%, specificity 85.7% (p = 0.011). Combining all three parameters yielded an AUC of 0.81, with a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 85.7% (p = 0.002). The results for individual measurements were: SUVmax(pre-NT): AUC = 0.56, sensitivity 78.6%, specificity 50% (p = 0.646). SUVmax(post-NT): AUC = 0.81, sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 87.5% (p = 0.002). ADCb0(pre-NT): AUC = 0.55, sensitivity 71.4%, specificity 62.5% (p = 0.682). ADCb0(post-NT): AUC = 0.63, sensitivity 78.6%, specificity 57.1% (p = 0.339). ADCb50(pre-NT): AUC = 0.51, sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 37.5% (p = 0.952). ADCb50(post-NT): AUC = 0.63, sensitivity 42.9%, specificity 100% (p = 0.279). No significant correlation was found between RECIST group and survival status (p = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that PET/MRI is feasible for predicting long-term survival in AEG patients. The highest AUCs were achieved when combining SUV and ADC parameters, and when using post-NT SUVmax alone.

Cancer recurrence and survival among patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment and surgery for esophageal cancer: A single-institution 10-year experience

BACKGROUND

Standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer is neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection. The objective of this study is to explore perioperative factors associated with recurrence and survival among patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on all consecutive minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy cases for esophageal cancer performed from September 2013 to September 2023 was performed. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were used explore the risk and protective factors associated with recurrence-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, 222 consecutive patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy were included. On univariable analysis, hypertension, Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Group, N stage, number of positive lymph nodes, lymphovascular invasion, cellular differentiation, and positive margins were associated with recurrence. Age, N stage, number of positive lymph nodes, lymphovascular invasion, and cellular differentiation were associated with a worse overall survival. On multivariable analysis, N stage (1.911 [1.295-2.819], P = .009) and worsening cellular differentiation (2.042 [1.036-4.025], P = .039) remained risk factors for recurrence, whereas older age (1.056 [1.013-1.102], P = .011) and cellular differentiation (1.949 [1.004-3.782], P = .049) remained significantly associated with a greater risk of death.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that older age and cellular differentiation are strong independent risk factors associated with overall survival. N stage and age are strong independent risk factors associated with both recurrence and survival. These findings may help guide treatment options and shared decision-making among patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer on the basis of their risk and protective factors to maximize recurrence-free and overall survival.

The Effect of Postoperative Sepsis on 1-Year Mortality and Cancer Recurrence Following Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal-Gastric Junction Adenocarcinomas: A Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) is used for specific gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. THE is a high-risk surgical procedure. We aimed to assess the impact of postoperative sepsis (sepsis or septic shock) on the 1-year mortality after THE and to determine the risk factors associated with these outcomes. Secondly, we aimed to assess the impact of postoperative sepsis and other risk factors on 1-year cancer recurrence.

METHOD

A retrospective, observational study was undertaken at the Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, from January 2012 to March 2022.

RESULTS

Of 118 patients, 24.6% (n = 29) presented with postoperative sepsis. Their 1-year mortality was 11% (n = 13), and their 1-year cancer recurrence was 23.7% (n = 28). In the multivariate analysis, independent factors for 1-year mortality were the following: postoperative sepsis (OR: 7.22 (1.11-47); p = 0.038), number of lymph nodes removed (OR: 0. 78 (0.64-0.95); p = 0.011), recurrence at one year (OR: 9.22 (1.66-51.1); p = 0.011), mediastinitis (OR: 17.7 (1.43-220); p = 0.025) and intraoperative driving pressure (OR: 1.77 (1.17-2.68); p = 0.015). For postoperative sepsis, independent factors were low-dose vasopressors (OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.95; p = 0.049), a cervical abscess (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 1.5-18.9; p = 0.01), bacterial pneumonia (OR: 11.1; 95% CI: 2.99-41.0; p < 0.001) and a high SOFA score on day 1 (OR: 2.65; 95% CI: 1.36-5.19; p = 0.04). For 1-year cancer recurrence, independent factors were the number of lymph nodes removed (sHR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.79-0.96; p = 0.005), pTNM stages of III or IV (sHR: 8.29; 95% CI: 2.71-25.32; p < 0.001) and postoperative sepsis (sHR: 6.54; 95% CI: 1.70-25.13; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that after THE, postoperative sepsis influences survival and cancer recurrence. We identified the associated risk factors, suggesting an early diagnosis might decrease mortality and recurrence.

Evaluation of gastric tube blood flow by multispectral camera and fluorescence angiography

Background

Evidence regarding the application of the multispectral camera for blood flow measurement is insufficient, and its performance has not been compared with the conventional indocyanine green (ICG) method. Therefore, we retrospectively compared the effectiveness of a new multispectral camera for non-invasive, real-time, quantitative imaging of tissue oxygen (O2) saturation and hemoglobin (Hb) levels and commercially available ICG fluorescence imaging in hemodynamic assessment of gastric tubes in esophagectomy.

Methods

Thirty patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer were included in this study. The multispectral camera was used to measure tissue O2 saturation and Hb levels. The ICG fluorescence imaging, with the analysis software tool Lumi view, was employed to record ICG luminance changes, with values measured at the anastomotic site. Furthermore, the usefulness of each assessment device was examined using the arterial and venous blood flow indices as cutoff lines for cases with anastomotic failure.

Results

In the evaluation of arterial perfusion, anastomotic leak occurred in three of the five (60 %) patients with arterial insufficiency as assessed by the ICG imaging, while anastomotic leakage occurred in all three patients (100 %) who were assessed as having arterial insufficiency by the multispectral camera. In the evaluation of venous perfusion, anastomotic leakage occurred in three of the nine (33.3 %) patients diagnosed with venous stasis by the IC imaging and in three of the five (60 %) patients assessed by the multispectral camera.

Conclusion

The multispectral camera assessed gastric tube blood flow more accurately than the ICG fluorescence method.

Pre-operative psoas muscle index, a surrogate for sarcopenia; as a predictor of post-esophagectomy complications

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy is the standard of care for curative esophageal cancer. However, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Esophageal cancer is known to negatively affect the nutritional status of patients and many manifest cancer sarcopenia. At present, measures of sarcopenia involve complex and often subjective measurements. We assess whether the Psoas Muscle Index (PMI); an inexpensive, simple, validated method used to diagnose sarcopenia, can be used to predict adverse outcomes in patients after curative esophagectomy.

METHODS

Multi-centre, retrospective cohort between 2010-2020, involving all consecutive patients undergoing curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in University Malaya Medical Centre, Sungai Buloh Hospital, and Sultanah Aminah Hospital. The cut-off value differentiating low and normal PMI is defined as 443mm2/m2 in males and 326326 mm2/m2 in females. Complications were recorded using the Clavien-Dindo Scale.

RESULTS

There was no statistical correlation between PMI and major post-esophagectomy complications (p-value: 0.495). However, complication profile was different, and patients with low PMIs had higher 30-day mortality (21.7%) when compared with patients with normal PMI (8.1%) (p-value: 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Although PMI did not significantly predict post-esophagectomy complications, low PMI correlates with higher 30-day mortality, reflecting a lower tolerance for complications among these patients. PMI is a useful, inexpensive tool to identify sarcopenia and aids the patient selection process. This alerts healthcare professionals to institute intensive physiotherapy and nutritional optimization prior to esophagectomy.

Long-term survival is not affected by severity of complications following esophagectomy

INTRODUCTION

Outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer have continued to improve over the last 30 years. Post-operative complications impact upon peri-operative and short-term survival but the effect on long-term survival remains debated. This study aims to investigate the effect of post-operative complications on long-term survival following esophagectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent an esophagectomy between January 2010 and January 2019 were included from a single high-volume center. Data was collected contemporaneously. Patients were separated into three groups; those who experienced no, or very minor complications (Clavien-Dindo 0 or 1), minor complications (Clavien-Dindo 2), and major complications (Clavien-Dindo 3-4), at 30 days. To correct for short-term mortality effects, those who died during the index hospital admission were excluded. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and log rank testing.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 721 patients. There were 42.4% (306/721), 29.5% (213/721) and 25.7% (185/721) in the Clavien-Dindo 0-1, Clavien-Dindo 2, and Clavien-Dindo 3-4 group respectively. Seventeen patients (2.4%) died during their index hospital admission and were therefore excluded. There was no significant difference between median survival across the 3 groups (50, 57 and 52 months). Across all 3 groups, overall long-term survival rates were equivalent at 1 (87.5%, 84.9%, 83.2%), 3 (59.7%, 59.6%, 54.2%), and 5 years (43.9%, 48.9%, 45.7%) (p = 0.806). The only factors independently associated with survival in this cohort, were male gender, Charlson comorbidity index, and overall pathological stage of disease.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival is not affected by peri-operative complications, irrespective of severity, following esophagectomy. Further study into the long-term quality of life is required.

Nomogram incorporating prognostic immune-inflammatory-nutritional score for survival prediction in pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Prognosis prediction for pancreatic cancer has always been difficult in clinical practice because of its high heterogeneity and mortality. The aim of the study was to assess the value of prognostic immune-inflammatory-nutritional (PIIN) score on overall survival (OS) in postoperative patients with pancreatic cancer and to develop a nomogram incorporating PIIN score.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the clinic pathological data of 155 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent radical surgery. PIIN score was calculated by measuring the fibrinogen (FIB), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI). Patients were divided into two groups by PIIN score levels over a threshold of 37.2. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using the Cox regression analysis model. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to compare the prognostic values of the scoring systems. Finally, a nomogram based on PIIN score was constructed and validated.

RESULTS

Multivariate regression analysis showed that PIIN score (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.171, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.207-3.906, P = 0.010), lymphovascular invasion (HR = 1.663, 95% CI = 1.081-2.557, P = 0.021), poor tumor grade (HR = 2.577, 95% CI = 1.668-3.982, P < 0.001), bad TNM stage (I vs. II: HR = 1.791, 95% CI = 1.103-2.906, P = 0.018; I vs. III: HR = 4.313, 95% CI = 2.365-7.865, P < 0.001) and without adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.552, 95% CI = 0.368-0.829, P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for OS. The time-dependent ROC curves revealed that PIIN score was better than the other scoring systems in predicting survival prognosis. And last, the nomogram established from independent factors such as PIIN score had good predictive power for OS. The ROC curve results showed that the AUC values for 1, 3 and 5 years were 0.826, 0.798 and 0.846, respectively. The calibration plots showed the superior clinical applicability of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram model based on PIIN score can be utilized as one of the prognosis stratifications as well as postoperative follow-up for the development of individual treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Achievements of perioperative assist team medical care in esophageal cancer surgery, Tokushima University Hospital

BACKGROUND

Radical esophagectomy is highly invasive and associated with many postoperative complications. A decline in postoperative QOL is a serious issue for patients, and comprehensive perioperative management through multidisciplinary cooperation is necessary. Our institution has established a perioperative assist team (OPERA) to address this need since 2017.

METHODS

This study included 109 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and esophagectomy from 2009 to 2018. O group, means OPERA intervention group, included 57 patients, and N group, means Non-OPERA intervention group, included 52 patients. The effects of the OPERA intervention on reducing chemotherapy-related adverse events and improving postoperative outcomes were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS

The OPERA intervention significantly reduced the incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events (P=0.002). In particular, anorexia and diarrhea, febrile neutropenia were significantly reduced (P<0.001, P=0.002, P=0.025, respectively). Postoperatively, the start date of walking was significantly earlier (P<0.001), the incidence of pneumonia was lower (P=0.022). At the time of postoperative discharge, N group was significantly greater weight loss compared to O group (P=0.002). The 5-year survival rate was longer in O group (P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

The OPERA intervention reduced the incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events and postoperative complications and helped improved prognosis. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 279-285, August, 2024.

Comparison of two different methods for lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Lymph nodes along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (LRLN) is thought to be highly involved in esophageal cancer. Given the unique anatomical positioning of the nerve, performing lymphadenectomy in this region requires advanced techniques within limited working space. Meanwhile, high incidence of morbidity and mortality is associated with lymphadenectomy. Although several methods have been applied to reduce the technical requirement and the incidence of postoperative complication, the optimal method remains controversial.

METHODS

This study was a single-center, prospective, randomized trial to investigate the utility of lymphadenectomy along the LRLN during the minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients by comparing the surgical outcome, postoperative complication, survival rate, and quality of life (QoL) between the retraction method (RM) and the suspension method (SM) in patients with esophageal cancer from June 2018 to November 2020. QoL was assessed according to questionnaire: EQ-5D-5L.

RESULTS

Of 94 patients were enrolled and randomized allocated to RM and SM group equally. Characteristics did not differ between groups. The duration of lymph node dissection along LRLN was significant longer in SM group ( P <0.001). No difference was observed about postoperative complications. One of in-hospital death was occurred in each group ( P >0.999). Patients in neither of groups exhibiting difference about 3-year disease-free survival rate ( P =0.180) and overall survival rate ( P =0.430). No difference was observed in postoperative QoL between groups at different time points (all, P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both methods of lymph node dissection along the LRLN during minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients are technically feasible and safe. The RM appears more favorable in terms of reducing surgical duration compared to the SM.

Efficacy of Biomarkers in Predicting Anastomotic Leakage After Gastrointestinal Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Our systematic review and meta-analysis were designed to evaluate the published literature from 2016 to 2019 on which the role of biomarkers in predicting the anastomotic leakage (AL) in gastroesophageal cancer surgery was investigated. This extensive literature search was conducted on the principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) were used to gather the relevant information. No restrictions were made on the type of biomarkers. Wald or likelihood ratio (LRT) fixed effect tests were used to estimate the pooled prevalence to generate the proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and model-fitted weights. For analyzing heterogeneity, the Cochran Q test and I square test were used. The Egger regression asymmetry test and funnel plot were used for publication. In this meta-analysis, a total of 15 studies were recruited with 1892 patients undergoing the resection. The pooled elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) was observed as 13.9% ranging from 11.6% to 16.1%. The pooled prevalence of other biomarkers with AL was observed as 4.4%. Significant heterogeneity was observed between studies that reported CRP and other biomarkers (92% each with chi-squared values of 78.80 and 122.78, respectively). However, no significant publication was observed between studies (p=0.61 and p=0.11, respectively). We concluded our study on this note that different biomarkers are involved in the diagnosis of AL. However, all these biomarkers are poor predictors with insufficient predictive value and sensitivity.

The influence of short-term postoperative outcomes on overall survival after gastric cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in combination with perioperative chemotherapy is the cornerstone of modern curative treatment for gastric adenocarcinoma. The primary objective of this study was to assess the influence of textbook outcome, postoperative complications, and readmission on survival in patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent curative and prophylactic gastric resections from 2014 to 2022 at Christchurch Hospital were identified from the hospital database. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess risk factors for each postoperative outcome. A survival analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of these outcomes on overall survival.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients underwent a gastric resection during the study period. Thirteen were prophylactic resections for E-cadherin gene mutations and 64 were for malignancy. The overall postoperative complication rate was 34%, with an anastomotic leak rate of 8% (n = 6). The 30-day readmission rate, 30-day mortality rate and 90-day mortality rate were 17%, 1%, and 5% respectively. No sociodemographic differences were identified in each outcome. An increasing day-4 CRP trajectory was observed in patients with an anastomotic leak. Postoperative complications and nodal disease were independent prognostic factors for reduced survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Textbook outcome, postoperative complications, and readmission are validated quality performance indicators of gastric cancer surgery. Postoperative complications are associated with poor overall survival independent of severity or type. The underlying mechanisms of this influence remain elusive. The aggressive biology of gastric cancer, combined with the surgical morbidity and its negative influence on survival, highlights the importance of ongoing quality improvement.

Preoperative Risk Stratification in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Comparing Risk Models with the Clinical Judgment of the Surgeon

BACKGROUND

Numerous prediction models estimating the risk of complications after esophagectomy exist but are rarely used in practice. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical judgment of surgeons using these prediction models.

METHODS

Patients with resectable esophageal cancer who underwent an esophagectomy were included in this prospective study. Prediction models for postoperative complications after esophagectomy were selected by a systematic literature search. Clinical judgment was given by three surgeons, indicating their estimated risk for postoperative complications in percentage categories. The best performing prediction model was compared with the judgment of the surgeons, using the net reclassification improvement (NRI), category-free NRI (cfNRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) indexes.

RESULTS

Overall, 159 patients were included between March 2019 and July 2021, of whom 88 patients (55%) developed a complication. The best performing prediction model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.56. The three surgeons had an AUC of 0.53, 0.55, and 0.59, respectively, and all surgeons showed negative percentages of cfNRIevents and IDIevents, and positive percentages of cfNRInonevents and IDIevents. This indicates that in the group of patients with postoperative complications, the prediction model performed better, whereas in the group of patients without postoperative complications, the surgeons performed better. NRIoverall was 18% for one surgeon, while the remainder of the NRIoverall, cfNRIoverall and IDIoverall scores showed small differences between surgeons and the prediction models.

CONCLUSION

Prediction models tend to overestimate the risk of any complication, whereas surgeons tend to underestimate this risk. Overall, surgeons' estimations differ between surgeons and vary between similar to slightly better than the prediction models.

The association between postoperative complications and long-term survival after esophagectomy: a multicenter cohort study

Conflicting results are reported on the association between post-esophagectomy complications and long-term survival. This multicenter study assesses the association between complications after an esophagectomy and long-term overall survival. Five Dutch high-volume centers collected data from consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy between 2010 and 2016 and merged these with long-term survival data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Exclusion criteria were non-curative resections and 90-day mortality, among others. Primary outcome was overall survival related to the presence of a postoperative complication in general. Secondary outcomes analyzed the presence of anastomotic leakage and cardiopulmonary complications. Propensity score matching was performed and the outcomes were analyzed via Log-Rank test and Kaplan Meier analysis. Among the 1225 patients included, a complicated course occurred in 719 patients (59.0%). After matching for baseline characteristics, 455 pairs were successfully balanced. Patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course had a 5-year overall survival of 51.7% versus 44.4% in patients with complications (P = 0.011). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 18.4% (n = 226), and in 208 matched pairs, it was shown that the 5-year overall survival was 57.2% in patients without anastomotic leakage versus 44.0% in patients with anastomotic leakage (P = 0.005). Overall cardiopulmonary complication rate was 37.1% (n = 454), and in 363 matched pairs, the 5-year overall survival was 52.1% in patients without cardiopulmonary complications versus 45.3% in patients with cardiopulmonary complications (P = 0.019). Overall postoperative complication rate, anastomotic leakage, and cardiopulmonary complications were associated with a decreased long-term survival after an esophagectomy. Efforts to reduce complications might further improve the overall survival for patients treated for esophageal carcinoma.

Learning curve for adoption of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review of oncological, clinical, and efficiency outcomes

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is gaining increasing popularity as an operative approach. Learning curves to achieve surgical competency in robotic-assisted techniques have shown significant variation in learning curve lengths and outcomes. This study aimed to summarize the current literature on learning curves for RAMIE.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were searched, and articles reporting on learning curves in RAMIE were identified and scrutinized. Studies were eligible if they reported changes in operative outcomes over time, or learning curves, for surgeons newly adopting RAMIE.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies reporting on 1767 patients were included. Nine studies reported on surgeons with prior experience of robot-assisted surgery prior to adopting RAMIE, with only four studies outlining a specified RAMIE adoption pathway. Learning curves were most commonly analyzed using cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) and were typically reported for lymph node yields and operative times, with significant variation in learning curve lengths (18-73 cases and 20-80 cases, respectively). Most studies reported adoption without significant impact on clinical outcomes such as anastomotic leak; significant learning curves were more likely in studies, which did not report a formal learning or adoption pathway.

CONCLUSION

Reported RAMIE adoption phases are variable, with some authors suggesting significant impact to patients. With robust training through formal programmes or proctorship, however, others report RAMIE adoption without impact on clinical outcomes. A formalized adoption curriculum appears critical to prevent adverse effects on operative efficiency and patient care.

Esophagectomy Complications Impact Long-term Survival: A National Cancer Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of prolonged length of stay (LOS) after esophagectomy on long term survival.

BACKGROUND

Complications after esophagectomy have a significant impact in short-term survival. The specific effect of prolonged LOS after esophagectomy is unclear. We hypothesized that postoperative complications that occur after esophagectomy, resulting in prolonged LOS, have a detrimental effect on long term survival.

METHODS

All patients undergoing esophagectomy between 2004 and 2014 were identified in the National Cancer Database. To eliminate the confounding effect of short-term mortality, we included only patients who survived at least 90 days postoperatively. Demographics, disease characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Postoperative LOS was used as a surrogate for postoperative complications. The highest quintile of LOS was defined as excessive LOS (ELOS). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards survival analyses were performed to examine survival.

RESULTS

A total of 20,719 patients were identified. Of those 3826 had ELOS, with median LOS 26days (range 18-168days). Their median survival was 30.6 months compared to 53.6 months in the entire non-ELOS group (P < 0.0001). After multivariate analysis ELOS (odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.46-1.67) was an independent predictor of overall mortality. Higher disease stage, higher age, male sex, higher Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score, and readmission after discharge were also significant negative predictors of long-term survival, whereas surgery in an academic institution, being at the highest income quartile and having private or Medicare insurance predicted longer survival (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Postoperative complications after esophagectomy, resulting in ELOS, predict lower long-term survival independent of other factors. Counseling patients about surgery should include the detrimental long-term effects of postoperative complications and ELOS. Avoiding ELOS (LOS exceeding 18 days) could be considered a quality metric after esophagectomy.

Effect of Thoracic Surgery Regionalization on 1- and 3-Year Survival after Cancer Esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether our previously reported improvements in short-term cancer esophagectomy outcomes after large-scale regionalization in the United States translated to longer-term survival benefit.

BACKGROUND

Regionalization is associated with better early postoperative outcomes following cancer esophagectomy; however, data regarding its effect on long-term survival are mixed.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 461 patients undergoing cancer esophagectomy before (2009-2013, N = 272) and after (2014-2016, N = 189) regionalization. Kaplan-Meier curves and chi-square tests were used to describe 1- and 3-year survival in each era. Hierarchical logistic regression models examined the adjusted effect of regionalization on mortality.

RESULTS

Compared to pre-regionalization patients, post-regionalization patients had significantly higher 1-year survival (83.1% vs 73.9%, P = 0.02) but not 3-year survival (52.9% vs 58.2%, P = 0.26).Subgroup analysis by cancer stage revealed that 1-year survival benefit was only significant among mid-stage (IIB-IIIB) patients, whereas differences in 3-year survival only approached significance among early-stage (IA-IIA) patients.In multivariable analysis, only regionalization was a predictor of lower mortality at 1 year [odds ratio (OR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-1.00], and only thoracic specialty at 3years (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.38-0.99). Older age, more advanced stage, and complications were associated with higher 1- and 3-year mortality. Comorbidity, minimally invasive approach, surgeon volume, facility volume, and neoadjuvant treatment were not significant in this model.

CONCLUSIONS

Regionalization was associated with improved 1-year survival after cancer esophagectomy, independent of factors such as morbidity or volume in our adjusted models. This survival benefit did not persist at 3 years, likely due to the aggressive nature of the disease.

Anastomotic Leaks following Esophagectomy for Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: The Key Is the Multidisciplinary Management

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is associated with high mortality and impaired quality of life.

AIM

The objective of this work was to determine the effectiveness of management of esophageal anastomotic leakage (EAL) after esophagectomy for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer.

METHODS

Patients submitted to esophagectomy for esophageal and GEJ cancer at a tertiary oncology hospital between 2014 and 2019 (n = 119) were retrospectively reviewed and EAL risk factors and its management outcomes determined.

RESULTS

Older age and nodal disease were identified as independent risk factors for anastomotic leak (adjusted OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.13, and adjusted OR 4.89, 95% CI 1.09-21.8). Patients with EAL spent more days in the intensive care unit (ICU; median 14 vs. 4 days) and had higher 30-day mortality (15 vs. 2%) and higher in-hospital mortality (35 vs. 4%). The first treatment option was surgical in 13 patients, endoscopic in 10, and conservative in 3. No significant differences were noticeable between these patients, but sepsis and large leakages were tendentially managed by surgery. At follow-up, 3 patients in the surgery group (23%) and 9 in the endoscopic group (90%) were discharged under an oral diet (p = 0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate was 38% in the surgical group, 33% in the conservative group, and 10% in endoscopic group (p = 0.132). In patients with EAL, the presence of septic shock at leak diagnosis was the only predictor of mortality (p = 0.004). ICU length-of-stay was non-significantly lower in the endoscopic therapy group (median 4 days, vs. 16 days in the surgical group, p = 0.212).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for EAL may help change pre-procedural optimization. The results of this study suggest including an endoscopic approach for EAL.

Anastomotic Leakage after Oesophagectomy: Upper Endoscopy or Computed Tomography First? Time Is of the Essence

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic leakage (AL) following oesophageal surgery is the most feared complication. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to diagnose it in a timely and safe manner. The diagnostic algorithm, however, differs across institutions world-wide, with no clear consensus or guidelines. The aim of this study was to analyse whether computed tomography (CT) or upper endoscopy (UE) should be performed first.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Records of 185 patients undergoing oesophageal surgery for underlying malignancy were analysed. All patients that developed an AL were further analysed. Results of CT and UE were compared to calculate sensitivity.

RESULTS

Overall, 33 out of 185 patients were diagnosed with an AL after oesophagectomy. All patients received a CT and a UE. The CT identified 23 out of 33 patients correctly. Sensitivity was 69.7% for CT, compared to 100% for UE.

CONCLUSION

If patients are clinically suspicious regarding development of an AL after oesophagectomy, UE should be performed prior to CT as it has a sensitivity of 100%. In addition, treatment by means of endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) or self-expanding-metal stents (SEMS) can be initiated promptly.

Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is one of the most feared complications, which results in increased morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a powered circular stapler on complications after esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for esophageal cancer. Between May 2019 and July 2021, all consecutive oesophagectomies for cancer with intrathoracic anastomosis in a high-volume center were included in this retrospective study. Surgeons were free to choose either a manual or a powered circular stapler. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative complications were recorded in a prospective database, according to EsoData. Propensity score matching (age, body mass index, Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance and neoadjuvant therapy) was conducted to reduce potential confounding. We included 128 patients. Powered and manual circular staplers were used in 62 and 66 patients, respectively. Fewer anastomotic leakages were observed with the powered stapler group (OR = 7.3 (95%CI: 1.58-33.7); [3.2% (n = 2) vs 19.7% (n = 13), respectively; p = 0.004]). After propensity score matching, this remained statistically significant (OR = 8.5 (95%CI: 1.80-40.1); [4.1% (n = 2) vs 20.4% (n = 10), respectively; p = 0.013]). Additionally, anastomotic diameter was significantly higher with the powered stapler (median: 29 mm (63.3%) vs 25 mm (57.1%), respectively; p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in comprehensive complication index (p = 0.146). A decreased mean length of stay was observed in the powered stapler group (11.1 vs 18.7 days respectively; p = 0.022). Postoperative anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection was significantly reduced after the introduction of the powered circular stapler, consequently resulting in a reduced length of stay. Further evaluation on long-term strictures and quality of life are warranted to support these results.

C-reactive protein identifies patients at low risk of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy

PURPOSE

Fast-track protocols are increasingly used after digestive surgery. After esophagectomy, the gravity and the fear of anastomotic leak may be an obstacle to generalization of such protocols. C-reactive protein (CRP) might be a reliable tool to identify patients at low risk of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy, so that they can be safely included in a fast-track program. The aim of our retrospective bicentric study is to evaluate the interest of C-reactive protein measurement for the early diagnosis of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

METHODS

Patients having undergone Ivor-Lewis procedure between January 2009 and September 2017 were included in this bicentric retrospective study. CRP values were recorded between postoperative day 3 (POD 3) and postoperative day 5 (POD 5). All postoperative complications were recorded, and the primary endpoint was anastomotic leak.

RESULTS

We included 585 patients. Among them, 241 (41.2%) developed infectious complications and 69 patients (11.8%) developed anastomotic leak. CRP had the best predictive value on POD 5 (AUC = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.67-0.81). On POD 5, a cut-off value of 130 mg/L yielded a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 51%, and a negative predictive value of 96% for the detection of anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSIONS

CRP may help in identifying patients at very low risk of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Patients with CRP values < 130 mg/L on POD 5 can safely undertake an enhanced recovery protocol.

Is there a relationship between two different anesthetic methods and postoperative length of stay during radical resection of malignant esophageal tumors in China?: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Data providing a relationship between the anesthetic method and postoperative length of stay (PLOS) is limited. We aimed to investigate whether general anesthesia alone or combined with epidural anesthesia might affect perioperative risk factors and PLOS for patients undergoing radical resection of malignant esophageal tumors.

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 680 patients who underwent a radical esophageal malignant tumor resection in a Chinese hospital from January 01, 2010, to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome measure was PLOS, and the secondary outcome was perioperative risk-related parameters that affect PLOS. The independent variable was the type of anesthesia: general anesthesia (GA) or combined epidural-general anesthesia (E-GA). The dependent variable was PLOS. We conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching to compare the relationships of GA and E-GA with PLOS and identify the perioperative risk factors for PLOS. In this cohort study, the confounders included sociodemographic data, preoperative chemotherapy, coexisting diseases, laboratory parameters, intraoperative variables, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In all patients, the average PLOS was 19.85 ± 12.60 days. There was no significant difference in PLOS between the GA group and the E-GA group either before or after propensity score matching (20.01 days ± 14.90 days vs. 19.79 days ± 11.57 days, P = 0.094, 18.09 ± 9.71 days vs. 19.39 ± 10.75 days, P = 0.145). The significant risk factors for increased PLOS were lung infection (β = 3.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.54-5.52), anastomotic leakage (β = 25.73, 95% CI: 22.11-29.34), and surgical site infection (β = 9.39, 95% CI: 4.10-14.68) by multivariate regression analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association between PLOS and vasoactive drug use, blood transfusions, and open esophagectomy. The results remained essentially the same (stable and reliable) after subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is no significant association between the type of anesthesia(GA or E-GA) and PLOS for patients undergoing radical esophageal malignant tumor resection, an association between PLOS and lung infection, anastomotic leakage, and surgical site infection was determined by multivariate regression analysis. A larger sample future study design may verify our results.

Does chronic kidney disease affect the complications and prognosis of patients after primary colorectal cancer surgery?

BACKGROUND

The effect of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after primary CRC surgery is controversial.

AIM

To analyze whether CKD had specific effect on the outcomes after CRC surgery.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases and CNKI, from inception to March 14, 2022. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for the quality assessment in this meta-analysis, and we used RevMan 5.3 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies including 47771 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. No significant difference was found in terms of overall postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR) = 1.78, 95%CI: 0.64-4.94, P = 0.27]. We analyzed the specific complications and found that the CKD group had higher rates of pulmonary infection (OR = 2.70, 95%CI: 1.82-4.00, P < 0.01), cardiovascular complications (OR = 3.39, 95%CI: 2.34-4.91, P < 0.01) and short-term death (OR = 3.01, 95%CI: 2.20-4.11, P < 0.01). After pooling the hazard ratio (HR), the CKD group had worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.04-2.20, P = 0.03). We performed subgroup analyses of the dialysis and non-dialysis groups, and no significant difference was found in the non-dialysis group (HR = 1.20, 95%CI: 0.98-1.47, P = 0.08). The dialysis group had worse OS (HR = 3.36, 95%CI: 1.92-5.50, P < 0.01) than the non-dialysis group. The CKD group had worse disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.12-1.78, P < 0.01), and in the subgroup analysis of the dialysis and non-dialysis groups, no significant difference was found in the non-dialysis group (HR = 1.27, 95%CI: 0.97-1.66, P = 0.08). The dialysis group had worse OS (HR = 1.95, 95%CI: 1.23-3.10, P < 0.01) than the non-dialysis group.

CONCLUSION

Preexisting CKD was associated with higher rates of pulmonary infection, higher rates of short-term death, and worse OS and poorer DFS following CRC surgery.

Serum albumin at resection predicts in-hospital death, while serum lactate and aPTT on the first postoperative day anticipate anastomotic leakage after Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy

Background

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication after esophagectomy, potentiating morbidity and mortality. There are several patient risk factors associated with AL, but high-fidelity postoperative predictors are still under debate. The aim was to identify novel reliable predictors for AL after esophagectomy.

Methods

A high-volume single-center database study, including 138 patients receiving Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy between 2017 and 2019, was performed. Serum levels of albumin, aPTT, and lactate before and after surgery were extracted to assess their impact on AL and in-hospital mortality.

Results

High serum lactate on postoperative day 1 (POD1) could be shown to predict AL after esophagectomy [AL vs. no AL: 1.2 (0.38) vs. 1.0 (0.37); p < 0.001]. Accordingly, also differences of serum lactate level between end (POD0-2) and start of surgery (POD0-1) (p < 0.001) as well as between POD1 and POD0-1 (p < 0.001) were associated with AL. Accordingly, logistic regression identified serum lactate on POD 1 as an independent predictor of AL [HR: 4.37 (95% CI: 1.28–14.86); p = 0.018]. Further, low serum albumin on POD0 [2.6 (0.53) vs. 3.1 (0.56); p = 0.001] and high serum lactate on POD 0–1 [1.1 (0.29) vs. 0.9 (0.30); p = 0.043] were associated with in-hospital death. Strikingly, logistic-regression (HR: 0.111; p = 0.008) and cox-regression analysis (HR: 0.118; p = 0.003) showed low serum albumin as an independently predictor for in-hospital death after esophagectomy.

Conclusions

This study identified high serum lactate as an independent predictor of AL and low serum albumin as a high-fidelity predictor of in-hospital death after esophagectomy. These parameters can facilitate improved postoperative treatment leading to better short-term as well as long-term outcomes.

Evaluation of International Contemporary Operative Outcomes and Management Trends Associated With Esophagectomy: A 4-Year Study of >6000 Patients Using ECCG Definitions and the Online Esodata Database

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to verify the utility of international online datasets to benchmark and monitor treatment and outcomes in major oncologic procedures.

BACKGROUND

The Esophageal Complication Consensus Group (ECCG) has standardized the reporting of complications after esophagectomy within the web-based Esodata.org database. This study will utilize the Esodata dataset to update contemporary outcomes and to monitor trends in practice in an era of rapid technical change.

METHODS

This observational study, based on a prospectively developed specific database, updates esophagectomy outcomes collected between 2015 and 2018. Evolution in patient and operative demographics, treatment, complications, and quality outcome measures were compared between patients undergoing surgery in 2015 to 2016 and 2017 to 2018.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2018, 6022 esophagectomies from 39 centers were entered into Esodata. Most patients were male (78.3%) with median age 63. Patients having minimally invasive esophagectomy constituted 3177 (52.8%), a chest anastomosis 3838 (63.7%), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy 2834 (48.7%), and R0 resections 5441 (93.5%). For quality measures, 30- and 90-day mortality was 2.0% and 4.5%, readmissions 9.7%, transfusions 12%, escalation in care 22.1%, and discharge home 89.4%. Trends in quality measures between 2015 and 2016 (2407 patients) and 2017 and 2018 (3318 patients) demonstrated significant (P < 0.05) improvements in readmissions 11.1% to 8.5%, blood transfusions 14.3% to 10.2%, and escalation in care from 24.5% to 20% A significantly (P < 0.05) reduced incidence in pneumonia (15.3%-12.8%) and renal failure (1.0%-0.4%) was observed. Anastomotic leak rates increased from 11.7% to 13.1%, whereas leaks requiring surgery decreased 3.3% and 3.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Esodata database provides a valuable resource for assessing contemporary international outcomes. This study highlights an increased application of minimally invasive approaches, a high percentage of complications, improvements in pneumonia and key quality metrics, but with anastomotic leak rates still >10%.

Outcomes after totally minimally invasive versus hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: results from the International Esodata Study Group

BACKGROUND

Large studies comparing totally minimally invasive oesophagectomy (TMIE) with laparoscopically assisted (hybrid) oesophagectomy are lacking. Although randomized trials have compared TMIE invasive with open oesophagectomy, daily clinical practice does not always resemble the results reported in such trials. The aim of the present study was to compare complications after totally minimally invasive, hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

The study was performed using data from the International Esodata Study Group registered between February 2015 and December 2019. The primary outcome was pneumonia, and secondary outcomes included the incidence and severity of anastomotic leakage, (major) complications, duration of hospital stay, escalation of care, and 90-day mortality. Data were analysed using multivariable multilevel models.

RESULTS

Some 8640 patients were included between 2015 and 2019. Patients undergoing TMIE had a lower incidence of pneumonia than those having hybrid (10.9 versus 16.3 per cent; odds ratio (OR) 0.56, 95 per cent c.i. 0.40 to 0.80) or open (10.9 versus 17.4 per cent; OR 0.60, 0.42 to 0.84) oesophagectomy, and had a shorter hospital stay (median 10 (i.q.r. 8-16) days versus 14 (11-19) days (P = 0.041) and 11 (9-16) days (P = 0.027) respectively). The rate of anastomotic leakage was higher after TMIE than hybrid (15.1 versus 10.7 per cent; OR 1.47, 1.01 to 2.13) or open (15.1 versus 7.3 per cent; OR 1.73, 1.26 to 2.38) procedures.

CONCLUSION

Compared with hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy, TMIE resulted in a lower pneumonia rate, a shorter duration of hospital stay, but higher anastomotic leakage rates. Therefore, no clear advantage was seen for either TMIE, hybrid or open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy when performed in daily clinical practice.

The Effect of Postoperative Complications After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy on Long-term Survival: An International Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy is a technically challenging procedure, associated with significant morbidity. The introduction of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has reduced postoperative morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

Although the short-term effect on complications is increasingly being recognized, the impact on long-term survival remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between postoperative complications following MIE and long-term survival.

METHODS

Data were collected from the EsoBenchmark Collaborative composed by 13 high-volume, expert centers routinely performing MIE. Patients operated between June 1, 2011 and May 31, 2016 were included. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. To correct for short-term effects of postoperative complications on mortality, patients who died within 90 days postoperative were excluded. Primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 915 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 30.8 months (standard deviation 17.9). Complications occurred in 542 patients (59.2%) of which 50.2% had a CD grade ≥III complication [ie, (re)intervention, organ dysfunction, or death]. The incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) was 135 of 915 patients (14.8%) of which 84 patients were classified as a CD grade ≥III. Multivariable analysis showed a significantly deteriorated long-term survival in all patients with AL [hazard ratio (HR) 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.24]. This inverse relation was most distinct when AL was scored as a CD grade ≥III (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.30-2.58). For all other complications, no significant association with long-term survival was found.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence and severity of AL, but not overall complications, after MIE negatively affect long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients.

Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after esophagectomy in older adults: A SEER-Medicare analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy is a complex procedure associated with a high rate of postoperative complications. It is not clear whether postoperative complications effect long-term survival. Most studies report the results from single institutions.

METHODS

We examined the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to assess whether long-term overall and cancer-specific mortality of patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer is impacted by postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and forty patients underwent esophagectomy from 2007 to 2014, of which 50 died, resulting in a cohort of 890 patients. Majority were males (n = 764, 85.8%) with adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus. Almost 60% of the group had no neoadjuvant therapy. Four hundred and fifty-five patients had no major complications (51.1%), while 285 (32.0%) and 150 (16.9%) patients had one, two, or more major complications, respectively. Overall survival at 90 days was 93.1%. Multivariate analysis of patients followed up for a minimum of 90 days demonstrated that the number of complications was significantly associated with decreased overall survival but no impact on cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our population-based analysis with its inherent limitations suggests that patients undergoing esophagectomy who experience complications have worse overall survival but not cancer-specific survival if they survive at least 90 days from the date of surgery.

The Academic Facility Is Associated with Higher Utilization of Esophagectomy and Improved Overall Survival for Esophageal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Operable esophageal carcinoma is potentially curable with surgical resection. The short-term outcomes and overall survival rate for operable esophageal carcinoma may be impacted by the healthcare facility type where patients receive care.

METHODS

A total of 37, 271 cases with the American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I, II, and III esophageal carcinoma that were reported to the National Cancer Data Base at over 12,721 facilities were analyzed. Healthcare facilities were dichotomized into the community and academic facility types. Marginal multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate differences in overall survival between facility types, which accounted for facility esophageal cancer volume. Propensity score methodology with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for patient related baseline differences between facility types.

RESULTS

Patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy at academic healthcare facilities had a significantly better overall survival compared with patients who underwent esophagectomy at community healthcare facilities [HR = 0.89: CI [0.84-0.95] (p = 0.0005)]. The rate of esophagectomy was significantly higher at the academic facilities (49.0% versus 26.5%; p < 0.0001). The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates for esophagectomy were significantly better for patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at the academic facility types.

CONCLUSION

Patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal carcinoma who received care at academic facility types had significantly better overall survival compared with community facility types. The utilization of esophagectomy was significantly higher and the short-term surgical outcomes were better for patients treated at academic facility types.

Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Siewert Type II T1 Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Population-Based Study

Background:

Endoscopic resection has been introduced as an alternative treatment for superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), but is limited by positive nodal status. We aimed to investigate the predictors of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with Siewert type II T1 AEG.

Methods:

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify eligible patients with Siewert type II T1 AEG. The prevalence of LNM was assessed. Logistic regression analysis with multivariable adjustment was used to determine predictors of LNM. We also performed Cox regression analysis to examine the prognostic value of LNM, which was further confirmed by competing risk analysis and cumulative incidence function (CIF).

Results:

In total, 2651 patients with T1 AEG were included, with a median age of 69 years and a median follow-up of 28 months. The overall prevalence of LNM was 17.2% in T1 AEG. When stratified by tumor invasion depth, the prevalence of LNM was 8.5% for intramucosal tumors and 22.6% for submucosal tumors. Adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that age, sex, tumor grade, tumor size and tumor infiltration depth were independent predictors of LNM in T1 AEG. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that positive nodal status was significantly associated with worse overall survival and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Subgroup analysis consistently demonstrated that patients with LNM had significantly poorer CSS than those without LNM in most subgroups. Finally, the CIF was calculated, showing that patients with LNM had a significantly higher cancer-specific death rate than those without LNM.

Conclusions:

This population-based study identified age, sex, tumor grade, tumor infiltration depth and tumor size as independent predictors of LNM in T1 AEG. Considering the high prevalence of LNM in T1 AEG, endoscopic resection for curative aims may only be introduced in patients without high risks of LNM.

An Approach to Accelerate Healing and Shorten the Hospital Stay of Patients With Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy: An Explorative Study of Systematic Endoscopic Intervention

Objective

To explore the comprehensive role of systemic endoscopic intervention in healing esophageal anastomotic leak.

Methods

In total, 3919 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy and immediate esophageal reconstruction were screened. In total, 203 patients (5.10%) diagnosed with anastomotic leakage were included. The participants were divided into three groups according to differences in diagnosis and treatment procedures. Ninety-four patients received conventional management, 87 patients received endoscopic diagnosis only, and the remaining 22 patients received systematic endoscopic intervention. The primary endpoint was overall healing of the leak after oncologic esophageal surgery. The secondary endpoints were the time from surgery to recovery and the occurrence of adverse events.

Results

173 (85.2%; 95% CI, 80.3-90.1%) of the 203 patients were successfully healed, with a mean healing time of 66.04 ± 3.59 days (median: 51 days; range: 13-368 days), and the overall healing rates differed significantly among the three groups according to the stratified log-rank test (P<0.001). The median healing time of leakage was 37 days (95% CI: 33.32-40.68 days) in the endoscopic intervention group, 51 days (95% CI: 44.86-57.14 days) in the endoscopic diagnostic group, and 67 days (95% CI: 56.27-77.73 days) in the conventional group. The overall survival rate was 78.7% (95% CI: 70.3 to 87.2%) in the conventional management group, 89.7% (95% CI: 83.1 to 96.2%) in the endoscopic diagnostic group and 95.5% (95% CI: 86.0 to 100%) in the systematic endoscopic intervention group. Landmark analysis indicated that the speed of wound healing in the endoscopic intervention group was 2-4 times faster at any period than that in the conservative group. There were 20 (21.28%) deaths among the 94 patients in the conventional group, 9 (10.34%) deaths among the 87 patients in the endoscopic diagnostic group and 1 (4.55%) death among the 22 patients in the endoscopic intervention group; this difference was statistically significant (Fisher exact test, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Tailored endoscopic treatment for postoperative esophageal anastomotic leakage based on endoscopic diagnosis is feasible and effective. Systematic endoscopic intervention shortened the treatment period and reduced mortality and should therefore be considered in the management of this disease.

Extracapsular lymph node involvement is a robust survival predictor in esophageal cancer patients: A pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

Although extracapsular lymph node involvement (EC-LNI) has been proposed to be incorporated into the staging system of esophageal cancer, the prognostic value of EC-LNI remains controversial with conflicting data available, especially in the era of neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was undertaken using four public databases. Studies investigating the effects of EC-LNI on survival were included. In addition to analysis of the entire cohort, subset analyses were also performed to assess the impact of EC-LNI on patients receiving different treatment modalities.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Pooling 13 studies on overall survival (OS), we observed that presence of EC-LNI was associated with significantly worse OS (HR = 2.09, 95%CI: 1.63-2.68; p < 0.01). Nine studies describing disease-free survival (DFS) included, the pooled data revealed that presence of EC-LNI was associated with significantly worse DFS (HR = 1.89, 95%CI: 1.63-2.20; p < 0.001). Subset analyses of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated a survival disadvantage of EC-LNI on OS (HR = 1.928, 95%CI: 1.196-3.107; p = 0.007) and DFS (HR = 1.985, 95%CI: 1.585-2.487; p < 0.001). Similar result was also seen in patients receiving primary surgery (OS: HR = 2.219, 95%CI: 1.720-2.864; p < 0.001; DFS: HR = 1.659, 95%CI: 1.285-2.141; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EC-LNI is a strong prognostic predictor of inferior survival in patients with esophageal cancer irrespective of treatment modality. The currently pooled evidence indicates that EC-LNI has great potential to be incorporated into the future staging system.

Association of perioperative red blood cell transfusions with all-cause and cancer-specific death in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: Long-term outcomes from a population-based cohort

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell transfusions are common in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Yet, to adequately balance their risks and benefits, clinicians must understand how transfusions may affect long-term outcomes. We aimed to determine if perioperative red blood cell transfusions are associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cancer-specific death among patients who underwent gastrointestinal cancer resection.

METHOD

We identified a population-based cohort of patients who underwent gastrointestinal cancer resection in Ontario, Canada (2007-2019). All-cause death was compared between transfused and nontransfused patients using Cox proportional hazards regression, while cancer-specific death was compared with competing risk regression.

RESULT

A total of 74,962 patients (mean age, 67.7 years; 55.4% male; 79.7% colorectal cancer) had gastrointestinal cancer surgery during the study period; 20.8% received perioperative red blood cell transfusions. Patients who received red blood cell transfusions had increased hazards of all-cause and cancer-specific death relative to patients who did not (hazard ratio: 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.34-1.44; cause-specific hazard ratio: 1.36, 1.30-1.43). The adjusted risk of all-cause death was higher in early follow-up intervals (3-6 months postoperatively) but remained elevated in each interval over 5 years. The association persisted after restricting to patients without postoperative complications or bleeding and was robust to unmeasured confounding.

CONCLUSION

Red blood cell transfusion among patients with gastrointestinal cancer is associated with increased all-cause death. This was observed long beyond the immediate postoperative period and independent of short-term postoperative morbidity and mortality. These findings should help clinicians balance the risks and benefits of transfusion before well-designed trials are conducted in this patient population.

Geriatric assessment and intervention in older vulnerable patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial (GEPOC trial)

BACKGROUND

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) increases with age. Older patients are a heterogeneous group ranging from fit to frail with various comorbidities. Frail older patients with CRC are at increased risk of negative outcomes and functional decline after cancer surgery compared to younger and fit older patients. Maintenance of independence after treatment is rarely investigated in clinical trials despite older patients value it as high as survival. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an evaluation of an older persons' medical, psychosocial, and functional capabilities to develop an overall plan for treatment and follow-up. The beneficial effect of CGA is well documented in the fields of medicine and orthopaedic surgery, but evidence is lacking in cancer surgery. We aim to investigate the effect of CGA on physical performance in older frail patients undergoing surgery for CRC.

METHODS

GEPOC is a single centre randomised controlled trial including older patients (≥65 years) undergoing surgical resection for primary CRC. Frail patients (≤14/17 points using the G8 screening tool) will be randomised 1:1 to geriatric intervention and exercise (n = 50) or standard of care along (n = 50) with their standard surgical procedure. Intervention includes preoperative CGA, perioperative geriatric in-ward review and postoperative follow-up. All patients in the intervention group will participate in a pre- and postoperative resistance exercise programme (twice/week, 2 + 12 weeks). Primary endpoint is change in 30-s chair stand test. Assessment of primary endpoint will be performed by physiotherapists blinded to patient allocation. Secondary endpoints: changes in health related quality of life, physical strength and capacity (handgrip strength, gait speed and 6 min walking test), patient perceived quality of recovery, complications to surgery, body composition (Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectric impedance), serum biomarkers, readmission, length of stay and survival.

DISCUSSION

This ongoing trial will provide valuable knowledge on whether preoperative CGA and postoperative geriatric follow-up and intervention including an exercise program can counteract physical decline and improve quality of life in frail CRC patients undergoing surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03719573 (October 2018).

A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi-mechanical with hand-sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE-study)

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare leak rate between hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis (ETE) and semi-mechanical anastomosis (SMA) after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.

BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal surgical technique for creation of an anastomosis in the neck after esophagectomy is unclear.

METHODS

Patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and cervical anastomosis were eligible for participation after written informed consent. Patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was anastomotic leak rate defined as external drainage of saliva from the site of the anastomosis or intra-thoracic manifestation of leak. Secondary endpoints included anastomotic stricture rate at one year follow up, number of endoscopic dilatations, dysphagia-score, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Patients were blinded for intervention.

RESULTS

Between August 2011 and July 2014, 174 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy. Ninety-three patients were randomized to ETE (n = 44) or SMA (n = 49). Anastomotic leak occurred in 9 of 44 patients (20%) in the ETE group and 12 of 49 patients (24%) in the SMA group (absolute difference 4%, 95% CI -13% to +21%; p = .804). There was no significant difference in dysphagia at 1 year postoperatively (ETE 25% vs. SMA 20%; p = .628), in stricture rate (ETE 25% vs. 19% in SMA, p = .46), nor in median hospital stay (17 days in the ETE group, 13 days in the SMA group), morbidity (82% vs. 73%, p = .460) or mortality (0% vs. 4%, p = .175) between the groups.

The effects of intensive oral care before surgery for gastric cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Oral function management has been recognized as important strategy for preventing postoperative complications. In this historical cohort study, we focused on the patients who planed gastrectomy, and investigated the appropriate duration and frequency of preoperative oral care to prevent complications after surgery.

METHODS

Patients who planed surgery for gastric cancer between 2012 and 2018 were enrolled. We defined intensive oral care (IOC) as initial intervention at least three weeks before surgery and follow-up intervention within a week before surgery. As the primary outcome, the incidence of postoperative infectious complications was compared between the IOC and non-intensive oral care groups.

RESULTS

A total of 576 patients were enrolled, including 66 with IOC. The incidence of infectious complications was 2/66 (3.0%) in the IOC group and 64/510 (12.5%) in the non-intensive oral care group. After adjusting for confounding factors, patients with IOC exposure had a lower chance of developing postoperative infectious complications (odds ratio; 0.217, 0.051-0.927).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive oral care can help prevent postoperative infectious complications after gastrectomy. These findings suggest that appropriate preoperative oral care includes at least two interventions: three weeks or more before and within one week before surgery.

Impact of Postoperative Complications on Oncologic Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of the US Rectal Cancer Consortium

BACKGROUND

Postoperative complications (POCs) are associated with worse oncologic outcomes in several cancer types. The implications of complications after rectal cancer surgery are not well studied.

METHODS

The United States Rectal Cancer Consortium (2007-2017) was reviewed for primary rectal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent R0/R1 resection. Ninety-day POCs were categorized as major or minor and were grouped into infectious, cardiopulmonary, thromboembolic, renal, or intestinal dysmotility. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Among 1136 patients, the POC rate was 46% (n = 527), with 63% classified as minor and 32% classified as major. Of all POCs, infectious complications comprised 20%, cardiopulmonary 3%, thromboembolic 5%, renal 9%, and intestinal dysmotility 19%. Compared with minor or no POCs, major POCs were associated with both worse RFS and worse OS (both p < 0.01). Compared with no POCs, a single POC was associated with worse RFS (p < 0.01), while multiple POCs were associated with worse OS (p = 0.02). Regardless of complication grade, infectious POCs were associated with worse RFS (p < 0.01), while cardiopulmonary and thromboembolic POCs were associated with worse OS (both p < 0.01). Renal POCs were associated with both worse RFS (p < 0.001) and worse OS (p = 0.01). After accounting for pathologic stage, neoadjuvant therapy, and final margin status, Multivariable analysis (MVA) demonstrated worse outcomes with cardiopulmonary, thromboembolic, and renal POCs for OS (cardiopulmonary: hazard ratio [HR] 3.6, p = 0.01; thromboembolic: HR 19.4, p < 0.01; renal: HR 2.4, p = 0.01), and renal and infectious POCs for RFS (infectious: HR 2.1, p < 0.01; renal: HR 3.2, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Major complications after proctectomy for cancer are associated with decreased RFS and OS. Given the association of infectious complications and postoperative renal dysfunction with earlier recurrence of disease, efforts must be directed towards defining best practices and standardizing care.

It's not always too late: a case for minimally invasive salvage esophagectomy

INTRODUCTION

Standard of care for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) and surgical resection 4-8 weeks after completion of nCRT. It is recommended that the CRT to surgery interval not exceed 90 days. Many patients do not undergo surgery within this timeframe due to patient/physician preference, complete clinical response, or poor performance status. Select patients are offered salvage esophagectomy (SE), defined in two ways: resection for recurrent/persistent disease after complete response to definitive CRT (dCRT) or esophagectomy performed > 90 days after completion of nCRT. Salvage esophagectomy reportedly has higher postoperative morbidity and poor survival outcomes. In this study, we assessed outcomes, overall, and disease-free survival of patients undergoing salvage esophagectomy by both definitions (recurrent/persistent disease after dCRT and/or > 90 days), compared to planned (resection after nCRT/within 90 days) esophagectomy (PE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy at a single institution from 2009 to 2019. Esophagectomy for benign disease and patients who did not receive nCRT were excluded. Outcomes included postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

97 patients underwent minimally invasive esophageal resection for esophageal carcinoma. 89.7% of patients were male. Mean age was 64.9 years (range 36-85 years). 94.8% of patients had adenocarcinoma, with 16 transthoracic and 81 transhiatal approaches. On comparing planned esophagectomy (n = 87) to esophagectomy after dCRT failure (n = 10), no significant differences were identified in overall survival (p = 0.73), disease-free survival (p = 0.32), 30-day or major complication rate, anastomotic leak, or LOS. Similarly, when comparing esophagectomy < 90 days after CRT (n = 62) to > 90 days after CRT completion (n = 35), no significant differences were identified in overall survival (p = 0.39), disease-free survival (p = 0.71), 30-day or major complication rate, LOS, or anastomotic leak rate between groups. In this comparison, local recurrence was noted to be elevated with SE as compared to PE (64.3% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Overall survival and disease-free survival were equivalent between SE and PE. Local recurrence was noted to be increased with SE, though this did not appear to affect survival. Although planned esophagectomy remains the standard of care, salvage esophagectomy has comparable outcomes and is appropriate for selected patients.

Association between postoperative complications and long-term oncologic outcomes following total laryngectomy: 10-year experience at MD Anderson Cancer Center

BACKGROUND

Postoperative complications are an independent predictor of poor survival across several tumors. However, there is limited literature on the association between postoperative morbidity and long-term survival following total laryngectomy (TL) for cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all TL patients at a single institution from 2008 to 2013. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed, including postsurgical outcomes, which were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 362 patients were identified. The mean age was 64 years, and the majority of patients were male (81%). The median follow-up interval was 21 months. Fifty-seven percent of patients had received preoperative radiation, and 40% had received preoperative chemotherapy. Fifty-seven percent of patients underwent salvage TL, and 60% underwent advanced reconstruction (45% free flap and 15% pedicled flap). A total of 136 patients (37.6%) developed postoperative complications, 92 (25.4%) of which were major. Multivariable modeling demonstrated that postoperative complications independently predicted shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% CI, 1.16-1.96; P = .002) and DFS (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05-1.76; P = .021). Other independent negative predictors of OS and DFS included positive lymph node status, preoperative chemotherapy, comorbidity grade, and delayed adjuvant therapy. Severity of complication and reason for TL (salvage vs primary) were not shown to be predictive of OS or DFS.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative complications are associated with worse long-term OS and DFS relative to uncomplicated cases. Patient optimization and timely management of postoperative complications may play a critical role in long-term survival.

A Potential Mechanism of Tumor Progression during Systemic Infections Via the Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)/c-Met Signaling Pathway

Background: Increasing evidence has demonstrated that postoperative infectious complications (PICs) after digestive surgery are significantly associated with negative long-term outcomes; however, precise mechanisms of how PICs affect the poor long-term survival remain unclear. Here, we focused on the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/c-Met signaling pathway as one of those mechanisms. Methods: In the clinical setting, serum HGF levels were measured in the patients with sepsis and those with PICs after undergoing esophagectomy. Using a liver metastasis mouse model with cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), expressions of HGF and the roles of the HGF/c-Met pathway in the progression of tumor cells were examined. Results: Serum HGF levels were very high in the patients with intra-abdominal infection on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 5; similarly, compared to the patients without PICs, those with PICs had significantly higher serum HGF levels on 1, 3, and 5 days after esophagectomy. The patients with PICs showed poorer overall survival than those without PICs, and the patients with high serum HGF levels on POD 3 showed poorer prognosis than those with low HGF levels. Similarly, at 24 and 72 h after operation, serum levels of HGF in CLP mice were significantly higher than those in sham-operated mice. Intraperitoneal injection of mouse recombinant HGF significantly promoted liver metastases in sham-operated mice on 14 days after surgery. Knocking down c-Met expression on NL17 tumor cells by RNAi technology significantly inhibited the promotion of CLP-induced liver metastases. Conclusions: Infections after surgery increased serum HGF levels in the clinical as well as experimental settings. Induction of high serum HGF levels by CLP promoted liver metastases in a murine liver metastasis model, suggesting the involvement of the HGF/c-Met signaling pathway in tumor promotion mechanisms. Thus, targeting the HGF/c-Met signaling pathway may be a promising approach for malignant tumors, particularly in the patients with PICs.

The Impact of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Neck-Abdominal First Approach on the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no consensus for an optimal minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) approach. This study aimed to compare hybrid MIE (hMIE) with neck-abdominal first approach to standard open esophagectomy (OE).

METHODS

Data from a cohort of 301 patients were retrospectively analyzed. All participants received either hMIE or OE for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at Tokyo Medical and Dental University between January 2003 and December 2013. Analyses included propensity score matching and the Kaplan-Meier statistical method to determine overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of the cohort.

RESULTS

After one-to-one propensity score matching, there were 68 patient pairs. The hMIE group had significantly lower incidence of severe postoperative complications (20.1% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.026) and severe respiratory complications (7.4% vs. 0%; p = 0.058) than the OE group. The 5-year oncological outcomes of the two groups were almost equivalent (OS: OE, 55.0%; hMIE, 69.0%; p = 0.063 and DFS: OE, 54.0%; hMIE, 62.0%; p = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

This study compared hMIE with neck-abdominal first approach to standard OE. The results showed significantly less severe postoperative complications for hMIE with neck-abdominal first approach in comparison with OE, without a compromise in long-term oncological outcomes.

Prognostic Implication of Postoperative Weight Loss After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative weight loss in esophageal cancer is reported to be associated with a poor prognosis. However, the impact of postoperative weight loss on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer remains unclear.

METHODS

This study included 186 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgery between January 2012 and January 2015. The relationship between weight loss 6 months after esophagectomy as well as the clinical factors and prognosis of patients was investigated.

RESULTS

The mean weight loss rate for all the patients was 9.3% at 3 months, 10.8% at 6 months, 11.1% at 12 months, and 11.4% at 24 months after surgery. The patients with severe weight loss 6 months after surgery (≥ 12%) exhibited lower serum albumin levels and a lower prognostic nutrition index 6 months after esophagectomy than the patients with moderate weight loss (< 12%; p = 0.011 and 0.009, respectively). Although overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups, for all the patients, severe weight loss was significantly associated with shortened overall survival for the cStages 3 and 4 patients (3-year overall survival rate, 76.6% in the moderate group vs 54.5% in the severe group; p = 0.042). The multivariate analyses identified only severe weight loss as an independent factor associated with worse overall survival for the cStages 3 and 4 patients (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that postoperative weight loss negatively affected the prognosis for patients with advanced esophageal cancer, indicating the necessity of administering nutritional interventions to these patients to prevent postoperative weight loss.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation does not impact on overall survival after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background: Administration of landiolol hydrochloride was found to be associated with reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in our previous randomized controlled trial (RCT). In addition, reduced incidence of AF was associated with reduction of other complications. Meanwhile, the effects of postoperative AF and other complications on long-term survival following esophagectomy are not well understood.

Materials and Methods: Between March 2014 and January 2016, 100 patients with esophageal cancer were registered in an RCT trial and randomly allocated to receive either administration of landiolol or a placebo. We analyzed data from this RCT to better understand the effect of postoperative AF and severe associated complications on overall survival (OS) after esophagectomy for cancer. We also examined whether prophylactic administration of landiolol hydrochloride directly affects prolonged survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Results: The five-year rates of OS in the patients with and without AF were 60%, and 68.6%, respectively, there was no significant difference (P = 0.328). Five-year rates of OS of the patients with and without severe complications were 64.6%, and 67.5%, respectively (P = 0.995). The five-year rates of OS in the placebo and landiolol groups were 65.8% and 68%, respectively (P = 0.809). In multivariate analysis, high stage (stage III/IV) alone was an independent prognostic factor for esophageal cancer patients following esophagectomy.

Conclusions: New-onset AF and the other severe complications were not associated with poorer long-term survival following esophagectomy. In addition, administration of landiolol hydrochloride after esophagectomy did not contribute to prolonging the OS.

The survival impact of postoperative complications after curative resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: propensity score-matching analysis

PURPOSE

The relationship between postoperative complications and long-term survival after surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is controversial.

METHOD

A total of 210 patients with ESCC who underwent subtotal esophagectomy with a reconstructed gastric tube were investigated according to the development of postoperative complications. The associations of age, gender, T and N factors, and pStage with grade 0-2 complications (NSC) and grade 3 and higher complications (SC) were compared by propensity score-matching analysis. Fifty-one pairs of NSC and SC groups were selected for the final analysis. We divided 102 patients between the NSC and SC groups or between the no pulmonary complication (NPC) and the pulmonary complication (PC) groups. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by log-rank tests. Possible predictors of OS and DFS were subjected to univariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

The propensity score matching revealed that the 5-year OS and DFS of the NSC group were not different from those of the SC group. However, the 5-year OS of the PC group was significantly worse than that of the NPC group, while no significant differences were observed in the DFS between the PC and NPC groups. In the multivariate analysis, UICC pStage, pulmonary complication, and American Heart Association (AHA) classification for OS and UICC pStage for DFS were significant prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

The OS and DFS did not differ in patients with or without severe postoperative complications. However, postoperative pulmonary complications were independent predictors of poorer OS, but not DFS, in patients who underwent R0 resection for ESCC.

Impact of perioperative high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 expression on long-term outcomes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

High mobility group box chromosomal protein-1 (HMGB-1) is a potential late mediator of sepsis and a possible risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. This study aimed to determine the relationship between HMGB-1 and clinicopathological factors and long-term prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We measured perioperative serum HMGB-1 levels using ELISA and HMGB-1 protein by immunohistochemistry expression in resected specimens.

RESULTS

Postoperative serum HMGB-1 levels were significantly higher than preoperative levels. Preoperative serum HMGB-1 levels were significantly higher in patients with more intraoperative bleeding, longer intensive care unit stays, and postoperative pneumonia. Postoperative serum HMGB-1 levels were significantly higher in older patients and those with longer operation time and more intraoperative bleeding. There were significant differences in long-term outcomes according to postoperative but not preoperative serum HMGB-1 levels. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that advanced pathological stage, postoperative pulmonary complications, and higher postoperative serum HMGB-1 levels were independently associated with relapse-free survival and overall survival. Preoperative serum HMGB-1 levels were significantly higher in patients with high HMGB-1 expression than those with low HMGB-1 expression by immunohistochemistry, whereas such statistical differences were not observed in postoperative serum HMGB-1. There were no differences in relapse-free survival and overall survival according to HMGB-1 expression by immunohistochemistry. Serum HMGB-1 levels were significantly increased after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

CONCLUSION

Elevated postoperative serum HMGB-1, which was associated not only with poor long-term but also short-term outcomes such as postoperative complications, might serve as a potential marker for prognosis in esophageal cancer.

Impact of postoperative complications on survival after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests that complications after oesophagectomy may decrease short- and long-term survival of patients with oesophageal cancer. This study aimed to analyse the impact of complications on survival in a Western cohort.

METHODS

Complications after oesophagectomy were recorded for all patients operated on between January 2006 and February 2017, with severity defined using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Associations between complications and overall and recurrence-free survival were assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of 430 patients, 292 (67·9 per cent) developed postoperative complications, with 128 (39·8 per cent) classified as Clavien-Dindo grade III or IV. No significant associations were detected between Clavien-Dindo grade and either tumour (T) (P = 0·071) or nodal (N) status (P = 0·882). There was a significant correlation between Clavien-Dindo grade and ASA fitness grade (P = 0·032). In multivariable analysis, overall survival in patients with Clavien-Dindo grade I complications was similar to that in patients with no complications (hazard ratio (HR) 0·97, P = 0·915). However, patients with grade II and IV complications had significantly shorter overall survival than those with no complications: HR 1·64 (P = 0·007) and 1·74 (P = 0·013) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Increasing severity of complications after oesophagectomy was associated with decreased overall survival. Prevention of complications should improve survival.

Systematic Review of the Role of Biomarkers in Predicting Anastomotic Leakage Following Gastroesophageal Cancer Surgery

Anastomotic leakage (AL) following gastroesophageal cancer surgery remains a serious postoperative complication. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of investigated biomarkers for the early detection of AL following esophagectomy, esophagogastrectomy and gastrectomy. All published studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers predicting AL following gastroesophageal resection for cancer were included. The Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) 2 tool. Twenty-four studies evaluated biomarkers in the context of AL following gastroesophageal cancer surgery. Biomarkers were derived from the systemic circulation, mediastinal and peritoneal drains, urine and mediastinal microdialysis. The most commonly evaluated serum biomarkers were C-reactive protein and leucocytes. Both proved to be useful markers for excluding AL owing to its high specificity and negative predictive values. Amylase was the most commonly evaluated peritoneal drain biomarker and significantly elevated levels can predict AL in the early postoperative period. The associated area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve values ranged from 0.482 to 0.994. Current biomarkers are poor predictors of AL after gastroesophageal cancer surgery owing to insufficient sensitivity and positive predictive value. Further research is needed to identify better diagnostic tools to predict AL.

Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

Utilizing a standardized dataset with specific definitions to prospectively collect international data to provide a benchmark for complications and outcomes associated with esophagectomy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Outcome reporting in oncologic surgery has suffered from the lack of a standardized system for reporting operative results particularly complications. This is particularly the case for esophagectomy affecting the accuracy and relevance of international outcome assessments, clinical trial results, and quality improvement projects.

METHODS

The Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) involving 24 high-volume esophageal surgical centers in 14 countries developed a standardized platform for recording complications and quality measures associated with esophagectomy. Using a secure online database (ESODATA.org), ECCG centers prospectively recorded data on all resections according to the ECCG platform from these centers over a 2-year period.

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and December 2016, 2704 resections were entered into the database. All demographic and follow-up data fields were 100% complete. The majority of operations were for cancer (95.6%) and typically located in the distal esophagus (56.2%). Some 1192 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (46.1%) and 763 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (29.5%). Surgical approach involved open procedures in 52.1% and minimally invasive operations in 47.9%. Chest anastomoses were done most commonly (60.7%) and R0 resections were accomplished in 93.4% of patients. The overall incidence of complications was 59% with the most common individual complications being pneumonia (14.6%) and atrial dysrhythmia (14.5%). Anastomotic leak, conduit necrosis, chyle leaks, recurrent nerve injury occurred in 11.4%, 1.3%, 4.7%, and 4.2% of cases, respectively. Clavien-Dindo complications ≥ IIIb occurred in 17.2% of patients. Readmissions occurred in 11.2% of cases and 30- and 90-day mortality was 2.4% and 4.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Standardized methods provide contemporary international benchmarks for reporting outcomes after esophagectomy.

A National Cohort Study Evaluating the Association Between Short-term Outcomes and Long-term Survival After Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between short-term outcome indicators and long-term survival after esophagogastric resections.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Short-term outcome indicators are often used to compare performance between care providers. Some short-term outcome indicators concern the direct quality of care, that is, complications, others are used because they are expected to be associated with long-term outcomes.

METHOD

For this national cohort study, all patients who underwent esophagectomy or gastrectomy for cancer with curative intent between 2011 and 2016 and were registered in the Dutch Upper gastrointestinal Cancer Audit were included. Primary outcome was conditional survival (under the condition of surviving the first postoperative 30 days and hospital admission). Cox regression modeling was used to study the independent association between "textbook outcome" with survival. "Textbook outcome," a composite quality indicator, was defined as a pathological complete resection with at least 15 retrieved lymph nodes, an uneventful postoperative course, and no hospital readmission.

RESULTS

In total, 4414 and 2943 patients with esophageal or gastric cancer, respectively, were included. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 76%, 62%, and 54%, and 71%, 56%, and 49% for esophageal and gastric cancer, respectively. Textbook outcome was achieved in 33% and 35% of patients respectively. "Textbook outcome" was independently associated with longer conditional survival [hazard ratio: 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.84) and 0.69 (0.60-0.79), respectively].

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the short-term outcome indicator textbook outcome is associated with long-term overall survival and therefore may accentuate the importance of using these indicators in clinical audits.