1
|
McClanahan TR, Oddenyo RM. Stimulating the capacity to govern the commons. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2025; 39:e14333. [PMID: 39046099 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
The ability to strengthen governance institutions and fisheries restrictions and laws is needed to improve conservation and management of common-pool resources. We evaluated the potential for stimulating change with modest interventions by studying fishing village households before and after a 27-month intervention period in a high-priority coral reef conservation area. Interventions included training in catch monitoring, stock assessment, mapping fishing grounds, microcredit, gender inclusion, theatrical skills, fuel efficient stoves, and participation in the planning of a conservation proposal. There was a background increase in reported formal education, household size, group membership, and household wealth but a decrease in fish consumption and public services. Of conservation importance, the perceived strength of 13 governance institutions and benefits of 6 fisheries restrictions increased over the intervention period. Finally, correspondence between knowledge of and agreement with recent national fisheries laws was moderate to high and positively correlated. The intervention period was stronger than demographic factors that often influence perceptions, such as village, government services, gender, household size, membership in community groups, and age responses. In general, perceptions of strengths of governance and benefits of restrictions increased more among women and youth than adult men respondents. The largest changes in perceptions of increased benefits were among strict restrictions initially ranked low, specifically fisheries closures, parks, and species restrictions. Consequently, capacity building overrode demographic factors common to poor people with limited employment capacity that can have negative perceptions of strict conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T R McClanahan
- Global Marine Programs, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - R M Oddenyo
- Kenyan Marine Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, Mombasa, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wujdi A, Bang G, Amin MHF, Jang Y, Kim HW, Kundu S. Elucidating the Mitogenomic Blueprint of Pomadasys perotaei from the Eastern Atlantic: Characterization and Matrilineal Phylogenetic Insights into Haemulid Grunts (Teleostei: Lutjaniformes). Biochem Genet 2024:10.1007/s10528-024-10941-z. [PMID: 39453547 DOI: 10.1007/s10528-024-10941-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/26/2024]
Abstract
The parrot grunt fish, Pomadasys perotaei, has a limited distribution in the Eastern Atlantic Ocean and is an important species in marine capture fisheries across several West African countries. Despite its ecological and economic significance, the mitogenomic information for this species is lacking. This study utilized next-generation sequencing to generate the de novo mitogenome of P. perotaei from Eastern Atlantic. The resulting mitogenome is 16,691 base pairs and includes 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNAs, two ribosomal RNAs, and an AT-rich control region (CR). Most of the PCGs exhibit nonsynonymous (Ka) and synonymous (Ks) substitution rates of less than '1', indicating strong negative selection across haemulid fishes. The control region of Pomadasys species contains four conserved domains, as seen in other teleost's, with polymorphic nucleotides that can be used to study population structures through the amplification of short mitochondrial gene fragments. Additionally, Bayesian phylogenetic analysis based on PCGs revealed a non-monophyletic clustering pattern of Pomadasys within the haemulid matrilineal tree. Overall, the structural characterization and phylogenetic analysis enhance our understanding of the genetic composition and evolutionary history of Pomadasys species from the Indo-West Pacific and Eastern Atlantic Oceans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arief Wujdi
- Department of Marine Biology, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea
- Research Center for Fishery, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Cibinong, Bogor, 16912, Republic of Indonesia
| | - Gyurim Bang
- Department of Marine Biology, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea
| | - Muhammad Hilman Fu'adil Amin
- Advanced Tropical Biodiversity, Genomics, and Conservation Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60115, Indonesia
| | - Yeongju Jang
- Department of Marine Biology, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Marine Living Modified Organisms, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Woo Kim
- Department of Marine Biology, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.
- Advanced Tropical Biodiversity, Genomics, and Conservation Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Airlangga University, Surabaya, 60115, Indonesia.
- Research Center for Marine Integrated Bionics Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.
| | - Shantanu Kundu
- Ocean and Fisheries Development International Cooperation Institute, College of Fisheries Science, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.
- International Graduate Program of Fisheries Science, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Viana DF, Gill D, Zvoleff A, Krueck NC, Zamborain-Mason J, Free CM, Shepon A, Grieco D, Schmidhuber J, Mascia MB, Golden CD. Sustainable-use marine protected areas to improve human nutrition. Nat Commun 2024; 15:7716. [PMID: 39289342 PMCID: PMC11408491 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49830-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Coral reef fisheries are a vital source of nutrients for thousands of nutritionally vulnerable coastal communities around the world. Marine protected areas are regions of the ocean designed to preserve or rehabilitate marine ecosystems and thereby increase reef fish biomass. Here, we evaluate the potential effects of expanding a subset of marine protected areas that allow some level of fishing within their borders (sustainable-use MPAs) to improve the nutrition of coastal communities. We estimate that, depending on site characteristics, expanding sustainable-use MPAs could increase catch by up to 20%, which could help prevent 0.3-2.85 million cases of inadequate micronutrient intake in coral reef nations. Our study highlights the potential add-on nutritional benefits of expanding sustainable-use MPAs in coral reef regions and pinpoints locations with the greatest potential to reduce inadequate micronutrient intake level. These findings provide critical knowledge given international momentum to cover 30% of the ocean with MPAs by 2030 and eradicate malnutrition in all its forms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel F Viana
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Ocean Conservation, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
| | - David Gill
- Duke University Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC, 28516, USA
| | - Alex Zvoleff
- Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Nils C Krueck
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia
| | - Jessica Zamborain-Mason
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Christopher M Free
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- Marine Sciences Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Alon Shepon
- Department of Environmental Studies, The Porter School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dana Grieco
- Duke University Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC, 28516, USA
| | | | - Michael B Mascia
- Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA
- Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christopher D Golden
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Borbee EM, Puspa IA, Gelis ERE, Setiawan F, Maduppa H, Humphries AT, Lane CE. Surface currents shape protist community structure across the Indo-Pacific. JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY 2024; 60:816-833. [PMID: 38817114 DOI: 10.1111/jpy.13465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Biogeographic structure in marine protist communities is shaped by a combination of dispersal potential and environmental selection. High-throughput sequencing and global sampling efforts have helped better resolve the composition and functions of these communities in the world's oceans using both molecular and visual methods. However, molecular barcoding data are critically lacking across the Indo-Pacific, a region widely considered the epicenter of marine biodiversity. To fill this gap, we characterized protist communities in four sampling regions across Indonesia that represent the latitudinal, longitudinal, and human population gradients of the region: Lombok, Wakatobi, Misool, and Waigeo. We show high spatial structuring in marine protist communities across Indonesia, and biotic factors appear to play little role in driving this observed structure. Our results appear to be driven by abiotic factors linked to surface current patterns across the Indo-Pacific as a result of: (1) a choke point in circulation at the Indonesian Throughflow leading to low diatom diversity in Lombok, Wakatobi, and Misool; (2) an increase in nutrient availability at the edge of the Halmahera Eddy in Waigeo, leading to an increase in diatom diversity; and/or (3) seasonal variations in protist communities in line with shifts in velocity of the Indonesian Throughflow. Overall, our results highlight the importance of abiotic factors in shaping protist communities on broad geographic scales over biotic, top-down pressures, such as grazing from higher trophic levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M Borbee
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Inna Ayu Puspa
- Department of Marine Science and Technology, Institut Pertainian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia
| | | | - Fahkrizal Setiawan
- Department of Marine Science and Technology, Institut Pertainian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia
| | - Hawis Maduppa
- Department of Marine Science and Technology, Institut Pertainian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia
| | - Austin T Humphries
- Department of Fisheries, Animal, and Veterinary Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christopher E Lane
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hadj-Hammou J, Cinner JE, Barneche DR, Caldwell IR, Mouillot D, Robinson JPW, Schiettekatte NMD, Siqueira AC, Taylor BM, Graham NAJ. Global patterns and drivers of fish reproductive potential on coral reefs. Nat Commun 2024; 15:6105. [PMID: 39030209 PMCID: PMC11271586 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50367-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Fish fecundity scales hyperallometrically with body mass, meaning larger females produce disproportionately more eggs than smaller ones. We explore this relationship beyond the species-level to estimate the "reproductive potential" of 1633 coral reef sites distributed globally. We find that, at the site-level, reproductive potential scales hyperallometrically with assemblage biomass, but with a smaller median exponent than at the species-level. Across all families, modelled reproductive potential is greater in fully protected sites versus fished sites. This difference is most pronounced for the important fisheries family, Serranidae. When comparing a scenario where 30% of sites are randomly fully protected to a current protection scenario, we estimate an increase in the reproductive potential of all families, and particularly for Serranidae. Such results point to the possible ecological benefits of the 30 × 30 global conservation target and showcase management options to promote the sustainability of population replenishment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeneen Hadj-Hammou
- Lancaster University Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
| | - Joshua E Cinner
- Thriving Oceans Research Hub. School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Caperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Diego R Barneche
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Iain R Caldwell
- College of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - David Mouillot
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Ifremer, Montpellier, France
| | - James P W Robinson
- Lancaster University Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Alexandre C Siqueira
- Centre for Marine Ecosystems Research, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, 6027, Australia
- Research Hub for Coral Reef Ecosystem Functions, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia
| | - Brett M Taylor
- University of Guam Marine Laboratory and UOG Sea Grant, 303 University Drive, UOG Station, Mangilao, Guam, 96923, USA
| | - Nicholas A J Graham
- Lancaster University Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gill DA, Lester SE, Free CM, Pfaff A, Iversen E, Reich BJ, Yang S, Ahmadia G, Andradi-Brown DA, Darling ES, Edgar GJ, Fox HE, Geldmann J, Trung Le D, Mascia MB, Mesa-Gutiérrez R, Mumby PJ, Veverka L, Warmuth LM. A diverse portfolio of marine protected areas can better advance global conservation and equity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2313205121. [PMID: 38408235 PMCID: PMC10927568 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2313205121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used for ocean conservation, yet the relative impacts of various types of MPAs are poorly understood. We estimated impacts on fish biomass from no-take and multiple-use (fished) MPAs, employing a rigorous matched counterfactual design with a global dataset of >14,000 surveys in and around 216 MPAs. Both no-take and multiple-use MPAs generated positive conservation outcomes relative to no protection (58.2% and 12.6% fish biomass increases, respectively), with smaller estimated differences between the two MPA types when controlling for additional confounding factors (8.3% increase). Relative performance depended on context and management: no-take MPAs performed better in areas of high human pressure but similar to multiple-use in remote locations. Multiple-use MPA performance was low in high-pressure areas but improved significantly with better management, producing similar outcomes to no-take MPAs when adequately staffed and appropriate use regulations were applied. For priority conservation areas where no-take restrictions are not possible or ethical, our findings show that a portfolio of well-designed and well-managed multiple-use MPAs represents a viable and potentially equitable pathway to advance local and global conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Gill
- Duke Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC28516
| | - Sarah E. Lester
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL32306
| | - Christopher M. Free
- Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA93117
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA93117
| | - Alexander Pfaff
- Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC27708
| | - Edwin Iversen
- Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC27708
| | - Brian J. Reich
- Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC27695
| | - Shu Yang
- Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC27695
| | - Gabby Ahmadia
- Ocean Conservation, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC20037
| | | | | | - Graham J. Edgar
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS7001, Australia
- Reef Life Survey Foundation, Battery Point, TAS7000, Australia
| | | | - Jonas Geldmann
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen2100, Denmark
| | - Duong Trung Le
- Duke Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC28516
- World Bank, Washington, DC20006
| | - Michael B. Mascia
- Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC27708
- Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA22202
| | - Roosevelt Mesa-Gutiérrez
- Duke Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC28516
- Integrated Statistics Inc. in support of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Protected Resources Division, Gloucester, MA01930
| | - Peter J. Mumby
- Marine Spatial Ecology Lab, School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD4072, Australia
| | - Laura Veverka
- Ocean Conservation, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC20037
| | - Laura M. Warmuth
- Duke Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC28516
- Department of Biology, University of Oxford, OxfordOX1 3SZ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Malesios C, Jones N, Begley A, McGinlay J. Methodological approaches to exploring the spatial variation in social impacts of protected areas: An intercomparison of Bayesian regression modeling approaches and potential implications. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING : MBE 2024; 21:3816-3837. [PMID: 38549309 DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2024170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Protected Areas (PAs) are widely used to conserve biodiversity by protecting and restoring ecosystems while also contributing to socio-economic priorities. An increasing number of studies aim to examine the social impacts of PAs on aspects of people's well-being, such as, quality of life, livelihoods, and connectedness to nature. Despite the increase in literature on this topic, there are still few studies that explore possible robust methodological approaches to capturing and assessing the spatial distribution of impacts in a PA. This study aims to contribute to this research gap by comparing Bayesian spatial regression models that explore links between perceived social impacts and the relative location of local residents and communities in a PA. We use primary data collected from 227 individuals, via structured questionnaires, living in or near the Peak District National Park, United Kingdom. By comparing different models we were able to show that the location of respondents influences their perception of social impacts and that neighboring communities within the national park can have similar perceptions regarding social impacts. Simulation based on existing data using the Bootstrap sub-sampling was also conducted to validate the association between social impacts and mutual proximity of residents. Our findings suggest that this type of data is better treated, in terms of accounting for potential spatial effects, using models that allow for proximity effects to be stronger between people living nearby, e.g. between neighbors in the same community and have minimum effects otherwise. Understanding the spatial clustering of perceived social impacts in and around PA, is key to understanding their causes and to managing and mitigating them. Our findings highlight therefore the need to develop new methodological approaches to assessing and predicting accurately the spatial distribution of social impacts when designating PAs. The findings in this paper will assist practitioners in this regard by proposing approaches to the consideration of the distribution of social impacts when designing the boundaries of PAs alongside typical ecological and socio-economic criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chrysovalantis Malesios
- Institute for Global Sustainable Development, The Ramphal Building, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Nikoleta Jones
- Institute for Global Sustainable Development, The Ramphal Building, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Alfie Begley
- Institute for Global Sustainable Development, The Ramphal Building, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - James McGinlay
- Institute for Global Sustainable Development, The Ramphal Building, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Linking key human-environment theories to inform the sustainability of coral reefs. Curr Biol 2022; 32:2610-2620.e4. [PMID: 35568029 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Effective solutions to the ongoing "coral reef crisis" will remain limited until the underlying drivers of coral reef degradation are better understood. Here, we conduct a global-scale study of how four key metrics of ecosystem states and processes on coral reefs (top predator presence, reef fish biomass, trait diversity, and parrotfish scraping potential) are explained by 11 indicators based on key human-environment theories from the social sciences. Our global analysis of >1,500 reefs reveals three key findings. First, the proximity of the nearest market has the strongest and most consistent relationships with these ecosystem metrics. This finding is in keeping with a body of terrestrial research on how market accessibility shapes agricultural practices, but the integration of these concepts in marine systems is nascent. Second, our global study shows that resource conditions tend to display a n-shaped relationship with socioeconomic development. Specifically, the probabilities of encountering a top predator, fish biomass, and fish trait diversity were highest where human development was moderate but lower where development was either high or low. This finding contrasts with previous regional-scale research demonstrating an environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis (which predicts a U-shaped relationship between socioeconomic development and resource conditions). Third, together, our ecosystem metrics are best explained by the integration of different human-environment theories. Our best model includes the interactions between indicators from different theoretical perspectives, revealing how marine reserves can have different outcomes depending on how far they are from markets and human settlements, as well as the size of the surrounding human population.
Collapse
|
9
|
Assessing Potential Climatic and Human Pressures in Indonesian Coastal Ecosystems Using a Spatial Data-Driven Approach. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10110778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Blue carbon ecosystems are key for successful global climate change mitigation; however, they are one of the most threatened ecosystems on Earth. Thus, this study mapped the climatic and human pressures on the blue carbon ecosystems in Indonesia using multi-source spatial datasets. Data on moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) ocean color standard mapped images, VIIRS (visible, infrared imaging radiometer suite) boat detection (VBD), global artificial impervious area (GAIA), MODIS surface reflectance (MOD09GA), MODIS land surface temperature (MOD11A2), and MODIS vegetation indices (MOD13A2) were combined using remote sensing and spatial analysis techniques to identify potential stresses. La Niña and El Niño phenomena caused sea surface temperature deviations to reach −0.5 to +1.2 °C. In contrast, chlorophyll-a deviations reached 22,121 to +0.5 mg m−3. Regarding fishing activities, most areas were under exploitation and relatively sustained. Concerning land activities, mangrove deforestation occurred in 560.69 km2 of the area during 2007–2016, as confirmed by a decrease of 84.9% in risk-screening environmental indicators. Overall, the potential pressures on Indonesia’s blue carbon ecosystems are varied geographically. The framework of this study can be efficiently adopted to support coastal and small islands zonation planning, conservation prioritization, and marine fisheries enhancement.
Collapse
|
10
|
Roberts KE, Cook CN, Beher J, Treml EA. Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2021; 35:699-710. [PMID: 32623761 PMCID: PMC8048790 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) is a critical step in ensuring the continued persistence of marine biodiversity. Although the area protected in MPAs is growing, the movement of individuals (or larvae) among MPAs, termed connectivity, has only recently been included as an objective of many MPAs. As such, assessing connectivity is often neglected or oversimplified in the planning process. For promoting population persistence, it is important to ensure that protected areas in a system are functionally connected through dispersal or adult movement. We devised a multi-species model of larval dispersal for the Australian marine environment to evaluate how much local scale connectivity is protected in MPAs and determine whether the extensive system of MPAs truly functions as a network. We focused on non-migratory species with simplified larval behaviors (i.e., passive larval dispersal) (e.g., no explicit vertical migration) as an illustration. Of all the MPAs analyzed (approximately 2.7 million km2 ), outside the Great Barrier Reef and Ningaloo Reef, <50% of MPAs (46-80% of total MPA area depending on the species considered) were functionally connected. Our results suggest that Australia's MPA system cannot be referred to as a single network, but rather a collection of numerous smaller networks delineated by natural breaks in the connectivity of reef habitat. Depending on the dispersal capacity of the taxa of interest, there may be between 25 and 47 individual ecological networks distributed across the Australian marine environment. The need to first assess the underlying natural connectivity of a study system prior to implementing new MPAs represents a key research priority for strategically enlarging MPA networks. Our findings highlight the benefits of integrating multi-species connectivity into conservation planning to identify opportunities to better incorporate connectivity into the design of MPA systems and thus to increase their capacity to support long-term, sustainable biodiversity outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey E. Roberts
- School of Marine and Atmospheric SciencesStony Brook University, Stony BrookNew York
- School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Jutta Beher
- School of BioSciencesThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Eric A. Treml
- School of BioSciencesThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative EcologyDeakin UniversityGeelongVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lavin CP, Jones GP, Williamson DH, Harrison HB. Minimum size limits and the reproductive value of numerous, young, mature female fish. Proc Biol Sci 2021; 288:20202714. [PMID: 33715428 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Fisheries management relies on various catch and effort controls to preserve spawning stock biomass and maximize sustainable yields while limiting fishery impacts on marine ecosystems. These include species-specific minimum or maximum size limits to protect either small non-reproductive subadults, a portion of reproductively mature adults, or large highly fecund individuals. Protecting size classes of mature fish is expected to yield a viable source of larvae for replenishing populations and reduce the risk of recruitment overfishing, yet size-specific recruitment contributions have rarely been assessed empirically. Here, we apply genetic parentage analysis to measure the reproductive success of a size-structured population of a commercially important species of coral grouper (Plectropomus maculatus-Serranidae) in no-take marine reserves (NTMRs) in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Australia. Although the per capita reproductive success of individual fish increases rapidly with body length, the numerous young mature female fish, below the minimum size limit (MSL) (38 cm total length), were responsible for generating disproportionately large contributions (36%) towards larval replenishment of both fished and reserve reefs. Our findings indicate that MSLs are an effective harvest control measure to safeguard a portion of the spawning stock biomass for coral grouper and supplement recruitment subsidies assured from NTMRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles P Lavin
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Geoffrey P Jones
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.,ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - David H Williamson
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Hugo B Harrison
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.,Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Foo SA, Walsh WJ, Lecky J, Marcoux S, Asner GP. Impacts of pollution, fishing pressure, and reef rugosity on resource fish biomass in West Hawaii. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2021; 31:e2213. [PMID: 32750738 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Human activities and land-use drivers combine in complex ways to affect coral reef health and, in turn, the diversity and abundance of reef fauna. Here we examine the impacts of different marine protected area (MPA) types, and various human and habitat drivers, on resource fish functional groups (i.e., total fish, herbivore, grazer, scraper, and browser biomass) along the 180 km west coast of Hawaii Island. Across survey years from 2008 to 2018, we observed an overall decrease in total fish biomass of 45%, with similar decreases in biomass seen across most fish functional groups. MPAs that prohibited a combination of lay nets, aquarium collection, and spear fishing were most effective in maintaining and/or increasing fish biomass across all functional groups. We also found that pollution, fishing, and habitat drivers all contributed to changes in total fish biomass, where the most negative impact was nitrogen input from land-based sewage disposal. Fish biomass relationships with our study drivers depended on fish functional grouping. For surgeonfish (grazers), changes in biomass linked most strongly to changes in reef rugosity. For parrotfish (scrapers), biomass was better explained by changes in commercial catch where current commercial fishing levels are negatively affecting scraper populations. Our observations suggest that regional management of multiple factors, including habitat, pollution, and fisheries, will benefit resource fish biomass off Hawaii Island.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawna A Foo
- Center for Global Discovery and Conservation Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287, USA
| | - William J Walsh
- Hawaii Division of Aquatic Resources, 74-380B Kealakehe Parkway, Kailua Kona, Hawaii, 96740, USA
| | - Joey Lecky
- Lynker Technologies LLC, Marine, Ocean, and Coastal Science and Information Group, 202 Church Street, SE/Suite 536, Leesburg, Virginia, 20175, USA
| | - Stacia Marcoux
- Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, Hawaii Division of Aquatic Resources, 75-308B Kealakehe Parkway, Kailua Kona, Hawaii, 96740, USA
| | - Gregory P Asner
- Center for Global Discovery and Conservation Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Maxwell SL, Cazalis V, Dudley N, Hoffmann M, Rodrigues ASL, Stolton S, Visconti P, Woodley S, Kingston N, Lewis E, Maron M, Strassburg BBN, Wenger A, Jonas HD, Venter O, Watson JEM. Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century. Nature 2020; 586:217-227. [PMID: 33028996 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2773-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 231] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Humanity will soon define a new era for nature-one that seeks to transform decades of underwhelming responses to the global biodiversity crisis. Area-based conservation efforts, which include both protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, are likely to extend and diversify. However, persistent shortfalls in ecological representation and management effectiveness diminish the potential role of area-based conservation in stemming biodiversity loss. Here we show how the expansion of protected areas by national governments since 2010 has had limited success in increasing the coverage across different elements of biodiversity (ecoregions, 12,056 threatened species, 'Key Biodiversity Areas' and wilderness areas) and ecosystem services (productive fisheries, and carbon services on land and sea). To be more successful after 2020, area-based conservation must contribute more effectively to meeting global biodiversity goals-ranging from preventing extinctions to retaining the most-intact ecosystems-and must better collaborate with the many Indigenous peoples, community groups and private initiatives that are central to the successful conservation of biodiversity. The long-term success of area-based conservation requires parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity to secure adequate financing, plan for climate change and make biodiversity conservation a far stronger part of land, water and sea management policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean L Maxwell
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Victor Cazalis
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France
| | - Nigel Dudley
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.,Equilibrium Research, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Hoffmann
- Conservation and Policy, Zoological Society of London, London, UK
| | - Ana S L Rodrigues
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Piero Visconti
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.,Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, London, UK.,International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria
| | - Stephen Woodley
- World Commission on Protected Areas, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland
| | - Naomi Kingston
- UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, UK
| | - Edward Lewis
- UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, UK
| | - Martine Maron
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Bernardo B N Strassburg
- Rio Conservation and Sustainability Science Centre, Department of Geography and the Environment, Pontifícia Universidade Católica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Programa de Pós Graduacão em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Amelia Wenger
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.,Global Marine Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, NY, USA
| | - Harry D Jonas
- World Commission on Protected Areas, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland.,Future Law, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
| | - Oscar Venter
- Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada
| | - James E M Watson
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.,Global Conservation Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
McDonald G, Wilson M, Veríssimo D, Twohey R, Clemence M, Apistar D, Box S, Butler P, Cadiz FC, Campbell SJ, Cox C, Effron M, Gaines S, Jakub R, Mancao RH, Rojas PT, Tirona RS, Vianna G. Catalyzing sustainable fisheries management through behavior change interventions. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2020; 34:1176-1189. [PMID: 32011772 PMCID: PMC7540413 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Small-scale fisheries are an important livelihood and primary protein source for coastal communities in many of the poorest regions in the world, yet many are overfished and thus require effective and scalable management solutions. Positive ecological and socioeconomic responses to management typically lag behind immediate costs borne by fishers from fishing pressure reductions necessary for fisheries recovery. These short-term costs challenge the long-term success of these interventions. However, social marketing may increase perceptions of management benefits before ecological and socioeconomic benefits are fully realized, driving new social norms and ultimately long-term sustainable behavior change. By conducting underwater visual surveys to quantify ecological conditions and by conducting household surveys with community members to quantify their perceptions of management support and socioeconomic conditions, we assessed the impact of a standardized small-scale fisheries management intervention that was implemented across 41 sites in Brazil, Indonesia, and the Philippines. The intervention combines TURF reserves (community-based territorial use rights for fishing coupled with no-take marine reserves) with locally tailored social-marketing behavior change campaigns. Leveraging data across 22 indicators and 4 survey types, along with data from 3 control sites, we found that ecological and socioeconomic impacts varied and that communities supported the intervention and were already changing their fishing practices. These results suggest that communities were developing new social norms and fishing more sustainably before long-term ecological and socioeconomic benefits of fisheries management materialized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin McDonald
- Marine Science Institute, Santa Barbara – Marine Science BuildingUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraCA93106U.S.A.
- Bren School of Environmental Science & ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaSanta Barbara – 2400 Bren HallSanta BarbaraCA93106U.S.A.
| | - Molly Wilson
- Bren School of Environmental Science & ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaSanta Barbara – 2400 Bren HallSanta BarbaraCA93106U.S.A.
| | - Diogo Veríssimo
- Department of Zoology, Oxford Martin SchoolUniversity of Oxford34 Broad StOxfordOX1 3BDU.K.
| | - Rebecca Twohey
- Coral Reef Alliance1330 Broadway #600OaklandCA94612U.S.A.
| | - Michaela Clemence
- Marine Science Institute, Santa Barbara – Marine Science BuildingUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraCA93106U.S.A.
- Bren School of Environmental Science & ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaSanta Barbara – 2400 Bren HallSanta BarbaraCA93106U.S.A.
| | - Dean Apistar
- Rare Philippines91–104 F. Ramos StCebu CityCebu6000Philippines
| | - Stephen Box
- Rare – 1310 N Courthouse Rd Suite 110ArlingtonVA22201U.S.A.
| | - Paul Butler
- Rare – 1310 N Courthouse Rd Suite 110ArlingtonVA22201U.S.A.
| | - Fel Cesar Cadiz
- Rare Philippines91–104 F. Ramos StCebu CityCebu6000Philippines
| | - Stuart J. Campbell
- Rare Indonesia – Jl. Gunung Gede I No.6RT.3/RW.4, Bantarjati, Bogor UtaraKota BogorJawa Barat16153Indonesia
| | - Courtney Cox
- Rare – 1310 N Courthouse Rd Suite 110ArlingtonVA22201U.S.A.
| | - Micah Effron
- Rare – 1310 N Courthouse Rd Suite 110ArlingtonVA22201U.S.A.
| | - Steve Gaines
- Bren School of Environmental Science & ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaSanta Barbara – 2400 Bren HallSanta BarbaraCA93106U.S.A.
| | - Raymond Jakub
- Rare Indonesia – Jl. Gunung Gede I No.6RT.3/RW.4, Bantarjati, Bogor UtaraKota BogorJawa Barat16153Indonesia
| | | | - Pablo T. Rojas
- Rare Philippines91–104 F. Ramos StCebu CityCebu6000Philippines
| | | | - Gabriel Vianna
- Rua Visconde de Pirajá177‐sala 801, IpanemaRio de JaneiroRJBrazil
- Current address: University of Western Australia35 Stirling HwyCrawleyWA6009Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ramírez-Ortiz G, Reyes-Bonilla H, Balart EF, Olivier D, Huato-Soberanis L, Micheli F, Edgar GJ. Reduced fish diversity despite increased fish biomass in a Gulf of California Marine Protected Area. PeerJ 2020; 8:e8885. [PMID: 32296607 PMCID: PMC7151750 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Multi-use marine protected areas (MUMPAs) are a commonly applied tool for marine conservation in developing countries, particularly where large no-take reserves are not socially or politically feasible. Although MUMPAs have produced benefits around the world, the persistence of moderate fishing pressure reduces the likelihood of achieving the primary objective of these areas, which is the conservation of ecosystems. In this study we used traditional and functional metrics to evaluate how fish assemblages changed through time in a MUMPA, including shifts in species responses and in ecological processes. We conducted visual censuses of fishes at Espíritu Santo Island, México (MUMPA; N = 320; 24°N, 110°W) from 2005 to 2017 to assess fish richness, size-distribution and density. Three functional indices were calculated using six traits (size, mobility, period of activity, aggregation, position in water column and diet): functional richness (volume occupied by species), dispersion (complementarity between species) and originality (inverse of functional redundancy). We compared fish diversity among three management zone types (sustainable fishing, traditional fishing and no-take zones), through a 13-year period, assessing which species increased or decreased in occurrence, density, and biomass, and how indices respond over time. Despite a general increase in biomass and stability in density and originality, we detected a reduction in fish biodiversity in the form of declines in species and functional richness, which could imply the risk of local extinction and decrease in certain ecosystem processes. In addition, changes in functional dispersion showed that some functions are losing representation through time. Although no single cause is apparent, such factors as competitive interactions, habitat loss and persistence of fishing pressure potentially explain these decreases. The rise in biomass was associated with a general increase in the average size, rather than increased biomass of commercial species, as the latter remained stable during the study period. Expansion of no-take areas, enforcement of fishing regulations, and surveillance in core zones, should be implemented to reverse the decline in particular species and to promote conservation of fish functional diversity in this MUMPA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina Ramírez-Ortiz
- Programa de Ecología Pesquera, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C., La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
| | - Héctor Reyes-Bonilla
- Departamento Académico de Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
| | - Eduardo F. Balart
- Programa de Ecología Pesquera, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C., La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
| | - Damien Olivier
- Departamento Académico de Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Leonardo Huato-Soberanis
- Programa de Ecología Pesquera, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C., La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
| | - Fiorenza Micheli
- Hopkins Marine Station and Center for Ocean Solutions, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, United States of America
| | - Graham J. Edgar
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Campbell SJ, Darling ES, Pardede S, Ahmadia G, Mangubhai S, Amkieltiela, Estradivari, Maire E. Fishing restrictions and remoteness deliver conservation outcomes for Indonesia's coral reef fisheries. Conserv Lett 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/conl.12698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart J. Campbell
- Indonesia ProgramWildlife Conservation Society Bogor West Java Indonesia
- Rare Indonesia Bogor West Java Indonesia
| | - Emily S. Darling
- Wildlife Conservation SocietyGlobal Marine Program Bronx New York
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Shinta Pardede
- Indonesia ProgramWildlife Conservation Society Bogor West Java Indonesia
| | | | - Sangeeta Mangubhai
- Wildlife Conservation SocietyGlobal Marine Program Bronx New York
- The Nature Conservancy Sorong West Papua Indonesia
| | - Amkieltiela
- WWF IndonesiaConservation Science Unit Jakarta West Java Indonesia
| | - Estradivari
- WWF IndonesiaConservation Science Unit Jakarta West Java Indonesia
| | - Eva Maire
- MARBECUniv. Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Montpellier France
- Lancaster Environment CentreLancaster University Lancaster UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Strain EMA, Edgar GJ, Ceccarelli D, Stuart‐Smith RD, Hosack GR, Thomson RJ. A global assessment of the direct and indirect benefits of marine protected areas for coral reef conservation. DIVERS DISTRIB 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth M. A. Strain
- School of Bioscience University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia
| | - Graham J. Edgar
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia
| | - Daniela Ceccarelli
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
| | - Rick D. Stuart‐Smith
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia
| | - Geoffrey R. Hosack
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Hobart Tasmania Australia
| | - Russell J. Thomson
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia
- School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics Centre for Research in Mathematics Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cinner JE, Maire E, Huchery C, MacNeil MA, Graham NAJ, Mora C, McClanahan TR, Barnes ML, Kittinger JN, Hicks CC, D'Agata S, Hoey AS, Gurney GG, Feary DA, Williams ID, Kulbicki M, Vigliola L, Wantiez L, Edgar GJ, Stuart-Smith RD, Sandin SA, Green A, Hardt MJ, Beger M, Friedlander AM, Wilson SK, Brokovich E, Brooks AJ, Cruz-Motta JJ, Booth DJ, Chabanet P, Gough C, Tupper M, Ferse SCA, Sumaila UR, Pardede S, Mouillot D. Gravity of human impacts mediates coral reef conservation gains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115:E6116-E6125. [PMID: 29915066 PMCID: PMC6142230 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708001115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Coral reefs provide ecosystem goods and services for millions of people in the tropics, but reef conditions are declining worldwide. Effective solutions to the crisis facing coral reefs depend in part on understanding the context under which different types of conservation benefits can be maximized. Our global analysis of nearly 1,800 tropical reefs reveals how the intensity of human impacts in the surrounding seascape, measured as a function of human population size and accessibility to reefs ("gravity"), diminishes the effectiveness of marine reserves at sustaining reef fish biomass and the presence of top predators, even where compliance with reserve rules is high. Critically, fish biomass in high-compliance marine reserves located where human impacts were intensive tended to be less than a quarter that of reserves where human impacts were low. Similarly, the probability of encountering top predators on reefs with high human impacts was close to zero, even in high-compliance marine reserves. However, we find that the relative difference between openly fished sites and reserves (what we refer to as conservation gains) are highest for fish biomass (excluding predators) where human impacts are moderate and for top predators where human impacts are low. Our results illustrate critical ecological trade-offs in meeting key conservation objectives: reserves placed where there are moderate-to-high human impacts can provide substantial conservation gains for fish biomass, yet they are unlikely to support key ecosystem functions like higher-order predation, which is more prevalent in reserve locations with low human impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua E Cinner
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia;
| | - Eva Maire
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
- Marine Biodiversity Exploration and Conservation, UMR Institut de Recherche pour le Développement-CNRS-UM-L'Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer 9190, University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier Cedex, France
| | - Cindy Huchery
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
| | - M Aaron MacNeil
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia
- Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 3J5, Canada
| | - Nicholas A J Graham
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, LA1 4YQ Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Camilo Mora
- Department of Geography, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822
| | - Tim R McClanahan
- Global Marine Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY 10460
| | - Michele L Barnes
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
- Department of Botany, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822
| | - John N Kittinger
- Center for Oceans, Conservation International, Honolulu, HI 96825
- Center for Biodiversity Outcomes, Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Life Sciences Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281
| | - Christina C Hicks
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, LA1 4YQ Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie D'Agata
- Marine Biodiversity Exploration and Conservation, UMR Institut de Recherche pour le Développement-CNRS-UM-L'Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer 9190, University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier Cedex, France
- Global Marine Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY 10460
- Laboratoire d'Excellence LABEX CORAIL, UMR-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement-UR-CNRS ENTROPIE, BP A5, 98848 Nouméa Cedex, New Caledonia
| | - Andrew S Hoey
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
| | - Georgina G Gurney
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
| | - David A Feary
- School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ivor D Williams
- Coral Reef Ecosystems Program, NOAA Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, Honolulu, HI 96818
| | - Michel Kulbicki
- UMR Entropie, Labex Corail, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Université de Perpignan, 66000 Perpignan, France
| | - Laurent Vigliola
- Laboratoire d'Excellence LABEX CORAIL, UMR-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement-UR-CNRS ENTROPIE, BP A5, 98848 Nouméa Cedex, New Caledonia
| | - Laurent Wantiez
- EA4243 LIVE, University of New Caledonia, BPR4 98851 Noumea cedex, New Caledonia
| | - Graham J Edgar
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
| | - Rick D Stuart-Smith
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
| | - Stuart A Sandin
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| | - Alison Green
- The Nature Conservancy, Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia
| | | | - Maria Beger
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, QLD 4074, Australia
- School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Alan M Friedlander
- Fisheries Ecology Research Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822
- Pristine Seas Program, National Geographic Society, Washington, DC 20036-4688
| | - Shaun K Wilson
- Department of Parks and Wildlife, Kensington, Perth, WA 6151, Australia
- Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Eran Brokovich
- The Israel Society of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 6775323 Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Andrew J Brooks
- Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6150
| | - Juan J Cruz-Motta
- Departamento de Ciencias Marinas, Recinto Universitario de Mayaguez, Universidad de Puerto Rico, Mayaguez 00680, Puerto Rico
| | - David J Booth
- School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
| | - Pascale Chabanet
- UMR ENTROPIE, Laboratoire d'Excellence LABEX CORAIL, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, CS 41095, 97495 Sainte Clotilde, La Réunion (FR)
| | - Charlotte Gough
- Omnibus Business Centre, Blue Ventures Conservation, N7 9DP London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Tupper
- Advanced Centre for Coastal and Ocean Research and Development, University of Trinidad and Tobago, Chaguaramas, Trinidad and Tobago, W.I
| | | | - U Rashid Sumaila
- Fisheries Economics Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries and Liu Institute for Global Studies, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Shinta Pardede
- Global Marine Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY 10460
| | - David Mouillot
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
- Marine Biodiversity Exploration and Conservation, UMR Institut de Recherche pour le Développement-CNRS-UM-L'Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer 9190, University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|