CMV high-risk status and posttransplant outcomes in kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept

Surveillance and prevention of infection in clinical xenotransplantation

SUMMARYXenotransplantation, the transplantation of living organs, tissues, or cells between species, carries the potential to address the global shortage of human organs for patients with end-stage organ failure. Recent advances in genetic engineering have improved prospects for clinical xenotransplantation by reducing immune and inflammatory responses to grafts, controlling coagulation on endothelial surfaces, and modifying viral risks, including the porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV). Management of infectious risks posed by clinical xenotransplantation requires meticulous attention to the biosecure breeding and microbiological surveillance of source animals and recipients and consideration of novel infection control requirements. Infectious risks in xenotransplantation stem from both known human pathogens in immunosuppressed transplant recipients and from porcine organisms for which the clinical manifestations, microbial assays, and therapies are generally limited. Both known and unknown zoonoses may be transmitted from pigs to humans. Some pig-specific pathogens do not infect human cells but have systemic manifestations when active within the xenograft, including porcine cytomegalovirus/porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV), which contributes to graft rejection and consumptive coagulopathy. The role of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) in humans remains uncertain despite the absence of documented transmissions and the availability of swine with inactivated genomic PERV. New technologies, such as metagenomic sequencing and multi-omics approaches, will be essential for detection of novel infections and for understanding interactions between the xenograft, the host's immune system, and potential pathogens. These approaches will allow development of infection control protocols, pathogen surveillance requirements, and tailored antimicrobial therapies to enhance the safety and success of clinical xenotransplantation.

Pulmonary Immunocompromise in Solid Organ Transplantation

This article reviews the multitude of factors contributing to immune dysfunction and pulmonary infection risk in solid organ transplant recipients and references relevant clinical scientific reports. The mechanisms of action of individual immunosuppressive agents are explained, and the clinical effects of these drugs are compared. In addition, specialized methods to assess the net state of immunosuppression in individual transplant recipients and their limitations are discussed.

Secular trends in cytomegalovirus (CMV) risk and outcomes: results from a 10-year longitudinal cohort study in adult kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to determine the secular trends in the incidence of CMV sero-mismatch (D+/R -) and if these trends meaningfully impact clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This was a single-center longitudinal cohort study in adult kidney recipients transplanted between Jan 2012 and June 2021 with follow-up through June 2022. Baseline and follow-up data were collected. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

2,392 kidney transplants were performed during the study period; 132 patients did not meet inclusion criteria. The mean age was 52 years, 41% were female, 57% were black, and 19% were CMV D + /R -. The odds of being CMV high-risk increased by 6% each year (OR 1.06, 1.02-1.10 p = 0.003); 48% of the variability associated with CMV serostatus was explained by transplant year (R2 = 0.478, p = 0.002). Sequential modeling demonstrated that CMV D + /R - serostatus was a substantial risk factor for CMV infection (HR 5.7, 4.5-7.3), CMV disease (HR 8.4, 3.9-18.0), CMV resistance (HR 17.9, 3.8-84.2), CMV refractory infection (HR 35, 4-280), late CMV infection (HR 12.0, 8.3-17.1), acute rejection, and hospitalization for opportunistic infections. Secular trend analysis demonstrated that CMV infections, CMV resistance, and late CMV increased in incidence since 2012. The risks of CMV resistance and late infection was significantly influenced by D + /R - serostatus and transplant year, indicating that this risk is worsening over time.

CONCLUSION

The CMV D + /R - serostatus remains the single most important risk factor for CMV infection, disease, resistance, refractory infection, and late CMV, which appears to be increasing in magnitude.

Belatacept-related cytomegalovirus infection: Advocacy for tailored immunosuppression based on individual assessment of immune fitness

Belatacept, a fusion protein combining cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and the Fc region of human IgG1, is increasingly used as a calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimen in patients with chronic graft dysfunction. Older kidney transplant recipients, particularly from expanded criteria donors, may be switched to belatacept due to poor renal recovery. However, late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is increasingly reported with this treatment, especially in older patients with graft dysfunction. This suggests a progressive loss of CMV-specific T cell response, potentially driven by T cell exhaustion. Contributing factors include preexisting T cell dysfunction, increased viral antigen exposure, and interference in the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway by belatacept. mTOR inhibitors have shown efficacy in preventing CMV reactivation by reinvigorating CMV-specific T cells. These findings support combining belatacept with mTOR inhibitors in high-risk CMV-seropositive recipients and emphasize the need for personalized immune assessments to guide immunosuppressive strategies.

Long Term Outcomes of Transplant Recipients Comparing Belatacept vs. Tacrolimus: A UNOS Database Analysis

Calcineurin inhibitors have been the choice for maintenance immunosuppression (IS) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR), but they are associated with nephrotoxicity and metabolic side effects. We aim to compare the long-term outcomes of KTR on belatacept (bela) versus tacrolimus (tac) IS, in all KTRs and various subgroups. Using the UNOS-STAR files, we identified adult first-KTR from 2010 to 2022. Patients were categorized based on maintenance-IS at index transplant admission by creating a propensity score matched cohort at 1:5 rate using several clinical characteristics. Primary outcomes included patient death, graft failure (GF), and death-censored graft failure (DCGF). Secondary outcomes included delayed graft function (DGF), acute-rejections (AR) within a year, and serum creatinine (Cr) at 1-year. The propensity-matched cohort included KTRs on bela (N = 2612) and tac (N = 12760). There was no significant difference in the hazard ratio of death (1.03 [0.92, 1.14]), GF (1.07 [0.97, 1.17]), or DCGF (1.11 [0.98, 1.25]). A sensitivity analysis comparing a propensity-matched cohort of bela + tac (n = 2033) versus tac (n = 9004); demonstrated significantly reduced risks of death (0.87 [0.76-1.00], p = 0.043) and GF (0.73 [0.64-0.83] p < 0.001) compared to those on Tac alone. In conclusion, bela + tac seems to be a nephron-sparing and rejection-lowering IS regimen with overall improved graft and patient outcomes when compared to the current standard of tacrolimus. Larger Randomized Controlled studies are needed.

Epidemiology of Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients Treated With Belatacept

BACKGROUND

Belatacept is a costimulatory blocker that can be used to prevent and treat rejection in lung transplant recipients (LuTRs). The epidemiology of infections in belatacept-treated LuTRs has not been systematically evaluated.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study of all adult LuTRs who received belatacept as prevention or treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (desensitization) or as part of maintenance immunosuppression from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2022. We assessed the epidemiology of infections that occurred within 12 months following the first belatacept dose.

RESULTS

Fifty-two LuTRs received at least one dose of belatacept as either desensitization (n = 32) or maintenance immunosuppression (n = 20). Among 45 patients who were cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor and/or recipient seropositive, nine (20%) developed CMV infection. Seven (77%) CMV infections occurred despite valganciclovir prophylaxis and four (44%) were associated with antiviral resistance. Three (6%) LuTRs developed Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Twenty-five (48%) LuTRs developed 43 bacterial infections and five (10%) developed proven or probable invasive fungal disease. Incidence rates of viral, bacterial, and fungal infections were similar between the desensitization and maintenance groups: incidence rate ratios (95% confidence interval) were 0.70 (0.32-1.57), 1.31 (0.70-2.46), and 2.82 (0.31-25.2), respectively. Infection/PTLD prompted belatacept discontinuation in eight (15%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first year after belatacept initiation, LuTRs commonly developed CMV infections, EBV+ PTLD, and bacterial infections. Multicenter collaborations are needed to better understand infection risks in LuTRs treated with belatacept.

Anti-intercellular adhesion molecule 1 monomaintenance therapy induced long-term liver allograft survival without chronic rejection

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are essential in liver transplantation (LT); however, their long-term use leads to various adverse effects. The anti-intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 monoclonal antibody MD3 is a potential alternative to CNI. Despite its promising results with short-term therapy, overcoming the challenge of chronic rejection remains important. Thus, we aimed to investigate the outcomes of long-term MD3 therapy with monthly MD3 monomaintenance in nonhuman primate LT models. Rhesus macaques underwent major histocompatibility complex-mismatched allogeneic LT. The conventional immunosuppression group (Con-IS, n = 4) received steroid, tacrolimus, and sirolimus by 4 months posttransplantation. The induction MD3 group (IN-MD3, n = 5) received short-term MD3 therapy for 3 months with Con-IS. The maintenance MD3 group (MA-MD3, n = 4) received MD3 for 3 months, monthly doses by 2 years, and then quarterly. The MA-MD3 group exhibited stable liver function without overt infection and had significantly better liver allograft survival than the IN-MD3 group. Development of donor-specific antibody and chronic rejection were suppressed in the MA-MD3 group but not in the IN-MD3 group. Donor-specific T cell responses were attenuated in the MA-MD3 group. In conclusion, MD3 monomaintenance therapy without maintenance CNI provides long-term liver allograft survival by suppressing chronic rejection, offering a potential breakthrough for future human trials.

Management of resistant and refractory cytomegalovirus infections after transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a classic opportunistic infection in transplant recipients. Treatment-refractory CMV infections are of concern, with growing identification of strains that have developed genetic mutations which confer resistance to standard antiviral therapy. Resistant and refractory CMV infections are associated with worse patient outcomes, prolonged hospitalization, and increased healthcare costs.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a comprehensive practical overview of resistant and refractory CMV infections in transplant recipients. We review the updated definitions for these infections, antiviral pharmacology, mechanisms of drug resistance, diagnostic workup, management strategies, and host-related factors including immune optimization.

EXPERT OPINION

Resistant and refractory CMV infections are a significant contributor to post-transplant morbidity and mortality. This is likely the result of a combination of prolonged antiviral exposure and active viral replication in the setting of intensive pharmacologic immunosuppression. Successful control of resistant and refractory infections in transplant recipients requires a combination of immunomodulatory optimization and appropriate antiviral drug choice with sufficient treatment duration.

Evolving trends in immunosuppression use and cytomegalovirus infection risk over the past decade in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The goal was to determine trends in immunosuppression use and its impact on cytomegalovirus (CMV) outcomes over the past 10 years.

METHODS

This was a single-center longitudinal cohort study of adult kidney recipients transplanted between Jan 2012 and June 2021. Baseline and follow-up data were gathered via chart abstraction and analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of 2392 kidney transplants conducted, 131 patients did not meet inclusion criteria. The mean age was 52 years, 41% were female, 57% were black, and 19% were CMV high-risk. The use of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (RATG) induction (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 1.3-2.1), tacrolimus (FK) level >8 ng/mL (OR 1.1, 1.09-1.11), CMV D+/R- rates (OR 1.06, 1.02-1.10), white blood cell count <3000 (OR 1.22, 1.18-1.26) and valganciclovir prophylaxis (OR 1.7, 1.6-1.9) have significantly increased over the past 10 years.  Rejection rates (OR 0.86, 0.82-0.91) and BK viremia >2000 (OR 0.91, 0.91-0.98) have decreased. RATG induction (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.35, 1.2-1.5), FK >8 ng/mL (aHR 3.5, 3.2-3.9), Belatacept conversion (aHR 2.5, 2.1-3.1), and rejection (aHR 1.8, 1.6-2.0) were significant risk factors for developing CMV infection, while mycophenolate mofetil <1500 mg (aHR 0.52, 0.47-0.59), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) conversion (0.77, 0.56-0.89), cyclosporine-A conversion (aHR 0.68, 0.56-0.84) were associated with lower risk of CMV infection.

CONCLUSION

Increasing use of potent immunosuppression coupled with higher CMV D+/R- F rates may be driving higher rates of CMV infection. Cyclosporine and mTORi conversion appears to be protective against CMV.  A more individualized immunosuppression regimen based on infection risk merits consideration.

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Belatacept based immunosuppression: What and when to combine?

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the effect of belatacept based salvage regimens on kidney transplant outcomes.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included all adult kidney transplant recipients between 2011 and 2022 who were converted to belatacept salvage therapy during their follow up. eGFR, graft survival, incidence of infections and neoplasia, histology and DSA data were collected through systematic review of the medical record.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into 3 groups based on salvage regimen: Mycophenolate mofetil/belatacept (MMF/Bela) (n = 28), low-dose Calcineurin inhibitors/belatacept (CNI/Bela) (n = 22), and low-dose Calcineurin inhibitors/ Mycophenolate mofetil /belatacept (CNI/MMF/Bela) (n = 13). Patients with antibody-mediated rejection were more likely to receive CNIs in addition to belatacept (low-dose CNI/MMF/Bela 54%, low-dose CNI/Bela 45%, MMF/Bela 3.6%, p < 0.001). DSA decreased in all groups after transition to belatacept by 15.67% (p = 0.15). No difference in Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time was observed between the groups, and eGFR remained stable over the first year after transition to belatacept. The incidence of death and allograft failure was similar between the groups (low- dose CNI/MMF/Bela n = 3, low-dose CNI/Bela n = 7, MMF/Bela n = 4; p = 0.41). Patients in the low-dose CNI/Bela cohort who were transitioned to belatacept within 6 months from transplant showed a decline in eGFR over the first year after transition, while the other treatment cohorts demonstrated stable or slight increase in eGFR.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates comparable transplant outcomes in terms of eGFR, graft survival, incidence of infections and neoplasia, rejection rate and donor specific antibody (DSA) in three belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression regimens supporting the safety and efficacy of these therapeutic options.

Cytomegalovirus Matching in Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation: Results From a U.S. National Simulation Model

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infects >60% of adults and can pose an independent risk factor for allograft loss and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a nationwide implementation of CMV seromatching (donor/recipient: D-/R- and D+/R+) in the U.S. deceased donor kidney allocation system (KAS).

Methods

Adult candidates on the U.S. kidney-only transplant waiting list and deceased donor kidneys offered to the U.S. transplant centers were considered. A discrete-event simulation model, simulating the pre-COVID-19 period from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2018, was used to compare the performances of currently employed KAS-250 policy (without CMV matching) to various simulated CMV matching policies parameterized by calculated panel reactive antibody exception threshold. Outcomes included CMV serodistribution, waiting time, access to transplantation among various groups, transplant rate, graft survival, kidney discard rate, and antigen-mismatch distribution, stratified by CMV serostatus.

Results

CMV matching policy with a calculated panel reactive antibody exception threshold of 50% (namely, the CMV">50%" policy) strikes a better balance between benefits and drawbacks of CMV matching. Compared with KAS-250, CMV">50%" reduced CMV high-risk (D+/R-) transplants (6.1% versus 18.1%) and increased CMV low-risk (D-/R-) transplants (27.2% versus 13.1%); increased transplant rate for CMV R- patients (11.54 versus 12.57) but decreased for R+ patients (10.68 versus 10.48), yielding an increase in aggregate (11.09 versus 10.94); and reduced mean time to transplantation (by 6 wk); and reduced kidney discard rate (25.7% versus 26.2%).

Conclusions

Our findings underscore the feasibility and potential advantages of a nationwide CMV seromatching policy in kidney transplantation.

Use of a Belatacept-based Immunosuppression for Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Circulatory Death: A Paired Kidney Analysis

Background

Efficacy and safety of belatacept have not been specifically reported for kidney transplantations from donors after circulatory death.

Methods

In this retrospective multicenter paired kidney study, we compared the outcome of kidney transplantations with a belatacept-based to a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression. We included all kidney transplant recipients from donors after uncontrolled or controlled circulatory death performed in our center between February 2015 and October 2020 and treated with belatacept (n = 31). The control group included the recipients of the contralateral kidney that were treated with CNI in 8 other centers (tacrolimus n = 29, cyclosporine n = 2).

Results

There was no difference in the rate of delayed graft function. A higher incidence of biopsy-proven rejections was noted in the belatacept group (24 versus 6 episodes). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly higher in the belatacept group at 3-, 12-, and 36-mo posttransplant, but the slope of eGFR was similar in the 2 groups. During a mean follow-up of 4.1 y, 12 patients discontinued belatacept and 2 patients were switched from CNI to belatacept. For patients who remained on belatacept, eGFR mean value and slope were significantly higher during the whole follow-up. At 5 y, eGFR was 80.7 ± 18.5 with belatacept versus 56.3 ± 22.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 with CNI (P = 0.003). No significant difference in graft and patient survival was observed.

Conclusions

The use of belatacept for kidney transplants from either uncontrolled or controlled donors after circulatory death resulted in a better medium-term renal function for patients remaining on belatacept despite similar rates of delayed graft function and higher rates of cellular rejection.

The Burden and Impact of Early Post-transplant Multidrug-Resistant Organism Detection Among Renal Transplant Recipients, 2005-2021

Background

Reducing the burden of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization and infection among renal transplant recipients (RTRs) may improve patient outcomes. We aimed to assess whether the detection of an MDRO or a comparable antibiotic-susceptible organism (CSO) during the early post-transplant (EPT) period was associated with graft loss and mortality among RTRs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of RTRs transplanted between 2005 and 2021. EPT positivity was defined as a positive bacterial culture within 30 days of transplant. The incidence and prevalence of EPT MDRO detection were calculated. The primary outcome was a composite of 1-year allograft loss or mortality following transplant. Multivariable Cox hazard regression, competing risk, propensity score-weighted sensitivity, and subgroup analyses were performed.

Results

Among 3507 RTRs, the prevalence of EPT MDRO detection was 1.3% (95% CI, 0.91%-1.69%) with an incidence rate per 1000 EPT-days at risk of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.31-0.57). Among RTRs who met survival analysis inclusion criteria (n = 3432), 91% (3138/3432) had no positive EPT cultures and were designated as negative controls, 8% (263/3432) had a CSO detected, and 1% (31/3432) had an MDRO detected in the EPT period. EPT MDRO detection was associated with the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.29; 95% CI, 1.21-8.92) and death-censored allograft loss (cause-specific aHR, 7.15; 95% CI, 0.92-55.5; subdistribution aHR, 7.15; 95% CI, 0.95-53.7). A similar trend was seen in the subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

MDRO detection during the EPT period was associated with allograft loss, suggesting the need for increased strategies to optimize prevention of MDRO colonization and infection.

Infective complications in the renal transplant recipients

Infections remain a common complication of solid-organ transplantation and are a major factor of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. The incidence of infection in renal transplant patients is directly related to the net immunosuppressive effect achieved and the duration of the administration of immunosuppressive therapy. The major types of infections can be categorized according to the time post-transplant during which they occur: in the first month after transplantation post-surgical bacterial infections and in the period from one to four months post-transplant opportunistic infections, overall cytomegalovirus; late infections, beyond 6-12 months, are community-acquired infections. Opportunistic infections (like Pneumocystis carini, Listeria monocytogenes, and Aspergillus fumigatus) most frequently occur in the first 12 months post-transplant and can be modulated by prior exposures and the use of prophylaxis.

Letermovir Rescue Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Refractory/Resistant CMV Disease

(1) Background: CMV infections remain a problem after kidney transplantation, particularly if patients are refractory or resistant (r/r) to treatment with valganciclovir (VGCV) or ganciclovir (GCV). (2) Methods: In a single-center retrospective study, kidney transplant recipients (KTR) receiving letermovir (LTV) as rescue therapy for VGCV-/GCV-r/r CMV disease were analyzed regarding CMV history, immunosuppression, and outcomes. (3) Results: Of 201 KTR treated for CMV between 2017 and 2022, 8 patients received LTV following treatment failure with VGCV/GCV. All patients received CMV prophylaxis with VGCV according to the center's protocol, and 7/8 patients had a high-risk (D+/R-) CMV constellation. In seven of eight cases, rising CMV levels occurred during prophylaxis. In seven of eight patients, a mutation in UL97 associated with a decreased response to VGCV/GCV was detected. In four of eight patients, LTV resulted in CMV clearance after 24 ± 10 weeks (16-39 weeks), two of eight patients stabilized at viral loads <2000 cop/mL (6-20 weeks), and two of eight patients developed LTV resistance (range 8-10 weeks). (4) Conclusion: LTV, which is currently evaluated for CMV prophylaxis in kidney transplantation, also shows promising results for the treatment of patients with VGCV/GCV resistance despite the risk of developing LTV resistance. Additional studies are needed to further define its role in the treatment of patients with CMV resistance.

Real world experience with conversion from valganciclovir to letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis: Letermovir reverses leukopenia and avoids mycophenolate dose reduction

PURPOSE

Valganciclovir (VGC) is the gold-standard for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis (PPX) after solid organ transplant (SOT). Letermovir (LTV) was recently approved in high-risk kidney transplant and has reduced myelosuppressive toxicity. Conversion from VGC to LTV may be pursued in the setting of leukopenia. It is unknown if this strategy is effective.

METHODS

Adult patients receiving abdominal SOT were included if converted from VGC to LTV between January 1, 2018 and January 31, 2023. Primary objective was to describe the impact of LTV conversion as measured by WBC recovery, mycophenolate modification, and use of GCSF, and prophylaxis efficacy assessed by course completion and breakthrough DNAemia. Secondary objective was to evaluate rates of post-prophylaxis CMV.

RESULTS

Seventy five SOT recipients met inclusion criteria. Mean change in WBC in response to LTV conversion by day 14 was +2.02 ± 2.52 k/uL. 75%(56/75) of the population did not require mycophenolate adjustment or had their dose increased after conversion. GCSF was required in 38.7%(29/75) prior to conversion; only 21.3%(16/75) of patients required GCSF after conversion. Early termination was uncommon, 14.7%(11/75) stopped due to lack of ongoing insurance approval, only one patient stopped due to adverse effects (1.3%). One patient had clinically significant breakthrough (1.3%) that was successfully managed with VGC. Incidence of post prophylaxis CMV was 40%.

CONCLUSION

Withholding of VGC with LTV conversion may improve leukopenia without need for additional supportive measures. Most importantly, this strategy avoided additional mycophenolate modifications. In our study, LTV was associated with low rates of breakthrough. Post-prophylaxis CMV was similar to VGC prophylaxis.

Costimulatory Blockade and Solid Organ Transplantation: The Past, Present, and Future

Belatacept is the first costimulatory blockade agent clinically approved for transplant immunosuppression. Although more than 10 years of study have demonstrated that belatacept offers superior long-term renal allograft and patient survival compared to conventional calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression regimens, the clinical adoption of belatacept has continued to lag because of concerns of an early risk of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and various logistical barriers to its administration. In this review, the history of the clinical development of belatacept is examined, along with the findings of the seminal BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials culminating in the clinical approval of belatacept. Recent efforts to incorporate belatacept into novel CNI-free immunosuppression regimens are reviewed, as well as the experience of the Emory Transplant Center in using a tapered course of low-dose tacrolimus in belatacept-treated renal allograft patients to garner the long-term outcome benefits of belatacept without the short-term increased risks of ACR. Potential avenues to increase the clinical adoption of belatacept in the future are explored, including surmounting the logistical barriers of belatacept administration through subcutaneous administration or more infrequent belatacept dosing. In addition, belatacept conversion strategies and potential expanded clinical indications of belatacept are discussed for pediatric transplant recipients, extrarenal transplant recipients, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and in patients with failed renal allografts. Finally, we discuss the novel immunosuppressive drugs currently in the development pipeline that may aid in the expansion of costimulation blockade utilization.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Belatacept

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in kidney transplant recipients has been reported in 3% to 9% of anti-HBc antibody (HBcAb)-positive HBs antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients. It has not been studied in patients receiving belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of all transplant recipients receiving belatacept in 2 kidney transplantation centers in France. Among HBcAb-positive patients, we analyzed HBV reactivation rate, outcomes, and risk factors.

Results

A total of 135 patients treated with belatacept were included: 32 were HBcAb-positive and 2 were HBsAg-positive. Seven patients reactivated HBV (21.9% of HBcAb-positive patients), including 5 HBsAg-negative patients (16.7% of HBcAb-positive HBsAg-negative patients). Reactivation occurred 54.8 (± 70.9) months after transplantation. One patient presented with severe hepatitis and 1 patient developed cirrhosis. There was no significant difference in survival between patients that reactivated HBV and patients that did not: 5-year patient survival of 100% (28.6; 100) and 83.4% (67.6; 100), respectively (P = 0.363); and 5-year graft survival of 100% (28.6; 100) and 79.8% (61.7; 100), respectively (P = 0.335). No factor, including HBsAb positivity and antiviral prophylaxis, was statistically associated with the risk of HBV reactivation.

Conclusion

HBV reactivation rate was high in patients treated with belatacept when compared with previous transplantation studies. HBV reactivation did not impact survival. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. A systematic antiviral prophylaxis for these patients should be considered and evaluated.

Increased CMV disease and "severe" BK viremia with belatacept vs. sirolimus three-drug maintenance immunosuppression

OBJECTIVES

Belatacept may provide benefit in delayed graft function, but its association with infectious complications is understudied. We aim to assess the incidence of CMV and BK viremia in patients treated with sirolimus or belatacept as part of a three-drug immunosuppression regimen after kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Kidney transplant recipients from 01/01/2015 to 10/01/2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Maintenance immunosuppression was either tacrolimus, mycophenolate and sirolimus (B0) or tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and belatacept (5.0 mg/kg monthly) (B1). Primary outcomes of interest were BK and CMV viremia which were followed until the end of the study period. Secondary outcomes included graft function (serum creatinine, eGFR) and acute rejection through 12 months.

RESULTS

Belatacept was initiated in patients with a higher mean kidney donor profile index (B0:0.36 vs. B1:0.44, p = .02) with more delayed graft function (B0:6.1% vs. B1:26.1%, p < .001). Belatacept therapy was associated with more "severe" CMV viremia >25,000 copies/mL (B0:1.2% vs. B1:5.9%, p = .016) and CMV disease (B0:0.41% vs. B1:4.2%, p = .015). However, there was no difference in the overall incidence of CMV viremia >200 IU/mL (B0:9.4% vs. B1:13.5%, p = .28). There was no difference in the incidence of BK viremia >200 IU/mL (B0:29.7% vs. B1:31.1%, p = .78) or BK-associated nephropathy (B0:2.4% vs. B1:1.7%, p = .58), but belatacept was associated with "severe" BK viremia, defined as >10,000 IU/mL (B0:13.0% vs. B1:21.8%, p = .03). The mean serum Cr was significantly higher with belatacept therapy at 1-year follow up (B0:1.24 mg/dL vs. B1:1.43 mg/dL, p = .003). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (B0:1.2% vs. B1:2.6%, p = .35) and graft loss (B0:1.2% vs. B1:0.84%, p = .81) were comparable at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Belatacept therapy was associated with an increased risk of CMV disease and "severe" CMV and BK viremia. However, this regimen did not increase the overall incidence of infection and facilitated comparable acute rejection and graft loss at 12-month follow up.

Continuation of immunosuppression vs. immunosuppression weaning in potential repeat kidney transplant candidates: a care management perspective

Management of immunosuppression in patients with a failing or failed kidney transplant requires a complete assessment of their clinical condition. One of the major considerations in determining immunosuppression is whether or not such an individual is considered a candidate for re-transplantation. Withdrawal of immunosuppression in a re-transplant candidate can result in allosensitization and markedly reduce the chances of a repeat transplant. In this review, we summarize the effects of immunosuppression reduction on HLA sensitization, discuss the impacts of allosensitization in these patients, and explore reduction protocols and future directions. Risks of chronic immunosuppression, medical management of the failing allograft, and the effect of nephrectomy are covered elsewhere in this issue.

Discordance in cytomegalovirus viremia in kidney recipients from the same donor is associated with the worst outcomes

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common viral infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) that has been associated with negative outcomes. The effect on outcomes of concordance versus discordance in CMV between two different recipients of kidneys from the same donor is largely unknown.

METHODS

We reviewed all adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (DDKTs) for which both kidneys were transplanted to two different recipients at our center between 2014 and 2019. Recipient pairs from each donor were divided into groups based on concordance or discordance for the development of CMV viremia between the pair; concordant no CMV (cc-no-CMV) if neither KTR developed CMV, concordant CMV (cc-CMV) if both KTRs developed CMV. The discordant group was then further divided based on the individual development of CMV (dc-CMV) or lack of development of CMV (dc-no-CMV). Patient mortality and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) were outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Of 578 KTRs, 67% were cc-no-CMV, 5% were cc-CMV, 14% were dc-no-CMV, and 14% dc-CMV. Some of the baseline characteristics differ among the groups including a higher prevalence of high-risk serostatus (D+/R-) in cc-CMV (32%) and dc-CMV (32%). In multivariate analysis, with reference to cc-no-CMV, dc-CMV was associated with increased risk for DCGF (HR 3.13, 95% CI 1.58-6.19), and so was delayed graft function. Factors associated with increased risk of mortality were advanced recipient age and DGF. cc-CMV was neither associated with mortality nor DCGF.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support that in certain contexts, CMV viremia has adverse allograft outcomes, and this is highlighted when illustrated via discordance in CMV between pair kidneys from the same deceased donor.

Infections after organ transplantation and immune response

Organ transplantation has provided another chance of survival for end-stage organ failure patients. Yet, transplant rejection is still a main challenging factor. Immunosuppressive drugs have been used to avoid rejection and suppress the immune response against allografts. Thus, immunosuppressants increase the risk of infection in immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. The infection risk reflects the relationship between the nature and severity of immunosuppression and infectious diseases. Furthermore, immunosuppressants show an immunological impact on the genetics of innate and adaptive immune responses. This effect usually reactivates the post-transplant infection in the donor and recipient tissues since T-cell activation has a substantial role in allograft rejection. Meanwhile, different infections have been found to activate the T-cells into CD₄⁺ helper T-cell subset and CD₈⁺ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte that affect the infection and the allograft. Therefore, the best management and preventive strategies of immunosuppression, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and intensive medical care are required for successful organ transplantation. This review addresses the activation of immune responses against different infections in immunocompromised individuals after organ transplantation.

Three-year Outcomes After Conversion From Monthly to Every 2-month Belatacept Maintenance Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Maintenance immunosuppression with belatacept following kidney transplantation results in improved long-term graft function as compared with calcineurin inhibitors. However, broad application of belatacept has been limited, in part related to logistical barriers surrounding a monthly (q1m) infusion requirement.

Methods

To determine whether every 2-mo (q2m) belatacept is noninferior to standard q1m maintenance, we conducted a prospective, single-center randomized trial in low-immunologic-risk, stable renal transplant recipients. Here, post hoc analysis of 3-y outcomes, including renal function and adverse events, are reported.

Results

One hundred sixty-three patients received treatment in the q1m control group (n = 82) or q2m study group (n = 81). Renal allograft function as measured by baseline-adjusted estimated glomerular filtration rate was not significantly different between groups (time-averaged mean difference of 0.2 mL/min/1.73 m²; 95% confidence interval: -2.5, 2.9). There were no statistically significant differences in time to death or graft loss, freedom from rejection, or freedom from donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). During the extended 12- to 36-mo follow-up, 3 deaths, 1 graft loss occurred in the q1m group, compared with 2 deaths, and 2 graft losses in the q2m group. In the q1m group, 1 patient developed DSAs and acute rejection. In the q2m group, 3 patients developed DSAs and 2 associated with acute rejection.

Conclusions

Based on the similar renal function and survival at 36 mo compared with q1m, q2m belatacept is a potentially viable maintenance immunosuppressive strategy in low immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients that may facilitate increased clinical utilization of costimulation blockade-based immunosuppression.

Use of belatacept in kidney transplantation: what's new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The advent of calcineurin inhibitors have led to a significant improvement in short term outcomes after kidney transplantation. However, long term outcomes are hindered by the cardiovascular, metabolic and chronic renal toxicity associated with these agents. Belatacept is a selective T cell costimulation blocker that is approved for prevention of rejection in kidney transplantation, and has been associated with favorable cardiovascular, metabolic and renal outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. This review provides an overview of recent updates in the use of belatacept in kidney transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Belatacept may be a safe alternative to calcineurin inhibitors for select kidney transplant populations. Patients converted to belatacept from a calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression generally experience improvement in renal function, and may be less likely to develop de novo donor specific antibodies or new onset diabetes after transplantation. Although, belatacept based immunosuppression may increase the risk of early acute cellular rejection, it may however be beneficial in stabilization of long-term renal function and improvement in inflammation in patients with chronic active antibody mediated rejection. These benefits need to be counterweighed with risks of lack of response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination and other adverse infectious outcomes.

SUMMARY

Belatacept may be an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors and may contribute to improved long term metabolic and allograft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Careful selection of patients for belatacept-based immunosuppression is needed, to obviate the risk of acute rejection shown in clinical studies.

Progress in kidney transplantation: The role for systems immunology

The development of systems biology represents an immense breakthrough in our ability to perform translational research and deliver personalized and precision medicine. A multidisciplinary approach in combination with use of novel techniques allows for the extraction and analysis of vast quantities of data even from the volume and source limited samples that can be obtained from human subjects. Continued advances in microfluidics, scalability and affordability of sequencing technologies, and development of data analysis tools have made the application of a multi-omics, or systems, approach more accessible for use outside of specialized centers. The study of alloimmune and protective immune responses after solid organ transplant offers innumerable opportunities for a multi-omics approach, however, transplant immunology labs are only just beginning to adopt the systems methodology. In this review, we focus on advances in biological techniques and how they are improving our understanding of the immune system and its interactions, highlighting potential applications in transplant immunology. First, we describe the techniques that are available, with emphasis on major advances that allow for increased scalability. Then, we review initial applications in the field of transplantation with a focus on topics that are nearing clinical integration. Finally, we examine major barriers to adapting these methods and discuss potential future developments.

Impact of belatacept and tacrolimus on cytomegalovirus viral load control and relapse in moderate and high-risk cytomegalovirus serostatus kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Belatacept improves long-term graft survival, but control of some primary viral infections may be impaired. We evaluated the impact of belatacept and tacrolimus on cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral control, remission and relapse in CMV high-risk and moderate-risk recipients.

METHODS

Using a multistate Markov model, we evaluated viral load state transitions of 173 kidney transplant recipients with at least one episode of viremia within 1 year after transplant: state 1, undetectable/low viral load; state 2, moderate viremia; and state 3, severe viremia.

RESULTS

Among high-risk recipients, belatacept-treated recipients exhibited a significantly higher probability of entering moderate viremia (.36; 95% CI = .31, .41) than tacrolimus-treated recipients (.20; 95% CI = .13, .29). The expected number of days in viremic states differed. High-risk belatacept-treated recipients persisted in moderate viremia for significantly longer (128 days, 95% CI = 110, 146) than did tacrolimus-treated recipients (70.0 days, 95% CI = 45.2, 100) and showed a trend of shorter duration in low/undetectable viral load state (172 days, 95% CI = 148, 195) than did tacrolimus-treated recipients (239 days, 95% CI = 195, 277). Moderate-risk recipients showed better viral load control and with no differences by immunosuppression.

CONCLUSION

High-risk belatacept-treated recipients showed defects in sustaining viral control relative to tacrolimus-treated recipients. Avoidance of initial use belatacept in high-risk recipients or development of modified management protocols should be considered.

Altered Signatures of Plasma Inflammatory Proteins and Phonotypic Markers of NK Cells in Kidney Transplant Patients upon CMV Reactivation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation remains a common opportunistic infection with a prominent role in immune reconstitution in organ transplant recipients. CMVs as important drivers of natural killer (NK) cell differentiation has been indicated to prompt several phenotypic and functional alteration in these cells. We aimed to monitor the reconstitution of NK cells and change the signature of inflammatory proteins at the critical phase of CMV reactivation over six months after kidney transplantation. The present study indicated that CMV reactivation is associated with the development of IL-6, IL-10, and cytotoxic granules, including granzyme-B and granulysin, and the drop in the frequency of CD16 + NKG2A-CD57 + NK cell subset in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with reactivation versus non- reactivated ones. Our findings describe distinct immune signatures that emerged with CMV reactivation after kidney transplantation, which may be helpful in the timely management of CMV infection in KTRs.

Preservation of Antiviral Immunologic Efficacy Without Alloimmunity After Switch to Belatacept in Calcineurin Inhibitor-Intolerant Patients

Introduction

Belatacept has shown potential for prevention of rejection after kidney transplantation, given its demonstration of reduced nephrotoxicity in combination with absence of significant incidence of rejection. However, concerns have been raised regarding increased risk of viral infection.

Methods

We set out to explore the impact of the switch to belatacept on alloimmune and antiviral immunity through the study of patients switched from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept within 3 months of kidney transplantation compared with a matched cohort of control patients on a CNI-based regimen.

Results

After the switch to belatacept, immune phenotyping demonstrated a decrease in naive and an increase in terminally differentiated effector memory (TMRA) T cells, with no significant difference compared with control patients. Donor-specific immune response, measured by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), did not change significantly either by single or double cytokine secretion, but it was associated with the appearance of donor-specific antibody (DSA) in the control but not the belatacept cohort (P = 0.039 for naive and P = 0.002 for TMRA subtypes). Increased incidence of de novo DSA development was observed in the control group (P = 0.035). Virus-specific immune response, as measured by ICS in response to cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), was similar in both groups and stable over time.

Conclusion

We found that belatacept use was associated with an absence of alloreactivity without impact on immune phenotype, while preserving the antiviral immune response, for patients switched from a CNI-based regimen. In parallel, the antiviral immune response against CMV and EBV was preserved after the belatacept switch (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01953120).

The Prevalence of Neurological Complication after Renal Transplantation

Objective

To evaluate the incidence of neurological complications (NCs) after renal transplantation by meta-analysis.

Methods

A broad literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane-Library was performed from inception to December 31, 2021, to collect published studies on the incidence of NCs after kidney transplantation. The R language meta-package was used to organize and analyze the data.

Results

17 articles including 1,1119 participants were considered eligible. There were 3 studies that recorded unclassified NCs (249 participants), 6 that recorded nervous system CMV infection (1489 participants), 3 that recorded headache (243 participants), and 5 that recorded cerebrovascular events (9138 participants). There was significant heterogeneity (all I ² ≥ 75%) in all analyses, and random-effects models were selected. Meta-analysis results showed that the incidence of unclassified NCs was 0.29 (95% CI (0.16-0.48)), the incidence of nervous system CMV infection was 0.38 (95% CI (0.26-0.52)), the incidence of headache was 0.55 (95% CI (0.44-0.66)), and the incidence of stroke was 0.05 (95% CI (0.02-0.09)). Egger's test showed that there was no conspicuous publication bias in the included literature in each group.

Conclusions

Headache had the highest incidence (55%) in the nervous system after KT, followed by nervous system CMV infection (38%) and stroke (5%). Nevertheless, due to the inconsistencies in the types of NCs included and the follow-up time, our results might only serve as an epidemiological reference for the specific incidence differences.

Belatacept in Kidney Transplantation: What Are the True Benefits? A Systematic Review

The current gold standard to prevent allograft rejection for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation currently consists in glucocorticoids, an antiproliferative agent and a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), with better outcome for tacrolimus than cyclosporin. Although, CNI drastically improved early graft survival, so far, CNI have failed to significantly improve long-term survival mainly because of nephrotoxicity. In addition, CNI carry several other side effects such as an increased risk for cardiovascular events and for diabetes mellitus. Therefore, seeking alternatives to CNI remains of paramount importance in kidney transplantation. Belatacept is a fusion protein composed of the human IgG1 Fc fragment linked to the modified extracellular domain of cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated antigen 4. In kidney transplant recipients, pivotal phase III randomized studies suggested clinical benefits of belatacept as an initial maintenance regimen, as compared with cyclosporine, mainly on kidney function. Recently, a randomized study also suggested a clinical benefit on renal function of a conversion from a CNI-based to a belatacept-based maintenance regimen in patients. However, conversion from CNIs to belatacept is probably associated with an increased risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection and should prompt close clinical surveillance. On the other hand, other studies suggest a decrease in de novo humoral transplant immunization. Belatacept is probably associated with an increase in both risk and severity of some infectious diseases, including EBV-linked post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders, and with a decreased response to vaccines. Most studies on belatacept are observational, retrospective, and non-comparative. Consequently, high-quality data about the safety and efficacy profile of belatacept, as compared with the current gold standard for maintenance regimens (tacrolimus-based), is uncertain. Our review will therefore focus on the most recent published data aiming at evaluating the evidence-based or the “true” benefits and risks of belatacept-based regimens in kidney transplantation.

The Clinical and Economic Benefit of CMV Matching in Kidney Transplant: A Decision Analysis

BACKGROUND

The development of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after kidney transplant remains a significant cause of posttransplant morbidity, graft loss, and mortality. Despite appropriate antiviral therapy, recipients without previous CMV exposure can currently be allocated a kidney from a donor with previous CMV infection (D+R-) that carries the greatest risk of posttransplant CMV infection and associated complications. Preferential placement of CMV D- organs in negative recipients (R-) has been shown to reduce the risk of viral infection and associated complications.

METHODS

To assess the long-term survival and economic benefits of allocation policy reforms, a decision-analytic model was constructed to compare receipt of CMV D- with CMV D+ organ in CMV R- recipients using data from transplant registry, Medicare claims, and pharmaceutical costs.

RESULTS

For CMV R- patients, receipt of a CMV D- organ was associated with greater average survival (14.3 versus 12.6 y), superior quality-adjusted life years (12.6 versus 9.8), and lower costs ($529 512 versus $542 963). One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated a survival advantage for patients waiting as long as 30 mo for a CMV D- kidney.

CONCLUSIONS

Altering national allocation policy to preferentially offer CMV D- organs to CMV R- recipients could improve survival and lower costs after transplant if appropriately implemented.

Longitudinal Evaluation of Cytopenias in the Renal Transplant Population

Cytopenias, a common complication for immunosuppressed patients, are known to be associated with adverse transplant outcomes. However, there is little information on cytopenias in recipients treated with the costimulation blockade agent, belatacept.

Methods

We compared cytopenia incidence and manifestations in patients undergoing kidney transplant at Emory University Hospital on tacrolimus and belatacept. To reduce selection bias, the tacrolimus group was narrowed to include only patients eligible for belatacept.

Results

Of 1651 patients transplanted between 2009 and 2019, 187 (11%) experienced severe anemia, 309 (19%) experienced leukopenia, and 62 (4%) thrombocytopenia. On multivariable regressions, deceased-donor transplant, cytomegalovirus viremia, and thymoglobulin treatment were associated with risk of developing leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. High-risk cytomegalovirus status was also associated with development of leukopenia and anemia. Additionally, azathioprine was associated with development of anemia, and both tacrolimus therapy and Caucasian race were associated with thrombocytopenia. Longitudinal quantifications of hematologic cell lines over the first-year posttransplant were extracted from generalized linear models fit using splines. Only hemoglobin range was significantly different between groups (greater in belatacept patients). Plots of mean cell count for each group suggest an earlier recovery from posttransplant anemia in belatacept patients.

Conclusions

Belatacept patients are not at increased risk of cytopenia but may have improved recovery from posttransplant anemia.

Long-Term Infectious Complications of Kidney Transplantation

Infections remain a common complication of solid-organ transplantation. Most infections in the first month after transplant are typically health care-associated infections, whereas late infections, beyond 6-12 months, are community-acquired infections. Opportunistic infections most frequently present in the first 12 months post-transplant and can be modulated on prior exposures and use of prophylaxis. In this review, we summarize the current epidemiology of postkidney transplant infections with a focus on key viral (BK polyomavirus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and norovirus), bacterial (urinary tract infections and Clostridioides difficile colitis), and fungal infections. Current guidelines for safe living post-transplant are also summarized. Literature supporting prophylaxis and vaccination is also provided.

Conversion from Calcineurin Inhibitor- to Belatacept-Based Maintenance Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Phase 3b Trial

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are standard of care after kidney transplantation, but they are associated with nephrotoxicity and reduced long-term graft survival. Belatacept, a selective T cell costimulation blocker, is approved for the prophylaxis of kidney transplant rejection. This phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of conversion from CNI-based to belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Stable adult kidney transplant recipients 6-60 months post-transplantation under CNI-based immunosuppression were randomized (1:1) to switch to belatacept or continue treatment with their established CNI. The primary end point was the percentage of patients surviving with a functioning graft at 24 months.

RESULTS

Overall, 446 renal transplant recipients were randomized to belatacept conversion ( n =223) or CNI continuation ( n =223). The 24-month rates of survival with graft function were 98% and 97% in the belatacept and CNI groups, respectively (adjusted difference, 0.8; 95.1% CI, -2.1 to 3.7). In the belatacept conversion versus CNI continuation groups, 8% versus 4% of patients experienced biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), respectively, and 1% versus 7% developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs), respectively. The 24-month eGFR was higher with belatacept (55.5 versus 48.5 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 with CNI). Both groups had similar rates of serious adverse events, infections, and discontinuations, with no unexpected adverse events. One patient in the belatacept group had post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching stable renal transplant recipients from CNI-based to belatacept-based immunosuppression was associated with a similar rate of death or graft loss, improved renal function, and a numerically higher BPAR rate but a lower incidence of dnDSA.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: A Study in Maintenance Kidney Transplant Recipients Following Conversion to Nulojix® (Belatacept)-Based, NCT01820572.

Heterologous Immunity of Virus-Specific T Cells Leading to Alloreactivity: Possible Implications for Solid Organ Transplantation

Exposure of the adaptive immune system to a pathogen can result in the activation and expansion of T cells capable of recognizing not only the specific antigen but also different unrelated antigens, a process which is commonly referred to as heterologous immunity. While such cross-reactivity is favourable in amplifying protective immune responses to pathogens, induction of T cell-mediated heterologous immune responses to allo-antigens in the setting of solid organ transplantation can potentially lead to allograft rejection. In this review, we provide an overview of murine and human studies investigating the incidence and functional properties of virus-specific memory T cells cross-reacting with allo-antigens and discuss their potential relevance in the context of solid organ transplantation.

Temporal trends and current use of de novo belatacept in kidney transplant recipients in the United States

The adoption of de novo belatacept in kidney transplant (kTx) recipients was hampered by an increased risk of acute cellular rejection (ACR) with variation in adopted belatacept based immunosuppressive therapies across centers. We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) to evaluate the temporal trends in belatacept use and describe the associated induction and maintenance regimens in US adult kTx recipients transplanted between June 2011 and December 2018. The number of patients receiving de novo-belatacept based immunosuppressive therapy increased from .74% in 2011 to 3.11% in 2016. In 2016, 66/207 centers used de novo belatacept-based regimen with 3.03% using it in over 50% of their patients. The use of T-cell depleting agents increased with time. Since 2012, the rate of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) use in combination with belatacept remained stable around 50% and ∼30% remained under belatacept/CNI combination at 1-year post-transplantation. The adoption of belatacept as de novo immunosuppressive regimen has been slow and its use remains low in the United States. Various regimens have been used to modulate the risk of ACR. Further studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of these regimens and assessing their safety especially with regard to the risk of infection are needed.

Belatacept Use after Kidney Transplantation and Its Effects on Risk of Infection and COVID-19 Vaccine Response

Introduction: Belatacept is a common immunosuppressive therapy used after kidney transplantation (KT) to avoid calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) use and its related toxicities. It is unclear whether its use exposes KT recipients (KTx) to a greater risk of infection or a poorer response to vaccines. Areas covered: We reviewed PubMed and the Cochrane database. We then summarized the mechanisms and impacts of belatacept use on the risk of infection, particularly opportunistic, in two settings, i.e., de novo KTx and conversion from CNIs. We also focused on COVID-19 infection risk and response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients whose maintenance immunosuppression relies on belatacept. Expert opinion: When belatacept is used de novo, or after drug conversion the safety profile regarding the risk of infection remains good. However, there is an increased risk of opportunistic infections, mainly CMV disease and Pneumocystis pneumonia, particularly in those with a low eGFR, in older people, in those receiving steroid-based therapy, or those that have an early conversion from CNI to belatacept (i.e., <six months post-transplantation). Thus, we recommend, if possible, delaying conversion from CNI to belatacept until at least six months post-transplantation. Optimal timing seems to be eight months post-transplantation. In addition, KTx receiving belatacept respond poorly to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Adverse Effects of Immunosuppression: Infections

Immunosuppressive therapies are currently indicated for a wide range of diseases. As new agents emerge and indications evolve the landscape grows increasingly complex. Therapies can target pathologic immune system over-activation in rheumatologic or autoimmune disease, or conditioning and graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylactic regimens may eliminate or inhibit host immune function to improve graft survival and risk of complication in solid organ transplantation (SOT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). With immunosuppressive therapy, infections occur. Complex disease states, host factors, and concomitant therapies contribute to a "net state" of immunosuppression that must be considered and may confound perceived increased infection risks in patients receiving treatment.

Every 2-month belatacept maintenance therapy in kidney transplant recipients greater than 1-year posttransplant: A randomized, noninferiority trial

Belatacept results in improved kidney transplant outcomes, but utilization has been limited by logistical barriers related to monthly (q1m) intravenous infusions. Every 2-month (q2m) belatacept has potential to increase utilization, therefore we conducted a randomized noninferiority trial in low immunologic risk renal transplant recipients greater than 1-year posttransplant. Patients on belatacept were randomly assigned to q1m or q2m therapy. The primary objective was a noninferiority comparison of renal function (eGFR) at 12 months with a noninferiority margin (NIM) of 6.0 ml/min/1.73 m² . One hundred and sixty-six participants were randomized to q1m (n = 82) or q2m (n = 84) belatacept, 163 patients received treatment, and 76 q1m and 77 q2m subjects completed the 12-month study period. Every 2-month belatacept was noninferior to q1m, as the difference in mean eGFR adjusted for baseline renal function did not exceed the NIM. Two-month dosing was safe and well tolerated, with no patient deaths or graft losses. Four rejection episodes and three cases of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) occurred among q2m subjects; however, only one rejection and one instance of DSA were observed in subjects adherent to the study protocol. Every 2-month belatacept therapy may facilitate long-term utilization of costimulation blockade, but future multicenter studies with long-term follow-up will further elucidate immunologic risk. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02560558).

Cytomegalovirus in urinary sediment in patients with acute kidney injury

Background

Immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation is associated with frequent infections. Renal allograft recipients are susceptible to opportunistic infections and can acquire human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infections even within the allograft. There, HCMV can be found in both the glomerulus and tubular cells, but is mostly restricted to specific and circumscribed sites. Therefore, not all organ infections are identifiable by immunohistology for HCMV proteins in fine needle core biopsies. Thus, we performed a urinalysis study to search for HCMV-specific RNA transcripts in the urine sediment of patients with acute kidney injury.

Methods

Urinary sediment of 90 patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), including 48 renal transplant recipients (RTX) and 42 non-transplant recipients (nRTX), was collected from morning urine for RNA extraction and reverse transcription. The copy number of HCMV transcripts was evaluated using a UL132 HCMV-specific probe set and by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

Results

Of the 48 RTX patients, ten showed HCMV copies in their urine sediment cells. Within this group, three recipients had negative HCMV serology and received an allograft from an HCMV-seropositive donor. In addition, all three RTX patients on a belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen had HCMV transcripts in their urine. Of the 42 nRTX patients, only two had detectable HCMV transcripts in urine sediment cells and both were under immunosuppression.

Conclusions

Ten immunosuppressed renal allograft recipients and two immunosuppressed non-transplant patients with AKI showed HCMV copies in urine sediment. Thus, HCMV positivity in urinary sediment appears to be associated with immunosuppression. This study describes a novel noninvasive method for detection of HCMV in urinary sediment. Whether all HCMV infections can be detected or only those with viral replication warrants further investigation.

Optimization of de novo belatacept-based immunosuppression administered to renal transplant recipients

Kidney transplant recipients administered belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression present with a more favorable metabolic profile, reduced incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), and improved renal function and long-term patient/graft survival relative to individuals receiving calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression. However, the rates and severity of acute rejection (AR) are greater with the approved belatacept-based regimen than with CNI-based immunosuppression. Although these early co-stimulation blockade-resistant rejections are typically steroid sensitive, the higher rate of cellular AR has led many transplant centers to adopt immunosuppressive regimens that differ from the approved label. This article summarizes the available data on these alternative de novo belatacept-based maintenance regimens. Steroid-sparing, belatacept-based immunosuppression (following T cell-depleting induction therapy) has been shown to yield AR rates comparable to those seen with CNI-based regimens. Concomitant treatment with belatacept plus a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi; sirolimus or everolimus) has yielded AR rates ranging from 0 to 4%. Because the optimal induction agent and number of induction doses; blood levels of mTORi; and dose, duration, and use of corticosteroids have yet to be determined, larger prospective clinical trials are needed to establish the optimal alternative belatacept-based regimen for minimizing early cellular AR occurrence.

Cytomegalovirus in renal transplant recipients from living donors with and without valganciclovir prophylaxis and with immunosuppression based on anti-thymocyte globulin or basiliximab

BACKGROUND

In our population, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) of 1 mg/Kg/day for 4 days is used; which permits not using valgancyclovir (VGC) prophylaxis in some renal transplant recipients (RTR) with moderate risk (R+), to reduce costs. This study aimed to determine the incidence and risk of developing cytomegalovirus (CMV), with or without prophylaxis, when exposed to low doses of ATG or basiliximab (BSL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort included 265 RTR with follow-up of 12 months. Prophylaxis was used in R-/D+ and some R+. Tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone were used in all patients. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the risk of CMV in RTR with or without VGC.

RESULTS

Cytomegalovirus was documented in 46 (17.3%) patients: 20 (43.5%) with CMV infection, and 26 (56.5%) with CMV disease. Anti-thymocyte globulin was used in 39 patients (85%): 32 R+, six D+/R-, and one D-/R-. ATG was used in 90% (27 of 30) of patients with CMV and without prophylaxis. The multivariate analysis showed an association of risk for CMV with the absence of prophylaxis (RR 2.29; 95% CI 1.08-4.86), ATG use (RR 3.7; 95% CI 1.50-9.13), TAC toxicity (RR 3.77; 95% CI 1.41-10.13), and lymphocytes at the sixth post-transplant month (RR 1.77; 95% CI 1.0-3.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Low doses of ATG favored the development of CMV and a lower survival free of CMV compared with BSL. In scenarios where resources for employing VGC are limited, BSL could be an acceptable strategy.