1
|
Chen M, Xu Z. A Bayesian framework linking perceived social-ecological effectiveness to stakeholder acceptance in China's Sousa chinensis protected areas. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2025; 387:125839. [PMID: 40412182 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2025] [Accepted: 05/13/2025] [Indexed: 05/27/2025]
Abstract
Enhancing stakeholder acceptance of marine protected areas (MPAs) is key to fulfilling the 30 × 30 Target, ocean-related Sustainable Development Goals, and the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030). These require MPAs not merely as management interventions, but also as social-ecological systems (SESs), where social-ecological effectiveness is the complex coupling of social and ecological effectiveness through interactions. However, the relationships between perceived social-ecological effectiveness and stakeholder acceptance are often indirect and mediated, while traditional models can yield statistical instabilities, risking false conclusions. This article tentatively proposes a partially informative Bayesian posterior framework with three steps and five criteria, using a theoretically based regulator formula and an inverse-Wishart prior in a penalized likelihood function for stricter estimates. Using field surveys and remote sensing data of China's Sousa chinensis MPAs, the study tentatively explores the proposed framework through stakeholder perceptions. Bayesian estimates improved model convergence, positive definiteness and nonsingularity, revealing an average 63 % underestimation of standard errors. Monte Carlo bootstrapping suggested the chain mediation and layered mechanisms, whereby perceived ecological effectiveness is related to stakeholder acceptance through perceived social effectiveness and stakeholder-MPA interaction. Practical implications include socially effective conservation, community-based activities, and stakeholder acceptance monitoring by the scientific community. The framework with more informative Bayesian methods may offer preliminary insights for broader biological conservation settings and practices, subject to contextual adaptations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingbao Chen
- Center of Marine Development, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, 999078, China; Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory(Zhuhai), Zhuhai, 51900, China.
| | - Zhibin Xu
- Center of Marine Development, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, 999078, China; The Institute of Sustainable Development, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, 999078, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cabral RB, Millage KD, Mayorga J, Kordell T, Kelkar M, Caughman AM, Favoretto F, Schuhbauer A, Aburto-Oropeza O, Sala E, Bradley D. Marine protected areas for dive tourism. Sci Rep 2025; 15:1923. [PMID: 39934266 PMCID: PMC11814124 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83664-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Marine and coastal tourism deliver economic benefits to coastal communities that far surpass those generated by fisheries, yet its potential contribution to global marine conservation remains underexamined. Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) help restore biodiversity and enhance nearby fisheries, but their direct tourism benefits are not well understood. Here, we estimate the global demand for recreational scuba dive tourism, map the distribution and protection status of all marine dive sites globally, and develop a bioeconomic model to estimate the revenue gains from upgrading unprotected dive sites to fully protected MPAs. We estimate that 33.1 million scuba dives occur annually in marine environments worldwide, with 70% taking place within MPAs. However, only 15% of these MPA-affiliated dive sites are highly or fully protected. We show that designating all unprotected recreational dive sites, representing less than 1% of the global ocean, as highly or fully protected MPAs would improve fish biomass and biodiversity while generating an additional US$2 billion per year in direct tourism revenue (not including economic multipliers). Importantly, 62% of marine diving currently occurs in developing countries, underscoring the potential for dive tourism to support both marine conservation and local livelihoods in regions where such benefits are most needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reniel B Cabral
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
- Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
| | - Katherine D Millage
- Environmental Markets Lab, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- Pristine Seas, National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Juan Mayorga
- Environmental Markets Lab, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- Pristine Seas, National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tia Kordell
- Environmental Markets Lab, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- Marine Science Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Mukta Kelkar
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Alicia M Caughman
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Fabio Favoretto
- Centro Para la Biodiversidad Marina y Conservación, A.C., La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Anna Schuhbauer
- Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Octavio Aburto-Oropeza
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Enric Sala
- Pristine Seas, National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Darcy Bradley
- Environmental Markets Lab, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- Marine Science Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Phillips GAC, Ogier E, Dutton I, Barrett N, Krueck NC, Hartmann K. The ambiguous role of partially protected marine protected areas in Australia: Results from a systematic literature review. PLoS One 2025; 20:e0307324. [PMID: 39774310 PMCID: PMC11706464 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are an important tool in helping to protect biodiversity in the oceans. Recent ratification of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) has ensured that globally we are committed to effectively protecting 30% of the world's oceans by 2030, in MPAs. In Australia there is considerable interest in the potential benefits that partially protected areas (PPAs) may provide. However, a consistent definition of a PPA is currently lacking, and urgently needed to conduct quantitative analyses of PPAs. We conducted a systematic literature review to understand the current knowledge surrounding PPAs and their potential benefits. We define a PPA, characterise PPA implementation in Australia, and present results for the outcomes of PPAs in terms of ecological, economic, and social indicators. Our review suggests that although 45% of Australia's marine environment is within MPAs, 61% of MPAs provide only partial protection. The Northern Territory (100%), New South Wales (81%), and Queensland (79.8%) have the highest percentage of MPAs that are partially protected, compared to Tasmania which has the smallest percentage of partially protected MPAs (13.12%). Tasmania also has the smallest percentage cover of MPAs (6.49% state waters). Most PPA management plans did not contain quantifiable Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to be able to effectively monitor the progress of these PPAs against the stated outcomes. We find the benefits of PPAs to be ambiguous: PPAs generally provide benefits when compared to 'open' ocean, however this is not a consistent result. There are no PPAs that provide greater overall benefits when compared to fully protected MPAs. Only one state (South Australia) and the Commonwealth (Australian Marine Parks) are collecting publicly available baseline data to facilitate quantitative monitoring of PPAs. Contrary to fisheries management, there were no plans of action if the declared MPAs and PPAs failed to meet their declared objectives and goals. Some PPAs within Australia appear to be incompatible with conservation priorities according to the recent "MPA Guide" classification framework. This study highlights the need for clearer management rationale and plans for PPAs in Australia, as these comprise the majority of MPAs in Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve A. C. Phillips
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, The University of Tasmania, Australia
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, The University of Tasmania, Australia
| | - Emily Ogier
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, The University of Tasmania, Australia
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, The University of Tasmania, Australia
| | - Ian Dutton
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, The University of Tasmania, Australia
| | - Neville Barrett
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, The University of Tasmania, Australia
| | - Nils C. Krueck
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, The University of Tasmania, Australia
| | - Klaas Hartmann
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, The University of Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mouillot D, Velez L, Albouy C, Casajus N, Claudet J, Delbar V, Devillers R, Letessier TB, Loiseau N, Manel S, Mannocci L, Meeuwig J, Mouquet N, Nuno A, O'Connor L, Parravicini V, Renaud J, Seguin R, Troussellier M, Thuiller W. The socioeconomic and environmental niche of protected areas reveals global conservation gaps and opportunities. Nat Commun 2024; 15:9007. [PMID: 39424792 PMCID: PMC11489723 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53241-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The global network of protected areas has rapidly expanded in the past decade and is expected to cover at least 30% of land and sea by 2030 to halt biodiversity erosion. Yet, the distribution of protected areas is highly heterogeneous on Earth and the social-environmental preconditions enabling or hindering protected area establishment remain poorly understood. Here, using fourteen socioeconomic and environmental factors, we characterize the multidimensional niche of terrestrial and marine protected areas, which we use to accurately establish, at the global scale, whether a particular location has preconditions favourable for paestablishment. We reveal that protected areas, particularly the most restrictive ones, over-aggregate where human development and the number of non-governmental organizations are high. Based on the spatial distribution of vertebrates and the likelihood to convert non-protected areas into strictly protected areas, we identify 'potential' versus 'unrealistic' conservation gains on land and sea, which we define as areas of high vertebrate diversity that are, respectively, favourable and unfavourable to protected area establishment. Where protected areas are unrealistic, alternative strategies such as other effective area-based conservation measures or privately protected areas, could deliver conservation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Mouillot
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, Montpellier, France.
- Institut Universitaire de France, IUF, Paris, France.
| | - Laure Velez
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Joachim Claudet
- National Center for Scientific Research, PSL Université Paris, CRIOBE, CNRS-EPHE-UPVD, Maison de l'Océan, 195 rue Saint-Jacques, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Vincent Delbar
- La TeleScop, Maison de la Télédétection, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Tom B Letessier
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK
- Marine Futures Laboratory and Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- School of Biological and Marine Sciences Portland Square B304 Drake Circus, University of Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Nicolas Loiseau
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | - Stéphanie Manel
- Institut Universitaire de France, IUF, Paris, France
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Univ Paul Valéry, Montpellier, France
| | - Laura Mannocci
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, Montpellier, France
- FRB - CESAB, 34000, Montpellier, France
| | - Jessica Meeuwig
- Marine Futures Laboratory and Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Nicolas Mouquet
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, Montpellier, France
- FRB - CESAB, 34000, Montpellier, France
| | - Ana Nuno
- Interdisciplinary Centre of Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Penryn, United Kingdom
| | - Louise O'Connor
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, F-38000, Grenoble, France
| | - Valeriano Parravicini
- PSL Université Paris, EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France
| | - Julien Renaud
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, F-38000, Grenoble, France
| | - Raphael Seguin
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Wilfried Thuiller
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, F-38000, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Caldwell IR, McClanahan TR, Oddenyo RM, Graham NA, Beger M, Vigliola L, Sandin SA, Friedlander AM, Randriamanantsoa B, Wantiez L, Green AL, Humphries AT, Hardt MJ, Caselle JE, Feary DA, Karkarey R, Jadot C, Hoey AS, Eurich JG, Wilson SK, Crane N, Tupper M, Ferse SC, Maire E, Mouillot D, Cinner JE. Protection efforts have resulted in ~10% of existing fish biomass on coral reefs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2308605121. [PMID: 39374392 PMCID: PMC11494344 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2308605121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The amount of ocean protected from fishing and other human impacts has often been used as a metric of conservation progress. However, protection efforts have highly variable outcomes that depend on local conditions, which makes it difficult to quantify what coral reef protection efforts to date have actually achieved at a global scale. Here, we develop a predictive model of how local conditions influence conservation outcomes on ~2,600 coral reef sites across 44 ecoregions, which we used to quantify how much more fish biomass there is on coral reefs compared to a modeled scenario with no protection. Under the assumptions of our model, our study reveals that without existing protection efforts there would be ~10% less fish biomass on coral reefs. Thus, we estimate that coral reef protection efforts have led to approximately 1 in every 10 kg of existing fish biomass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain R. Caldwell
- Thriving Oceans Research Hub, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW2006, Australia
- College of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD4811, Australia
| | - Tim R. McClanahan
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Marine Program, Bronx, NY10460
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Kenya Marine Program, Mombasa80107, Kenya
| | - Remy M. Oddenyo
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Kenya Marine Program, Mombasa80107, Kenya
| | - Nicholas A.J. Graham
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, LancasterLA1 4YQ, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Beger
- School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9JT, United Kingdom
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD4072, Australia
| | - Laurent Vigliola
- Écologie Marine Tropicale des Océans Pacifique et Indien research unit, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Université de la Réunion, Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer, CNRS, Nouméa, New Caledonia98800, France
| | - Stuart A. Sandin
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92037
| | - Alan M. Friedlander
- Pristine Seas, National Geographic Society, Washington, DC20036
- Hawai’i Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawai’i, Kāne’ohe, HI96744
| | | | - Laurent Wantiez
- Département des Sciences et Techniques, University of New Caledonia, Nouméa98851, New Caledonia
| | | | - Austin T. Humphries
- Department of Fisheries, Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI02881
| | | | | | - David A. Feary
- General Organization for Conservation of Coral Reefs and Turtles in the Red Sea, Jeddah21431, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Rucha Karkarey
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, LancasterLA1 4YQ, United Kingdom
- Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysore570017, India
| | | | - Andrew S. Hoey
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD4811, Australia
| | - Jacob G. Eurich
- Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA93106
- Environmental Defense Fund, Santa Barbara, CA93106
| | - Shaun K. Wilson
- University of Western Australia, Oceans Institute, Crawley, Western Australia6009, Australia
- Marine Science Program, Science and Conservation Division, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia6151, Australia
| | - Nicole Crane
- Society For Conservation Biology, Smith Fellows Program, Washington, DC20005
- One People One Reef, Santa Cruz, CA95076
| | - Mark Tupper
- Centre for National Parks and Protected Areas, Institute of Science and the Environment, University of Cumbria, Ambleside, CumbriaLA22 9BB, United Kingdom
- Terra Nexus, Business Center 1, Meydan Hotel, Nad al Sheba, Dubai34252, United Arab Emirates
| | - Sebastian C.A. Ferse
- Department of Ecology, Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research, Bremen28359, Germany
- Department of Marine Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Chemistry, University of Bremen, Bremen28359, Germany
- Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor16680, Indonesia
| | - Eva Maire
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, LancasterLA1 4YQ, United Kingdom
- Marine Biodiversity, Exploitation, & Conservation (MARBEC), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier34090, Cedex5, France
| | - David Mouillot
- Marine Biodiversity, Exploitation, & Conservation (MARBEC), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier34090, Cedex5, France
- Institut Universitaire de France, Paris75480, France
| | - Joshua E. Cinner
- Thriving Oceans Research Hub, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW2006, Australia
- College of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD4811, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Karr KA, Pina-Amargós F, Figueredo-Martín T, Olivera-Espinosa Y. Fishery Management Enforcement Gradients to Achieve Fishery Goals. FISHES 2024; 9:355. [DOI: 10.3390/fishes9090355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2025]
Abstract
Marine protected areas (MPAs) can allow some fish populations to rebuild within their borders in areas impacted by overfishing, but the effectiveness of reserves is highly dependent on how effectively fishing mortality is controlled, which in turn depends on the level of fishery management implementation. In Cuba’s Gardens of the Queen MPA, the largest in the Caribbean, a variety of fishery management measures have been implemented to ensure the social, economic, and political viability of protecting such a large area. Here, we evaluate the biological response, in terms of fish density and the biomass of commercially valuable and ecologically important reef fish species, to a spatial gradient of fishery management enforcement, in terms of fish density and biomass, of commercially valuable and ecologically important reef fish species. The enforcement gradient is characterized by the level of protection, fishing effort, patrolling effort, distance to the nearest fishing port, and fishing intensity. Fish density and biomass were estimated from visual scuba surveys. Areas with higher levels of enforcement support higher levels of average biomass (up to 1378 kg/ha) and density (up to 2367 indv./ha) of commercially important fishes in comparison to areas with very low or no enforcement (estimates of 757 kg/ha average biomass and 1090 indv./ha average density, respectively). These fish density and biomass levels can serve as proxies in the development of harvest control rules that adjust fishing pressure according to the ratio of fished density or biomass to unfished density or biomass, through the use of the MPA Density Ratio method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendra A. Karr
- Coastal Science and Policy Program, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | | | | | - Yunier Olivera-Espinosa
- Centro de Investigaciones de Ecosistemas Costeros (CIEC), Ciego de Ávila 64900, Cuba
- Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (CICIMAR-IPN), Av. Instituto Politecnico Nacional s/n, Playa Palo de Santa Rita, La Paz 23096, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang X, Carroll EL, Constantine R, Andrews-Goff V, Childerhouse S, Cole R, Goetz KT, Meyer C, Ogle M, Harcourt R, Stuck E, Zerbini AN, Riekkola L. Effectiveness of marine protected areas in safeguarding important migratory megafauna habitat. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 368:122116. [PMID: 39116808 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a commonly used management tool to safeguard marine life from anthropogenic impacts, yet their efficacy often remains untested. Evaluating how highly dynamic marine species use static MPAs is challenging but becoming more feasible with the advancement of telemetry data. Here, we focus on southern right whales (Eubalaena australis, SRWs) in the waters off Aotearoa/New Zealand, which declined from 30,000 whales to fewer than 40 mature females due to whaling. Now numbering in the low thousands, the key socializing and nursery areas for this population in the remote subantarctic islands are under the protection of different types of MPAs. However, the effectiveness of these MPAs in encompassing important whale habitat and protecting the whales from vessel traffic has not been investigated. To address this, we analyzed telemetry data from 29 SRWs tagged at the Auckland Islands between 2009 and 2022. We identified two previously unknown and currently unprotected areas that were used by the whales for important behaviors such as foraging, socializing, or resting. Additionally, by combining whale locations and vessel tracking data (2020-2022) during peak breeding period (June to October), we found high spatiotemporal overlap between whales and vessels within several MPAs, suggesting the whales could still be vulnerable to multiple anthropogenic stressors even when within areas designated for protection. Our results identify areas to be prioritized for future monitoring and investigation to support the ongoing recovery of this SRW population, as well as highlight the overarching importance of assessing MPA effectiveness post-implementation, especially in a changing climate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuelei Zhang
- Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland/Waipapa Taumata Rau, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Emma L Carroll
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland/Waipapa Taumata Rau, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Rochelle Constantine
- Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland/Waipapa Taumata Rau, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand; School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland/Waipapa Taumata Rau, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Virginia Andrews-Goff
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania, 7050, Australia
| | - Simon Childerhouse
- Environmental Law Initiative, 75 Taranaki St, Te Aro, Wellington, 6011, New Zealand
| | - Rosalind Cole
- Department of Conservation - Te Papa Atawhai, Invercargill Office, PO Box 743, Invercargill, 9840, New Zealand
| | - Kimberly T Goetz
- Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98115, United States
| | - Catherine Meyer
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland/Waipapa Taumata Rau, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Mike Ogle
- Department of Conservation - Te Papa Atawhai, Takaka Office, 62 Commercial Street, Takaka, 7110, New Zealand
| | - Robert Harcourt
- School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, 18 Wally's Walk, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Esther Stuck
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland/Waipapa Taumata Rau, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Alexandre N Zerbini
- Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98115, United States; Cooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, & Ecosystem Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, United States; Marine Ecology and Telemetry Research, Seabeck, WA, 98380, United States
| | - Leena Riekkola
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland/Waipapa Taumata Rau, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Costello MJ. Fully protected Marine Protected Areas do not displace fisheries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2412543121. [PMID: 39162725 PMCID: PMC11348145 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2412543121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark John Costello
- Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø8049, Norway
- College of Life Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao266005, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hays GC, Schofield G, Papazekou M, Chatzimentor A, Katsanevakis S, Mazaris AD. A pulse check for trends in sea turtle numbers across the globe. iScience 2024; 27:109071. [PMID: 38524373 PMCID: PMC10960059 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Population declines of vertebrates are common, but rebuilding marine life may be possible. We assessed trends in sea turtle numbers globally, building 61 time series of abundance extending beyond 2015, representing monitoring in >1200 years. Increases were widespread with significant upward trends, no significant change, and significant downward trends in 28, 28, and 5 time series, respectively. For example, annual nest numbers increased between 1980 and 2018 from around 4,000 to 16,000 for green turtles at Aldabra (Seychelles, Indian Ocean) and between 2008 and 2020 from around 500 to 35,000 for loggerhead turtles in Sal (Cape Verde, north Atlantic). However, conservation concerns remain. Major populations may experience declines, such as loggerhead turtles in Oman, while previous upward trends can be reversed, as with green turtles nesting at Tortuguero (Costa Rica, Caribbean). Further, decreases in abundance were evident in several leatherback turtle time series. These concerns show there is no room for complacency for sea turtle conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graeme C. Hays
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3280, Australia
| | - Gail Schofield
- School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
| | - Maria Papazekou
- Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Anastasia Chatzimentor
- Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Stelios Katsanevakis
- Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Department of Marine Sciences, University of the Aegean, 81100 Mytilene, Greece
| | - Antonios D. Mazaris
- Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bell JJ, Micaroni V, Harris B, Strano F, Broadribb M, Rogers A. Global status, impacts, and management of rocky temperate mesophotic ecosystems. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2024; 38:e13945. [PMID: 35587786 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The ecology and function of rocky temperate mesophotic ecosystems (TMEs) remain poorly understood globally despite their widespread distribution. They typically occur at 20-150 m (the limit of photosynthesis), and on rocky substratum they support rich benthic communities and mobile fauna. We determined the distribution of rocky TMEs, their conservation status, and their most characteristic biological groups. Rocky TMEs were dominated by algae, turf-invertebrate matrices (<50 m only), sponges, bryozoans, and cnidarians. The community composition of TMEs differed significantly from shallow (0-15 m) subtidal reefs. Data were geographically biased and variable, available only from the North and South Atlantic, Mediterranean, and Temperate Australasia. Degree of protection of rocky TMEs varied considerably across the world. The biggest threats to rocky TMEs were identified changes in temperature, sedimentation rates, nutrient concentrations, and certain fishing types. We propose a conservation framework to inform future rocky TME management and conservation, highlighting the need to recognize the importance of these biologically diverse and functionally important ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Bell
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Valerio Micaroni
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Benjamin Harris
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Francesca Strano
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Manon Broadribb
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Alice Rogers
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dalongeville A, Boulanger E, Marques V, Charbonnel E, Hartmann V, Santoni MC, Deter J, Valentini A, Lenfant P, Boissery P, Dejean T, Velez L, Pichot F, Sanchez L, Arnal V, Bockel T, Delaruelle G, Holon F, Milhau T, Romant L, Manel S, Mouillot D. Benchmarking eleven biodiversity indicators based on environmental
DNA
surveys: more diverse functional traits and evolutionary lineages inside marine reserves. J Appl Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emilie Boulanger
- Aix‐Marseille Université Université de Toulon, CNRS, IRD, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), UM 110 Marseille France
| | - Virginie Marques
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE‐PSL University, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3 Montpellier France
| | - Eric Charbonnel
- Parc Marin de la Côte Bleue, Observatoire, plage du Rouet. 31 Av. J. Bart. BP 42. 13820 Carry‐le‐Rouet France
| | - Virginie Hartmann
- Reserve Naturelle Marine de Cerbère‐Banyuls, Département des Pyrénées‐Orientales, 5 rue Roger David 66650 Banyuls‐sur‐mer France
| | | | - Julie Deter
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Montpellier France
- Andromède Océanologie, 7 place Cassan – Carnon plage, 34130 Mauguio France
| | - Alice Valentini
- SPYGEN, 17 rue du Lac Saint‐André, 73370 Le Bourget‐du‐Lac France
| | - Philippe Lenfant
- Université Perpignan Via Domitia Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens, UMR 5110, 58 Avenue Paul Alduy Perpignan France
| | - Pierre Boissery
- Agence de l’Eau Rhône‐Méditerranée‐Corse, Délégation de Marseille, 2 rue Barbusse, CS 90464, 13207 Marseille Cedex France
| | - Tony Dejean
- SPYGEN, 17 rue du Lac Saint‐André, 73370 Le Bourget‐du‐Lac France
| | - Laure Velez
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Montpellier France
| | - Franck Pichot
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Montpellier France
| | - Loic Sanchez
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Montpellier France
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE‐PSL University, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3 Montpellier France
| | - Veronique Arnal
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE‐PSL University, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3 Montpellier France
| | - Thomas Bockel
- Andromède Océanologie, 7 place Cassan – Carnon plage, 34130 Mauguio France
| | | | - Florian Holon
- Andromède Océanologie, 7 place Cassan – Carnon plage, 34130 Mauguio France
| | - Tristan Milhau
- SPYGEN, 17 rue du Lac Saint‐André, 73370 Le Bourget‐du‐Lac France
| | - Lola Romant
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Montpellier France
| | - Stéphanie Manel
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE‐PSL University, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3 Montpellier France
| | - David Mouillot
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Montpellier France
- Institut Universitaire de France Paris France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rodríguez-Rodríguez D, Martínez-Vega J. Ecological effectiveness of marine protected areas across the globe in the scientific literature. ADVANCES IN MARINE BIOLOGY 2022; 92:129-153. [PMID: 36208878 DOI: 10.1016/bs.amb.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
A systematic literature review (SLR) of scientific articles on the effectiveness of marine protected areas (MPAs) to conserve biodiversity in the 2010-2019 decade using Scopus was done. Only studies that used Before-After-Control-Impact (BACI-type) research designs and at least one marine biodiversity indicator were included. The 23 studies included in the review were published in 19 journals and comprised 66 MPAs from 18 countries from the five continents. Fifty-seven percent of the studies used species-specific indicators of MPA effectiveness, chiefly density/abundance and size of organisms. Over 90% of the studies used incomplete research designs, with just 9% using BACI-type designs or over. Just over half of the studies reported positive or slightly positive ecological outcomes from MPAs, with 17.4% of them reporting negative or slightly negative outcomes, and 30.4% reporting mixed or inconclusive outcomes. Legally stringent reserves clearly outperformed multiple-use MPAs ecologically. The major stated pressures to both types of MPAs related to fishing, whereas the main mentioned MPA effectiveness factors included managerial and regulatory issues. Our results add to the existing evidence that the global ocean coverage by legally stringent reserves should be expanded if effective marine biodiversity conservation is to be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Javier Martínez-Vega
- Institute of Economy, Geography and Demography, Spanish National Research Council (IEGD-CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ingeman KE, Zhao LZ, Wolf C, Williams DR, Ritger AL, Ripple WJ, Kopecky KL, Dillon EM, DiFiore BP, Curtis JS, Csik SR, Bui A, Stier AC. Glimmers of hope in large carnivore recoveries. Sci Rep 2022; 12:10005. [PMID: 35864129 PMCID: PMC9304400 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13671-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
In the face of an accelerating extinction crisis, scientists must draw insights from successful conservation interventions to uncover promising strategies for reversing broader declines. Here, we synthesize cases of recovery from a list of 362 species of large carnivores, ecologically important species that function as terminal consumers in many ecological contexts. Large carnivores represent critical conservation targets that have experienced historical declines as a result of direct exploitation and habitat loss. We examine taxonomic and geographic variation in current extinction risk and recovery indices, identify conservation actions associated with positive outcomes, and reveal anthropogenic threats linked to ongoing declines. We find that fewer than 10% of global large carnivore populations are increasing, and only 12 species (3.3%) have experienced genuine improvement in extinction risk, mostly limited to recoveries among marine mammals. Recovery is associated with species legislation enacted at national and international levels, and with management of direct exploitation. Conversely, ongoing declines are robustly linked to threats that include habitat modification and human conflict. Applying lessons from cases of large carnivore recovery will be crucial for restoring intact ecosystems and maintaining the services they provide to humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt E Ingeman
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA. .,David H. Smith Conservation Research Program, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Lily Z Zhao
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Christopher Wolf
- Global Trophic Cascades Program, Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - David R Williams
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Amelia L Ritger
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - William J Ripple
- Global Trophic Cascades Program, Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Kai L Kopecky
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Erin M Dillon
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Bartholomew P DiFiore
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Joseph S Curtis
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Samantha R Csik
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - An Bui
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
| | - Adrian C Stier
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, 2018 Noble Hall, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pettersen AK, Marzinelli EM, Steinberg PD, Coleman MA. Impact of marine protected areas on temporal stability of fish species diversity. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2022; 36:e13815. [PMID: 34342040 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Preserving biodiversity over time is a pressing challenge for conservation science. A key goal of marine protected areas (MPAs) is to maintain stability in species composition, via reduced turnover, to support ecosystem function. Yet, this stability is rarely measured directly under different levels of protection. Rather, evaluations of MPA efficacy generally consist of static measures of abundance, species richness, and biomass, and rare measures of turnover are limited to short-term studies involving pairwise (beta diversity) comparisons. Zeta diversity is a recently developed metric of turnover that allows for measurement of compositional similarity across multiple assemblages and thus provides more comprehensive estimates of turnover. We evaluated the effectiveness of MPAs at preserving fish zeta diversity across a network of marine reserves over 10 years in Batemans Marine Park, Australia. Snorkel transect surveys were conducted across multiple replicated and spatially interspersed sites to record fish species occurrence through time. Protection provided by MPAs conferred greater stability in fish species turnover. Marine protected areas had significantly shallower decline in zeta diversity compared with partially protected and unprotected areas. The retention of harvested species was four to six times greater in MPAs compared with partially protected and unprotected areas, and the stabilizing effects of protection were observable within 4 years of park implementation. Conversely, partial protection offered little to no improvement in stability, compared with unprotected areas. These findings support the efficacy of MPAs for preserving temporal fish diversity stability. The implementation of MPAs helps stabilize fish diversity and may, therefore, support biodiversity resilience under ongoing environmental change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda K Pettersen
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ezequiel M Marzinelli
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Peter D Steinberg
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Marine Bio-Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melinda A Coleman
- Marine Ecosystem Research, Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales Fisheries, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
- National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tussipkan D, Manabayeva SA. Employing CRISPR/Cas Technology for the Improvement of Potato and Other Tuber Crops. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2021; 12:747476. [PMID: 34764969 PMCID: PMC8576567 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.747476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
New breeding technologies have not only revolutionized biological science, but have also been employed to generate transgene-free products. Genome editing is a powerful technology that has been used to modify genomes of several important crops. This review describes the basic mechanisms, advantages and disadvantages of genome editing systems, such as ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas. Secondly, we summarize in detail all studies of the CRISPR/Cas system applied to potato and other tuber crops, such as sweet potato, cassava, yam, and carrot. Genes associated with self-incompatibility, abiotic-biotic resistance, nutrient-antinutrient content, and post-harvest factors targeted utilizing the CRISPR/Cas system are analyzed in this review. We hope that this review provides fundamental information that will be useful for future breeding of tuber crops to develop novel cultivars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shuga A. Manabayeva
- Plant Genetic Engineering Laboratory, National Center for Biotechnology, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Davies BFR, Holmes L, Rees A, Attrill MJ, Cartwright AY, Sheehan EV. Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management works—How switching from mobile to static fishing gear improves populations of fished and non‐fished species inside a marine‐protected area. J Appl Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bede F. R. Davies
- School of Biological & Marine Science University of Plymouth Plymouth UK
| | - Luke Holmes
- School of Biological & Marine Science University of Plymouth Plymouth UK
| | - Adam Rees
- School of Biological & Marine Science University of Plymouth Plymouth UK
| | - Martin J. Attrill
- School of Biological & Marine Science University of Plymouth Plymouth UK
| | - Amy Y. Cartwright
- School of Biological & Marine Science University of Plymouth Plymouth UK
| | - Emma V. Sheehan
- School of Biological & Marine Science University of Plymouth Plymouth UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Loiseau N, Thuiller W, Stuart-Smith RD, Devictor V, Edgar GJ, Velez L, Cinner JE, Graham NAJ, Renaud J, Hoey AS, Manel S, Mouillot D. Maximizing regional biodiversity requires a mosaic of protection levels. PLoS Biol 2021; 19:e3001195. [PMID: 34010287 PMCID: PMC8133472 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Protected areas are the flagship management tools to secure biodiversity from anthropogenic impacts. However, the extent to which adjacent areas with distinct protection levels host different species numbers and compositions remains uncertain. Here, using reef fishes, European alpine plants, and North American birds, we show that the composition of species in adjacent Strictly Protected, Restricted, and Non-Protected areas is highly dissimilar, whereas the number of species is similar, after controlling for environmental conditions, sample size, and rarity. We find that between 12% and 15% of species are only recorded in Non-Protected areas, suggesting that a non-negligible part of regional biodiversity occurs where human activities are less regulated. For imperiled species, the proportion only recorded in Strictly Protected areas reaches 58% for fishes, 11% for birds, and 7% for plants, highlighting the fundamental and unique role of protected areas and their environmental conditions in biodiversity conservation. This study shows that the dissimilarity in species composition between sites with different levels of protection is consistently high, suggesting that adjacent and connected areas with different protection levels host very dissimilar species assemblages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Loiseau
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, F-38000 Grenoble, France
- CEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Wilfried Thuiller
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, F-38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Rick D. Stuart-Smith
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Vincent Devictor
- CNRS, ISEM, Université de Montpellier, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France
| | - Graham J. Edgar
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Laure Velez
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | - Joshua E. Cinner
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Julien Renaud
- Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, F-38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Andrew S. Hoey
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - Stephanie Manel
- EPHE, PSL Research University, CNRS, UM, SupAgro, IRD, INRA, UMR 5175 CEFE, F-Montpellier, France
| | - David Mouillot
- MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France
- Institut Universitaire de France, IUF, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|