1
|
Hong M, Yu W, Gao Y, Pei B, Chen J, Lou Y. Pelvic floor muscle training for the prevention and management of low anterior resection syndrome in patients with rectal cancer: An evidence-based summary. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2025; 12:100620. [PMID: 39712512 PMCID: PMC11658566 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2024] [Revised: 11/09/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aims to summarize the best available evidence on the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in preventing and managing low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) among patients with rectal cancer, with the goal of enhancing quality of care. Methods A systematic search was conducted across databases, including BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, WHO, GIN, UK NICE, NGC, SIGN, RNAO, NCCN, JBI Library, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, OVID, PubMed, Chinese Wanfang, CNKI, SinoMed, and VIP, covering publications from inception through June 30, 2024. We targeted clinical decisions, guidelines, evidence summaries, expert consensus statements, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials related to PFMT for LARS in patients with rectal cancer. Two independent reviewers assessed the quality of the literature and extracted key findings. Results A total of 15 articles were included, yielding 21 pieces of evidence across six core areas: multidisciplinary management, bowel function risk screening and assessment, the purpose and target population for PFMT, pre-exercise instructions, exercise regimens, and exercise feedback. Conclusions The summarized 21 recommendations provide guidance for integrating PFMT into care plans for patients with rectal cancer and LARS. However, given that evidence originates from diverse clinical settings, considerations such as the local health care environment should be evaluated before implementation. Future research should focus on optimizing PFMT regimens to improve bowel function outcomes in patients with rectal cancer, refining exercise protocols, and gathering further data to enhance clinical application. Systematic review registration Registered with the Fudan University Centre for Evidence-Based Nursing, registration number ES20245385.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meirong Hong
- School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei Yu
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yating Gao
- Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bei Pei
- School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ji Chen
- Nursing Department, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yan Lou
- School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu JH, Zhang FM, Wang Z, Zhang XZ, Wu HF, Huang JY, Zhuang CL, Liu ZC. Colonic J-Pouch vs. straight colorectal reconstruction after anal preservation surgery for ultra-low rectal cancer: A prospective cohort study on quality of life and bowel function. Surgery 2025; 181:109284. [PMID: 40058110 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2024] [Revised: 02/02/2025] [Accepted: 02/05/2025] [Indexed: 04/30/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with ultra-low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery are at high risk of poor anal function. Sphincter preservation in ultra-low rectal cancer poses significant challenges, and there is limited research exploring the impact of colonic J-pouch reconstruction on anal function in such patients. Given these challenges, the objective of this study was to assess the impact of colonic J-pouch reconstruction on quality of life and bowel function in patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery for ultra-low rectal cancer. METHODS From February 2023 to July 2024, 66 patients with ultra-low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery were prospectively included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on anastomotic techniques: direct anastomosis group and colon J-Pouch group. Subsequently, postoperative complication statistics, anal function, and quality of life assessment were conducted. The LARS, Wexner, and Vaizey scales were used to evaluate anal function, while the FIQL scale assessed patients' quality of life at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery postoperatively. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to assess postoperative complications. Differences in bowel function, quality of life, and complication rates between the 2 groups were analyzed. RESULTS There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative Clavien-Dindo II and above complications between the 2 groups (25% vs. 26.5%, P = .183). In terms of bowel function, the colonic J-pouch anastomosis demonstrated superior LARS scores at 1 month (29 vs. 32, P = .006), 3 months (23 vs. 29, P < .001), and 6 months postoperatively (20 vs. 25, P < .001). Similarly, regarding quality of life, patients in the colonic J-pouch group reported higher FIQL scores than those in the direct anastomosis group at 1 month postoperatively (84 vs. 71, P = .001), 3 months postoperatively (94 vs. 81, P = .007), and 6 months postoperatively (104 vs. 91, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS Patients who underwent colonic J-pouch reconstruction for ultra-low rectal cancer had enhanced functional and quality-of-life outcomes compared to straight colorectal anastomosis. More research is needed to explore the long-term implications of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Hao Zhu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng-Min Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xian-Zhong Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao-Fan Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Ying Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Shibei Hospital of Shanghai Jing'an District, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng-Le Zhuang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Zhong-Chen Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Andreyev J, Adams R, Bornschein J, Chapman M, Chuter D, Darnborough S, Davies A, Dignan F, Donnellan C, Fernandes D, Flavel R, Giebner G, Gilbert A, Huddy F, Khan MSS, Leonard P, Mehta S, Minton O, Norton C, Payton L, McGuire G, Pritchard DM, Taylor C, Vyoral S, Wilson A, Wedlake L. British Society of Gastroenterology practice guidance on the management of acute and chronic gastrointestinal symptoms and complications as a result of treatment for cancer. Gut 2025:gutjnl-2024-333812. [PMID: 40068855 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival rates after a diagnosis of cancer are improving. Poorly managed gastrointestinal (GI) side effects can interfere with delivery of curative cancer treatment. Long-term physical side effects of cancer therapy impinge on quality of life in up to 25% of those treated for cancer, and GI side effects are the most common and troublesome. AIM To provide comprehensive, practical guidance on the management of acute and chronic luminal gastrointestinal symptoms arising during and after treatment for cancer METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert group including patients treated for cancer, divided into working parties to identify, and synthesise recommendations for the optimal assessment, diagnosis and appropriate interventions for luminal GI side effects of systemic and local cancer therapies. Recommendations were developed using the principles of the BMJ AGREE II reporting. RESULTS 103 recommendations were agreed. The importance of the patient perspective and what can be done to support patients are emphasised. Key physiological principles underlying the development of GI toxicity arising from cancer therapy are outlined. Individual symptoms or symptom clusters are poor at distinguishing the underlying cause(s), and investigations are required if empirical therapy does not lead rapidly to significant benefits. Patients frequently have multiple GI causes for symptoms; all need to be diagnosed and optimally treated to achieve resolution. Investigations and management approaches now known to be ineffective or of questionable benefit are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS The physical, emotional and financial costs to individuals, their families and society from cancer therapy can be considerable. Identifying and signposting affected patients who require specialist services is the role of all clinicians. Progress in the treatment of cancer increasingly means that patients require expert, multidisciplinary supportive care providing effective and safe treatment at every stage of the cancer journey. Development of such expertise should be prioritised as should the education of health professionals and the public in what, when and how acute and chronic gastrointestinal symptoms and complications should be managed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jervoise Andreyev
- Consultant Gastroenterologist and Honorary Professor, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust and The Medical School, The University of Nottingham, Lincoln, UK
| | - Richard Adams
- Professor and Honorary Consultant Clinical Oncologist, Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jan Bornschein
- Consultant Gastroenterologist, Medical Research Council Translational Immune Discovery Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford and John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Chapman
- Consultant Colorectal Surgeon, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Sally Darnborough
- GP and Clinical Lead, Pelvic Radiation Late Effects Service, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Davies
- Consultant Upper GI surgeon, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Fiona Dignan
- Consultant Haematologist, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Clare Donnellan
- Consultant Gatroenterologist, Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Darren Fernandes
- Specialist Registrar, Department of Gastroenterology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Georgina Giebner
- Dietitian, Macmillan Pelvic Radiation Disease, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Associate Professor in Clinical Oncology, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Fiona Huddy
- Specialist Macmillan Oesophago-Gastric Dietitian, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Mohid Shakil S Khan
- Consultant in Gastroenterology & Neuroendocrine Tumours and Clinical Lead, South Wales Neuroendocrine Cancer Service, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Pauline Leonard
- Consultant Medical Oncologist, Barking Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK
| | - Shameer Mehta
- Consultant Gastroenterologist, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ollie Minton
- Consultant in Palliative Medicine and Clinical Director for Cancer, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Christine Norton
- Professor of Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - D Mark Pritchard
- Professor of Gastroenterology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Claire Taylor
- Macmillan Nurse Consultant, St Mark's Hospital, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Susan Vyoral
- Macmillan Oncology Dietitian, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Ana Wilson
- Consultant Gastroenterologist, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Linda Wedlake
- Lead Project Manager, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zang Y, Zhang B, Liu X, Chen B, Gao L, Zhou M, Gu X, Li Z, Zhou Y, Tang B, Jiang C, Guan G, Ding J, Xiang J. The Effects of Intersphincteric Space Dissection Approaches on Low Rectal Cancer Outcomes: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2025; 6:e550. [PMID: 40134470 PMCID: PMC11932611 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2025] [Indexed: 03/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effects of 2 intersphincteric space (ISS) dissection approaches for intersphincteric resection (ISR) on perioperative safety, oncological prognosis, and anal function. Background The dissection of ISS is a crucial aspect of ISR, yet the outcomes associated with various ISS dissection approaches remain uncertain. Methods Data were retrospectively collected from 314 patients with rectal cancer who underwent ISR at 5 Chinese tertiary referral medical institutions from January 2015 to December 2020. ISS dissection was performed using 1 of the 2 avenues: the complete transabdominal approach (CTA) and the transabdominal-perineal transanal approach (TPTA). The primary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. The secondary endpoints were postoperative anal function assessed by questionnaires. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to match the clinicopathological characteristics of patients from both cohorts. Results After PSM, 140 patients were successfully matched in the CTA and TPTA groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of perioperative complication rates, 3-year OS/DFS, and Wexner incontinence scores within 3 years after ileostomy reversal surgery (P > 0.05). However, the CTA group demonstrated less surgical time and superior low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores compared with the TPTA group (P < 0.05). Similar outcomes were observed after conducting IPTW adjustment. Conclusions CTA and TPTA showed similar efficacy regarding perioperative safety and oncological outcomes. However, the CTA approach demonstrated a clear superiority in the LARS score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiwen Zang
- From the Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bin Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, China
| | - Xing Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Baoxiang Chen
- Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Linfeng Gao
- Department of General Surgery, Southwest Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Minwei Zhou
- From the Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaodong Gu
- From the Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenyang Li
- From the Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiming Zhou
- From the Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo Tang
- Department of General Surgery, Southwest Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Congqing Jiang
- Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Guoxian Guan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jianhua Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, China
| | - Jianbin Xiang
- From the Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dingemans SA, Kreisel SI, Rutgers MLW, Musters GD, Hompes R, Brown CJ. Oncologic safety and technical feasibility of completion transanal total mesorectal excision after local excision; a cohort study from the International TaTME Registry. Surg Endosc 2025; 39:970-977. [PMID: 39663245 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11390-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 12/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As part of an organ sparing strategy, a surgical local excision may be performed in patients with early-stage rectal cancer or following neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. In selected cases, a completion total mesorectal excision may be recommended which can be more complex because of the preceding local excision. A transanal approach to perform completion total mesorectal excision may offer an advantage through the better visualization of the surgical field in the distal rectum and less forceful retraction for exposure. However, the oncologic safety and technical feasibility of this approach have yet to be demonstrated in these patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the oncological and technical safety of completion transanal total mesorectal excision following a local excision in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS Patients from the prospective International Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Registry who underwent a surgical local excision prior to completion transanal total mesorectal excision were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS In total, 189 patients were included of which 22% received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. In 94% of the patients, a low anterior resection was performed. A primary anastomosis was constructed in 91% (n = 171/189) of the patients, with the majority also receiving a defunctioning stoma (84%, n = 144/171), of which 69% (n = 100/144) were reversed. Within 30 days, 7% developed an anastomotic leakage. The two-year local recurrence rate was 5% (n = 5/104) with an estimated rate of 3% (95% CI 0-7%). Two-year disease-free survival was 85% (n = 88/104) and overall survival was 95% (n = 99/104). CONCLUSIONS Transanal completion total mesorectal excision following local excision for rectal cancer is oncologically safe, with low complication rates and high restorative rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siem A Dingemans
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia I Kreisel
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke L W Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carl J Brown
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
- Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miyo M, Akizuki E, Okuya K, Noda A, Ishii M, Miura R, Ichihara M, Toyota M, Okamoto K, Ito T, Akiyama Y, Takemasa I. Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome. J Anus Rectum Colon 2025; 9:1-9. [PMID: 39882231 PMCID: PMC11772791 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2024-069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2025] Open
Abstract
Defecation disorders following rectal resection have long been overlooked as an inevitable surgical complication due to the lack of established diagnostic criteria or definitions. However, these disorders have been recently termed low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), which is a defecation disorder that occurs following rectal resection and impairs the patient's quality of life (QOL). The LARS score developed by Emmertsen et al., which is a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate the severity of bowel dysfunction following rectal surgery by scoring the major symptoms of LARS, facilitates the diagnosis and assessment of LARS and enables international comparison and validation through the use of validated scores generated according to the international standards. Based on comparisons with other evaluation instruments, the use of the LARS score is strongly recommended internationally for LARS screening in patients following rectal resection. Recent findings have indicated that multiple pathophysiological changes, including reservoir function and evacuation of the neorectum, anal sphincter function, negative impact of a diverting stoma, autonomic denervation, and radiotherapy, are involved in the etiology of LARS. Due to the lack of established treatments and prevention of LARS, a suggested treatment chart for patients with LARS was presented in the Management Guidelines for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (MANUEL) project. Future surgical treatment should focus not only on the radical cure of cancer and safety of treatment but also on the maintenance and improvement of QOL, with particular attention to the preservation of function. Particularly for rectal cancer, surgeons must formulate treatment plans that consider the prevention and treatment of LARS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaaki Miyo
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Emi Akizuki
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koichi Okuya
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Ai Noda
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ishii
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Ryo Miura
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Momoko Ichihara
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Maho Toyota
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kohei Okamoto
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ito
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yuji Akiyama
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Takemasa
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aparicio López D, González-Nicolás Trébol MT, Sánchez Fuentes N, Martínez Germán A, Duque Mallén MV. Importance of the LARS Score and POLARS Score predictive scale in the ideal treatment of rectal cancer. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2024; 47:502191. [PMID: 38729423 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Aparicio López
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España; Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General de la Defensa, Zaragoza, España.
| | - María Teresa González-Nicolás Trébol
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España; Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General de la Defensa, Zaragoza, España
| | - Nieves Sánchez Fuentes
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España; Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General de la Defensa, Zaragoza, España
| | - Antonio Martínez Germán
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España; Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General de la Defensa, Zaragoza, España
| | - María Victoria Duque Mallén
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, España; Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General de la Defensa, Zaragoza, España
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Linhares SM, Schultz KS, Coppersmith NA, Esposito AC, Leeds IL, Pantel HJ, Reddy VB, Mongiu AK. Association Between Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3578. [PMID: 39518019 PMCID: PMC11545659 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2024] [Revised: 10/04/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) can be a debilitating condition that develops after undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is a common side effect of platinum-based chemotherapy agents used as systemic therapy for rectal cancer treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential relationship between CIPN and LARS. METHODS This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent a low anterior resection for rectal cancer and received systemic therapy contacted at least six months from the most recent surgery. Eligible patients were called and completed the relevant surveys over the phone or email. RESULTS There was a total of 42 patients who completed the surveys with 33 (79%) having major LARS. Presence of a diverting ileostomy was the only significantly differentcharacteristic in those with major LARS versus those without. CIPN was independently associated with LARS (p = 0.046) on linear regression when controlling for neoadjuvant chemoradiation, diverting ileostomy and tumor distance from the anal verge. CONCLUSIONS Developing severe CIPN is associated with developing LARS. Further studies evaluating the etiology behind this relationship should be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M. Linhares
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA (A.K.M.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhou L, Zhong C, Su Y, Zhang Z, Wang L. Application of pelvic floor rehabilitation in patients with colorectal cancer: a scoping review. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:141. [PMID: 39373909 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03017-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic floor rehabilitation is common in patients with colorectal cancer, the purpose of this study is to analyze the role of pelvic floor rehabilitation in patients with colorectal cancer and to understand the specific details of pelvic floor rehabilitation intervention in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS Six databases were searched for this scoping review and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. RESULTS A total of 1014 studies were searched, and 12 studies were finally included for analysis. The study found that pelvic floor rehabilitation for colorectal cancer patients can help improve bowel symptoms, quality of life, and psychological status of colorectal cancer patients after surgery, but details of the interventions for pelvic floor rehabilitation for colorectal cancer patients are not standardized. CONCLUSIONS Pelvic floor rehabilitation has shown positive significance in patients with colorectal cancer, but there is a lack of uniform standards in the process of pelvic floor rehabilitation intervention in patients with colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Zhou
- Department of Nursing, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Changkun Zhong
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, People's Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuanyuan Su
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, People's Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhengyang Zhang
- Department of Nursing, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of Nursing, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nguyen TM, Traeger L, Overall B, Sammour T, Thomas M. Functional outcomes following anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a needs assessment and proposal of a nurse-led remote management algorithm. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:1590-1597. [PMID: 38680012 DOI: 10.1111/ans.19010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
AIM With the rise of structured, remote follow-up of colorectal cancers, there is the potential risk of underdiagnosing and undermanaging low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This cohort study aims to determine the rate of LARS and its patterns of care, with the aim of generating a risk-stratified management algorithm that can be employed for nurse-led follow-up. METHOD Patients who underwent elective anterior resection for the management of colorectal cancer between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021 were sent quality-of-life questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ-CR29 and LARS score) and surveyed for LARS symptoms and management utilized. RESULTS Out of 70 patients who completed questionnaires, 71.4% had LARS and 42.9% had major LARS. The international Delphi consensus definition identified more patients (n = 50) with LARS than the LARS score (n = 41). Tumours located <8 cm from the anal verge, ULAR, and temporary stoma were predictive of major LARS on univariate analysis. However, only temporary stoma was predictive for LARS (OR 7.89 (1.15-53.95), P = 0.035) and majors LARS (8.14 (1.79-37.01), P = 0.007) on multivariate analysis. Forty-four percent of patients with LARS did not have input from any health professional for this condition. Consultation with specialist allied health and/or colorectal surgeons ranged from 4% to 22%. CONCLUSIONS Our study highlights that with the current remote follow-up system focused on cancer outcomes a significant proportion of patients with LARS are overlooked, resulting in the underutilization of relevant health professionals and management options. We propose a nurse-led management algorithm to address this issue while still minimizing surgical outpatient load.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuy-My Nguyen
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Luke Traeger
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Bronwyn Overall
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michelle Thomas
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Assmann SL, Mulders E, Kimman ML, Keszthelyi D, Breukink SO. Toward a core outcome set for faecal incontinence-A systematic review of outcomes reported in the literature. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:1505-1514. [PMID: 38923161 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
AIM Faecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent issue which can have a detrimental impact on the patient's quality of life. Current international guidelines lack strong treatment recommendations due to few studies in the field, in combination with the heterogeneity in outcome reporting. To address this, a core outcome set (COS) is proposed to standardize outcome reporting in FI studies, facilitating meta-analyses and enhancing therapeutic recommendations. Through several steps outlined by COMET 'what' to measure will be determined prior to determining 'how' to measure these outcomes. This systematic review aims to identify 'what' outcomes have been used in FI intervention studies so far in adult patients as a starting phase for the development of a future COS for FI. METHOD Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library were searched to identify all outcomes reported in comparative effectiveness trials assessing one or more treatment option in adult patients suffering from FI. The outcomes were categorized according to the Core Outcome Measurement in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy to standardize outcome terminology, assess completeness, and inform subsequent steps in COS development. RESULTS A total of 109 studies were included, which revealed 51 unique outcomes classified into 38 domains within four core areas. On average four outcomes were reported per study (range 1-11). The most commonly reported outcomes were "severity of FI" (83%), "quality of life" (64%), "number of FI episodes" (40%), "anorectal motor function" (39%), and "frequency of bowel movements" (16%). CONCLUSION This systematic review offers an overview of outcomes reported in FI studies, highlighting the heterogeneity between studies. This heterogeneity emphasizes the need for standardizing outcome reporting which can be established through the creation of a COS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadé L Assmann
- Department of Surgery and Colorectal Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Research Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Evy Mulders
- Research Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Merel L Kimman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Keszthelyi
- Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Research Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie O Breukink
- Department of Surgery and Colorectal Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Research Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maalouf MF, Robitaille S, Penta R, Wang A, Liberman S, Fiore JF, Feldman LS, Lee L. How well do we measure the impact of bowel dysfunction on health-related quality of life after rectal cancer surgery? Surgery 2024; 176:303-309. [PMID: 38839434 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal cancer surgery risks causing bowel dysfunction, which has an important impact on health-related quality of life. The validity of generic tools used to measure health-related quality of life after bowel dysfunction is unclear. This study aimed to determine the content validity of health-related quality-of-life measurement tools in rectal cancer. METHODS This was a qualitative single-center study in which adult patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation from July 2017 to October 2020 were recruited. Patients were excluded if they developed local metastasis, required a permanent stoma, or had surgery <1 year since recruitment. Telephone-based semi-structured interviews were conducted. Bowel dysfunction was measured using the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score. Content analysis was achieved using the International Classification of Functioning framework. RESULTS Recurrent bowel dysfunction-related concepts included "Mental functions," "Defecation functions," "Emotional functions," "Recreation and leisure," "Intimate relationships," and "Remunerative employment." A mean of 7.5 recurrent bowel dysfunction-related concepts were identified within the health-related quality of life instruments analyzed. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-C30 (n = 11) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (n = 9) covered the greatest number of recurrent bowel dysfunction-related concepts. Concepts such as "Mental functions," "Urination functions," "Sexual functions," "Driving," and "Mobility" were not covered by any instrument. CONCLUSION The content of traditional health-related quality-of-life instruments is missing important areas that represent the impact of bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery on health-related quality of life. These findings could help improve patient-centered care in rectal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Maalouf
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. https://twitter.com/MichaelMaalouf_
| | - Stephan Robitaille
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ruxandra Penta
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Anna Wang
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sender Liberman
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julio F Fiore
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
de Miguel Valencia MJ, Marin G, Acevedo A, Hernando A, Álvarez A, Oteiza F, de Miguel Velasco MJ. Long-term outcomes of sacral neuromodulation for low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery. Ann Coloproctol 2024; 40:234-244. [PMID: 38946094 PMCID: PMC11362764 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00542.0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study assessed the long-term outcomes and quality of life in patients who underwent sacral neuromodulation (SNM) due to low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). METHODS This single-center retrospective study, conducted from 2005 to 2021, included 30 patients (21 men; median age, 70 years) who had undergone total mesorectal excision with stoma closure and had no recurrence at inclusion. All patients were diagnosed with LARS refractory to conservative treatment. We evaluated clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after SNM through a stool diary, Wexner score, LARS score, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) questionnaire, and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire. RESULTS Peripheral nerve stimulation was successful in all but one patient. Of the 29 patients who underwent percutaneous nerve evaluation, 17 (58.62%) responded well to SNM and received permanent implants. The median follow-up period was 48 months (range, 18-153 months). The number of days per week with fecal incontinence episodes decreased from a median of 7 (range, 2-7) to 0.38 (range, 0-1). The median number of bowel movements recorded in patient diaries fell from 5 (range, 4-12) to 2 (range, 1-6). The median Wexner score decreased from 18 (range, 13-20) to 6 (range, 0-16), while the LARS score declined from 38.5 (range, 37-42) to 19 (range, 4-28). The FIQL and EQ-5D questionnaires demonstrated enhanced quality of life. CONCLUSION SNM may benefit patients diagnosed with LARS following rectal cancer surgery when conservative options have failed, and the treatment outcomes may possess long-term sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriel Marin
- Unit of Coloproctology, University Hospital of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ana Acevedo
- General Surgery Service, Reina Sofia Hospital, Tudela, Spain
| | - Ana Hernando
- Unit of Coloproctology, University Hospital of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alfonso Álvarez
- General Surgery Service, Reina Sofia Hospital, Tudela, Spain
| | - Fabiola Oteiza
- Unit of Coloproctology, University Hospital of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim YI, Hong SW, Lim SB, Yang DH, Kim EB, Kim MH, Kim CW, Lee JL, Yoon YS, Park IJ, Yu CS. Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic balloon dilation to manage anastomotic stricture from colorectal surgery: retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1775-1783. [PMID: 38278933 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10661-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An anastomotic stricture after colorectal surgery is principally managed by endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD). Although this intervention is effective, however, subsequent procedures or surgical interventions are often required. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of EBD for anastomotic stricture arising from colorectal cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed 173 patients who received curative surgery for colorectal cancer at our hospital between January 2000 and December 2022 and had undergone EBD to manage anastomotic stricture. The medical records of these cases were retrospectively reviewed to assess the outcomes and risk factors for restenosis and permanent stoma. RESULTS Of the 173 study patients, 41 (23.7%) presented with restenosis with a median time to recurrence of 49 [37-150] days. The restenosis group was significantly younger (55.6 years versus 60.8 years), with a more prominent rectal location (80.5% versus 57.6%), a higher incidence of hand-sewn anastomosis (24.4% versus 5.3%), and a higher percentage of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (34.1% versus 5.3%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis indicated neoadjuvant radiotherapy (adjusted HR 2.48; 95% CI 1.03-5.95) and cerebral vascular disease (adjusted HR 6.97; 95% CI 2.15-22.54) as independent prognostic factors for restenosis. Fourteen patients (8.1%) required a permanent stoma due to treatment failure. All cases needing a permanent stoma were male (14 patients, 100%, P = 0.007) and this group had a higher rate of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and hand-sewn anastomosis. CONCLUSION Patients receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy are most prone to restenosis after an EBD intervention to manage an anastomotic stricture. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy is also a strong risk factor for requiring a permanent stomas due to treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Il Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Seung Wook Hong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seok-Byung Lim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
| | - Dong-Hoon Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eon Bin Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Min Hyun Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Chan Wook Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Jong Lyul Lee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Yong Sik Yoon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - In Ja Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Chang Sik Yu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhu Y, Ding X, Xiong W, Yang G, Si M, Yan H. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Total Mesorectal Excision: Risk Factors and Its Relationship with Quality of Life. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2024; 34:199-206. [PMID: 38010240 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a bowel dysfunction following sphincter-sparing proctectomy. The occurrence of LARS may affect a patient's overall quality of life (QoL) after surgery. Current research was aimed to investigate related factors of LARS and major LARS in total mesorectal excision (TME) and its relationship with QoL. Methods: This study included patients who underwent TME at authors' institutes. LARS was evaluated with an LARS score. QoL was identified using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire, version 3.0. Appropriate statistical methods were used to ascertain risk factors for LARS and major LARS and to analyze the relationships between QoL and LARS. The primary objective was to identify related factors of LARS and major LARS. The secondary objective was to examine the relationships between QoL and LARS. Results: Multivariable analysis identified neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 4.923, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.335-10.379, P < .001), local anal distance from the lower edge of the tumor (OR 6.199, 95% CI 2.701-14.266, P < .001), and anastomotic leakage (OR 5.624, 95% CI 1.463-21.614, P = .012) as independent predictors for development of LARS. Meanwhile, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (OR 4.693, 95% CI 1.368-16.107, P = .014) and local anal distance from the lower edge of the tumor (OR 4.935, 95% CI 1.332-18.285, P = .017) were dramatically correlated with development of major LARS in a multivariable analysis. In the major LARS group, statistically significant differences (P < .05) were ascertained, include physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and global health. In addition, pain and diarrhea were evidently higher. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, local anal distance from the lower edge of the tumor, and anastomotic leakage correlated strongly with development of LARS, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local anal distance from the lower edge of the tumor correlated strongly with development of major LARS. Meanwhile, the QoL of patients with major LARS was lower than that of patients with no/minor LARS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanfei Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiangyuan Ding
- Department of General Surgery, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Wenbin Xiong
- Department of General Surgery, Jinzhong Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Jinzhong, China
| | - Gang Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Mengke Si
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Huiming Yan
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rethy B, Nordenvall C, Pieniowski E, Jansson-Palmer G, Johar A, Lagergren P, Abraham-Nordling M. Validity assessment of the POLARS score tool in the prediction of post rectal cancer surgery LARS score in a population-based Swedish cohort. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2024; 11:e001274. [PMID: 38199776 PMCID: PMC10870788 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is one of the most common functional impairments after rectal cancer surgery with a high impact on quality of life. The Pre-Operative LARS score (POLARS) nomogram and its online tool has been developed to predict the degree of postoperative LARS. The aim of this study was to analyse how accurately the POLARS score could predict LARS scores when compared with actual patient-reported LARS (PR-LARS) scores in a population-based Swedish cohort. DESIGN This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery between 2007 and 2013 in Stockholm County and were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR). Information regarding preoperative risk factors, patient and treatment characteristics, and presence of LARS postoperatively were collected from patient charts, SCRCR and patient questionnaires. The POLARS model formula was used to predict LARS scores, which then were compared with the actual PR-LARS scores. Individual LARS score differences between the two estimates were shown with a modified Bland-Altman plot of difference. RESULTS The cohort included 477 patients, of whom 359 (75%) of patients were categorised as having no/minor LARS based on the POLARS score. The correctly identified patients by the POLARS score were 80/255 (31%) in the major LARS group and 184/222 (83%) no/minor LARS group. The sensitivity was 31% for major LARS and the positive predictive value was 68%. CONCLUSION The POLARS score has a low sensitivity for major LARS in this Swedish cohort. Other methods to predict the risk of LARS need to be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boglarka Rethy
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Caroline Nordenvall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emil Pieniowski
- Department of Surgery, South General Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Asif Johar
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Xu LL, Xiang NJ, Cheng TC, Li YX, Chen P, Jiang ZW, Liu XX. Application of electroacupuncture in the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:2765-2773. [PMID: 38221997 PMCID: PMC10784840 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is one of the common postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer, which seriously affects their postoperative recovery and quality of life (QoL). Electroacupuncture therapy is one of the characteristic therapies of traditional Chinese medicine. There are few reports on the prevention and treatment of LARS by electroacupuncture therapy. AIM To explore the clinical effectiveness of electroacupuncture in managing rectal cancer patients with postoperative LARS. METHODS A total of 50 patients with LARS after rectal cancer surgery were retrospectively selected as the research subjects. According to the treatment methods, they were divided into an observation group (n = 25) and a control group (n = 25). During the four-week treatment period, the control group received standard defecation function training, while the observation group received electroacupuncture care and traditional defecation function training. The anal pressure index (which includes anal resting pressure, anal systolic pressure, and maximum tolerable volume), European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL C30 (QLQ-C30) score, LARS Scale (LARSS) score, Wexner anal incontinence scale score, Xu Zhongfa five-item 10-point scale score, and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. RESULTS The experimental group showed considerably enhanced LARSS scores compared to those in the control group after four weeks of treatment. In the first week, second week, and fourth week, the LARSS score and Wexner anal incontinence scale score decreased, and the Xu Zhong method five-item 10-point scale score increased, with significant differences (P < 0.05). The experimental group showed substantial improvements in anal resting pressure, anal systolic pressure, and maximum tolerance volume after undergoing 4 wk of therapy in the untreated group (P < 0.05). The experimental group's QLQ-C30 score on the EORTC QoL questionnaire was higher than that of the control group during the 1st, 2nd, and 4th wk (P < 0.05). No significant variation between the groups in the frequency of adverse reactions (P > 0.05) was observed. CONCLUSION Electroacupuncture positively impacted LARS following rectal cancer surgery, effectively improving clinical symptoms and anal pressure indicators and patients' standard of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu-Lu Xu
- The First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Neng-Jun Xiang
- The First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Tian-Cheng Cheng
- The First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yi-Xian Li
- The First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Peng Chen
- The First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Zhi-Wei Jiang
- Department of General Surger, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Xin-Xin Liu
- Department of General Surger, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Barzola E, Felsenreich DM. High tie sigmoidectomy syndrome. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:1409-1410. [PMID: 37801173 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02864-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- E Barzola
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Taylor Pavilion, Suite D-365, 100 Woods Road, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.
| | - D M Felsenreich
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tejedor P, Arredondo J, Pellino G, Pata F, Pastor C. Patient Reported Outcomes following Cancer of the Rectum (PROCaRe): protocol of a prospective multicentre international study. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:1345-1350. [PMID: 37770748 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02865-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Rectal cancer surgery presents challenges in achieving good oncological results and preserving functional outcomes. Different surgical approaches, including open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal techniques, have been employed, but there is a lack of consensus on the optimal approach, particularly in terms of functional results. This study aims to assess bowel function and to compare outcomes of patients that had undergone surgery for mid-low rectal cancer across different surgical approaches. METHOD This is an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria are patients diagnosed with rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection, eligible for different surgical approaches for total mesorectal excision (TME). Data will be collected using validated questionnaires assessing bowel, sexual and urinary function, and quality of life (QOL). Secondary outcomes include short-term postoperative results. Data will be collected at baseline and 6, 12 and 24 months after index surgery or stoma reversal surgery. CONCLUSION This study will provide insights into the impact of different approaches for TME on bowel, sexual and urinary function, and overall QOL of patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. The findings will provide important information to optimise the surgical strategy and to improve patient care in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04936581 (registered 23 June 2021).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Tejedor
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, University Hospital Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Jorge Arredondo
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, University Clinic of Navarre, Pamplona and Madrid, Spain
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
- Italian Surgical Research Group (ItSURG), Rende, Italy
| | - Francesco Pata
- Italian Surgical Research Group (ItSURG), Rende, Italy
- Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
| | - Carlos Pastor
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, University Clinic of Navarre, Pamplona and Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liapis SC, Baloyiannis I, Perivoliotis K, Lytras D, Theodoropoulos G, Tzovaras G. The Role of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:1128-1139. [PMID: 36703030 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-023-00910-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pooled efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA guidelines. The primary endpoint was the pooled effect size of PTNS in LARS score (LARSS). Secondary endpoints included incontinence (Fecal Incontinence Score-FIC, Obstructive Defecation Syndrome-ODS), sexual functionality and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, and manometric evaluations. Continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD), with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Quality evaluation was performed via the National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool. RESULTS Overall, 5 studies were included. PTNS resulted to reduced LARSS values (WMD: - 5.68, 95%CI: - 7.73, - 3.63, p < 0.001). A similar effect was noted in St Mark's FIC (p < 0.001) and ODS (p = 0.02) score. An improvement in several QoL scales was found. There was no effect in sexual functionality and manometric measurements. Compared to sham, PTNS significantly improved LARSS. CONCLUSIONS The application of PTNS in patients with LARS results in an improvement in multiple clinical parameters, including defecation functionality and quality of life. Due to several study limitations, further high quality RCTs are required to delineate the exact efficacy of PTNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ioannis Baloyiannis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Dimitrios Lytras
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Volos, Polymeri 134, 38222, Volos, Greece
| | - Georgios Theodoropoulos
- Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Tzovaras
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Banday I, Malik AA, Khan MA, Parray F, Wani RA, Banday M, Zahoor H. Validation of Urdu Version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) Score. Indian J Surg Oncol 2023; 14:909-917. [PMID: 38187850 PMCID: PMC10766916 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-023-01801-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Patients subjected to low anterior resection for rectal cancers experience a constellation of symptoms of disordered bowel function which leads to a detriment in the quality of life. The LAR syndrome (LARS) score is a self-administered questionnaire to identify and assess disordered bowel function after resective surgery. The objective of this study was to validate the Urdu version of the LARS score. The translation process was carried out in a fashion outlined by the original authors of the LARS score after obtaining proper permission. The validation of the translated version included the assessment of its reliability, convergent and discriminant validities, internal consistency, and confirmatory analyses. A total of 60 patients were enrolled in the study with a 95% power of study. The translated questionnaire was initially administered to a random subgroup of patients to verify the adequacy and degree of comprehension of questions. Then reproducibility was investigated by a test-retest procedure. An analysis was then done to determine the correlation between Urdu LARS score and a quality of life related question that was included along with the questionnaire. The Urdu version of the LARS score demonstrates a high convergent validity in terms of its correlation with self-reported quality of life. It also demonstrated its efficacy to discriminate between clinical variables expected to differ with regards to LARS. There was almost perfect agreement in the test and retest values demonstrating good reliability across all instruments. The Urdu version of the LARS score has proven to be a reliable and a valid tool for measuring LARS in the Urdu speaking population of the Indian subcontinent. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-023-01801-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imad Banday
- Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar India
| | - Ajaz Ahmad Malik
- Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar India
| | - Mohammad Abrar Khan
- Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar India
| | - Fazl Parray
- Colorectal Division, Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar India
| | - Rauf Ahmad Wani
- Colorectal Division, Department of General and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar India
| | - Meeran Banday
- Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar India
| | - Hanna Zahoor
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Acharya Shri Chander College of Medical Sciences, Sidhra, Jammu India
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Meurette G, Faucheron JL, Cotte E, Denost Q, Portier G, Loriau J, Hansen AW, Vicaut E, Lakkis Z. Low anterior resection syndrome after rectal resection management: multicentre randomized clinical trial of transanal irrigation with a dedicated device (cone catheter) versus conservative bowel management. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1092-1095. [PMID: 36977128 PMCID: PMC10416684 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Meurette
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Luc Faucheron
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Visceral Surgery and Acute Care Surgery Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Eddy Cotte
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Quentin Denost
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Hospital Pierre Bénite, CHU Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Jerôme Loriau
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Saint Joseph, Paris, France
| | | | - Eric Vicaut
- Department of Biostatistics Hospital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Zaher Lakkis
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hodgson R, Albatat B, Tacey M, Zucchi E, Strugnell N, Lee B. An integrated interpreting service normalizes access to care for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) patients with colorectal cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023; 19:559-565. [PMID: 36507563 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
AIM To compare access to the initial management and overall survival with colorectal cancer for limited English proficient (LEP) patients compared with patients from an English background. METHODS All newly diagnosed patients from 2017 with colorectal cancer from a single health service with a highly multicultural catchment area and a well-developed and integrated translation and language support (TALS) department were recruited. Time from referral to: biopsy, date seen by a surgeon, oncologist, discussion at a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM), and day of commencement of the first treatment modality, and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS One hundred sixty-two patients were analyzed, including 57 LEP patients from 22 countries of birth. Interpreters were present at 687/782 appointments with LEP patients. There were no differences in demographics or cancer staging. There were no differences between English background and LEP patients with regard to times from referral to biopsy (1 vs. 0 days), specialist review (surgical: 4 vs. 6 days, oncological: 45 vs. 57 days), MDM discussion (23 vs. 15 days), or commencement of treatment (32 vs. 28.5 days). There were no differences in treatment for colorectal cancer, although a higher rate of stomas was noted in LEP patients. There was no difference in overall survival between groups. CONCLUSION Time to critical initial checkpoints and overall survival were similar in LEP and English background patients with colorectal cancer. An integrated TALS department may abrogate the language and cultural barriers that are known to disadvantage LEP patients and may contribute to normalizing care for the culturally and linguistically diverse community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell Hodgson
- Division of Surgery, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| | - Batool Albatat
- Division of Surgery, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Tacey
- Department of Research, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emiliano Zucchi
- Transcultural and Language Services, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
- School of Languages, Literature, Cultures and Linguistics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Neil Strugnell
- Division of Surgery, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda Lee
- Department of Oncology, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Oncology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Maspero M, Hull T. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2023; 36:240-251. [PMID: 37223227 PMCID: PMC10202545 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Given the increased life expectancy and improvements in the treatment of colorectal patients, the success of a treatment course can no longer be determined only by objective outcomes. Health care providers ought to take into consideration the impact an intervention will have on the quality of life of patients. Endpoints that take into account the patient's perspective are defined as patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PROs are assessed through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), usually in the form of questionnaires. PROs are especially important in colorectal surgery, whose procedures can often be associated with some degree of postoperative functional impairment. Several PROMs are available for colorectal surgery patients. However, while some scientific societies have offered recommendations, there is no standardization in the field and PROMs are seldom implemented in clinical practice. The routine use of validated PROMs can guarantee that functional outcomes are followed over time; this way, they can be addressed in case of worsening. This review will provide an overview of the most commonly used PROMs in colorectal surgery, both generic and disease specific, as well as a summary of the available evidence in support of their routine utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Maspero
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tracy Hull
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kim YM, Min A, Hong HC. The Effectiveness of Telenursing Interventions on Patient Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Semin Oncol Nurs 2023; 39:151406. [PMID: 36966061 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review existing telenursing interventions for patients with colorectal cancer and determine the effects of such interventions on health-related quality of life and health care service utilization. DATA SOURCES We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis after protocol registration. International databases, including PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL and Korean databases, were searched. The last search was conducted on June 8, 2021. Two authors independently selected relevant studies, evaluated their methodological quality, and extracted data. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted using the statistical software STATA 16.0. Of the 223 articles retrieved, 7 were included for narrative synthesis and 3 were used for the meta-analysis. There were 857 patients in the telenursing group and 842 patients in the conventional group. Three studies applied theoretical frameworks for designing the intervention. CONCLUSION The effect of telenursing intervention was not different from that of usual care. However, both readmission rates and emergency department visits were lower in the telenursing group than in the usual care group, although these trends were not statistically significant. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE These findings indicate that telenursing intervention did not differ from usual care in terms of health-related quality of life while reducing readmission and emergency department visits in a nonstatistically significant manner. Therefore, telenursing interventions could serve as a partial alternative to current face-to-face interventions for patients with colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Man Kim
- Assistant Professor, College of Nursing·Research Institute of Nursing Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, South Korea
| | - Ari Min
- Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hye Chong Hong
- Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pape E, Decoene E, Debrauwere M, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Pattyn P, Feryn T, Pattyn PRL, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A. Information and counselling needs of patients with major low anterior resection syndrome: A qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:1240-1250. [PMID: 35253296 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The aim was to explore the information and counselling needs of rectal cancer survivors confronted with major low anterior resection syndrome. BACKGROUND Rectal cancer survivors are often confronted with bowel problems after surgery. This is called low anterior resection syndrome. Patients are unsure what to expect after treatment and healthcare professionals often underestimate the impact of low anterior resection syndrome on patients' lives. DESIGN A qualitative study with a grounded theory approach was conducted. METHODS Patients were recruited between 2017 and 2019 in three hospitals, and a call was distributed in two patients' organisations. Semi-structured interviews with patients confronted with major low anterior resection syndrome were performed. An iterative process between data collection and data analysis was used. Data analysis was done using the constant comparative method, and investigators' triangulation was applied. Qualitative data were reported following COREQ guidelines. The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04896879. RESULTS A total of 28 patients were interviewed until theoretical data saturation. Before surgery patients' need for information varied according to their individual coping mechanisms. Some patients required information before surgery, while others considered this too overwhelming. When confronted with LARS, patients desired that healthcare professionals recognised its impact and clarified its expected evolution. A proactive counselling with an easy accessible and approachable healthcare professional was beneficial. CONCLUSION Patients expressed several needs regarding the information before rectal cancer surgery and counselling of low anterior resection syndrome after surgery. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Better knowledge and understanding of major low anterior resection syndrome and its challenges by healthcare professionals are crucial. Especially the impact on quality of life is significant for patients and underestimated by healthcare professionals. Information before surgery and counselling when confronted with major low anterior resection syndrome should be optimised and tailored to patients' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Pape
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elsie Decoene
- Department of Nursing, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mieke Debrauwere
- Intravenous Vascular Access Team, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yves Van Nieuwenhove
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Pattyn
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tom Feryn
- Department of Surgery, AZ Sint-Jan, Bruges, Belgium
| | | | - Sofie Verhaeghe
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ann Van Hecke
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Nursing Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Assessment of Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer with Organ-Preservation Treatment: Are We There yet? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e110-e120. [PMID: 36443138 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Rectal cancer is a common cancer and shows an increased incidence with older age. Although the gold standard treatment is surgical excision, minimally invasive approaches are increasingly used and organ preservation is becoming a reasonable approach. The conservative treatment approach includes local excision, external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. However, these all carry a risk of side-effects. It is crucial to provide patients with information to quantify the improvement or detriment in quality of life with their cancer treatment. This can only be done with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as tools within current and future trials. Colorectal cancer has numerous publications with specific PROMs. However, PROMs reporting in rectal cancer is more sparse; PROMs are generally extrapolated from colorectal cancer. Rectal PROMs trials hold small population samples and PROMs as an end point is scarce. We present a review of recent literature based on the PROMs reporting of quality of life for rectal cancer patients and introduce the CITRuS trial as an innovative feasibility study related to electronic PROMs data collection.
Collapse
|
28
|
Van Hoof S, Sels T, Patteet E, Hendrickx T, Van den Broeck S, Hubens G, Komen N. Functional outcome after Hartmann's reversal surgery using LARS, COREFO & QoL scores. Am J Surg 2023; 225:341-346. [PMID: 36116971 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional complaints after colorectal surgery have a profound effect on quality of life (QoL). Our goal was to investigate the prevalence of functional complaints and quality of life after Hartmann's reversal surgery. METHOD A cross-sectional study was performed where one hundred nineteen patients were included. All patients underwent Hartmann's reversal procedure between 2007 and 2019. All patients were asked to complete 3 validated questionnaires related to bowel function in benign and colorectal cancer surgery as well as general QoL. RESULTS The response rate was 67%. Among responders, 32.8% reported LARS-like symptoms whereas 25% had significant COREFO Scores (>15). Higher LARS and COREFO scores were significantly associated with worse global QoL and several QoL domain scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION This study highlights the prevalence of bowel dysfunction after Hartmann's reversal surgery. Patients undergoing this procedure show similar functional complaints compared to those in literature who had a resection without colostomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Van Hoof
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital Wilrijkstraat 10, 2610, Edegem, Belgium.
| | - Toon Sels
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital Wilrijkstraat 10, 2610, Edegem, Belgium; Department of General & Abdominal Surgery, AZ Turnhout Rubensstraat 166, 2300, Turnhout, Belgium
| | - Eveline Patteet
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital Wilrijkstraat 10, 2610, Edegem, Belgium; Department of General & Abdominal Surgery, AZ Turnhout Rubensstraat 166, 2300, Turnhout, Belgium
| | - Tom Hendrickx
- Department of General & Abdominal Surgery, AZ Turnhout Rubensstraat 166, 2300, Turnhout, Belgium
| | - Sylvie Van den Broeck
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital Wilrijkstraat 10, 2610, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Guy Hubens
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital Wilrijkstraat 10, 2610, Edegem, Belgium; Antwerp ReSURG, Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Niels Komen
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital Wilrijkstraat 10, 2610, Edegem, Belgium; Antwerp ReSURG, Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Was ist LARS? COLOPROCTOLOGY 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s00053-022-00671-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
30
|
Asnong A, D’Hoore A, Van Kampen M, Wolthuis A, Van Molhem Y, Van Geluwe B, Devoogdt N, De Groef A, Guler Caamano Fajardo I, Geraerts I. The Role of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2022; 276:761-768. [PMID: 35894434 PMCID: PMC9534049 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer (RC) often results in significant bowel symptoms, commonly known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Although pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is recommended in noncancer populations for treating bowel symptoms, this has been scarcely investigated in RC patients. The objective was to investigate PFMT effectiveness on LARS in patients after TME for RC. METHODS A multicenter, single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial comparing PFMT (intervention; n=50) versus no PFMT (control; n=54) 1 month following TME/stoma closure was performed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with an improvement in the LARS category at 4 months. Secondary outcomes were: continuous LARS scores, ColoRectal Functioning Outcome scores, Numeric Rating Scale scores, stool diary items, and Short Form 12 scores; all assessed at 1, 4, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS The proportion of participants with an improvement in LARS category was statistically higher after PFMT compared with controls at 4 months (38.3% vs 19.6%; P =0.0415) and 6 months (47.8% vs 21.3%; P =0.0091), but no longer at 12 months (40.0% vs 34.9%; P =0.3897). Following secondary outcomes were significantly lower at 4 months: LARS scores (continuous, P =0.0496), ColoRectal Functioning Outcome scores ( P =0.0369) and frequency of bowel movements ( P =0.0277), solid stool leakage (day, P =0.0241; night, P =0.0496) and the number of clusters ( P =0.0369), derived from the stool diary. No significant differences were found for the Numeric Rating Scale/quality of life scores. CONCLUSIONS PFMT for bowel symptoms after TME resulted in lower proportions and faster recovery of bowel symptoms up to 6 months after surgery/stoma closure, justifying PFMT as an early, first-line treatment option for bowel symptoms after RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Asnong
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - André D’Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marijke Van Kampen
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yves Van Molhem
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, OLV Hospitals, Aalst/Asse/Ninove, Belgium
| | - Bart Van Geluwe
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Nele Devoogdt
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Center for Lymphedema, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An De Groef
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- International Research Group Pain in Motion, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ipek Guler Caamano Fajardo
- Interuniversity Centre for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven and Hasselt University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Inge Geraerts
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yeom J, Lee JM. Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in Patients With Colorectal Cancer. Clin Nutr Res 2022; 11:255-263. [PMID: 36381470 PMCID: PMC9633969 DOI: 10.7762/cnr.2022.11.4.255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
This study was conducted to analyze the relationship between cancer-related stress and the types of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) used by subjects diagnosed with colorectal cancer. The number of study subjects was 142, and for data analysis, descriptive statistics, t-test, χ2 test, logistic regression procedures were performed. Of the subjects, 114 were CAM users, who accounted for 79.6%. When it came to using CAM, 82 (72.6%) said they did "to prevent cancer recurrence." The most popular reason for not using CAM was "to focus on treatment as instructed by the doctor," with 22 (75.8%) respondents selecting the answer. Of those who used CAM, 79 (55.6%) said they took "dietary supplements," followed by 65 (45.8%) who picked "vitamins and minerals." Regarding CAM usage, ginger, aloe, swimming, and walking had the highest satisfaction (4.25 ± 0.71). The cancer-related stress of subjects who use CAM (18.21 ± 15.37) was higher than that of subjects who did not use CAM (10.11 ± 12.08). Logistic regression analysis determined that cancer-related stress were factors significantly associated with CAM use. Patients using CAM had higher cancer-related stress, suggesting that stress on cancer increased CAM interest. Safe and reliable CAM information and standardized recommendations should be provided to cancer survivors. We propose the development of training programs for CAM to improve communication between medical staff and patients and to protect patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeongwon Yeom
- Department of Nursing, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon 14584, Korea
| | - Jung Mi Lee
- Department of Nursing, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon 14584, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ri H, Kang H, Xu Z, Kim K, Ren Y, Gong Z, Chen X. The risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome after colorectal cancer surgery: A retrospective study of 566 patients in a single institution in China. Front Surg 2022; 9:990702. [PMID: 36439535 PMCID: PMC9683037 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.990702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to identify the independent risk factors in the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD This was a retrospective, single-institution study in the Second Affiliation Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China. Patients underwent sphincter-preserving low anterior resection with total or partial mesorectal resection (with or without protective ileostomy) and completed a self-filled questionnaire over the phone to assess postoperative bowel dysfunction from January 2017 to December 2019. The predictors of LAR were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULT The study population was 566 patients, 264 (46.64%), 224 (39.58%), and 78 (13.78%) patients with no, minor, and major LARS, respectively. In the univariate analysis, independent factors such as tumor location and size, anastomotic height, protective ileostomy, post-operation chemoradiotherapy, tumor T stage, lymphatic nodal metastasis classification, surgery duration, and time interval for closure of stoma were significantly associated with LARS points while we found the tumor T stage and lymphatic nodal metastasis classification as the new independent risk factors compared with the last decade studies. In the multivariate analysis, factors such as low and middle tumor location and protective ileostomy, and post operation treatment, nodal metastasis classification were the independent risk factors for major LARS. CONCLUSION The new independence risk factors were tumor T stage and lymphatic nodal metastasis status in univariate analysis in our study, with anastomotic height, low and middle tumor location, protective ileostomy, post-operation chemoradiotherapy, nodal metastasis status increasing LARS point in multivariate analysis after surgery for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HyokJu Ri
- Department of Hernia and Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliation Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Hospital of Pyongyang Medical College, Pyongyang, Democratic people's republic of Korea, Korea
| | - HaoNan Kang
- Department of Hernia and Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliation Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - ZhaoHui Xu
- Department of Hernia and Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliation Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - KunHyok Kim
- Department of Hernia and Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliation Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- Department of Pathophysiology, The University of Hamhung Medical College, Hamhung, Democratic people's republic of Korea, Korea
| | - YanYing Ren
- Department of Hernia and Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliation Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - ZeZhong Gong
- Department of Hernia and Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliation Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xin Chen
- Department of Hernia and Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliation Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
De Simone V, Litta F, Persiani R, Rizzo G, Sofo L, Menghi R, Santullo F, Biondi A, Coco C, Sacchetti F, Longo F, Attalla El Halabieh M, Moroni R, Ratto C. Effectiveness and Validation of the Italian Translation of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score in an Italian High-Volume University Hospital. Front Surg 2022; 9:917224. [PMID: 35795231 PMCID: PMC9251199 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.917224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score is a validated questionnaire developed in Denmark to measure the severity of bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection. This retrospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the LARS score in the Italian language in a population of Italian patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The convergent and discriminative validity and the test-retest reliability of the score were investigated. Methods A cohort of two hundred and five patients treated with low anterior resection were enrolled in an Italian high-volume university hospital between January 2000 and April 2018. The Italian version of the LARS score (tested twice), as translated from English original version, a single question on quality of life and the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire were submitted to patients. Results A high proportion of patients showed a perfect or moderate fit between the LARS score and QoL categories (convergent validity, p < 0.0005). All differences regarding the items of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) functional scales were statistically significant (p < 0.0005). The LARS score was able to discriminate between groups of patients who received or did not receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.0005) and those who received total or partial mesorectal excision (p < 0.0005). The test-retest reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.96). Conclusion The Italian translation of the LARS score is an easy and reliable tool for assessing bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection and its routine use in clinical practice should be recommended.Trial registration number at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04406311.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica De Simone
- Proctology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Litta
- Proctology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Persiani
- General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Rizzo
- General Surgery II Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Sofo
- Abdominal Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Menghi
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Santullo
- Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Biondi
- General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Coco
- General Surgery II Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Sacchetti
- Abdominal Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Longo
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Miriam Attalla El Halabieh
- Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossana Moroni
- Scientific Direction, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Ratto
- Proctology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fearnhead NS. Big data exposes the tip of the LARS iceberg. Surgery 2022; 172:789-790. [PMID: 35660021 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
35
|
Asnong A, D’Hoore A, Wolthuis A, Van Molhem Y, Van Geluwe B, Devoogdt N, De Groef A, De Vrieze T, Dams L, Geraerts I. Is evaluation by questionnaires sufficient to cover all aspects of bowel symptoms in rectal cancer patients after low anterior resection? Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:611-620. [PMID: 35040548 PMCID: PMC9306656 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of the study was to investigate whether bowel symptoms related to low anterior resection for rectal cancer can be sufficiently well evaluated by the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) questionnaire score or the ColoRectal Functional Outcome (COREFO) questionnaire compared with a stool diary. METHOD All patients underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer. They were asked to fill out a stool diary, the LARS questionnaire and the COREFO questionnaire, at 1, 4, 6 and 12 months after low anterior resection or stoma closure. The main outcome measure was the amount of association (calculated by means of canonical correlation analysis) between items on anal incontinence for faeces, frequency of bowel movements, clustering of bowel movements, urgency and soiling. RESULTS Ninety-five patients were included. Items on anal incontinence for faeces and frequency of bowel movements were significantly correlated between the LARS questionnaire or the COREFO questionnaire, versus the stool diary, respectively. Items on soiling were significantly correlated between the COREFO questionnaire and the stool diary. CONCLUSION Although the LARS questionnaire and the COREFO questionnaire are reliable and valid for measuring low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer, our results show that there are no strong associations with the stool diary. Therefore, we can conclude that there is additional clinical information to be obtained from the stool diary. In order to evaluate all aspects of low anterior resection syndrome, we suggest the addition of a stool diary or a combination of different measurement methods during patient follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Asnong
- Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven – University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - André D’Hoore
- Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospitals GasthuisbergLeuvenBelgium,KU Leuven – University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospitals GasthuisbergLeuvenBelgium,KU Leuven – University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Yves Van Molhem
- Department of Abdominal SurgeryOLV HospitalsAalst/Asse/NinoveBelgium
| | - Bart Van Geluwe
- Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospitals GasthuisbergLeuvenBelgium
| | - Nele Devoogdt
- Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven – University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium,Center for LymphedemaUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - An De Groef
- Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven – University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium,Department of Rehabilitation SciencesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium,International Research Group Pain in MotionBrusselsBelgium
| | - Tessa De Vrieze
- Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven – University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and PhysiotherapyMOVANTUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
| | - Lore Dams
- Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven – University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium,International Research Group Pain in MotionBrusselsBelgium,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and PhysiotherapyMOVANTUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
| | - Inge Geraerts
- Department of Rehabilitation SciencesKU Leuven – University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pape E, Decoene E, Debrauwere M, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Pattyn P, Feryn T, Pattyn P, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A, Vandecandelaere P, Desnouck S, Dejonckheere D, Debleu C, Leupe T, Deseyne P, Geboes K, Van de Putte D, van Ramshorst GH, Vlerick I. Experiences and needs of partners as informal caregivers of patients with major low anterior resection syndrome: A qualitative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2022; 58:102143. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
37
|
Physical activity levels after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: one-year follow-up. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:2270. [PMID: 34903207 PMCID: PMC8667409 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12311-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Overall survival rates after rectal cancer have increased. Therefore, functional outcomes rightly deserve more interest. The aims of this study were to assess progression in total, sports, occupational and household physical activity levels of rectal cancer survivors, from preoperatively to 12 months after surgery/stoma closure and to explore predictive factors. Methods Multi-center prospective study with 125 patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The Flemish Physical Activity Computerized Questionnaire was completed concerning all physical activity levels at baseline (past preoperative year) and at 1, 4, 6 and 12 months after surgery/stoma closure. At these timepoints, questionnaires (LARS−/ COREFO-questionnaire) regarding bowel symptoms were also filled out. Results were analyzed using linear mixed models for repeated measures. Results Total physical activity levels up to 12 months remained significantly lower than preoperative. Occupational and sports physical activity levels remained significantly lower until 6 and 4 months postoperative, respectively. Predictive factors for decreased physical activity levels at a specific timepoint were: younger age and no stoma (total physical activity, 1 month), low/mid rectal tumor, no stoma, non-employed status (total, 4 months), higher COREFO-scores (occupational, 4 months) and non-employed status (total, 12 months). At all timepoints, lower COREFO-scores were associated with higher total physical activity levels; male gender and lower educational levels with higher occupational levels; younger age, normal BMI, employed status and adjuvant therapy with higher sports levels; and female gender, lower educational level and unemployed status with higher household levels. Conclusions One year after rectal cancer treatment, total physical activity levels were still not recovered. Rectal cancer patients, especially those at risk for decreased physical activity levels and with major bowel complaints, should be identified and guided to increase their activities. Trial registration This trial has been registered at Netherlands Trial Register (NTR6383, 23/01/2017).
Collapse
|
38
|
Deng J, Su M, Hu J, Lin D, Li J, Liu W, Zhang J, Zhong Q, Guo X. A nomogram to predict risk factors of frequent defecation early after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1595. [PMID: 34790801 PMCID: PMC8576722 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-4660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Defecation disorders after ileostomy reversal are among the most common complications for rectal cancer patients, and significantly diminish their quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with frequent defecation early after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients. Methods We retrospectively collected the data of rectal cancer patients who underwent ileostomy reversal from January 2018 to December 2019 at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. We divided patients into two groups: a no frequent defecation group (≤7 times/day) and a frequent defecation group (>7 times/day). Results Of the 264 included patients, 59 patients (22.35%) had frequent defecation within 1 month after ileostomy closure and were defined as the frequent defecation group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender, age, hypertension, and diabetes. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that proctitis (P=0.04) and anastomotic stenosis (P=0.02) were independent risk factors for frequent defecation. Four factors, including proctitis, anastomotic stenosis, hypertension, and age were included to construct the nomogram. The consistency index of the nomogram was 0.949 and the area under the curve value was 0.623. Conclusions For rectal cancer patients, proctitis and anastomotic stenosis were correlated with frequent defecation within 1 month after ileostomy closure. Surgeons should pay attention to the rectal examination before ileostomy reversal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxin Deng
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mingli Su
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiancong Hu
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dezheng Lin
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiawei Zhang
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qinghua Zhong
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuefeng Guo
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) aims to improve anorectal function in patients with disorders of anal continence and rectal emptying. The mechanism of action of SNM is not well known, and its indications are still under evaluation. We report the functional results and morbidity of a prospective cohort treated between 2002 and 2019. RESULTS A total of 284 patients (of 423 tested) had implantation of a SNM. Five patients (1.8%) were lost to follow-up. Among those who had implantation, the indications for SNM were anal incontinence (n=376), refractory constipation (n=17), anterior resection syndrome (n=13), solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (n=7), and chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n=10). The morbidity rate was 2.7% (Dindo-Clavien>2), 33 patients (11%) required explantation for infection (n=5), pain (n=2), inefficacy (n=24) or other reasons (rectal cancer) (n=3). It was necessary to change the stimulator in 68 patients (24%) during the follow-up period. Regarding the group of patients with anal incontinence, functional results showed improvement of the incontinence score in 40% and of quality of life in 25% after a mean follow-up of 55months. CONCLUSION SNM constitutes a mini-invasive treatment associated with low morbidity. Its' efficacy in anal incontinence makes it a priority approach. Other indications are still under evaluation; while results are promising, they are highly variable.
Collapse
|
40
|
Harji D, Fernandez B, Boissieras L, Berger A, Capdepont M, Zerbib F, Rullier E, Denost Q. A novel bowel rehabilitation programme after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the BOREAL pilot study. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2619-2626. [PMID: 34264005 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer has a high prevalence, with an impact on long-term bowel dysfunction and quality of life. We designed the bowel rehabilitation programme (BOREAL) as a proactive strategy to assess and treat patients with LARS. The BOREAL programme consists of a stepwise approach of escalating treatments: medical management (steps 0-1), pelvic floor physiotherapy, biofeedback and transanal irrigation (step 2), sacral nerve neuromodulation (step 3), percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy and anterograde enema (step 4) and definitive colostomy (step 5). METHODS A pilot study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of collecting LARS data routinely with the parallel implementation of the BOREAL programme. All patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer between February 2017 and March 2019 were included. LARS was assessed using the LARS score and the Wexner Faecal Incontinence score at 30 days and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively. A good functional result was considered to be a combined LARS score <20 and/or a Wexner score <4. RESULTS In all, 137 patients were included. Overall compliance with the BOREAL programme was 72.9%. Major LARS decreased from 48% at 30 days postoperatively to 12% at 12 months, with a concomitant improvement in overall good function from 33% to 77%, P < 0.001. The majority of patients (n = 106, 77%) required medical management of their LARS. CONCLUSION The BOREAL programme demonstrates the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of implementing a responsive, stepwise programme for detecting and treating LARS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deena Harji
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Benjamin Fernandez
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Lara Boissieras
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Arthur Berger
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Maylis Capdepont
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, INSERM CIC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Eric Rullier
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Quentin Denost
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pape E, Vlerick I, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Pattyn P, Van de Putte D, van Ramshorst GH, Geboes K, Van Hecke A. Experiences and needs of patients with rectal cancer confronted with bowel problems after stoma reversal: A systematic review and thematic-synthesis. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 54:102018. [PMID: 34543812 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE After the reversal of the temporary stoma, rectal cancer survivors are often confronted with bowel complaints largely impacting on their quality of life. This systematic review aims to identify and synthesise the experiences and needs of patients with rectal cancer confronted with bowel problems after stoma reversal. METHODS A systematic search was performed through Pubmed, CINAHL and Web of Science. Only studies with a qualitative design were included in this review. Quality assessment was done by the critical appraisal skill programme (CASP) Qualitative Studies Checklist. A thematic-synthesis was performed. RESULTS Of 2713 identified papers, 10 were included in this systematic review. Two general themes were identified: 'experiences and needs about bowel function before surgery' and 'experiences and needs afterwards'. Before restoration of continuity patients had to cope with the temporary stoma, and they felt uncertain about what to expect. Patients indicated that the timing of providing information was crucial but varied. Bowel problems after surgery had a physical and emotional impact on patients' family life. They were also confronted with shame and stigma. Patients were happy to be alive and cancer free but were hopeful that the bowel problems would resolve. They used several strategies to manage and cope with these symptoms. Peers and healthcare professionals proved valuable resources of support. CONCLUSION Rectal cancer survivors experience ongoing bowel problems after treatment. Patients describe experiences and needs before rectal cancer surgery and afterwards when confronting with bowel problems. Follow-up care should be organised proactively and focus on management strategies and emotional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Pape
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - I Vlerick
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Y Van Nieuwenhove
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - P Pattyn
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - D Van de Putte
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - G H van Ramshorst
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Geboes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - A Van Hecke
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Staff Member Nursing Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pilkington SA, Bhome R, Gilbert S, Harris S, Richardson C, Dudding TC, Knight JS, King AT, Mirnezami AH, Beck NE, Nichols PH, Nugent KP. Sequential assessment of bowel function and anorectal physiology after anterior resection for cancer: a prospective cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2436-2446. [PMID: 34032359 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to investigate changes in bowel function and anorectal physiology (ARP) after anterior resection for colorectal cancer. METHOD Patients were recruited from November 2006 to September 2008. Cleveland Clinic Incontinence (CCI) scores and stool frequency were determined by patient questionnaires before surgery (t0 ) and at three (t3 ), six (t6 ), nine (t9 ) and 12 (t12 ) months after restoration of intestinal continuity. ARP measurements were recorded at T0 , T3 and T12 . Endoanal ultrasound was performed at T0 and T12 . RESULTS Eighty-nine patients were included. CCI score increased postoperatively then normalized, whereas stool frequency did not change. Patients who had neoadjuvant radiotherapy or a lower anastomosis had increased incontinence and stool frequency in the postoperative period, whereas those with defunctioning stomas or open surgery had increased stool frequency alone. Maximum resting pressure, volume at first urge and maximum rectal tolerance were reduced throughout the postoperative period. Radiotherapy, lower anastomosis and defunctioning stoma (but not operative approach) altered manometric parameters postoperatively. Maximum rectal tolerance correlated with incontinence and first urge with stool frequency. The length of the anterior internal anal sphincter decreased postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Incontinence recovers in the first year after anterior resection. Radiotherapy, lower anastomosis, defunctioning stoma and open surgery have a negative influence on bowel function. ARP may be useful if bowel dysfunction persists beyond 12 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie A Pilkington
- Colorectal Unit, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Rahul Bhome
- Colorectal Unit, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.,University Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,Cancer Sciences, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sally Gilbert
- Colorectal Unit, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Scott Harris
- Primary Care and Population Studies, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Carl Richardson
- Colorectal Unit, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Thomas C Dudding
- Colorectal Unit, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - John S Knight
- Colorectal Unit, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrew T King
- Colorectal Unit, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Alex H Mirnezami
- Colorectal Unit, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.,University Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,Cancer Sciences, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nicholas E Beck
- Colorectal Unit, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul H Nichols
- Colorectal Unit, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Karen P Nugent
- Colorectal Unit, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.,University Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Patients Undergoing Ileoanal Pouch Surgery Experience a Constellation of Symptoms and Consequences Representing a Unique Syndrome: A Report from the Patient-Reported Outcomes After Pouch Surgery (PROPS) Delphi Consensus Study. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:861-870. [PMID: 33938531 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional outcomes after ileoanal pouch creation have been studied; however, there is great variability in how relevant outcomes are defined and reported. More importantly, the perspective of patients has not been represented in deciding which outcomes should be the focus of research. OBJECTIVE The primary aim was to create a patient-centered definition of core symptoms that should be included in future studies of pouch function. DESIGN This was a Delphi consensus study. SETTING Three rounds of surveys were used to select high-priority items. Survey voting was followed by a series of online patient consultation meetings used to clarify voting trends. A final online consensus meeting with representation from all 3 expert panels was held to finalize a consensus statement. PATIENTS Expert stakeholders were chosen to correlate with the clinical scenario of the multidisciplinary team that cares for pouch patients, including patients, colorectal surgeons, and gastroenterologists or other clinicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A consensus statement was the main outcome. RESULTS patients, 62 colorectal surgeons, and 48 gastroenterologists or nurse specialists completed all 3 Delphi rounds. Fifty-three patients participated in online focus groups. One hundred sixty-one stakeholders participated in the final consensus meeting. On conclusion of the consensus meeting, 7 bowel symptoms and 7 consequences of undergoing ileoanal pouch surgery were included in the final consensus statement. LIMITATIONS The study was limited by online recruitment bias. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to identify key functional outcomes after pouch surgery with direct input from a large panel of ileoanal pouch patients. The inclusion of patients in all stages of the consensus process allowed for a true patient-centered approach in defining the core domains that should be focused on in future studies of pouch function. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B571. LOS PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A CIRUGA DE RESERVORIO ILEOANAL EXPERIMENTAN UNA CONSTELACIN DE SNTOMAS Y CONSECUENCIAS QUE REPRESENTAN UN SNDROME UNICO Un Informe de los Resultados Reportados por los Pacientes Posterior a la Cirugía de Reservorio (PROPS) Estudio de Consenso DelphiANTECEDENTES:Los resultados funcionales después de la creación del reservorio ileoanal han sido estudiados; sin embargo, existe una gran variabilidad en la forma en que se definen y reportan los resultados relevantes. Más importante aún, la perspectiva de los pacientes no se ha representado a la hora de decidir qué resultados deberían ser el foco de investigación.OBJETIVO:El objetivo principal era crear en el paciente una definición centrada de los síntomas principales que debería incluirse en los estudios futuros de la función del reservorio.DISEÑO:Estudio de consenso Delphi.ENTORNO CLINICO:Se emplearon tres rondas de encuestas para seleccionar elementos de alta prioridad. La votación de la encuesta fue seguida por una serie de reuniones de consulta de pacientes en línea que se utilizan para aclarar las tendencias de votación. Se realizo una reunión de consenso final en línea con representación de los tres paneles de expertos para finalizar una declaración de consenso.PACIENTES:Se eligieron partes interesadas expertas para correlacionar con el escenario clínico del equipo multidisciplinario que atiende a los pacientes con reservorio: pacientes, cirujanos colorrectales, gastroenterólogos / otros médicos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Declaración de consenso.RESULTADOS:Ciento noventa y cinco pacientes, 62 cirujanos colorrectales y 48 gastroenterólogos / enfermeras especialistas completaron las tres rondas Delphi. 53 pacientes participaron en grupos focales en línea. 161 interesados participaron en la reunión de consenso final. Al concluir la reunión de consenso, siete síntomas intestinales y siete consecuencias de someterse a una cirugía de reservorio ileoanal se incluyeron en la declaración de consenso final.LIMITACIONES:Sesgo de reclutamiento en línea.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio es el primero en identificar resultados funcionales claves después de la cirugía de reservorio con información directa de un gran panel de pacientes con reservorio ileoanal. La inclusión de pacientes en todas las etapas del proceso de consenso permitió un verdadero enfoque centrado en el paciente para definir los dominios principales en los que debería centrarse los estudios futuros de la función del reservorio. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B571.
Collapse
|
44
|
Cavallaro PM, Fearnhead NS, Bissett IP, Brar MS, Cataldo TE, Clarke R, Denoya P, Elder AL, Gecse KB, Hendren S, Holubar S, Jeganathan N, Myrelid P, Norton BA, Wexner SD, Wilson L, Zaghiyan K, Bordeianou L. Patients Undergoing Ileoanal Pouch Surgery Experience a Constellation of Symptoms and Consequences Representing a Unique Syndrome: A Report From the Patient-Reported Outcomes After Pouch Surgery (PROPS) Delphi Consensus Study. Ann Surg 2021; 274:138-145. [PMID: 33914449 PMCID: PMC8968673 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary aim was to create a patient-centered definition of core symptoms that should be included in future studies of pouch function. BACKGROUND Functional outcomes after ileoanal pouch creation have been studied; however, there is great variability in how relevant outcomes are defined and reported. More importantly, the perspective of patients has not been represented in deciding which outcomes should be the focus of research. METHODS Expert stakeholders were chosen to correlate with the clinical scenario of the multidisciplinary team that cares for pouch patients: patients, colorectal surgeons, gastroenterologists/other clinicians. Three rounds of surveys were employed to select high-priority items. Survey voting was followed by a series of online patient consultation meetings used to clarify voting trends. A final online consensus meeting with representation from all 3 expert panels was held to finalize a consensus statement. RESULTS One hundred ninety-five patients, 62 colorectal surgeons, and 48 gastroenterologists/nurse specialists completed all 3 Delphi rounds. Fifty-three patients participated in online focus groups. One hundred sixty-one stakeholders participated in the final consensus meeting. On conclusion of the consensus meeting, 7 bowel symptoms and 7 consequences of undergoing ileoanal pouch surgery were included in the final consensus statement. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to identify key functional outcomes after pouch surgery with direct input from a large panel of ileoanal pouch patients. The inclusion of patients in all stages of the consensus process allowed for a true patient-centered approach in defining the core domains that should be focused on in future studies of pouch function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M. Cavallaro
- Department of General Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nicola S. Fearnhead
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ian P. Bissett
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Mantaj S. Brar
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas E. Cataldo
- Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, Beth Israel-Deaconess Health Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Paula Denoya
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital. Stony Brook, New York
| | | | - Krisztina B. Gecse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Samantha Hendren
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Stefan Holubar
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nimalan Jeganathan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Beth-Anne Norton
- Crohn’s and Colitis Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven D. Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Lauren Wilson
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Karen Zaghiyan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Liliana Bordeianou
- Massachusetts General Hospital Colorectal Surgery and Crohn’s Colitis Centers, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Comparing functional outcomes between transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:1163-1174. [PMID: 33580808 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03849-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is concern that transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) may result in poorer functional outcomes as compared to laparoscopic TME (LaTME). These concerns arise from the fact that TaTME entails both a low anastomosis and prolonged dilatation of the anal sphincter from the transanal platform. OBJECTIVES This paper aimed to assess the comparative functional outcomes following TaTME and LaTME, with a focus on anorectal and genitourinary outcomes. DATA SOURCES A meta-analysis and systematic review was performed on available literature between 2000 and 2020 from the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases. STUDY SELECTION All comparative studies assessing the functional outcomes following taTME versus LaTME in adults were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Functional anorectal and genitourinary outcomes were evaluated using validated scoring systems. RESULTS A total of seven studies were included, consisting of one randomised controlled trial and six non-randomised studies. There were 242 (52.0%) and 233 (48.0%) patients in the TaTME and LaTME groups respectively. Anorectal functional outcomes were similar in both groups with regard to LARS scores (30.6 in the TaTME group and 28.3 in the LaTME group), Jorge-Wexner incontinence scores, and EORTC QLQ C30/29 scores. Genitourinary function was similar in both groups with IPSS scores of 5.5 to 8.0 in the TaTME group, and 3.5 to 10.1 in the LaTME group. (p = 0.835). CONCLUSION This review corroborates findings from previous studies in showing that the transanal approach is not associated with increased anal sphincter damage. Further prospective clinical trials are needed in this field of research.
Collapse
|
46
|
Stelzner S, Kupsch J, Mees ST. [Low anterior resection syndrome-Causes and treatment approaches]. Chirurg 2021; 92:612-620. [PMID: 33877394 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01398-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With improvement of the oncological prognosis and more sphincter-preserving procedures for rectal cancer of the lower third, the functional sequelae of anterior rectal resection become more and more predominant and are summarized under the term low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). MATERIAL AND METHODS In this narrative review the causes, associated factors, prevalence, diagnostics and treatment strategies are presented based on an evaluation of the international literature. RESULTS The central role of the rectum in the physiology of defecation and continence explains the frequency of symptoms following anterior rectal resection. In an unselected patient population a major LARS is to be expected in approximately 40% and a minor LARS in approximately 20%. The most important factor is the length of the remaining rectal stump. The diagnosis of LARS is made clinically and can be quantified by scores, especially by the LARS score. Treatment options range from patient counselling to stoma construction and a symptom-related, stepwise approach is generally accepted. CONCLUSION While the evidence for the causes, the quantification and determination of associated factors of LARS is good, the treatment options are based either on experience or on only few studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigmar Stelzner
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Friedrichstr. 41, 01067, Dresden, Deutschland.
| | - Juliane Kupsch
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Friedrichstr. 41, 01067, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Sören Torge Mees
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Friedrichstr. 41, 01067, Dresden, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Christensen P, IM Baeten C, Espín‐Basany E, Martellucci J, Nugent KP, Zerbib F, Pellino G, Rosen H, MANUEL Project Working Group. Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome - the MANUEL project. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:461-475. [PMID: 33411977 PMCID: PMC7986060 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Little is known about the pathophysiology of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), and evidence concerning the management of patients diagnosed with this condition is scarce. The aim of the LARS Expert Advisory Panel was to develop practical guidance for healthcare professionals dealing with LARS. METHOD The 'Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome' (MANUEL) project was promoted by a team of eight experts in the assessment and management of patients with LARS. After a face-to-face meeting, a strategy was agreed to create a comprehensive, practical guide covering all aspects that were felt to be clinically relevant. Eight themes were decided upon and working groups established. Each working group generated a draft; these were collated by another collaborator into a manuscript, after a conference call. This was circulated among the collaborators, and it was revised following the comments received. A lay patient revised the manuscript, and contributed to a section containing a patient's perspective. The manuscript was again circulated and finalized. A final teleconference was held at the end of the project. RESULTS The guidance covers all aspects of LARS management, from pathophysiology, to assessment and management. Given the lack of sound evidence and the often poor quality of the studies, most of the recommendations and conclusions are based on the opinions of the experts. CONCLUSIONS The MANUEL project provides an up-to-date practical summary of the available evidence concerning LARS, with useful directions for healthcare professional and patients suffering from this debilitating condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Christensen
- Department of SurgeryDanish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects after Cancer in the Pelvic OrgansAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
| | - Coen IM Baeten
- Department of SurgeryGroene Hart ZiekenhuisGoudaThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology DepartmentCHU de BordeauxCentre Medico‐Chirurgical MagellanHôpital Haut‐LévêqueUniversité de BordeauxBordeauxFrance
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Colorectal SurgeryVall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversitá degli Studi della Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’NaplesItaly
| | - Harald Rosen
- Department of Surgical OncologySigmund Freud UniversityViennaAustria
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zhang B, Zhao K, Zhao YJ, Yin SH, Zhuo GZ, Zhao Y, Ding JH. Variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:424-433. [PMID: 33191594 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim was to evaluate the physiological variation in rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (Lap-ISR) for ultralow rectal cancer. METHOD This was a retrospective study that included 56 patients who underwent Lap-ISR from a prospectively collected database. The RAIR was examined preoperatively and up to 12 months after ileostomy closure. The primary outcome included physiological variation in RAIR and its difference between partial, subtotal and total ISR. The secondary outcome was its correlation with functional outcome. RESULTS The reflex was present in 95% (53/56) of patients preoperatively, in 36% (20/56) before ileostomy closure, in 48% (27/56) at 3-6 months and in 61% (34/56) at 12 months after ileostomy closure. The elicited volume of RAIR was significantly increased at 12 months after ileostomy closure than at baseline (P = 0.005), but its duration and amplitude did not differ significantly. There was no significant difference in the reflex recovery between the ISR groups (partial vs. subtotal vs. total: 65% vs. 63% vs. 44%, P = 0.61). At 12 months after ileostomy closure, the RAIR-present group had favourable functional results and patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). Major faecal incontinence was found in 82% of patients in the RAIR-absent group. CONCLUSION The RAIR is abolished in the majority of patients after Lap-ISR, but a time-dependent recovery could be observed in more than half of the patients. The reflex recovery is not influenced by the resection grade of the internal sphincter. However, persistent loss of the RAIR correlates with worse continence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, China
| | - Ke Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, China
| | - Yu-Juan Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-Hui Yin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, China
| | - Guang-Zuan Zhuo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, China
| | - Jian-Hua Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Characteristic Medical Center of PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bokor A, Hudelist G, Dobó N, Dauser B, Farella M, Brubel R, Tuech JJ, Roman H. Low anterior resection syndrome following different surgical approaches for low rectal endometriosis: A retrospective multicenter study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 100:860-867. [PMID: 33188647 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is increasing evidence that intermediate and long-term bowel dysfunction may occur as a consequence of radical surgery for rectal deep endometriosis (DE). Typical symptoms include constipation, feeling of incomplete evacuation, clustering of stools, and urgency. This is described in the colorectal surgical literature as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Within this, several studies suggested that differences regarding functional outcomes could be favorable to more conservative surgical approaches, that is, excision of endometriotic tissue with preservation of the luminal structure of the rectal wall when compared with classical segmental resection techniques for DE, especially when performed for low DE. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 211 patients undergoing rectal surgery for low DE (≤7 cm from the anal verge) in three different tertiary referral centers between October 2009 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed regarding major complications and LARS. From the 211 eligible patients, six women were excluded because of loss to follow-up. Finally, a total number of 205 patients were enrolled for the statistical analysis; 139 with nerve- and vessel-sparing segmental resection (NVSSR) and 66 operated for laparoscopic-transanal disk excision (LTADE) were included. Gastrointestinal functional outcomes of the two procedures were compared using the validated LARS questionnaire. The median follow-up time was 46 ± 11 months. As a secondary outcome, the surgical sequelae were examined. RESULTS We found no statistically significant difference between the incidence of LARS (31.7% and 37.9%, respectively) among patients operated by LTADE when compared with NVSSR (P = .4). The occurrence of LARS was positively associated with the use of protective ileostomy or colostomy (P = .02). A higher rate of severe complications was observed in women undergoing LTADE (19.7%) when compared with patients with NVSSR (9.0%, P = .029). CONCLUSIONS LARS is not more frequent after NVSSR when compared with a more conservative approach such as LTADE in patients undergoing rectal surgery for low DE. To confirm our findings prospective studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Attila Bokor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gernot Hudelist
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Endometriosis St. John of God, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria
| | - Noémi Dobó
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bernhard Dauser
- Department of General Surgery, Center for Endometriosis St. John of God, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Réka Brubel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jean-Jacques Tuech
- Expert Center in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Horace Roman
- Endometriosis Center, Clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France.,Expert Center in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Christensen P, Fearnhead NS, Martellucci J. Transanal irrigation: another hope for patients with LARS. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:1231-1232. [PMID: 33026563 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02348-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- P Christensen
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research on Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects After Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - N S Fearnhead
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Martellucci
- General, Emergency and Mini-Invasive Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|