1
|
Milton-Cole R, Goubar A, Ayis S, O’Connell MDL, Kristensen MT, Schuch FB, Sheehan KJ. The role of depression in the association between mobilisation timing and live discharge after hip fracture surgery: Secondary analysis of the UK National Hip Fracture Database. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298804. [PMID: 38574013 PMCID: PMC10994389 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim was to compare the probability of discharge after hip fracture surgery conditional on being alive and in hospital between patients mobilised within and beyond 36-hours of surgery across groups defined by depression. METHODS Data were taken from the National Hip Fracture Database and included patients 60 years of age or older who underwent hip fracture surgery in England and Wales between 2014 and 2016. The conditional probability of postsurgical live discharge was estimated for patients mobilised early and for patients mobilised late across groups with and without depression. The association between mobilisation timing and the conditional probability of live discharge were also estimated separately through adjusted generalized linear models. RESULTS Data were analysed for 116,274 patients. A diagnosis of depression was present in 8.31% patients. In those with depression, 7,412 (76.7%) patients mobilised early. In those without depression, 84,085 (78.9%) patients mobilised early. By day 30 after surgery, the adjusted odds ratio of discharge among those who mobilised early compared to late was 1.79 (95% CI: 1.56-2.05, p<0.001) and 1.92 (95% CI: 1.84-2.00, p<0.001) for those with and without depression, respectively. CONCLUSION A similar proportion of patients with depression mobilised early after hip fracture surgery when compared to those without a diagnosis of depression. The association between mobilisation timing and time to live discharge was observed for patients with and without depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Milton-Cole
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - A. Goubar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - S. Ayis
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - M. D. L. O’Connell
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - M. T. Kristensen
- Department of Physical- and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - F. B. Schuch
- Department of Sports Methods and Techniques, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Providencia, Chile
- Institute of Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - K. J. Sheehan
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Surís X, Vela E, Larrosa M, Llargués E, Pueyo-Sánchez MJ, Cancio-Trujillo JM. Impact of major osteoporotic fractures on the use of healthcare resources in Catalonia, Spain. Bone 2024; 180:116993. [PMID: 38145863 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the impact of first major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) on health resource use and healthcare expenditures in people aged ≥50 years in Catalonia, Spain. DESIGN Observational, retrospective study. The Catalan Health Surveillance System (CHSS) registry was used to obtain sociodemographic, clinical and expenditure data from all public centres in Catalonia (Spain). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Males and females aged ≥50 years who sustained a first major osteoporotic fracture between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. METHODS Data on admissions to the emergency department, hospitalization and skilled nursing facilities, primary and specialized care visits, nonemergency medical transport, outpatient rehabilitation and pharmacy prescriptions were retrieved for each patient. Monthly and yearly mean usage rates, expenditure in euros (€) and incremental costs one and two years after fracture were calculated. RESULTS There were 64,403 patients with first MOF: 47,555 females and 16,848 males with a mean age (standard deviation) of 76.5 (12.0) years. The average annual expenditure increased from €4564 in the year before to €12,331 in the year following a hip fracture. For forearm fractures, the expenditure increased from €2511 to €4251, for vertebral fractures from €4146 to €6659, for pelvic fractures from €4442 to €7124, for humerus fractures from €3058 to €5992, and for multiple fractures from €4598 to €12,028. The average cost for overall fractures experienced a 110.3 % increase. The leading cause of health expenditure in the year following MOF was hospital admission. Expenditure in the second year post-fracture returned to pre-fracture levels. The use of some healthcare resources, especially visits to emergency services, increased in the prefracture month. Male sex, older age and high previous comorbidities were associated with a higher expenditure. CONCLUSIONS In people with a first MOF, healthcare expenditure doubled during the first-year post-facture, mostly in relation to inpatient care. The healthcare resource use increased during the previous month. This increase could potentially be attributed to the worsening of pre-existing comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Surís
- Department of Health, Master Plan of Musculoskeletal Diseases, Barcelona, Spain; Rheumatology Department, Hospital General de Granollers, Granollers, Spain; School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain; Catalan Health Service.
| | - Emili Vela
- Catalan Health Service; Knowledge and Information Unit; Digitalization for the Sustainability of the Healthcare System.
| | - Marta Larrosa
- Department of Health, Master Plan of Musculoskeletal Diseases, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esteve Llargués
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain; Internal Medicine Department, Hospital General de Granollers, Granollers, Spain.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baji P, Patel R, Judge A, Johansen A, Griffin J, Chesser T, Griffin XL, Javaid MK, Barbosa EC, Ben-Shlomo Y, Marques EMR, Gregson CL. Organisational factors associated with hospital costs and patient mortality in the 365 days following hip fracture in England and Wales (REDUCE): a record-linkage cohort study. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2023; 4:e386-e398. [PMID: 37442154 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(23)00086-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hip fracture care delivery varies between hospitals, which might explain variations in patient outcomes and health costs. The aim of this study was to identify hospital-level organisational factors associated with long-term patient outcomes and costs after hip fracture. METHODS REDUCE was a record-linkage cohort study in which national databases for all patients aged 60 years and older who sustained a hip fracture in England and Wales were linked with hospital metrics from 18 organisational data sources. Multilevel models identified organisational factors associated with the case-mix adjusted primary outcomes: cumulative all-cause mortality, days spent in hospital, and inpatient costs over 365 days after hip fracture. FINDINGS Between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2019, 178 757 patients with an index hip fracture were identified from 172 hospitals in England and Wales. 126 278 (70·6%) were female, 52 479 (29·4%) were male, and median age was 84 years (IQR 77-89) in England and 83 years (77-89) in Wales. 365 days after hip fracture, 50 354 (28·2%) patients had died. Patients spent a median 21 days (IQR 11-41) in hospital, incurring costs of £14 642 (95% CI 14 600-14 683) per patient, ranging from £10 867 (SD 5880) to £23 188 (17 223) between hospitals. 11 organisational factors were independently associated with mortality, 24 with number of days in hospital, and 25 with inpatient costs. Having all patients assessed by an orthogeriatrician within 72 h of admission was associated with a mean cost saving of £529 (95% CI 148-910) per patient and a lower 365-day mortality (odds ratio 0·85 [95% CI 0·76-0·94]). Consultant orthogeriatrician attendance at clinical governance meetings was associated with cost savings of £356 (95% CI 188-525) and 1·47 fewer days (95% CI 0·89-2·05) in the hospital in the 365 days after hip fracture per patient. The provision of physiotherapy to patients on weekends was associated with a cost saving of £676 (95% CI 67-1285) per patient and with 2·32 fewer days (0·35-4·29) in hospital in the 365 days after hip fracture. INTERPRETATION Multiple, potentially modifiable hospital-level organisational factors associated with important clinical outcomes and inpatient costs were identified that should inform initiatives to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of hip fracture services. FUNDING Versus Arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Baji
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Rita Patel
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew Judge
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Antony Johansen
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University and University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK; National Hip Fracture Database, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
| | | | - Tim Chesser
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Xavier L Griffin
- Barts Bone and Joint Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Muhammad K Javaid
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Estela C Barbosa
- Violence and Society Centre, School of Policy and Global Affairs, City University of London, London, UK; UKPRP VISION Consortium, London, UK
| | - Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Elsa M R Marques
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Celia L Gregson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Older People's Unit, Royal United Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Bath, Bath, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dong Y, Zhang Y, Song K, Kang H, Ye D, Li F. What was the Epidemiology and Global Burden of Disease of Hip Fractures From 1990 to 2019? Results From and Additional Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481:1209-1220. [PMID: 36374576 PMCID: PMC10194687 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hip fractures are associated with a high risk of death; among those who survive a hip fracture, many experience substantial decreases in quality of life. A comprehensive understanding of the epidemiology and burden of hip fractures by country, age, gender, and sociodemographic factors would provide valuable information for healthcare policymaking and clinical practice. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study 2019 was a global-level study estimating the burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories. An exploration and additional analysis of the GBD 2019 would provide a clearer picture of the incidence and burden of hip fractures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES Using data from the GBD 2019, we asked, (1) What are the global, regional, and national incidences of hip fractures, and how did they change over a recent 30-year span? (2) What is the global, regional, and national burden of hip fractures in terms of years lived with disability, and how did it change over that same period? (3) What is the leading cause of hip fractures? (4) How did the incidence and years lived with disability of patients with hip fractures change with age, gender, and sociodemographic factors? METHODS This was a cross-sectional study. Participant data were obtained from the GBD 2019 ( http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool ). The GBD study is managed by the WHO, coordinated by the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It estimates the burden of disease and injury for 204 countries by age, gender, and sociodemographic factors, and can serve as a valuable reference for health policymaking. All estimates and their 95% uncertainty interval (UI) were produced using DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression tool in the GBD 2019. In this study, we directly pulled the age-standardized incidence rate and years lived with disability rate of hip fractures by location, age, gender, and cause from the GBD 2019. Based on these data, we analyzed the association between the incidence rate and latitude of each country. Then, we calculated the estimated annual percentage change to represent trends from 1990 to 2019. We also used the Spearman rank-order correlation analysis to determine the correlation between the incidence or burden of hip fractures and the sociodemographic index, a composite index of the income per capita, average years of educational attainment, and fertility rates in a country. RESULTS Globally, hip fracture incidences were estimated to be 14.2 million (95% UI 11.1 to 18.1), and the associated years lived with disability were 2.9 million (95% UI 2.0 to 4.0) in 2019, with an incidence of 182 (95% UI 142 to 231) and 37 (95% UI 25 to 50) per 100,000, respectively. A strong, positive correlation was observed between the incidence rate and the latitude of each country (rho = 0.65; p < 0.001). From 1990 to 2019, the global incidence rate for both genders remained unchanged (estimated annual percentage change 0.01 [95% confidence interval -0.08 to 0.11]), but was slightly increased in men (estimated annual percentage change 0.11 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.2]). The years lived with disability rate decreased slightly (estimated annual percentage change 0.66 [95% CI -0.73 to -0.6]). These rates were standardized by age. Falls were the leading cause of hip fractures, accounting for 66% of all patients and 55% of the total years lived with disability. The incidence of hip fractures was tightly and positively correlated with the sociodemographic index (rho 0.624; p < 0.001), while the years lived with disability rate was slightly negatively correlated (rho -0.247; p < 0.001). Most hip fractures occurred in people older than 70 years, and women had higher incidence rate (189.7 [95% UI 144.2 to 247.2] versus 166.2 [95% UI 133.2 to 205.8] per 100,000) and years lived with disability (38.4 [95% UI 26.9 to 51.6] versus 33.7 [95% UI 23.1 to 45.5] per 100,000) than men. CONCLUSION Hip fractures are common, devastating to patients, and economically burdensome to healthcare systems globally, with falls being the leading cause. The age-standardized incidence rate has slightly increased in men. Many low-latitude countries have lower incidences, possibly because of prolonged sunlight exposure. Policies should be directed to promoting public health education about maintaining bone-protective lifestyles, enhancing the knowledge of osteoporosis management in young resident physicians and those in practice, increasing the awareness of osteoporosis screening and treatment in men, and developing more effective antiosteoporosis drugs for clinical use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, prognostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yimin Dong
- Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, PR China
| | - Yayun Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, PR China
| | - Kehan Song
- Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, PR China
| | - Honglei Kang
- Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, PR China
| | - Dawei Ye
- Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, PR China
| | - Feng Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Landon BE, Hatfield LA, Bakx P, Banerjee A, Chen YC, Fu C, Gordon M, Heine R, Huang N, Ko DT, Lix LM, Novack V, Pasea L, Qiu F, Stukel TA, Uyl-de Groot C, Yan L, Weinreb G, Cram P. Differences in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction for Low- and High-Income Patients in 6 Countries. JAMA 2023; 329:1088-1097. [PMID: 37014339 PMCID: PMC10074220 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.1699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
Importance Differences in the organization and financing of health systems may produce more or less equitable outcomes for advantaged vs disadvantaged populations. We compared treatments and outcomes of older high- and low-income patients across 6 countries. Objective To determine whether treatment patterns and outcomes for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction differ for low- vs high-income individuals across 6 countries. Design, Setting, and Participants Serial cross-sectional cohort study of all adults aged 66 years or older hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction from 2013 through 2018 in the US, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Taiwan, and Israel using population-representative administrative data. Exposures Being in the top and bottom quintile of income within and across countries. Main Outcomes and Measures Thirty-day and 1-year mortality; secondary outcomes included rates of cardiac catheterization and revascularization, length of stay, and readmission rates. Results We studied 289 376 patients hospitalized with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 843 046 hospitalized with non-STEMI (NSTEMI). Adjusted 30-day mortality generally was 1 to 3 percentage points lower for high-income patients. For instance, 30-day mortality among patients admitted with STEMI in the Netherlands was 10.2% for those with high income vs 13.1% for those with low income (difference, -2.8 percentage points [95% CI, -4.1 to -1.5]). One-year mortality differences for STEMI were even larger than 30-day mortality, with the highest difference in Israel (16.2% vs 25.3%; difference, -9.1 percentage points [95% CI, -16.7 to -1.6]). In all countries, rates of cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention were higher among high- vs low-income populations, with absolute differences ranging from 1 to 6 percentage points (eg, 73.6% vs 67.4%; difference, 6.1 percentage points [95% CI, 1.2 to 11.0] for percutaneous intervention in England for STEMI). Rates of coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with STEMI in low- vs high-income strata were similar but for NSTEMI were generally 1 to 2 percentage points higher among high-income patients (eg, 12.5% vs 11.0% in the US; difference, 1.5 percentage points [95% CI, 1.3 to 1.8 ]). Thirty-day readmission rates generally also were 1 to 3 percentage points lower and hospital length of stay generally was 0.2 to 0.5 days shorter for high-income patients. Conclusions and Relevance High-income individuals had substantially better survival and were more likely to receive lifesaving revascularization and had shorter hospital lengths of stay and fewer readmissions across almost all countries. Our results suggest that income-based disparities were present even in countries with universal health insurance and robust social safety net systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce E. Landon
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura A. Hatfield
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pieter Bakx
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Amitava Banerjee
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, England
- Department of Cardiology, University College London Hospitals, London, England
| | - Yu-Chin Chen
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Christina Fu
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michal Gordon
- Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Renaud Heine
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole Huang
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Dennis T. Ko
- Schulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa M. Lix
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Victor Novack
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Laura Pasea
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, England
| | - Feng Qiu
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Therese A. Stukel
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lin Yan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Gabe Weinreb
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter Cram
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scheffers-Barnhoorn MN, Haaksma ML, Achterberg WP, Niggebrugge AH, van der Sijp MP, van Haastregt JC, van Eijk M. Course of fear of falling after hip fracture: findings from a 12-month inception cohort. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068625. [PMID: 36918243 PMCID: PMC10016251 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the course of fear of falling (FoF) up to 1 year after hip fracture, including the effect of prefracture FoF on the course. DESIGN Observational cohort study with assessment of FoF at 6, 12 and 52 weeks after hip fracture. SETTING Haaglanden Medical Centre, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 444 community-dwelling adults aged 70 years and older, admitted to hospital with a hip fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), with a cut-off score ≥11 to define elevated FoF levels. RESULTS Six weeks after hip fracture the study population-based mean FES-I was located around the cut-off value of 11, and levels decreased only marginally over time. One year after fracture almost one-third of the population had FoF (FES-I ≥11). Although the group with prefracture FoF (42.6%) had slightly elevated FES-I levels during the entire follow-up, the effect was not statistically significant. Patients with persistent FoF at 6 and 12 weeks after fracture (26.8%) had the highest FES-I levels, with a mean well above the cut-off value during the entire follow-up. For the majority of patients in this group, FoF is still present 1 year after fracture (84.9%). CONCLUSIONS In this study population, representing patients in relative good health condition that are able to attend the outpatient follow-up at 6 and 12 weeks, FoF as defined by an FES-I score ≥11 was common within the first year after hip fracture. Patients with persistent FoF at 12 weeks have the highest FES-I levels in the first year after fracture, and for most of these patients the FoF remains. For timely identification of patients who may benefit from intervention, we recommend structural assessment of FoF in the first 12 weeks after fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miriam L Haaksma
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- University Network for the Care Sector South Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Wilco P Achterberg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- University Network for the Care Sector South Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Max Pl van der Sijp
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Monica van Eijk
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lorenzoni L, Marino A, Or Z, Blankart CR, Shatrov K, Wodchis W, Janlov N, Figueroa JF, Bowden N, Bernal-Delgado E, Papanicolas I. Why the US spends more treating high-need high-cost patients: a comparative study of pricing and utilization of care in six high-income countries. Health Policy 2023; 128:55-61. [PMID: 36529552 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
One of the most pressing challenges facing most health care systems is rising costs. As the population ages and the demand for health care services grows, there is a growing need to understand the drivers of these costs across systems. This paper attempts to address this gap by examining utilization and spending of the course of a year for two specific high-need high-cost patient types: a frail older person with a hip fracture and an older person with congestive heart failure and diabetes. Data on utilization and expenditure is collected across five health care settings (hospital, post-acute rehabilitation, primary care, outpatient specialty and drugs), in six countries (Canada (Ontario), France, Germany, Spain (Aragon), Sweden and the United States (fee for service Medicare) and used to construct treatment episode Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) that compare prices using baskets of goods from the different care settings. The treatment episode PPPs suggest other countries have more similar volumes of care to the US as compared to other standardization approaches, suggesting that US prices account for more of the differential in US health care expenditures. The US also differs with regards to the share of expenditures across care settings, with post-acute rehab and outpatient speciality expenditures accounting for a larger share of the total relative to comparators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Lorenzoni
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France
| | - Alberto Marino
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK
| | - Zeynep Or
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES), Paris, France
| | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine (sitem-insel), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine (sitem-insel), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Walter Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nils Janlov
- The Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services Analysis, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jose F Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas Bowden
- Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
| | | | - Irene Papanicolas
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK; Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang X, Zhou X, Xin F, Becker B, Linden D, Hernaus D. Age-dependent changes in the dynamic functional organization of the brain at rest: a cross-cultural replication approach. Cereb Cortex 2023; 33:6394-6406. [PMID: 36642496 PMCID: PMC10183740 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Age-associated changes in brain function play an important role in the development of neurodegenerative diseases. Although previous work has examined age-related changes in static functional connectivity, accumulating evidence suggests that advancing age is especially associated with alterations in the dynamic interactions and transitions between different brain states, which hitherto have received less attention. Conclusions of previous studies in this domain are moreover limited by suboptimal replicability of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and culturally homogenous cohorts. Here, we investigate the robustness of age-associated changes in dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) by capitalizing on the availability of fMRI cohorts from two cultures (Western European and Chinese). In both the LEMON (Western European) and SALD (Chinese) cohorts, we consistently identify two distinct states: a more frequent segregated within-network connectivity state (state I) and a less frequent integrated between-network connectivity state (state II). Moreover, in both these cohorts, older (55-80 years) compared to younger participants (20-35 years) exhibited lower occurrence of and spent less time in state I. Older participants also tended to exhibit more transitions between networks and greater variance in global efficiency. Overall, our cross-cultural replication of age-associated changes in dFC metrics implies that advancing age is robustly associated with a reorganization of dynamic brain activation that favors the use of less functionally specific networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Yang
- Department of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience MHeNS, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Xinqi Zhou
- Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, 610066 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Fei Xin
- School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, 518060 Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Benjamin Becker
- The Center of Psychosomatic Medicine, Sichuan Provincial Center for Mental Health, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Xiyuan Ave, West Hi-Tech Zone, 611731 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - David Linden
- Department of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience MHeNS, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis Hernaus
- Department of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and NeuroScience MHeNS, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Backman C, Shah S, Webber C, Turcotte L, McIsaac DI, Papp S, Harley A, Beaulé P, French-Merkley V, Berdusco R, Poitras S, Tanuseputro P. Postsurgery paths and outcomes for hip fracture patients (POST-OP HIP PATHS): a population-based retrospective cohort study protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e065599. [PMID: 36581429 PMCID: PMC9806031 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hip fracture patients receive varying levels of support posthip fracture surgery and often experience significant disability and increased risk of mortality. Best practice guidelines recommend that all hip fracture patients receive active rehabilitation following their acute care stay, with rehabilitation beginning no later than 6 days following surgery. Nevertheless, patients frequently experience gaps in care including delays and variation in rehabilitation services they receive. We aim to understand the factors that drive these practice variations for older adults following hip fracture surgery, and their impact on patient outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a retrospective population-based cohort study using routinely collected health administrative data housed at ICES. The study population will include all individuals with a unilateral hip fracture aged 50 and older who underwent surgical repair in Ontario, Canada between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018. We will use unadjusted and multilevel, multivariable adjusted regression models to identify predictors of rehabilitation setting, time to rehabilitation and length of rehabilitation, with predictors prespecified including patient sociodemographics, baseline health and characteristics of the acute (surgical) episode. We will examine outcomes after rehabilitation, including place of care/residence at 6 and 12 months postrehabilitation, as well as other short-term and long-term outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The use of the data in this project is authorised under section 45 of Ontario's Personal Health Information Protection Act and does not require review by a Research Ethics Board. Results will be disseminated through conference presentations and in peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Backman
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Soha Shah
- Care of the Elderly, Bruyère Continuing Care, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Colleen Webber
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - D I McIsaac
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- University of Ottawa Department of Anesthesiology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steve Papp
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anne Harley
- Care of the Elderly, Bruyère Continuing Care, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Beaulé
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Randa Berdusco
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephane Poitras
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Deschasse G, Drumez E, Visade F, Charpentier A, Delecluse C, Loggia G, Lescure P, Attier-Żmudka J, Bloch J, Gaxatte C, Bloch F, Puisieux F, Beuscart JB. Factors Associated with Transfer from an Acute Geriatric Unit to a Post-Acute Care Facility among Community-Dwelling Patients: Results from the DAMAGE Cohort. Clin Interv Aging 2022; 17:1821-1832. [DOI: 10.2147/cia.s370562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
11
|
Merchán-Galvis A, Posso M, Canovas E, Jordán M, Aguilera X, Martinez-Zapata MJ. Quality of life and cost-effectiveness analysis of topical tranexamic acid and fibrin glue in femur fracture surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:827. [PMID: 36045358 PMCID: PMC9429462 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05775-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We assessed quality of life (QoL) of patients undergoing surgery for proximal femur fracture and performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of haemostatic drugs for reducing postoperative bleeding. Methods We analysed data from an open, multicentre, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) that assessed the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA group) and fibrin glue (FG group) administered topically prior to surgical closure, compared with usual haemostasis methods (control group). For this study we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of these interventions from the Spanish Health System perspective, using a time horizon of 12 months. The cost was reported in $US purchasing power parity (USPPP). We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY (quality-adjusted life-year). Results We included 134 consecutive patients from February 2013 to March 2015: 42 patients in the TXA group, 46 in the FG group, and 46 in the control group. Before the fracture, EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) health questionnaire score was 68.6. During the 12 months post-surgery, the intragroup EQ-VAS improved, but without reaching pre-fracture values. There were no differences between groups for EQ-VAS and EuroQol 5 dimensions 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) health questionnaire score, nor in hospital stay costs or medical complication costs. Nevertheless, the cost of one FG treatment was significantly higher (399.1 $USPPP) than the cost of TXA (12.9 $USPPP) or usual haemostasis (0 $USPPP). When comparing the cost-effectiveness of the interventions, FG was ruled out by simple dominance since it was more costly (13,314.7 $USPPP) than TXA (13,295.2 $USPPP) and less effective (utilities of 0.0532 vs. 0.0734, respectively). TXA compared to usual haemostasis had an ICER of 15,289.6 $USPPP per QALY). Conclusions There were no significant differences between the intervention groups in terms of postoperative changes in QoL. However, topical TXA was more cost-effective than FG or usual haemostasis. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02150720. Date of registration 30/05/2014. Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
|
12
|
Grimm F, Johansen A, Knight H, Brine R, Deeny SR. Indirect effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital mortality in patients with hip fracture: a competing risk survival analysis using linked administrative data. BMJ Qual Saf 2022; 32:264-273. [PMID: 35914925 PMCID: PMC10176403 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hip fracture is a leading cause of disability and mortality among older people. During the COVID-19 pandemic, orthopaedic care pathways in the National Health Service in England were restructured to manage pressures on hospital capacity. We examined the indirect consequences of the pandemic for hospital mortality among older patients with hip fracture, admitted from care homes or the community. METHODS Retrospective analysis of linked care home and hospital inpatient data for patients with hip fracture aged 65 years and over admitted to hospitals in England during the first year of the pandemic (1 March 2020 to 28 February 2021) or during the previous year. We performed survival analysis, adjusting for case mix and COVID-19 infection, and considered live discharge as a competing risk. We present cause-specific hazard ratios (HRCS) for the effect of admission year on hospital mortality risk. RESULTS During the first year of the pandemic, there were 55 648 hip fracture admissions: a 5.2% decrease on the previous year. 9.5% of patients had confirmed or suspected COVID-19. Hospital stays were substantially shorter (p<0.05), and there was a higher daily chance of discharge (HRCS 1.40, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.41). Overall hip fracture inpatient mortality increased (7.2% in 2020/2021 vs 6.4% in 2019/2020), but patients without concomitant COVID-19 infection had lower mortality rates compared with the year before (5.3%). Admission during the pandemic was associated with a 11% increase in the daily risk of hospital death for patients with hip fracture (HRCS 1.11, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.16). CONCLUSIONS Although COVID-19 infections led to increases in hospital mortality, overall hospital mortality risk for older patients with hip fracture remained largely stable during the first year of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antony Johansen
- University Hospital of Wales and Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.,National Hip Fracture Database, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Johansen A, Ojeda-Thies C, Poacher AT, Hall AJ, Brent L, Ahern EC, Costa ML. Developing a minimum common dataset for hip fracture audit to help countries set up national audits that can support international comparisons. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:721-728. [PMID: 35638208 PMCID: PMC9948447 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b6.bjj-2022-0080.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to explore current use of the Global Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) Minimum Common Dataset (MCD) within established national hip fracture registries, and to propose a revised MCD to enable international benchmarking for hip fracture care. METHODS We compared all ten established national hip fracture registries: England, Wales, and Northern Ireland; Scotland; Australia and New Zealand; Republic of Ireland; Germany; the Netherlands; Sweden; Norway; Denmark; and Spain. We tabulated all questions included in each registry, and cross-referenced them against the 32 questions of the MCD dataset. Having identified those questions consistently used in the majority of national audits, and which additional fields were used less commonly, we then used consensus methods to establish a revised MCD. RESULTS A total of 215 unique questions were used across the ten registries. Only 72 (34%) were used in more than one national audit, and only 32 (15%) by more than half of audits. Only one registry used all 32 questions from the 2014 MCD, and five questions were only collected by a single registry. Only 21 of the 32 questions in the MCD were used in the majority of national audits. Only three fields (anaesthetic grade, operation, and date/time of surgery) were used by all ten established audits. We presented these findings at the Asia-Pacific FFN meeting, and used an online questionnaire to capture feedback from expert clinicians from different countries. A draft revision of the MCD was then presented to all 95 nations represented at the Global FFN conference in September 2021, with online feedback again used to finalize the revised MCD. CONCLUSION The revised MCD will help aspirant nations establish new registry programmes, facilitate the integration of novel analytic techniques and greater multinational collaboration, and serve as an internationally-accepted standard for monitoring and improving hip fracture services. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):721-728.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony Johansen
- University Hospital of Wales and School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK,National Hip Fracture Database, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Louise Brent
- National Office of Clinical Audit, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Matt L. Costa
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK,Correspondence should be sent to Matt L. Costa. E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
The sustainability of healthcare of older people in Europe is at stake. Many experts currently focus on the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences. But there are other elements coming up that might even have a greater impact. Healthcare systems, geriatric care and geriatric rehabilitation in particular, will face disruptive changes due to both demographic demand and a shortage of human and financial resources. This decade will be transformed by a high proportion of the older health workforce transitioning to retirement. This expertise must be retained. The brain drain of health care workers migrating from Eastern parts to Western Europe is diminishing. Discussing and deciding upon the priorities of value-based health care for older people such as equity and access is required. The acute healthcare sector in most countries focuses on fee-for-service models instead of building systemic approaches to maximise independence and autonomy of older citizens. In this commentary, we build on recent book chapters and articles on geriatric rehabililtation. Our main questions for the anniversary edition of Age and Ageing is what it is that geriatric rehabilitation could, should and must contribute in the roaring 2020s?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Becker
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany.,Unit of Digital Geriatric Medicine, Geriatric Centre, University Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wilco Achterberg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cram P, Hatfield LA, Bakx P, Banerjee A, Fu C, Gordon M, Heine R, Huang N, Ko D, Lix LM, Novack V, Pasea L, Qiu F, Stukel TA, de Groot CU, Yan L, Landon B. Variation in revascularisation use and outcomes of patients in hospital with acute myocardial infarction across six high income countries: cross sectional cohort study. BMJ 2022; 377:e069164. [PMID: 35508312 PMCID: PMC9066381 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare treatment and outcomes for patients admitted to hospital with a primary diagnosis of ST elevation or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI) in six high income countries with very different healthcare delivery systems. DESIGN Retrospective cross sectional cohort study. SETTING Patient level administrative data from the United States, Canada (Ontario and Manitoba), England, the Netherlands, Israel, and Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS Adults aged 66 years and older admitted to hospital with STEMI or NSTEMI between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2017. OUTCOMES MEASURES The three categories of outcomes were coronary revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery), mortality, and efficiency (hospital length of stay and 30 day readmission). Rates were standardised to the age and sex distribution of the US acute myocardial infarction population in 2017. Outcomes were assessed separately for STEMI and NSTEMI. Performance was evaluated longitudinally (over time) and cross sectionally (between countries). RESULTS The total number of hospital admissions ranged from 19 043 in Israel to 1 064 099 in the US. Large differences were found between countries for all outcomes. For example, the proportion of patients admitted to hospital with STEMI who received percutaneous coronary intervention in hospital during 2017 ranged from 36.9% (England) to 78.6% (Canada; 71.8% in the US); use of percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI increased in all countries between 2011 and 2017, with particularly large rises in Israel (48.4-65.9%) and Taiwan (49.4-70.2%). The proportion of patients with NSTEMI who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery within 90 days of admission during 2017 was lowest in the Netherlands (3.5%) and highest in the US (11.7%). Death within one year of admission for STEMI in 2017 ranged from 18.9% (Netherlands) to 27.8% (US) and 32.3% (Taiwan). Mean hospital length of stay in 2017 for STEMI was lowest in the Netherlands and the US (5.0 and 5.1 days) and highest in Taiwan (8.5 days); 30 day readmission for STEMI was lowest in Taiwan (11.7%) and the US (12.2%) and highest in England (23.1%). CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of myocardial infarction in six high income countries, all countries had areas of high performance, but no country excelled in all three domains. Our findings suggest that countries could learn from each other by using international comparisons of patient level nationally representative data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Cram
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura A Hatfield
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pieter Bakx
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Amitava Banerjee
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Cardiology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Christina Fu
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michal Gordon
- Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Renaud Heine
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nicole Huang
- Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Dennis Ko
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Schulich Heart Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa M Lix
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Victor Novack
- Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Laura Pasea
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Therese A Stukel
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carin Uyl de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lin Yan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Bruce Landon
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Street A, Smith P. How can we make valid and useful comparisons of different health care systems? Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1299-1301. [PMID: 34755335 PMCID: PMC8579199 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Street
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
| | - Peter Smith
- Centre for Health EconomicsUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Papanicolas I, Figueroa JF. International comparison of patient care trajectories: Insights from the ICCONIC project. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1295-1298. [PMID: 34755338 PMCID: PMC8579200 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Blankart CR, van Gool K, Papanicolas I, Bernal‐Delgado E, Bowden N, Estupiñán‐Romero F, Gauld R, Knight H, Abiona O, Riley K, Schoenfeld AJ, Shatrov K, Wodchis WP, Figueroa JF. International comparison of spending and utilization at the end of life for hip fracture patients. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1370-1382. [PMID: 34490633 PMCID: PMC8579204 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and explore differences in spending and utilization of key health services at the end of life among hip fracture patients across seven developed countries. DATA SOURCES Individual-level claims data from the inpatient and outpatient health care sectors compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC). STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively analyzed utilization and spending from acute hospital care, emergency department, outpatient primary care and specialty physician visits, and outpatient drugs. Patterns of spending and utilization were compared in the last 30, 90, and 180 days across Australia, Canada, England, Germany, New Zealand, Spain, and the United States. We employed linear regression models to measure age- and sex-specific effects within and across countries. In addition, we analyzed hospital-centricity, that is, the days spent in hospital and site of death. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS We identified patients who sustained a hip fracture in 2016 and died within 12 months from date of admission. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Resource use, costs, and the proportion of deaths in hospital showed large variability being high in England and Spain, while low in New Zealand. Days in hospital significantly decreased with increasing age in Canada, Germany, Spain, and the United States. Hospital spending near date of death was significantly lower for women in Canada, Germany, and the United States. The age gradient and the sex effect were less pronounced in utilization and spending of emergency care, outpatient care, and drugs. CONCLUSIONS Across seven countries, we find important variations in end-of-life care for patients who sustained a hip fracture, with some differences explained by sex and age. Our work sheds important insights that may help ongoing health policy discussions on equity, efficiency, and reimbursement in health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
- Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Kees van Gool
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Irene Papanicolas
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
| | | | - Nicholas Bowden
- Department of Women's and Children's HealthUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | - Robin Gauld
- Otago Business School and Centre for Health Systems and TechnologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | - Olukorede Abiona
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Andrew J. Schoenfeld
- Division of Orthopedic SurgeryBrigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Swiss Institute of Translational and Entrepreneurial MedicineBernSwitzerland
| | - Walter P. Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
| | - Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Figueroa JF, Horneffer KE, Riley K, Abiona O, Arvin M, Atsma F, Bernal‐Delgado E, Blankart CR, Bowden N, Deeny S, Estupiñán‐Romero F, Gauld R, Hansen TM, Haywood P, Janlov N, Knight H, Lorenzoni L, Marino A, Or Z, Pellet L, Orlander D, Penneau A, Schoenfeld AJ, Shatrov K, Skudal KE, Stafford M, van de Galien O, van Gool K, Wodchis WP, Tanke M, Jha AK, Papanicolas I. A methodology for identifying high-need, high-cost patient personas for international comparisons. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 3:1302-1316. [PMID: 34755334 PMCID: PMC8579201 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish a methodological approach to compare two high-need, high-cost (HNHC) patient personas internationally. DATA SOURCES Linked individual-level administrative data from the inpatient and outpatient sectors compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC) across 11 countries: Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. STUDY DESIGN We outline a methodological approach to identify HNHC patient types for international comparisons that reflect complex, priority populations defined by the National Academy of Medicine. We define two patient profiles using accessible patient-level datasets linked across different domains of care-hospital care, primary care, outpatient specialty care, post-acute rehabilitative care, long-term care, home-health care, and outpatient drugs. The personas include a frail older adult with a hip fracture with subsequent hip replacement and an older person with complex multimorbidity, including heart failure and diabetes. We demonstrate their comparability by examining the characteristics and clinical diagnoses captured across countries. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Data collected by ICCONIC partners. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Across 11 countries, the identification of HNHC patient personas was feasible to examine variations in healthcare utilization, spending, and patient outcomes. The ability of countries to examine linked, individual-level data varied, with the Netherlands, Canada, and Germany able to comprehensively examine care across all seven domains, whereas other countries such as England, Switzerland, and New Zealand were more limited. All countries were able to identify a hip fracture persona and a heart failure persona. Patient characteristics were reassuringly similar across countries. CONCLUSION Although there are cross-country differences in the availability and structure of data sources, countries had the ability to effectively identify comparable HNHC personas for international study. This work serves as the methodological paper for six accompanying papers examining differences in spending, utilization, and outcomes for these personas across countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kathryn E. Horneffer
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Olukorede Abiona
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Mina Arvin
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Femke Atsma
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Carl Rudolf Blankart
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
- Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Nicholas Bowden
- Dunedin School of MedicineUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | | | - Robin Gauld
- Otago Business SchoolUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | | | - Philip Haywood
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Nils Janlov
- The Swedish Agency for Health and Care Services AnalysisStockholmSweden
| | | | - Luca Lorenzoni
- Health DivisionOrganisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
| | - Alberto Marino
- Health DivisionOrganisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD)ParisFrance
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
| | - Zeynep Or
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Leila Pellet
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Duncan Orlander
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Anne Penneau
- Institute for Research and Documentation in Health Economics (IRDES)ParisFrance
| | - Andrew J. Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic SurgeryBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kosta Shatrov
- KPM Center for Public ManagementUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
| | | | | | | | - Kees van Gool
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE)University of TechnologySydneyAustralia
| | - Walter P. Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy Management & EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
| | - Marit Tanke
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of HealthcareNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Ashish K. Jha
- Brown School of Public HealthProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|