Systemic and T cell-associated responses to SARS-CoV-2 immunisation in gut inflammation (STAR SIGN study): effects of biologics on vaccination efficacy of the third dose of mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Three Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Ulcerative Colitis: A Real-World Multicentre Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Three Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are approved for ulcerative colitis (UC) in Japan.

AIM

To compare the real-world efficacy and safety of these three JAK inhibitors in UC.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, retrospective study of patients with UC started on JAK inhibitors. The primary outcome was clinical remission at 10, 26 and 58 weeks, and at the most recent follow-up. To compare the efficacy and safety among the JAK inhibitors, we created three matched cohorts (upadacitinib vs. filgotinib, tofacitinib vs. filgotinib and upadacitinib vs. tofacitinib) using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

We identified 228 upadacitinib-treated patients (median follow-up 49 weeks; IQR 25-72), 215 filgotinib-treated patients (follow-up 56 weeks; IQR 17-82) and 159 tofacitinib-treated patients (follow-up 112 weeks; IQR 10-258). Clinical remission rates for upadacitinib, filgotinib and tofacitinib at the most recent follow-up were 72.8%, 50.6% and 45.8%, respectively. Over 70% of the patients previously treated with other biologics or JAK inhibitors achieved clinical remission with upadacitinib. On multivariate analysis, the number of previous advanced therapies was inversely associated with the efficacy of filgotinib and tofacitinib. Comparative analysis showed that upadacitinib-treated patients had higher efficacy and lower risk of discontinuation than patients treated with other JAK inhibitors. However, upadacitinib had a significant risk of acne.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the particularly high efficacy of upadacitinib, even in patients with refractory UC, filgotinib or tofacitinib may be considered as an upfront JAK inhibitor before using upadacitinib.

XBB.1.5-Adapted COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines but Not Infections With Previous Omicron Variants Boost Neutralisation Against the SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 Variant in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, many patients rely on pre-existing immunity by original vaccines or prior infections.

AIM

To assess whether such immunity sufficiently combats the highly immune-evasive SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 variant.

METHODS

Utilising two longitudinal cohorts, we evaluated immunity against JN.1 induced by original vaccines (IBD: n = 98; healthy: n = 48), omicron breakthrough infection (IBD: n = 55; healthy: n = 57) or XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines (IBD: n = 18). Neutralisation and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and JN.1 were assessed using multiplex immunoassays. Study outcomes were wild-type and JN.1 neutralisation following three doses of original mRNA vaccines, stratified by immunosuppressive therapy (primary outcome), and JN.1 neutralisation following third-dose breakthrough infection or a fourth dose of XBB.1.5-adapted mRNA vaccines (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

Following original vaccines, JN.1 neutralisation was lower than wild-type neutralisation in all study groups (healthy, anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF; each p < 0.001); most individuals lacked JN.1 neutralisation (healthy: 97.9%; anti-TNF: 98.3% and non-anti-TNF: 92.3%). Confounder-adjusted multivariable modelling strongly associated anti-TNF therapy with low levels of anti-JN.1-RBD IgG (fold-change 0.48 [95% CI 0.39-0.59]). JN.1 neutralisation was similar in patients with or without breakthrough infection (anti-TNF, non-anti-TNF; each p > 0.05); neutralisation failure was 100% despite breakthrough infection. XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines enhanced JN.1 neutralisation (p < 0.001) and reduced neutralisation failure rates in patients with IBD (94.4% pre-vaccination vs. 44.4% post-vaccination; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Only variant-adapted vaccines protect against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Patients with IBD and healthy individuals without recent vaccination may lack protection against the JN.1 subvariant KP.3 which causes current COVID-19 surges.

STAR LIGHT Study: XBB.1.5 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Boost Systemic but Not Mucosal Immunity Against the SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 Variant in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) have impaired vaccine immunogenicity and an excess risk of severe COVID-19. While variant-adapted COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are recommended for vulnerable individuals, their efficacy in patients with CLD has not been studied.

METHODS

We present the first evaluation of XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity against the SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 variant in patients with CLD. Serum anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, neutralization, and saliva anti-RBD IgG and IgA against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (WT) and the XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, BA.2.86, and JN.1 variants were quantified before and 2-4 weeks following a fourth dose of XBB.1.5 mRNA vaccines.

RESULTS

Vaccination boosted anti-RBD IgG and neutralization against all tested variants including JN.1 (each p < 0.001). Following immunization, neutralization was lower against JN.1 compared to WT, XBB.1.5, and EG.5.1 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.01, respectively). Vaccination reduced neutralization failure rates against BA.2.86 and JN.1 (each p < 0.05). The evasion of vaccine-induced antibodies by the tested variants was low, indicated by the positive correlation between anti-RBD IgG and neutralization. At mucosal sites, vaccination boosted anti-RBD IgG (each p < 0.01) but failed to induce infection-blocking IgA (each p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

XBB.1.5 vaccines protect CLD patients against recent SARS-CoV-2 variants, but developing vaccines with optimized mucosal immunogenicity is required to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission and recurrent seasonal COVID-19 outbreaks.

T cell responses to repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and breakthrough infections in patients on TNF inhibitor treatment: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Understanding cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 immunisations is important for informing vaccine recommendations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other vulnerable patients on immunosuppressive therapies. This study investigated the magnitude and quality of T cell responses after multiple SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses and COVID-19 breakthrough infection.

METHODS

This prospective, observational study included patients with IBD and arthritis on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) receiving up to four SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses. T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 peptides were measured by flow cytometry before and 2-4 weeks after vaccinations and breakthrough infection to assess the frequency and polyfunctionality of responding cells, along with receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD) antibodies.

FINDINGS

Between March 2, 2021, and December 20, 2022, 143 patients (118 IBD, 25 arthritis) and 73 healthy controls were included. In patients with either IBD or arthritis, humoral immunity was attenuated compared to healthy controls (median anti-RBD levels 3391 vs. 6280 BAU/ml, p = 0.008) after three SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses. Patients with IBD had comparable quantities (median CD4 0.11% vs. 0.11%, p = 0.26, CD8 0.031% vs. 0.047%, p = 0.33) and quality (polyfunctionality score: 0.403 vs. 0.371, p = 0.39; 0.105 vs. 0.101, p = 0.87) of spike-specific T cells to healthy controls. Patients with arthritis had lower frequencies but comparable quality of responding T cells to controls. Breakthrough infection increased spike-specific CD8 T cell quality and T cell responses against non-spike peptides.

INTERPRETATION

Patients with IBD on TNFi have T cell responses comparable to healthy controls despite attenuated humoral responses following three vaccine doses. Repeated vaccination and breakthrough infection increased the quality of T cell responses. Our study adds evidence that, in the absence of other risk factors, this group may in future be able to follow the general recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines.

FUNDING

South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Akershus University Hospital, Diakonhjemmet Hospital.

Systemic and Mucosal Immunogenicity of Monovalent XBB.1.5-Adapted COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Recently updated COVID-19 mRNA vaccines encode the spike protein of the omicron subvariant XBB.1.5 and are recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immunosuppressive treatment. Nonetheless, their immunogenicity in patients with IBD against rapidly expanding virus variants remains unknown. This prospective multicenter cohort study is the first study to investigate the immunogenicity of XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines in patients with IBD. Systemic and mucosal antibodies targeting the receptor-binding domains (RBDs) of the omicron subvariants XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86, as well as their neutralization were quantified before and two to four weeks after vaccination with monovalent XBB.1.5-adapted mRNA vaccines. Vaccination increased levels of serum anti-RBD IgG targeting XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86 (1.9-fold, 1.8-fold, and 2.6-fold, respectively) and enhanced corresponding neutralization responses (2.3-fold, 3.1-fold, and 3.5-fold, respectively). Following vaccination, anti-TNF-treated patients had reduced virus neutralization compared to patients on treatments with other cellular targets. 11.1% and 16.7% of patients lacked EG.5.1 and BA.2.86 neutralization, respectively; all these patients received anti-TNF treatment. At mucosal sites, vaccination induced variant-specific anti-RBD IgG but failed to induce RBD-targeting IgA. Our findings provide a basis for future vaccine recommendations while highlighting the importance of frequent booster vaccine adaptation and the need for mucosal vaccination strategies in patients with IBD.

Higher and Sustained Cell-Mediated Immune Responses After 3 Doses of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Studies suggest that the generation of durable T-cell immunity following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination protects against severe disease. The aim of this study was to measure cell-mediated immune response (CMIR) 1-2 months and 6 months after a third dose of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.

METHODS

This prospective study (HumoRal and CellULar initial and Sustained immunogenicity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]) evaluated CMIR at 28-65 days (t 1 ) after dose 2, 28-65 days (t 2 ) (n = 183) and 6 months (±45 days) (t 3 ) (n = 167) after a third dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. A small cohort had blood sample available 28-65 days (t 4 ) (n = 55) after a fourth dose. Primary outcomes were CMIR at (t 2 ) and (t 3 ). Secondary outcomes included the effect of immunosuppressing IBD medications on CMIR and response at (t 4 ).

RESULTS

All patients had measurable CMIR at all time points. CMIR increased at t 2 compared with that at t 1 (median 1,467 responding cells per million (interquartile range [IQR] 410-5,971) vs 313 (94-960) P < 0.001). There was no significant waning in t 2 vs t 3 or significant boosting at t 4 . Those on anti-tumor necrosis factor monotherapy had a higher CMIR compared with those not on this therapy at t 2 (4,132 [IQR 1,136-8,795] vs 869 [IQR 343-3,221] P < 0.001) and t 3 (2,843 [IQR 596-6,459] vs 654 [IQR 143-2,067] P < 0.001). In univariable analysis, anti-tumor necrosis factor monotherapy was associated with a higher CMIR at t 2 ( P < 0.001) and t 3 ( P < 0.001) and confirmed in a multivariable model ( P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

A third dose of a COVID-19 vaccine boosts CMIR, and the response is sustained in patients with IBD.

mRNA-1273 vaccinated inflammatory bowel disease patients receiving TNF inhibitors develop broad and robust SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cell responses

SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells recognize conserved viral peptides and in the absence of cross-reactive antibodies form an important line of protection against emerging viral variants as they ameliorate disease severity. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce robust spike-specific antibody and T cell responses in healthy individuals, but their effectiveness in patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) is less well defined. These patients are often treated with systemic immunosuppressants, which may negatively affect vaccine-induced immunity. Indeed, TNF inhibitor (TNFi)-treated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients display reduced ability to maintain SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses post-vaccination, yet the effects on CD8+ T cells remain unclear. Here, we analyzed the impact of IBD and TNFi treatment on mRNA-1273 vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell responses compared to healthy controls in SARS-CoV-2 experienced and inexperienced patients. CD8+ T cells were analyzed for their ability to recognize 32 SARS-CoV-2-specific epitopes, restricted by 10 common HLA class I allotypes using heterotetramer combinatorial coding. This strategy allowed in-depth ex vivo profiling of the vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell responses using phenotypic and activation markers. mRNA vaccination of TNFi-treated and untreated IBD patients induced robust spike-specific CD8+ T cell responses with a predominant central memory and activated phenotype, comparable to those in healthy controls. Prominent non-spike-specific CD8+ T cell responses were observed in SARS-CoV-2 experienced donors prior to vaccination. Non-spike-specific CD8+ T cells persisted and spike-specific CD8+ T cells notably expanded after vaccination in these patient cohorts. Our data demonstrate that regardless of TNFi treatment or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, IBD patients benefit from vaccination by inducing a robust spike-specific CD8+ T cell response.

A Practical Update on COVID-19 and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: COVID-19 Disease Risk and Vaccine Safety and Efficacy

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced significant uncertainty regarding the care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Substantial research efforts have made progress in answering many of the questions that arose, but the constantly shifting paradigm of COVID-19-related research and recommendations has made it challenging for IBD clinicians to remain up-to-date. The goal of this article is to provide a concise and practical summary of the literature evaluating COVID-19 disease risk in addition to COVID-19 vaccine safety, immunogenicity, real-world effectiveness, and uptake among patients with IBD.

STAR SIGN study: Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy against the SARS-CoV-2 variants BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Vaccine-elicited immune responses are impaired in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-TNF biologics.

AIMS

To assess vaccination efficacy against the novel omicron sublineages BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 in immunosuppressed patients with IBD.

METHODS

This prospective multicentre case-control study included 98 biologic-treated patients with IBD and 48 healthy controls. Anti-spike IgG concentrations and surrogate neutralisation against SARS-CoV-2 wild-type, BA.1, BA.5, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 were measured at two different time points (2-16 weeks and 22-40 weeks) following third dose vaccination. Surrogate neutralisation was based on antibody-mediated blockage of ACE2-spike protein-protein interaction. Primary outcome was surrogate neutralisation against tested SARS-CoV-2 sublineages. Secondary outcomes were proportions of participants with insufficient surrogate neutralisation, impact of breakthrough infection, and correlation of surrogate neutralisation with anti-spike IgG concentration.

RESULTS

Surrogate neutralisation against all tested sublineages was reduced in patients with IBD who were treated with anti-TNF biologics compared to patients treated with non-anti-TNF biologics and healthy controls (each p ≤ 0.001) at visit 1. Anti-TNF therapy (odds ratio 0.29 [95% CI 0.19-0.46]) and time since vaccination (0.85 [0.72-1.00]) were associated with low, and mRNA-1273 vaccination (1.86 [1.12-3.08]) with high wild-type surrogate neutralisation in a β-regression model. Accordingly, higher proportions of patients treated with anti-TNF biologics had insufficient surrogate neutralisation against omicron sublineages at visit 1 compared to patients treated with non-anti-TNF biologics and healthy controls (each p ≤ 0.015). Surrogate neutralisation against all tested sublineages decreased over time but was increased by breakthrough infection. Anti-spike IgG concentrations correlated with surrogate neutralisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD who are treated with anti-TNF biologics show impaired neutralisation against novel omicron sublineages BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 and may benefit from prioritisation for future variant-adapted vaccines.

Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in inflammatory bowel disease patients receiving anti-TNF therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objectives

There are concerns about the serological responses to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, particularly those receiving anti-TNF therapy. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. We calculated pooled seroconversion rate after COVID-19 vaccination and subgroup analysis for vaccine types and different treatments were performed. Additionally, we estimated pooled rate of T cell response, neutralization response, and breakthrough infections in this population.

Results

32 studies were included in the meta-analysis. IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy had relatively high overall seroconversion rate after complete vaccination, with no statistical difference in antibody responses associated with different drug treatments. The pooled positivity rate of T cell response was 0.85 in IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy. Compared with healthy controls, the positivity of neutralization assays was significantly lower in IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy. The pooled rate of breakthrough infections in IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy was 0.04.

Conclusions

COVID-19 vaccines have shown good efficacy in IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy. However, IBD patients receiving anti-TNF have a relatively high rate of breakthrough infections and a low level of neutralization response.

Editorial: immunosuppression and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-where do we stand?

This article is linked to Woelfel et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17264